DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced High Pressure Engine Study for Mixed-Mode Vehicle Applications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced High Pressure Engine Study for Mixed-Mode Vehicle Applications NASA CR - 135141 (HIS&-CS-135141) bDV&NC?a HIGH PEdSSURB N77-23194 ESGXNS STUDY FOR NIXEC-UODR VEHICLE IPPLICBTXONS Final Beport (Aerojet Liquid socket Co.) 319 y HC A14/HF 901 CSCL 21H Unclas G3/20 29365 NASA \ ADVANCED HIGH PRESSURE ENGINE STUDY FOR MIXED-MODE VEHICLE APPLICATIONS Final Report by W. P. Luscher and 3. A. Mellish AEROJET t IQUI D ROCKET COMPANY Prepared for NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADNINISTRATION NASA Lewis Research Center Contract NAS 3-1 9727 - - 1. Report No. 2. Gavernnient Access~onNo. 3. Rec~p~ent'sCatalog No. NASA CR- 135141 4. T~lleand Sublltle 15. Rcporl Date Advanced High Pressure Engine Study for Mixed-Mode Vehicle Applications, Final Report I 1 8. Perlorm~ngOrgantzallon Report No. W. P. Luscher and J. A. Mellish I 9. Pedorm~ngOrgan~zalton Name and Address Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company - Post Office Box 13222 Sacramento, California 95813 NAS3-19727 13. Type 01 Report and Per~odCovered qency Name and Address Contractor Reporr;, Final - National Aeronautics and Space Administration 14. Swnsor~ngAgency Code Washington, D. C. 20546 I 15. Supplementary Notes Project Manager, D. D . Scheer , Chemi cal Energy Division, NASA-Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio 16. High pressure liquid rocket engine design, performance, weight, envelope and operational characteristics were evaluated for a variety of candidate engines for use in mixed-mode, single-stage-to-orbi t appl ications. Propellant property and performance data were obtained for candidate Mode 1 fuels which included; RP-1, RJ-5, hydrazine, monomethyl -hydrazine, and methane. The common oxidizer was liquid oxygen. Oxygen, the candidate Mode 1 fuels, and hydrogen were evaluated as thrust chanber coolants. Oxygen, methane and hydrogen were found to be the nmt viable cooling candidates. Water, 1i thi um and sodium-potassi um were also evaluated as auxi 1iary coolant systems. Water proved to be the best of these but the system was heavier than those systems which cooled with the engine pro- pel 1ants. Engine weight and envelope parametric data were establ ished for candidate Mode 1, Mode 2 and dual-fuel engines. Delivered engine performance data was also calculated for all candidate Mode 1 and dual-fuel engine. Engines carried into prel iminary design were; (1) LOX cooled, LOXIRP-1 Mode 1, staged combustior cycle, (2) hydrogen cooled, LOXIRP-1 Mode 1, gas- generator cycle, and (3) dual-fuel LOX cooled, LOXIRP-1 Mode 1/LH2 Mode 2, staged combustion cycle. ---- --- 17. Key Words (Sgggested by Authcr(s\ Single-Stage-to-Orb i t Mixed-Mode Propulsion Unclassified - Unlimited High Pressure Liquid Rock c Engine Mode 1 and Mode 2 Dual -Fuel - - 19. Secur~tyClass~f. (ot lhls report) 20. Sec rr~tyClasslf. (of this page) -/%-NO. of Pages 122. Price' Unclassified I-Unclassified 304 *For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22151 FOREWORD The work described herein was performed at the Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company under NASA Contract NAS3-19727 with Mr. Dean D, Scheer, NASA-Lewis Research Center, as Project Manager. The ALRC Program Manager was Mr. Werner P. Luscher and the Project Engineer was Mr. Joseph A. Me11 ish. The technical period performance for the study was from 30 June 1975 to 30 June 1976. The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts of the following ALRC engineering personnel who contributed signi fi- cantly t~this report: R. E. Anderson L. L. Bickford A. T. Caffo R. L. Ewen J. W. Hidahl M. C. Huppert G. R. Janser J. E. Jellison C. J. O'Brien J. W. Salmon D. H. Saltzman M. Short K. Y. Wong We also wish to thank Mr. Rudi Beichel , ALRC Senior Scientist, for his comments and assistance throughout the study effort. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page I SUMMARY 1 A, Study Objectives and Scope B. Results and Conclusions II INTRODUCTION A. Background B. Purpose and Scope C. General Requirements D. Approach 111 TASK I - PROPELLANT PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE A. Objectives and Guidelines B . Physical and Thermodynamic Property Data C. Operational Considerations D. Combustion Gas Property Data E. Main Chamber Theoretical Performance Data TASK I1 - COOLANT EVALUATION A. Objectives and Gui del ines B. TCA Geometry and Mixture Ratio Selection C. Low Cycle Fatigue Analysis D. Thermal Analysis TASK I11 - CYCLE EVALUATION A. Objectives and Guidel ines B. Task I11 Delivered Performance C. Engine Cycle Power Balances TASK IV - ENGINE WEIGHT AND ENVELOPE A. Objective and Guidel ines B. Base1 ine Engine Weight Statements C. Parametric Weight Data D. Parametric Envelope Data VII TASK V - AUXILIARY COOLANT FEASIBILITY A. Objectives and Gui del ines B. Auxi 1 iary Coolant Properties TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont. ) Section Paqe I C. Materials Compatibility 154 D. Chamber Cool ing 156 E. Engine Data 158 IP VIII TASK VI - ENGINE PRELIMINARY DESIGN 163 -.. A. Objectives and Guide1 ines 163 5. Ejost Pump Drive Selection 166 C. Boost Pump NPSH Effects 170 D. Engine Design and Operating Specifications 171 Model 1 LOX/RP-1 Baseline Design 178 a. Configuration and Nominal Operating 178 Conditions b. Engine Operation and Control 178 c. Start and Shutdown Data 186 d. Design and Off-Design Engine Performance 186 e. Engine Mass Properties Data 186 Dual -Fuel Engine Design 191 a. Configuration and Nominal Operating 191 Conditions b. Engine Operation and Control 193 c. Start and Shutdown Data 203 d. Design and Off-Desi gn Engine Performance 203 e. Engine Mass Properties Data 203 Alternate Mode 1 Engine Design 21 0 a. Configuration and Nominal Operating 21 0 Conditions b. Engine Operation and Control 21 0 c. Start and Shutdown Data 220 d. Design and Off-Design Engine Performance 220 e. Engine Mass Properties Data 220 E. Turbomachinery Design 224 F. Thrust Chamber Design 247 1. Performance 247 2. Thermal Analysis 257 G. Main Injector Design 265 H. Preburner Design 268 I. Valve Selection and Sizing 282 J. Material Selection 287 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) Section Page IX CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 292 A. Concl us i ons B. Recomnendations for Technology Work REFERENCES LIST OF TABLES -'1'7bl e No. Page I Engine Preliminary Design Data Sumnary II Para11 el Burn Mixed-Mode Vehicle Definition I11 Series Burn Mixed-Mode Vehicle Definition IV Baseline Engine Definitions V Properties of Candidate Propel 1ants VI Vapor Pressure of RJ-5 VII Density of RJ-5 VIII Viscosity of RJ-5 IX Heat Capacity and Thermal Conductivity of RJ-5 X Extrapolated Heat Capacities of Methane XI Extrapolated Densities of Methane XII Viscosity of Methane XI11 Thermal Conductivity of Methane XIV Propel 1ant Cost Sumnary xv LOX/RJ-5 Main Chamber Gas Property Data xv I LOX/RP-1 Main Chamber Gas Property Data XVII LOX/MMH Main Chamber Gas Property Data XVIII LOX/N2H4 Main Chamber Gas Property Data XIX LOX/LH2 Main Chamber Gas Property Data X X LOX/CH4 Main Chamber Gas Property Data XX I LOX/RJ-5 Oxidizer-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumna ry XXII LOX/RP-1 Oxidizer-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXIII LOX/MMH Oxidizer-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXIV LOX/N2H4 Oxidi zer-Ri ch Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary xxv LOX/LH2 Oxidizer-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXVI LOX/CH4 Oxi dizer-Ri ch Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXVI I LOX/MMH Fuel -Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Summary XXVI II LOX/N2H4 Fuel-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Summary LIST OF TABLES (cont.) Table No. XXIX LOX/LH2 Fuel-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumry XXX LOXIRJ-5 %el-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXXI LOX/RP-1 Fuel-Rich Preburner Gas Property Data Sumnary XXXI I LOX/CH4 Fuel-Rich Preburnsr Gas Property Data Sumry XXXI II Cool ant Eva1 uation Study Guide1 ines XXXIV Task I1 Mode 1 Engine Geometry and Mixture Ratio Selection Sumnary xxxv Task I1 Chamber Design Limits XXXVI Number of Cool ant Channel s in Combustion Chamber xxxv II Task I1 Coolant Evaluation Sumnary XXYVI II Maximum Bearing DN Values XXXIX Face Contact Seal Maximum PV, FV and PFV Factors XL Task I11 Turbine Inlet Temperature Selections XL I Task I11 Cycle Evaluation Summary XLII Task I11 Candidate Mode 1 Engine Comparisons XLIII Task IV - Engine Weight Definitions XLIV Task IV - Base1 ine Engine Weight Statements XLV Candidate Mode 