DOCSLIB.ORG

Nonlinear Regression Modeling of Nutrient Loads in Streams: a Bayesian Approach Song S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nonlinear Regression Modeling of Nutrient Loads in Streams: a Bayesian Approach Song S WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 41, W07012, doi:10.1029/2005WR003986, 2005 Nonlinear regression modeling of nutrient loads in streams: A Bayesian approach Song S. Qian and Kenneth H. Reckhow Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA Jun Zhai Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA Gerard McMahon U.S. Geological Survey, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Received 24 January 2005; revised 30 March 2005; accepted 28 April 2005; published 13 July 2005. [1] A Bayesian nonlinear regression modeling method is introduced and compared with the least squares method for modeling nutrient loads in stream networks. The objective of the study is to better model spatial correlation in river basin hydrology and land use for improving the model as a forecasting tool. The Bayesian modeling approach is introduced in three steps, each with a more complicated model and data error structure. The approach is illustrated using a data set from three large river basins in eastern North Carolina. Results indicate that the Bayesian model better accounts for model and data uncertainties than does the conventional least squares approach. Applications of the Bayesian models for ambient water quality standards compliance and TMDL assessment are discussed. Citation: Qian, S. S., K. H. Reckhow, J. Zhai, and G. McMahon (2005), Nonlinear regression modeling of nutrient loads in streams: A Bayesian approach, Water Resour. Res., 41, W07012, doi:10.1029/2005WR003986. 1. Introduction a nonlinear regression model does not allow different coefficient values (e.g., the nutrient delivery rates) for [2] A nonlinear regression modeling approach for mod- eling nutrient loading in streams using simple mechanistic different subwatersheds. Second, the least squares method equations to describe watershed nutrient generation and for estimating model coefficients does not incorporate retention processes was proposed by Smith et al. [1997]. spatial autocorrelation in the data except for the implicit Because it is identifiable and fitted from observational data, component in the stream network. As a result of these a regression model provides an estimate of prediction error weaknesses and because a simple empirical model cannot and can be used to assess the value from information of include all sources and sinks of nutrients in the watershed, additional monitoring. Information on model prediction model residuals are correlated and often display a spatial error also is necessary for identifying impaired water bodies pattern. When residuals are correlated the least squares and evaluating the effectiveness of a total maximum daily method is not the most efficient model coefficient estimator; load (TMDL) program to eliminate the impairment. that is, estimated coefficients likely are subject to large estimation errors, and the resulting uncertainty analysis may [3] Nonlinear regression assumes a strict model error structure. (Model residuals are independent random variate be misleading. from the same normal distribution.) Because nutrient or [5] We present a Bayesian analysis for nonlinear regres- other pollutant flux within a watershed is potentially highly sion models of stream nutrient loads. The main focus of the correlated and a simple nonlinear regression model cannot method is to explicitly model the correlations in the model be expected to explain all nutrient or pollutant generation residuals, including a state space modeling strategy to and attenuation processes, correlation among model resid- model nutrient transport between subwatersheds and a uals is to be expected. Our work builds on recent advances conditional autoregressive model to account for additional in computational statistics to explicitly model the spatial spatial correlation. The state space modeling component correlation structure in river basin hydrology and in water- separates model and observation errors. Using a least shed characteristics, such as soil and land use. squares method, the observed upstream loading likely will be treated as input from a fixed point source; hence this [4] Using nonlinear regression approach for watershed modeling has two potential weaknesses, which are similar to method fails to model the dynamic nature of nutrient those suggested by McMahon et al. [2003], who applied the transport from upstream to downstream subwatersheds. spatially referenced regressions on watershed (SPARROW) [6] With a Bayesian approach, the estimated model coef- model to three river basins in eastern North Carolina. First, ficients are presented in terms of a posterior joint distribu- tion. Although the Bayesian approach using noninformative priors often produces model coefficient estimates similar to Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union. those from the maximum likelihood method, the Bayesian 0043-1397/05/2005WR003986$09.00 emphasis on the posterior distribution will