The Summa Halensis and Augustine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Summa Halensis and Augustine Lydia Schumacher The Summa Halensis and Augustine Abstract: Augustine of Hippo is, without adoubt,the authority that the Summa Ha- lensis invokes most frequently. This has led the editors of the Summa and many other scholars subsequentlytoconclude thatthis text and the earlyFranciscan tradition more generallyislittle but an effort to systematize the tradition of Augustine that had prevailed for most of the earlier Middle Ages. In turn, that assumption has led to atendency to downplaythe significance of earlyFranciscan thought and to its ne- glect in scholarship. This chapter will highlight some significant ways in which the Summa departs from Augustine in the process of innovation. In the first of three case studies, Iwill show how the Summa employs amethodology, in fact,scholastic methodology, which invokes invoking authorities likeAugustine with aview to ad- vancingits own opinionswhich are not necessarilyfound in Augustine himself. In two further studies, Iwill examine how the Summa departs from Augustine on two of its most fundamental theological doctrines concerning the nature of God as one and as Triune. Augustine of Hippo is, withoutadoubt,the authority thatthe Summa Halensis in- vokes most frequently.¹ Accordingtoits Prolegomena,this multi-volume Franciscan text which was initiallyoverseenbyAlexander of Hales cites over 100 works by Au- gustine, some spurious but most of them genuine. In total, it contains 4,814explicit and 1,372implicit quotations to Augustine, which amounts to more than one quarter of the texts cited in the bodyofthe Summa.² Although the Prolegomena acknowledge that ‘the whole Western Christian tradi- tion was nourished by his [Augustine’s] writingsuntil the introduction of Aristotle’,it describes the Summa Halensis as particularlysignificant in this regardfor one main reason, namely, ‘that bothits theologyand philosophycollatethe tradition of Augus- tine, and are ordained to its defense’,inaworld whereAristotle’srecentlyrediscov- ered works wererapidlyrising in popularity.For this reason, the Prolegomena con- See Victorin Doucet, ‘Prolegomena in librum III necnon in libros IetII“Summae Fratris Alexan- dri”,’ in Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica,vol. 4(Quarac- chi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1948), lxxxviii: ‘Patres Latini’;cf. Jacques-GuyBougerol, ‘The Church Fathers and auctoritates in Scholastic Theology to Bonaventure,’ in TheReception of the Church Fathers in the West,ed. Irena Backus(Leiden: Brill, 1996), 289–335, esp. 301. Formoreinfor- mation on the relationship between Alexander’sworks and the Summa,see Victorin Doucet, ‘ANew Source of the Summa fratris Alexandri,’ Franciscan Studies 6(1946): 403–17;Victorin Doucet, ‘The History of the Problemofthe Authenticity of the Summa,’ Franciscan Studies 7(1947): 26–41;Victorin Doucet, ‘The History of the Problem of the Authenticity of the Summa (Continued),’ Franciscan Stud- ies 7(1947): 274–312. Doucet, ‘Prolegomena,’ lxxxviii. OpenAccess. ©2020 Lydia Schumacher,published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-005 34 Lydia Schumacher cludes,the Summa ‘is universallyand rightlyseen as the foundation of the Augusti- nian-Franciscan school in the 13th century’.³ Forthe authors of the Summa,its editors assumed, there was consequentlylittle major difference between the Augustinian and Franciscan schools otherthan that the latter was more systematicallyand comprehensively expressed. Thus, one of the first modernmedievalists, Franz Ehrle, defined the Franciscan school as ‘neo-Augustini- an’ in away that influenced manysubsequent scholars, to the present day.⁴ By most accounts, this schoolofthought is one that Alexander’sprizestudent Bonaventure articulated in its mature form.⁵ Moreover,itisthe school of thought from which later Franciscans like John Duns Scotus eventuallydeparted in favour of following the new Aristotelian—and modern—intellectual trends.