DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to High-Frequency Radar: Reality and Myti-I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to High-Frequency Radar: Reality and Myti-I FEATURE INTRODUCTION TO HIGH-FREQUENCY RADAR: REALITY AND MYTI-I By Jeffrey D. Paduan and Hans C. Graber THE CONCEPT OF USING high-frequency (HF) electromagnetic spectrum. Figure 2 illustrates sev- radio pulses to remotely probe the ocean surface eral of these remote sensing techniques used to ex- has been around for decades. In this paper and the tract information about the ocean surface. The fig- companion paper by Teague et al. (1997) we ure is adapted from the review by Shearman strive to introduce this technique to a broad ocean- (1981) and it contrasts space-borne systems, such ographic audience. Teague et al. (1997) provides as altimeters and scatterometers, which use mi- the historical context plus an outline of different crowave frequencies, with shore-based systems, system configurations, whereas we focus on the which use a range of frequencies depending on the measurements of primary interest to coastal ocean- application. (Not shown are aircraft-borne sys- ographers, i.e., maps of near-surface currents, tems, which also operate in the microwave band.) • . we focus on the wave heights, and wind direction. Another goal of The figure also illustrates the different types of measurements of pri- this paper and, indeed, this entire issue is to pres- transmission paths, including true line-of-sight ent a realistic assessment of the state-of-the-art in paths, "sky wave" paths, which reflect off the ioni- mary interest to HF radar techniques vis-h-vis coastal oceanogra- sphere, and "ground wave" paths, which exploit phy. When evaluating any new measurement tech- coupling of the radiowaves with the conducting coastal oceanogra- nique, it is important to separate issues related to ocean water to achieve extended ranges. For HF phers... system design from fundamental limitations of the radars, instruments that operate using sky wave technique. The former are engineering shortcom- transmissions are often referred to as over-the- ings, which are subject to continuous improve- horizon (OTH) radars (e.g_ Georges, 1980), al- ment. The latter are real limitations in the use of though HF ground wave radars, which are the the particular geophysical signal in the presence of major focus of this issue, also achieve beyond-the- realistic noise• Most of the "myths" about HF horizon ranges. radar measurements, in our view, stem from the Reflection (or backscatter) of electromagnetic confusion of these two issues. energy from the sea surface can be expected to One common misconception about HF radar produce an energy "spectrum" at the receiver, stems from the word "'radar" itself. A more de- even if the energy source was single-frequency, scriptive name would be HF "radio," as the HF because of the complicated shape and motion of portion of the electromagnetic spectrum is within the sea surface. Interpreting these spectral returns the radio bands. Figure 1 shows a broad range of for various transmit frequencies is the key to ex- the electromagnetic spectrum, including the tracting information about the ocean. Many instru- nomenclature commonly applied to different por- ments rely on a resonant backscatter phenomenon tions of the spectrum. The HF band, with frequen- known as "Bragg scattering," which results from cies of -3-30 MHz and wavelengths of-10-100 coherent reflection of the transmitted energy by m, sits between the spectral bands used for televi- ocean surface waves whose wavelength is exactly sion and (AM) radio transmissions. Often, the term one-half as long as the transmitted radar waves. radar is applied to instruments operating in the mi- The inset in Figure 2 attempts to illustrate this crowave portion of the spectrum, for which wave- process by showing how energy reflected at one lengths are measured in millimeters or centimeters. wave crest is precisely in phase with other energy Throughout oceanography, many different in- that traveled ~I wavelength down and ~[ wavelength struments exploit many different portions of the back to reflect from the next wave crest. These co- herent reflections result in a strong peak in the backscatter spectrum. Scatterometers exploit Jeffrey D. Paduan. Code OC/Pd, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 93943. USA- Hans C. Graber, Rosen- Bragg scattering from capillary waves (-1 cm) to stiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science. University of obtain information about winds. HF radars, on the Miami, Miami, FL 33149-1049, USA. other hand, exploit Bragg scattering from surface 36 OCEANOGRAPHY'VoI.10, NO. 2"1997 gravity waves (-10 m) to obtain information about Wavelength • currents (and winds). 