provide a full W07012 1of10 W07012 QIAN ET AL.: BAYESIAN NONLINEAR REGRESSION MODELS W07012 description of the nature of uncertainty, leading to better where quantification of model prediction error. Consequently, the Loadi the nitrogen load or flux in reach i, measured in Bayesian approach is better suited for predicting the fre- metric tons for the year 1992; quency of water quality standard violations, which is im- n, N source index, where N is the total number of portant for TMDL development and assessment. In addition, individual n sources; the Bayesian approach allows objective model comparisons J(i) the set of all reaches upstream and including reach i, through the Bayes Factor and the deviance information except reaches at or above monitoring stations criteria. We illustrate our methods using the SPARROW upstream from reach i; attributes [Smith et al., 1997] and the data set developed for bn the estimated source coefficient for source n; the three river basins in eastern North Carolina by McMahon a the estimated vector of land-to-water delivery et al. [2003] as an example. coefficients; Sn,j the nitrogen mass from source n in drainage to reach 2. Method j; Zj land surface characteristics data associated with [7] The objective of our study is to better model the drainage to reach j; spatial autocorrelation. As pointed out by McMahon et al. S Hi,j fraction of nutrient mass present in water body [2003], the residuals of the initial application of the SPAR- j transported to water body i as a function of first- ROW model contain a systematic (spatial) pattern. Statisti- order loss processesQ associated with stream cal theory indicates that the least squares based model S channels (Hi,j = mexp(ÀksmLi,j,m), where ksm is coefficient estimator is inefficient when model residuals a first-order loss coefficient, m is the number of are not independent. This inefficiency indicates potentially discrete flow classes, and Li,j,m is the length of the large coefficient estimation errors and misleading model stream channel between water bodies j and i in uncertainty assessment. The proposed Bayesian analysis flow class m); will address the spatial autocorrelation in three steps, with R Hi,j the fraction of nutrient mass present in water Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations [Gilks et body j transported to water body i as a function al., 1996] employed as the computational tool in the of first-order loss processes associatedQ with following procedures. R À1 lakes and reservoirs (Hi,j = lexp(Àkrql ), [8] 1. The MCMC simulation method is used for param- where kr is an estimated first-order loss rate eter estimation to replace the least squares method used À1 or ‘‘settling velocity’’, ql is the ratio of water by most nonlinear regression models including the surface area to outflow discharge, and l is the SPARROW model. With MCMC, uncertainty about lakes and reservoirs located between water model coefficients is summarized using the joint poste- bodies j and i) rior distribution of the model coefficients, and avoiding i the error term assumed to be independent and the use of the bootstrap method currently used in identically distributed across separate subbasins SPARROW applications. defined by intervening drainage areas between [9] 2. A state space (STSP) modeling approach is used monitoring stations ( N(0, s2)). to simulate the transportation of nutrient loads through the i [13] There are eight unknown parameters (seven model watershed. A STSP model can better address the serial coefficients plus the unknown variance s2; Table 1). The correlation resulting from the stream network structure. TN loading is generated from three sources (agricultural Using a Bayesian approach resulted in a straightforward land, nonagricultural land, and point sources). Diffuse way to account for both the model and data uncertainty. source nitrogen is attenuated as it moves across the land- [10] 3. A conditional autoregressive (CAR) term is scape to the stream’s edge (modeled using one land delivery added to the STSP model to account for arbitrary spatial variable). Additional attenuation occurs as nitrogen moves correlation. through the reservoir and stream network to a downstream 2.1. SPARROW and Its Initial Application on North monitoring station using three aquatic loss rate coefficients. Carolina Rivers Detailed information about this model form, its assump- tions, and applications is available elsewhere [Smith et al., [11] In a recent application, a SPARROW total nitrogen 1997; Preston and Brakebill, 1999; Alexander et al., 2000, (TN) model was calibrated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: the Package Nlstools
