DOCSLIB.ORG

The Catastrophic Late Pleistocene Bonneville Flood in the Snake River Plain, Idaho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Catastrophic Late Pleistocene Bonneville Flood in the Snake River Plain, Idaho liBRARY COPY The Catastrophic Late Pleistocene Bonneville Flood in the Snake River Plain, Idaho GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 596 The Catastrophic Late Pleistocene Bonneville Flood in the Snake River Plain, Idaho By HAROLD E. MALDE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 596 A study of colossal features of erosion and deposition produced along the Snake River by sudden overflow of Lake Bonneville UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1968 -. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 70 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page 1 The canyon below Twin Falls-Continued IntroductionAbstract------------------------------------------- ______________________________________ _ 2 Melon Valley section (mile 162-155) _____________ _ 32 Background of study ___________________________ _ 2 Thousand Springs section (mile 155-151) _________ _ 32 Acknowledgments ______________________________ _ 6 Hagerman Valley (mile 151-141) _________________ _ 32 Summary of flood path _________________________ _ 6 Bliss section (mile 141-121) _____________________ _ 34 Glacial and pluvial stratigraphy ________________ ~_ 7 King Hill basin (mile 121-109) __________________ _ 35 Source--------------------------------------------­ 9 Cove section (mile 109-76) ______________________ _ 37 Age----------------------------------------------- 10 Crane Falls section (mile 76-61) _________________ _ 37 Magnitude of flood _________________________________ _ 11 Grand View basin (mile 61-28) __________________ _ 40 Duration _________________________________________ _ 12 Swan Falls section (mile 28-14) __________________ _ 42 Comparison with last catastrophic flood from glacial Walters basin (mile 14-0)------------------------ 42 Lake Missoula, Mont ____________________________ _ 13 Budget of erosion and deposition ____________________ _ 44 Diagnostic depositional and erosional features _________ _ 13 Discharge as indicated by size of boulders _____________ _ 46 Melon GraveL ________________________________ _ 13 Comparison with historic floods ______________________ _ 47 Lithology _________________________________ _ 13 Reservoir failures ______________________________ _ 47 Physiography _____________________________ _ 17 Gohna Lake, India _________________________ _ 47 Marginal channels _____________________________ _ 18 The Great Indus Flood, India _______________ _ 48 Impounded water ______________________________ _ 18 Flood at Gros Ventre, Wyo _________________ _ 48 Scabland _____________________________________ _ 20 Lake Issyk, U.S.S.R _______________________ _ 48 Path of flood above Twin Falls ______________________ _ 21 St. Francis Dam, Calif ______________________ _ 48 Upper Snake River Plain _______________________ _ 21 Vaiont Reservoir, Italy _____________________ _ 49 Rupert channeL ______________ ----------- ______ _ 22 Floods associated with glaciers __________________ _ 49 Milner reach _____________________________ ------ 23 Jokulhlaups in Iceland _____________________ _ 49 Erosion near Twin Falls ____________________________ _ 25 Various ice-dammed lakes ___________________ _ 50 The canyon below Twin Falls _______________________ _ 30 Summary of historic floods ______________________ _ 51 Weeping Wall section (mile 175-162) _____________ _ 31 References cited ___________________________________ _ 51 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map of northern part of Lake Bonneville and nearby part of Snake River Plain ___________________________ _ 3 2. Map of Snake River below Twin Falls----------------------------------------------------------------- 5 3. Diagram showing profile of Snake River and of Bonneville Flood ________________________________________ _ 8 4. Photograph showing boulders on bar of Melon Gravel near Hagerman ____________________________________ _ 14 5. Photograph showing terminus of gravel bar in Melon Valley _____________________________________________ _ 15 6. Sketch of pit in sandbar of Melon GraveL _________________________________________________________ -- __ 16 7-9. Photographs: 7. Festoon crossbeds in dipping layers of sand _____________________________________________________ _ 17 8. Boulder train on surface of Melon GraveL _______________________________________________ - ____ -_ 17 9. Minor erosional features in basalt scabland _____________________________________________________ _ 20 10. Geologic sketch map of American Falls area ___________________________________________________________ _ 21 11. Topographic map showing dry falls and giant potholes near Eden ________________________________________ _ 23 12. Photograph showing Snake River canyon upstream from Hansen Bridge __________________________________ _ 24 13. Cross sections of Snake River canyon _________________________________________________________________ _ 26 14. Topographic map of Snake River canyon near Twin Falls _______________________________________________ _ 28 15. Photograph showing Snake River canyon downstream from Perrine Memorial Bridge _______________________ _ 30 16. Topographic map of Melon Valley area---------------------------------------------------------------- 33 ~ 7. Geologic sketch of Melon Valley _____________________________________________________________________ _ 34 18. Photograph showing boulders of Melon· Gravel near Banbury Hot Springs ________________________________ _ 34 19. Topographic map of Hagerman Valley ________________________________________________________________ _ 36 20. Topographic map of King Hill basin __________________________________________________________________ _ 38 21. Photograph showing basalt boulders on lava flow near Bancroft Springs ___________________________________ _ 40 III IV CONTENTS Page FIGURE 22. Topographic map of Crane Falls area__________________________________________________________________ 41 23. Topographic map of Walters basin____________________________________________________________________ 43 24. Graph showing volume of Melon Gravel along Snake River______________________________________________ 46 25. Graph showing discharge of some glacier bursts in Iceland_______________________________________________ 50 26. Section of a supra-aquatic delta of sandur type_________________________________________________________ 50 TABLES Page TABLE 1. Topographic relations of mariginal channels______________________________________________________________ 19 2. Discharge capacity of Snake River canyon at selected constrictions_________________________________________ 25 3. Computation of volume of Snake River canyon, Augur Falls (mile 17 5) to Hansen Bridge (mile 1~9) __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 45 4. Volume of Melon Gravel above Grand View______________________________________________________________ 45 5. Velocities and discharges indicated by size of boulders in Melon Gravel just below canyon constrictions__________ 46 6. Velocities indicated by size of boulders in Melon Gravel where floodwater was not constricted__________________ 46 7. Flood wave on the Ganges caused by rupture of landslide dam at Gohna, India______________________________ 48 8. Progress of flood wave from St. Francis Dam, CaliL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 49 \., -' THE CATASTROPHIC LATE PLEISTOCENE BONNEVILLE FLOOD IN THE SNAKE RIVER PLAIN, IDAHO By HAROLD E. MALDE ABSTRACT basalt boulders just below canyon constrictions are commonly A catastrophic flood caused by overflow and rapid lowering larger than 5 feet and can be identified as having come from of Pleistocene Lake Bonneville at Red Rock Pass near Preston, outcrops not more than a few miles upstream. The gravel occurs Idaho, descended Marsh Creek Valley and reached the Snake mainly in wide places along the canyon as groups of bars of River Plain at the site of Pocatello. Large tracts in the upper colossal size that together resemble the greatly magnified bed Snake River Plain were inundated, particularly an area near of a braided stream. In the lower reach of wide segments along American Falls and a basin that surrounds Rupert. Farther the canyon, bouldery flood debris gives way to sandy deposits, downstream, the Snake River CtUlyon that extends 200 miles presumably because of retarded flow. Bars of gravel block the west of Twin Falls was flooded to a depth of 300 feet. Spec­ mouths of some tributary valleys, but at most places the bars tacular erosion in the form of abandoned channels, spillways, stand midway between the canyon walls, from which they are cataracts, nnd scabland identifies the flood path between Ameri­ separated by marginal channels as deep as 150 feet. The con­ can Falls and Twin Falls, and the cnnyon farther west is strewn structional form of these bars is well preserved, and they ap­ with huge boulders-some of them more than 10 feet in diam­ parently have been little modified by erosion since the flood. eter-which are heaped in enormous bars of boulders and sand Fine-grained alluvium formed broad flats in tributary valleys that rise nearly 300 feet above the canyon floor. that were blocked by deposits of Melon Gravel. Other fine­ The Bonneville Flood nlmost certainly wa:s caused by capture grained material was dropped in backwater areas of temporary of the Benr River, which resulted in greatly augmented inflow lakes that filled broad segments of the Snake River canyon to the Bonneville
