553 Wing Loading in 15 Species of North American Owls David H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

553 Wing Loading in 15 Species of North American Owls David H Wing Loading in 15 Species of North American Owls David H. Johnson 1 Abstract.—Infor mation on wing morphology is important in under - standing the mechanics and ener getics of flight and in aspects r e- lated to reversed sexual size dimorphism in owls. I summarized wing span, wing area, wing loading, root box, and aspect ratio calculations from the available literatur e and from 113 owls examined in this study. Wing loading estimates for 15 species ranged fr om 0.211 to 0.545 g/cm 2. Measur ements were available for both male and female owls in 12 species; males of all species had a lower wing loading. In five species with sufficient sample sizes, males had significantly lower wing loading (18 percent on average) than females of the same spe- cies. Root box ar ea (the area between the wings) averaged 15.4 percent of the combined wing and r oot box ar eas. Aspect ratio, the ratio of the wing span to mean wing width, ranged fr om 4.84 to 8.90. Infor mation is pr esented for the following species: Bar n (Tyto alba), Short-ear ed (Asio flammeus), Long-ear ed (A. otus), Gr eat Horned (Bubo virginianus), Barred (Strix varia), Gr eat Gray (S. nebulosa), Norther n Spotted ( S. occidentalis caurina), Snowy (Nyctea scandiaca), Eastern Scr eech- ( Otus asio), Western Scr eech- ( O. kennicottii), Flammulated (O. flammeolus), Norther n Pygmy- (Glaucidium gnoma), Norther n Saw-whet (Aegolius acadicus), Bor eal (A. funereus), and Burr owing (Speotyto cunicularia) Owls. The type of habitat a flying or gliding animal narrow, slim, unslotted high-speed wings, chooses to live in, as well as its way of exploit- designed for fast flight in open habitats. ing the habitat, ar e closely related to its body Shearwaters, albatrosses, and other seabir ds size, wing form, flight style, flight speed, and have long, narr ow, flat, high-aspect-ratio wings, flight ener getics. Natural selection is likely to designed for long-distance gliding. Last, act towards a wing structur e that minimizes storks, eagles, and vultur es have high-lift or the power requir ed to fly at the speed and style slotted soaring wings, which in lar ge birds optimal for the animal, and is assumed to produces a very efficient soaring wing result in some near -optimal combination of (Feduccia 1996). Most owls have r elatively these variables. The optimal flight speed varies large, rounded, and slotted wings. Savile with the flight goal and the type and abun- (1957) characterized the Easter n Scr eech-owl dance of food. T o understand how flying (Otus asio) as having a slotted high-lift wing. animals work, their physiology, morphology, The “slotting” is a r esult of the abrupt narr ow- ecology, and wing function must be known. ing (ter med attenuation or emar gination) in the distal end of up to five or six of the longest Although ther e are many styles of wings, primaries. While this attenuation is limited in ornithologists generally r ecognize four basic some owls, it is quite pr onounced in others (see wing types (Savile 1957). Woodpeckers, galli- Averill 1927). W ithers (1981) suggests that naceous species, and most passerines have wing-tip slots have evolved because of biome- short, br oad elliptical wings, designed for chanical limitations to the bending str ength of maneuvering thr ough dense vegetation. Swifts, large, low-aspect ratio bir d wings that could swallows, falcons, and plovers have long, have detrimental aer odynamic consequences. Wing loading is a metric used in deter mining 1 Washington Department of Fish and W ildlife, the speed, dynamics of lift, and tur ning radius 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, W A 98501- of birds (also bats and aircraft). It is expr essed 1091. as the relationship between body mass and 553 2nd Owl Symposium total wing area, calculated by dividing the association with other activities during a weight of a bird by the sur face area of both demographic study on this species. Bor eal wings. Wing loading is expr essed by grams per Owls were sexed by their behavior during square centimeter (g/cm 2) (Clark 1971). Owls’ radio-telemetry studies during the nesting wings are broad, with a large area in compari- season (e.g., males delivering pr ey to nest site; son to the weight of the bir d, giving them a low females incubating and br ooding) (G. Hayward, wing-loading relative to other bir ds. pers. comm.). Gr eg Hayward (unpubl. data) submitted wing ar eas, weights, and capture Another