1 Engine Envelope Parametrics XLV I Candidate Mode 1 Engine Envelope Parametri cs XLVI I Hydrogen Cooled , Gas Generator Cycle Engi ne Envelope Parametrics XLVI I1 Hydrogen Cooled , Gas Generator Cycl e Engi ne Envelope Parametri cs XLIX Dual -Fuel Engine Envelope ParametriL; L Mode 2 Engine Envelope Parametri cs L I Properties of Candidate Auxi 1i ary Cool ants LII Density of Liquid NaK (56) LIII Viscosity of Liquid NaK (56) LIV Summary of Task V Chamber Designs LV Task V Auxiliary Cooled Engine Sumnary viii I LIST OF TABLES (cont. Table No. Page LV I Mode 1 LOX/RP-1 Engi ne Operati ng Speci f ications, 182 Nominal MR=2.9 L'JII Mode 1 LOXIRP-1 Base1 ine Engi ne Pressure Schedule, 185 Nominal MR=2.9 LVI II Sequence of Operations, Base1 ine LOXIRP-1 187 LIX Mode 1 LOXIRP-1 Base1 ine Start and Shutdown 188 Transient Data Summary LX Mode 1 LOXIRP-1 Baseline Engine Design and Off-Design '189 MR Performance LXI Mode 1 LOXIRP-1 Base1 ine Engi ne Wei ght Statement 190 LXI I Dual -Fuel Nominal Engine Operating Specifications 196 LXI II Dual -Fuel , Mode 1 Nomi nal Engine Pressure Schedule 201 LXIV Dual -Fuel , Mode 2 Nominal Engine Pressure Schedule 202 LXV Sequence of Operation Dual -Fuel Engine 204 LXVI Dual-Fuel Engine Start and Shutdown Transient Data 206 Summary LXVI I Dual-Fuel, Mode 1 Design and Off-Design MR Performance 207 LXVI II Dual-Fuel, Mode 2 Design and Off-Design
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IAF Space Propulsion Symposium 2019
    IAF Space Propulsion Symposium 2019 Held at the 70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2019) Washington, DC, USA 21 -25 October 2019 Volume 1 of 2 ISBN: 978-1-7138-1491-7 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2019) by International Astronautical Federation All rights reserved. Printed with permission by Curran Associates, Inc. (2020) For permission requests, please contact International Astronautical Federation at the address below. International Astronautical Federation 100 Avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris France Phone: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 www.iafastro.org Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 PROPULSION SYSTEM (1) BLUE WHALE 1: A NEW DESIGN APPROACH FOR TURBOPUMPS AND FEED SYSTEM ELEMENTS ON SOUTH KOREAN MICRO LAUNCHERS ............................................................................ 1 Dongyoon Shin KEYNOTE: PROMETHEUS: PRECURSOR OF LOW-COST ROCKET ENGINE ......................................... 2 Jérôme Breteau ASSESSMENT OF MON-25/MMH PROPELLANT SYSTEM FOR DEEP-SPACE ENGINES ...................... 3 Huu Trinh 60 YEARS DLR LAMPOLDSHAUSEN – THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH AND TEST SITE FOR CHEMICAL SPACE PROPULSION SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 9 Anja Frank, Marius Wilhelm, Stefan Schlechtriem FIRING TESTS OF LE-9 DEVELOPMENT ENGINE FOR H3 LAUNCH VEHICLE ................................... 24 Takenori Maeda, Takashi Tamura, Tadaoki Onga, Teiu Kobayashi, Koichi Okita DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF BOOSTER STAGE LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE OF KSLV-II PROGRAM .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Analysis of a LOX/Methane Expander Bleed Engine
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-332 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) DOI: ADD DOINUMBER HERE Basic Analysis of a LOX/Methane Expander Bleed Engine ? ? ? Marco Leonardi , Francesco Nasuti † and Marcello Onofri ?Sapienza University of Rome Via Eudossiana 18, Rome, Italy [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] · · †Corresponding author Abstract As present trends in rocket engine development recommend overall simplicity and reliability as the main design driver, while preserving high performance, expander cycle engines based on the oxygen-methane pair have been considered as a possible upper stage option. A closed expander cycle is considered for Vega Evolution upper stage, while there are no studies published in the literature on methane-based expander bleed cycles. A basic cycle analysis is presented to evaluate the performance of an oxygen/methane ex- pander bleed cycle for an engine of 100 kN thrust class. Results show the feasibility of the system and its peculiarities with respect to the better known expander bleed cycle based on hydrogen. 