DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Download the Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF Download the Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail THE SIGNAL AND THE NOISE: WHY SO MANY PREDICTIONS FAIL--BUT SOME DONT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nate Silver | 560 pages | 03 Feb 2015 | Penguin Books | 9780143125082 | English | United States The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--But Some Dont PDF Book Basically, it's hard to predict stuff. The chance of getting a positive mammogram for a woman without cancer. Without any introduction to the subject, he claims Hume is stuck in some 'skeptical shell' that prevents him from understanding the simple, elegant solutions of Bayes. In almost every chapter following this he refers to the way that Bayesian reasoning can be used to strengthen forecasting and to overcome some of the difficulties of predicting in that area. Silver simply crunched the numbers and nailed the outcomes in every state. Vision and taste, for example, are perceptions derived from the brain's ability to discern pattern. It was published in Japanese in November One of my favorite tweets ever I don't read many tweets came from Ken Jennings on election morning of , something along t Reading Nate Silver is like exhaling after holding your breath for a really long time. Had this quote been from the introduction, and had the book given any insight into how to get beyond the platitudes, it would be the book I hoped to read. Silver's book, The Signal and the Noise , was published in September In respect of the financial crisis, he identifies various failures of prediction housing bubble, rating agencies, failure to see how it would cause a global financial crisis, failure to realise how big and deep recession would be which he largely ascribes to over-confidence and inability to forecast out of sample events. Feb 13, Wen rated it it was amazing Shelves: data-science. But, I did find the book fascinating, informative, and chock full calculations juxtaposed against unpredictable elements that could not be foreseen, or against patterns in plain sight, were ignored, all mix together to prove why predictions and forecast often fail, but also, what makes them work! People often tend to ignore items 1 and 3 on the list, leading to very erroneous conclusions. Be very afraid. Nathaniel Read "Nate" Silver born January 13, is an American statistician and writer who analyzes baseball and elections. There was a missed opportunity to spend some time on results from the medical research industry. Also, the explanation of Bayes' theorem was solid, as was the chapter on stocks. As has been noted by others, the number of typographical errors is unacceptable. Just think about the times when you made it out of the path of a tornado, and be thankful for these guys, who must decipher an incredible amount of data and unpredictable patterns, and they must deal with the human element on top of that. Are they good-or just lucky? Loved each and every part of this book. All that being said, be forewarned that most people will find this book extremely boring. The first section of the book, takes a look at the various ways experts make predictions, and how they could miss something like the financial crisis, for example. The majority of chapters in this book are inferior rehashes of arguments and anecdotes from other authors. See more Timeisrhythm. Over-simplification on the one hand and brute-force data crunching on the other can both lead to serious errors. Then I'm jarred out of complacency by a sudden shot from nowhere, in which he says that David Hume, one of the greatest philosophers of the 18th century, is simply too 'daft to understand' probabilistic arguments. He provides examples from Kasparov's chess match with Big Blue, and an interview on poker strategy with Tom Dwan. By summer of that year, after he revealed his identity to his readers, he began to appear as an electoral and political analyst in national print, online, and cable news media. Goodreads Librari Let's start by two weaknesses: At some points it seems good prediction looks like a 'hammer' to see all the problems as 'needles'. While I was searching for the words to describe the book, I have found the perfect description in Chapter 12 the book itself: Heuristics like Occam's razor If I weren't a completist I would have read only the chapters that started going somewhere in the first few pages, as the correlation between the first five pages was. One is the fawning approach to Donald Rumsfeld. But the number of meaningful relationships in the data. That's what I was assuming the book would be. Mar 26, Justin rated it it was ok. The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--But Some Dont Writer If he had even kept on for five more pages he would have found that Hume was defending the very type of probabilistic arguments that Silver said Hume was 'too daft' to understand. These different topics illustrate different statistical principles. In , after his triumph of predicting the outcome of the last two presidential elections and selling his "fivethirtyeight" blog to the New York Times, Nate Silver accomplished what is almost impossible. Please note that the tricks or techniques listed in this pdf are either fictional or claimed to work by its creator. At any rate, I think the chapters on the financial collapse and global warming should be required reading for everyone, and the rest of it for those who are interested. Interesting at points, but the main message gets swallowed by the noise—almost too much random content. Jan 