DOCSLIB.ORG

The Spacial and Temporal Community Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Spacial and Temporal Community Structure UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2013 The pS acial and Temporal Community Structure of Ichthyoplankton in a Northeast Florida Estuary : A Study of Ingress at a Faunal Boundary Breanna Korsman University of North Florida Suggested Citation Korsman, Breanna, "The pS acial and Temporal Community Structure of Ichthyoplankton in a Northeast Florida Estuary : A Study of Ingress at a Faunal Boundary" (2013). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 452. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/452 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2013 All Rights Reserved T H E SPA T I A L A ND T E MPO R A L C O M M UNI T Y ST RU C T UR E O F I C H T H Y OPL A N K T O N IN A N O R T H E AST F L O RID A EST U A R Y: A ST UD Y O F IN G R ESS A T A F A UN A L B O UND A R Y Breanna Marie Korsman A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology University of North Florida August 2013 C E R T I F I C A T E O F APPR O V A L The Spatial and Temporal Community Structure of Ichthyoplankton in a Northeast Florida Estuary: A Study of Ingress at a Faunal Boundary By Breanna Marie Korsman Approved by the thesis committee: Date _____________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Matthew E. Kimball, Committee Chair _____________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Courtney T. Hackney _____________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Eric G. Johnson _____________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Frank J. Hernandez Accepted for the Department of Biology: ______________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Daniel C. Moon, Chair Accepted for the College of A rts and Sciences: _______________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Barbara A. Hetrick, Dean Accepted for the University: __________________________________________ ____________________ Dr. Len Roberson, Dean of the Graduate School ii A C K N O W L E D G E M E N TS Foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Matt Kimball for providing guidance in designing and carrying out the project that would become my M.S. thesis. Your motivation and high expectations are qualities that I hope to carry with me through the rest of my career. Additional thanks go out to my committee members: Dr. Courtney Hackney, Dr. Eric Johnson and Dr. Frank Hernandez. Thanks for listening to theories and ideas, and for providing great advice on data analysis. Frank ± your lab at DISL provided an excellent environment for someone just beginning to learn how to identify larval fish. Thanks to all of you! Thanks to everyone who helped make my field work possible. Wendy Eash- Loucks, Tom Harding, and the rest of the research staff at the Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas NERR were instrumental in the process. Kurt Foote, Andrew Rich, and Sam Adukiewicz ± thanks so much for working with me in establishing and gaining access to my field sites. Your support is appreciated! To my regulars in the field: Blake Thomas, Cora Johnston and Jessica Landkrohn ± thank you so much! You all put in more than your fair share of early mornings, and helped make the work fun. Thanks as well to all of the rest of my volunteers. Many hours of sleep were given up in order to help me complete this project. iii T A B L E O F C O N T E N TS List of Tables «««««««««««««««««««««««« v List of Figures ««««««««««««««««««««««««. vii Abstract «««««««««««««««««««««««««« x Introduction ««««««««««««««««««««««««« 1 ObjecWLYHV««««««««««««««««««««««« 5 Methods ««««««««««««««««««««««««««« 6 Study Area ««««««««««««««««««««««« 6 General Field Sampling Methodology «««««««««««« 8 7ULDO6DPSOLQJ0HWKRGRORJ\«««««««««««««««« 9 Data Analysis «««««««««««««««««««««« 11 Results ««««««««««««««««««««««««««« 12 (QYLURQPHQWDO9DULDEOHV««««««««««««««««« 12 7ULDO6DPSOLQJ««««««««««««««««««««« 13 Standard Sampling «««««««««««««««««««« 14 Discussion «««««««««««««««««««««««««« 19 Tables and Figures «««««««««««««««««««««« 32 Literature Cited ««««««««««««««««««««««« 50 Curriculum Vitae ««««««««««««««««««««««« 57 iv List of Tables: Table 1. Summary of results from paired t-tests on species richness and larval density values from diel, depth, duration, and location sampling protocols. Mean values of density (number of fish / 100 m3) and species richness (taxa / sample) are presented (± 1 