Jeremiah and Ezekiel Jeremiah and E Zekiel
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NOTES to the SEPTUAGINT EZEKIEL 6 Thematically Chapter 6
NOTES TO THE SEPTUAGINT EZEKIEL 6 Thematically chapter 6 continues chapters 4–5 with its threatening predictions. From a dramatized condemnation of Jerusalem the prophet turns now to address the mountains of the surrounding land of Israel, the sites of the high places with their idolatric worship. The Septuagint (LXX) is shorter than the Masoretic Text (MT). LXX lacks the conflations of MT and of its maximizing text into which vari- ants have been incorporated. On the other hand, the trimmer text of LXX sometimes suggests it has been contracted1. Whereas in MT verses 8-9 seem to ring a hopeful note, in LXX they further develop the threatening message of the forgoing verses. The Double Name Twice in a role in verse 3, and once in v. 11, the critical editions of LXX have single kúriov where MT reads the double Name evei inda. In earlier contributions we already dealt with this phenomenon2. Here it may suffice to briefly summarise the data, adding remarks on the treatment of the topic in some newer commen- taries, and on L.J. McGregor's evaluation of the Greek evidence. In MT the double Name evei inda occurs 301 times3. It is typical for the book of Ezekiel were it is attested 217 times. In these instances, the critical editions of the Hebrew text, BHK and BHS, characterise inîda∏ as a secondary intrusion, either by commanding the reader to delete (dl) it, or by saying that it is an addition (add). The basis for this correction is the Greek text, and the suggestion that inîda∏ was inserted into the text as a help for the reader, to remind him of the fact that the “tetragram” could not be pronounced and was to be replaced by Adonay. -
(Leviticus 10:6): on Mourning and Refraining from Mourning in the Bible
1 “Do not bare your heads and do not rend your clothes” (Leviticus 10:6): On Mourning and Refraining from Mourning in the Bible Yael Shemesh, Bar Ilan University Many agree today that objective research devoid of a personal dimension is a chimera. As noted by Fewell (1987:77), the very choice of a research topic is influenced by subjective factors. Until October 2008, mourning in the Bible and the ways in which people deal with bereavement had never been one of my particular fields of interest and my various plans for scholarly research did not include that topic. Then, on October 4, 2008, the Sabbath of Penitence (the Sabbath before the Day of Atonement), my beloved father succumbed to cancer. When we returned home after the funeral, close family friends brought us the first meal that we mourners ate in our new status, in accordance with Jewish custom, as my mother, my three brothers, my father’s sisters, and I began “sitting shivah”—observing the week of mourning and receiving the comforters who visited my parent’s house. The shivah for my father’s death was abbreviated to only three full days, rather than the customary week, also in keeping with custom, because Yom Kippur, which fell only four days after my father’s death, truncated the initial period of mourning. Before my bereavement I had always imagined that sitting shivah and conversing with those who came to console me, when I was so deep in my grief, would be more than I could bear emotionally and thought that I would prefer for people to leave me alone, alone with my pain. -
Jeremiah Commentary
YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE JEREMIAH BOB UTLEY PROFESSOR OF HERMENEUTICS (BIBLE INTERPRETATION) STUDY GUIDE COMMENTARY SERIES OLD TESTAMENT, VOL. 13A BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL MARSHALL, TEXAS 2012 www.BibleLessonsIntl.com www.freebiblecommentary.org Copyright ©2001 by Bible Lessons International, Marshall, Texas (Revised 2006, 2012) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any way or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Bible Lessons International P. O. Box 1289 Marshall, TX 75671-1289 1-800-785-1005 ISBN 978-1-892691-45-3 The primary biblical text used in this commentary is: New American Standard Bible (Update, 1995) Copyright ©1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation P. O. Box 2279 La Habra, CA 90632-2279 The paragraph divisions and summary captions as well as selected phrases are from: 1. The New King James Version, Copyright ©1979, 1980, 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 2. The New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, Copyright ©1989 by the Division of Christian Education of National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U. S. A. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 3. Today’s English Version is used by permission of the copyright owner, The American Bible Society, ©1966, 1971. Used by permission. All rights reserved. 4. The New Jerusalem Bible, copyright ©1990 by Darton, Longman & Todd, Ltd. and Doubleday, a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. www.freebiblecommentary.org The New American Standard Bible Update — 1995 Easier to read: } Passages with Old English “thee’s” and “thou’s” etc. -