19, Dave rated it liked it. View all 13 comments. That same year, Silver's predictions of U. The chapter on terrorism was an excellent ending to the book, as it not only tied the concepts together, but it also made apparent the stakes in predicti This was a fun read that tickled the nonfiction part of my brain in pleasant ways. These include the housing bubble, the collapse of the Soviet Union, and the Fukushima disaster. Book about prediction by the author of the political blog, which became particularly famous in the presidential election after the book was written due to the author's high confidence in an Obama victory due to polling evidence in marginals. An admonition like "The more complex you make the model the worse the forecast gets" is equivalent to saying "Never add too much salt to the recipe" Throughout it all, he reminds us that human beings are pattern-seeking animals and that we are just as likely to build patterns where none exist as we are to find the correct patterns and harness their predictive capacity. See all 6 questions about The Signal and the Noise…. Original Title. The Noise Everything else. More filters. Just, turns out I prefer him doing stats in word articles and in person, where he comes across much better. See more Timeisrhythm. But what I was not expecting was the exten I picked up The Signal and the Noise from the library because I thought it would be slightly boring. He calmly points out that some things are predictable and are predicted, using various methods with resultant various success. So,yes, Silver's political forecasting is exceedingly accurate and his writing is hit or miss. I am sure the vast majority of readers will roll a bemused eye at my anger over trivial details like this - but not only does it show that Silver very often doesn't take the time to understand his sources see Michael Mann's critique of Silver's presentation of global warming , but Silver's casual remarks could easily turn a lot of readers off to Hume before they've even read him. Senate races that year. Silver frames issues in terms of Bayes Theorem, which is a centuries-old mathematical formula for determining how probabilities change as new information becomes available. If our appreciation of uncertainty improves, our predictions can get better too. I read some of the other reviews that complained that this book is somewhat meandering, which I can see. Most of my book group ended up awarding only 3-stars. Loved each and every part of this book. Dont Let Me Go by J. This "Bayesian" approach is named for the 18th century minister Thomas Bayes who discovered a simple formula for updating probabilities using new data. I had hoped that the book would draw on the author's experience and give an insight into how to apply this idea in the real world. Four stars, without hesitation. I approached the chapter on climate prediction with some trepidation, wondering if Silver was going to somehow take the position that it was all baloney. The writing is excellent, the graphics helpful and the type not too small. It concluded that most of these findings were likely to fail when applied in the real world. An even greater editorial error is letting the author ramble on again, in some chapters. But I really didn't mind at all. The difficulty in handling large amounts of data is separating the signal from the noise. If you've read Michael Lewis's The Big Short and Moneyball you can skip chapters 1 and 3 and if you've ever had a class that proves pundits are not any more accurate forecasters than the Silver's gone 99 for on predicting the state winners of the last two presidential elections. Nevertheless, I must have thought it sounded interesting and placed a hold on it at the library. We make approximations and assumptions about the world that are much cruder than we realize.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--But Some Dont Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    THE SIGNAL AND THE NOISE: WHY SO MANY PREDICTIONS FAIL--BUT SOME DONT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nate Silver | 560 pages | 03 Feb 2015 | Penguin Books | 9780143125082 | English | United States The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail—But Some Don't by Nate Silver Please note that the tricks or techniques listed in this pdf are either fictional or claimed to work by its creator. We do not guarantee that these techniques will work for you. Some of the techniques listed in The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail - But Some Dont may require a sound knowledge of Hypnosis, users are advised to either leave those sections or must have a basic understanding of the subject before practicing them. DMCA and Copyright : The book is not hosted on our servers, to remove the file please contact the source url. If you see a Google Drive link instead of source url, means that the file witch you will get after approval is just a summary of original book or the file has been already removed. Loved each and every part of this book. I will definitely recommend this book to non fiction, science lovers. Your Rating:. Your Comment:. As a devotee of , website and especially podcasts, I was looking forward to this book. I wanted to love it. It was enjoyable, certainly, and I learned a few things. But after opening the door, it Nate Silver. He solidified his standing as the nation's foremost political forecaster with his near perfect prediction of the election. Drawing on his own groundbreaking work, Silver examines the world of prediction, investigating how we can distinguish a true signal from a universe of noisy data.
