DOCSLIB.ORG

National Cathedral School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Cathedral School COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION REVIEW NATIONAL CATHEDRAL SCHOOL WASHINGTON , DC August 21, 2018 Board of ZoningBoard Adjustment of Zoning Adjustment District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia CASE NO.18233A Case No. 18233A EXHIBIT NO.34A1 34A1 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW 3914 Centreville Road 15125 Washington Street Suite 600 Suite 330 Suite 136 Washington, DC 20036 Chantilly, VA 20151 Haymarket, VA 20169 Tel: 202.296.8625 Tel: 703.787.9595 Tel: 703.787.9595 Fax: 202.785.1276 Fax: 703.787.9905 Fax: 703.787.9905 www.goroveslade.com This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of services, is intended for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization by Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc., shall be without liability to Gorove/Slade Associates, Inc. Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Contents of Study .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Major Transportation Features .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Future Projects ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Design .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Site Access and Circulation .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Trip Generation ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 19 Transit ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Existing Transit Service ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Proposed Transit Service ..................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Site-Generated Transit Impacts ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Pedestrian Study Area.......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Pedestrian Infrastructure ..................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Site Generated Pedestrian Impacts ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Bicycle Facilities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Existing Bicycle Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Proposed Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Site Impacts .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 29 Summary and Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Figures Figure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Site Location (Aerial) ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Major Regional Transportation Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 4: Major Local Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 5: Site Plan .................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 6: Parking Map .............................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 7: Student and Staff Vehicular Circulation .................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 8: Student Drop-off/Pick-up Circulation ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 9: Distribution Assignment ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 Figure 10: Existing Transit Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 11: Pedestrian Pathways ............................................................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 12: Existing Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 13: Bicycle Study Area ................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Tables Table 1: Carshare Locations ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 2: NCS FTE and Student Approval Caps .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 3: Adjacent School Approval Caps .................................................................................................................................................. 13 Table 4: Estimated Trip Generation ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table 5: Estimated Net New Trip-Generation for Non-Auto Modes ....................................................................................................... 19 Table 6: Metrobus Route Information ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 7: Sidewalk Requirements .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 “Close,” “Cathedral campus,” or “campus”). The Close is EXECUTIVE SUMMARY bounded by Woodley Road
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summary Plan Description of the Beauvoir School Retirement Plan
    Summary Plan Description of the Beauvoir School Retirement Plan November 2008 DC: 3012874-1 . TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PLAN ...................................... 6 1. What is the Beauvoir School Retirement Plan? .......................................................... 6 2. Who is eligible to participate in the Plan? .................................................................... 6 3. How do I become a participant in the Plan? ................................................................ 7 4. What is a “year of service” under the Plan? ................................................................ 7 5. What contributions will I make to the Plan? ................................................................. 8 6. What contributions will the School make to the Plan? ............................................... 9 7. What does compensation mean for purposes of the School’s contributions to the Plan on my behalf? .......................................................................................................... 9 8. Can I change the amount I contribute to the Plan? .................................................... 9 9. Is there an overall limit on contributions to the Plan on my behalf each year? ...... 9 10. Is there a limit on the contributions that I am allowed to make to the Plan each year under my salary reduction agreement? ............................................................. 10 11. Are there any exceptions to the limits on my contributions? .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bullis Magazine Fall-Winter 2015.Indd