1 / l I I I I I I I I 1 1 I [ I I Measuring Currents 1020 1018 1016 S 1014 1012 1010 I(~ 106 104 102 gamma I t ~ehf~ shf ~uhf vhf, hf mf~ If The history of HF backscatter measurements is --ray--J I ~ / Lrad~--radi°'a--bands ' l audio ' x-ray 1 t...microwave...a better outlined by Teague et al. (1997). We point Nomenclature t'ultra-e-near~mid~far'a "~'-=" Frequency (Hz) vmiet.JM., infrared to the work of Crombie (1955) as the first to iden- vlbgyor tify strong sea echoes in the HF band with reso- nant Bragg scattering. Bragg waves in the HF Fig. 1: Electromagnetic spectrum showing the HF band relative to other radio wave band happen to be "short" surface gravity waves, bands and the broader spectrum. which can be assumed to be traveling as deep- water waves, except in very shallow depths of a few meters or less. This is important because it al- metric dilution of precision (GDOP) in the global lows information contained in the Doppler shift of positioning system (Chapman and Graber, 1997). If Bragg peaks to be used to estimate ocean currents. currents are assumed to be constant over several ra- Figure 3 illustrates the Doppler technique for dial bins, it is also possible to estimate velocities ocean current determination from HF radar using a single radar site as was done by Bjorkstedt backscatter. It shows an actual spectrum from the and Roughgarden (1997), although the GDOP-re- Ocean Surface Current Radar (OSCR) system. The lated errors will be relatively large in this case. spectrum contains obvious Bragg peaks due to the The current measurement by HF radars is close presence of Bragg waves traveling toward and to a "true" surface current measurement. Because away from the receiver. The frequencies of these radar pulses scatter off ocean waves, the derived peaks are offset from that of the transmitted en- currents represent an integral over a depth that is ergy for the two following reasons: 1) the Bragg proportional to the radar wavelength. Stewart and waves are moving with the deep-water phase Joy (1974) show this depth to be -d = X/87r. Be- speed given by c = ~(gX/47r), where k is the wave cause wavelength depends on the radar frequency, length of the transmitted energy and g is the gravi- it is feasible to use multifrequency HF radars to tational acceleration and 2) the Bragg waves are estimate vertical shear in the top two meters of the moved by the underlying ocean current. Because ocean. the expected Doppler shift due to the Bragg waves Present system and coverage capabilities of HF The current mea- is known, any additional Doppler shift is attributed radars are quite impressive. Measurements can be to the current as shown in Figure 3. made in range as short as 1 km and as long as 150 surement by HF It is important to keep in mind the following km from the shore at a resolution of -0.3-3 km points about HF radar-derived currents: 1) a single along a radial beam. Radio interference or high sea radars is close to a radar site is capable of detecting only the compo- states can limit the actual range at times as well as "true" surface current nent of flow traveling toward or away from the site for a given look angle; 2) the effective depth measurement. of the measurement depends on the depth of influ- ence of the Bragg waves and is quite shallow (-1 m); 3) stable estimates require scattering from hundreds of wave crests plus ensemble averaging of the spectral returns, which sets the space-time resolution of the instruments; 4) the precision is limited by the frequency resolution of the Doppler spectrum and is typically 2-5 cm s '; and 5) the accuracy is controlled by numerous factors, such as signal-to-noise ratios, pointing errors, and geometry. Because a single radar station measures only the component of flow along a radial beam emanating from the site, "radial" currents from two or more sites should be combined to form vector surface current estimates. Figure 4 illustrates this principle using radial data from two radar sites. It also illus- trates the "baseline problem" that occurs where both radar sites measure the same (or nearly the Fig. 2: Schematic representation of various remote same) component of velocity, such as along the sensing methods exploiting signals backscattered from baseline between the sites or at great distances from the sea surface (adapted fronl Shearman, 1981). The both sites. Generally two radials must have an angle inset illustrates the resonant Bragg scattering process >30 ° and <150 ° to resolve the current vector. This that occurs due to reflection from waves whose wave- geometric sensitivity is similar to the familiar geo- length"ts ~ as long as that of the incident energy. OCEANOGRAPHY*VoI. 10, NO. 2"1997 37 -115 i i the ground conditions in the vicinity of the receive __ ~.._/__f a.._£_f antennas• Wet and moist sandy soils enhance the -120 ground wave propagation, whereas dry and rocky Bragg Peak from Bragg Peak from -125 Receding Waves Advancing Waves grounds reduce signal strengths• Typical azimuthal resolutions are -5 °.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microwave Communications and Radar
