DOCSLIB.ORG

TASI Lectures on Moonshine Arxiv:1807.00723V1 [Hep-Th]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TASI Lectures on Moonshine Arxiv:1807.00723V1 [Hep-Th] TASI Lectures on Moonshine Vassilis Anagiannis∗1 and Miranda C. N. Chengy1,2 1Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Abstract The word moonshine refers to unexpected relations between the two distinct mathematical structures: finite group representations and mod- ular objects. It is believed that the key to understanding moonshine is through physical theories with special symmetries. Recent years have seen a varieties of new ways in which finite group representations and modular objects can be connected to each other, and these developments have brought promises and also puzzles into the string theory community. These lecture notes aim to bring graduate students in theoretical physics and mathematical physics to the forefront of this active research area. In Part II of this note, we review the various cases of moonshine connections, ranging from the classical monstrous moonshine established in the last century to the most recent findings. In Part III, we discuss the relation between the moonshine connections and physics, especially string theory. After briefly reviewing a recent physical realisation of monstrous moonshine, we will describe in some details the mystery of the physical aspects of umbral moonshine, and also mention some other setups where string theory black holes can be connected to moonshine. To make the exposition self-contained, we also provide the relevant background knowledge in Part I, including sections on finite groups, mod- ular objects, and two-dimensional conformal field theories. This part oc- cupies half of the pages of this set of notes and can be skipped by readers who are already familiar with the relevant concepts and techniques. arXiv:1807.00723v1 [hep-th] 2 Jul 2018 ∗[email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction The word moonshine is employed in mathematics to refer to an unexpected rela- tionship between modular objects and representations of finite groups. The study of moonshine phenomenon has seen rapid developments in the past five years. While the relation is between two mathematical structures, it is expected that the existence of this surprising relation has its origin in physics, and in string theory in particular. Moonshine: what, how and why? Q: What is moonshine? The structures of modular forms and that of finite group representations have a priori nothing to do with each other. The word moonshine refers to an unexpected relation between them. But this simple answer calls for more questions. Where does moonshine occur? What types of modular objects feature in moonshine relations? What types of finite groups can be represented by (mock) modular forms? In what ways? Is there a classification possible of such moonshine relations? Before satisfying answers to these questions are found, the existence of moonshine relation remains to a large extent a mysterious phenomenon. Q: How do moonshine relations arise? In the classical case of monstrous (and similarly Conway) moonshine, reviewed in x4, the relevant group representation has the structure of a vertex operator algebra (VOA). In physical terms, these cases of moonshine can be can be thought of as being \explained" by the existence of certain special 2-dimensional conformal field theories (CFTs) that have the relevant finite groups as symmetry groups. It would be very gratifying to have a similar physical construction for the finite group modules underlying umbral and other recently discovered moonshine relations. In certain \simpler" cases this has been achieved (cf. x5.2). Nevertheless, a uni- form construction of the umbral moonshine module, reflecting the uniform structure among the twenty-three instances of umbral moonshine, is still absent. Similarly, the modules underlying the various other cases of new moonshines have not been constructed so far. Apart from the question \what are these finite group modules?" there is also a deeper question of \what kind of (algebraic) structure do these moonshine modules possess?". The mock modular nature of the modular objects involved in the new cases of moonshine seems to suggest that a departure from the familiar unitary conformal field theories with discrete spectrum is necessary in order to accommodate the corresponding moonshine modules. However, the existence of generalised umbral 2 moonshine (cf. x5.2) suggests that certain features resembling those of holomorphic orbifold CFTs should still be present in these new modules. Last but not least, the