SE). Diel, depth, and duration sampling took place at both inlets and data were combined. Location sampling occurred only at St. Augustine inlet. Table 2. Average monthly densities as number of larvae per 100 m3 of all taxa collected with a 1 mm mesh plankton net ingressing into the GTM estuary through the St. Augustine inlet between March 2012 and February 2013. Abundance rankings were calculated for the St. Augustine inlet and the Matanzas inlet (SA Rank, M Rank) for all taxa represented by > 5 individuals. Rare taxa (in rankings = R) were those represented E\LQGLYLGXDOV7D[DFROOHFWHGRQO\DWWKH0DWDQ]DVLQOHW RUWKH6W$XJXVWLQH inlet (^) are identified (in rankings, NC = no catch). Selected mixed taxa were exempted (E) from abundance rankings. Monthly larval densities represent sums of mean densities and were not used in statistical analyses. Table 3. Average monthly densities as number of larvae per 100 m3 of all taxa collected with a 1 mm mesh plankton net ingressing into the GTM estuary through the Matanzas inlet between March 2012 and February 2013. Abundance rankings were calculated for the St. Augustine inlet and the Matanzas inlet (SA Rank, M Rank) for all taxa represented by > 5 individuals. Rare taxa (in rankings = R) were tKRVHUHSUHVHQWHGE\ v individuals. Taxa collected only at the Matanzas inlet (*) or the St. Augustine inlet (^) are identified (in rankings, NC = no catch). Selected mixed taxa were exempted (E) from abundance rankings. Monthly larval densities represent sums of mean densities and were not used in statistical analyses. Table 4. Summary (expressed as a percentage of the total catch along with rank in parentheses) of the dominant families of ichthyoplankton collected ingressing into the Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas estuary during the March 2012 ± February 2013 study period, along with summaries of the dominant families from other similar surveys elsewhere in the South Atlantic Bight presented geographically from north to south. Family groups representing a negligible portion of the overall catch (*) or not caught (--) are indicated. Percent shared taxa refers to the proportion of total taxa shared with the present study. vi List of Figures: Figure 1. The St. Augustine and Matanzas inlets of the Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas estuary along the US Atlantic coast in northeast Florida. Primary ichthyoplankton sampling locations for each inlet are marked with stars. Figure 2. Mean (± 1 SE) temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen (D.O.) for the GTM estuary March 2012 through February 2013. Data for the inlets were pooled, as no major differences existed between them during any sampling event (Kruskal-Wallis, temp: p = 0.954, salinity: p = .193, dissolved oxygen: p = .273). Figure 3. Monthly average species richness (taxa sample-1) and monthly average density (number of fish / 100 m3; ± 1 SE), for the Matanzas inlet (filled bars) and St. Augustine inlet (open bars) between March 2012 and February 2013. Note that the y-axis scales differ. Figure 4. Spatial differences demonstrated by non-metric multidimensional scaling in ichthyoplankton community structure at each of the two inlets that open to the Guana- Tolomato-Matanzas estuary, FL. Collections were taken between March 2012 and February 2013 with a 1 mm mesh plankton net. Each data point represents the density and diversity of the larval fish assemblage by month for each inlet. Ovals classify monthly assemblages into seasonal groups based on degree of similarity. Data were fourth root transformed prior to analyses. Similarity: 45, 2-D stress: 0.1 vii Figure 5. Temporal species associations for collections made at the inlets connecting the Atlantic Ocean with the Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas estuary, FL between March 2012 and February 2013, as demonstrated by non-metric multidimensional scaling. Collections were taken with a 1 mm mesh plankton net. Each data point represents the density of a single species by month for the two inlets combined. Species clustered together were often collected together. Data were fourth root transformed prior to analyses. Similarity: 50, 2-D stress: 0.1. Figure 6. Winter-recruiting taxa mean larval concentrations (number of fish / 100 m3; ± 1 SE). Total numbers of scaled individuals and mean standard length (SL) given for abundant winter-recruiting taxa entering the GTM estuary between March 2012 and February 2013. Mean length is reported as standard length (mm). Note that the y-axis scales vary. Figure 7. Summer-recruiting taxa mean larval concentrations (number of fish / 100 m3; ± 1 SE). Total numbers of scaled individuals and mean standard length (SL) given for abundant summer-recruiting taxa entering the GTM estuary between March 2012 and February 2013. Mean length is reported as standard length (mm). Note that the y-axis scales vary. Figure 8. Year-round-, spring-, and fall-recruiting mean larval concentrations (number of fish / 100 m3; ± 1 SE). Total numbers of scaled individuals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the First District Court of Appeal State of Florida