    2/26 6.014 Lecture 14: Microwave Communications and Radar A. Overview Microwave communications and radar systems have similar architectures. They typically process the signals before and after they are transmitted through space, as suggested in Figure L14-1. Conversion of the signals to electromagnetic waves occurs at the output of a power amplifier, and conversion back to signals occurs at the detector, after reception. Guiding-wave structures connect to the transmitting or receiving antenna, which are generally one and the same in monostatic radar systems. We have discussed antennas and multipath propagation earlier, so the principal novel mechanisms we need to understand now are the coupling of these electromagnetic signals between antennas and circuits, and the intervening propagating structures. Issues we must yet address include transmission lines and waveguides, impedance transformations, matching, and resonance. These same issues also arise in many related systems, such as lidar systems that are like radar but use light beams instead, passive sensing systems that receive signals emitted by the environment either naturally (like thermal radiation) or by artifacts (like motors or computers), and data recording systems like DVD’s or magnetic disks. The performance of many systems of interest is often limited in part by our ability to couple energy efficiently from one port to another, and our ability to filter out deleterious signals. Understanding these issues is therefore an important part of such design effors. The same issues often occur in any system utilizing high-frequency signals, whether or not they are transmitted externally. B. Radar, Lidar, and Passive Systems Figure L14-2 illustrates a standard radar or lidar configuration where the transmitted power Pt is focused toward a target using an antenna with gain Gt.
    [Show full text]
  • Compact Bilateral Single Conductor Surface Wave Transmission Line
    Compact bilateral single conductor Regarded as half mode CPW, a series of slotlines have been proposed whose characteristic impedance is easy to control [7]. The bilateral surface wave transmission line slotline with 50 ohm characteristic impedance is designed as shown in Fig. 2. The copper layers on both sides of the substrate are connected by Zhixia Xu, Shunli Li, Hongxin Zhao, Leilei Liu and the metalized via arrays, and the two via arrays can increase the perunit- Xiaoxing Yin length capacitance and decrease characteristic impedance to 50 ohm which is usually quite high for a conventional slotline. The height of via A compact bilateral single conductor surface wave transmission line h is 1.524 mm, the slot S is 0.3 mm; the space between via arrays d is (TL) is proposed, converting the quasi-transverse electromagnetic 0.4 mm; the space between neighbour vias a is 1 mm. (QTEM) mode of low characteristic impedance slotline into the As a single conductor TL, bilateral corrugated metallic strips are transverse magnetic (TM) mode of single-conductor TL. The propagation constant of the proposed TL is decided by geometric printed on both sides of the substrate and connected by via arrays the parameters of the periodic corrugated structure. Compared to configuration is shown in Fig. 3a. To excite the transverse magnetic conventional transitions between coplanar waveguide (CPW) and (TM) mode, the surface mode of the corrugated strip, from the quasi- single-conductor TLs, such as Goubau line (G-Line) and surface transverse electromagnetic (QTEM) mode, the mode of slotline, we plasmons TL, the proposed structure halves the size and this feature propose a compact bilateral transition structure, as shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar, Without Tears