1. Introduction The high chamber pressure required to achieve high specific impulse in liquid propellant rocket engines (LRE), has been efficiently obtained by pump-fed systems. Different solutions have been proposed since the beginning of space age and just a few of them has found its own field of application. In these systems the pumps are driven by gas turbines whose power comes from two possible sources: combustion or cooling system. The different needs for the specific applications (booster, sustainer or upper stage of different classes of rockets) led to classify pump-fed LRE systems in open and closed cycles, which differ because of turbine discharge pressure.14, 16 Closed cycles are those providing the best performance because the whole propellant mass flow rate is exploited in the main chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation
    BC98-04 Space Transportation System Training Data Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation June 1998 Use this data for training purposes only Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power BOEING PROPRIETARY FORWARD This manual is the supporting handout material to a lecture presentation on the Space Shuttle Main Engine called the Abbreviated SSME Orientation Course. This course is a technically oriented discussion of the SSME, designed for personnel at any level who support SSME activities directly or indirectly. This manual is updated and improved as necessary by Betty McLaughlin. To request copies, or obtain information on classes, call Lori Circle at Rocketdyne (818) 586-2213 BOEING PROPRIETARY 1684-1a.ppt i BOEING PROPRIETARY TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms and Abbreviations............................. v Low-Pressure Fuel Turbopump............................ 56 Shuttle Propulsion System................................. 2 HPOTP Pump Section............................................ 60 SSME Introduction............................................... 4 HPOTP Turbine Section......................................... 62 SSME Highlights................................................... 6 HPOTP Shaft Seals................................................. 64 Gimbal Bearing.................................................... 10 HPFTP Pump Section............................................ 68 Flexible Joints...................................................... 14 HPFTP Turbine Section......................................... 70 Powerhead...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Study of the Combustion Efficiency in Multi-Element Gas
    energies Article Experimental Study of the Combustion Efficiency in Multi-Element Gas-Centered Swirl Coaxial Injectors Seongphil Woo 1,* , Jungho Lee 1,2, Yeoungmin Han 2 and Youngbin Yoon 1,3 1 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 2 Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, Korea; [email protected] 3 Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: The effects of the momentum-flux ratio of propellant upon the combustion efficiency of a gas-centered-swirl-coaxial (GCSC) injector used in the combustion chamber of a full-scale 9-tonf staged-combustion-cycle engine were studied experimentally. In the combustion experiment, liquid oxygen was used as an oxidizer, and kerosene was used as fuel. The liquid oxygen and kerosene burned in the preburner drive the turbine of the turbopump under the oxidizer-rich hot-gas condition before flowing into the GCSC injector of the combustion chamber. The oxidizer-rich hot gas is mixed with liquid kerosene passed through combustion chamber’s cooling channel at the injector outlet. This mixture has a dimensionless momentum-flux ratio that depends upon the dispensing speed of the two fluids. Combustion tests were performed under varying mixture ratios and combustion pressures for different injector shapes and numbers of injectors, and the characteristic velocities and performance efficiencies of the combustion were compared. It was found that, for 61 gas-centered swirl-coaxial injectors, as the moment flux ratio increased from 9 to 23, the combustion-characteristic velocity increased linearly and the performance efficiency increased from 0.904 to 0.938.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost. Liquid propellant engines offer higher performance, that is, they deliver greater thrust per unit weight of propellant burned.
