DOCSLIB.ORG

SYSTEMIST Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SYSTEMIST Contents Systemist, Vol. 41 (1), September 2020 ISSN 0961-8309 Volume 41(1) No. 1, Sept. 2020 V SYSTEMIST Publication of The UK Systems Society 1 Systemist, Vol. 41 (1), September 2020 UK SYSTEMS SOCIETY Registered office: Sidelands, Nutgrove Lane, Chew Magna, BRISTOL, BS40 8PU Registered Charity, No: 1078782 President Editor-in-Chief: Systemist Professor Frank Stowell Professor Frank Stowell Treasurer & Company Secretary University of Portsmouth Ian Roderick Portsmouth Secretary to the Board Hampshire PO1 2EG Gary Evans Email: [email protected] Managing Editor: Systemist Dr Christine Welch Gatcombe House, Copnor Road Portsmouth PO3 5EJ Email: [email protected] Submission of Material All material should be submitted electronically, following the instructions on the Journal website systemist.org.uk. In case of any difficulty, please email the Managing Editor in the first instance. Material should be in word processed form, e.g. Microsoft Word .doc or docx. Please do not submit .pdf files. The font size must be 12 and in Times New Roman, with all figures and tables in a format that will be still legible if reduced by up to 50%. All materials must conform with the Harvard Referencing System. A title page must be provided and should include the title of the paper, authors name(s), affiliation, address and an abstract of 100-150 words. The material published in the journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the UKSS Management Committee or the Editorial Board of Systemist. The responsibility for the content of any material posted within the journal remains with the author(s). Copyright for that material is also with the author(s). Systemist is published under Creative Commons (CC-BY) Licence. Full details may be seen on the journal website. The Editor reserves the right to select submitted content and to make amendments where necessary. 2 Volume 41 (1), September 2020 SYSTEMIST Contents Editorial by Editor-in-Chief 3 Editorial to Issue 41(1) 6 Identity Within Constraints: Processes of Systemic Anthropology 10 Lucia Urbani Ulivi, Primavera Fisogni Critical systems thinking and practice: what has been done and what 31 needs doing Professor Michael Jackson, OBE Soft Systems Thinking in the ‘Information Age’ 62 Professor Frank Stowell Exploring the Notion of Information Content for Information Systems 76 Xiaoping Shen, Lishuan Qin and Junkang Feng An autopoietic approach to assessing the impact of TCM Qigong 108 exercise on wellbeing: A feasibility study Petia Sice, Garry Elvin, Lee Walton, Chirine Riachy, Corinna Zink, Laurie Rauch Variety, innovation and readiness for change in organizations 133 Christine Welch, Tammi Sinha and Christopher Milner Call for Papers 156 Systemist Advertising Rates 157 Details of UKSS Committee and Gold Medallists 158 3 Editor-in-Chief Editorial by Editor in Chief Welcome back to the Systemist. In 2012 the UKSS decided to move Systemist into the commercial arena. A good relationship had been developed with our American publisher IGI through earlier connections with another of their publications [IJITSA]. We created a new Systems journal entitled ‘The International Journal of Systems and Society. We decided that to maintain the Society’s connections to our long history and a clear link to our members we included Systemist within its covers. It is important to note that the UKSS retained ownership of Systemist and its associated Gold Medalists. The first edition of the International Journal of Systems and Society was published in 2014 and we published two editions per year until 2018. In 2018 a text was published with selected papers from earlier editions of the journal. These papers were developed further into chapters providing insightful accounts of Systems practice. This text is entitled ‘Systems Research for Real World Problems’ and is published by igi Global. New Systemist In the past decade or so many commercial journals have incorporated a software system to underpin their editorial process. This has acted to create a disconnect between the editor and the publisher. There is a move away from the personal connections between the journal and the publishing editors in favour of a computer based ‘system’. This has many advantages such as reducing the amount of administration that the editorial team have to undertake, but it sometimes causes frustration when the submission system is counter intuitive. The editors responsible for the processing of the paper such as checking references are often located thousands of miles from the home base of the journal. These, doubtless, well qualified colleagues may have little or no knowledge of the subject matter nor of the history of the journal itself. The disconnect is highlighted further by the fact