<<

8–30–10 Monday Vol. 75 No. 167 Aug. 30, 2010

Pages 52857–53192

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:00 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\30AUWS.LOC 30AUWS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS6 II Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010

The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records PUBLIC Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing. For a list of documents FEDERAL REGISTER WORKSHOP currently on file for public inspection, see www.federalregister.gov. The seal of the National Archives and Records Administration THE FEDERAL REGISTER: WHAT IT IS AND HOW TO USE IT authenticates the Federal Register as the official serial publication FOR: Any person who uses the Federal Register and Code of established under the Federal Register Act. Under 44 U.S.C. 1507, Federal Regulations. the contents of the Federal Register shall be judicially noticed. The Federal Register is published in paper and on 24x microfiche. WHO: Sponsored by the Office of the Federal Register. It is also available online at no charge as one of the databases WHAT: Free public briefings (approximately 3 hours) to present: on GPO Access, a service of the U.S. Government Printing Office. 1. The regulatory process, with a focus on the Federal The online edition of the Federal Register, www.gpoaccess.gov/ Register system and the public’s role in the develop- nara, available through GPO Access, is issued under the authority of the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register as the ment of regulations. official legal equivalent of the paper and microfiche editions (44 2. The relationship between the Federal Register and U.S.C. 4101 and 1 CFR 5.10). It is updated by 6 a.m. each day Code of Federal Regulations. the Federal Register is published and includes both text and graphics from Volume 59, Number 1 (January 2, 1994) forward. 3. The important elements of typical Federal Register doc- uments. For more information about GPO Access, contact the GPO Access User Support Team, call toll free 1-888-293-6498; DC area 202- 4. An introduction to the finding aids of the FR/CFR sys- 512-1530; fax at 202-512-1262; or via e-mail at [email protected]. tem. The Support Team is available between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. WHY: To provide the public with access to information nec- Eastern Time, Monday–Friday, except official holidays. essary to research Federal agency regulations which di- The annual subscription price for the Federal Register paper rectly affect them. There will be no discussion of spe- edition is $749 plus postage, or $808, plus postage, for a combined cific agency regulations. Federal Register, Federal Register Index and List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA) subscription; the microfiche edition of the Federal llllllllllllllllll Register including the Federal Register Index and LSA is $165, plus postage. Six month subscriptions are available for one-half WHEN: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 the annual rate. The prevailing postal rates will be applied to 9 a.m.–12:30 p.m. orders according to the delivery method requested. The price of a single copy of the daily Federal Register, including postage, WHERE: Office of the Federal Register is based on the number of pages: $11 for an issue containing Conference Room, Suite 700 less than 200 pages; $22 for an issue containing 200 to 400 pages; 800 North Capitol Street, NW. and $33 for an issue containing more than 400 pages. Single issues of the microfiche edition may be purchased for $3 per copy, Washington, DC 20002 including postage. Remit check or money order, made payable RESERVATIONS: (202) 741–6008 to the Superintendent of Documents, or charge to your GPO Deposit Account, VISA, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover. Mail to: U.S. Government Printing Office—New Orders, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197-9000; or call toll free 1- 866-512-1800, DC area 202-512-1800; or go to the U.S. Government Online Bookstore site, see bookstore.gpo.gov. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal Register. How To Cite This Publication: Use the volume number and the page number. Example: 75 FR 12345. Postmaster: Send address changes to the Superintendent of Documents, Federal Register, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, along with the entire mailing label from the last issue received.

.

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:00 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\30AUWS.LOC 30AUWS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS6 III

Contents Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 167

Monday, August 30, 2010

Administration on Aging See International Trade Administration See Aging Administration See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Defense Acquisition Regulations System NOTICES PROPOSED RULES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements Submissions, and Approvals, 52951–52952 (DFARS): Solicitation for Nominations for Members of U.S. Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items, 52917–52921 Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), 52958– 52960 Defense Department See Defense Acquisition Regulations System Aging Administration See National Security Agency/Central Security Service NOTICES See Navy Department Funding Opportunities: RULES Grants for Native Americans, Native Hawaiian Programs, Federal Acquisition Regulations: and Native American Caregiver Support Program, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; Buy 52956–52957 American Requirements for Construction Material, 53153–53169 Agricultural Research Service Definition of Cost or Pricing Data, 53135–53153 NOTICES Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Introduction, Intent to Grant Exclusive License, 52924–52925 53128–53129 Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Small Entity Agriculture Department Compliance Guide, 53169–53170 See Agricultural Research Service Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds, See Forest Service 53129–53135 See Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards NOTICES Administration Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel Management Demonstration Projects, 53076–53126 Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau NOTICES Delaware River Basin Commission Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, NOTICES Submissions, and Approvals: Meetings, 52932–52934 Application for Amended Federal Firearms License, 52977–52978 Education Department Application for Federal Firearms License, 52978 NOTICES Application for Tax Paid Transfer and Registration of Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Firearm, 52976–52977 Submissions, and Approvals, 52934–52935 Application to Register as Importer of U.S. Munitions Import List Articles, 52977 Election Assistance Commission NOTICES Arts and Humanities, National Foundation Meetings; Sunshine Act, 52935 See National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Employee Benefits Security Administration Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PROPOSED RULES NOTICES Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Benefit Plans, 53172–53192 Submissions, and Approvals, 52952–52954 Employment and Training Administration Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services NOTICES NOTICES Solicitations of Additional Participants: Affirmative Determinations Regarding Applications for Medicare Program; Rural Community Hospital Reconsideration: Demonstration Program, 52960–52961 Wacker Neuson Corp., Menonomee Falls, WI, 52980– 52981 Central Security Service/National Security Agency Amended Certifications Regarding Eligibility to Apply for See National Security Agency/Central Security Service Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance: Civil Rights Commission Chrysler, LLC, et al., Detroit, MI, 52981 NOTICES Chrysler, LLC, et al., Twinsburg, OH, 52981 Meetings; Sunshine Act; Cancellation, 52927 Amended Certifications Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance: Commerce Department Bluescope Buildings North America, et al., Laurinburg, See Foreign–Trade Zones Board NC, 52981–52982

VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:01 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30AUCN.SGM 30AUCN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS5 IV Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Contents

Chrysler Group LLC, et al., Kenosha, WI, 52982 Federal Emergency Management Agency Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker RULES Adjustment Assistance, 52982–52987 Final Flood Elevation Determinations, 52868–52872 Investigations Regarding Certifications of Eligibility to Suspension of Community Eligibility, 52861–52868 Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 52987–52988 NOTICES Negative Determinations Regarding Applications for Emergency Declarations: Reconsideration: Texas (Amendment No. 1), 52962 Speciality Minerals, Inc., Franklin, VA, 52989–52990 Major Disaster Declarations: Iowa (Amendment No. 4), 52962 Energy Department Texas (Amendment No. 2), 52962–52963 See Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Texas (Amendment No. 3), 52963 PROPOSED RULES Major Disasters and Related Determinations: Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Illinois, 52963 Test Procedures for Residential Water Heaters, Direct Missouri, 52964 Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters, 52892–52907 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Agency NOTICES PROPOSED RULES Applications: Federal Implementation Plans: Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 52935–52936 Action to Ensure Authority to Issue Permits under the Energy Exchange, Inc., 52935–52937 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program to Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Co., LLC, 52937–52938 Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 52916–52917 Filings: NOTICES E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 52938 Data Availability: Preliminary Permit Application: 2010 CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program New Unit Set- Energy Exchange, Inc., 52938 aside Allowance Allocations, etc., 52940 Requests Under Blanket Authorizations: Meetings: ANR Pipeline Co., 52938–52939 Chartered Science Advisory Board, 52940–52941 Technical Conferences: National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and California Independent System; et al., 52939–52940 Technology, 52941 Proposed CERCLA Administrative Agreements for De Federal Housing Finance Agency Minimis Settlements: NOTICES Mercury Refining Superfund Site, Towns of Guilderland Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 52944–52946 and Colonie, Albany County, NY, 52942 Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Executive Office of the President NOTICES See Trade Representative, Office of United States Public Listening Session, 53015–53017

Federal Aviation Administration Federal Reserve System RULES NOTICES Final Airworthiness Design Standards for Acceptance under Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Primary Category Rule: Holding Companies, 52946–52947 Orlando Helicopter Airways (OHA), Inc., Models Cessna 172I, 172K, 172L, and 172M, 52860 Fish and Wildlife Service Re-Registration and Renewal of Aircraft Registration, 52859 RULES PROPOSED RULES Migratory Bird Hunting: Airworthiness Directives: Final Frameworks for Early Season Migratory Bird Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Model 427 Hunting Regulations, 52873–52890 Helicopters, 52912–52914 NOTICES Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Models 206A, Endangered and Threatened Species Permit Applications, 206B, 206L, 206L–1, 206L–3, and 206L–4 52965–52966 Helicopters, 52914–52916 Receipt of Applications for Permit, 52971–52972 Boeing Co. Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, et al. Series Food and Drug Administration Airplanes, 52907–52912 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Federal Communications Commission Submissions, and Approvals, 52954–52956 RULES Request for Applications: Services: Supplemental Funding Under the Emergency Response Blythe, CA, 52872–52873 Laboratory Network Microbiological Cooperative NOTICES Agreement Program, 52957–52958 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals, 52942–52944 Foreign–Trade Zones Board NOTICES Federal Election Commission Applications for Subzone Authority: NOTICES Foreign Trade Zone 29; Dow Corning Corp.; Extension of Meetings; Sunshine Act, 52944 Rebuttal Period, 52927–52928

VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:01 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30AUCN.SGM 30AUCN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS5 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Contents V

Reorganizations of Foreign–Trade Zone 126 under Internal Revenue Service Alternative Site Framework: NOTICES Reno, NV, 52931–52932 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Site Renumberings: Submissions, and Approvals, 53018–53021 Foreign–Trade Zone 43; Battle Creek, MI, 52932 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Forest Service Regulation Project, 53021–53023 NOTICES Meetings: International Trade Administration Alpine Resource Advisory Committee, 52925 NOTICES Consolidated Decisions on Applications for Duty-Free Entry General Services Administration of Electron Microscopes: RULES Emory University, et al., 52928 Federal Acquisition Regulations: Meetings: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; Buy President’s Export Council, 52929–52930 American Requirements for Construction Material, Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed- 53153–53169 Circumstances Reviews: Definition of Cost or Pricing Data, 53135–53153 Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India, 52930–52931 Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Introduction, 53128–53129 International Trade Commission Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 53169–53170 NOTICES Complaints; Receipts, Requests for Comments, 52975–52976 Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds, Users Manual for Commission Mediation Program for 53129–53135 NOTICES Investigations, etc., 52976 Maximum Per Diem Rates for the Continental United States (CONUS), 52947 Justice Department See Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration NOTICES Labor Department Designations: See Employee Benefits Security Administration Amarillo, TX; Cairo, IL; State of Louisiana; State of North See Employment and Training Administration Carolina; Belmond, IA; State of New Jersey; and State See Occupational Safety and Health Administration of Areas, 52924 NOTICES Opportunities for Designation; Requests for Comments, etc.: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Owensboro, KY; Bloomington, IL; Iowa Falls, IA; Casa Submissions, and Approvals, 52978–52980 Grande, AZ; Fargo, ND; Grand Forks, ND; and Plainview, TX Areas, 52925–52927 Land Management Bureau NOTICES Health and Human Services Department Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: See Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Genesis Solar, LLC Genesis Solar Energy Project and See Aging Administration Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan See Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Amendment, 52966–52967 See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Temporary Closures and Restrictions on Specific Uses of See Food and Drug Administration Public Lands in Pershing County, , 52972– See National Institutes of Health 52975 NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Millennium Challenge Corporation Submissions, and Approvals, 52947–52949 Meetings: NOTICES National Biodefense Science Board, 52950–52951 Meetings; Sunshine Act, 52990 National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, 52950 Report on Countries that are Candidates for Millennium Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Challenge Account Eligibility in Fiscal Year 2011, etc., Society, 52949–52950 52990–52992

Homeland Security Department National Aeronautics and Space Administration See Federal Emergency Management Agency RULES See Transportation Security Administration Federal Acquisition Regulations: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; Buy Interior Department American Requirements for Construction Material, See Fish and Wildlife Service 53153–53169 See Land Management Bureau Definition of Cost or Pricing Data, 53135–53153 See National Park Service Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Introduction, NOTICES 53128–53129 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; Small Entity Submissions, and Approvals: Compliance Guide, 53169–53170 Non-use Valuation Survey, Klamath Basin; Revision, Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds, 52964–52965 53129–53135

VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:01 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30AUCN.SGM 30AUCN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS5 VI Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Contents

National Archives and Records Administration Navy Department NOTICES RULES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Professional Conduct of Attorneys Practicing Under the Submissions, and Approvals, 52992–52993 Cognizance and Supervision of the Judge Advocate Records Schedules; Availability, 52993–52995 General, 52860–52861

Nuclear Regulatory Commission National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities NOTICES RULES Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitutions: Implementation of OMB Guidance on Drug Free Workplace Areva Enrichment Services, LLC (Eagle Rock Enrichment Requirements, 52857–52859 NOTICES Facility), 52996 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Draft Regulatory Guides; Issuance, Availability: Submissions, and Approvals: Administrative Practices in Radiation Surveys and State Library Administrative Agencies Survey, FY 2011– Monitoring, 52996–52997 2013, 52995–52996 Exemptions: Nebraska Public Power District; Cooper Nuclear Station, 52997–52998 National Institutes of Health Meetings: NOTICES ACRS Subcommittee on Economic Simplified Boiling Meetings: Water Reactor, 52999 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 52957 Regulatory Guides; Issuance and Availability: Planned Special Exposure (Revision 1), 52999–53000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RULES Occupational Safety and Health Administration Fisheries of Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska: NOTICES Pollock in Statistical Area 630 in Gulf of Alaska, 52891 Meetings: Fisheries of Northeastern United States: National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety Summer Flounder Fishery; Commercial Quota Harvested and Health, 52988–52989 for Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 52890–52891 Office of United States Trade Representative Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska: Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management in Bering Sea See Trade Representative, Office of United States Pollock Fishery, 53026–53074 PROPOSED RULES Peace Corps Fisheries in the Western Pacific: NOTICES Hawaii Bottomfish and Seamount Groundfish; Privacy Act; Systems of Records:, 53000 Management Measures for Hancock Seamounts to Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Rebuild Overfished Armorhead, 52921–52923 NOTICES NOTICES Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, 90-Day Finding for Petition to List Georgia Basin Submissions, and Approvals: Populations of China Rockfish and Tiger Rockfish as Termination of Single-Employer Plans, Missing Endangered or Threatened, 52928–52929 Participants, 53000–53001 Personnel Management Office National Park Service NOTICES NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Environmental Impact Statements; Availability, etc.: Submissions, and Approvals: Prisoners Harbor Wetland Restoration, Santa Cruz Island, Applications for 10-Point Veteran Preference, 53001– CA, 52969 53002 South Florida and Caribbean Parks Exotic Plant Management Plan, 52967–52969 Postal Regulatory Commission Meetings: NOTICES National Park System Advisory Board, 52969 New Postal Products, 53002–53003 Public Scoping: Product List Transfer, 53003–53004 Rim of Valley Corridor Special Resource Study, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, CA, 52969–52971 Railroad Retirement Board NOTICES National Science Foundation Privacy Act; Systems of Records, 53004–53006 NOTICES Securities and Exchange Commission Meetings: NOTICES Advisory Committee for International Science and Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes: Engineering, 52996 NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc., 53008–53012

National Security Agency/Central Security Service Selective Service System NOTICES NOTICES Intents to Grant Exclusive License: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Doar, Pekuin, Sall Limited Liability Co., 52932 Submissions, and Approvals, 53012

VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:01 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30AUCN.SGM 30AUCN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS5 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Contents VII

Small Business Administration Transportation Security Administration NOTICES NOTICES Disaster Declarations: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Iowa (Amendment 2), 53006–53007 Submissions, and Approvals: Gulf Opportunity Pilot Loan Program (GO Loan Pilot), Security Threat Assessment for Individuals Applying for 53007 a Hazardous Materials Endorsement for a Meetings: Commercial Drivers License, 52961–52962 Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs, Treasury Department 53007–53008 See Internal Revenue Service See Thrift Supervision Office State Department See United States Mint NOTICES NOTICES Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Submissions, and Approvals, 53017 Determinations: Appointment of Members of Legal Division to Performance Chaos and Classicism; 1918–1936 Art in France, Italy, Review Board, Internal Revenue Service, 53017 and Germany, 53013 Ivory Mirror Case, 53012 United States Mint Pre-Raphaelite Lens; 1848–1875 British Photography and NOTICES Painting, 53013 Change to Procedures to Qualify for Bulk Purchase of Gold Treasures of Heaven; Saints, Relics, and Devotion in Bullion Coins, 53024 Medieval Europe, 53013 Treasures of Moscow; Icons from Andrey Rublev Museum, 53012–53013 Separate Parts In This Issue

Thrift Supervision Office Part II Commerce Department, National Oceanic and Atmospheric NOTICES Administration, 53026–53074 Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Part III Sound Incentive Compensation Guidance, 53023–53024 Defense Department, 53076–53126

Trade Representative, Office of United States Part IV NOTICES Defense Department, 53128–53170 General Services Administration, 53128–53170 Fiscal Year 2011 Tariff-rate Quota Allocations: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 53128– Raw Cane Sugar, Refined and Specialty Sugar, and Sugar- 53170 containing Products; Revision, 53013–53014 Modification of Action: Part V Canada; Compliance with Softwood Lumber Agreement, Labor Department, Employee Benefits Security 53014–53015 Administration, 53172–53192

Transportation Department See Federal Aviation Administration Reader Aids See Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Consult the Reader Aids section at the end of this page for phone numbers, online resources, finding aids, reminders, See Transportation Security Administration NOTICES and notice of recently enacted public laws. Applications: To subscribe to the Federal Register Table of Contents Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and LISTSERV electronic mailing list, go to http:// Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B, listserv.access.gpo.gov and select Online mailing list 53015 archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow the instructions.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:01 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4748 Sfmt 4748 E:\FR\FM\30AUCN.SGM 30AUCN hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS5 VIII Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Contents

CFR PARTS AFFECTED IN THIS ISSUE

A cumulative list of the parts affected this month can be found in the Reader Aids section at the end of this issue.

2 CFR 53135, 53153 3373...... 52857 Proposed Rules: 10 CFR 211...... 52917 246...... 52917 Proposed Rules: 252...... 52917 430...... 52892 50 CFR 14 CFR 20...... 52873 13...... 52859 648...... 52890 21...... 52860 679 (2 documents) ...... 52891, 47...... 52859 91...... 52859 53026 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 39 (3 documents) ...... 52907, 665...... 52921 52912, 52914 15 CFR 902...... 53026 29 CFR Proposed Rules: 2570...... 53172 32 CFR 776...... 52860 40 CFR Proposed Rules: 52...... 52916 44 CFR 64 (2 documents) ...... 52861, 52865 67...... 52868 45 CFR 1173...... 52857 47 CFR 73...... 52872 48 CFR Chapter 1 (2 documents) ...... 53128, 53169 1...... 53129 2 (3 documents) ...... 53129, 53135, 53153 3...... 53129 4...... 53135 5 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53153 6...... 53129 7...... 53129 8...... 53129 12 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 13...... 53129 14...... 53135 15 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 16 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 17...... 53129 19 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 22...... 53129 23...... 53129 25...... 53153 27...... 53135 28...... 53129 30...... 53135 31...... 53135 32 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 36...... 53129 42 (2 documents) ...... 53129, 53135 44...... 53135 49...... 53135 50...... 53129 52 (3 documents) ...... 53129,

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:02 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4711 Sfmt 4711 E:\FR\FM\30AULS.LOC 30AULS hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS4 52857

Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 167

Monday, August 30, 2010

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER e-mail: [email protected], or by mail: FR 28149, June 15, 2009] contains regulatory documents having general Susan Daisey, Director, Office of Grant Governmentwide guidance with policies applicability and legal effect, most of which Management, National Endowment for and procedures to implement drug-free are keyed to and codified in the Code of the Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania workplace requirements for financial Federal Regulations, which is published under Ave., NW., Room 311, Washington, DC assistance. The guidance requires each 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. 20506. agency to replace the common rule on The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: drug-free workplace requirements that the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of Susan G. Daisey at 202–606–8494 or the agency previously issued in its own new books are listed in the first FEDERAL e-mail her at [email protected]. CFR title with a brief regulation in REGISTER issue of each week. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2 CFR adopting the Governmentwide policies and procedures. One advantage Background of this approach is that it reduces the NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 total volume of drug-free workplace ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES [Pub. L. 100–690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 regulations. A second advantage is that it collocates OMB’s guidance and all of 2 CFR Part 3373 U.S.C. 701, et seq.] was enacted as a part of omnibus drug legislation on the agencies’ implementing regulations in 2 CFR. 45 CFR Part 1173 November 18, 1988. Federal agencies issued an interim final common rule to The Current Regulatory Actions RIN 3136–AA30 implement the act as it applied to grants As the OMB guidance requires, NEH [54 FR 4946, January 31, 1989]. The rule is taking two regulatory actions. First, National Endowment for the was a subpart of the Governmentwide we are removing the drug-free Humanities Implementation of OMB common rule on nonprocurement workplace common rule from 45 CFR Guidance on Drug-Free Workplace suspension and debarment. The Requirements part 1173. Second, to replace the agencies issued a final common rule common rule, we are issuing a brief AGENCY: National Endowment for the after consideration of public comments regulation in 2 CFR part 3373 to adopt Humanities, National Foundation on the [55 FR 21681, May 25, 1990]. the Governmentwide policies and The agencies proposed an update to Arts and the Humanities. procedures in the OMB guidance. the drug-free workplace common rule in ACTION: Final rule. 2002 [67 FR 3266, January 23, 2002] and Invitation To Comment SUMMARY: The National Endowment for finalized it in 2003 [68 FR 66534, Taken together, these regulatory the Humanities (NEH) is removing its November 26, 2003]. The updated actions are solely an administrative regulation implementing the common rule was redrafted in plain simplification and are not intended to Governmentwide common rule on drug- language and adopted as a separate part, make any substantive change in policies free workplace requirements for independent from the common rule on or procedures. In soliciting comments financial assistance, currently located nonprocurement suspension and on these actions, we therefore are not within Part 1173 of Title 45 of the Code debarment. Based on an amendment to seeking to revisit substantive issues that of Federal Regulations (CFR), and the drug-free workplace requirements in were resolved during the development issuing a new regulation to adopt the 41 U.S.C. 702 [Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, of the final common rule in 2003. We Office of Management and Budget title VIII, Sec. 809, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 are inviting comments specifically on (OMB) guidance at 2 CFR part 182. This Stat. 1838], the update also allowed any unintended changes in substantive regulatory action implements the OMB’s multiple enforcement options from content that the new part in 2 CFR initiative to streamline and consolidate which agencies could select, rather than would make relative to the common rule into one title of the CFR all Federal requiring use of a certification in all at 45 CFR part 1173. cases. regulations on drug-free workplace Administrative Procedure Act requirements for financial assistance. When it established Title 2 of the CFR These changes constitute an as the new central location for OMB Under the Administrative Procedure administrative simplification that would guidance and agency implementing Act (5 U.S.C. 553), agencies generally make no substantive change in NEH’s regulations concerning grants and propose a regulation and offer interested policy or procedures for drug-free agreements [69 FR 26276, May 11, parties the opportunity to comment workplace. 2004], OMB announced its intention to before it becomes effective. However, as replace common rules with OMB described in the ‘‘Background’’ section DATES: This final rule is effective on guidance that agencies could adopt in of this preamble, the policies and October 29, 2010 without further action. brief regulations. OMB began that procedures in this regulation have been Submit comments by September 29, process by proposing [70 FR 51863, proposed for comment two times—one 2010 on any unintended changes this August 31, 2005] and finalizing [71 FR time by Federal agencies as a common action makes in NEH policies and 66431, November 15, 2006] rule in 2002 and a second time by OMB procedures for drug-free workplace. All Governmentwide guidance on as guidance in 2008—and adopted each comments on unintended changes will nonprocurement suspension and time after resolution of the comments be considered and, if warranted, NEH debarment in 2 CFR part 180. received. will revise the rule. As the next step in that process, OMB This direct final rule is solely an ADDRESSES: You may submit comments proposed for comment [73 FR 55776, administrative simplification that would by either one of the following methods: September 26, 2008] and finalized [74 make no substantive change in NEH

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52858 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

policy or procedures for drug-free List of Subjects 3373.505 Who in the NEH determines that workplace. We therefore believe that the a recipient who is an individual violated 2 CFR Part 3373 rule is noncontroversial and do not the requirements of this part? expect to receive adverse comments, Administrative practice and Subpart F—Definitions [Reserved] although we are inviting comments on procedure, Drug abuse, Grant programs, any unintended substantive change this Reporting and recordkeeping Authority: 41 U.S.C. 701–707. requirements. rule makes. § 3373.10 What does this part do? Accordingly, we find that the 45 CFR Part 1173 solicitation of public comments on this This part requires that the award and Administrative practice and direct final rule is unnecessary and that administration of NEH grants and procedure, Drug abuse, Grant programs, ‘‘good cause’’ exists under 5 U.S.C. cooperative agreements comply with Reporting and recordkeeping 553(b)(B) and 553(d) to make this rule Office of Management and Budget requirements. effective on October 29, 2010 without (OMB) guidance implementing the ■ further action, unless we receive Accordingly, for the reasons set forth portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act adverse comment by September 29, in the preamble, and under the of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701–707, as 2010. If any comment on unintended authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, the NEH amended, hereafter referred to as ‘‘the changes is received, it will be amends the Code of Federal Act’’) that applies to grants. It thereby— considered and, if warranted, we will Regulations, Title 2, Subtitle B, chapter (a) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB publish a timely revision of the rule. XXIII, and Title 45 chapter 11, part guidance (Subparts A through F of 2 1173, as follows: CFR part 182) for the NEH’s grants and Executive Order 12866 Title 2—Grants and Agreements cooperative agreements; and OMB has determined this rule to be (b) Establishes NEH policies and not significant for purposes of E.O. ■ 1. Add part 3373 in Subtitle B, procedures for compliance with the Act 12866. Chapter XXIII, to read as follows: that are the same as those of other Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 PART 3373—REQUIREMENTS FOR Federal agencies, in conformance with (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) Governmentwide implementing This regulatory action will not have a regulations. significant adverse impact on a Sec. substantial number of small entities. 3373.10 What does this part do? § 3373.20 Does this part apply to me? Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 3373.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, 3373.30 What policies and procedures must (Sec. 202, Pub. L. 104–4) pertinent portions of the OMB guidance I follow? in Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part This regulatory action does not Subpart A—Purpose and Coverage 182 (see table at 2 CFR 182.115(b)) contain a Federal mandate that will [Reserved] apply to you if you are a— result in the expenditure by State, local, Subpart B—Requirements for Recipients (a) Recipient of a NEH grant or and Tribal governments, in aggregate, or Other Than Individuals cooperative agreement; or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. 3373.225 Whom in the NEH does a (b) NEH awarding official. recipient other than an individual notify Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 about a criminal drug conviction? § 3373.30 What policies and procedures must I follow? (44 U.S.C., Chapter 35) Subpart C—Requirements for Recipients This regulatory action will not impose Who Are Individuals (a) General. You must follow the any additional reporting or 3373.300 Whom in the NEH does a policies and procedures specified in recordkeeping requirements under the recipient who is an individual notify applicable sections of the OMB Paperwork Reduction Act. about a criminal drug conviction? guidance in Subparts A through F of 2 Subpart D—Responsibilities of Agency CFR part 182, as implemented by this Federalism (Executive Order 13132) Awarding Officials part. This regulatory action does not have 3373.400 What method do I use as an (b) Specific sections of OMB guidance Federalism implications, as set forth in agency awarding official to obtain a that this part supplements. In Executive Order 13132. It will not have recipient’s agreement to comply with the implementing the OMB guidance in 2 substantial direct effects on the States, OMB guidance? CFR part 182, this part supplements on the relationship between the national Subpart E—Violations of This Part and four sections of the guidance, as shown government and the States, or on the Consequences in the following table. For each of those distribution of power and 3373.500 Who in the NEH determines that sections, you must follow the policies responsibilities among the various a recipient other than an individual and procedures in the OMB guidance, as levels of government. violated the requirements of this part? supplemented by this part.

Section in this Section of OMB guidance part where What the supplementation clarifies supplemented

(1) 2 CFR 182.225(a) ...... § 3373.225 Whom in the NEH a recipient other than an individual must notify if an employee is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute in the workplace. (2) 2 CFR 182.300(b) ...... § 3373.300 Whom in the NEH a recipient who is an individual must notify if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occur- ring during the conduct of any award activity.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52859

Section in this Section of OMB guidance part where What the supplementation clarifies supplemented

(3) 2 CFR 182.500 ...... § 3373.500 Who in the NEH is authorized to determine that a recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of 2 CFR part 182, as im- plemented by this part. (4) 2 CFR 182.505 ...... § 3373.505 Who in the NEH is authorized to determine that a recipient who is an in- dividual is in violation of the requirements of 2 CFR part 182, as imple- mented by this part.

(c) Sections of the OMB guidance that Subpart E—Violations of This Part and requirements in 14 CFR part 47 on this part does not supplement. For any Consequences August 16, 2010. The rule becomes section of OMB guidance in Subparts A effective on October 1, 2010. through F of 2 CFR part 182 that is not § 3373.500 Who in the NEH determines FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John listed in paragraph (b) of this section, that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part? G. Bent, Civil Aviation Registry, Mike NEH policies and procedures are the Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 same as those in the OMB guidance. The NEH General Counsel is the agency official authorized to make the South MacArthur Boulevard, Oklahoma Subpart A—Purpose and Coverage determination under 2 CFR 182.500. City, OK 73169; telephone: (405) 954– 4331. [Reserved] § 3373.505 Who in the NEH determines that a recipient who is an individual violated SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July Subpart B—Requirements for the requirements of this part? 20, 2010, the FAA published the final Recipients Other Than Individuals The NEH General Counsel is the rule, ‘‘Re-Registration and Renewal of § 3373.225 Whom in the NEH does a agency official authorized to make the Aircraft Registration’’ (75 FR 41968). recipient other than an individual notify determination under 2 CFR 182.505. Over a 3-year period, this rule will about a criminal drug conviction? terminate the registration of all aircraft Subpart F—Definitions [Reserved] registered before October 1, 2010, and A recipient other than an individual will require the re-registration of each that is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) Title 45—Public Welfare aircraft to retain U.S. civil aircraft to notify Federal agencies about an status. The rule also establishes a Chapter XI—National Foundation on employee’s conviction for a criminal system for a 3-year recurrent expiration the Arts and the Humanities drug offense must notify the Director, and renewal of registration for all Office of Grant Management, NEH. ■ 2. Remove Part 1173. aircraft issued a registration certificate on or after October 1, 2010. The final Subpart C—Requirements for Michael P. McDonald, rule amends the FAA’s regulations to Recipients Who Are Individuals General Counsel. provide standards for the timely § 3373.300 Whom in the NEH does a [FR Doc. 2010–21600 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] cancellation of registration (N-numbers) recipient who is an individual notify about BILLING CODE 7536–01–P for unregistered aircraft. This final rule a criminal drug conviction? makes other minor changes to establish consistency and ensure the regulations A recipient who is an individual and conform to statute or current Registry is required under 2 CFR 182.300(b) to DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION practices. The amendments will notify Federal agencies about a Federal Aviation Administration improve the accuracy of the Civil conviction for a criminal drug offense Aviation Registry. must notify the Director, Office of Grant 14 CFR Parts 13, 47, and 91 Management, NEH. The rule contained information [Docket No. FAA–2008–0118; Amdt. Nos. collection requirements that had not yet Subpart D—Responsibilities of Agency 13–34, 47–29, 91–318] been approved by the Office of Awarding Officials RIN 2120–AI89 Management and Budget at the time of publication. In accordance with the § 3373.400 What method do I use as an Re-Registration and Renewal of Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB agency awarding official to obtain a approved that request on August 16, recipient’s agreement to comply with the Aircraft Registration; OMB Approval of OMB guidance? Information Collection 2010, and assigned the information collection OMB Control Number 2120– To obtain a recipient’s agreement to AGENCY: Federal Aviation 0729. The FAA request was approved by comply with applicable requirements in Administration, DOT. OMB for a term of 18 months and the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, ACTION: Final rule; approval of the expires on February 29, 2010. This you must include the following term or information collection. notice is being published to inform condition in the award: affected parties of the approval of the SUMMARY: This document announces information collection requirements of Drug-free workplace. You as the recipient Office of Management and Budget’s 14 CFR part 47. must comply with drug-free workplace (OMB’s) approval of the information requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if collection requirement contained in the Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24, the recipient is an individual) of 2 CFR Part FAA’s final rule, ‘‘Re-Registration and 2010. 3373, which adopts the Governmentwide Dennis R. Pratte, II, implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. Renewal of Aircraft Registration,’’ which 5152–5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of was published on July 20, 2010. Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. 1988 (Pub. L. 100–690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 DATES: The FAA received OMB [FR Doc. 2010–21561 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] U.S.C. 701–707). approval for the information collection BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52860 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Applicability DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Federal Aviation Administration As discussed above, these Department of the Navy airworthiness design standards under 14 CFR Part 21 the primary category rule are applicable 32 CFR Part 776 to the C172I, C172K, C172L, and Final Airworthiness Design Standards C172M. Should OHA, Inc., wish to [No. USN–2010–0019] for Acceptance Under the Primary apply these airworthiness design RIN 0703–AA88 Category Rule; Orlando Helicopter standards to other airplane models, Airways (OHA), Inc., Models Cessna OHA, Inc. must submit a new Professional Conduct of Attorneys 172I, 172K, 172L, and 172M airworthiness design standard Practicing Under the Cognizance and application under the primary rule Supervision of the Judge Advocate AGENCY: Federal Aviation category. General Administration (FAA), DOT. AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD. ACTION: Issuance of final Airworthiness Conclusion Design Standards. ACTION: Interim final rule. This action affects only certain SUMMARY: This Airworthiness Design airworthiness design standards on SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy Standard is issued to OHA, Inc., for Cessna model C172I, C172K, C172L, (DON) is amending its rules to update certification under primary category C172M airplanes. It is not a standard of existing sections relating to the regulations of modified Cessna 172I, general applicability and it affects only professional conduct of attorneys 172K, 172L, and 172M airplanes. the applicant who applied to the FAA practicing under the cognizance and for approval of these features on the supervision of the Judge Advocate DATES: This Airworthiness Design General (JAG) for clients with Standard is effective September 29, airplane. diminished capacity. The amendment 2010. Citation comports with current policy reflected FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. The authority citation for these in JAG Instruction 5803.1 (Series), Leslie B. Taylor, Aerospace Engineer, airworthiness standards is as follows: Professional Conduct of Attorneys Standards Office (ACE–111), Small Practicing Under the Cognizance and Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and Supervision of the Judge Advocate Certification Service, FAA; telephone 44701. General. number (816) 329–4134, fax number Final Airworthiness Standards for The new rule allows a covered (816) 329–4090, e-mail at Acceptance Under the Primary attorney to take preventative action [email protected]. Category Rule when the attorney reasonably believes that a client has diminished capacity SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any person may obtain a copy of this For all airplane modifications and the and is at risk of substantial physical information by contacting the person powerplant installation: harm to himself or herself unless immediate action is taken. Not having named above under FOR FURTHER Part 3 of the Civil Air Regulations this immediate change negatively INFORMATION CONTACT. (CAR 3), effective November 1, 1949, as amended by Amendments 3–1 through impacts an attorney’s ability to preserve Background 3–12, except for § 3.415, Engines and life when a client expresses the intent The ‘‘primary’’ category for aircraft § 3.416(a), Propellers; and 14 CFR part to harm himself or herself or an attorney was created specifically for the simple, 23, §§ 23.603, 23.863, 23.907, 23.961, receives information about a client’s low performance personal aircraft. 23.1322 and 23.1359 (latest suicidal intentions. The JAG has Section 21.17(f) provides a means for amendments through Amendment 23– directed that this change take effect applicants to propose airworthiness 59) as applicable to these airplanes. immediately as the former version of the rule potentially created a professional standards for their particular primary For engine assembly certification: category aircraft. The FAA procedure responsibility violation if an attorney establishing appropriate airworthiness Joint Aviation Requirements 22 (JAR acted to preserve life or risked the standards includes reviewing and 22), ‘‘Sailplanes and Powered client’s life. possibly revising the applicant’s Sailplanes,’’ Change 5, dated October 28, DATES: This interim final rule is proposal, publication of the submittal in 1995, Subpart H only. effective August 30, 2010. Written the Federal Register for public review For propeller certification: comments received at the address indicated below by October 29, 2010 and comment, and addressing the 14 CFR part 35 as amended through will be considered and addressed in the comments. After all necessary revisions, Amendment 35–8 except § 35.1 (or a final rule. the standards are published as approved propeller with an FAA type certificate FAA airworthiness standards. may be used). ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or Discussion of Comments For noise standards: Regulatory Information Number (RIN) Existence of Proposed Airworthiness 14 CFR part 36, Amendment 36–28, and title, by any of the following Design Standards for Acceptance Under Appendix G. methods: the Primary Category Rule; Orlando Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Helicopter Airways (OHA), Inc., Models 19, 2010. www.regulations.gov. Follow the Cessna 172I, 172K, 172L, and 172M instructions for submitting comments. airplanes was published in the Federal John R. Colomy, Mail: Federal Docket Management Register on June 21, 2010, 75 FR 34953. Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, No comments were received, and the Aircraft Certification Service. Washington, DC 20301–1160. airworthiness design standards are [FR Doc. 2010–21444 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Instructions: All submissions received adopted as proposed. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P must include the agency name and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52861

docket or RIN number for this Federal (3) Materially alter the budgetary shall, as far as reasonably possible, Register document. The general policy impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, maintain a normal attorney-client for comments and other submissions or loan programs, or the rights and relationship with the client. from members of the public is to make obligations of recipients thereof; or (2) When the covered attorney these submissions available for public (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues reasonably believes that the client has viewing on the Internet at http:// arising out of legal mandates, the diminished capacity, is at risk of www.regulations.gov as they are President’s priorities, or the principles substantial physical, financial, or other received without change, including any set forth in this Executive Order. harm unless action is taken and cannot personal identifiers or contact adequately act in the client’s own Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Sec. information. interest, the covered attorney may take 202, Pub. L. 104–4) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: reasonably necessary protective action, Lieutenant Commander Janelle M. Beal, It has been certified that 32 CFR part including consulting with individuals JAGC, U.S. Navy, Office of the Judge 776 does not contain a Federal mandate or entities that have the ability to take Advocate General (Administrative Law), that may result in the expenditure by action to protect the client. Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson State, local and tribal governments, in (3) Information relating to the Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy aggregate, or by the private sector, of representation of a client with Yard, DC 20374–5066, telephone: 703– $100 million or more in any one year. diminished capacity is protected by 614–7403. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork § 776.25 of this part. When taking SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) protective action pursuant to paragraph Department of the Navy is amending 32 (a)(2) of this section, the covered It has been certified that 32 CFR part CFR part 776, to comport with current attorney is impliedly authorized under 776 does not impose any reporting or policy as stated in JAG Instruction § 776.25 of this part to reveal recordkeeping requirements under the 5803.1 (Series) governing the information about the client, but only to Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 professional conduct of attorneys the extent reasonably necessary to U.S.C. chapter 35). practicing under the cognizance and protect the client’s interests. supervision of the Judge Advocate Federalism (Executive Order 13132) (b) [Reserved] General for clients with diminished It has been certified that 32 CFR Part Dated: August 24, 2010. capacity. This rule updates the existing 776 does not have federalism D.J. Werner, section to reflect the current policy of implications, as set forth in Executive Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge the Judge Advocate General to permit a Order 13132. This rule does not have Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal covered attorney to take protective substantial direct effects on: Register Liaison Officer. action and disclose a client’s condition (1) The States; [FR Doc. 2010–21499 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] when he or she reasonably believes that (2) The relationship between the BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P the client has diminished capacity and National Government and the States; or is at risk of substantial physical self- (3) The distribution of power and harm if action is not taken. Thus, responsibilities among the various DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND aligning the policy with ABA Model levels of government. SECURITY Rules of Professional Conduct (2010), Rule 1.14 (Client with Diminished List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 776 Federal Emergency Management Capacity). Interested persons are invited Rules of Professional Conduct, and Agency to comment in writing on this Complaint Processing Procedures. amendment. All written comments ■ 44 CFR Part 64 received will be considered in finalizing For the reasons set forth in the the amendment to 32 CFR part 776. It preamble, the Department of the Navy [Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal has been determined that this rule amends 32 CFR Part 776, as follows: Agency Docket No. FEMA–8145] amendment is not a major rule within PART 776—PROFESSIONAL Suspension of Community Eligibility the criteria specified in Executive Order CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS 12866, as amended by Executive Order PRACTICING UNDER THE AGENCY: Federal Emergency 13258, and does not have substantial COGNIZANCE AND SUPERVISION OF Management Agency, DHS. impact on the public. THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL ACTION: Final rule. Matters of Regulatory Procedure ■ 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR SUMMARY: This rule identifies Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Part 776 continues to read as follows: communities, where the sale of flood Planning and Review’’ Authority: 10 U.S.C. 806, 806a, 826, 827. insurance has been authorized under It has been determined that 32 CFR the National Flood Insurance Program Part 776 is not a significant regulatory Subpart B—Rules of Professional (NFIP), that are scheduled for action. The rule does not: Conduct suspension on the effective dates listed (1) Have an annual effect on the within this rule because of economy of $100 million or more or ■ 2. Revise § 776.33 to read as follows: noncompliance with the floodplain adversely affect in a material way the management requirements of the economy, a sector of the economy, § 776.33 Client with diminished capacity. program. If the Federal Emergency productivity, competition, jobs, the (a) Client with diminished capacity: Management Agency (FEMA) receives environment, public health or safety, or (1) When a client’s ability to make documentation that the community has State, local, or tribal governments or adequately considered decisions in adopted the required floodplain communities; connection with the representation is management measures prior to the (2) Create a serious inconsistency or diminished, whether because of effective suspension date given in this otherwise interfere with an action taken minority, mental impairment, or for rule, the suspension will not occur and or planned by another agency; some other reason, the covered attorney a notice of this will be provided by

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52862 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

publication in the Federal Register on a the communities will be published in the Regulatory Flexibility Act because subsequent date. the Federal Register. the National Flood Insurance Act of DATES: Effective Dates: The effective In addition, FEMA has identified the 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, date of each community’s scheduled Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in prohibits flood insurance coverage suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) these communities by publishing a unless an appropriate public body listed in the third column of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The adopts adequate floodplain management following tables. date of the FIRM, if one has been measures with effective enforcement FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If published, is indicated in the fourth measures. The communities listed no you want to determine whether a column of the table. No direct Federal longer comply with the statutory particular community was suspended financial assistance (except assistance requirements, and after the effective on the suspension date or for further pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford date, flood insurance will no longer be information, contact David Stearrett, Disaster Relief and Emergency available in the communities unless Mitigation Directorate, Federal Assistance Act not in connection with a remedial action takes place. Emergency Management Agency, 500 C flood) may legally be provided for Regulatory Classification. This final Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, construction or acquisition of buildings rule is not a significant regulatory action (202) 646–2953. in identified SFHAs for communities under the criteria of section 3(f) of not participating in the NFIP and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP Executive Order 12866 of September 17, identified for more than a year, on enables property owners to purchase 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, FEMA’s initial flood insurance map of flood insurance which is generally not 58 FR 51735. the community as having flood-prone otherwise available. In return, Executive Order 13132, Federalism. areas (section 202(a) of the Flood communities agree to adopt and This rule involves no policies that have Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 administer local floodplain management federalism implications under Executive U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This aimed at protecting lives and new Order 13132. prohibition against certain types of construction from future flooding. Federal assistance becomes effective for Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Section 1315 of the National Flood the communities listed on the date Reform. This rule meets the applicable Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 shown in the last column. The standards of Executive Order 12988. U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance Administrator finds that notice and Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule coverage as authorized under the NFIP, public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) does not involve any collection of 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; unless an are impracticable and unnecessary information for purposes of the appropriate public body adopts because communities listed in this final Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. adequate floodplain management rule have been adequately notified. 3501 et seq. measures with effective enforcement Each community receives 6-month, List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64 measures. The communities listed in 90-day, and 30-day notification letters this document no longer meet that addressed to the Chief Executive Officer Flood insurance, Floodplains. statutory requirement for compliance stating that the community will be ■ Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is with program regulations, 44 CFR part suspended unless the required amended as follows: 59. Accordingly, the communities will floodplain management measures are be suspended on the effective date in met prior to the effective suspension PART 64—[AMENDED] the third column. As of that date, flood date. Since these notifications were insurance will no longer be available in made, this final rule may take effect ■ 1. The authority citation for part 64 the community. However, some of these within less than 30 days. continues to read as follows: communities may adopt and submit the National Environmental Policy Act. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; required documentation of legally This rule is categorically excluded from Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, enforceable floodplain management the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, measures after this rule is published but Environmental Considerations. No 3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376. prior to the actual suspension date. environmental impact assessment has § 64.6 [Amended] These communities will not be been prepared. suspended and will continue their Regulatory Flexibility Act. The ■ 2. The tables published under the eligibility for the sale of insurance. A Administrator has determined that this authority of § 64.6 are amended as notice withdrawing the suspension of rule is exempt from the requirements of follows:

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Region II New York: Barker, Village of, Niagara County ...... 360498 April 10, 1975, Emerg; May 1, 1984, Reg; Sept. 17, 2010 .. Sept. 17, 2010. September 17, 2010, Susp. Cambria, Town of, Niagara County ...... 360499 July 7, 1975, Emerg; September 30, 1983, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Hartland, Town of, Niagara County ...... 360500 May 1, 1975, Emerg; October 7, 1983, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Lewiston, Town of, Niagara County ...... 360502 March 27, 1974, Emerg; June 18, 1980, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Lockport, City of, Niagara County ...... 360503 December 17, 1973, Emerg; February 4, ...... do ...... Do. 1981, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52863

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Lockport, Town of, Niagara County ...... 361013 December 17, 1973, Emerg; September 2, ...... do ...... Do. 1981, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Middleport, Village of, Niagara County 360505 April 8, 1975, Emerg; August 1, 1983, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. North Tonawanda, City of, Niagara 360508 May 14, 1975, Emerg; January 6, 1982, ...... do ...... Do. County. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Pendleton, Town of, Niagara County .... 360509 April 12, 1974, Emerg; January 6, 1982, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Porter, Town of, Niagara County ...... 360510 July 17, 1974, Emerg; August 15, 1983, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Royalton, Town of, Niagara County ...... 360511 November 29, 1974, Emerg; July 6, 1979, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Wheatfield, Town of, Niagara County ... 360513 July 5, 1973, Emerg; July 16, 1981, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Youngstown, Village of, Niagara County 360515 March 30, 1973, Emerg; June 4, 1980, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Region III Virginia: Clifton, Town of, Fairfax County ...... 510186 December 5, 1973, Emerg; May 2, 1977, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Fairfax County, Unincorporated Areas .. 515525 June 19, 1970, Emerg; January 7, 1972, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Gloucester County, Unincorporated 510071 March 25, 1974, Emerg; August 4, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Herndon, Town of, Fairfax County ...... 510052 May 21, 1973, Emerg; August 1, 1979, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Irvington, Town of, Lancaster County ... 510221 August 18, 1975, Emerg; August 4, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Lancaster County, Unincorporated 510084 November 27, 1973, Emerg; March 4, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. 1988, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Northumberland County, Unincor- 510107 October 9, 1973, Emerg; July 4, 1989, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. porated Areas. September 17, 2010, Susp. Vienna, Town of, Fairfax County ...... 510053 August 8, 1974, Emerg; February 3, 1982, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. White Stone, Town of, Lancaster Coun- 510235 August 18, 1975, Emerg; September 24, ...... do ...... Do. ty. 1984, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Region IV Alabama: Aliceville, City of, Pickens County ...... 010180 February 8, 1974, Emerg; July 17, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Ethelsville, Town of, Pickens County.... 010281 December 21, 1978, Emerg; March 18, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Gordo, Town of, Pickens County ...... 010220 August 6, 1974, Emerg; August 15, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Pickens County, Unincorporated Areas 010283 May 25, 1976, Emerg; June 4, 1990, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Pickensville, Town of, Pickens County 010423 N/A, Emerg; June 6, 1996, Reg; September ...... do ...... Do. 17, 2010, Susp. Reform, Town of, Pickens County ...... 010221 July 31, 1974, Emerg; July 3, 1978, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Georgia: Comer, City of, Madison County ...... 130211 May 12, 1975, Emerg; June 1, 1978, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Morganton, City of, Fannin County ...... 130449 November 17, 1976, Emerg; April 2, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Mountain City, Town of, Rabun County 130252 January 30, 1980, Emerg; July 9, 1982, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Randolph County, Unincorporated 130553 May 16, 1997, Emerg; September 17, 2010, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Kentucky: Hustonville, City of, Lincoln County ...... 210144 August 26, 1975, Emerg; September 27, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Stanford, City of, Lincoln County ...... 210145 February 26, 1975, Emerg; September 27, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Mississippi: Alcorn County, Unincorporated Areas ... 280267 N/A, Emerg; February 27, 1992, Reg; Sep- ...... do ...... Do. tember 17, 2010, Susp. Coffeeville, Town of, Yalobusha County 280186 April 8, 1975, Emerg; September 4, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52864 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Corinth, City of, Alcorn County...... 280002 July 26, 1974, Emerg; March 16, 1981, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Duck Hill, Town of, Montgomery County 280118 June 23, 1975, Emerg; April 2, 1986, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Louisville, City of, Winston County ...... 280185 February 11, 1974, Emerg; June 15, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Montgomery County, Unincorporated 280212 April 11, 1974, Emerg; September 1, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Rienzi, Town of, Alcorn County ...... 280322 October 30, 2006, Emerg; September 17, ...... do ...... Do. 2010, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Water Valley, City of, Yalobusha Coun- 280187 December 5, 1974, Emerg; September 27, ...... do ...... Do. ty. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Winona, City of, Montgomery County ... 280119 February 18, 1975, Emerg; July 2, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Winston County, Unincorporated Areas 280308 December 21, 1978, Emerg; August 19, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Tennessee: Ashland City, Town of, Cheatham 470027 March 10, 1975, Emerg; April 1, 1981, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. County. September 17, 2010, Susp. Cheatham County, Unincorporated 470026 September 27, 1974, Emerg; May 19, 1981, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Decatur, Town of, Meigs County...... 470134 March 27, 1975, Emerg; June 3, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Kingston Springs, Town of, Cheatham 470289 June 11, 1984, Emerg; June 11, 1984, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. County. September 17, 2010, Susp. Pegram, Town of, Cheatham County .... 470291 April 9, 1987, Emerg; April 9, 1987, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Region V Illinois: Bonnie, Village of, Jefferson County ..... 170306 September 10, 1975, Emerg; August 19, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. East Dubuque, City of, Jo Daviess 170752 June 25, 1975, Emerg; October 18, 1983, ...... do ...... Do. County. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Galena, City of, Jo Daviess County ...... 175168 August 27, 1971, Emerg; July 20, 1973, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Hanover, Village of, Jo Daviess County 170755 July 21, 1975, Emerg; May 4, 1989, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Ina, Village of, Jefferson County ...... 170307 March 2, 1976, Emerg; May 25, 1984, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Jefferson County, Unincorporated 170305 October 31, 2000, Emerg; September 17, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. 2010, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Jo Daviess County, Unincorporated 170902 April 19, 1979, Emerg; January 18, 1984, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Mount Vernon, City of, Jefferson Coun- 170308 September 30, 1974, Emerg; February 15, ...... do ...... Do. ty. 1984, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Peoria Heights, Village of, Peoria, 170537 October 13, 1972, Emerg; November 1, ...... do ...... Do. Tazewell, and Woodford Counties. 1979, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Roanoke, Village of, Woodford County 170727 June 17, 1975, Emerg; September 4, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Spring Bay, Village of, Woodford Coun- 170887 August 26, 1977, Emerg; June 4, 1980, ...... do ...... Do. ty. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Washburn, Village of, Marshall and 170728 January 27, 1975, Emerg; July 2, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Woodford Counties. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Woodford County, Unincorporated 170730 September 7, 1973, Emerg; February 1, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. 1984, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Michigan: Bangor, Township of, Bay County ...... 260019 March 30, 1973, Emerg; July 2, 1979, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Bay City, City of, Bay County ...... 260020 March 30, 1973, Emerg; September 1, ...... do ...... Do. 1978, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Essexville, City of, Bay County...... 260021 March 30, 1973, Emerg; September 1, ...... do ...... Do. 1978, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Fraser, Township of, Bay County ...... 260657 November 13, 1981, Emerg; November 13, ...... do ...... Do. 1981, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Hampton, Township of, Bay County ..... 260023 March 30, 1973, Emerg; August 1, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Kawkawlin, Township of, Bay County... 260658 January 29, 1979, Emerg; February 1, ...... do ...... Do. 1979, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Monitor, Township of, Bay County ...... 260358 July 21, 1982, Emerg; August 19, 1985, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52865

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Pinconning, City of, Bay County ...... 260607 March 17, 1975, Emerg; August 3, 1981, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Pinconning, Township of, Bay County.. 260025 March 30, 1973, Emerg; September 1, ...... do ...... Do. 1978, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Region VII Missouri: Bolivar, City of, Polk County ...... 290299 July 24, 1975, Emerg; June 15, 1988, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Marshfield, City of, Webster County ..... 290685 June 13, 1975, Emerg; September 10, ...... do ...... Do. 1984, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Seymour, City of, Webster County ...... 290933 N/A, Emerg; February 11, 2005, Reg; Sep- ...... do ...... Do. tember 17, 2010, Susp. Webster County, Unincorporated Areas 290848 N/A, Emerg; April 14, 2003, Reg; Sep- ...... do ...... Do. tember 17, 2010, Susp. Region X Oregon: Astoria, City of, Clatsop County ...... 410028 October 16, 1974, Emerg; August 1, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Cannon Beach, City of, Clatsop County 410029 March 6, 1974, Emerg; September 1, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Clatsop County, Unincorporated Areas 410027 February 7, 1974, Emerg; July 3, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Gearhart, City of, Clatsop County ...... 410030 April 11, 1974, Emerg; May 15, 1978, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. Seaside, City of, Clatsop County...... 410032 March 25, 1974, Emerg; September 5, ...... do ...... Do. 1979, Reg; September 17, 2010, Susp. Warrenton, City of, Clatsop County ...... 410033 July 16, 1975, Emerg; May 15, 1978, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 17, 2010, Susp. * do = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg.—Emergency; Reg.—Regular; Susp.—Suspension.

Dated: August 19, 2010. program. If the Federal Emergency Section 1315 of the National Flood Sandra K. Knight, Management Agency (FEMA) receives Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, 42 Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation documentation that the community has U.S.C. 4022, prohibits flood insurance Administrator, Mitigation. adopted the required floodplain coverage as authorized under the NFIP, [FR Doc. 2010–21594 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] management measures prior to the 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; unless an BILLING CODE 9110–12–P effective suspension date given in this appropriate public body adopts rule, the suspension will not occur and adequate floodplain management a notice of this will be provided by measures with effective enforcement DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND publication in the Federal Register on a measures. The communities listed in SECURITY subsequent date. this document no longer meet that DATES: Effective Dates: The effective statutory requirement for compliance Federal Emergency Management date of each community’s scheduled with program regulations, 44 CFR part Agency suspension is the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) 59. Accordingly, the communities will listed in the third column of the be suspended on the effective date in 44 CFR Part 64 following tables. the third column. As of that date, flood [Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003; Internal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If insurance will no longer be available in Agency Docket No. FEMA–8143] you want to determine whether a the community. However, some of these particular community was suspended communities may adopt and submit the Suspension of Community Eligibility on the suspension date or for further required documentation of legally enforceable floodplain management AGENCY: Federal Emergency information, contact David Stearrett, Management Agency, DHS. Mitigation Directorate, Federal measures after this rule is published but Emergency Management Agency, 500 C prior to the actual suspension date. ACTION: Final rule. Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, These communities will not be SUMMARY: This rule identifies (202) 646–2953. suspended and will continue their communities, where the sale of flood SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP eligibility for the sale of insurance. A insurance has been authorized under enables property owners to purchase notice withdrawing the suspension of the National Flood Insurance Program flood insurance which is generally not the communities will be published in (NFIP), that are scheduled for otherwise available. In return, the Federal Register. suspension on the effective dates listed communities agree to adopt and In addition, FEMA has identified the within this rule because of administer local floodplain management Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) in noncompliance with the floodplain aimed at protecting lives and new these communities by publishing a management requirements of the construction from future flooding. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52866 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

date of the FIRM, if one has been met prior to the effective suspension Executive Order 13132, Federalism. published, is indicated in the fourth date. Since these notifications were This rule involves no policies that have column of the table. No direct Federal made, this final rule may take effect federalism implications under Executive financial assistance (except assistance within less than 30 days. Order 13132. pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford National Environmental Policy Act. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Disaster Relief and Emergency This rule is categorically excluded from Reform. This rule meets the applicable Assistance Act not in connection with a the requirements of 44 CFR part 10, standards of Executive Order 12988. flood) may legally be provided for Environmental Considerations. No Paperwork Reduction Act. This rule construction or acquisition of buildings environmental impact assessment has does not involve any collection of in identified SFHAs for communities been prepared. not participating in the NFIP and Regulatory Flexibility Act. The information for purposes of the identified for more than a year, on Administrator has determined that this Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. FEMA’s initial flood insurance map of rule is exempt from the requirements of 3501 et seq. the community as having flood-prone the Regulatory Flexibility Act because List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 64 areas (section 202(a) of the Flood the National Flood Insurance Act of Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022, Flood insurance, Floodplains. U.S.C. 4106(a), as amended). This prohibits flood insurance coverage ■ Accordingly, 44 CFR part 64 is prohibition against certain types of unless an appropriate public body amended as follows: Federal assistance becomes effective for adopts adequate floodplain management the communities listed on the date measures with effective enforcement PART 64—[AMENDED] shown in the last column. The measures. The communities listed no Administrator finds that notice and longer comply with the statutory ■ 1. The authority citation for part 64 public comment under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) requirements, and after the effective continues to read as follows: are impracticable and unnecessary date, flood insurance will no longer be Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; because communities listed in this final available in the communities unless Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, rule have been adequately notified. remedial action takes place. 1978 Comp.; p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, Each community receives 6-month, Regulatory Classification. This final 3 CFR, 1979 Comp.; p. 376. 90-day, and 30-day notification letters rule is not a significant regulatory action addressed to the Chief Executive Officer under the criteria of section 3(f) of § 64.6 [Amended] stating that the community will be Executive Order 12866 of September 30, ■ 2. The tables published under the suspended unless the required 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, authority of § 64.6 are amended as floodplain management measures are 58 FR 51735. follows:

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Region III : Ansted, Town of, Fayette County ...... 540027 June 10, 1975, Emerg; October 30, 1981, Sept. 3, 2010 .... Sept. 3, 2010. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Gauley Bridge, Town of, Fayette Coun- 540294 September 22, 1989, Emerg; September ...... do ...... Do. ty. 18, 1991, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Fayette County, Unincorporated Areas 540026 April 16, 1975, Emerg; March 4, 1988, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Meadow Bridge, Town of, Fayette 540028 October 1, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1991, ...... do ...... Do. County. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Montgomery, City of, Fayette and 540029 July 2, 1975, Emerg; June 1, 1982, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. Kahawha Counties. September 3, 2010, Susp. Mount Hope, City of, Fayette County .... 540280 October 30, 1974, Emerg; August 10, 1979, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Oak Hill, City of, Fayette County ...... 540031 October 24, 1974, Emerg; January 18, ...... do ...... Do. 1980, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Pax, Town of, Fayette County ...... 540032 July 8, 1975, Emerg; August 10, 1979, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Smithers, Town of, Fayette County ...... 540033 June 12, 1975, Emerg; April 15, 1982, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Region IV Alabama: Butler, City of, Choctaw County ...... 010033 August 7, 1975, Emerg; July 5, 1982, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Choctaw County, Unincorporated Areas 010310 September 25, 1974, Emerg; September ...... do ...... Do. 30, 1988, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Gilbertown, Town of, Choctaw County.. 010034 January 29, 1979, Emerg; July 3, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Hueytown, City of, Jefferson County ..... 010337 April 22, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1981, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Lipscomb, City of, Jefferson County ..... 010126 July 25, 1975, Emerg; January 2, 1981, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52867

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Pennington, Town of, Choctaw County 010035 July 16, 1979, Emerg; September 18, 1985, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Silas, Town of, Choctaw County ...... 010036 N/A, Emerg; February 27, 2006, Reg; Sep- ...... do ...... Do. tember 3, 2010, Susp. Georgia: Stewart County, Unincorporated 130393 September 8, 1986, Emerg; July 1, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Mississippi: New Albany, Town of, Union County .... 280174 March 25, 1975, Emerg; September 4, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Union County, Unincorporated Areas ... 280237 December 3, 2007, Emerg; September 3, ...... do ...... Do. 2010, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Tennessee: Byrdstown, City of, Pickett County ...... 470147 February 12, 1976, Emerg; July 3, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Pickett County, Unincorporated Areas .. 470384 November 17, 1994, Emerg; February 1, ...... do ...... Do. 2006, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Region VI Louisiana: Basile, Town of, Evangeline Parish ...... 220065 January 22, 1976, Emerg; January 15, ...... do ...... Do. 1988, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Evangeline Parish, Unincorporated 220064 January 12, 1976, Emerg; August 1, 1988, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Mamou, Town of, Evangeline Parish .... 220067 September 13, 1974, Emerg; November 1, ...... do ...... Do. 1985, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Pine Prairie, Village of, Evangeline Par- 220068 July 8, 1975, Emerg; June 25, 1976, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. ish. September 3, 2010, Susp. Turkey Creek, Village of, Evangeline 220069 August 11, 2008, Emerg; September 1, ...... do ...... Do. Parish. 2008, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Ville Platte, City of, Evangeline Parish .. 220070 April 13, 1976, Emerg; October 15, 1985, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Oklahoma: Bethel Acres, Town of, Pottawatomie 400346 June 16, 1989, Emerg; December 1, 1989, ...... do ...... Do. County. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Brooksville, City of, Pottawatomie 400469 September 19, 1979, Emerg; August 19, ...... do ...... Do. County. 1985, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Kickapoo Tribal Lands, Pottawatomie 400563 February 26, 2002, Emerg; September 3, ...... do ...... Do. County. 2010, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. McLoud, Town of, Pottawatomie County 400398 December 27, 1977, Emerg; October 16, ...... do ...... Do. 1987, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Pottawatomie County, Unincorporated 400496 March 26, 1984, Emerg; June 1, 1988, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Shawnee, City of, Pottawatomie County 400178 April 2, 1975, Emerg; July 2, 1980, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Tecumseh, City of, Pottawatomie Coun- 400179 February 10, 1975, Emerg; July 16, 1980, ...... do ...... Do. ty. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Texas: Austin County, Unincorporated Areas ... 480704 November 21, 1975, Emerg; January 17, ...... do ...... Do. 1990, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Bellville, City of, Austin County ...... 481095 N/A, Emerg; June 17, 1998, Reg; Sep- ...... do ...... Do. tember 3, 2010, Susp. Brazos Country, City of, Austin County 481693 N/A, Emerg; December 18, 2001, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Corrigan, City of, Polk County ...... 480527 January 26, 1978, Emerg; April 20, 1982, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Goodrich, City of, Polk County ...... 481070 November 12, 1980, Emerg; June 19, 1985, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Livingston, City of, Polk County ...... 480528 May 21, 1975, Emerg; September 1, 1987, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Onalaska, City of, Polk County ...... 480974 November 6, 1996, Emerg; November 1, ...... do ...... Do. 2007, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Polk County, Unincorporated Areas ...... 480526 September 5, 1990, Emerg; March 1, 1991, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. San Felipe, Town of, Austin County ..... 480705 April 7, 1976, Emerg; January 3, 1986, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Wood County, Unincorporated Areas ... 481055 February 21, 2001, Emerg; August 1, 2008, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Yantis, City of, Wood County ...... 481167 December 29, 1980, Emerg; October 26, ...... do ...... Do. 1982, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52868 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Date certain Federal assist- State and location Community Effective date authorization/cancellation of Current effective ance no longer No. sale of flood insurance in community map date available in SFHAs

Region IX : Yavapai County, Unincorporated 040093 January 31, 1975, Emerg; September 18, ...... do ...... Do. Areas. 1985, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Region X Oregon: Adams, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410205 February 12, 1976, Emerg; May 15, 1984, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Athena, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410206 June 4, 1975, Emerg; July 16, 1984, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Echo, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410207 April 15, 1975, Emerg; May 15, 1984, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Helix, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410208 January 13, 1976, Emerg; June 1, 1984, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Hermiston, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410209 November 7, 1974, Emerg; October 28, ...... do ...... Do. 1977, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Milton-Freewater, City of, Umatilla 410210 April 16, 1975, Emerg; September 12, ...... do ...... Do. County. 1978, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Pendleton, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410211 March 3, 1972, Emerg; July 13, 1976, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Pilot Rock, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410212 July 5, 1974, Emerg; August 4, 1988, Reg; ...... do ...... Do. September 3, 2010, Susp. Stanfield, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410213 October 2, 1974, Emerg; August 15, 1984, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Ukiah, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410279 August 25, 1975, Emerg; September 24, ...... do ...... Do. 1984, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Umatilla, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410214 February 6, 1975, Emerg; September 24, ...... do ...... Do. 1984, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Umatilla County, Unincorporated Areas 410204 February 4, 1972, Emerg; June 15, 1978, ...... do ...... Do. Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. Weston, City of, Umatilla County ...... 410215 August 8, 1975, Emerg; September 18, ...... do ...... Do. 1987, Reg; September 3, 2010, Susp. *do = Ditto. Code for reading third column: Emerg.—Emergency; Reg.—Regular; Susp.—Suspension.

Dated: August 16, 2010. already in effect in order to qualify or elevations have been published in Sandra K. Knight, remain qualified for participation in the newspapers of local circulation and Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation National Flood Insurance Program ninety (90) days have elapsed since that Administrator, Mitigation. (NFIP). publication. The Deputy Federal [FR Doc. 2010–21597 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] DATES: The date of issuance of the Flood Insurance and Mitigation Administrator BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) showing has resolved any appeals resulting from BFEs and modified BFEs for each this notification. community. This date may be obtained This final rule is issued in accordance DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND by contacting the office where the maps with section 110 of the Flood Disaster SECURITY are available for inspection as indicated Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, in the table below. and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has Federal Emergency Management developed criteria for floodplain ADDRESSES: The final BFEs for each Agency management in floodprone areas in community are available for inspection accordance with 44 CFR part 60. at the office of the Chief Executive 44 CFR Part 67 Interested lessees and owners of real Officer of each community. The property are encouraged to review the [Docket ID FEMA–2010–0003] respective addresses are listed in the proof Flood Insurance Study and FIRM table below. Final Flood Elevation Determinations available at the address cited below for FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy each community. The BFEs and AGENCY: Federal Emergency E. Wright, Deputy Director, Risk modified BFEs are made final in the Management Agency, DHS. Analysis Division, Federal Insurance communities listed below. Elevations at and Mitigation Administration, Federal ACTION: Final rule. selected locations in each community Emergency Management Agency, 500 C are shown. SUMMARY: Base (1% annual-chance) Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, National Environmental Policy Act. Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified (202) 646–2820, or (e-mail) This final rule is categorically excluded BFEs are made final for the [email protected]. from the requirements of 44 CFR part communities listed below. The BFEs SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 10, Environmental Consideration. An and modified BFEs are the basis for the Federal Emergency Management Agency environmental impact assessment has floodplain management measures that (FEMA) makes the final determinations not been prepared. each community is required either to listed below for the modified BFEs for Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood adopt or to show evidence of being each community listed. These modified elevation determinations are not within

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52869

the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice PART 67—[AMENDED] Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, a regulatory Reform. This final rule meets the ■ flexibility analysis is not required. applicable standards of Executive Order 1. The authority citation for part 67 Regulatory Classification. This final 12988. continues to read as follows: rule is not a significant regulatory action Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; under the criteria of section 3(f) of List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 67 Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR, Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, Administrative practice and 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376. 58 FR 51735. procedure, Flood insurance, Reporting § 67.11 [Amended] Executive Order 13132, Federalism. and recordkeeping requirements. This final rule involves no policies that ■ Accordingly, 44 CFR part 67 is ■ 2. The tables published under the have federalism implications under amended as follows: authority of § 67.11 are amended as Executive Order 13132. follows:

* Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) Modified

Jefferson County, Alabama, and Incorporated Areas Docket Nos.: FEMA–B–1022 and FEMA–B–1051

Dry Creek ...... Approximately 630 feet upstream of Navajo Trail North- +722 City of Center Point, Unin- east. corporated Areas of Jeffer- son County. Just upstream of Chalkville Mountain Road ...... +958 Griffin Brook ...... Approximately 800 feet upstream of Lakeshore Drive ...... +631 City of Homewood, Unincor- porated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 90 feet upstream of Montgomery Highway +788 Huckleberry Branch ...... Approximately 200 feet downstream of Tyler Road ...... +514 City of Hoover, City of Vestavia Hills, Unincor- porated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 1,500 feet upstream of Mountain Oaks +814 Drive. Little Shades Creek (Cahaba Approximately 930 feet upstream of Loch Haven Drive ..... +432 City of Hoover, City of Moun- Basin). tain Brook, City of Vestavia Hills, Unincor- porated Areas of Jefferson County. Just upstream of Pipe Line Road ...... +626 Little Shades Creek (Shades Just downstream Wenonah Oxmoor Road ...... +514 City of Bessemer, City of Bir- Creek). mingham, Unincorporated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 2.3 miles downstream of Alabama Highway +632 150. Patton Creek ...... Approximately 0.6 mile downstream of Alabama Highway +423 City of Hoover, City of 150. Vestavia Hills, Unincor- porated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 310 feet downstream of West Ridge Drive +533 Pinchgut Creek ...... Approximately 0.7 mile downstream of Watterson Park- +691 City of Birmingham, City of way. Trussville, Unincorporated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 2.0 miles upstream of Gadsden Highway ... +846 Turkey Creek ...... Approximately 0.7 mile downstream of Old Bradford Road +565 City of Center Point, City of Clay, City of Pinson, Unin- corporated Areas of Jeffer- son County. Approximately 950 feet upstream of Eagle Ridge Drive .... +885 Unnamed Creek 9 ...... Just downstream of Alabama Highway 151 ...... +590 City of Center Point, Unin- corporated Areas of Jeffer- son County. Just downstream of Pinson Heights Road ...... +631 Unnamed Creek 10 ...... Approximately 515 feet downstream of Main Street ...... +607 City of Center Point, City of Pinson, Unincorporated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 90 feet downstream of Houston Road ...... +667

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52870 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

* Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) Modified

Unnamed Creek 11 ...... Just upstream of Center Point Road ...... +626 City of Center Point, City of Pinson, Unincorporated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 1,610 feet upstream of Green Crest Drive +692 Valley Creek ...... Approximately 0.5 mile downstream of Power Plant Road +431 City of Bessemer, Unincor- porated Areas of Jefferson County. Approximately 0.5 mile upstream of Power Plant Road ..... +440

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES City of Bessemer Maps are available for inspection at 1800 3rd Avenue, North, Bessemer, AL 35020. City of Birmingham Maps are available for inspection at 710 20th Street, North, Birmingham, AL 35203. City of Center Point Maps are available for inspection at 2209 Center Point Parkway, Center Point, AL 35215. City of Clay Maps are available for inspection at 6757 Old Springville Road, Pinson, AL 35126. City of Homewood Maps are available for inspection at 1903 29th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35209. City of Hoover Maps are available for inspection at 100 Municipal Drive, Hoover, AL 35236. City of Mountain Brook Maps are available for inspection at 56 Church Street, Mountain Brook, AL 35213. City of Pinson Maps are available for inspection at 4410 Main Street, Pinson, AL 35126. City of Trussville Maps are available for inspection at 131 Main Street, Trussville, AL 35173. City of Vestavia Hills Maps are available for inspection at 513 Montgomery Highway, Vestavia Hills, AL 35085. Unincorporated Areas of Jefferson County Maps are available for inspection at 716 Richard Arrington, Jr. Boulevard North, Room 260, Birmingham, AL 35203.