⁶ Although prevalent and longstanding, scholarlyassumptions about the Augusti- nian character of earlyFranciscan thought have not been subjectedtothe test of sus- tained research, in part because this tradition of thought has been dismissed from the start as amere attempt to bolster an Augustiniantradition whose authority sup- posedlybegan to diminish in the times of earlyFranciscans themselves. In the proc- ess of researching the work of their school, however,significant reasons emerge to re-think theirrelationship to Augustine. Someofthese reasons pertain to the meth- odologythey employed in developing their arguments, which, on closer examina- tion, complicateastraightforward reading of quotations to Augustine as indicators Doucet, ‘Prolegomena,’ lxxxviii. Franz Ehrle, Grundsätzliches zurCharakteristik der neueren und neuesten Scholastik (Freiburgim Breisgau: Herder,1918). BernardVogtfollowedEhrle’sreading in an importantarticle, ‘Der Ursprung und die Entwicklungder Franziskanerschule,’ Franziskanische Studien 9(1922).Étienne Gilson argues that Aquinas critiqued aFranciscan rendering of Augustine in his landmark article, ‘Pourquoi saint Thomas acritique saint Augustin,’ Archivesd’histoiredoctrinale et littéraireduMoyen Age 1(1926–7): 5–127. More recent scholars whohavesupported the Augustinian reading of earlyFranciscans in- cludethe following: A.-M. Hamelin, L’écolefranciscaine de ses debuts jusqu’àl’occamisma,Analecta mediaevalia Namurcensia, 12 (Louvain: Nauwelaerts,1961); Leone Veuthy, ScuolaFrancescana:filo- sofia, teologia,spiritualia (Rome: Miscellanea Francescana, 1996): LeonardoSileo, ‘Iprimi maestri francescani di Parigi ediOxford,’ in Storia della teologianel Medioevo,ed. G. D’Onofrio (Casale Mon- ferrato:Piemme,1996), 645–97. Étienne Gilson, ThePhilosophy of St Bonaventure (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1938); Joshua Ben- son, ‘Augustine and Bonaventure,’ in TheT&T ClarkCompanion to Modern Theology,ed. C.C. Peck- nold and Tarmo Toom (London: T&T Clark, 2013). Bonaventurenames Alexander of Hales as his ‘mas- terand father’ and claims to add nothingnew to what he learned from his teacher in Doctoris Seraphici S. Bonaventurae operaomnia,10vols (Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1882–1902), 2:1–3. Olivier Boulnois, Être et representation: Une généalogie de la métaphysique moderne àl’époquede Duns Scot (Paris:PressesUniversitaires de France, 1999); Hans Blumenberg, TheLegitimacyofthe Modern Age (Cambridge,MA: MITPress, 1985): Ludger Honnefelder, Scientia transcendens: Die for- male Bestimmung der Seiendheit und Realität in der Metaphysik des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit (DunsScotus,Suárez, Wolff,Kant, Peirce) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag,1990); Michael Allen Gilles- pie, TheologicalOrigins of Modernity (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2008). The SummaHalensis and Augustine 35 of exactallegiancetohis opinions. Other reasons concern certain key theological concepts they developed, which clearlydiverge from Augustine’sown views. Although Icannot discuss all the methodological or conceptual movesthe Sum- mists make thatcall for the reconsideration of their relationship to Augustine, Iwill present threecase studies, which collectively provide abasis for doing so in the many cases where they use Augustine. The first will illuminatetheir methodologyinways that requireustothink more critically about the meaning they attribute to quotations from Augustine.⁷ The second and third will assess the doctrines they endorse con- cerningthe one God and the Trinity, which represent two clear cases—and arguably the most central aspects of earlyFranciscan theology—in which they depart from Au- gustine in obvious ways. The Summa’sMethodology The period in which Alexander and his colleagues worked was one in which the scholastic method, as high medievalscholars came to employ it in the 13th century particularly, was onlybeginning to develop. As manyreaders will be aware, this method required scholars to marshalauthoritiesfor and against acertain position before developing their own opinion about it,alsoinconversation with authorities. Although it was the common methodfor advancingbothwritten and oral arguments in the medieval university, the wayinwhich the scholastic method was deployed— and how to interpret its uses of authoritative