expr ession of wing morphology is dates for all of the Bor eal Owls examined in called aspect ratio—the ratio of wing span to this study. Data on a lar ge sample of Barn mean wing width. Thus, long and narr ow Owls (Tyto alba) was drawn from Marti (1990); wings designed for high speed, have a high differences in his methodology should be noted. aspect ratio, while short, br oad wings designed Summary wing loading and aspect ratio calcu- for low speed and maneuverability, have a low lations were determined using a weighted aspect ratio. In general, wing length is some- mean, that is: (mean of males plus mean of what shorter in those bir d species which hunt females)/2. in cover, and longer in those which hunt in open country or ar e highly migratory. Wing span—Wing span is defined as the dis- tance (mm) fr om one wing tip to the other , with The objective of this paper is to summarize the the wings spread horizontally as far out as they relevant literatur e and to pr ovide mor e specific will go (fig. 1). Wing span measur ements were infor mation on wing span, wing loading, r oot taken with the owls placed on their backs atop box, aspect ratio, and male/female compari- a tape measure. sons for the owls of North America. Wing area—Owls were held with their body METHODS AND MA TERIALS facing downward and a single wing spread over a paper on a board or table (see Pennycuick Wing data for eight species was extracted fr om 1989, p. 11). W ing area was measured by the limited literatur e on this topic. Data for tracing ar ound each fully extended and flat- this study was obtained from the following tened wing. Starting wher e the front of the locations: Gr eat Gray Owls (Strix nebulosa) from souther n Manitoba, Bor eal Owls (Aegolius funereus) from Idaho, a Flammulated Owl (Otus flammeolus) from Colorado, and nine species of owls from Or egon. With the exception of eight Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus), the owls from Or egon came from the west side of the Cascade Mountains. Except for the Norther n Spotted Owls (Strix occidentalis caurina), Bor eal Owls, and one Barred Owl (S. varia), all owls examined were dead. Between 1988 and 1997, over 250 owl carcasses were examined. The owls were trauma-killed, the vast majority resulting fr om vehicle collisions. Only fr esh specimens in excellent condition wer e used; owls with broken wing bones, tor n skin tissue, a pronounced keel suggesting cause of death by starvation, other damage, or br oken or Figure 1.—Wing span is the wingtip-to-wingtip molted wing feathers were discarded. The sex distance (in mm), with wings spread out to of dead owls was determined through inter nal the sides to their fullest extent. WL = wing sexing (e.g., by looking for testes or ovaries). length, as measured (in mm) from the wing The sex of live Norther n Spotted Owls and the root line to tip of the longest primary. RL = Barred Owl was determined by their vocaliza- root line, a straight line depicting the inter- tions and by examination for the pr esence/ face between the wing and the owl’s body. absence of a brood patch (if during the nesting RB = root box, (in cm2). This (reduced) season). Norther n Spotted Owl wing measur e- tracing is from a male Western Screech-owl ments were acquir ed during 1988-1989 in (Otus kennicottii ). 554 wing meets the body, a line was drawn follow- Wing length—Wing length was determined by ing the outline of the individual feathers. After measuring the perpendicular distance (mm) tracing the wing to wher e it again met the body from the wing r oot line to the tip of the longest (at the inside edge of the secondaries), the bir d primary feather (fig. 1). was lifted off the paper and a wing root line was drawn to the starting point, thus closing Root box—The area (cm 2) between the wings the wing polygon. Both wings fr om each owl (fig. 1). were measured (except in Bor eal Owls, where only one wing was measured). Wing tracings Aspect ratio—The aspect ratio is a simple were digitized into a geographical infor mation measure of the shape of the wing. It is the system (e.g., ArcInfo software) and the total ratio of the wing span to mean wing width. area (cm 2) calculated. Ar eas of paired wings Wing width is the distance fr om the leading were generally within 0-3 per cent of each other; edge to the trailing edge, measur ed along the the larger wing area was doubled and used in direction of flight. The mean wing width was subsequent analysis. T racing wings requir es determined by first summing the ar ea of both two people and some practice; the slight dif fer- wings with the area of the root box.
