Climate Change Mitigation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Mitigation environment Climate change MITIGATION Emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), been so effective sinceISO introduced Standards in the ISO 1406x series them in 2006 that many governmental for assessing and verifying GHG emissions bodies regulating GHG emissions have especially carbon dioxide (CO2) from ISO 14064-1 (GHG emissions adopted these standards and made • and removals for organizations – them mandatory for assessing and burning fossil fuels for energy, are corporate level) verifying GHG emissions regulated • ISO 14064-2 (GHG emissions causing climate change. ISO standards within emissions trading schemes. and removals for organizations – Since then, ISO has published a related project level) play a role in mitigating its effects. standard, ISO 14067, for determining the • ISO 14064-3 (validation and GHG emissions, or carbon footprint, of verification of GHG statements) ISO 14065 (requirements products. This document describes the • for verification bodies) Climate change is a significant threat standards in the ISO 1406x series and • ISO 14066 (requirements to life on Earth, so humankind needs how these contribute to the transition for verifiers) to first reduce and then ultimately to a zero-carbon economy. • ISO 14067 (GHG emissions eliminate emissions of carbon dioxide. of products) Fortunately, this transformation to a zero-carbon economy is already hap- Taking action pening in many industrial, commercial Climate change is the single largest and municipal sectors, with ISO stand- threat facing humanity and biodi- ards playing a pivotal role in making versity. There is strong evidence that this happen. increasing concentrations of green- Based on the premise that monitoring, house gases in the atmosphere – validating and verifying GHG emissions notably CO from burning fossil fuels enables organizations to better target 2 for energy and transportation – are and control them, ISO technical com- mittee ISO/TC 207 for environmental changing the Earth’s climate. The other management has produced several key GHGs are methane (CH4), which standards in the ISO 1406x series to is typically generated when organic manage greenhouse gases from organi- wastes such as sewage decompose, zations, projects and products. All three nitrous oxide (N2O) and halogenated parts of ISO 14064, for example, have compounds. Climate change mitigation – 1 Principle greenhouse gases, their global warming potential (GWP) and main sources GAS ESTIMATED GWP* MAIN SOURCES Scientists have determined the Global RELATIVE TO CO2 Warming Potential (GWP) of all GHGs. Carbon dioxide 1× Fossil-fuel combustion for power This is the warming potential of a gas (CO2) generation, transportation and relative to CO2. Halogenated gases, such domestic heating/cooking as sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), hydro- fluorocarbons (HFCs) and perfluoro- Methane 28× Fermentation, decomposition of carbons (PFCs), typically have the highest (CH4) wastes, oil & gas industry, coal mines GWPs. This means that these GHGs can Nitrous oxide 265× Agriculture, fossil-fuel make a big contribution to climate change, (N2O) combustion, industry even if their emissions are much lower than CO2. (see table opposite) Sulphur hexafluoride 22 500× Electrical insulation, medical Unless humankind takes firm and prompt (SF6) applications, tracer gas action to reduce GHG emissions, the Earth will become much, much warmer, sea levels Perfluorocarbons 6 630× to 17 400× Electronics manufacturing, will rise and there will be greater extremes in (PFCs) refrigeration, fire suppressants, weather. In simple terms, extreme weather medical applications Many scientists means many more storms, droughts, major Hydrofluorocarbons 4× to 8 060× Refrigeration, air conditioning, floods and heatwaves. This in turn leads to believe that (HFCs) insulation, fire suppressants, aerosols losses in biodiversity, crop failures and dam- age to infrastructure. continued changes Nitrogen trifluoride 17 200× Used as a fluorine source in the The threats are so severe that many sci- (NF3) electronics industry (plasma etching, entists believe that continued changes in climate will cause silicon chips, semi-conductors, LCD in climate will cause a mass extinction panels) as well as in the photovoltaic of biodiversity and make the Earth unin- a mass extinction and chemical laser industries habitable for most species, including us. According to the Intergovernmental Panel of biodiversity. on Climate Change (IPCC), we need to con- tain the average global temperature rise to within 1.5 °C and do so by 2030. * Source : The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) www.ipcc.ch 2 – Climate change mitigation Climate change mitigation – 3 This means we need to use energy more validating and verifying GHG emissions. The role of efficiently, replace fossil-fuelled sources These standards apply the principle that, of energy with zero-carbon, renewable