DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling Radar Propagation Over Terrain

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling Radar Propagation Over Terrain MODELING RADAR PROPAGATION OVER TERRAIN Modeling Radar Propagation Over Terrain Denis J. Donohue and James R. Kuttler M athematical techniques are presented for modeling electromagnetic propaga- tion over an irregular boundary. The techniques are aimed at upgrading the Applied Physics Laboratory’s Tropospheric Electromagnetic Parabolic Equation Routine (TEM- PER) model for radar propagation over terrain. The physical domain with an irregular boundary is mapped to a rectangular domain, where a numerical solution can be generated by the same approach used in TEMPER. This new method is applied to several model terrain problems and shown to be accurate and practical for a reasonable range of surface slopes. Interesting results are discussed for the shadowing of radar by terrain obstacles and the detection of low-flying targets over mountainous terrain. (Keywords: Electromagnetics, Ground clutter, Parabolic equation, Propagation, Rough boundaries.) INTRODUCTION The propagation of radar waves at low grazing angles interaction with the ground occurs. The Theater Sys- over terrain is a critical area for numerical modeling tems Development Group of APL’s Air Defense and performance prediction. A principal goal is esti- Systems Department has developed the computational mating ground clutter, or surface backscatter, an model TEMPER (Tropospheric Electromagnetic Para- obvious impediment to target detection. In addition, bolic Equation Routine) to better understand and diffuse reflection from the ground can alter the coher- predict the effect of such environmental factors on ent interference between the direct and reflected radar system performance. beams, adding additional uncertainty to the radar’s TEMPER has been under development at APL since coverage pattern. These terrain effects become even the early 1980s. The first objective was to accurately more pronounced when coupled with atmospheric re- calculate electromagnetic propagation over the sea in fraction. The inhomogeneity of the atmosphere, which complicated refractive environments.1–5 TEMPER is often takes the form of horizontally stratified density currently used extensively on several Navy programs to layers, can redirect radar energy such that repeated provide propagation calculations for radar system de- JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2 (1997) 279 D. J. DONOHUE AND J. R. KUTTLER sign studies, posttest reconstruction, and in situ ship- wavelength is particularly important to propagation board environmental assessment. Although TEMPER over the ocean surface and to certain types of terrain is mature and well established as a predictor of prop- as well (a related problem is scattering from ground agation over the sea, the Navy’s current emphasis on cover/foliage). Alternative techniques have been de- littoral operations results in a need for accurate prop- veloped to account for such features,4 and they are not agation calculations over irregular terrain as well. This discussed here. article describes recent efforts to develop algorithms to address this need. The Parabolic Wave Equation (PE) was first derived REVIEW OF PARABOLIC WAVE in the 1940s by Fock,6 but analytical solutions were EQUATION AND FOURIER/SPLIT- developed only for problems involving unrealistically STEP SOLUTION simple refractive conditions. In 1973, Hardin and Tap- TEMPER is based on the PE, an approximation to pert introduced an efficient numerical approach for 7 the reduced wave (or Helmholtz) equation, where it is solving the PE called the Fourier/split-step algorithm. assumed that the wave energy propagates predominant- This algorithm was used primarily for underwater prop- ly in the forward or horizontal direction. This approx- agation until 1981, at which time Harvey Ko and col- imation has been found to work quite well for modeling leagues in APL’s Submarine Technology Department low-grazing-angle radar propagation. The principal (STD) modified an acoustic model to address electro- 1 advantage of the PE approach is numerical efficiency. magnetic propagation in the troposphere. The new By neglecting backscattered wave energy and restrict- model was called the Electromagnetic Parabolic Equa- ing propagation to small angles with respect to the tion (EMPE). horizon, highly optimized numerical methods can be In 1984, Dan Dockery, then in the Fleet Systems employed to rapidly calculate propagation over tens or Department, working with the STD developers and even hundreds of kilometers in range. Altitudes are members of the APL Research Center, began modifi- generally limited to a few kilometers above the Earth’s