DOCSLIB.ORG

Muncy Heritage Park and Nature Trail 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Muncy Heritage Park and Nature Trail Master Plan March 2008 FINAL DRAFT FINAL DRAFT Muncy Heritage Park and Nature Trail Master Plan Prepared for: The Muncy Historical Society Prepared by: SEDA-Council of Governments Community Resource Center 201 Furnace Road Lewisburg, PA 17837 (570) 524-4491 www.seda-cog.org March 2008 FINAL DRAFT CREDITS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Study Committee Representatives Project Funding: Pennsylvania Department of Conservation Ryn Agnew and Natural Resources (DCNR) Tom ‘Tank’ Baird Mal Barlow Planning and Design: SEDA Council of Governments, Dan Berninger Community Resource Center Steven Fairchild, PhD Tom Grbenick, Director Ed Hannan Brian Auman, RLA, Landscape Architect/ Anne Katz, PhD Principle Planner Harvey Katz, PhD Mandy Burbage, Community Planner Bob Keintz Stephen Keefer, Student Intern, Carol Lundy Penn State Department of Robert Olmstead Landscape Architecture John Piper, PhD Alison Stevenson, Landscape Architecture Bill Poulton Graduate & Publications Linda Poulton Consultant Dennis Ringling, PhD Amy Rogers Geographic Information Systems: SEDA Council of Governments, Dave Rupert GIS Services Linda Stein Linda Swisher Printing and Graphics: SEDA Council of Governments, Alice Trowbridge Graphics and Printing Services Robin Van Auken Andrea Young Development Plan Production: SEDA Council of Governments, Community Resource Center This project was financed in part by a grant from the Community Conservation Partnerships Program- Keystone Recreation, Park and Unless otherwise noted, all historic photographs are from the Muncy Historical Conservation Fund- under the administration of the Pennsylvania Society; historic postcards are from the collections of Robin Van Auken. Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. This project could not have been completed without the support, commitment, and assistance of the Muncy Historical Society For leadership in this project, special thanks also go to: Bill & Linda Poulton and Robin Van Auken CONTENTS Executive Summary i Master Plan Report Chapter 1: Project Overview 1 Chapter 2: Community Profile & History of the Muncy Heritage Park Site 2 Chapter 3: Site Information and Analysis 3 Chapter 4: Master Plan Design 4 Chapter 5: Operations, Maintenance & Security 5 Chapter 6: A Strategy for Action 6 Appendix 7 Site Inventory Image Gallery: River Landscape 7.1 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Meadow 7.4 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Recreation Pond and Tributary Creek 7.8 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Mill Pond 7.12 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Canal Corridor and Towpath 7.14 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Woodlands 7.19 Site Inventory Image Gallery: North Entrance 7.22 Site Inventory Image Gallery: South Edge 7.24 Site Inventory Image Gallery: Archcological Dig Area 7.25 Cost Estimates 7.27 Mule Barn Kit: Cost Comparison 7.32 Site Survey Maps 7.34 Ecological Assessment: Flora, Fauna, Soils and Drainage 7.47 List of References 8 Muncy Master Plan 9 Project CD 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The hamlet of Port Penn grew up in direct response to the building of the West Branch Canal and also used to occupy the site. Port Penn was a Project Background full community with a range of businesses, mills and residential houses; the sawmill and lock tender’s house once sat on the park property. The In 2004, 11 acres of undeveloped land just outside Muncy, Pennsylvania, were importance of Port Penn diminished with the end of the canal era, leaving it donated to the Muncy Historical Society and History Museum. This generous a sleepy residential community on the outskirts of Muncy. Houses from Port act set in motion the process to turn the ecologically and culturally rich Penn still sit at the north end of the park site. Many remnants and artifacts property into an incredible public park for the residents of Muncy and visitors found at the park attest to the presence of the once thriving community. from the region and beyond. Over the past three years, a vision has been Several areas have been identified as containing a large number of historic created for the park to become a place for quiet recreation and celebration of artifacts. These will be excavated and interpreted through an ongoing the region’s unique beauty as it is expressed through the park’s woodlands, archeological dig on the park property. meadow, pond, stream and river landscapes. The park will also be a bastion for teaching and interactive learning about the local environment, local The park site is also tied to the region’s lumber heritage; timber was the heritage and the creative arts. More than an isolated resource, the park will major industry in the heavily forested West Branch watershed throughout actively tie into and promote the missions of regional projects designed to most of the 19th century and log rafts were regularly being corralled and promote healthy living, connect to the history, culture and environment floated down the river for