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Photo Courtesy of Idaho Tourism Shoshone Falls
    PHOTO COURTESY OF IDAHO TOURISM SHOSHONE FALLS Located at the edge of Twin Falls, Shoshone Falls is a natural beauty on the Snake River. At 212 feet, the falls are higher than Niagara and put on a show in spring and early summer, when water flows are at their peak PHOTO COURTESY OF IDAHO TOURISM after winter snowmelt. During high water years, the falls attract thousands of out-of-town spectators who KNOW BEFORE come to witness nature’s awesome power. YOU GO: Shoshone Falls access Even when the falls aren’t at their peak, they’re still an is available from 7 a.m. to dusk. Entry fees are inspirational sight. Make a day — or even a weekend! $3 per car and $20 per — of it by taking advantage of the hiking trails, tour bus. Season passes are $25 and can be playgrounds, picnic areas, boat ramps, and swimming purchased at the holes that surround the falls. You can rent a stand-up park entrance. paddleboard from the AWOL Dive & Kayak stand and get an up-close view of Shoshone Falls from below — an experience that visitors say they’ll never forget. VISITSOUTHIDAHO.COM TWIN FALLS ©BLIPPRINTERS The city of Twin Falls took its name from these two waterfalls in the Snake River Canyon. So why is only one waterfall visible today? A dam along the Snake River, which uses water for hydroelectricity throughout the year, diverted water away from the second KNOW BEFORE waterfall. However, Twin Falls still remains a beautiful YOU GO: The best time to see landmark in spring and early summer, when thousands Twin Falls is from March upon thousands of gallons of water plummet 125 feet through early June, to the river below.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehman Caves Management Plan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Great Basin National Park Lehman Caves Management Plan June 2019 ON THE COVER Photograph of visitors on tour of Lehman Caves NPS Photo ON THIS PAGE Photograph of cave shields, Grand Palace, Lehman Caves NPS Photo Shields in the Grand Palace, Lehman Caves. Lehman Caves Management Plan Great Basin National Park Baker, Nevada June 2019 Approved by: James Woolsey, Superintendent Date Executive Summary The Lehman Caves Management Plan (LCMP) guides management for Lehman Caves, located within Great Basin National Park (GRBA). The primary goal of the Lehman Caves Management Plan is to manage the cave in a manner that will preserve and protect cave resources and processes while allowing for respectful recreation and scientific use. More specifically, the intent of this plan is to manage Lehman Caves to maintain its geological, scenic, educational, cultural, biological, hydrological, paleontological, and recreational resources in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and current guidelines such as the Federal Cave Resource Protection Act and National Park Service Management Policies. Section 1.0 provides an introduction and background to the park and pertinent laws and regulations. Section 2.0 goes into detail of the natural and cultural history of Lehman Caves. This history includes how infrastructure was built up in the cave to allow visitors to enter and tour, as well as visitation numbers from the 1920s to present. Section 3.0 states the management direction and objectives for Lehman Caves. Section 4.0 covers how the Management Plan will meet each of the objectives in Section 3.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Basalts and Glacier Floods—Roadside Geology