cations to expand EMPE’s capabilities as a radar prop- 2–5 surface. The PE approach is also well suited to incor- agation prediction tool. These upgrades included in- porating atmospheric refraction. Rigorous solution over corporation of an impedance boundary condition, a a large-scale irregular boundary has previously been rough surface model, and flexible antenna pattern al- considered a limitation of the PE method. gorithms; increased numerical efficiency and robustness For this article, we consider a scalar form of the were also achieved. Eventually, the model was renamed Helmholtz wave equation, corresponding to one com- TEMPER to avoid confusion with the original program. ponent of a vector electric (or magnetic) field. Further- An extensive experimental campaign was also under- more, we assume azimuthal homogeneity of the atmo- taken between 1984 and 1989 to validate EMPE/TEM- sphere and terrain, so that solutions are generated in PER using calibrated propagation data collected in 2,3 a two-dimensional (range x vs. altitude z) slice. Under measured refractive conditions. These tests estab- these assumptions, the Helmholtz equation for the field lished the accuracy of the PE Fourier/split-step ap- f has the form proach for predicting radar propagation over the sea in complicated, range-varying, refractive environments. At present, however, TEMPER is limited in its ∂2∂2 ff(,)xz (,)xz 22 ability to rigorously account for irregular terrain. Ac- + +=k n(,)(,) xzf xz 0, (1) ∂ 2∂ 2 curate numerical solutions can only be guaranteed x z when propagating over mean smooth surfaces, such as a flat plane or spherical Earth. An approximate tech- where k = 2p/l is the wavenumber of the field and n nique, described in the next section, was previously is the index of refraction. It is important to emphasize introduced to account for arbitrary changes in surface that all of the effects of atmospheric refraction are slope. However, this technique introduces nonquanti- incorporated into n, and furthermore, the boundary fiable errors into the solution. This article describes mapping methods discussed in the next section result techniques for rigorously incorporating an irregular in modification to n only. This is critical to the ap- boundary into the TEMPER model. A principal re- proach, since it allows us to account for both atmo- quirement is that the new technique allows one to spheric and terrain effects through the standard meth- retain the Fourier/split-step numerical approach. We ods used to solve Eq. 1. emphasize that the terrain under consideration con- To obtain the parabolic form of the wave equation, tains roughness features or slope variations on scales we first assume that the field f propagates as time- that are much larger than the typical radar wavelength harmonic (eiwt), cylindrical (two-dimensional) waves of ⋅ l (centimeters to meters). The effect of fine-scale the form f(,)xz= uxze (,)i(k r) / r , where r is the dis- roughness that is comparable to or smaller than the tance from the source in the two-dimensional space. 280 JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2 (1997) MODELING RADAR PROPAGATION OVER TERRAIN The function u(x,z) can be regarded as the slowly satisfies Dirichlet’s boundary condition [u(x, 0) = 0], varying (in space) envelope of the propagating wave whereas the V-pol field satisfies Neumann’s boundary field. Our objective is a wave equation for u in which condition [∂u(x, 0)/∂z = 0]. These boundary conditions the traveling wave dependence is factored out of the are satisfied exactly by using either sine (Dirichlet or problem. By substituting u into Eq. 1 and dropping a H-pol) or cosine (Neumann or V-pol) transforms in Eq. term containing ∂2u(x, z)/∂x2 (the paraxial approxima- 3. For nonflat surfaces, the z derivative becomes a tion), we arrive at such a form, normal derivative, which couples both x and z. In that case, satisfying the boundary condition is considerably more involved. An approach discussed in the next ∂ ∂2 uxz(,)= i +−k 2 section is to map the irregular surface via coordinate [nxz (,)1 ] uxz (,). (2) ∂x 22k∂z2 transformation to a space in which the surface is locally flat, so that a similar splitting of cosine and sine trans- forms may be employed. We emphasize that once so- The paraxial approximation used to derive Eq. 2 as- lutions are obtained for the orthogonal H and V po- sumes that the propagation is nearly horizontal, and larizations, the solution for any linear polarization state that gradients in the horizontal direction are small may be obtained by simple linear combination. compared with the vertical. For a complete develop- The preceding discussion considers the solution of ment of this equation, the reader is referred to Ref. 4. the PE over surfaces that are flat or that may be made Equation 2 is a parabolic partial differential equation flat by simple coordinate transformation. Although the that can be solved as an initial value problem. A start- following section considers more general boundaries of ing field, u(z), is specified for an initial x, and the nonzero slope, the current TEMPER code uses an ap- solution is marched forward in range. The marching proximate technique for such boundaries that may be method is highly efficient numerically, particularly mentioned here. The terrain is approximated by a se- since the range and altitude stepping can be decoupled quence of up and down stair steps. At each down step, using the Fourier/split-step method.