Searching for New Search Technologies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Searching for New Search Technologies Search services are a key to attracting users because they are an important rea- Searching for son people use portals in the first place. Moreover, about 71 percent of Internet users utilize search services to find Web sites, according to Nielsen Media Re- Industry Trends New Search search, a company that measures com- puter and Internet usage (as well as television audience levels). Currently, though, said Werbach, “For Technologies consumers, most of the search engines are pretty comparable.” Users thus fre- quently choose a portal for reasons other Ilan Greenberg and Lee Garber than its search service. However, a company might attract more users to its portal if it could offer an improved search technology. Re- earching for Web sites is one of searchers are thus looking at a variety of the most common tasks per- new technologies and techniques. formed on the Web. It is also one of the most frustrating. In CHALLENGES S fact, the situation has become The sheer size of the Web is a challenge a notorious symbol of the Web’s grow- to improving search technology. There ing size and lack of structure, as well as are more than 350 million Web pages, the inadequacy of Web search tech- and AltaVista contains only about 140 nologies. million of them, one of the largest totals However, a number of Web companies of any search service. and research organizations are taking a There are technical, Meanwhile, the Web is constantly variety of approaches to try to solve this commercial incentives changing, with new URLs added and old problem. for improving search pages discarded. NEC’s Research Institute Traditional search technology (see the technology. estimated that in 1998, more than 5 per- sidebar “Traditional Web Search Tech- cent of search results in one prominent nology”) is based on users typing in key- search service were invalid or “dead” links. words for the information they want to Boolean search techniques from the 60s receive. Search services then scan Web and 70s are running out of gas,” said NEW APPROACHES pages for those keywords. This approach Kevin Werbach, managing editor of Researchers are taking a variety of consistently causes a number of well- Release 1.0, a newsletter on emerging approaches to improving Web search known problems. communications and computing tech- technology. For example, some search Users must try to come up with the nologies. services are making their Web indexes correct keywords for their search. If the There are considerable commercial bigger, in an effort to make their results keywords are too general or have multi- incentives for developing better search more comprehensive. ple meanings, users may receive too technologies. Various search services— many results or too many irrelevant including AltaVista, Excite, Lycos, and Human annotation results to find the information they want. Yahoo—are turning their Web pages The human-annotation approach For example, a search for “history of into portals. Portals are Web home bases search results on the behavior of rock” could yield results related to pop- bases from which users can access a and the results obtained by previous ular music, geology, or history classes at variety of services, including searches, Web searchers, rather than just on key- a university. Meanwhile, the wrong e-commerce, stock prices, weather fore- words. Proponents say the results of pre- choice of keywords may lead to useless casts, chat rooms, and driving direc- vious searches, as well as Webmasters’ results or no results at all. tions. decisions about which pages their sites “In general, what’s happening is the Companies want to attract more peo- should link to, better indicate which sites ple to their portals because the more will satisfy new searches. They also say unique users they attract, the more this technique reduces the ability of a Editor: Lee Garber, Computer, 10662 Los money they can charge advertisers and Web site to use keywords to manipulate Vaqueros Circle, PO Box 3014, Los Alamitos, partners on the sites. Figure 1 lists the five search services. CA 90720-1314; [email protected] Web sites that attracted the most unique However, Release 1.0’s Werbach and visitors as of May 1999. Continued on page 6 4 Computer Industry Trends COMPUTER EDITORIAL BOARD EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: JAMES H. AYLOR, UNIV. OF VIRGINIA; [email protected]; (804) 924-6100 ASSOCIATE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: DORIS CARVER, LOUISIANA STATE UNIV.; [email protected] ADVANCED DESIGN/MANUFACTURING: 35 JOSEPH WONG, [email protected] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: BILL MARK, SRI INTERNATIONAL; [email protected] 30 BINARY CRITIC: TED G. LEWIS, TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT GROUP;TEDGLEWIS@ FRICTION- FREE- ECONOMY.COM 25 COMPONENT AND OBJECT TECHNOLOGY: BERTRAND MEYER, INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE 20 ENGINEERING AND MONASH UNIV.; [email protected] COMPUTING PRACTICES: THOMAS CAIN, UNIV. 15 OF PITTSBURGH; [email protected] CYBERSQUARE: RONALD HOELZEMAN, UNIV. OF PITTSBURGH; R.HOELZEMAN@ COMPUTER.ORG 10 HARDWARE TECHNOLOGIES: ROHIT KAPUR, Unique visitors (millions) SYNOPSYS; [email protected] 5 HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING: ROBERT COLWELL, INTEL CORP.; BCOLWELL@ICHIPS. INTEL.COM Yahoo Infoseek Excite Lycos AltaVista INTEGRATED ENGINEERING: JERZY ROZENBLIT, UNIV. OF ARIZ., TUCSON; [email protected]; Source: Media Metrix AND SANJAYA KUMAR, HONEYWELL TECHNOL- OGY CENTER; [email protected] According to Media Metrix, a company that provides Internet and digital-media measurement INTERNET WATCH: RON VETTER, UNIV. OF NORTH CAROLINA AT WILMINGTON; services, the Web-search sites with the greatest number of unique visitors as of May 1999 were [email protected] Yahoo, Infoseek, Excite, Lycos, and AltaVista. MANAGEMENT: BARRY BOEHM, UNIV. OF SOUTH- ERN CALIFORNIA; [email protected] MULTIMEDIA AND DATABASES: SHUNSUKE other critics say this approach can limit a other techniques. Google ranks such UEMURA, NARA INST. OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOL- search service’s effectiveness by forcing it pages highly and is likely to return them OGY; [email protected] to reflect past usage and not leaving it open in response to a search query. NETWORKING: JONATHAN M. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA; [email protected] enough to meet the needs of new users. Clever. IBM is developing search tech- NEW BOOKS: MIKE LUTZ, ROCHESTER INSTITUTE Direct Hit. The Direct Hit search ser- nology it calls Clever, which uses an algo- OF TECHNOLOGY; [email protected] vice uses a technology it calls the Pop- rithm it calls HITS (Hyperlink-Induced SOFTWARE METRICS: WILL TRACZ, LOCKHEED MARTIN SYSTEMS; [email protected] ularity Engine. A proprietary algorithm Topic Search). (See the related article, SOFTWARE REALITIES: JAMES M. BACH, RELIABLE tracks users through Web searches. “Mining the Web’s Link Structure,” on SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES; [email protected] Direct Hit cofounder Gary Culliss said page 60.) The technology starts with a SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES: BILL N. SCHILIT, the tracking is done anonymously and standard keyword search to get a root set FX PALO ALTO LABORATORY; SCHILIT@ PAL.XEROX.COM cannot match specific IP addresses to of results. It then looks for documents SPECIAL ISSUES: KATHLEEN SWIGGER, UNIV. OF Web pages. that link to and from the root results. NORTH TEXAS; [email protected] The Popularity Engine monitors which Clever rates the Web pages in the root set STANDARDS: CHARLES R. SEVERANCE, MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; [email protected] Web pages a user accesses, how much and the linked pages on the basis of how TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES FORUM: DEBORAH time the user spends at each site, and many other sites link to them. SCHERRER, STANFORD UNIV.; DEBBIE@QUAKE. which hyperlinks the user clicks on. Pages that many Web site authors have STANFORD.EDU Direct Hit then uses this information to chosen to link to are called authorities CONTRIBUTING EDITORS rate the relevance of individual Web sites and are considered to be valuable sources DUNCAN LAWRIE, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS; [email protected] to specific searches. of content. Web sites that link to many HOWARD RUBIN, HUNTER COLLEGE; [email protected] According to Culliss, this technique authorities are called hubs and are con- turns users into search editors. sidered to be valuable reference tools. COMPUTER ADVISERS EDWARD A. PARRISH, WORCESTER Google. Google, founded by Stanford POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE; [email protected] University doctoral students Sergey Brin Built for speed RALPH CAVIN, SEMICONDUCTOR RESEARCH CORP.; [email protected] and Larry Page, is something of a hybrid Fast Search & Transfer (http://www. between the keyword and