    [Show full text]
  • Psephological Fallacies of Public Opinion Polling
    SPECIAL ARTICLE Psephological Fallacies of Public Opinion Polling Praveen Rai Opinion polls in India capture electoral snapshots in time he terms “survey” and “opinion poll” in India would that divulge information on political participation, have remained a professional jargon of market research industry, had it not been used for predicting election ideological orientation of voters and belief in core T outcomes. The green shoots of opinion polls to study Indian democratic values. The survey data provides for crucial national elections emerged in the 1950s, but it caught the ima- social science insights, validation of theoretical research gination of the people and became clichéd in the closing dec- and academic knowledge production. Although the ade of the 20th century. The popularity of election surveys stems from the political socialisation and crystal ball gazing media’s obsession with political forecasting has shifted curiosity of Indians to foresee the outcomes of hustings before to electoral prophecy, psephology continues to provide the pronouncement of formal results. The electoral inquisitive- the best telescopic view of elections based on the ness of the stakeholders created a large canvas of opportunity feedback of citizens. The ascertainment of subaltern for opinion-polling industry and scope for scientifi c forecasting of Indian election competitions. The proliferation of electronic opinion by surveys not only broadens the contours of media and the rapid monetisation in the 1990s provided mo- understanding electoral democracy, but also provides mentum to polling agencies to venture into opinion polling on an empirical alternative to the elitist viewpoint of national electoral politics and state election contests. The opin- competitive politics in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting Elections: Voter Intentions Versus Expectations*
    Forecasting Elections: Voter Intentions versus Expectations* David Rothschild Justin Wolfers Microsoft Research Dept of Economics and Ford School of Public Policy, and Applied Statistics Center, Columbia University of Michigan Brookings, CEPR, CESifo, IZA and NBER [email protected] [email protected] www.ResearchDMR.com www.nber.org/~jwolfers Abstract Most pollsters base their election projections off questions of voter intentions, which ask “If the election were held today, who would you vote for?” By contrast, we probe the value of questions probing voters’ expectations, which typically ask: “Regardless of who you plan to vote for, who do you think will win the upcoming election?” We demonstrate that polls of voter expectations consistently yield more accurate forecasts than polls of voter intentions. A small-scale structural model reveals that this is because we are polling from a broader information set, and voters respond as if they had polled twenty of their friends. This model also provides a rational interpretation for why respondents’ forecasts are correlated with their expectations. We also show that we can use expectations polls to extract accurate election forecasts even from extremely skewed samples. This draft: November 1, 2012 Keywords: Polling, information aggregation, belief heterogeneity JEL codes: C53, D03, D8 * The authors would like to thank Stephen Coate, Alex Gelber, Andrew Gelman, Sunshine Hillygus, Mat McCubbins, Marc Meredith and Frank Newport, for useful discussions, and seminar audiences at AAPOR, Berkeley, Brookings, CalTech, Columbia, Cornell, the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, the Congressional Budget Office, the Council of Economic Advisers, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Maryland, Michigan, MIT, the NBER Summer Institute, University of Pennsylvania’s political science department, Princeton, UCLA, UCSD, USC, and Wharton for comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Forecasts of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election