in order to control an activity, we first ISO standards Standards in the ISO 1406x series energy sources to transform to a sustain- need to measure it. They are founded for GHG assessment and verification ISO standards have many roles in able zero-carbon economy. on the principles that apply to all • ISO 14064-1:2018, Greenhouse tackling climate change, from stra- There have already been many suc- ISO standards, i.e. harmonization, con- gases – Part 1 : Specification with tegic, governmental and organi- guidance at the organization level cesses in this transformation, with sistency, comparability, traceability and, zational levels, through to tactical for quantification and reporting technologies and techniques available above all, validity. As such, they serve as of greenhouse gas emissions and applications at the project and even to reduce GHG emissions. In some indus- a useful complement to ISO 14001:2015, removals product levels. ISO standards in the trial sectors, emissions of CO2 have fallen Environmental management systems – • ISO 14064-2:2019, Greenhouse ISO 1406x series provide the tools for and ISO standards have played a crucial Requirements with guidance for use, and gases – Part 2 : Specification with organizations to develop the starting guidance at the project level for role in making this happen. are designed to integrate easily within an point for all programmes to control quantification, monitoring and This document describes the standards organization’s existing environmental reporting of greenhouse gas and then eliminate GHG emissions, in the ISO 1406x series for assessing, management framework. emission reductions or removal which is the baseline inventory. This enhancements can be at an organizational level, or • ISO 14064-3:2019, Greenhouse at the detailed level of an individual gases – Part 3 : Specification with process or product, also known as a guidance for the verification and carbon footprint. Having such data validation of greenhouse gas statements and information enables organiza- ISO 14065:2013, Greenhouse tions, regulatory bodies and compa- • gases – Requirements for green- nies to make informed decisions and house gas validation and verifica- then track their progress in reducing tion bodies for use in accreditation GHG emissions. or other forms of recognition The box on the right shows the • ISO 14066:2011, Greenhouse gases – Competence require- main standards in the ISO 1406x ments for greenhouse gas valida- series whilst the following sections tion teams and verification teams explain how these standards work, • ISO 14067:2018, Greenhouse how they fit together and how they gases – Carbon footprint of play a big part in tackling climate products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification change. 4 – Climate change mitigation Climate change mitigation – 5 Two types of boundaries apply here : ∙ The organizational boundaries refer to any facilities for which the organization has practical and financial responsibilities. ∙ The operational boundaries refer to the organization’s activities, such as burning fossil fuels for heating and industrial processes. Once the organization has established these boundaries, ISO 14064-1 provides guidance on developing a register of direct and indi- rect emissions ; for example, employees travelling by air count as an indirect emis- Quantifying GHG emissions sion. The entity can then decide on appro- priate methods set out by ISO 14064-1 for ISO published all three standards sinks ”. ISO designed the stand- quantifying these emissions. in the ISO 14064 series in 2006, ard for any organization requiring If a GHG emission is The standard also contains advice on verify- revising them in 2018 and 2019. tools and guidance on evaluating ing the organization’s inventory ; verification and reporting GHG emissions. Spe- within the company is defined as the process of evaluating the ISO 14064-1 for cifically,ISO 14064-1 describes how data and methods to determine accuracy. quantifying GHG emissions an organization can create a list boundaries, then The 2018 amendments to ISO 14064-1 reflect at the organizational level of sources and sinks by first con- the increasing number of organizations The standard specifies how sidering its boundaries ; if a GHG the company has reporting indirect emissions. Furthermore, organizations develop auditable emission is within the company it includes new guidance on the measure- GHG inventories, where an inven- boundaries, then the company complete control of ment and reporting of specific examples tory is defined as the “sum of an has complete control of these of GHG sources and sinks based on users’
Recommended publications
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Public Lands
