Evolution of Adaptive Immunity from Transposable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Adaptive Immunity from Transposable Nature Reviews Genetics | AOP, published online 9 December 2014; doi:10.1038/nrg3859 PERSPECTIVES independent occasions via recruitment of OPINION non-homologous endonucleases. Owing to the ubiquity and high abun- Evolution of adaptive immunity from dance of MGEs, their co-evolution with cellular hosts is a perennial parasite–host transposable elements combined ‘arms race’ in which the two sides evolved extremely diverse and elaborate systems of defence and counter-defence18–22. Notably, with innate immune systems many defence systems — including restric- tion–modification enzymatic modules, Eugene V. Koonin and Mart Krupovic toxin–antitoxin and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat– Abstract | Adaptive immune systems in prokaryotes and animals give rise to CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR–Cas) long-term memory through modification of specific genomic loci, such as by systems in prokaryotes, and the apop- insertion of foreign (viral or plasmid) DNA fragments into clustered regularly tosis machinery in eukaryotes — seem interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci in prokaryotes and by V(D)J to be ‘guns for hire’; that is, they are also recombination of immunoglobulin genes in vertebrates. Strikingly, recombinases recruited by viruses and other MGEs for counter-defence23,24. derived from unrelated mobile genetic elements have essential roles in both All organisms have a plethora of innate prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Mobile elements, which immunity mechanisms, and many also have are ubiquitous in cellular life forms, provide the only known, naturally evolved adaptive immunity25–27. In general, innate tools for genome engineering that are successfully adopted by both innate immunity covers all systems of defence immune systems and genome-editing technologies. In this Opinion article, we against a broad range of pathogens, whereas present a general scenario for the origin of adaptive immunity from mobile adaptive immunity is tailored towards a specific pathogen, and its essential feature elements and innate immune systems. is immunological memory, whereby an organism that survives an encounter with a All cellular organisms persist and evolve in the host genome via the ‘cut-and-paste’ particular pathogen is specifically protected under a perennial onslaught of mobile mechanism, whereby the transposon from that pathogen for the long term (often genetic elements (MGEs), such as transpo- is excised from its initial location and for the lifetime of the individual). Adaptive sons, viral sequences and plasmids. Many, if inserted into a new locus. Most of the class II immunity is highly specific and extremely not most, of these diverse, ‘selfish’ elements transposons have characteristic terminal efficient against many pathogens, despite insert into the chromosomes of the cellular inverted repeats (TIRs) but differ widely numerous powerful counter-defence hosts, either as an obligate part of their life with respect to the element size and gene strategies evolved by the pathogens18–22. cycles or at least sporadically. In multicellular content, the mechanisms of transposition In prokaryotes, innate immunity eukaryotes, MGEs constitute a substantial and the transposases encoded8,10,11. The mechanisms include the well-studied proportion of the host genome, for example, majority of the transposases belong to restriction–modification enzymatic modules >50% of the genome in mammals and >70% the DDE superfamily (which is named after and multiple less thoroughly characterized of the genome in some plants1–3. Integrated two aspartate residues and one glutamate systems28. Notable among the latter is the MGEs are also present in the genomes of residue that form the catalytic triad), but recently described mechanism that uses most bacteria and archaea4,5; although they several other unrelated families of trans- bacterial homologues of the eukaryotic are not as abundant as those in eukaryotes, posases have been identified8,10,11. Some Argonaute proteins — the key enzymes of these elements account for up to 30% of some transposons encode transposases that are RNA interference (RNAi) — to generate bacterial genomes6,7. homologous to the rolling-circle replication guide RNA or DNA molecules that are then Transposons are DNA segments that initiation endonucleases found in single- used to inactivate foreign genomes29–31. Until move from one location in the host genome stranded DNA viruses and