DOCSLIB.ORG

AAPL 2018Cat.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AAPL 2018Cat.Indd AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW 49TH ANNUAL MEETING October 25-28, 2018 Austin, Texas The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to sponsor continuing medical education for physicians. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law designates this live activity for a maximum of 33.75 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. AAPL 2018Cat.indd 1 10/11/18 9:05 AM AAPL 2018Cat.indd 2 10/11/18 9:05 AM Forty-ninth Annual Meeting American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law October 25-28, 2018 Austin, Texas OFFICERS OF THE ACADEMY Christopher R. Thompson, MD John Paul Fedoroff, MD President Councilor Richard Frierson, MD Anna Glezer, MD President-Elect Councilor Liza Gold, MD Trent Holmberg, MD Vice President Councilor Barry Wall, MD Reena Kapoor, MD Vice President Councilor Michael A. Norko, MD Richard B. Krueger, MD Immediate Past President Councilor William Newman, MD Britta Ostermeyer, MD Secretary Councilor Stuart Anfang Karen Rosenbaum, MD Treasurer Councilor Charles C. Dike, MD, FRCPsy Hal S. Wortzel, MD Councilor Councilor PAST PRESIDENTS Michael A. Norko, Md 2016-17 Larry H. Strasburger, MD 2001-02 J. Richard Ciccone, MD 1986-87 Emily A. Keram, MD 2015-16 Jefrey L. Metzner, MD 2000-01 Selwyn M. Smith, MD 1985-86 Graham Glancy, MB 2014-15 Thomas G. Gutheil, MD 1999-00 Phillip J. Resnick, MD 1984-85 Robert Weinstock, MD 2013-14 Larry R. Faulkner, MD 1998-99 Loren H. Roth, MD 1983-84 Debra Pinals, MD 2012-13 Renée L. Binder, MD 1997-98 Abraham L. Halpern, MD 1982-83 Charles Scott, MD 2011-12 Ezra E. H. Griffith, MD 1996-97 Stanley L. Portnow, MD 1981-82 Peter Ash, MD 2010-11 Paul S. Appelbaum, MD 1995-96 Herbert E. Thomas, MD 1980-81 Stephen B. Billick, MD 2009-10 Park E. Dietz, MD, PhD, MPH 1994-95 Nathan T. Sidley, MD 1979-80 Patricia R. Recupero, MD, JD 2008-09 John M. Bradford, MB 1993-94 Irwin N. Perr, MD 1977-79 Jeffrey S. Janofsky, MD 2007-08 Howard V. Zonana, MD 1992-93 G. Sarwer-Foner, MD 1975-77 Alan R. Felthous, MD 2006-07 Kathleen M. Quinn, MD 1991-92 Seymour Pollack, MD 1973-75 Robert I. Simon, MD 2005-06 Richard T. Rada, MD 1990-91 Robert L. Sadoff, MD 1971-73 Robert T.M. Phillips, MD, PhD 2004-05 Joseph D. Bloom, MD 1989-90 Jonas R. Rappeport, MD 1969-71 Robert Wettstein, MD 2003-04 William H. Reid, MD, MPH 1988-89 Roy J. O’Shaughnessy, MD 2002-03 Richard Rosner, MD 1987-88 2018 ANNUAL MEETING CO-CHAIRS Jessica Ferrante, MD and William Newman, MD EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE ACADEMY One Regency Drive, P. O. Box 30, Bloomfield, CT 06002-0030 Office: 860-242-5450 Fax: 860-286-0787 Toll Free: 800-331-1389 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.AAPL.org Jeffrey Janofsky, MD Jacquelyn T. Coleman, CAE Medical Director Executive Director i AAPL 2018Cat.indd 1 10/11/18 9:05 AM CALL FOR PAPERS 2019 The 50th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law will be held in Baltimore, MD – October 24-27, 2019 AAPL AT 50: TEACHING AND ADVOCATING FOR FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY Inquiries may be directed to Dr. Susan Hatters Friedman The Program Chair welcomes suggestions for a mock trial or other special presentations well in advance of the submission date. Abstract submission forms will be posted online at www.AAPL.org. The deadline for abstractO submission is March 1, 2019 FUTURE ANNUAL MEETING DATES and LOCATIONS 51st Annual Meeting October 22-25, 2020 – Chicago, IL 52nd Annual Meeting October 28-31, 2021 – Vancouver, BC, Canada 53rd Annual Meeting October 27-30, 2022 – New Orleans, LA ii AAPL 2018Cat.indd 2 10/11/18 9:05 AM GENERAL INFORMATION Table of Contents Awardees ........................................ 2 CME Information ............................... 145 Call for Papers - 2019 .............................. ii Evaluation Form ................................ 156 Future Meeting Dates .............................. ii AAPL Policies .................................... v Financial Disclosures .............................viii Index of Authors ................................ 151 Invited Speakers .................................. 5 Meeting Facilities ................................. x Opening Ceremony ............................... 1 Program ........................................ 