milling. The Muncy dam shortly downstream from of the Susquehanna and improve quality of life throughout Northcentral the park created a log boom that held timber for processing at many local Pennsylvania. These regional efforts include the Susquehanna Greenway mills including the saw mill that once sat on the park site. Overexploitation Partnership, the Lumber Heritage Region, and the Lycoming County of timber led to a fall in the industry by the early 1900’s; over the decades, Comprehensive Plan. those who had actively worked the log rafts down the rivers were becoming scarce. Pride in the lumber past was strong, however, and in March 1938, a The donated land is culturally significant to Muncy and the region in several commemorative log raft was constructed to be floated 200 miles down the ways. First, it straddles the entrance to the Muncy section of the West Susquehanna to Harrisburg. Known as the “Last Raft,” the festive journey Branch Canal that was opened in 1834 and operated throughout the 19th met wtih tragedy when the rafters failed to maneuver a recently constructed century until it was badly damaged by floods in 1889 and 1894. Having railroad bridge at Muncy. All but one of more than 45 passengers were served for decades as a major seasonal route for shipping and transportation thrown into the icy water and seven died as a result of the ill-fated event. The that tied into a statewide network of canals, the West Branch Canal was Muncy Heritage Park sits in view of the ‘Last Raft’ crash site. rendered obsolete by railroads and finally decommissioned in 1901. The Muncy Heritage Park sits where the branch entered from the Susquehanna From an ecological perspective, the park land exhibits a wonderful diversity River, includes a double and single set of locks, a wide basin where canal of landscapes and plant communities. Within a relatively small space, there boats could be pulled to a dry dock and repaired, and a length of the canal are areas that display the variety, uniqueness, beauty and charm of the channel and tow path. Many of these historic features are still discernable Northcentral Pennsylvania landscape. Visitors will explore woodlands, a within the landscape, including the canal locks, basin and channel. native meadow, an open pond and one that is overgrown and slowly turning into a marsh. They will enjoy views of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, working agricultural lands, the historic canal corridor and a tributary Executive Summary i creek crossing to the river. As a whole, these areas offer rich opportunities restore, interpret and interact with the historic resources found throughout for visitors to enjoy their park experience while also serving important the property. ecological functions as habitat for wildlife and vegetated open space to clean the air and filter water before it enters the Susquehanna. Looking at the park The primary gathering place for programs and picnicking will be at the through its layers of cultural, environmental and scenic resources, it clearly Mule Barn Pavilion, to be constructed on the upper slopes of the native possesses incredible potential to become an ecologically valuable place that grass and wildflower meadow. The design of this pavilion and other park celebrates and encourages the recreation, education and healthy living of elements will be inspired by vernacular structures of the region, such as barns local residents, school groups, and visitors alike. and outbuildings. In this way, the appearance and feel of the park will be contextually appropriate to the area and the park as a whole will take on a cohesive and harmonious character that melds with the historic remnants The park will support a number of uses, programs and activities. It will serve already present on the property. the Muncy community as a place to walk, bicycle and access the river for canoeing and kayaking. Ranges of educational programs will be developed The park will be open year round, from dawn to dusk. Restroom facilities, that are geared to different age groups. Some of these will center around lighting, storage and electricity will all be provided at the Mule Barn Pavilion. the ongoing archeological dig on the site that already engages school The front façade of the structure will appear solid from the lock house and children, college students and the general public with different participatory main trail; sliding barn doors will reveal an open air pavilion with moveable events and educational programs. The park as a whole will be treated as picnic tables and informational displays. an outdoor classroom where school children will participate in a variety of learning activities. Education programming will be developed to promote The Master Plan illustrates how the park will meet goals to provide environmental education, teach about local history and encourage creativity recreational opportunities; visitor access and circulation; space for and arts through participatory interaction with the landscape. educational programs, events and gatherings; and how it will capitalize on opportunities for cultural interpretation and environmental learning.
Recommended publications
  • Muncy Creek Township