Recommended publications
  • © 2006 Abcteach.Com an Owl Is a Bird. There Are Two Basic Types of Owls: Typical Owls and Barn Owls. Owls Live in Almost Every
    Reading Comprehension/ Animals Name _________________________________ Date ____________________ OWLS An owl is a bird. There are two basic types of owls: typical owls and barn owls. Owls live in almost every country of the world. Owls are mostly nocturnal, meaning they are awake at night. Owls are predators- they hunt the food that they eat. Owls hunt for mice and other small mammals, insects, and even fish. Owls are well adapted for hunting. Their soft, fluffy feathers make their flight nearly silent. They have very good hearing, which helps them to hunt well in the darkness. The sharp hooked beaks and claws of the owl make it very easy to tear apart prey quickly, although owls also eat some prey whole. Owl eyes are unusual. Like most predators, both of the owl’s eyes face front. The owl cannot move its eyes. Owls are far-sighted, which means they can see very well far away… but they can’t see up close very well at all. Fortunately, their distant vision is what they use for hunting, and they can see far away even in low light. Owls have facial disks around their eyes, tufts of feathers in a circle around each eye. These facial disks are thought to help with the owl’s hearing. Owls can turn their heads 180 degrees. This makes it look like they might be able to turn their heads all the way around, but 180 degrees is all the owl needs to see what’s going on all around him. Perhaps because of the owl’s mysterious appearance, especially its round eyes and flexible neck, there are a lot of myths and superstitions about owls.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Reservoir & Harvey Bear..…
    Coyote Reservoir & Harvey Bear..…. February 24, south Santa Clara County Quick Overview – Watching the weather reports we all saw the storm coming, but a group of adventurous souls arrived with all their rain gear and ready to go regardless of the elements, and what a day we had! Once east of Gilroy and traveling through the country roads we realized that soaking wet birds create unique ID challenges. With characteristic feathers in disarray and the wet plumages now appearing much darker we had to leave some questionable birds off our list. We had wanted to walk some of the trails that make up the new Harvey Bear Ranch Park, but the rain had us doing most of our birding from the cars which was easy along Coyote Reservoir Road as it parallels the lake. It also makes it easy when no one else is in the park. We could stop anywhere we wanted and we were not in anyone’s way – a birder’s dream come true! Watching Violet Green Swallows by the hundreds reminded us all that spring is near. And at one stop we got four woodpecker species. Ending our day watching Bald Eagles grasp fish at the surface of the water was worth our getting all wet! And I’ll not soon forget our close encounter with the dam’s Rufous Crowned Sparrow. Since we started our day at the south entrance of the park we ended Rufous Crowned Sparrow our day at the north entrance. It was here we listened to above and hard working Western Meadowlarks and watched a Say’s Phoebe.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Habitat in the Distribution and Abundance of Marsh Birds
    s 542 .18 S74 no.;43 1965 Role of Habitat in the Distribution and Abundance of Marsh Birds by Milton W. Weller and Cecil S. Spatcher Department of Zoology and Entomology Special Report No. 43 Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Iowa State University of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa- April 1965 IOWA STATE TRA YEUNG LIBRARY DES MOlNESt 'IOWA CONTENTS Summary ---------------------- -- --------------------------------------- --- ------------------------------ --- ----------- 4 Introduction ------------------- ---- ------ --- -------- ----- ------------------------------ ---------------------- --- ---- 5 Study areas --------- -- --- --- --- -------------------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- --------- 5 Methods ----------- --- ----------- --------- ------------------------------------------------------- --- -------------------- 6 Vegetation ---------------------------- ------------ --- -------------------------- --- ------------------ -- -------- 6 Bird populations ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- 6 Results ______ _ __ ____ __ _ __ ___ __ __ __ ______ __ ___ ___ __ _ _ _ ____ __ __ ___ __ ______ __ __ _____ ______ ____ ___ __ _ _ ____ ___ _____ __ __ ___ ___ _ 6 Species composition and chronology of nesting -------------------------------------- 6 Habitat changes at Little Wall and Goose lakes ------ -------------------------------- 8 Bird populations in relation to habitat ----------- ---- ----------- -------------------------- 11 Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Predator and Competitor Management Plan for Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge
    Appendix J /USFWS Malcolm Grant 2011 Fencing exclosure to protect shorebirds from predators Predator and Competitor Management Plan for Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge Background and Introduction Background and Introduction Throughout North America, the presence of a single mammalian predator (e.g., coyote, skunk, and raccoon) or avian predator (e.g., great horned owl, black-crowned night-heron) at a nesting site can result in adult bird mortality, decrease or prevent reproductive success of nesting birds, or cause birds to abandon a nesting site entirely (Butchko and Small 1992, Kress and Hall 2004, Hall and Kress 2008, Nisbet and Welton 1984, USDA 2011). Depredation events and competition with other species for nesting space in one year can also limit the distribution and abundance of breeding birds in following years (USDA 2011, Nisbet 1975). Predator and competitor management on Monomoy refuge is essential to promoting and protecting rare and endangered beach nesting birds at this site, and has been incorporated into annual management plans for several decades. In 2000, the Service extended the Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge Nesting Season Operating Procedure, Monitoring Protocols, and Competitor/Predator Management Plan, 1998-2000, which was expiring, with the intent to revise and update the plan as part of the CCP process. This appendix fulfills that intent. As presented in chapter 3, all proposed alternatives include an active and adaptive predator and competitor management program, but our preferred alternative is most inclusive and will provide the greatest level of protection and benefit for all species of conservation concern. The option to discontinue the management program was considered but eliminated due to the affirmative responsibility the Service has to protect federally listed threatened and endangered species and migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baraminological Analysis of the Land Fowl (Class Aves, Order Galliformes)
    Galliform Baraminology 1 Running Head: GALLIFORM BARAMINOLOGY A Baraminological Analysis of the Land Fowl (Class Aves, Order Galliformes) Michelle McConnachie A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2007 Galliform Baraminology 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Timothy R. Brophy, Ph.D. Chairman of Thesis ______________________________ Marcus R. Ross, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Harvey D. Hartman, Th.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Judy R. Sandlin, Ph.D. Assistant Honors Program Director ______________________________ Date Galliform Baraminology 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, without Whom I would not have had the opportunity of being at this institution or producing this thesis. I would also like to thank my entire committee including Dr. Timothy Brophy, Dr. Marcus Ross, Dr. Harvey Hartman, and Dr. Judy Sandlin. I would especially like to thank Dr. Brophy who patiently guided me through the entire research and writing process and put in many hours working with me on this thesis. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their interest in this project and Robby Mullis for his constant encouragement. Galliform Baraminology 4 Abstract This study investigates the number of galliform bird holobaramins. Criteria used to determine the members of any given holobaramin included a biblical word analysis, statistical baraminology, and hybridization. The biblical search yielded limited biosystematic information; however, since it is a necessary and useful part of baraminology research it is both included and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • CONVERGENT EVOLUTION of ELANUS KITES and the OWLS Author(S): Juan J
    CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF ELANUS KITES AND THE OWLS Author(s): Juan J. Negro, Cino Pertoldi, Ettore Randi, Juan J. Ferrero, José M. López-Caballero, Domingo Rivera, and Erkki Korpimäki Source: Journal of Raptor Research, 40(3):222-225. 2006. Published By: The Raptor Research Foundation DOI: 10.3356/0892-1016(2006)40[222:CEOEKA]2.0.CO;2 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3356/0892- 1016%282006%2940%5B222%3ACEOEKA%5D2.0.CO%3B2 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. SHORT COMMUNICATIONS J. Raptor Res. 40(3):222–225 E 2006 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF ELANUS KITES AND THE OWLS JUAN J. NEGRO1 AND CINO PERTOLDI Estacio´n Biolo´gica de Don˜ana, Apdo. 1056, 41080 Sevilla, Spain ETTORE RANDI Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica, 40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy JUAN J.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip 17-Apr 18-Apr Havana Las Terrazas ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae Fulvous Whistling-Duck X Wood Duck X Blue-Winged Teal X Northern Pintail X Red-Breasted Merganser X