7 Special Events ....................................ix REGISTRATION DESK (Lone Star Foyer) Hours of Operation Wednesday 7:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Thursday 7:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Friday 7:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Sunday 7:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. AAPL BOOKSTORE Lone Star Foyer NOETIC FILMS Lone Star Foyer PRESENTATION CODES T = Thursday F = Friday S = Saturday Z = Sunday iii AAPL 2018Cat.indd 3 10/11/18 9:05 AM O SUPPORT THE AIER! American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Institute for Education and Research (AIER) The AIER was developed to stimulate educational and research activities, provide educational resources and activities, and to aid education and research by encouraging tax-exempt contributions to forensic education and research programs. MERCHANDISE FOR SALE All proceeds used to fund AIER grants. ORIGINAL PRICE AT MEETING PRICE AAPL Logo Shirt $35.00 $25.00 AAPL Logo Hat $20.00 $10.00 AAPL Shirt and Hat Combo $50.00 $30.00 AAPL Logo Tie $25.00 $15.00 Available shirt sizes are: Men’s M, L, XL and Women’s S, M, L, XL. Merchandise purchases or additional contributions (cash, check, Visa or MasterCard) to the Institute can be made at the AAPL registration desk. To place an order or contribute to the AIER after the meeting please contact the AAPL Executive Office at 800-331-1389. Contributions can be also be made online at www.AAPL.org. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law’s Institute for Education and Research, Inc., is exempt from federal income taxes as a public charity under IRS Section 501(c) (3). iv AAPL 2018Cat.indd 4 10/11/18 9:05 AM O A MESSAGE TO PHYSICIAN ATTENDEES CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION I. Gaps: In compliance with the Updated Accreditation Criteria of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Education Committee of AAPL has identified “professional practice gaps.” Definition: A “professional practice gap” is the difference between what a health professional is doing or accomplishing compared to what is achievable on the basis of current professional knowledge. For this Annual Meeting the following gaps have been identified based on the AAPL Educational Mission Statement printed on the next page: 1. Not practicing forensic psychiatry at the highest level attainable based on current knowledge of the fundamentals of the field. Need: Improvement in knowledge of civil, criminal, and correctional forensic psychiatry. 2. Lacking the knowledge of content or technique to teach psychiatrists the fundamentals of forensic psychiatry in the most effective ways. Need: Knowing new content and effective ways to teach forensic psychiatry. 3. Lacking the ability to conduct or assess research in forensic psychiatry. Needs: 1. Knowing how to do research or 2. Knowing the outcomes of research in forensic psychiatry and how to apply those outcomes to forensic practice. II. Changes in behavior/objectives: It is intended that, as a result of attending this meeting, psychiatrists will be able to identify changes in competence or performance that are desirable. Definitions: Competence” is knowing how to do something. “Performance” is what a psychiatrist would do in practice if given the opportunity. Participants will improve their competence or performance in forensic psychiatry in the following three areas: 1. Service, including treatment of forensic patients, development of service delivery strategies, and enhancement of consultative abilities at the interface of psychiatry and the legal profession; 2. Teaching, including new methods of training of forensic psychiatrists and classification of the tasks and functions of forensic psychiatrists; and 3. Research, gaining access to scientific data in area that form the basis for practice of discipline. III. Evaluation: The Updated Accreditation criteria are designed to integrate with the new requirements for maintenance of certification. (For more information see www.ABPN.org.) Physicians are expected to perform self assessments of their prac- tice, but AAPL, as an organization accredited by the ACCME, is expected to measure how its educational activities assist physicians in this activity. Questions on the evaluation form address your intended changes in competence or performance. In a few months, we will contact all physician meeting attendees to ask you if you actually HAVE experienced changes in competence or performance. Your responses, now and in the future, will assist us and ultimately you in determining educa- tional activities that are most useful to you. Thank you in advance. Richard Frierson, MD, and Liza Gold, MD Co-chairs, Education Committee v AAPL 2018Cat.indd 5 10/11/18 9:05 AM O AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW Continuing Medical Education Mission Statement The Bylaws of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law place education first among the purposes for which the Academy exists. Purpose: Through the education process, the Academy desires to: promote the exchange of ideas and experiences that enrich the field of psychiatry and the law, provide practical knowledge for members and others with an interest in this