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microwave Communications and Radar
    2/26 6.014 Lecture 14: Microwave Communications and Radar A. Overview Microwave communications and radar systems have similar architectures. They typically process the signals before and after they are transmitted through space, as suggested in Figure L14-1. Conversion of the signals to electromagnetic waves occurs at the output of a power amplifier, and conversion back to signals occurs at the detector, after reception. Guiding-wave structures connect to the transmitting or receiving antenna, which are generally one and the same in monostatic radar systems. We have discussed antennas and multipath propagation earlier, so the principal novel mechanisms we need to understand now are the coupling of these electromagnetic signals between antennas and circuits, and the intervening propagating structures. Issues we must yet address include transmission lines and waveguides, impedance transformations, matching, and resonance. These same issues also arise in many related systems, such as lidar systems that are like radar but use light beams instead, passive sensing systems that receive signals emitted by the environment either naturally (like thermal radiation) or by artifacts (like motors or computers), and data recording systems like DVD’s or magnetic disks. The performance of many systems of interest is often limited in part by our ability to couple energy efficiently from one port to another, and our ability to filter out deleterious signals. Understanding these issues is therefore an important part of such design effors. The same issues often occur in any system utilizing high-frequency signals, whether or not they are transmitted externally. B. Radar, Lidar, and Passive Systems Figure L14-2 illustrates a standard radar or lidar configuration where the transmitted power Pt is focused toward a target using an antenna with gain Gt.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar, Without Tears
    Radar, without tears François Le Chevalier1 May 2017 Originally invented to facilitate maritime navigation and avoid icebergs, at the beginning of the last century, radar took off during the Second World War, especially for aerial surveillance and guidance from the ground or from aircraft. Since then, it has continued to expand its field of employment. 1 What is it, what is it for? Radar is used in the military field for surveillance, guidance and combat, and in the civilian area for navigation, obstacle avoidance, security, meteorology, and remote sensing. For some missions, it is irreplaceable: detecting flying objects or satellites, several hundred kilometers away, monitoring vehicles and convoys more than 100 kilometers round, making a complete picture of a planet through its atmosphere, measuring precipitations, marine currents and winds at long ranges, detecting buried objects or observing through walls – as many functions that no other sensor can provide, and whose utility is not questionable. Without radar, an aerial or terrestrial attack could remain hidden until the last minute, and the rain would come without warning to Roland–Garros and Wimbledon ... Curiously, to do this, the radar uses a physical phenomenon that nature hardly uses: radio waves, which are electromagnetic waves using frequencies between 1 MHz and 100 GHz – most radars operating with wavelength ( = c / f, being the wavelength, c the speed of light, 3.108 m/s, and f the frequency) between 300 m and 3 mm (actually, for most of them, between 1m and 1cm): wavelengths on a human scale ... Indeed, while the optical domain of electromagnetic waves, or even the ultraviolet and infrared domains, are widely used by animals, while the acoustic waves are also widely used by marine or terrestrial animals, there is practically no example of animal use of this vast part, known as "radioelectric", of the electromagnetic spectrum (some fish, Eigenmannia, are an exception to this rule, but they use frequencies on the order of 300 Hz, and therefore very much lower than the "radar" frequencies).