human-anno- fast.no) is using several approaches in an CS MAGAZINE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE CARL CHANG (CHAIR), tation approaches. effort to make its search service (http:// WILLIAM EVERETT (VICE CHAIR), JAMES H. AYLOR, JEAN BACON, Google uses its own crawler, called www.alltheweb.com) faster. WUSHOW CHOU, GEORGE CYBENKO, Googlebot, to zip around the Web. But Through the scalability in the archi- WILLIAM I. GROSKY, STEVE MCCONNELL, DANIEL E. O’LEARY, KEN SAKAMURA, instead of looking for keywords, tecture, the average response time for an MUNINDAR P. SINGH, JAMES J. THOMAS, Googlebot searches for hyperlinks. In advanced search is under a second, com- YERVANT ZORIAN response to a search topic, Googlebot pared to an industry average of four to CS PUBLICATIONS BOARD BEN WAH (CHAIR), CARL CHANG, JON BUTLER, looks for Web pages that hyperlink to four-and-a-half seconds, said Ray Ro- ALAN CLEMENTS, DANTE DEL CORSO, other pages that are deemed relevant to magnolo, a vice president at Fast Search WILLIAM EVERETT, DAVE PESSEL, FRANCIS LAU, RICHARD ECKHOUSE, SOREL REISMAN the topic, based on text-matching and & Transfer. The company credits its search ser- using natural language,” said John Laf- queries is limited because the algorithms vice’s performance in part to fast index- ferty, associate professor at Carnegie Mel- are still quite immature.
Recommended publications
  • Cryonics Magazine, Q1 2001
    SOURCE FEATURES PAGE Fred Chamberlain Glass Transitions: A Project Proposal 3 Mike Perry Interview with Dr. Jerry Lemler, M.D. 13 Austin Esfandiary A Tribute to FM-2030 16 Johnny Boston FM & I 18 Billy H. Seidel the ALCOR adventure 39 Natasha Vita-More Considering Aesthetics 45 Columns Book Review: Affective Computing..................................41 You Only Go Around Twice .................................................42 First Thoughts on Last Matters............................................48 TechNews.......................................................................51 Alcor update - 19 The Global Membership Challenge . 19 Letter from Steve Bridge . 26 President’s Report . 22 “Last-Minute” Calls . 27 Transitions and New Developments . 24 Alcor Membership Status . 37 1st Qtr. 2001 • Cryonics 1 Alcor: the need for a rescue team or even for ingly evident that the leadership of The Origin of Our Name cryonics itself. Symbolically then, Alcor CSC would not support or even would be a “test” of vision as regards life tolerate a rescue team concept. Less In September of 1970 Fred and extension. than one year after the 1970 dinner Linda Chamberlain (the founders of As an acronym, Alcor is a close if meeting, the Chamberlains severed all Alcor) were asked to come up with a not perfect fit with Allopathic Cryogenic ties with CSC and incorporated the name for a rescue team for the now- Rescue. The Chamberlains could have “Rocky Mountain Cryonics Society” defunct Cryonics Society of California forced a five-word string, but these three in the State of Washington. The articles (CSC). In view of our logical destiny seemed sufficient. Allopathy (as opposed and bylaws of this organization (the stars), they searched through star to Homeopathy) is a medical perspective specifically provided for “Alcor catalogs and books on astronomy, wherein any treatment that improves the Members,” who were to be the core of hoping to find a star that could serve as prognosis is valid.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Comments to the FCC on the NTIA Petition for Rulemaking On
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) National Telecommunications ) RM – 11862 and Information Administration ) ) Petition for Rulemaking to ) Clarify provisions of Section 230 ) Of the Communications Act of 1934 ) COMMENTS OF TECHFREEDOM (CORRECTED) 110 Maryland Ave NE Suite #205 Washington, DC 20002 Dated: September 2, 2020 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) National Telecommunications ) RM – 11862 and Information Administration ) ) Petition for Rulemaking to ) Clarify provisions of Section 230 ) Of the Communications Act of 1934 ) COMMENTS OF TECHFREEDOM: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Section 230 is the law that made today’s Internet possible. The law has allowed websites to host content created by users without, as the bill’s author, Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA), warned in 1995, “spending vast sums of money trying to define elusive terms that are going to lead to a flood of legal challenges.” Without the broad protections of 