Coconino County, Arizona, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1053

Bow and Arrow Wash ...... Approximately 50 feet downstream of South Lone Tree +6,878 City of Flagstaff. Road. Approximately 1,800 feet upstream of Lake Mary Road .... +6,949 Peak View Wash ...... At the confluence with the Rio de Flag ...... +7,113 City of Flagstaff. Approximately 125 feet upstream of Lois Lane ...... +7,123 Rio de Flag ...... At Rio Rancho Road ...... +6,521 City of Flagstaff, Unincor- porated Areas of Coconino County. Approximately 150 feet downstream of Route 66 ...... +6,758 At the Narrows Dam ...... +7,087 Approximately 565 feet downstream of Hidden Hollow +7,148 Road. Schultz Creek ...... Approximately 175 feet upstream of North Fort Valley +7,006 City of Flagstaff, Unincor- Road. porated Areas of Coconino County. Approximately 0.57 mile upstream of Mary Russel Way .... +7,140 Schultz Creek Ponding ...... Approximately 50 feet upstream of the confluence with the #1 City of Flagstaff, Unincor- Rio de Flag. porated Areas of Coconino County. Approximately 175 feet upstream of North Fort Valley #1 Road. Switzer Canyon Wash ...... Approximately 50 feet upstream of the upstream end of +6,869 City of Flagstaff, Unincor- the East Route 66 Culvert. porated Areas of Coconino County.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52871

* Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) Modified

Approximately 0.42 mile upstream of Elk Drive ...... +7,030

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES City of Flagstaff Maps are available for inspection at Flagstaff City Hall, 211 West Aspen Avenue, Flagstaff, AZ 86001. Unincorporated Areas of Coconino County Maps are available for inspection at the Coconino County Department of Community Development, 2500 North Fort Valley Road, Building 1, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.

Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1038

Bayou Barwick Tributary ...... At the intersection of Bayou Barwick Tributary and Stagg +44 Unincorporated Areas of Road. Evangeline Parish. At the intersection of Bayou Barwick Tributary and High- +44 way 190. Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #1 At Alton Locks Street ...... +67 City of Ville Platte. At Te Mamou Road ...... +67 Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #2 Approximately 522 feet upstream of Main Street (Base +73 City of Ville Platte. Flood Elevations extend to Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #3). At Ortego Street (Base Flood Elevations extend to Bayou +74 Joe Marcel Tributary #3). Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #3 Approximately 1,054 feet downstream of Reed Street +72 City of Ville Platte. (Base Flood Elevations extend to Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #2). Approximately 197 feet downstream of Reed Street (Base +74 Flood Elevations extend to Bayou Joe Marcel Tributary #2).

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES City of Ville Platte Maps are available for inspection at P.O. Box 390, Ville Platte, LA 70586. Unincorporated Areas of Evangeline Parish Maps are available for inspection at 200 Court Street, Suite 207, Ville Platte, LA 70586.

Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1024

Tributary #1 to Rock Creek ...... At the confluence with Rock Creek ...... +974 City of Shawnee. Approximately 1,565 feet upstream of Kickapoo Street ..... +986 Tributary #1 to Tributary #2 to Approximately 500 feet downstream of Union Street ...... +989 City of Shawnee. Rock Creek. At 45th Street ...... +1,021

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES City of Shawnee Maps are available for inspection at the Pottawatomie County Courthouse, 325 North Broadway, Shawnee, OK 74801.

Umatilla County, Oregon, and Incorporated Areas Docket Number: FEMA–B–1049

Iskuupla Creek ...... At the confluence with the Umatilla River ...... +1,690 Umatilla Indian Reservation. Approximately 1.0 mile upstream of Bingham Road ...... +1,779

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52872 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

* Elevation in feet (NGVD) + Elevation in feet (NAVD) Flooding source(s) Location of referenced elevation # Depth in feet Communities affected above ground ∧ Elevation in me- ters (MSL) Modified

Iskuupla Creek left bank split ... Approximately 3,000 feet west along Bingham Road from +1,682 Umatilla Indian Reservation. Iskuupla Creek. At the divergence from Iskuupla Creek ...... +1,707 Meacham Creek ...... At the confluence with the Umatilla River ...... +1,762 Umatilla Indian Reservation. Just downstream of Meacham Creek Road Bridge and +1,819 Railroad Bridge. Umatilla River ...... Just upstream of State Highway 11 Bridge ...... +1,111 City of Pendleton, Umatilla Indian Reservation, Unin- corporated Areas of Umatilla County. Approximately 700 feet downstream of the confluence +1,908 with Ryan Creek. Walla Walla River ...... At Southeast 17th Avenue ...... #1 City of Milton-Freewater, Un- incorporated Areas of Umatilla County. At Northeast 15th Avenue ...... #1 Wildhorse Creek ...... At Range Line 32E/33E ...... +1,142 Unincorporated Areas of Umatilla County. At Township Line 2N/3N ...... +1,154

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES City of Milton-Freewater Maps are available for inspection at 722 South Main Street, Milton-Freewater, OR 97862. City of Pendleton Maps are available for inspection at 500 Southwest Dorion Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801. Umatilla Indian Reservation Maps are available for inspection at 73239 Confederated Way, Pendleton, OR 97801. Unincorporated Areas of Umatilla County Maps are available for inspection at 216 Southeast 4th Street, Pendleton, OR 97801.

Fayette County, West Virginia, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA–B–1061

Smithers Creek ...... Approximately 700 feet downstream of Carbondale Road +640 Unincorporated Areas of Fayette County. Approximately 550 feet upstream of Carbondale Road ..... +651

* National Geodetic Vertical Datum. + North American Vertical Datum. # Depth in feet above ground. ∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter. ADDRESSES Unincorporated Areas of Fayette County Maps are available for inspection at the Fayette County Building, Safety Department, 100 Court Street, Fayetteville, WV 25840.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the 97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’) COMMISSION request of Prescott Valley Radio Dated: August 19, 2010. Broadcasting Company, Inc., substitutes 47 CFR Part 73 Sandra K. Knight, FM Channel 247B for Channel 239B at Blythe, California. Channel 247B can be Deputy Federal Insurance and Mitigation [MB Docket No. 08–151, RM–11476, DA 10– Administrator, Mitigation, Department of 1519] allotted at Blythe, consistent with the Homeland Security, Federal Emergency minimum distance separation Management Agency. Radio Broadcasting Services; Blythe, requirements of the Commission’s rules, CA [FR Doc. 2010–21595 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] at coordinates 33–37–02 NL and 114– 35–20 WL, with a site restriction of 1.0 BILLING CODE 9110–12–P AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. km (.61 miles) northeast of the community. The Government of Mexico ACTION: Final rule. has conveyed its concurrence in the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52873

allotment of FM Channel 247B at § 73.202 [Amended] overview of the migratory bird hunting Blythe, California. Concurrently with ■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM regulations process, and addressed the release of the Report and Order, Allotments under California, is establishment of seasons, limits, and petitioner’s minor change application amended by removing Channel 239B other regulations for hunting migratory for FM Station KPKR (File No. BPH– and adding Channel 247B at Blythe. game birds under §§ 20.101 through 20080418AAU) was granted, contingent [FR Doc. 2010–21560 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 20.107, 20.109, and 20.110 of subpart K. Major steps in the 2010–11 regulatory on the receipt of Mexican concurrence BILLING CODE 6712–01–P in the operation of FM Channel 239C3 cycle relating to open public meetings at Parker, Arizona. See SUPPLEMENTARY and Federal Register notifications were INFORMATION infra. also identified in the May 13 proposed DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DATES: Effective September 30, 2010. rule. Further, we explained that all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fish and Wildlife Service sections of subsequent documents Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) outlining hunting frameworks and 418–2180. 50 CFR Part 20 guidelines were organized under numbered headings. Subsequent SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a [Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2010–0040; documents will refer only to numbered synopsis of the Commission’s Report 91200–1231–9BPP–L2] items requiring attention. Therefore, it is and Order, MB Docket No. 08–151, important to note that we omit those adopted August 12, 2010, and released RIN 1018–AX06 items requiring no attention, and August 16, 2010. The full text of this Migratory Bird Hunting; Final remaining numbered items might be Commission decision is available for discontinuous or appear incomplete. inspection and copying during normal Frameworks for Early-Season Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations On June 10, 2010, we published in the business hours in the FCC Information Federal Register (75 FR 32872) a second Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, document providing supplemental Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. Interior. proposals for early- and late-season The complete text of this decision also ACTION: Final rule. migratory bird hunting regulations. The may be purchased from the June 10 supplement also provided Commission’s duplicating contractor, SUMMARY: This rule prescribes final information on the 2010–11 regulatory Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th early-season frameworks from which the schedule and announced the Service Street, SW, Room CY–B402, States, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Regulations Committee (SRC) and Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378–3160, Islands may select season dates, limits, summer Flyway Council meetings. or via the company’s Web site, http:// and other options for the 2010–11 On June 23 and 24, 2010, we held www.bcpiweb.com. This document does migratory bird hunting seasons. Early open meetings with the Flyway Council not contain proposed information seasons are those that generally open Consultants where the participants collection requirements subject to the prior to October 1, and include seasons reviewed information on the current Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the status of migratory shore and upland Public Law 104–13. In addition, Virgin Islands. The effect of this final game birds and developed therefore, it does not contain any rule is to facilitate the selection of recommendations for the 2010–11 proposed information collection burden hunting seasons by the States and regulations for these species plus ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer Territories to further the annual regulations for migratory game birds in than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the establishment of the early-season Alaska, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of migratory bird hunting regulations. Islands, special September waterfowl 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. DATES: This rule takes effect on August seasons in designated States, special sea 3506(c)(4). The Commission will send a 30, 2010. duck seasons in the Atlantic Flyway, copy of this Report and Order in a and extended falconry seasons. In ADDRESSES: States and Territories report to be sent to Congress and the addition, we reviewed and discussed should send their season selections to: Government Accountability Office preliminary information on the status of Chief, Division of Migratory Bird pursuant to the Congressional Review waterfowl as it relates to the Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Act, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). development and selection of the Service, ms MBSP–4107–ARLSQ, 1849 regulatory packages for the 2010–11 List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. regular waterfowl seasons. Radio, Radio broadcasting. You may inspect comments during On July 29, 2010, we published in the normal business hours at the Service’s Federal Register (75 FR 44856) a third Federal Communications Commission. office in room 4107, 4501 N. Fairfax Deborah A. Dupont, document specifically dealing with the Drive, Arlington, Virginia, or at http:// proposed frameworks for early-season Senior Counsel, Allocations, Audio Division, www.regulations.gov at Docket No. Media Bureau. regulations. We published the proposed FWS–R9–MB–2010–0040. frameworks for late-season regulations Final Rules FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (primarily hunting seasons that start Robert Blohm, Chief, or Ron W. Kokel, ■ For the reasons discussed in the after October 1 and most waterfowl Division of Migratory Bird Management, preamble, the Federal Communications seasons not already established) in an U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (703) Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as August 25, 2010, Federal Register. 358–1714. follows: This document is the fifth in a series SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of proposed, supplemental, and final PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST rulemaking documents. It establishes Regulations Schedule for 2010 SERVICES final frameworks from which States may On May 13, 2010, we published in the select season dates, shooting hours, and ■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 Federal Register (75 FR 27144) a daily bag and possession limits for the continues to read as follows: proposal to amend 50 CFR part 20. The 2010–11 season. These selections will Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. proposal provided a background and be published in the Federal Register as

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52874 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

amendments to §§ 20.101 through has been a longstanding example of declines in productivity and ongoing 20.107, and § 20.109 of title 50 CFR part State-Federal cooperative management mortality. 20. since its establishment in 1952. Fortunately, waterfowl management However, as always, we continue to has a rich and successful history of Review of Public Comments seek new ways to streamline and monitoring and assessment programs The preliminary proposed improve the process. which provide annual updates on the rulemaking, which appeared in the May Regarding the use of abbreviated status and health of waterfowl 13 Federal Register, opened the public public comment periods for these rules, populations. Programs such as the May comment period for migratory game bird the rulemaking process for migratory aerial breeding population survey, the hunting regulations. We have game bird hunting must, by its nature, continental bird banding program, the considered all pertinent comments operate under severe time constraints. mid-winter waterfowl surveys, and the received. Comments are summarized However, we intend that the public be hunter harvest surveys, among others, below and numbered in the order used given the greatest possible opportunity all provide important pieces of in the May 13 proposed rule. We have to comment. Thus, when the information on the population status, included only the numbered items preliminary proposed rulemaking was productivity, and distribution of pertaining to early-season issues for published in May, we established what important waterfowl species. These data which we received comments. we believed were the longest periods are integral in the process of Consequently, the issues do not follow possible for public comment. In doing establishing hunting regulations for in successive numerical or alphabetical this, we recognized that when the waterfowl and other migratory game order. We received recommendations comment period closed, time would be birds. Through the Adaptive Harvest from all Flyway Councils. Some of the essence. Any delays in either Management process we currently recommendations supported extending public comment periods or in utilize to establish waterfowl seasons, continuation of last year’s frameworks. the effective date of these regulations and other associated species-specific Due to the comprehensive nature of the after this final rulemaking would harvest strategies, monitoring and Councils’ annual review of the seriously compromise the States assessment data are explicitly linked to frameworks, we assume Council support abilities to implement these decisions. regulatory decision making, ensuring for continuation of last year’s States would have insufficient time to that appropriate regulatory actions will frameworks for items for which we select season dates and limits; to be taken if warranted by changes in received no recommendation. Council continental population status. communicate those selections to us; and recommendations for changes are Therefore, from both a National and to establish and publicize the necessary summarized below. Flyway harvest-management regulations and procedures to perspective, we intend to respond to the General implement their decisions. Deepwater Horizon oil spill as we Written Comments: Several individual Regarding the Deepwater Horizon oil would any other non-hunting factor commenters protested the entire spill, the release of oil into the Gulf of with potentially substantial effects on migratory bird hunting regulations Mexico following the explosion and mortality or reproduction (e.g., process, the killing of all migratory sinking of the Deepwater Horizon hurricane, disease, prairie drought, birds, the Flyway Council process and mobile offshore drilling unit and habitat loss), by monitoring abundance the abbreviated public comment periods impacts to Gulf wetlands and wildlife and vital rates of waterfowl and other associated with these rules. has led to concerns about the potential migratory game birds and adjusting The Animal Legal Defense Fund for increased mortality in waterfowl and harvest regulations as needed on the (ALDF) urged us to reduce bag limits other migratory game birds, particularly basis of existing harvest strategies. We and institute a hunting moratorium for in the fall and winter when local believe this is the most prudent course those species potentially affected by the populations increase. This potential for of action, and further, firmly believe Deepwater Horizon oil spill. increased mortality of migrating and that our existing monitoring and Service Response: Our long-term wintering game birds has led to further assessment programs are sufficient to objectives continue to include providing questions regarding the need to impose help safeguard the long-term opportunities to harvest portions of precautionary regulatory restrictions in conservation of any potentially-affected certain migratory game bird populations anticipation of increased spill-related waterfowl or other migratory game and to limit harvests to levels mortality. However, it is important to birds. compatible with each population’s remember that waterfowl migration and Recently obtained results of annual ability to maintain healthy, viable habitat use are highly variable from year spring waterfowl population surveys numbers. Having taken into account the to year, not only at the Flyway level but indicate that population sizes of most zones of temperature and the at regional and local levels, and duck species and breeding habitat distribution, abundance, economic dependent on any number of conditions are good this year. While we value, breeding habits, and times and environmental factors. It is also believe that regulatory restrictions are lines of flight of migratory birds, we important to recognize that populations currently unnecessary, we remain very believe that the hunting seasons of many species of North American concerned about both the short and provided herein are compatible with the waterfowl naturally undergo large long-term impacts of the oil spill on current status of migratory bird population fluctuations in response to migratory birds, their habitats, and the populations and long-term population variability in breeding habitat resources upon which birds depend. goals. Additionally, we are obligated to, conditions across their range, especially There remains considerable uncertainty and do, give serious consideration to all within the important prairie-parkland regarding the short-term and long-term information received as public region. In fact, during the drought- impacts this spill will have on comment. While there are problems stricken years of the 1980s and early waterfowl and other migratory game inherent with any type of representative 1990s, many North American waterfowl birds that utilize the impacted region management of public-trust resources, species declined to population sizes less during all or part of their annual life we believe that the Flyway-Council than one-half those recently cycle. We have been heavily engaged in system of migratory bird management experienced as a result of natural the immediate response to the BP oil

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52875

spill. The intent of these efforts is to 1. Ducks the upcoming winter flyway meetings. document and minimize impacts to Categories used to discuss issues The intent of this review would be to natural resources including migratory related to duck harvest management are: summarize historical analyses and birds and their habitats. Large-scale (A) General Harvest Strategy; (B) dialogue regarding the issue of early- efforts to influence bird migration and Regulatory Alternatives, including season teal harvest opportunities in distribution at the flyway-level are specification of framework dates, season production States and provide a likely fruitless given the importance of lengths, and bag limits; (C) Zones and common understanding of the issues weather and photoperiod on the timing Split Seasons; and (D) Special Seasons/ that would have to be reconsidered to and speed of bird migrations. It is Species Management. The categories fully address the Mississippi Flyway possible that re-distribution of birds at correspond to previously published Council’s recommendation. With this smaller scales could help reduce some issues/discussions, and only those information, the Flyways could more oil exposure. Working with containing substantial recommendations fully assess how they may want to conservation partners, we are preparing are discussed below. approach teal harvest opportunities for to implement a range of on-the-ground their States in the future, following D. Special Seasons/Species Management habitat conservation or management completion of the current teal measures near the oil-impact area i. Special Teal Seasons assessment. intended to minimize the entrance of oil Council Recommendations: The Regarding the regulations for this into managed habitats along the Gulf Upper-Region Regulations Committee of year, utilizing the criteria developed for and to enhance the availability of food the Mississippi Flyway Council the teal season harvest strategy, this resources outside the oil impact area. recommended that the Service explore year’s estimate of 6.3 million blue- The provision of additional, reliable options for providing production States winged teal from the traditional survey food sources could also help buffer an opportunity to harvest teal outside area indicates that a 16-day September against the worst-case scenario of an the regular duck season frameworks as teal season in the Atlantic, Central, and early winter in northern portions of the part of the teal season assessment that Mississippi Flyways is appropriate for Mississippi and Central Flyways and is currently being conducted. 2010. dry habitat conditions in the northern Service Response: Last year, we noted 4. Canada Geese Mississippi Alluvial Valley that would that an assessment of the cumulative result in large wintering waterfowl effects of all teal harvest, including A. Special Seasons populations along the Gulf Coast. We harvest during special September Council Recommendations: The are working with partners to determine seasons, had never been conducted. As Mississippi Flyway Council what portion of these projects should be such, we committed to a thorough recommended that the closing date for available as ‘‘sanctuary’’ (areas closed to assessment of the harvest potential for the September Canada goose season in hunting) to encourage bird use of these both blue-winged and green-winged Minnesota be September 22 Statewide. areas and minimize redistribution due teal, as well as an assessment of the The Central Flyway Council to disturbance. impacts of current special September recommended that we increase the daily Simultaneous with immediate seasons on these two species. We bag limit framework from 5 to 8 for the response efforts, we are also working requested that the Atlantic, Mississippi, Central Flyway States of South Dakota, with partners to assess potential and Central Flyway Councils designate Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma during the Special Early Canada Goose hunting pathways for long-term acute and sub- representatives to assist Service staff season. lethal effects of the BP oil spill on the with the technical aspects of these Service Response: We agree with the full suite of migratory birds utilizing assessments. Our goal is to complete Mississippi Flyway Council’s Gulf (or other impacted) habitats during this important assessment work within 3 years. recommendation to extend Minnesota’s some portion of their life cycle. Effects The Mississippi Flyway Council’s framework closing date for their may result from direct exposure of birds request to include an assessment of September Canada goose season to to oil or to the long-term accumulation potential teal harvest opportunities for September 22. In 2007, Minnesota began of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or production States in the ongoing teal a 3-year experiment to assess the other toxins at levels sufficient to cause assessment, and the additional work proportion of migrant geese harvested physiological disorders impacting associated with this request, would during September 16–22 in the productivity or survival. The intent of likely delay the completion of our Northwest Goose Zone. The remainder this assessment is to assist in identifying original task. As we noted above, the of Minnesota already has an operational potential mitigation and conservation original purpose of this assessment was September goose season that extends measures as well as long-term to assess the harvest potential of the from September 1 through 22. Results monitoring and assessment needs for three teal species. The Council’s request from the 3-year experimental season migratory birds. would entail not only an evaluation of evaluation showed that migrant geese Regardless of the eventual impact of the potential effects of production comprised 7 percent of the Canada the BP oil spill on migratory game birds, States’ teal harvest on those species, but goose harvest in the Northwest Goose we recognize the importance of working the possibility of impacts to nontarget Zone during September 16–22, below with the States as well as other species as well. However, we the 10 percent threshold level governmental and non-governmental understand the production States’ established by the Service for allowing conservation partners to ensure that concern about teal harvest special early Canada goose seasons. This reasonable and science-based measures opportunities. Therefore, we will result is consistent with the proportion are implemented in the face of the compile information and analyses from of migrant geese harvested in other areas ongoing crisis in the Gulf, and that the historic reports that address teal seasons of Minnesota (< 5 percent) during rationale for decisions regarding harvest and, particularly, issues related to duck September 16–22. Further, goose harvest regulations or other actions are clearly harvests from production and non- (an average of 1,369 additional geese) in communicated to the public. We will production States, and provide them to the Northwest Goose Zone during the continue to do so. the Flyways for consideration during experimental season extension

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52876 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(September 16–22) represents 1.5 formula using the 2007–09 3-year FR 49622, August 28, 2007). However, percent of the total Statewide September running average. the population inventory on which the season goose harvest. We note that the The Pacific Flyway Council LCRVP hunt plan is based was not Minnesota giant Canada goose recommended initiating a limited hunt completed that year. Thus, the Arizona population remains at high levels for Lower Colorado River Valley Game and Fish Department chose to not throughout the State with spring Population (LCRVP) of sandhill cranes conduct the hunt in 2007 and sought breeding population estimates averaging in Arizona with a goal of a limited approval from the Service again in 2008 313,425 over the past 5 years. Thus, we harvest of 9 cranes during the 2010–11 to begin conducting the hunt. We again concur with the Council that the season hunting season. Arizona will issue approved the limited hunt (73 FR extension in the Northwest Goose Zone permits to hunters and require 50678, August 27, 2008). However, due meets our special September Canada mandatory check-in of all harvested to complications encountered with the goose season criteria; allows for cranes. The Service previously proposed onset of this new season uniform, Statewide season dates in approved the hunt in 2007. falling within ongoing efforts to open Minnesota (September 1–22) in order to Service Response: In 2006, the new hunting seasons on federal simplify current hunting regulations; Management Plan for MCP sandhill National Wildlife Refuges, the and appears to have negligible impacts cranes was revised and endorsed by the experimental limited hunt season was on migrant Canada geese. Central, Mississippi, and Pacific Flyway not opened in 2008. As such, last year We also agree with the Central Flyway Councils. Guidelines in the Plan the State of Arizona requested that Council’s request to increase the Canada recommended that the MCP continue to 2009–12 be designated as the new goose daily bag limit in South Dakota, be managed as a single population and experimental season and designated an Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma. The management at a smaller scale (i.e., area under State control where the Special Early Canada Goose hunting breeding affiliation or subpopulation experimental hunt will be conducted. season is generally designed to reduce level) was not warranted at that time. Given that the LCRVP survey results or control overabundant resident We note that the Plan clearly recognized indicate an increase from 1,900 birds in Canada geese populations. Increasing sandhill cranes breeding and staging in 1998 to 2,264 birds in 2009, and that the the daily bag limit from 5 to 8 may help NW Minnesota as part of the mid- 3-year average of 2,847 LCRVP cranes is these States reduce or control existing continent population. Further, the above the population objective of 2,500, high populations of resident Canada current population index for MCP we continue to support the geese. cranes was 498,400 in 2009, above the establishment of the 3-year current population objective range of experimental framework for this hunt, B. Regular Seasons 349,000–472,000 cranes. As the conditional on successful monitoring Council Recommendations: The proposed new hunt in northwest being conducted as called for in the Mississippi Flyway Council Minnesota would conform to guidelines Flyway hunt plan for this population. recommended that the framework from the Management Plan and sandhill Our final environmental assessment opening date for all species of geese for crane hunting frameworks to be (FEA) on this new hunt can be obtained the regular goose seasons in Michigan established for MCP cranes in the by writing Robert Trost, Pacific Flyway and Wisconsin be September 16, 2010. Mississippi Flyway, we agree with the Representative, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Response: We concur. Councils’ recommendations to establish Service, Division of Migratory Bird Michigan, beginning in 1998, and this new season. Based on sandhill management, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Wisconsin, beginning in 1989, have crane hunter numbers and harvest in Portland, OR 97232–4181, or it may be opened their regular Canada goose other States in the Central Flyway, the viewed at http://www.regulations.gov at seasons prior to the Flyway-wide small size of the hunting zone proposed Docket No. FWS–R9–MB–2010–0040 or framework opening date to address in Minnesota, and the low hunter via the Service’s home page at http:// resident goose management concerns in density in this region of Minnesota, we www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/ these States. As we have previously expect hunter numbers and crane CurrentBirdIssues/Management/ stated (73 FR 50678, August 27, 2008), harvest to be relatively low (< 500 of BirdManagement.html. we agree with the objective to increase each). harvest pressure on resident Canada We also agree with the Councils’ 14. Woodcock geese in the Mississippi Flyway and recommendations on the RMP sandhill Council Recommendations: The will continue to consider the opening crane harvest allocation of 1,939 birds Atlantic and Mississippi Flyway dates in both States as exceptions to the for the 2010–11 season, as outlined in Councils recommended adoption of the general Flyway opening date, to be the RMP sandhill crane management Interim American Woodcock Harvest reconsidered annually. plan’s harvest allocation formula. The Strategy for implementation in the objective for the RMP sandhill crane is 2011–12 hunting season. 9. Sandhill Cranes to manage for a stable population index The Central Flyway Council Council Recommendations: The of 17,000–21,000 cranes determined by recommended that the interim harvest Mississippi, Central, and Pacific Flyway an average of the three most recent, strategy outlined in the Draft American Councils recommended a sandhill crane reliable September (fall pre-migration) Woodcock Harvest Strategy be hunting season for mid-continent surveys. While this year’s survey implemented for a period of 5 years sandhill cranes in northwest Minnesota counted 20,321 birds, a decrease from (2011–15). in 2010, following guidelines outlined the previous year’s count of 21,156 Written Comments: The Wisconsin in the 2006 Cooperative Management birds, the 3-year average for the RMP Department of Natural Resources Plan for the Mid-Continent Population sandhill crane fall index is 21,433. supported the interim woodcock harvest (MCP) of sandhill cranes. Regarding the proposed limited hunt strategy. The Central and Pacific Flyway for LCRVP cranes in the Arizona hunt, Service Response: In 2008, we Councils recommend using the 2010 in 2007, the Pacific Flyway Council completed a review of available Rocky Mountain Population (RMP) recommended, and we approved, the woodcock population databases to sandhill crane harvest allocation of establishment of a limited hunt for the assess their utility for developing a 1,979 birds as proposed in the allocation LCRVP sandhill cranes in Arizona (72 woodcock harvest strategy.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52877

Concurrently, we requested that the The Mississippi and Central Flyway Regulations Permitting the Sport Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Councils recommend the use of the Hunting of Migratory Birds (FSES 88– Flyway Councils appoint members to a standard (or ‘‘moderate’’) season package 14),’’ filed with the Environmental working group to cooperate with us on of a 15-bird daily bag limit and a 70-day Protection Agency on June 9, 1988. We developing a woodcock harvest strategy. season for the 2010–11 mourning dove published a notice of availability in the In February 2010, the working group season in the States within the Central Federal Register on June 16, 1988 (53 completed a draft interim harvest Management Unit. FR 22582). We published our Record of strategy for consideration by the Flyway The Pacific Flyway Council Decision on August 18, 1988 (53 FR Councils at their March 2010 meetings. recommended use of the ‘‘moderate’’ 31341). In addition, an August 1985 The working group’s draft interim season framework for States in the environmental assessment entitled harvest strategy provides a transparent Western Management Unit (WMU) ‘‘Guidelines for Migratory Bird Hunting framework for making regulatory population of mourning doves, which Regulations on Federal Indian decisions for woodcock season length represents no change from last year’s Reservations and Ceded Lands’’ is and bag limit while we work to improve frameworks. available from the address indicated Service Response: In 2008, we monitoring and assessment protocols for under the caption ADDRESSES. accepted and endorsed the interim this species. While the strategy’s In a notice published in the objective is to set woodcock harvest at harvest strategies for the Central, Eastern, and Western Management Units September 8, 2005, Federal Register (70 a level commensurate with population, FR 53376), we announced our intent to data limitations preclude accurately (73 FR 50678, August 27, 2008). As we stated then, the interim mourning dove develop a new Supplemental assessing harvest potential at this time. Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Thus, the strategy’s thresholds for harvest strategies are a step towards implementing the Mourning Dove for the migratory bird hunting program. changing regulations are based on the National Strategic Harvest Plan (Plan) Public scoping meetings were held in premise that further population declines that was approved by all four Flyway the spring of 2006, as detailed in a would result in decreased harvest, while Councils in 2003. The Plan represents a March 9, 2006, Federal Register (71 FR population increases would allow for new, more informed means of decision- 12216). We released the draft SEIS on additional harvest. The working group making for dove harvest management July 9, 2010 (75 FR 39577). The draft recommended that the interim harvest besides relying solely on traditional SEIS is available by either writing to the strategy be implemented for the 2011– roadside counts of mourning doves as address indicated under ADDRESSES or 12 hunting season, that the Service and indicators of population trend. by viewing on our Web site at http:// Flyway Councils evaluate the strategy However, recognizing that a more www.fws.gov/migratorybirds. after 5 years, and that we continue to comprehensive, national approach assess the feasibility of developing a would take time to develop, we Endangered Species Act Consideration derived harvest strategy. requested the development of interim In the May 13 Federal Register, we Section 7 of the Endangered Species harvest strategies, by management unit, Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531–1543; stated that following review and until the elements of the Plan can be comment by the Flyway Councils, we 87 Stat. 884), provides that, ‘‘The fully implemented. In 2004, each Secretary shall review other programs would announce our intentions whether management unit submitted its administered by him and utilize such to propose the draft strategy. Given the respective strategy, but the strategies programs in furtherance of the purposes unanimous Flyway Council approval of used different datasets and different of this Act’’ (and) shall ‘‘insure that any the working group’s draft interim approaches or methods. After initial action authorized, funded, or carried out harvest strategy, we concurred with the submittal and review in 2006, we * * * is not likely to jeopardize the three Flyway Councils and proposed requested that the strategies be revised, adoption of the strategy in the July 29 using similar, existing datasets among continued existence of any endangered Federal Register beginning in the 2011– the management units along with species or threatened species or result in 12 hunting season for a period of 5 years similar decision-making criteria. In the destruction or adverse modification (2011–15). Based on public comment, January 2008, we recommended that, of [critical] habitat. * * *.’’ we see no reason not to formally following approval by the respective Consequently, we conducted formal complete the adoption of the new Flyway Councils in March, they be consultations to ensure that actions interim harvest strategy. Thus, we plan submitted in 2008 for endorsement by resulting from these regulations would to implement the strategy beginning the Service, with implementation for the not likely jeopardize the continued with the 2011–12 hunting season. 2009–10 hunting season. Last year, for existence of endangered or threatened Specifics of the interim harvest strategy the first time, the interim harvest species or result in the destruction or can be found at http://www.fws.gov/ strategies were successfully employed adverse modification of their critical migratorybirds/ and implemented in all three habitat. Findings from these NewsPublicationsReports.html. Management Units (74 FR 36870, July consultations are included in a biological opinion, which concluded 16. Mourning Doves 24, 2009). This year, based on the interim harvest strategies and current that the regulations are not likely to Council Recommendations: The population status, we agree with the jeopardize the continued existence of Atlantic and Mississippi Flyway recommended selection of the any endangered or threatened species. Councils recommended use of the ‘‘moderate’’ season frameworks for doves Additionally, these findings may have ‘‘moderate’’ season framework for States in the Eastern, Central, and Western caused modification of some regulatory within the Eastern Management Unit Management Units. measures previously proposed, and the population of mourning doves resulting final frameworks reflect any such in a 70-day season and 15-bird daily bag NEPA Consideration modifications. Our biological opinions limit. The daily bag limit could be NEPA considerations are covered by resulting from this section 7 composed of mourning doves and the programmatic document ‘‘Final consultation are public documents white-winged doves, singly or in Supplemental Environmental Impact available for public inspection at the combination. Statement: Issuance of Annual address indicated under ADDRESSES.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52878 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Executive Order 12866 annually from 1990–95. In 1995, the person is not required to respond to a The Office of Management and Budget Service issued a Small Entity Flexibility collection of information unless it has determined that this rule is Analysis (Analysis), which was displays a currently valid OMB control significant and has reviewed this rule subsequently updated in 1996, 1998, number. 2004, and 2008. The primary source of under Executive Order 12866. OMB Unfunded Mandates Reform Act bases its determination of regulatory information about hunter expenditures We have determined and certify, in significance upon the following four for migratory game bird hunting is the compliance with the requirements of the criteria: (a) Whether the rule will have National Hunting and Fishing Survey, Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 an annual effect of $100 million or more which is conducted at 5-year intervals. The 2008 Analysis was based on the U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this rulemaking on the economy or adversely affect an 2006 National Hunting and Fishing will not impose a cost of $100 million economic sector, productivity, jobs, the Survey and the U.S. Department of or more in any given year on local or environment, or other units of the Commerce’s County Business Patterns, State government or private entities. government; (b) Whether the rule will from which it was estimated that Therefore, this rule is not a ‘‘significant create inconsistencies with other migratory bird hunters would spend regulatory action’’ under the Unfunded Federal agencies’ actions; (c) Whether approximately $1.2 billion at small Mandates Reform Act. the rule will materially affect businesses in 2008. Copies of the entitlements, grants, user fees, loan Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order Analysis are available upon request programs, or the rights and obligations 12988 from the Division of Migratory Bird of their recipients; and (d) Whether the Management (see FOR FURTHER The Department has determined that rule raises novel legal or policy issues. INFORMATION CONTACT) or from our Web this rule will not unduly burden the An economic analysis was prepared site at http://www.fws.gov/ judicial system and that it meets the for the 2008–09 season. This analysis migratorybirds/ requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) was based on data from the 2006 NewReportsPublications/SpecialTopics/ of Executive Order 12988. National Hunting and Fishing Survey, SpecialTopics.html#HuntingRegs or at Takings Implication Assessment the most recent year for which data are http://www.regulations.gov at Docket available (see discussion in Regulatory No. FWS–R9–MB–2010–0040. In accordance with Executive Order Flexibility Act section below). This 12630, this rule, authorized by the analysis estimated consumer surplus for Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not three alternatives for duck hunting Fairness Act have significant takings implications (estimates for other species are not This rule is a major rule under 5 and does not affect any constitutionally quantified due to lack of data). The U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business protected property rights. This rule will alternatives are (1) Issue restrictive Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. not result in the physical occupancy of regulations allowing fewer days than For the reasons outlined above, this rule property, the physical invasion of those issued during the 2007–08 season, has an annual effect on the economy of property, or the regulatory taking of any (2) Issue moderate regulations allowing $100 million or more. However, because property. In fact, these rules allow more days than those in alternative 1, this rule establishes hunting seasons, we hunters to exercise otherwise and (3) Issue liberal regulations do not plan to defer the effective date unavailable privileges and, therefore, identical to the regulations in the 2007– under the exemption contained in 5 reduce restrictions on the use of private 08 season. For the 2008–09 season, we U.S.C. 808(1). and public property. chose alternative 3, with an estimated consumer surplus across all flyways of Paperwork Reduction Act Energy Effects—Executive Order 13211 $205–$270 million. At this time, we are We examined these regulations under Executive Order 13211 requires proposing no changes to the season the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 agencies to prepare Statements of frameworks for the 2010–11 season, and (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The various Energy Effects when undertaking certain as such, we will again consider these recordkeeping and reporting actions. While this rule is a significant three alternatives. However, final requirements imposed under regulations regulatory action under Executive Order frameworks will depend on population established in 50 CFR part 20, subpart 12866, it is not expected to adversely status information available later this K, are utilized in the formulation of affect energy supplies, distribution, or year. For these reasons, we have not migratory game bird hunting use. Therefore, this action is not a conducted a new economic analysis, but regulations. Specifically, OMB has significant energy action and no the 2008–09 analysis is part of the approved the information collection Statement of Energy Effects is required. record for this rule and is available at requirements of our Migratory Bird Government-to-Government http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/ Surveys and assigned control number Relationship With Tribes NewReportsPublications/SpecialTopics/ 1018–0023 (expires 2/28/2011). This SpecialTopics.html#HuntingRegs or at information is used to provide a In accordance with the President’s http://www.regulations.gov at Docket sampling frame for voluntary national memorandum of April 29, 1994, No. FWS–R9–MB–2010–0040. surveys to improve our harvest ‘‘Government-to-Government Relations estimates for all migratory game birds in with Native American Tribal Regulatory Flexibility Act order to better manage these Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), Executive The regulations have a significant populations. OMB has also approved Order 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have economic impact on substantial the information collection requirements evaluated possible effects on Federally numbers of small entities under the of the Alaska Subsistence Household recognized Indian tribes and have Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Survey, an associated voluntary annual determined that there are no effects on et seq.). We analyzed the economic household survey used to determine Indian trust resources. However, in the impacts of the annual hunting levels of subsistence take in Alaska, and May 13 Federal Register, we solicited regulations on small business entities in assigned control number 1018–0124 proposals for special migratory bird detail as part of the 1981 cost-benefit (expires 4/30/2013). A Federal agency hunting regulations for certain Tribes on analysis. This analysis was revised may not conduct or sponsor and a Federal Indian reservations, off-

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52879

reservation trust lands, and ceded lands Administrative Procedure Act, and Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, for the 2010–11 migratory bird hunting these frameworks will, therefore, take Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, season. The resulting proposals were effect immediately upon publication. Tennessee, and Wisconsin. contained in a separate proposed rule Therefore, under authority of the Central Flyway—includes Colorado (75 FR 47682). By virtue of these Migratory Bird Treaty Act (July 3, 1918), (east of the Continental Divide), Kansas, actions, we have consulted with Tribes as amended (16 U.S.C. 703–711), we Montana (Counties of Blaine, Carbon, affected by this rule. prescribe final frameworks setting forth Fergus, Judith Basin, Stillwater, the species to be hunted, the daily bag Sweetgrass, Wheatland, and all counties Federalism Effects and possession limits, the shooting east thereof), Nebraska, New Mexico Due to the migratory nature of certain hours, the season lengths, the earliest (east of the Continental Divide except species of birds, the Federal opening and latest closing season dates, the Jicarilla Apache Indian Reservation), Government has been given and hunting areas, from which State North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, responsibility over these species by the conservation agency officials will select Texas, and Wyoming (east of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually hunting season dates and other options. Continental Divide). prescribe frameworks from which the Upon receipt of season selections from Pacific Flyway—includes Alaska, States make selections regarding the these officials, we will publish a final Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, hunting of migratory birds, and we rulemaking amending 50 CFR part 20 to Oregon, Utah, Washington, and those employ guidelines to establish special reflect seasons, limits, and shooting portions of Colorado, Montana, New regulations on Federal Indian hours for the conterminous United Mexico, and Wyoming not included in reservations and ceded lands. This States for the 2010–11 season. the Central Flyway. process preserves the ability of the States and Tribes to determine which List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20 Management Units seasons meet their individual needs. Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting Mourning Dove Management Units: Any State or Indian Tribe may be more and recordkeeping requirements, Eastern Management Unit—All States restrictive than the Federal frameworks Transportation, Wildlife. east of the , and at any time. The frameworks are The rules that eventually will be Louisiana. developed in a cooperative process with promulgated for the 2010–11 hunting Central Management Unit—Arkansas, the States and the Flyway Councils. season are authorized under 16 U.S.C. Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, This process allows States to participate 703–712 and 16 U.S.C. 742a–j. Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New in the development of frameworks from Dated: August 18, 2010. Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South which they will make selections, Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. Thomas L. Strickland, thereby having an influence on their Western Management Unit—Arizona, own regulations. These rules do not Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Parks. have a substantial direct effect on fiscal and Washington. capacity, change the roles or Final Regulations Frameworks for Woodcock Management Regions: responsibilities of Federal or State 2010–11 Early Hunting Seasons on Eastern Management Region— governments, or intrude on State policy Certain Migratory Game Birds Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, or administration. Therefore, in Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New accordance with Executive Order 13132, Act and delegated authorities, the Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, these regulations do not have significant Department of the Interior approved the North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode federalism effects and do not have following frameworks, which prescribe Island, South Carolina, Vermont, sufficient federalism implications to season lengths, bag limits, shooting Virginia, and West Virginia. warrant the preparation of a Federalism hours, and outside dates within which Central Management Region— Assessment. States may select hunting seasons for Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Regulations Promulgation certain migratory game birds between Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, September 1, 2010, and March 10, 2011. Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, The rulemaking process for migratory Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, game bird hunting must, by its nature, General Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, operate under severe time constraints. Dates: All outside dates noted below Texas, and Wisconsin. However, we intend that the public be are inclusive. Other geographic descriptions are given the greatest possible opportunity Shooting and Hawking (taking by contained in a later portion of this to comment. Thus, when the falconry) Hours: Unless otherwise document. preliminary proposed rulemaking was specified, from one-half hour before Definitions published, we established what we sunrise to sunset daily. believed were the longest periods Possession Limits: Unless otherwise Dark geese: Canada geese, white- possible for public comment. In doing specified, possession limits are twice fronted geese, brant (except in Alaska, this, we recognized that when the the daily bag limit. California, Oregon, Washington, and the comment period closed, time would be Atlantic Flyway), and all other goose of the essence. That is, if there were a Flyways and Management Units species, except light geese. delay in the effective date of these Waterfowl Flyways: Light geese: snow (including blue) regulations after this final rulemaking, Atlantic Flyway—includes geese and Ross’s geese. States would have insufficient time to Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Waterfowl Seasons in the Atlantic select season dates and limits; to Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Flyway communicate those selections to us; and Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, to establish and publicize the necessary North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode In the Atlantic Flyway States of regulations and procedures to Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, implement their decisions. We therefore Virginia, and West Virginia. Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, find that ‘‘good cause’’ exists, within the Mississippi Flyway—includes North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and terms of 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) of the Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Virginia, where Sunday hunting is

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52880 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

prohibited Statewide by State law, all regular duck seasons. The days must be areas under the hunting regulations Sundays are closed to all take of held outside any regular duck season on adopted by the respective States. migratory waterfowl (including a weekend, holidays, or other non- Special Early Canada Goose Seasons mergansers and coots). school days when youth hunters would have the maximum opportunity to Atlantic Flyway Special September Teal Season participate. The days may be held up to General Seasons Outside Dates: Between September 1 14 days before or after any regular duck- and September 30, an open season on season frameworks or within any split Canada goose seasons of up to 15 days all species of teal may be selected by the of a regular duck season, or within any during September 1–15 may be selected following States in areas delineated by other open season on migratory birds. for the Eastern Unit of Maryland and State regulations: Daily Bag Limits: The daily bag limits Delaware. Seasons not to exceed 30 days Atlantic Flyway—Delaware, Florida, may include ducks, geese, mergansers, during September 1–30 may be selected Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, coots, moorhens, and gallinules and for Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, New South Carolina, and Virginia. would be the same as those allowed in Jersey, New York ( Zone Mississippi Flyway—Alabama, the regular season. Flyway species and only), North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, area restrictions would remain in effect. South Carolina. Seasons may not exceed Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Shooting Hours: One-half hour before 25 days during September 1–25 in the and Tennessee. sunrise to sunset. remainder of the Flyway. Areas open to Central Flyway—Colorado (part), Participation Restrictions: Youth the hunting of Canada geese must be Kansas, Nebraska (part), New Mexico hunters must be 15 years of age or described, delineated, and designated as (part), Oklahoma, and Texas. younger. In addition, an adult at least 18 such in each State’s hunting regulations. Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag years of age must accompany the youth Daily Bag Limits: Not to exceed 15 Limits: Not to exceed 16 consecutive hunter into the field. This adult may not Canada geese. hunting days in the Atlantic, duck hunt but may participate in other Mississippi, and Central Flyways. The Experimental Seasons seasons that are open on the special daily bag limit is 4 teal. youth day. Canada goose seasons of up to 10 days Shooting Hours: during September 16–25 may be Atlantic Flyway—One-half hour Scoter, Eider, and Long-tailed Ducks selected in Delaware. The daily bag before sunrise to sunset, except in (Atlantic Flyway) limit may not exceed 15 Canada geese. Maryland, where the hours are from Outside Dates: Between September 15 Areas open to the hunting of Canada sunrise to sunset. and January 31. geese must be described, delineated, Mississippi and Central Flyways— and designated as such in each State’s One-half hour before sunrise to sunset, Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag Limits: Not to exceed 107 days, with a hunting regulations. except in the States of Arkansas, Shooting Hours: One-half hour before Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, and Ohio, daily bag limit of 7, singly or in the aggregate, of the listed sea-duck species, sunrise to sunset, except that during any where the hours are from sunrise to general season, shooting hours may sunset. of which no more than 4 may be scoters. Daily Bag Limits During the Regular extend to one-half hour after sunset if Special September Duck Seasons Duck Season: Within the special sea all other waterfowl seasons are closed in the specific applicable area. Florida, Kentucky and Tennessee: In duck areas, during the regular duck lieu of a special September teal season, season in the Atlantic Flyway, States Mississippi Flyway may choose to allow the above sea duck a 5-consecutive-day season may be General Seasons selected in September. The daily bag limits in addition to the limits applying limit may not exceed 4 teal and wood to other ducks during the regular duck Canada goose seasons of up to 15 days ducks in the aggregate, of which no season. In all other areas, sea ducks may during September 1–15 may be selected, more than 2 may be wood ducks. be taken only during the regular open except in the Upper Peninsula in Iowa: Iowa may hold up to 5 days of season for ducks and are part of the Michigan, where the season may not its regular duck hunting season in regular duck season daily bag (not to extend beyond September 10, and in September. All ducks that are legal exceed 4 scoters) and possession limits. Minnesota, where a season of up to 22 during the regular duck season may be Areas: In all coastal waters and all days during September 1–22 may be taken during the September segment of waters of rivers and streams seaward selected. The daily bag limit may not the season. The September season from the first upstream bridge in Maine, exceed 5 Canada geese. Areas open to segment may commence no earlier than New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode the hunting of Canada geese must be the Saturday nearest September 20 Island, Connecticut, and New York; in described, delineated, and designated as (September 18). The daily bag and any waters of the Atlantic Ocean and in such in each State’s hunting regulations. possession limits will be the same as any tidal waters of any bay which are A Canada goose season of up to 10 those in effect last year but are subject separated by at least 1 mile of open consecutive days during September 1– to change during the late-season water from any shore, island, and 10 may be selected by Michigan for regulations process. The remainder of emergent vegetation in New Jersey, Huron, Saginaw, and Tuscola Counties, the regular duck season may not begin South Carolina, and Georgia; and in any except that the Shiawassee National before October 10. waters of the Atlantic Ocean and in any Wildlife Refuge, Shiawassee River State tidal waters of any bay which are Game Area Refuge, and the Fish Point Special Youth Waterfowl Hunting Days separated by at least 800 yards of open Wildlife Area Refuge will remain Outside Dates: States may select 2 water from any shore, island, and closed. The daily bag limit may not consecutive days (hunting days in emergent vegetation in Delaware, exceed 5 Canada geese. Atlantic Flyway States with Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia; Shooting Hours: One-half hour before compensatory days) per duck-hunting and provided that any such areas have sunrise to sunset, except that during zone, designated as ‘‘Youth Waterfowl been described, delineated, and September 1–15 shooting hours may Hunting Days,’’ in addition to their designated as special sea-duck hunting extend to one-half hour after sunset if

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52881

all other waterfowl seasons are closed in Regular Goose Seasons provisions of seasons must be consistent the specific applicable area. Regular goose seasons may open as with the management plan and approved by the Central and Pacific Central Flyway early as September 16 in Wisconsin and Michigan. Season lengths, bag and Flyway Councils, with the following General Seasons possession limits, and other provisions exceptions: In Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, will be established during the late- A. In Utah, 100 percent of the harvest South Dakota, and Texas, Canada goose season regulations process. will be assigned to the RMP quota; seasons of up to 30 days during B. In Arizona, monitoring the racial Sandhill Cranes September 1–30 may be selected. In composition of the harvest must be Colorado, New Mexico, North Dakota, Regular Seasons in the Mississippi conducted at 3-year intervals; C. In Idaho, 100 percent of the harvest Montana, and Wyoming, Canada goose Flyway: will be assigned to the RMP quota; and seasons of up to 15 days during Outside Dates: Between September 1 D. In New Mexico, the season in the September 1–15 may be selected. The and February 28. Estancia Valley is experimental, with a daily bag limit may not exceed 5 Canada Hunting Seasons: A season not to requirement to monitor the level and geese, except in Kansas, Nebraska, exceed 37 consecutive days may be racial composition of the harvest; Oklahoma, and South Dakota, where the selected in the designated portion of greater sandhill cranes in the harvest bag limit may not exceed 8 Canada northwestern Minnesota (Northwest will be assigned to the RMP quota. geese. Areas open to the hunting of Goose Zone). Special Seasons in the Pacific Flyway: Daily Bag Limit: 2 sandhill cranes. Canada geese must be described, Arizona may select a season for Permits: Each person participating in delineated, and designated as such in hunting sandhill cranes within the the regular sandhill crane season must each State’s hunting regulations. range of the Lower Colorado River Shooting Hours: One-half hour before have a valid Federal or State sandhill Population (LCR) of sandhill cranes, sunrise to sunset, except that during crane hunting permit. subject to the following conditions: Regular Seasons in the Central September 1–15 shooting hours may Outside Dates: Between December 1 Flyway: extend to one-half hour after sunset if and January 31. Outside Dates: Between September 1 all other waterfowl seasons are closed in Hunting Seasons: The season may not and February 28. the specific applicable area. exceed 3 days. Hunting Seasons: Seasons not to Pacific Flyway Bag limits: Not to exceed 1 per season. exceed 37 consecutive days may be Permits: Participants must have a General Seasons selected in designated portions of North valid permit, issued by the appropriate California may select a 9-day season Dakota (Area 2) and Texas (Area 2). State, in their possession while hunting. in Humboldt County during the period Seasons not to exceed 58 consecutive Other provisions: The season is September 1–15. The daily bag limit is days may be selected in designated experimental. Numbers of permits, open 2. portions of the following States: areas, season dates, protection plans for Colorado may select a 9-day season Colorado, Kansas, Montana, North other species, and other provisions of during the period of September 1–15. Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. seasons must be consistent with the The daily bag limit is 3. Seasons not to exceed 93 consecutive management plan and approved by the Oregon may select a special Canada days may be selected in designated Pacific Flyway Council. goose season of up to 15 days during the portions of the following States: New period September 1–15. In addition, in Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Common Moorhens and Purple the NW Goose Management Zone in Daily Bag Limits: 3 sandhill cranes, Gallinules Oregon, a 15-day season may be selected except 2 sandhill cranes in designated Outside Dates: Between September 1 during the period September 1–20. portions of North Dakota (Area 2) and and the last Sunday in January (January Daily bag limits may not exceed 5 Texas (Area 2). 30) in the Atlantic, Mississippi, and Canada geese. Permits: Each person participating in Central Flyways. States in the Pacific Idaho may select a 7-day season the regular sandhill crane season must Flyway have been allowed to select during the period September 1–15. The have a valid Federal or State sandhill their hunting seasons between the daily bag limit is 2, and the possession crane hunting permit. outside dates for the season on ducks; limit is 4. Special Seasons in the Central and therefore, they are late-season Washington may select a special Pacific Flyways: frameworks, and no frameworks are Canada goose season of up to 15 days Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, provided in this document. during the period September 1–15. New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming may Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag Daily bag limits may not exceed 5 select seasons for hunting sandhill Limits: Seasons may not exceed 70 days Canada geese. cranes within the range of the Rocky in the Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Wyoming may select an 8-day season Mountain Population (RMP) subject to Flyways. Seasons may be split into 2 on Canada geese during the period the following conditions: segments. The daily bag limit is 15 September 1–15. This season is subject Outside Dates: Between September 1 common moorhens and purple to the following conditions: and January 31. gallinules, singly or in the aggregate of A. Where applicable, the season must Hunting Seasons: The season in any the two species. be concurrent with the September State or zone may not exceed 30 days. Zoning: Seasons may be selected by portion of the sandhill crane season. Bag limits: Not to exceed 3 daily and zones established for duck hunting. B. A daily bag limit of 2, with season 9 per season. and possession limits of 4, will apply to Permits: Participants must have a Rails the special season. valid permit, issued by the appropriate Outside Dates: States included herein Areas open to hunting of Canada State, in their possession while hunting. may select seasons between September geese in each State must be described, Other provisions: Numbers of permits, 1 and the last Sunday in January delineated, and designated as such in open areas, season dates, protection (January 30) on clapper, king, sora, and each State’s hunting regulations. plans for other species, and other Virginia rails.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52882 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Hunting Seasons: Seasons may not Four-Corners States (Arizona, length, and shooting hours must be exceed 70 days, and may be split into Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah) uniform within each hunting zone. 2 segments. Outside Dates: Between September 1 Western Management Unit Daily Bag Limits: and November 30. Clapper and King Rails—In Rhode Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Limits: Not more than 30 consecutive Limits: Idaho, Oregon, and Washington—Not Delaware, and Maryland, 10, singly or days, with a daily bag limit of 5 band- more than 30 consecutive days, with a in the aggregate of the 2 species. In tailed pigeons. Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Zoning: New Mexico may select daily bag limit of 10 mourning doves. Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North hunting seasons not to exceed 20 Utah—Not more than 30 consecutive Carolina, and Virginia, 15, singly or in consecutive days in each of two zones. days, with a daily bag limit that may not the aggregate of the two species. The season in the South Zone may not exceed 10 mourning doves and white- Sora and Virginia Rails—In the open until October 1. winged doves in the aggregate. Atlantic, Mississippi, and Central Nevada—Not more than 30 Flyways and the Pacific-Flyway Mourning Doves consecutive days, with a daily bag limit portions of Colorado, Montana, New Outside Dates: Between September 1 of 10 mourning doves, except in Clark Mexico, and Wyoming, 25 daily and 25 and January 15, except as otherwise and Nye Counties, where the daily bag in possession, singly or in the aggregate provided, States may select hunting limit may not exceed 10 mourning and of the two species. The season is closed seasons and daily bag limits as follows: white-winged doves in the aggregate. in the remainder of the Pacific Flyway. Arizona and California—Not more Eastern Management Unit than 60 days, which may be split Common Snipe Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag between two periods, September 1–15 Outside Dates: Between September 1 Limits: Not more than 70 days, with a and November 1–January 15. In and February 28, except in Maine, daily bag limit of 15 mourning and Arizona, during the first segment of the Vermont, New Hampshire, white-winged doves in the aggregate. season, the daily bag limit is 10 Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Zoning and Split Seasons: States may mourning and white-winged doves in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, select hunting seasons in each of two the aggregate, of which no more than 6 Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia, zones. The season within each zone may may be white-winged doves. During the where the season must end no later than be split into not more than three remainder of the season, the daily bag January 31. periods. Regulations for bag and limit is 10 mourning doves. In Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag possession limits, season length, and California, the daily bag limit is 10 Limits: Seasons may not exceed 107 shooting hours must be uniform within mourning doves, except in Imperial, days and may be split into two specific hunting zones. Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, segments. The daily bag limit is 8 snipe. where the daily bag limit may not Zoning: Seasons may be selected by Central Management Unit exceed 10 mourning and white-winged zones established for duck hunting. Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag doves in the aggregate. Limits: Not more than 70 days, with a American Woodcock White-Winged and White-Tipped Doves daily bag limit of 15 mourning and Outside Dates: States in the Eastern white-winged doves in the aggregate. Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag Management Region may select hunting Zoning and Split Seasons: Limits: seasons between October 1 and January States may select hunting seasons in Except as shown below, seasons must 31. States in the Central Management each of two zones. The season within be concurrent with mourning dove Region may select hunting seasons each zone may be split into not more seasons. between the Saturday nearest September than three periods. Eastern Management Unit: The daily 22 (September 25) and January 31. Texas may select hunting seasons for bag limit may not exceed 15 mourning Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag each of three zones subject to the and white-winged doves in the Limits: Seasons may not exceed 30 days following conditions: aggregate. in the Eastern Region and 45 days in the A. The hunting season may be split Central Management Unit: Central Region. The daily bag limit is 3. into not more than two periods, except In Texas, the daily bag limit may not Seasons may be split into two segments. in that portion of Texas in which the exceed 15 mourning, white-winged, and Zoning: New Jersey may select special white-winged dove season is white-tipped doves in the aggregate, of seasons in each of two zones. The allowed, where a limited mourning which no more than 2 may be white- season in each zone may not exceed 24 dove season may be held concurrently tipped doves. In addition, Texas also days. with that special season (see white- may select a hunting season of not more Band-Tailed Pigeons winged dove frameworks). than 4 days for the special white-winged B. A season may be selected for the dove area of the South Zone between Pacific Coast States (California, Oregon, North and Central Zones between September 1 and September 19. The Washington, and Nevada) September 1 and January 25; and for the daily bag limit may not exceed 15 Outside Dates: Between September 15 South Zone between the Friday nearest white-winged, mourning, and white- and January 1. September 20 (September 17), but not tipped doves in the aggregate, of which Hunting Seasons and Daily Bag earlier than September 17, and January no more than 4 may be mourning doves Limits: Not more than 9 consecutive 25. and 2 may be white-tipped doves. days, with a daily bag limit of 2 band- C. Daily bag limits are aggregate bag In the remainder of the Central tailed pigeons. limits with mourning, white-winged, Management Unit, the daily bag limit Zoning: California may select hunting and white-tipped doves (see white- may not exceed 15 mourning and white- seasons not to exceed 9 consecutive winged dove frameworks for specific winged doves in the aggregate. days in each of two zones. The season daily bag limit restrictions). Western Management Unit: in the North Zone must close by October D. Except as noted above, regulations Arizona may select a hunting season 3. for bag and possession limits, season of not more than 30 consecutive days,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52883

running concurrently with the first C. In Units 6–B, 6–C and on Hunting Seasons: Not more than 65 segment of the mourning dove season. Hinchinbrook and Hawkins Islands in days (75 under the alternative) for The daily bag limit may not exceed 10 Unit 6–D, a special, permit-only Canada mourning doves. mourning and white-winged doves in goose season may be offered. Hunters Bag Limits: Not to exceed 15 (12 the aggregate, of which no more than 6 must have all harvested geese checked under the alternative) mourning doves. may be white-winged doves. and classified to subspecies. The daily Note: Mourning doves may be taken in In Utah, the Nevada Counties of Clark bag limit is 4 daily and 8 in possession. Hawaii in accordance with shooting hours and Nye, and in the California Counties The Canada goose season will close in and other regulations set by the State of of Imperial, Riverside, and San all of the permit areas if the total dusky Hawaii, and subject to the applicable Bernardino, the daily bag limit may not goose (as defined above) harvest reaches provisions of 50 CFR part 20. exceed 10 mourning and white-winged 40. Puerto Rico doves in the aggregate. D. In Units 9, 10, 17, and 18, dark In the remainder of the Western goose limits are 6 per day, 12 in Doves and Pigeons Management Unit, the season is closed. possession; however, no more than 2 Outside Dates: Between September 1 Alaska may be Canada geese in Units 9(E) and and January 15. 18; and no more than 4 may be Canada Hunting Seasons: Not more than 60 Outside Dates: Between September 1 geese in Units 9(A–C), 10 (Unimak and January 26. days. Island portion), and 17. Daily Bag and Possession Limits: Not Hunting Seasons: Alaska may select to exceed 20 Zenaida, mourning, and 107 consecutive days for waterfowl, Brant—A daily bag limit of 2 and a white-winged doves in the aggregate, of sandhill cranes, and common snipe in possession limit of 4. which not more than 10 may be Zenaida each of 5 zones. The season may be split Common snipe—A daily bag limit of doves and 3 may be mourning doves. without penalty in the Kodiak Zone. 8. Sandhill cranes—Bag and possession Not to exceed 5 scaly-naped pigeons. The seasons in each zone must be Closed Seasons: The season is closed concurrent. limits of 2 and 4, respectively, in the Southeast, Gulf Coast, Kodiak, and on the white-crowned pigeon and the Closures: The hunting season is plain pigeon, which are protected by the closed on emperor geese, spectacled Aleutian Zones, and Unit 17 in the Northern Zone. In the remainder of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. eiders, and Steller’s eiders. Closed Areas: There is no open season Northern Zone (outside Unit 17), bag Daily Bag and Possession Limits: on doves or pigeons in the following and possession limits of 3 and 6, Ducks—Except as noted, a basic daily areas: Municipality of Culebra, respectively. bag limit of 7 and a possession limit of Desecheo Island, Mona Island, El Verde 21 ducks. Daily bag and possession Tundra Swans—Open seasons for Closure Area, and Cidra Municipality limits in the North Zone are 10 and 30, tundra swans may be selected subject to and adjacent areas. and in the Gulf Coast Zone, they are 8 the following conditions: and 24. The basic limits may include no A. All seasons are by registration Ducks, Coots, Moorhens, Gallinules, and more than 1 canvasback daily and 3 in permit only. Snipe possession and may not include sea B. All season framework dates are Outside Dates: Between October 1 and ducks. September 1–October 31. January 31. In addition to the basic duck limits, C. In Game Management Unit (GMU) Hunting Seasons: Not more than 55 Alaska may select sea duck limits of 10 17, no more than 200 permits may be days may be selected for hunting ducks, daily, 20 in possession, singly or in the issued during this operational season. common moorhens, and common snipe. aggregate, including no more than 6 No more than 3 tundra swans may be The season may be split into two each of either harlequin or long-tailed authorized per permit, with no more segments. ducks. Sea ducks include scoters, than 1 permit issued per hunter per Daily Bag Limits: Ducks—Not to exceed 6. common and king eiders, harlequin season. ducks, long-tailed ducks, and common Common moorhens—Not to exceed 6. D. In Game Management Unit (GMU) and red-breasted mergansers. Common snipe—Not to exceed 8. Light Geese—A basic daily bag limit 18, no more than 500 permits may be Closed Seasons: The season is closed of 4 and a possession limit of 8. issued during the operational season. on the ruddy duck, white-cheeked Dark Geese—A basic daily bag limit of Up to 3 tundra swans may be authorized pintail, West Indian whistling duck, 4 and a possession limit of 8. per permit. No more than 1 permit may fulvous whistling duck, and masked Dark-goose seasons are subject to the be issued per hunter per season. duck, which are protected by the following exceptions: E. In GMU 22, no more than 300 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The A. In Units 5 and 6, the taking of permits may be issued during the season also is closed on the purple Canada geese is permitted from operational season. Each permittee may gallinule, American coot, and Caribbean September 28 through December 16. be authorized to take up to 3 tundra coot. B. On Middleton Island in Unit 6, a swans per permit. No more than 1 Closed Areas: There is no open season special, permit-only Canada goose permit may be issued per hunter per on ducks, common moorhens, and season may be offered. A mandatory season. common snipe in the Municipality of goose identification class is required. F. In GMU 23, no more than 300 Culebra and on Desecheo Island. Hunters must check in and check out. permits may be issued during the Virgin Islands The bag limit is 1 daily and 1 in operational season. No more than 3 possession. The season will close if tundra swans may be authorized per Doves and Pigeons incidental harvest includes 5 dusky permit, with no more than 1 permit Outside Dates: Between September 1 Canada geese. A dusky Canada goose is issued per hunter per season. and January 15. any dark-breasted Canada goose Hawaii Hunting Seasons: Not more than 60 (Munsell 10 YR color value five or less) days for Zenaida doves. with a bill length between 40 and 50 Outside Dates: Between October 1 and Daily Bag and Possession Limits: Not millimeters. January 31. to exceed 10 Zenaida doves.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52884 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Closed Seasons: No open season is Geneva, Henry, Houston, and Mobile South Zone—That portion of the State prescribed for ground or quail doves or Counties. south and west of a line beginning at the pigeons. North Zone—Remainder of the State. International Bridge south of Del Rio, Closed Areas: There is no open season California proceeding east on U.S. 90 to State Loop for migratory game birds on Ruth Cay 1604 west of ; then south, (just south of St. Croix). White-winged Dove Open Areas— east, and north along Loop 1604 to Local Names for Certain Birds: Imperial, Riverside, and San Bernardino Interstate Highway 10 east of San Zenaida dove, also known as mountain Counties. Antonio; then east on I–10 to Orange, dove; bridled quail-dove, also known as Florida Texas. Barbary dove or partridge; Common ground-dove, also known as stone dove, Northwest Zone—The Counties of Special White-winged Dove Area in tobacco dove, rola, or tortolita; scaly- Bay, Calhoun, Escambia, Franklin, the South Zone—That portion of the naped pigeon, also known as red-necked Gadsden, Gulf, Holmes, Jackson, State south and west of a line beginning or scaled pigeon. Liberty, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Walton, at the International Bridge south of Del Washington, Leon (except that portion Rio, proceeding east on U.S. 90 to State Ducks north of U.S. 27 and east of State Road Loop 1604 west of San Antonio, Outside Dates: Between December 1 155), Jefferson (south of U.S. 27, west of southeast on State Loop 1604 to and January 31. State Road 59 and north of U.S. 98), and Interstate Highway 35, southwest on Hunting Seasons: Not more than 55 Wakulla (except that portion south of Interstate Highway 35 to TX 44; east consecutive days. U.S. 98 and east of the St. Marks River). along TX 44 to TX 16 at Freer; south Daily Bag Limits: Not to exceed 6. South Zone—Remainder of State. along TX 16 to FM 649 in Randado; Closed Seasons: The season is closed south on FM 649 to FM 2686; east on Louisiana on the ruddy duck, white-cheeked FM 2686 to FM 1017; southeast on FM pintail, West Indian whistling duck, North Zone—That portion of the State 1017 to TX 186 at Linn; east along TX fulvous whistling duck, and masked north of a line extending east from the 186 to the Mansfield Channel at Port duck. Texas border along State Highway 12 to Mansfield; east along the Mansfield U.S. Highway 190, east along U.S. 190 Special Falconry Regulations Channel to the Gulf of Mexico. to Interstate Highway 12, east along Area with additional restrictions— Falconry is a permitted means of Interstate 12 to Interstate Highway 10, Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy taking migratory game birds in any State then east along Interstate Highway 10 to Counties. meeting Federal falconry standards in the Mississippi border. 50 CFR 21.29. These States may select South Zone—The remainder of the Central Zone—That portion of the an extended season for taking migratory State. State lying between the North and South game birds in accordance with the Zones. following: Mississippi Extended Seasons: For all hunting North Zone—That portion of the State Band-Tailed Pigeons methods combined, the combined north and west of a line extending west California length of the extended season, regular from the Alabama State line along U.S. season, and any special or experimental Highway 84 to its junction with State North Zone—Alpine, Butte, Del Norte, seasons must not exceed 107 days for Highway 35, then south along State Glenn, Humboldt, Lassen, Mendocino, any species or group of species in a Highway 35 to the Louisiana State line. Modoc, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, geographical area. Each extended season South Zone—The remainder of Siskiyou, Tehama, and Trinity Counties. may be divided into a maximum of 3 Mississippi. South Zone—The remainder of the segments. State. Framework Dates: Seasons must fall Nevada between September 1 and March 10. White-winged Dove Open Areas— New Mexico Daily Bag and Possession Limits: Clark and Nye Counties. North Zone—North of a line following Falconry daily bag and possession limits Oklahoma for all permitted migratory game birds U.S. 60 from the Arizona State line east must not exceed 3 and 6 birds, North Zone—That portion of the State to I–25 at Socorro and then south along respectively, singly or in the aggregate, north of a line extending east from the I–25 from Socorro to the Texas State during extended falconry seasons, any Texas border along U.S. Highway 62 to line. special or experimental seasons, and Interstate 44, east along Oklahoma State South Zone—The remainder of the regular hunting seasons in all States, Highway 7 to U.S. Highway 81, then State. including those that do not select an south along U.S. Highway 81 to the extended falconry season. Texas border at the Red River. Washington Regular Seasons: General hunting Southwest Zone—The remainder of Oklahoma. Western Washington—The State of regulations, including seasons and Washington excluding those portions hunting hours, apply to falconry in each Texas lying east of the Pacific Crest Trail and State listed in 50 CFR 21.29. Regular- North Zone—That portion of the State east of the Big White Salmon River in season bag and possession limits do not Klickitat County. apply to falconry. The falconry bag limit north of a line beginning at the International Bridge south of Fort is not in addition to gun limits. Woodcock Hancock; north along FM 1088 to TX 20; Area, Unit, and Zone Descriptions west along TX 20 to TX 148; north along New Jersey Mourning and White-Winged Doves TX 148 to I–10 at Fort Hancock; east along I–10 to I–20; northeast along North Zone—That portion of the State Alabama I–20 to I–30 at Fort Worth; northeast north of NJ 70. South Zone—Baldwin, Barbour, along I–30 to the Texas–Arkansas State South Zone—The remainder of the Coffee, Covington, Dale, Escambia, line. State.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52885