    Muncy Creek Township

    Muncy Creek Planning Area Plan Adoptions 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Plan Adoptions HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH COUNCIL – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> WOLF TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS – Adopted <MONTH DAY, YEAR> Lycoming 2030: Plan the Possible 2 Muncy Creek Planning Area Acknowledgements 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Acknowledgements Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team (PAT) WALTER REED, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH RICHARD SMITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF HUGHESVILLE BOROUGH STEVE JAQUITH, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH (ALTERNATE) BILL RAMSEY, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH LINDA STEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY BOROUGH STEVEN CULVER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL POULTON, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP ANGELA SNYDER, REPRESENTATIVE OF MUNCY CREEK TOWNSHIP BILL DORMAN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH EUGENE OTTERBEIN, REPRESENTATIVE OF PICTURE ROCKS BOROUGH DEAN BARTO, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP MELANIE MCCOY, REPRESENTATIVE OF WOLF TOWNSHIP TERRY DINCHER, REPRESENTATIVE OF SHREWSBURY TOWNSHIP REBECCA FOUGHT, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING RECREATION AUTHORITY DAVID MACIEJEWSKI, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT MICHAEL PAWLIK, REPRESENTATIVE OF EAST LYCOMING SCHOOL DISTRICT GENE CAHN, REPRESENTATIVE
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy

    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS

    2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS

    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
  • FFY 2009 Williamsport TIP Highway & Bridge

    FFY 2009 Williamsport TIP Highway & Bridge

    FFY 2009 Williamsport TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Lycoming MPMS #: 61360 Municipality: Title: Grade Crossing Line Item Route: Section: A/Q Status: Improvement Type: RR High Type Crossing Est. Let Date: Actual Let Date: Geographic Limits: Lycoming County Narrative: Railroad Grade Crossing Reserve Line Item, Lycoming County TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONRRX $48 $0 $52 $54 $0 $0 $48 $0 $52 $54 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $154 MPMS #: 71068 Municipality: Title: WATS Enhance. Line Item Route: Section: A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Transportation Enhancement Est. Let Date: Actual Let Date: Geographic Limits: Lycoming County Narrative: Transportation Enhancement Reserve Line Item, Lycoming County TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONSTE $0 $0 $320 $336 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320 $336 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $656 MPMS #: 6081 Municipality: Pine (Twp) Title: T-776 English Run Br#2 Route: Section: A/Q Status: Improvement Type: Bridge Replacement Est. Let Date: 11/10/2005 Actual Let Date: 11/10/2005 Geographic Limits: OVER ENGLISH RUN : PINE TWP : T-776 : Narrative: ENGLISH RUN BR#2 TIP Program Years ($000) Phase Fund FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 2nd 4 Years 3rd 4 Years CONBOO $42 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 CONLOC $11 $13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53 $63 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total FY 2009-2012 Cost $116 Page 1 of 42 FFY 2009 Williamsport TIP Highway & Bridge Original US DOT Approval Date: 10/01/2008 Current Date: 06/30/2010 Lycoming MPMS #: 5743 Municipality: Moreland (Twp) Title: T-664 over Ltl.
  • West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy

    West Branch Subbasin AMD Remediation Strategy

    Publication 254 West Branch Susquehanna Subbasin May 2008 AMD Remediation Strategy: West Branch Susquehanna Background, Data Assessment River Task Force and Method Development Despite the enormous legacy ■ INTRODUCTION Pristine setting along the West Branch Susquehanna River. of pollution from abandoned mine The West Branch Susquehanna drainage (AMD) in the West Subbasin, draining a 6,978-square-mile Branch Susquehanna Subbasin, area in northcentral Pennsylvania, is the there has been mounting support largest of the six major subbasins in and enthusiasm for a fully restored the Susquehanna River Basin (Figure 1). watershed. Under the leadership The West Branch Susquehanna of Governor Edward G. Rendell Subbasin is one of extreme contrasts. While and with support from it has some of the Commonwealth’s Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania most pristine and treasured waterways, Department of Environmental including 1,249 miles of Exceptional Protection Secretary Kathleen Value streams and scenic forestlands and mountains, it also unfortunately M. Smith McGinty established the West bears the legacy of past Branch Susquehanna River Task unregulated mining. With Abandoned mine lands in Clearfield County. Force (Task Force) in 2004. 1,205 miles of waterways The goal of the Task Force is to impaired by AMD, it is the assist and advise the department and most AMD-impaired region its partners as they work toward of the entire Susquehanna the long-term goal to remediate the River Basin (Figure 2). At its most degraded region’s AMD. sites, the West Branch The Task Force is comprised Susquehanna River contains of state, federal, and regional acidity concentrations of agencies, Trout Unlimited, and nearly 200 milligrams per other conservation and watershed liter (mg/l), and iron and aluminum concentrations of organizations (members are identified A.
  • Lycoming County

    Lycoming County

    LYCOMING COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge rehabilitation on State Route 2014 over Lycoming Creek in the City of BASE Bridge Rehabilitation State Route 2014 over Lycoming Creek Williamsport 1 $ 2,100,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on PA 973 over the First Fork of Larry's Creek in Mifflin BASE Bridge Replacement PA 973 over the First Fork of Larry's Creek Township and epoxy overlay on PA 973 over Larry's Creek in Mifflin Township 1 $ 1,577,634 2 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation State Route 2039 over Mill Creek Bridge replacement on State Route 2039 over Mill Creek in Loyalsock Township 1 $ 398,640 1 1 0 Bridge rehabilitation on Township Road 434 over Mosquito Creek in Armstrong BASE Bridge Rehabilitation Township Road 434 over Mosquito Creek Township 3 $ 1,220,000 1 1 0 Bridge truss rehabilitation on State Route 2069 over Little Muncy Creek in BASE Bridge Rehabilitation State Route 2069 over Little Muncy Creek Moreland Township 1 $ 1,000,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 87 over Tributary to Loyalsock Creek in Upper Fairfield BASE Bridge Replacement PA 87 over Tributary to Loyalsock Creek Township 3 $ 1,130,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 (Elimsport Road) over Branch of Spring BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2001 over Branch of Spring Creek #1 Creek in Washington Township 1 $ 1,270,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement PA 414 over Upper Pine Bottom Run Bridge replacement on PA 414 over Upper Pine Bottom Run in Cummings Township 2 $ 1,620,000 1 1
  • Northumberland County

    Northumberland County

    NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY START BRIDGE SD MILES PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT TYPE TITLE DESCRIPTION COST PERIOD COUNT COUNT IMPROVED Bridge replacement on Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek in West Cameron BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 480 over Mahanoy Creek Township 3 $ 2,120,000 1 1 0 Bridge Replacement on State Route 1025 (Shakespeare Road) over Chillisquaque BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 1025 over Chillisquaque Creek Creek in East Chillisquaque Township, Northumberland County 1 $ 1,200,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 4022 over Boile Run Bridge replacement on State Route 4022 over Boile Run in Lower Augusta Township 1 $ 195,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek in Rush BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2001 over Little Roaring Creek Township 1 $ 180,000 1 1 0 Bridge replacement on PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad in West BASE Bridge Replacement PA 405 over Norfolk Southern Railroad Chillisquaque Township 1 $ 2,829,000 1 1 0 BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 61 over Shamokin Creek Bridge rehabilitation on PA 61 over Shamokin Creek in Coal Township 1 $ 850,000 1 0 0 Bridge rehabilitation on PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek in East Chillisquaque & BASE Bridge Rehabilitation PA 45 over Chillisquaque Creek West Chillisquaque Townships 2 $ 1,700,000 1 0 0 Bridge replacement on State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek in BASE Bridge Replacement State Route 2022 over Tributary to Shamokin Creek Shamokin Township 3 $ 240,000 1 0 0 BASE Bridge Replacement Township Road 631 over
  • Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021

    Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
  • West Branch Subbasin Survey 2015

    West Branch Subbasin Survey 2015

    West Branch Susquehanna River Subbasin Year 1 Survey, April through August 2015 Pub. No.308 September 2016 Ellyn J. Campbell Supervisor, Monitoring and Assessment Susquehanna River Basin Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS USED IN THE 2015 SUBBASIN SURVEY ............................................................. 5 Long-term Sites ........................................................................................................................... 6 Probabilistic Sites........................................................................................................................ 6 Water Chemistry and Discharge ................................................................................................. 8 Macroinvertebrates ................................................................................................................... 10 Physical Habitat ........................................................................................................................ 11 RESULTS and DISCUSSION ...................................................................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................... 25 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 27 FIGURES
  • NOTICES DEPARTMENT of BANKING Actions on Applications

    NOTICES DEPARTMENT of BANKING Actions on Applications

    4397 NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF BANKING Actions on Applications The Department of Banking (Department), under the authority contained in the act of November 30, 1965 (P. L. 847, No. 356), known as the Banking Code of 1965; the act of December 14, 1967 (P. L. 746, No. 345), known as the Savings Association Code of 1967; the act of May 15, 1933 (P. L. 565, No. 111), known as the Department of Banking Code; and the act of December 19, 1990 (P. L. 834, No. 198), known as the Credit Union Code, has taken the following action on applications received for the week ending July 20, 2010. Under section 503.E of the Department of Banking Code (71 P. S. § 733-503.E), any person wishing to comment on the following applications, with the exception of branch applications, may file their comments in writing with the Department of Banking, Corporate Applications Division, 17 North Second Street, Suite 1300, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2290. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date notice regarding receipt of the application is published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. The nonconfidential portions of the applications are on file at the Department and are available for public inspection, by appointment only, during regular business hours. To schedule an appointment, contact the Corporate Applications Division at (717) 783-2253. Photocopies of the nonconfidential portions of the applications may be requested consistent with the Department’s Right-to-Know Law Records Request policy. BANKING INSTITUTIONS Branch Applications De Novo Branches Date Name
  • Muncy Creek Planning Area 1 Final Draft – February 2003 Technical Background Studies No

    Muncy Creek Planning Area 1 Final Draft – February 2003 Technical Background Studies No

    TThhee CCoommpprreehheennssiivvee PPllaann BBaacckkggrroouunndd SSttuuddiieess ffoorr tthhee MMuunnccyy CCrreeeekk PPllaannnniinngg AArreeaa Hughesville Borough, Muncy Borough, Muncy Creek Township, Picture Rocks Borough, Shrewsbury Township, Wolf Township Lycoming County, PA Technical Background Studies No. 1 – Community Development Profile Introduction The development of an effective comprehensive plan requires an understanding of the issues and trends that impact a community’s ability to sustain a “good quality of life” for its residents. During the early stages of plan development, coordination has been undertaken with many individuals and organizations in order to develop an understanding of what are perceived to be important issues that will impact the community and its development and growth in the future. This Community Development Profile summarizes where the community has been, where it is today, and where it may be going in the future based on known data sources. It includes past trend information (historic), current trend information (today), and projections (future), where appropriate and available from existing data sources. Key Community Development Issues Through consultation with the Planning Advisory Team (PAT) and interviews with key persons within the planning area and throughout the county, the important issues that could potentially impact the community in terms of social and economic conditions were identified. Issues of importance that relate to the county or region are shown in the adjacent highlight box. Input from the Muncy Creek Planning Advisory Team reflected the rural nature of the area. The overriding important social issue identified by the Planning Advisory Team was the “Small town character of the close knit communities where you know the people.” Thus, one would expect the following issues to be of particular interest in this planning area.