    BULLISfall-winter 2015 magazine Finding the Right College Match Origins of Teaching at Bullis 2013-2014 Report of Annual Giving BULLISfall-winter 2015 magazine HEAD OF SCHOOL features Gerald Boarman, Ed.D. Michael Reidy, Ed.D., Associate Head of School 2 College Counseling: Putting the Pieces Together Margaret Andreadis, Lower School Principal Jamie Dickie, Director of Technology 6 The Origins of Teaching at Bullis Constance Giles, Ph.D., Director of Curriculum and Institutional Research Darlene Haught, Director of Extended Programs and Emerging Technologies departments Kathleen Lloyd, Director of Girls Athletics Todd McCreight, Business Offi cer Andres Parra, Director of Boys Athletics news Marilyn Moreno, Middle School Principal Robert Pollicino, Upper School Principal 9 Capital Campaign Update Tim Simpson, Assistant Head, Director of Admission and Financial Aid 10 Nicole Cutts ’88: Inaugural Convocation Speaker Joanne Szadkowski, Director of Institutional faculty/staff Advancement and Alumni Sherri A. Watkins, Publications Manager 11 New Staff Join Bullis Community Susie Zimmermann, Director of Communications Susan King, Communications Coordinator academics Bullis Magazine is published two times a year by the Offi ce of Institutional Advancement and distributed to alumni, parents, grandparents and friends. Letters and suggestions for future 15 One is Good, Two Can Be Great articles are welcome. Located in Potomac, Maryland, Bullis School is a private, 16 A Place Where Imagination Can Flourish coeducational, nondenominational college preparatory day school for grades 2–12. Bullis admits students of any race, color, religion, and national and ethnic origin to all the rights, privileges, programs and activities generally accorded or made service available to students at the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Zoning Adjustment Order No. 16433
    ~OVERNMENTOF THE ISTRlCT OF BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CORRECTED ORDER *Application No. 16433 of the Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia ("the National Cathedral") on behalf of The National Cathedral School ("NCS" or "Applicant") pursuant to 11 DCMR $ 3 108.1. for a special exception under 11 DCMR 5 206 to allow the construction of a girls' athletic facility at a private school in an K-1-B District on the grounds of the National Cathedral, 3500 Woodley Road, N.W. (Square 1944. Lot 25). HEARING DATE: April 14,1999 DECISION DATE: June 2. 1999 FINDING OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER *This order replaces the Board's order dated August 1 1. 1999, and corrects the vote on page I0 from 3-0 to 4-0. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1. The application to construct an athletic facility at NCS was filed on December 3 1. 1998. The application was submitted as two alternatives, the only difference in the alternatives being the inclusion of an existing building, known as the gatehouse, at the southeast corner of Woodley Road and Beauvoir Drive. 2. Petitions in opposition to the application were submitted to the BZA by the National Cathedral Neighborhood Association ("NCNA") on February 19. 1999, by the Cleveland Park Citizen's Association (TPCA") on March 1, 1999. and by citizens in the neighborhood, prior to the initial BZA hearing on the application. 3. The Board first heard testimony on the application at its regularly scheduled meeting on March 5, 1999.' A continuance was granted for April 14, 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Individualaccomplishment
    The Term PotomacThe Alumni Magazine of The Potomac School • Spring 2012 Individual Accomplishment Zal Batmanglij ‘98 Zal Batmanglij Louisa Thomas ‘00 Thomas Louisa Sasha DiGiulian ‘11 Sasha DiGiulian Whitney Tymas ‘76 Tymas Whitney Jody Goehring ‘99 Jody Goehring Alex Ross ‘83 Ross Alex April 27–28, 2012 In just a few weeks, Potomac alumni will return to campus once again to celebrate and reconnect with classmates, friends and faculty. Join us April 27 and 28 to relive May Day, walk the trails you explored as children, and experience new traditions that help us grow as a community. ALL Potomac alumni, regardless of graduation year, are invited to come together for Reunion ’12. We will celebrate milestones for classes ending in 2 and 7! SPECIAL PERFORMANCE THIS YEAR ON FRIDAY, APRIL 27 7:00–11:00 pm: All-Alumni Cocktail Party and Live Music Join alumni and past and current faculty for a cocktail party in the Upper School’s Kettler Crossroads and Civali Courtyard. Don’t miss this musical extravaganza with: Baron Tymas’75 Associate Professor of Music and Assistant Director of Jazz Studies at NCCU Kofi Burbridge ’76 The Derek Trucks Band and Tedeschi Trucks Band Oteil Burbridge ’79 Grammy Award-winning musician, Allman Brothers Band and Tedeschi Trucks Band David Moses ’76, drummer These accomplished musicians first launched their band at Potomac in the 1970s. To see the schedule and register go to www.potomacschool.org/alumni. Questions? Contact Laura Miller, Director of Alumni of Relations at [email protected] or 703-749-6356 II ■ The Potomac Term A Conversation Head of School Geoff Jones and Alumni Governing Council President Ann Renzy Maclean ’86 Tell me about the Strategic Plan and specifically about the goal around individual accomplishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who and Where in Women's Studies. INSTITUTION State Univ