Special September Canada Goose Eastern Long Island Goose Area (NAP County line to US 17 in Midway, US 17 Seasons High Harvest Area)—That area of in Midway to US 13 in Windsor to the Atlantic Flyway Suffolk County lying east of a Hertford County line; and that portion continuous line extending due south of Northampton County that is north of Connecticut from the New York-Connecticut US 158 and east of NC 35. boundary to the northernmost end of North Zone—That portion of the State Pennsylvania north of I–95. Roanoke Avenue in the Town of Southern James Bay Population (SJBP) South Zone—The remainder of the Riverhead; then south on Roanoke Zone—The area north of I–80 and west State. Avenue (which becomes County Route 73) to State Route 25; then west on of I–79, including in the city of Erie Maryland Route 25 to Peconic Avenue; then south west of Bay Front Parkway to and including the Lake Erie Duck Zone Eastern Unit—Calvert, Caroline, Cecil, on Peconic Avenue to County Route (Lake Erie, Presque Isle, and the area Dorchester, Harford, Kent, Queen (CR) 104 (Riverleigh Avenue); then within 150 yards of the Lake Erie Anne’s, St. Mary’s, Somerset, Talbot, south on CR 104 to CR 31 (Old Shoreline). Wicomico, and Worcester Counties; and Riverhead Road); then south on CR 31 that part of Anne Arundel County east to Oak Street; then south on Oak Street Vermont of Interstate 895, Interstate 97 and Route to Potunk Lane; then west on Stevens Lane; then south on Jessup Avenue (in Lake Champlain Zone—The U.S. 3; that part of Prince George’s County portion of Lake Champlain and that area east of Route 3 and Route 301; and that Westhampton Beach) to Dune Road (CR 89); then due south to international north and west of the line extending part of Charles County east of Route 301 from the New York border along U.S. 4 to the Virginia State line. waters. Western Long Island Goose Area (RP to VT 22A at Fair Haven; VT 22A to U.S. Western Unit—Allegany, , Area)—That area of Westchester County 7 at Vergennes; U.S. 7 to the Canadian Carroll, Frederick, Garrett, Howard, and its tidal waters southeast of border. Montgomery, and Washington Counties Interstate Route 95 and that area of Interior Zone—That portion of and that part of Anne Arundel County Nassau and Suffolk Counties lying west Vermont west of the Lake Champlain west of Interstate 895, Interstate 97 and of a continuous line extending due Zone and eastward of a line extending Route 3; that part of Prince George’s south from the New York-Connecticut from the Massachusetts border at County west of Route 3 and Route 301; boundary to the northernmost end of the Interstate 91; north along Interstate 91 to and that part of Charles County west of Sunken Meadow State Parkway; then US 2; east along US 2 to VT 102; north Route 301 to the Virginia State line. south on the Sunken Meadow Parkway along VT 102 to VT 253; north along VT Massachusetts to the Sagtikos State Parkway; then 253 to the Canadian border. south on the Sagtikos Parkway to the Connecticut River Zone—The Western Zone—That portion of the State Parkway; then south remaining portion of Vermont east of State west of a line extending south on the Robert Moses Parkway to its the Interior Zone. from the Vermont border on I–91 to MA southernmost end; then due south to 9, west on MA 9 to MA 10, south on MA Mississippi Flyway international waters. Arkansas 10 to U.S. 202, south on U.S. 202 to the Central Long Island Goose Area (NAP Connecticut border. Low Harvest Area)—That area of Suffolk Early Canada Goose Area—Baxter, Central Zone—That portion of the County lying between the Western and Benton, Boone, Carroll, Clark, Conway, State east of the Berkshire Zone and Eastern Long Island Goose Areas, as Crawford, Faulkner, Franklin, Garland, west of a line extending south from the defined above. Hempstead, Hot Springs, Howard, New Hampshire border on I–95 to U.S. Western Zone—That area west of a Johnson, Lafayette, Little River, Logan, 1, south on U.S. 1 to I–93, south on I– line extending from Lake Ontario east Madison, Marion, Miller, Montgomery, 93 to MA 3, south on MA 3 to U.S. 6, along the north shore of the Salmon Newton, Perry, Pike, Polk, Pope, west on U.S. 6 to MA 28, west on MA River to I–81, and south along I–81 to Pulaski, Saline, Searcy, Sebastian, 28 to I–195, west to the Rhode Island the Pennsylvania border. Sevier, Scott, Van Buren, Washington, border; except the waters, and the lands Northeastern Zone—That area north and Yell Counties. 150 yards inland from the high-water of a line extending from Lake Ontario Illinois mark, of the Assonet River upstream to east along the north shore of the Salmon the MA 24 bridge, and the Taunton River to I–81, south along I–81 to NY 49, Northeast Canada Goose Zone—Cook, River upstream to the Center St.–Elm St. east along NY 49 to NY 365, east along Du Page, Grundy, Kane, Kankakee, bridge will be in the Coastal Zone. NY 365 to NY 28, east along NY 28 to Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will Coastal Zone—That portion of NY 29, east along NY 29 to I–87, north Counties. Massachusetts east and south of the along I–87 to U.S. 9 (at Exit 20), north North Zone—That portion of the State Central Zone. along U.S. 9 to NY 149, east along NY outside the Northeast Canada Goose Zone and north of a line extending west New York 149 to U.S. 4, north along U.S. 4 to the Vermont border, exclusive of the Lake from the Indiana border along Peotone– Lake Champlain Zone—The U.S. Champlain Zone. Beecher Road to Illinois Route 50, south portion of Lake Champlain and that area Southeastern Zone—The remaining along Illinois Route 50 to Wilmington– east and north of a line extending along portion of New York. Peotone Road, west along Wilmington– NY 9B from the Canadian border to U.S. Peotone Road to Illinois Route 53, north 9, south along U.S. 9 to NY 22 south of North Carolina along Illinois Route 53 to New River Keesville; south along NY 22 to the west Northeast Hunt Unit—Camden, Road, northwest along New River Road shore of South Bay, along and around Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Hyde, to Interstate Highway 55, south along I– the shoreline of South Bay to NY 22 on Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and 55 to Pine Bluff–Lorenzo Road, west the east shore of South Bay; southeast Washington Counties; that portion of along Pine Bluff–Lorenzo Road to along NY 22 to U.S. 4, northeast along Bertie County north and east of a line Illinois Route 47, north along Illinois U.S. 4 to the Vermont border. formed by NC 45 at the Washington Route 47 to I–80, west along I–80 to I–

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52886 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

39, south along I–39 to Illinois Route 18, Avenue; then north along Green Castle County Road C66, then east along west along Illinois Route 18 to Illinois Avenue to County Road F12; then west County Road C66 to the point of Route 29, south along Illinois Route 29 along County Road F12 to County Road beginning. to Illinois Route 17, west along Illinois W30; then north along County Road Minnesota Route 17 to the Mississippi River, and W30 to Highway 151; then north along due south across the Mississippi River the Linn–Benton County line to the Twin Cities Metropolitan Canada to the Iowa border. point of beginning. Goose Zone— Central Zone—That portion of the Des Moines Goose Zone—Includes A. All of Hennepin and Ramsey State outside the Northeast Canada those portions of Polk, Warren, Madison Counties. Goose Zone and south of the North Zone and Counties bounded as follows: B. In Anoka County, all of Columbus to a line extending west from the Beginning at the intersection of Township lying south of County State Indiana border along Interstate Highway Northwest 158th Avenue and County Aid Highway (CSAH) 18, Anoka 70 to Illinois Route 4, south along Road R38 in Polk County; then south County; all of the cities of Ramsey, Illinois Route 4 to Illinois Route 161, along R38 to Northwest 142nd Avenue; Andover, Anoka, Coon Rapids, Spring west along Illinois Route 161 to Illinois then east along Northwest 142nd Lake Park, Fridley, Hilltop, Columbia Route 158, south and west along Illinois Avenue to Northeast 126th Avenue; Heights, Blaine, Lexington, Circle Pines, Route 158 to Illinois Route 159, south then east along Northeast 126th Avenue Lino Lakes, and Centerville; and all of along Illinois Route 159 to Illinois Route to Northeast 46th Street; then south the city of Ham Lake except that portion 156, west along Illinois Route 156 to A along Northeast 46th Street to Highway lying north of CSAH 18 and east of U.S. Road, north and west on A Road to 931; then east along Highway 931 to Highway 65. Levee Road, north on Levee Road to the Northeast 80th Street; then south along C. That part of Carver County lying south shore of New Fountain Creek, Northeast 80th Street to Southeast 6th north and east of the following west along the south shore of New Avenue; then west along Southeast 6th described line: Beginning at the Fountain Creek to the Mississippi River, Avenue to Highway 65; then south and northeast corner of San Francisco and due west across the Mississippi west along Highway 65 to Highway 69 Township; then west along the north River to the Missouri border. in Warren County; then south along boundary of San Francisco Township to South Zone—The remainder of Highway 69 to County Road G24; then the east boundary of Dahlgren Illinois. west along County Road G24 to Township; then north along the east boundary of Dahlgren Township to U.S. Iowa Highway 28; then southwest along Highway 28 to 43rd Avenue; then north Highway 212; then west along U.S. North Zone—That portion of the State along 43rd Avenue to Ford Street; then Highway 212 to State Trunk Highway north of U.S. Highway 20. west along Ford Street to Filmore Street; (STH) 284; then north on STH 284 to South Zone—The remainder of Iowa. then west along Filmore Street to 10th County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 10; Cedar Rapids/Iowa City Goose Zone— Avenue; then south along 10th Avenue then north and west on CSAH 10 to Includes portions of Linn and Johnson to 155th Street in Madison County; then CSAH 30; then north and west on CSAH Counties bounded as follows: Beginning west along 155th Street to Cumming 30 to STH 25; then east and north on at the intersection of the west border of Road; then north along Cumming Road STH 25 to CSAH 10; then north on Linn County and Linn County Road to Badger Creek Avenue; then north CSAH 10 to the Carver County line. E2W; then south and east along County along Badger Creek Avenue to County D. In Scott County, all of the cities of Road E2W to Highway 920; then north Road F90 in Dallas County; then east Shakopee, Savage, Prior Lake, and along Highway 920 to County Road E16; along County Road F90 to County Road Jordan, and all of the Townships of then east along County Road E16 to R22; then north along County Road R22 Jackson, Louisville, St. Lawrence, Sand County Road W58; then south along to Highway 44; then east along Highway Creek, Spring Lake, and Credit River. County Road W58 to County Road E34; 44 to County Road R30; then north E. In Dakota County, all of the cities then east along County Road E34 to along County Road R30 to County Road of Burnsville, Eagan, Mendota Heights, Highway 13; then south along Highway F31; then east along County Road F31 Mendota, Sunfish Lake, Inver Grove 13 to Highway 30; then east along to Highway 17; then north along Heights, Apple Valley, Lakeville, Highway 30 to Highway 1; then south Highway 17 to Highway 415 in Polk Rosemount, Farmington, Hastings, along Highway 1 to Morse Road in County; then east along Highway 415 to Lilydale, West St. Paul, and South St. Johnson County; then east along Morse Northwest 158th Avenue; then east Paul, and all of the Township of Road to Wapsi Avenue; then south along Northwest 158th Avenue to the Nininger. along Wapsi Avenue to Lower West point of beginning. F. That portion of Washington County Branch Road; then west along Lower Cedar Falls/Waterloo Goose Zone— lying south of the following described West Branch Road to Taft Avenue; then Includes those portions of Black Hawk line: Beginning at County State Aid south along Taft Avenue to County Road County bounded as follows: Beginning Highway (CSAH) 2 on the west F62; then west along County Road F62 at the intersection of County Roads C66 boundary of the county; then east on to Kansas Avenue; then north along and V49 in Black Hawk County, then CSAH 2 to U.S. Highway 61; then south Kansas Avenue to Black Diamond Road; south along County Road V49 to County on U.S. Highway 61 to State Trunk then west on Black Diamond Road to Road D38, then west along County Road Highway (STH) 97; then east on STH 97 Jasper Avenue; then north along Jasper D38 to State Highway 21, then south to the intersection of STH 97 and STH Avenue to Rohert Road; then west along along State Highway 21 to County Road 95; then due east to the east boundary Rohert Road to Ivy Avenue; then north D35, then west along County Road D35 of the State. along Ivy Avenue to 340th Street; then to Grundy Road, then north along Northwest Goose Zone—That portion west along 340th Street to Half Moon Grundy Road to County Road D19, then of the State encompassed by a line Avenue; then north along Half Moon west along County Road D19 to Butler extending east from the North Dakota Avenue to Highway 6; then west along Road, then north along Butler Road to border along U.S. Highway 2 to State Highway 6 to Echo Avenue; then north County Road C57, then north and east Trunk Highway (STH) 32, north along along Echo Avenue to 250th Street; then along County Road C57 to U.S. Highway STH 32 to STH 92, east along STH 92 east on 250th Street to Green Castle 63, then south along U.S. Highway 63 to to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 2

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52887

in Polk County, north along CSAH 2 to Wisconsin Highway 83; that portion of Bon CSAH 27 in Pennington County, north Early-Season Subzone A—That Homme, Brule, Buffalo, Charles Mix, along CSAH 27 to STH 1, east along portion of the State encompassed by a and Hyde County south and west of a STH 1 to CSAH 28 in Pennington line beginning at the intersection of U.S. line beginning at the Hughes–Hyde County, north along CSAH 28 to CSAH Highway 141 and the Michigan border County line of SD Highway 34, east to 54 in Marshall County, north along near Niagara, then south along U.S. 141 Lees Boulevard, southeast to SD 34, east CSAH 54 to CSAH 9 in Roseau County, to State Highway 22, west and 7 miles to 350th Avenue, south to I–90, north along CSAH 9 to STH 11, west southwest along State 22 to U.S. 45, south and east on SD Highway 50 to along STH 11 to STH 310, and north south along U.S. 45 to State 22, west Geddes, east on 285th Street to US along STH 310 to the Manitoba border. and south along State 22 to State 110, Highway 281, south on US Highway 281 Southeast Goose Zone—That part of south along State 110 to U.S. 10, south to SD 50, east and south on SD 50 to the the State within the following described along U.S. 10 to State 49, south along Bon Homme–Yankton County boundaries: beginning at the State 49 to State 23, west along State 23 boundary; that portion of Fall River intersection of U.S. Highway 52 and the County east of SD Highway 71 and US south boundary of the Twin Cities to State 73, south along State 73 to State 60, west along State 60 to State 23, Highway 385; that portion of Custer Metro Canada Goose Zone; then along County east of SD Highway 79 and the U.S. Highway 52 to State Trunk south along State 23 to State 11, east along State 11 to State 78, then south south of French Creek; that portion of Highway (STH) 57; then along STH 57 Dewey County south of BIA Road 8, BIA to the municipal boundary of Kasson; along State 78 to the Illinois border. Early-Season Subzone B—The Road 9, and the section of US 212 east then along the municipal boundary of of BIA Road 8 junction. Kasson County State Aid Highway remainder of the State. (CSAH) 13, Dodge County; then along Central Flyway Pacific Flyway CSAH 13 to STH 30; then along STH 30 Nebraska Idaho to U.S. Highway 63; then along U.S. East Zone—Bonneville, Caribou, Highway 63 to the south boundary of September Canada Goose Unit—That the State; then along the south and east part of Nebraska bounded by a line from Fremont, and Teton Counties. boundaries of the State to the south the Nebraska–Iowa State line west on Oregon U.S. Highway 30 to US Highway 81, boundary of the Twin Cities Metro Northwest Zone—Benton, Clackamas, then south on US Highway 81 to NE Canada Goose Zone; then along said Clatsop, Columbia, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Highway 64, then east on NE Highway boundary to the point of beginning. Marion, Polk, Multnomah, Tillamook, Five Goose Zone—That portion of the 64 to NE Highway 15, then south on NE Washington, and Yamhill Counties. State not included in the Twin Cities Highway 15 to NE Highway 41, then Southwest Zone—Coos, Curry, Metropolitan Canada Goose Zone, the east on NE Highway 41 to NE Highway Douglas, Jackson, Josephine, and Northwest Goose Zone, or the Southeast 50, then north on NE Highway 50 to NE Klamath Counties. Goose Zone. Highway 2, then east on NE Highway 2 East Zone—Baker, Gilliam, Malheur, West Zone—That portion of the State to the Nebraska–Iowa State line. Morrow, Sherman, Umatilla, Union, and encompassed by a line beginning at the Wasco Counties. junction of State Trunk Highway (STH) North Dakota 60 and the Iowa border, then north and Missouri River Canada Goose Zone— Washington east along STH 60 to U.S. Highway 71, The area within and bounded by a line Area 1—Skagit, Island, and north along U.S. 71 to I–94, then north starting where ND Hwy 6 crosses the Snohomish Counties. and west along I–94 to the North Dakota South Dakota border; then north on ND Area 2A (SW Quota Zone)—Clark border. Hwy 6 to I–94; then west on I–94 to ND County, except portions south of the Hwy 49; then north on ND Hwy 49 to Tennessee Washougal River; Cowlitz County; and ND Hwy 200; then north on Mercer Wahkiakum County. Middle Tennessee Zone—Those County Rd. 21 to the section line Area 2B (SW Quota Zone)—Pacific portions of Houston, Humphreys, between sections 8 and 9 (T146N– County. Montgomery, Perry, and Wayne R87W); then north on that section line Area 3—All areas west of the Pacific Counties east of State Highway 13; and to the southern shoreline to Lake Crest Trail and west of the Big White Bedford, Cannon, Cheatham, Coffee, Sakakawea; then east along the southern Salmon River that are not included in Davidson, Dickson, Franklin, Giles, shoreline (including Mallard Island) of Areas 1, 2A, and 2B. Hickman, Lawrence, Lewis, Lincoln, Lake Sakakawea to US Hwy 83; then Area 4—Adams, Benton, Chelan, Macon, Marshall, Maury, Moore, south on US Hwy 83 to ND Hwy 200; Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Robertson, Rutherford, Smith, Sumner, then east on ND Hwy 200 to ND Hwy Lincoln, Okanogan, Spokane, and Walla Trousdale, Williamson, and Wilson 41; then south on ND Hwy 41 to US Walla Counties. Counties. Hwy 83; then south on US Hwy 83 to Area 5—All areas east of the Pacific East Tennessee Zone—Anderson, I–94; then east on I–94 to US Hwy 83; Crest Trail and east of the Big White Bledsoe, Bradley, Blount, Campbell, then south on US Hwy 83 to the South Salmon River that are not included in Carter, Claiborne, Clay, Cocke, Dakota border; then west along the Area 4. Cumberland, DeKalb, Fentress, South Dakota border to ND Hwy 6. Grainger, Greene, Grundy, Hamblen, Rest of State: Remainder of North Ducks Hamilton, Hancock, Hawkins, Jackson, Dakota. Atlantic Flyway Jefferson, Johnson, Knox, Loudon, Marion, McMinn, Meigs, Monroe, South Dakota New York Morgan, Overton, Pickett, Polk, Putnam, Special Early Canada Goose Unit— Lake Champlain Zone—The U.S. Rhea, Roane, Scott, Sequatchie, Sevier, Entire State of South Dakota except the portion of Lake Champlain and that area Sullivan, Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Counties of Bennett, Gregory, Hughes, east and north of a line extending along Warren, Washington, and White Lyman, Perkins, and Stanley; that NY 9B from the Canadian border to U.S. Counties. portion of Potter County west of US 9, south along U.S. 9 to NY 22 south of

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52888 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Keesville; south along NY 22 to the west Nebraska border along State Highway line; south along Interstate 5 to its shore of South Bay, along and around 175 to State Highway 37, southeast junction with Walters Lane south of the the shoreline of South Bay to NY 22 on along State Highway 37 to State town of Yreka; west along Walters Lane the east shore of South Bay; southeast Highway 183, northeast along State to its junction with Easy Street; south along NY 22 to U.S. 4, northeast along Highway 183 to State Highway 141, east along Easy Street to the junction with U.S. 4 to the Vermont border. along State Highway 141 to U.S. Old Highway 99; south along Old Long Island Zone—That area Highway 30, then east along U.S. Highway 99 to the point of intersection consisting of Nassau County, Suffolk Highway 30 to the Illinois border. with Interstate 5 north of the town of County, that area of Westchester County South Zone—The remainder of Iowa. Weed; south along Interstate 5 to its southeast of I–95, and their tidal waters. junction with Highway 89; east and Western Zone—That area west of a Central Flyway south along Highway 89 to Main Street line extending from Lake Ontario east Colorado Greenville; north and east to its junction along the north shore of the Salmon Special Teal Season Area—Lake and with North Valley Road; south to its River to I–81, and south along I–81 to Chaffee Counties and that portion of the junction of Diamond Mountain Road; the Pennsylvania border. State east of Interstate Highway 25. north and east to its junction with North Northeastern Zone—That area north Arm Road; south and west to the of a line extending from Lake Ontario Kansas junction of North Valley Road; south to east along the north shore of the Salmon High Plains Zone—That portion of the the junction with Arlington Road (A22); River to I–81, south along I–81 to NY 49, State west of U.S. 283. west to the junction of Highway 89; east along NY 49 to NY 365, east along Low Plains Early Zone—That area of south and west to the junction of NY 365 to NY 28, east along NY 28 to Kansas east of U.S. 283, and generally Highway 70; east on Highway 70 to NY 29, east along NY 29 to I–87, north west of a line beginning at the Junction Highway 395; south and east on along I–87 to U.S. 9 (at Exit 20), north of the Nebraska State line and KS 28; Highway 395 to the point of intersection along U.S. 9 to NY 149, east along NY south on KS 28 to U.S. 36; east on U.S. with the California–Nevada State line; 149 to U.S. 4, north along U.S. 4 to the 36 to KS 199; south on KS 199 to north along the California–Nevada State Vermont border, exclusive of the Lake Republic Co. Road 563; south on line to the junction of the California– Champlain Zone. Republic Co. Road 563 to KS 148; east Nevada–Oregon State lines west along Southeastern Zone—The remaining the California–Oregon State line to the portion of New York. on KS 148 to Republic Co. Road 138; south on Republic Co. Road 138 to point of origin. Colorado River Zone—Those portions Maryland Cloud Co. Road 765; south on Cloud Co. of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Road 765 to KS 9; west on KS 9 to U.S. Special Teal Season Area—Calvert, Imperial Counties east of a line 24; west on U.S. 24 to U.S. 281; north Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Harford, extending from the Nevada border south Kent, Queen Anne’s, St. Mary’s, on U.S. 281 to U.S. 36; west on U.S. 36 along U.S. 95 to Vidal Junction; south Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and to U.S. 183; south on U.S. 183 to U.S. on a road known as ‘‘Aqueduct Road’’ in Worcester Counties; that part of Anne 24; west on U.S. 24 to KS 18; southeast San Bernardino County through the Arundel County east of Interstate 895, on KS 18 to U.S. 183; south on U.S. 183 town of Rice to the San Bernardino– Interstate 97, and Route 3; that part of to KS 4; east on KS 4 to I–135; south on Riverside County line; south on a road Prince Georges County east of Route 3 I–135 to KS 61; southwest on KS 61 to known in Riverside County as the and Route 301; and that part of Charles KS 96; northwest on KS 96 to U.S. 56; ‘‘Desert Center to Rice Road’’ to the town County east of Route 301 to the Virginia west on U.S. 56 to U.S. 281; south on of Desert Center; east 31 miles on I–10 State Line. U.S. 281 to U.S. 54; west on U.S. 54 to to the Wiley Well Road; south on this U.S. 183; north on U.S. 183 to U.S. 56; Mississippi Flyway road to Wiley Well; southeast along the and southwest on U.S. 56 to U.S. 283. Army–Milpitas Road to the Blythe, Indiana Low Plains Late Zone—The Brawley, Davis Lake intersections; south North Zone—That portion of the State remainder of Kansas. on the Blythe–Brawley paved road to north of a line extending east from the Nebraska the Ogilby and Tumco Mine Road; south Illinois border along State Road 18 to on this road to U.S. 80; east 7 miles on Special Teal Season Area—That U.S. Highway 31, north along U.S. 31 to U.S. 80 to the Andrade–Algodones portion of the State south of a line U.S. 24, east along U.S. 24 to Road; south on this paved road to the beginning at the Wyoming State line; Huntington, then southeast along U.S. Mexican border at Algodones, Mexico. east along U.S. 26 to Nebraska Highway 224 to the Ohio border. Southern Zone—That portion of L62A east to U.S. 385; south to U.S. 26; Zone—That portion of the southern California (but excluding the east to NE 92; east along NE 92 to NE State south of a line extending east from Colorado River Zone) south and east of 61; south along NE 61 to U.S. 30; east the Illinois border along Interstate a line extending from the Pacific Ocean along U.S. 30 to the Iowa border. Highway 64 to New Albany, east along east along the Santa Maria River to CA State Road 62 to State 56, east along New Mexico (Central Flyway Portion) 166 near the City of Santa Maria; east on State 56 to Vevay, east and north on CA 166 to CA 99; south on CA 99 to the North Zone—That portion of the State crest of the Tehachapi Mountains at State 156 along the Ohio River to North north of I–40 and U.S. 54. Landing, north along State 56 to U.S. Tejon Pass; east and north along the South Zone—The remainder of New crest of the Tehachapi Mountains to CA Highway 50, then northeast along U.S. Mexico. 50 to the Ohio border. 178 at Walker Pass; east on CA 178 to South Zone—That portion of the State Pacific Flyway U.S. 395 at the town of Inyokern; south on U.S. 395 to CA 58; east on CA 58 to between the North and Ohio River Zone California boundaries. I–15; east on I–15 to CA 127; north on Northeastern Zone—In that portion of CA 127 to the Nevada border. Iowa California lying east and north of a line Southern San Joaquin Valley North Zone—That portion of the State beginning at the intersection of Temporary Zone—All of Kings and north of a line extending east from the Interstate 5 with the California–Oregon Tulare Counties and that portion of

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52889

Kern County north of the Southern along STH 11 to STH 310, and north Zone B—That portion of Texas lying Zone. along STH 310 to the Manitoba border. within boundaries beginning at the Balance-of-the-State Zone—The junction of U.S. Highway 81 and the Central Flyway remainder of California not included in Texas–Oklahoma State line, then the Northeastern, Southern, and Colorado—The Central Flyway southeast along U.S. Highway 81 to its Colorado River Zones, and the Southern portion of the State except the San Luis junction with U.S. Highway 287 in San Joaquin Valley Temporary Zone. Valley (Alamosa, Conejos, Costilla, Montague County, then southeast along Hinsdale, Mineral, Rio Grande, and U.S. Highway 287 to its junction with Canada Geese Saguache Counties east of the Interstate Highway 35W in Fort Worth, Michigan Continental Divide) and North Park then southwest along Interstate (Jackson County). Highway 35 to its junction with Mississippi Valley Population (MVP)– Kansas—That portion of the State Interstate Highway 10 in San Antonio, Upper Peninsula Zone—The MVP– west of a line beginning at the then northwest along Interstate Highway Upper Peninsula Zone consists of the Oklahoma border, north on I–35 to 10 to its junction with U.S. Highway 83 entire Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Wichita, north on I–135 to Salina, and in the town of Junction, then north MVP–Lower Peninsula Zone—The north on U.S. 81 to the Nebraska border. along U.S. Highway 83 to its junction MVP–Lower Peninsula Zone consists of Montana—The Central Flyway with U.S. Highway 62, 16 miles north of the area within the Lower Peninsula of portion of the State except for that area Childress, then east along U.S. Highway Michigan that is north and west of the south and west of Interstate 90, which 62 to the Texas–Oklahoma State line, point beginning at the southwest corner is closed to sandhill crane hunting. then south along the Texas–Oklahoma of Branch County, north continuing State line to the south bank of the Red New Mexico along the western border of Branch and River, then eastward along the Calhoun Counties to the northwest Regular-Season Open Area—Chaves, vegetation line on the south bank of the corner of Calhoun County, then east to Curry, De Baca, Eddy, Lea, Quay, and Red River to U.S. Highway 81. the southwest corner of Eaton County, Roosevelt Counties. Zone C—The remainder of the State, then north to the southern border of Middle Rio Grande Valley Area—The except for the closed areas. Ionia County, then east to the southwest Central Flyway portion of New Mexico Closed areas—(A) That portion of the corner of Clinton County, then north in Socorro and Valencia Counties. State lying east and north of a line along the western border of Clinton Estancia Valley Area—Those portions beginning at the junction of U.S. County continuing north along the of Santa Fe, Torrance and Bernallilo Highway 81 and the Texas–Oklahoma county border of Gratiot and Montcalm Counties within an area bounded on the State line, then southeast along U.S. Counties to the southern border of west by New Mexico Highway 55 Highway 81 to its junction with U.S. Isabella county, then east to the beginning at Mountainair north to NM Highway 287 in Montague County, then southwest corner of Midland County, 337, north to NM 14, north to I–25; on southeast along U.S. Highway 287 to its then north along the west Midland the north by I–25 east to U.S. 285; on junction with Interstate Highway 35W County border to Highway M–20, then the east by U.S. 285 south to U.S. 60; in Fort Worth, then southwest along easterly to U.S. Highway 10, then and on the south by U.S. 60 from U.S. Interstate Highway 35 to its junction easterly to I–75/U.S. 23, then northerly 285 west to NM 55 in Mountainair. with U.S. Highway 290 East in Austin, along I–75/U.S. 23 and easterly on U.S. Southwest Zone—Sierra, Luna, Dona then east along U.S. Highway 290 to its 23 to the centerline of the Au Gres Ana Counties, and those portions of junction with Interstate Loop 610 in River, then southerly along the Grant and Hidalgo Counties south of I– Harris County, then south and east centerline of the Au Gres River to 10. along Interstate Loop 610 to its junction Saginaw Bay, then on a line directly east with Interstate Highway 45 in Houston, 10 miles into Saginaw Bay, and from North Dakota then south on Interstate Highway 45 to that point on a line directly northeast to Area 1—That portion of the State west State Highway 342, then to the shore of the Canadian border. of U.S. 281. the Gulf of Mexico, and then north and SJBP Zone—The rest of the State, that Area 2—That portion of the State east east along the shore of the Gulf of area south and east of the boundary of U.S. 281. Mexico to the Texas–Louisiana State described above. Oklahoma—That portion of the State line. west of I–35. (B) That portion of the State lying Sandhill Cranes South Dakota—That portion of the within the boundaries of a line Mississippi Flyway State west of U.S. 281. beginning at the Kleberg-Nueces County line and the shore of the Gulf of Mexico, Minnesota Texas then west along the County line to Park Northwest Goose Zone—That portion Zone A—That portion of Texas lying Road 22 in Nueces County, then north of the State encompassed by a line west of a line beginning at the and west along Park Road 22 to its extending east from the North Dakota international toll bridge at Laredo, then junction with State Highway 358 in border along U.S. Highway 2 to State northeast along U.S. Highway 81 to its Corpus Christi, then west and north Trunk Highway (STH) 32, north along junction with Interstate Highway 35 in along State Highway 358 to its junction STH 32 to STH 92, east along STH 92 Laredo, then north along Interstate with State Highway 286, then north to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 2 Highway 35 to its junction with along State Highway 286 to its junction in Polk County, north along CSAH 2 to Interstate Highway 10 in San Antonio, with Interstate Highway 37, then east CSAH 27 in Pennington County, north then northwest along Interstate Highway along Interstate Highway 37 to its along CSAH 27 to STH 1, east along 10 to its junction with U.S. Highway 83 junction with U.S. Highway 181, then STH 1 to CSAH 28 in Pennington at Junction, then north along U.S. north and west along U.S. Highway 181 County, north along CSAH 28 to CSAH Highway 83 to its junction with U.S. to its junction with U.S. Highway 77 in 54 in Marshall County, north along Highway 62, 16 miles north of Sinton, then north and east along U.S. CSAH 54 to CSAH 9 in Roseau County, Childress, then east along U.S. Highway Highway 77 to its junction with U.S. north along CSAH 9 to STH 11, west 62 to the Texas–Oklahoma State line. Highway 87 in Victoria, then south and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52890 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

east along U.S. Highway 87 to its Salt River Area—That portion of Guavate, west along Rio Guavate to junction with State Highway 35 at Port Lincoln County described in State Highway 1, southwest on Highway 1 to Lavaca, then north and east along State regulations. Highway 14, west on Highway 14 to Highway 35 to the south end of the Farson-Eden Area—Those portions of Highway 729, north on Highway 729 to Lavaca Bay Causeway, then south and Sweetwater and Sublette Counties Cidra Municipality boundary to the east along the shore of Lavaca Bay to its described in State regulations. point of the beginning. junction with the Port Lavaca Ship Uinta County Area—That portion of [FR Doc. 2010–21375 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Channel, then south and east along the Uinta County described in State BILLING CODE 4310–55–P Lavaca Bay Ship Channel to the Gulf of regulations. Mexico, and then south and west along All Migratory Game Birds in Alaska the shore of the Gulf of Mexico to the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Kleberg-Nueces County line. North Zone—State Game Management Units 11–13 and 17–26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Wyoming Gulf Coast Zone—State Game Administration Regular-Season Open Area— Management Units 5–7, 9, 14–16, and Campbell, Converse, Crook, Goshen, 10 (Unimak Island only). 50 CFR Part 648 Southeast Zone—State Game Laramie, Niobrara, Platte, and Weston [Docket No. 0908191244–91427ndash;02] Counties, and those portions of Johnson Management Units 1–4. County east of Interstates 25 and 90 and Pribilof and Aleutian Islands Zone— RIN 0648–XY35 Sheridan County east of Interstate 90. State Game Management Unit 10 (except Unimak Island). Fisheries of the Northeastern United Riverton-Boysen Unit—Portions of Kodiak Zone—State Game States; Summer Flounder Fishery; Fremont County. Management Unit 8. Commercial Quota Harvested for the Park and Big Horn County Unit— Commonwealth of Massachusetts Portions of Park and Big Horn Counties. All Migratory Game Birds in the Virgin Islands AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Pacific Flyway Ruth Cay Closure Area—The island of Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Arizona Ruth Cay, just south of St. Croix. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. Special-Season Area—Game All Migratory Game Birds in Puerto ACTION: Temporary rule; closure. Management Units 30A, 30B, 31, and Rico 32. SUMMARY: Municipality of Culebra Closure NMFS announces that the LCRV Crane Hunt Area (Gillespie Area—All of the municipality of 2010 summer flounder commercial Dam Hunt Area in Unit 39)—That Culebra. quota allocated to the Commonwealth of portion of the Gila River corridor in Desecheo Island Closure Area—All of Massachusetts has been harvested. Unit 39 south of Gillespie Dam and Desecheo Island. Vessels issued a commercial Federal north of Gila Bend located within the Mona Island Closure Area—All of fisheries permit for the summer following townships and ranges: T2S Mona Island. flounder fishery may not land summer R4W, T2S R5W, T3S R4W, T3S R5W, El Verde Closure Area—Those areas flounder in Massachusetts for the T4S R4W, and T5S R4W. of the municipalities of Rio Grande and remainder of calendar year 2010, unless additional quota becomes available Montana Loiza delineated as follows: (1) All lands between Routes 956 on the west through a transfer from another state. Special-Season Area—See State and 186 on the east, from Route 3 on the Regulations governing the summer regulations. north to the juncture of Routes 956 and flounder fishery require publication of this notification to advise Massachusetts Utah 186 (Km 13.2) in the south; (2) all lands between Routes 186 and 966 from the that the quota has been harvested and to Special-Season Area—Rich, Cache, juncture of 186 and 966 on the north, to advise vessel permit holders and dealer and Unitah Counties and that portion of the Caribbean National Forest Boundary permit holders that no commercial Box Elder County beginning on the on the south; (3) all lands lying west of quota is available for landing summer Utah–Idaho State line at the Box Elder– Route 186 for 1 kilometer from the flounder in Massachusetts. Cache County line; west on the State juncture of Routes 186 and 956 south to DATES: Effective 0001 hours, September line to the Pocatello Valley County Km 6 on Route 186; (4) all lands within 1, 2010, through 2400 hours, December Road; south on the Pocatello Valley Km 14 and Km 6 on the west and the 31, 2010. County Road to I–15; southeast on I–15 Caribbean National Forest Boundary on FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to SR–83; south on SR–83 to Lamp the east; and (5) all lands within the Sarah Heil, Fishery Management Junction; west and south on the Caribbean National Forest Boundary Specialist,(978) 281–9257. Promontory Point County Road to the whether private or public. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tip of Promontory Point; south from Cidra Municipality and adjacent Regulations governing the summer Promontory Point to the Box Elder– areas—All of Cidra Municipality and flounder fishery are found at 50 CFR Weber County line; east on the Box portions of Aguas Buenas, Caguas, part 648. The regulations require annual Elder–Weber County line to the Box Cayey, and Comerio Municipalities as specification of a commercial quota that Elder–Cache County line; north on the encompassed within the following is apportioned on a percentage basis Box Elder–Cache County line to the boundary: Beginning on Highway 172 as among the coastal states from North Utah–Idaho State line. it leaves the municipality of Cidra on Carolina through Maine. The process to Wyoming the west edge, north to Highway 156, set the annual commercial quota and the east on Highway 156 to Highway 1, percent allocated to each state is Bear River Area—That portion of south on Highway 1 to Highway 765, described in § 648.100. Lincoln County described in State south on Highway 765 to Highway 763, The initial total commercial quota for regulations. south on Highway 763 to the Rio summer flounder for the 2010 calendar

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 52891

year was set equal to 13,278,001 lb DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE of the 2010 TAC of pollock in Statistical (6,023 mt) (74 FR 67978, December 22, Area 630 of the GOA will soon be 2009). The percent allocated to vessels National Oceanic and Atmospheric reached. Therefore, the Regional landing summer flounder in Administration Administrator is establishing a directed Massachusetts is 6.82046 percent, fishing allowance of 4,846 mt, and is resulting in a commercial quota of 50 CFR Part 679 setting aside the remaining 10 mt as 905,621 lb (411 mt). The 2010 allocation [Docket No. 0910131362–0087–02] bycatch to support other anticipated was reduced to 846,667 lb (384 mt) after groundfish fisheries. In accordance with deduction of research set-aside and RIN 0648–XY57 § 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional adjustment for 2009 quota overages. Administrator finds that this directed Section 648.101(b) requires the Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS Zone Off Alaska; Pollock in Statistical fishing allowance has been reached. (Regional Administrator), to monitor Area 630 in the Gulf of Alaska Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting state commercial quotas and to directed fishing for pollock in Statistical determine when a state’s commercial AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Area 630 of the GOA. quota has been harvested. NMFS then Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and After the effective date of this closure Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), publishes a notification in the Federal the maximum retainable amounts at Commerce. Register to advise the state and to notify § 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time Federal vessel and dealer permit holders ACTION: Temporary rule; closure. during a trip. that, effective upon a specific date, the state’s commercial quota has been SUMMARY: NMFS is prohibiting directed Classification harvested and no commercial quota is fishing for pollock in Statistical Area available for landing summer flounder 630 in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). This This action responds to the best in that state. The Regional action is necessary to prevent exceeding available information recently obtained Administrator has determined, based the C season allowance of the 2010 total from the fishery. The Assistant upon dealer reports and other available allowable catch (TAC) of pollock for Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA information, that Massachusetts has Statistical Area 630 in the GOA. (AA), finds good cause to waive the harvested its quota for 2010. DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local requirement to provide prior notice and The regulations at § 648.4(b) provide time (A.l.t.), August 27, 2010, through opportunity for public comment that Federal permit holders agree, as a 1200 hrs, A.l.t., October 1, 2010. pursuant to the authority set forth at 5 condition of the permit, not to land FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is summer flounder in any state that the Obren Davis, 907–586–7228. impracticable and contrary to the public Regional Administrator has determined SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS interest. This requirement is no longer has commercial quota manages the groundfish fishery in the impracticable and contrary to the public available. Therefore, effective 0001 GOA exclusive economic zone interest as it would prevent NMFS from hours, September 1, 2010, further according to the Fishery Management responding to the most recent fisheries landings of summer flounder in Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of data in a timely fashion and would Massachusetts by vessels holding Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North delay the closure of pollock in summer flounder commercial Federal Pacific Fishery Management Council Statistical Area 630 of the GOA. NMFS fisheries permits are prohibited for the under authority of the Magnuson- was unable to publish a notice remainder of the 2010 calendar year, Stevens Fishery Conservation and providing time for public comment unless additional quota becomes Management Act. Regulations governing available through a transfer and is because the most recent, relevant data fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance announced in the Federal Register. only became available as of August 24, with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50 Effective 0001 hours, September 1, 2010. CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679. 2010, federally permitted dealers are The AA also finds good cause to The C season allowance of the 2010 also notified that they may not purchase waive the 30–day delay in the effective TAC of pollock in Statistical Area 630 summer flounder from federally date of this action under 5 U.S.C. permitted vessels that land in of the GOA is 5,912 metric tons (mt) as established by the final 2010 and 2011 553(d)(3). This finding is based upon Massachusetts for the remainder of the the reasons provided above for waiver of calendar year, or until additional quota harvest specifications for groundfish of the GOA (75 FR 11749, March 12, 2010). prior notice and opportunity for public becomes available through a transfer comment. from another state. In accordance with § 679.20(a)(5)(iv)(B) the Administrator, Alaska Region, This action is required by § 679.20 Classification NMFS (Regional Administrator), hereby and is exempt from review under This action is required by 50 CFR part decreases the C season pollock Executive Order 12866. allowance by 1,056 mt, to reflect the 648 and is exempt from review under Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Executive Order 12866. total amount of pollock TAC that has been caught prior to the C season in Dated: August 25, 2010. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Statistical Area 630. Therefore, the Carrie Selberg, Dated: August 25, 2010. revised C season allowance of the Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Carrie Selberg, pollock TAC in Statistical Area 630 is Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 4,856 mt (5,912 mt minus 1,056 mt). [FR Doc. 2010–21528 Filed 8–25–10; 4:15 pm] Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i), BILLING CODE 3510–22–S [FR Doc. 2010–21531 Filed 8–25–10; 4:15 pm] the Regional Administrator has BILLING CODE 3510–22–S determined that the C season allowance

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUR1.SGM 30AUR1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES 52892

Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 167

Monday, August 30, 2010

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER DATES: DOE will hold a public meeting For detailed instructions on contains notices to the public of the proposed Friday, September 24, 2010, from 9 a.m. submitting comments and additional issuance of rules and regulations. The to 4 p.m., in Washington, DC. DOE must information on the rulemaking process, purpose of these notices is to give interested receive requests to speak at the public see section V, ‘‘Public Participation,’’ of persons an opportunity to participate in the meeting before 4 p.m., Friday, this document. rule making prior to the adoption of the final Docket: For access to the docket to rules. September 10, 2010. DOE must receive a signed original and an electronic copy read background documents or of statements to be given at the public comments received, visit the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY meeting before 4 p.m., Friday, Department of Energy, Resource Room September 3, 2010. of the Building Technologies Program, 10 CFR Part 430 DOE will accept comments, data, and 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600, information regarding the notice of Washington, DC 20024, (202) 586–2945, [Docket No. EERE–2009–BT–TP–0013] proposed rulemaking (NOPR) before and between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday after the public meeting, but no later through Friday, except Federal holidays. RIN 1904–AB95 than November 15, 2010. See section V, Please call Ms. Brenda Edwards at the ‘‘Public Participation,’’ of this NOPR for above telephone number for additional Energy Conservation Program for details. information about visiting the Resource Consumer Products: Test Procedures Room. for Residential Water Heaters, Direct ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters held at the U.S. Department of Energy, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Forrestal Building, Room 1E–245, 1000 Mohammed Khan, U.S. Department of AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Independence Avenue, SW., Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Washington, DC 20585–0121. To attend Renewable Energy, Building Energy. the public meeting, please notify Ms. Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000 ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945. Independence Avenue, SW., and announcement of public meeting. (Please note that foreign nationals Washington, DC 20585–0121. visiting DOE Headquarters are subject to Telephone: (202) 586–7892. E-mail: SUMMARY: In order to implement recent advance security screening procedures. [email protected]. amendments to the Energy Policy and Any foreign national wishing to Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), the participate in the public meeting should Energy, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) advise DOE as soon as possible by GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue, proposes to amend its test procedures contacting Ms. Edwards to initiate the SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. for residential direct heating equipment necessary procedures.) Telephone: (202) 586–9507. E-mail: and pool heaters to provide for Any comments submitted must [email protected]. measurement of standby mode and off identify the NOPR on Test Procedures For information on how to submit or mode power use by these products. for Residential Water Heaters, Direct review public comments and on how to Where appropriate, the amendments Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters, participate in the public meeting, would incorporate into the DOE test and provide the docket number EERE– contact Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. procedures relevant provisions from the 2009–BT–TP–0013 and/or Regulatory Department of Energy, Office of Energy International Electrotechnical Information Number (RIN) 1904–AB95. Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Commission’s (IEC) Standard 62301, Comments may be submitted using any Building Technologies Program, EE–2J, ‘‘Household electrical appliances— of the following methods: 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Measurement of standby power’’ (First 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http: Washington, DC 20585–0121. Edition 2005–06), as well as language to //www.regulations.gov. Follow the Telephone: (202) 586–2945. E-mail: clarify application of these provisions as instructions for submitting comments. [email protected]. they specifically relate to measurement 2. E-mail: EISA-Heat-Equip-2010-TP- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of electrical standby mode and off mode [email protected]. Include docket power consumption in direct heating number EERE–2009–BT–TP–0013 and/ Table of Contents equipment and pool heaters. or RIN 1904–AB95 in the subject line of I. Background and Authority This rulemaking also proposes a the message. II. Summary of the Proposal number of definitions for key terms. III. Discussion 3. Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, A. Determination Not To Amend Test DOE has tentatively concluded that no U.S. Department of Energy, Building Procedures for Residential Water Heaters amendments are necessary to the test Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, B. Proposed Test Procedure Amendments procedure for residential water heaters 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., for Vented Heaters to address standby mode and off mode Washington, DC 20585–0121. Please 1. Treatment of Fossil-Fuel Consumption power use, because the existing test submit one signed paper original. in Existing Test Procedures for Fossil- procedures for water heaters already 4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Fuel Vented Heaters fully account for and incorporate the Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 2. Specific Amendments for Vented standby mode and off mode energy Building Technologies Program, 950 Heaters 3. Active Mode Hours Approximated by consumption. In addition, DOE L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Suite 600, Burner Operating Hours for Vented announces a public meeting to discuss Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: Heaters and receive comments on the issues (202) 586–2945. Please submit one 4. Measurement of Standby Mode and Off presented in this notice. signed paper original. Mode Wattages of Vented Heaters

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52893

5. Incorporating by Reference IEC Standard energy conservation standards. The CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix G for 62301 (First Edition 2005–06) for testing requirements consist of test unvented home heating equipment, and Measuring Standby Mode and Off Mode procedures, prescribed under EPCA, 10 CFR 430.23(o) and 10 CFR part 430, Energy Consumption for Vented Heaters that manufacturers of covered products subpart B, appendix O for vented home C. Proposed Test Procedure Amendments for Unvented Heaters must use as the basis for certifying to heating equipment. Taken together, D. Proposed Test Procedure Amendments DOE that their products comply with these two classes of home heating for Pool Heaters applicable energy conservation equipment represent ‘‘direct heating 1. Treatment of Fossil-Fuel Consumption standards adopted under EPCA and for equipment,’’ the covered product listed in Existing Test Procedures for Pool representations about the energy at 42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(9). (Hereafter in this Heaters consumption or energy efficiency of notice, the terms ‘‘vented heater’’ and 2. Treatment of Electricity Consumption in those products. Similarly, DOE must use ‘‘unvented heater’’ are used to describe Existing Test Procedures for Pool Heaters these test procedures whenever testing the two types of direct heating 3. Measurement of Standby Energy Consumption in ANSI/ASHRAE is required in an enforcement action to equipment.) The vented heater test Standard 146–2006 determine whether the products comply procedures include provisions for 4. Specific Amendments for Pool Heaters with energy conservation standards determining energy efficiency (annual 5. Incorporating by Reference IEC Standard adopted pursuant to EPCA. fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE)), as 62301 (First Edition 2005–06) for Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth well as annual energy consumption. The Measuring Standby Mode and Off Mode criteria and procedures for DOE’s unvented heater test procedures Energy Consumption for Pool Heaters adoption and amendment of such test currently have no provisions for IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review procedures. EPCA provides that any test determining energy efficiency; however, A. Review Under Executive Order 12866 B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility procedures prescribed or amended shall for unvented heaters that are the Act be reasonably designed to produce test primary heating source for the home, C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction results which measure energy there is a calculation of annual energy Act of 1995 efficiency, energy use, or estimated consumption based on a single D. Review Under the National annual operating cost of a covered assignment of active mode hours. For Environmental Policy Act of 1969 product during a representative average unvented heaters that are not the E. Review Under Executive Order 13132 use cycle or period of use, and shall not primary heating source for the home, F. Review Under Executive Order 12988 be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 there are no calculation provisions for G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) In addition, if DOE Reform Act of 1995 efficiency or annual energy H. Review Under the Treasury and General determines that a test procedure consumption. Government Appropriations Act, 1999 amendment is warranted, it must DOE’s test procedures for pool heaters I. Review Under Executive Order 12630 publish proposed test procedures and are found at 10 CFR 430.23(p) and 10 J. Review Under the Treasury and General offer the public an opportunity to CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix P. Government Appropriations Act, 2001 present oral and written comments The test procedures include provisions K. Review Under Executive Order 13211 thereon. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) Finally, for determining two energy efficiency L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal in any rulemaking to amend a test descriptors (i.e., thermal efficiency and Energy Administration Act of 1974 procedure, DOE must determine to what pool heater heating seasonal efficiency), V. Public Participation extent, if any, the proposed test as well as annual energy consumption. A. Attendance at the Public Meeting B. Procedure for Submitting Requests To procedure would alter the measured On December 19, 2007, the Energy Speak energy efficiency of any covered Independence and Security Act of 2007 C. Conduct of Public Meeting product as determined under the (EISA 2007), Public Law 110–140, was D. Submission of Comments existing test procedure. (42 U.S.C. enacted. The EISA 2007 amendments to E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment 6293(e)(1)) If DOE determines that the EPCA, in relevant part, require DOE to 1. Incorporation of IEC Standard 62301 amended test procedure would alter the amend the test procedures for all 2. Separate Standard measured efficiency of a covered covered products to include VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary product, DOE must amend the measurement of standby mode and off I. Background and Authority applicable energy conservation standard mode energy consumption. Specifically, accordingly. (42 U.S.C. 6293(e)(2)) section 310 of EISA 2007 provides Title III of the Energy Policy and DOE’s test procedures for residential definitions of ‘‘active mode,’’ ‘‘standby Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291, et water heaters are found in the Code of mode,’’ and ‘‘off mode’’ (42 U.S.C. ‘‘ ’’ ‘‘ ’’ seq.; EPCA or, in context, the Act ) Federal Regulations (CFR) at 10 CFR 6295(gg)(1)(A)); however, the statute sets forth a variety of provisions 430.23(e) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart permits DOE to amend these definitions designed to improve energy efficiency. B, appendix E. The test procedures in the context of a given product (42 Part A of Title III (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309) include provisions for determining the U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(B)). The legislation establishes the ‘‘Energy Conservation energy efficiency (energy factor (EF)), as requires integration of such energy Program for Consumer Products Other well as the annual energy consumption consumption into the overall energy Than Automobiles,’’ including of these products. efficiency, energy consumption, or other residential water heaters, direct heating The direct heating equipment covered energy descriptor for each covered equipment, and pool heaters (all of product (not including furnaces) is product, unless the Secretary which are referred to below as ‘‘covered referred to as ‘‘home heating equipment’’ determines that—(i) the current test 1 products’’). (42 U.S.C. 6291(1)–(2) and in CFR. Unlike central heating furnaces, procedures for a covered product 6292(a)(4), (9) and (11)) direct heating equipment is a covered already fully account for and Under the Act, the overall program product which is designed to furnish incorporate the standby and off mode consists essentially of three parts: (1) warmed air to the living space of a energy consumption of the covered Testing; (2) labeling; and (3) Federal residence, directly from the device, product; or (ii) such an integrated test without duct connections. There are procedure is technically infeasible for a 1 All references to EPCA refer to the statute as amended, including through the Energy separate test procedures for the two particular covered product, in which Independence and Security Act of 2007, Public Law classes of home heating equipment, case the Secretary shall prescribe a 110–140. specifically 10 CFR 430.23(g) and 10 separate standby mode and off mode

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52894 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

energy use test procedure for the mode power consumption; and (2) Further clarification would also be covered product, if technically feasible. provide a foundation for DOE to provided that as of 180 days after (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)). develop, implement, and ensure publication of a test procedure final Under the statutory provisions compliance with amended energy rule, any representations as to the introduced by EISA 2007, any such conservation standards in the future that standby mode and off mode energy amendment must consider the most address the energy use of these products consumption of the products that are current versions of International when in standby mode and off mode. the subject of this rulemaking would Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) In addition to these statutory need to be based upon results generated Standard 62301, ‘‘Household electrical requirements for amended test under the applicable provisions of this appliances—Measurement of standby procedures, EISA 2007 has three test procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(2)) power’’ (First Edition 2005–06) and IEC separate provisions regarding the On November 24, 2006, DOE Standard 62087, ‘‘Methods of inclusion of standby mode and off mode published a notice in the Federal measurement for the power energy use in any energy conservation Register announcing the availability of consumption of audio, video, and standard, which have bearing on the and seeking comment on a framework related equipment’’ (Second Edition, current test procedures rulemaking. document to initiate rulemaking to 2008–09).2 Id. Further, section 310 of First, test procedure amendments to consider amended energy conservation EISA 2007 provides that any final rule include standby mode and off mode standards for residential water heaters, establishing or revising energy energy consumption shall not be used to direct heating equipment, and pool conservation standards adopted on or determine compliance with standards heaters (hereafter the November 2006 after July 1, 2010, must incorporate established prior to the adoption of such Framework Document). 71 FR 67825. standby mode and off mode energy use. test procedure amendments. (42 U.S.C. The issuance of a framework document (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3)(A)). 6295(gg)(2)(C)) Second, standby mode is the first step in conducting an Accordingly, pursuant to section 310 and off mode energy use must be appliance standards rulemaking. of EISA 2007, DOE’s residential water included into a single amended or new The November 2006 Framework heater, direct heating equipment, and standard for a covered product adopted Document was issued before the pool heater test procedures must in a final rule after July 1, 2010. Finally, enactment of EISA 2007, and account for standby mode and off mode a separate standard for standby mode consequently, it did not address the energy consumption. (42 U.S.C. and off mode energy consumption is possible amendments to the test 6295(gg)(2)) DOE test procedures are required if a single amended or new procedure associated with the EISA needed that account for standby mode standard is not feasible. (42 U.S.C. 2007 legislative charge (i.e., the standby and off mode energy use (to the extent 6295(gg)(3)(B)) mode and off mode provisions in 42 those operational modes apply to the In order to accommodate the above- U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3)) DOE issued its final products in question), in order to permit mentioned first provision, DOE clarifies rule revising energy conservation manufacturers to measure and certify that today’s proposed amended test standards for residential water heaters, compliance with future amended energy procedures would not alter the direct heating equipment, and pool conservation standards that address measures of energy efficiency used in heaters on March 31, 2010, which was those modes for the products that are existing energy conservation standards; published in the Federal Register on the subject of this rulemaking. If therefore, this proposal would not affect April 16, 2010. 75 FR 20112. Because finalized, today’s proposal would also a manufacturer’s ability to demonstrate publication of this final rule amending provide DOE a means for determining compliance with previously-established the energy conservation standards for compliance with any future standards standards. These amended test these products was required to be adopted for these products that include procedures would become effective, in completed before July 1, 2010 (the date standby mode and off mode energy terms of adoption into the CFR, 30 days after which any final rule establishing or consumption. after the date of publication in the revising a standard must incorporate Federal Register of the final rule in this standby mode and off mode energy use), II. Summary of the Proposal test procedures rulemaking. However, this standards final rule did not In today’s NOPR, DOE has tentatively DOE is proposing added language to the necessarily need to incorporate standby concluded that for residential water regulations codified in the CFR that mode and off mode energy use. heaters, there is no need to amend the would state that any added procedures Nonetheless, today’s proposal for test procedures pursuant to EISA 2007. and calculations for standby mode and amended test procedures will allow Specifically, because the current test off mode energy consumption resulting consideration of the standby mode and procedures for residential water heaters from implementation of the relevant off mode energy use of these products already fully account for and provisions of EISA 2007 need not be in a subsequent standards rulemaking incorporate standby mode energy performed at this time to determine (e.g., standards adopted after July 1, consumption, and because off mode is compliance with the current energy 2010). not applicable to water heaters, no conservation standards. Subsequently, As currently drafted, three of the test amendment is required. (42 U.S.C. and consistent with the second procedures for the products at issue in 6295(gg)(2)(A)(i)) A more complete provision above, manufacturers would this rulemaking would require discussion is provided below in section be required to use the amended test amendment to account for standby III.A. procedures’ standby mode and off mode mode and off mode energy use as For direct heating equipment and provisions to demonstrate compliance required by EISA 2007. Specifically, the pool heaters, DOE is proposing to with DOE’s energy conservation test procedure for vented heaters would amend the test procedures in order to: standards on the compliance date of a need added measurement and (1) Address the statutory requirement to final rule establishing amended energy calculation provisions to integrate expand test procedures to incorporate conservation standards for these electrical standby mode and off mode measurement of standby mode and off products that address standby mode and energy use into the overall energy off mode energy consumption, at which consumption equations. Fossil-fuel 2 IEC standards are available for purchase at: time the limiting statement in the DOE standby mode and off mode energy use http://www.iec.ch. test procedure would be removed. is already integrated into the vented

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52895

heater test procedure (see section III.B.1 electricity and fossil fuel as applicable discusses amendments for the test below). Test procedures for unvented to a given unit. The following explains procedure provisions for vented heaters, heaters would need added measurement generally how water heater energy and section III.C addresses test provisions of standby power (fossil-fuel consumption is determined under the procedure amendments for unvented and electrical). However, for the reasons DOE test procedure. Specific heaters. Specifically, the vented heater explained in section III.C below, no measurements are required to determine test procedures require additional added calculations or new energy the water heater’s energy performance measurement and calculation provisions efficiency descriptors are offered in in providing a representative daily in order to account for electrical standby today’s proposal for unvented heaters. amount of hot water. The measurements mode and off mode energy use. Fossil- Pool heater test procedures would need are used to calculate two separate fuel standby mode and off mode energy added measurement and calculation performance metrics: (1) Recovery use is already integrated into the vented provisions for both electric and fossil- efficiency, and (2) standby loss. Further heater test procedure.4 fuel standby mode and off mode energy calculations provide for a As a first step in addressing the use. Such energy use would need to be comprehensive efficiency descriptor requirements of EISA 2007, DOE incorporated into both the overall (EF) which represents the overall believes the relevant terms and concepts energy consumption equations. As efficiency of the water heater in from that statute need clarification as noted above, the test procedures for providing the representative daily they apply to vented heaters. While residential water heaters would not amount of hot water. Annual energy EISA 2007 provided definitions and need amendment, because standby consumption and cost are estimated by concepts that are generally applicable mode energy use is fully integrated into extending this daily performance and workable within the context of the the existing test procedure, and off measured by EF to a full year (i.e., 365 existing vented heater test procedure, mode is not applicable for residential days). some clarifying language is necessary to water heaters. There are some non-substantive address the specific characteristics of In amending the current test differences in terms of the terminology the products relevant to this procedures for residential direct heating used in the existing residential water rulemaking. The following paragraphs equipment and pool heaters, DOE heater test procedures as compared to discuss these proposed clarifications. proposes to incorporate by reference IEC what is used in EISA 2007. For example, Section 310(3) of EISA 2007 defines Standard 62301, ‘‘Household electrical the test procedure’s standby loss is ‘‘active mode’’ as ‘‘* * * the condition appliances—measurement of standby expressed as either an hourly standby in which an energy-using product—(I) is power’’ (First Edition, 2005–06), loss or a heat loss coefficient, and while connected to a main power source; regarding test conditions and test not identical, it can be equated to EISA (II) has been activated; and (III) provides procedures for measuring standby mode 2007’s ‘‘standby mode’’ energy use. In 1 or more main functions.’’ (42 U.S.C. and off mode energy consumption. DOE addition, the EISA 2007 definition of 6295(gg)(1)(A)(i)) This statutory also proposes to incorporate product- ‘‘off mode’’ appears inapposite to water definition of ‘‘active mode’’ is specific definitions of ‘‘active mode,’’ heater operation. Water heaters are comparable to what is referred to as ‘‘on- ‘‘standby mode,’’ and ‘‘off mode’’ that are assumed to operate all year either cycle’’ in the current vented heater test consistent with the guidance set forth actively heating water or incurring procedures. 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, under 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(1)(A). Further, energy consumption (loss) in standby appendix O, section 4.0 Calculations. DOE proposes to include in each test mode. There is no other mode of energy On-cycle is the period during the procedure additional language that consumption conceivable for these heating season when the vented heater would clarify the application of IEC products. Accordingly, to the extent is performing its main function (i.e., Standard 62301 for measuring standby those terms apply, DOE believes the heat delivery). The heat delivery process mode and off mode power full-year accounting of energy use as begins with the activation of the burner consumption.3 currently presented in the DOE water followed by, or simultaneously with, the heater test procedure fully accounts for III. Discussion activation of circulating fans, and ends measurement of active mode, standby with the deactivation of these A. Determination Not To Amend Test mode, and off mode energy components. As discussed in section Procedures for Residential Water consumption, as required by EISA 2007. III.B.3 below, the duration of on-cycle Heaters Similarly, the water heater test can be estimated in the test procedure procedure’s efficiency descriptor Energy as burner operating hours (BOH). As noted above, DOE’s test Factor is a complete accounting of all procedures for residential water heaters Section 310(3) of EISA 2007 defines energy consumption possible for a ‘‘standby mode’’ as ‘‘* * * the condition are found at 10 CFR 430.23(e) and 10 residential water heater. CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix E. in which an energy-using product—(I) is In consideration of the above, DOE connected to a main power source; and These test procedures include has tentatively concluded that the provisions for determining the energy (II) offers 1 or more of the following user current test procedures for water heaters oriented or protective functions: (aa) To factor (EF) as well as the annual energy already fully account for and consumption of those products. As facilitate the activation or deactivation incorporate measurement of standby of other functions (including active written, the test procedures include a mode and off mode energy full year accounting of energy use, both mode) by remote switch (including consumption, as required by EISA 2007. remote control), internal sensor, or (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)(i)) 3 EISA 2007 directs DOE to also consider IEC timer; (bb) Continuous functions, Standard 62087 when amending its test procedure B. Proposed Test Procedure including information or status displays to include standby mode and off mode energy Amendments for Vented Heaters (including clocks) or sensor-based consumption. See 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A). ’’ However, IEC Standard 62087 addresses the As discussed above, EISA 2007 functions. (42 U.S.C. methods of measuring the power consumption of requires amendment of DOE’s test audio, video, and related equipment. As explained 4 Vented heaters can be fueled by natural gas, subsequently in this notice, the narrow scope of this procedures for direct heating equipment propane, or oil. For simplicity, the expressions particular IEC Standard reduces its relevance to to account for standby mode and off ‘‘fossil-fueled’’ or ‘‘fossil-fuel’’ will be used to today’s proposal. mode energy consumption. This section include all three fuel types.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52896 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