    Radar, without tears François Le Chevalier1 May 2017 Originally invented to facilitate maritime navigation and avoid icebergs, at the beginning of the last century, radar took off during the Second World War, especially for aerial surveillance and guidance from the ground or from aircraft. Since then, it has continued to expand its field of employment. 1 What is it, what is it for? Radar is used in the military field for surveillance, guidance and combat, and in the civilian area for navigation, obstacle avoidance, security, meteorology, and remote sensing. For some missions, it is irreplaceable: detecting flying objects or satellites, several hundred kilometers away, monitoring vehicles and convoys more than 100 kilometers round, making a complete picture of a planet through its atmosphere, measuring precipitations, marine currents and winds at long ranges, detecting buried objects or observing through walls – as many functions that no other sensor can provide, and whose utility is not questionable. Without radar, an aerial or terrestrial attack could remain hidden until the last minute, and the rain would come without warning to Roland–Garros and Wimbledon ... Curiously, to do this, the radar uses a physical phenomenon that nature hardly uses: radio waves, which are electromagnetic waves using frequencies between 1 MHz and 100 GHz – most radars operating with wavelength ( = c / f, being the wavelength, c the speed of light, 3.108 m/s, and f the frequency) between 300 m and 3 mm (actually, for most of them, between 1m and 1cm): wavelengths on a human scale ... Indeed, while the optical domain of electromagnetic waves, or even the ultraviolet and infrared domains, are widely used by animals, while the acoustic waves are also widely used by marine or terrestrial animals, there is practically no example of animal use of this vast part, known as "radioelectric", of the electromagnetic spectrum (some fish, Eigenmannia, are an exception to this rule, but they use frequencies on the order of 300 Hz, and therefore very much lower than the "radar" frequencies).
    [Show full text]
  • Long Earthquake'waves
    ~ LONG EARTHQUAKE'WAVES Seisllloloo-istsLl are tuning their instnlments to record earth 1l10tiollS with periods of one Jninute to an hour and mllplitudes of less than .01 inch. These,,~aycs tell llluch about the earth's crust and HHltltle by Jack Oliver "lhe hi-H enthusiast who hitS strug· per cycle. A reI.ltlvely shorr earthquake earth'luake waves tmvel at .9 to 1.S 1 gled to ImprO\'e tlIe re;pollse of wave has a duration of 10 seconds. At miles per second, they lange in length hI:; e'jlllpment In the bass range at present the most infornl.1tive long waves from 10 mile" up to the 8,OOO-mde length .11 oUlld 10 c~'d(-s per ;econd wIll ha VI" a h,\v€ periods of 15 to 75 seconds from of the earth's ,hamete... TheIr amplitude, fellow-feeling for the selsmologi;t \vho CfEst to crest. \Vith more advanced in­ however, is of an entirely di/lerent 01 de.. : IS ,attempting to tune hiS installments to ,,11 uments seismologists hope sooo to one of these waves displaces a point on the longest earth'luake \\".\\'es. But where study 450-second waves. The longest so the sudace of the eal th at some dislil1lce IIl-n deals in cITIes per second, seisll1OIo" f.tr detected had ., penod of :3,400 sec­ from the shock by no more than a hun· gy measures its fre<luencle; 111 seconds onds-·nearly an hour! Since these long dredth of an inch, even when eXCited by t/) ~ ~ SUBTERRANEAN TOPOGRAPHY of the North American con· at which the depth of the boundary was established.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Waves: What Are They? Why Are They Interesting?
    SURFACE WAVES: WHAT ARE THEY? WHY ARE THEY INTERESTING? Janice Hendry Roke Manor Research Limited, Old Salisbury Lane, Romsey, SO51 0ZN, UK [email protected] ABSTRACT Surface waves have been known about for many decades and quite in-depth research took place up until ~1960s . Since then, little work has been done in this area. It is unclear why, however today we have more powerful modelling methods which may enable us to understand their use better. It is known that high frequency (HF) surface waves follow the terrain and this has been utilised in some cases such as Raytheon's HF surface wave radar (HFSWR) for detecting ships over-the-horizon. It is thought with some more insight and knowledge of this phenomenon, surface waves could be extremely useful for both military and civil use, from communications to agriculture. WHAT ARE SURFACE WAVES? Over the many decades that surface waves have been researched, some confusion has built up over exactly what constitutes a surface wave. This was discussed by James Wait in an IEE Transaction in 1965 1 and was even a matter of discussion at the General Assembly of International Union of Radio Science (URSI) held in London in 1960. It was concluded that “there is no neat definition which would encompass all forms of wave which could glide or be guided along an interface”. However, the definitions which have been settled upon for this paper are as follows: Surface Wave Region : The region of interest in which the surface wave propagates. Surface Wave : A surface wave is one that propagates along an interface between two different media without radiation; such radiation being construed to mean energy converted from the surface wave field to some other form.