THRU the BIBLE EXPOSITION Ezekiel
THRU THE BIBLE EXPOSITION Ezekiel: Effective Ministry To The Spiritually Rebellious Part XXXIII: Illustrating Israel's Great Pain From God's Discipline (Ezekiel 24:15-27) I. Introduction A. When God disciplines man for sin, His discipline is very painful that it might produce the desired repentance. B. Ezekiel 24:15-27 provides an illustration of this truth, and we view this passage for our insight (as follows): II. Illustrating Israel's Great Pain From God's Discipline, Ezekiel 24:15-27. A. God made Ezekiel a moving illustration of the painful shock his fellow Hebrew captives would experience at the fall of Jerusalem in God's judgment, the destruction of their beloved temple and children, Ezek. 24:15-24: 1. After God's prophet in Ezekiel 24:1-14 announced that the Babylonian army had begun its siege of Jerusalem, the Lord told Ezekiel that He was going to take the delight of his eyes, Ezekiel's wife, away from him in death with a "blow," that is, to take her life very suddenly, Ezekiel 24:15-16a NIV. 2. Regardless of the intense shock of such event, Ezekiel was not to mourn or weep, not to let tears run from his eyes, but to sigh silently, to perform no public mourning act for the dead, Ezek. 24:16b-17a. Rather, he was to bind on his turban, put on his sandals, not cover the lower part of his face nor eat any food, highly unusual behavior for a man who had just tragically, suddenly lost his beloved wife, Ezekiel 24:17b NIV. -
Number 115 “Ezekiel 6”
The Naked Bible Podcast 2.0 Number 115 “Ezekiel 6” Dr. Michael S. Heiser With Residential Layman Trey Stricklin August 28, 2016 Ezekiel 6 Chapter 6 of the book of Ezekiel focuses on the primary reason for Judah’s exile: idolatry. This episode discusses the vocabulary used by Ezekiel for idolatry and spiritual apostasy and its links back to passages like Leviticus 26, which connect occupation of the Promised Land to believing loyalty to Yahweh alone. pdfs referenced: HIGH PLACES IDOLS TS: Welcome to the Naked Bible Podcast, Episode 115, Ezekiel 6. I’m the layman, Trey Stricklin, and he’s the scholar, Dr. Michael Heiser. Hey Mike, how are you doing? MSH: Very good, how are you Trey? TS: I’m doing pretty good. Staying busy. How was your trip last week? MSH: It was good. We had probably pushing 50 people at the event, then we had a nice get together afterwards. It was in Potomac Falls Cascade Library there in Virginia, near DC. People seem to appreciate the content, appreciate coming out, good questions. It was a pretty good group. TS: Good deal. I’m excited about continuing with Ezekiel so we might as well just get right to it. MSH: I hope you and everybody else are into idolatry, at least hearing about it, because that’s about all we’re going to get. Ezekiel 6 is pretty much just about why Jerusalem was being punished for idolatry. So obviously it comes on the heels of Ezekiel 4-5 with that whole series of sign acts against the city of Jerusalem. -
FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES in SHAKESPEARE's PLAYS by ALAN
“BECOMES A WOMAN BEST”: FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS by ALAN MORRIS COCHRUM Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON December 2015 Copyright © by Alan Morris Cochrum 2015 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the helpfulness and professional dedication of my dissertation committee chair, Dr. Amy Tigner, in shepherding this work to completion. I am also grateful to Dr. Jacqueline Fay and Dr. Kevin Gustafson for their willingness to serve as the other members of my committee, and to Dr. Jim Warren, who along with Dr. Tigner and Dr. Fay served on my comprehensive-exams committee. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Penny Ingram for her help during the prospectus process. I received a great deal of support over the years from many relatives, friends, and fellow students, for whose encouragement and prayers I am grateful. I would also like to thank my children, Lindsay, Blair, Nathaniel, and Alexander; my parents, Morris and Bonnie Cochrum; and my late mother-in-law, Jimmie Frazier. And, most important, this project could not have been completed without the constant love and support of my wife, Dr. Jennifer Cochrum, DPT. Nov. 9, 2015 iii Abstract “BECOMES A WOMAN BEST”: FEMALE PROPHETIC FIGURES IN SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS Alan Morris Cochrum, PhD The University of Texas at Arlington, 2015 Supervising Professor: Amy Tigner This dissertation argues that female characters in Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale, Henry VIII, Richard III, Macbeth, and 1 Henry VI function as prophets in the style of the Old Testament. -