sources—has rarelybeen the subject of extensive research, especiallyfor the earlyperiod in question. This maybebecause scholars of medieval thoughthavesimplytended to assume that scholastic thinkers quoted authorities in much the same waythat scholars do so today, thatis, in the effort accuratelytopresent and interpret their views. As we have seen, this assumption has led scholars to conclude that earlyFranciscans operated in aprimarilyAugustinian cast of mind. Although modernscholars have admittedlyrec- ognizedother influences and nuances as relevant in the case of different thinkers, they have drawnasimilar inference about earlier figures like Anselm and Hugh of St Victor,bothofwhom have been called an alter Augustinus, and even Peter Lom- bard, around half of whose Sentencesare quotations to Augustine.⁸ What the ‘Augustinian’ readingofsuch thinkers neglects to appreciate is the ex- tent to which every scholar at this time was constrained on some level to position themselveswith reference to the key representative of the Western Christian tradi- Formoreonthis see Lydia Schumacher, ‘The EarlyFranciscanDoctrineofthe Knowledge of God: Between Augustine’sAuthority and Innovation,’ TheMedieval Journal 6(2016): 1–28. See
Recommended publications
  • Bishop Robert Barron Recommended Books
    BISHOP ROBERT BARRON’S Recommended Books 5 FAVORITE BOOKS of ALL TIME SUMMA THEOLOGIAE Thomas Aquinas THE DIVINE COMEDY Dante Alighieri THE SEVEN STOREY MOUNTAIN Thomas Merton MOBY DICK Herman Melville MACBETH William Shakespeare FAVORITE Systematic Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Summa Theologiae St. Thomas • On the Trinity (De trinitate) St. Augustine • On First Principles (De principiis) Origen • Against the Heresies (Adversus haereses) Irenaeus • On the Development of Christian Doctrine John Henry Newman MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • The Spirit of Catholicism Karl Adam • Catholicism Henri de Lubac • Glory of the Lord, Theodrama, Theologic Hans Urs von Balthasar • Hearers of the Word Karl Rahner • Insight Bernard Lonergan • Introduction to Christianity Joseph Ratzinger • God Matters Herbert McCabe FAVORITE Moral Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Secunda pars of the Summa theologiae Thomas Aquinas • City of God St. Augustine • Rule of St. Benedict • Philokalia Maximus the Confessor et alia MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • The Sources of Christian Ethics Servais Pinckaers • Ethics Dietrich von Hilldebrand • The Four Cardinal Virtues and Faith, Hope, and Love Josef Pieper • The Cost of Discipleship Dietrich Bonhoeffer • Sanctify Them in the Truth: Holiness Exemplified Stanley Hauerwas FAVORITE Biblical Theology BOOKS CLASSICAL: • Sermons Origen • Sermons and Commentary on Genesis and Ennarationes on the Psalms Augustine • Commentary on John, Catena Aurea, Commentary on Job, Commentary on Romans Thomas Aquinas • Commentary on the Song of Songs Bernard of Clairvaux • Parochial and Plain Sermons John Henry Newman MODERN/CONTEMPORARY: • Jesus and the Victory of God and The Resurrection of the Son of God N.T. Wright • The Joy of Being Wrong James Alison • The Theology of the Old Testament Walter Brueggemann • The Theology of Paul the Apostle James D.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Beauty on Display Plato and the Concept of the Kalon
    BEAUTY ON DISPLAY PLATO AND THE CONCEPT OF THE KALON JONATHAN FINE Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Jonathan Fine All rights reserved ABSTRACT BEAUTY ON DISPLAY: PLATO AND THE CONCEPT OF THE KALON JONATHAN FINE A central concept for Plato is the kalon – often translated as the beautiful, fine, admirable, or noble. This dissertation shows that only by prioritizing dimensions of beauty in the concept can we understand the nature, use, and insights of the kalon in Plato. The concept of the kalon organizes aspirations to appear and be admired as beautiful for one’s virtue. We may consider beauty superficial and concern for it vain – but what if it were also indispensable to living well? By analyzing how Plato uses the concept of the kalon to contest cultural practices of shame and honour regulated by ideals of beauty, we come to see not only the tensions within the concept but also how attractions to beauty steer, but can subvert, our attempts to live well. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii 1 Coordinating the Kalon: A Critical Introduction 1 1 The Kalon and the Dominant Approach 2 2 A Conceptual Problem 10 3 Overview 24 2 Beauty, Shame, and the Appearance of Virtue 29 1 Our Ancient Contemporaries 29 2 The Cultural Imagination 34 3 Spirit and the Social Dimension of the Kalon 55 4 Before the Eyes of Others 82 3 Glory, Grief, and the Problem of Achilles 100 1 A Tragic Worldview 103 2 The Heroic Ideal 110 3 Disgracing Achilles 125 4 Putting Poikilia in its Place 135 1 Some Ambivalences 135 2 The Aesthetics of Poikilia 138 3 The Taste of Democracy 148 4 Lovers of Sights and Sounds 173 5 The Possibility of Wonder 182 5 The Guise of the Beautiful 188 1 A Psychological Distinction 190 2 From Disinterested Admiration to Agency 202 3 The Opacity of Love 212 4 Looking Good? 218 Bibliography 234 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “To do philosophy is to explore one’s own temperament,” Iris Murdoch suggested at the outset of “Of ‘God’ and ‘Good’”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Simplicity in Science and Theory. C
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Undergraduate Honors Theses Student Works 5-2013 It's Not So Simple: The Role of Simplicity in Science and Theory. C. R. Gregg East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/honors Part of the Theory and Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Gregg, C. R., "It's Not So Simple: The Role of Simplicity in Science and Theory." (2013). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 97. https://dc.etsu.edu/honors/97 This Honors Thesis - Withheld is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IT’S NOT SO SIMPLE: THE ROLE OF SIMPLICITY IN SCIENCE AND THEORY Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of Honors By C. R. Gregg Philosophy Honors In Discipline Program East Tennessee State University May 3, 2013 (Updated) May 7, 2013 Dr. David Harker, Faculty Mentor Dr. Jeffrey Gold, Honors Coordinator Dr. Gary Henson, Faculty Reader Dr. Allen Coates, Faculty Reader Paul Tudico, Faculty Reader ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to sincerely thank: David Harker, my mentor and friend. Paul Tudico, who is largely responsible for my choice to pursue Philosophy. Leslie MacAvoy, without whom I would not be an HID student. Karen Kornweibel, for believing in me. Rebecca Pyles, for believing in me. Gary Henson and Allen Coates, for offering their time to serve as readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer in the Life of Saint Francis by Thomas of Celano
    PRAYER IN THE LIFE OF SAINT FRANCIS BY THOMAS OF CELANO J.A. Wayne Hellmann Brother Thomas of Celano,1 upon the request of Pope Gregory IX,2 shortly after the 1228 canonization of Francis of Assisi, wrote The Life of St. Francis.3 In the opening lines, Thomas describes the begin- nings of Francis’s conversion. Thomas writes that Francis, secluded in a cave, prayed that “God guide his way.”4 In the closing lines at the end of The Life, Thomas accents the public prayer of the church in the person of pope. After the canonization Pope Gregory went to Francis’s tomb to pray: “by the lower steps he enters the sanc- tuary to offer prayers and sacrifices.”5 From beginning to end, through- out the text of The Life of St. Francis, the author, Brother Thomas, weaves Francis’s life together through an integrative theology of prayer. To shape his vision of Francis, Thomas, as a hagiographer, moves with multiple theological and literary currents, old and new. At the core of his vision, however, Thomas presents the life of a saint that developed from beginning to end in prayer. To do this, he employs 1 Brother Thomas of Celano was born into the noble family of the Conti dei Marsi sometime between the years of 1185–1190. Celano, the place of his birth, is a small city in the Abruzzi region southeast of Aquila. Thomas may have included himself a reference in number 56 of his text that “some literary men and nobles gladly joined” Francis after his return from Spain in 1215.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectio Divina