230(c)(1) in particular, websites would face “death by ten thousand duck-bites” in the form of massive litigation risks. NTIA asks the FCC to turn this law on its head, but the FCC has no authority to reinterpret the statute. The plain language and the legislative history of Section 230 demonstrate that Congress did not intend to grant any regulatory authority to the FCC. Instead, as Rep. Cox declared, Congress did “not wish to have a Federal Computer Commission with an army of bureaucrats regulating the Internet.” Under the statute’s express terms, the “interactive computer service” providers protected by Section 230 are not “information service providers,” nor are they otherwise subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G
    Technology Review Cruising the Information Highway: Online Services and Electronic Mail for Physicians and Families John G. Faughnan, MD; David J. Doukas, MD; Mark H. Ebell, MD; and Gary N. Fox, MD Minneapolis, Minnesota; Ann Arbor and Detroit, Michigan; and Toledo, Ohio Commercial online service providers, bulletin board ser­ indirectly through America Online or directly through vices, and the Internet make up the rapidly expanding specialized access providers. Today’s online services are “information highway.” Physicians and their families destined to evolve into a National Information Infra­ can use these services for professional and personal com­ structure that will change the way we work and play. munication, for recreation and commerce, and to obtain Key words. Computers; education; information services; reference information and computer software. Com m er­ communication; online systems; Internet. cial providers include America Online, CompuServe, GEnie, and MCIMail. Internet access can be obtained ( JFam Pract 1994; 39:365-371) During past year, there has been a deluge of articles information), computer-based communications, and en­ about the “information highway.” Although they have tertainment. Visionaries imagine this collection becoming included a great deal of exaggeration, there are some the marketplace and the workplace of the nation. In this services of real interest to physicians and their families. article we focus on the latter interpretation of the infor­ This paper, which is based on the personal experience mation highway. of clinicians who have played and worked with com­ There are practical medical and nonmedical reasons puter communications for the past several years, pre­ to explore the online world. America Online (AOL) is one sents the services of current interest, indicates where of the services described in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving the Boaters of America PROLOG P/R/C Greg Scotten, SN
    Volume 2, Issue 2 May 2012 Marketing and Public Relations, The Art and Science of Creating LINKS (Click on selected Link) a Call to Action and Causing a Change. The United States Power Squadrons PR Contest Forms Boating Safety Centennial Anniversary Articles Cabinet Serving the Boaters of America PROLOG P/R/C Greg Scotten, SN The United States Power Squadrons is Inside this issue: celebrating 100 years of community Jacksonville Sail & Power service on 1 February 2014. Your Squadron to conduct a celebratory USPS Centennial 1 squadron needs to be part of that boat parade on the St. John’s important Centennial event which is a River. national milestone. To celebrate this Bright Ideas 2 national milestone, several projects are The Power Squadrons Flag and underway and a national anniversary Etiquette Committee has designed Importance of 3 a unique boat Ensign, which Squadron Editors web page will post exciting activities and information. The Power Squadrons’ emphasizes the event, and is to be MPR Committee 3 Ship Store will be featuring items with flown on members’ vessels in 2013 Mission the 100th Anniversary Logo. An and 2014. A special new Power anniversary postal commemorative is Squadrons logo has been under discussion. All levels of the distributed and is available on line. organization are planning local 2012 Governing 4 A year long ceremonial activity is community activities. Board planned. At the 2013 Annual The precise anniversary day is Sunday, Meeting Governing Board, full sized anniversary Ensigns will be Hands-on Training 6 2 February 2014. But because the Governing Board at the Annual Meeting presented to each of the thirty- two districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicator's Tools