    [Show full text]
  • Lox/Lch4 Upper Stage Development Strategies for Future Launchers
    TURBO, vol. VI (2019), no. 2 LOX/LCH4 UPPER STAGE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES FOR FUTURE LAUNCHERS Theodora ANDREESCU1, Andreea MANGRA1, Valeriu VILAG1, Ion MALAEL1, Alexandru CANCESC1, Jeni VILAG1, Dan IFRIM1, Simona DANESCU1 ABSTRACT: The reduction of Earth-to-orbit launch costs in conjunction with an increase in Launcher reliability and operational efficiency are the key requirements of future space transportation systems. This paper underlines the progress in LOX/CH4 upper stage engine development carried out by COMOTI and also being provided the prediction of the rocket engine performances at the conceptual and preliminary stages of design. This paper focuses on the trade-off studies for the engine architecture definition, considering both open and closed thermodynamic cycles. Various subsystems configurations have been taken into account, analyzing the optimum configuration in terms of performance. The main operating and geometrical parameters were discussed: combustion pressure, optimum mixture ratio, turbine pressure ratio, thrust chamber geometry, and the turbopump size is addressed. KEYWORDS: upper stage, liquid rocket engine, turbopump, LOX/CH4 cryogenic propellant, thrust chamber NOMENCLATURE A – turbine characteristic area 풎̇ – gas flow rate 푨풆 - nozzle exit diameter 푷풑풐풙 – liquid oxygen pump power 푨풕 – nozzle throat diameter 푷풑풇풖풆풍 – liquid methane pump power 푨풄 – combustion chamber area 푷푻 – turbine power 푻풄 – combustion temperature 풏풔 – pump specific rotational speed 휸 - specific heat ratio 휶 – turbine flow angle ∗ 푪풑- specific heat capacity 풑 - turbine pressure losses 풑풄 – combustion pressure R – gas constant 푪푭 – thrust coefficient – density 풄∗ - characteristic velocity M – Mach number 품ퟎ – gravitational constant 풉풑풇, 풉풑풎 – turbine blades hight 풙풑풇, 풙풑풎, - axial width 1. INTRODUCTION As the present trend in rocket engine development recommends a high versatility and low launch service cost, while preserving high performance, expander cycle upper stage based on LOX/LCH4 being a key competitiveness factor recognized by the market.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Committee Briefs
    IAF Committee Briefs July 2021 IAF SPACE PROPULSION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE 1. Introduction/Summary The Space Propulsion Committee addresses sub-orbital, earth to orbit, and in-space propulsion. The general areas considered include both chemical and non-chemical rocket propulsion, and air-breathing propulsion. Typical specific propulsion categories of interest are liquid, solid and hybrid rocket systems, electric, nuclear, solar and other advanced rocket systems, ramjet, scramjet, and various combinations of air-breathing and rocket propulsion. (Copyright SpaceX) The Committee deals with component technologies, propulsion system aspects, the implementation and In China, a project of heavy-lift launch vehicle, for future application of overall propulsion systems and dedicated important missions such as deep-space exploration and test facilities. The Committee is also examining the manned landing on the Moon, has been carried out. A feasibility of new missions made possible by new 500 ton- thrust-class LOX/kerosene rocket engine will propulsion systems and how combinations of pro- be used for the first stage and boosters of the launch pulsion technologies, such as chemical and electrical vehicle, which is also the next generation of large thrust technologies, can be optimized for this purpose. rocket engine in China. The engine employs oxidizer-rich staged-combustion cycle system and after-pump gimbal 2. Latest Developments configuration. The first engine has been manufactured and the sub-systems have been successfully hot-fire Right now, all over the world, a lot of new launchers tested. are appearing with new engines, with first flights just completed or planned for this year or in the next few On the coming first flights, we can underline the arrival years.