    JSS Journal of Statistical Software August 2015, Volume 66, Issue 5. http://www.jstatsoft.org/ A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools Florent Baty Christian Ritz Sandrine Charles Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen University of Copenhagen University of Lyon Martin Brutsche Jean-Pierre Flandrois Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen University of Lyon Marie-Laure Delignette-Muller University of Lyon Abstract Nonlinear regression models are applied in a broad variety of scientific fields. Various R functions are already dedicated to fitting such models, among which the function nls() has a prominent position. Unlike linear regression fitting of nonlinear models relies on non-trivial assumptions and therefore users are required to carefully ensure and validate the entire modeling. Parameter estimation is carried out using some variant of the least- squares criterion involving an iterative process that ideally leads to the determination of the optimal parameter estimates. Therefore, users need to have a clear understanding of the model and its parameterization in the context of the application and data consid- ered, an a priori idea about plausible values for parameter estimates, knowledge of model diagnostics procedures available for checking crucial assumptions, and, finally, an under- standing of the limitations in the validity of the underlying hypotheses of the fitted model and its implication for the precision of parameter estimates. Current nonlinear regression modules lack dedicated diagnostic functionality. So there is a need to provide users with an extended toolbox of functions enabling a careful evaluation of nonlinear regression fits. To this end, we introduce a unified diagnostic framework with the R package nlstools.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient Nonlinear Regression Approach for Genome-Wide
    An Efficient Nonlinear Regression Approach for Genome-wide Detection of Marginal and Interacting Genetic Variations Seunghak Lee1, Aur´elieLozano2, Prabhanjan Kambadur3, and Eric P. Xing1;? 1School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, USA 2IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, USA 3Bloomberg L.P., USA [email protected] Abstract. Genome-wide association studies have revealed individual genetic variants associated with phenotypic traits such as disease risk and gene expressions. However, detecting pairwise in- teraction effects of genetic variants on traits still remains a challenge due to a large number of combinations of variants (∼ 1011 SNP pairs in the human genome), and relatively small sample sizes (typically < 104). Despite recent breakthroughs in detecting interaction effects, there are still several open problems, including: (1) how to quickly process a large number of SNP pairs, (2) how to distinguish between true signals and SNPs/SNP pairs merely correlated with true sig- nals, (3) how to detect non-linear associations between SNP pairs and traits given small sam- ple sizes, and (4) how to control false positives? In this paper, we present a unified framework, called SPHINX, which addresses the aforementioned challenges. We first propose a piecewise linear model for interaction detection because it is simple enough to estimate model parameters given small sample sizes but complex enough to capture non-linear interaction effects. Then, based on the piecewise linear model, we introduce randomized group lasso under stability selection, and a screening algorithm to address the statistical and computational challenges mentioned above. In our experiments, we first demonstrate that SPHINX achieves better power than existing methods for interaction detection under false positive control.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Selection, Transformations and Variance Estimation in Nonlinear Regression
    Model Selection, Transformations and Variance Estimation in Nonlinear Regression Olaf Bunke1, Bernd Droge1 and J¨org Polzehl2 1 Institut f¨ur Mathematik, Humboldt-Universit¨at zu Berlin PSF 1297, D-10099 Berlin, Germany 2 Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum f¨ur Informationstechnik Heilbronner Str. 10, D-10711 Berlin, Germany Abstract The results of analyzing experimental data using a parametric model may heavily depend on the chosen model. In this paper we propose procedures for the ade- quate selection of nonlinear regression models if the intended use of the model is among the following: 1. prediction of future values of the response variable, 2. estimation of the un- known regression function, 3. calibration or 4. estimation of some parameter with a certain meaning in the corresponding field of application. Moreover, we propose procedures for variance modelling and for selecting an appropriate nonlinear trans- formation of the observations which may lead to an improved accuracy. We show how to assess the accuracy of the parameter estimators by a ”moment oriented bootstrap procedure”. This procedure may also be used for the construction of confidence, prediction and calibration intervals. Programs written in Splus which realize our strategy for nonlinear regression modelling and parameter estimation are described as well. The performance of the selected model is discussed, and the behaviour of the procedures is illustrated by examples. Key words: Nonlinear regression, model selection, bootstrap, cross-validation, variable transformation, variance modelling, calibration, mean squared error for prediction, computing in nonlinear regression. AMS 1991 subject classifications: 62J99, 62J02, 62P10. 1 1 Selection of regression models 1.1 Preliminary discussion In many papers and books it is discussed how to analyse experimental data estimating the parameters in a linear or nonlinear regression model, see e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Regression, Nonlinear Least Squares, and Nonlinear Mixed Models in R