    [Show full text]
  • Band Radar Models FR-2115-B/2125-B/2155-B*/2135S-B
    R BlackBox type (with custom monitor) X/S – band Radar Models FR-2115-B/2125-B/2155-B*/2135S-B I 12, 25 and 50* kW T/R up X-band, 30 kW I Dual-radar/full function remote S-band inter-switching I SXGA PC monitor either CRT or color I New powerful processor with LCD high-speed, high-density gate array and I Optional ARP-26 Automatic Radar sophisticated software Plotting Aid (ARPA) on 40 targets I New cast aluminum scanner gearbox I Furuno's exclusive chart/radar overlay and new series of streamlined radiators technique by optional RP-26 VideoPlotter I Shared monitor utilization of Radar and I Easy to create radar maps PC systems with custom PC monitor switching system The BlackBox radar system FR-2115-B, FR-2125-B, FR-2155-B* and FR-2135S-B are custom configured by adding a user’s favorite display to the blackbox radar package. The package is based on a Furuno standard radar used in the FR-21x5-B series with (FURUNO) monitor which is designed to comply with IMO Res MSC.64(67) Annex 4 for shipborne radar and A.823 (19) for ARPA performance. The display unit may be selected from virtually any size of multi-sync PC monitor, either a CRT screen or flat panel LCD display. The blackbox radar system is suitable for various ships which require no specific type approval as a SOLAS compliant radar. The radar is available in a variety of configurations: 12, 25, 30 and 50* kW output, short or long antenna radiator, 24 or 42 rpm scanner, with standard Electronic Plotting Aid (EPA) and optional Automatic Radar Plotting Aid (ARPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Microwave Radar/Radiometer for Arctic Clouds (Mirac): First Insights from the ACLOUD Campaign
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5019–5037, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5019-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Microwave Radar/radiometer for Arctic Clouds (MiRAC): first insights from the ACLOUD campaign Mario Mech1, Leif-Leonard Kliesch1, Andreas Anhäuser1, Thomas Rose2, Pavlos Kollias1,3, and Susanne Crewell1 1Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 2Radiometer-Physics GmbH, Meckenheim, Germany 3School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, NY, USA Correspondence: Mario Mech ([email protected]) Received: 12 April 2019 – Discussion started: 23 April 2019 Revised: 26 July 2019 – Accepted: 11 August 2019 – Published: 18 September 2019 Abstract. The Microwave Radar/radiometer for Arctic vertical resolution down to about 150 m above the surface Clouds (MiRAC) is a novel instrument package developed is able to show to some extent what is missed by Cloud- to study the vertical structure and characteristics of clouds Sat when observing low-level clouds. This is especially im- and precipitation on board the Polar 5 research aircraft. portant for the Arctic as about 40 % of the clouds during MiRAC combines a frequency-modulated continuous wave ACLOUD showed cloud tops below 1000 m, i.e., the blind (FMCW) radar at 94 GHz including a 89 GHz passive chan- zone of CloudSat. In addition, with MiRAC-A 89 GHz it is nel (MiRAC-A) and an eight-channel radiometer with fre- possible to get an estimate of the sea ice concentration with a quencies between 175 and 340 GHz (MiRAC-P).
    [Show full text]
  • RADAR Steve Krar Radar Is a System That Uses Radio Waves That Can See
    1 RADAR (Radio Detection And Ranging) Steve Krar Radar is a system that uses radio waves that can see hundreds of miles in fog, rain, snow, clouds and darkness. It can identify the range, altitude, direction, or speed of both moving and fixed objects such as aircraft, ships, motor vehicles, weather formations, and ground formation. A transmitter sends radio waves that are aimed at a target and deflected back to a receiver. Although the radio signal returned is usually very weak, radio signals can easily be amplified. Radar is used in many areas such as weather prediction, air traffic control, police detection of speeding traffic, and by the armed forces to detect incoming planes and missiles. The term RADAR was coined in 1941 as an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging. The concept of using radio waves to detect objects goes back as far as 1902, but the practical system we know as radar began in the late 1930s. British inventors, aided by research from other countries, developed a warning system that could detect airplanes or missiles moving toward England. Basic Principles The basic principle of radar can be easily demonstrated. Imagine facing the side of a mountain or large wall somewhere in the distance. You have a very accurate stopwatch and 'super hearing' to help you. If a person would shout at the top of their voice and accurately time between the voice leaving and the first echo returning, this time is recorded in a radar device. You have now become a basic radar unit. Instead of one person screaming, a powerful radio beam is sent out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of a Microwave Radar with an Asymmetric Knifelike Beam for the Remote Sensing of Ocean Waves