first case of umbral moonshine, often referred to as the Mathieu moonshine, was uncovered in the context of string theory in the background of K3 surfaces. Subsequent development established the intimate relation between K3 string theory and all twenty-three instances of umbral moonshine. This relation to K3 string theory is the topic of x8. To sum up, the origin of the classical monstrous moonshine can be understood as lying in the existence of certain special physical theory { certain 2d chiral CFTs and the corresponding string theory embedding to be more precise. See x4 and x7. The search for the origin of the newer cases of moonshine is still largely a challenging puzzle. However, one does expect the answer to again lie in certain physical theories, and most probably arises from the framework of string theory. Q: Why should I care about moonshine? Here are a few reasons why the authors, and many other mathematicians and physi- cists, care about moonshine phenomenon. First, theoretical physics is to a large extent about symmetries, and moonshine is to a large extent about hidden sym- metries, which (conjecturally) take place in a physical context. There are therefore very good reasons for physicists to care about what is going on in moonshine. More generally speaking, the broad and interdisciplinary nature of the question and its connection to different areas in mathematics and theoretical physics suggests that the understanding of this mathematical paradigm is likely to spur novel develop- ments in these areas, as was clearly true in the case of the classical monstrous moonshine. Here we highlight a few examples of such connections, in the context of recent developments: • The discovery of Mathieu and umbral moonshine was initiated in the context of K3 string theory, arguably one of the most important examples of string theory compactifications. The development of umbral moonshine has always led to new results in the study of automorphic forms and K3 geometry, espe- cially in the context of string theory. We expect it to also shed light on the structure of BPS states, non-perturbative black hole quantum states,and on other interesting aspects of the string landscape in the future. See x5.1, 5.2 and x8. • The discovery of various new moonshine examples (cf. x6), involving various types of finite groups including an infinite family of them, poses a fascinat- ing challenge for theoretical physics to accommodate the corresponding group representations. The solution of this (completely well-posed) puzzle is likely to point to novel structures in physics. • The connection between certain new examples of moonshine and arithmetic geometry is interesting and constitutes a potentially fruitful path towards new perspectives in number theory. See x6. Moreover, it is fascinating and puzzling why the two distinct structures of modu- lar objects and finite groups are so deeply connected. An understanding of the true nature of these connections has the potential to change the way mathematicians think about these objects in a profound way. 3 About these lecture notes The lecture note is written for the occasion of the TASI 2017 lectures on Moonshine given by the second author. Acknowledgement The second author would like to thank the organisers of the TASI 2017 school for giving her the opportunity to lecture in this very nice school. We would like to thank Sarah Harrison, Justin Kaidi, Natalie Paquette and Roberto Volpato for comments on an earlier version of the draft. Last but not least, the second author would like to thank Sarah Harrison, Jeff Harvey, Shamit Kachru, Natalie Paquette, Brandon Rayhaun, Roberto Volpato, Max Zimet, and in particular John Duncan for enjoyable collaborations on related topics, and for having taught me so much about this really fun subject! 4 Contents I Background 6 1 Finite groups and their representations 6 1.1 Groups . .6 1.2 Classification of finite groups . .8 1.3 Sporadic groups and lattices . .9 1.4 Representations of finite groups . 12 2 Modular objects 15 2.1 Modular forms . 15 2.2 (Skew-)Holomorphic Jacobi forms . 19 2.3 Mock modular forms . 22 3 Conformal field theory in 2 dimensions 26 3.1 General structure . 26 3.2 Orbifolds . 31 3.3 Elliptic genus . 33 II Moonshine 38 4 Moonshine at weight zero 38 4.1 Monstrous moonshine . 38 4.2 Conway moonshine . 43 5 Moonshine at weight one-half 46 5.1 Mathieu moonshine . 46 5.2 Umbral moonshine . 48 5.3 Thompson moonshine . 53 6 Moonshine at weight three-halves 55 III Moonshine and string theory 58 7 Monstrous moonshine 58 8 Moonshine and K3 string theory 59 8.1 Mathieu moonshine and K3 elliptic genus . 