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 135 678 SO 009 616 AUTHOR Berkowitz, Tamar, Ed.; And Others TITLE Who's Who and Where in Women's Studies. INSTITUTION State Univ. of New York, Old Westbury. Coll. at Old Westbury. Feminist Press. SPONS AGENCY Ford Foundation, New York, N.Y. PUB DATE 74 NOTE 322p. AVAILABLE FROMThe Feminist Press, Box 334, Old Westbury, New York 1156E ($7.50 paperback) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS College Programs; *Courses; Curriculum; Directories; Educational History; Educational Innovation; Females; Feminism; Guides; Higher Education; *Teachers; *Universities; Womens Education; *Womens Studies ABSTRACT This guide to people, courses, and institutions concerned with women's studies provides a view of the movement's size and scope and a record of the moveMent's history. Designed to provide an overview of the institutional development of courses, the pioneering instructors, and the sponsoring departments, the guide is intended for use by feminist scholars/teachers and historians. The guide lists courses at accredited undergraduate and graduate higher education institutions in the United States only. It includes 4,658 ccurses and 2,964 male and female feminist teachers at 885 universities and colleges. The guide is a:ranged in three sections. The first section lists institutions, arranged alphabetically, and their faculty.members involved in women's studies with their respective courses and dates offered. The second section lists persons involved in women's studies with information about field, institutions, courses, and years the courses were offered. The third section is arranged by discipline or topic. Under each, related courses are listed alphabetically with their instructors.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Growing School
    The Windowpane Capitol Hill Day School Newsletter Volume 6 Number 1 Fall/Winter 2005 Our Growing School: Branching to the Future Message from the Head of School Concentric circles! Our first graders identify them as patterns in nature, observable in the rings of tree trunks and watery swells from pebbles dropped in ponds. In 2005, we’d find 37 rings in the trunk of a Capitol Hill Day School tree. “This has been the best week ever! It’s a tree that has grown tall and strong, its branches spreading in every Yesterday we won the soccer semi-finals direction. Over the years, the sturdy trunk has been its mission and its unfolding and today we met the Royals!!” These branches, the ever-growing School. were the words of an elated eighth But this analogy has limits. Unlike the tree that grows through nature’s grader on the bus returning from the processes, the School is an institution, dependent for its growth upon human Folger Shakespeare Theater. direction and design. Education, we will argue in this Always challenging to a school are the tasks of envisioning its future, of edition of The Windowpane, is rooted incorporating new directions while holding fast to those aspects of its heritage in mission. A program that ties together that distinguish its character. It falls upon the Board of Trustees and the School across the grades and builds on common administration to tend to its growth. commitments is the strength of this School. The result is a deeply thoughtful curriculum, planned with care. But we know it is the spontaneous moments In art class, first graders that give life to learning, and we rejoice create images of patterns in the natural world, like when they occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Print Untitled (8 Pages)
    Testimony in Zoning Commission Case 08-15 May 4, 2009 I am Margaret Lenzner. I grew up on Porter Street in Cleveland Park and have lived two blocks east of the Giant since 1969. I shop at the Giant almost daily, and regularly use the bank and other retail in the Friendship Shopping Center. The residential community around the Giant has single family homes, apartment buildings, neighborhood commerce, parks and playgrounds, two landscape conservancies, 13 schools, and the Cathedral-- a major tourist attraction. 1 Balancing these diverse elements is vital to our community's well-being. I've worked with my neighbors to respond to many development and zoning issue, often involving the many schools in this area. 2 Other notable efforts established firm land use. For example: • In the seventies, we protected McLean Gardens from demolition and high rise redevelopment. • We created the Cleveland Park Historic District. • Working with the Wisconsin Ave. Corridor Committee, we sought to protect our small, neighborhood shopping center. It became part of the Macomb-Wisconsin Overlay, and C-1 zoning was embedded in the Comprehensive Plan. lh lf8tf- We succeeded in these and other community efforts with DC officials and political representatives as helpful allies. Given this history, I hope the Commissioners understand why many residents are alarmed by the large-scale redevelopment now proposed and the rezoning and waivers that the PUD application demands. Most distressing to me is that OP, DDOT and some of our elected representatives have not been interested in our concerns. You and ANC3C received a petition last October from 171 neighbors of the project expressing the same concerns you have heard tonight.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORERS WANTED! 4530 Macarthur Blvd