    Nonlinear Regression, Nonlinear Least Squares, and Nonlinear Mixed Models in R An Appendix to An R Companion to Applied Regression, third edition John Fox & Sanford Weisberg last revision: 2018-06-02 Abstract The nonlinear regression model generalizes the linear regression model by allowing for mean functions like E(yjx) = θ1= f1 + exp[−(θ2 + θ3x)]g, in which the parameters, the θs in this model, enter the mean function nonlinearly. If we assume additive errors, then the parameters in models like this one are often estimated via least squares. In this appendix to Fox and Weisberg (2019) we describe how the nls() function in R can be used to obtain estimates, and briefly discuss some of the major issues with nonlinear least squares estimation. We also describe how to use the nlme() function in the nlme package to fit nonlinear mixed-effects models. Functions in the car package than can be helpful with nonlinear regression are also illustrated. The nonlinear regression model is a generalization of the linear regression model in which the conditional mean of the response variable is not a linear function of the parameters. As a simple example, the data frame USPop in the carData package, which we load along with the car package, has decennial U. S. Census population for the United States (in millions), from 1790 through 2000. The data are shown in Figure 1 (a):1 library("car") Loading required package: carData brief(USPop) 22 x 2 data.frame (17 rows omitted) year population [i] [n] 1 1790 3.9292 2 1800 5.3085 3 1810 7.2399 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression
    Fitting Models to Biological Data using Linear and Nonlinear Regression A practical guide to curve fitting Harvey Motulsky & Arthur Christopoulos Copyright 2003 GraphPad Software, Inc. All rights reserved. GraphPad Prism and Prism are registered trademarks of GraphPad Software, Inc. GraphPad is a trademark of GraphPad Software, Inc. Citation: H.J. Motulsky and A Christopoulos, Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression. A practical guide to curve fitting. 2003, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego CA, www.graphpad.com. To contact GraphPad Software, email [email protected] or [email protected]. Contents at a Glance A. Fitting data with nonlinear regression.................................... 13 B. Fitting data with linear regression..........................................47 C. Models ....................................................................................58 D. How nonlinear regression works........................................... 80 E. Confidence intervals of the parameters ..................................97 F. Comparing models................................................................ 134 G. How does a treatment change the curve?..............................160 H. Fitting radioligand and enzyme kinetics data ....................... 187 I. Fitting dose-response curves .................................................256 J. Fitting curves with GraphPad Prism......................................296 3 Contents Preface ........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Regression and Nonlinear Least Squares
    Nonlinear Regression and Nonlinear Least Squares Appendix to An R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression John Fox January 2002 1 Nonlinear Regression The normal linear regression model may be written yi = xiβ + εi where xi is a (row) vector of predictors for the ith of n observations, usually with a 1 in the first position representing the regression constant; β is the vector of regression parameters to be estimated; and εi is a random error, assumed to be normally distributed, independently of the errors for other observations, with 2 expectation 0 and constant variance: εi ∼ NID(0,σ ). In the more general normal nonlinear regression model, the function f(·) relating the response to the predictors is not necessarily linear: yi = f(β, xi)+εi As in the linear model, β is a vector of parameters and xi is a vector of predictors (but in the nonlinear 2 regression model, these vectors are not generally of the same dimension), and εi ∼ NID(0,σ ). The likelihood for the nonlinear regression model is n y − f β, x 2 L β,σ2 1 − i=1 i i ( )= n/2 exp 2 (2πσ2) 2σ This likelihood is maximized when the sum of squared residuals n 2 S(β)= yi − f β, xi i=1 is minimized. Differentiating S(β), ∂S β ∂f β, x ( ) − y − f β, x i ∂β = 2 i i ∂β Setting the partial derivatives to 0 produces estimating equations for the regression coefficients. Because these equations are in general nonlinear, they require solution by numerical optimization. As in a linear model, it is usual to estimate the error variance by dividing the residual sum of squares for the model by the number of observations less the number of parameters (in preference to the ML estimator, which divides by n).