60 8.2 Umbral moonshine and K3 elliptic genus . 61 8.3 Conway moonshine and K3 elliptic genus . 63 8.4 Symmetries of K3 string theory and moonshine . 64 8.5 Beyond perturbative string theory . 66 9 Other connections 68 References 69 5 Part I Background In the first part we briefly summarise the relevant background knowledge in moon- shine study, including sections on finite groups, modular objects, and two-dimensional conformal field theories. This part can be safely skipped by readers who are familiar with these topics. 1 Finite groups and their representations In this chapter we briefly review of basic notions of finite groups and their represen- tations. We mainly follow [1{3] (see also [4]).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flavor Moonshine
    Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 013B03 (20 pages) DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptz137 Flavor moonshine Shotaro Shiba Funai1,∗ Hirotaka Sugawara2,∗ 1Physics and Biology Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST), 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Kunigami-gun, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan 2High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan ∗E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received August 30, 2019; Revised October 17, 2019; Accepted October 23, 2019; Published January 13, 2020 ................................................................................................................... The flavor moonshine hypothesis is formulated to suppose that all particle masses (leptons, quarks, Higgs, and gauge particles—more precisely, their mass ratios) are expressed as coef- ficients in the Fourier expansion of some modular forms just as, in mathematics, dimensions of representations of a certain group are expressed as coefficients in the Fourier expansion of some modular forms. The mysterious hierarchical structure of the quark and lepton masses is thus attributed to that of the Fourier coefficient matrices of certain modular forms. Our inten- tion here is not to prove this hypothesis starting from some physical assumptions but rather to demonstrate that this hypothesis is experimentally verified and, assuming that the string theory correctly describes the natural law, to calculate the geometry (Kähler potential and the metric) of the moduli space of the Calabi–Yau manifold, thus providing a way to calculate the metric of the Calabi–Yau manifold itself directly from the experimental data. ................................................................................................................... Subject Index B41, B55 1. Introduction Some researchers, including one of the authors of this work (H.S.), have been working on flavor physics, assuming that some discrete symmetry plays an important role in its understanding [1–9]; S3, S4, A4, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces Arxiv:1406.0619V3 [Hep-Th]
    SLAC-PUB-16469 Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces Miranda C. N. Cheng∗1 and Sarah Harrisony2 1Institute of Physics and Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlandsz 2Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, and Theory Group, SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Abstract Recently, 23 cases of umbral moonshine, relating mock modular forms and finite groups, have been discovered in the context of the 23 even unimodular Niemeier lattices. One of the 23 cases in fact coincides with the so-called Mathieu moonshine, discovered in the context of K3 non-linear sigma models. In this paper we establish a uniform relation between all 23 cases of umbral moonshine and K3 sigma models, and thereby take a first step in placing umbral moonshine into a geometric and physical context. This is achieved by relating the ADE root systems of the Niemeier lattices to the ADE du Val singularities that a K3 surface can develop, and the configuration of smooth rational curves in their resolutions. A geometric interpretation of our results is given in terms of the marking of K3 surfaces by Niemeier lattices. arXiv:1406.0619v3 [hep-th] 18 Mar 2015 ∗[email protected] [email protected] zOn leave from CNRS, Paris. 1 This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515 and HEP. Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces 2 Contents 1 Introduction and Summary 3 2 The Elliptic Genus of Du Val Singularities 8 3 Umbral Moonshine and Niemeier Lattices 14 4 Umbral Moonshine and the (Twined) K3 Elliptic Genus 20 5 Geometric Interpretation 27 6 Discussion 30 A Special Functions 32 B Calculations and Proofs 34 C The Twining Functions 41 References 48 Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces 3 1 Introduction and Summary Mock modular forms are interesting functions playing an increasingly important role in various areas of mathematics and theoretical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Mock Moonshine by Prof. Kishore Marathe City University of New