    Filing # 86133755 E-Filed 03/08/2019 06:28:15 PM IN THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA JOSE OLIVIA, in his official capacity as Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, et al., Appellants, CASE NO. 1D18-3141 LT CASE Nos. 2015-CA-001423 v. 2015-CA-002682 FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., et al., Appellees, _________________________________/ REPLY TO APPELLANT LEGISLATIVE PARTIES’ RESPONSE TO WATERKEEPERS FLORIDA’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES Waterkeepers Florida respectfully submits this Reply to the Appellant Legislative Parties’ (Appellants) Response to Waterkeepers Florida’s Motion for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief in order to address mischaracterizations and factual inaccuracies made by Appellants in their Response, and states as follows: RECEIVED, 03/08/2019 06:28:33 PM, Clerk, First District Court of Appeal 1 I. APPELLANTS MISCHARACTERIZE WATERKEEPERS FLORIDA AS “LITTLE MORE THAN AN ALTER EGO OF ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER.”1 Contrary to the characterization of Waterkeepers Florida that was made in the Appellants’ Response, Waterkeepers Florida is not at all an “alter ego” of St. Johns Riverkeeper. It is, in fact, a separate entity comprised of multiple waterkeeper organizations across the state (of which the St. Johns Riverkeeper is one) each having equal input as to Waterkeeper Florida’s activities. Waterkeepers Florida is composed of thirteen (13) separate Waterkeeper organizations working in the State of Florida. Therefore, the issues addressed, the geography covered, and the number of participants in Waterkeepers Florida extends far beyond that of the St. Johns Riverkeeper organization, and the implication by Appellants that Waterkeepers Florida is merely an alias for a single member organization is false.
    [Show full text]
  • Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve 2014 – 2016 Oyster Monitoring Summary
    Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve 2014 – 2016 Oyster Monitoring Summary Pam Marcum, Biologist Nikki Dix, Research Director Matt Monroe, Biologist June 8, 2018 INTRODUCTION Oysters provide many valuable services in estuaries and coastal communities. As suspension feeding bivalves, oysters remove large quantities of particulate carbon from waters and prevent phase shifts of estuarine communities to those dominated by planktonic and microbial organisms (Baird et al. 2004, Newell 1988). By removing suspended particles from the water column, oysters increase light penetration which in turn benefits the growth of submerged aquatic vegetation such as seagrass (Newell & Koch 2004). Suspension feeding causes oysters to integrate water quality conditions, also making them useful as bioindicators. Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) have been used to test for the presence of certain metals and for terrestrially sourced nitrogen in U.S. waters (Daskalakis 1996, Fertig et al. 2009, Kimbrough et al. 2008). Oysters also help to mediate eutrophication caused by nitrogen loading of estuarine waters by enhancing denitrification rates (Kellogg et al. 2014, Newell et al. 2002). Oyster reefs can reduce erosion to other estuarine habitats such as salt marsh and can be used as natural breakwaters to mitigate shoreline loss (Meyer et al. 1997, Scyphers et al. 2011, Stricklin et al. 2009). The structures created by oyster reefs also provide shelter as well as productive ecosystems for foraging and consequently host many birds, fish, and invertebrates, some of which are commercially and recreationally important species such as blue crabs, red drum, and snapper (Coen et al. 1999, Coen & Grizzle 2007, Tolley & Volety 2005). Unfortunately, the importance of oysters and their functions has been highlighted by losses in oyster populations.
