DOCSLIB.ORG

An Ethnobotanical Survey of the Economic and Cultural Significance of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Southwest Rhodope Mountain Region of Bulgaria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Ethnobotanical Survey of the Economic and Cultural Significance of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Southwest Rhodope Mountain Region of Bulgaria Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports - Open Reports 2011 An ethnobotanical survey of the economic and cultural significance of non-timber forest products in the southwest Rhodope Mountain region of Bulgaria Callie A. Bertsch Michigan Technological University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Forest Sciences Commons Copyright 2011 Callie A. Bertsch Recommended Citation Bertsch, Callie A., "An ethnobotanical survey of the economic and cultural significance of non-timber forest products in the southwest Rhodope Mountain region of Bulgaria", Master's Thesis, Michigan Technological University, 2011. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/146 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etds Part of the Forest Sciences Commons AN ETHNOBOTANICAL SURVEY OF THE ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS IN THE SOUTHWEST RHODOPE MOUNTAIN REGION OF BULGARIA By Callie A. Bertsch A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Forestry MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2011 ©2011 Callie A. Bertsch This thesis, “An Ethnobotanical Survey of the Economic and Cultural Significance of Non-Timber Forest Products in the Southwest Rhodope Mountain Region of Bulgaria,” is hereby approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN FORESTRY. School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Signatures: Thesis Advisor _____________________________________ Dr. Blair D. Orr Dean ______________________________________ Dr. Margaret R. Gale Date ______________________________________ Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... vii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter One: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter Two: Background Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................... 5 History ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Government ................................................................................................................................. 7 People........................................................................................................................................... 8 Health ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Economy .................................................................................................................................... 10 Geography .................................................................................................................................. 10 Environmental Issues and Policies ............................................................................................. 13 Chapter Three: Study Area Background Municipality of Garmen .................................................................................................... 15 Geography .................................................................................................................................. 15 People......................................................................................................................................... 17 Economy .................................................................................................................................... 20 Climate ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Forests ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Chapter Four: Methods ..................................................................................................... 24 Chapter Five: Results and Discussion............................................................................... 27 Ethnicities .................................................................................................................................. 27 Roma ...................................................................................................................................... 27 Bulgarian ................................................................................................................................ 30 Muslim ................................................................................................................................... 31 Species collected ........................................................................................................................ 32 Berries .................................................................................................................................... 32 Herbs ...................................................................................................................................... 36 iii Mushrooms ............................................................................................................................ 43 Changes in the past 20 years ...................................................................................................... 47 Problems among groups of people ............................................................................................. 51 Forest Management .................................................................................................................... 52 Chapter Six: Conclusion ................................................................................................... 56 Reference List ................................................................................................................... 60 Appendix A ....................................................................................................................... 64 Appendix B ....................................................................................................................... 68 iv List of Figures Figure 2.1: Ancient Thracian and Roman ruins ‘Nikopolus ad Nestum’ ........................... 7 Figure 2.2: Ethnicities in Bulgaria ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 2.3: Religions in Bulgaria ........................................................................................ 9 Figure 2.4: Topographic map of Bulgaria......................................................................... 11 Figure 2.5: Seven Rila Lakes in the Rila Mountains, Bulgaria ........................................ 