    [Show full text]
  • Band Radar Models FR-2115-B/2125-B/2155-B*/2135S-B
    R BlackBox type (with custom monitor) X/S – band Radar Models FR-2115-B/2125-B/2155-B*/2135S-B I 12, 25 and 50* kW T/R up X-band, 30 kW I Dual-radar/full function remote S-band inter-switching I SXGA PC monitor either CRT or color I New powerful processor with LCD high-speed, high-density gate array and I Optional ARP-26 Automatic Radar sophisticated software Plotting Aid (ARPA) on 40 targets I New cast aluminum scanner gearbox I Furuno's exclusive chart/radar overlay and new series of streamlined radiators technique by optional RP-26 VideoPlotter I Shared monitor utilization of Radar and I Easy to create radar maps PC systems with custom PC monitor switching system The BlackBox radar system FR-2115-B, FR-2125-B, FR-2155-B* and FR-2135S-B are custom configured by adding a user’s favorite display to the blackbox radar package. The package is based on a Furuno standard radar used in the FR-21x5-B series with (FURUNO) monitor which is designed to comply with IMO Res MSC.64(67) Annex 4 for shipborne radar and A.823 (19) for ARPA performance. The display unit may be selected from virtually any size of multi-sync PC monitor, either a CRT screen or flat panel LCD display. The blackbox radar system is suitable for various ships which require no specific type approval as a SOLAS compliant radar. The radar is available in a variety of configurations: 12, 25, 30 and 50* kW output, short or long antenna radiator, 24 or 42 rpm scanner, with standard Electronic Plotting Aid (EPA) and optional Automatic Radar Plotting Aid (ARPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Sky-Wave Propagation
    ANTENNA AND WAVE PROPAGATION Introduction Electromagnetic Wave(Radio Waves) travel with a vel. of light. These waves comprises of both Electric and Magnetic Field. The two fields are at right-angles to each other and the direction of propagation is at right-angles to both fields. The Plane of the Electric Field defines the Polarisation of the wave. Field Strength Relationship Electric Field, E x y Magnetic Direction of Field, H z Propagation Electromagnetic Wave(Radio Waves) travel with a vel. of light. These waves comprises of both Electric and Magnetic Field. The two fields are at right-angles to each other and the direction of propagation is at right-angles to both fields. The Plane of the Electric Field defines the Polarisation of the wave. POLARIZATION The polarization of an antenna is the orientation of the electric field with respect to the Earth's surface. Polarization of e.m. Wave is determined by the physical structure of the antenna and by its orientation. Radio waves from a vertical antenna will usually be vertically polarized. Radio waves from a horizontal antenna are usually horizontally polarized. Classification of Radio Wave Propagation GROUND WAVE, SPACE WAVE, SKY WAVE Ground Waves or Surface Waves Ground Waves or Surface Waves ◦ Frequencies up to 2 MHz ◦ follows the curvature of the earth and can travel at distances beyond the horizon (upto some km) ◦ must have vertically polarized antennas ◦ strongest at the low- and medium-frequency ranges ◦ AM broadcast signals are propagated primarily by ground waves during the day and by sky waves at nightis a Surface Wave that propagates or travels close to the surface of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation and Utilization of the Echo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 62, NO. 6, JUNE 1974 673 Sea Backscatter at HF: Interpretation and Utilization of the Echo DONALD E. BARRICK, MEMBER, IEEE, JAMES M. HEADRICK, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, ROBERT W. BOGLE, DOUGLASS D. CROMBIE AND Abstract-Theories and concepts for utilization of HF sea echo are compared and tested against surface-wave measurements made from San Clemente Island in the Pacific in a joint NRL/ITS/NOAA Although the heights of ocean waves are generally small experiment. The use of first-order sea echo as a reference target for in terms of these radar wavelengths, the scattered echo is calibration of HF over-the-horizon radars is established. Features of the higher order Doppler spectrum can be employed to deduce the nonetheless surprisingly large and readily interpretable in principal parameters of the wave-height directional. spectrum (i.e., terms of its Doppler features. The fact that these heights are sea state); and it is shown that significant wave height can be read small facilitates the analysis of scatter using the perturbation from the