    Mock Moonshine by Prof. Kishore Marathe City University of New York, Brooklyn College International Conference on Recebt Developments in String Theory Congressi Stefano Franscini - Monte Verita, Switzerland July 21 to 25, 2014 ====================== 1 Thirty years ago some very surprising relations between the Fourier coefficients of the Jacobi Hauptmodul or the J-function and represen- tations of the largest finite simple sporadic group, the Monster were discovered. Precise formulation of these relations is now called the ’Monstrous Moonshine’. It has given rise to a large body of new mathematics. The moonshine correspondence has been extended to other groups revealing unexpected relations to conformal field theory, gravity and string theory in physics and to Ramanujan’s mock theta functions and its extensions in mathe- matics. We call these results which have been discoverd in the last 30 years ’ Mock Moon- shine’. We will survey some recent develop- ments related to Mock Moonshine and indicate directions for future research. 2 List of Topics 1. Some Historical Remarks 2. Modular objects 3. Monstrous Moonshine Conjectures 4. Monstrous Moonshine and Vertex Algebras 5. Moonshine for other groups 6. Mock Moonshine and Field Theories 3 The following historical material is taken from [4]. Recall that a group is called simple if it has no proper non-trivial normal subgroup. Thus an abelian group is simple if and only if it is isomorphic to one of the groups Zp, for p a prime number. This is the simplest example of an infinite family of finite simple groups. An- other infinite family of finite simple groups is the family of alternating groups An,n> 4 that we study in the first course in algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Positive Definite Lattices. 22 Feb 2000 Richard E
    Classification of positive definite lattices. 22 Feb 2000 Richard E. Borcherds, ∗ Mathematics department, Evans Hall #3840, University of California at Berkeley, CA 94720-3840 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] www home page www.math.berkeley.edu/˜reb Contents. 1. An algorithm for classifying vectors in some Lorentzian lattices. 2. Vectors in the lattice II1,25. 3. Lattices with no roots. Table 0: Primitive norm 0 vectors in II1,25. Table 1: Norm 2 vectors in II1,25. Table 2: Norm 4 vectors in II1,25. 1. Classification of positive norm vectors. In this paper we describe an algorithm for classifying orbits of vectors in Lorentzian lattices. The main point of this is that isomorphism classes of positive definite lattices in some genus often correspond to orbits of vectors in some Lorentzian lattice, so we can classify some positive definite lattices. Section 1 gives an overview of this algorithm, and in section 2 we describe this algorithm more precisely for the case of II1,25, and as an application we give the classification of the 665 25-dimensional unimodular positive definite lattices and the 121 even 25 dimensional positive definite lattices of determinant 2 (see tables 1 and 2). In section 3 we use this algorithm to show that there is a unique 26 dimensional unimodular positive definite lattice with no roots. Most of the results of this paper are taken from the unpublished manuscript [B], which contains more details and examples. For general facts about lattices used in this paper see [C-S], especially chapters 15–18 and 23–28.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphism Groups of the Holomorphic Vertex Operator
    AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF THE HOLOMORPHIC VERTEX OPERATOR ALGEBRAS ASSOCIATED WITH NIEMEIER LATTICES AND THE 1-ISOMETRIES − HIROKI SHIMAKURA Abstract. In this article, we determine the automorphism groups of 14 holomorphic vertex operator algebras of central charge 24 obtained by applying the Z2-orbifold con- struction to the Niemeier lattice vertex operator algebras and lifts of the 1-isometries. − 1. Introduction Recently, (strongly regular) holomorphic vertex operator algebras (VOAs) of central charge 24 with non-zero weight one spaces are classified; there exist exactly 70 such VOAs (up to isomorphism) and they are uniquely determined by the Lie algebra structures on the weight one spaces. The remaining case is the famous conjecture in [FLM88]: a (strongly regular) holomorphic VOA of central