12 Figure 2.6: Black Sea coast near Nessebar. ...................................................................... 13 Figure 3.1: River Kanina Gorge, Municipality of Garmen ............................................... 15 Figure 3.2: Stone head at ancient Thracian worship site in Garmen ................................ 16 Figure 3.3: Ethnicities in the municipality of Garmen ..................................................... 17 Figure 3.4: Age demographic in Municipality of Garmen. .............................................. 19 Figure 3.5: Age demographics of Bulgaria. ...................................................................... 19 Figure 3.6: Number of Residents in Garmen employed in the industry sectors ............... 20 Figure 3.7: Number of Residents in Garmen employed in non-industry sectors.............. 21 Figure 3.8: Fields of tobacco near the village of Garmen................................................. 22 Figure 5.1: Roma woman selling mushrooms to a Bulgarian ........................................... 29 Figure 5.2: Muslim woman collecting herbs while on a picnic ........................................ 31 Figure 5.3: Muslim woman sorting through bilberries to make a compote. ..................... 33 Figure 5.4: St. John’s Wort ............................................................................................... 39 Figure 5.5: Oregano .......................................................................................................... 39 Figure 5.6: Wild Thyme .................................................................................................... 40 Figure 5.7: Peppermint...................................................................................................... 40 Figure 5.8: Lemon Balm ................................................................................................... 41 Figure 5.9: Pirinski Chai ................................................................................................... 41 Figure 5.10: Common Yarrow .......................................................................................... 42 Figure 5.11:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Nicopolis Ad Nestum and Its Place in the Ancient Road Infrastructure of Southwestern Thracia
    BULLETIN OF THE NATIONAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, XLIV, 2018 Proceedings of the First International Roman and Late Antique Thrace Conference “Cities, Territories and Identities” (Plovdiv, 3rd – 7th October 2016) Nicopolis ad Nestum and Its Place in the Ancient Road Infrastructure of Southwestern Thracia Svetla PETROVA Abstract: The road network of main and secondary roads for Nicopolis ad Nestum has not been studied comprehensively so far. Our research was carried out in the pe- riod 2010-2015. We have gathered the preserved parts of roads with bridges, together with the results of archaeological studies and data about the settlements alongside these roads. The Roman city of Nicopolis ad Nestum inherited road connections from 1 One of the first descriptions of the pre-Roman times, which were further developed. Road construction in the area has road net in the area of Nevrokop belongs been traced chronologically from the pre-Roman roads to the Roman primary and to Captain A. Benderev (Бендерев 1890, secondary ones for the ancient city. There were several newly built roadbeds that were 461-470). V. Kanchov is the next to follow important for the area and connected Nicopolis with Via Diagonalis and Via Egnatia. the ancient road across the Rhodopes, The elements of infrastructure have been established: primary and secondary roads, connecting Nicopolis ad Nestum with crossings, facilities and roadside stations. Also the locations of custom-houses have the valley of the Hebros river (Кънчов been found at the border between Parthicopolis and Nicopolis ad Nestum. We have 1894, 235-247). The road from the identified a dense network of road infrastructure with relatively straight sections and a Nestos river (at Nicopolis) to Dospat, lot of local roads and bridges, connecting the settlements in the territory of Nicopolis the so-called Trans-Rhodopean road, ad Nestum.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Per I Cittadini
    Europa per i cittadini The project « POWER- EUROPEAN NETWORK OF WOMAN MAYORS FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES IN CITIZENS LIFE» was funded with the support of the European Union under the Programme "Europe for Citizens" Applicable to the Strand 2 – Measure 2.2 "Networks of Towns" 6 events have been carried out within this project: Event 1 Participation: The event involved 126 citizens, including: - 6 participants from the city of Ciudad Real (Spain), - 4 participants from the city of Blagoevgrad (Bulgaria), - 4 participants from the city of Labin (Croatia), - 4 participants from the city of Tetovo (Macedonia), - 1 participant from the city of Vilnius (Lithuania), - 1 participant from the city of Wien (Austria), - 3 participants from the city of Pittsburgh (USA), - 5 participants from the city of Buenos Aires (Argentina), - 5 participants from the city of Hamburg (Germany), - 1 participant from the city of Rotterdam (Netherlands), - 2 participants from the city of Liverpool (UK), - 1 participant from the city of Uppsala (Sweden), - 1 participant from the city of San Marino (Republic of San Marino), - 88 participants from the cities of Pollina, Montagnareale, Castelbuono, Sinagra, Vita, Geraci Siculo, Rimini (Italy). Location / Dates: The event took place in Pollina (Italy), from 4/12/2014 to 6/12/2014 Short description: The first day of meeting (December 4th 2014) started with the welcome of the Mayor of Pollina, Mrs Magda Culotta, to the public audience and to the European delegations from partner organizations Municipality of Tetovo (Macedonia), Municipality of Ciudad Real (Spain), Municipality of Labin (Croatia) and the Association South Western Municipalities (Bulgaria). They presented their Municipalities with a particular focus about gender policies realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Normalisation of Islam in Bulgaria and the Role of Intellectuals