spectral records. Finally, it is shown that surface currents approximation. This theory [2] produces an equation which and current (depth) gradients can be inferred from the same Doppler 1) agrees with the scattering mechanism deduced by Crombie sea-echo records. from experimental data; 2) properly predicts the positions of I. INTRODUCTION the dominant Doppler peaks; 3) shows how the dominant echo magnitude is related to the sea wave height; and 4) per­ mits an explanation of some of the less dominant, more com­ T WENTY YEARS ago Crombie [1] observed sea echo plex features of the sea echo through retention and use of the with an HF radar, and he correctly deduced the scatter­ higher order terms in the perturbation analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Microwave Radar/Radiometer for Arctic Clouds (Mirac): First Insights from the ACLOUD Campaign
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5019–5037, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5019-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Microwave Radar/radiometer for Arctic Clouds (MiRAC): first insights from the ACLOUD campaign Mario Mech1, Leif-Leonard Kliesch1, Andreas Anhäuser1, Thomas Rose2, Pavlos Kollias1,3, and Susanne Crewell1 1Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany 2Radiometer-Physics GmbH, Meckenheim, Germany 3School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, NY, USA Correspondence: Mario Mech ([email protected]) Received: 12 April 2019 – Discussion started: 23 April 2019 Revised: 26 July 2019 – Accepted: 11 August 2019 – Published: 18 September 2019 Abstract. The Microwave Radar/radiometer for Arctic vertical resolution down to about 150 m above the surface Clouds (MiRAC) is a novel instrument package developed is able to show to some extent what is missed by Cloud- to study the vertical structure and characteristics of clouds Sat when observing low-level clouds. This is especially im- and precipitation on board the Polar 5 research aircraft. portant for the Arctic as about 40 % of the clouds during MiRAC combines a frequency-modulated continuous wave ACLOUD showed cloud tops below 1000 m, i.e., the blind (FMCW) radar at 94 GHz including a 89 GHz passive chan- zone of CloudSat. In addition, with MiRAC-A 89 GHz it is nel (MiRAC-A) and an eight-channel radiometer with fre- possible to get an estimate of the sea ice concentration with a quencies between 175 and 340 GHz (MiRAC-P).
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Energy Harvesting by Direct Voltage Multiplication on Lateral Waves from a Suspended Dielectric Layer
    SPECIAL SECTION ON ENERGY EFFICIENT WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS WITH ENERGY HARVESTING AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER Received September 2, 2017, accepted September 26, 2017, date of publication September 29, 2017, date of current version November 7, 2017. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2757947 Wireless Energy Harvesting by Direct Voltage Multiplication on Lateral Waves From a Suspended Dielectric Layer LOUIS WY LIU 1, QINGFENG ZHANG 1, YIFAN CHEN2, MOHAMMED A. TEETI1, AND RANJAN DAS1,3 1Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 154108, China 2School of Engineering, University of Waikato, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand 3School of Engineering, IIT Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India Corresponding author: Qingfeng Zhang ([email protected]) This work was supported in part by the Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar under Grant 2015A030306032, in part by the Guangdong Special Support Program under Grant 2016TQ03X839, in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61401191, in part by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee funds under Grant KQJSCX20160226193445, Grant JCYJ20150331101823678, Grant KQCX2015033110182368, Grant JCYJ20160301113918121, Grant JSGG20160427105120572, and in part by the Shenzhen Development and Reform Commission Funds under Grant [2015] 944. ABSTRACT This paper explores the feasibility of wireless energy harvesting by direct voltage multiplication on lateral waves. Whilst free space is undoubtedly a known medium for wireless energy harvesting, space waves are too attenuated to support realistic transmission of wireless energy. A layer of thin stratified dielectric material suspended in mid-air can form a substantially less attenuated pathway, which efficiently supports propagation of wireless energy in the form of lateral waves.