charge 24 is isomorphic to the moonshine VOA if the weight one space is zero. The determination of the automorphism groups of vertex operator algebras is one of fundamental problems in VOA theory; it is natural to ask what the automorphism groups of holomorphic VOAs of central charge 24 are. For example, the automorphism group of the moonshine VOA is the Monster ([FLM88]) and those of Niemeier lattice VOAs were determined in [DN99]. However, the other cases have not been determined yet. The purpose of this article is to determine the automorphism group of the holomorphic orb(θ) VOA VN of central charge 24 obtained in [DGM96] by applying the Z2-orbifold con- arXiv:1811.05119v1 [math.QA] 13 Nov 2018 struction to the lattice VOA VN associated with a Niemeier lattice N and a lift θ of the orb(θ) 1-isometry of N.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of an Umbral Module
    Thank the Organizers Construction of an Umbral module With John Duncan J. Harvey, Eurostrings 2015 OUTLINE 1. Moonshine, Monstrous and Umbral 2. A free fermion trick 3. The 3E8 example of Umbral Moonshine 4. Indefinite lattice theta functions 5. A Vertex Operator Algebra for indefinite lattices 6. Putting the pieces together 7. What does it mean for string theory? M O O N S H I N E M (Mock)ModularForms G S Groups (Finite) String theory A Algebras (VOA) The original example of this structure is Monstrous Moonshine G The Monster sporadic group M The weight zero modular function 1 2⇡i⌧ J(⌧)=q− + 196884q + ,q= e ··· A Vertex Operator Algebra (OPE of chiral Vertex operators) S Bosonic or Heterotic String on an asymmetric orbifold background 24 (R /ΛL)/(Z/2) We now have Mathieu Moonshine and its extension to Umbral Moonshine. We know the extension for two of these objects: G : M24 or more generally GX = Aut(LX )/W X M : A weight 1/2 mock modular form whose coefficients count the multiplicities of massive Eguchi, N=4 SCA characters in the elliptic genus of K3 Ooguri, Tachikawa (2) 1/8 2 3 H (⌧)=2q− 1 + 45q + 231q + 770q + − ··· or more generally, a weight 1/2, m-1 component X vector-valued mock modular form Hr (⌧) Here L X is one of the 23, rank 24 Niemeier lattices and m = m ( X ) is its Coxeter number. Are there analogs of the VOA algebraic structure and/or a string theoretic interpretation of these structures? More specifically, is there an explicit construction of the infinite-dimensional G X modules implied by these constructions along with an explicit action of G X ? That is, the M24 mock modular form suggests that there exists an infinite set of vector spaces (2) (2) (2) K 1/8,K7/8,K15/8, − ··· of dimension 2, 2x45, 2x231, …that provide representations of M24 and should be combined into (2) (2) 1 K = n=0 Kn 1/8 − L In Monstrous Moonshine we have \ V = Vn n 1 M≥− 1 n dimVn = c(n),J(q)= c(n)q n= 1 X− with V n the vector space of states of conformal dimension n c/ 24 in the Monster CFT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romance Between Maths and Physics
    The Romance Between Maths and Physics Miranda C. N. Cheng University of Amsterdam Very happy to be back in NTU indeed! Question 1: Why is Nature predictable at all (to some extent)? Question 2: Why are the predictions in the form of mathematics? the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in natural sciences. Eugene Wigner (1960) First we resorted to gods and spirits to explain the world , and then there were ….. mathematicians?! Physicists or Mathematicians? Until the 19th century, the relation between physical sciences and mathematics is so close that there was hardly any distinction made between “physicists” and “mathematicians”. Even after the specialisation starts to be made, the two maintain an extremely close relation and cannot live without one another. Some of the love declarations … Dirac (1938) If you want to be a physicist, you must do three things— first, study mathematics, second, study more mathematics, and third, do the same. Sommerfeld (1934) Our experience up to date justifies us in feeling sure that in Nature is actualized the ideal of mathematical simplicity. It is my conviction that pure mathematical construction enables us to discover the concepts and the laws connecting them, which gives us the key to understanding nature… In a certain sense, therefore, I hold it true that pure thought can grasp reality, as the ancients dreamed. Einstein (1934) Indeed, the most irresistible reductionistic charm of physics, could not have been possible without mathematics … Love or Hate? It’s Complicated… In the era when Physics seemed invincible (think about the standard model), they thought they didn’t need each other anymore.