    Islam on Тrial: Normalisation of Islam in Bulgaria and the role of intellectuals by Madlen Ivanova Nikolova Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisors: Professor Alexandra Kowalski Professor Jean-Louis Fabiani CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2016 Abstract The purpose of the thesis is to analyse the symbolic violence intellectuals exert in constructing politically effective representations of Islam in Bulgaria. This is done through the close investigation of expert witnesses’ discourse in a recent trial against thirteen Muslims from Bulgaria, who were accused and convicted of propagating a “foreign” and “political-ideological” Islam against the “democratic-liberal order.” The expert witnesses opposed this “political” and “foreign” Islam to “traditional” and “everyday” Islam. I argue that this discursive strategy could be read as normalisation in Foucauldian terms. In contrast to Foucault’s understanding of normalisation and the role of psychiatric expertise within the juridical field, what is normalised in the case of the trial I studied are not individual pathologies, but forms of (“everyday”) Islam that are compatible with the current post-political liberal regime. I also consider intellectuals’ conflicting relationships to the trial by taking into account their positioning within the field of power. CEU eTD Collection I Acknowledgements I would like to extend my gratitude to Professor Alexandra Kowalski for the thought- provoking conversations, constructive critique and support throughout the year. Professor Jean-Louis Fabiani’s classes helped me develop a more nuanced account of the dynamics within the academic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Report Submitted by Bulgaria Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities
    Strasbourg, 23 November 2012 ACFC/SR/III(2012)004 THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY BULGARIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 23 November 2012 ACFC/SR/III(2012)004 THIRD REPORT SUBMITTED BY BULGARIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES 2 ACFC/SR/III(2012)004 Table of Contents: I. Practical arrangements made at the national level for following up the results of the second monitoring cycle II. Measures taken to improve the implementation of the Framework Convention III. Specific questions 3 ACFC/SR/III(2012)004 I. Practical arrangements made at the national level for following up the results of the second monitoring cycle The Republic of Bulgaria ratified the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in 1999. Since then, the provisions of the Framework Convention have been applied by the Bulgarian authorities in good faith in conformity with its Article 2. This Third State Report by Bulgaria represents the progress achieved in the implementation of the Framework Convention since the submission of the Second State Report (ACFC/SR/II (2007)007), which along with the observations of the Government could be used for references. Implementing in practice the principle that ethnic identity is a matter of free personal choice for any individual all Bulgarian citizens are given the opportunity to freely state their ethnic, religious or linguistic affiliation. The protection of their rights and freedoms is guaranteed by the Bulgarian Constitution, the national legislation and Bulgaria’s international legal obligations in the field of human rights, in strict conformity with the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex No.3 to Art. 14, Para. 1 of ORDINANCE No
    Annex No.3 to Art. 14, para. 1 of ORDINANCE No. 22 from 14.12.2015 for the application of Sub- measure 19.2 “Application of Activities Within the Frameworks of the Community-Lead Local Development Strategies” of Measure 19 “Community-Lead Local Development”(CLLD) of the 2014-2020 Rural Area Development Programme (RADP). (Altered by State Gazette # 38 from 2016, valid from 20.05.2016) CLLD STRATEGY OF GOTSE DELCHEV – GARMEN – HADZHIDIMOVO LOCAL INITIATIVE GROUP Introduction During the 2007-2013 period, for the first time ever, Bulgaria managed to effectively utilize the LEADER method as a tool for decentralized management and integrated local development in rural areas. For the purpose, 35 local initiative groups, comprising 57 rural municipalities and 6 local fishing groups spanning across the territories of 17 municipalities have been established in the years prior 2013 and are still functioning. During the 2009-2011 period, we have performed activities with the purpose of preparing potential local initiative groups for implementing strategies for local development. Additionally, these activities are responsible for teaching skills and ensuring activities can happen on a communal level across the territories of potential local initiative groups under the Rural Area Development Programme. The LEADER method in Europe dates back to 1991. Since then it has been developed as a separate initiative in the EU member-states until 2007 (“Leader I” during the 1991-1993 period, “Leader II” during the 1994-1999 period and “Leader+” during the 2000-2006 period) and as for the 2007-2013 Programme Period, the initiative has been included as a part of the Programmes for Rural Area Development (PRAD) of member-states.
    [Show full text]
  • In Bulgaria – Plovdiv
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Special Edition 2 2019 Eight International Conference of FMNS (FMNS-2019) Modern Trends in Sciences South-West University “Neofit Rilski”, Faculty of Mathematics & Natural Sciences Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, 26-30 June, 2019 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Online ISSN 1313-9940; Print ISSN 1314-0213 (from 2009-2015) Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. The journal is dedicated to publish studies conducted on the Balkans and Europe. Studies conducted anywhere else in the World may be accepted only as an exception after decision of the Editorial Board and the Editor-In-Chief. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorising Return Migration
    ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES TOLERANCE AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DISCOURSES IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak and Maya Kosseva with Antonina Zhelyazkova International Center for Minority Studies and Intercultural Relations (IMIR) Sofia, Bulgaria 2012/21 5. New Knowledge Country Synthesis Reports EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES TOLERANCE AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY DISCOURSES IN BULGARIA Marko Hajdinjak and Maya Kosseva (with contribution of Antonina Zhelyazkova) IMIR Work Package 5 – New Knowledge on Tolerance and Cultural Diversity in Europe D5.1 Country Synthesis Reports on Tolerance and Cultural diversity - Concepts and Practices © 2012 Marko Hajdinjak, Maya Kosseva, Antonina Zhelyazkova This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the research project, the year and the publisher. Published by the European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Via dei Roccettini 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole - Italy ACCEPT PLURALISM Research Project, Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe European Commission, DG Research Seventh Framework Programme Social Sciences and Humanities grant agreement no. 243837 www.accept-pluralism.eu www.eui.eu/RSCAS/ Available from the EUI institutional repository CADMUS cadmus.eui.eu Tolerance, Pluralism and Social Cohesion: Responding to the Challenges of the 21st Century in Europe (ACCEPT PLURALISM) ACCEPT PLURALISM is a Research Project, funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to Rural Development Programme