plasmids12–14, recently, prokaryotes have not been thought to another. Most of the transposons can be whereas other transposases are homologous to have adaptive immunity. However, this grouped into two classes8,9. Class I elements to bacteriophage tyrosine or serine recom- perception was overturned by the discovery (also known as retrotransposons) trans- binases15,16, or to eukaryotic APE1‑like DNA of the CRISPR–Cas systems that are repre- pose via an RNA intermediate which, prior repair endonucleases (which function in con- sented in most archaea and many to integration, is copied back to the DNA junction with reverse transcriptases)17. Such bacteria (FIG. 1a). CRISPR–Cas is an immu- form by the element-encoded reverse trans­ diversity of transposases strongly suggests nity mechanism that functions by incorpo- criptase. Class II DNA transposons move that transposons have emerged on multiple rating fragments of foreign (viral or plasmid) NATURE REVIEWS | GENETICS ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION | 1 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved PERSPECTIVES a Adaptation cas genes Repeats Spacers Leader Cas1–Cas2 Viral DNA Integration of new protospacer Transcription Expression Transcript processing by Cas nucleases Interference crRNA Cleavage of invading DNA or RNA b Germline configuration V segments D segments J segments Constant region V1 V2 V3 V4 D1 D2 D3 D4 J1 J2 J3 C1 C2 C3 23-RSS 12-RSS RAG1–RAG2 D3 D-to-J recombination J2 V1 V2 V3 V4 D1 D2 J3 C1 C2 C3 + DJ coding Signal joint D4 joint RAG1–RAG2 J1 V-to-DJ recombination D1 V1 V2 V3 D2 J3 C1 C2 C3 + V4 VDJ coding joint Signal joint Transcription and splicing AAA Translation and assembly Variable region Figure 1 | Adaptive immune systems of prokaryotes and eukary- variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain is assembled by V(D)J otes. a | The prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic recombination from V (variable; purple rectangle),Nature D (diversity; Reviews green| Genetics rec- repeat–CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR–Cas) locus consists of cas tangle) and J (joining; brown rectangle) gene segments. The immunoglobu- genes (blue arrows) that encode different Cas proteins, and CRISPR arrays lin light chain is assembled from V and J segments by VJ recombination (not composed of variable spacers (coloured hexagons) interspersed with direct shown). Multiple V, D, J and C (constant region; red rectangles) gene seg- repeats (red triangles). The leader sequence (grey rectangle) contains a pro- ments are available for recombination in the germline genome. The recom- moter for the transcription of the CRISPR array and marks the end where bination is carried out by the RAG1–RAG2 recombinase complex and new spacers are incorporated. Three stages of CRISPR–Cas immunity are involves two types of recombination signal sequences (RSSs), 23‑RSS (red depicted. During the adaptation stage, a Cas1–Cas2 heterohexamer triangles) and 12‑RSS (pink triangles), which flank each gene segment. uptakes a protospacer from the invading plasmid or viral DNA (green) and Joining of the DNA ends requires non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pro- incorporates it at the leader-proximal end of the CRISPR array. During the teins (not shown). Two rounds of recombination, D to J and V to DJ, produce expression stage, the CRISPR array is transcribed, and the transcript is pro- a VDJ coding joint and two circular molecules (signal joints); the latter do cessed into small CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) by different Cas nucleases in a not have any further role and are discarded. Transcription across the VDJ CRISPR–Cas type-dependent manner. During the interference stage, coding joint, followed by splicing, produces the mature transcript of the crRNAs act as guides for the cleavage of invading viral or plasmid DNA or immunoglobulin heavy chain. Subsequent translation of the transcript, RNA that contains regions complementary to the crRNA. b | Lymphocyte assembly of the heavy chain and association with the light chain (beige antigen receptor diversification by V(D)J recombination is shown. The rectangles) complete the assembly of the immunoglobulin receptor. 2 | ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION www.nature.com/reviews/genetics © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved PERSPECTIVES Type I Type II Type III Type IV Cas1 Cas2 Cas1 Cas2 Cas1 Cas2 Adaptation Spacer acquisition and potential Cas4 Cas4 involvement in programmed cell death Cas6 RNase III Cas9 Cas6 Expression Transcript cleavage Cas8 (LS) SS Cas10 (LS) SS Cas8 (LS) SS Interference Cascade complex: crRNA and Cas7 Cas5 Cas9 Cas7 Cas5 Cas7 Cas5 target binding HD-Cas3 Cas3 HD-Cas10 Target cleavage Optional components (function unclear) Csn2 COG1517 DinG Figure 2 | A general scheme of the organization of CRISPR–Cas binding and target cleavage. Similarly, in TypeNature I and Type Reviews III CRISPR–Cas | Genetics systems. Protein names follow the current nomenclature and classifi- systems, Cas6 is a subunit of the Cascade (CRISPR-associated complex cation32. The general functions and the stages of the clustered regularly