E Z E K I E L
E Z E K I E L —prophet to the exiles in Babylon, early sixth century. Name means “God will strengthen” 1. Date Ezekiel dates his prophecies very frequently, as much or more than any other OT book. There are 14 time-posts in Ezekiel, all in chronological order except 29:17 that has a logical connection to its context of Oracles against the Nations: 1:1 30th year (of what?) 1:2 5th year of Jehoiachin’s captivity 8:1 6th “ 20:1 7th 24:1 9th 26:1 11th 29:1 10th 29:17 27th 30:20 11th 31:1 11th 32:1 12th 32:17 12th 33:21 12th year of our captivity 40:1 25th “ Jehoiachin’s captivity started in 597 BC, the apparent terminus a quo: 5th year = 593 BC 27th year = 571 BC Note that many of these prophecies were given during his 11th and 12th years of captivity. That would be 587-586 BC, just during and after the fall and destruction of Jerusalem (cf. 33:21). Ezekiel 1:1 poses a question: the “30th year” of what? It could be the 30th year of the Neo-Babylonian empire (about 596 BC, assuming its beginnings under Nabopolassar in 626 BC), the year after Jehoiachin was taken captive, two years before Ezekiel’s call related in chapter 1. Another possibility is that it is Ezekiel’s age at the time of his call (cf. Num. 4:3, and the lives of John the Baptist and of Jesus, Lk. 3:23). The old critical view of C. -
JEREMIAH, JUDGEMENT and CREATION Hetty Lalleman
JEREMIAH, JUDGEMENT AND CREATION Hetty Lalleman Summary Building on a German publication by Helga Weippert, it is argued that the idea of creation can already be found in Jeremiah, not just in Isaiah 40–55. Jeremiah 4–5 has parallels in Genesis 1–2 as well as in Jeremiah 33, and there is insufficient ground to assume that Jeremiah 33 represents a post-Jeremiah development, as Weippert suggests. Jeremiah uses not only the covenant as a framework for his proclamation of judgement and doom but also creation. 1. Introduction In the moral life of ancient Israel the prophets played an important role.1 In the so-called Former Prophets we see them in action in warning kings when the Ten Commandments are trespassed, for example Nathan over against David, Elijah over against Ahab. The Latter Prophets confront the people time and again with the consequences of ignoring God’s commandments, the ‘stipulations’ provided in the framework of the covenant. As God’s covenant people, Israel is required to live according to the laws of the covenant made at Sinai. But it is not only the covenant which forms the framework used by the prophets to warn the people. Creation also played a role in the preaching of judgement and repentance and in the message of the prophets in general. In this article we will focus on the book of Jeremiah and investigate if there is a relationship between creation and covenant, in particular in the area of ethics. 1 A previous version of this paper was delivered at the Tyndale Fellowship Triennial Conference in Nantwich, 2006. -
The Relationship of Religion and Consumerism in Eighteenth Century Colonial America
ABSTRACT Evangelical Jeremiads and Consuming Eves: The Relationship of Religion and Consumerism in Eighteenth Century Colonial America Amanda S. Mylin, M.A. Mentor: Thomas S. Kidd, Ph.D. This thesis examines the commercial world of the American British colonies from the Great Awakening to the American Revolution through the lens of eighteenth century American religious history. It examines evangelical and Quaker responses to the consumer market through published sermons and other religious rhetoric. Colonial ministers discussed the dangers of consumerism through the format of jeremiads, seeing God’s punishment for indulgence in luxury through the turmoil of the eighteenth century. However, revival ministers also used commercial methods to spread the gospel. Additionally, women in particular were a focal point of religious discussion about consumerism. While many historians have focused on the consumer revolution, and many have focused on early American religion, little has been done to unite these threads. This thesis hopes to do that by showing that religious discussion was essential to the American tradition of participating in the marketplace. Evangelical Jeremiads and Consuming Eves: The Relationship of Religion and Consumerism in Eighteenth-Century Colonial America by Amanda S. Mylin, B.A. A Thesis Approved by the Department of History Kimberly R. Kellison, Ph.D., Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee Thomas S. Kidd, Ph.D., Chairperson Andrea L. Turpin, Ph.D. Julie Holcomb, Ph.D. Accepted by the Graduate School August 2015 J. Larry Lyon, Ph.D., Dean Page bearing signatures is kept on file in the Graduate School. -