6295(gg)(1)(A)(iii)) The statutory temperatures and percent not, AFUE represents a full accounting definition of ‘‘standby mode’’ is concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) of annual fossil-fuel consumption (i.e., comparable to what is referred to as ‘‘off- in the flue. The fossil fuel and electric active mode, standby mode, and off cycle’’ in the current vented heater test input is measured within a tolerance of mode) into a single efficiency procedure. 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, the nameplate input.6 For units descriptor. appendix O, section 4.0 Calculations. equipped with a constant-burning pilot In addition to the efficiency The duration of off-cycle would be the light, a separate measurement of energy descriptors discussed above, the vented total time during the heating season input to the pilot light is required. An heater test procedure’s annual energy when the vented heater is connected to exception to the pilot light measurement consumption calculations also represent power sources and not in active mode. requirement is granted to manually- a complete accounting of fossil-fuel Section 310(3) of EISA 2007 defines controlled heaters where the pilot light energy consumption. ‘‘off mode’’ as ‘‘* * * the condition in is designed to be turned off by the user In sum, the energy efficiency and which an energy-using product—(I) is when the heater is not in use and where consumption equations in the existing connected to a main power source; and the unit is labeled with instructions to test procedures for vented heaters (II) is not providing any standby or do so. provide an entire year’s accounting of active mode function.’’ (42 U.S.C. From this relatively limited set of fossil-fuel energy consumption (i.e., 6295(gg)(1)(A)(ii)) For vented heaters, data, on-cycle and off-cycle losses are 8,760 hours),7 which includes active off mode would occur during the non- determined using empirical coefficients mode, standby mode, and off mode heating season when the vented heater and a suite of calculations that address energy consumption, as required under is connected to power sources but is not various design features such as manual EISA 2007. Given that EISA 2007 does activated to provide heat. The statutory and modulating controls. Direct not prescribe any time periods over definition of ‘‘off mode’’ is comparable measurement of draft coefficients for which to measure the energy to what is referred to as non-heating units that are installed with thermal consumption for all three modes, DOE season in the current vented heaters test stack dampers is required. At the believes it is reasonable to interpret the procedure. The proposed definitions are manufacturer’s discretion, this direct Act as permitting the consolidation of located in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, measurement procedure is optional for active mode, standby mode, and off appendix O, section 4.0 Calculations. vented heaters without thermal stack mode together into an entire year’s DOE believes these proposed dampers. The gas pilot light accounting. definitions provide the clarification consumption is present during testing In consideration of the above, and necessary to carry out the requirements and is, therefore, accounted for in the pursuant to section 310(2)(A)(i) of EISA of EISA 2007 without unduly off-cycle. 2007, DOE has tentatively concluded complicating matters by addressing the The test procedure’s on-cycle and off- that the existing test procedures for potential for minor inaccuracies, such as cycle provisions are essentially identical vented heaters already fully account for those that might be caused by slight in meaning to the EISA 2007 statutory and integrate standby mode and off differences in run times for burners and definitions of ‘‘active mode’’ and mode fossil-fuel energy consumption. air circulating fans (see section III.B.3 ‘‘standby mode,’’ respectively. This on- below). DOE requests comments on this cycle/off-cycle format provides a 2. Specific Amendments for Vented approach for characterizing the active complete accounting of gas energy use Heaters mode, standby mode, and off mode during the entire heating season. In Some vented heaters have electric operation of vented heaters. EISA 2007 terminology, gas auxiliaries. In most cases, the only consumption in both active mode and electric auxiliary associated with vented 1. Treatment of Fossil-Fuel standby mode is fully accounted for and heaters is the air circulating fan. Consumption in Existing Test integrated into the test procedure’s However, it is conceivable that other Procedures for Fossil-Fueled Vented primary efficiency metric, part-load fuel auxiliaries, such as power burners and Heaters utilization efficiency. damper controls, could be present, and DOE has tentatively concluded that A second efficiency descriptor, AFUE, such devices may have associated the existing test procedures for vented provides an accounting of the non- electric standby mode and off mode heaters already fully account for and heating-season fossil-fuel energy energy consumption. The vented heater integrate standby mode and off mode consumption (i.e., pilot light energy test procedure, as written, requires fossil fuel energy consumption.5 consumption). Non-heating season measurement of maximum auxiliary Underlying the basis for this conclusion directly relates to the EISA 2007 electric power and does not distinguish is the manner in which gas definition of ‘‘off mode.’’ Accordingly, separate measurements of multiple consumption is accounted for in two of DOE has tentatively concluded that the components. For vented heaters so the test procedure’s efficiency metrics, AFUE provides a full accounting of equipped, this maximum auxiliary the part-load fuel utilization efficiency fossil-fuel off mode energy consumption electric power measurement would and the Annual Fuel Utilization pursuant to EISA 2007. include the total active wattage of Efficiency (AFUE). Part-load efficiency is calculated for multiple auxiliaries. DOE believes this The existing test procedure for vented vented heaters with manual controls single measurement of maximum active heaters is a flue loss procedure which, and thermal dampers. For all other wattage coupled with the estimate of accordingly, requires measurement of vented heaters, the calculations produce active hours, discussed below in section an AFUE without separately calculating III.B.3, constitutes a full accounting of 5 The only possible fossil fuel standby mode or off part-load efficiency. Nonetheless, what EISA 2007 refers to as active mode mode energy use for vented heaters would be the regardless of whether part-load energy consumption associated with a constant- electrical consumption. Accordingly, no burning pilot light. Therefore, only gas-fired vented efficiency is separately calculated or amendments are offered today to heaters are a part of this discussion, where the term expand the active mode accounting of ‘‘gas-fired’’ encompasses both natural gas and 6 Nameplate input is the energy supply rate in propane. Oil-fired vented heaters do not have pilot Btus per hour, which is physically listed on the electrical energy consumption. lights. In the case of electrical energy use, all types tested vented heater. Testing at this input would be of vented heaters may have measurable standby the most appropriate and consistent way to specify 7 Each year comprises 8,760 hours—i.e. (365 mode and off mode energy use. a uniform test input rate. days/year) × (24 hours/day) = 8,760 hours/year.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52897

However, since operation of vented assigned the test procedures value for accuracy of the assumptions made heaters with electric auxiliaries may burner operating hours. regarding the relative magnitude of the also result in electric energy No changes to the current regulating standby mode and off mode energy consumption in standby mode and off quotient, AFUE, are proposed. consumption for vented heaters. mode, and since electric standby mode Therefore, the proposed test procedure 3. Active Mode Hours Approximated by and off mode are not accounted for, it amendments related to standby mode Burner Operating Hours for Vented will be necessary to amend the vented and off mode would not impact testing Heaters home heating equipment test and certification under the existing procedures. First, it is necessary to energy conservation standard (which As mentioned above in section III.B.2, include a measurement of the standby does not currently address standby today’s proposal would assign active mode and off mode electrical mode and off mode energy consumption mode hours of a particular vented heater consumption rate (i.e., wattages). This in a comprehensive manner). DOE as its burner operating hours (BOH). can be done by adding a new subsection considered proposing an integrated BOH is a calculated value in the existing to the vented home heating equipment AFUE that would incorporate the test procedure for gas-fired and oil-fired test procedure. Specifically, separate standby mode and off mode energy vented heaters. BOH is determined by measurements of standby mode and off consumption into the existing AFUE by estimating the expected annual heating mode wattages can be added to section adding this additional energy load and deducing the burner on hours 3.0, Testing and measurements, of 10 consumption to the active energy necessary to address the annual heating CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix O. consumption within the AFUE quotient. load. BOH is exactly the active mode For these provisions, DOE proposes to However, DOE has determined that such hours for the burner itself. However, the reference IEC Standard 62301 for the integration is technically infeasible for blower and other electric auxiliaries measurement itself. The added section vented heaters. This is because the may have different active mode hours would require only one measurement of standby mode and off mode energy because of intentional time delays and wattage if there is no difference between usage is essentially not measureable due overruns. This possible slight standby mode and off mode. Separate to the fact that most manufacturers’ inaccuracy in the active mode hours measurements would be required if a ratings of AFUE (as well as the current accounting would be expected to have difference is expected. Clarification of energy conservation standards) are an insignificant effect on the overall the requirement for separate presented to the nearest whole number, accounting of standby mode and off measurements is provided in section and the magnitude of the energy for mode energy consumption, considering III.B.4. standby mode and off mode would be so the order of magnitude difference It is further clarified in this added comparatively small that it would be between standby mode and off mode section that the existing test procedure unlikely to change the reported value. hours compared to active mode hours. specifications for ambient temperature For example, assuming a representative For example, assuming a representative and voltage shall apply in lieu of the 4 watts 8 of standby mode and off mode BOH of 800 hours, the corresponding IEC 62301 standard provisions for these standby mode and off mode hours power might only represent 0.3 percent ¥ parameters. This is done to avoid the of the total active energy consumption, would be 7,960 hours (8,760 800); possibility of unnecessary burden that and it is expected that in most cases, no accordingly, a one-percent error in BOH might result if the slightly different IEC change in the reported AFUE would would result in a 0.1-percent error in provisions were required. These result because of the integration. standby mode and off mode accounting. parameters have little bearing on the DOE’s proposed approach would Therefore, considering the complexity measurement of electrical standby mode allow for the measurement of standby and increased burden of expanding the and off mode energy consumption as mode and off mode electrical energy accounting to provide detailed auxiliary long as they are reasonably uniform consumption of different vented heater run hours with no significant during the test. The existing test products. Although the magnitude of improvement in quantifying the procedure requires uniform control of energy savings may be small for a given magnitude of standby mode and off these parameters and, thus, should unit, it could be substantial when mode energy consumption, DOE suffice for these added measurements. aggregated across the full range of maintains that assigning active mode A second amendment is needed to covered products over the 30-year hours for all electrical auxiliaries as specify how to calculate the annual analysis period. DOE plans to further burner operating hours is both uniform electrical standby mode and off mode address the standby mode and off mode and reasonable. energy consumption from the measured electrical energy consumption of vented 4. Measurement of Standby Mode and wattages. This can be done by adding a heaters in the next standards Off Mode Wattages of Vented Heaters new calculation subsection within rulemaking. Today’s proposed amendments allow existing section 4.0, Calculations, of 10 DOE seeks comment on its tentative for a single wattage (i.e., electrical CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix O. conclusion that it would be technically power) measurement to serve as both The new subsection would be infeasible to adopt an integrated AFUE standby mode wattage and off mode designated as 4.7, Average annual for vented heaters, as well as the electric standby mode and off mode wattage. DOE has tentatively concluded energy consumption. This added 8 DOE does not have complete knowledge of the that this is a reasonable approach when subsection would assign mode hours range of expected standby wattages for all types of there is expected to be no difference consistent with the annual accounting vented heaters at this time, but it is assumed to be between the two modes in terms of already in the test procedure. less than the 7-watt average that DOE has wattage. This would be the case for most determined for central furnaces. This is because Specifically, off mode hours would be vented heaters typically do not have as extensive vented heater designs where the assigned the test procedure’s value for an array of electrical components and controls as appliance is not disconnected from the non-heating season hours. Standby compared to central furnaces. For example, a electric power source or where there is mode hours would be assigned the test vented heater may have one small fan as its only an absence of some other condition that electrical component, whereas a central furnace procedure’s value for heating season might have a larger circulating fan, electrical power would affect standby mode and off hours minus the active mode hours, burners, igniters, and considerably more associated mode wattage. The utilization of a where active mode hours would be electronic controls. seasonal off switch would be a case

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52898 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

where a reduction or elimination of off ambient temperature and voltage, and because all the input energy is delivered mode wattage compared to standby not the corresponding specifications of to the heated space as useful heat. This mode wattage can be expected. On units the IEC Standard, will apply for these energy rate is converted by so equipped, a separate measurement of measurements. The IEC specification of mathematical constants to either dollars off mode wattage would be required, room ambient conditions is slightly per million Btu’s output and/or annual and zero wattage for off mode would be more restrictive than those of the energy consumption. (Annual energy a distinct possibility. Although DOE is existing DOE test procedure. However, consumption is calculated only for not currently aware of some other factor DOE has tentatively concluded that heaters that are the primary heating or condition that might affect a there would be no meaningful source for the entire house. difference between standby mode and difference in wattage measurement Supplemental heaters only require off mode, a separate measure of off resulting from the two differing calculation of dollars per million Btu’s.) mode wattage would also be required specifications. Overall, IEC Standard As currently written, this test procedure anytime the wattages are expected to 62301 is concise and well organized, generally reflects the lack of any differ. and its use should not pose a significant appreciable energy performance DOE believes the phrases ‘‘reduction burden to anyone having the ordinary difference among models of this product or elimination’’ and ‘‘seasonal off skill and knowledge associated with the subcategory. This product subcategory switch’’ are unambiguous and clear vented heater manufacturing and testing has not been subject to any labeling enough to direct the testing official as to industries. requirements or energy conservation when a separate measurement of off DOE also reviewed IEC Standard standards, because of the lack of mode wattage is needed. DOE invites 62087, which specifies methods of appreciable performance difference as comments on the appropriateness and measuring the power consumption of would support regulation. As workability of these provisions. television (TV) receivers, video cassette mentioned above, pursuant to EISA recorders (VCRs), set top boxes, audio 5. Incorporating by Reference IEC 2007, DOE must now include provisions equipment, and multi-function Standard 62301 (First Edition 2005–06) to measure standby mode and off mode equipment for consumer use. IEC for Measuring Standby Mode and Off energy use in the test procedures used Standard 62087 does not, however, Mode Energy Consumption for Vented for these and many other products. This include measurement for the power Heaters brings up the question of whether consumption of electrical appliances unvented heaters use energy in standby As noted previously, EPCA, as such as vented heaters. Therefore, DOE mode or off mode and whether this amended by EISA 2007, requires that has tentatively concluded that IEC energy consumption might be regulated. test procedures be amended to include Standard 62087 is unsuitable for use DOE anticipates that such test standby mode and off mode energy regarding the proposed amendments to procedure amendments could identify consumption, taking into consideration the vented heater test procedures. the most current versions of Standards an opportunity for energy performance 62301 and 62087 of the International C. Proposed Test Procedure improvements in unvented heater Electrotechnical Commission. (42 U.S.C. Amendments for Unvented Heaters models, which would in turn require 6295(gg)(2)(A)) Today’s amendments Consistent with the requirements of DOE to consider regulating this energy would reference the IEC Standard 62301 EISA 2007, today’s proposal also performance. to obtain the standby mode and off includes test procedure amendments to DOE realizes that this product mode measured wattage. The amended address the standby mode and off mode subcategory presents a unique set of test procedure would use these energy consumption of unvented circumstances when addressing the measured wattages in calculations to heaters. These amendments are less applicable provisions of EISA 2007, accomplish the incorporation of standby involved, as compared to those for particularly the requirement to mode and off mode energy consumption vented heaters. Specifically, to effect the eventually include standby mode and into the test procedures. DOE reviewed necessary changes for unvented heaters, off mode energy consumption in a the IEC Standard 62301 and believes it DOE proposes to add only certain future energy conservation standard. is generally applicable to vented heater measurement provisions to the existing First, unlike other test procedures, testing, although some clarification is test procedure. DOE has tentatively appendix G does not include energy needed. Specifically, because there is a concluded that no added or amended efficiency or energy use metrics that possible conflict with provisions of the calculations to quantify annual standby would allow for the integration of existing procedures, DOE is clarifying in mode and off mode energy use are standby mode and off mode energy use. the proposed standby mode and off necessary. The reasons for this approach Instead, it merely provides a measure of mode measurement provisions that the are discussed below in detail. DOE energy consumption for that unit. As a accuracy and precision provisions of the believes that its proposed amendments consequence, there currently exists no IEC Standard 62301 are to be used in are appropriate for unvented heater basis to establish what EISA 2007 would lieu of the existing test procedure products and are consistent with the call a single or integrated standard for accuracy provisions. The issues direction provided in EISA 2007 for the energy efficiency of unvented addressed in the IEC Standard 62301 of both test procedures and standards. (42 heaters. supply voltage waveform and power U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2) and (3)) Second, standby mode energy use measurement accuracy apply to any By way of background, the unvented (defined as energy use during the measurement of low electrical power, heater test procedure is found at 10 CFR heating season when the heater is not including the low-power measurement 430.23(g) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart on) is as effective in heating the space for vented heater standby mode and off B, appendix G. This test procedure as active mode energy use. Therefore, mode. The existing test procedures’ applies to the active mode of both this energy consumption is not energy accuracy and measurement provisions electric and fossil-fueled unvented waste, but, rather, it is useful output. will still apply to the measurement of heaters, and it only requires Accordingly, it may not be beneficial to active mode electricity consumption. measurement of input energy rate (e.g., measure this energy use or appropriate Further, it is clarified that the existing Btu’s/hour). Output energy rate is to consider its regulation in an energy test procedure’s specification of room simply equated to input energy rate, conservation standard, unless it is

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52899

properly considered as part of the In consideration of all of above, DOE procedures need additional overall system. believes that the best way to satisfy the measurement and calculation provisions Finally, off mode energy consumption EISA 2007 test procedure requirements to integrate electrical standby mode and (defined as non-heating-season energy is to propose additional measurement off mode energy use, as required by consumption) could be considered provisions for standby mode and off EISA 2007. The sections below explain ineffective energy use and, accordingly, mode energy rates without attempting to the existing test procedure’s could be minimized by prescribing a define an average representative use requirements for measuring the fossil- separate energy conservation standard. cycle. The added measurement fuel and electrical energy consumption However, defining a representative off provisions for pilot lights would be of pool heaters, followed by a mode for this subcategory is difficult similar those already incorporated in discussion of DOE’s proposed because of the lack of data on consumer vented heater test procedure. The added amendments pertaining to the use. For example, prior to the present measurement provisions for electrical measurement of standby mode and off rulemaking proceeding, DOE has not standby mode and off mode energy use mode energy consumption for these been aware of data, or attempted to rates would be similar to what is products. collect data, on the fraction of the year proposed today for vented heaters. Both 1. Treatment of Fossil-Fuel unvented heaters might be unplugged or of these added provisions would allow Consumption in Existing Test otherwise disconnected from the energy for exemption from measurement if Procedures for Pool Heaters source, and the extent to which pilot there is means to disconnect the power lights are turned off during the non- source when not in use and instructions The existing DOE test procedure for heating season. to do so are clearly visible. This pool heaters is based on a steady-state This unique set of circumstances exemption from measurement is measure of thermal efficiency in active formed the basis of an inquiry to nine identical to what is currently in the mode, as specified by ANSI Standard manufacturers of unvented heaters, a existing vented heater test procedures as Z21.56–1994, ‘‘Gas-Fired Pool Heaters.’’ number which DOE believes would applied to pilot lights on manually- (It is noted that ‘‘thermal efficiency’’ is provide representative input from the controlled heaters. DOE believes this specified by statute as the regulating affected industry. Specifically, a request exemption from measurement should efficiency descriptor. (42 U.S.C. for information regarding possible apply to unvented heaters so equipped. 6291(22)) It is also noted that the standby mode and off mode energy use The proposed approach does not current version of this ANSI standard for unvented heaters was sent to relinquish DOE’s authority to regulate was released in 2006. Upon review, manufacturers in March 2009. This unvented direct heating equipment, DOE found no substantive differences request for information outlined the given the statutory directive to consider between the 1994 version and the 2006 issue and asked specific questions amended standards for ‘‘direct heating version, and accordingly, DOE is designed to aid DOE in addressing the equipment’’ generally. (42 U.S.C. proposing to update the incorporation requirements of EISA 2007 for these 6295(e)) The results of the additional by reference in DOE’s regulations at 10 products. The letter and responses measurements provisions could be used CFR 430.3.) The DOE pool heater test received are available at: http:// to regulate standby mode and off mode procedure as it now appears in 10 CFR www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ energy use for these products. part 430, subpart B, appendix P extends appliance_standards/residential/ DOE is interested in receiving this ANSI procedure by creating a water_pool_heaters_tp_nopr.html. comment on its tentative decision not to heating seasonal efficiency descriptor Basically, all respondents agreed as to define a representative use cycle for (EFFYHS). The heating seasonal the unique set of circumstances for this unvented heaters and the sufficiency of efficiency accounts for active and product type. The respondents reported the proposed amendments. DOE is standby modes of fossil-fuel energy that standby mode and off mode energy particularly interested in data that might consumption, and unlike thermal use is present in some designs of allow for more complete treatment of efficiency, it also accounts for auxiliary unvented heaters. Specifically, fossil- unvented heaters. electrical energy consumption in the fueled unvented heaters could have active mode, which is identified in the D. Proposed Test Procedure constant-burning pilot lights and test procedure as the period of time Amendments for Pool Heaters electric remote controls, both of which when the main heating device is would contribute to standby mode and As indicated above, EISA 2007 energized. off mode energy use. Similarly, electric requires amendment of the test Fossil-fuel energy consumption in the heaters could have remote controls that procedures for pool heaters to account standby mode, which is essentially the would contribute to off mode energy for standby mode and off mode energy pilot light energy consumption (QP), is use. All respondents agreed that it is consumption. The applicable pool included in the existing test procedure’s difficult to define an average heater test procedure is found at 10 CFR calculations of heating seasonal representative use cycle for these 430.23(p) and 10 CFR part 430, subpart efficiency. The term Qp is currently products, particularly in the off mode. B, appendix P. As explained below, included in the test procedures’ One respondent, the Association of consumption of fossil fuel in the equations without a specified protocol Home Appliance Manufacturers standby mode is already included in the to ascertain the value of Qp. No default (AHAM), suggested that the off mode be existing test procedure’s calculations. value for Qp is specified, so it is not ignored entirely for portable electric However, DOE is proposing to add a clear how this value is obtained. heaters, considering the evidence of specific measurement procedure for Accordingly, today’s proposal would these units being unplugged when not fossil-fuel standby mode and off mode provide a method by which to measure in use. Specifically, AHAM stated that energy consumption, because there is the pilot light energy consumption to consumer data, collected by The currently no protocol for actual help quantify fossil fuel consumption in Stevenson Group for AHAM in 2004, measurement of such energy the standby mode. reports that 86 percent of the consumers consumption. In addition, measurement The existing test procedures’ heating unplug their portable electric heaters and calculation provisions need to be seasonal efficiency includes an per the safety instructions. (AHAM, No. added for off mode fossil-fuel energy accounting of fossil-fuel standby mode 2 at pp. 1–2) consumption. Furthermore, the test that DOE believes is consistent with

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52900 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

EISA 2007 guidance for standby mode. incorporate the results into the test energy conservation standard, as called Specifically, standby mode is when the procedures’ energy usage and efficiency for in 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A) and 42 pool heater is connected to the main equations. However, for pool heaters U.S.C. 6295(gg)(3) respectively. The power source but the heater’s main with a seasonal off switch, off mode thermal efficiency descriptor will heating device is not functioning. The electrical energy consumption would be remain in the test procedure to provide test procedure establishes that the assigned a value of zero. the regulating basis for the current duration of the standby mode is energy conservation standard. 3. Measurement of Standby Energy equivalent to the number of pool Unlike the integrated AFUE for Consumption in ANSI/ASHRAE operating hours (POH) during the year vented heaters discussed above, DOE Standard 146–2006 (4,464 hours) minus the burner has tentatively concluded that the operating hours (BOH = 104 hours), ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 146–2006, integrated thermal efficiency is where 4,464 and 104 are assigned values ‘‘Method of Testing and Rating Pool technically feasible and would provide already in the existing test procedure. Heaters,’’ extends the procedure measurable performance differentiation, DOE believes this accounting is specified by ANSI Standard Z21.56 by because the added standby mode and off consistent with EISA 2007 and, including a test in which the energy mode energy consumption is significant accordingly, should remain as the basis consumption in standby mode is relative to the active energy of incorporating standby mode. Under measured. During this 60-minute consumption of the original thermal today’s modified approach, the active standby test, the thermostat setting for efficiency. There are two contributing mode rate of consumption would be the pool heater is set low enough so that factors to this conclusion: (1) The added multiplied by the time during which the the pool heater does not enter active energy consumption includes both fossil pool heater is in the active mode, and mode during the test. The total fuel and electrical energy consumption, the standby mode rate of consumption electricity and natural gas energy and (2) the active energy consumption would be multiplied by the time during consumption is measured over this 60- is relatively smaller because of the which the pool heater is in the standby minute period and added to provide a smaller number of active mode hours for mode. metric for standby mode energy pool heaters as compared to vented The existing DOE pool heater test consumption. Today’s NOPR proposes heaters. As a result, the pilot light alone procedure does not account for off mode to adopt a similar approach to measure would be expected to have the effect of fossil-fuel energy consumption (i.e., the standby mode and off mode energy reducing the thermal efficiency by a few amount of energy used when the pool consumption. DOE believes that ANSI/ percentage points. heater is not in service). Off mode ASHRAE 146–2006 cannot be adopted Additionally, the proposed operation would occur outside the pool ‘‘as-is’’ because there are some amendments to appendix P would heating season that is currently terminology differences specific to update the references to ANSI Standard described in the test procedure by the implementation of the requirements of Z21.56–2006, the most recent version of average number of pool operating hours EISA 2007. For example, there is no that standard. As noted above, DOE has during the year, which is defined as measurement or definition of ‘‘off mode’’ compared this version with the 4,464 h per year throughout the country. in ANSI/ASHRAE 146–2006. currently-referenced version from 1994 and found no substantive differences The pilot light energy consumption 4. Specific Amendments for Pool between the two test methods. during this period would be an example Heaters of off mode fossil-fuel energy 5. Incorporating by Reference IEC consumption. Under the modified The proposed amendments to appendix P would modify the existing Standard 62301 (First Edition 2005–06) approach, DOE proposes to now include for Measuring Standby Mode and Off off mode fossil-fuel energy consumption test procedure by adding a standby mode energy consumption measurement Mode Energy Consumption for Pool measurement provisions and to Heaters incorporate the results into the test that is similar to that used in the procedures’ energy usage and efficiency ASHRAE Standard 146, ‘‘Method of As noted previously, EPCA, as equations. Again, under today’s Testing for Rating Pool Heaters,’’ but amended by EISA 2007, requires that modified approach, the off mode rate of that is tailored to address the specific DOE test procedures be amended to consumption would be multiplied by concepts of EISA 2007. Specifically, a include standby mode and off mode the time during which the pool heater definition section would be added to the energy consumption, taking into is in the off mode. However, for pool test procedure to clarify the EISA 2007 consideration the most current versions heaters with a seasonal off switch, off definitions of ‘‘active mode,’’ ‘‘standby of Standards 62301 and 62087 of the mode fossil-fuel energy consumption mode,’’ and ‘‘off mode,’’ as applied to International Electrotechnical would be assigned a value of zero. pool heaters. Separate measurement and Commission. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) calculation provisions would be added Today’s amendments to the pool heater 2. Treatment of Electricity Consumption to allow separate quantification of test procedure would incorporate by in Existing Test Procedures for Pool standby mode and off mode energy reference IEC Standard 62301 to obtain Heaters consumption. A new efficiency the standby mode and off mode As mentioned in section III.D.1, the descriptor, integrated thermal measured wattage. Today’s proposed electricity consumption during active efficiency, would replace the heating test procedure amendments would use mode is incorporated in the heating seasonal efficiency to allow for these measured wattages in calculations seasonal efficiency descriptor, but integration of standby mode and off to accomplish the incorporation of electricity consumption during the mode energy consumption into a single standby mode and off mode energy standby mode or off mode is not efficiency measure. The term ‘‘integrated consumption into the test procedures. considered in the existing DOE pool thermal efficiency’’ is used to maintain DOE is proposing the following heater test procedure. Under the consistency with the statute. This clarifications to avoid any conflicts modified approach, DOE proposes to approach would allow for the between the existing test procedure and introduce standby mode and off mode integration and incorporation of standby IEC Standard 62301. First, DOE electrical energy consumption mode and off mode energy consumption proposes to clarify that the room measurement provisions and to into both the test procedure and an ambient temperature and voltage

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52901

specifications of the existing test B. Review Under the Regulatory covered in this rulemaking. On procedure would suffice to carryout the Flexibility Act December 11, 2009, DOE published a new wattage measurements and should The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and continue to be used rather than the U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation Public Meeting for Energy Conservation corresponding specifications of room of an initial regulatory flexibility Standards for Residential Water Heaters, ambient temperature and voltage in IEC analysis for any rule that by law must Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool Standard 62301. DOE has tentatively be proposed for public comment, unless Heaters in the Federal Register. 74 FR concluded that there would be no the agency certifies that the rule, if 65852. This notice inaccurately stated meaningful difference in the wattage promulgated, would not have a that the applicable NAICS classification number for pool heaters is 335228. As measurement resulting from the slightly significant economic impact on a these rulemakings apply to the same differing specifications for room substantial number of small entities. As sets of products, the DOE believes required by Executive Order 13272, ambient temperature and voltage. clarification is both necessary and ‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities Second, DOE would clarify that the appropriate. Additionally, DOE has in Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461 accuracy and measurement provisions included a similar notification regarding (August 16, 2002), DOE published of IEC Standard 62301 are appropriate the correct NAICS classification number procedures and policies on February 19, for these measurements and would in the context of the final rule for 2003, to ensure that the potential supersede the corresponding provisions Energy Conservation Standards for impacts of its rules on small entities are of the existing test procedure. DOE Residential Water Heaters, Direct properly considered during the DOE believes the issues addressed in section Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters. 5 of IEC Standard 62301, related to rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE’s The standards final rule was issued on procedures and policies may be viewed supply voltage waveform and power March 31, 2010 and was published in on the Office of the General Counsel’s measurement accuracy, would apply to the Federal Register on April 16, 2010. Web site (http://www.gc.doe.gov). any measurement of low electrical 75 FR 20112. DOE reviewed today’s proposed rule In the December 11, 2009 NOPR for power, including the low-power under the provisions of the Regulatory measurement for pool heater standby energy conservation standards, DOE Flexibility Act and the procedures and identified 12 small DHE manufacturers mode and off mode. The existing test policies published on February 19, procedure’s accuracy and measurement and one small pool heater manufacturer 2003. This proposed rule would that can be considered small businesses. provisions will still apply to the prescribe test procedure amendments measurement of active mode electricity Pool heater manufacturers and the that would be used to determine vented heater manufacturers of the DHE consumption. In general, DOE believes compliance with energy conservation product class are the same as identified IEC Standard 62301 is concise and well standards for the products that are the in the standards notice. An estimate of organized and would not impose a subject of this rulemaking. Although the number of manufacturers of significant burden, given the DOE considers test procedure unvented heaters was not developed as considerable skill and knowledge base amendments for residential water part of the standards analysis because, present in the pool heater heaters, direct heating equipment, and for reasons stated in the 2009 NOPR, manufacturing and associated testing pool heaters in this rulemaking, DOE DOE believes it is unnecessary to set industries. proposes amendments to the test minimum efficiency standards for DOE also reviewed IEC Standard procedures for pool heaters and direct unvented DHE. 74 FR 65852, 65866 62087, which specifies methods of heating equipment only. For the reasons (Dec. 11, 2009). Based on its interviews measuring the power consumption of stated earlier in the preamble, DOE has with manufacturers, DOE has tentatively TV receivers, VCRs, set top boxes, audio tentatively determined that amendments determined that there are three to the test procedure for water heaters equipment, and multi-function unvented DHE manufactures considered are not necessary. equipment for consumer use. IEC small businesses. The Small Business Administration Standard 62087 does not, however, For the reasons explained below, DOE (SBA) considers an entity to be a small has tentatively concluded that the include measurement for the power business if, together with its affiliates, it proposed rule would not have a consumption of electrical appliances employs less than a threshold number of significant impact on either small or such as pool heaters. Therefore, DOE workers specified in 13 CFR part 121. large manufacturers under the has tentatively concluded that IEC The threshold values set forth in these applicable provisions of the Regulatory Standard 62087 is unsuitable for use regulations use size standards and codes Flexibility Act. The proposed rule regarding the proposed amendments to established by the North American would amend DOE’s test procedures for the pool heater test procedures. Industry Classification System (NAICS) direct heating equipment and pool IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory that are available at http://www.sba.gov/ heaters by incorporating testing Review idc/groups/public/documents/ provisions to address standby mode and sba_homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf. off mode energy consumption. The A. Review Under Executive Order 12866 The threshold number designation as a proposed procedures involve measuring small business under NAICS power input when the direct heating Today’s proposed rule is not a classification 333414, titled ‘‘Heating equipment or pool heater is in standby ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Equipment (Except Warm Air Furnaces) mode and off mode during testing. Pool section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Manufacturing,’’ is 500 employees. This heater proposed test procedure ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ 58 classification specifically includes amendments would require FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, manufacturers of direct heating measurement of both fossil fuel and this proposed action was not subject to equipment and pool heaters. electric energy use in standby mode and review under the Executive Order by the Concurrent to this rulemaking for test off mode. DHE proposed test procedure Office of Information and Regulatory procedures, DOE has been in the amendments would require Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of process of developing amended energy measurement of only electrical energy Management and Budget (OMB). conservation standards for the products use in standby mode and off mode.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52902 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

These tests can be conducted in the Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a E. Review Under Executive Order 13132 same facilities used for the current regulatory flexibility analysis for this Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ energy testing of these products, so rulemaking. DOE will provide its imposes certain requirements on there would be no additional facilities certification and supporting statement agencies formulating and implementing costs required by the proposed rule. In of factual basis to the Chief Counsel for policies or regulations that preempt addition, while the power meter Advocacy of the SBA for review under State law or that have Federalism proposed to be required for these tests 5 U.S.C. 605(b). implications. 64 FR 43255 (August 10, might require greater accuracy than the C. Review Under the Paperwork 1999). The Executive Order requires power meter used for current energy Reduction Act of 1995 agencies to examine the constitutional testing, the investment required for a This rule contains a collection-of- and statutory authority supporting any possible instrumentation upgrade would action that would limit the be modest. It is likely that the information requirement subject to the policymaking discretion of the States, manufacturers, or their testing facilities, Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) which and to carefully assess the necessity for already have equipment that meets the has been approved by OMB under such actions. The Executive Order also requirements of IEC 62301, but an control number 1910–1400. Public requires agencies to have an accountable Internet search of equipment that reporting burden for compliance process to ensure meaningful and timely specifically meets the requirements of reporting for energy and water input by State and local officials in the IEC 62301 reveals a cost of conservation standards is estimated to development of regulatory policies that approximately $2,700 to $3,000. This average 30 hours per response, have Federalism implications. On cost is small compared to the overall including the time for reviewing March 14, 2000, DOE published a financial investment needed to instructions, searching existing data undertake the business enterprise of sources, gathering and maintaining the statement of policy describing the testing consumer products which data needed, and completing and intergovernmental consultation process involves facilities, qualified staff, and reviewing the collection of information. that it will follow in developing such specialized equipment. Send comments regarding this burden regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has The duration of the electrical standby estimate, or any other aspect of this data examined this proposed rule and mode and off mode testing for DHE is collection, including suggestions for determined that it would not have a also short, approximately five minutes if reducing the burden, to DOE (see substantial direct effect on the States, on the power supply is stable and ten ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to the relationship between the national minutes if the power supply is not [email protected]. government and the States, or on the stable. For example, testing with Notwithstanding any other provision distribution of power and unstable power supply might require of the law, no person is required to responsibilities among the various five minutes to determine that it is in respond to, nor shall any person be levels of government. EPCA governs and fact unstable followed by an additional subject to a penalty for failure to comply prescribes Federal preemption of State integrated test measurement of five with, a collection of information subject regulations as to energy conservation for minutes. The duration of the fossil fuel to the requirements of the PRA, unless the products that are the subject of and electrical standby mode and off that collection of information displays a today’s proposed rule. States can mode test proposed for pool heaters is currently valid OMB Control Number. petition DOE for exemption from such preemption to the extent, and based on one hour. This one hour time period is D. Review Under the National criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. consistent with the industry consensus Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for such measurement (i.e., the ASHRAE 6297(d)) Therefore, Executive Order Standard 146), and, is not a significant In this rulemaking, DOE is proposing 13132 requires no further action. test procedure amendments that it extension of the DOE existing test F. Review Under Executive Order 12988 procedures. The existing DOE test expects would be used to develop and procedure requires, in addition to set- implement future energy conservation Regarding the review of existing up, an establishment of steady state standards for residential direct heating regulations and the promulgation of conditions that might approach 2 hours equipment and pool heaters. DOE has new regulations, section 3(a) of followed by the actual thermal determined that this rule falls into a Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice efficiency test for 30 minutes. The class of actions that are categorically Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), proposed standby test could begin excluded from review under the imposes on Federal agencies the general immediately following the thermal National Environmental Policy Act of duty to adhere to the following efficiency test and therefore, would not 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE’s requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting require additional set up, implementing regulations at 10 CFR part errors and ambiguity; (2) write instrumentation, or waiting period. The 1021. Specifically, this proposed rule regulations to minimize litigation; testing official could run simultaneous would amend the existing test (3) provide a clear legal standard for tests on other units and simply record procedures for these products without affected conduct rather than a general the results of the test at the end of the changing their environmental effects, standard; and (4) promote simplification 60 minute standby period. For these and, therefore, it is covered by and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of reasons, DOE believes that the proposed Categorical Exclusion A5 in 10 CFR part Executive Order 12988 specifically requirements for equipment and time to 1021, subpart D, which applies because requires that Executive agencies make conduct the additional tests would not this rule would establish revisions to every reasonable effort to ensure that the be expected to impose a significant existing test procedures that would not regulation clearly specifies the economic impact on affected entities, affect the amount, quality, or following: (1) The preemptive effect, if regardless of size. distribution of energy usage, and, any; (2) any effect on existing Federal Accordingly, DOE tentatively therefore, would not result in any law or regulation; (3) a clear legal concludes and certifies that this environmental impacts. Accordingly, standard for affected conduct while proposed rule would not have a neither an environmental assessment promoting simplification and burden significant economic impact on a nor an environmental impact statement reduction; (4) the retroactive effect, if substantial number of small entities. is required. any; (5) definitions of key terms; and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52903

(6) other important issues affecting of the family as an institution. under Executive Order 12866. It has clarity and general draftsmanship under Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it likewise not been designated as a any guidelines issued by the Attorney is not necessary to prepare a Family significant energy action by the General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order Policymaking Assessment. Administrator of OIRA. Moreover, it 12988 requires Executive agencies to would not have a significant adverse I. Review Under Executive Order 12630 review regulations in light of applicable effect on the supply, distribution, or use standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to Pursuant to Executive Order 12630, of energy. Therefore, it is not a determine whether they are met or ‘‘Governmental Actions and Interference significant energy action, and, whether it is unreasonable to meet one with Constitutionally Protected Property accordingly, DOE has not prepared a or more of them. DOE has completed the Rights,’’ 53 FR 8859 (March 15, 1988), Statement of Energy Effects. required review and determined that, to DOE has determined that this proposed the extent permitted by law, this regulation would not result in any L. Review Under Section 32 of the proposed rule meets the relevant takings that might require compensation Federal Energy Administration Act of standards of Executive Order 12988. under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. 1974 Constitution. Under section 301 of the DOE G. Review Under the Unfunded Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–91; 42 Mandates Reform Act of 1995 J. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), DOE must comply Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Act, 2001 with section 32 of the Federal Energy Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. Administration Act of 1974, as amended 104–4; 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires Section 515 of the Treasury and by the Federal Energy Administration each Federal agency to assess the effects General Government Appropriations Authorization Act of 1977 (FEAA). (15 of Federal regulatory actions on State, Act, 2001 (Pub. L. 106–554; 44 U.S.C. U.S.C. 788) Section 32 essentially local, and Tribal governments and the 3516 note) provides for agencies to provides in relevant part that, where a private sector. For a proposed regulatory review most disseminations of proposed rule authorizes or requires use action likely to result in a rule that may information to the public under of commercial standards, the cause the expenditure by State, local, guidelines established by each agency rulemaking must inform the public of pursuant to general guidelines issued by and Tribal governments, in the the use and background of such OMB. OMB’s guidelines were published aggregate, or by the private sector of standards. In addition, section 32(c) at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and $100 million or more in any one year requires DOE to consult with the DOE’s guidelines were published at 67 (adjusted annually for inflation), section Attorney General and the Chairman of FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reviewed today’s notice under OMB and to publish estimates of the resulting concerning the impact of the DOE guidelines and has concluded that costs, benefits, and other effects on the commercial or industry standards on it is consistent with applicable policies national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a),(b)) competition. UMRA also requires a Federal agency to in those guidelines. The proposed modifications to the develop an effective process to permit K. Review Under Executive Order 13211 test procedures addressed by this timely input by elected officers of State, Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions proposed rule incorporate testing local, and Tribal governments on a methods contained in the commercial proposed ‘‘significant intergovernmental Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, standards, the International mandate,’’ and requires an agency plan Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for giving notice and opportunity for Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to Standard 62301, ‘‘Household electrical timely input to potentially affected appliances—Measurement of standby small governments before establishing prepare and submit to OMB a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed power,’’ Publication 62301 First Edition any requirements that might 2005–06 and ‘‘American National significantly or uniquely affect such significant energy action. A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as any action Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard governments. On March 18, 1997, DOE Z21.56–2006, ‘‘Gas-Fired Pool Heaters.’’ published a statement of policy on its by an agency that promulgates or is expected to lead to promulgation of a DOE has evaluated these standards and process for intergovernmental is unable to conclude whether they fully consultation under UMRA. 62 FR final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order comply with the requirements of section 12820. (The policy is also available at 32(b) of the FEAA (i.e., whether it was http://www.gc.doe.gov). Today’s 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a significant adverse developed in a manner that fully proposed rule contains neither an provides for public participation, intergovernmental mandate nor a effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; or (3) is designated by the comment, and review). DOE will mandate that may result in an consult with the Attorney General and expenditure of $100 million or more in Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. For any proposed the Chairman of the FTC about the any year, so these requirements do not impact of these test procedures on apply. significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed statement of any competition, before prescribing a final H. Review Under the Treasury and adverse effects on energy supply, rule. General Government Appropriations distribution, or use should the proposal V. Public Participation Act, 1999 be implemented, and of reasonable Section 654 of the Treasury and alternatives to the action and their A. Attendance at the Public Meeting General Government Appropriations expected benefits on energy supply, The time, date, and location of the Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires distribution, and use. Today’s proposed public meeting are listed in the DATES Federal agencies to issue a Family regulatory action to amend the test and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning Policymaking Assessment for any rule procedures for residential direct heating of this NOPR. To attend the public that may affect family well-being. equipment and pool heaters to address meeting, please notify Ms. Brenda Today’s proposed rule would not have standby mode and off mode energy use Edwards at (202) 586–2945. As any impact on the autonomy or integrity is not a significant regulatory action explained in the ADDRESSES section,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52904 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

foreign nationals visiting DOE summaries of comments received before exempt by law from public disclosure Headquarters are subject to advance the public meeting, allow time for should submit two copies: One copy of security screening procedures. presentations by participants, and the document that includes all of the encourage all interested parties to share information believed to be confidential, B. Procedure for Submitting Requests to their views on issues affecting this and one copy of the document with that Speak rulemaking. Each participant will be information deleted. DOE will make its Any person who has an interest in the allowed to make a prepared general own determination as to the topics addressed in this notice, or who statement (within time limits confidential status of the information is a representative of a group or class of determined by DOE), before the and treat it accordingly. persons that has an interest in these discussion of specific topics. DOE will Factors of interest to DOE when issues, may request an opportunity to permit other participants to comment evaluating requests to treat submitted make an oral presentation at the public briefly on any general statements. At the information as confidential include: (1) meeting. Such persons may hand- end of all prepared statements on each A description of the items; (2) whether deliver requests to speak to the address specific topic, DOE will permit and why such items are customarily shown in the ADDRESSES section at the participants to clarify their statements treated as confidential within the beginning of this notice between 9 a.m. briefly and to comment on statements industry; (3) whether the information is and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, made by others. generally known by or available from except Federal holidays. Requests may Participants should be prepared to other sources; (4) whether the also be sent by mail or e-mail to: Ms. answer DOE’s and other participants’ information was previously made Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of questions. DOE representatives may also available to others without obligation Energy, Building Technologies Program, ask participants about other matters concerning its confidentiality; (5) an Mailstop EE–2J, 1000 Independence relevant to this rulemaking. The official explanation of the competitive injury to Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585– conducting the public meeting will the submitting person that would result 0121, or [email protected]. accept additional comments or from public disclosure; (6) when such Persons who wish to speak should questions from those attending, as time information might lose its confidential include with their request a computer permits. The presiding official will nature due to the passage of time; and diskette or CD–ROM in WordPerfect, announce any further procedural rules (7) why disclosure of the information Microsoft Word, PDF, or text (ASCII) file or modification of the above procedures would be contrary to the public interest. format that briefly describes the nature needed for the proper conduct of the of their interest in this rulemaking and public meeting. After the public E. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment the topics they wish to discuss. Such meeting, interested parties may submit Although comments are welcome on persons should also provide a daytime further comments on the proceedings as all aspects of this rulemaking, DOE is telephone number where they can be well as on any aspect of the rulemaking particularly interested in receiving reached. until the end of the comment period. comments and views of interested DOE requests persons scheduled to DOE will make the entire record of parties on the following issues: make an oral presentation to submit an this proposed rulemaking, including the 1. Incorporation of IEC Standard advance copy of their statements at least transcript from the public meeting, one week before the public meeting. available for inspection at the U.S. 62301. DOE invites comment on the DOE may permit persons who cannot Department of Energy, 6th Floor, 950 adequacy of IEC Standard 62301 to supply an advance copy of their L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC measure standby mode and off mode statement to participate, if those persons 20024, (202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m. power for vented heaters, unvented have made advance alternative and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, heaters, and pool heaters. arrangements with the Building except Federal holidays. Copies of the 2. No Need to Amend Water Heater Technologies Program. As necessary, transcript will be posted on the DOE Test Procedures. DOE invites comment requests to give an oral presentation Web site and are also available for on its tentative conclusion that the should ask for such alternative purchase from the transcribing reporter. current test procedures for water heaters arrangements. already fully account for and D. Submission of Comments incorporate measurement of standby C. Conduct of Public Meeting DOE will accept comments, data, and mode and off mode energy DOE will designate a DOE official to information regarding the proposed rule consumption, as required by EISA 2007. preside at the public meeting and may before or after the public meeting, but 3. Updated Reference for Pool Heater also use a professional facilitator to aid no later than November 15, 2010. Testing. DOE invites comment on the discussion. The meeting will not be a Comments, data, and information updated version of American National judicial or evidentiary-type public submitted to DOE’s e-mail address for Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard hearing, but DOE will conduct it in this rulemaking should be provided in Z21.56–2006, ‘‘Gas-Fired Pool Heaters,’’ accordance with section 336 of EPCA WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or and whether it constitutes any (42 U.S.C. 6306). There shall not be text (ASCII) file format. Stakeholders substantive change relative to the 1994 discussion of proprietary information, should avoid the use of special version of ANSI Standard Z21.56 costs or prices, market share, or other characters or any form of encryption, currently referenced in the existing test commercial matters regulated by U.S. and wherever possible, comments procedure. anti-trust laws. A court reporter will be should include the electronic signature 4. Integrated AFUE for Vented present to record the proceedings and of the author. Comments, data, and Heaters. DOE seeks comment on its prepare a transcript. information submitted to DOE via mail tentative conclusion that it would be The public meeting will be conducted or hand delivery/courier should include technically infeasible to adopt an in an informal, conference style. DOE one signed paper original. No integrated AFUE for vented heaters, as reserves the right to schedule the order telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted. well as the accuracy of the assumptions of presentations and to establish the Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any made regarding the relative magnitude procedures governing the conduct of the person submitting information that he of the standby mode and off mode public meeting. DOE will present or she believes to be confidential and energy consumption for vented heaters.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52905

5. Integrated Thermal Efficiency for b. Removing the words ‘‘section 4.3 of c. Adding new sections 1.1, 1.16, 1.22, Pool Heaters. DOE seeks comment on appendix P’’ in paragraph (p)(1)(ii) and 1.25 and 1.30; the proposed efficiency descriptor, adding in their place ‘‘section 5.3 of d. Adding new sections 3.7, 3.7.1, and integrated thermal efficiency, that appendix P’’. 3.7.2; and would allow for integration of standby e. Revising sections 4.6.3 and 4.6.3.1, Appendix G to Subpart B—[Amended] mode and off mode energy consumption and adding a new section 4.7. into a single efficiency measure, and 4. Appendix G to Subpart B of Part The additions and revisions read as whether this approach would allow for 430 is amended in section 2 by adding follows: the integration and incorporation into new sections 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.4, and 2.4.1 to Appendix O to Subpart B of Part 430— the test procedure and an energy read as follows: Uniform Test Method for Measuring the conservation standard, as called for in Appendix G to Subpart B of Part 430— Energy Consumption of Vented Home 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A) and 42 U.S.C. Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Heating Equipment 6295(gg)(3) respectively. Energy Consumption of Unvented Home Note: The procedures and calculations that VI. Approval of the Office of the Heating Equipment refer to standby mode and off mode energy Secretary * * * * * consumption, (i.e., sections 3.7 and 4.7 of 2. Testing and measurements. this appendix O) need not be performed to The Secretary of Energy has approved determine compliance with energy publication of this notice of proposed * * * * * conservation standards for vented heaters at rulemaking. 2.3 Pilot light measurement. Except as this time. However, any representation provided in section 2.3.1, measure the energy List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430 related to standby mode and off mode energy input rate to the pilot light (Qp), with an error consumption of these products made after Administrative practice and no greater than 3 percent, for unvented [date 180 days after date of publication of the procedure, Confidential business heaters so equipped. test procedure final rule in the Federal 2.3.1 The measurement of Q is not information, Energy conservation, p Register] must be based upon results required for unvented heaters where the pilot generated under this test procedure, Household appliances, Imports, light is designed to be turned off by the user consistent with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. Incorporation by reference, when the heater is not in use (i.e., for units 6293(c)(2). After July 1, 2010, any adopted Intergovernmental relations, Small where turning the control to the OFF position energy conservation standard shall businesses. will shut off the gas supply to the burner(s) incorporate standby mode and off mode and the pilot light). This provision applies Issued in Washington, DC, on August 20, energy consumption, and upon the only if an instruction to turn off the unit is 2010. compliance date for such standards, provided on the heater near the gas control compliance with the applicable provisions of Cathy Zoi, value (e.g., by label) by the manufacturer. this test procedure will also be required. Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and 2.4 Electrical standby mode power 1.0. Definitions. Renewable Energy. measurement. Except as provided in section 1.1 ‘‘Active mode’’ means the condition For the reasons stated in the 2.4.1, for all electric heaters and unvented during the heating season in which the preamble, DOE is proposing to amend heaters with electrical auxiliaries, measure vented heater is connected to the power part 430 of chapter II, subchapter D of the standby power (PSB) in accordance with source, and either the burner or any electrical title 10 of the Code of Federal the procedures in the International auxiliary is activated. Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard * * * * * Regulations, to read as set forth below: 62301, ‘‘Household electrical appliances— 1.16 ‘‘IEC 62301’’ means the test standard Measurement of standby power,’’ Publication published by the International PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION 62301 First Edition 2005–06 (incorporated by Electrotechnical Commission, titled PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER reference; see § 430.3), with all electrical ‘‘Household electrical appliances— PRODUCTS components not activated. Voltage shall be as Measurement of standby power,’’ Publication specified in section 1.4.1 Electrical supply of 1. The authority citation for part 430 62301 First Edition 2005–06. (incorporated this appendix. by reference; see § 430.3) continues to read as follows: 2.4.1 The measurement of PSB is not Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C. required for heaters designed to be turned off * * * * * 1.22 ‘‘Off mode’’ means the condition 2461 note. by the user when the heater is not in use (i.e., for units where turning the control to the during the non-heating season in which the 2. Section 430.3 is amended by OFF position will shut off the electrical vented heater is connected to the power revising paragraph (c)(13) to read as supply to the heater). This provision applies source, and neither the burner nor any follows: only if an instruction to turn off the unit is electrical auxiliary is activated. provided on the heater (e.g., by label) by the * * * * * § 430.3 Materials incorporated by manufacturer. 1.25 ‘‘Seasonal off switch’’ means the reference. * * * * * control device, such as a lever or toggle, on * * * * * the vented heater that affects a difference in (c) * * * Appendix O to Subpart B—[Amended] off mode energy consumption as compared to standby mode consumption. (13) ANSI Z21.56–2006 (‘‘ANSI 5. Appendix O to Subpart B of Part Z21.56’’), Standard for Gas-Fired Pool 430 is amended by: * * * * * 1.30 ‘‘Standby mode’’ means the Heaters, approved December 13, 2005, a. Adding a Note after the heading; IBR approved for Appendix P to Subpart condition during the heating season in which b. Redesignating sections 1.1 through the vented heater is connected to the power B. 1.33 as follows: source, and neither the burner nor any * * * * * electrical auxiliary is activated. Old sections New sections § 430.23 [Amended] * * * * * 3.0 Testing and measurements. 3. Section 430.23 is amended by: 1.1 to 1.14 ...... 1.2 to 1.15. * * * * * a. Removing the words ‘‘section 4.2 of 1.15 to 1.19 ...... 1.17 to 1.21. 1.20 and 1.21 ...... 1.23 and 1.24. 3.7 Measurement of electrical standby appendix P’’ in paragraph (p)(1)(i) and mode and off mode power. ‘‘ 1.22 to 1.25 ...... 1.26 to 1.29. adding in their place section 5.2 of 1.26 to 1.33 ...... 1.31 to 1.38. 3.7.1 Standby power measurements. With appendix P’’, and all electrical auxiliaries of the vented heater

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52906 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

not activated, measure the standby power 4,160 = average heating season hours per year 2.1 Active mode. The test method for (PSB) in accordance with the procedures in POFF = vented heater off mode power, in testing pool heaters in active mode is as IEC 62301 (incorporated by reference, see watts, as measured in section 3.7 specified in ANSI Z21.56 (incorporated by § 430.3), except that section 2.9, Room 4,600 = average non-heating season hours per reference; see § 430.3). ambient temperature, and the voltage year 2.2 Standby mode. The test method for provision of section 2.3.5, Electrical supply, K = 0.001 kWh/Wh, conversion factor for testing the energy consumption of pool of this appendix shall apply in lieu of the IEC watt-hours to kilowatt-hours. heaters in standby mode is as described in 62301 corresponding sections 4.2, Test room, BOH = burner operating hours as calculated sections 3 through 5 below. and 4.3, Power supply. Clarifying further, the in section 4.6.1 where for single stage 2.3 Off mode. IEC 62301 sections 4.5, Power measurement controls or manual controls vented 2.3.1 Pool heaters with a seasonal off accuracy, and section 5, Measurements, shall heaters BOH = BOHSS and for vented switch. apply in lieu of section 2.8, Energy flow heaters equipped with two stage or For pool heaters with a seasonal off switch, instrumentation, of this appendix. Measure modulating controls BOH = (BOHR + no off-mode test is required. the wattage so that all possible standby mode 2.3.2 Pool heaters without a seasonal off BOHH). wattage for the entire appliance is recorded, switch. not just the standby mode wattage of a single 6. Appendix P to Subpart B of Part For pool heaters without a seasonal off auxiliary. 430 is revised to read as follows: switch, the test method for testing the energy 3.7.2 Off mode power measurement. If consumption of the pool heater is as the unit is equipped with a seasonal off Appendix P to Subpart B of Part 430— described in sections 3 through 5 below. switch or there is an expected difference Uniform Test Method for Measuring the 3. Test conditions. between off mode power and standby mode Energy Consumption of Pool Heaters 3.1 Active mode. Establish the test power, measure off mode power (POFF) in conditions specified in section 2.10 of ANSI accordance with the standby power Note: The procedures and calculations that Z21.56 (incorporated by reference; see procedures in IEC 62301 (incorporated by refer to standby mode and off mode energy § 430.3). reference, see § 430.3), except that section consumption (i.e., sections 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 4.2, 3.2 Standby mode and off mode. 2.9, Room ambient temperature, and the 4.3, 5.3 equation (3), and 5.4 of this appendix Following the conclusion of the 30-minute voltage provision of section 2.3.5, Electrical P) need not be performed to determine active mode test described in section 3.1, supply, of this appendix shall apply in lieu compliance with energy conservation reduce the thermostat setting to a low enough of the IEC 62301 corresponding sections 4.2, standards for pool heaters at this time. temperature to put the pool heater into Test room, and 4.3, Power supply. Clarifying However, any representation related to standby mode. Reapply the energy sources further, the IEC 62301 sections 4.5, Power standby mode and off mode energy and operate the pool heater in standby mode measurement accuracy, and section 5, consumption of these products made after for 60 minutes. Measurements, shall apply in lieu of section [date 180 days after date of publication of the 4. Measurements. 2.8, Energy flow instrumentation, of this test procedure final rule in the Federal 4.1 Active mode. Measure the quantities appendix. Measure the wattage so that all Register] must be based upon results delineated in section 2.10 of ANSI Z21.56 possible standby mode wattage for the entire generated under this test procedure, (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3). The appliance is recorded, not just the standby consistent with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. measurement of energy consumption for oil- mode wattage of a single auxiliary. If there 6293(c)(2). After July 1, 2010, any adopted fired pool heaters in Btu is to be carried out is no expected difference in off mode power energy conservation standard shall in appropriate units (e.g., gallons). and standby mode power, let POFF = PSB, in incorporate standby mode and off mode 4.2 Standby mode. Record the total which case no separate measurement of off energy consumption, and upon the electricity consumption during the standby mode power is necessary. compliance date for such standards, mode test, Es, in Wh, in accordance with 4.0 Calculations. compliance with the applicable provisions of section 5 of IEC 62301 (incorporated by * * * * * this test procedure will also be required. reference; see § 430.3) and the fossil fuel energy consumption during the standby test, 4.6.3 Average annual auxiliary electrical 1. Definitions. energy consumption for vented heaters. For Q p, in Btu. Ambient temperature and voltage 1.1. Active mode means the condition specifications of ANSI Z21.56 (incorporated vented heaters with single stage controls or during the pool heating season in which the manual controls, the average annual auxiliary by reference; see § 430.3) shall apply to this pool heater is connected to the power source, standby mode testing. electrical consumption (EAE) is expressed in and the main burner, electric resistance kilowatt-hours and defined as: 4.3 Off mode. element, or heat pump is activated to heat 4.3.1 Pool heaters with a seasonal off EAE = BOHSSPE + ESO pool water. switch. For pool heaters with a seasonal off Where: 1.2 IEC 62301 means the test standard switch, the total electricity consumption published by the International BOHSS = as defined in 4.6.1 of this appendix during the off mode, Eoff = 0, and the fossil Electrotechnical Commission, titled PE= as defined in 3.1.3 of this appendix fuel energy consumed during the off mode, ‘‘Household electrical appliances— ESO = as defined in 4.7 of this appendix Qoff = 0. Measurement of standby power,’’ Publication 4.6.3.1 For vented heaters with two stage 4.3.2 Pool heaters without a seasonal off 62301 First Edition 2005–06. (incorporated switch. Record the total electricity or modulating controls, EAE is defined as: by reference; see § 430.3) consumption during the standby/off mode EAE=(BOHR+BOHH)PE + ESO 1.3 Off mode means the condition during test, Eoff (= Es), in Wh, in accordance with Where: the non-pool heating season in which the section 5 of IEC 62301 (incorporated by BOHR= as defined in 4.6.1 of this appendix pool heater is connected to the power source, reference; see § 430.3), and the fossil fuel BOHH= as defined in 4.6.1 of this appendix and neither the main burner, electric energy consumption during the off mode test, PE= as defined in 3.1.3 of this appendix resistance elements, nor heat pump is Qoff (= Qp), in Btu. Ambient temperature and ESO = as defined in 4.7 of this appendix activated. voltage specifications of ANSI Z21.56 * * * * * 1.4 Seasonal off switch means a switch (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3) shall 4.7 Average annual electric standby present on the pool heater that effects a apply to this off mode testing. mode and off mode energy consumption. difference in off mode energy consumption 5. Calculations. Calculate the annual electric standby mode as compared to standby mode energy 5.1 Thermal efficiency. Calculate the consumption. thermal efficiency, Et (expressed as a and off mode energy consumption, ESO, defined as, in kilowatt-hours: 1.5 Standby mode means the condition percent), as specified in section 2.10 of ANSI ¥ during the pool heating season in which the Z21.56 (incorporated by reference; see ESO = ((PSB * (4160 BOH)) + (POFF * 4600)) pool heater is connected to the power source, § 430.3). The expression of fuel consumption * K and neither the main burner, electric for oil-fired pool heaters shall be in Btu. Where: resistance elements, nor heat pump is 5.2 Average annual fossil fuel energy for PSB = vented heater standby mode power, in activated. pool heaters. The average annual fuel energy watts, as measured in section 3.7 2. Test Method. for pool heaters, EF, is defined as:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52907

¥ EF = BOH QIN + (POH BOH)QPR + (8760 100 = conversion factor, from percent to into fatigue cracks in the skin and cause ¥ POH) Qoff,R fraction sudden decompression of the airplane. Where: 5.4.2 Calculate the annual input to the DATES: We must receive comments on pool heater as: BOH = average number of burner operating this supplemental NPRM by September hours = 104 h EIN = EF + EAE 24, 2010. POH = average number of pool operating Where: hours = 4464 h ADDRESSES: You may send comments by EF = as defined in 5.2 of this appendix QIN = rated fuel energy input as defined any of the following methods: E = as defined in 5.3 of this appendix according to section 2.10.1 or section AE • 5.4.3 Calculate the pool heater integrated Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 2.10.2 of ANSI Z21.56 (incorporated by http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the reference; see § 430.3), as appropriate. thermal efficiency (TEI) (in percent). TE = 100(E /E ) instructions for submitting comments. QPR = average energy consumption rate of I OUT IN • Fax: 202–493–2251. continuously operating pilot light, if Where: • Mail: U.S. Department of employed, = (Q /1 h) P EOUT = as defined in 5.4.1 of this appendix Transportation, Docket Operations, QP = energy consumption of continuously EIN = as defined in 5.4.2 of this appendix M–30, West Building Ground Floor, operating pilot light, if employed, as 100 = conversion factor, from fraction to measured in section 4.2, in Btu percent Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 8,760 = number of hours in one year Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. [FR Doc. 2010–21363 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Qoff,R = average off mode fossil fuel energy • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of consumption rate = Qoff/(1 h) BILLING CODE 6450–01–P Transportation, Docket Operations, Qoff = off mode energy consumption as M–30, West Building Ground Floor, defined in section 4.3 of this appendix Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 5.3 Average annual auxiliary electrical DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION energy consumption for pool heaters. The Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday average annual auxiliary electrical energy Federal Aviation Administration consumption for pool heaters, EAE, is through Friday, except Federal holidays. expressed in Btu and defined as: For service information identified in 14 CFR Part 39 (1) EAE = EAE,active + EAE,standby,off this proposed AD, contact Boeing (2) EAE,active = BOH * PE [Docket No. FAA–2008–0107; Directorate Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data ¥ (3) EAE,standby,off = (POH BOH) Es,aux + (8760 Identifier 2007–NM–087–AD] & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, ¥ POH) Eoff,aux MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– Where: RIN 2120–AA64 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, EAE,active = auxiliary electrical consumption extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; e-mail Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing in the active mode [email protected]; Internet Company Model 747–100, 747–100B, EAE,standby,off = auxiliary electrical https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You consumption in the standby and off 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, may review copies of the referenced mode 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747– service information at the FAA, PE = 2Ec, if heater is tested according to 400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 section 2.10.1 of ANSI Z21.56 Series Airplanes (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3), Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. in Btu/h AGENCY: Federal Aviation For information on the availability of = 3.412 PErated, if heater is tested according Administration (FAA), DOT. this material at the FAA, call 425–227– to section 2.10.2 of ANSI Z21.56, in 1221. Btu/h ACTION: Supplemental notice of Ec = electrical consumption of the heater proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Examining the AD Docket reopening of comment period. (converted to equivalent unit of Btu), You may examine the AD docket on including the electrical energy to the recirculating pump if used, during the SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier the Internet at http://www.regulations. 30-minute thermal efficiency test, as proposed airworthiness directive (AD) gov; or in person at the Docket defined in section 2.10.1 of ANSI Z21.56, for certain Model 747–100, 747–100B, Management Facility between 9 a.m. in Btu per 30 min. 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 2 = conversion factor to convert unit from per 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747– except Federal holidays. The AD docket 30 min. to per h. 400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP contains this proposed AD, the PE = nameplate rating of auxiliary rated series airplanes. The original NPRM regulatory evaluation, any comments electrical equipment of heater, in Watts received, and other information. The BOH = as defined in 5.2 of this appendix would have required inspections for POH = as defined in 5.2 of this appendix scribe lines in affected lap and butt street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in the Es,aux = electrical energy consumption rate splices, wing-to-body fairings locations, ADDRESSES during standby mode = 3.412 Es/(1 h), and external repair and cutout section. Comments will be Btu/h reinforcement areas; and related available in the AD docket shortly after Es = as defined in 4.2 of this appendix investigative and corrective actions if receipt. Eoff,aux = electrical energy consumption rate necessary. The original NPRM resulted FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: during off mode = 3.412 Eoff/(1 h), Btu/ from reports of scribe lines found at lap Nicholas Han, Aerospace Engineer, h joints and butt joints, around external Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Eoff = as defined in 4.3 of this appendix 5.4 Integrated thermal efficiency. doublers and antennas, and at locations Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 5.4.1 Calculate the seasonal useful output where external decals had been cut. 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, of the pool heater as: This action revises the original NPRM Washington 98057–3356; telephone

EOUT = BOH[(Et/100)(QIN + PE)] by revising certain compliance times (425) 917–6449; fax (425) 917–6590. Where: including reducing the compliance time SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BOH = as defined in 5.2 of this appendix for certain repetitive inspections. This supplemental NPRM also proposes to Comments Invited Et = thermal efficiency as defined in 5.1 of this appendix add inspections for certain airplanes. We invite you to send any written QIN = as defined in 5.2 of this appendix We are proposing this AD to detect and relevant data, views, or arguments about PE = as defined in 5.3 of this appendix correct scribe lines, which can develop this proposed AD. Send your comments

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52908 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

to an address listed under the dated November 8, 2007; or Boeing 2010, states that if scribe lines were ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision found previously and are being FAA–2008–0107; Directorate Identifier 2, dated June January 3, 2008. inspected as part of the LRTS program, 2007–NM–087–AD’’ at the beginning of Boeing Service Bulletin 747– the repeat inspections are done in your comments. We specifically invite 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin comments on the overall regulatory, 2010: 747–53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, economic, environmental, and energy • Revises the repeat inspection 2010. aspects of this proposed AD. We will interval data for lap joint and butt joint Requests To Delay AD Issuance consider all comments received by the areas that have scribe damage which are Pending Revised Service Information closing date and may amend this inspected under the Limited Return to proposed AD because of those Service (LRTS) inspection program. Japan Airlines (JAL) reports that comments. • For airplanes identified as Group 2, certain structures prevented the We will post all comments we Group 3 Configuration 2, Group 4, accomplishment of the inspection receive, without change, to http:// Group 6, and Group 8 airplanes in specified in Boeing Service Bulletin www.regulations.gov, including any Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, 747–53A2563, Revision 2, dated January personal information you provide. We Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010: Adds 3, 2008. JAL therefore believes that more will also post a report summarizing each detailed inspections for scribe lines of detailed information in the service substantive verbal contact we receive the S–18L lap splice from station (STA) bulletin is necessary to prevent operator about this proposed AD. 1780 to STA 1920 (on the main deck inconvenience. We infer that the commenter is requesting that we delay Discussion side cargo door) to inspection area 3. • For airplanes identified as Group 1 issuing the final rule until Boeing We issued a notice of proposed and Group 2 airplanes in Boeing Service Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision rulemaking (NPRM) (the ‘‘original Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, 2, dated January 3, 2008, is revised to NPRM’’) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to dated May 6, 2010: Adds detailed address these concerns. include an airworthiness directive (AD) KLM reports that some of the inspections for scribe lines of the S34R that would apply to certain Model 747– nondestructive test (NDT) inspections lap splice from STA 1810 to STA 1920 100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747– could not be performed according to the (on the aft lower lobe cargo door). 200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, procedures specified in Boeing Service • For airplanes identified as Group 3 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 2, and Group 4 airplanes in Boeing Service and 747SP series airplanes. That dated January 3, 2008, without Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, original NPRM was published in the modifying the process itself. KLM adds dated May 6, 2010: Adds detailed Federal Register on January 31, 2008 that the inspection areas and details are inspections for scribe lines of the S–6L (73 FR 5768). That original NPRM vague, ambiguous, and subject to and S–6R lap splice from STA 1000 to proposed to require inspections for misinterpretation. KLM requests that, to 1220 to inspection area 3. scribe lines in affected lap and butt eliminate requests for alternative • Adds general repair instructions for splices, wing-to-body fairing locations, methods of compliance (AMOCs) lap joint locations with scribe lines, but and external repair and cutout related to this matter, we delay issuing no cracks in Paragraph 3.B. of Part 17 reinforcement areas; and related the final rule until these matters are in the work instructions and in a new investigative and corrective actions if resolved. necessary. Appendix F. We agree that clarification may be Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, necessary. While the commenters did Actions Since Original NPRM Was Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, adds not provide specific details of the Issued more work for Group 1, Group 2, Group difficulties they encountered, Boeing Since we issued the original NPRM, 3, Group 4, Group 6, and Group 8 Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision Boeing has issued Service Bulletin 747– airplanes that were previously inspected 4, dated May 6, 2010, clarifies multiple 53A2563, Revision 3, dated June 11, in Area 3 in accordance with the steps and procedures as described 2009; and Service Bulletin 747– original issue, dated March 29, 2007; previously. We have revised this 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, Revision 2, dated January 3, 2008; or supplemental NPRM to refer to Boeing 2010. The procedures in Revision 3 are Revision 3, dated June 11, 2009; of Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision essentially the same as those in Boeing Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563. 4, dated May 6, 2010. Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, 2, dated January 3, 2008, which we Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, specifies Request To Delay AD Issuance Pending referred to as the appropriate source of that at the time given in Table 29 of Repair Instructions service information for accomplishing Paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing JAL states that the NPRM would the actions proposed in the original Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision require operators to contact the NPRM. However, Revision 3 of this 4, dated May 6, 2010, certain lap splices manufacturer for a method to repair service bulletin changes the initial are inspected in accordance with discrepancies. (Although Boeing Service threshold for the inspection at certain Paragraph 3.B., Work Instructions, Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, lap joints and changes the repeat PART 19. dated May 6, 2010, specifies this inspection intervals (including some Boeing Service Bulletin 747– directive, the original and this reductions in inspection intervals) for 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, supplemental NPRM propose to require many lap joint inspection areas. 2010, specifies that no more work is operators to contact the FAA for a repair Revision 3 of this service bulletin also necessary on Group 5, Group 7, and method.) JAL anticipates many such adds more work for airplanes that were Group 9 airplanes that were inspected inquiries from operators, resulting in previously inspected in Area 1 and Area in accordance with Boeing Service delayed responses from the 2 in accordance with Boeing Alert Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 3, manufacturer. The commenter requests Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, dated dated June 11, 2009. that we delay issuing the final rule until March 29, 2007; Boeing Alert Service Boeing Service Bulletin 747– a typical repair is incorporated into the Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 1, 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, structural repair manual (SRM).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52909

We do not agree with the commenter changed the supplemental NPRM in bulletin specifications in the proposed to delay the final rule until a typical regard to this issue. AD: repair can be incorporated into the Request To Revise Inspection (i) This AD required performing the SRM. Boeing Service Bulletin 747– Threshold for Certain Airplanes inspections of the STA 1283 butt joint on 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, Groups 3 and 4 from STR–4.6 to STR–6 per 2010, provides procedures for an British Airways (BA) requests that we Service Bulletin 747–53A2563 Revision 2, inspection to determine the extent of revise the inspection threshold for dated January 3, 2008, except allows this scribe lines on the airplanes. This certain airplanes. BA states that the location to be treated as Area 2 rather than service bulletin refers to several SRMs proposed inspection thresholds penalize Area 1 for the initial inspection threshold as a source of information for repairing and allows a LRTS inspection interval of operators of airplanes with lower flight 1500 flight cycles rather than 500. cracks. For certain repair instructions, cycles. BA recommends that we review this service bulletin also specifies to Boeing’s Fleet Team Resolution Process Boeing states that this change would be contact Boeing for repair instructions; Item 04134, which discusses the check reflected in a future revision to the however, paragraph (i) of this level required to accomplish the Area 1 service bulletin. supplemental NPRM would require that inspections. According to the We agree with the request. However, operators repair in a manner approved commenter, operator consensus since the time that Boeing submitted its by the FAA. In addition, Boeing Service indicates these inspections will require comments, Boeing released Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, a D check. BA suggests that airplanes Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, provides a LRTS with fewer than 17,500 flight cycles be dated May 6, 2010, which incorporates inspection program for scribe lines assigned a threshold of the earlier of the the inspection and compliance times found during the required inspections. next D check following 15,000 total described above. Because the inspection We note the existing Model 747 SRMs flight cycles, or 19,000 total flight and times are included in Revision 4 of referenced in Boeing Service Bulletin cycles, whichever is sooner. this service bulletin and we propose to mandate the requirements contained in 747–53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, We do not agree to revise the Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, 2010, have lap splice repairs that are inspection threshold for certain Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, this acceptable to repair scribe line damage. airplanes. We reviewed the Boeing Fleet inspection is no longer a difference We have not changed the supplemental Team Resolution Process Item 04134, between the service bulletin NPRM regarding this issue. which suggests that a D check would be specification and this supplemental the suitable opportunity to accomplish Request To Delay AD Issuance Pending NPRM. We have not changed the the scribe line inspections. We do not Revised Inspection Interval supplemental NPRM in this regard. JAL notes that the inspection interval specify compliance times in terms of is the same from butt joint to butt joint ‘‘letter checks.’’ Since maintenance Request To Revise Reporting or lap joint to lap joint. JAL states that schedules vary among operators, we Requirement it understands that the stress value can have determined that the compliance Boeing requests that we revise the be provided (i.e., the stress value can times as proposed are appropriate. The reporting requirement, which is vary) from stringer to stringer or frame minimum grace period for compliance paragraph (i) in the NPRM (now to frame. Therefore, JAL requests that with this AD is 1,500 flight cycles for identified as paragraph (j) in this we wait to issue the final rule until airplanes with fewer than 17,500 total supplemental NPRM), to require Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, flight cycles, which corresponds to operators to also report the maximum Revision 2, dated January 3, 2008, is approximately 3 years based on a scribe depth on each airplane. Boeing revised to incorporate more detailed typical utilization of 500 flight cycles states that this pertinent information inspection intervals. per year for long-haul airplanes. A 3- would allow Boeing to better assess the We infer that the commenter is asking year grace period is sufficient for accuracy of the 747 inspection program, if the repetitive inspection intervals operators to plan for the scribe line and is necessary for Boeing to re- along a lap splice from butt joint to butt inspections, and will allow for timely evaluate the accuracy of the overall joint, or along a butt joint from lap data collection for use in developing scribe analysis methodology. splice to lap splice, may be extended in final action and determining whether We agree with the request to revise certain areas if the local stresses are this AD should be revised in the future. the reporting requirement. The scribe used to determine the repetitive We have not changed the supplemental depths must be determined during the intervals. We do not find any benefit in NPRM regarding this issue. However, mandated inspections, and this intent variable repetitive inspection intervals operators may request an AMOC in was included in the phrase in paragraph for a lap splice or butt splice. The accordance with the procedures in (i) of the original NPRM that reads repetitive inspection intervals have been paragraph (m) of this AD. ‘‘description of any discrepancies determined after a review of the specific Request To Extend Compliance Time found.’’ However, we have included stresses the commenter notes, and then for Certain Inspection Locations additional language to clarify the the stress that provided the lowest reporting requirement by specifying that repetitive interval was used to simplify Boeing requests that we extend the scribe depths are to be included in the the inspection along a lap or butt splice. compliance time for certain inspection required report. Including the depth If each stringer or frame bay stress were locations. Boeing reports that recent information with the required report, used along the entire joint, the work engineering analysis has revealed therefore, would create no additional instructions would become too large to slightly reduced stresses in the STA burden to operators. We have revised manage and accomplish in a reasonable 1283 butt joint. The resulting greater paragraph (j) of this supplemental manner. Also, Boeing has released analytical threshold and interval value NPRM to clarify this requirement. Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, would allow for longer compliance Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, and this times to inspect this location on certain Request To Limit Data Collection revision includes improved data for the airplanes. Boeing therefore requests that BA requests that we limit the data repeat inspection interval for lap joint we add the following new paragraph as collection. BA questions the need for and butt joint areas. We have not an additional exception to the service the reporting requirement specified in

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52910 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

the NPRM. BA claims that the reports, who inspected using Boeing Alert required. BA requests that we revise that as they are being submitted, would soon Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, dated section to include the following provide Boeing with adequate data to March 29, 2007, would not likely have additional exception: reassess the proposed actions and inspected STA 1283, a new area of Where the airplane has been delivered compliance times (based on the number inspection added in Boeing Service without fillet sealed lap joints (i.e., is not of affected airplanes). BA recommends Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 2, included in the listing in the SB appendix E), that provisions be included in the dated January 3, 2008, and included in and the operator has not applied sealant to NPRM to ensure that Boeing and the the original NPRM. Boeing therefore the lap joints during any maintenance or FAA will reassess the data in a timely requests that we revise paragraph (j) of paint input, then lap joint inspections are not manner, after a statistically significant the NPRM (which is now paragraph (l) required. number of data points have been of the supplemental NPRM) to include The commenter adds that this condition collected—with a view to revising the the following provisions related to this is provided in Boeing Service Bulletin service bulletin and AD compliance inspection area: 747–53A2563, Revision 2, dated January times based on actual data. • Required inspection for scribe We infer that BA is requesting that we damage of the STA 1283 butt joint on 3, 2008. eventually remove the reporting Groups 3 and 4 from STR–4.5 to STR– We do not agree with the request. requirement from the AD. We partially 6 in accordance with Boeing Service Appendix E of this service bulletin agree. We do not agree to remove the Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 2, identifies airplanes that had fillet seals reporting requirements from this dated January 3, 2008; installed during production. Several supplemental NPRM. The original • A compliance time within 1,500 operators subsequently removed the NPRM and this supplemental NPRM flight cycles after the effective date of fillet seals, and a listing was needed to clearly note that this AD is considered this AD or before the threshold cycle ensure that those airplanes delivered interim action. Data received from the limit corresponding to the Area 2 with fillet seals would be inspected. In required reporting will be evaluated to inspection, whichever occurs later; and addition, fillet seals might have been help determine whether further • Repair of scribe damage as specified applied to lap joints at various times rulemaking will be necessary or whether in paragraph (f) of the NPRM (which is and subsequently removed, and the inspection requirements can be now paragraph (g) of the supplemental maintenance records might not contain relaxed. We have not changed the NPRM). sufficient detail for such an exclusion. supplemental NPRM in this regard. We agree, for the reasons provided by We have not changed the supplemental the commenter. However, since the time NPRM regarding this issue. Request To Provide Additional Detail in that Boeing submitted its comments, it the Service Bulletin issued Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, FAA’s Determination and Proposed KLM notes that Boeing Service Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, which Requirements of the Supplemental Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 2, incorporates the inspection and NPRM dated January 3, 2008, provides for compliance times described above along We are proposing this supplemental with other inspections required for some relief for un-inspectable locations, NPRM because we evaluated all airplanes that were previously inspected but states that this relief is insufficient pertinent information and determined in accordance with earlier issues of this for several structural details, and no an unsafe condition exists and is likely service bulletin. Because the referenced alternative inspection method is to exist or develop on other products of inspection and times are included in available. The commenter provides no these same type designs. Certain Revision 4 of this service bulletin and further information. changes described above expand the We infer that KLM is requesting that we propose to mandate the scope of the original NPRM. As a result, we delay issuance of the final rule until requirements contained in Revision 4 of we have determined that it is necessary Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, this service bulletin, there is no need to to reopen the comment period to Revision 2, dated January 3, 2008, is state this requirement specifically. provide additional opportunity for the revised to provide the structural details. Rather, we have added a new paragraph public to comment on this supplemental Boeing has released Boeing Service (k) to this supplemental NPRM to NPRM. Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, require certain actions done in dated May 6, 2010, which provides accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin Explanation of Change to Costs of more information regarding inspections. 747–53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, Compliance We have revised this supplemental 2010, for airplanes that were previously NPRM to refer to Boeing Service inspected in accordance with Boeing Since issuance of the original NPRM, Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, we have increased the labor rate used in dated May 6, 2010, as the appropriate dated March 29, 2007; Boeing Service the Costs of Compliance from $80 per source of service information in this Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 2, work-hour to $85 per work-hour. The supplemental NPRM. dated January 3, 2008; or Boeing Service Costs of Compliance information, Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 3, below, reflects this increase in the Request To Stipulate Credit Conditions dated June 11, 2009. specified hourly labor rate. Boeing states that paragraph (j) of the Costs of Compliance NPRM indicated that operators could Request To Add Exception to Inspection receive credit for inspections done Requirements There are about 1,038 airplanes of the before the effective date of the AD BA notes that the Relevant Service affected design in the worldwide fleet. according to the Boeing Alert Service Information section of the NPRM The following table provides the Bulletin 747–53A2563, dated March 29, describes conditions under which estimated costs for U.S. operators to 2007. But, as Boeing notes, operators certain inspections would not be comply with this supplemental NPRM.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52911

ESTIMATED COSTS

Number of Work Average Cost per U.S.- Action hours labor rate airplane registered Fleet cost per hour airplanes

Detailed inspections ...... 1,020 to 1,140 ..... $85 $86,700 to $96,900 ...... 219 $18,987,300 to $21,221,100.