    [Show full text]
  • Up of Main Liquid Propellant Engine Under Hot Test Conditions
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-236 8TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND SPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Mathematical modeling of transient processes during start- up of main liquid propellant engine under hot test conditions Dmytro Koptilyy, Roman Marchan, Sergey Dolgopolov and Olexiy Nikolayev FireFly Aerospace Ukraine, 103A, Gagarina Avenue, Dnipro 49050, Ukraine [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], aleksey.nikolaev@fireflyaerospace. Abstract Predicting parameters of transient processes before static fire tests of liquid rocket engines (LRE), issuing recommendations to ensure the engine performance, stability and dynamic strength of its structure, monitoring and analyzing technical condition of the engine during tests, are important to be addressed before conducting static fire tests of main LRE. An advanced approach to the mathematical modeling of transient processes in aggregates and systems of the main rocket engine (similar to 2000 kN RD 191, liquid oxygen and kerosene) with oxidizer staged combustion is proposed. The development of a mathematical model of nonlinear dynamics of rocket engines is based on the results of long-term research of low-frequency dynamics of cavitating pumps, injection of oxidizer gas products into the flow of liquid oxygen, the Turbo Pump Unit (TPU) dynamic interaction with oscillatory processes in gas manifolds, and dynamic processes in flow regulators and others. Applied to the LRE bench tests conditions the analysis of transient processes
    [Show full text]
  • RWTH Aachen University Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery
    RWTH Aachen University Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery DLR - German Aerospace Center Institute of Space Propulsion Optimization of a Reusable Launch Vehicle using Genetic Algorithms A thesis submitted for the degree of M.Sc. Aerospace Engineering by Simon Jentzsch June 20, 2020 Advisor: Felix Wrede, M.Sc. External Advisors: Kai Dresia, M.Sc. Dr. Günther Waxenegger-Wilfing Examiner: Prof. Dr. Michael Oschwald Statutory Declaration in Lieu of an Oath I hereby declare in lieu of an oath that I have completed the present Master the- sis entitled ‘Optimization of a Reusable Launch Vehicle using Genetic Algorithms’ independently and without illegitimate assistance from third parties. I have used no other than the specified sources and aids. In case that the thesis is additionally submitted in an electronic format, I declare that the written and electronic versions are fully identical. The thesis has not been submitted to any examination body in this, or similar, form. City, Date, Signature Abstract SpaceX has demonstrated that reusing the first stage of a rocket implies a significant cost reduction potential. In order to maximize cost savings, the identification of optimum rocket configurations is of paramount importance. Yet, the complexity of launch systems, which is further increased by the requirement of a vertical landing reusable first stage, impedes the prediction of launch vehicle characteristics. Therefore, in this thesis, a multidisciplinary system design optimization approach is applied to develop an optimization platform which is able to model a reusable launch vehicle with a large variety of variables and to optimize it according to a predefined launch mission and optimization objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Cycle Variants, Propellant Combinations and Operating Regimes on Fatigue Life Expectancies of Liquid Rocket Engines
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-69 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) DOI: 069 Implications of Cycle Variants, Propellant Combinations and Operating Regimes on Fatigue Life Expectancies of Liquid Rocket Engines Günther Waxenegger?, Jörg Riccius?, Evgeny Zametaev?, Jan Deeken? and Julia Sand? ?German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany Im Langen Grund, 74239 Hardthausen am Kocher, Germany [email protected] Abstract The paper in hand thematises a fatigue life analysis methodology for liquid rocket engines, with maiden fo- cus on the combustion chamber. The method of analysis combines the engine cycle modelling tool Ecosim- Pro/ESPSS with 2-d Finite Element analysis methods developed by DLR’s Institute of Space Propulsion. From the starting point of a generic LOx/LH2 engine three objectives are pursued, changing the power cycle, the propellant combination to LOx/LCH4 and lowering the chamber pressure. The results of the trade-off study focusing on the fatigue life expectancy are presented in detail. 