Pennsylvania Postal Historian
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania. -
SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization
APPENDIX F SITE ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Tonolli Corporation Site Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Ecological Characterization Prepared for Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 220 Continental Drive, Suite 311 Newark, Delaware 19713 Prepared by RMC Environmental Services, Inc. 3450 Schuylkill Road Spring City, Pennsylvania 19475 March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................... i i LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................... i1 LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction ....................................................... 1 2.0 Site Location ....................................................... 2 3.0 Objectives of the Ecological Characterization ...................... 4 4.0 Scope .............................................................. 5 5.0 Methods ............................................................. 6 5.1 Terrestrial and Wetlands Habitat Characterization ............ 6 5.1.1 General ............................................... 6 5.1.2 Special Criteria for Wetland Identification ........... 9 5.2 Terrestrial and Wetland Fauna ................................ 12 5.3 Surface Water Resources ...................................... 12 5.3.1 Habitat Assessment .................................... 15 5.3.2 Macroinvertebrate Community ........................... 17 5.3.3 F1sh Community ........................................ 19 6.0 Findings .......................................................... -
Watersheds Connecting People, Land and Water by John Jose, Watershed Specialist, Pike County Conservation District
1. Watersheds Connecting People, Land and Water by John Jose, Watershed Specialist, Pike County Conservation District “When the land does well for its owner, and the owner does well by his land – when both end up better by reason of their partnership – then we have conservation.” ~ Aldo Leopold All lands covering the Earth’s surface are divided into watersheds. At any given time a person will find his or herself in the watershed where they live or as a visitor in a water- shed that other people call home. All lands covering the Earth’s surface A watershed can be com- are divided into watersheds. pared to a large basin that captures all the precipitation (rain, snow, etc.) that falls within its boundary. A wa- tershed boundary is formed by highpoints in the landscape, where an un- broken, continuous ridgeline creates a divide between adjacent basins. Each watershed has its own uniqueness based on climate, differences in topogra- phy (flat vs. rolling hills or mountainous), the types of plants and soils found there and, very importantly, both past and present land use activi- ties that have taken place. Examples of land use activities include commer- cial, industrial and residential development, farming, mining, logging, and recreational activities. Watersheds vary greatly in shape and size from the greater Atlantic Basin that extends from the Continental Divide to the east coast of the U.S., down to a smaller sub-watershed – or watershed within a watershed – of less than an acre draining into a local backyard pond. Pike County watersheds are part of the larger Delaware River Basin that drains portions of New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. -
Stormwater Management Plan Phase 1
Westmoreland County Department of Planning and Development Greensburg, Pennsylvania Act 167 Scope of Study for Westmoreland County Stormwater Management Plan June 2010 © PHASE 1 – SCOPE OF STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 Purpose6 ................................................................................................................... 3 Stormwater7 Runoff Problems and Solutions ........................................................ 3 Pennsylvania8 Storm Water Management Act (Act 167) ................................... 4 9 Act 167 Planning for Westmoreland County ...................................................... 5 Plan1 Benefits ........................................................................................................... 6 Stormwater1 Management Planning Approach ................................................. 7 Previous1 County Stormwater Management Planning and Related Planning Efforts ................................................................................................................................. 8 II. GENERAL COUNTY DESCRIPTION ........................................................................... 9 Political1 Jurisdictions .............................................................................................. 9 NPDES1 Phase 2 Involvement ................................................................................. 9 General1 Development Patterns ........................................................................ -
Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission BUCKS COUNTY FLOOD RECOVERY AND MITIGATION STRATEGY Prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration Prepared by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission This Economic Adjustment Strategy was accomplished by staff of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission through Economic Development Administration Adjustment Strategy Grant No. 01-09-58005. The statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and other data in this report are solely those of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Economic Development Administration. The background flood map is used in part solely for state affairs only. courtesy FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION SEPTEMBER 1998 DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract TITLE Date Published: September 1998 Bucks County Flood Recovery and Mitigation Strategy Publication No. 98032 Geographic Area Covered: Bucks County Key Words: Floods, Flooding, Floodplain, Flood Prone, Flood Proofing, Regulations, Impervious Coverage, Watersheds, Sub-Basin 2, Emergency Management, Neshaminy Creek, Buck Creek, Brock Creek, National Flood Insurance Program, Levee, Dam, Floodwall, Acquisition, Relocation, Army Corps of Engineers, Delaware River Basin Commission ABSTRACT This report provides a flood recovery and mitigation strategy for those flood prone communities in Bucks County. As an element of a flood mitigation plan for eastern Pennsylvania, which -
Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts
2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Species Accounts Appendix 1.4C-Amphibians Amphibian Species of Greatest Conservation Need Maps: Physiographic Provinces and HUC Watersheds Species Accounts (Click species name below or bookmark to navigate to species account) AMPHIBIANS Eastern Hellbender Northern Ravine Salamander Mountain Chorus Frog Mudpuppy Eastern Mud Salamander Upland Chorus Frog Jefferson Salamander Eastern Spadefoot New Jersey Chorus Frog Blue-spotted Salamander Fowler’s Toad Western Chorus Frog Marbled Salamander Northern Cricket Frog Northern Leopard Frog Green Salamander Cope’s Gray Treefrog Southern Leopard Frog The following Physiographic Province and HUC Watershed maps are presented here for reference with conservation actions identified in the species accounts. Species account authors identified appropriate Physiographic Provinces or HUC Watershed (Level 4, 6, 8, 10, or statewide) for specific conservation actions to address identified threats. HUC watersheds used in this document were developed from the Watershed Boundary Dataset, a joint project of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Physiographic Provinces Central Lowlands Appalachian Plateaus New England Ridge and Valley Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain Appalachian Plateaus Central Lowlands Piedmont Atlantic Coastal Plain New England Ridge and Valley 675| Appendix 1.4 Amphibians Lake Erie Pennsylvania HUC4 and HUC6 Watersheds Eastern Lake Erie -
STP & IWTP Docket
DOCKET NO. D-2004-015 CP-4 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION Buckingham Township Buckingham Village Wastewater Treatment Plant and Furlong Spray Fields Buckingham Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania PROCEEDINGS This docket is issued in response to an application submitted to the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC or Commission) on November 4, 2019 (Application), for renewal of the docket holder’s existing wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and its discharge. The discharge is permitted by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. PA0052353. The PADEP issued Water Quality Management Permit No. 0911402 for this facility on June 3, 2013. The application was reviewed for continuation of the project in the Comprehensive Plan and approval under Section 3.8 of the Delaware River Basin Compact. The Bucks County Planning Commission has been notified of pending action. A public hearing on this project was held by the DRBC on February 10, 2021. A. DESCRIPTION 1. Purpose. The purpose of this docket is to renew approval of the docket holder’s existing 0.236 million gallons per day (mgd) Buckingham Village WWTP and its seasonal discharge to Lahaska Creek and the existing Furlong lagoon treatment system and three sets of spray irrigation fields, referred to as the Kaplan, Coles, and Lindquist Spray Fields. No modifications to the WWTP and associated facilities are proposed. 2. Location. The docket holder’s WWTP and spray fields are located adjacent to the east of State Route 263 in in Buckingham Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. The WWTP will continue to discharge treated effluent seasonally to Lahaska Creek at River Mile 115.6 – 23.7 – 5.7 – 0.4 (Delaware River – Neshaminy Creek – Mill Creek– Lahaska Creek). -
JANUARY, 1938 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER'* Vol
9 ANGLER.^ OFFICIAL STATE JANUARY, 1938 PUBLICATION ''ANGLER'* Vol. 7—No. 1 ?*= =«c PUBLISHED MONTHLY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA by the BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF FISH COMMISSIONERS 111 CHARLES A. FRENCH Ten cents a copy — 50 cents a year Commissioner of Fisheries MEMBERS OF BOARD 111 CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman Ellwood City ALEX P. SWEIGART, Editor MILTON L. PEEK Radnor South Office BIdg., Harrisburg, Pa. HARRY E. WEBER Philipsburg SAMUEL J. TRUSCOTT Dalton FRANK J. PENTRACK NOTE Johnstown Subscriptions to the PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER EDGAR W. NICHOLSON should be addressed to the Editor. Submit fee either Philadelphia by check or money order payable to the Common KENNETH A. REID wealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. Connellsville Individuals sending cash do so at their own risk. FRED McKEAN New Kensington H. R. STACKHOUSE Secretary to Board PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contribu tions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to contributors. All contributions returned if accompanied by first C. R. BULLER class postage. Chief Fish Culturist, Bellefonte «"»»= ItfC IMPORTANT—The Editor should be notified immediately of change in subscriber's address Please give both old and new addresses Permission to reprint will be granted provided proper credit notice is given 7 Vol. 7 No. I ^ANGLER JANUARY, 1938 EDITORIAL :0& FISH CONSERVATION ADVANCED IN 1937 HE year 1937 will go down in the records of fish conserva in keeping with changing conditions. Some idea of the extent to tion in Pennsylvania as one of the most outstanding from the which pollution has interfered with widespread stream stocking Tangle of progress in the history of the Fish Commission may be had when it is realized that of Pennsylvania's 100,000 since its organization in 1873. -
Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania
Nesquehoning Creek Watershed TMDL Carbon County, Pennsylvania Prepared by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection August 30, 2008 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction.................................................................................................................................4 Directions to the Nesquehoning Creek Watershed .....................................................................5 Segments addressed in this TMDL .............................................................................................5 Clean Water Act Requirements...................................................................................................6 303(d) List and Integrated Water Quality Report Listing Process..............................................6 Basic Steps for Determining a TMDL ........................................................................................7 Watershed History.......................................................................................................................8 AMD Methodology.....................................................................................................................9 TMDL Endpoints ......................................................................................................................11 TMDL Elements (WLA, LA, MOS).........................................................................................12 Allocation Summary .................................................................................................................12 -
Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021
Pennsylvania Wild Trout Waters (Natural Reproduction) - September 2021 Length County of Mouth Water Trib To Wild Trout Limits Lower Limit Lat Lower Limit Lon (miles) Adams Birch Run Long Pine Run Reservoir Headwaters to Mouth 39.950279 -77.444443 3.82 Adams Hayes Run East Branch Antietam Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.815808 -77.458243 2.18 Adams Hosack Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.914780 -77.467522 2.90 Adams Knob Run Birch Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.950970 -77.444183 1.82 Adams Latimore Creek Bermudian Creek Headwaters to Mouth 40.003613 -77.061386 7.00 Adams Little Marsh Creek Marsh Creek Headwaters dnst to T-315 39.842220 -77.372780 3.80 Adams Long Pine Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Long Pine Run Reservoir 39.942501 -77.455559 2.13 Adams Marsh Creek Out of State Headwaters dnst to SR0030 39.853802 -77.288300 11.12 Adams McDowells Run Carbaugh Run Headwaters to Mouth 39.876610 -77.448990 1.03 Adams Opossum Creek Conewago Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.931667 -77.185555 12.10 Adams Stillhouse Run Conococheague Creek Headwaters to Mouth 39.915470 -77.467575 1.28 Adams Toms Creek Out of State Headwaters to Miney Branch 39.736532 -77.369041 8.95 Adams UNT to Little Marsh Creek (RM 4.86) Little Marsh Creek Headwaters to Orchard Road 39.876125 -77.384117 1.31 Allegheny Allegheny River Ohio River Headwater dnst to conf Reed Run 41.751389 -78.107498 21.80 Allegheny Kilbuck Run Ohio River Headwaters to UNT at RM 1.25 40.516388 -80.131668 5.17 Allegheny Little Sewickley Creek Ohio River Headwaters to Mouth 40.554253 -80.206802 -
Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan
Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan Prepared for: Prepared by: Carbon County Office of Planning and Zoning Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 76 Susquehanna Street 1818 Market Street, Suite 3110 Jim Thorpe, Pennsylvania 18229-0210 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19130 Approved on: <Month Day, Year> DRAFT – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION Carbon County 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan Table of Contents Table of Figures………………………………………………………………...v Table of Tables………………………………………………………………….vi 1. Introduction .............................................................. 1 1.1. Background ................................................................................. 1 1.2. Purpose ....................................................................................... 1 1.3. Scope ........................................................................................... 2 1.4. Authority and Reference ............................................................ 2 2. Community Profile ................................................... 4 2.1. Geography and Environment ..................................................... 4 2.2. Community Facts ........................................................................ 7 2.3. Population and Demographics .................................................. 7 2.4. Land Use and Development ....................................................... 9 2.5. Data Sources and Limitations .................................................. 12 3. Planning Process ................................................... 16 3.1. Process and -
Heritage Tour Guide
Saltsburg, PENNSYLVANIA Heritage Tour Guide In Saltsburg you will see how embracing the past has poised the community as a place for today’s recreation and heritage enthusiasts. Saltsburg – Something Special 3 Salt How the heck did it get there? Geologic History Where the Loyalhanna Creek joins the Conemaugh River to form the Kiskiminetas Sometime between 1795 and 1798, a woman known only 350 million years ago, anywhere you stand in Saltsburg, River in southwestern Indiana County, to history as Mrs. Deemer was boiling water from a spring or anywhere in western Pennsylvania, you would have been Pennsylvania, the town of Saltsburg grew – near what is now Saltsburg. As the water evaporated, she under water. An ocean covered much of North America, and noticed a formation of salt crystals in the bottom of her kettle. and was named for – its role in the salt ocean brines were trapped in rocks that once were sand at Mrs. Deemer’s discovery led to the birth of an industry that, industry from 1798 to as late as the 1890s. the bottom of an ancient sea. Saltsburg’s history as a frontier town over the next few decades, made the Kiskiminetas-Conemaugh Valley the third leading producer of Salt in the nation. was built initially upon its place on the When geologic forces raised the eastern mountains of North Pennsylvania Main Line Canal during the America out of the great inland sea millions of years ago, salt Saltsburg’s role in the salt industry, and in the pioneering of first half of the 19th Century.