Authority for This Rulemaking The Proposed Amendment and butt splices, wing-to-body fairing locations, and external repair and cutout Title 49 of the United States Code Accordingly, under the authority reinforcement areas, and do all applicable specifies the FAA’s authority to issue delegated to me by the Administrator, related investigative and corrective actions, rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part by accomplishing all actions specified in the section 106, describes the authority of 39 as follows: Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more dated May 6, 2010, except as provided by DIRECTIVES paragraph (i) of this AD. detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. Note 1: The inspection exemptions noted 1. The authority citation for part 39 in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing We are issuing this rulemaking under continues to read as follows: Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. dated May 6, 2010, apply to this AD provided Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: that the operator meets the requirements General requirements.’’ Under that § 39.13 [Amended] stated in each applicable exemption. 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding section, Congress charges the FAA with Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in the following new AD: air commerce by prescribing regulations (h) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 747– The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, for practices, methods, and procedures 2008–0107; Directorate Identifier 2007– specifies a compliance time after the date on the Administrator finds necessary for NM–087–AD. that revision or any previous issue of Boeing safety in air commerce. This regulation Comments Due Date Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, this AD is within the scope of that authority requires compliance within the specified because it addresses an unsafe condition (a) We must receive comments by compliance time after the effective date of September 24, 2010. that is likely to exist or develop on this AD. Where Boeing Service Bulletin 747– products identified in this rulemaking Affected ADs 53A2563 states that airplane flight-cycle time shall be calculated after the ‘‘issue date on action. (b) None. this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires the Regulatory Findings Applicability airplane flight-cycle time to be calculated as (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747– of the effective date of this AD. We determined that this proposed AD 100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, (i) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 747– would not have federalism implications 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010, under Executive Order 13132. This 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SP, and 747SR specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate proposed AD would not have a series airplanes, certificated in any category; action, accomplish applicable actions before substantial direct effect on the States, on as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747– further flight using a method approved in the relationship between the national 53A2563, Revision 4, dated May 6, 2010. accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD. Government and the States, or on the Subject distribution of power and Report (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of responsibilities among the various America Code 53: Fuselage. (j) At the applicable time specified in levels of government. paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD: Submit Unsafe Condition For the reasons discussed above, I a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of the inspections required by certify this proposed regulation: (e) This AD results from reports of scribe lines found at lap joints and butt joints, paragraphs (g) and (k) of this AD. Send the 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory around external doublers and antennas, and report to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. action’’ under Executive Order 12866, at locations where external decals had been Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the cut. We are issuing this AD to detect and The report must contain, at a minimum, the correct scribe lines, which can develop into inspection results, a description of any DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures discrepancies including maximum scribe (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and fatigue cracks in the skin and cause sudden decompression of the airplane. depth, the airplane serial number, and the 3. Will not have a significant number of flight cycles and flight hours on economic impact, positive or negative, Compliance the airplane. Under the provisions of the on a substantial number of small entities (f) You are responsible for having the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et under the criteria of the Regulatory actions required by this AD performed within seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information Flexibility Act. the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. collection requirements contained in this AD You can find our regulatory and has assigned OMB Control Number evaluation and the estimated costs of Inspection 2120–0056. compliance in the AD Docket. (g) At the applicable times specified in (1) If the inspection was done on or after Tables 1 through 21 and Table 25 in the effective date of this AD: Submit the List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing report within 30 days after the inspection. Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, (2) If the inspection was done before the Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation dated May 6, 2010, except as provided in effective date of this AD: Submit the report safety, Incorporation by reference, paragraph (h) of this AD, do detailed within 30 days after the effective date of this Safety. inspections for scribe lines of affected lap AD.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52912 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Actions Accomplished According to paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing inspections of scribe lines, and do all Previous Issues of Service Bulletin Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, applicable related investigative and (k) For airplanes that have been inspected dated May 6, 2010, except as provided in corrective actions, by accomplishing all the before the effective date of this AD in paragraph (h) of this AD, do detailed applicable actions specified in the accordance with the service information inspections for scribe lines of affected lap Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing specified in Table 1 of this AD: At the splices, butt splices and cargo door lap Service Bulletin 747–53A2563, Revision 4, applicable times specified in Tables 22 splices; and do detailed and surface high dated May 6, 2010, except as provided by through 24 and Tables 26 through 29 of frequency eddy current or ultrasonic paragraph (i) of this AD.

TABLE 1—CREDIT SERVICE BULLETINS

Document Revision Date

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–53A2563 ...... Original March 29, 2007. Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563 ...... 2 January 3, 2008. Boeing Service Bulletin 747–53A2563 ...... 3 June 11, 2009.

Note 2: Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– Issued in Renton, Washington, on August DATES: We must receive comments on 53A2563, Revision 1, dated November 8, 13, 2010. this proposed AD by October 14, 2010. 2007, was published with omitted Ali Bahrami, ADDRESSES: You may send comments by information. Actions accomplished according Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, any of the following methods: to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747– Aircraft Certification Service. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 53A2563, Revision 1, dated November 8, [FR Doc. 2010–21523 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 2007, are not considered acceptable for BILLING CODE 4910–13–P instructions for submitting comments. compliance with this AD. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. (l) Actions accomplished before the • Mail: U.S. Department of effective date of this AD according to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation, Docket Operations, service information identified in Table 1 of M–30, West Building Ground Floor, this AD are considered acceptable for Federal Aviation Administration Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey compliance with the corresponding actions Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, except 14 CFR Part 39 • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of as required by paragraph (k) of this AD. [Docket No. FAA–2010–0866; Directorate Transportation, Docket Operations, Alternative Methods of Compliance Identifier 2010–SW–065–AD] M–30, West Building Ground Floor, (AMOCs) Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey RIN 2120–AA64 (m)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday Airworthiness Directives; Bell through Friday, except Federal holidays. approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested Helicopter Textron Canada Limited using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Model 427 Helicopters Examining the AD Docket Send information to ATTN: Nicholas Han, You may examine the AD docket on Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM– AGENCY: Federal Aviation the Internet at http:// 120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Administration (FAA), Department of www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Transportation (DOT). Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) Docket Management Facility between 9 ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 917–6449; fax (425) 917–6590. Or, e-mail (NPRM). information to 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC- Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the [email protected]. SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new (2) To request a different method of airworthiness directive (AD) for the regulatory evaluation, any comments compliance or a different compliance time products listed above. This proposed received, and other information. The for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR AD results from mandatory continuing street address for the Docket Office 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on airworthiness information (MCAI) (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the any airplane to which the AMOC applies, originated by an aviation authority of ADDRESSES section. Comments will be notify your principal maintenance inspector another country to identify and correct available in the AD docket shortly after (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), an unsafe condition on an aviation receipt. as appropriate, or lacking a principal product. The MCAI describes the unsafe FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: inspector, your local Flight Standards District condition as: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, Office. The AMOC approval letter must FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 specifically reference this AD. Tail rotor driveshaft hanger bearing bracket Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas part number (P/N) 427–044–223–101 has (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable been found cracked due to fatigue. It has 76137; telephone: (817) 222–5122; fax: level of safety may be used for any repair been determined that the fatigue cracking (817) 222–5961. required by this AD, if it is approved by the was initiated by a tooling mark left during SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization manufacture. Designation Authority (ODA) that has been The existence of tooling marks on the Comments Invited authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to bracket could lead to bracket failure, loss of We invite you to send any written make those findings. For a repair method to tail rotor drive and, consequently, loss of relevant data, views, or arguments about be approved, the repair must meet the control of the helicopter. this proposed AD. Send your comments certification basis of the airplane, and the The proposed AD would require actions to an address listed under the approval must specifically refer to this AD. that are intended to address the unsafe ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. condition described in the MCAI. FAA–2010–0866; Directorate Identifier

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52913

2010–SW–065–AD’’ at the beginning of general, agree with their substance. But responsibilities among the various your comments. We specifically invite we might have found it necessary to use levels of government. comments on the overall regulatory, different words from those in the MCAI For the reasons discussed above, I economic, environmental, and energy to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. certify this proposed regulation: aspects of this proposed AD. We will operators and is enforceable. In making 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory consider all comments received by the these changes, we do not intend to differ action’’ under Executive Order 12866; closing date and may amend this substantively from the information 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the proposed AD because of those provided in the MCAI and related DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures comments. service information. (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and We will post all comments we We might also have proposed 3. Will not have a significant receive, without change, to http:// different actions in this AD from those economic impact, positive or negative, www.regulations.gov, including any in the MCAI in order to follow FAA on a substantial number of small entities personal information you provide. We policies. Any such differences are under the criteria of the Regulatory will also post a report summarizing each highlighted in a Note within the Flexibility Act. substantive verbal contact we receive proposed AD. We prepared a regulatory evaluation about this proposed AD. of the estimated costs to comply with Costs of Compliance this proposed AD and placed it in the Discussion We estimate that this proposed AD AD docket. Transport Canada, which is the will affect 30 products of U.S. registry. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 aviation authority for Canada, has We also estimate that it would take issued AD No. CF–2010–17, dated June about 4 work-hours per product to Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 2, 2010 (referred to after this as ‘‘the comply with the basic requirements of safety, Incorporation by reference, MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition this proposed AD. The average labor Safety. for the specified products. The MCAI rate is $85 per work-hour. The Proposed Amendment states: Based on these figures, we estimate Accordingly, under the authority the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. Tail rotor driveshaft hanger bearing bracket delegated to me by the Administrator, part number (P/N) 427–044–223–101 has operators to be $10,200, or $340 per the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part been found cracked due to fatigue. It has product. been determined that the fatigue cracking In addition, we estimate that any 39 as follows: was initiated by a tooling mark left during necessary follow-on actions would PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS manufacture. require parts costing $5,034, for a cost The existence of tooling marks on the DIRECTIVES bracket could lead to bracket failure, loss of of $5,034 per product. We have no way tail rotor drive and, consequently, loss of of determining the number of products 1. The authority citation for part 39 control of the helicopter. that may need these actions. continues to read as follows: The MCAI requires you to rework the Authority for This Rulemaking Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. tail rotor driveshaft hanger bearing Title 49 of the United States Code § 39.13 [Amended] bracket. You may obtain further specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding information by examining the MCAI in rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, the following new AD: the AD docket. section 106, describes the authority of Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited: Relevant Service Information the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Docket No. FAA–2010–0866; Directorate Bell Helicopter has issued Alert Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more Identifier 2010–SW–065–AD. detail the scope of the Agency’s Service Bulletin No. 427–09–29, REV A, Comments Due Date dated November 17, 2009. The actions authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under (a) We must receive comments by October described in this service information are 14, 2010. intended to correct the unsafe condition the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, identified in the MCAI. Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: Affected ADs General requirements.’’ Under that (b) None. FAA’s Determination and Requirements section, Congress charges the FAA with of the Proposed AD promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Applicability This product has been approved by air commerce by prescribing regulations (c) This AD applies to Model 427 the aviation authority of another for practices, methods, and procedures helicopters, all serial numbers (SNs), certificated in any category. country, and is approved for operation the Administrator finds necessary for in the United States. Pursuant to our safety in air commerce. This regulation Subject bilateral agreement with this State of is within the scope of that authority (d) Air Transport Association of America Design Authority, they have notified us because it addresses an unsafe condition (ATA) Code 65: Tail Rotor Drive. that is likely to exist or develop on of the unsafe condition described in the Reason MCAI and service information products identified in this rulemaking referenced above. We are proposing this action. (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: AD because we evaluated all Regulatory Findings information and determined the unsafe Tail rotor driveshaft hanger bearing bracket condition exists and is likely to exist or We determined that this proposed AD part number (P/N) 427–044–223–101 has been found cracked due to fatigue. It has develop on other products of the same would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This been determined that the fatigue cracking type design. was initiated by a tooling mark left during proposed AD would not have a manufacture. Differences Between This Proposed AD substantial direct effect on the States, on and the MCAI or Service Information The existence of tooling marks on the the relationship between the national bracket could lead to bracket failure, loss of We have reviewed the MCAI and Government and the States, or on the tail rotor drive and, consequently, loss of related service information and, in distribution of power and control of the helicopter.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52914 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

The MCAI requires you to rework the tail Related Information Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey rotor driveshaft hanger bearing bracket. (h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Actions and Compliance No. CF–2010–17, dated June 2, 2010; and • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. (f) Unless already done, do the following Transportation, Docket Operations, 427–09–29, REV A, dated November 17, actions: M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 2009, for related information. (1) Applicable to SNs 56001 through Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 56073, and 56077: Within 30 days after the Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 19, Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, effective date of this AD, inspect both sides 2010. between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday of the hanger bracket, P/N 427–044–223–101, Mark R. Schilling, through Friday, except Federal holidays. for cracks following Bell Helicopter Alert Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Examining the AD Docket Service Bulletin No. 427–09–29, REV A, Aircraft Certification Service. dated November 17, 2009. You may examine the AD docket on (i) If no cracks are found during the [FR Doc. 2010–21582 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this BILLING CODE 4910–13–P the Internet at http:// AD, before further flight rework both sides of www.regulations.gov; or in person at the the hanger bracket, P/N 427–044–223–101, Docket Management Facility between 9 following Bell Helicopter Alert Service DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Bulletin No. 427–09–29, REV A, dated Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD November 17, 2009. Federal Aviation Administration docket contains this proposed AD, the (ii) If cracks are found during the regulatory evaluation, any comments inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this 14 CFR Part 39 received, and other information. The AD, before further flight replace the hanger bracket, P/N 427–044–223–101, with a new [Docket No. FAA–2010–0865; Directorate street address for the Docket Office hanger bracket, P/N 427–044–223–101, that Identifier 2010–SW–061–AD] (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the has been reworked following Bell Helicopter ADDRESSES section. Comments will be Alert Service Bulletin No. 427–09–29, REV RIN 2120–AA64 available in the AD docket shortly after A, dated November 17, 2009. receipt. Airworthiness Directives; Bell (2) Applicable to all SNs: As of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: effective date of this AD, you may not install Helicopter Textron Canada Limited replacement tail rotor driveshaft hanger Models 206A, 206B, 206L, 206L–1, Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, bracket, P/N 427–044–223–101, unless the 206L–3, and 206L–4 Helicopters FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 bracket has been inspected and found free of Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas cracks and has been reworked following Bell AGENCY: Federal Aviation 76137; telephone: (817) 222–5122; fax: Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 427– Administration (FAA), Department of (817) 222–5961. 09–29, REV A, dated November 17, 2009. Transportation (DOT). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FAA AD Differences ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Comments Invited Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ We invite you to send any written or service information as follows: No SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new differences. relevant data, views, or arguments about airworthiness directive (AD) for the this proposed AD. Send your comments Other FAA AD Provisions products listed above. This proposed to an address listed under the AD results from mandatory continuing (g) The following provisions also apply to ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. this AD: airworthiness information (MCAI) FAA–2010–0865; Directorate Identifier (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance originated by an aviation authority of 2010–SW–061–AD’’ at the beginning of (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, another country to identify and correct your comments. We specifically invite FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs an unsafe condition on an aviation comments on the overall regulatory, for this AD, if requested using the procedures product. The MCAI describes the unsafe economic, environmental, and energy found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to condition as: aspects of this proposed AD. We will ATTN: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham It has been determined that new tail rotor consider all comments received by the Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: disc assembly Part Number (P/N) 101584–1 closing date and may amend this (817) 222–5122; fax: (817) 222–5961. Before or –2, sold through Bell Helicopter Spares proposed AD because of those using any approved AMOC on any airplane beginning March 2009, as an alternate to comments. to which the AMOC applies, notify your P/N 32721–1, does not conform to the We will post all comments we appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the approved configuration. Operating a helicopter with disk assembly P/N 101584– receive, without change, to http:// FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), www.regulations.gov, including any or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. 1 or –2 installed may result in loss of control of the helicopter. personal information you provide. We (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement will also post a report summarizing each in this AD to obtain corrective actions from The proposed AD would require actions a manufacturer or other source, use these substantive verbal contact we receive that are intended to address the unsafe about this proposed AD. actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective condition described in the MCAI. actions are considered FAA-approved if they Discussion are approved by the State of Design Authority DATES: We must receive comments on (or their delegated agent). You are required this proposed AD by October 14, 2010. Transport Canada, which is the to assure the product is airworthy before it ADDRESSES: You may send comments by aviation authority for Canada, has is returned to service. any of the following methods: issued AD No. CF–2010–07, dated (3) Reporting Requirements: For any • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to February 24, 2010 (referred to after this reporting requirement in this AD, under the http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act instructions for submitting comments. condition for the specified products. (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of • Management and Budget (OMB) has Fax: (202) 493–2251. The MCAI states: • approved the information collection Mail: U.S. Department of It has been determined that new tail rotor requirements and has assigned OMB Control Transportation, Docket Operations, disc assembly Part Number (P/N) 101584–1 Number 2120–0056. M–30, West Building Ground Floor, or –2, sold through Bell Helicopter Spares

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52915

beginning March 2009, as an alternate to Based on these figures, we estimate PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS P/N 32721–1, does not conform to the the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. DIRECTIVES approved configuration. Operating a operators to be $982,215 or $345 per helicopter with disk assembly P/N 101584– product. 1. The authority citation for part 39 1 or –2 installed may result in loss of control continues to read as follows: of the helicopter. Authority for This Rulemaking This directive mandates the removal from Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Title 49 of the United States Code service tail rotor disc assembly P/N 101584– § 39.13 [Amended] 1 and –2. specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding You may obtain further information by section 106, describes the authority of the following new AD: examining the MCAI in the AD docket. the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited: Relevant Service Information Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more Docket No. FAA–2010–0865; Directorate detail the scope of the Agency’s Identifier 2010–SW–061–AD. Bell Helicopter has issued Alert authority. Service Bulletin No. 206–09–123, REV Comments Due Date A, dated June 10, 2009, and Alert We are issuing this rulemaking under (a) We must receive comments by October ‘‘ Service Bulletin No. 206L–09–157, REV the authority described in Subtitle VII, 14, 2010. A, dated June 10, 2009. The actions Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that Affected ADs described in this service information are (b) None. intended to correct the unsafe condition section, Congress charges the FAA with identified in the MCAI. promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in Applicability air commerce by prescribing regulations (c) This AD applies to the following model FAA’s Determination and Requirements for practices, methods, and procedures and serial number airplanes, certificated in of the Proposed AD the Administrator finds necessary for any category. This product has been approved by safety in air commerce. This regulation the aviation authority of another is within the scope of that authority Model Serial No. (S/N) because it addresses an unsafe condition country, and is approved for operation 206A ...... 004 through 660 and 672 in the United States. Pursuant to our that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking through 715. bilateral agreement with this State of 206B ...... All S/Ns including those con- Design Authority, they have notified us action. verted from Model 206A. of the unsafe condition described in the Regulatory Findings 206L ...... 45004 through 45153 and 46601 MCAI and service information through 46617. referenced above. We are proposing this We determined that this proposed AD 206L–1 ..... 45154 through 45790. AD because we evaluated all would not have federalism implications 206L–3 ..... 51001 through 51612. 206L–4 ..... All S/Ns. information and determined the unsafe under Executive Order 13132. This condition exists and is likely to exist or proposed AD would not have a Subject develop on other products of the same substantial direct effect on the States, on type design. the relationship between the national (d) Air Transport Association of America Government and the States, or on the (ATA) Code 65: Tail Rotor Drive. Differences Between This Proposed AD distribution of power and Reason and the MCAI or Service Information responsibilities among the various (e) The mandatory continuing We have reviewed the MCAI and levels of government. airworthiness information (MCAI) states: related service information and, in For the reasons discussed above, I It has been determined that new tail rotor general, agree with their substance. But certify this proposed regulation: disc assembly Part Number (P/N) 101584–1 we might have found it necessary to use 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory or –2, sold through Bell Helicopter Spares different words from those in the MCAI action’’ under Executive Order 12866; beginning March 2009, as an alternate to P/ to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the N 32721–1, does not conform to the approved operators and is enforceable. In making DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures configuration. Operating a helicopter with (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and disk assembly P/N 101584–1 or –2 installed these changes, we do not intend to differ may result in loss of control of the helicopter. substantively from the information 3. Will not have a significant This directive mandates the removal from provided in the MCAI and related economic impact, positive or negative, service tail rotor disc assembly P/N 101584– service information. on a substantial number of small entities 1 and –2. We might also have proposed under the criteria of the Regulatory Actions and Compliance different actions in this AD from those Flexibility Act. in the MCAI in order to follow FAA We prepared a regulatory evaluation (f) Unless already done, do the following actions following Bell Helicopter Alert policies. Any such differences are of the estimated costs to comply with Service Bulletin No. 206–09–123, highlighted in a Note within the this proposed AD and placed it in the REV A, dated June 10, 2009; and Bell proposed AD. AD docket. Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. 206L– Costs of Compliance List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 09–157, REV A, dated June 10, 2009, as applicable. We estimate that this proposed AD Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation (1) Check the helicopter maintenance will affect 2,847 products of U.S. safety, Incorporation by reference, records to determine if a disc assembly, part registry. We also estimate that it would Safety. number (P/N) 101584–1 or –2, is installed. take about 1 work-hour per product to Do this check within the next 30 days after The Proposed Amendment the effective date of this AD or within the comply with the basic requirements of next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the this proposed AD. The average labor Accordingly, under the authority effective date of this AD, whichever occurs rate is $85 per work-hour. Required delegated to me by the Administrator, first. parts would cost about $260 per the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part (2) If, during the maintenance records product. 39 as follows: check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52916 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

you cannot positively determine that a and Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin only be used outside of the building, P/N 101584–1 or –2 disc assembly is not No. 206L–09–157, REV A, dated June 10, and demonstrations will not be allowed installed, within the next 30 days after the 2009, for related information. on federal property for security reasons. effective date of this AD or within the next Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 19, The EPA Web Site for the rulemaking, 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this 2010. AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the tail which includes the proposal and rotor driveshaft system to determine if Mark R. Schilling, information about the public hearing, P/N 101584–1 or –2 is installed. Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, can be found at: http://www.epa.gov/ (3) If, during the maintenance records Aircraft Certification Service. nsr. check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD [FR Doc. 2010–21589 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If or during the inspection required in BILLING CODE 4910–13–P you would like to present oral testimony paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or at the public hearing, please contact Ms. –2 disc assembly is not installed, no further Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental action is required. Before further flight, make ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality an entry in the log book showing compliance AGENCY Planning and Standards, Air Quality with this AD. Planning Division, (C504–03), Research (4) If, during the maintenance records 40 CFR Part 52 Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone check required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD [EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0107; FRL–9190–1] (919) 541–0641, fax number (919) 541– or during the inspection required in 5509, e-mail address: [email protected] paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, you can RIN–2060–AQ45 positively determine that a P/N 101584–1 or (preferred method for registering), no –2 disc assembly is installed, within the next Action To Ensure Authority To Issue later than September 10, 2010. If using 30 days after the effective date of this AD or Permits Under the Prevention of e-mail, please provide the following within the next 100 hours TIS after the Significant Deterioration Program to information: Time you wish to speak effective date of this AD, whichever occurs Sources of Greenhouse Gas (morning, afternoon, evening), name, first, replace disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or affiliation, address, e-mail address, and –2 with disc assembly P/N 32721–1. Emissions: Federal Implementation Plan telephone and fax numbers. (5) As of the effective date of this AD, do Questions concerning the August not install disc assembly P/N 101584–1 or –2. AGENCY: Environmental Protection 2010 proposed rule should be addressed FAA AD Differences Agency (EPA). to Ms. Lisa Sutton, U.S. EPA, Office of Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ ACTION: Notice of public hearing. Air Quality Planning and Standards, or service information as follows: No New Source Review Group, (C504–03), differences. SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing a Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, public hearing to be held for the telephone number (919) 541–3450, e- Other FAA AD Provisions proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure mail at [email protected]. (g) The following provisions also apply to Authority to Issue Permits under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The this AD: Prevention of Significant Deterioration public hearing is to provide the public (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas an opportunity to present oral (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, Emissions: Federal Implementation comments regarding EPA’s proposed FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs Plan’’ which will publish in the near for this AD, if requested using the procedures ‘‘Action to Ensure Authority to Issue future in the Federal Register. The Permits under the Prevention of found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to hearing will be held on September 14, ATTN: Sharon Miles, Aerospace Engineer, Significant Deterioration Program to FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, 2601 Meacham 2010, in Arlington, VA. Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone: DATES: The public hearing will be held Federal Implementation Plan,’’ which (817) 222–5122; fax: (817) 222–5961. Before on September 14, 2010. proposes a Federal Implementation Plan using any approved AMOC on any airplane ADDRESSES: The September 14, 2010 to apply in any state that is unable to to which the AMOC applies, notify your hearing will be held at the EPA Ariel submit, by its deadline, a corrective appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the Rios East building, Room 1153, 1301 FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), State Implementation Plan revision to or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC ensure that the state has authority to (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 20460. The public hearing will convene issue permits under the Clean Air Act’s in this AD to obtain corrective actions from at 9 a.m. (Eastern standard time) and New Source Review Prevention of a manufacturer or other source, use these continue until the later of 6 p.m. or 1 Significant Deterioration program for actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective hour after the last registered speaker has sources of greenhouse gases. actions are considered FAA-approved if they spoken. The EPA will make every effort Public hearing: The proposal for are approved by the State of Design Authority to accommodate all speakers that arrive which EPA is holding the public (or their delegated agent). You are required and register. A lunch break is scheduled hearing will publish in the near future to assure the product is airworthy before it from 12:30 p.m. until 2 p.m. Because in the Federal Register and is available is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any this hearing is being held at U.S. at: http://www.epa.gov/nsr and also in reporting requirement in this AD, under the government facilities, individuals the rulemaking docket. The public provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act planning to attend the hearing should be hearing will provide interested parties (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of prepared to show valid picture the opportunity to present data, views, Management and Budget (OMB) has identification to the security staff in or arguments concerning the proposal. approved the information collection order to gain access to the meeting The EPA may ask clarifying questions requirements and has assigned OMB Control room. In addition, you will need to during the oral presentations, but will Number 2120–0056. obtain a property pass for any personal not respond to the presentations at that Related Information belongings you bring with you. Upon time. Written statements and supporting (h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada, AD leaving the building, you will be information submitted during the No. CF–2010–07, dated February 24, 2010; required to return this property pass to comment period will be considered Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin No. the security desk. No large signs will be with the same weight as oral comments 206–09–123, REV A, dated June 10, 2009; allowed in the building, cameras may and supporting information presented at

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52917

the public hearing. Written comments DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE items subject to Item Unique on the proposed rule must be Identification (IUID) in the IUID postmarked by October 14, 2010, 30 Defense Acquisition Regulations registry. This proposed rule addresses days after the September 14, 2010 System the requirement to more effectively hearing. track warranties for IUID items. 48 CFR Parts 211, 246, and 252 The tracking of warranties, from the Commenters should notify Ms. Long if identification of the requirement to the they will need specific equipment, or if Defense Federal Acquisition expiration date of the warranted item, there are other special needs related to Regulation Supplement (DFARS); will enhance significantly the ability of providing comments at the hearing. The Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items, DoD to take full advantage of warranties EPA will provide equipment for DFARS Case 2009–D018 when they are part of an acquisition. commenters to show overhead slides or AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Presently, DoD lacks the enterprise make computerized slide presentations Regulations System, Department of capability that would provide visibility if we receive special requests in Defense (DoD). and accountability of warranty data advance. Oral testimony will be limited associated with acquired goods. The ACTION: Proposed rule with request for to 5 minutes for each commenter. The comments. capability to track warranties will result EPA encourages commenters to provide in— EPA with a copy of their oral testimony SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend (a) Reduced costs; electronically (via e-mail or CD) or in the Defense Federal Acquisition (b) Ability to recognize benefits hard copy form. Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to included for free; (c) Ability to compare performance The hearing schedule, including lists implement a policy memorandum of the Undersecretary of Defense for against Government specified of speakers, will be posted on EPA’s warranties; Web Site http://www.epa.gov/nsr. Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics dated February 6, 2007, that required (d) Increased level of insurance for Verbatim transcripts of the hearings and purchased goods; written statements will be included in definition of the requirements to track warranties for items subject to Item (e) Sufficient durations of warranties the docket for the rulemaking. Unique Identification in the Item for specific goods; EPA will make every effort to follow Unique Identification registry. This (f) Ability to identify and enforce the schedule as closely as possible on proposed rule stresses that the warranties (e.g., against fraudulent the day of the hearing; however, please enforcement of warranties is essential to vendors, or for criminal actions). plan for the hearing to run either ahead the effectiveness and efficiency of DoD’s DoD proposes the following changes: • Revise DFARS 211.274–2(a)(4), of schedule or behind schedule. material readiness. Policy for unique item identification, to How can I get copies of this document DATES: Comments on this proposed rule add any warranted item. and other related information? should be submitted in writing to the • Revise the definitions of address shown below on or before ‘‘acceptance’’ and ‘‘defect,’’ and add a The EPA has established a docket for October 29, 2010, to be considered in definition for ‘‘warranty tracking’’ at the proposed rule ‘‘Action to Ensure the formation of the final rule. DFARS 246.701. Authority to Issue Permits under the ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, • Add DFARS 246.710(5) to include Prevention of Significant Deterioration identified by DFARS Case 2009–D018, provision and clause prescriptions Program to Sources of Greenhouse Gas using any of the following methods: 252.246–70XX and 252.246–70YY. Emissions: Federal Implementation Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// • Revise DFARS 252.211–7003, Item Plan’’ under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– www.regulations.gov. Follow the Identification and Valuation, definition OAR–2010–0107 (available at http:// instructions for submitting comments. of ‘‘issuing agency.’’ E-mail: [email protected]. Include • www.regulations.gov). Add provision 252.246–70XX, DFARS Case 2009–D018 in the subject Notice of Warranty Tracking of As stated previously, the proposed line of the message. Serialized Items. rule will publish in the near future in Fax: 703–602–0350. • Add clause 252.246–70YY, the Federal Register and is available at Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items. http://www.epa.gov/nsr and in the System, Attn: Mr. Julian E. Thrash, This is not a significant regulatory rulemaking docket. OUSD (AT&L) DPAP/DARS, Room action and, therefore, was not subject to Dated: August 24, 2010. 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, review under section 6(b) of Executive Washington, DC 20301–3060. Mary Henigin, Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Comments received generally will be Review, dated September 20, 1993. This Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning posted without change to http:// is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. and Standards. www.regulations.gov, including any [FR Doc. 2010–21691 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] personal information provided. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. DoD has prepared an initial regulatory Julian E. Thrash, 703–602–0310. flexibility analysis consistent with 5 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U.S.C. 603 et seq. A copy of the analysis may be obtained from the point of A. Background contact specified herein. The objective The Undersecretary of Defense for of this rule is for DoD to develop a more Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics effective way to track warranties for issued a policy memorandum dated items subject to Item Unique February 6, 2007, that instructed the Identification (IUID). Presently, DoD Director, Defense Procurement and lacks the enterprise capability that Acquisition Policy, to define the would provide visibility and requirements to track warranties for accountability of warranty data

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52918 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

associated with acquired goods. The The following is a summary of the and by adding paragraph (a)(4)(iii) as tracking of warranties, from the information collection requirement. follows: identification of the requirement to the Title: Defense Federal Acquisition expiration date of the warranted item, Regulation Supplement; Warranty § 211.274–2 Policy for unique item identification. will enhance significantly the ability of Tracking of Serialized Items. DoD to take full advantage of warranties Type of Request: New collection. * * * * * when they are part of an acquisition, Number of Respondents: 38,000. (a) * * * resulting in– Responses per Respondent: (4) * * * (a) Reduced costs; Approximately 1.4. (i) Any DoD serially managed (b) Ability to recognize benefits Annual Responses: 54,000. subassembly, component, or part included for free; Average Burden Per Response: 0.5 embedded within a delivered item; (c) Ability to compare performance hour. (ii) The parent item (as defined in against Government specified Annual Public Burden Hours: 27,000. 252.211–7003(a)) that contains the warranties; Needs and Uses: DoD needs the embedded subassembly, component, or (d) Sufficient durations of warranties information required by 252.246–70XX part; and for specific goods. and 252.246–70YY in order to properly (iii) Any warranted item. DoD will address the requirement to track the warranty of serialized items. * * * * * track warranties with the following Affected Public: Businesses or other DFARS provision and clause: for-profit institutions. PART 246—QUALITY ASSURANCE (1) 252.246–70XX, Notice of Warranty Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 3. Revise section 246.701 to read as Tracking of Serialized Items; obtain or retain benefits. follows: (2) 252.246–70YY, Warranty Tracking Frequency: On occasion. of Serialized Items. Written comments and § 246.701 Definitions. In FY 2009, DoD issued recommendations on the proposed As used in this subpart— approximately 16,000 solicitations that information collection should be sent to Acceptance, as used in the warranty use warranty clauses. In response to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of clauses at FAR 52.246–17, Warranty of those solicitations, approximately Management and Budget, Desk Officer Supplies of a Noncomplex Nature; FAR 76,000 offers would be received (66,000 for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 52.246–18, Warranty of Supplies of a from small business, 10,000 from other Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Complex Nature; FAR 52.246–19, than small business). Of that total, DoD with a copy to the Defense Acquisition Warranty of Systems and Equipment estimates that 50% of the time the Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Julian E. Under Performance Specifications or Government will provide the required Thrash, OUSD(AT&L) DPAP/DARS, Design Criteria; and FAR 52.246–20, warranty information for 38,000 offers Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Warranty of Services, includes the (33,000 small and 5,000 other than Washington, DC 20301–3060. execution of an official document (e.g., small businesses). Therefore, 33,000 Comments can be received from 30 to 60 DD Form 250, Material Inspection and small entities would be impacted by the days after the date of this notice, but Receiving Report) by an authorized rule. comments to OMB will be most useful representative of the Government. DoD invites comments from small if received by OMB within 30 days after Defect means any condition or concerns and other interested parties on the date of this notice. characteristic in any supply or service the impact of this rule on small entities. To request more information on this furnished by the contractor under the DoD will also consider comments from proposed information collection or to contract that is not in compliance with small entities concerning the existing obtain a copy of the proposal and the requirements of the contract. regulations in subparts affected by this associated collection instruments, Warranty tracking is defined in the rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. please write to the Defense Acquisition clause 252.246–70YY, Warranty Interested parties must submit such Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Julian E. Tracking of Serialized Items. comments separately and should cite 5 Thrash, OUSD(AT&L) DPAP/DARS, 4. Amend section 246.710 by revising U.S.C. 610 (DFARS case 2009–D018), in Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, the section heading and adding correspondence. Washington, DC 20301–3060. paragraph (5) to read as follows: C. Paperwork Reduction Act List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 211, § 246.710 Solicitation provision and The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 246, and 252 contract clauses. U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies because the Government procurement. * * * * * proposed rule does contain information (5)(i) In addition to 252.211–7003, collection requirements. DoD invites Ynette R. Shelkin, Item Unique Valuation, which is comments on the following aspects of Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations prescribed in 211.274–5(a), use the the proposed rule: (a) Whether the System. following provision and clause in collection of information is necessary Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 solicitations and contracts when it is for the proper performance of the CFR parts 211, 246, and 252 as follows: anticipated that the resulting contract functions of DoD, including whether the 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR will include a warranty for serialized information will have practical utility; parts 211, 246, and 252 continues to items: (b) the accuracy of the estimate of the read as follows: (A) 252.246–70XX, Notice of burden of the information collection; Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR (include only if offerors will be required and clarity of the information to be chapter 1. to enter data with the offer); and collected; and (d) ways to minimize the PART 211—DESCRIBING AGENCY (B) 252.246–70YY, Warranty Tracking burden of the information collection on NEEDS of Serialized Items. respondents, including the use of (ii) If the Government specifies a automated collection techniques or 2. Amend section 211.274–2 by warranty, then the contracting officer other forms of information technology. revising paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (a)(4)(ii) shall request the requiring activity to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52919

provide information to ensure that Table § 252.246–70XX Notice of Warranty Commercial and Government Entity I in the clause 252.246–70YY is Tracking of Serialized Items. (NCAGE)/Commercial and Government populated with data specifying the As prescribed in 246.710(5)(i)(A), use Entity (CAGE) Code, or the Coded the following provision: Representation of the North American Government’s required warranty Telecommunications Industry provision by contract line item number, Notice of Warranty Tracking of Serialized Manufacturers, Suppliers, and Related subline item number, or exhibit line Items (XXX 2010) Service Companies (ATIS–0322000) item number prior to solicitation. In Number), European Health Industry Business such case, do not include 252.246–70XX (a) Definition. ‘‘Unique item identifier’’ and Communication Council (EHIBCC) and ‘‘warranty tracking’’ are defined in the clause in the solicitation. Health Industry Business Communication at 252.246–70YY, Warranty Tracking of Council (HIBCC), as indicated in the Register (iii) If the Government does not Serialized Items. specify a warranty, include 252.246– of Issuing Agency Codes for ISO/IEC 15459, (b) Reporting of data for warranty tracking located at http://www.nen.nl/web/Normen- 70XX in the solicitation. The contractor and administration. The offeror shall provide ontwikkelen/ISOIEC-15459-Issuing-Agency- may offer a warranty and shall then the information required by Table I in the Codes.htm. populate Table I in the clause 252.246– clause at 252.246–70YY (indicated by a Item type means a coded representation of 70YY, as appropriate, as part of its offer single asterisk (*)), on each contract line item the description of the item being warranted, as required by 252.246–70XX. number (CLIN), subline item number (SLIN), consisting of the codes C—component (iv) All warranty tracking information or exhibit line item number (ELIN) for procured separate from end item, warranted items. The offeror shall provide all that is indicated with a single asterisk S—subassembly procured separate from end information required by Table II no later than item or subassembly, E—embedded in (*) in Table I in the clause 252.246– when the warranted items are presented for component, subassembly or end item parent, 70YY shall be completed prior to award. receipt and/or acceptance. The ‘‘Warranty and P—parent end item. Data indicated with two asterisks (**) Item Unique Item Identifier (UII)’’ data Starting event means the event or action may be completed on or after the time category may also be completed in that initiates the warranty. of award, but no later than the time of conjunction with Table II. The offeror shall Serialized item means each item produced delivery. submit the data for warranty tracking to the is assigned a serial number that is unique (v) The contractor shall provide Contracting Officer. among all the collective tangible items warranty repair source instructions produced by the enterprise, or each item of (End of provision) a particular part, lot, or batch number is (Table II in the clause 252.246–70YY) 7. Add section 252.246–70YY to read assigned a unique serial number within that no later than the time of delivery. as follows: part, lot, or batch number assignment within As prescribed in 246.710(5)(i)(B), use the enterprise identifier. The enterprise is PART 252—SOLICITATION responsible for ensuring unique serialization PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT the following clause: within the enterprise identifier or within the CLAUSES Warranty Tracking of Serialized Items (XXX part, lot, or batch numbers, and that serial 2010) numbers, once assigned, are never used 5. Amend section 252.211–7003 by again. revising the clause date to read ‘‘(XXX (a) Definitions. As used in this clause— Unique item identifier means a set of data 2010)’’ and, at paragraph (a), by revising DoD Item Unique Identification (IUID) elements marked on an item that is globally the definition of ‘‘issuing agency’’ to Registry means the central repository for IUID unique and unambiguous. information that serves as an acquisition read as follows: Usage means the quantity and an gateway to identify what the uniquely associated unit of measure that specifies the § 252.211–7003 Item Identification and identified tangible item is, how and when it amount-of a characteristic subject to the Valuation. was acquired, the initial Government unit contractor’s obligation to provide for remedy cost of the item, current custody * * * * * or corrective action such as a number of (Government or Contractor), and how it is miles, hours, or cycles. (a) * * * marked. Warranty administrator means the * * * * * Duration means the warranty period. This organization specified by the guarantor for Issuing agency means an organization period may be a stated period of time, managing the warranty. responsible for assigning a non- amount of usage, or the occurrence of a Warranty guarantor means the enterprise specified event, after formal acceptance of that provides the warranty under the terms repeatable identifier to an enterprise delivery, for the Government to assert a (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet’s Data Universal and conditions of a contract. contractual right for the correction of defects. Warranty repair source means the Numbering System (DUNS) Number, Enterprise means the entity (e.g., a organization specified by a warranty GS1 Company Prefix, Allied Committee manufacturer or vendor) responsible for guarantor for receiving and managing 135 NATO Commercial and granting the warranty and/or assigning warranty items that are returned by a Government Entity (NCAGE)/ unique item identifiers to serialized warranty customer. Commercial and Government Entity items. Warranty tracking means the ability to (CAGE) Code, or the Coded Enterprise identifier means a code that is trace a warranted item from delivery through Representation of the North American uniquely assigned to an enterprise by an completion of the effectivity of the warranty. issuing agency. Telecommunications Industry (b) Reporting of data for warranty tracking First use means the initial or first time use and administration. The Contractor shall Manufacturers, Suppliers, and Related of a product by the Government. provide the following information (see Table Service Companies (ATIS–0322000) Fixed expiration means the date the I) on each contract line item number (CLIN), Number), European Health Industry warranty expires and the Contractor’s subline item number (SLIN), or exhibit line Business Communication Council obligation to provide for a remedy or item number (ELIN) for warranted items. The (EHIBCC) and Health Industry Business corrective action ends. Contractor shall provide all information Communication Council (HIBCC), as Installation means the date a unit is required by Table II no later than when the indicated in the Register of Issuing inserted into a higher level assembly in order warranted items are presented for receipt Agency Codes for ISO/IEC 15459, to make it operational. and/or acceptance. The ‘‘Warranty Item Issuing agency means an organization Unique Item Identifier (UII)’’ data category located at http://www.nen.nl/web/ responsible for assigning a non-repeatable may also be completed in conjunction with Normen-ontwikkelen/ISOIEC-15459- identifier to an enterprise (e.g., Dun & Table II. The Contractor shall submit the data Issuing-Agency-Codes.htm. Bradstreet’s Data Universal Numbering for warranty tracking to the Contracting 6. Add section 252.246–70XX to read System (DUNS) Number, GS1 Company Officer with a copy to the requiring activity as follows: Prefix, Allied Committee 135 NATO and the Contracting Officer Representative.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52920 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

TABLE I—WARRANTY TRACKING INFORMATION

Warranty term Warranty adminis- Warranty Warranty Warranty Warranty Fixed trator en- adminis- guarantor guarantor CLIN, SLIN, OR Item item Usage (c)* Duration (d)* expiration terprise trator en- enterprise enterprise ELIN type (a) UII Starting (e) identifier terprise identifier identifier * ** ** event (b) code type identifier code type code type * Quantity Unit Quantity Unit Date (f) (g) (h) (i) * * * * * ** ** ** **

* To be completed by the requiring activity, if warranty is specified by the Government. Otherwise, all offerors are to complete as part of their offers. ** To be completed by the Contractor at the time of award (if known), otherwise at the time of delivery.

Notes: (d) Duration (for warrantees that expire Government Entity (NCAGE)/Commercial (a) Item type— after a set period of time) and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, or the C—component procured separate from end (e) Date (for warrantees with a fixed Coded Representation of the North American item expiration date) Telecommunications Industry S—subassembly procured separate from (f) Warranty administrator enterprise Manufacturers, Suppliers, and Related end item or subassembly identifier code type— Service Companies (ATIS–0322000) Number, E—embedded in component, subassembly 0–9—GS1 Company Prefix European Health Industry Business D—CAGE or end item parent Communication Council (EHIBCC) and LB—ATIS–0322000 P—parent end item Health Industry Business Communication LH—EHIBCC (b) Starting event— RH—HIBCC Council (HIBCC). Acceptance (A) UN—DUNS (h) Warranty guarantor enterprise identifier Installation (I) (g) Warranty administrator enterprise code type— First use (F) identifier—A non-repeatable identifier code 0–9—GS1 Company Prefix Other (O) assigned to an enterprise by an issuing D—CAGE Warranty term—Choose one of the agency [e.g., Dun & Bradstreet’s Data LB—ATIS–0322000 following: Universal Numbering System (DUNS) LH—EHIBCC (c) Usage (for warrantees where effectivity Number, GS1 Company Prefix , Allied RH—HIBCC is in terms of operating time or cycles) Committee 135 NATO Commercial and UN—DUNS

TABLE II—WARRANTY REPAIR SOURCE INSTRUCTIONS Contract Number:

Warranty re- Shipping address for warranty returns Warranty repair source pair source enterprise identifier enterprise Address City/ State/ Postal Instructions code type identifier Name line 1 Address county province code Country (r) (j) (k) (l) (m) line 2 (n) (o) (p) (q) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

For each warranty repair source enterprise identifier listed above, include the shipping address for returning warranty items, or in- clude instructions for accessing a Web site to obtain prepaid shipping labels for returning warranty items to the designated source of warranty repair.

** To be completed by the Contractor at the time of award and/or at the time of delivery.

(j) Warranty repair source enterprise LB—ATIS–0322000 (k) Warranty repair source enterprise identifier code type— LH—EHIBCC identifier—A non-repeatable identifier code 0–9—GS1 Company Prefix RH—HIBCC assigned to an enterprise by an issuing D—CAGE UN—DUNS agency [e.g., Dun & Bradstreet’s Data

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:31 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52921

Universal Numbering System (DUNS) • Mail: Mail written comments to four, 6–year domestic fishing moratoria Number, GS1 Company Prefix, Allied Michael D. Tosatto, Acting Regional at the Hancock Seamounts, beginning in Committee 135 NATO Commercial and Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands 1986. The current 6–year moratorium Government Entity (NCAGE)/Commercial Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Blvd, Suite expires on August 31, 2010. Although and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, or the there would be a short time period Coded Representation of the North American 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–4700. Telecommunications Industry Instructions: Comments must be between the expiration of the current Manufacturers, Suppliers, and Related submitted to one of these two addresses moratorium and implementation of this Service Companies (ATIS–0322000) Number, to ensure that the comments are rule, if approved, the likelihood of a European Health Industry Business received, documented, and considered new Hawaii-based domestic armorhead Communication Council (EHIBCC) and by NMFS. Comments sent to any other fishery developing is discountable. The Health Industry Business Communication address or individual, or received after Hancock Seamounts are a relatively Council (HIBCC). the end of the comment period, may not small and isolated fishing area, and the (c) Reservation of Rights. The terms of this be considered. Comments will be posted costs of starting up fishing operations to clause shall not be construed to limit the for public viewing after thecomment enter this fishery would be prohibitive Government’s rights or remedies under any relative to the potential fishing yield other contract clause. period has closed. All comments received are a part of the public record during the very short time that the area (End of clause)] and will generally be posted to would be open. Additionally, existing [FR Doc. 2010–21358 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] www.regulations.gov without change. domestic North Pacific trawl vessels BILLING CODE 5001–08–P All personal identifying information would not be allowed to fish at Hancock (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted Seamounts because trawls are voluntarily by the commenter may be prohibited fishing gear in the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE publicly accessible. Do not submit Pacific Islands. confidential business information, or From July 2009 to August 2010, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric otherwise sensitive or protected Council developed Amendment 2 to the Administration information. NMFS will accept Hawaii FEP to rebuild the armorhead anonymous comments (enter ‘‘NA’’ in stock pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens 50 CFR Part 665 the required fields if you wish to remain Act; the amendment is currently undergoing Secretarial review (75 FR [Docket No. 100618274–0377–01] anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft 51237, August 19, 2010). The Council RIN 0648–AY92 Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe recommended in Amendment 2 that NMFS establish a minimum rebuilding Fisheries in the Western Pacific; PDF file formats only. Amendment 2 to the Fishery time of 35 years for the U.S. portion of Hawaii Bottomfish and Seamount Ecosystem Plan for the Hawaiian the armorhead stock. The Council also Groundfish; Management Measures for Archipelago contains an environmental recommended that NMFS classify the Hancock Seamounts to Rebuild assessment and background portion of the EEZ surrounding the Overfished Armorhead information, and is available from Hancock Seamounts as an ecosystem AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries www.regulations.gov and from the management area, and extend the Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Council, 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, moratorium at Hancock Seamounts until Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220, the stock is rebuilt. In response to these Commerce. fax 808–522–8226, or web site recommendations, NMFS developed this proposed rule to implement the ACTION: www.wpcouncil.org. Proposed rule; request for latter two recommendations. comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Council and NMFS recognize Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIR Sustainable SUMMARY: that, because less than five percent of This proposed rule would Fisheries, 808–944–2108. continue a moratorium on fishing for the armorhead habitat lies within U.S. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: bottomfish and seamount groundfish at This jurisdiction, rebuilding of the stock the Hancock Seamounts until the document is also available at must be accomplished through overfished U.S. stock of pelagic www.gpoaccess.gov/fr. coordinated international management. Fishing for pelagic armorhead is armorhead (Pseudopentaceros wheeleri) Nonetheless, a prohibition on all managed under the Fishery Ecosystem is rebuilt. This proposed rule would armorhead catches in U.S. waters would Plan for the Hawaiian Archipelago also reclassify the management area provide the maximum protection (FEP). Armorhead are overfished as a around the Hancock Seamounts as an available for armorhead stocks in U.S. result of over-exploitation by foreign ecosystem management area. The intent waters. vessels in international waters, dating The current moratorium applies to all of the continued moratorium is to back to at least the 1970s. Although bottomfish and seamount groundfish, facilitate rebuilding of the armorhead there has never been a U.S. fishery and the proposed moratorium would stock, and the intent of the ecosystem targeting this fish, continued continue to do so. While only management area is to facilitate research exploitation outside the U.S. Exclusive armorhead are overfished, other on armorhead and other seamount Economic Zone (EEZ) by foreign fleets bottomfish and seamount groundfish are groundfish. has kept the stock in an overfished caught with the same gear type as DATES: Comments on the amendment condition. armorhead. Opening the Hancock must be received by October 14, 2010. The Hancock Seamounts are the only Seamount fishery to non-armorhead fish ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed known armorhead habitat within the would increase the likelihood of rule, identified by 0648–AY92, may be EEZ. These seamounts lie west of 180° incidental catches of armorhead, sent to either of the following addresses: W. and north of 28° N., to the northwest resulting in possible delays to • Electronic Submission: Submit all of Kure Atoll in the Northwestern rebuilding the stock. In addition, the electronic public comments via the Hawaiian Islands. The Council and fishing gear (anchors, weighted lines, Federal e-Rulemaking Portal NMFS have responded to the overfished and hooks) used to target non- www.regulations.gov; or condition of armorhead with a series of armorhead fish, or lost on fishing

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52922 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

grounds, has the potential to impact This proposed rule has been be small entities under the current Small armorhead essential fish habitat and determined to be not significant for Business Administration definition of small habitat areas of particular concern. For purposes of Executive Order 12866. fish-harvesting businesses (gross receipts not these reasons, all bottomfish and The Chief Counsel for Regulation of in excess of $ 4.0 million). There are no the Department of Commerce certified additional small entities that could be seamount groundfish have been affected by this proposed rulemaking. included in past fishing moratoria at to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the There has never been any U.S. fishery at Hancock Seamounts, and are also Small Business Administration that this Hancock Seamounts, nor has there been any included in this proposed rule. proposed rule, if adopted, would not recent interest in starting one, so this NMFS anticipates that further have a significant economic impact on proposed rule would not affect the research will be necessary for the a substantial number of small entities. profitability of fishing businesses under Regional Administrator to determine The analysis follows: Federal management. Therefore, there are no when armorhead stocks are rebuilt and Pelagic armorhead (Pseudopentaceros disproportionate economic impacts from this could support a domestic fishery. wheeleri) is a management unit species under proposed rule based on home port, gear type, the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the Hawaiian or relative vessel size. For these reasons, Specifically, research must be Archipelago. Armorhead are overfished as a pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory conducted to obtain better information result of over-exploitation by foreign vessels Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), it has been about armorhead life history, ecological in international waters. There has never been determined that this proposed rule will not information such as food-web dynamics a U.S. fishery targeting this fish, but have a significant economic impact on a and essential fish habitat, population continued exploitation by foreign fleets has substantial number of small entities, based dynamics, and fishery-independent kept the stock in an overfished condition. on the pre-existing status of U.S. fishery for information at the population level. The Western Pacific Fishery Management armorhead and other bottomfish and Additionally, the Council has identified Council (Council) and National Marine seamount groundfish at Hancock Seamounts. the need for habitat mapping and Fisheries Service (NMFS) have responded to As a result, an initial regulatory the overfished condition of armorhead with characterization, and fish distribution a series of four, 6–year domestic fishing flexibility analysis is not required and and abundance by habitat types. This moratoria, beginning in 1986, around the none has been prepared. information is necessary to determine Hancock Seamounts. These seamounts are List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665 whether the status of the stock could the only known armorhead habitat in the support a domestic fishery at Hancock U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The Armorhead, Bottomfish, Fisheries, Seamounts in the future. current 6–year moratorium expires on August Fishing, Hancock Seamounts, Hawaii, Classifying the portion of the EEZ 31, 2010. The Council developed Amendment 2 to Seamount groundfish. around the Hancock Seamounts as an the Hawaii fishery ecosystem plan to Dated: August 24, 2010. ecosystem management area would establish rebuilding requirements pursuant to Samuel D. Rauch III, acknowledge the significance of the area Magnuson-Stevens Act section 304(e)(4). Deputy Assistant Administrator for as a monitoring and research site for Amendment 2 would: (1) continue a Regulatory Programs, National Marine moratorium on fishing for armorhead and ecological studies on armorhead and Fisheries Service. other bottomfish and seamount other bottomfish and seamount groundfish groundfish and their associated benthic until the armorhead stock is rebuilt; (2) For the reasons set out in the habitats. The ecosystem management establish a minimum rebuilding time of 35 preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is proposed years for the U.S. portion of the armorhead to be amended as follows: area would also serve as the area in stock; and (3) classify the portion of the EEZ which the maximum U.S. contribution around the Hancock Seamounts as an PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE to rebuilding of the armorhead stock ecosystem management area. WESTERN PACIFIC would occur. Hancock Seamounts could The fishing moratorium continues to apply also serve as a control site for future to all bottomfish and seamount groundfish. 1. The authority citation for part 665 research that assesses the effectiveness While only armorhead are overfished, other continues to read as follows: of management actions being considered bottomfish and seamount groundfish are by other nations and regional fishery caught with the same gear type as armorhead. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. management organizations, such as Thus, opening the fishery to non-armorhead fish increases the likelihood of incidental 2. In § 665.202, revise paragraph (a)(3) seasonal closures and bank-specific catches of armorhead, resulting in possible to read as follows: closures in international waters adjacent delays to rebuilding the stock. In addition, § 665.202 Management subareas. to Hancock Seamounts. the fishing gear (anchors, weighted lines, and Additional information and analyses hooks) used to target non-armorhead fish, or * * * * * may be found in Amendment 2, lost on fishing grounds, may impact (3) Hancock Seamounts Ecosystem available from the Council (see armorhead essential fish habitat and habitat Management Area means that portion of ADDRESSES). areas of particular concern. For these reasons, the EEZ in the Northwestern Hawaiian all bottomfish and seamount groundfish have To be considered, comments on this Islands west of 180° W. long. and north been included in the fishing moratoriums at ° proposed rule must be received by Hancock Seamounts in the past, and are also of 28 N. lat. October 14, 2010, not postmarked or included in this action. The intent of the * * * * * otherwise transmitted by that date. continued moratorium and minimum 3. In § 665.204, add new paragraph (k) Classification rebuilding time is to facilitate rebuilding of the armorhead stock, and the intent of the to read as follows: Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the ecosystem management area is to facilitate § 665.204 Prohibitions. research on armorhead and other seamount Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS * * * * * Assistant Administrator has determined groundfish. A description of the action, why that this proposed rule is consistent it is being considered, and the legal basis for (k) Fish for or possess any Hawaii this action are contained in the preamble to bottomfish or seamount groundfish with the fishery ecosystem plan for this proposed rule. Hawaii, other provisions of the MUS in the Hancock Seamounts This proposed rule does not duplicate, Ecosystem Management Area, in Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules. applicable laws, subject to further All fishing vessels having the potential to violation of § 665.209. consideration after public comment. participate in this fishery are considered to 4. Revise § 665.209 to read as follows:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 52923

§ 665.209 Fishing moratorium at Hancock MUS in the Hancock Seamounts Administrator determines that the Seamounts. Ecosystem Management Area is armorhead stock is rebuilt. Fishing for, and possession of, Hawaii prohibited until the Regional [FR Doc. 2010–21537 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] bottomfish and seamount groundfish BILLING CODE S

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:08 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUP1.SGM 30AUP1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS 52924

Notices Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 167

Monday, August 30, 2010

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER Grain Inspection Agency, Inc. (Cairo); serviced by Amarillo, Cairo, and North contains documents other than rules or Louisiana Department of Agriculture Carolina and subsequently requested proposed rules that are applicable to the and Forestry (Louisiana); North Carolina applications for these areas in the June public. Notices of hearings and investigations, Department of Agriculture (North 25, 2010, Federal Register (75 FR committee meetings, agency decisions and Carolina); and D. R. Schaal Agency, Inc. 36348). Applications for this rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency (Schaal). announcement were due by July 26, statements of organization and functions are DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010. 2010. examples of documents appearing in this ADDRESSES: Karen W. Guagliardo, Amarillo, Cairo, Louisiana, North section. Branch Chief, Review Branch, Carolina, and Schaal were the sole Compliance Division, GIPSA, USDA, applicants for designations to provide STOP 3604, Room 1647–S, 1400 official services in these areas. As a DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Independence Avenue, SW., result, GIPSA did not ask for additional Washington, DC 20250–3604. comments. Grain Inspection, Packers and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GIPSA evaluated all available Stockyards Administration Karen W. Guagliardo, 202–720–8262 or information regarding the designation Designation for the Amarillo, TX; Cairo, [email protected]. criteria in section 7(f)(l) of the USGSA IL; State of Louisiana; State of North Read Applications: All applications (7 U.S.C. 79(f)) and determined that Carolina; Belmond, IA; State of New and comments will be available for Amarillo, Cairo, Louisiana, North Jersey; and State of New York Areas public inspection at the office above Carolina, and Schaal are qualified to during regular business hours (7 CFR provide official services in the AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and 1.27(c)). geographic areas specified in the March Stockyards Administration, USDA. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 31, 2010, and June 25, 2010, Federal ACTION: Notice. March 31, 2010, Federal Register (75 FR Register for which they applied. These 16068), GIPSA requested applications designation actions to provide official SUMMARY: GIPSA is announcing the for designation to provide official services in the specified areas are designation of the following services in the geographic areas effective October 1, 2010, and terminate organizations to provide official services presently serviced by the agencies on September 30, 2013. under the United States Grain Standards named above. Applications were due by Interested persons may obtain official Act, as amended (USGSA): Amarillo April 30, 2010. GIPSA received no services by calling the telephone Grain Exchange, Inc. (Amarillo); Cairo applications for the areas presently numbers listed below:

Designation Designation Official agency Headquarters location and telephone start end

Amarillo ...... Amarillo, TX (806–372–2152) ...... 10/1/2010 9/30/2013 Additional Location: Guymon, OK. Cairo ...... Cairo, IL (618–734–1316) ...... 10/1/2010 9/30/2013 Louisiana ...... Baton Rouge, LA (318–428–5453) ...... 10/1/2010 9/30/2013 Additional Locations: Jonesville, Oak Grove, Opelousas, LA. North Carolina ...... Raleigh, NC (919–733–4491) ...... 10/1/2010 9/30/2013 Additional Location: Elizabeth City, NC. Schaal ...... Belmond, IA (641–444–7292) ...... 10/1/2010 9/30/2013