    Communicator’s Tools (II): Documentation and web resources ENGLISH FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ““LaLa webweb eses unun mundomundo dede aplicacionesaplicaciones textualestextuales…… hayhay unun grangran conjuntoconjunto dede imimáágenesgenes ee incontablesincontables archivosarchivos dede audio,audio, peropero elel textotexto predominapredomina nono ssóólolo enen cantidad,cantidad, sinosino enen utilizaciutilizacióónn……”” MillMilláánn (2001:(2001: 3535--36)36) Internet • Global computer network of interconnected educational, scientific, business and governmental networks for communication and data exchange. • Purpose: find and locate useful and quality information. Internet • Web acquisition. Some problems – Enormous volume of information – Fast pace of change on web information – Chaos of contents – Complexity and diversification of information – Lack of security – Silence & noise – Source for advertising and money – No assessment criteria Search engines and web directories • Differencies between search engines and directories • Search syntax (Google y Altavista) • Search strategies • Evaluation criteria Search engines • Index millions of web pages • How they work: – They work by storing information about many web pages, which they retrieve from the WWW itself. – Generally use robot crawlers to locate searchable pages on web sites (robots are also called crawlers, spiders, gatherers or harvesters) and mine data available in newsgroups, databases, or open directories. – The contents of each page are analyzed to determine how it should be indexed (for example, words are extracted from the titles, headings, or special fields called meta tags). Data about web pages are stored in an index database for use in later queries. – Some search engines, such as Google, store all or part of the source page (referred to as a cache) as well as information about the web pages.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose a Search Engine Or Directory
    How to Choose a Search Engine or Directory Fields & File Types If you want to search for... Choose... Audio/Music AllTheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | FindSounds.com | Lycos Music Downloads | Lycos Multimedia Search | Singingfish Date last modified AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Domain/Site/URL AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | SearchEdu.com | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search File Format AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Geographic location Exalead Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Images AllTheWeb | AltaVista | The Amazing Picture Machine | Ditto | Dogpile | Fazzle | Google Image Search | IceRocket | Ixquick | Mamma | Picsearch Language AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Language Tools | HotBot Advanced Search | iBoogie Advanced Web Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Multimedia & video All TheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | IceRocket | Singingfish | Yahoo Video Search Page Title/URL AOL Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997
    Case Study: Internet Explorer 1994..1997 Ben Slivka General Manager Windows UI [email protected] Internet Explorer Chronology 8/94 IE effort begins 12/94 License Spyglass Mosaic source code 7/95 IE 1.0 ships as Windows 95 feature 11/95 IE 2.0 ships 3/96 MS Professional Developer’s Conference AOL deal, Java license announced 8/96 IE 3.0 ships, wins all but PC Mag review 9/97 IE 4.0 ships, wins all the reviews IE Feature Chronology IE 1.0 (7/14/95) IE 2.0 (11/17/95) HTML 2.0 HTML Tables, other NS enhancements HTML <font face=> Cell background colors & images Progressive Rendering HTTP cookies (arthurbi) Windows Integration SSL Start.Run HTML (MS enhancements) Internet Shortcuts <marquee> Password Caching background sounds Auto Connect, in-line AVIs Disconnect Active VRML 1.0 Navigator parity MS innovation Feature Chronology - continued IE 3.0 (8/12/96) IE 3.0 - continued... IE 4.0 (9/12/97) Java Accessibility Dynamic HTML (W3C) HTML Frames PICS (W3C) Data Binding Floating frames HTML CSS (W3C) 2D positioning Componentized HTML <object> (W3C) Java JDK 1.1 ActiveX Scripting ActiveX Controls Explorer Bars JavaScript Code Download Active Setup VBScript Code Signing Active Channels MSHTML, SHDOCVW IEAK (corporations) CDF (XML) WININET, URLMON Internet Setup Wizard Security Zones DocObj hosting Referral Server Windows Integration Single Explorer ActiveDesktop™ Navigator parity MS innovation Quick Launch, … Wins for IE • Quality • CoolBar, Explorer Bars • Componetization • Great Mail/News Client • ActiveX Controls – Outlook Express – vs. Nav plug-ins