    [Show full text]
  • String Theory Moonshine
    Strings 2014, Princeton Umbral Moonshine and String Theory Miranda Cheng University of Amsterdam* *: on leave from CNRS, France. A Myseros Story Abot Strings on K3 Finite Moonshine Modular Groups Objects symmetries of interesting objects functions with special symmetries K3 Sigma-Model 2d sigma models: use strings to probe the geometry. M = K3 Σ N=(4,4) superconformal Elliptic Genus of 2d SCFT In a 2d N>=(2,2) SCFT, susy states are counted by the elliptic genus: q = e2⇡i⌧ ,y = e2⇡iz • holomorphic [Schellekens–Warner, Witten ’87] • modular SL(2,Z) •topological EG = EG ⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘ K3 Sigma-Model 2d sigma model on K3 is a N=(4,4) SCFT. ⇒ The spectrum fall into irred. representations of the N=4 SCA. 4 2 J +J¯ J L c/24 L c/24 ✓i(⌧,z) EG(⌧,z; K3) = Tr ( 1) 0 0 y 0 q 0− q¯ 0− =8 HRR − ✓ (⌧, 0) i=2 i ⇣ ⌘ X ✓ ◆ = 24 massless multiplets + tower of massive multiplets 1 2 ✓ (⌧,z) 1/8 2 3 = 1 24 µ(⌧,z)+2 q− ( 1 + 45 q + 231 q + 770 q + ...) ⌘3(⌧) − “Appell–Lerch⇣ sum” numbers of massive N=4 multiplets ⌘ also dimensions of irreps of M24, ! an interesting finite group with ~108 elements [Eguchi–Ooguri–Tachikawa ’10] Why EG(K3) ⟷ M24? Q: Is there a K3 surface M whose symmetry (that preserves the hyperKähler structure) is M24? [Mukai ’88, Kondo ’98] No! M24 elements symmetries of M2 symmetries of M1 Q: Is there a K3 sigma model whose symmetry is M24? [Gaberdiel–Hohenegger–Volpato ’11] No! M24 elements possible symmetries of K3 sigma models 3.
    [Show full text]
  • K3 Elliptic Genus and an Umbral Moonshine Module
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) K3 Elliptic Genus and an Umbral Moonshine Module Anagiannis, V.; Cheng, M.C.N.; Harrison, S.M. DOI 10.1007/s00220-019-03314-w Publication date 2019 Document Version Final published version Published in Communications in Mathematical Physics License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Anagiannis, V., Cheng, M. C. N., & Harrison, S. M. (2019). K3 Elliptic Genus and an Umbral Moonshine Module. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 366(2), 647-680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03314-w General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:27 Sep 2021 Commun. Math. Phys. 366, 647–680 (2019) Communications in Digital Object Identifier (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-019-03314-w Mathematical Physics K3 Elliptic Genus and an Umbral Moonshine Module Vassilis Anagiannis1, Miranda C.