    u 0 by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF Natural Resources Jennifer M. Belcher - Commissioner of Public Lands Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor FLOOD BASALTS AND GLACIER FLOODS: Roadside Geology of Parts of Walla Walla, Franklin, and Columbia Counties, Washington by Robert J. Carson and Kevin R. Pogue WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Information Circular 90 January 1996 Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor Division of Geology and Earth Resources WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Jennifer M. Belcher-Commissio11er of Public Lands Kaleeo Cottingham-Supervisor DMSION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Raymond Lasmanis-State Geologist J. Eric Schuster-Assistant State Geologist William S. Lingley, Jr.-Assistant State Geologist This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 3.24 Tax (WA residents only) ~ Total $ 3.50 Mail orders must be prepaid: please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Front Cover: Palouse Falls (56 m high) in the canyon of the Palouse River. Printed oo recycled paper Printed io the United States of America Contents 1 General geology of southeastern Washington 1 Magnetic polarity 2 Geologic time 2 Columbia River Basalt Group 2 Tectonic features 5 Quaternary sedimentation 6 Road log 7 Further reading 7 Acknowledgments 8 Part 1 - Walla Walla to Palouse Falls (69.0 miles) 21 Part 2 - Palouse Falls to Lower Monumental Dam (27.0 miles) 26 Part 3 - Lower Monumental Dam to Ice Harbor Dam (38.7 miles) 33 Part 4 - Ice Harbor Dam to Wallula Gap (26.7 mi les) 38 Part 5 - Wallula Gap to Walla Walla (42.0 miles) 44 References cited ILLUSTRATIONS I Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead (Snake River Basin) Oncorhynchus Mykiss Gairdneri
    Steelhead (Snake River basin) Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri Actinopterygii — Salmoniformes — Salmonidae CONSERVATION STATUS / CLASSIFICATION Rangewide: Imperiled/Vulnerable subspecies (G5T2T3) Statewide: Vulnerable (S3) ESA: Threatened USFS: Region 1: No status; Region 4: Sensitive BLM: Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate (Type 1) IDFG: Game fish; Threatened BASIS FOR INCLUSION Threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act; declining abundance and habitat degradation. TAXONOMY Steelhead are the anadromous life form of rainbow\redband trout Behnke (2002). Steelhead spawning east of the Cascades are considered part of the redband trout of the Columbia Basin, which is a subspecies of rainbow trout. The rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss complex includes 5 additional subspecies. Rainbow trout were originally described by Walbaum in 1792 (Nelson et al. 2004). DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE Steelhead, which are the anadromous life form of rainbow\redband trout, were historically found along the west coast of North America from southern California to central Alaska. The interior Columbia River basin steelhead ranged from east of the Cascades upstream in the Columbia River and tributary streams to natural geologic barriers such as Shoshone Falls on the Snake River (Behnke 2002). In Idaho, steelhead had access to most of the Clearwater, Salmon, Weiser, Payette, Boise, Owyhee, Bruneau and Salmon Falls Creek drainages. Populations using the tributaries above Hells Canyon Dam were eliminated with the construction of the Hells Canyon complex in the 1950s and earlier upriver dams. Currently, wild and hatchery steelhead are found in the Snake River below Hells Canyon Dam, Clearwater, and Salmon River drainages. The resident life form, inland redband trout, are also present in the Salmon and Clearwater drainage along with steelhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Twin Falls 30 X 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho
    Geologic Map of the Twin Falls 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho Compiled and Mapped by Kurt L. Othberg, John D. Kauffman, Virginia S. Gillerman, and Dean L. Garwood 2012 Idaho Geological Survey Third Floor, Morrill Hall University of Idaho Geologic Map 49 Moscow, Idaho 83843-3014 2012 Geologic Map of the Twin Falls 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho Compiled and Mapped by Kurt L. Othberg, John D. Kauffman, Virginia S. Gillerman, and Dean L. Garwood INTRODUCTION 43˚ 115˚ The geology in the 1:100,000-scale Twin Falls 30 x 23 13 18 7 8 25 60 minute quadrangle is based on field work conduct- ed by the authors from 2002 through 2005, previous 24 17 14 16 19 20 26 1:24,000-scale maps published by the Idaho Geological Survey, mapping by other researchers, and compilation 11 10 from previous work. Mapping sources are identified 9 15 12 6 in Figures 1 and 2. The geologic mapping was funded in part by the STATEMAP and EDMAP components 5 1 2 22 21 of the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Cooperative 4 3 42˚ 30' Geologic Mapping Program (Figure 1). We recognize 114˚ that small map units in the Snake River Canyon are dif- 1. Bonnichsen and Godchaux, 1995a 15. Kauffman and Othberg, 2005a ficult to identify at this map scale and we direct readers 2. Bonnichsen and Godchaux, 16. Kauffman and Othberg, 2005b to the 1:24,000-scale geologic maps shown in Figure 1. 1995b; Othberg and others, 2005 17. Kauffman and others, 2005a 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Isobases of the Algonquin and Iroquois Beaches, and Their Significance1
    BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 21, PP. 227-248, PL. 5 JUNE 10, 1910 ISOBASES OF THE ALGONQUIN AND IROQUOIS BEACHES, AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE1 BY JAMES WALTER GOl.DTHWAIT (Read before the Society December 28, 1909) CONTENTS Page Introduction ............................................................................................................... 227 The Algonquin w ater-p lan e.................................................................................... 229 Stage recorded by the Algonquin beach.......................................................229 Isobases of the upwarped portion of the Algonquin plane...................... 233 The horizontal portion of the Algonquin plane.......................................... 236 The “hinge line” or “isobase of zero” ............................................................ 239 The Algonquin plane as a datum plane........................................................ 240 The Iroquois w ater-plane........................................................................................ 241 Relative ages of the Iroquois beach and the Algonquin beach..............241 Isobases of the Iroquois plane........................................................................ 242 Comparison of the two water-planes.................................................................... 243 The isobases and the pre-Cambrian boundary.................................................... 245 Summary ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Idaho Fast Facts
    Southern Idaho Fast Facts Location: Contact: Located in south-central Idaho, the mighty Snake River and its magnificent canyon etch the Lisa Buddecke boundary of Southern Idaho’s numerous cities. Boise, the state capital, is about a 1.5 hour drive [email protected] 208-731-9996 Office west and Pocatello, the state’s third largest city, is a 1.5 hour drive east. Salt Lake City is about 3 southernidaho.org hours southeast and northern Nevada is less than 1 hour south. Ideal interstate availability, local goods and products are only one day via truck to Oregon, Washington (and their seaports), Utah and Nevada, and two days to California, Colorado and Arizona. The topographic, geographic location, and seasonal variation in climate create a unique and varied natural Important Facts: environment which ranges from the scenic high alpine country in the north to the desolate lava • Southern Idaho was designated as a Top plains and desert mountains in the south, including world-famous ski resort, Sun Valley. U.S. Manufacturing Community by the U.S. Department of Commerce – one of four U.S. regions in the Food Manufacturing category (July 2015) Population: • Southern Idaho leads the state’s Twin Falls Jerome Burley/Cassia Rupert/Minidoka agribusiness industry by contributing well City 45,981 11,038 10,456 5,617 over half of the state’s nearly $9.7 billion County 80,914 22,514 23,540 20,323 agriculture receipts for 2014. Glenns Ferry/Elmore Wendell/Gooding • Idaho Power customers pay some of City 1,600 3,475 the lowest prices in the country for County 26,187 15,291 electricity – second lowest in the Pacific Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 26 Trails in Grant County 2020
    and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units For more information, please contact: Grant County Tourism Commission P.O. Box 37, Ephrata, WA 98823 509.765.7888 • 800.992.6234 In Grant County, Washington TourGrantCounty.com TOP TRAILS Grant County has some of the most scenic and pristine vistas, hiking trails and outdoor 26 recreational opportunities in Washington State. and 12 Watchable Wildlife Units Grant County is known for its varied landscapes on a high desert plateau with coulees, lakes, in Grant County Washington reservoirs, sand dunes, canals, rivers, creeks, and other waterways. These diverse ecosystems Grant County Tourism Commission For Additional copies please contact: support a remarkable variety of fish and PO Box 37 Jerry T. Gingrich wildlife species that contribute to the economic, Ephrata, Washington 98837 Grant County Tourism Commission recreational and cultural life of the County. www.tourgrantcounty.com Grant County Courthouse PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 No part of this book may be reproduced in (509) 754-2011, Ext. 2931 any form, or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, without