Hastings Coastal Environment Strategy Technical Paper #5 – Reserves and Recreation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Report Hastings Coastal Environment Strategy Technical Paper #5 – Reserves and Recreation Prepared for Hastings District Council REPORT Hastings Coastal Environment Strategy Technical Paper #5 – Reserves and Recreation Prepared for HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL By BECA CARTER HOLLINGS & FERNER LTD Prepared By: Amelia Linzey (BSc, MSc (Geog)). Verified and Approved for Release By: Don Lyon (BPlan, MNZPI). ................................................................................... Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner PO Box 6345, Auckland Phone: +64-9-300-9000 Final July 2000 2107635/10/01 AJL7OO10.DOC CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1 2. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................................3 2.1. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991..................................................................................3 2.2. DISTRICT PLAN POLICY......................................................................................................4 2.3. OTHER LEGISLATION .........................................................................................................4 3. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES........................................................................6 4. DEMAND, PREFERENCES AND EXISTING RESOURCE CONFLICTS.................................7 4.1. RECREATION SURVEYS AND CONSULTATION FEEDBACK .......................................................7 4.2. AREA SPECIFIC DEMANDS AND EXISTING RESOURCE ISSUES ...............................................9 5. DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES ...................................................20 5.1. POLICY CONSTRAINTS .....................................................................................................20 5.2. PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS..................................................................................................21 5.3. PRIORITY ISSUES ............................................................................................................27 6. IMPLEMENTATION AND AREA SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT OUTCOMES..........................30 6.1. AROPAOANUI ..................................................................................................................30 6.2. WAIPATIKI.......................................................................................................................31 6.3. TANGOIO ........................................................................................................................32 6.4. WHIRINAKI ......................................................................................................................33 6.5. WAITANGI / NGARURORO .................................................................................................34 6.6. CLIVE / EAST CLIVE.........................................................................................................35 6.7. HAUMOANA.....................................................................................................................36 6.8. TE AWANGA....................................................................................................................37 6.9. CLIFTON .........................................................................................................................38 6.10. CAPE KIDNAPPERS ..........................................................................................................39 6.11. OCEAN BEACH ................................................................................................................40 6.12. WAIMARAMA ...................................................................................................................41 7. IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE WORK ...........................................................................42 HCES Technical Paper #5: Reserves and Recreation 1 1. INTRODUCTION The core purpose of the Hastings Coastal Environment Strategy (HCES) is to establish a comprehensive strategy that “will enable the community to develop an integrated regime to protect, manage and develop the coastal environment”. The strategy has a planning horizon of 20 years, hence the recommendations and outcomes of the strategy are intended to go beyond the ambit of the Resource Management Act to encapsulate wider Council functions and responsibilities and to extend beyond the strict 10 year life of the District Plan. A key issue in the management of the coastal environment is the provision for public access and recreation activities, as the beach remains one of New Zealand’s preferred outdoor recreation locations. There has traditionally been a lack of focus on recreation and reserve facilities within the coastal environment and there are emerging issues of demand exceeding supply, resulting in adverse environmental effects. It is recognised that there is a strong link between the provision of recreation and reserve facilities and other resource demands (including infrastructure). Accordingly, it is important that the strategic planning for reserves and recreation is integrated with other resources and resource demands. In this regard, this paper is one of a series aimed at addressing key technical issues for the HCES (refer Figure 1.1). The purpose of this technical paper is to bring together the relevant existing information and results from investigations undertaken in the HCES study to establish a set of general parameters and locality specific objectives which will guide resource management planning over the next 20 years. The paper establishes a broad framework for accommodating recreation and reserve demand in a sustainable manner and satisfying the objectives and policies identified. Areas requiring further work subsequent to release of the HCES are also identified. The focus of this paper is on recreation and reserve demand as it specifically relates to the coastal environment. It is recognised that there will be further recreation demands, particularly for active recreation facilities, in a number of coastal settlements. It is considered that these demands are not specific to the coastal environment, but rather an issue for the urban development of these settlement areas (as with community and commercial activities) (as discussed in Technical Paper #2). While it is important that these issues are addressed in any future structure planning for residential growth, they are not specifically addressed as part of the HCES. It is also recognised that there are a number of functions for reserves, including protection and enhancement of the environment, provision of open space for amenity, and for recreation activities. While the focus of this paper is principally on the latter two functions for reserves, where relevant the integration of all three functions has been identified (the preservation and enhancement of significant environments has been addressed through other technical papers, particularly Technical Paper #1: Part II Matters). 2107635/10/01 Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd FINAL AJL7OO10.DOC July 2000 HCES Technical Paper #5: Reserves and Recreation 2 Figure 1.1 HCES Process Schematic Issues and Options Consultative Paper Strategic Area Priority Issues and Actions Ocean Beach Strategy Policy Specific Paper = + Priorities Priorities Study and Structure Plan Technical Papers TP #1: Part II TP #2: Coastal TP #3: Coastal = Matters + Residential + Infrastructure TP #4: Erosion TP #5: Reserves Other Technical + and Hazards + & Recreation + Papers HDC Management Review Draft HCES Report Consultation & Informal Statutory Newsletter and Release of Draft Submissions = Agencies, Forum + Public Meetings + Report Group and Iwi Information Papers Consultation Report Reference Report = + FINAL HCES REPORT Study Completion Technical Direction and Monitoring Plans Statutory Plans: Area Specific Action/Implementation Plans = and Technical + Annual, District, + Structure Plans Investigations Recreation 2107635/10/01 Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Ltd FINAL AJL7OO10.DOC July 2000 HCES Technical Paper #5: Reserves and Recreation 3 2. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 2.1. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT 1991 Technical Paper 1 provides an overview of the Purpose and Principles of the RMA, in particular Part II matters of relevance to the Hastings Coastal Environment. Of relevance to this paper, section 6(d) of the Act identifies the maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along the coastal marine area. Specific policy direction of relevance to provision of reserves and recreation activities is contained in the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement (NZCPS); the Hawke’s Bay Regional Policy Statement 1995 (HBRPS); the Proposed Hawkes Bay Regional Resource Management Plan 2000 (HBRRMP) and the Hastings Proposed District Plan (PDP). Relevant policies from the NZCPS include: • Policy 1.1.1 NZCPS – preservation of the natural character of the coastal environment by encouraging appropriate subdivision, use and development in areas already compromised and by avoiding cumulative effects; • Policy 3.1.1 NZCPS – use of the coast by the public should not be allowed to have significant adverse effects on the coastal environment, amenity values, nor on the safety of the public nor on the enjoyment of the coast by the public; • Policy 3.2.1 NZCPS – policy statements and plans should identify those recreational areas which are important to the region or district and which should therefore be given special protection;