that once submitted the journal’s academic editorial team are more or less powerless to intervene at any stage even when an author asks for assistance – the software may rule out an appeal about a technicality such as a rejection of the paper that has not been submitted as the software expects. We are not alone in voicing this frustration. But because papers are still judged by the star rating of the journal in which they are published [despite the REF guidelines]career minded academics have little alternative but to accept these processes. Bearing this in mind it is important to note that although the Systemist submission system is front-ended by IT the editorial team are very much ‘hands-on’ and will communicate directly with authors throughout. The EiC and Managing Editor will be available to discuss difficulties or queries that our authors might experience. 4 Systemist, Vol. 41 (1), September 2020 The UKSS management team, decided that the new Systemist would pick up where it left off 7 years ago and produce a journal for our community. The significant difference between the new Systemist and the previous incarnation is that Systemist will be published on-line and hard copy for those that require it. It will be embedded in the Systemist website and linked to the UKSS website. In the case where an author wants a hard copy this will incur a charge to the author to cover publishing costs. All papers will be at least double blind refereed and published papers will be open access following the publication on the UKSS web page. In summary Systemist will: 1. Be published annually [There may be an additional copy for conference proceedings] 2. Provide, for members, a digital version of the complete journal sent directly to their email address and a complete hard copy will be made available for the British Library and for purchase. The cost of the hard copy will depend upon the prevailing publication costs. The on-line version will be displayed as the complete edition with journal citation references such as issue number, page numbers etc. Each edition will be posted on the Web for those interested to discover 3. Have a human connection throughout the editorial chain 4. Editors will consider any topic using Systems or holistic approaches 5. Ensure proper refereeing is carried out, but the responsibility for the assertions and conclusions are those of the author and do not reflect the policy of the UKSS 6. Recruit editors from those members who have shown their active support for the journal and the Society. We do not seek to have a long list of referees as these are too often window dressing – I have found that often many so- called referees are reluctant to undertake refereeing yet are happy to have their name associated with a particular journal. 7. Will be edited and operated through the EiC and a Managing Editor assisted by a small team of commissioning editors. 8. Will stand alone pursuing quality publications and not become side-tracked by the requirements HE research exercises, SJR or Impact factor ratings. This edition provides an insight into the breadth of Systems thinking and practice. We have papers from Philosophy, Critical Theory, Soft Systems, VSM and Technology. Our hope is to attract colleagues from other disciplines who approach their subject from a holistic perspective. We would like to hear from colleagues in Education, Health, Environment, Mathematics, as well as those in IT/IS, Management and Cybernetics as presently. If you know someone who you think 5 Editor-in-Chief uses ‘Systems Thinking’, even though they may not call it that, please encourage them to submit in a paper or send in an opinion piece for our news letter I hope that you enjoy this edition, Good Systems thinking Frank Stowell 6 Systemist, Vol. 41 (1), September 2020 Editorial to Issue 41(1) This is the first edition of a new look Systemist, and my first as Managing Editor. I am excited and energised by the potential of this journal in its renewed mission to publish Systems ideas and, especially, to promote dialogue between those ideas and their use in practical settings. As Immanuel Kant is reported to have said: ‘Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play’1. It has long been a problem in academic life that scholars have tended to surround themselves with screens, marking off one area of understanding from another and in the process narrowing their focus. Systems, as a lens for looking at the World, enables as to look beyond these divisions among forms of knowledge. Our stance is interdisciplinary, looking for interconnectedness within and among the phenomena we observe and experience, rather than opportunities to isolate and classify. Interdisciplinarity ‘interlocks with the concerns of epistemology … and tends to be centred around problems and issues that cannot be addressed or solved within the existing disciplines, rather than a quest for an all-inclusive synthesis’ (Moran, 2002). It is unfortunate that the exigencies of academic life have driven even Systemists into a tendency to divide and classify.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 System Viability of Organizations and The