    Go Deep! Session 6 “Fiat voluntas tua…” Luke 18: 9 – 14 “He then addressed this parable to those who were convinced of their own righteousness and despised everyone else – "Two people went up to the temple area to pray; one was a Pharisee and the other was a tax collector. The Pharisee took up his position and spoke this prayer to himself, 'O God, I thank you that I am not like the rest of humanity--greedy, dishonest, adulterous--or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week, and I pay tithes on my whole income.' Luke 18: 9 – 14 But the tax collector stood off at a distance and would not even raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast and prayed, 'O God, be merciful to me a sinner.' I tell you, the latter went home justified, not the former; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and the one who humbles himself will be exalted.” #2. Avoiding Self-Reliance “Our blessed father [Francis] would say: "Too much confidence makes one guard too little against the enemy. If the devil can get but one hair from a man, he will soon make it grow into a beam. Even if after many years he still has not made him fall whom he has tempted, he is not put out over the delay, as long as he catches him in the end. For this is his (the devil) business, and he is busy about nothing else by day or by night."” Thomas of Celano St. Alphonsus de Ligouri “To obtain perseverance in good, we must not trust in our resolutions and in the promises we have made to God; if we trust in our own strength, we are lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander of Hales'stheology in His Authentic Texts (Commentary On
    chapter 13 Alexander of Hales’s Theology in His Authentic Texts (Commentary on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, Various Disputed Questions) Hubert Philipp Weber As the first teacher at the University of Paris to become a Franciscan friar, Alexander of Hales has an honoured place in the history of the order. The greater part of his theological work was already completed while he was a secular master. It is therefore more correct to call him an important theolo- gian who influenced Franciscan theology. However, it is not easy to distinguish what makes him a ‘Franciscan theologian’. I will begin by offering some his- torical remarks on his life and his authentic writings, most of which were discovered in the twentieth century. Then I will continue by giving an impres- sion of his thought with a few examples from his writings. The final sec- tion contains a very short outline of the Summa Universae Theologiae (also known as the Summa fratris Alexandri or Summa Halensis) connected with his name. 1 Historical Remarks: Alexander’s Life and Work We do not know very much about Alexander’s early life.1 His surname indicates his origin, Hales in Shropshire, England, where he was born around 1185. He stayed in contact with England all his life. In the first years of the thirteenth century he arrived at the University of Paris, where he studied and taught artes liberales. From about 1220 he lectured at the theological faculty. During the conflict between the university and the bishop of Paris in 1229/31 he went into exile.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Spring 2020 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death Christopher Choma [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Christianity Commons, Epistemology Commons, European History Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, History of Religion Commons, Metaphysics Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Choma, Christopher, "St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death" (2020). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 1048. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/1048 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1 St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas on the Mind, Body, and Life After Death By: Christopher Choma Sponsored by: Dr. Joseph Li Vecchi Readers: Dr. Howard Ducharme Dr. Nathan Blackerby 2 Table of Contents Introduction p. 4 Section One: Three General Views of Human Nature p.