area, foster the development of future psychiatrists in this field, and encourage research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Department of Justice Washington,D.C. 20530 Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco 145688 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce thisllll~ material has been granted by Publ:Cc Domain U.S. Dep~nt of Justice ustice Re .......... of the N£ Recommendations of Experts for improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco TABLE OF CONTENTS Mandate to the Experts Handling Hostage/Barricade Situations Robert J, Louden Ronald McCarthy Ariel Merari Dealing with Persons whose Motivations and Thought Processes are Unconventional \, Nancy T. Ammerman Robert Canero Lawrence E. Sullivan Coordinating Law Enforcement Efforts in Hostage/Barricade Situations Colin E. Birt Richard J. Davis William H. Webster O @ @ UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM J~e ~,1~3 TO: Dr. Nancy Ammerman Mr. Colin B/rt Dr. Robert Cancro Mr. Richard J. Davis Mr. Robert J. Louden Mr. Ronald M. McCarthy Dr. Ariel Merafi @ Dr. Alan A. Stone Dr. Lawrence E. Sull/van Mr..William H. Webster FROM: Philip B. Heymann ~.~. Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice Ronald IC Noble Assistant Secretary (Enforcement) Department of the Treasury Q SUBJECT: your R01e in M~g Recommendations Concerning the Handling of Incidents Such asthe Branch Davidian Standoff in Waco, Texas @ L MANDATE We would like you to assist us in addressing issues that federal law enforcement confi'0n~ ~ bani'cade/hos~g e situatiom such as the stand-off that occurred near Waco, Texas, ~tween February 28, 1993 and April 19, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Janet Warren's CV
    27-CV-15-20713 CURRICULUM VITAE JANET I. WARREN Janet I. Warren, DSW, LCSW The Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy P.O. Box 800660 UVA Health System University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia 229008-0660 (434) 924-8305 [email protected] FACULTY AND RESEARCH APPOINTMENTS 2002 - present Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 2000 - present Associate, Park Dietz and Associates, Newport Beach, California 1996 - present University of Virginia Liaison, FBI Behavioral Sciences Unit, Quantico, Virginia 2000 - 2010 Associate Director, Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy, University of Virginia 1992 - 2002 Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatric Medicine, General Medical Faculty, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 1991 - 1992 Assistant Professor of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, General Medical Faculty, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 1985 - 1991 Assistant Professor, Division of Medical Center Social Work and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, General Medical Faculty, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 1981 - 1985 Instructor, General Medical Faculty, Division of Medical Center Social Work and Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia ADVISORY POSITIONS 1990 - 1991 Ritualistic Crime Task Force, Virginia State Crime Commission, Commonwealth of Virginia 1996-1997 Megan’s Law Crime Task Force, Virginia State Crime Commission, Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • Homicide Studies: Ten Years After Its Inception
    Homicide Studies: Ten Years After Its Inception Proceedings of the 2007 Homicide Research Working Group Annual Symposium Minneapolis, Minnesota June 7-10 Edited by Katharina Gruenberg Lancaster University And C. Gabrielle Salfati John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1 Acknowledgements 2 The Homicide Research Working Group (HRWG) is an international and interdisciplinary organization of volunteers dedicated to cooperation among researchers and practitioners who are trying to understand and limit lethal violence. The HRWG has the following goals: to forge links between research, epidemiology and practical programs to reduce levels of mortality from violence; to promote improved data quality and the linking of diverse homicide data sources; to foster collaborative, interdisciplinary research on lethal and non-lethal violence; to encourage more efficient sharing of techniques for measuring and analyzing homicide; to create and maintain a communication network among those collecting, maintaining and analyzing homicide data sets; and to generate a stronger working relationship among homicide researchers. Homicide Research Working Group publications, which include the Proceedings of each annual Intensive Workshop (beginning in 1992), the HRWG Newsletter, and the contents of issues of the journal Homicide Studies (beginning in 1997), may be downloaded from the HRWG web site, which is maintained by the Inter-University Consortium of Political and Social Research, at the following address: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/HRWG/ Suggested citation: Lin Huff-Corzine Katharina Gruenberg, Gabrielle Salfati (Eds.) (2007). Homicide Studies: Ten Years After Its Inception. Proceedings of the 2007 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group. Minneapolis, MN : Homicide Research Working Group. The views expressed in these Proceedings are those of the authors and speakers, and not necessarily those of the Homicide Research Working Group or the editor of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Homicide