    trip 17-Apr 18-Apr Havana Las Terrazas ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae Fulvous Whistling-Duck X Wood Duck X Blue-winged Teal X Northern Pintail X Red-breasted Merganser X PHOENICOPTERIFORMES: Phoenicopteridae American Flamingo X PODICIPEDIFORMES Least Grebe X SULIFORMES: Fregatidae Magnificent Frigatebird X SULIFORMES: Sulidae Brown Booby X SULIFORMES: Phalacrocoracidae Neotropic Cormorant X Double-crested Cormorant X SULIFORMES: Anhingidae Anhinga X PELECANIFORMES: Pelecanidae Brown Pelican X X X American White Pelican X PELECANIFORMES: Ardeidae Great Blue Heron X Great Egret X X Snowy Egret X X Little Blue Heron X X Tricolored Heron X Reddish Egret X Cattle Egret X X Green Heron X X Yellow-crowned Night-Heron X PELECANIFORMES: Threskiornithidae White Ibis X Glossy Ibis X Roseate Spoonbill X CATHARTIFORMES: Cathartidae Turkey Vulture X X X ACCIPITRIFORMES: Pandionidae Osprey X ACCIPITRIFORMES: Accipitridae Snail Kite X X Cuban Black Hawk X Red-tailed Hawk X X GRUIFORMES: Rallidae Common Gallinule X X CHARADRIIFORMES: Recurvirostridae Black-necked Stilt X American Avocet X CHARADRIIFORMES: Charadriidae Black-bellied Plover X Killdeer X CHARADRIIFORMES: Scolopacidae Ruddy Turnstone Stilt Sandpiper X Sanderling X Semipalmated Sandpiper X Short-billed Dowitcher X Spotted Sandpiper X X Solitary Sandpiper X Greater Yellowlegs X Lesser Yellowlegs X CHARADRIIFORMES: Laridae Laughing Gull X X Herring Gull X Least Tern X Royal Tern X X X Sandwich Tern X Black Skimmer X CHARADRIIFORMES: Stercocariidae Pomarine Jaeger X COLUMBIFORMES: Columbidae Rock Pigeon
    [Show full text]
  • American Paleontologist Pages 1 and 4
    FinalV OLUMEIssue 19, NUMBER 4 AMERICAN WINTER 2012 PALEONTOLOGIST A MAGAZINE OF EARTH SCIENCE PUBLISHED BY THE PALEONTOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTION AND ITS MUSEUM OF THE EARTH The Last Good Buy Birds in the New Age of Extinction Also in this issue... An Inordinate Fondness for Vertebrae page 20 Goodbye American Paleontologist pages 1 and 4 ...plus much more! US $5.00 FEATURE ARTICLE Th e Last Good Buy: Birds in the New Age of Extinction By Constance M. Soja Th e oldest fossils belonging to the undisputed bird survivors of the end-Mesozoic biodiversity crisis experienced Archaeopteryx date back 140-150 million years to the extraordinary evolutionary radiations. Co-adapting to the Mesozoic. During that geologic era, dinosaurs dominated brave new world, they fi lled vacated ecologic niches and terrestrial ecosystems around the globe. Pterosaurs – evolved into the iconic species that defi ne the Cenozoic – dinosaurs' evolutionary cousins, the fl ying reptiles – soared our modern world and Earth's current great geologic era. overhead, and an astounding variety of diminutive to gigantic With most animal and plant groups of the Mesozoic laid to aquatic reptiles – ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, pliosaurs, and rest, new species rose to dominance, and new competitive mosasaurs – cruised the world's oceans. Consuming squid- relationships were established. Oversized, fl ightless "terror like belemnoid and ammonoid prey, those top predators birds" – T. rex ultimate but down-sized body doubles – were also swam in the shallow seaways that fl ooded the interior pitted against fox- and pony-sized mammals, which in the of North America and other continents. Within 80 million previous 150 million years had been small, nocturnal, rat- years, the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction that brought like animals eeking out a subsidiary existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Aullwood's Birds (PDF)
    Aullwood's Bird List This list was collected over many years and includes birds that have been seen at or very near Aullwood. The list includes some which are seen only every other year or so, along with others that are seen year around. Ciconiiformes Great blue heron Green heron Black-crowned night heron Anseriformes Canada goose Mallard Blue-winged teal Wood duck Falconiformes Turkey vulture Osprey Sharp-shinned hawk Cooper's hawk Red-tailed hawk Red-shouldered hawk Broad-winged hawk Rough-legged hawk Marsh hawk American kestrel Galliformes Bobwhite Ring-necked pheasant Gruiformes Sandhill crane American coot Charadriformes Killdeer American woodcock Common snipe Spotted sandpiper Solitary sandpiper Ring-billed gull Columbiformes Rock dove Mourning dove Cuculiformes Yellow-billed cuckoo Strigiformes Screech owl Great horned owl Barred owl Saw-whet owl Caprimulgiformes Common nighthawk Apodiformes Chimney swift Ruby-throated hummingbird Coraciformes Belted kinghisher Piciformes Common flicker Pileated woodpecker Red-bellied woodpecker Red-headed woodpecker Yellow-bellied sapsucker Hairy woodpecker Downy woodpecker Passeriformes Eastern kingbird Great crested flycatcher Eastern phoebe Yellow-bellied flycatcher Acadian flycatcher Willow flycatcher Least flycatcher Eastern wood pewee Olive-sided flycatcher Tree swallow Bank swallow Rough-winged swallow Barn swallow Purple martin Blue jay Common crow Black-capped chickadee Carolina chickadee Tufted titmouse White-breasted nuthatch Red-breasted nuthatch Brown creeper House wren Winter wren
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Barred Owl Threat to the Northern Spotted Owl