Recommended publications
  • "Evolutionary Emergence of Genes Through Retrotransposition"
    Evolutionary Emergence of Advanced article Genes Through Article Contents . Introduction Retrotransposition . Gene Alteration Following Retrotransposon Insertion . Retrotransposon Recruitment by Host Genome . Retrotransposon-mediated Gene Duplication Richard Cordaux, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France . Conclusion Mark A Batzer, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0020783 Louisiana, USA Variation in the number of genes among species indicates that new genes are continuously generated over evolutionary times. Evidence is accumulating that transposable elements, including retrotransposons (which account for about 90% of all transposable elements inserted in primate genomes), are potent mediators of new gene origination. Retrotransposons have fostered genetic innovation during human and primate evolution through: (i) alteration of structure and/or expression of pre-existing genes following their insertion, (ii) recruitment (or domestication) of their coding sequence by the host genome and (iii) their ability to mediate gene duplication via ectopic recombination, sequence transduction and gene retrotransposition. Introduction genes, respectively, and de novo origination from previ- ously noncoding genomic sequence. Genome sequencing Variation in the number of genes among species indicates projects have also highlighted that new gene structures can that new genes are continuously generated over evolution- arise as a result of the activity of transposable elements ary times. Although the emergence of new genes and (TEs), which are mobile genetic units or ‘jumping genes’ functions is of central importance to the evolution of that have been bombarding the genomes of most species species, studies on the formation of genetic innovations during evolution. For example, there are over three million have only recently become possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Pogo, a Separate Superfamily of IS630-Tc1-Mariner
    Gao et al. Mobile DNA (2020) 11:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-020-00220-0 RESEARCH Open Access Evolution of pogo, a separate superfamily of IS630-Tc1-mariner transposons, revealing recurrent domestication events in vertebrates Bo Gao, Yali Wang, Mohamed Diaby, Wencheng Zong, Dan Shen, Saisai Wang, Cai Chen, Xiaoyan Wang and Chengyi Song* Abstracts Background: Tc1/mariner and Zator, as two superfamilies of IS630-Tc1-mariner (ITm) group, have been well-defined. However, the molecular evolution and domestication of pogo transposons, once designated as an important family of the Tc1/mariner superfamily, are still poorly understood. Results: Here, phylogenetic analysis show that pogo transposases, together with Tc1/mariner,DD34E/Gambol,and Zator transposases form four distinct monophyletic clades with high bootstrap supports (> = 74%), suggesting that they are separate superfamilies of ITm group. The pogo superfamily represents high diversity with six distinct families (Passer, Tigger, pogoR, Lemi, Mover,andFot/Fot-like) and wide distribution with an expansion spanning across all the kingdoms of eukaryotes. It shows widespread occurrences in animals and fungi, but restricted taxonomic distribution in land plants. It has invaded almost all lineages of animals—even mammals—and has been domesticated repeatedly in vertebrates, with 12 genes, including centromere-associated protein B (CENPB), CENPB DNA-binding domain containing 1 (CENPBD1), Jrk helix–turn–helix protein (JRK), JRK like (JRKL), pogo transposable element derived with KRAB domain (POGK), and with ZNF domain (POGZ), and Tigger transposable element-derived 2 to 7 (TIGD2–7), deduced as originating from this superfamily. Two of them (JRKL and TIGD2) seem to have been co-domesticated, and the others represent independent domestication events.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrotransposon Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element1 (LINE1) Is