    [Show full text]
  • East Florida
    ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX: EAST FLORIDA INTRODUCTION 8C) Sheltered Riprap An Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) database has been 8D) Sheltered Rocky, Rubble Shores developed for the marine and coastal areas of East Florida. The Area 9A) Sheltered Tidal Flats of Interest (AOI) includes the following marine, coastal and 9B) Vegetated Low Banks estuarine water bodies: Atlantic Ocean from the Georgia - Florida border to Spanish River Park in Boca Raton, Florida; St. Marys River 9C) Hyper-Saline Tidal Flats and Amelia River (Fort Clinch SP); Nassau Sound, Nassau River, 10A) Salt- and Brackish-water Marshes South Amelia River, Back River (Amelia Island); Sawpit Creek, 10B) Freshwater Marshes Clapboard Creek, Simpson Creek, Mud River, Fort George River (Big Talbot and Little Talbot Islands); St. Johns River; Intracoastal 10C) Swamps Waterway; Guana River, Lake Ponte Vedra, Tolomato River (St. 10D) Scrub-Shrub Wetlands Augustine); Matanzas River, San Sebastian River, Salt Run 10F) Mangroves (Anastasia State Park); Pellicer Creek (Marineland); Halifax River, Rose Bay, Strickland Bay, Spruce Creek, Trumbull Bay (Daytona Each of the shoreline habitats are described on pages 10-18 in Beach); Ponce de Leon Inlet, Indian River North (Smyrna Beach); terms of their physical description, predicted oil behavior, and Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River (Canaveral National Seashore, response considerations. Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge); Indian River (Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge); St. Lucie River, Peck Lake (Jensen SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Beach); Loxahatchee River, Jupiter Inlet (Jupiter); Little Lake Worth, North Palm Beach Waterway, Earman River, Palm Beach Inlet; Lake Biological information presented in this atlas was collected, Worth Lagoon (Palm Beach); Gulf Stream (Delray Beach); and Lake compiled, and reviewed with the assistance of biologists and Rogers, Lake Wyman (Boca Raton).
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding Bridges of Florida*
    2013 OOUUTTSSTTAANNDDIINNGG BBRRIIDDGGEESS OOFF FFLLOORRIIDDAA** This photograph collection was compiled by Steven Plotkin, P.E. RReeccoorrdd HHoollddeerrss UUnniiqquuee EExxaammpplleess SSuuppeerriioorr AAeesstthheettiiccss * All bridges in this collection are on the State Highway System or on public roads Record Holders Longest Total Length: Seven Mile Bridge, Florida Keys Second Longest Total Length: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Third Longest Total Length: Bryant Patton Bridge, Saint George Island Most Single Bridge Lane Miles: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Most Dual Bridge Lane Miles: Henry H. Buckman Bridge, South Jacksonville Longest Viaduct (Bridge over Land): Lee Roy Selmon Crosstown Expressway, Tampa Longest Span: Napoleon Bonaparte Broward Bridge at Dames Point, North Jacksonville Second Longest Span: Sunshine Skyway Bridge, Lower Tampa Bay Longest Girder/Beam Span: St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge, Jacksonville Longest Cast-In-Place Concrete Segmental Box Girder Span: St. Elmo W. Acosta Bridge, Jacksonville Longest Precast Concrete Segmental Box Girder Span and Largest Precast Concrete Segment: Hathaway Bridge, Panama City Longest Concrete I Girder Span: US-27 at the Caloosahatchee River, Moore Haven Longest Steel Box Girder Span: Regency Bypass Flyover on Arlington Expressway, Jacksonville Longest Steel I Girder Span: New River Bridge, Ft. Lauderdale Longest Moveable Vertical Lift Span: John T. Alsop, Jr. Bridge (Main Street), Jacksonville Longest Movable Bascule Span: 2nd Avenue, Miami SEVEN MILE BRIDGE (new bridge on left and original remaining bridge on right) RECORD: Longest Total Bridge Length (6.79 miles) LOCATION: US-1 from Knights Key to Little Duck Key, Florida Keys SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE RECORDS: Second Longest Span (1,200 feet), Second Longest Total Bridge Length (4.14 miles), Most Single Bridge Lane Miles (20.7 miles) LOCATION: I–275 over Lower Tampa Bay from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 62-302: Surface Water Quality Standards
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. blue – not a standard black – standard TCHAPTER 62-302: WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Effective April 30, 2018 In instances where the EPA has determined that certain provisions are not considered new or revised water quality standards, the Agency has attempted to indicate those in blue text. However, the font color indicated within this document, should not be interpreted as the official position of the Agency, and primarily addresses recent reviews by the EPA. For more detailed explanations on the EPA’s analysis and rationale related to decisions of new or revised water quality standards, see the Agency’s historical decision documents and associated records or contact the appropriate Agency staff. Additionally, arrow boxes found in the margins of this document direct the reader to other new or revised water quality standards which are related to provisions found in Chapter 62-302 but are found in documents outside of the regulations and are generally incorporated by reference. (See Attachments A-E of this document). The State of Florida recently revised the table of surface water criteria set out at section 62-302, F.A.C., to incorporate new human health criteria and designated uses promulgated by the state in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRTR—2013/703 ON THE COVER Fort Matanzas, St. Augustine, Florida Photograph by: Kate Dallas Inventory of Coastal Engineering Projects in Fort Matanzas National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRTR—2013/703 Kate Dallas Oregon State University 104 CEOAS Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 Michael Berry, Peter Ruggiero Oregon State University 104 CEOAS Administration Building Corvallis, OR 97331 March 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Beach Management Plan: Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Office of Resilience and Coastal Protection Florida Department of Environmental Protection