permission in For more information on writing from the Grant County Tourism Grant County accommodations Commission. www.tourgrantcounty.com © 2019, Grant County Tourism Commission Second printing, 10m Trails copy and photographs Book, map and cover design by: provided by: Denise Adam Graphic Design Cameron Smith, Lisa Laughlin, J. Kemble, Veradale, WA 99037 Shawn Cardwell, Mark Amara, (509) 891-0873 Emry Dinman, Harley Price, [email protected] Sebastian Moraga and Madison White Printed by: Rewriting and editing by: Mark Amara Pressworks 2717 N. Perry Street Watchable Wildlife copy and Spokane, Washington 99207 photographs provided by: (509) 462-7627 Washington Department of [email protected] Fish and Wildlife Photograph by Lisa Laughlin CONTENTS CONTENTS Grant County Trails and Hiking Grant County Watchable Wildlife Viewing Upper Grand Coulee Area 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatially-Explicit Modeling of Modern and Pleistocene Runoff and Lake Extent in the Great Basin Region, Western United States
    Spatially-explicit modeling of modern and Pleistocene runoff and lake extent in the Great Basin region, western United States Yo Matsubara1 Alan D. Howard1 1Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia P.O. Box 400123 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123 Abstract A spatially-explicit hydrological model balancing yearly precipitation and evaporation is applied to the Great Basin Region of the southwestern United States to predict runoff magnitude and lake distribution during present and Pleistocene climatic conditions. The model iteratively routes runoff through, and evaporation from, depressions to find a steady state solution. The model is calibrated with spatially-explicit annual precipitation estimates and compiled data on pan evaporation, mean annual temperature, and total yearly runoff from stations. The predicted lake distribution provides a close match to present-day lakes. For the last glacial maximum the sizes of lakes Bonneville and Lahontan were well predicted by linear combinations of decrease in mean annual temperature from 0 to 6 °C and increases in precipitation from 0.8 to 1.9 times modern values. Estimated runoff depths were about 1.2 to 4.0 times the present values and yearly evaporation about 0.3 to 1 times modern values. 2 1. Introduction The Great Basin of the southwestern United States in the Basin and Range physiographic province contains enclosed basins featuring perennial and ephemeral lakes, playas and salt pans (Fig. 1). The Great Basin consists of the entire state of Nevada, western Utah, and portions of California, Idaho, Oregon, and Wyoming. At present it supports an extremely dry, desert environment; however, about 40 lakes (some reaching the size of present day Great Lakes) episodically occupied the Great Basin, most recently during the last glacial maximum (LGM) [Snyder and Langbein, 1962; Hostetler et al., 1994; Madsen et al., 2001].
    [Show full text]
  • A Great Basin-Wide Dry Episode During the First Half of the Mystery
    Quaternary Science Reviews 28 (2009) 2557–2563 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev A Great Basin-wide dry episode during the first half of the Mystery Interval? Wallace S. Broecker a,*, David McGee a, Kenneth D. Adams b, Hai Cheng c, R. Lawrence Edwards c, Charles G. Oviatt d, Jay Quade e a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964-8000, USA b Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89512, USA c Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA d Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Thompson Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA e Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA article info abstract Article history: The existence of the Big Dry event from 14.9 to 13.8 14C kyrs in the Lake Estancia New Mexico record Received 25 February 2009 suggests that the deglacial Mystery Interval (14.5–12.4 14C kyrs) has two distinct hydrologic parts in the Received in revised form western USA. During the first, Great Basin Lake Estancia shrank in size and during the second, Great Basin 15 July 2009 Lake Lahontan reached its largest size. It is tempting to postulate that the transition between these two Accepted 16 July 2009 parts of the Mystery Interval were triggered by the IRD event recorded off Portugal at about 13.8 14C kyrs which post dates Heinrich event #1 by about 1.5 kyrs. This twofold division is consistent with the record from Hulu Cave, China, in which the initiation of the weak monsoon event occurs in the middle of the Mystery Interval at 16.1 kyrs (i.e., about 13.8 14C kyrs).