Section 7(f)(1) of the USGSA Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that authorizes GIPSA’s Administrator to Marianne Plaus, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends designate a qualified applicant to Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, provide official services in a specified Packers and Stockyards Administration. to grant to Horticultural Research Institute, Inc. of Washington, DC, an area after determining that the applicant [FR Doc. 2010–21456 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. is better able than any other applicant BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P to provide such official services (7 7,066,995, ‘‘Compositions and Films U.S.C. 79(f)(1)). Comprised of Avian Feather Keratin,’’ issued on June 27, 2006. Under section 7(g)(1) of the USGSA, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE designations of official agencies are DATES: Comments must be received on Agricultural Research Service effective for 3 years unless terminated or before September 29, 2010. by the Secretary; however, designations Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, may be renewed according to the License ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, criteria and procedures prescribed in 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4–1174, section 7(f) of the Act. AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705–5131. USDA. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June ACTION: Notice of intent. Blalock of the Office of Technology

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52925

Transfer at the Beltsville address given Dated: August 19, 2010. • Mail: Karen W. Guagliardo, Review above; telephone: 301–504–5989. Genny E. Wilson, Branch Chief, Compliance Division, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Designated Federal Officer. GIPSA, USDA, STOP 3604, 1400 Federal Government’s patent rights in [FR Doc. 2010–21414 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Independence Avenue, SW., this invention are assigned to the United BILLING CODE 3410–11–M Washington, DC 20250–3604. States of America, as represented by the Read Applications: All applications Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the and comments will be available for public interest to so license this DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE public inspection at the office above invention as Horticultural Research during regular business hours (7 CFR Institute, Inc. of Washington, DC has Grain Inspection, Packers and 1.27(c)). submitted a complete and sufficient Stockyards Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: application for a license. The Karen W. Guagliardo, 202–720–7312 or Opportunity for Designation in the prospective exclusive license will be [email protected]. Owensboro, KY; Bloomington, IL; Iowa royalty-bearing and will comply with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Falls, IA; Casa Grande, AZ; Fargo, ND; Section the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 7(f)(1) of the United States Grain 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective Grand Forks, ND; and Plainview, TX Areas; Request for Comments on the Standards Act (USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 71– exclusive license may be granted unless, 87k) authorizes GIPSA’s Administrator Official Agencies Servicing These within thirty (30) days from the date of to designate a qualified applicant to Areas this published Notice, the Agricultural provide official services in a specified Research Service receives written AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and area after determining that the applicant evidence and argument which Stockyards Administration, USDA. is better able than any other applicant establishes that the grant of the license ACTION: Notice. to provide such official services. Under would not be consistent with the section 7(g)(1) of the USGSA, requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 SUMMARY: The designations of the designations of official agencies are CFR 404.7. official agencies listed below will end effective for 3 years unless terminated on March 31, 2011. We are asking by the Secretary, but may be renewed Richard J. Brenner, persons or governmental agencies according to the criteria and procedures Assistant Administrator. interested in providing official services prescribed in section 7(f) of the Act. [FR Doc. 2010–21491 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] in the areas presently served by these Areas Open for Designation: BILLING CODE 3410–03–P agencies to submit an application for Barton designation. In addition, we are asking for comments on the quality of services Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE provided by the following designated the following geographic areas, in the States of Indiana, Kentucky, and Forest Service agencies: J. W. Barton Grain Inspection Service, Inc. (Barton); Central Illinois Tennessee are assigned to this official Alpine County Resource Advisory Grain Inspection, Inc. (Central Illinois); agency: In Indiana: Committee (RAC) Central Iowa Grain Inspection Service, • Inc. (Central Iowa); Farwell Commodity Clark, Crawford, Floyd, Harrison, AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. and Grain Services, Inc. (Farwell Jackson, Jennings, Jefferson, Lawrence, ACTION: Notice of meeting. Southwest); North Dakota Grain Martin, Orange, Perry, Scott, Spencer, Inspection Service, Inc. (North Dakota); and Washington Counties. SUMMARY: The Alpine County Resource In Kentucky: Northern Plains Grain Inspection Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a • Bounded on the North by the Service, Inc. (Northern Plains); and meeting. northern Daviess, Hancock, Plainview Grain Inspection and Breckinridge, Meade, Hardin, Jefferson, DATES: The meeting will be held on Weighing Service, Inc. (Plainview). September 21st, 2010 and will begin at Oldham, Trimble, and Carroll County DATES: Applications and comments are 6 p.m. lines; due by September 29, 2010. • ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in Bounded on the East by the eastern ADDRESSES: Alpine County at the Alpine Early Submit applications Carroll, Henry, Franklin, Scott, Fayette, Learning Center, 100 Foothill Road, concerning this notice using only one of Jessamine, Woodford, Anderson, Markleeville, CA 96120. the following methods: Nelson, Larue, Hart, Barren, and Allen • Internet: Apply using FGISonline County lines; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (https://fgis.gipsa.usda.gov/ • Bounded on the South by the Daniel Morris, RAC Coordinator, USDA, default_home_FGIS.aspx) by clicking on southern Allen and Simpson County Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, the Delegations/Designations and Export lines; and Carson Ranger District, 1536 S. Carson Registrations (DDR) link. You will need • Bounded on the West by the Street, Carson City, NV 89701 (775) to obtain an FGISonline customer western Simpson and Warren County 884–8140; E-mail number and USDA eAuthentication lines; the southern Butler and [email protected]. username and password prior to Muhlenberg County lines; the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda applying. Submit comments at http:// Muhlenberg County line west to the items to be covered include: (1) Review www.regulations.gov. Instructions for Western Kentucky Parkway; the and recommend finding allocation for submitting and reading comments are Western Kentucky Parkway west to proposed projects (2) Determine detailed on the site. State Route 109; State Route 109 north timeframes for the next round of project • Hand Delivery/Courier Address: to State Route 814; State Route 814 proposals (3) Public Comment. The Karen W. Guagliardo, Review Branch north to U.S. Route Alternate 41; U.S. meeting is open to the public. Public Chief, Compliance Division, GIPSA, Route Alternate 41 north to the Webster input opportunity will be provided and USDA, Room 1647–S, 1400 County line; the northern Webster individuals will have the opportunity to Independence Avenue, SW., County line; the western McLean and address the Committee at that time. Washington, DC 20250. Daviess County lines.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52926 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

In Tennessee: western Hamilton County line north to areas, which are serviced by GIPSA, are • Bounded on the North by the U.S. Route 20; U.S. Route 20 east to R38; assigned to this official agency: northern Tennessee State line from R38 north to the Hamilton County line; • Maricopa, Pinal, Santa Cruz, and Sumner County east; the northern Hamilton County line east Yuma Counties, Arizona. • Bounded on the East by the eastern to Interstate 35; Interstate 35 northeast • Imperial, Riverside, and San Diego Tennessee State line southwest; to C55; C55 east to S41; S41 north to Counties, California. • Bounded on the South by the State Route 3; State Route 3 east to U.S. North Dakota southern Tennessee State line west to Route 65; U.S. Route 65 north to C25; the western Giles County line; and C25 east to S56; S56 north to C23; C23 Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, • Bounded on the West by the east to T47; T47 south to C33; C33 east the following geographic areas, in the western Giles, Maury, and Williamson to T64; T64 north to B60; B60 east to States of Illinois, Minnesota and North County lines North; the northern U.S. Route 218; U.S. Route 218 north to Dakota, are assigned to this official Williamson County line east; the Chickasaw County; the western agency: western Rutherford, Wilson, and In Illinois: Chickasaw County line; and the western • Sumner County lines north. and northern Howard County lines. Bounded on the East by the eastern • Cumberland County line; the eastern Central Illinois Bounded on the East by the eastern Howard and Chickasaw County lines; Jasper County line south to State Route Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, the eastern and southern Bremer County 33; State Route 33 east-southeast to the the following geographic area, in the lines; V49 south to State Route 297; Indiana-Illinois State line; the Indiana- State of Illinois, is assigned to this State Route 297 south to D38; D38 west Illinois State line south to the southern official agency: to State Route 21; State Route 21 south Gallatin County line; • • Bounded on the South by the Bounded on the North by State to State Route 8; State Route 8 west to southern Gallatin, Saline, and Route 18 east to U.S. Route 51; U.S. U.S. Route 63; U.S. Route 63 south to Williamson County lines; the southern Route 51 south to State Route 17; State Interstate 80; Interstate 80 east to the Jackson County line west to U.S. Route Route 17 east to Livingston County; the Poweshiek County line; the eastern 51; U.S. Route 51 north to State Route Livingston County line east to State Poweshiek, Mahaska, Monroe, and 13; State Route 13 northwest to State Route 47; Appanoose County lines; • Bounded on the East by State Route Route 149; State Route 149 west to State • Bounded on the South by the 47 south to State Route 116; State Route Route 3; State Route 3 northwest to southern Appanoose, Wayne, Decatur, 116 west to Pontiac, which intersects State Route 51; State Route 51 south to Ringgold, and Taylor County lines; with a straight line running north and • the Mississippi River; south through Arrowsmith to the Bounded on the West by the • Bounded on the West by the southern McLean County line; western Taylor County line; the Mississippi River north to the northern • Bounded on the South by the southern Montgomery County line west Calhoun County line; and southern McLean County line; the to State Route 48; State Route 48 north • Bounded on the North by the eastern Logan County line south to State to M47; M47 north to the Montgomery northern and eastern Calhoun County Route 10; State Route 10 west to the County line; the northern Montgomery lines; the northern and eastern Jersey Logan County line; the western Logan County line; the western Cass and County lines; the northern Madison County line; the southern Tazewell Audubon County lines; the northern County line; the western Montgomery County line; and Audubon County line east to U.S. Route County line north to a point on this line • Bounded on the West by the 71; U.S. Route 71 north to U.S. Route that intersects with a straight line, from western Tazewell County line; the 30. the junction of State Route 111 and the western Peoria County line north to The following grain elevators, located northern Macoupin County line to the Interstate 74; Interstate 74 southeast to outside of the above contiguous junction of Interstate 55 and State Route State Route 116; State Route 116 north geographic area, are part of this 16 (in Montgomery County); from this to State Route 26; State Route 26 north geographic area assignment: AgVantage point southeast along the straight line to to State Route 18. FS, Chapin, Franklin County; and Five the junction of Interstate 55 and State Central Illinois’ assigned geographic Star Coop, Rockwell, Cerro Gordo Route 16; State Route 16 east-northeast area does not include the East Lincoln County (located inside D.R. Schaal to a point approximately 1 mile Farmers Grain Co. (Lincoln, Logan Agency’s area). northeast of Irving; a straight line from County, Illinois) grain elevator, which is Central Iowa’s assigned geographic this point to the northern Fayette located inside Central Illinois’ area. area does not include the following County line; the northern Fayette, Springfield Grain Inspection, Inc. grain elevators, which are located inside Effingham, and Cumberland County presently services and will continue to Central Iowa’s area: lines. service this elevator. • West Central Coop in Boxholm, In Minnesota: Boone County, Iowa (serviced by Sioux • Koochiching, St. Louis, Lake, Cook, Central Iowa City Inspection and Weighing Service Itasca, Norman, Mahnomen, Hubbard, Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, Company) and Cass, Clay, Becker, Wadena, Crow Wing, the following geographic area, in the • Hancock Elevator in Elliot, Aitkin, Carlton, Wilkin, and Otter Tail State of Iowa, is assigned to this official Montgomery County, Iowa and two Counties, excluding those export port agency: Hancock elevators in Griswold, Cass locations served by GIPSA. • Bounded on the North by U.S. County, Iowa (serviced by Omaha Grain In North Dakota: Route 30 east to N44; N44 south to E53; Inspection Service, Inc.). • Bounded on the North by the E53 east to U.S. Route 30; U.S. Route 30 northern Steele County line from State Farwell Southwest east to the Boone County line; the Route 32 east; the northern Steele and western Boone County line north to E18; Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, Traill County lines east to the North E18 east to U.S. Route 169; U.S. Route the following geographic areas, in the Dakota State line; 169 north to the Boone County line; the States of Arizona and California, except • Bounded on the East by the eastern northern Boone County line; the those export port locations within these North Dakota State line;

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52927

• Bounded on the South by the Mitchell, Howard, Martin, and Andrews ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation. southern North Dakota State line west to County lines; and State Route 1; and • Bounded on the West by the SUMMARY: On August 19, 2010 (75 FR • Bounded on the West by State western Andrews, Gaines, and Yoakum 51238–51239), the U.S. Commission on Route 1 north to Interstate 94; Interstate County lines; the northern Yoakum and Civil Rights announced a business 94 east to the Soo Railroad line; the Soo Terry county lines; the western Lubbock meeting to be held on Friday, August Railroad line northwest to State Route 1; County line; the western Hale County 27, 2010 via teleconference. On State Route 1 north to State Route 200; line north to FM 37; FM 37 west to U.S. Wednesday, August 25, 2010, the State Route 200 east to State Route 45; Route 84; U.S. Route 84 northwest to meeting was cancelled. The decision to State Route 45 north to State Route 32; FM 303; FM 303 north to U.S. Route 70; cancel the meeting was too close in time State Route 32 north. U.S. Route 70 west to the Lamb County to the date and time of the meeting for line; the western and northern Lamb the publication of a cancellation notice Northern Plains County lines; the western Castro County to appear in advance of the scheduled Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, line; the southern Deaf Smith County meeting date. The details of the the following geographic areas, in the line west to State Route 214; State Route cancelled meeting are: States of Minnesota and North Dakota, 214 north to the northern Deaf Smith DATE AND TIME: Friday, August 27, 2010; are assigned to this official agency: County line. 11:30 a.m. EDT. In Minnesota: PLACE: Via Teleconference. • Opportunity for Designation Kittson, Roseau, Lake of the Woods, Public Dial In: 1–800–597–7623. Marshall, Beltrami, Polk, Pennington, Interested persons or governmental Conference ID # 94458880. Red Lake, and Clearwater Counties. agencies may apply for designation to In North Dakota: provide official services in the Meeting Agenda • Bounded on the North by the North geographic areas specified above under This meeting is open to the public, Dakota State line; the provisions of section 7(f) of the except where noted otherwise. • Bounded on the East by the North USGSA and 7 CFR 800.196(d). I. Approval of Agenda. Dakota State line south to the southern Designation in the specified geographic II. Program Planning. Grand Forks County line; • • areas is for the period beginning April New Black Panther Party Bounded on the South by the 1, 2011, and ending March 31, 2014. To Enforcement Project. southern Grand Forks and Nelson apply for designation or for more • Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts County lines west to the western Nelson information, contact Karen W. College Admissions Project. County line; the western Nelson County Guagliardo at the address listed above or • Timeline for Briefing Report on line north to the southern Benson visit GIPSA’s Web site at http:// English-Only in the Workplace. County line, the southern Benson and www.gipsa.usda.gov. III. State Advisory Committee Issues. Pierce County lines west to State Route • Wyoming SAC. 3; and Request for Comments III. Approval of August 13 Meeting • Bounded on the West by State We are publishing this notice to Minutes. Route 3 north to the southern Rolette provide interested persons the IV. Adjourn. County line; the southern Rolette opportunity to comment on the quality CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER County line west to the western Rolette of services provided by the Barton, INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting County line north to the North Dakota Central Illinois, Central Iowa, Farwell Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376– State line. Southwest, North Dakota, Northern 8591. TDD: (202) 376–8116. Plainview Plains, and Plainview official agencies. Persons with a disability requiring In the designation process, we are special services, such as an interpreter Pursuant to Section 7(f)(2) of the Act, particularly interested in receiving for the hearing impaired, should contact the following geographic areas, in the comments citing reasons and pertinent Pamela Dunston at least seven days State of Texas, are assigned to this data supporting or objecting to the prior to the meeting at 202–376–8105. official agency. designation of the applicants. Submit all TDD: (202) 376–8116. • Bounded on the North by the comments to Karen W. Guagliardo at the northern Deaf Smith County line east to Dated: August 26, 2010. above address or at http:// U.S. Route 385; U.S. Route 385 south to David Blackwood, www.regulations.gov. FM 1062; FM 1062 east to State Route We consider applications, comments, General Counsel. 217; State Route 217 east to Prairie Dog and other available information when [FR Doc. 2010–21681 Filed 8–26–10; 4:15 pm] Town Fork of the Red River; Prairie Dog determining which applicant will be BILLING CODE 6335–01–P Town Fork of the Red River southeast to designated. the northern Briscoe County line and Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k. along the northern Hall County line east DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE to U.S. Route 287; U.S. Route 287 Marianne Plaus, southeast to the eastern Hall County line Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Foreign-Trade Zones Board south to the northern Cottle County line; Packers and Stockyards Administration. [Docket 20–2009] the northern Cottle County line east to [FR Doc. 2010–21460 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the northern Hardeman County line; • BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P Foreign-Trade Zone 29; Application for Bounded on the East by the eastern Subzone Authority; Dow Corning Hardeman and Fourd County lines to Corporation; Extension of Rebuttal the northern Baylor and Archer County COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Period lines to the eastern Archer, Throckmorton, Shackelford, and Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting Based on a request from Dow Corning Callahan County lines; Corporation (Dow Corning), the rebuttal • Bounded on the South by the AGENCY: United States Commission on period on the preliminary southern Callahan, Taylor, Nolan, Civil Rights. recommendation for the application for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52928 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

subzone status at the Dow Corning instruments are intended to be used, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: facilities in Carrollton, Elizabethtown was being manufactured in the United Background and Shepherdsville, Kentucky (75 FR States at the time the instruments were 31763, 6/3/2010) is being extended to ordered. Reasons: Each foreign Section 4 of the ESA contains October 1, 2010 to allow additional time instrument is an electron microscope provisions allowing interested persons for the submission of rebuttal and is intended for research or scientific to petition the Secretary of the Interior comments. Original submissions shall educational uses requiring an electron or the Secretary of Commerce be sent to the Board’s Executive microscope. We know of no electron (Secretary) to add a species to or remove Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones microscope, or any other instrument a species from the List of Endangered Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, suited to these purposes, which was and Threatened Wildlife and to Room 2111, 1401 Constitution Ave., being manufactured in the United States designate critical habitat. On April 27, NW., Washington, DC 20230. An at the time of order of each instrument. 2010, we received a petition from Mr. electronic copy shall be submitted to Sam Wright of Olympia, WA, to list Dated: August 24, 2010. Georgia Basin populations of China [email protected]. Gregory W. Campbell, For further information, contact rockfish and tiger rockfish. For the Elizabeth Whiteman at Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement purpose of this petition finding, we Office, Import Administration. [email protected] or (202) consider the Georgia Basin to include 482–0473. [FR Doc. 2010–21557 Filed 8–29–10; 8:45 am] the inland marine waters of Puget BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S Sound, the Strait of Georgia (north to Dated: August 24, 2010. the mouth of the Campbell River in Andrew McGilvray, British Columbia), and the portion of Executive Secretary. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE the Strait of Juan de Fuca east of the [FR Doc. 2010–21571 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Victoria Sill (see our determination to National Oceanic and Atmospheric BILLING CODE P list three distinct population segments Administration of Puget Sound/Georgia Basin distinct [Docket No. 100813341–0341–01] population segments of rockfish, 75 FR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 22276 (April 28, 2010)). RIN 0648–XX56 Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the ESA (16 International Trade Administration U.S.C. 1531–1544) requires that we Endangered and Threatened Wildlife determine whether a petition to list, Emory University, et al., Notice of and Plants; Notice of 90–Day Finding delist, or reclassify a species presents Consolidated Decision on Applications for a Petition to List Georgia Basin substantial scientific or commercial for Duty–Free Entry of Electron Populations of China Rockfish and information to indicate that the Microscopes Tiger Rockfish as Endangered or petitioned action may be warranted. In Threatened This is a decision consolidated pursuant making this determination, we consider to Section 6(c) of the Educational, AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries information submitted with and Scientific, and Cultural Materials Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and referenced in the petition, and all other Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89– Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), information available in our files. To the 651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–36; 80 Commerce. maximum extent practicable, this finding is to be made within 90 days of Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related ACTION: Notice of 90–day petition the receipt of the petition, and the records can be viewed between 8:30 finding. A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3720, U.S. finding is to be published promptly in Department of Commerce, 14th and SUMMARY: We (NMFS) received a the Federal Register. Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington, petition to list Georgia Basin In evaluating a petition, the Secretary D.C. populations of China rockfish (Sebastes considers whether it (1) describes past Docket Number: 10–038. Applicant: nebulosus) and tiger rockfish (S. and present numbers and distribution of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. nigrocinctus) as endangered or the species and any threats faced by the Instrument: Electron Microscope. threatened species under the species (50 CFR 424.14(b)(2)(ii)); (2) Manufacturer: JEOL, Ltd., Japan. Endangered Species Act (ESA). We provides information regarding the Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR determine that the petition does not status of the species over all or a 46912, August 4, 2010. present substantial evidence to indicate significant portion of its range (50 CFR Docket Number: 10–049. Applicant: that the petitioned action may be 424.14(b)(2)(iii)); and (3) is Health Research Inc., New York State warranted. accompanied by appropriate supporting Department of Health, Menands, NY documentation (50 CFR 12204–2719. Instrument: Electron ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of this 424.14(b)(2)(iv)). Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., petition regarding Georgia Basin China The ESA defines ‘‘species’’ to include Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 75 FR rockfish and tiger rockfish should be subspecies, or a distinct population 46912, August 4, 2010. submitted to Chief, Protected Resources segment of a vertebrate species (16 Docket Number: 10–051. Applicant: Division, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd U.S.C. 1532(16)). The petitioner Regents of the University of California at Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR requested listing of the Georgia Basin San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093–0651. 97232. The petition and supporting data populations of China rockfish and tiger Instrument: Electron Microscope. are available for public inspection, by rockfish. We evaluated whether the Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech appointment, Monday through Friday, information provided or cited in the Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 75 at this address. petition met our standard for FR 46912, August 4, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ‘‘substantial information’’ as defined in Comments: None received. Decision: Garth Griffin, NMFS, Northwest Region, joint ESA implementing regulations Approved. No instrument of equivalent (503) 231–2005 or Dwayne Meadows, issued by NMFS and the U.S. Fish and scientific value to the foreign NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, Wildlife Service (50 CFR 424.14(b)). We instrument, for such purposes as these (301) 713–1401. also reviewed other information

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52929

available to us (currently within our abundance of these two species. In the action may be warranted. If new files). absence of an analysis in the petition, information becomes available to we independently reviewed the suggest that Georgia Basin populations Previous Petition to list Puget Sound information on recreational catches of of China rockfish and tiger rockfish may China Rockfish and Tiger Rockfish these two species available in our warrant listing under the ESA, we will We have received numerous petitions records. The proportion of these two reconsider conducting a status review. from Mr. Wright. In 1999, he petitioned species in the recreational rockfish us to list 18 species of Puget Sound catch is low, approximately 1 percent References marine fishes. Based on the information over the 12–year period. Standing alone, A complete list of all references cited presented in that petition, and available however, this low percentage does not herein is available upon request (see in our files, we conducted status indicate a low occurrence of these ADDRESSES section). reviews on seven of those fishes. rockfish species relative to others Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. Information on the other eleven fishes because, as noted above, adults of the (including China rockfish and tiger petitioned species tend to remain Dated: August 24, 2010. rockfish) was insubstantial and we hidden in rocky habitat and are Samuel D. Rauch III, therefore did not conduct status reviews therefore less available to anglers. Nor Deputy Assistant Administrator for (64 FR 33037; June 21, 1999). does this information reveal anything Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. Analysis of Petition about the absolute abundance of these two species. The catch information [FR Doc. 2010–21536 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] When reviewing a petition to list a therefore does not indicate that BILLING CODE 3510–22–S species under the ESA, we consider abundance of these species is low information provided in the petition as enough to pose a threat to viability. well as information available in agency We agree with the petitioner’s DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE files. Mr. Wright’s petition provides assertion that China rockfish and tiger information from SCUBA surveys rockfish typically utilize a small home International Trade Administration conducted in the Georgia Basin from range and experience low productivity. President’s Export Council: Meeting of 1998 to 2009. The petition points to the However, as the petitioner the President’s Export Council fact that there are few observations of acknowledges, a small home range China rockfish and tiger rockfish in causes individuals to remain hidden in AGENCY: International Trade these surveys. The petition provides no rocky habitat, where they may Administration, U.S. Department of analysis to explain how these surveys experience lower mortality, as a result Commerce. can be interpreted to indicate either a of less frequent exposure to predators. ACTION: Notice of an open meeting. low abundance level or a declining Low productivity can be a risk factor in trend in abundance, either of which some instances. However, low SUMMARY: The President’s Export might be evidence of risk to the species. productivity is not an indication of Council will hold a meeting to discuss To the contrary, the petitioner declining abundance (another risk topics related to the National Export acknowledges that adults of these two factor) since it reflects a life history Initiative, and advice from the species tend to remain hidden in rocky trade-off between fecundity and life President’s Export Council as to how to habitats, which could make them span. promote U.S. exports, jobs, and growth. difficult for SCUBA divers to observe. Finally, the petitioner fails to In the absence of any analysis in the demonstrate how any of these DATES: September 16, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. petition, we independently reviewed individual pieces of information could (EDT). the information from these surveys and be integrated into a trend analysis or ADDRESSES: The President’s Export concluded they do not provide evidence some other type of analysis suggesting Council will convene its next meeting of low abundance or a declining trend the two species are at risk. via live webcast on the Internet at in abundance. The surveys are The petitioner states ‘‘This would be http://whitehouse.gov/live. opportunistic sightings, reported by an ideal time to conduct a status review FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. recreational or professional divers. of these two species since most of the Marc Chittum, President’s Export There is no research protocol associated required assessment work has already Council, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution with these SCUBA reports, and the been done and there is an existing Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, identification of individual fish species Biological Review Team (BRT).’’ While telephone: 202–482–1124, e-mail: cannot be independently verified. it is true that NMFS recently completed [email protected]. Because the area surveyed and the level an ESA review of five rockfish species of effort are opportunistic and variable, in the Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: because the reports are not collected in (including the formation and use of a Background: The President’s Export a systematic sampling design, and BRT), that is not a basis to conduct Council was first established by because adults of these species tend to additional reviews under ESA section Executive Order on December 20, 1973 hide in rocky habitats that could make 4(b)(3)(A). NMFS did not look at to advise the President on matters them difficult to observe, we concluded information on China rockfish and tiger relating to U.S. export trade and report that these survey results do not support rockfish during its review earlier in the to the President on its activities and on inferences about population abundance. year, and the BRT was subsequently its recommendations for expanding U.S. The petition also provides a short disbanded. exports. The President’s Export Council description of the total recreational was renewed most recently by Executive catch of these species over a 12–year Petition Finding Order 13511 of September 29, 2009, for period. The description appears under a After reviewing the petition, as well the two-year period ending September heading in the petition entitled ‘‘Low as information readily available to us, 30, 2011. Abundance Problem,’’ but the petition we have determined that the petition Public Submissions: The public is provides no explanation of how this does not present substantial scientific invited to submit written statements to information reveals anything about the information indicating the petitioned the President’s Export Council by C.O.B.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52930 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

September 10, 2010 by either of the Meghmani is the successor-in-interest to On June 3, 2010, we sent a following methods: Alpanil. Interested parties are invited to questionnaire to Meghmani requesting comment on these preliminary results. further information on the nature of the Electronic Statements DATES: Effective Date: August 30, 2010. name change and whether additional Send electronic statements to the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: changes had occurred. Although we President’s Export Council Web site at Jerrold Freeman or Richard Rimlinger, granted Meghmani an extension of the http://trade.gov/pec/peccomments.asp; AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import deadline to respond, Meghmani did not or Administration, International Trade respond to our questionnaire. Instead, on July 6, 2010, Meghmani notified the Paper Statements Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Department that it will not participate Send paper statements to J. Marc Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; in the changed-circumstances review. Chittum, President’s Export Council, telephone: (202) 482–0180 or (202) 482– Meghmani did not provide any reasons Room 4043, 1401 Constitution Avenue, 4477, respectively. for its decision to withdraw its NW., Washington, DC 20230. All participation from the changed- statements will be posted on the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: circumstances review. President’s Export Council Web site Background Since the initiation of the review, no (http://trade.gov/pec/peccomments.asp) other interested party has submitted On December 11, 2009, the without change, including any business comments. Department was notified by Alpanil or personal information provided such that, on April 9, 2009, Alpanil’s name Scope of the Order as names, addresses, e-mail addresses, was officially changed to Meghmani or telephone numbers. All statements The merchandise subject to the order Pigments. In addition to a brief narrative received, including attachments and is carbazole violet pigment 23 identified explaining that there was no change in other supporting materials, are part of as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical company ownership, management, the public record and subject to public Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the production, office or factory location, ′ ′ disclosure. You should submit only chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3 ,2 - employees, customers, or suppliers, a 1 information that you wish to make m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, copy of ‘‘Form G’’ from the Gujurat State available publicly. 15-diethyl-5, 15-dihydro-, and Registar of Firms was attached to Meeting minutes: Copies of the molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2. demonstrate a record of all corporate Council’s meeting minutes will be The subject merchandise includes the changes for Alpanil/Meghmani since the available within 90 days of the meeting. crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry incorporation of Alpanil in 1992. This powder, paste, wet cake) and finished Dated: August 25, 2010. attachment indicates that Alpanil’s pigment in the form of presscake and J. Marc Chittum, name change to Meghmani was dry color. Pigment dispersions in any Executive Secretary, President’s Export recorded on April 9, 2009. form (e.g., pigment dispersed in Council. On March 9, 2010, in accordance with oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) [FR Doc. 2010–21641 Filed 8–26–10; 4:15 pm] section 751(b) of the Act, 19 CFR are not included within the scope of the BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 351.216, and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3), we order. The merchandise subject to the published in the Federal Register a order is classifiable under subheading notice of initiation of an antidumping 3204.17.90.40 of the Harmonized Tariff DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE duty changed-circumstances review. See Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Although the HTSUS subheading is International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping Duty provided for convenience and customs [A–533–838] Changed-Circumstances Review, 75 FR purposes, the written description of the 10759 (March 9, 2010) (Initiation). In scope of the order is dispositive. Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From this notice we indicated that we would Use of Adverse Facts Available India: Preliminary Results of conduct the changed-circumstances Antidumping Duty Changed- review in the context of the For the reason discussed below, we Circumstances Review administrative review of the order determine that the use of adverse facts covering the period December 1, 2008, available is appropriate for the AGENCY: Import Administration, through November 30, 2009. preliminary results of the changed- International Trade Administration, On April 5, 2010, Meghmani circumstances review with respect to Department of Commerce. withdrew its request for a review of its Meghmani. SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 751(b) of sales of merchandise subject to the A. Use of Facts Available the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the antidumping duty order for the 2008/09 Act), and 19 CFR 351.216 and period in a timely manner. Therefore, in Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides 351.221(c)(3), the Department of accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), that, if an interested party withholds Commerce (the Department) is we rescinded the 2008/09 review with information requested by the conducting a changed-circumstances respect to CVP 23 from India produced administering authority, fails to provide review of the antidumping duty order and/or exported by Meghmani. See such information by the deadlines for on carbazole violet pigment 23 from Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: submission of the information and in India to determine whether Meghmani Rescission of Administrative Review, 75 the form or manner requested, Pigments (Meghmani) is the successor- FR 25209 (May 7, 2010). In the notice significantly impedes a proceeding in-interest to Alpanil Industries we indicated that, in accordance with under this title, or provides such (Alpanil) for determining antidumping 19 CFR 351.216(e), we intend to ‘‘issue information but the information cannot duty liability. Because Meghmani did final results of the changed- be verified as provided in section 782(i) not respond to the Department’s circumstances review within 270 days 1 The bracketed section of the product questionnaire, we have preliminarily after the date on which we initiated the description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business- determined that the use of facts changed-circumstances review.’’ See 75 proprietary information. In this case, the brackets available is appropriate to find that FR at 25210. are simply part of the chemical nomenclature.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52931

of the Act, the Department shall use Meghmani is the successor-in-interest to As indicated in the Initiation, during facts otherwise available in reaching the Alpanil. In making the adverse the course of this changed- applicable determination. inference, we have relied on the circumstances review we will not Because Meghmani did not respond to information placed on the record by change any cash-deposit requirements our June 3, 2010, questionnaire, Meghmani to determine that Meghmani on entries of merchandise subject to the pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A) and (B) is the successor-in-interest to Alpanil. antidumping duty order unless a change of the Act, we must rely entirely on facts See section 776(b) of the Act.2 If we is determined to be warranted pursuant available. were to find that Meghmani is not the to the final results of this changed- B. Application of Adverse Inferences for successor-in-interest to Alpanil, that circumstances review. Facts Available would ensure that Meghmani would We are issuing and publishing these ‘‘obtain a more favorable result by failing preliminary results and notice in In selecting among the facts otherwise to cooperate’’ because the all-others rate accordance with sections 751(b) and available, section 776(b) of the Act of 27.48 percent for the antidumping 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. provides that, if the Department finds duty order would apply to Meghmani Dated: August 23, 2010. that an interested party has failed to which is significantly lower than cooperate by not acting to the best of its Alpanil’s current rate of 58.90 percent. Ronald K. Lorentzen, ability to comply with a request for Accordingly, we preliminarily Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import information, the Department may use an determine that Meghmani is the Administration. inference adverse to the interests of that successor-in-interest to Alpanil and will [FR Doc. 2010–21577 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] party. In addition, the Statement of assign to Meghmani the same treatment BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Administrative Action accompanying as Alpanil with respect to the the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, antidumping duty proceeding. H.R. Rep. 103–316, Vol. 1, 103d Cong. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (1994), reprinted in 1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. Public Comment 4040 (SAA), establishes that the Case briefs from interested parties Foreign-Trade Zones Board Department may employ an adverse may be submitted not later than 15 days [Order No. 1703] inference ‘‘to ensure that the party does after the date of publication of this not obtain a more favorable result by notice of preliminary results of changed- Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone failing to cooperate than if it had circumstances review. See 19 CFR 126 Under Alternative Site Framework; cooperated fully.’’ See SAA at 870. The 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs from Reno, NV SAA also instructs the Department to interested parties, limited to the issues Pursuant to its authority under the consider, in employing adverse raised in the case briefs, may be Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, inferences, ‘‘the extent to which a party submitted not later than five days after 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), may benefit from its own lack of the time limit for filing the case briefs the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the cooperation.’’ Id. Moreover, ‘‘affirmative or comments. Parties who submit case Board) adopts the following Order: evidence of bad faith on the part of a briefs or rebuttal briefs in this respondent is not required before the proceeding are requested to submit with Whereas, the Board adopted the Department may make an adverse each argument a statement of the issue, alternative site framework (ASF) in inference.’’ See Antidumping Duties; a summary of the arguments not December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 62 FR exceeding five pages, and a table of correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) as an 27296, 27340 (May 19, 1997). statutes, regulations, and cases cited. option for the establishment or We find that, by failing completely to Interested parties who wish to request reorganization of general-purpose zones; respond to our questionnaire in the a hearing or to participate in a hearing Whereas, the Economic Development changed-circumstances review if a hearing is requested must submit a Authority of Western Nevada, grantee of concerning its name change, Meghmani written request to the Assistant Foreign-Trade Zone 126, submitted an withheld requested information and Secretary for Import Administration application to the Board (FTZ Docket thus failed to cooperate to the best of its within 15 days of the date of publication 26–2010, filed 4/19/2010) for authority ability and, therefore, we may use an of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). to reorganize under the ASF with a inference that is adverse to the interests Such requests should contain the service area of Carson City, Douglas and of Meghmani. following information: (1) The party’s Storey Counties as well as portions of name, address, and telephone number; Churchill, Lyon and Washoe Counties, C. Selection of Information Used as (2) the number of participants; (3) a list Nevada, in and adjacent to the Reno Facts Available of issues to be discussed. Issues raised Customs and Border Protection port of Where the Department applies an in the hearing will be limited to those entry, FTZ 126’s existing Sites 1, 4–14 adverse inference because a respondent discussed in the case briefs. If and 17 would be categorized as magnet failed to cooperate by not acting to the requested, any hearing will be held two sites, existing Sites 2, 3, 15 and 16 best of its ability to comply with a days after the scheduled date for would be categorized as usage-driven request for information, section 776(b) submission of rebuttal briefs. sites, and the grantee proposes two of the Act authorizes the Department to The Department will publish in the additional usage-driven sites (Sites 18 rely on information derived from the Federal Register a notice of the final and 19); petition, a final determination, a results of this changed-circumstances Whereas, notice inviting public previous administrative review, or other review, including the results of its comment was given in the Federal information placed on the record. See analysis of issues raised in any written Register (75 FR 21594–21595, 4/26/10) also 19 CFR 351.308(c) and the SAA at briefs or at the hearing if requested. and the application has been processed 870. pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s Because we are making an adverse 2 Because the information upon which we are regulations; and, relying was obtained in the course of the review inference with regard to Meghmani and is not secondary information, corrobation of Whereas, the Board adopts the based on the most recent information at this information is not necessary. See section 776(c) findings and recommendations of the our disposal, we preliminarily find that of the Act. examiner’s report, and finds that the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52932 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

requirements of the FTZ Act and Drive in Texas Township (Kalamazoo Dated: August 25, 2010. Board’s regulations are satisfied, and County); Site 4 (22 acres)—8250 Logistic Mitchell S. Bryman, that the proposal is in the public Drive, Zeeland Township (Ottawa Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison interest; County), some 20 miles southwest of Officer, Department of Defense. Now, therefore, the Board hereby Grand Rapids; Site 5 (30 acres)—located [FR Doc. 2010–21540 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] orders: within the 120-acre St. Joseph River BILLING CODE 5001–06–P The application to reorganize FTZ 126 Harbor Development Area adjacent to under the alternative site framework is Lake Michigan in Benton Harbor approved, subject to the FTZ Act and (Berrien County), some 50 miles east of DELAWARE RIVER BASIN the Board’s regulations, including Battle Creek; Site 7 (14 acres)—72100 COMMISSION Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard Highway M–40 South, Lawton (Van 2,000-acre activation limit for the Buren County); and Site 8 (50,000 sq. Notice of Commission Meeting and overall general-purpose zone project, to ft.)—located at 1609 Parnall Road, Public Hearing a five-year ASF sunset provision for Jackson (approved on a temporary basis Notice is hereby given that the magnet sites that would terminate until 1/31/11). authority for Sites 1, 4, 5, 7–14 and 17 Delaware River Basin Commission will For further information, contact hold an informal conference followed if not activated by August 31, 2015, and Elizabeth Whiteman at to a three-year ASF sunset provision for by a public hearing on Wednesday, [email protected] or (202) September 15, 2010. The hearing will be usage-driven sites that would terminate 482–0473. authority for Sites 2, 3, 15–16 and 18– part of the Commission’s regular 19 if no foreign-status merchandise is Dated: August 25, 2010. business meeting. The conference admitted for a bona fide customs Andrew McGilvray, session and business meeting both are purpose by August 31, 2013. Executive Secretary. open to the public and will be held at [FR Doc. 2010–21572 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the West Trenton Volunteer Fire Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of Company, located at 40 West Upper August 2010. BILLING CODE P Ferry Road, West Trenton, New Jersey. Ronald K. Lorentzen, The conference among the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import commissioners and staff will begin at Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 10:30 a.m. and will consist of: A report Trade Zones Board. by staff on the year’s progress in Attest: National Security Agency implementing the 2004 Basin Plan; a Andrew McGilvray, report by a representative of the U.S. Executive Secretary. Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive Army Corps of Engineers on the regional [FR Doc. 2010–21573 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] License; Doar, Pekuin, Sall Limited sediment management planning BILLING CODE P Liability Company process; and a presentation by a representative of the U.S. AGENCY: National Security Agency, DoD. Environmental Protection Agency on DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ACTION: Notice. the Delaware Basin Source Water Collaborative Forum to take place on Foreign-Trade Zones Board SUMMARY: The National Security Agency March 10, 2011. hereby gives notice of its intent to grant The subjects of the public hearing to Foreign-Trade Zone 43—Battle Creek, Doar, Pekuin, Sall Limited Liability MI; Site Renumbering Notice be held during the 1:30 p.m. business Company a revocable, non-assignable, meeting include the dockets listed Foreign-Trade Zone 43 was approved exclusive, license to practice the below: by the FTZ Board on October 19, 1978 following Government-Owned 1. Upper Southampton Municipal (Board Order 138, 43 FR 50233, 10/27/ invention as described in U.S. Patent Authority, D–1965–023 CP–2. An 78), and expanded on December 27, No. 6,404,407 entitled ‘‘Ridge laser with application for the renewal of a 1990 (Board Order 496, 56 FR 675, 1/8/ oxidized strain-compensated groundwater withdrawal project to 91), January 3, 1992 (Board Order 554, superlattice of group III–V supply the docket holder’s water supply 57 FR 1143, 1/10/92 and Board Order semiconductor.’’ The invention is distribution system from existing Wells 555, 57 FR 1143, 1/10/92), and June 20, assigned to the United States Nos. 3, 7, and 9. The docket holder 1997 (Board Order 897, 62 FR 36044, 7/ Government as represented by the requests an allocation of 13.53 million 3/97 and Board Order 898, 62 FR 36043, National Security Agency. gallons per month (mgm). The project 7/3/97). DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the wells were constructed in the Stockton FTZ 43 currently consists of 5 ‘‘sites’’ grant of this license has fifteen (15) days Formation and are located in the totaling 1,820 acres in the Battle Creek, from the publication date of this notice Southampton and Mill Creek Michigan area. The current update does to file written objections along with any Watersheds in Upper Southampton not alter the physical boundaries that supporting evidence, if any. Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania, have previously been approved, but in the Southeastern Pennsylvania instead involves an administrative ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be Ground Water Protected Area (GWPA). renumbering that separates certain non- filed with the National Security Agency 2. Abington Township, D–1973–191 contiguous sites for record-keeping Technology Transfer Program, 9800 CP–4. An application for renewal of the purposes. Savage Road, Suite 6541, Fort George G. Abington Township Wastewater Under this revision, the site list for Meade, MD 20755–6541. Treatment Plant (WWTP). The existing FTZ 43 will be as follows: Site 1 (1,710 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WWTP will continue to discharge acres)—within the Fort Custer Industrial Marian T. Roche, Director, Technology treated effluent at an annual average Park, Battle Creek; Site 2 (21 acres)— Transfer Program, 9800 Savage Road, flow of 3.91 million gallons per day Columbia West Industrial Park, Battle Suite 6541, Fort George G. Meade, MD (mgd) to Sandy Run, a tributary of the Creek; Site 3 (23 acres)—6677 Beatrice 20755–6541, telephone (443) 479–9569. Wissahickon Creek, which drains to the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52933

Schuylkill River. The facility is located Aquashicola Creek, a tributary of the traverse and dock at the facility. The in Upper Dublin Township, Lehigh River, and is located within the project is located in Water Quality Zone Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. drainage area of the section of the non- 5 of the Delaware River at River Mile 3. Lower Moreland Township tidal Delaware River known as the 61.8, in Delaware City, New Castle Authority, D–1987–052 CP–3. An Lower Delaware, which is classified as County, Delaware. application for the renewal of an Special Protection Waters. The facility 12. Naval Surface Warfare Center, existing 0.279 mgd discharge from the is located in the Borough of Palmerton, Carderock Division, Ship Systems Chapel Hill WWTP to an unnamed Carbon County, Pennsylvania. Engineering Station, D–2009–003–1. An tributary of Southampton Creek at River 8. Upper Gwynedd Township, D– application for approval of a surface Mile 109.75–16.1–0.71–0.5 (Delaware 1991–088 CP–6. An application for water withdrawal of up to 1,147.25 mgm River-Pennypack Creek-Southampton approval of a modification of the Upper from an existing surface water intake to Creek-UNT). The Chapel Hill WWTP is Gwynedd Township WWTP by the be used for once-through non-contact located in Lower Moreland Township, addition of a BiomagTM treatment cooling of land-based test sites (LBTS) Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. process. The process entails adding for ship systems associated with the 4. Manwalamink Water Company, D– magnetite to the aeration tanks in order Naval Surface Warfare Center, 1989–050 CP–5. An application for to enhance solids settling and BOD and Carderock Division, Ship Systems renewal of a groundwater withdrawal nutrient removal. The WWTP will Engineering Station (NSWCCD–SSES). project to continue to supply up to 15 continue to treat an average annual flow The project intake is located in the Navy mgm of groundwater to the public water of 5.7 mgd and discharge treated sewage Reserve Basin, which is connected by a supply system from existing Wells Nos. effluent to the Wissahickon Creek, a channel to the Schuylkill River, one-half 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. Wells Nos. 1 and 2 are tributary of the Schuylkill River. The mile upstream of the confluence of the completed in the Pleistocene alluvial facility is located in Upper Gwynedd Schuylkill and Delaware rivers. The sand and gravel aquifer. Wells Nos. 3, 5, Township, Montgomery County, Navy Reserve Basin is located in the and 6 are completed in the Ridgeley- Pennsylvania. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in Coeymans Formation. The project is 9. Plumstead Township, D–1997–033 the Schuylkill River Watershed. located in the Shawnee Creek and CP–3. An application to approve the 13. City of Dover, D–2009–014 CP–1. Delaware River watersheds in addition of new Well No. LG–6 to the An application for approval of an Smithfield Township, Monroe County, applicant’s 11 existing wells and to existing 0.360 mgd discharge of cooling Pennsylvania within the drainage area increase the applicant’s total tower blowdown from Outfalls Nos. 004 of the section of the non-tidal Delaware groundwater withdrawal allocation from and 005 from the applicant’s McKee River known as the Middle Delaware, all wells from 15.31 million gallons per Run Electric Generating Station. The which is classified as Special Protection 30 days (mg/30 days) to 23.02 mgm. The project outfalls are located at River Mile Waters. project wells are located in the 23.70–14.36–0.34 (Delaware River-Saint 5. Waste Management of Brunswick Group, Lockatong Jones River-McKee Run) in the City of Pennsylvania, D–1991–090–2. An Formation, and Stockton Formation in Dover, Kent County, Delaware. application for the renewal of a surface Plumstead Township, Bucks County, 14. Reading Area Water Authority— water withdrawal project to continue to Pennsylvania within four subbasins of Maiden Creek, D–2010–009 CP–1. An supply 6 mgm of water to the the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground application for approval of an existing applicant’s landfill operations from the Water Protected Area: Tohickon-Deep 4.3 mgd discharge from the Maiden existing Intake on Manor Lake. The Run, Tohickon-Geddes-Cabin Runs, Creek Water Filtration Plant (WFP). The project is located in the Delaware River Pine Run, and North Branch Neshaminy discharge consists of filter backwash, Watershed in Tullytown and Falls Creek. pump seal water, chlorine analyses, and townships, Bucks County, 10. Borough of Bryn Athyn, D–2008– diesel generator cooling water from the Pennsylvania. 013 CP–3. An application for approval WFP. Modifications to the backwash 6. Dan Schantz Farm and to modify the existing 0.08 mgd New treatment process are proposed that will Greenhouses, D–1999–014–2. An Church WWTP. Modifications include not increase the capacity of the WFP. application for the renewal of a the addition of an equalization tank and The project discharges to Maiden Creek groundwater withdrawal project to a sludge holding tank, to be at River Mile 92.47–85.63–0.24 continue the withdrawal of up to 3.57 incorporated into the existing treatment (Delaware River-Schuylkill River- mgm of water for irrigation and potable design. The New Church WWTP will Maiden Creek) in Ontelaunee water supply from eight existing wells continue to discharge to an unnamed Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania. located in the Brunswick Formation. Tributary of Huntingdon Valley Creek at 15. Friesland Campino Domo, D– The project is located in the Hosensach- River Mile 109.75–12.02–1.11–0.17 2010–010–1. An application for Indian Creek Watershed in Lower (Delaware River-Pennypack Creek- approval of an existing groundwater Milford Township, Lehigh County, Huntingdon Valley Creek-UNT) in Bryn withdrawal project to supply up to Pennsylvania in the Southeastern Athyn Borough, Montgomery County, 31.95 mg/30 days of water to the Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected Pennsylvania. The project is located in applicant’s vitamin production facility Area. the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground from existing Wells No. 1 and 2. The 7. Borough of Palmerton, D–1964–028 Water Protected Area. project is located in the Lower Walton CP–2. An application for approval of an 11. Premcor Refining Group, D–2009– Formation in the West Branch Delaware upgrade of the existing Palmerton 023–1. An application for approval to River Watershed in the Town of Delhi, Borough WWTP. The upgrade includes increase the dredging depth of the Delaware County, New York, within the replacing the existing contact facility’s Entrance Channel and Turning drainage area of the section of the non- stabilization activated sludge treatment Basin by five feet (to a new depth of tidal Delaware River known as the system with a sequencing batch reactor ¥37 ft. MLW) and of the Pier Berthing Upper Delaware, which is classified as (SBR) treatment system. No increase in Area by three feet (to a new depth of Special Protection Waters. the design annual average flow of 0.75 ¥40 ft. MLW). Approximately 650,000 16. Schuylkill County Municipal mgd is proposed. The WWTP will cubic yards of new material will be Authority—Deer Lake, D–2010–019 CP– continue to discharge to the dredged to allow for larger ships to 1. An application for approval to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52934 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

expand the existing Deer Lake WWTP hearing are occasionally postponed to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section from a hydraulic design of 0.229 mgd to allow more time for the Commission to 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1.0 mgd. Treated wastewater will consider them. Please check the 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires continue to discharge to Pine Creek at Commission’s Web site, drbc.net, closer that the Office of Management and River Mile 92.47–106.75–2.35 (Delaware to the meeting date for changes that may Budget (OMB) provide interested River-Schuylkill River-Pine Creek) via be made after the deadline for filing this Federal agencies and the public an early Outfall No. 001, in West Brunswick notice. opportunity to comment on information Township, Schuylkill County, Individuals who wish to comment for collection requests. The OMB is Pennsylvania. the record on a hearing item or to particularly interested in comments 17. Gloucester County Utilities address the Commissioners informally which: (1) Evaluate whether the Authority—Pitman Golf Course, D– during the public dialogue portion of proposed collection of information is 2010–029 CP–1. An application for the meeting are asked to sign up in necessary for the proper performance of approval to construct and operate the advance by contacting Ms. Paula the functions of the agency, including 0.2 mgd Pitman Golf Course (PGC) Schmitt of the Commission staff, at whether the information will have WWTP. Effluent limits for the PGC [email protected] or by practical utility; (2) Evaluate the WWTP will be based upon a 0.1 mgd phoning Ms. Schmitt at 609–883–9500 accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the discharge, the requested irrigation flow ext. 224. burden of the proposed collection of required at the PGC to avoid an increase Individuals in need of an information, including the validity of in withdrawal from New Jersey Critical accommodation as provided for in the the methodology and assumptions used; Water Supply Area 2. The PGC WWTP Americans with Disabilities Act who (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and will receive flow from the Chestnut wish to attend the informational clarity of the information to be Branch Interceptor, an existing meeting, conference session or hearings collected; and (4) Minimize the burden component of the wastewater collection should contact the Commission of the collection of information on those system for the Gloucester County Secretary directly at 609–883–9500 ext. who are to respond, including through Utilities Authority (GCUA) WWTP, 203 or through the Telecommunications the use of appropriate automated, which discharges to Water Quality Zone Relay Services (TRS) at 711, to discuss electronic, mechanical, or other 4 in the tidal Delaware River. After how the Commission can accommodate technological collection techniques or treatment, the effluent will be spray- your needs. other forms of information technology. irrigated on the Pitman Golf Course, located in Mantua Township, Dated: August 24, 2010. Dated: August 24, 2010. Gloucester County, New Jersey. Excess Pamela M. Bush, Stephanie Valentine, wastewater withdrawn from the Commission Secretary. Acting Director, Information Collection Interceptor will be returned to the [FR Doc. 2010–21505 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management. Interceptor for treatment at the GCUA’s BILLING CODE 6360–01–P 27 mgd WWTP located in West Office of Postsecondary Education Deptford, Gloucester County, New Jersey. Type of Review: Reinstatement. In addition to the standard business DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title of Collection: Financial Report meeting items, consisting of adoption of for Grantees under the Title III Part A, the Minutes of the Commission’s May 5 Notice of Submission for OMB Review Title III Part B, and the Title V Program and July 14, 2010 business meetings, Endowment Activities and Endowment AGENCY: Department of Education. announcements of upcoming meetings Challenge Grant Program. and events, a report on hydrologic ACTION: Comment request. OMB Control Number: 1840–0564. conditions, reports by the Executive Agency Form Number(s): N/A. SUMMARY: The Acting Director, Frequency of Responses: Annually. Director and the Commission’s General Information Collection Clearance Counsel, public hearings on water Affected Public: Not-for-profit Division, Regulatory Information institutions. withdrawal and discharge projects, and Management Services, Office of public dialogue, the business meeting Total Estimated Number of Annual Management invites comments on the Responses: 500. also will include a public hearing on a submission for OMB review as required resolution concerning delegation of Total Estimated Annual Burden by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Hours: 1,500. DRBC review of the Southport Marine (Pub. L. 104–13). Terminal project and consideration by Abstract: This financial reporting the Commission of its proposal DATES: Interested persons are invited to form will be utilized for Title III Part A, (published in February and March of submit comments on or before Title III Part B and Title V Program 2010) to amend water charging rates. September 29, 2010. Endowment Activities and Title III Part Draft dockets scheduled for public ADDRESSES: Written comments should C Endowment Challenge Grant Program. hearing on September 15, 2010 can be be addressed to the Office of The purpose of this Annual Financial accessed through the Notice of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Report is to have the grantees report Commission Meeting and Public Attention: Education Desk Officer, annually the kind of investments that Hearing on the Commission’s Web site, Office of Management and Budget, 725 have been made, the income earned and drbc.net, ten days prior to the meeting 17th Street, NW., Room 10222, New spent, and whether any part of the date. Additional public records relating Executive Office Building, Washington, Endowment Fund Corpus has been to the dockets may be examined at the DC 20503, be faxed to (202) 395–5806 or spent. This information allows us to Commission’s offices. Please contact e-mailed to give technical assistance and determine William Muszynski at 609–883–9500, [email protected] with a whether the grantee has complied with extension 221, with any docket-related cc: to [email protected]. Please note the statutory and regulatory investment questions. that written comments received in requirements. Note that conference items are subject response to this notice will be Requests for copies of the information to change and items scheduled for considered public records. collection submission for OMB review

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52935

may be accessed from the RegInfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY encourages electronic filing, documents Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, public/do/PRAMain or from the Federal Energy Regulatory mail an original and seven copies to: Department’s website at http:// Commission Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the [Project No. 13729–000] Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 ‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. by clicking on link number 4345. When Energy Exchange, Inc.; Notice of More information about this project, you access the information collection, Preliminary Permit Application including a copy of the application, can click on ‘‘Download Attachments ’’ to Accepted for Filing and Soliciting be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’ view. Written requests for information Comments, Motions To Intervene, and link of Commission’s Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ should be addressed to U.S. Department Competing Applications elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, August 23, 2010. (P–13729–000) in the docket number SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. On May 11, 2010, and supplemented field to access the document. For Requests may also be electronically on July 20, 2010, Energy Exchange, Inc. assistance, contact FERC Online mailed to the Internet address filed an application, pursuant to section Support. [email protected] or faxed to 202– 4(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 401–0920. Please specify the complete proposing to study the feasibility of the Kimberly D. Bose, title of the information collection and Tacoma Water Supply Hydroelectric Secretary. OMB Control Number when making Project (Tacoma Project). The Tacoma [FR Doc. 2010–21464 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] your request. Project would be located within the city BILLING CODE 6717–01–P of Tacoma in Pierce County, Individuals who use a Washington on an existing water telecommunications device for the deaf conveyance system. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (TDD) may call the Federal Information The Tacoma Project would consist of: Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877– (1) Two existing 60-inch diameter Federal Energy Regulatory 8339. pipelines that originate at the Green Commission [FR Doc. 2010–21494 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] River headworks at the lower end of the [Docket No. CP10–486–000] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P Green River Watershed; (2) two new powerhouses to be located at two points Colorado Interstate Gas Company; along the pipelines with one 1.8- Notice of Application megawatt (MW) turbine/generating unit ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION at each; (3) a new three-phase August 23, 2010. transmission line (voltage to be Take notice that on August 12, 2010, Sunshine Act Notice determined) connecting to the nearest Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), tie-in point of a local utility. The project P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance would produce an estimated average Colorado 80944, pursuant to section 7(c) Commission. annual generation of about 31,000 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), filed in megawatt-hours. Docket No. CP10–486–000, an ACTION: Notice of closed meeting Applicant Contact: Duane Pratt, application authoring the construction agenda. Energy Exchange, Inc., 2711 Centerville and operation of an air blending station Rd., Suite 120—PMB 7023, Wilmington, consisting of compression and DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, September DE 19808; phone (208) 371–1285. appurtenant facilities located in Douglas 1, 2010; 9:30 a.m.–12 p.m. EDT. FERC Contact: Patrick Murphy (202) County, Colorado. Specifically, CIG 502–8755. states that it proposes: (1) To construct PLACE: U.S. Election Assistance Deadline for filing comments, motions and operate the Spruce Hill Air Commission, 1201 New York Ave., NW., to intervene, competing applications Blending Project facilities (Project); (2) Washington, DC 20005. (without notices of intent), or notices of to charge and collect, pursuant to AGENDA: Commissioners will hold a intent to file competing applications: 60 section 4 of the NGA, the New Spruce closed session discussion regarding a days from the issuance of this notice. Hill Gas Quality Control Surcharge for personnel matter on the appointment of Competing applications and notices of services to be rendered via the Project; an EAC general counsel. intent must meet the requirements of 18 (3) acceptance of certain potential non- CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to conforming contract provisions * View EAC Regulations intervene, notices of intent, and contained in the executed Firm Implementing Government in the competing applications may be filed Transportation Service Agreements Sunshine Act. This meeting will be electronically via the Internet. See 18 (FTSA) for the Project; and (4) closed to the public. CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the exemption, for one of the FTSAs, from PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: instructions on the Commission’s Web the collection of Fuel Gas. The proposed Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566– site. http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ facilities will be constructed adjacent to 3100. efiling.asp. Commenters can submit CIG’s existing Spruce Hill Meter Station. brief comments up to 6,000 characters, CIG estimates the cost of the facilities Alice Miller, without prior registration, using the will be $15,900,000, all as more fully set Chief Operating Officer, U.S. Election eComment system at http:// forth in the application, which is on file Assistance Commission. www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ with the Commission and open to [FR Doc. 2010–21713 Filed 8–26–10; 4:15 pm] ecomment.asp. You must include your public inspection. The filing may also name and contact information at the end be viewed on the Web at http:// BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P of your comments. For assistance, www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. please contact FERC Online Support. Enter the docket number excluding the Although the Commission strongly last three digits in the docket number

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52936 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

field to access the document. For However, a person does not have to Comment Date: September 13, 2010. assistance, contact FERC at intervene in order to have comments Kimberly D. Bose, [email protected] or call considered. The second way to Secretary. toll-free, (866) 208–3676 or TTY, (202) participate is by filing with the 502–8659. Secretary of the Commission, as soon as [FR Doc. 2010–21467 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Any questions regarding the possible, an original and two copies of BILLING CODE 6717–01–P application should be directed to Ms. comments in support of or in opposition Susan C. Stires, Director, Regulatory to this project. The Commission will Affairs, Colorado Interstate Gas DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY consider these comments in Company, P.O. Box 1087, Colorado determining the appropriate action to be Springs, Colorado, 80944 at (719) 667– Federal Energy Regulatory 7514 or by fax at (719) 520–4697. or Mr. taken, but the filing of a comment alone Commission Craig V. Richardson, Vice President and will not serve to make the filer a party [Project No. 13721–000] General Counsel, Colorado Interstate to the proceeding. The Commission’s Gas Company; P.O. Box 1087, Colorado rules require that persons filing Energy Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Springs, Colorado, 80944 at (719) 520– comments in opposition to the project Preliminary Permit Application 4370 or by fax at (719) 520–4898. provide copies of their protests only to Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Pursuant to section 157.9 of the the party or parties directly involved in Comments, Motions to Intervene, and Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9, the protest. Competing Applications within 90 days of this Notice the Persons who wish to comment only Commission staff will either: Complete August 23, 2010. on the environmental review of this On May 5, 2010, and amended on July its environmental assessment (EA) and project should submit an original and place it into the Commission’s public 19, 2010, Energy Exchange, Inc. filed an two copies of their comments to the record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or application, pursuant to section 4(f) of Secretary of the Commission. issue a Notice of Schedule for the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing Environmental Review. If a Notice of Environmental commentors will be to study the feasibility of the Geren Schedule for Environmental Review is placed on the Commission’s Island Hydroelectric Project (Geren issued, it will indicate, among other environmental mailing list, will receive Island Project). The Geren Island Project milestones, the anticipated date for the copies of the environmental documents, would be located within the city of Commission staff’s issuance of the final and will be notified of meetings Salem, Marion County, Oregon. environmental impact statement (FEIS) associated with the Commission’s The Geren Island Project would or EA for this proposal. The filing of the environmental review process. consist of: (1) The city of Salem’s EA in the Commission’s public record Environmental commentors will not be existing water delivery system for this proceeding or the issuance of a required to serve copies of filed consisting of two reservoirs (Frazen and Notice of Schedule for Environmental documents on all other parties. Fairmont) and two existing, 36- and 54- Review will serve to notify federal and However, the non-party commentors inch diameter steel pipelines; (2) three state agencies of the timing for the will not receive copies of all documents proposed powerhouses, each to contain completion of all necessary reviews, and filed by other parties or issued by the a 0.37-megawatt-(MW) turbine- the subsequent need to complete all Commission (except for the mailing of generating unit, with a total capacity of 1.11 MW, and (3) a new three-phase federal authorizations within 90 days of environmental documents issued by the transmission line (voltage to be the date of issuance of the Commission Commission) and will not have the right determined) to connect with the nearest staff’s FEIS or EA. to seek court review of the There are two ways to become tie-in point of a local power company Commission’s final order. involved in the Commission’s review of grid system. The project would produce this project. First, any person wishing to The Commission strongly encourages an estimated average annual generation obtain legal status by becoming a party electronic filings of comments, protests of about 8,000 megawatt-hours. to the proceedings for this project and interventions in lieu of paper using Applicant Contact: Duane Pratt, should, on or before the comment date the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. Energy Exchange, Inc., 2711 Centerville stated below, file with the Federal Persons unable to file electronically Rd., Suite 120—PMB 7023, Wilmington, Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 should submit an original and 14 copies DE 19808; phone (208) 371–1285. First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, of the protest or intervention to the FERC Contact: Patrick Murphy (202) a motion to intervene in accordance Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 502–8755. with the requirements of the 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC Deadline for filing comments, motions Commission’s Rules of Practice and 20426. to intervene, competing applications Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) (without notices of intent), or notices of and the Regulations under the NGA (18 This filing is accessible on-line at intent to file competing applications: 60 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party http://www.ferc.gov, using the days from the issuance of this notice. status will be placed on the service list ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for Competing applications and notices of maintained by the Secretary of the review in the Commission’s Public intent must meet the requirements of 18 Commission and will receive copies of Reference Room in Washington, DC. CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to all documents filed by the applicant and There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the intervene, notices of intent, and by all other parties. A party must submit Web site that enables subscribers to competing applications may be filed original plus seven copies of any filings receive e-mail notification when a electronically via the Internet. See 18 made with the Commission and must document is added to a subscribed CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the mail a copy to the applicant and to docket(s). For assistance with any FERC instructions on the Commission’s Web every other party in the proceeding. Online service, please e-mail site. http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ Only parties to the proceeding can ask [email protected], or call efiling.asp. Commenters can submit for court review of Commission orders (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call brief comments up to 6,000 characters, in the proceeding. (202) 502–8659. without prior registration, using the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52937

eComment system at document. For assistance, please contact Commission’s Rules of Practice and http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ FERC Online Support at Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) ecomment.asp. You must include your [email protected] or toll and the Regulations under the NGA (18 name and contact information at the end free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party of your comments. For assistance, (202) 502–8659. status will be placed on the service list please contact FERC Online Support. Turtle Bayou’s new storage project maintained by the Secretary of the Although the Commission strongly has been designed to provide Commission and will receive copies of encourages electronic filing, documents approximately 12 billion cubic feet (Bcf) all documents filed by the applicant and may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, of working gas capacity with a by all other parties. A party must submit mail an original and seven copies to: maximum injection rate of up to 300 seven copies of filings made with the Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) and Commission and must mail a copy to Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 a maximum withdrawal rate of 600 the applicant and to every other party in First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. MMcf/d. Additionally, Turtle Bayou the proceeding. Only parties to the More information about this project, intends to construct a total of 13.1 miles proceeding can ask for court review of including a copy of the application, can of 24-inch diameter pipeline to deliver Commission orders in the proceeding. be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’ the natural gas to Natural Gas Pipeline However, a person does not have to link of Commission’s Web site at http:// Company of America and Texas Eastern intervene in order to have comments www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Transmission, LP, as well as three considered. The second way to Enter the docket number (P–13721–000) reciprocating units to produce a total of participate is by filing with the in the docket number field to access the 16,470 horsepower, leaching facilities, Secretary of the Commission, as soon as document. For assistance, contact FERC water supply wells, brine disposal possible, an original and two copies of Online Support. wells, and two meter stations. comments in support of or in opposition Any questions concerning this to this project. The Commission will Kimberly D. Bose, application may be directed to Jim consider these comments in Secretary. Lindsay, Turtle Bayou Gas Storage determining the appropriate action to be [FR Doc. 2010–21471 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Company, LLC, One Office Park Circle, taken, but the filing of a comment alone BILLING CODE 6717–01–P Suite 300, Birmingham, Alabama 35223, will not serve to make the filer a party at (877) 558–4521 or to the proceeding. The Commission’s [email protected]; or Amy L. Baird, rules require that persons filing DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Jackson Walker L.L.P., 1401 McKinney comments in opposition to the project Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas provide copies of their protests only to Federal Energy Regulatory 77010, at (713) 752–4525 or the party or parties directly involved in Commission [email protected]. the protest. [Docket Nos. CP10–481–000; PF09–14–000] Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Persons who wish to comment only Commission’s rules, 18 CFR 157.9, on the environmental review of this Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Company, within 90 days of this Notice the project should submit an original and LLC; Notice of Application Commission staff will either: Complete two copies of their comments to the its environmental assessment (EA) and Secretary of the Commission. August 20, 2010. place it into the Commission’s public Environmental commentors will be Take notice that on August 6, 2010, record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or placed on the Commission’s Turtle Bayou Gas Storage Company, issue a Notice of Schedule for environmental mailing list, will receive LLC (Turtle Bayou), One Office Park Environmental Review. If a Notice of copies of the environmental documents, Circle, Suite 300, Birmingham, Alabama Schedule for Environmental Review is and will be notified of meetings 35223, filed in the above referenced issued, it will indicate, among other associated with the Commission’s docket an application pursuant to milestones, the anticipated date for the environmental review process. section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act Commission staff’s issuance of the final Environmental commentors will not be (NGA), for an order granting a certificate environmental impact statement (FEIS) required to serve copies of filed of public convenience to construct, or EA for this proposal. The filing of the documents on all other parties. own, operate, and maintain a new salt EA in the Commission’s public record However, the non-party commentors dome natural gas storage facility in two for this proceeding or the issuance of a will not receive copies of all documents caverns and related facilities to be Notice of Schedule for Environmental filed by other parties or issued by the located in Chambers and Liberty Review will serve to notify federal and Commission (except for the mailing of Counties, Texas. Turtle Bayou is state agencies of the timing for the environmental documents issued by the requesting blanket certificates under completion of all necessary reviews, and Commission) and will not have the right Part 284, Subpart G and Part 157, the subsequent need to complete all to seek court review of the Subpart F of the Commission’s federal authorizations within 90 days of Commission’s final order. regulations. Turtle Bayou also seeks for the date of issuance of the Commission The Commission strongly encourages authorization of market based rates, staff’s FEIS or EA. electronic filings of comments, protests approval of the pro forma tariff, and There are two ways to become and interventions in lieu of paper using waivers of some of the Commission’s involved in the Commission’s review of the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. regulations, all as more fully set forth in this project. First, any person wishing to Persons unable to file electronically the application which is on file with the obtain legal status by becoming a party should submit an original and seven Commission and open to public to the proceedings for this project copies of the protest or intervention to inspection. should, on or before the comment date the Federal Energy Regulatory The filing may also be viewed on the stated below, file with the Federal Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 Washington, DC 20426. ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, This filing is accessible on-line at excluding the last three digits in the a motion to intervene in accordance http://www.ferc.gov, using the docket number field to access the with the requirements of the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52938 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

review in the Commission’s Public Web site that enables subscribers to FERC Contact: Patrick Murphy (202) Reference Room in Washington, DC. receive e-mail notification when a 502–8755. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the document is added to a subscribed Deadline for filing comments, motions Web site that enables subscribers to docket(s). For assistance with any FERC to intervene, competing applications receive e-mail notification when a Online service, please e-mail (without notices of intent), or notices of document is added to a subscribed [email protected], or call intent to file competing applications: 60 docket(s). For assistance with any FERC (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call days from the issuance of this notice. Online service, please e-mail (202) 502–8659. Competing applications and notices of [email protected], or call Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time intent must meet the requirements of 18 (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call on August 30, 2010. CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to (202) 502–8659. intervene, notices of intent, and Kimberly D. Bose, Comment Date: September 10, 2010. competing applications may be filed Secretary. electronically via the Internet. See 18 Kimberly D. Bose, [FR Doc. 2010–21469 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the Secretary. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P instructions on the Commission’s Web [FR Doc. 2010–21465 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] site. http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ BILLING CODE 6717–01–P efiling.asp. Commenters can submit DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission eComment system at http:// Federal Energy Regulatory www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ [Project No. 13720–000] Commission ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the end [Docket No. ER10–1810–001] Energy Exchange, Inc.; Notice of of your comments. For assistance, Preliminary Permit Application please contact FERC Online Support. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Although the Commission strongly Company; Notice of Filing Comments, Motions To Intervene, and encourages electronic filing, documents Competing Applications August 20, 2010. may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, Take notice that on August 20, 2010, August 23, 2010. mail an original and seven copies to: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, On May 5, 2010, and amended on July Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal filed clarification and an amendment to 19, 2010, Energy Exchange, Inc. filed an Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 its July 19, 2010 petition for market- application, pursuant to section 4(f) of First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. based rate authorization and request for the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing More information about this project, waivers and blanket authorizations. to study the feasibility of the Bear Creek including a copy of the application, can Any person desiring to intervene or to Hydroelectric Project (Bear Creek be viewed or printed on the ‘‘eLibrary’’ protest this filing must file in Project). The Bear Creek Project would link of Commission’s Web site at http: accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of be located at Bear Creek Dam Municipal //www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Water System within the city of Astoria, Enter the docket number (P–13720–000) Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Clatsop County, Oregon. The sole in the docket number field to access the Protests will be considered by the purpose of a preliminary permit, if document. For assistance, contact FERC Commission in determining the issued, is to grant the permit holder Online Support. appropriate action to be taken, but will priority to file a license application Kimberly D. Bose, not serve to make protestants parties to during the permit term. A preliminary Secretary. the proceeding. Any person wishing to permit does not authorize the permit [FR Doc. 2010–21470 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] become a party must file a notice of holder to perform any land-disturbing BILLING CODE 6717–01–P intervention or motion to intervene, as activities or otherwise enter upon lands appropriate. Such notices, motions, or or waters owned by others without the protests must be filed on or before the owners’ express permission. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY comment date. Anyone filing a motion The Bear Creek Project would consist to intervene or protest must serve a copy of: (1) The existing Bear Creek reservoir Federal Energy Regulatory of that document on the Applicant and and two other reservoirs (known as # 2 Commission all the parties in this proceeding. and # 3); (2) the existing 21-inch [Docket No. CP10–484–000] The Commission encourages diameter steel pipes; (3) two new electronic submission of protests and powerhouses to be located at reservoir ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of interventions in lieu of paper using the # 2 and reservoir # 3; (4) one 125- Request Under Blanket Authorization ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. kilowatt (kw) turbine/generating unit, to Persons unable to file electronically be installed in each powerhouse; and (5) August 20, 2010. should submit an original and 14 copies a new three-phase transmission line Take notice that on August 12, 2010, of the protest or intervention to the (voltage to be determined) to connect ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 717 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, with the nearest tie-in point on a local Texas Street, Houston, Texas 77002– 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC electric grid system. The project would 2761, filed in Docket No. CP10–484–000 20426. produce an estimated average annual an application, pursuant to sections This filing is accessible on-line at generation of about 1,700 megawatt- 157.205 and 157.216(b) of the http://www.ferc.gov, using the hours. Commission’s Regulations under the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for Applicant Contact: Duane Pratt, Natural Gas Act (NGA), as amended, for review in the Commission’s Public Energy Exchange, Inc., 2711 Centerville permission and approval to abandon by Reference Room in Washington, DC. Rd., Suite 120—PMB 7023, Wilmington, sale certain natural gas facilities located There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the DE 19808; phone (208) 371–1285. between Eugene Island Blocks 307 and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52939

305, offshore Louisiana, to Dynamic automatic or prior notice authority of Any person or the Commission’s staff Offshore Resources NS, LLC (Dynamic), this section to abandon facilities by sale may, within 60 days after issuance of a natural gas producer, under ANR’s to a third party does not address the the instant notice by the Commission, blanket certificate issued in Docket No. jurisdictional status of the facilities after file pursuant to Rule 214 of the CP82–480–000,1 all as more fully set the effective date of abandonment. The Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR forth in the application which is on file acquiring party is still responsible for 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice with the Commission and open to the seeking a determination, if one is of intervention and pursuant to Section public for inspection. desired, on the jurisdictional status of 157.205 of the regulations under the ANR proposes to abandon by sale 3 the facilities.’’ NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the approximately its Line 607 2 (4.41 miles Any questions concerning this request. If no protest is filed within the of 16-inch diameter pipeline) and application may be directed to Rene appurtenances, located in Eugene Island Staeb, Manager, Project Determinations time allowed therefor, the proposed Blocks 307, 306, and 305 to Dynamic, & Regulatory Administration, ANR activity shall be deemed to be pursuant to their June 10, 2010, Pipeline Pipeline Company, 717 Texas Street, authorized effective the day after the Repair and Purchase and Sale Houston, Texas 77002, or via telephone time allowed for filing a protest. If a Agreement. ANR states that it would at (832) 320–5215, facsimile (832) 320– protest is filed and not withdrawn cost an estimated $25,186,000 to 6215, or e-mail within 30 days after the allowed time replicate the Line 607 facilities today [email protected]. for filing a protest, the instant request and that no construction or removal of This filing is available for review at shall be treated as an application for facilities would be required in this the Commission or may be viewed on authorization pursuant to Section 7 of proposal. the Commission’s Web site at http:// the NGA. ANR further states that upon www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. abandonment of the Line 607 facilities, Enter the docket number excluding the Kimberly D. Bose, Dynamic intends to operate the facilities last three digits in the docket number Secretary. as non-jurisdictional facilities and ANR filed to access the document. For [FR Doc. 2010–21466 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] further requests that the Commission assistance, please contact FERC Online BILLING CODE 6717–01–P consider the Line 607 Facilities to be Support at FERC non-jurisdictional gathering not subject [email protected] or call toll-free to jurisdiction under Section 1(b) of the at (866) 206–3676, or, for TTY, contact DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Natural Gas Act. However, this specific (202) 502–8659. Comments, protests and jurisdictional status request is beyond interventions may be filed electronically Federal Energy Regulatory the scope of requests eligible for via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 Commission consideration under a blanket certificate CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the and the prior notice process. As instructions on the Commission’s Web Supplemental Notice Regarding Staff discussed in Commission Order No. site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The Technical Conference 603–A, the Commission stated that Commission strongly encourages ‘‘* * * we clarify that using either the intervenors to file electronically. August 20, 2010.