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Homicide – Suicide in the Netherlands. An epidemiology. Liem, M; Postulart, M.; Nieuwbeerta, P. Published in: Homicide Studies DOI: 10.1177/1088767908330833 IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2009 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Liem, M., Postulart, M., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Homicide – Suicide in the Netherlands. An epidemiology. Homicide Studies, 13, 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767908330833 Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 12-11-2019 Homicide Studies http://hsx.sagepub.com/ Homicide-Suicide
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Absence of Neonaticide in Norway
    VOLUME 18 - No 2 - 2012 - Page 155-163 - doi: 10.2478/v10278-012-0005-2 Scandinavian journal of FORENSIC SCIENCE Nordisk rettsmedisin A current absence of neonaticide in Norway Vibeke Ottesen Centre for Evolutionary and Ecological Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biology, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway [email protected] ABSTRACT The present study is the first attempt to explore the rate, characteristics and legal reactions to neonaticide in Norway during the years 1990 – 2009. Potential incidents of neonaticide were identified through the national homicide index held by the National Criminal Investigation Service and the national police registers for all recorded crime in Norway held by the National Police Computing and Material Services. The study uncovers that no clear incident of neonaticide has been recorded in the respective registers during the study’s time period. There was however recorded one case of a discarded stillborn and one case of an abandoned neonate that died through exposure. The paper discusses whether the study’s findings are congruent with an evolutionary psychological understanding of filicide and current knowledge of risk factors and rates for neonaticide. Keywords: Evolutionary psychology, Filicide, Neonaticide INtrODUctiON hypothesis concerning alternative probabilities for risk factors for every recognised category of homicide, including filicide, successfully identifying Neonaticide, defined as the killing of a newborn within the first 24 hours after significant risk factors [15-27]. its birth, was first recognised as a distinct type of caretaker perpetrated child The present study is the first attempt to explore the rate and homicide (filicide) in a seminal paper by the psychiatrist Phillip J.
    [Show full text]
  • Shooting Alone: the Pre-Attack Experiences and Behaviors of U.S
    1 Shooting Alone: The Pre-Attack Experiences and Behaviors of U.S. Solo Mass Murderers12 Authors Paul Gill, PhD. Department of Security and Crime Science University College London James Silver, ABD. Center for Terrorism and Security Studies University of Massachusetts Lowell John Horgan, PhD. Global Studies Institute and Department of Psychology Georgia State University Emily Corner, MSc ABD. Department of Security and Crime Science University College London 1 This research is supported by Award No. 2013-ZA-BX-0002, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice. 2 Aspects of this paper have previously been presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting in Washington DC, November 2015. 2 Abstract: This paper outlines the socio-demographic, developmental, antecedent attack, attack preparation and commission properties of 115 mass murderers between 1990 and 2014. The results indicate that mass murderer attacks are usually the culmination of a complex mix of personal, political and social drivers that crystalize at the same time to drive the individual down the path of violent action. We specifically focus upon areas related to prior criminal engagement, leakage and attack location familiarity. Whether the violence comes to fruition is usually a combination of the availability and vulnerability of suitable targets that suit the heady mix of personal and political grievances and the individual’s capability to engage in an attack from both a psychological and technical capability standpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Murder in the 21St Century