    [Show full text]
  • Life with Augustine
    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Member Institutions
    South Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin Michigan Ohio Maine Mount Marty College College of Saint Benedict Alverno College University of Detroit Mercy Franciscan University of Steubenville Saint Joseph’s College of Maine Presentation College Saint John’s University Edgewood College John Carroll University Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota Marquette University Indiana Mercy College of Ohio Vermont Nebraska St. Catherine University Holy Cross College Mount St. Joseph University Saint Michael’s College Creighton University The College of Saint Scholastica Illinois Marian University Ohio Dominican University University of St. Thomas DePaul University Saint Mary’s College University of Dayton New Hampshire Kansas Dominican University Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College Ursuline College Saint Anselm College Benedictine College Iowa Lewis University University of Notre Dame Walsh University 2019-2020 Newman University New York Briar Cliff University Loyola University Chicago Xavier University Member Institutions University of Saint Mary Quincy University Kentucky Fordham University Missouri University of St. Francis Bellarmine University Iona College Fontbonne University Brescia University Le Moyne College Saint Louis University Manhattan College Molloy College Mount Saint Mary College Niagara University Siena College St. Bonaventure University St. Francis College St. John Fisher College St. John’s University-New York St. Thomas Aquinas College Massachusetts Assumption College Boston College College of the Holy Cross Merrimack College Regis College Stonehill
    [Show full text]
  • School Spirit from University Ministries to Mt
    The Magazine of St.Bonaventure University Fall/Winter ’09 School Spirit From University Ministries to Mt. Irenaeus, service is at the heart of spirituality at St. Bonaventure PLUS: The Fosters’ remarkable commitment to the liberal arts E FALL/WINTER ‘09 R U T N E V A N O B The Rise of the Mounain By Tom Donahue Holy Peace Chapel today (above) and under construction in 1988 (below, left) he backdrop for an Oct. 17 concert, Mass and supper celebrating the 25th anniversary of Mt. Irenaeus was supposed to be one of those spectacularly clear, crisp, autumn afternoons when the hill- sides are ablaze with color. T But an early winter storm had rolled through the day before, dump- ing half a foot of snow on the mountaintop retreat in Allegany County. Huge tents meant to shelter the concertgoers sagged under the heavy blanket of white, and everywhere the ground was a slushy mess. When events were moved indoors, Br. Kevin Kriso, O.F.M., the newest member of the friar community at Irenaeus, remembers thinking that the sloppy weather might keep some people away. But the cars kept coming and Holy Peace Friary, the retreat’s community house, kept filling with people. Visitors who couldn’t squirm their way into the spacious main room joined those standing in the kitchen or just gave up and waited out- side, chatting and shivering on the porch. 20 B O N AV E N T U R E F A L L / W I N T E R ‘ 0 “A lot of people truly wanted to be that would be called Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine's "De Trinitate"
    Theological Studies 64 (2003) AUGUSTINE’S DE TRINITATE AND LONERGAN’S REALMS OF MEANING NEIL ORMEROD [After reviewing various proposals concerning the structure of Au- gustine’s De Trinitate, the author presents a structural analysis of that work using the notion of “realms of meaning” found in Ber- nard Lonergan’s Method in Theology. It suggests that Augustine’s treatise comprises four distinct sections which present an account of the Trinity from the perspective of a biblically informed common sense (Books 1–4); of theory (Books 5–7); of interiority (Books 8–11); and finally of transcendence (Books 12–15).] Y ALL ACCOUNTS, Augustine’s De Trinitate is a complex and difficult B book. Augustine himself declared that it would be “understood only by a few.” Among the few cannot be included a number of contemporary trinitarian theologians for whom Augustine has become something of a whipping boy.1 Variously misrepresented and frequently misunderstood, a variety of theological sins have been laid at his feet, notably the sin of individualism, with more than a suspicion of modalism. Subsequently con- temporary trinitarian thought has turned wholesale from the Western tra- dition championed by Augustine and Aquinas to embrace the supposedly superior position of the East, particularly that of the Cappadocians. As Augustine scholar Michael Rene´Barnes has noted: “It is impossible to do contemporary trinitarian theology and not have a judgment on Augustine; NEIL ORMEROD received a Ph. D. in pure mathematics from the University of New South Wales, Australia, and his D. Theol. from the Melbourne College of Divinity. He is lecturer in theology at the Catholic Institute of Sydney and president of the Australian Catholic Theological Association.
    [Show full text]