    [Show full text]
  • Part III Nonlinear Regression
    Part III Nonlinear Regression 255 Chapter 13 Introduction to Nonlinear Regression We look at nonlinear regression models. 13.1 Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models We compare linear regression models, Yi = f(Xi; ¯) + "i 0 = Xi¯ + "i = ¯ + ¯ Xi + + ¯p¡ Xi;p¡ + "i 0 1 1 ¢ ¢ ¢ 1 1 with nonlinear regression models, Yi = f(Xi; γ) + "i where f is a nonlinear function of the parameters γ and Xi1 γ0 . Xi = 2 . 3 γ = 2 . 3 q£1 p£1 6 Xiq 7 6 γp¡1 7 4 5 4 5 In both the linear and nonlinear cases, the error terms "i are often (but not always) independent normal random variables with constant variance. The expected value in the linear case is 0 E Y = f(Xi; ¯) = X ¯ f g i and in the nonlinear case, E Y = f(Xi; γ) f g 257 258 Chapter 13. Introduction to Nonlinear Regression (ATTENDANCE 12) Exercise 13.1(Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models) Identify whether the following regression models are linear, intrinsically linear (nonlinear, but transformed easily into linear) or nonlinear. 1. Yi = ¯0 + ¯1Xi1 + "i This regression model is linear / intrinsically linear / nonlinear 2. Yi = ¯0 + ¯1pXi1 + "i This regression model is linear / intrinsically linear / nonlinear because Yi = ¯0 + ¯1 Xi1 + "i p0 = ¯0 + ¯1Xi1 + "i 3. ln Yi = ¯0 + ¯1Xi1 + "i This regression model is linear / intrinsically linear / nonlinear because ln Yi = ¯0 + ¯1 Xi1 + "i 0 p0 Yi = ¯0 + ¯1Xi1 + "i 0 where Yi = ln Yi 4. Yi = γ0 + γ1Xi1 + γ2Xi2 + "i This regression model1 is linear / intrinsically linear / nonlinear 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Regression for Split Plot Experiments
    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture 1990 - 2nd Annual Conference Proceedings NONLINEAR REGRESSION FOR SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENTS Marcia L. Gumpertz John O. Rawlings Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Applied Statistics Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Gumpertz, Marcia L. and Rawlings, John O. (1990). "NONLINEAR REGRESSION FOR SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENTS," Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.4148/2475-7772.1441 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 159 Conference on Applied Statistics in Agriculture Kansas State University NONLINEAR REGRESSION FOR SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENTS Marcia L. Gumpertz and John O. Rawlings North Carolina State University ABSTRACT Split plot experimental designs are common in studies of the effects of air pollutants on crop yields. Nonlinear functions such the Weibull function have been used extensively to model the effect of ozone exposure on yield of several crop species. The usual nonlinear regression model, which assumes independent errors, is not appropriate for data from nested or split plot designs in which there is more than one source of random variation. The nonlinear model with variance components combines a nonlinear model for the mean with additive random effects to describe the covariance structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Regression
    Nonlinear Regression © 2017 Griffin Chure. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0. All code contained herein is licensed under an MIT license In this tutorial... In this tutorial, we will learn how to perform nonlinear regression using the statistic by estimating the DNA binding energy of the lacI repressor to the O2 operator DNA sequence. What is probability? One of the most powerful skills a scientist can possess is a knowledge of probability and statistics. I can nearly guarantee that regardless of discipline, you will have to perform a nonlinear regression and report the value of a parameter. Before we get into the details, let's briefly touch on what we mean we report the "value of a parameter". What we seek to identify through parameter estimation is the value of a given parameter which best describes the data under a given model. Estimation of a parameter is intimately tied to our interpretation of probability of which there are two major schools of thought (Frequentism and Bayesian). A detailed discussion of these two interpretations is outside the scope of this tutorial, but see this wonderful 25 minute video on Bayesian vs Frequentist probability by Jake VanderPlas. Also see BE/Bi 103 - Data Analysis in the Biological Sciences by Justin Bois, which is one of the best courses I have ever taken. How do we estimate a parameter? Above, we defined a parameter value as that which best describes our data given a specific model, but what do we mean by "best describes"? Imagine we have some set of data ( and , which are linearly correlated, as is shown in the figure below.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Regression (Part 1)