    Strategic Beach Management Plan: Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Office of Resilience and Coastal Protection Florida Department of Environmental Protection April 2020 Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Strategic Beach Management Plan – Northeast Atlantic Coast Region Table of Contents Introduction - Northeast........................................................................................................................... 1 Sea Islands ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Strategies for Inlets and Critically Eroded Beaches .......................................................................... 2 St. Marys River Entrance, Nassau County .......................................................................................... 2 Fort Clinch, Nassau County, 2,500 feet west of R1-R9 ...................................................................... 3 Fernandina Beach, Nassau County, R9-R33 ....................................................................................... 4 South Amelia Island, Nassau County, R60-R80 ................................................................................. 5 Nassau Sound, Nassau County R79 to Duval County R1 ................................................................... 6 Little Talbot Island State Park, Duval County, R21-R23 .................................................................... 7 Fort George Inlet, Duval County, R25-R26 .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Techniques
    Protection Techniques 10.0 PROTECTION TECHNIQUES Town of Marineland The Town of Marineland was designated as the first Remarkable Coastal Place in July 2000. The Town has approximately 6-12 people and contains 160 acres. 90 acres are owned by Flagler County and the Town of Marineland jointly, 50 acres are owned by Marine Park of Flagler (which includes Marineland Ocean Resorts property containing the historic Oceanarium built in 1937) and 20 acres are owned by the University of Florida Whitney Laboratory. Over half of the Town’s land functions as a River to Sea preserve purchased with Florida Community Trust (FCT)) funds. The River to Sea Preserve will be managed to enhance the natural environment through educational programs, interpretative signs and various other passive Town of Marineland recreational uses (i.e., beach access, picnic shelters, pavilion, canoe/kayak launch and pedestrian trails). Within the River to Sea Preserve the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is leasing the old campground market and has transformed this facility into the administration headquarter for the Guana, Tolomato, Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (GTM - NERR), the 25th federally designated NERR in the nation by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The University of Florida’s Whitney Lab, a low intensity institutional use, occupies twenty acres within the Town. This use is complementary to the surrounding natural environment. The remaining 50 acres are owned by Marine Park of Flagler, a subsidiary of the Jacoby Development, Inc. is slated for development as a place for human-dolphin therapeutic interaction program. This proposed development will complement the uses of the Whitney Laboratory and the Oceanarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Matanzas--The Little Fort with the Big Job
    Fort Matanzas--The Little Fort With the Big Job Standards-Based Activities (4th-5th grade) NOTE: This activity set can stand alone or be used as an introduction for a fieldtrip to Fort Matanzas National Monument, St. Augustine, Florida (904) 471-0116 Contents: 1) Reading 2) Writing 3) Math 4) Answer Page Designed by Linda A. Chandler (Interpretive Specialist, Fort Matanzas National Monument) For more Florida Standards-based activities in science and social studies, check out http://pelotes.jea.com. Fort Matanzas - The Little Fort with the Big Job Anastasia Island, a long, thin barrier island, stretches for nearly sixteen miles from the St. Augustine Inlet south to the Matanzas Inlet. Behind this island is the Matanzas River. This river and the Matanzas Inlet were called the "backdoor to St. Augustine", and they would be a good way for enemies to try to sneak up on St. Augustine from the rear. The Spanish were concerned about this potential danger, and as early as 1569 they built a wooden watchtower surrounded by a stockade somewhere near the south end of Anastasia Island to keep watch against enemies approaching from the south. This was just a lookout tower as it was not strong enough to hold cannons. If a strange ship was sighted, the Spanish could somehow signal St. Augustine or send a boat with a warning message. No doubt several such towers were built to replace the previous ones which fell down or were washed away, but no sign of any has ever been found. Only Spanish records tell us about the wooden watchtowers at Matanzas.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Distribution of Pyrodinium Bahamense Var