    The Japanese Society of Developmental Biologists Develop. Growth Differ. (2012) 54, 673–685 doi: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2012.01368.x Original Article Retrotransposon long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) is activated during salamander limb regeneration Wei Zhu,1 Dwight Kuo,2 Jason Nathanson,3 Akira Satoh,4,5 Gerald M. Pao,1 Gene W. Yeo,3 Susan V. Bryant,5 S. Randal Voss,6 David M. Gardiner5*and Tony Hunter1* 1Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory and Laboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, Departments of 2Bioengineering and 3Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093, USA; 4Okayama University, R.C.I.S. Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan; 5Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, and 6Department of Biology and Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA Salamanders possess an extraordinary capacity for tissue and organ regeneration when compared to mam- mals. In our effort to characterize the unique transcriptional fingerprint emerging during the early phase of sala- mander limb regeneration, we identified transcriptional activation of some germline-specific genes within the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) that is indicative of cellular reprogramming of differentiated cells into a germline-like state. In this work, we focus on one of these genes, the long interspersed nucleotide element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposon, which is usually active in germ cells and silent in most of the somatic tissues in other organisms. LINE-1 was found to be dramatically upregulated during regeneration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review On the Population Dynamics of Junk: A Review on the Population Genomics of Transposable Elements Yann Bourgeois and Stéphane Boissinot * New York University Abu Dhabi, P.O. 129188 Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, UAE; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 April 2019; Accepted: 21 May 2019; Published: 30 May 2019 Abstract: Transposable elements (TEs) play an important role in shaping genomic organization and structure, and may cause dramatic changes in phenotypes. Despite the genetic load they may impose on their host and their importance in microevolutionary processes such as adaptation and speciation, the number of population genetics studies focused on TEs has been rather limited so far compared to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here, we review the current knowledge about the dynamics of transposable elements at recent evolutionary time scales, and discuss the mechanisms that condition their abundance and frequency. We first discuss non-adaptive mechanisms such as purifying selection and the variable rates of transposition and elimination, and then focus on positive and balancing selection, to finally conclude on the potential role of TEs in causing genomic incompatibilities and eventually speciation. We also suggest possible ways to better model TEs dynamics in a population genomics context by incorporating recent advances in TEs into the rich information provided by SNPs about the demography, selection, and intrinsic properties of genomes. Keywords: transposable elements; population genetics; selection; drift; coevolution 1. Introduction Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive DNA sequences that are ubiquitous in the living world and have the ability to replicate and multiply within genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Transposable Element Annotation and Their Classification in the Light of Functional Genomics
    The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics -what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine? Peter Arensburger, Benoit Piegu, Yves Bigot To cite this version: Peter Arensburger, Benoit Piegu, Yves Bigot. The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from thefables of Jean de la Fontaine?. Mobile Genetic Elements, Taylor & Francis, 2016, 6 (6), pp.e1256852. 10.1080/2159256X.2016.1256852. hal-02385838 HAL Id: hal-02385838 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02385838 Submitted on 27 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright The future of transposable element annotation and their classification in the light of functional genomics - what we can learn from the fables of Jean de la Fontaine? Peter Arensburger1, Benoît Piégu2, and Yves Bigot2 1 Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768 - United States of America. 2 Physiologie de la reproduction et des Comportements, UMR INRA-CNRS 7247, PRC, 37380 Nouzilly – France Corresponding author address: Biological Sciences Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768 - United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Horizontal Transfers of Four DNA Transposons in Invertebrates and Bats Zhou Tang1†, Hua-Hao Zhang2†, Ke Huang3, Xiao-Gu Zhang2, Min-Jin Han1 and Ze Zhang1*