    Timeline: Evolution of the Barred Owl Threat to the Northern Spotted Owl Full literature citations are listed alphabetically by author at the end of this fact sheet. 1959: Barred owls, native to eastern North America, are first documented in the northern parts of the northern spotted owl’s range in British Columbia. They appear to have moved westward from the Northeastern U.S. into British Columbia and then south into Washington. 1970s: Barred owls are first documented within the range of the spotted owl in Oregon (in 1972), Washington (in 1973), and California (in 1976). 1988: A thesis on barred owl and spotted owl ranges shows barred owls are “generalists” compared to spotted owls because they use a variety of habitats and forage on a broader range of prey. [Hamer, Thomas, “Barred Owl and Spotted Owl Home Ranges and Habitat Use in Washington”] 1989: A status review for the spotted owl indicates that the long-term impact of barred owl expansion into the range of the spotted owl is unknown but of considerable concern. [USFWS, “The Northern Spotted Owl Status Review Supplement”] 1990: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) lists the northern spotted owl under the Endangered Species Act as a threatened species in Washington, Oregon, and California. Habitat loss is identified as the primary threat to spotted owls. The listing documents reflect concerns raised in the previous year’s status review about barred owl expansion. 1994: Northwest Forest Plan is finalized, in part to guide federal agencies’ contribution to spotted owl conservation throughout the owl’s range. The plan amends federal resource management plans within 19 National Forests (19.4 million acres) and seven BLM districts (2.7 million acres).
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Roosting Birds in Urban Areas
    L-1921 03-01 Controlling Roosting Birds in Urban Areas Several species of birds are commonly referred to The droppings also will damage the finish on cars as roosting birds. Included among these are the and kill grass and other ornamental plants. blackbirds, starlings and grackles (see Fig. 1). These Grackles are noisy birds, often making a disturbing birds flock together during fall, winter and early and obnoxious racket. spring, often forming huge roosts in urban areas. Grackles may consume or destroy farm crops Their presence is often objectionable because of such as citrus, tomatoes, watermelons, cabbage, let- potential health, economic and nuisance problems. tuce, grain, corn, peaches, figs and cantaloupes. Identification Starlings Starlings are smaller than grackles (about the size Grackles of a robin) and have short, square tails. During the These large blackbirds are characterized by long, winter adult starlings are speckled with light dots, keel-shaped tails and yellow eyes. Male grackles but they become more iridescent and less speckled often appear iridescent purple. They are about the during the breeding season. Juvenile starlings are a size of a small crow and are very common in Texas. dusky, gray color. Grackles are frequently seen feeding in fields, lawns, Starlings were introduced into New York from golf courses and orchards. They nest wherever Europe in the late 1800s and have since spread there is adequate cover such as trees in parks, yards, across the entire country. They are common in woodlots, orchards and marshes. Grackles are urban and suburban areas and nest in any suitable omnivorous, which means they feed on a variety of hole or cavity in bird houses, buildings and trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Strigiformes) and Lesser Nighthawks (Chodeiles Acutipennis
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Evolution of Quiet Flight in Owls (Strigiformes) and Lesser Nighthawks (Chodeiles acutipennis) A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology by Krista Le Piane December 2020 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Christopher J. Clark, Chairperson Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin Dr. Khaleel A. Razak Copyright by Krista Le Piane 2020 The Dissertation of Krista Le Piane is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my Oral Exam Committee: Dr. Khaleel A. Razak (chairperson), Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin, Dr. Mark Springer, Dr. Jesse Barber, and Dr. Scott Curie. Thank you to my Dissertation Committee: Dr. Christopher J. Clark (chairperson), Dr. Erin Wilson Rankin, and Dr. Khaleel A. Razak for their encouragement and help with this dissertation. Thank you to my lab mates, past and present: Dr. Sean Wilcox, Dr. Katie Johnson, Ayala Berger, David Rankin, Dr. Nadje Najar, Elisa Henderson, Dr. Brian Meyers Dr. Jenny Hazelhurst, Emily Mistick, Lori Liu, and Lilly Hollingsworth for their friendship and support. I thank the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), the California Academy of Sciences (CAS), Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ) at UC Berkeley, the American Museum of Natural History (ANMH), and the Natural History Museum (NHM) in Tring for access to specimens used in Chapter 1. I would especially like to thank Kimball Garrett and Allison Shultz for help at LACM. I also thank Ben Williams, Richard Jackson, and Reddit user NorthernJoey for permission to use their photos in Chapter 1. Jessica Tingle contributed R code and advice to Chapter 1 and I would like to thank her for her help.
    [Show full text]