Jeremiah Chapter 17
Jeremiah Chapter 17 Jeremiah 17:1 "The sin of Judah [is] written with a pen of iron, [and] with the point of a diamond: [it is] graven upon the table of their heart, and upon the horns of your altars;" “The sin of Judah”: Reasons for the judgment (chapter 16) continue here. (1) Idolatry (verses 1-4); (2) Relying on the flesh (verse 5); and (3) Dishonesty in amassing wealth (verse 11). “Pen of iron”: The names of idols were engraved on the horns of their altars with such a tool. The idea is that Judah’s sin was permanent, etched in them as if into stone. How much different to have God’s word written on the heart (31:33). The “pen of iron” and “point of a diamond” refer to writing instruments used to make etchings and engravings on metal or stone. The sin of the people was indelibly inscribed on their hardened hearts, which is why they were unable to turn from their sinful ways and obey the Lord’s commands. The promise of the new covenant (in 31:31-34), is that the Lord would transform the people by writing His law on their hearts and giving them the inward desire and ability to obey His commands. Iron denotes it is unbendable. Something engraved with a pin of iron with a point of diamond, would be deeply set. In this case, it is set into their hearts. Instead of God's laws engraved into their hearts, they have engraved their sins. The horns of the altar showed power through God. -
Jeremiad Lamentations
JEREMIAD LAMENTATIONS >, OJ oo QJ co .c .;;:u co .S! :0ro C') m m Assyrian soldiers with battering ram attacking Lachish (2 Kings 18:13-14) The career of the prophet Jeremiah prophet as well as the book that bears his spanned the most turbulent years in the his name, let's sketch briefly the main historical tory of Jerusalem and Judah. Called to be a events of Jeremiah's day. prophet in 626 B.C., his last activity of The time of Jeremiah's call coincided which we have knowledge occuned in the with the beginning of the demise of the late 580's. For almost forty years he carried hated Assyrian Empire. For over one hun the burdens of Judah's life. But he could dred years the Assyrians had ruled most of not tum the tide that eventually led to the the Near East, including Judah. They had destruction of the state, the holy city of governed with an iron hand and a heal1 of Jerusalem, the sacred Temple, and the cho stone. War scenes dominated Assyrian art sen dynasty of the Davidic family. towns being captured, exiles being led In order to understand the career of this away, prisoners being impaled on sharp BOOKS OF TIlE BIBLE 86 people's obedience to God and to God's qUESTIONS FOR transformation of the world. Read the DISCUSSION words about the future in Isaiah 65:17-18. 1. Scholars hold the opinion that our pres Read Isaiah 55:6-11 and answer the ques ent book is actually made up of the work of tions below. -
A Spring of Living Waters in a Pool of Metaphors: the Metaphorical Landscape of 1Qha 16:5–27
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 7 Original Research A spring of living waters in a pool of metaphors: The metaphorical landscape of 1QHa 16:5–27 Author: This research article focuses on the use of the water metaphor in column 16 of the Hodayot. 1 Marieke Dhont Previous scholarship has often concentrated on the garden metaphor in this section, particularly Affiliation: on its intertextual links with the book of Isaiah. By drawing on contemporary metaphor theory, 1Faculty of Divinity, University in particular blending theory, I show how the author of the Hodayot creates poetry through a of Cambridge, Cambridge, multiple blended network of garden and water metaphors, and how aspects of the linguistic United Kingdom well of living waters’, can be read as an‘ מבוע מים חיים form of the poem, in particular the phrase Corresponding author: expression of this blend. The aim of this study is to contribute (1) to the study of the Hodayot Marieke Dhont, and its poetic practices, against older dismissals of the poetic quality of the Hodayot, and (2) [email protected] to our understanding of semantic constellations and the conceptual world of ancient Judaism. Dates: Contribution: This article fits within the scope of HTS’s theme ‘Historical Thought and Source Received: 09 Apr. 2021 Interpretation’ as it contributes to our insights into ancient Jewish thought through the Accepted: 07 May 2021 Published: 21 July 2021 interpretation of a religious source text using metaphor theory. Keywords: Hodayot; Isaiah; Jeremiah; Qumran poetry; metaphors; blending theory; water.