    [Show full text]
  • ULTRA WIDEBAND SURFACE WAVE COMMUNICATION J. A. Lacomb
    Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 8, 95{105, 2009 ULTRA WIDEBAND SURFACE WAVE COMMUNICATION J. A. LaComb and P. M. Mileski Naval Undersea Warfare Center 1176 Howell St., Newport, RI 02841, USA R. F. Ingram Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) 23 Clara Dr. Suite 206 Mystic, CT 06355, USA Abstract|Ultra Wideband (UWB), an impulse carrier waveform, was applied at HF-VHF frequencies to utilize surface wave propagation. Due to the low duty cycle of the pulse, the energy requirements are signi¯cantly reduced. UWB involves the propagation of transient pulses rather than continuous waves which makes the system easier to implement, inexpensive and small. The use of surface wave propagation (instead of commercial SHF UWB) extends the communication range. The waveform, transmitter, receiver, modulation and channel characteristics of the novel system design will be presented. 1. INTRODUCTION Ultra Wideband (UWB) technology is vastly di®erent from classical radio transmission. The extremely short pulses are generated at baseband and are transmitted without the use of a carrier. The short pulses of electromagnetic energy translate to very wide transmission bandwidths in the frequency domain. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) de¯nes UWB as a signal with either a fractional bandwidth of 20% of the center frequency or 500 MHz. Due to the low duty cycle of the pulse the energy requirements are signi¯cantly reduced. Due to the low power spectral density the system has a low probability of intercept (LPI). Corresponding author: J. A. LaComb ([email protected]). 96 LaComb, Mileski, and Ingram The FCC has allocated 7,500 MHz of spectrum for unlicensed use of UWB in the 3.1 to 10.6 GHz frequency band [1].
    [Show full text]
  • High Frequency Surface Wave Radar
    Beyond the horizon: High Frequency Surface Wave Radar Frédéric Lamole1, François Jacquin1, Gilles Rigal2 1 Embedded Systems Dpt / HF division 5, rue Brindejonc des Moulinais, 31506 Toulouse Cedex 5 2 Embedded Systems Dpt / HF division Les Hauts de la Duranne, 370, rue René Descartes, 13857 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 3 ABSTRACT In this paper, we present a high-level view of the High Frequency Surface Wave Radar developed for the Radars for long distance maritime surveillance and SAR operations (RANGER) project ([1]). The over-the-horizon radar proposes a new system architecture, with new waveforms, new processing methods, and new antenna concepts to provide solutions to meet HFSWR (High Frequency Surface Wave Radar) challenges as increasing the long range distance detection for small vessels with improved accuracy. Keywords: Over-the-horizon (OTH) Radar; High Frequency (HF) Surface Wave Radar (SWR); maritime surveillance; Radar Cross Section (RCS) 1. INTRODUCTION The potential offered by HF surface wave radars for maritime surveillance and in particular for the entire Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), is a sea area for a state which has rights from its baseline out to 200 nautical miles from the coast defined by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1982[2], has recently been rediscovered, with the overhaul of national strategies related to security and surveillance of the maritime environment. Thus, over the past decade or so, the evolution of the strategic context has led to international instability, primarily affecting fragile states, promoting illicit and violent activities, generating potential risks for societies as: security threats, caused by trafficking (narcotics, psychotropic substances, weapons), illegal transport of migrants, maritime terrorism and piracy, have replaced the military threat.
    [Show full text]