    SYSTEM VIABILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS AND THE AETIOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL CRISIS A Quantitative Assessment of Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model SYSTEMISCHE LEVENSVATBAARHEID VAN ORGANISATIES EN DE ETIOLOGIE VAN ORGANISATIE CRISES Een kwantitatieve toets van Stafford Beers 'Viable System Model' (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 20 november 2017 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Michael Dominik PFIFFNER geboren op 9 oktober 1963 te Zürich, Zwitserland 1 Promotoren: Prof. dr. S.G.L. Schruijer Prof. dr. J.P.P.E.F. Boselie 2 3 Committee: Prof. dr. M. van Bottenburg Prof. dr. A.J. Meijer Prof. dr. E.F. Loos Prof. dr. P. Curşeu Prof. dr. A. Wierdsma 4 5 1 Abstract 1.1 Abstract in English Michael Dominik Pfiffner System Viability of Organizations and the Aetiology of Organizational Crisis A Test of Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model and a Quantitative As- sessment of the System Viability of Organizations for the Understanding and Pre-Emption of Organizational Crisis Keywords: System Viability, Organizational Crisis, Failure, Manage- ment Cybernetics, Early Recognition, Prevention, VSM Subject of this dissertation is the aetiology of crisis processes which place organizations under existential threats and which often cause organiza- tional demise and bankruptcy. To date, research on organizational crises (OC) has not succeeded in identifying the generic grounds for these detri- mental processes in organizations. Instead, by referring to the complexity and to the assumed multi-causality of the phenomenon, research has contin- ued to provide only either general observations or deep singular analyses of often prominent crisis cases, which provide no generalizable insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Viable System Model As a Framework for Understanding
    The Viable System Model as a Framework for Understanding Organizations by Raúl Espejo and Antonia Gill Introducing the Model The Viable System Model (VSM) is not a new idea. Created by Stafford Beer over twenty years ago, it has been used extensively as a conceptual tool for understanding organizations, redesigning them (where appropriate) and supporting the management of change. Despite its successful application within numerous private and public sector organizations, however, the VSM is not yet widely known among the general management population. There are two main reasons for this. Firstly, the ideas behind the model are not intuitively easy to grasp; secondly, they run counter to the great legacy of thinking about organizations dating from the Industrial Revolution - a legacy that is only now starting to be questioned. To deal with the second point in more detail, organizations have been viewed traditionally as hierarchical institutions that operate according to a top-down command structure: strategic plans are formulated at the top and implemented by a cascade of instructions through the tiered ranks. It is now widely acknowledged that this modus operandi is too slow and inflexible to cope with the increasing rate of change and complexity surrounding most organizations. Technology developments have helped to usher in a new concept of a flatter, networked-type organization with a wider distribution of data to reach all those who actually perform the work - in real time. The ground is now fertile for viewing the organization in a new light. However, there is also much confusion about the nature of this new-style organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Detangling the Wicked Problem of Modern Crime
    WEBS OF DECEIT: DETANGLING THE WICKED PROBLEM OF MODERN CRIME drhgfdjhngngfmhgmghmghjmghfmf For: 2016 Fram Applied Critical Thinking Speaker Series PAMELA J. SYDELKO DIRECTOR: SYSTEMS SCIENCE CENTER GLOBAL SECURITY SCIENCES DIVISION ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Pamela J. Sydelko Education PhD M.S. in Soil B.S. in Botany MBA Candidate Science Systems North Dakota Skills Science University University the State Something aboutUniversity me that of you should know of Illinois of Chicago University Hull, UK 1982 1984 2004 Present Experience Environmental Spatial GIS Integrated Executive Systems Science Modeling M&S Management Science the zero 1985 1988 1994 2003 2004 2014 U.S. Army Argonne Construction National Engineering Laboratory Research Laboratory 2 WHAT IS A SYSTEM? EVOLUTION