    NOVEMBER 2005 K A R A E V E T A L . 1809 The Concept of a Microwave Radar with an Asymmetric Knifelike Beam for the Remote Sensing of Ocean Waves V. YU.KARAEV,M.B.KANEVSKY, AND G. N. BALANDINA Institute of Applied Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia P. CHALLENOR,C.GOMMENGINGER, AND M. SROKOSZ Southampton Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom (Manuscript received 2 December 2004, in final form 10 April 2005) ABSTRACT The features of near-nadir probing of the ocean surface from a satellite are investigated, and a new configuration of a microwave radar for the surface slopes measurement is proposed. Numerical modeling is used to examine the feasibility of a spaceborne implementation, to devise a measuring technique, and to develop a data processing algorithm. It is shown that the radar with a knifelike beam (1° ϫ 25°–30°) can be used to measure the variance of surface wave slopes. Using range selection and a new processing procedure to synthesize data, it is possible to achieve the spatial resolution required to study wave processes on the ocean surface from satellites. A new approach to wind speed retrieval at and near nadir is also discussed. 1. Introduction shortcomings, and new radars are constantly being de- veloped (e.g., Lin et al. 2000; Moccia et al. 2000; Hauser Remote sensing is widely used for oceanographic re- et al. 2001). These new systems aim to measure ocean search. At present, spaceborne radars allow us to ob- parameters more precisely or to obtain data across a tain a global overview of the ocean surface state and to wider swath to improve sampling.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar Wind Profiler (RWP) and Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) Instrument Handbook
    DOE/SC-ARM-TR-044 Radar Wind Profiler (RWP) and Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) Instrument Handbook P Muradyan R Coulter March 2020 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the U.S. Government. Neither the United States nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. DOE/SC-ARM-TR-044 Radar Wind Profiler (RWP) and Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) Instrument Handbook P Muradyan R Coulter Both at Argonne National Laboratory March 2020 Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research P Muradyan and R Coulter, March 2020, DOE/SC-ARM-TR-044 Acronyms and Abbreviations ACAPEX ARM Cloud Aerosol Precipitation Experiment AMF ARM mobile facility ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement AT Acceptance Test BBSS balloon-borne sounding system BSRWP beam-steered radar wind profiler CF Central
    [Show full text]
  • Active Phased Array Antenna Development for Modern Shipboard Radar Systems
    A. K. AGRAWAL et al. Active Phased Array Antenna Development for Modern Shipboard Radar Systems Ashok K. Agrawal, Bruce A. Kopp, Mark H. Luesse, and Kenneth W. O’Haver Current and future Navy radar requirements are driven by rapidly evolving threats, including both cruise missiles and tactical ballistic missiles. To address these threats, array antennas will have to operate over wider bandwidths with enhanced sensitivity, higher radiated power levels, improved stability, and improved electronic protection to address reduced target radar cross-sections. In addition, there is a growing need for reduced array signatures and a practical need to control costs, including acquisition, operational, and support costs. Active phased array antennas have emerged as a funda- mental technology for addressing these evolving Navy radar system needs. APL’s Air Defense Systems Department has long been at the forefront of phased array antenna development for shipboard radar systems, and the Department is contributing to the development of active array antennas for the new generation of Navy radar systems cur- rently under development. This article provides an overview of the emerging active array antenna technology. INTRODUCTION Shipboard radar systems typically must provide sur- required to perform discrimination and target identifi- veillance of thousands of angular locations and track cation functions. At the same time that radar demands hundreds of targets and guided missiles, all within rela- are increasing, there is a practical need to reduce tively short reaction times. These requirements can be acquisition and operation and support (O&S) costs, met only with phased array antennas that allow elec- improve reliability, and reduce manning requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of HF Radar Fields of Directional Wave Spectra Against in Situ Measurements at Multiple Locations
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Comparison of HF Radar Fields of Directional Wave Spectra Against In Situ Measurements at Multiple Locations Guiomar Lopez 1,* and Daniel C. Conley 2 1 Morphodynamique Continentale et Côtière, CNRS UMR 6143, Caen University, 14000 Caen, France 2 Coastal Processes Research Group, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 June 2019; Accepted: 12 August 2019; Published: 14 August 2019 Abstract: The coastal zone hosts a great number of activities that require knowledge of the spatial characteristics of the wave field, which in coastal seas can be highly heterogeneous. Information of this type can be obtained from HF radars, which offer attractive performance characteristics in terms of temporal and spatial resolution. This paper presents the validation of radar-derived fields of directional wave spectra. These were retrieved from measurements collected with an HF radar system specifically deployed for wave measurement, using an established inversion algorithm. Overall, the algorithm reported accurate estimates of directional spectra, whose main distinctive characteristic was that the spectral energy was typically spread over a slightly broader range of frequencies and directions than in their in situ-measured counterparts. Two errors commonly reported in previous studies, namely the overestimation of wave heights and noise related to short measurement periods, were not observed in our results. The maximum wave height recorded by two in situ devices differed by 30 cm on average from the radar-measured values, and with the exception of the wave spreading, the standard deviations of the radar wave parameters were between 3% and 20% of those obtained with the in situ datasets, indicating the two were similarly grouped around their means.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE 583 Lectures 15 RADAR History and Basics