    bs_bs_banner Citizen Forecasts of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election MICHAEL K. MILLER Australian National University GUANCHUN WANG Lightspeed China Ventures SANJEEV R. KULKARNI Princeton University H. VINCENT POOR Princeton University DANIEL N. OSHERSON Princeton University We analyze individual probabilistic predictions of state outcomes in the 2008 U.S. presidential election. Employing an original survey of more than 19,000 respondents, we find that partisans gave higher probabilities to their favored candidates, but this bias was reduced by education, numerical sophistication, and the level of Obama support in their home states. In aggregate, we show that individual biases balance out, and the group’s predictions were highly accurate, outperforming both Intrade (a prediction market) and fivethirtyeight.com (a poll-based forecast). The implication is that electoral forecasters can often do better asking individuals who they think will win rather than who they want to win. Keywords: Citizen Forecasts, Individual Election Predictions, 2008 U.S. Presidential Election, Partisan Bias, Voter Information, Voter Preference, Wishful Thinking Bias in Elections. Related Articles: Dewitt, Jeff R., and Richard N. Engstrom. 2011. The Impact of Prolonged Nomination Contests on Presidential Candidate Evaluations and General Election Vote Choice: The Case of 2008.” Politics & Policy 39 (5): 741-759. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00311.x/abstract Knuckey, Jonathan. 2011. “Racial Resentment and Vote Choice in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” Politics & Policy 39 (4): 559-582. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00304.x/abstract Politics & Policy, Volume 40, No. 6 (2012): 1019-1052.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (398Kb)
    US Presidential Elections: Why a Democrat is now favourite to win in 2020. The results of the US midterm elections are now largely in and they came as a shock to many seasoned forecasters. This wasn’t the kind of shock that occurred in 2016, when the EU referendum tipped to Brexit and the US presidential election to Donald Trump. Nor the type that followed the 2015 and 2017 UK general elections, which produced a widely unexpected Conservative majority and a hung parliament respectively. On those occasions, the polls, pundits and prediction markets got it, for the most part, very wrong, and confidence in political forecasting took a major hit. The shock on this occasion was of a different sort – surprise related to just how right most of the forecasts were. Take the FiveThirtyEight political forecasting methodology, most closely associated with Nate Silver, famed for the success of his 2008 and 2012 US presidential election forecasts. In 2016, even that trusted methodology failed to predict Trump’s narrow triumph in some of the key swing states. This was reflected widely across other forecasting methodologies, too, causing a crisis of confidence in political forecasting. And things only got worse when much academic modelling of the 2017 UK general election was even further off target than it had been in 2015. How did it go so right? So what happened in the 2018 US midterm elections? This time, the FiveThirtyEight “Lite” forecast, based solely on local and national polls weighted by past performance, predicted that the Democrats would pick up a net 38 seats in the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Ericka Menchen-Trevino
    Ericka Menchen-Trevino 7/24/2020 c COPYRIGHT by Kurt Wirth July 23, 2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PREDICTING CHANGES IN PUBLIC OPINION WITH TWITTER: WHAT SOCIAL MEDIA DATA CAN AND CAN'T TELL US ABOUT OPINION FORMATION by Kurt Wirth ABSTRACT With the advent of social media data, some researchers have claimed they have the potential to revolutionize the measurement of public opinion. Others have pointed to non-generalizable methods and other concerns to suggest that the role of social media data in the field is limited. Likewise, researchers remain split as to whether automated social media accounts, or bots, have the ability to influence con- versations larger than those with their direct audiences. This dissertation examines the relationship between public opinion as measured by random sample surveys, Twitter sentiment, and Twitter bot activity. Analyzing Twitter data on two topics, the president and the economy, as well as daily public polling data, this dissertation offers evidence that changes in Twitter sentiment of the president predict changes in public approval of the president fourteen days later. Likewise, it shows that changes in Twit- ter bot sentiment of both the president and the economy predict changes in overall Twitter sentiment on those topics between one and two days later. The methods also reveal a previously undiscovered phenomenon by which Twitter sentiment on a topic moves counter to polling approval of the topic at a seven-day interval. This dissertation also discusses the theoretical implications of various methods of calculating social media sentiment. Most importantly, its methods were pre-registered so as to maximize the generalizability of its findings and avoid data cherry-picking or overfitting.
    [Show full text]