    Tang et al. Mobile DNA (2015) 6:3 DOI 10.1186/s13100-014-0033-1 RESEARCH Open Access Repeated horizontal transfers of four DNA transposons in invertebrates and bats Zhou Tang1†, Hua-Hao Zhang2†, Ke Huang3, Xiao-Gu Zhang2, Min-Jin Han1 and Ze Zhang1* Abstract Background: Horizontal transfer (HT) of transposable elements (TEs) into a new genome is considered as an important force to drive genome variation and biological innovation. However, most of the HT of DNA transposons previously described occurred between closely related species or insects. Results: In this study, we carried out a detailed analysis of four DNA transposons, which were found in the first sequenced twisted-wing parasite, Mengenilla moldrzyki. Through the homology-based strategy, these transposons were also identified in other insects, freshwater planarian, hydrozoans, and bats. The phylogenetic distribution of these transposons was discontinuous, and they showed extremely high sequence identities (>87%) over their entire length in spite of their hosts diverging more than 300 million years ago (Mya). Additionally, phylogenies and comparisons of transposons versus orthologous gene identities demonstrated that these transposons have transferred into their hosts by independent HTs. Conclusions: Here, we provided the first documented example of HT of CACTA transposons, which have been so far extensively studied in plants. Our results demonstrated that bats had continuously acquired new DNA elements via HT. This implies that predation on a large quantity of insects might increase bat exposure to HT. In addition, parasite-host interaction might facilitate exchanging of their genetic materials. Keywords: Horizontal transfer, CACTA transposons, Mammals, Recent activity Background or isolated species.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Repeatmaskedgenomes
    Kojima Mobile DNA (2018) 9:2 DOI 10.1186/s13100-017-0107-y REVIEW Open Access Human transposable elements in Repbase: genomic footprints from fish to humans Kenji K. Kojima1,2 Abstract Repbase is a comprehensive database of eukaryotic transposable elements (TEs) and repeat sequences, containing over 1300 human repeat sequences. Recent analyses of these repeat sequences have accumulated evidences for their contribution to human evolution through becoming functional elements, such as protein-coding regions or binding sites of transcriptional regulators. However, resolving the origins of repeat sequences is a challenge, due to their age, divergence, and degradation. Ancient repeats have been continuously classified as TEs by finding similar TEs from other organisms. Here, the most comprehensive picture of human repeat sequences is presented. The human genome contains traces of 10 clades (L1, CR1, L2, Crack, RTE, RTEX, R4, Vingi, Tx1 and Penelope) of non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons (long interspersed elements, LINEs), 3 types (SINE1/7SL, SINE2/tRNA, and SINE3/5S) of short interspersed elements (SINEs), 1 composite retrotransposon (SVA) family, 5 classes (ERV1, ERV2, ERV3, Gypsy and DIRS) of LTR retrotransposons, and 12 superfamilies (Crypton, Ginger1, Harbinger, hAT, Helitron, Kolobok, Mariner, Merlin, MuDR, P, piggyBac and Transib) of DNA transposons. These TE footprints demonstrate an evolutionary continuum of the human genome. Keywords: Human repeat, Transposable elements, Repbase, Non-LTR retrotransposons, LTR retrotransposons, DNA transposons, SINE, Crypton, MER, UCON Background contrast, MER4 was revealed to be comprised of LTRs of Repbase and conserved noncoding elements endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) [1]. Right now, Repbase Repbase is now one of the most comprehensive data- keeps MER1 to MER136, some of which are further bases of eukaryotic transposable elements and repeats divided into several subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of Tc1/ Mariner-Like DNA Transposons in Genomes of the Pathogenic Fungi of the Paracoccidioi