    Nonlinear Regression (Part 1) Christof Seiler Stanford University, Spring 2016, STATS 205 Overview I Smoothing or estimating curves I Density estimation I Nonlinear regression I Rank-based linear regression Curve Estimation I A curve of interest can be a probability density function f I In density estimation, we observe X1,..., Xn from some unknown cdf F with density f X1,..., Xn ∼ f I The goal is to estimate density f Density Estimation 0.4 0.3 0.2 density 0.1 0.0 −2 0 2 4 rating Density Estimation 0.4 0.3 0.2 density 0.1 0.0 −2 0 2 4 rating Nonlinear Regression I A curve of interest can be a regression function r I In regression, we observe pairs (x1, Y1),..., (xn, Yn) that are related as Yi = r(xi ) + i with E(i ) = 0 I The goal is to estimate the regression function r Nonlinear Regression Bone Mineral Density Data 0.2 0.1 gender female male Change in BMD 0.0 10 15 20 25 Age Nonlinear Regression Bone Mineral Density Data 0.2 0.1 gender female male Change in BMD 0.0 −0.1 10 15 20 25 Age Nonlinear Regression Bone Mineral Density Data 0.2 0.1 gender female male Change in BMD 0.0 10 15 20 25 Age Nonlinear Regression Bone Mineral Density Data 0.2 0.1 gender female male Change in BMD 0.0 10 15 20 25 Age The Bias–Variance Tradeoff I Let fbn(x) be an estimate of a function f (x) I Define the squared error loss function as 2 Loss = L(f (x), fbn(x)) = (f (x) − fbn(x)) I Define average of this loss as risk or Mean Squared Error (MSE) MSE = R(f (x), fbn(x)) = E(Loss) I The expectation is taken with respect to fbn which is random I The MSE can be
    [Show full text]
  • Sketching Structured Matrices for Faster Nonlinear Regression
    Sketching Structured Matrices for Faster Nonlinear Regression Haim Avron Vikas Sindhwani David P. Woodruff IBM T.J. Watson Research Center IBM Almaden Research Center Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 San Jose, CA 95120 fhaimav,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract Motivated by the desire to extend fast randomized techniques to nonlinear lp re- gression, we consider a class of structured regression problems. These problems involve Vandermonde matrices which arise naturally in various statistical model- ing settings, including classical polynomial fitting problems, additive models and approximations to recently developed randomized techniques for scalable kernel methods. We show that this structure can be exploited to further accelerate the solution of the regression problem, achieving running times that are faster than “input sparsity”. We present empirical results confirming both the practical value of our modeling framework, as well as speedup benefits of randomized regression. 1 Introduction Recent literature has advocated the use of randomization as a key algorithmic device with which to dramatically accelerate statistical learning with lp regression or low-rank matrix approximation techniques [12, 6, 8, 10]. Consider the following class of regression problems, arg min kZx − bkp; where p = 1; 2 (1) x2C where C is a convex constraint set, Z 2 Rn×k is a sample-by-feature design matrix, and b 2 Rn is the target vector. We assume henceforth that the number of samples is large relative to data dimensionality (n k). The setting p = 2 corresponds to classical least squares regression, while p = 1 leads to least absolute deviations fit, which is of significant interest due to its robustness properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Likelihood Ratio Tests for Goodness-Of-Fit of a Nonlinear Regression Model
    Likelihood Ratio Tests for Goodness-of-Fit of a Nonlinear Regression Model Ciprian M. Crainiceanu¤ David Rupperty April 2, 2004 Abstract We propose likelihood and restricted likelihood ratio tests for goodness-of-fit of nonlinear regression. The first order Taylor approximation around the MLE of the regression parameters is used to approximate the null hypothesis and the alternative is modeled nonparametrically using penalized splines. The exact finite sample distribution of the test statistics is obtained for the linear model approximation and can be easily simulated. We recommend using the restricted likelihood instead of the likelihood ratio test because restricted maximum likelihood estimates are not as severely biased as the maximum likelihood estimates in the penalized splines framework. Short title: LRTs for nonlinear regression Keywords: Fan-Huang goodness-of-fit test, mixed models, Nelson-Siegel model for yield curves, penalized splines, REML. 1 Introduction Nonlinear regression models used in applications arise either from underlying theoretical principles or from the trained subjective choice of the statistician. From the perspective of goodness-of-fit testing these are null models and, once data become available, statistical testing may be used to validate or invalidate the original assumptions. There are three main approaches to goodness-of-fit testing of a null regression model. The standard approach is to nest the null parametric model into a parametric supermodel (sometimes called the “full model”) that is assumed to be true and use likelihood ratio tests (LRTs). This ¤Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205 USA. Email: [email protected] ySchool of Operational Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, Rhodes Hall, NY 14853, USA.
    [Show full text]