    The Climate Report 2020: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Public Lands As the world works to respond to the dire regulations meant to protect the public and the warnings issued last fall by the United Nations environment from these exact decisions. New Environment Programme, the Trump policies have made it cheaper and easier for administration continues to open up as much fossil energy corporations to gain and hold of our shared public lands as possible to fossil control of public lands. And they have hidden fuel extraction.1 And while doing so, the federal from public view the implications of these government continues to keep the public (aka decisions for taxpayers and the planet. the owners of these resources) in the dark on This report seeks to pull the curtain back on the mounting greenhouse gas emissions that this situation and shed light on the range of would result from drilling on our public lands. potential climate consequences of these At the same time, we’ve seen this leasing decisions. administration water down policies and 1 UN. 26 Nov. 2019. stories/press-release/cut-global-emissions-76- https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and- percent-every-year-next-decade-meet-15degc Key Takeaways: The federal government cannot manage development of these leases could be as what it does not measure, yet the Trump high as 6.6 billion MT CO2e. administration is actively seeking to These leasing decisions have significant suppress disclosure of climate emissions and long-term ramifications for our climate from fossil energy leases on public lands. and our ability to stave off the worst The leases issued during the Trump impacts of global warming.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kyoto Protocol and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    THE KYOTO PROTOCOL AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS NOVEMBER 1999 Paper prepared by the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of WA Kyoto and the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ......................................................................................1 Introduction and Caveats .......................................................................................................1 Summary................................................................................................................................2 Key Recommendations.......................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND: THE KYOTO PROTOCOL.........................................................................4 ISSUES, PROCESSES AND IMPLICATIONS .......................................................................5 Political Structures and Incentives.........................................................................................5 National Solutions to Global Problems..................................................................................6 Equity and Universality .......................................................................................................10 Conclusions on Kyoto And Global Warming ......................................................................11 POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND PRINCIPLES.....................................................................13 An Effective Global Emissions Policy.................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Lasting Coastal Hazards from Past Greenhouse Gas Emissions COMMENTARY Tony E
    COMMENTARY Lasting coastal hazards from past greenhouse gas emissions COMMENTARY Tony E. Wonga,1 The emission of greenhouse gases into Earth’satmo- 100% sphereisaby-productofmodernmarvelssuchasthe Extremely likely by 2073−2138 production of vast amounts of energy, heating and 80% cooling inhospitable environments to be amenable to human existence, and traveling great distances 60% Likely by 2064−2105 faster than our saddle-sore ancestors ever dreamed possible. However, these luxuries come at a price: 40% climate changes in the form of severe droughts, ex- Probability treme precipitation and temperatures, increased fre- 20% quency of flooding in coastal cities, global warming, RCP2.6 and sea-level rise (1, 2). Rising seas pose a severe risk RCP8.5 0% to coastal areas across the globe, with billions of 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 2120 2140 US dollars in assets at risk and about 10% of the ’ Year when 50-cm sea-level rise world s population living within 10 m of sea level threshold is exceeded (3–5). The price of our emissions is not felt immedi- ately throughout the entire climate system, however, Fig. 1. Cumulative probability of exceeding 50 cm of sea-level rise by year (relative to the global mean sea because processes such as ice sheet melt and the level from 1986 to 2005). The yellow box denotes the expansion of warming ocean water act over the range of years after which exceedance is likely [≥66% course of centuries. Thus, even if all greenhouse probability (12)], where the left boundary follows a gas emissions immediately ceased, our past emis- business-as-usual emissions scenario (RCP8.5, red line) sions have already “locked in” some amount of con- and the right boundary follows a low-emissions scenario (RCP2.6, blue line).