    Marini et al. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:130 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/130 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Identification and characterization of Tc1/ mariner-like DNA transposons in genomes of the pathogenic fungi of the Paracoccidioides species complex Marjorie M Marini1, Tamiris Zanforlin2, Patrícia C Santos1, Roberto RM Barros2, Anne CP Guerra1, Rosana Puccia2, Maria SS Felipe3, Marcelo Brigido3, Célia MA Soares4, Jerônimo C Ruiz5, José F Silveira2, Patrícia S Cisalpino1* Abstract Background: Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (Eukaryota, Fungi, Ascomycota) is a thermodimorphic fungus, the etiological agent of paracoccidioidomycosis, the most important systemic mycoses in Latin America. Three isolates corresponding to distinct phylogenetic lineages of the Paracoccidioides species complex had their genomes sequenced. In this study the identification and characterization of class II transposable elements in the genomes of these fungi was carried out. Results: A genomic survey for DNA transposons in the sequence assemblies of Paracoccidioides, a genus recently proposed to encompass species P. brasiliensis (harboring phylogenetic lineages S1, PS2, PS3) and P. lutzii (Pb01-like isolates), has been completed. Eight new Tc1/mariner families, referred to as Trem (Transposable element mariner), labeled A through H were identified. Elements from each family have 65-80% sequence similarity with other Tc1/ mariner elements. They are flanked by 2-bp TA target site duplications and different termini. Encoded DDD- transposases, some of which have complete ORFs, indicated that they could be functionally active. The distribution of Trem elements varied between the genomic sequences characterized as belonging to P. brasiliensis (S1 and PS2) and P. lutzii. TremC and H elements would have been present in a hypothetical ancestor common to P.
    [Show full text]
  • Living Organisms Author Their Read-Write Genomes in Evolution
    biology Review Living Organisms Author Their Read-Write Genomes in Evolution James A. Shapiro ID Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago GCIS W123B, 979 E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-773-702-1625 Academic Editor: Andrés Moya Received: 23 August 2017; Accepted: 28 November 2017; Published: 6 December 2017 Abstract: Evolutionary variations generating phenotypic adaptations and novel taxa resulted from complex cellular activities altering genome content and expression: (i) Symbiogenetic cell mergers producing the mitochondrion-bearing ancestor of eukaryotes and chloroplast-bearing ancestors of photosynthetic eukaryotes; (ii) interspecific hybridizations and genome doublings generating new species and adaptive radiations of higher plants and animals; and, (iii) interspecific horizontal DNA transfer encoding virtually all of the cellular functions between organisms and their viruses in all domains of life. Consequently, assuming that evolutionary processes occur in isolated genomes of individual species has become an unrealistic abstraction. Adaptive variations also involved natural genetic engineering of mobile DNA elements to rewire regulatory networks. In the most highly evolved organisms, biological complexity scales with “non-coding” DNA content more closely than with protein-coding capacity. Coincidentally, we have learned how so-called “non-coding” RNAs that are rich in repetitive mobile DNA sequences are key regulators of complex phenotypes. Both biotic and abiotic ecological challenges serve as triggers for episodes of elevated genome change. The intersections of cell activities, biosphere interactions, horizontal DNA transfers, and non-random Read-Write genome modifications by natural genetic engineering provide a rich molecular and biological foundation for understanding how ecological disruptions can stimulate productive, often abrupt, evolutionary transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Paleontology of Transposable Elements in the Drosophila Melanogaster Genome
    Molecular paleontology of transposable elements in the Drosophila melanogaster genome Vladimir V. Kapitonov* and Jerzy Jurka* Genetic Information Research Institute, 2081 Landings Drive, Mountain View, CA 94043 Communicated by Margaret G. Kidwell, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, April 7, 2003 (received for review December 23, 2002) We report here a superfamily of ‘‘cut and paste’’ DNA transposons and retrotransposons found in the DMG. Surprisingly, the called Transib. These transposons populate the Drosophila mela- diversity of TEs fossilized in the DMG is higher than in mam- nogaster and Anopheles gambiae genomes, use a transposase that malian or vertebrate genomes studied so far. TEs can become is not similar to any known proteins, and are characterized by 5-bp stable structural components of the eukaryotic heterochromatin target site duplications. We found that the fly genome, which was (8–10). Perhaps the best example in this respect is AT, where TEs thought to be colonized by the P element <100 years ago, harbors are highly compartmentalized: Ϸ90% of genomic TEs are Ϸ5 million year (Myr)-old fossils of ProtoP, an ancient ancestor of localized in the paracentromeric heterochromatin, and Ϸ90% of the P element. We also show that Hoppel, a previously reported the paracentromeric heterochromatin is composed of TEs (6, transposable element (TE), is a nonautonomous derivate of ProtoP. 