    Mass Murder in the 21st Century: From Assumptions to Truths Meredith L. Ille 3 Acknowledgements For my dear Mother, Mary Lou Ille, my best friend and staunchest supporter. There are not enough words to express my gratitude and love. For my thesis committee members: Chairperson Dr. Shawna Cleary, for inspiring this thesis and seeing it through to the end; Dr. Elizabeth Maier, for taking the time and having such patience; And Dr. Burle Steelman, for his willingness to help and going above and beyond the call of duty. 4 Table of Contents Abstract 5 Introduction 6 Literature Review 9 Hypotheses 39 Methods 40 Results 43 Discussion 50 Conclusions 57 References 59 5 Abstract Mass murder is the killing of four or more people in one incident. There is a national lack of awareness of the most predominant type of mass murder. This thesis hypothesized that the majority of mass murders in the United States are mass murder familicides. It is further hypothesized that most mass murder familicides are committed by Caucasian men in their 30s and 40s. Data from two sources were used: the USA Today Behind the Bloodshed database, and the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) for the years 2006- 2016. It was also necessary to use supplemental data from media accounts where data was missing or in doubt. Mass murder familicides were tallied from both databases. They were then categorized to determine if mass murder familicide was the most common form of mass murder, testing hypothesis one. Ages and race of offenders were then tallied to determine support for hypothesis two, that most offenders were Caucasian and in their 30s and 40s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Murderers: a Case Study Analysis of Social Media Influence and Copycat Suicide
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2020 Mass Murderers: A Case Study Analysis of Social Media Influence and Copycat Suicide Stephanie Ann McKay Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Stephanie McKay has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Eric Hickey, Committee Chairperson, Psychology Faculty Dr. Jerrod Brown, Committee Member, Psychology Faculty Dr. Victoria Latifses, University Reviewer, Psychology Faculty Chief Academic Officer and Provost Sue Subocz, Ph.D. Walden University 2020 Abstract Mass Murderers: A Case Study Analysis of Social Media Influence and Copycat Suicide by Stephanie McKay MS, Walden University, 2012 BS, Francis Marion University, 1996 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Forensic Psychology Walden University May 2020 Abstract The frequency of mass murder has increased over the past decade, with nearly half of all mass murderers committing suicide. Previous researchers have found imitations of mass murderers which relate to suicide contagion, media contagion, and copycat effects; however, there remains a gap in the literature pertaining to the connection between copycat suicides of mass killers and the influence of social media.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMICIDE STUDIES an Interdisciplinary & International Journal
    HOMICIDE STUDIES An Interdisciplinary & International Journal Editor M. Dwayne Smith, Criminology, University of South Florida Associate Editors Carolyn Rebecca Block, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, Cofounder of Homicide Research Working Group Richard Block, Sociology, Loyola University, Cofounder of Homicide Research Working Group Jay Corzine, Sociology, University of Central Florida Editorial Board Allan F.Abrahamse, RAND Corporation Leigh Buchanan Bienen, Law, Northwestern University Paul H. Blackman, National Rifle Association Alfred Blumstein, Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University Jacquelyn Campbell, Nursing, Johns Hopkins University David Canter, Psychology, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom Derral Cheatwood, Social and Policy Sciences, University of Texas–San Antonio Martin Daly, Psychology, McMaster University, Canada Chris Dunn, ICPSR, University of Michigan Michael Finnegan, Anthropology, Kansas State University James Alan Fox, Criminal Justice, Northeastern University Kenneth C. Haas, Criminal Justice, University of Delaware Darnell F.Hawkins, African American Studies, University of Illinois–Chicago Kathleen M. Heide, Criminology, University of South Florida Ronald M. Holmes, Justice Administration, University of Louisville Lin Huff-Corzine, Sociology, University of Central Florida John P.Jarvis, Federal Bureau of Investigation Academy Simha F.Landau, Criminology & Law, Hebrew University, Israel Pamela K. Lattimore, Research Triangle Institute Cheryl Maxson, Law & Society, University
    [Show full text]
  • Trial Calendar: Boston, Massachusetts Date: May 21, 2007 PRETRIAL