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Energy Planning and Management Xa9642813 in View of the Commitments to the Framework Convention on Climate Change
    EGYPT'S ENERGY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT XA9642813 IN VIEW OF THE COMMITMENTS TO THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE A.-G.S. EMARA, S.M. RASHAD Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt Abstract Egypt has a rapidly growing population and per capita energy demand. As a signatory of the Framework Convention on Climate Change Egypt is making all efforts to comply with the obligations of the Convention. This paper summarizes the efforts carried out in the field of electricity generation and consumption. Plans implemented to improve energy efficiency and to achieve switching to non-carbon energy resources, such as solar, wind and biomass power, are outlined. 1. INTRODUCTION Egypt has at present a population of 59 million which is expected to increase rapidly at a rate of 3.2% per annum. This gives rise to an ever increasing demand for energy resources to achieve social and economic development goals of the country. The assessment of energy resources, production, conversion, transmission and consumption patterns is basic for formulating and evaluating the efficiency of the structure of the energy sector and its interaction with other sectors of the economy. For developing countries, such as Egypt, the demand for energy is rapidly growing and is exceeding that for developed countries. The environmental impact of energy production and use with the associated emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, has created much attention and growing concern on both national and international levels. Reduction of total energy consumption is considered worldwide as an effective measure to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Efficiency increase by introduction of new and innovative technologies is a determining factor in achieving reduction of energy consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • ALBEDO ENHANCEMENT by STRATOSPHERIC SULFUR INJECTIONS: a CONTRIBUTION to RESOLVE a POLICY DILEMMA? an Editorial Essay
    ALBEDO ENHANCEMENT BY STRATOSPHERIC SULFUR INJECTIONS: A CONTRIBUTION TO RESOLVE A POLICY DILEMMA? An Editorial Essay Fossil fuel burning releases about 25 Pg of CO2 per year into the atmosphere, which leads to global warming (Prentice et al., 2001). However, it also emits 55 Tg S as SO2 per year (Stern, 2005), about half of which is converted to sub-micrometer size sulfate particles, the remainder being dry deposited. Recent research has shown that the warming of earth by the increasing concentrations of CO2 and other greenhouse gases is partially countered by some backscattering to space of solar radiation by the sulfate particles, which act as cloud condensation nuclei and thereby influ- ence the micro-physical and optical properties of clouds, affecting regional precip- itation patterns, and increasing cloud albedo (e.g., Rosenfeld, 2000; Ramanathan et al., 2001; Ramaswamy et al., 2001). Anthropogenically enhanced sulfate particle concentrations thus cool the planet, offsetting an uncertain fraction of the anthro- pogenic increase in greenhouse gas warming. However, this fortunate coincidence is “bought” at a substantial price. According to the World Health Organization, the pollution particles affect health and lead to more than 500,000 premature deaths per year worldwide (Nel, 2005). Through acid precipitation and deposition, SO2 and sulfates also cause various kinds of ecological damage. This creates a dilemma for environmental policy makers, because the required emission reductions of SO2, and also anthropogenic organics (except black carbon), as dictated by health and ecological considerations, add to global warming and associated negative conse- quences, such as sea level rise, caused by the greenhouse gases.
    [Show full text]
  • Default Emissions from Biofuels
    Definition of input data to assess GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation Version 1c - July 2017 Edwards, R. Padella, M. Giuntoli, J. Koeble, R. O’Connell, A. Bulgheroni, C. Marelli, L. 2017 EUR 28349 EN This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC104483 EUR 28349 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-79-64617-1 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2790/658143 Print ISBN 978-92-79-64616-4 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2790/22354 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 © European Union, 2017 The reuse of the document is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the original meaning or message of the texts are not distorted. The European Commission shall not be held liable for any consequences stemming from the reuse. How to cite this report: Edwards, R., Padella, M., Giuntoli, J., Koeble, R., O’Connell, A., Bulgheroni, C., Marelli, L., Definition of input data to assess GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation, Version 1c – July 2017 , EUR28349 EN, doi: 10.2790/658143 All images © European Union 2017 Title Definition of input data to assess GHG default emissions from biofuels in EU legislation, Version 1c – July 2017 Abstract The Renewable Energy Directive (RED) (2009/28/EC) and the Fuel Quality Directive (FQD) (2009/30/EC), amended in 2015 by Directive (EU) 2015/1513 (so called ‘ILUC Directive’), fix a minimum requirement for greenhouse gas (GHG) savings for biofuels and bioliquids for the period until 2020, and set the rules for calculating the greenhouse impact of biofuels, bioliquids and their fossil fuels comparators.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet on the Kyoto Protocol