    [Show full text]
  • Browsers Supported
    System and Browser Requirements for Online Bill Pay (Revised June, 2013) The following list describes systems and browsers that are classified as “Supported” and “Allowed” for PayLynx online bill pay. While the billpay application functions properly with other browser and platform combinations, PSCU recommends only those on the following list: Microsoft Windows: Windows 8: Supported - IE 10*, Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Allowed - JAWS 14, IE 9* Windows 7: Supported - IE 9*, Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Allowed – IE 10, JAWS 14.0 * Internet Explorer 9 supported when used in Compatibility Mode http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/internet-explorer/use-compatibility-view#ie=ie-9 Macintosh: OS X 10.7 – Safari 6.x, Allowed - Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release OS X 10.6 – Safari 6.x, Allowed - Firefox & Chrome – Current Stable Release Browser Notes: • JavaScript – is required for the application to function optimally. • Cookies – the browser must be set to allow cookies and/or explicitly allow 3rd party cookies. • Screen Resolution – 800 x 600 VGA or higher • Windows Display Properties Settings – should be 96 dpi (Windows default) • Browser Text Size – should be Medium Blocked Browsers: The following browsers are programmatically blocked from use: • Microsoft Windows – CompuServe, Netscape • Macintosh – Microsoft IE Macintosh Screen Capture: • Apple/Shift/3 – Captures the entire screen • Apple/Shift/4 – Click and drag the pointer and release mouse button to capture a portion of the screen. Links for Browsers: • Microsoft http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/products/internet-explorer • Apple http://www.apple.com/downloads/ • Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ • Google http://www.google.com/chrome/ • JAWS http://sales.freedomscientific.com/ProductInfo.aspx?productid=340014-001 Browser Category Definitions: • Supported – All functionality of the product has been tested and successfully meets functional and design requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Remember, the Dial-Up Era of Internet Access? Back Then There Were Line
    Remember, the dial-up era of Internet access? Back then there were line sharing mandates requiring the telephone company to allow firms like AOL, Prodigy, CompuServe etc to use the phone company’s network to supply dial-up Internet access into an individual’s home. You could use your home phone connection - suppose you had AT&T for your home telephone service and AOL in that case AOL could use your phone connection with AT&T or whatever phone company you had for an affordable cheap reasonable rate to connect you to their internet service. AOL could use AT&T’s phone network to connect an AT&T phone customer to the Internet. There were plenty of competitors in the dial-up arena from AOL and Prodigy to CompuServe, NetZero and even EarthLink to name a few of the commercial providers, What happened in the broadband era? When we started the broadband era in 2001 the U.S. was poised to lead the world in broadband and have the same level of competition as the dial-up market but the FCC under George W. Bush’s Presidency ended the line sharing requirement and any competition mandates by re-classifying broadband services under Title I of the Telecommunications Act as an information service. We need to get back to that. We need competition restored it is the best way after all to protect Net Neutrality. If competition mandates had been continued and phone companies had to provide access to their infrastructure to competitors today we would still have plenty of land-line or wire-line competition for the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean's Line Contents
    With the initiation of “Polytechnic" programs in California, DEAN’S LINE a “Learn by Doing” ethic emerged that was copied in countless high schools and junior colleges throughout the Harold B. Schleifer Dean, University Library state. To meet student needs, Cal Poly elevated the level of instruction at several stages along the way. Originally a high school, the institution was gradually transformed into the CAL POLY POMONA CAMPUS HISTORY BOOK equivalent of a junior college, and then to a four-year You probably knew that the cereal magnate W.K. Kellogg founded college, and ultimately, to a university that included our campus, but did you know that Cal Poly Pomona was the graduate-level instruction. home