    ECE 583 Lectures 15 RADAR History and Basics 1 A BIT OF HISTORY -RADAR - The acronym - RADAR is an acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging The Start: The thought/concept of using propagating EM waves began almost with the start of experiments to understand EM waves. H. Hertz in 1886 performed experiments showing that reflected signals from incident EM waves could be measured from metallic and dielectric bodies. Huelsmeyer in Germany experimented with the detection of "radio waves" in 1903 and obtained a patent in 1904 for an obstacle detector and ship navigational device. 2 The 1920's: * Marconi in 1922 in a speech delivered to a meeting of the Institute of Radio Engineers (later to become a part of IEEE) spoke of the use of a radar type device on a ship to "immediately reveal the presence and bearing of other ships in fog and thick weather.“ * The US Navy, through the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), began in 1922 investigating the use of radio waves for ship detection after noting signal interruptions in ship to ship and ship to shore communications. They used 60 MHz CW signals and separated transmitter and receiver, bistatic configuration, which was rather cumbersome and not as precise in ship location as later pulsed systems. As a result, acceptance was slow to catch on for field use of the CW-bistatic approach. 3 The 1930's The first detection of an aircraft by radar occurred accidentally in 1930 with an NRL CW-bistatic system doing direction finding experiments and detecting an aircraft 2 miles away on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Radar Functional Requirements
    NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements NOAA/National Weather Service Radar Functional Requirements Approved by the NOAA Observing Systems Council September 2015 NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements Signatures Radar Functional Requirements Validation NOSC Endorsement The NOAA Observing Systems Council (NOSC) has received the National Weather Service Radar Functional Requirements with Line Office, Subject Matter Expert and Research Program concurrence, and is satisfied with the Level-of-Validation provided for the threshold and “optimal for 2030” requirements. 1 NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements Validation Line Office Endorsement The Directors of the National Weather Service (NWS) Office of Science and Technology (OST), Office of Climate, Water and Weather Services (OCWWS), and Office of Operational Systems (OOS) Radar Operations Center (ROC), and the Director of the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) have received NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements (RFR) document with Project Lead and Developmental Team concurrence and are satisfied with the level of validation for requirements that extend from present day through 2030, given information known at the date of signing. 2 NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements Radar Functional Requirements Lead Validation The NWS OST Radar Improvement Development Manager, and OCWWS Meteorological Services Division Chief have validated the process and contents of this NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements document. Radar Functional Requirements Integrated Working Team Concurrence The Radar Functional Requirements Integrated Working Team (IWT) membership concur that the requirements contained herein, comprise NOAA/NWS Radar Functional Requirements from the present day through 2030, given information known at the date of signing.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to High-Frequency Radar: Reality and Myti-I
    FEATURE INTRODUCTION TO HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR: REALITY AND MYTI-I By Jeffrey D. Paduan and Hans C. Graber THE CONCEPT OF USING high-frequency (HF) electromagnetic spectrum. Figure 2 illustrates sev- radio pulses to remotely probe the ocean surface eral of these remote sensing techniques used to ex- has been around for decades. In this paper and the tract information about the ocean surface. The fig- companion paper by Teague et al. (1997) we ure is adapted from the review by Shearman strive to introduce this technique to a broad ocean- (1981) and it contrasts space-borne systems, such ographic audience. Teague et al. (1997) provides as altimeters and scatterometers, which use mi- the historical context plus an outline of different crowave frequencies, with shore-based systems, system configurations, whereas we focus on the which use a range of frequencies depending on the measurements of primary interest to coastal ocean- application. (Not shown are aircraft-borne sys- ographers, i.e., maps of near-surface currents, tems, which also operate in the microwave band.) • . we focus on the wave heights, and wind direction. Another goal of The figure also illustrates the different types of measurements of pri- this paper and, indeed, this entire issue is to pres- transmission paths, including true line-of-sight ent a realistic assessment of the state-of-the-art in paths, "sky wave" paths, which reflect off the ioni- mary interest to HF radar techniques vis-h-vis coastal oceanogra- sphere, and "ground wave" paths, which exploit phy. When evaluating any new measurement tech- coupling of the radiowaves with the conducting coastal oceanogra- nique, it is important to separate issues related to ocean water to achieve extended ranges.
    [Show full text]