    [Show full text]
  • Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces Arxiv:1406.0619V4 [Hep-Th] 18 Jul 2017
    Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces Miranda C. N. Cheng∗1 and Sarah Harrisony2 1Institute of Physics and Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlandsz 2Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, and Theory Group, SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA Abstract Recently, 23 cases of umbral moonshine, relating mock modular forms and finite groups, have been discovered in the context of the 23 even unimodular Niemeier lattices. One of the 23 cases in fact coincides with the so-called Mathieu moonshine, discovered in the context of K3 non-linear sigma models. In this paper we establish a uniform relation between all 23 cases of umbral moonshine and K3 sigma models, and thereby take a first step in placing umbral moonshine into a geometric and physical context. This is achieved by relating the ADE root systems of the Niemeier lattices to the ADE du Val singularities that a K3 surface can develop, and the configuration of smooth rational curves in their resolutions. A geometric interpretation of our results is given in terms of the marking of K3 surfaces by Niemeier lattices. arXiv:1406.0619v4 [hep-th] 18 Jul 2017 ∗[email protected] [email protected] zOn leave from CNRS, Paris. 1 Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces 2 Contents 1 Introduction and Summary 3 2 The Elliptic Genus of Du Val Singularities 8 3 Umbral Moonshine and Niemeier Lattices 14 4 Umbral Moonshine and the (Twined) K3 Elliptic Genus 20 5 Geometric Interpretation 27 6 Discussion 30 A Special Functions 32 B Calculations and Proofs 34 C The Twining Functions 41 References 49 Umbral Moonshine and K3 Surfaces 3 1 Introduction and Summary Mock modular forms are interesting functions playing an increasingly important role in various areas of mathematics and theoretical physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Monstrous Entanglement JHEP10(2017)147 ] (Or Its Chiral 8 [ 3 20 6 22 11 15 4 22 28 9 16 29 26 , As Its Automorphism Group
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: September 1, 2017 Accepted: October 12, 2017 Published: October 20, 2017 Monstrous entanglement JHEP10(2017)147 Diptarka Das,a Shouvik Dattab and Sridip Pala aDepartment of Physics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A. bInstitut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Eidgen¨ossischeTechnische Hochschule Z¨urich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, 8049 Z¨urich,Switzerland E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: The Monster CFT plays an important role in moonshine and is also conjectured to be the holographic dual to pure gravity in AdS3. We investigate the entanglement and R´enyi entropies of this theory along with other extremal CFTs. The R´enyi entropies of a single interval on the torus are evaluated using the short interval expansion. Each order in the expansion contains closed form expressions in the modular parameter. The leading terms in the q-series are shown to precisely agree with the universal corrections to R´enyi entropies at low temperatures. Furthermore, these results are shown to match with bulk computations of R´enyi entropy using the one-loop partition function on handlebodies. We also explore some features of R´enyi entropies of two intervals on the plane. Keywords: Conformal Field Theory, AdS-CFT Correspondence, Field Theories in Lower Dimensions, Discrete Symmetries ArXiv ePrint: 1708.04242 Open Access, c The Authors. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2017)147 Article funded by SCOAP3. Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Short interval expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report (PDF)
    Novel Approaches to the Finite Simple Groups John McKay (Concordia University), Roland Friedrich (Humboldt University Berlin) 22. April–29. April 2012 1 Motivation It is now accepted that the classification of finite simple groups (CFSG) is complete. Our purpose is in con- structions which we re-examine in the light of observations that suggest that a substantial amount of insight is to be gained if we pursue novel connections to other, apparently disparate, areas of mathematics. This may lead to a natural home for the 26 sporadic simple groups which today are considered the complement of the Lie-Chevalley groups. 2 Overview of the Field In order to understand the importance of the new ideas and conjectures linked with Monstrous Moon- shine (MM) that we set out to develop, we have to understand its history, see [15, 19, 20]. Although the Monster is the most spectacular of the sporadic groups, it is just one of 26 groups under our wing. We discern three major evolutionary periods linked with the Monster group, the early and foundational one [5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 17, 18, 22, 23], the time when the fruits of previous labour could be picked, cul- minating in Borcherds’ Fields medal rewarded proof of the conjecture [2], and finally the post Moonshine one, where it is becoming evident that we are not dealing with one particular isolated phenomenon but rather with a (possible) new class of objects of which MM is the most prominent representative so far, and its new mathematical connections [16]. An electronic collection of relevant articles for the subject has been posted at: http://www.fields.utoronto.ca/˜jplazas/MoonshineRoadmap.html 3 Recent Developments and Open Problems During the focused research group various parts of this picture became clearer.
    [Show full text]