OF SYSTEMS THINKING Systems HARD AND SOFT SYSTEMS THINKING Thinking CRITICAL SYSTEMS THINKING (CST) RadialSYSTEMIC List INTERVENTION-SmartArt This is example for a subtitle WHAT IS A WICKED PROBLEM? Wicked Problems PROPERTIES OF WICKED PROBLEMS COMPLICATED VS WICKED PROBLEM? Brainstorm OUTLINE The Inter- STOVE-PIPED GOVERNMENT agency GOVERNMENT CZARS AND TASK FORCES Proposal PARTICIPATORY SYSTEMIC PROBLEM STRUCTURING Crime at ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS the Urban Edge SYSTEMIC ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN EVALUATION OF METHODS AND PROCESS 3 4 WHAT IS A SYSTEM? . A System is a set of interacting or interdependent components forming an integrated whole and serving a common purpose 5 FOUNDATIONS OF SYSTEMS THINKING? "Modern science is characterized by its ever-increasing specialization, necessitated by the enormous amount of data, the complexity of Ludwig von Bertalanffy techniques and of Systems thinking has theoretical structures “There appear to exist roots in the General within every field. Thus general system laws which apply to any Systems Theory that science is split into was advanced by system of a particular Ludwig von innumerable type, irrespective of the Bertalanffy in disciplines continually particular properties of the1940’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Viable System Model
    Viable System Model Jolene Hurtubise Omar Khattab Background Stafford Beer ● Operational Researcher and Cybernetician ● Head of the Department of Operational Research and Cybernetics for United Steel ● Founder of Management Cybernetics ○ “The science of effective organization” ● Author of Brain of the Firm and The Heart of the https://squiretothegiants.files.wordpress.com/20 Enterprise 15/12/stafford-beer.jpeg ● Magnificent beerd! History ● Developed in 1950s ❖ Tool for dealing with organizational structure issues ● Idea of viable systems originated from the human body ❖ Neuro-physiological terminology ❖ Organisation is a neural network that co-evolves with the environment ● Model presented in graphic representations The 4 M’s http://cdn.onlinewebfonts.c http://cdn.onlinewebfo https://www.shareicon.net/t https://cdn4.iconfinder.com/dat om/svg/img_453915.png nts.com/svg/img_895 ag/machinery?p=3 a/icons/aiga-symbol- 75.png signs/441/aiga_cashier- 512.png Purpose of the Viable System Model ● Develop viability based on universal invariances ● Meta-language facilitating autonomy in social groups ● Encourage self-transformation in organizations ● Sustainability in businesses and communities ○ Ability to learn, adapt and evolve http://solutionslab.io/academy/wp- content/uploads/sites/4/2016/05/Complexity-science-course.png Variety A way to measure complexity. “The number of possible states of a system.” What is a Viable system / viable system model? https://ih0.redbubble.net/image.387863594.5073/flat,800x800,075,f.jpg Main elements of an organisational
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Decentralized Global Political Economy
    A SYSTEM THAT WORKS: BUILDING A DECENTRALIZED GLOBAL POLITICAL ECONOMY USING THE VIABLE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Li Institute for Public Science & Art 1075 Olive Drive #4, Davis CA USA, 530-753-0352, [email protected] ABSTRACT A political economy that enhances personal freedom requires effective but limited regulation. The Viable System Model by Stafford Beer offers a way to analyze an organization’s communication problems, maximize resource use, minimize waste, and adapt to a changing environment by clarifying what to regulate. Jon Walker’s “VSM Quick Guide” and Allenna Leonard’s “Personal VSM” ground the reader. VSM is applied to a community of 65,000 people in Davis, California, USA, in a way that could be used in other places around the world, to help identify strategies to better meet human needs, enhance the local economy, reduce environmental damage, and encourage natural healing processes. Given the recursive nature of the VSM, this method could be used at every level from person to family/neighborhood/village/community/ district/ region/ state/nation/continent/planet, emphasizing the system in focus. “National Government: disseminated regulation in real time, or ‘How to run a country’” by Stafford Beer describes how to construct “quantified flow charts” to identify which statistics to measure daily as regulation at a particular level of recursion. REDEFINING THE SOCIAL CONTRACT When someone says “bureaucracy,” you probably think – delay, confusion, even obstruction. What if we could eliminate MOST of the organizational confusion – just disappear it – along with half the bureaucracy itself? THAT is the claim of this paper: A 1950s British scientific discovery that precipitates a complete revolution in social science as we know it.