11). We show that similar compartmentalization characterizes We found that the ‘‘rolling-circle’’ Helitron transposons identified distributions of TEs in the DMG. previously in plants and worms populate also insect genomes. Our results indicate that Helitrons were horizontally transferred into Materials and Methods the fly or͞and mosquito genomes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalytic Domain of All Eukaryotic Cut-And-Paste Transposase Superfamilies
    The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies Yao-Wu Yuana,b and Susan R. Wesslera,c,1 aDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; bDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and cDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Contributed by Susan R. Wessler, March 17, 2011 (sent for review January 17, 2011) Cut-and-paste DNA transposable elements are major components autonomous elements use transposase encoded by autonomous of eukaryotic genomes and are grouped into superfamilies (e.g., elements located elsewhere in the genome. Prior studies have hAT, P) based on sequence similarity of the element-encoded classified eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposases into 19 super- transposase. The transposases from several superfamilies possess families, including hAT, Tc1/mariner, CACTA (En/Spm), Mutator a protein domain containing an acidic amino acid triad (DDE or (MuDR), P, PiggyBac, PIF/Harbinger, Mirage, Merlin, Transib, DDD) that catalyzes the “cut and paste” transposition reaction. Novosib, Rehavkus, ISL2EU, Kolobok, Chapaev, Sola, Zator, Ginger, However, it was unclear whether this domain was shared by the and Academ [see Repbase (10); http://www.girinst.org/repbase/ transposases from all superfamilies. Through multiple-alignment index.html]. Six of these 19 superfamilies (Mirage, Novosib, of transposase sequences from a diverse collection of previously Rehavkus, ISL2EU, Kolobok, Academ) have been described only identified and recently annotated elements from a wide range of in Repbase and, as such, their validity and relationship to other organisms, we identified the putative DDE/D triad for all super- superfamilies remains to be evaluated (11).
    [Show full text]
  • The Catalytic of All Eukaryotic Cut-And-Paste Transposase Superfamilies
    The catalytic of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies Yao-Wu Yuana,b and Susan R. Wesslera,c,1 aDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; bDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and cDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 Contributed by Susan R. Wessler, March 17, 2011 (sent for review January 17, 2011) Cut-and-paste DNA transposable elements are major components autonomous elements use transposase encoded by autonomous of eukaryotic genomes and are grouped into superfamilies (e.g., elements located elsewhere in the genome. Prior studies have hAT, P) based on sequence similarity of the element-encoded classified eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposases into 19 super- transposase. The transposases from several superfamilies possess families, including hAT, Tc1/mariner, CACTA (En/Spm), Mutator a protein domain containing an acidic amino acid triad (DDE or (MuDR), P, PiggyBac, PIF/Harbinger, Mirage, Merlin, Transib, DDD) that catalyzes the “cut and paste” transposition reaction. Novosib, Rehavkus, ISL2EU, Kolobok, Chapaev, Sola, Zator, Ginger, However, it was unclear whether this domain was shared by the and Academ [see Repbase (10); http://www.girinst.org/repbase/ transposases from all superfamilies. Through multiple-alignment index.html]. Six of these 19 superfamilies (Mirage, Novosib, of transposase sequences from a diverse collection of previously Rehavkus, ISL2EU, Kolobok, Academ) have been described only identified and recently annotated elements from a wide range of in Repbase and, as such, their validity and relationship to other organisms, we identified the putative DDE/D triad for all super- superfamilies remains to be evaluated (11).
    [Show full text]