    ANNEXES TO RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (2007-2013) TABLE OF CONTENTS Annex 1 ...........................................................................................................................................4 Information on the Consultation Process ........................................................................................4 Annex 2 .........................................................................................................................................13 Organisations and Institutions Invited to the Monitoring Committee of the Implementation of the Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 .................................................................................13 Annex 3 .........................................................................................................................................16 Baseline, Output, Result and Impact Indicators............................................................................16 Annex 4 .........................................................................................................................................29 Annexes to the Axis 1 Measures...................................................................................................29 Attachment 1 (Measure 121 Modernisation of Agricultural Holding) .........................................30 List of Newly Introduced Community Standards .........................................................................30 Attachment 1.A. (Measure 121 Modernisation of Agricultural Holding
    [Show full text]
  • Building a New Identity on Religious Symbols: a Case Study of a Village in South-Western Bulgaria
    2 63 • 2015 ARTICLES BUILDING A NEW IDENTITY ON RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS: A CASE STUDY OF A VILLAGE IN SOUTH-WESTERN BULGARIA ALBENA GEORGIEVA Albena Georgieva, Doctor of Sciences, Professor, Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with the Ethnographic Museum at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev str., bl. 6, Sofia 1113, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] THE ARTICLE DEALS WITH THE RESTORED ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF RELIGION IN BULGARIAN SO - CIETY AFTER THE POLITICAL CHANGE IN 1989. THE REVIVED INTEREST IN RELIGION COVERS A WIDER SCOPE THAN THE SPECIFIC SPIRITUAL ONE: MANY SHRINES DEVELOP OR REAFFIRM THEIR SIGNIFICANCE AS THE IDENTITY MARKS OF THEIR REGION OR OF VARIOUS ETHNIC AND CONFES - SIONAL GROUPS. THE CASE OF ST. NEDELYA’S CHAPEL NEAR THE VILLAGE OF GARMEN IS ANALYZED. AS A RESULT OF THE AUTHOR’S WORK AS A SCHOLAR AND OF THE ACTIVITIES ON A CIVIL PROJECT AIMED AT IN - VESTIGATING AND REVIVING THE TRADITIONAL HERITAGE, THE CHAPEL ITSELF, THE RELIGIOUS NAR - RATIVES RELEVANT TO IT AND ITS TWO HOLIDAYS ( VENERATION OF THE CROSS ON THE THIRD SUN - DAY OF GREAT LENT AND 7 JULY ) BECOME EMBLEMATIC SYMBOLS FOR THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. SUBSEQUENTLY THE BUILDING OF ST. ANNE’S CHURCH IN THE CENTRE OF THE VILLAGE IS COM - PLETED AND A GREAT NUMBER OF VILLAGERS VISIT IT ON BIG CHRISTIAN HOLIDAYS. Keywords : ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY, CIVIL ACTIVITIES, RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS, CHRISTIAN SHRINES, LOCAL IDENTITY, BULGARIA TURNING BACK TO RELIGION IN BULGARIA 1989 DID NOT PUT AN END TO COMMUNISM; RATHER, IT WAS THE STARTING POINT FOR A COMPLEX AND SUSTAINED PROCESS OF SOCIAL CHANGE, AT FIRST AIMED AT OPPOSING AND OVERCOMING THE ONGOING COMMUNIST REGIME.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted on 18 March 2010)
    Strasbourg, 23 January 2012 Public FCNM/II(2012)001 SECOND OPINION OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ON BULGARIA (adopted on 18 March 2010) AND COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BULGARIA ON THE SECOND OPINION OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES BY BULGARIA (received on 3 January 2011) FCNM/II(2012)001 Contents Second opinion of the Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities on Bulgaria ....................................................................... 5 I. MAIN FINDINGS ........................................................................................................10 Monitoring process...............................................................................................................10 Personal scope of application of the Framework Convention ................................................10 General legislative framework and institutional arrangements...............................................10 Tolerance and intercultural dialogue .....................................................................................11 Police and ethnically-motivated incidents .............................................................................12 Support for minority cultures................................................................................................12 Use of minority languages in the public sphere .....................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • GLOB@L LIBRARIES – BULGARIA PROGRAM List of Approved by The
    GLOB@L LIBRARIES – BULGARIA PROGRAM List of Approved by the Program Board 147 Applications under Stage 2011 - 12 July 2011 Table of Contents SUMMARY OF NUMBER OF TARGET LIBRARIES STAGES 2009 - 2011 ........................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY ON THE NUMBER OF ICT PACKAGES IN TARGET LIBRARIES STAGE 2011 ................................................................................ 4 BLAGOEVGRAD DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 BURGAS DISTRICT........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 VARNA DISTRICT ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 VELIKO TARNOVO DISTRICT ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 VIDIN DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 VRATSA DISTRICT .....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]