    16 WASHINGTON BUSINESS JOURNAL NOVEMBER 24, 2017 17 Compiled by Carolyn M. Proctor 703-258-0826 @WBJBookofLists [email protected] PRIVATE DAY SCHOOLS RANKED BY ANNUAL HIGH-END TUITION Annual high-end Annual lower-end Grades served/ Name/Prior/URL Address/Phone tuition tuition Enrollment Student gender Year founded Head of school 8328 Georgetown Pike 9-12 The Madeira School 1 McLean, VA 22102 $45,710 $45,710 319 1906 Pilar Cabeza de Vaca 1 Girls madeira.org 703-556-8273 8224 Lochinver Ln. K-12 McLean School 4 Potomac, MD 20854 $44,675 $24,890 403 1954 Michael Saxenian 2 Coed mcleanschool.org 240-395-0698 22407 Foxhound Ln. P.O. Box 5555 9-12 Foxcroft School $44,640 $44,640 151 1914 Catherine Smylie McGehee 3 foxcroft.org * Middleburg, VA 20118 Girls 540-687-5555 2301 Foxhall Rd. NW 6-12 The Field School 2 Washington, DC 20007 $44,600 $44,600 370 1972 Dale Johnson 4 Coed fieldschool.org 202-295-5800 Mount Saint Alban 4-12 St. Albans School 3 Washington, DC 20016 $44,141 $44,141 575 1909 Vance Wilson 5 Boys stalbansschool.org 202-537-6440 3612 Woodley Rd. NW 4-12 National Cathedral School 5 Washington, DC 20016 $41,975 $41,975 585 1900 Kathleen O'Neill Jamieson 6 Girls ncs.cathedral.org 202-537-6300 7303 River Rd. 3-12 Holton-Arms School 7 Bethesda, MD 20817 $41,755 $40,695 664 1901 Susanna Jones 7 Girls holton-arms.edu 301-365-5300 10601 Falls Rd. 2-12 Bullis School 6 Potomac, MD 20854 $41,500 $32,840 813 1930 Gerald Boarman 8 Coed bullis.org 301-299-8500 3825 Wisconsin Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Board Liaisons to Member Schools (Listed by Member School)
    2018-2019 Board Liaisons to Member Schools (listed by Member School) Member School Board Liaison Aidan Montessori School Susan Newell Alexandria Country Day School Joan Friedrichs Beauvoir School Julie Buchanan Blessed Sacrament School* Catherine Scott Blyth-Templeton Academy Carla Taylor-Pla British International School of Washington* Mena Burke Browne Academy* Malvika Paddock Bullis School Susan Newell Burgundy Farm Country Day School Pam Murphy Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School Elizabeth Savage Commonwealth Academy Joan Friedrichs Concord Hill School Carla Taylor-Pla Congressional School Mena Burke Connelly School of the Holy Child Michelle Sullivan Edmund Burke School Michelle Sullivan Flint Hill School Pam Murphy 1 Foxcroft School Catherine Scott Georgetown Day School Pam Murphy Georgetown Preparatory School Frazier Schulman Georgetown Visitation Preparatory School Margaret Farrell Gonzaga College High School Catherine Scott Grace Episcopal Day School Susan Newell Green Acres School* Catherine Scott Green Hedges School Carla Taylor-Pla Holton-Arms School Julie Buchanan Holy Trinity School Mena Burke Landon School Julie Buchanan Lowell School Carla Taylor-Pla Madeira School Joan Friedrichs Maret School Pam Murphy McLean School of Maryland Margaret Farrell National Cathedral School Michelle Sullivan National Presbyterian School Malvika Paddock Norwood School Frazier Schulman Oneness-Family School Mena Burke Our Lady of Good Counsel Katherine Corsico Sandy Spring Friends School Katherine Corsico Sheridan School Frazier Schulman Sidwell
    [Show full text]
  • Print Untitled (15 Pages)
    Wisconsin-Newark Neighborhood Coalition Zoning Commission Case 08-15 View of Newark/Wisconsin Avenue Intersection from Cleveland Park Historic District Perspective Testimony on Traffic Impact ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia ZONING COMMISSION Case No. 08-15 District of Columbia CASE NO.08-15 226 EXHIBIT NO.226 Surrounding Neighborhoods Are Bisected by Several Arterials and Have High Cut-Through Traffic on Residential Streets ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia Case No. 08-15 226 PUD Area Includes Many Schools and National Cathedral, With Resulting Traffic on Local Streets ,._. ......_.~ , . ._ . '' .. '.,op'•J' ~ : r:v'.' Tilden S1 N\', Hearst PES Sidwell MS Sidwell US t;'~··· !· aL _, Nat' l Child Rsrch Ctr Pre-School Eaton PES Washington Inti School Beauvoir School Nat' l Cathedral School St Albans School Maret School - ~la c ntn~ ~ ~-· Washington Latin PCS ~";, Wash Hebrew Cong. Pre-School \.'LII·. ·, ::>.I I Washington National Cathedral • ZONING COMMISSION District of Columbia - --.... _ -~.;_1 ... C4 "-'"A.I ._, Case No. 08-15 226 Substantial Additional Traffic Impact of PUD on Neighborhood • Even by Applicant's traffic study and projections, the traffic impact is substantial. By Giant's own estimates, the PUDwill add an additiona/539 (or 119 percent) more weekday PM peak hour trips, and 550 (or 118 percent) more Saturday mid­ day peak hour vehicle-trips than the existing uses. • A peer review of Applicant's traffic study by Precision Systems, Inc. concluded that trips generated by the PUD site will increase from 4630 vehicles per day to 8687 vehicles per day, an increase of approximately 4050 additional vehicles per day on neighborhood streets.