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 322: 99–115, 2006 Published September 20 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Factors affecting the distribution of Pyrodinium bahamense var. bahamense in coastal waters of Florida E. J. Phlips*, S. Badylak, E. Bledsoe, M. Cichra Dept. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Florida, 7922 N.W. 71st Street, Gainesville, Florida 32653, USA ABSTRACT: Over the last half of the 20th century Pyrodinium bahamense var. bahamense has been observed in a variety of locations in the western North Atlantic. Recent evidence of the toxin- producing capacity of this variety of P. bahamense has heightened interest in its habitat requirements and preferences. The objective of this study was to examine the environmental factors that relate to the spatial and temporal patterns of the distribution and abundance of P. bahamense var. bahamense. Based on the results of this study we view the factors as operating in one or more ways: (1) eco- physiological limitations for survival and successful reproductive cycle, (2) environmental regulation of growth and standing crop, and (3) competitive advantages in relation to other species. The focus of the study was the Florida peninsula, but information from other environments in the tropical Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico was included in the interpretation of the results. In terms of physiological limitations, 20°C appears to be the lower temperature limit for a significant presence of P. bahamense var. bahamense, and the salinity tolerance ranged from 10 to 45. The bloom potential of P. bahamense var. bahamense was most closely associated with shallow ecosystems with long water residence times, and peak biomass levels were correlated to nutrient concentrations in regions of high abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Waterkeepers Request Protection for Florida Waters
    Florida Waterkeepers Request Protection For Florida Waters August 2, 2018 The Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the state water authorities have failed miserably to protect our water resources from depletion and pollution. This failure started many years ago, and despite much work and money invested, the situation is not improving, but becoming more severe. Water flow from springs and rivers decline, aquifer levels drop, free water permits continue to be issued, and lately many waters have become unusable and can no longer sustain aquatic creatures. Our leaders know the causes but refuse to realistically address the issues of overpumping and excessive use of fertilizers. It has become obvious that the solution will not come from Tallahassee but from environmental organizations and citizens, principally using litigation as a means to force our agencies to act. The following is a press release from united waterkeepers. Our thanks to John Quarterman for this information, and to all the Waterkeepers for what they do. Comments by OSFR historian Jim Tatum. -A river is like a life: once taken, it cannot be brought back- FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 1, 2018 CONTACTS Georgia Ackerman, Apalachicola Riverkeeper (850) 321-6262, [email protected] Marty Baum, Indian Riverkeeper (772)631-5827, [email protected] Rick Frey, St. Marys Riverkeeper (404)909-0667, [email protected] Andy Hayslip, Tampa Bay Waterkeeper (727) 537-0484, [email protected] Jen Lomberk, Matanzas Riverkeeper (904) 471-9878, [email protected] John S. Quarterman, Suwannee Riverkeeper (850) 290-2350, [email protected] Lisa Rinaman, St. Johns Riverkeeper (904) 509-3260, [email protected] FLORIDA WATERKEEPERS UNITE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA — On July 31, Florida Waterkeepers joined forces in Tallahassee to stand up for Florida waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Coastal Basin Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    Northern Coastal Basin Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Prepared by Paul J. Haydt and Frazel, Inc. St. Johns River Water Management District Palatka, Florida December 2003 Northern Coastal Basin Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overview The St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) initiated the Northern Coastal Basin (NCB) project in 1995 in response to general water quality concerns and the closure of historic shellfish harvesting areas. Potential negative impacts from current and anticipated growth on coastal resources, particularly shellfish harvesting, highlighted the need for a dedicated program to address surface water quality and estuary issues. In addition, a number of water bodies in the NCB are listed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (303d list) as not having sufficient water quality to meet their designated uses. SJRWMD is legislatively mandated to assess these water bodies and determine the potential need for establishment and implementation of pollutant load reduction goals (PLRGs). Through a series of workshops and public forums, management agencies, local governments, and stakeholders were requested to identify issues and provide listings of reports and related studies for the portions of the NCB within their jurisdiction. This was used for development of an initial NCB Reconnaissance Report (Bonnie Holub & Associates 1998). The Reconnaissance Report was used as a resource guide in development of the NCB Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Plan by a team of SJRWMD staff members and Frazel, Inc. The purpose of the NCB SWIM Plan is to set forth a proactive course of action, identifying the projects that address both estuarine water quality and habitat protection, and the effort needed to accomplish them, consistent with the levels and trends of available funding.
    [Show full text]