1. Introduction The (partial) reusability of launch systems provides a possibility of significantly reducing the costs associated with rocket launches. Currently technically feasible concepts of reusability focus on reusable booster stages. With the Falcon 9 launch vehicles, SpaceX demonstrated its ability to successfully return the first stages of orbital launchers. Furthermore, SpaceX conducted a re-flight of a recovered first stage in March 2017 and once again landed the booster. In order to bring down the costs, it is absolutely necessary to reduce the required refurbishment to a minimum. This is particularly true of the engines which are responsible for a large fraction of the total stage cost.4 To make things worse the propulsion system belongs to the most critical subsystems of a launch system.7 This is driven by the extreme operational load conditions to which the system is exposed during operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporation of RD-180 Failure Response 2011
    Incorporation of RD-180 Failure Response Features in the Atlas V Booster Emergency Detection System Felix Y. Chelkis NPO Energomash Khimki, Moscow Region, Russia Thaddeus D. Chwiedor United Launch Alliance, Denver, Colorado, USA Paul T. Connolly and John P. Hansen Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, Jupiter, Florida, USA Abstract Approximately 70% of the parts on the RD-180 engine as used on Atlas V launch vehicles are common with the RD-170 engine. The RD-170 engine was developed by NPO Energomash and certified in 1985 to power the Energia Buran rocket launch system, which was rated for human spaceflight as defined by the Russian standards. With over 45,000 seconds of operational time, the RD-180 has an extensive history of demonstrated performance, robustness, and reliability as does the Atlas vehicle that it powers. This paper describes why the RD-180/Atlas combination provides an optimal solution for human space flight directly applicable to the near-term commercial crew transportation program. The paper will examine how the RD-180/Atlas booster combination could meet Commercial Crew space flight requirements. An overview of the past NASA human space flight requirements to the Russian approach for manned flight will also be made. The paper will discuss the work that has been done to understand not only the potential failure modes to which the RD-180 propulsion system could be subjected to but also how these failure modes could be quickly identified, mitigated or managed such that a safe crew abort sequence could be initiated. The RD-180/Atlas Emergency Detection System (EDS) will be described and shown to be a viable approach to meeting Commercial Crew space flight requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Propulsion System Choices and Their Implications
    461h AIAAJAS M EJSAEJASEE Joint Propuls ion Conference AIAA 20 I O-XXXX 25 -28 July 20 10, Nashvi lle, Tc n n~scc Propulsion System Choices and Their Implications Claude R. Joyner II ' Prall & Whi tney Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida, 334 10 Daniel J. H. Levack' Prall & Whitney Rocke/dyne, Canoga Park, Californ ia, 91309 Russel E. Rhodes' NASA , Kennedy Space Center, Florida, 32899 John W. Robinson' Th e Boeing Company, Huntington Beach, California, 92647 Abstract In defining a space vehicle architecture, the propulsion system and related subsystem choices will have a major influence on achieving the goals and objectives desired. There are many alternatives and the choices made must produce a system that meets the performance requirements, but at the same time also provide the greatest opportunity of reaching all of the required objectives. Recognizing the above, the SPST Functional Requirements subteam has drawn on the knowledge, expertise, and experience of its members, to develop insight that wiIJ effectively aid the architectural concept developer in making the appropriate choices consistent with the architecture goals. This data not only identifies many selected choices, but also, more importantly, presents the collective assessment of this subteam on the "pros" and the "cons" of these choices. The propulsion system choices with their pros and cons are presented in five major groups. A. System Integration Approach. Focused on Ibe requirement for safety, reliability, dependability, maintainability, and lo\\" cost. B. Non-Chemical Propulsion. Focused on choice of propulsion type. C. Chemical Propulsion. Focused on propeUant choice implications. D. Functional Integration. Focused on the degree of integration of the many propulsive and closely associated functions, and on the choice of the engine combustion power cycle.
    [Show full text]