    The U.S. View FACT SHEET ON THE KYOTO PROTOCOL t a conference held December 1–11, 1997, in Kyoto, Japan, the Parties to A the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed to an historic Protocol to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by harnessing the forces of the global marketplace to protect the environment. Key aspects of the Kyoto Protocol include weather, either of which could spike emissions targets, timetables for industrial- emissions in a particular year. ized nations, and market-based measures for meeting those targets. The Protocol • The first budget period will be makes a down payment on the meaning- 2008–2012. The parties rejected bud- ful participation of developing countries, get periods beginning as early as but more needs to be done in this area. 2003, as neither realistic nor achiev- Securing meaningful developing country able. Having a full decade before the participation remains a core U.S. goal. start of the binding period will allow more time for companies to make the transition to greater energy efficiency Emissions Targets and/or lower carbon technologies. A central feature of the Kyoto Protocol is a set of binding emissions targets for • The emissions targets include all six developed nations. The specific limits major greenhouse gases: carbon diox- vary from country to country, though ide, methane, nitrous oxide, and three those for the key industrial powers of the synthetic substitutes for ozone-deplet- European Union, Japan, and the United ing CFCs that are highly potent and States are similar—8 percent below 1990 long-lasting in the atmosphere. emissions levels for the European Union, 7 percent for the United States, and 6 • Activities that absorb carbon, such as percent for Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGYENERCY a Balancing Act
    Educational Product Educators Grades 9–12 Investigating the Climate System ENERGYENERCY A Balancing Act PROBLEM-BASED CLASSROOM MODULES Responding to National Education Standards in: English Language Arts ◆ Geography ◆ Mathematics Science ◆ Social Studies Investigating the Climate System ENERGYENERGY A Balancing Act Authored by: CONTENTS Eric Barron, College of Earth and Mineral Science, Pennsylvania Grade Levels; Time Required; Objectives; State University, University Park, Disciplines Encompassed; Key Terms; Pennsylvania Prerequisite Knowledge . 2 Prepared by: Scenario. 5 Stacey Rudolph, Senior Science Education Specialist, Institute for Part 1: Understanding the absorption of energy Global Environmental Strategies at the surface of the Earth. (IGES), Arlington, Virginia Question: Does the type of the ground surface John Theon, Former Program influence its temperature? . 5 Scientist for NASA TRMM Part 2: How a change in water phase affects Editorial Assistance, Dan Stillman, surface temperatures. Science Communications Specialist, Institute for Global Environmental Question: How important is the evaporation of Strategies (IGES), Arlington, Virginia water in cooling a surface? . 6 Graphic Design by: Part 3: Determining what controls the temperature Susie Duckworth Graphic Design & of the land surface. Illustration, Falls Church, Virginia Question 1: If my town grows, will it impact the Funded by: area’s temperature? . 7 NASA TRMM Grant #NAG5-9641 Question 2: Why are the summer temperatures in the desert southwest so much higher than at the Give us your feedback: To provide feedback on the modules same latitude in the southeast? . 8 online, go to: Appendix A: Bibliography/Resources . 9 https://ehb2.gsfc.nasa.gov/edcats/ educational_product Appendix B: Answer Keys . 10 and click on “Investigating the Appendix C: National Education Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting to Climate Change: a Business Approach
    AdApting to climAte chAnge: A Business ApproAch TRATEGY S By Frances G. Sussman senior economist, icF internAtionAl, And J. Randall Freed senior Vice president, icF internAtionAl MARKETS AND BUSINESS AdApting to ClimAte ChAnge: A Business Approach Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change by Frances G. Sussman Senior economiSt, ICF international, and J. Randall Freed Senior Vice PreSident, ICF international April 2008 The authors would like to thank Kathryn Maher, of ICF International, who provided valuable research assistance for this paper, and Anne Choate and Susan Asam, also of ICF International, who provided helpful comments. We would also like to thank Andre de Fontaine and Vicki Arroyo of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, and Truman Semans, formerly of the Pew Center, as well as several anonymous peer reviewers and members of the Pew Center’s Business Environment Leadership Council (BELC), for helpful comments and suggestions. Contents Introduction 1 I. Climate Change: A Range of Risks and Opportunities 3 II. The Case for Business Adaptation: What is at Risk? 7 III. The Risk Disk and The Adaptation Challenge 11 IV. Meeting the Challenge: Screening for Climate Impacts and Adaptation 15 Question 1. Is climate important to business risk? 16 Question 2. Is there an immediate threat? Or are long-term assets, investments, or decisions being locked into place? 17 Question 3. Is a high value at stake if a wrong decision is made? 18 V. Case Studies: Three Business Responses to Climate Risks 19 Entergy Corporation: A Climate Wakeup Call— The First Step Was Admitting There Was a Problem 20 The Travelers Companies, Inc.: An Ounce of Prevention— Linking the Interests of Homeowners, Business, and Insurance Providers 23 Rio Tinto: Reappraising “Normal”— Designing to Weather, Climate, and Climate Change 26 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • IFC Carbon Neutrality Committment Factsheet