    Trial Calendar: Boston, Massachusetts Date: May 21, 2007 PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM FOR RESPONDENT NAME OF CASE: DOCKET NO. Rhiannon G. O'Donnabhain 6402-06 ATTORNEYS: Petitioner: Respondent: Karen L. Loewy Mary P. Hamilton (617) 426-1350 (617) 565-7915 Jennifer L. Levi John R. Mikalchus (617) 426-1350 (860) 290-4049 Bennett H. Klein Erika B. Cormier (617) 426-1350 (617) 565-5138 William E. Halmkin Molly H. Donohue (617) 338-2836 (617) 565-7828 David J. Nagle (617) 338-2873 Amy E. Sheridan (617) 338-2897 AMOUNTS IN DISPUTE: Year Deficiency 2001 $5,679* *As a result of concessions by the parties described below, the amount in dispute is less than the amount of the deficiency asserted in the notice of deficiency. STATUS OF CASE: Probable Settlement Probable Trial Definite Trial X_ Docket No. 6402-06 - 2 - CURRENT ESTIMATE OF TRIAL TIME: 40 hours MOTIONS RESPONDENT EXPECTS TO MAKE: Motions in Limine If necessary, to preclude Diane Ellaborn, LICSW, Alex Coleman, J.D., Ph.D., and Toby Meltzer, M.D., who have been identified by petitioner’s counsel as fact witnesses, from testifying in the capacity of expert witnesses. STATUS OF STIPULATION OF FACTS: Completed X In Process _ _ The Stipulation of Facts was submitted to the Court on June 15, 2007. A Supplemental Stipulation of Facts is expected to be submitted to the Court on July 3, 2007. ISSUE: Whether the costs of male to female sex reassignment surgery, feminizing hormone treatment, and other costs associated therewith including transportation and purported counseling are deductible medical expenses, as asserted by petitioner; or whether such expenses do not meet the requirements for deductible medical expenses under I.R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America
    Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft196n99ws&chunk.id=0&doc.... Preferred Citation: Tabor, James D., and Eugene V. Gallagher Why Waco?: Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1995 1995. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft196n99ws/ Why Waco? Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America James D. Tabor and Eugene V. Gallagher UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1997 The Regents of the University of California For David P. Efroymson in friendship and gratitude for a quarter century of intellectual guidance and for Jonathan Z. Smith, who taught both of us the importance of seeing ourselves in the light of the other and the other in the light of ourselves Preferred Citation: Tabor, James D., and Eugene V. Gallagher Why Waco?: Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1995 1995. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft196n99ws/ For David P. Efroymson in friendship and gratitude for a quarter century of intellectual guidance and for Jonathan Z. Smith, who taught both of us the importance of seeing ourselves in the light of the other and the other in the light of ourselves Preface So thoroughly negative is the public perception of groups labeled as "cults" that any attempt to balance the picture may be seen as misguided, if not downright threatening, to the best interests of society. In the case of the Branch Davidians, the news media were saturated with reports of gun stockpiling, sexual misconduct, and child abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmed to Kill
    PROGRAMMED TO KILL PROGRAMMED TO KILL The Politics of Serial Murder David McGowan iUniverse, Inc. New York Lincoln Shanghai Programmed to Kill The Politics of Serial Murder All Rights Reserved © 2004 by David McGowan No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or by any information storage retrieval system, without the written permission of the publisher. iUniverse, Inc. For information address: iUniverse, Inc. 2021 Pine Lake Road, Suite 100 Lincoln, NE 68512 www.iuniverse.com ISBN: 0-595-77446-6 Printed in the United States of America This book is for all the survivors. “This man, from the moment of conception, was programmed for murder.” —Attorney Ellis Rubin, speaking on behalf of serial killer Bobby Joe Long Contents Introduction: Mind Control 101 ................................................xi PART I: THE PEDOPHOCRACY Chapter 1 From Brussels… ......................................................3 Chapter 2 …to Washington ....................................................23 Chapter 3 Uncle Sam Wants Your Children ............................39 Chapter 4 McMolestation ......................................................46 Chapter 5 It Couldn’t Happen Here ........................................54 Chapter 6 Finders Keepers ......................................................59 PART II: THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT HENRY Chapter 7 Sympathy for the Devil ..........................................71 Chapter 8 Henry:
    [Show full text]