    [Show full text]
  • OUR CLIENTS Posted on August 1, 2015
    OUR CLIENTS Posted on August 1, 2015 Here is a sample of Littleford & Associates' extensive list of satisfied clients. Our For-Profit Companies and Non-Profit Organization clients are listed near the bottom. Please scroll down to see them. You may print this list for your future reference by using the combination of keys: Control-P (IBM) or Command-P (Mac) Independent and International Schools Abington Friends School (PA) Academia Cotopaxi (Ecuador) Academy of Notre Dame (PA) Academy of the Pacific (HI) ACCEL (AZ) Aiglon College (Switzerland) Agnes Irwin School (PA) Albany Academy (NY) Al-Abatinah International School (Oman) Albert College (Canada) Alexander Dawson School (CO and NV) All Saints'Academy (FL) All Saints Episcopal (AZ) All Saints Episcopal Day School (CA) All Saints Episcopal Church (Fort Worth, TX) All Saints Episcopal School of Fort Worth (TX) Alexandria Country Day School (LA) Altamonte School (AL) American Collegiate Institute (Turkey) American Community School- Amman (Jordan) American Institute of Monterrey (MX) American International School of Bucharest (Romania) American International School of Guangzhou (China) American International School of Lisbon (Portugal) American International School of Rotterdam (The Netherlands) American International School of Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) American International School in Mexico American Military Academy (PR) American Overseas School of Rome (Italy) American School Foundation of Monterrey (MX) American School of Asuncion (Asuncion, Paraguay) American School of Campinas (Brazil)
    [Show full text]
  • Girls Avoid Taking Engineering Classes by Lauren Hesse ‘19 PLTW Program
    41st Year, Issue No. 2 January 18, 2019 the Sherwood High School: 300 Olney Sandy Spring Road, Sandy Spring, MD 20860 Warriorwww.thewarrioronline.com Why Is Junior Year So Hard? Girls Avoid Taking Engineering Classes by Lauren Hesse ‘19 PLTW program. The type of reward many girls are look- by Kara Thompson ‘20 portant than other classes. “I’d ing for when they take difficult classes differs from most say I spend about four-five hours Of 24 students enrolled in Aerospace En- of their male classmates. Junior year is notorious for on homework [a night], maybe gineering, three are female. Seventeen students Brendan Lees, a PLTW teacher, explained that being the hardest year of high more,” said Malone. “But com- are enrolled in Civil Engineering, but just two “when surveyed, more females than males say they want school. Many students who plan bined with after-school activities are female. Only eight of the students enrolled in to make a difference with their career choices.” This to attend a four-year college and just taking a little bit of time Digital Electronics (a class focusing on electrical is clearly demonstrated by the overwhelming majority balance three or more AP class- to myself, I still end up staying engineering) are female. Yet, the ratio of females of girls enrolled in the Academy of Health Professions es, honors courses, and the ap- up pretty late doing work.” to males enrolled in other advanced STEM class- (medicine) and Early Child Development (teaching) ca- proaching SAT and ACT. There Shelley Jackson, English es like Honors Chemistry, AP Chemistry, and AP reer pathways.
    [Show full text]