    Carbon Neutral Commitment for IFC’s Own Operations IFC, along with the World Bank, are committed to making our internal business operations carbon neutral by: IFC’s Carbon Neutrality 1. Calculating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from our operations Commitment is an integral 2. Reducing carbon emissions through both familiar and innovative conservation measures part of IFC's corporate 3. Purchasing carbon offsets to balance our remaining internal carbon footprint after our reduction efforts response to climate change. IFC’s carbon neutrality commitment encourages continual improvement towards more efficient business operations that help mitigate climate change. It is also consistent with IFC’s strategy of guiding our investment work to address climate change and ensure environmental and social sustainability of projects that IFC finances. This factsheet focuses on the carbon footprint of our internal operations rather than the footprint of IFC’s portfolio. IFC uses the ‘operational control approach’ for setting its CALCULATING OUR GHG EMISSIONS organizational boundaries for its GHG inventory. Emissions are included from all locations for which IFC has direct control over IFC has calculated the annual GHG emissions for its internal business operations, and where it can influence decisions that impact GHG operations for headquarters in Washington, D.C. since 2006, and for emissions. IFC’s global operations since 2008 including global business travel. IFC’s annual GHG inventory includes the following sources of The methodology IFC formally used is based on the Greenhouse Gas GHG emissions from IFC’s leased and owned facilities and air Protocol Initiative (GHG Protocol), an internationally recognized GHG travel: accounting and reporting standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology for Afforestation And
    METHODOLOGY FOR THE QUANTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING AND VERIFICATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS AND REMOVALS FROM AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION OF DEGRADED LAND VERSION 1.2 May 2017 METHODOLOGY FOR THE QUANTIFICATION, MONITORING, REPORTING AND VERIFICATION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS AND REMOVALS FROM AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION OF DEGRADED LAND VERSION 1.2 May 2017 American Carbon Registry® WASHINGTON DC OFFICE c/o Winrock International 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 Arlington, Virginia 22202 USA ph +1 703 302 6500 [email protected] americancarbonregistry.org ABOUT AMERICAN CARBON REGISTRY® (ACR) A leading carbon offset program founded in 1996 as the first private voluntary GHG registry in the world, ACR operates in the voluntary and regulated carbon markets. ACR has unparalleled experience in the development of environmentally rigorous, science-based offset methodolo- gies as well as operational experience in the oversight of offset project verification, registration, offset issuance and retirement reporting through its online registry system. © 2017 American Carbon Registry at Winrock International. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced, displayed, modified or distributed without express written permission of the American Carbon Registry. The sole permitted use of the publication is for the registration of projects on the American Carbon Registry. For requests to license the publication or any part thereof for a different use, write to the Washington DC address listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Emission Reduction—Carbon Tax, Carbon Trading, and Carbon Offset
    energies Editorial Carbon Emission Reduction—Carbon Tax, Carbon Trading, and Carbon Offset Wen-Hsien Tsai Department of Business Administration, National Central University, Jhongli, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan; [email protected]; Tel.: +886-3-426-7247 Received: 29 October 2020; Accepted: 19 November 2020; Published: 23 November 2020 1. Introduction The Paris Agreement was signed by 195 nations in December 2015 to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change following the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. In Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, the increase in the global average temperature is anticipated to be held to well below 2 ◦C above pre-industrial levels, and efforts are being employed to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 ◦C. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides information on emissions of the main greenhouse gases. It shows that about 81% of the totally emitted greenhouse gases were carbon dioxide (CO2), 10% methane, and 7% nitrous oxide in 2018. Therefore, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (or carbon emissions) are the most important cause of global warming. The United Nations has made efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or mitigate their effect. In Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, three cooperative approaches that countries can take in attaining the goal of their carbon emission reduction are described, including direct bilateral cooperation, new sustainable development mechanisms, and non-market-based approaches. The World Bank stated that there are some incentives that have been created to encourage carbon emission reduction, such as the removal of fossil fuels subsidies, the introduction of carbon pricing, the increase of energy efficiency standards, and the implementation of auctions for the lowest-cost renewable energy.
    [Show full text]