    [Show full text]
  • A Viable System Model for Product-Driven Systems Carlos Herrera, André Thomas, Sana Belmokhtar, Rémi Pannequin
    A viable system model for product-driven systems Carlos Herrera, André Thomas, Sana Belmokhtar, Rémi Pannequin To cite this version: Carlos Herrera, André Thomas, Sana Belmokhtar, Rémi Pannequin. A viable system model for product-driven systems. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Manage- ment, IESM 2011, May 2011, Metz, France. pp.CDROM. hal-00607682 HAL Id: hal-00607682 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00607682 Submitted on 10 Jul 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management IESM’2011 May 25 - May 27 METZ - FRANCE ⋆ A Viable System Model for Product-Driven Systems Carlos HERRERA a, Andr´eTHOMAS a, Sana BELMOKHTAR a, R´emi PANNEQUIN a a Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy (CRAN), Nancy Universit´e, CNRS Campus Science, Vandœuvre, France. Abstract This paper describes a modeling approach for product-driven systems based on the Viable System Model (VSM). A general VSM description is presented, highlighting the pertinence of this approach for modeling intelligent product systems, specifically when a compromise between control and autonomy is aimed. An application is also provided for modeling a hybrid centralized/distributed production planning and control system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viable System Model
    Organization: Viable Systems Model The Viable System Model Trevor Hilder Cavendish Software Ltd. (Presentation v1.03 12-Jun-1995) © Cavendish Software Ltd. 1995, portions © Stafford Beer 1985 This presentation provides a brief introduction to Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model (VSM). Stafford Beer is one of the leading figures in the science of cybernetics, which concerns itself with the underlying laws which govern how organisms, machines and organizations maintain their identity, and fulfill their purposes within their environment. Cybernetics claims that there are underlying laws which apply equally to the manner in which the nervous system of an animal maintains control over its actions, to the way in which a species maintains itself within its ecosystem, and to how a corporation maintains its existence in its marketplace. The VSM provides a notation which can be applied by non- mathematicians to help them understand and apply these general laws. © Cavendish Software Ltd. 1995, portions © Stafford Beer 1985 1 Organization: Viable Systems Model Objective nTo provide a brief introduction to Stafford Beer’s Viable System Model uIts purpose uHow it can be used © Cavendish Software Ltd. 1995, portions © Stafford Beer 1985 Stafford Beer developed the VSM over a period of over thirty years as an aid to the practical process of diagnosing problems in human organizations, and helping to improve their functioning. Stafford believes that effective organizations should maximize the freedom of their participants, within the practical constraints of the requirement for those organizations to fulfill their purpose. He believes that the science of cybernetics can be used to design organizations which fulfill these objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Thinking in the Forest Service: a Framework to Guide Practical Application for Social-Ecological Management in the Enterprise Program
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Fall 10-27-2016 Systems Thinking in the Forest Service: a Framework to Guide Practical Application for Social-Ecological Management in the Enterprise Program Megan Kathleen Kmon Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Forest Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Kmon, Megan Kathleen, "Systems Thinking in the Forest Service: a Framework to Guide Practical Application for Social-Ecological Management in the Enterprise Program" (2016). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3312. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3292 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Systems Thinking in the Forest Service: A Framework to Guide Practical Application for Social-Ecological Management in the Enterprise Program by Megan Kathleen Kmon A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systems Science Thesis Committee: Wayne Wakeland, Chair Martin Reynolds Joe Fusion Portland State University 2016 Abstract The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Enterprise Program (EP), which provides fee-for- service consulting services to the USFS, is interested in integrating systems thinking into its service offerings. Despite there being several excellent sources on the range and diversity of systems thinking, no single framework exists that thoroughly yet concisely outlines what systems thinking is along with its deep history, theoretical tenets, and soft and hard approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Viable System Model to Study IT Governance Dynamics: Evidence from a Single Case Study
    Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences j 2018 Using the Viable System Model to Study IT Governance Dynamics: Evidence from a Single Case Study Tim Huygh Steven De Haes University of Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Antwerp, Belgium [email protected] [email protected] Abstract nonexistent or inappropriate IT governance. IT This paper presents a single descriptive case study in governance failure is for instance mentioned in which the viable system model (VSM) is used as a relation to information security breaches and IT theoretical lens to model an organization’s investment failure [10], [11]. In summary, contemporary IT governance system. The case contemporary organizations have clear incentives to presented herein was selected specifically for being a strive for effective IT governance, especially if their digitized company of which we knew that a lot of effort dependency on IT is high. was put recently in their IT governance system. We find that the case company’s IT governance system This study aims to explore an effort to bring in more maps well to the structure and underlying logic of the theory and prescriptive guidance in the area of IT VSM. This paper contributes to the literature by governance. More specifically, the goal of this study providing an empirical justification exemplar on the is to gauge the applicability of using the viable system applicability of systemic thinking in general, and the model (based on the theory of management VSM in specific, for modelling enterprise governance cybernetics) as a lens to study the IT governance and management of IT.