of Snow White’s horse, Prince Charming?” The Library is proud to make available a beautifully illustrated book California State Polytechnic University, Pomona: A Legacy documenting the history of the Cal Poly Pomona ranch and and a Mission, 1938-1989 is an heirloom-quality coffee- campus. California State Polytechnic University, table book with over 30 historical photographs, indexed, Pomona — A Legacy and a Mission 1938-1989 tells and displayed in a generous 9 x 11 inch, 294-page the story of a distinctive American university whose origins date hardcover format. Copies of the book can be obtained for back, in a limited sense, to the Gold Rush of 1849. The family of $100 through the University Library. the author, the late Donald H. Pflueger, Professor Emeritus, educator, historian, diplomat, and author, has kindly and To commemorate and honor the philanthropy of the generously pledged the proceeds of the book to the University Pflueger family, the Library will use the donations to Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Slides by Swri by December 8, 2006
    Change Management Board Meeting Bridgeline # 850-414-4976 January 12, 2007 SunGuide Change Management Board Meeting 1 Welcome and Introductions Steve Corbin, CMB Chairman January 12, 2007 SunGuide Change Management Board Meeting 2 Change Management Board Time Item Lead Supporting Materials 9:45 – 9:50 Welcome and Introductions Corbin December 1, 2006 9:50 – 10:05 Previous Meeting Recap and Action Item Review Corbin Meeting Minutes 10:05 – 10:20 SunGuideSM Footprints Issues Review Dellenback CMB .ppt CCTV Preset Scheduling CMB .ppt, White Paper, Enhancement Requirements, SunGuideSM Software 10:20 – 10:50 Dellenback Responses to Release 2.2.2 GUI Performance Comments on Enhancement Design AVL Subsystem – 1 new / 6 changed Req’s (Vote) EM Subsystem (Vote) PM (Reporting) Requirements (Vote) Release 2.2.1 Road Ranger Requirements Documents; SunGuideSM Software (Vote) Release 3.0 10:50 – 11:50 Bonds Release 3.0 Requirements Video Incident Detection Specification, Requirements (Vote) Ballots SunGuideSM Event Viewer Subsystem (Vote) AMBER Alert DMS Message Template – 2 new Req’s (Vote) SunGuide Change Management Board Meeting January 12, 2007 3 Change Management Board Time Item Lead Supporting Materials Using SunGuideSM Travel Time Enhancements Dellenback Travel Times SunGuideSM Software 11:50 – 12:20 White Paper Release 3.1 Tallahassee LPR and Tillander iFlorida Enhancements 12:20 – 12:30 Closing and Action Item Review Corbin SunGuide Change Management Board Meeting January 12, 2007 4 Change Management Board Previous Meeting Recap and Action Item Review SunGuide Change Management Board Meeting January 12, 2007 5 Change Management Board SunGuide users are to provide Trey Tillander with their comments on the SunGuide Support Definition Response Times document so that the mean time for software repairs can be tracked for the purposes of documenting response times.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity and Antigravity (1) Page 1 of 29
    Gravity and antigravity (1) Page 1 of 29 Gravity and Antigravity David Pratt Feb 2001, Feb 2005 Part 1 of 2 Contents (Part 1) 1. Gravity and mass (02/06) 2. Shielding, electrogravity, antigravity 3. Explaining gravity (Part 2) 4. Levitation and technology 5. Human levitation 6. Theosophical writings 1. Gravity and mass It is said to have been the sight of an apple falling from a tree that, around 1665, gave Isaac Newton the idea that the force that pulls an apple to earth is the same as that which keeps the moon in its orbit around the earth. The reason the moon does not fall to earth is because of the counteracting effect of its orbital motion. If the moon were to cease its orbital motion and fall to earth, the acceleration due to gravity that it would experience at the earth’s surface would be 9.8 m/s² – the same as that experienced by an apple or any other object in free fall. Newton’s universal law of gravitation states that the gravitational force between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. To calculate the gravitational force (F), their masses (m 1 and m 2) and the gravitational constant (G) are multiplied together, and the result is divided by the square of the distance (r) between them: F = http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/gravity.htm 15.12.2006 Gravity and antigravity (1) Page 2 of 29 Gm 1m2/r². According to newtonian theory, the gravitational force between two or more bodies is therefore dependent on their masses.
    [Show full text]