    [Show full text]
  • Open-File/Color For
    Questions about Lake Manly’s age, extent, and source Michael N. Machette, Ralph E. Klinger, and Jeffrey R. Knott ABSTRACT extent to form more than a shallow n this paper, we grapple with the timing of Lake Manly, an inconstant lake. A search for traces of any ancient lake that inundated Death Valley in the Pleistocene upper lines [shorelines] around the slopes Iepoch. The pluvial lake(s) of Death Valley are known col- leading into Death Valley has failed to lectively as Lake Manly (Hooke, 1999), just as the term Lake reveal evidence that any considerable lake Bonneville is used for the recurring deep-water Pleistocene lake has ever existed there.” (Gale, 1914, p. in northern Utah. As with other closed basins in the western 401, as cited in Hunt and Mabey, 1966, U.S., Death Valley may have been occupied by a shallow to p. A69.) deep lake during marine oxygen-isotope stages II (Tioga glacia- So, almost 20 years after Russell’s inference of tion), IV (Tenaya glaciation), and/or VI (Tahoe glaciation), as a lake in Death Valley, the pot was just start- well as other times earlier in the Quaternary. Geomorphic ing to simmer. C arguments and uranium-series disequilibrium dating of lacus- trine tufas suggest that most prominent high-level features of RECOGNITION AND NAMING OF Lake Manly, such as shorelines, strandlines, spits, bars, and tufa LAKE MANLY H deposits, are related to marine oxygen-isotope stage VI (OIS6, In 1924, Levi Noble—who would go on to 128-180 ka), whereas other geomorphic arguments and limited have a long and distinguished career in Death radiocarbon and luminescence age determinations suggest a Valley—discovered the first evidence for a younger lake phase (OIS 2 or 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Salt Lake FAQ June 2013 Natural History Museum of Utah
    Great Salt Lake FAQ June 2013 Natural History Museum of Utah What is the origin of the Great Salt Lake? o After the Lake Bonneville flood, the Great Basin gradually became warmer and drier. Lake Bonneville began to shrink due to increased evaporation. Today's Great Salt Lake is a large remnant of Lake Bonneville, and occupies the lowest depression in the Great Basin. Who discovered Great Salt Lake? o The Spanish missionary explorers Dominguez and Escalante learned of Great Salt Lake from the Native Americans in 1776, but they never actually saw it. The first white person known to have visited the lake was Jim Bridger in 1825. Other fur trappers, such as Etienne Provost, may have beaten Bridger to its shores, but there is no proof of this. The first scientific examination of the lake was undertaken in 1843 by John C. Fremont; this expedition included the legendary Kit Carson. A cross, carved into a rock near the summit of Fremont Island, reportedly by Carson, can still be seen today. Why is the Great Salt Lake salty? o Much of the salt now contained in the Great Salt Lake was originally in the water of Lake Bonneville. Even though Lake Bonneville was fairly fresh, it contained salt that concentrated as its water evaporated. A small amount of dissolved salts, leached from the soil and rocks, is deposited in Great Salt Lake every year by rivers that flow into the lake. About two million tons of dissolved salts enter the lake each year by this means. Where does the Great Salt Lake get its water, and where does the water go? o Great Salt Lake receives water from four main rivers and numerous small streams (66 percent), direct precipitation into the lake (31 percent), and from ground water (3 percent).
    [Show full text]