    [Show full text]
  • A Viable System Model: Consideration of Knowledge Management
    Page 1 sur 19 Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, August 1999 A Viable System Model: Consideration of Knowledge Management Allenna Leonard, PhD, The Complementary Set ABSTRACT: Contends that individual and organizational knowledge is difficult to value and therefore difficult to manage. Looks at the management of knowledge from the perspective of the individual, the network and the organization using Stafford Beer's Viable System Model, a powerful descriptive and diagnostic tool to map management capacities and promote viability. Introduction Individuals who are knowledge workers in a knowledge economy may find themselves, at different times and sometimes simultaneously, self-employed, working in an ad hoc network, or earning a salary with an organization. To be successful, they need to have a sense of how different aspects of knowledge management fit together as they guide their own career paths and find ways to add value to ad hoc and formal organizations. In Western countries, an increasing proportion of the workforce is employed for their knowledge. That knowledge is for the most part up to individuals to acquire and maintain, and it is largely portable. It may be of content or process, tacit or explicit, general or particular, linear or relational, timeless or up to the minute. It is utilized by individuals working alone and in small groups or large organizations. Especially in the private sector, many knowledge workers are self-employed or members of ad hoc virtual or network organizations rather than permanent salaried employees. The knowledge marketplace is not always a comfortable place for the individuals involved. They may suffer the disadvantages of insecurity and cost absorption which have traditionally been associated with the secondary labor market.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing an Understanding of Violence Using the Dsrp Theory As a Framework
    DEVELOPING AN UNDERSTANDING OF VIOLENCE USING THE DSRP THEORY AS A FRAMEWORK Victor MacGill 8 Cornwall Place Stoke Nelson New Zealand University of the Sunshine Coast ABSTRACT This paper uses the DSRP model to understand human violence. When a boundary is set by a distinction, inside and outside is created. That which is excluded becomes the other and is often disowned, demonised and marginalised making violence or abuse towards the other more likely. Sometimes parts of a system invade other parts disrupting the functioning of the whole system, reducing requisite variety. The relationships between parts can be distorted. Each part has its own perspective excluding other perspectives. Violence is thus latent in all complex systems. Violence is explored from a variety of perspectives. It is fractal appearing from the individual and family level through to national and global manifestations. It can be overt or covert and often becomes transgenerational. Systems thinking can be a powerful tool for restoring balance and resilience to human social systems and reduce the level of violence and abuse in society. Keywords: DSRP, violence, abuse, CAS, boundary Introduction This paper explores violence in social settings using the DSRP model (Cabrera & Cabrera, 2015) as a framework. First, there is an outline of the DSRP model leading to a definition of violence in systems terms. The nature of human violence is then explored from several perspectives. Shannon’s theory of communication (Shannon, 1948) is followed by Maturana’s (Maturana & Verden-Zoller, 2008) concepts of relational dynamics. This leads into an investigation of the process of othering through which individuals or groups are marginalised and disowned leading to violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Viable Systems Model
    How to design a healthy business: The use of the Viable Systems Model in the diagnosis and design of organisational structures in co-operatives and other social economy enterprises The Viable Systems Model a guide for co-operatives and federations by Jon Walker A manual for the diagnosis and design of organisational structures to enable social economy enterprises to function with increased efficiency without compromising democratic principles. 1 This is a Manual. Its objectives are: firstly, to provide you with a set of tools which will enable you to deal with any problems concerning your organisational structure, and secondly, to show you how to use these tools. It offers an alternative to the usual approach which depends upon hierarchy, authority and obedience, and is of particular interest to enterprises which are looking for ways of becoming more efficient and of encouraging participation and democratic work practices. As the manual unfolds, you will gradually acquire a new vocabulary. This new language is the basis of the Viable Systems Model approach: it will enable you to think about your organisation in a fundamentally different way. The methods described will enable you to Diagnose your own organisation. Prescribe ways of dealing with inadequacies. Design a healthy organisation from scratch. Based on "The Viable Systems Model Pack" originally published as part of the SMSE Strategic Management in the Social Economy training programme carried out by ICOM, CRU, CAG and Jon Walker with the financial assistance of Directorate General XXIII of the Commission of the European Communities Original version completed October 1991 This is a revised version incorporating some new material.
    [Show full text]