California Independent System Operator Corporation ...... Docket Nos. ER10–1401–000, ER10–2191–000. Green Energy Express LLC ...... Docket No. EL10–76–000 21st Century Transmission Holdings, LLC. Southern California Edison Company ...... Docket Nos. ER10–732–000, ER10–732–001. Southern California Edison Company ...... Docket Nos. EL10–1–000, EL10–1–001, EL10–1–002. Southern California Edison Company ...... Docket Nos. ER10–796–000, ER10–796–001.

1 20 FERC ¶ 62,595 (1982). granted in Docket No. CP77–386–000 [59 FPC 2164 3 See Revision of Existing Regulations Under the 2 ANR constructed the Line 607 facilities, which (1977)]. Natural Gas Act, Order No. 603–A, FERC Stats. & connect to ANR’s Line 606, under authorization Regs. ¶ 31,081, at 30,936 (1999).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52940 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

By order dated July 26, 2010, in or (202) 502–8447, or Katie Detweiler at CAMD (6204J), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., Docket No. ER10–1401–000, the Federal [email protected] or (202) 502– NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone Energy Regulatory Commission 6424. (202) 343–9077, and e-mail (Commission) directed staff to convene [email protected]. a technical conference regarding Kimberly D. Bose, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For more California Independent System Operator Secretary. background and information regarding Corporation’s (CAISO) proposed [FR Doc. 2010–21468 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the purpose of the NODA, requirements Revised Transmission Planning Process BILLING CODE 6717–01–P (RTPP).1 for requesting and receiving CAIRNOX Pursuant to notices issued on August new unit set-aside allowances under the 3, 2010 and August 19, 2010, such ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CAIR FIPs, procedures for allocating conference will be held on August 24, AGENCY such allowances, application of 2010 at the Commission’s headquarters requirements to individual CAIRNOX [FRL–9194–6] at 888 First Street, Washington, DC new unit set-aside allocation requests, and interpretation of the data upon 20426, beginning at 9 a.m. (EDT) in the Final Notice of Data Availability Commission Meeting Room. The which the CAIRNOX new unit set-aside Concerning 2010 CAIR NOX Annual technical conference will be led by allocations for 2010 and denials of Trading Program New Unit Set-Aside allocations were based, see the June 29, Commission staff. Commissioners may Allowance Allocations Under the Clean attend the conference. 2010 NODA (75 Fed. Reg. 37433, June Air Interstate Rule Federal 29, 2010). We emphasize that the purpose of the Implementation Plan technical conference is to discuss the EPA received no objections to the issues raised by CAISO’s proposed AGENCY: Environmental Protection determinations and data in the June 29, revisions to its Open Access Agency (EPA). 2010 NODA. Therefore, EPA adopts the Transmission Tariff (Tariff) to ACTION: Notice of data availability CAIRNOX new unit set-aside allocations implement its RTPP in Docket No. (NODA). set forth in the June 29, 2010 NODA. ER10–1401–000 and obtain additional EPA is not requesting objections to information regarding CAISO’s SUMMARY: EPA is administering—under the data provided in this final NODA. proposal. However, because CAISO’s the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) This action constitutes a final action for RTPP filing presents issues that may be Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs)— determining the CAIRNOX new unit set- tangentially related to the proceedings the CAIR NOX Annual Trading Program aside allowance allocations under in Docket Nos. ER10–732–000 and (CAIRNOX) new unit set-aside § 97.142 and the CAIR FIPs for 2010. ER10–732–001; Docket Nos. EL10–1– allowance pools for Delaware and the Dated: August 20, 2010. District of Columbia. The CAIRNOX 000, EL10–1–001 and EL10–1–002; and Drusilla Hufford, Docket Nos. ER10–796–000 and ER10– FIPs require the Administrator to determine each year by order the Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric 796–001, in an abundance of caution, Programs. we hereby notify parties that the allowance allocations from the new unit [FR Doc. 2010–21547 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] technical conference discussion may set-aside for units in these jurisdictions touch upon issues pending in these whose owners and operators requested BILLING CODE 6560–50–P proceedings. these allocations and to provide the A free Webcast of this event is public with the opportunity to object to ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION available through http://www.ferc.gov. the allocation determinations. On June AGENCY Anyone with Internet access who 29, 2010, EPA issued a NODA setting desires to view this event can do so by forth such determinations for 2010 in navigating to http://www.ferc.gov’s the Federal Register and provided an [FRL–9194–8] Calendar of Events and locating this opportunity for submission of Science Advisory Board Staff Office; event in the calendar. The event will objections. Through the NODA issued Notification of a Public Meeting of the contain a link to its Webcast. The today, EPA is making available to the Chartered Science Advisory Board Capitol Connection provides technical public the Agency’s determinations, support for the free Webcasts. It also after considering all objections, of AGENCY: Environmental Protection offers access to this event via television CAIRNOX allowance allocations and Agency (EPA). in the DC area and via phone bridge for denials of such allocations for 2010 ACTION: Notice. a fee. If you have any questions, visit under the FIPs, as well as the data upon http://www.CapitolConnection.org or which the allocations and denials of SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection call (703) 993–3100. allocations were based. Agency (EPA) Science Advisory Board FERC conferences are accessible DATES: Under § 97.153(e), EPA must (SAB) Staff Office announces a public under section 508 of the Rehabilitation record, by December 1, 2010, the meeting of the Chartered SAB to receive Act of 1973. For accessibility CAIRNOX new unit set-aside allowance briefings from EPA and EPA Federal accommodations please send an e-mail allocations, consistent with this NODA, advisory committee representatives and to [email protected] or call toll free in the compliance accounts of units to continue the SAB’s discussions with 1–866–208–3372 (voice) or 202–208– whose owners and operators EPA’s Office of Research and 8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202–208– successfully applied for a CAIRNOX Development (ORD) concerning EPA’s 2106 with the required new unit set-aside allowance allocation strategic research directions. The SAB accommodations. under the CAIR FIPs. See 40 CFR will also quality review one draft report. For more information on this 97.153(e). conference, please contact Robert DATES: The public meeting will be held Petrocelli at [email protected] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: on Tuesday, September 21, 2010 from Questions concerning this action should 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (Eastern Time) 1 Cal. Indep. Sys. Operator Corp., 132 FERC ¶ be addressed to Robert L. Miller, U.S. and Wednesday, September 22, 2010 61,067 (2010). Environmental Protection Agency, from 9 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. (Eastern Time).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52941

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Administrator concerning SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory the Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island nominations for the Agency’s Fiscal Committee Act, Public Law 92463, EPA Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Year 2010 Scientific and Technological gives notice of a public meeting of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any Achievement Awards. National Advisory Council for member of the public who wants further Availability of Meeting Materials: A Environmental Policy and Technology information concerning the meeting meeting agenda and other materials for (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to may contact Dr. Angela Nugent, the meeting will be placed on the SAB the EPA Administrator on a broad range Designated Federal Officer (DFO), EPA Web site at http://epa.gov/sab. of environmental policy, technology, Science Advisory Board (1400R), U.S. Procedures for Providing Public Input: and management issues. NACEPT Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Interested members of the public may represents diverse interests from Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., submit relevant written or oral academia, industry, non-governmental Washington, DC 20460; via telephone/ information for consideration on the organizations, and local, State, and voice mail (202) 564–2218, fax (202) topics included in this advisory activity. tribal governments. The Council will 202–565–2098; or e-mail at Oral Statements: To be placed on the continue discussing the workplans it is [email protected]. General public speaker list for the September developing to respond to EPA’s request information concerning the SAB can be 21–22, 2010 meeting, interested parties for advice on workforce issues the found on the EPA Web site at http:// should notify Dr. Angela Nugent, DFO, Agency is facing and how EPA can best www.epa.gov/sab. by e-mail no later than September 14, address the needs of vulnerable SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2010. Individuals making oral populations. A copy of the agenda for Background: Pursuant to the Federal statements will be limited to five the meeting will be posted at http:// Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. minutes per speaker. Written www.epa.gov/ocem/nacept/cal- 2 (FACA), notice is hereby given that Statements: Written statements for the nacept.htm. the EPA Science Advisory Board will September 21–22, 2010 meeting should DATES: NACEPT will hold a public hold a public meeting to receive be received in the SAB Staff Office by than September 14, 2010, so that the meeting on Monday, September 27, briefings on Agency and Federal 2010 from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and advisory committee science activities information may be made available to the SAB for its consideration prior to Tuesday, September 28, 2010 from 8:30 and continue the SAB’s discussions a.m. to 2 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. with EPA’s Office of Research and this meeting. Written statements should Development (ORD) concerning ORD’s be supplied to the DFO in the following ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in strategic research directions. The SAB formats: One hard copy with original the Madison, Loews Hotel, 1177 15th was established pursuant to 42 U.S.C. signature and one electronic copy via Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 4365 to provide independent scientific e-mail (acceptable file format: Adobe FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and technical advice to the Acrobat PDF, MS Word, WordPerfect, MS PowerPoint, or Rich Text files in Nancy New, Acting Designated Federal Administrator on the technical basis for Officer, [email protected], (202) 564– Agency positions and regulations. The IBM–PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format). Submitters are asked to provide 0464, U.S. EPA, Office of Federal SAB will comply with the provisions of Advisory Committee Management and FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff electronic versions of each document submitted with and without signatures, Outreach (1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Office procedural policies. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. The chartered SAB is holding this because the SAB Staff Office does not meeting to receive briefings from: (a) publish documents with signatures on SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests Liaison members who chair other its Web sites. to make oral comments or to provide Federal advisory committees that Accessibility: For information on written comments to NACEPT should be address priority Agency science access or services for individuals with sent to Nancy New at (202) 564–0464 or activities and (b) Agency representatives disabilities, please contact Dr. Nugent at [email protected] by Tuesday, on EPA’s Gulf Oil Spill science the phone number or e-mail address September 21, 2010. The public is activities. In addition, EPA’s Office of noted above, preferably at least ten days welcome to attend all portions of the Research and Development (ORD) had prior to the meeting, to give EPA as meeting, but seating is limited and is requested SAB advice on strategic much time as possible to process your allocated on a first-come, first-serve research directions over the next five request. basis. Members of the public wishing to years to support EPA’s mission and Dated: August 24, 2010. attend should contact Nancy New at priorities. The chartered SAB initiated Anthony F. Maciorowski, (202) 564–0464 or [email protected] discussions on November 9–10, 2009 Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board by September 21, 2010. (74 FR 52805–52806) and April 5–6, Staff Office. Meeting Access: For information on 2010 (75 FR 11883–11884) and provided [FR Doc. 2010–21546 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] access or services for individuals with an interim report on this topic, ‘‘Office BILLING CODE 6560–50–P disabilities, please contact Nancy New of Research and Development Strategic at (202) 564–0464 or Research Directions and Integrated [email protected]. To request Transdisciplinary Research’’ (EPA– ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION accommodation of a disability, please SAB–10–010), available on the SAB AGENCY contact Nancy New, preferably 10 days Web site at http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/ prior to the meeting, to give EPA as sabproduct.nsf/E989ECFC12596642 [FRL–9194–5] much time as possible to process your 8525775B0047BE1A/$File/EPA-SAB-10- request. 010-unsigned.pdf. The SAB will National Advisory Council for continue its discussion with ORD about Environmental Policy and Technology Dated: August 16, 2010. Nancy New, how to develop additional advice for AGENCY: Environmental Protection EPA on this advisory topic. The SAB Agency (EPA). Acting Designated Federal Officer. will also conduct a quality review of a [FR Doc. 2010–21549 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] ACTION: Notice of meeting. draft report making recommendations to BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52942 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION this notice, EPA will receive written Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – AGENCY comments relating to the settlements. 3520. Comments are requested EPA will consider all comments concerning: (a) whether the proposed [FRL–9194–7] received and may modify or withdraw collection of information is necessary Two Proposed CERCLA Section 122(g) its consent to one or both of the for the proper performance of the Administrative Agreements for De settlements if comments received functions of the Commission, including Minimis Settlements for the Mercury disclose facts or considerations that whether the information shall have Refining Superfund Site, Towns of indicate that one or both of the practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Guilderland and Colonie, Albany proposed settlements are inappropriate, Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways County, NY improper, or inadequate. EPA’s to enhance the quality, utility, and response to any comments received will clarity of the information collected; (d) AGENCY: Environmental Protection be available for public inspection at ways to minimize the burden of the Agency. EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New collection of information on the ACTION: Notice; request for public York, New York 10007–1866. respondents, including the use of comment. DATES: Comments must be submitted on automated collection techniques or or before September 29, 2010. other forms of information technology, SUMMARY: In accordance with Section and (e) ways to further reduce the 122(i) of the Comprehensive ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is information collection burden for small Environmental Response, available for public inspection at EPA business concerns with fewer than 25 Compensation, and Liability Act of Region II offices at 290 Broadway, New employees. 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 York, New York 10007–1866. Comments The FCC may not conduct or sponsor U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given by on the MTA-Tyson settlement should a collection of information unless it the U.S. Environmental Protection reference the Mercury Refining displays a currently valid control Agency (‘‘EPA’’), Region II, of two Superfund Site, Index No. CERCLA–02– number. No person shall be subject to proposed de minimis administrative 2010–2002. Comments on the MG- any penalty for failing to comply with agreements pursuant to Section 122(g) OxyChem settlement should reference a collection of information subject to the of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(g). One the Mercury Refining Superfund Site, Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that settlement is between EPA and the Index No. CERCLA–02–2010–2013. To Metropolitan Transportation Authority- request a copy of either settlement does not display a currently valid OMB Transit Authority agreement, please contact Sharon E. control number. (‘‘MTA–NYCTA’’) and Tyson Foods, Inc. Kivowitz at the address identified DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction (‘‘Tyson’’), hereinafter referred to as the below. All comments should be Act (PRA) comments should be ‘‘MTA-Tyson Settlement.’’ The second submitted to Sharon E. Kivowitz at the submitted on or before October 29, settlement is between EPA and MG address identified below. 2010. If you anticipate that you will be Automation and Controls Corporation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: submitting PRA comments, but find it (‘‘MG’’) and Occidental Chemical Sharon E. Kivowitz, Assistant Regional difficult to do so within the period of Corporation (‘‘OxyChem’’), hereinafter Counsel, New York/Caribbean time allowed by this notice, you should referred to as the ‘‘MG-OxyChem Superfund Branch, Office of Regional advise the FCC contact listed below as Settlement.’’ Both settlements pertain to Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection soon as possible. the Mercury Refining Superfund Site Agency, 17th Floor, 290 Broadway, New ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to (‘‘Site’’) located in the Towns of York, New York 10007–1866. Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Guilderland and Colonie, Albany Telephone: 212–637–3183. E-mail: Management and Budget, via fax at 202– County, New York. The MTA-Tyson [email protected]. 395–5167 or via email to _ _ Settlement requires that MTA–NYCTA Dated: August 18, 2010. Nicholas A. [email protected] and pay $67,844.54, and that Tyson pay Walter Mugdan, to the Federal Communications $32,684.84. The MG-OxyChem Director, Emergency and Remedial Response Commission via email to [email protected] Settlement requires MG to pay Division, EPA, Region 2. and [email protected]. $39,946.45 and OxyChem to pay [FR Doc. 2010–21548 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: $20,741.84. All payments will be paid to BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Cathy Williams on (202) 418–2918. the EPA Hazardous Substance SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Superfund Mercury Refining Superfund OMB Approval Number: 3060–0216. Site Special Account. Each settling Title: Section 73.3538, Application to party’s individual settlement amount is FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Make Changes in an Existing Station; considered to be that party’s fair share Section 73.1690(e), Modification of of cleanup costs incurred and Notice of Public Information Transmission Systems. anticipated to be incurred in the future, Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Form Number: N/A. plus a ‘‘premium’’ that accounts for, Federal Communications Commission Type of Review: Extension of a among other things, uncertainties for Extension Under Delegated currently approved collection. associated with the costs of that future Authority, Comments Requested Respondents: Business or other for– work at the Site. Each settlement profit entities, Not–for–profit includes a covenant not to sue pursuant August 24, 2010. institutions. to Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Number of Respondents and U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, relating to the Commission, as part of its continuing Responses: 650 respondents and 650 Site, subject to limited reservations, and effort to reduce paperwork burden responses. protection from contribution actions or invites the general public and other Estimated Hours per Response: 0.50 – claims as provided by Sections 113(f)(2) Federal agencies to take this 3 hours and 122(g)(5) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. opportunity to comment on the Frequency of Response: On occasion 9613(f)(2) and 9622(g)(5). For thirty (30) following information collection(s), as reporting requirement; Recordkeeping days following the date of publication of required by the Paperwork Reduction requirement.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52943

Total Annual Burden: 1,100 hours licensee’s discretion without the use of any penalty for failing to comply with Annual Burden Cost: None. a formal application. Section 74.751(d) a collection of information subject to the Obligation to Respond: Required to requires that licensees of low power TV Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that obtain or retain benefits. The statutory or TV translator stations place in the does not display a currently valid OMB authority for this information collection station records a certification that the control number. is contained in Sections 154(i), 303(r), installation of new or replacement DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 308, 309(j) and 337(e) of the transmitting equipment complies in all Act (PRA) comments should be Communications Act of 1934, as respects with the technical requirements submitted on or before October 29, amended. of this section and the station 2010. If you anticipate that you will be Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: authorization. The notifications and submitting PRA comments, but find it There is no need for confidentiality with certifications of equipment changes are difficult to do so within the period of this collection of information. used by FCC staff to ensure that the time allowed by this notice, you should Privacy Impact Assessment: No equipment changes made are in full advise the FCC contact listed below as impact(s). compliance with the technical soon as possible. Needs and Uses: Section 73.3538(b)(1) requirements of this section and the ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to of the Commission’s rules requires a station authorizations and will not Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of broadcast station to file an informal cause interference to other authorized Management and Budget, via fax at 202– application to modify or discontinue the stations. 395–5167 or via email to obstruction marking or lighting of an Federal Communications Commission. [email protected] and antenna supporting structure. Section 73.1690(e) of the Bulah P. Wheeler, to the Federal Communications Commission’s rules requires AM, FM Deputy Manager, Commission via email to [email protected] and TV station licensees to prepare an Office of the Secretary, and [email protected]. informal statement or diagram Office of Managing Director. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Williams on (202) 418–2918. describing any electrical and [FR Doc. 2010–21386 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mechanical modification to authorized BILLING CODE 6712–01–S transmitting equipment that can be OMB Control Number: 3060–0316. made without prior Commission Title: 47 CFR Sections 76.1700, approval provided that equipment FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Records to Be Maintained Locally by performance measurements are made to COMMISSION Cable System Operators; 76.1703, ensure compliance with FCC rules. This Commercial Records on Children’s informal statement or diagram must be Notice of Public Information Programs; 76.1704, Proof–of– retained at the transmitter site as long as Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the Performance Test Data, 76.1707 Leased the equipment is in use. Federal Communications Commission, Access, 76.1711 Emergency Alert OMB Control Number: 3060–0248. Comments Requested System (EAS) Tests and Activation. Title: Section 74.751, Modification of Form Number: N/A. Transmission Systems. August 24, 2010. Type of Review: Extension of a Form Number: N/A. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications currently approved collection. Type of Review: Extension of a Commission, as part of its continuing Respondents: Business or other for– currently approved collection. effort to reduce paperwork burden profit entities. Respondents: Business or other for– invites the general public and other Number of Respondents and profit entities; Not–for–profit Federal agencies to take this Responses: 3,000 respondents and 3,000 institutions; State, Local or Tribal opportunity to comment on the responses. Government. following information collection(s), as Estimated Hours per Response: 26 Number of Respondents and required by the Paperwork Reduction hours. Responses: 400 respondents and 400 Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 – Frequency of Response: responses. 3520. Comments are requested Recordkeeping requirement. Estimated Time per Response: 0.50 concerning: (a) whether the proposed Total Annual Burden: 78,000 hours. hours. collection of information is necessary Total Annual Cost: None. Frequency of Response: On occasion for the proper performance of the Obligation to Respond: Required to reporting requirement; Recordkeeping functions of the Commission, including obtain or retain benefits. The statutory requirement. whether the information shall have authority for this collection of Total Annual Burden: 200 hours. practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the information is contained in Sections Total Annual Cost: None. Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways 4(i), 303 and 308 of the Obligation to Respond: Required to to enhance the quality, utility, and Communications Act of 1934, as obtain or retain benefits. The statutory clarity of the information collected; (d) amended. authority for this collection is contained ways to minimize the burden of the Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: in Section 154(i) of the Communications collection of information on the Confidentiality is not required with this Act of 1934, as amended. respondents, including the use of collection of information. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: automated collection techniques or Privacy Impact Assessment (s): No There is no need for confidentiality with other forms of information technology, impact(s). this collection of information. and (e) ways to further reduce the Needs and Uses: 47 CFR Section Privacy Impact Assessment: No information collection burden on small 76.1700 exempts cable television impact(s). business concerns with fewer than 25 systems having fewer than 1,000 Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 74.751(c) employees. subscribers from the public inspection requires licensees of low power TV or The FCC may not conduct or sponsor requirements contained in 47 CFR TV translator stations to send written a collection of information unless it Sections 76.1701 (political file); 76.1702 notification to the FCC of equipment displays a currently valid control (equal employment opportunity); changes which may be made at number. No person shall be subject to 76.1703 (commercial records for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:06 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52944 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

children’s programming); 76.1704 47 CFR 76.1704(b) requires the Svoboda, Esq., and Jonathan S. Berkon, (proof–of–performance test data); provisions of paragraph (a) of this Esq., of Perkins Coie, LLP. 76.1706 (signal leakage logs and repair section shall not apply to any cable Explanation and Justification and records); and 76.1715 (sponsorship television system having fewer than Final Rules on Coordinated identifications). 1,000 subscribers, subject to the Communications. The operator of every cable television requirements of § 76.601(d). Explanation and Justification and system having 1,000 or more subscribers 47 CFR 76.1707 requires that if a cable Final Rules on Federal Election but fewer than 5,000 subscribers shall, operator adopts and enforces a written Activity. upon request, provide the information policy regarding indecent leased access Management and Administrative required by §§ 76.1702 (equal programming pursuant to § 76.701, such Matters. employment opportunity); 76.1703 a policy will be considered published Individuals who plan to attend and (commercial records for children’s pursuant to that rule by inclusion of the require special assistance, such as sign programming); 76.1704 (proof–of– written policy in the operator’s public language interpretation or other performance test data); 76.1706 (signal inspection file. reasonable accommodations, should leakage logs and repair records); and 47 CFR Section 76.1711 requires that contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, 76.1715 (sponsorship identifications) records be kept of each test and Commission Secretary and Clerk, at but shall maintain for public inspection activation of the Emergency Alert (202) 694–1040, at least 72 hours prior a file containing a copy of all records System (EAS) procedures pursuant to to the hearing date. required to be kept by 47 CFR Section the requirement of 47 CFR Part 11 and PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 76.1701 (political files). the EAS Operating Handbook. These Judith Ingram, Press Officer Telephone: The operator of every cable television records shall be kept for three years. (202) 694–1220. system having 5,000 or more subscribers Federal Communications Commission. Shawn Woodhead Werth, shall maintain for public inspection a Bulah P. Wheeler, Secretary and Clerk of the Commission. file containing a copy of all records Deputy Manager, [FR Doc. 2010–21408 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] which are required to be kept by §§ 76.1701 (political file); 76.1702 (equal Office of the Secretary, BILLING CODE 6715–01–M employment opportunity); 76.1703 Office of Managing Director. (commercial records for children’s [FR Doc. 2010–21387 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] programming); 76.1704 (proof–of– BILLING CODE 6712–01–S FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE performance test data); 76.1706 (signal AGENCY leakage logs and repair records); and [No. 2010–N–13] 76.1715 (sponsorship identifications). FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 47 CFR Section 76.1700(b) requires Privacy Act of 1974; System of that the public inspection file shall be Sunshine Act Notices Records maintained at the office which the AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance system operator maintains for the Agency. ordinary collection of subscriber DATE & TIME: Tuesday, August 24, 2010, ACTION: Notice of the establishment of a charges, resolution of subscriber at 10 a.m. new system of records. complaints, and other business or at any PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. accessible place in the community SUMMARY: In accordance with the served by the system unit(s) (such ass a STATUS: This meeting will be closed to requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, public registry for documents or an the public. as amended (Privacy Act), the Federal attorney’s office). The public inspection ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) gives file shall be available for public Compliance matters pursuant to 2 notice of a proposed Privacy Act system inspection at any time during regular U.S.C. 437g. of records to replace a system of records business hours. Audits conducted pursuant to 2 issued by FHFA’s predecessor agency, 47 CFR Section 76.1700(d) requires U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise the records specified in paragraph (a) of Matters concerning participation in Oversight (OFHEO) which was this section shall be retained for the civil actions or proceedings or abolished July 30, 2009, and to fulfill period specified in §§ 76.1701, 76.1702, arbitration. FHFA’s statutory requirement to collect Internal personnel rules and 76.1704(a), and 76.1706. the records. Upon the effective date of procedures or matters affecting a 47 CFR Section 76.1703 requires that this notice, system OFHEO–07, particular employee. cable operators airing children’s ‘‘Mortgage Fraud System’’ published at programming must maintain records DATE & TIME: Thursday, August 26, 71 FR 6085 on February 6, 2006 will be sufficient to verify compliance with 47 2010, at 10 a.m. deleted. CFR Section 76.225 and make such PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, The proposed system named ‘‘Fraud records available to the public. Such DC (Ninth Floor) Reporting System’’ (FHFA–6) will records must be maintained for a period STATUS: This meeting will be open to maintain information of fraud or sufficient to cover the limitations period the public. possible fraud involving the Federal specified in 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6)(B). ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: National Mortgage Association, the 47 CFR Section 76.1704(a) requires Correction and Approval of Minutes. Federal Home Loan Mortgage the proof of performance tests required Draft Advisory Opinion 2010–14: Corporation, and the Federal Home by § 76.601 shall be maintained on file Democratic Senatorial Campaign Loan Banks (collectively, ‘‘regulated at the operator’s local business office for Committee by its counsel, Marc E. Elias, entities’’). This system is being at least five years. The test data shall be Esq., and Jonathan S. Berkon, Esq., of established so that FHFA may carry out made available for inspection by the Perkins Coie, LLP. its statutory authority to require the Commission or the local franchiser, Draft Advisory Opinion 2010–15: Pike regulated entities to report fraud or upon request. for Congress by its counsel, Brian G. possible fraud upon discovery and in

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52945

furtherance of its authority for oversight Telecommunications Device for the Deaf or suspects a possible fraud relating to of the safe and sound operations of the is 800–877–8339. the purchase or sale of any loan or regulated entities. The deleted system of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: financial instrument. Additionally, the records is being replaced as a result of Director must require each regulated FHFA’s statutory authority. The I. Comments entity to establish and maintain proposed system will include Instructions: FHFA seeks public procedures designed to discover any information formerly maintained in the comments on the proposed new system such transactions. system, OFHEO–07, ‘‘Mortgage Fraud of records and will take all comments This notice informs the public of System’’ published at 71 FR 6085 on into consideration before issuing the FHFA’s proposal to establish and February 6, 2006. final notice. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4) and maintain a new system of records and DATES: The new system of records will (11). In addition to referencing to delete an obsolete system of records. become effective on October 12, 2010 ‘‘Comments/No. 2010–N–13,’’ please The proposed new system of records is: without further notice unless comments reference the title and number of the FHFA–6, Fraud Reporting System. The necessitate otherwise. FHFA will system of records your comment deleted system of records is: OFHEO–07 publish a new notice if the effective date addresses: ‘‘Fraud Reporting System’’ Mortgage Fraud System. is delayed to review comments or if (FHFA–6). This notice satisfies the Privacy Act changes are made based on comments Posting and Public Availability of requirement that an agency publish a received. To be assured of Comments: All comments received will system of records notice in the Federal consideration, comments should be be posted without change on the FHFA Register when there is an addition to received on or before September 29, Web site at http://www.fhfa.gov, and the agency’s system of records. Congress 2010. will include any personal information recognized that application of all provided. In addition, copies of all ADDRESSES: Submit comments to FHFA requirements of the Privacy Act to only once, identified by ‘‘2010–N–13,’’ comments received will be available for certain categories of records may have using any one of the following methods: examination by the public on business an undesirable and often unacceptable • E-mail: Comments to Alfred M. days between the hours of 10 a.m. and effect upon agencies in the conduct of Pollard, General Counsel, may be sent 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance necessary public business. by e-mail to [email protected]. Agency, Fourth Floor, 1700 G Street, Consequently, Congress established Please include ‘‘Comments/No. 2010–N– NW., Washington, DC 20552. To make general exemptions and specific 13,’’ in the subject line of the message. an appointment to inspect comments, exemptions that could be used to • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// please call the Office of General Counsel exempt records from provisions of the www.regulations.gov. Follow the at 202–414–6924. Privacy Act. Congress also required that instructions for submitting comments. If II. Introduction exempting records from provisions of you submit your comment to the the Privacy Act would require the head Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also The Housing and Economic Recovery of an agency to publish a determination send it by e-mail to FHFA at Act of 2008 (HERA), Public Law 110– to exempt a record from the Privacy Act [email protected] to ensure 289, 122 Stat. 2654 (2008), amended the as a rule in accordance with the timely receipt by the agency. Please Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Administrative Procedures Act. The include ‘‘Comments/No. 2010–N–13’’ in Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 Director of FHFA has determined that the subject line of the message. U.S.C. 4501 et seq.) (Safety and records and information in this new • Hand Delivered/Courier: The hand Soundness Act) and transferred to system of records is not exempt from delivery address is: Alfred M. Pollard, FHFA the supervisory and oversight requirements of the Privacy Act. General Counsel, Attention: Comments/ responsibilities over the Federal As required by the Privacy Act, No. 2010–N–13, Federal Housing National Mortgage Association, the 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), and pursuant to Finance Agency, Fourth Floor, 1700 G Federal Home Loan Mortgage paragraph 4c of Appendix I to OMB Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552. The Corporation, and the Federal Home Circular No. A–130, ‘‘Federal Agency package should be logged at the Guard Loan Banks (collectively, regulated Responsibilities for Maintaining Desk, First Floor, on business days entities). FHFA is responsible for Records About Individuals,’’ dated between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ensuring that the regulated entities February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996; 61 • U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service, operate in a safe and sound manner and FR 6427, 35), FHFA has submitted a Federal Express, or Other Mail Service: carry out their public policy missions. report describing the new system of The mailing address for comments is: The OFHEO and the Federal Housing records covered by this notice, to the Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, Finance Board were abolished on July Committee on Oversight and Attention: Comments/No. 2010–N–13, 30, 2009, one year after the enactment Government Reform of the House of 1 Federal Housing Finance Agency, of HERA. Representatives, the Committee on Fourth Floor, 1700 G Street, NW., Section 1379E of the Safety and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, and Washington, DC 20552. Soundness Act (section 1379E) (12 the Office of Management and Budget. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for U.S.C. 4642(a)) subjects the regulated The proposed new system of records additional information on submission entities to both fraud reporting and described above is set forth in its and posting of comments. internal control requirements. Under entirety below. this statutory provision, the Director of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Dated: August 26, 2010. Major, Privacy Act Officer, FHFA must require a regulated entity to Edward J. DeMarco, [email protected], 202–408–2849, or submit a timely report upon discovery David A. Lee, Senior Agency Official for that it has purchased or sold a Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency. Privacy, [email protected], 202–408– fraudulent loan or financial instrument, 2514 (not toll-free numbers), Federal FHFA–6 1 See HERA, Division A, Title I, Section 1101 Housing Finance Agency, 1700 G Street, ‘‘ Establishment of the Federal Housing Finance SYSTEM NAME: NW., Fourth Floor, Washington, DC Agency’’ and Title III, Section 1301 ‘‘Abolishment of 20552. The telephone number for the OFHEO.’’ Fraud Reporting System.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52946 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION: responsibilities of FHFA under the NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES: Unclassified but sensitive. Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Direct inquiries as to whether this Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as system contains a record pertaining to SYSTEM LOCATION: amended. an individual to the Privacy Act Officer Federal Housing Finance Agency, by electronic mail, regular mail, or fax. ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, 20552; The electronic mail address is: 1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: [email protected]. The regular mail 20006; and any alternate work site address is: Privacy Act Officer, Federal utilized by employees of the Federal It shall be a routine use to disclose information contained in this system for Housing Finance Agency, 1625 Eye Housing Finance Agency or by Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. The individuals assisting such employees. the purposes and to the users identified below: fax number is: 202–408–2580. For the CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE 1. FHFA personnel authorized as quickest possible handling, you should SYSTEM: having a need to access the records in mark your electronic mail, letter, or fax The ‘‘Fraud Reporting System’’ performance of their official functions. and the subject line, envelope, or fax contains information about individuals 2. The Financial Crimes Enforcement cover sheet ‘‘Privacy Act Request’’ in that are suspects of a fraud or possible Network and other law enforcement and accordance with the procedures set fraud in connection with a loan or government entities, as determined by forth in 12 CFR part 1204. financial instrument purchased or sold FHFA to be appropriate. RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES: 3. A regulated entity. involving the Federal National Mortgage Direct requests to access, amend, or 4. A consultant, person, or entity that Association, the Federal Home Loan correct a record to the Privacy Act contracts or subcontracts with FHFA, to Mortgage Corporation, or the Federal Officer, Federal Housing Finance the extent necessary for the performance Home Loan Banks (collectively, Agency, 1625 Eye Street, NW., of the contract or subcontract and ‘‘regulated entities’’). Such records may Washington, DC 20006, in accordance consistent with the purpose of the include information on: with the procedures set forth in 12 CFR system, provided that the person or (a) Individuals who are directors, part 1204. officers, employees, agents, of a entity acknowledges in writing that it is regulated entity; required to maintain Privacy Act CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: (b) Individuals that are actual or safeguards for the information. Direct requests to contest or appeal an potential victims of fraud or possible DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING adverse determination for a record to fraud; AGENCIES: the Privacy Act Appeals Officer, Federal (c) Individuals who are named as None. Housing Finance Agency, 1700 G Street, possible witnesses; NW., Washington, DC 20552, in (d) Individuals who have or might POLICIES AND PRACTICE FOR STORING, accordance with the procedures set have information about reported RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING AND forth in 12 CFR part 1204. matters; DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: (e) Individuals named as preparers of STORAGE: any reports; or Records in this system are stored in The information is obtained from the (f) Individuals named as persons to be paper and electronic format. regulated entities. contacted for assistance by FHFA. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: RETRIEVABILITY: CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: Records may be retrieved by Some information in this system that ‘‘ Records in the Fraud Reporting sectionalized data fields or by the use of is investigatory and compiled for law ’’ System contain information about the search and selection criteria, such as an enforcement purposes is exempt under ‘‘ individuals specified in Categories of individual’s or entity’s name. subsection 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act. Individuals Covered by the System’’ [FR Doc. 2010–21520 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] such as name, address, social security SAFEGUARDS: BILLING CODE 8070–01–P numbers, and financial information. The Records are maintained in controlled records may also contain information access areas. Electronic records are pertaining to criminal prosecutions, protected by restricted access FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM civil actions, enforcement proceedings, procedures, including user and investigations resulting from or identifications and passwords. Only Formations of, Acquisitions by, and relating to the records. FHFA staff whose official duties require Mergers of Bank Holding Companies access are allowed to view, administer, AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: The companies listed in this notice or control these records. The system is established and have applied to the Board for approval, maintained pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4513, RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 4514, 4526 and 4642 and 12 CFR part Records are maintained in accordance Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 1233. with National Archives and Records (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part Administration and FHFA retention 225), and all other applicable statutes PURPOSE(S): schedules. Records are disposed of and regulations to become a bank The information in this system of according to accepted techniques. holding company and/or to acquire the records will be analyzed by FHFA staff assets or the ownership of, control of, or in carrying out the statutory authorities SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: the power to vote shares of a bank or of the Director to require the regulated Division of Enterprise Regulation, bank holding company and all of the entities to report fraud or possible fraud Federal Housing Finance Agency, 1700 banks and nonbanking companies involving a loan or financial instrument G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552 owned by the bank holding company, purchased or sold by the regulated and the Division of Bank Regulation, including the companies listed below. entity upon discovery consistent with Federal Housing Finance Agency, 1625 The applications listed below, as well the safety and soundness Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. as other related filings required by the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52947

Board, are available for immediate prescribed in Bulletin 11–01 may be one, now constitute the only inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank found at http://www.gsa.gov/perdiem. notification of revisions in CONUS per indicated. The applications also will be GSA bases the lodging per diem rates on diem rates to agencies. available for inspection at the offices of the average daily rate that the lodging Dated: August 23, 2010. the Board of Governors. Interested industry reports to an independent Craig Flynn, persons may express their views in organization. The use of such data in the Assistant Deputy Associate Administrator. writing on the standards enumerated in per diem rate setting process enhances the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the the government’s ability to obtain [FR Doc. 2010–21489 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] proposal also involves the acquisition of policy-compliant lodging where it is BILLING CODE 6820–14–P a nonbanking company, the review also needed. In conjunction with the annual includes whether the acquisition of the lodging study, GSA identified five new nonbanking company complies with the non-standard areas (NSAs): West Des DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND standards in section 4 of the BHC Act Moines, Iowa (Dallas County); Queen HUMAN SERVICES (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise Anne County, Maryland; Moab, Utah [Document Identifier: OS–0990–0162; 60- noted, nonbanking activities will be (Grand County); Richland, Washington day Notice] conducted throughout the United States. (Benton County); and Berkeley County, Additional information on all bank West Virginia. Agency Information Collection holding companies may be obtained If a per diem rate is insufficient to Request; 60-Day Public Comment from the National Information Center meet necessary expenses in any given Request website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/. location, Federal executive agencies can AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. Unless otherwise noted, comments request that GSA review that location. In compliance with the requirement regarding each of these applications Please review numbers five and six of of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the must be received at the Reserve Bank GSA’s per diem Frequently Asked indicated or the offices of the Board of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Questions at (http://www.gsa.gov/ Office of the Secretary (OS), Department Governors not later than September 14, perdiemfaqs) for more information on 2010. of Health and Human Services, is the special review process. publishing the following summary of a A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis In addition, the Federal Travel proposed information collection request (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Regulation allows for actual expense for public comment. Interested persons Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, reimbursement as directed in § 301– are invited to send comments regarding Missouri 63166–2034: 11.300 through 301–11.306. GSA may this burden estimate or any other aspect 1. Benefit Financial Group, Inc., Fort begin asking agencies for data related to of this collection of information, Smith, Arkansas; to become a bank their use of actual expense approvals; if including any of the following subjects: holding company upon the conversion so, more information will be (1) The necessity and utility of the of its subsidiary bank, Benefit Bank, forthcoming. Fort Smith, Arkansas, from a federally proposed information collection for the chartered savings institution to a state DATES: This notice is effective October proper performance of the agency’s chartered bank. 1, 2010, and applies for travel functions; (2) the accuracy of the performed on or after October 1, 2010 estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve through September 30, 2011. System, August 25, 2010. the quality, utility, and clarity of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information to be collected; and (4) the Robert deV. Frierson, clarification of content, contact Ms. Jill use of automated collection techniques Deputy Secretary of the Board. Denning, Office of Governmentwide or other forms of information [FR Doc. 2010–21519 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Policy, Office of Travel, Transportation, technology to minimize the information BILLING CODE 6210–01–S and Asset Management, at (202) 208– collection burden. To obtain copies of 7642, or by e-mail at the supporting statement and any [email protected]. Please cite Notice related forms for the proposed GENERAL SERVICES of Per Diem Bulletin 11–01. paperwork collections referenced above, ADMINISTRATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: e-mail your request, including your address, phone number, OMB number, Maximum Per Diem Rates for the A. Background and OS document identifier, to Continental United States (CONUS) After analyzing recent lodging data, [email protected], or call AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide GSA determined that lodging rates for the Reports Clearance Office on (202) Policy (OGP), General Services certain localities do not adequately 690–6162. Written comments and Administration (GSA). reflect the current lodging markets. GSA recommendations for the proposed ACTION: Notice of Per Diem Bulletin 11– used the same lodging rate setting information collections must be directed 01, Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 Continental methodology for establishing the FY to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer United States (CONUS) per diem rates. 2011 per diem rates as when at the above e-mail address within 60 establishing the FY 2010 rates. days. SUMMARY: The General Services GSA issues and publishes the CONUS Proposed Project: State Medicaid Administration’s (GSA) annual per diem per diem rates, formerly published in Fraud Control Units’ Reports—OMB No. review has resulted in lodging and meal Appendix A to 41 CFR Chapter 301, 0990–0162—Extension-Office of the allowance changes for locations within solely on the Internet at http:// Inspector General (OIG). CONUS to provide for the www.gsa.gov/perdiem. This process, Abstract: Office of the Inspector reimbursement of Federal employees’ implemented in 2003, ensures more General (OIG) is requesting an extension expenses covered by per diem. This Per timely changes in per diem rates by Office of Management and Budget for Diem Bulletin updates the maximum established by GSA for Federal the collection of information to per diem amounts in existing per diem employees on official travel within specifically comply with the localities and updates the standard CONUS. Notices published periodically requirements in Title 19 of the Social CONUS rate. The CONUS per diem rates in the Federal Register, such as this Security Act at 1903(q) and 42

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52948 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

CFR1007.15 and 1007.17, in accordance grant certification/re-certification. The the information received to assess and with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The collection is submitted yearly to the determine the Units’ eligibility for information collected consists of fifty Office of the Inspector General (OIG) by continued participation in the Federal separate annual reports and fifty the fifty established State Medicaid Medicaid fraud control grant program. separate application requests for Federal Fraud Control Units (Units). OIG uses

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Average Number of Number of burden per Total Respondent Form respondents responses per response burden respondent (in hours) hours

State (MFCU) Units ...... Annual Report ...... 50 1 88 4,400 State (MFCU) Units ...... Certification/Recertification Application 50 1 5 250

Total ...... 4,650

Seleda Perryman, of this collection of information, at the above email address within 60- Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction including any of the following subjects: days. Act Clearance Officer. (1) The necessity and utility of the Proposed Project: State Medicaid [FR Doc. 2010–21400 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] proposed information collection for the Fraud Control Units’ Reports—OMB No. BILLING CODE 4152–01–P proper performance of the agency’s 0990–0162–Extension—Office of the functions; (2) the accuracy of the Inspector General (OIG). estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance Abstract: Office of the Inspector DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND the quality, utility, and clarity of the General (OIG) is requesting an extension HUMAN SERVICES information to be collected; and (4) the by Office of Management and Budget for the collection of information to [Document Identifier: OS–0990–0162; 60- use of automated collection techniques Day Notice] or other forms of information specifically comply with the technology to minimize the information requirements in Title 19 of the Social Agency Information Collection collection burden. Security Act at 1903 (q) and 42 Request; 60-Day Public Comment CFR1007.15 and 1007.17, in accordance To obtain copies of the supporting Request with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The statement and any related forms for the information collected consists of fifty AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS. proposed paperwork collections separate annual reports and fifty In compliance with the requirement referenced above, e-mail your request, separate application requests for Federal of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the including your address, phone number, grant certification/re-certification. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the OMB number, and OS document collection is submitted yearly to the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department identifier, to Office of the Inspector General (OIG) by of Health and Human Services, is [email protected], or call the fifty established State Medicaid publishing the following summary of a the Reports Clearance Office on (202) Fraud Control Units (Units). OIG uses proposed information collection request 690–6162. Written comments and the information received to assess and for public comment. Interested persons recommendations for the proposed determine the Units’ eligibility for are invited to send comments regarding information collections must be directed continued participation in the Federal this burden estimate or any other aspect to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer Medicaid fraud control grant program.

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Number of Average Number of responses burden per Total Respondent Form respondents per response burden respondents (in hours) hours

State (MFCU) Units ...... Annual Report ...... 50 1 88 4,400 State (MFCU) Units ...... Certification/Recertification Application 50 1 5 250

Total ...... 4,650

Seleda Perryman, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND In compliance with the requirement Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction HUMAN SERVICES of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Act Clearance Officer. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the [FR Doc. 2010–21433 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] [Document Identifier: OS–0990–0162; 60- Office of the Secretary (OS), Department BILLING CODE 4152–01–P Day Notice] of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following summary of a Agency Information Collection proposed information collection request Request; 60-Day Public Comment for public comment. Interested persons Request are invited to send comments regarding AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:35 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52949

this burden estimate or any other aspect address, phone number, OMB number, specifically comply with the of this collection of information, and OS document identifier, to requirements in Title 19 of the Social including any of the following subjects: [email protected], or call Security Act at 1903(q) and 42 CFR (1) The necessity and utility of the the Reports Clearance Office on (202) 1007.15 and 1007.17, in accordance proposed information collection for the 690–6162. Written comments and with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The proper performance of the agency’s recommendations for the proposed information collected consists of fifty functions; (2) the accuracy of the information collections must be directed separate annual reports and fifty estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance to the OS Paperwork Clearance Officer separate application requests for Federal the quality, utility, and clarity of the at the above e-mail address within 60 grant certification/re-certification. The information to be collected; and (4) the days. collection is submitted yearly to the use of automated collection techniques Proposed Project: State Medicaid Office of the Inspector General (OIG) by or other forms of information Fraud Control Units’ Reports—OMB No. the fifty established State Medicaid technology to minimize the information 0990–0162–Extension—Office of the collection burden. To obtain copies of Inspector General (OIG). Fraud Control Units (Units). OIG uses the supporting statement and any Abstract: Office of the Inspector the information received to assess and related forms for the proposed General (OIG) is requesting an extension determine the Units’ eligibility for paperwork collections referenced above, by Office of Management and Budget for continued participation in the Federal e-mail your request, including your the collection of information to Medicaid fraud control grant program.

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE

Number of Average Number of burden per Total burden Respondent Form respondents responses per response hours respondent (in hours)

State (MFCU) Units ...... Annual Report ...... 50 1 88 4,400 State (MFCU) Units ...... Certification/Recertification Application 50 1 5 250

Total ...... 4,650

Seleda Perryman, also include sessions on genomic data warranted, to provide advice on these Office of the Secretary, Paperwork Reduction sharing and the implications of issues. The draft meeting agenda and Act Clearance Officer. affordable whole-genome sequencing, other information about SACGHS, [FR Doc. 2010–21403 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] an update on the implementation of the including information about access to BILLING CODE 4152–01–P Genetic Information Nondiscrimination the Web cast, will be available at the Act, and a briefing from the Food and following Web site: http:// Drug Administration on activities oba.od.nih.gov/SACGHS/ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND related to genetic testing. sacghs_meetings.html. As always, the Committee welcomes HUMAN SERVICES Dated: August 24, 2010. hearing from anyone wishing to provide National Institutes of Health public comment on any issue related to Jennifer Spaeth, genetics, health and society. Please note Director, NIH Office of Federal Advisory Notice of Meeting: Secretary’s that because SACGHS operates under Committee Policy. Advisory Committee on Genetics, the provisions of the Federal Advisory [FR Doc. 2010–21533 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Health, and Society Committee Act, all public comments BILLING CODE 4140–01–P will be made available to the public. Pursuant to Public Law 92–463, Individuals who would like to provide notice is hereby given of the twenty- public comment should notify the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND third meeting of the Secretary’s SACGHS Executive Secretary, Ms. Sarah HUMAN SERVICES Advisory Committee on Genetics, Carr, by telephone at 301–496–9838 or Office of the Secretary Health, and Society (SACGHS), U.S. e-mail at [email protected]. The Public Health Service. The meeting will SACGHS office is located at 6705 Notice of Meeting: Secretary’s be held from 8:30 a.m. to approximately Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 5, 2010, Advisory Committee on Genetics, MD 20892. Anyone planning to attend Health, and Society and from 8:30 a.m. to approximately the meeting who needs special 3:45 p.m. on Wednesday, October 6, assistance, such as sign language Pursuant to Public Law 92–463, 2010, at the National Institute of Health, interpretation or other reasonable notice is hereby given of the twenty- Building 31, Conference Room 6C6, accommodations, is also asked to third meeting of the Secretary’s 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD contact the Executive Secretary. Advisory Committee on Genetics, 20892. The meeting will be open to the Under authority of 42 U.S.C. 217a, Health, and Society (SACGHS), U.S. public with attendance limited to space Section 222 of the Public Health Service Public Health Service. The meeting will available. The meeting will also be Web Act, as amended, the Department of be held from 8:30 a.m. to approximately cast. Health and Human Services established 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 5, 2010, The main agenda item will be a SACGHS to serve as a public forum for and from 8:30 a.m. to approximately review of the revised draft report on deliberations on the broad range of 3:45 p.m. on Wednesday, October 6, genetics education and training and human health and societal issues raised 2010, at the National Institute of Health, discussion of the final draft by the development and use of genetic Building 31, Conference Room 6C6, recommendations. The meeting will and genomic technologies and, as 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52950 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

20892. The meeting will be open to the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Dated: August 24, 2010. public with attendance limited to space HUMAN SERVICES James Scanlon, available. The meeting will also be Web Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and cast. National Committee on Vital and Health Evaluation (Science and Data Policy), Office Statistics: Meeting of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and The main agenda item will be a Evaluation. review of the revised draft report on Pursuant to the Federal Advisory [FR Doc. 2010–21516 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] genetics education and training and Committee Act, the Department of BILLING CODE 4151–05–P discussion of the final draft Health and Human Services (HHS) recommendations. The meeting will announces the following advisory also include sessions on genomic data committee meeting. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND sharing and the implications of Name: National Committee on Vital and HUMAN SERVICES affordable whole-genome sequencing, Health Statistics (NCVHS), Full Committee an update on the implementation of the Meeting. Meeting of the National Biodefense Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Time and Date: September 15, 2010 9 a.m.– Science Board 2 p.m.; September 16, 2010 8:30 a.m.– Act, and a briefing from the Food and AGENCY: Department of Health and 12:30 p.m. Drug Administration on activities Human Services, Office of the Secretary. related to genetic testing. Place: Embassy Suites Crystal City Hotel, 1300 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA ACTION: Notice. As always, the Committee welcomes 22202, (703) 979–9799. hearing from anyone wishing to provide Status: Open. SUMMARY: As stipulated by the Federal public comment on any issue related to Purpose: At this meeting the Committee Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. genetics, health and society. Please note will hear presentations and hold discussions Department of Health and Human that because SACGHS operates under on several health data policy topics. On the Services is hereby giving notice that the the provisions of the Federal Advisory morning of the first day the Committee will National Biodefense Science Board Committee Act, all public comments hear updates from the Department, the Center (NBSB) will be holding a public for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the will be made available to the public. meeting. The meeting is open to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health public. Individuals who would like to provide Information Technology. Draft letters to the public comment should notify the HHS Secretary regarding the HIPAA national DATES: The NBSB will hold a public SACGHS Executive Secretary, Ms. Sarah health plan identifier and operating rules on meeting on September 22, 2010 from 8 Carr, by telephone at 301–496–9838 or eligibility and claim status will also be a.m. to 5 p.m. ET. The agenda is subject e-mail at [email protected]. The discussed. In the afternoon there will be a to change as priorities dictate. discussion about a letter to the HHS SACGHS office is located at 6705 ADDRESSES: Washington, DC Metro Secretary regarding sensitive information in Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, Area. The venue details will be posted medical records. MD 20892. Anyone planning to attend On the morning of the second day there on the NBSB webpage at http:// the meeting who needs special will be a review of the final letters regarding www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/ assistance, such as sign language the national health plan identifier, operating boards/nbsb/Pages/default.aspx as they interpretation or other reasonable rules on eligibility and claim status, and become available. accommodations, is also asked to sensitive information in medical records. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E- contact the Executive Secretary. Subcommittees will also present their mail: [email protected]. reports. The afternoon of the second day will SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under authority of 42 U.S.C. 217a, conclude with a discussion of the 60th Pursuant Section 222 of the Public Health Service Anniversary Symposium that was held in to section 319M of the Public Health Act, as amended, the Department of June 2010. Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–7f) and Health and Human Services established The times shown above are for the full section 222 of the Public Health Service SACGHS to serve as a public forum for Committee meeting. Subcommittee breakout Act (42 U.S.C. 217a), the Department of deliberations on the broad range of sessions can be scheduled for late in the Health and Human Services established afternoon of the first day and second day and human health and societal issues raised the National Biodefense Science Board. in the morning prior to the full Committee by the development and use of genetic The Board shall provide expert advice meeting on the second day. Agendas for these and guidance to the Secretary on and genomic technologies and, as breakout sessions will be posted on the scientific, technical, and other matters warranted, to provide advice on these NCVHS Web site (URL below) when of special interest to the Department of available. issues. The draft meeting agenda and Health and Human Services regarding other information about SACGHS, Contact Person for More Information: Substantive program information as well as current and future chemical, biological, including information about access to nuclear, and radiological agents, the Web cast, will be available at the summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members may be obtained from whether naturally occurring, accidental, following Web site: http:// Marjorie S. Greenberg, Executive Secretary, or deliberate. The Board may also oba.od.nih.gov/SACGHS/ NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, provide advice and guidance to the sacghs_meetings.html. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Secretary on other matters related to Dated: August 24, 2010. 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2402, Hyattsville, public health emergency preparedness Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458–4245. Jennifer Spaeth, and response. Information also is available on the NCVHS Background: A portion of this public Director, NIH Office of Federal Advisory home page of the HHS Web site: http:// meeting will be dedicated to a report Committee Policy. www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/, where further and presentation by the Disaster Mental [FR Doc. 2010–21532 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] information including an agenda will be posted when available. Health Subcommittee to the NBSB on BILLING CODE 4140–01–P Should you require reasonable their assessment of the Department of accommodation, please contact the CDC Health and Human Services’ progress to Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on better integrate behavioral health into (301) 458–4EEO (4336) as soon as possible. emergency preparedness and response

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52951

activities. Subsequent agenda topics ADDRESSES: Written comments should supports AHRQ’s Centers for Education will be added as priorities dictate. be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz, and Research on Therapeutics initiative Availability of Materials: The meeting Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by e- to promote the safe and effective use of agenda and materials will be posted on mail at [email protected]. therapeutics. See 42 U.S.C. 299b–1(b). It the NBSB Web site at http:// Copies of the proposed collection plans, also supports AHRQ’s mandate for the www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/ data collection instruments, and specific inclusion of priority populations. See 42 boards/nbsb/Pages/default.aspx prior to details on the estimated burden can be U.S.C. 299(c). the meeting. obtained from the AHRQ Reports Method of Collection Procedures for Providing Public Input: Clearance Officer. Any member of the public providing FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To achieve the projects’ aims the oral comments at the meeting must sign Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports following data collections will be in at the registration desk and provide Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by implemented: his/her name, address, and affiliation. e-mail at (1) Surveys with parents of young All written comments must be received [email protected]. prior to September 21, and should be children (age < 8 years). The purpose of sent by e-mail to [email protected] with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: this survey is to learn how parents administer acetaminophen to their ‘‘NBSB Public Comment’’ as the subject Proposed Project line. Individuals who plan to attend and children and to identify determinants of need special assistance, such as sign Understanding Patients’ Knowledge and misuse of acetaminophen; language interpretation or other Use of Acetaminophen—Phase 2 (2) Surveys with adolescents (ages 13 reasonable accommodations, should AHRQ proposes a cross-sectional to 20). The purpose of this survey is to e-mail [email protected]. prospective survey to identify issues learn how adolescents use Dated: August 10, 2010. that relate to the misuse and overdosing acetaminophen and to identify Nicole Lurie, of over-the-counter (OTC) determinants of misuse of acetaminophen; Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and acetaminophen. The survey was Response. developed based on results from a (3) Surveys with adults (21 to 65 years [FR Doc. 2010–21504 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] previous data collection (OMB control of age). The purpose of this survey is to BILLING CODE 4150–37–P number 0935–0154, approved on 10/13/ learn how adults use acetaminophen 2009). Acetaminophen is the most and to identify determinants of misuse widely used analgesic and antipyretic of acetaminophen; DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND drug in the U.S. When appropriately (4) Surveys with adults (greater than HUMAN SERVICES used, it is a very safe agent. However, 65 years of age). The purpose of this a single large overdose, or several survey is to learn how older adults use Agency for Healthcare Research and supratherapeutic dosages in a short acetaminophen and to identify Quality period of time, has been associated with determinants of misuse of acute liver failure, which can occur with Agency Information Collection acetaminophen, particularly in regards dosages over 250 mg/kg over a 24-hour to age-related factors. Activities: Proposed Collection; period, or > 12 g in an adult. Toxicity Comment Request Data will be collected in person using from acetaminophen has been on the paper questionnaires administered by rise in the past 3 decades, and is now AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research the project personnel. and Quality, HHS. the most common cause of acute liver ACTION: Notice. failure in the U.S., surpassing viral Estimated Annual Respondent Burden hepatitis. SUMMARY: This notice announces the This project has the following aims: Exhibit 1 shows the estimated intention of the Agency for Healthcare (1) To estimate frequency of use, annualized burden hours for the Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request knowledge, and practices regarding use respondent’s time to participate in this that the Office of Management and of OTC acetaminophen, and project. Each of the four questionnaires Budget (OMB) approve the proposed (2) To evaluate potential determinants used in the planned face-to-face surveys information collection project: of misuse in community-based samples. will require approximately 30 minutes ‘‘Understanding Patients’ Knowledge This information will be useful for to complete. The total annualized and Use of Acetaminophen—Phase 2.’’ policy makers to consider and to burden for all participants is estimated In accordance with the Paperwork evaluate regulations and legislation with to be 400 hours. Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, respect to the distribution, dispensing Exhibit 2 shows the estimated AHRQ invites the public to comment on and sales of OTC acetaminophen. annualized cost burden for the this proposed information collection. This study is being conducted by respondent’s time to participate in the DATES: Comments on this notice must be AHRQ through its contractor, the project. The total annualized cost received by October 29, 2010. University of Texas. This project burden is estimated to be $8,361.

EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Number of Total Data collection mode Number of responses per Hours burden respondents respondent per response hours

Surveys with Parents of Children < 8 years of age ...... 300 1 30/60 150 Surveys with Adolescents (13 to 20 years of age) ...... 200 1 30/60 100 Surveys with Adults (20 to 65 years) ...... 150 1 30/60 75 Surveys with Adults (greater than 65 years) ...... 150 1 30/60 75

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued

Number of Total Data collection mode Number of responses per Hours burden respondents respondent per response hours

Total ...... 800 na na 400

EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN

Total Average Total Data collection mode Number of burden hourly cost respondents hours wage rate* burden

Surveys with Parents of Children < 8 years of age ...... 300 150 $20.90 $3,135 Surveys with Adolescents (13 to 20 years of age) ...... 200 100 20.90 2,090 Surveys with Adults (20 to 65 years) ...... 150 75 20.90 1,568 Surveys with Adults (greater than 65 years) ...... 150 75 20.90 1,568

Total ...... 800 400 na 8,361 * Based upon the mean of the average wages, National Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States, May 2009, ‘‘U.S. De- partment of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal automated collection techniques or Prevention and Health Promotion Government other forms of information technology. (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control Comments submitted in response to Exhibit 3 shows the estimated and Prevention (CDC). this notice will be summarized and annualized cost to the Federal included in the Agency’s subsequent Background and Brief Description government for this six-month project. request for OMB approval of the CDC currently supports the National The total cost is $280,269. This amount proposed information collection. All Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), a includes all direct and indirect costs of comments will become a matter of group of central cancer registries in 45 the design, data collection, analysis, and public record. states, the District of Columbia, and 2 reporting phase of the study. Dated: August 23, 2010. territories. The central cancer registries are data systems that collect, manage, EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED Carolyn M. Clancy, and analyze data about cancer cases and Director. COST cancer deaths. NPCR-funded central [FR Doc. 2010–21498 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] cancer registries submit population- Total BILLING CODE 4160–90–M Cost component cost based cancer incidence data to CDC on an annual basis (OMB No. 0920–0469, Project Development ...... $33,590 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND exp. 11/30/2012). Data Collection Activities ...... 85,760 Central cancer registries report that HUMAN SERVICES Data Processing and Analysis ...... 30,800 they are chronically understaffed, and Publication of Results ...... 750 Centers for Disease Control and many registries are concerned about the Project Management ...... 31,093 Prevention impact of staff shortages on data quality. Overhead ...... 98,276 Staffing patterns are known to vary [30Day–10–09BV] Total ...... 280,269 widely from registry to registry, and registries differ in the volume of cases Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork that they process as well as their use of Request for Comments Reduction Act Review information technology. Cancer In accordance with the above-cited The Centers for Disease Control and registries have asked for clear staffing Paperwork Reduction Act legislation, Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of guidelines based on registry comments on AHRQ’s information information collection requests under characteristics such as size, degree of collection are requested with regard to review by the Office of Management and automation, and reporting procedures. any of the following: (a) Whether the Budget (OMB) in compliance with the CDC proposes to conduct a one-time proposed collection of information is Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Workload and Time Management necessary for the proper performance of Chapter 35). To request a copy of these (WLM) Survey to inform the AHRQ healthcare research and requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance development of staffing guidelines for healthcare information dissemination Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an central cancer registries. Respondents functions, including whether the e-mail to [email protected]. Send written will be 46 cancer registrars in the NPCR- information will have practical utility; comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of funded central cancer registries in 45 (b) the accuracy of AHRQ’s estimate of Management and Budget, Washington, states and the District of Columbia. burden (including hours and costs) of DC or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written Participation will be requested by e- the proposed collection(s) of comments should be received within 30 mail. Non-responders will receive information; (c) ways to enhance the days of this notice. follow-up telephone calls to encourage quality, utility, and clarity of the participation. information to be collected; and (d) Proposed Project The WLM survey includes basic ways to minimize the burden of the Workload Management Study of questions about registry characteristics collection of information upon the Central Cancer Registries—New— such as organizational affiliation and respondents, including the use of National Center for Chronic Disease number of staff. The WLM also includes

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52953

questions about the caseload for the development, travel, and death the registry’s staff. The aggregate registry (the number of new cancer cases clearances. In order to complete this information will be reported to CDC reported annually), the sources of case section of the WLM survey, detailed through the WLM Survey. The information, whether case information information will be collected from individual Work Activities Journals will is collected utilizing manual or registry staff. An average of eight not be submitted to CDC. electronic methods, and the type of registrars in each registry will be asked Findings from the WLM survey will software employed for electronic to maintain a paper Work Activities enable CDC to assess the workforce collection. Because many tasks can be Journal for a one-week period. Each necessary for meeting data reporting performed manually or using electronic registrar will record the number of requirements and to estimate the impact methods, and because cancer coding hours and minutes dedicated to case of planned changes to surveillance data systems are frequently revised to reflect finding, records abstraction, follow-up, reporting. CDC plans to develop changes in cancer diagnosis and care, and quality assurance, and where guidance so that cancer registry the WLM survey asks registry managers applicable, indicate whether tasks were managers can more effectively measure to identify training needs that would conducted manually or electronically. workload, evaluate the need for staff improve registry productivity, and to In addition, each registrar will estimate and staff credentials, and advocate for provide comments about other resource the amount of time dedicated to adequate staffing. needs and management issues. auditing, database management, The web-based WLM Survey will also professional development, travel, and OMB approval is requested for one collect information about the total death clearances on a monthly or annual year. Participation in the survey is amount of time dedicated by registry basis. At the end of the one-week data voluntary. There are no costs to staff to specific activities such as case collection period, the registry manager respondents other than their time. The finding, records abstraction, follow-up, will compile information from all of the total estimated annualized burden hours quality assurance, professional Work Activities Journals completed by are 921.

ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Average Number of Number of burden per Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response respondent (in hours)

NPCR managers ...... Workload and Time Management Survey ..... 46 1 4 Telephone Reminder ...... 15 1 3/60 NPCR Staff Registrars ...... Work Activities Journal ...... 368 1 2

Dated: August 23, 2010. Proposed Project (PHSPO) is responsible for establishing Maryam I. Daneshvar, and managing the national reporting National Notifiable Condition system of epidemiologic data for Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Messaging Support Strategy—New— Control and Prevention. notifiable conditions (diseases) via Public Health Surveillance Program NEDSS. [FR Doc. 2010–21496 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Office (PHSPO); Office of Surveillance, BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services Case notification messaging for most (OSELS), Centers for Disease Control of the nationally notifiable conditions and Prevention, (CDC). (77 infectious conditions as of August DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 2009) will eventually be supported by HUMAN SERVICES Background and Brief Description the standard Health Level 7 v2.5 (HL7) The Public Health Services Act (42 message format. The HL7 message Centers for Disease Control and format requires a Message Mapping Prevention U.S.C. 241) authorizes CDC to disseminate nationally notifiable Guide (MMG)—developed by the condition information. CDC’s Morbidity NEDSS and NNDSS programs, in [30Day–10–10AK] and Mortality Weekly Report publishes collaboration with state and federal incidence tables for nationally notifiable subject matter experts—to implement Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork case notification to CDC via NEDSS. At Reduction Act Review conditions reported through the National Electronic Disease Surveillance present, seven MMGs are available for The Centers for Disease Control and System (NEDSS) and other surveillance implementation by jurisdictions, and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of data sources to the National Notifiable current NEDSS resources support the information collection requests under Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS). development of three new MMGs per review by the Office of Management and NEDSS (OMB 0920–0728, expiration year. A jurisdiction’s implementation of Budget (OMB) in compliance with the date: 2/28/2010) is an internet-based a MMG requires an average of four Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. infrastructure for public health months per MMG, and a jurisdiction Chapter 35). To request a copy of these surveillance data exchange that uses could potentially implement up to three requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance specific Public Health Information MMGs a year. In most instances, Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an Network (PHIN) and NEDSS electronic National Center for Public Health e-mail to [email protected]. Send written data and information standards to Informatics’ (NCPHI) programmatic and comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of advance the development of efficient, technical expertise is required to Management and Budget, Washington, integrated, and interoperable support this process at the jurisdictional DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806. surveillance systems at federal, state level. Written comments should be received and local levels. CDC’s proposed Public The National Notifiable Condition within 30 days of this notice. Health Surveillance Program Office Messaging Support Strategy

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52954 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Questionnaire has been developed by project schedule and level of human Laboratory Capacity cooperative the NEDSS program to gather and technical support needed to agreement. information needed for formulating a complete the jurisdiction’s Questionnaires will be distributed to technical and project management implementation of a nationally jurisdictions that initiate MMG support strategy for 57 reporting notifiable condition message. NEDSS implementation for a condition; jurisdictions (i.e., 50 states, 5 territories, infrastructure implementation support therefore, the maximum annual and 2 cities (New York City, NY and includes, but is not limited to frequency of responses per jurisdiction Washington, DC)) as they implement implementing NEDSS Message is three. The NEDSS team will request NEDSS messaging using MMGs. A Subscription Service (MSS) and NEDSS the jurisdiction to voluntarily complete jurisdiction’s response to the Messaging Solution (NMS) software in the questionnaire, but a response is not questionnaire will be used by the requesting jurisdictions; providing MSS a pre-requisite for support. NEDSS implementation and and NMS software training and ongoing There is no cost to respondents other management teams to assess the than their time to participate in the technical support; and distributing jurisdiction’s IT system environment survey. The total estimated annual funding via the CDC Epidemiology and and capacity and help determine the burden hours are 114.

ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS

Average Number of Number of burden per Respondents Form name respondents responses per response respondent (in hours)

State, Territory and Local Public Health De- National Notifiable Condition Messaging 57 3 40/60 partment. Support Strategy Questionnaire.

Dated: August 23, 2010. OMB recommends that written its use, or intended use, conform to the Maryam I. Daneshvar, comments be faxed to the Office of terms of an exemption for Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for Disease Information and Regulatory Affairs, investigational use; or (3) a food contact Control and Prevention. OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: notification submitted under section [FR Doc. 2010–21497 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 202–395–7285, or emailed to 409(h) of the FD&C Act is effective. _ BILLING CODE 4163–18–P oira [email protected]. All Food additive petitions (FAPs) are comments should be identified with the submitted by individuals or companies OMB control number 0910–0016. Also to obtain approval of a new food DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND include the FDA docket number found additive or to amend the conditions of HUMAN SERVICES in brackets in the heading of this use permitted under an existing food document. additive regulation. Section 171.1 of Food and Drug Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA’s regulations (21 CFR 171.1) [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0258] Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information specifies the information that a Management, Food and Drug petitioner must submit in order to Agency Information Collection Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50– establish that the proposed use of a food Activities; Submission for Office of 400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796– additive is safe and to secure the Management and Budget Review; 3793. publication of a food additive regulation describing the conditions under which Comment Request; Submission of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the additive may be safely used. Parts Petitions: Food Additive, Color compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA 172, 173, 179, and 180 (21 CFR parts Additive (Including Labeling), and has submitted the following proposed 172, 173, 179, and 180) contain labeling Generally Recognized as Safe collection of information to OMB for requirements for certain food additives Affirmation; Submission of Information review and clearance. to a Master File in Support of Petitions; to ensure their safe use. Electronic Submission Using Food and Submission of Petitions: Food Additive, Section 721(a) of the FD&C Act (21 Drug Administration Form 3503 Color Additive (Including Labeling), U.S.C. 379e(a)) provides that a color and Generally Recognized as Safe additive shall be deemed to be unsafe AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Affirmation; Submission of Information unless the additive and its use are in HHS. to a Master File in Support of Petitions; conformity with a regulation that ACTION: Notice. Electronic Submission Using FDA Form describes the condition(s) under which 3503—21 CFR 70.25, 71.1, 170.35, the additive may safely be used, or the SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 171.1, 172, 173, 179, and 180 (OMB additive and its use conform to the Administration (FDA) is announcing Control Number 0910–0016)—Revision terms of an exemption for that a proposed collection of Section 409(a) of the Federal Food, investigational use issued under section information has been submitted to the Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 721(f) of the FD&C Act. Color additive Office of Management and Budget U.S.C. 348(a)) provides that a food petitions (CAPs) are submitted by (OMB) for review and clearance under additive shall be deemed to be unsafe, individuals or companies to obtain the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. unless: (1) The additive and its use, or approval of a new color additive or a DATES: Fax written comments on the intended use, are in conformity with a change in the conditions of use collection of information by September regulation issued under section 409 of permitted for a color additive that is 29, 2010. the FD&C Act that describes the already approved. Section 71.1 of the ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on condition(s) under which the additive agency’s regulations (21 CFR 71.1) the information collection are received, may be safely used; (2) the additive and specifies the information that a

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:41 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52955

petitioner must submit to establish the implement the GRAS provisions of the 3503 can be used to substitute for the safety of a color additive and to secure act, FDA has set forth procedures for the ‘‘Dear Sir’’ section of 21 CFR 71.1(c) for the issuance of a regulation permitting GRAS affirmation petition process in a CAP and 21 CFR 171.1(c) for a FAP. its use. FDA’s color additive labeling § 170.35(c)(1) of its regulations (21 CFR The revised Form FDA 3503 provides requirements in § 70.25 (21 CFR 70.25) 170.35(c)(1)). While the GRAS for submitters to indicate the date of require that color additives that are to be affirmation petition process still exists, their most recent presubmission used in food, drugs, devices, or FDA has not received a GRAS consultation activity with FDA. The cosmetics be labeled with sufficient affirmation petition since the revised Form FDA 3503 can also be information to ensure their safe use. establishment of the voluntary GRAS used to organize information within a FDA scientific personnel review FAPs notification program and is not Master File submitted in support of to ensure the safety of the intended use expecting any during the period covered petitions according to the items listed of the additive in or on food or that may by this proposed extension of collection on the form. Master Files can be used as be present in food as a result of its use of information. repositories for information that can be in articles that contact food. Likewise, Currently, interested persons may referenced in multiple submissions to FDA personnel review color additive transmit regulatory submissions to the the Agency, thus minimizing paperwork petitions to ensure the safety of the Office of Food Additive Safety in the burden for food and color additive color additive prior to its use in food, Center for Food Safety and Applied drugs, cosmetics, or medical devices. Nutrition using Form FDA 3503 for FAP approvals. The revised Form FDA 3503 Under section 201(s) of the FD&C Act and Form FDA 3504 for CAP. FDA is is formatted to accept submissions for (21 U.S.C. 321(s)), a substance is revising Form FDA 3503 to better enable both FAP and CAP, thus making Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) if its use for electronic submission and to redundant Form FDA 3504 for it is generally recognized among experts permit its use for multiple types of collecting CAP submissions. Therefore, qualified by scientific training and submissions, which eliminates the need FDA is eliminating Form FDA 3504. experience to evaluate its safety, to be for Form FDA 3504. Because Form FDA Description of respondents: safe through either scientific procedures 3503 helps the respondent organize Respondents are businesses engaged in or common use in food. The FD&C Act their submission to focus on the the manufacture or sale of food, food historically has been interpreted to information needed for FDA’s safety ingredients, color additives, or permit food manufacturers to make their review, FDA now recommends that this substances used in materials that come own initial determination that use of a form be used for FAPs and CAPs, into contact with food. substance in food is GRAS and whether submitted in electronic format In the Federal Register of June 14, thereafter seek affirmation of GRAS or paper format. FDA estimates that the status from FDA. FDA reviews petitions amount of time for respondents to 2010 (75 FR 33624), FDA published a for affirmation of GRAS status that are complete the revised FDA Form 3503 60-day notice requesting public submitted on a voluntary basis by the will continue to be 1 hour. The revised comment on the proposed collection of food industry and other interested Form FDA 3503 can be used to submit information. No comments were parties under authority of sections 201, information to FDA in electronic format received. 402, 409, and 701 of the FD&C Act (21 using the Electronic Submission FDA estimates the burden of this U.S.C. 321, 342, 348, and 371). To Gateway portal. The revised Form FDA collection of information as follows:

TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1

21 CFR Section/ No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per Total Operating and Total FDA Form Respondents per Response Responses Response Maintenance Costs Hours

70.25, 71.1 2 1 2 1,337 $5,600 2,674

GRAS Affirmation Petitions

170.35 1 or fewer 1 1 or fewer 2,614 0 2,614

FAPs

171.1 3 1 3 7,093 0 21,279

FDA Form 3503 6 1 6 1 0 6

Total $5,600 26,573 1 There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.

The estimate of burden for food of petitions received in the past 4 years. work of drafting the petition itself. The additive, color additive, or GRAS The figures for ‘‘Hours per Response’’ are burden varies depending on the affirmation petitions is based on FDA’s based on estimates from experienced complexity of the petition, including the experience and the average number of persons in the Agency and in industry. amount and types of data needed for new petitions received in calendar years Although the estimated hour burden scientific analysis. 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009, and the varies with the type of petition Color additives are subjected to total hours expended in preparing the submitted, an average petition involves payment of fees for the petitioning petitions. In compiling these estimates, analytical work and appropriate process. The listing fee for a color FDA consulted its records of the number toxicological studies, as well as the additive petition ranges from $1,600 to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52956 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

$3,000, depending on the intended use Title VI, Part A: Grants for Native grantees will receive priority of the color and the scope of the Americans; Part B: Grants for Native consideration. Successful applications requested amendment. A complete Hawaiian Programs; and Part C: Grants from new applicants will be funded schedule of fees is set forth in 21 CFR for the Native American Caregiver pending the availability of funds or at 70.19. An average of one Category A and Support Program. the discretion of the Assistant Secretary one Category B color additive petition is Announcement Type: This is the for Aging. For those applying for Title expected per year. The maximum color initial announcement for this funding VI, Parts A or B funding you have the additive petition fee for a Category A opportunity. option to also apply for Part C. petition is $2,600 and the maximum Funding Opportunity Number: However, to apply for Part C, you must color additive petition fee for a Category Program Announcement No. is HHS– apply for both Part A and Part C or Part B petition is $3,000. Because an average 2011–AoA–TitleVI–1101. B and Part C. of two color additive petitions are Statutory Authority: The Older III. Eligibility Criteria and Other expected per calendar year, the Americans Act, Public Law 109–365. Requirements estimated total annual cost burden to Catalog of Federal Domestic petitioners for this startup cost would be Assistance (CFDA) Number: 93.047, 1. Eligible Applicants less than or equal to $5,600 (1 x $2,600 Title VI Parts A and B and 93.054, Title Eligibility for grant awards is limited + 1 x $3,000 listing fees = $5,600). There VI Part C. to all current Title VI, Part A and Part are no capital costs associated with Dates: The deadline date for the B grantees; current grantees who wish to color additive petitions. submission of applications is November leave a consortium; and eligible The labeling requirements for food 30, 2010. and color additives were designed to federally recognized Indian tribal specify the minimum information I. Funding Opportunity Description organizations that are not now participating in Title VI and would like needed for labeling in order that food This announcement seeks proposals to apply as a new grantee. Those tribes and color manufacturers may comply for grants to provide nutritional and who were a part of a consortium with all applicable provisions of the supportive services to Indian elders and receiving a Title VI grant in 1991 and FD&C Act and other specific labeling Alaskan Natives under Part A; Native applying individually will be acts administered by FDA. Label Hawaiian elders under Part B; and considered a ‘‘current grantee.’’ Proof of information does not require any Family Caregiver support services under being a part of a consortium that was additional information gathering beyond Part C of the OAA. The goal of these funded in FY 1991 must be submitted what is already required to assure programs is to increase home and as part of the application. A tribal conformance with all specifications and community-based services to older organization or Indian tribe must meet limitations in any given food or color Indians, Alaskan Natives and Native the application requirements contained additive regulation. Label information Hawaiians, that respond to local needs in sections 612(a), 612(b), and 612(c) of does not have any specific and are consistent with evidence-based the OAA and 45 CFR 1326.19. A public recordkeeping requirements unique to practices. A detailed description of the or nonprofit private organization serving preparing the label. Therefore, because funding opportunity may be found at Native Hawaiians must meet the labeling requirements under § 70.25 for http://www.grants.gov, http:// application requirements contained in a particular color additive involve www.aoa.gov under Grant Opportunities sections 622(1), 622(2), and 625 of the information required as part of the CAP →Funding Opportunities, or http:// OAA and 45 CFR 1328.19. Under the safety review process, the estimate for www.olderindians.org. number of respondents is the same for Native American Caregiver Support II. Award Information §§ 70.25 and 71.1, and the burden hours Program, a tribal or Native Hawaiian organization must meet the for labeling are included in the estimate 1. Funding Instrument Type requirements as contained in section for § 71.1. Also, because labeling Grant. requirements under parts 172, 173, 179, 631 of the OAA. These sections are and 180 for particular food additives 2. Anticipated Total Priority Area described in the application kit. involve information required as part of Funding per Budget Period 2. Cost Sharing or Matching the FAP safety review process under The Administration on Aging (AoA) Cost Sharing or matching does not § 171.1, the burden hours for labeling will accept applications for funding for apply to these grants. are included in the estimate for § 171.1. a three-year project period, April 1, Dated: August 19, 2010. 2011 to March 31, 2014, in FY 2011 3. D–U–N–S Number David Dorsey, under the OAA, Title VI, Part A: Grants All grant applicants must obtain a Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, for Native Americans; Part B: Grants for D–U–N–S number from Dun and Planning and Budget. Native Hawaiian Programs; and Part C: Bradstreet. It is a nine-digit [FR Doc. 2010–21388 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Grants for the Native American identification number, which provides BILLING CODE 4160–01–S Caregiver Support Program. Current unique identifiers of single business annual funding levels for Title VI, Part entities. The D–U–N–S number is free A and Part B range from $76,160 to and easy to obtain from http:// DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND $186,000. Current annual funding levels www.dnb.com/US/duns_update/ or by HUMAN SERVICES for Title VI, Part C range from $14,410 calling their live help line at 1–888– to $57,680. Distribution of funds among 814–1435. Applicants are also Administration on Aging tribal organizations and Native encouraged to check their Web site for Hawaiian organizations is subject to the Funding Opportunity other pertinent information regarding availability of appropriations to carry this process. Purpose of Notice: Availability of out Title VI. Funding is based on the 4. Intergovernmental Review funding opportunity announcement. number of eligible elders age 60 and Funding Opportunity Title/Program older in your proposed service area. Executive Order 12372, Name: Older Americans Act (OAA), Successful applications from current Intergovernmental Review of Federal

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52957

Programs, is not applicable to these requirements will be considered for Agenda: To review and evaluate contract grant applications. funding. proposals. Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 IV. Application and Submission VI. Application Review Information Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 Information Not Applicable (Telephone Conference Call). Contact Person: Youngsuk Oh, PhD, 1. Address To Request Application VII. Agency Contacts Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/ Package For further information/questions DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7182, Application kits are available by regarding your application, contact M. writing to the U.S. Department of Health Bethesda, MD 20892–7924, 301–435–0277, Yvonne Jackson, Ph.D., U.S. Department [email protected]. and Human Services, Administration on of Health and Human Services, Aging, Office for American Indian, (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Administration on Aging, Office for Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian American Indian, Alaskan Native, and Programs, Washington, DC 20001; by Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Native Hawaiian Programs, One Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung calling Cecelia Aldridge, telephone: Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Room Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases (202) 357–3422; or online at http:// 5013, Washington, DC 20001; telephone and Resources Research, National Institutes www.grants.gov, http://www.aoa.gov of Health, HHS) → (202) 357–3501; fax (202) 357–3560; under Grant Opportunities Funding e-mail [email protected]. Opportunities, or http:// Dated: August 24, 2010. www.olderindians.org. Dated: August 24, 2010. Jennifer S. Spaeth, Kathy Greenlee, Director, Office of Federal Advisory 2. Application Submission Assistant Secretary for Aging. Committee Policy. Requirements [FR Doc. 2010–21565 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2010–21526 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] An original and complete application BILLING CODE 4154–01–P BILLING CODE 4140–01–P must include all attachments and be signed by the principal official of the tribe. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND Applicants are encouraged to submit HUMAN SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES applications electronically via e-mail to [email protected] with the National Institutes of Health Food and Drug Administration following in the subject line of the e-mail: ‘‘FY2011–2014 Title VI National Heart, Lung, and Blood [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0445] Application: (insert your tribal Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings Supplemental Funding Under the Food organization name).’’ Pursuant to section 10(d) of the If sending via overnight delivery and Drug Administration’s Food Federal Advisory Committee Act, as Emergency Response Laboratory service, applications must be submitted amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is to the U.S. Department of Health and Network Microbiological Cooperative hereby given of the following meetings. Agreement Program (U18) PAR–09– Human Services, Administration on The meetings will be closed to the Aging, Office of Grants Management, 215; Request for Supplemental public in accordance with the Applications One Massachusetts Ave., NW., Room provisions set forth in sections 4714, Washington, DC 20001, attn: Yi- 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Hsin Yan. as amended. The grant applications and HHS. Faxed applications will not be the discussions could disclose accepted. ACTION: Notice of intent to provide confidential trade secrets or commercial supplemental funding to the existing 3. Submission Dates and Times property such as patentable material, cooperative agreement (U18), PAR–09– To receive consideration, applications and personal information concerning 215, with the Food and Drug must be received electronically by 11:59 individuals associated with the grant Administration and a request for p.m. EST on November 30, 2010, or applications, the disclosure of which supplemental applications. postmarked by the overnight delivery would constitute a clearly unwarranted service no later than November 30, invasion of personal privacy. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 2010. If AoA’s Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, Administration (FDA) is announcing the [email protected] e-mail site and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, availability of supplemental grant funds cannot reasonably be used, a hard copy Resource for Biopreservation. for the support of Food Emergency application and all attachments must be Date: September 14, 2010. Response Laboratory Network (FERN) Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Microbiological Laboratories. The goal provided to an overnight delivery Agenda: To review and evaluate grant service and documented with a receipt of these FERN Microbiological applications. Laboratories supplements is a minor by November 30, 2010. Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 program expansion to enhance the lab V. Screening Criteria (Telephone Conference Call). capabilities to handle human Each application submitted will be Contact Person: William J Johnson, PhD, pathogenic bacteria in animal feed. screened to determine whether it was Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch/ DATES: Important dates are as follows: received by the closing date and time. DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 1. The supplemental application due In addition, applications received by the Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, date is August 30, 2010. Bethesda, MD 20892–7924, 301–435–0725, closing date and time will be screened [email protected]. 2. The anticipated start date is for completeness and conformity with September 2010. Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, the requirements outlined in Sections III and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, 3. The opening date is August 30, and IV of this Notice and the Program Cardiovascular Computational Model. 2010. Announcement. Only completed and Date: September 17, 2010. 4. The expiration date is September 6, signed applications that meet these Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. 2010.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52958 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim and its meetings. Supplemental funds • If it participates in FERN proficiency McGrath, Office of Regulatory Affairs, may not be used for Federal employees testing; and Food and Drug Administration, 5600 to travel to or participate in these • If it has a geographically balanced Fishers Lane, rm. 12–41, Rockville, MD meetings. distribution of the selected laboratories. 20857, 301–827–1028, email: B. Research Objectives II. Award Information/Funds Available [email protected]; or Camille R. Peake, Food and Drug Selected FDA FERN Microbiological A. Award Amount Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. Cooperative Agreement Laboratories FDA anticipates providing 2105, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827– (CAP labs) will participate in a special approximately $50,000 total costs 7168, FAX: 301–827–7101, email: Cooperative Agreement program to (direct costs only) in support of this [email protected]. enhance their ability to handle human supplemental program in fiscal year pathogenic bacteria in animal feed. This 2010. It is estimated that up to six SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: additional program will be compatible microbiological laboratories will be I. Funding Opportunity Description with other FERN Cooperative supplemented at the level requested, but Agreement work that the selected not exceeding $50,000 total costs (direct For more information on the original laboratories will be performing. This costs only) for a 1-year minor program funding opportunity announcement special program will involve screening expansion. (FOA) for the FERN Microbiological and detection studies for selected Laboratories, please refer to the full pathogens (Listeria, Salmonella, B. Length of Support FOA located at http://grants.nih.gov/ Escherichia coli O157:H7 and generic E. The initial award will be for a 1-year grants/guide/pa-files/PAR–09–215.html. coli). The isolates will be tested using performance period and any additional The program is further described in the methods agreed upon in consultation funding related to this supplement will Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance with the Center for Veterinary be dependant on successful under 93.103. Medicine’s (CVM) Office of Research, performance and fiscal appropriations. A. Background most of which are already being used to isolate these organisms from human III. Paper Application and Submission This Federal Register announcement foods. The selected labs will participate Information issued by FDA under the FERN in FERN food defense/food safety To submit an application in response Microbiological Cooperative Agreement to this supplemental notice, applicants Program Grant mechanism (U18) is to assignments. The participation in this should download the PHS–398 form at solicit applications from existing FERN cooperative agreement will expand the http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/ Microbiology Laboratories to enhance ability of FERN to screen for potential phs398/phs398.html. current Cooperative Agreement Program foodborne pathogens in these feed matrices. In addition, this project will Submit the paper application to: (CAP) capabilities. The FERN Camille R. Peake, Food and Drug cooperative agreements are to enable the provide CVM with information needed to assess future testing needs. Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, analyses of foods and food products in rm. 2105, Rockville, MD 20857, the event that laboratory surge capacity C. Eligibility Information 301–827–7168; and is needed by FERN and FDA for Jenny Gabb, Office of Regulatory analyses related to microbiological These supplemental grant funds are only available to existing grant Affairs (HFC–150), Food and Drug contamination, either through Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, intentional or unintentional means. The recipients from State, local, and tribal government FERN laboratories and are rm. 12–07, Rockville, MD 20857, supplemental grant funds will enable 301–827–8299. analyses of human pathogenic bacteria authorized by section 312 of the Public found in animal feed, for samples Health Security and Bioterrorism Dated: August 24, 2010. collected by Federal, State, or local Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 Leslie Kux, agencies. Numbers of samples and (Public Law 107–188) (42 U.S.C. 247b- Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy. scheduling of samples will be done by 20). This program is described in the [FR Doc. 2010–21480 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Catalog of Federal Assistance under the FERN National Program Office BILLING CODE 4160–01–S (NPO) in coordination with State/local number 93.448. All projects developed lab authorities. with these funds at State, local, and These supplemental grant funds will tribal levels must have national DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND also be utilized to enhance animal feed implication or application that can HUMAN SERVICES analysis results through the usage of enhance Federal food and feed safety standardized methods, equipment and security programs. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality platforms (provided by the grant), D. Requirements analytical worksheets, and electronic Solicitation for Nominations for reporting. The supplemental funds will Laboratories will be selected based on Members of the U.S. Preventive also provide training and proficiency the following criteria: • Services Task Force (USPSTF) testing for each method/platform. If it’s an existing FDA FERN Minimal quality management systems Microbiological Cooperative Agreement AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research will be initiated for each lab, based on Laboratory; and Quality (AHRQ), HHS. • If it has routine microbiological existing systems in place in each lab ACTION: Solicits nominations for new and consultations between the FERN capabilities as demonstrated through members of USPSTF. NPO and each lab management group. established, ongoing State testing Each laboratory shall develop its own programs, preferably those involving SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare consensus decisionmaking, size, and animal feed testing; Research and Quality (AHRQ) invites format. Federal agency representatives • If it participates in FERN Food nominations of individuals qualified to may be invited to be nonmember Safety/Food Defense surveillance serve as members of the U.S. Preventive liaisons or advisors to the laboratory assignments; Services Task Force (USPSTF).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52959

The USPSTF, a standing, independent may be selected based on their expertise AHRQ will later ask persons under panel of non-Federal experts that makes in methodological issues such as serious consideration for membership to evidence-based recommendations to the medical decisionmaking, clinical provide detailed information that will health care community and the public epidemiology, behavioral medicine, permit evaluation of possible significant regarding the provision of clinical health equity, and health economics. conflicts of interest. Such information preventive services, see 42 U.S.C. 299b– For individuals with clinical expertise will concern matters such as financial 4(a), is composed of members appointed in primary health care, additional holdings, consultancies, and research to serve for four-year terms with an qualifications in one or more of these grants or contracts. option for reappointment. New areas would enhance their candidacy. Nominee Selection members are selected each year to Consideration will be given to replace approximately one fourth of the individuals who are recognized Appointments to the USPSTF will be USPSTF members, i.e., those who are nationally for scientific leadership made on the basis of qualifications as completing their appointments. within their field of expertise. outlined above (see Qualification Individuals nominated but not Applicants must have no substantial Requirements) and the current expertise appointed in previous years, as well as conflicts of interest, whether financial, needs of the USPSTF. those newly nominated, are considered professional, or other conflicts, that Arrangement for Public Inspection in the annual selection process. would impair the scientific integrity of USPSTF members meet three times a the work of the USPSTF. Nominations and applications are kept on file at the Center for Primary year for two days in the Washington, DC DATES: All nominations submitted in Care, Prevention, and Clinical area. Between meetings, member duties writing or electronically, and received Partnerships, AHRQ, and are available include reviewing and preparing by Friday, October 1, 2010, will be for review during business hours. AHRQ comments (off site) on systematic considered for appointment to the does not reply to individual evidence reviews prior to discussing USPSTF. and making recommendations on Nominated individuals will be nominations, but considers all preventive services, drafting final selected for the USPSTF on the basis of nominations in selecting members. recommendation documents, and their qualifications (in particular, those Information regarded as private and participating in workgroups on specific that address the required qualifications, personal, such as a nominee’s social topics or methods. outlined above) and the current security number, home and e-mail A diversity of perspectives is valuable expertise needs of the USPSTF. It is addresses, home telephone and fax to the work of the USPSTF. To help anticipated that two or three individuals numbers, or names of family members obtain a diversity of perspectives among will be invited to serve on the USPSTF will not be disclosed to the public. This nominees, AHRQ particularly beginning in January, 2011. All is in accord with AHRQ confidentiality encourages nominations of women, individuals will be considered; policies and Department of Health and members of minority populations, and however, strongest consideration will be Human Services regulations (45 CFR persons with disabilities. Interested given to individuals with demonstrated 5.67). individuals can self nominate. training and expertise in a specific area FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Organizations and individuals may such as family medicine, internal Gloria Washington at nominate one or more persons qualified medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, [email protected]. for membership on the USPSTF. pediatrics, nursing, behavioral Qualification Requirements: The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: medicine, health equity or methodology. mission of the USPSTF is to review the AHRQ will retain and consider for Background scientific evidence related to the future vacancies the nominations of effectiveness and appropriateness of Under Title IX of the Public Health those not selected during this cycle. clinical preventive services for the Service Act, AHRQ is charged with purpose of developing ADDRESSES: Submit your responses enhancing the quality, appropriateness, recommendations for the health care either in writing or electronically to: and effectiveness of health care services community. Therefore, in order to Gloria Washington, ATTN: USPSTF and access to such services. 42 U.S.C. qualify for the USPSTF, an applicant or Nominations, Center for Primary Care, 299(b). AHRQ accomplishes these goals nominee MUST demonstrate the Prevention, and Clinical Partnerships, through scientific research and following: Agency for Healthcare Research and promotion of improvements in clinical 1. Knowledge and experience in the Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, practice, including clinical prevention critical evaluation of research published Maryland 20850, of diseases and other health conditions, in peer reviewed literature and in the [email protected]. and improvements in the organization, financing, and delivery of health care methods of evidence review; Nomination Submissions 2. Understanding and experience in services. See 42 U.S.C. 299(b). the application of synthesized evidence Nominations may be submitted in The USPSTF is a panel of non-Federal to clinical decisionmaking and/or writing or electronically, but must experts that makes independent policy; include: evidence-based recommendations 3. Expertise in disease prevention and (1) The applicant’s current curriculum regarding the provision of clinical health promotion; vitae and contact information, including preventive services. See 42 U.S.C. 299b– 4. Ability to work collaboratively with mailing address, e-mail address, and 4(a). The USPSTF was first established peers; and telephone number and in 1984 under the auspices of the U.S. 5. Clinical expertise in the primary (2) A letter explaining how this Public Health Service. Currently, the health care of children and/or adults, individual meets the qualification USPSTF is convened by the Director of and/or expertise in counseling and requirements and how he/she would AHRQ, and AHRQ provides ongoing behavioral interventions for primary contribute to the USPSTF. The letter administrative, research and technical care patients. should also attest to the nominee’s support for the USPSTF’s operation. Some USPSTF members without willingness to serve as a member of the The USPSTF is charged with rigorously primary health care clinical experience USPSTF. evaluating the effectiveness and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52960 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

appropriateness of clinical preventive e-mail at the initial period of performance is services and formulating or updating [email protected]. scheduled to end on September 30, recommendations for primary care SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2010. Section 10313 of the Patient clinicians regarding the appropriate Protection and Affordable Care Act provision of preventive services. See 42 I. Background (ACA), (Pub. L. 111–148) mandates an U.S.C. 299b–4(a)(1). AHRQ is charged Section 410A(a) of Public Law 108– extension and expansion of the Rural with the dissemination of 173 required the Secretary to establish Community Hospital demonstration for recommendations. In addition to hard a demonstration program to test the 5 years. In order for other hospitals to copy materials (that may be obtained feasibility and advisability of begin participation in this new from the Publications Clearing house), establishing cost-based reimbursement demonstration for the 5-year extension current USPSTF recommendations and for ‘‘rural community hospitals’’ to period, rural community hospitals must associated evidence reviews are furnish covered inpatient hospital be located among the 20 States with the available on the Internet (http:// services to Medicare beneficiaries. The lowest population density—according to [email protected]). demonstration pays rural community the same criteria and data as the original demonstration. These States are: Alaska, Dated: August 18, 2010. hospitals for such services under a cost- Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Carolyn M. Clancy, based methodology for Medicare payment purposes for covered inpatient Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, Director. Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, [FR Doc. 2010–21500 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] hospital services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries. A rural community Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, BILLING CODE 4160–90–M Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, hospital, as defined in section and Wyoming. (Source: U.S. Census 410A(f)(1) of Public Law 108–173, is a Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the hospital that— DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND United States: 2003). The statute States • Has fewer than 51 acute care HUMAN SERVICES that no more than 30 rural community inpatient beds (excluding beds in a hospitals can participate, and that those Centers for Medicare & Medicaid distinct psychiatric or rehabilitation hospitals participating in the Services unit of the hospital) as reported in its demonstration program as of the date of most recent cost report; [CMS–5051–N] the last day of the initial 5-year period • Provides 24-hour emergency care will be allowed to continue in the services; and Medicare Program; Rural Community program. Up to 20 additional hospitals • Is not designated or eligible for Hospital Demonstration Program: will be able to begin participation in the designation as a critical access hospital Solicitation of Additional Participants demonstration. under section 1820 of the Social AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Security Act (the Act). II. Provisions of the Notice Medicaid Services (CMS). Section 410A(a)(4) of Public Law 108– This notice announces the solicitation ACTION: Notice. 173 specified that the Secretary was to for up to 20 additional hospitals to select for participation from among the SUMMARY: This notice announces a participate in the Rural Community applicants no more than 15 rural solicitation for up to 20 additional Hospital Demonstration Program. community hospitals in rural areas of eligible hospitals to participate in the Hospitals that enter the demonstration States that the Secretary identified as Rural Community Hospital under this solicitation will be able to having low population densities. Using Demonstration program for a 5-year participate for 5 years. 2002 data from the U.S. Census Bureau, period. we identified the 10 States with the A. Demonstration Payment Methodology DATES: Application Submission lowest population density in which Hospitals selected for the Deadline: Applications must be received rural community hospitals were to be demonstration will be paid the by 5 p.m. on or before October 14, 2010. located in order to participate in the reasonable costs of providing covered Only applications that are considered demonstration: Alaska, Idaho, Montana, inpatient hospital services, with the ‘‘timely’’ will be reviewed and Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North exclusion of services furnished in a considered by the technical panel. Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and psychiatric or rehabilitation unit that is ADDRESSES: The applications should be Wyoming. (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, a distinct part of the hospital, using the mailed or sent by an overnight delivery Statistical Abstract of the United States: following rules. For discharges service to the following address: Centers 2003). We solicited eligible hospitals occurring— for Medicare & Medicaid Services, among these States in 2004 and again in • In the first cost report period upon ATTN: Sid Mazumdar, Rural 2008. There are currently 10 hospitals the hospital’s participation in the Community Hospital Demonstration, participating in the demonstration. demonstration, reasonable costs for Medicare Demonstrations Program The demonstration is designed to test covered inpatient services; or Group, Mail Stop C4–17–27, 7500 the feasibility and advisability of • During the second or subsequent Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD reasonable cost reimbursement for cost reporting period, the lesser of their 21244–1850. inpatient services to small rural reasonable costs or a target amount. The Please allow sufficient time for mailed hospitals. The demonstration is aimed target amount in the second cost information to be received in a timely at increasing the capability of the reporting period is defined as the manner in the event of delivery delays. selected rural hospitals to meet the reasonable costs of providing covered Because of staffing and resource needs of their service areas. inpatient hospital services in the first limitations, and because we require an Section 410A(a)(5) of Public Law 108– cost reporting period, increased by the application containing an original 173 required a 5-year demonstration inpatient prospective payment system signature, we cannot accept applications period of participation. The 5-year update factor (as defined in section by facsimile (Fax) transmission. periods of performance for the hospitals 1886(b)(3)(B) of the Act) for that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sid originally selected will end by June 30, particular cost reporting period. The Mazumdar at (410) 786–6673 or by 2010. For the hospitals selected in 2008, target amount in subsequent cost

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52961

reporting periods is defined as the submit the information to CMS. The 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA preceding cost reporting period’s target burden associated with this requirement 20598–6011. amount increased by the hospital is currently approved under the Office FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: inpatient prospective payment system of Management and Budget control Joanna Johnson at the above address, or (IPPS) update factor for that particular number 0938–0880 with an expiration by telephone (571) 227–3651. cost reporting period. date of November 20, 2010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Covered inpatient hospital services Authority: Section 10313 of the Patient means inpatient hospital services Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. Comments Invited (defined in section 1861(b) of the Act) 111–148) In accordance with the Paperwork and includes extended care services (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 furnished under an agreement under Program No. 93.773 Medicare—Hospital et seq.), an agency may not conduct or section 1883 of the Act. Insurance Program; and No. 93.774, Section 410A of Public Law 108–173 sponsor, and a person is not required to Medicare—Supplementary Medical respond to, a collection of information requires that, ‘‘in conducting the Insurance Program). unless it displays a valid OMB control demonstration program under this Dated: June 22, 2010. section, the Secretary shall ensure that number. The ICR documentation is Marilyn Tavenner, the aggregate payments made by the available at http://www.reginfo.gov. Secretary do not exceed the amount Acting Administrator and Chief Operating Therefore, in preparation for OMB Officer, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid review and approval of the following which the Secretary would have paid if Services. the demonstration program under this information collection, TSA is inviting section was not implemented.’’ In order [FR Doc. 2010–21512 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] comments to— to achieve budget neutrality for this BILLING CODE P (1) Evaluate whether the proposed demonstration program in fiscal years information requirement is necessary for (FYs) 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 2010, we adjusted the national IPPS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND information will have practical utility; rates by an amount sufficient to offset SECURITY the added costs of this demonstration (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the program. We presented an estimate of Transportation Security Administration agency’s estimate of the burden; the amount to offset additional costs (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and due to the demonstration program in FY [Docket No. TSA–2003–14610] clarity of the information to be 2011, including the costs of additional collected; and rural community hospitals, in the FY Intent To Request Renewal From OMB (4) Minimize the burden of the 2011 inpatient prospective payment of One Current Public Collection of collection of information on those who system/long-term care hospital Information: Security Threat are to respond, including using prospective payment system (IPPS/ Assessment for Individuals Applying appropriate automated, electronic, LTCH PPS) supplemental proposed rule for a Hazardous Materials mechanical, or other technological (see the June 2, 2010 Federal Register Endorsement for a Commercial Drivers collection techniques or other forms of (75 FR 30918)). License information technology. B. Participation in the Demonstration AGENCY: Transportation Security Information Collection Requirement Administration, DHS. To participate in the demonstration, a OMB Control Number 1652–0027; hospital must be located in one of the ACTION: 60 day Notice. Security Threat Assessment for Individuals Applying for a Hazardous identified States with low-population SUMMARY: The Transportation Security density and meet the criteria for a rural Materials Endorsement for a Administration (TSA) invites public Commercial Drivers License, 49 CFR community hospital. Eligible hospitals comment on one currently approved that desire to participate in the part 1572. TSA is requesting renewal of Information Collection Request (ICR), the currently approved ICR with minor demonstration must properly submit a Office of Management and Budget timely application. Information about changes. This collection supports the (OMB) control number 1652–0027, implementation of section 1012 of the the demonstration and details on how to abstracted below that we will submit to apply can be found on the CMS Web USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. 107–56, 115 OMB for renewal in compliance with Stat. 272, 396, Oct. 26, 2001), which site: http://www.cms.gov/ the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). DemoProjectsEvalRpts/downloads/ mandates that no State or the District of _ _ _ The ICR describes the nature of the Columbia may issue a hazardous 2004 Rural Community information collection and its expected Hospital_Demonstration_Program.pdf. materials endorsement (HME) on a burden. The collection involves commercial driver’s license (CDL) III. Collection of Information applicant submission of biometric and unless TSA has first determined the Requirements biographic information for TSA’s driver is not a threat to transportation The information collection security threat assessment in order to security. On November 24, 2004, TSA requirements contained in this notice obtain the hazardous materials published the final rule in the Federal are subject to the Paperwork Reduction endorsement (HME) on a commercial Register (69 FR 68720), codified at 49 Act of 1995. As discussed in section drivers license (CDL) issued by the U.S. CFR part 1572, that describes the II.B. of this notice, a hospital must States and the District of Columbia. procedures, standards, and eligibility submit the required information on the DATES: Send your comments by October criteria for security threat assessments cover sheet of the CMS Medicare Waiver 29, 2010. on individuals seeking to obtain, renew, Demonstration Application to receive ADDRESSES: Comments may be e-mailed or transfer a HME on a CDL. TSA consideration by the technical review to [email protected] or delivered to the subsequently amended the rule on panel. The burden associated is the time TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3492). In order and effort necessary to complete the Technology (OIT), TSA–11, to conduct the security threat Medicare Waiver Application and Transportation Security Administration, assessment, States (or TSA’s agent in

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52962 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

States that elect to have TSA perform DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ACTION: Notice. the collection of information) must SECURITY collect information in addition to that SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice already collected for the purpose of Federal Emergency Management of a major disaster declaration for the HME applications, which will occur Agency State of Iowa (FEMA–1930–DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related once approximately every five years. [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–3313– determinations. The driver is required to submit an EM; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] application that includes personal DATES: Effective Date: August 23, 2010. biographic information (for instance, Texas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: height, weight, eye and hair color, date an Emergency Declaration Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, of birth); information concerning legal Federal Emergency Management AGENCY: Federal Emergency Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, status, mental health defects history, Management Agency, DHS. and criminal history; as well as DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. ACTION: fingerprints. TSA is amending the Notice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice application to collect optional minor SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the additional information, such as U.S. of an emergency declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to Department of State forms showing birth State of Texas (FEMA–3313–EM), dated include the following areas among those abroad to U.S. citizens and U.S. June 29, 2010, and related areas determined to have been adversely passport number. This information determinations. affected by the event declared a major helps the applicant prove U.S. disaster by the President in his DATES: Effective Date: August 14, 2010. citizenship even though the applicant declaration of July 29, 2010. was born abroad. Also, the application FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Calhoun, Clarke, Dallas, Keokuk, and will ask the applicant to state whether Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Washington Counties for Public Assistance. he is a new applicant, or is applying to Federal Emergency Management Hamilton and Ida Counties for Public renew or transfer the HME. This will Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, Assistance (already designated for Individual DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. Assistance). enable the program to better understand The following Catalog of Federal Domestic and forecast driver retention, transfer SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident period for Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used rate, and drop-rate to help improve for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, customer service, reduce program costs, this emergency is closed effective Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora and provide comparability with other August 14, 2010. Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; Federal background checks, including The following Catalog of Federal Domestic 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, the Transportation Workers Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; Identification Credential (TWIC). TSA is for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to removing items concerning military Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; Individuals and Households In Presidentially service. In addition, the rule (49 CFR 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, part 1572) requires States to maintain a Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— copy of the driver application for a 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals period of one year. 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals These changes should reduce the Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, burden on applicants, States, and TSA. Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Disaster Grants—Public Assistance By receiving this information during the Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, application process, requests for and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Hazard Mitigation Grant. Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals additional information or W. Craig Fugate, and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, documentation will be reduced during Administrator, Federal Emergency the post-adjudication process. Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Management Agency. From 2011 through 2013, TSA Hazard Mitigation Grant. [FR Doc. 2010–21603 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] estimates respondent drivers will spend BILLING CODE 9111–23–P approximately 2.9 million hours on the W. Craig Fugate, application and background check Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. process. TSA estimates an annualized DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 300,000 respondents will apply for an [FR Doc. 2010–21601 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] SECURITY HME, and that the application and BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Federal Emergency Management background check process will involve Agency 975,000 annualized hours. TSA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND estimates the total costs to respondent SECURITY [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1931– drivers will be $80.3 million over the DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] three-year period ($27 million Federal Emergency Management Texas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of annualized). Agency a Major Disaster Declaration Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on August [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1930– AGENCY: 19, 2010. DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. Joanna Johnson, Iowa; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a ACTION: Notice. Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of Major Disaster Declaration Information Technology. SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice [FR Doc. 2010–21316 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] AGENCY: Federal Emergency of a major disaster declaration for the BILLING CODE 9110–05–P Management Agency, DHS. State of Texas (FEMA–1931–DR), dated

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52963

August 3, 2010, and related areas determined to have been adversely sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant determinations. affected by the event declared a major a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency DATES: Effective Date: August 14, 2010. disaster by the President in his declaration of August 3, 2010. Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ‘‘Stafford Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Dawson County for Public Assistance. a major disaster exists in the State of Illinois. Federal Emergency Management (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic In order to provide Federal assistance, you Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used are hereby authorized to allocate from funds Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, available for these purposes such amounts as DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora you find necessary for Federal disaster SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; assistance and administrative expenses. hereby given that the incident period for 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, You are authorized to provide Individual this disaster is closed effective August Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); Assistance in the designated areas and 14, 2010. 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Consistent with the requirement that Federal The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Individuals and Households In Presidentially assistance is supplemental, any Federal Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, funds provided under the Stafford Act for for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals Assistance will be limited to 75 percent of Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; and Households; 97.050 Presidentially the total eligible costs. 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals Further, you are authorized to make Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, changes to this declaration for the approved 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; Disaster Grants—Public Assistance assistance to the extent allowable under the 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Stafford Act. Individuals and Households In Presidentially Hazard Mitigation Grant.) Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, The time period prescribed for the Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— W. Craig Fugate, implementation of section 310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals Administrator, Federal Emergency and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Management Agency. Public Facility and Public Housing Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, [FR Doc. 2010–21598 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] a period not to exceed six months after Disaster Grants—Public Assistance BILLING CODE 9111–23–P the date of this declaration. (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, The Federal Emergency Management Hazard Mitigation Grant. Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND pursuant to the authority vested in the W. Craig Fugate, SECURITY Administrator, Federal Emergency Administrator, under Executive Order Management Agency. Federal Emergency Management 12148, as amended, Gregory W. Eaton, [FR Doc. 2010–21599 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Agency of FEMA is appointed to act as the BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Federal Coordinating Officer for this [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1935– major disaster. DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] The following areas of the State of Illinois have been designated as DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND Illinois; Major Disaster and Related adversely affected by this major disaster: SECURITY Determinations Carroll, Cook, DuPage, Jo Daviess, Ogle, Federal Emergency Management AGENCY: Federal Emergency Stephenson, and Winnebago Counties for Agency Management Agency, DHS. Individual Assistance. ACTION: Notice. All counties within the State of Illinois are [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1931– eligible to apply for assistance under the DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Presidential declaration of a major The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Texas; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used a Major Disaster Declaration disaster for the State of Illinois (FEMA– 1935–DR), dated August 19, 2010, and for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora AGENCY: Federal Emergency related determinations. Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; Management Agency, DHS. DATES: Effective Date: August 19, 2010. 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, ACTION: Notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to of a major disaster declaration for the Federal Emergency Management Individuals and Households In Presidentially State of Texas (FEMA–1931–DR), dated Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, August 3, 2010, and related DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— determinations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals hereby given that, in a letter dated and Households; 97.050, Presidentially DATES: Effective Date: August 18, 2010. August 19, 2010, the President issued a Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: major disaster declaration under the and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, authority of the Robert T. Stafford Federal Emergency Management (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Disaster Relief and Emergency Hazard Mitigation Grant. Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’), as follows: W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice I have determined that the damage in Management Agency. of a major disaster declaration for the certain areas of the State of Illinois resulting State of Texas is hereby amended to from severe storms and flooding during the [FR Doc. 2010–21605 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] include the following area among those period of July 22 to August 7, 2010, is of BILLING CODE 9111–23–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52964 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND The following areas of the State of Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by electronic SECURITY Missouri have been designated as mail at [email protected] or adversely affected by this major disaster: by fax at 202–395–5806. Please also Federal Emergency Management Adair, Andrew, Atchison, Buchanan, send a copy of your comments to the Agency Caldwell, Carroll, Cass, Chariton, Clark, Department of the Interior; Office of [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1934– Clinton, Daviess, DeKalb, Gentry, Grundy, Policy Analysis, Attention: Don DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] Harrison, Holt, Howard, Jackson, Lafayette, Bieniewicz, Mail Stop 3530; 1849 C Lewis, Livingston, Mercer, Nodaway, Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240. If Missouri; Major Disaster and Related Putnam, Ray, Schuyler, Scotland, Sullivan, you wish to e-mail comments, the e- Determinations and Worth Counties for Public Assistance. mail address is All counties within the State of Missouri [email protected]. AGENCY: Federal Emergency are eligible to apply for assistance under the ‘‘ Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Reference Klamath Non-use valuation Management Agency, DHS. survey’’ in your e-mail subject line. ACTION: Notice. The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used Include your name and return address in your e-mail message and mark your SUMMARY: This is a notice of the for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Presidential declaration of a major Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora message for return receipt. disaster for the State of Missouri Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; DATES: OMB has 60 days to review this (FEMA–1934–DR), dated August 17, 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, request but may act after 30 days, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 2010, and related determinations. therefore you should submit your 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; comments on or before September 29, DATES: Effective Date: August 17, 2010. 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Individuals and Households In Presidentially Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate, Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Emergency Management Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Benjamin Simon, Economics Staff Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals Director, Office of Policy Analysis, U.S. Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, and Households; 97.050, Presidentially DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. Department of the Interior telephone at Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals 202–208–5978 or by e-mail at SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, [email protected]. hereby given that, in a letter dated Disaster Grants—Public Assistance August 17, 2010, the President issued a (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Hazard Mitigation Grant. major disaster declaration under the I. Abstract authority of the Robert T. Stafford W. Craig Fugate, Disaster Relief and Emergency Office of Management and Budget Administrator, Federal Emergency (OMB) regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. Management Agency. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’), as follows: implement the Paperwork Reduction [FR Doc. 2010–21604 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), require I have determined that the damage in BILLING CODE 9111–23–P that interested members of the public certain areas of the State of Missouri and affected agencies have an resulting from severe storms, flooding, and tornadoes during the period of June 12 to July opportunity to comment on information 31, 2010, is of sufficient severity and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR collection and recordkeeping activities magnitude to warrant a major disaster (see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)). This notice declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Office of the Secretary identifies an information collection Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance activity that the Office of the Secretary Revision of Information Collection; Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford will submit to OMB for revision. Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such a major Non-Use Valuation Survey, Klamath The Klamath River provides habitat disaster exists in the State of Missouri. Basin for fall and spring run Chinook salmon In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds AGENCY: U.S. Department of the Interior. (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho available for these purposes such amounts as ACTION: Notice; request for comments. salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), you find necessary for Federal disaster steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), assistance and administrative expenses. SUMMARY: In compliance with section green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris), You are authorized to provide Public 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentate), Assistance in the designated areas and Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the and Pacific eulachon (Thaleichthys Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Secretary of the Department of the pacificus). Some of these species are Consistent with the requirement that Federal Interior announces the proposed important components of non-tribal assistance is supplemental, any Federal revision of an information collection harvest (e.g., fall Chinook, steelhead), funds provided under the Stafford Act for ‘‘Klamath Non-use Valuation Survey,’’ Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will some have important subsistence and be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible Office of Management and Budget cultural value to Klamath Basin tribes costs. (OMB) Control No. 1090–0010, and that (e.g., salmon, sturgeon, lamprey, Further, you are authorized to make it is seeking comments on its provisions. eulachon), and some are at low levels of changes to this declaration for the approved As required by the Paperwork abundance or Endangered Species Act- assistance to the extent allowable under the Reduction Act of 1995 and as part of our listed (e.g., spring Chinook, lamprey, Stafford Act. continuing efforts to reduce paperwork coho, eulachon). In addition to its The Federal Emergency Management and respondent burden, we invite the importance as fish habitat, the Klamath Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that general public and other Federal River also provides water to agriculture pursuant to the authority vested in the agencies to take this opportunity to through the Bureau of Reclamation’s Administrator, under Executive Order comment on this information collection. Klamath Irrigation Project. 12148, as amended, Jose M. Girot, of ADDRESSES: You may submit your Oversubscription of Klamath water has FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal comments directly to the Desk Officer thwarted recovery of depressed fish Coordinating Officer for this major for the Department of the Interior (OMB stocks and led to economic hardship for disaster. 1090–0010), Office of Information and farming and fishing communities—

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52965

prompting Federal disaster relief for respondents and 7,496 non- (4) Ways to minimize the burden of farmers in 2001 and for fishermen in respondents). the collection of information on those 2006. Estimated Total Annual Responses: who are to respond, including through In November 2008 the U.S. 3,389. the use of appropriate automated, Government, the States of Oregon and Estimated Time per Response: The electronic, mechanical, or other California, and the utility company base for this survey is 10,885 collection techniques or other forms of PacifiCorp signed an agreement in households. The households will be information technology. principle (AIP) to remove four divided into two mailing groups, at a Burden means the total time, effort, or hydroelectric dams on the Klamath 10/90 split. The first wave of mailings financial resources expended by persons River by 2020. Dam removal is being will be to 10% of the households. 17% to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or considered a viable alternative to of households are estimated to respond, prove information to or for a Federal volitional fish passage (ladders and which will take 30 minutes. Non- agency. screens), which was being considered respondents will take 3 minutes. The An agency may not conduct or by the Federal Energy Regulatory second mailing will be sent to the sponsor, and a person is not required to Commission (FERC) as a condition for remaining 83% of non-respondent respond to, a collection of information relicensing of PacifiCorp’s hydroelectric households. 10% of the households are unless it displays a currently valid project. Parties to the AIP are working estimated to respond to the second Office of Management and Budget with stakeholders (including tribes, mailing, taking 30 minutes. The second control number. fishers, farmers, conservation groups, group of non-respondents are estimated Dated: August 25, 2010. and local governments) to reach a final to spend 3 minutes. The Department Benjamin M. Simon, agreement that would result in the will then conduct preliminary analysis. Economics Staff Director, Office of Policy largest dam removal project in U.S. The second wave of mailings will be Analysis. history. If achieved, this agreement will to the remaining 90% of the households. [FR Doc. 2010–21521 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] be part of a comprehensive solution to 17% of households are estimated to BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P species recovery, water allocation, and respond, which will take 30 minutes. water quality problems in the Klamath Non-respondents will take 3 minutes. Basin. The second phase will be sent to the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR In October 2011 the Secretary of the remaining 83% of non-respondent Interior is expected to make a final households. 10% of the households are Fish and Wildlife Service determination regarding dam removal, estimated to respond to the second [FWS–R2–ES–2010–N180; 20124–1113– contingent on results of an economic mailing, taking 30 minutes. The second 0000–F5] analysis that will address benefits, costs, group of non-respondents are estimated and distributional effects of dam to spend 3 minutes. Endangered and Threatened Species removal relative to volitional fish The remaining non-respondents from Permit Applications passage. Dam removal is expected to the second mailings will be split into AGENCY: have positive long-term effects on the Fish and Wildlife Service, two groups in a 80/20 split. It is Interior. viability of fish populations and other assumed that 65% of the non- aspects of the Klamath Basin ecosystem. ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications; respondent households will have a request for public comment. Benefits of these environmental phone number. Both groups will be sent improvements include ‘‘non-use values,’’ another copy of the survey. For the SUMMARY: The following applicants have which accrue to members of the public households with a phone number, a non applied for scientific research permits to who value such improvements response bias call will be made, taking conduct certain activities with regardless of whether they ever an estimated 2 to 5 minutes. endangered species under the consume Klamath fish or visit the Estimated Total Annual Burden Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Klamath Basin. An information Hours: 3,205 hours. amended (Act). The Act requires that we collection is planned in order to invite public comment on these permit implement a state-of-the-art non-use III. Request for Comments applications. valuation survey of the U.S. public that On June 9, 2009, we published in the DATES: To ensure consideration, written addresses the incremental Federal Register (74 FR 27340) a request comments must be received on or before environmental improvements of dam for public comments on this proposed September 29, 2010. removal relative to volitional fish survey. No comments were received. ADDRESSES: Written comments should passage. This data collection is intended This notice provides the public with an be submitted to the Chief, Endangered to address one component of an additional 30 days in which to comment Species Division, Ecological Services, economic analysis that will include all on the proposed information collection P.O. Box 1306, Room 6034, costs and benefits of dam removal activity. The Department of the Interior Albuquerque, NM 87103. Documents relative to volitional fish passage. invites comments on: and other information submitted with II. Data (1) Whether or not the collection of these applications are available for information is necessary for the proper Title: Klamath Non-Use Valuation review, subject to the requirements of performance of the functions of the the Privacy Act and Freedom of Survey. OMB Control Number: 1090–0010. agency, including whether the Information Act. Documents will be Type of Review: Revision of an information will have practical utility; available for public inspection, by approved collection. (2) The accuracy of the agency’s appointment only, during normal Affected Entities: Households. estimate of the burden of the collection business hours at the U.S. Fish and Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. and the validity of the methodology and Wildlife Service, 500 Gold Ave., SW., Frequency of Response: One time. assumptions used; Room 6034, Albuquerque, NM. Please Estimated Annual Number of (3) Ways to enhance the quality, refer to the respective permit number for Respondents: 10,885 households who utility, and clarity of the information to each application when submitting will receive the survey (3,389 be collected; and comments.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52966 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Permit TE–236730 person who meets the conditions and Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Endangered Applicant: Timothy Bonner, San files a protest must file the protest Species Division, P.O. Box 1306, Marcos, Texas. within 30 days of the date that EPA Albuquerque, NM 87103; (505) 248– Applicant requests an amendment to publishes its NOA in the Federal 6920. a current permit for research and Register. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: recovery purposes to conduct presence/ ADDRESSES: Copies of the Proposed Plan absence surveys for fountain darter Amendment/Final EIS for the GSEP Public Availability of Comments (Etheostoma fonticola), San Marcos have been sent to affected Federal, state, Before including your address, phone gambusia (Gambusia georgei), Comal and local government agencies and to number, e-mail address, or other Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis other stakeholders. Copies of the personal identifying information in your comalensis), Texas wild-rice (Zizania Proposed Plan Amendment/Final EIS comment, you should be aware that texana), and Texas blind salamander are available for public inspection at the your entire comment—including your (Eurycea rathbuni) within Texas. Palm Springs South Coast Field Office, personal identifying information—may Permit TE–20166A 1201 Bird Center Drive, Palm Springs, be made publicly available at any time. California 92262. Interested persons While you can ask us in your comment Applicant: Trinity Bey, Boerne, Texas. may also review the document at the Applicant requests a new permit for to withhold your personal identifying following Web site: http://www.blm.gov/ research and recovery purposes to information from public review, we ca/st/en/fo/palmsprings/Solar_Projects/ conduct presence/absence surveys for cannot guarantee that we will be able to Genesis_Ford_Dry_Lake.html. Submit golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica do so. comments on the Final EIS to the Palm chrysoparia) within Texas. Springs South Coast Field Office at the Permit TE–13850A Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. address above or e-mail them to Applicant: Jarrod Edens, Fort Worth, Dated: August 18, 2010. [email protected]. Texas. Regional Director, Southwest Region, Fish All protests must be in writing and Applicant requests a new permit for and Wildlife Service. mailed to one of the following addresses: research and recovery purposes to [FR Doc. 2010–21502 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] conduct presence/absence surveys for BILLING CODE 4310–55–P Regular Mail: BLM Director (210), American burying beetle (Nicrophorus Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box americanus) within Oklahoma, 66538, Washington, DC 20035. Arkansas, and Texas. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Overnight Mail: BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, 1620 L Permit TE–037155 Bureau of Land Management Street, NW., Suite 1075, Washington, Applicant: Bio-West, Inc., Round [CACA 048880, LLCAD06000, DC 20036. Rock, Texas. L51010000.FX0000, LVRWB09B2520] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Applicant requests an amendment to Allison Shaffer, BLM Project Manager, a current permit for research and Notice of Availability of the Final telephone (760) 833–7100; address (see recovery purposes to conduct presence/ Environmental Impact Statement for ADDRESSES, above); or e-mail absence surveys for Rio Grande silvery the Genesis Solar, LLC Genesis Solar [email protected]. Energy Project and Proposed minnow (Hybognathus amarus) and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Genesis southwestern willow flycatcher California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment Solar, LLC has submitted an application (Empidonax traillii extimus) along the to the BLM for development of the Rio Grande. AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, proposed GSEP, which would consist of Permit TE–17497A Interior. two independent solar electric ACTION: Notice of availability. generating facilities with a nominal net Applicant: Christa Weise, Tucson, electrical output of 125 megawatts (MW) Arizona. SUMMARY: In accordance with the each, resulting in a total net electrical Applicant requests a new permit for National Environmental Policy Act of output of 250 MW. The Proposed Action research and recovery purposes to 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the would be designed to utilize solar conduct presence/absence surveys for Federal Land Policy and Management parabolic trough technology to generate lesser long-nosed bat (Leptonycteris Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the electricity. yerbabuenae) within Arizona and New Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has Genesis Solar, LLC is seeking a right- Mexico and Mexican long-nosed bat prepared a Proposed California Desert of-way (ROW) grant for approximately (Leptonycteris nivalis) within New Conservation Act Plan Amendment/ 4,640 acres of land. Construction and Mexico and Texas. Final Environmental Impact Statement operation of the Proposed Action would (EIS) for Genesis Solar LLC’s Genesis Permit TE–17509A disturb a total of about 1,800 acres Solar Energy Project (GSEP) and by this within the site boundaries, and Applicant: University of Rhode notice is announcing its availability. approximately 90 acres for linear Island, Kingston, Rhode Island. DATES: The publication of the facilities and drainage features outside Applicant requests a new permit for Environmental Protection Agency’s the site boundaries. research and recovery purposes to (EPA) Notice of Availability (NOA) of The proposed GSEP would be obtain seeds of Welsh’s milkweed this Final EIS in the Federal Register approximately 27 miles east of the (Asclepias welshii) from the Arboretum initiates a 30-day public comment unincorporated community of Desert at Flagstaff (Permit TE–226653) at the period. In addition, the BLM’s planning Center and 25 miles west of the University’s greenhouse where regulations state that any person who Arizona-California border city of Blythe biological control agent testing will be meets the conditions as described in the in Riverside County, California. conducted inside their quarantine regulations may protest the BLM’s The Applicant proposes to construct facility. Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment. A the GSEP in two phases, which would

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52967

be designed to generate a combined total facilities on public lands, requires that addition of clarifying text and the of approximately 250 MW of electricity. all sites associated with power change in the preferred alternative from Phase 1 would consist of the Unit 1 generation or transmission not wet cooling to dry cooling technology, (western) power block, access road, identified in that Plan be considered but did not significantly change natural gas pipeline, and electric through the plan amendment process. If proposed land use plan decisions. transmission line. Phase 2 would the BLM decides to grant a ROW, the Instructions for filing a protest with consist of the Unit 2 (eastern) power BLM would also amend the CDCA Plan. the Director of the BLM regarding the block. The project would also include In the Final EIS, the BLM’s Preferred Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment may above-ground and subsurface fiber optic Alternative is the direct dry cooling be found in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’ Letter of lines. project alternative with a 250 nominal the Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment/ The overall site layout and MW output which includes a CDCA Final EIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. generalized land uses are characterized Plan Amendment. In addition to the E-mailed and faxed protests will not be as follows: Preferred Alternative, the Final EIS accepted as valid protests unless the 1. 250-MW facility including solar analyzes the following alternatives: The protesting party also provides the generation facilities; on-site switchyard proposed action with a 250 nominal original letter by either regular or (substation); administration, operations, MW output, wet-cooling technology and overnight mail postmarked by the close and maintenance facilities: an amendment the CDCA Plan to make of the protest period. Under these approximately 1,800 acres. the area suitable for solar energy conditions, the BLM will consider the 2. Two wastewater evaporation development; a reduced acreage e-mail or faxed protest as an advance ponds: Up to 30 acres each (located alternative which includes a 150 copy and it will receive full within the 1,800-acre site). nominal MW output, wet cooling consideration. If you wish to provide 3. A new generation-tie line to route technology, and an amendment to the the BLM with such advance generated electrical power transmitted CDCA Plan to make the area suitable for notification, please direct faxed protests from the GSEP switchyard by way of a solar energy development; and an to the attention of the BLM protest southeasterly ROW, that would connect amendment to the CDCA Plan without coordinator at (202) 912–7212, and e- to the Southern California Edison 500– approving any project. As required mails to Brenda_Hudgens- 230 kV Colorado River substation via under NEPA, the Final EIS analyzes a [email protected]. All protests, the existing Blythe Energy Project no action alternative, which would not including the follow-up letter to e-mails Transmission Line between the Julian approve the GSEP or amend the CDCA or faxes, must be in writing and mailed Hinds and Buck substations. Plan. The BLM also analyzes an to the appropriate address, as set forth 4. Additional linear facilities off-site, alternative that denies the GSEP, but in the ADDRESSES section above. including a 6.5-mile access road and amends the CDCA Plan to designate the Before including your phone number, natural gas pipeline. project area as suitable for other e-mail address, or other personal 5. Surface water control facilities for possible solar energy power generation identifying information in your protest, storm water flow and discharge. projects, and an alternative to deny the you should be aware that your entire 6. Temporary construction laydown project and amend the CDCA Plan to protest—including your personal area(s) within the larger site footprint. designate the project area as unsuitable identifying information—may be made No additional laydown areas outside the for solar energy power generation publicly available at any time. While project footprint are contemplated. projects. The BLM will take into you can ask us in your protest to Access to the site would be via a new consideration the provisions of the withhold your personal identifying 6.5-mile long, 24-foot wide Energy Policy Act of 2005 and information from public review, we (approximately 18.9 acres) paved access Secretarial Orders 3283 Enhancing cannot guarantee that we will be able to road extending north and west from the Renewable Energy Development on the do so. existing Wiley’s Well Road. Wiley’s Public Lands and 3285A1 Renewable Well Road is accessible by both Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10 and Energy Development by the Department 43 CFR 1610.2 and 1610.5. eastbound and westbound traffic off of the Interior in responding to the GSEP Interstate 10 at the Wiley’s Well Road application. Thomas Pogacnik, Interchange. The new access road would The Final EIS evaluates the potential Deputy State Director. be constructed entirely on BLM- impacts of the proposed GSEP on air [FR Doc. 2010–21570 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] administered land. quality, biological resources, cultural BILLING CODE 4310–40–P The BLM’s purpose and need for the resources, water resources, geological NEPA analysis of the GSEP project is to resources and hazards, land use, noise, respond to Genesis Solar, LLC’s paleontological resources, public health, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR application under Title V of FLPMA socioeconomics, soils, traffic and (43 U.S.C. 1761) for a ROW grant to transportation, visual resources, National Park Service construct, operate, and decommission a wilderness characteristics, and other solar thermal facility on public lands in resources. Final Environmental Impact Statement compliance with FLPMA, BLM ROW A Notice of Availability of the Draft and South Florida and Caribbean regulations, and other applicable EIS/Staff Assessment for the proposed Parks Exotic Plant Management Plan Federal laws. The BLM will decide GSEP and Possible Plan Amendment to AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. whether to approve, approve with the CDCA Plan was published in the ACTION: Notice of availability of a final modification, or deny a ROW grant to Federal Register on April 9, 2010 (75 FR environmental impact statement for the Genesis Solar, LLC for the proposed 18204). Comments on the Draft RMP South Florida and Caribbean Parks GSEP project. The BLM will also Amendment/Draft EIS/Staff Assessment Exotic Plant Management Plan. consider amending the California Desert received from the public and internal Conservation Act (CDCA) Plan of 1980, BLM review were considered and SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National as amended, in this analysis. The CDCA incorporated as appropriate into the Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 Plan, while recognizing the potential Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment/Final U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), and the Council on compatibility of solar generation EIS. Public comments resulted in the Environmental Quality regulations (40

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52968 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

CFR part 1500–1508), the National Park of Intent to prepare an environmental Ecological Preserve, and Virgin Islands Service (NPS), Department of the impact statement (EIS) for South Florida National Park, 1300 Cruz Bay Creek, St. Interior, announces the availability of and Caribbean parks exotic plant John, Virgin Islands 00830. the final environmental impact management was published in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Three statement (FEIS) in abbreviated form for Federal Register on January 22, 2004 alternatives are identified and potential the proposed South Florida and (69 FR 3174). Public scoping open impacts analyzed in the plan/FEIS. Caribbean Parks Exotic Plant houses were held in March 2004 in Cruz Alternative C, New Framework for Management Plan. This plan guides the Bay, St. John; Christiansted and Exotic Plant Management: Increased management and control of exotic Frederiksted, St. Croix; and Naples and Planning, Monitoring, and Mitigation, plants and restoration of native plant Homestead, Florida. A project with an Emphasis on Active Restoration communities in nine national parks: Big newsletter was also distributed and 40 of Native Plants, is the environmentally Cypress National Preserve, Biscayne letters or e-mails were received and preferable alternative and the NPS National Park, Canaveral National used by the interdisciplinary planning preferred alternative. Alternative C Seashore, Dry Tortugas National Park, team to refine the issues to be addressed would augment the systematic approach Everglades National Park, Buck Island in the plan/EIS. The Environmental integral to alternative B, described Reef National Monument, Christiansted Protection Agency published its notice below, and would add an active National Historic Site, Salt River Bay of filing of the Draft EIS in the Federal restoration program to enhance the National Historic Park and Ecological Register on September 22, 2006 (71 FR return of native species to treated areas Preserve, and Virgin Islands National 55463). The NPS notice of availability in selected high-priority areas. Under Park. The FEIS identifies and evaluates was published in the Federal Register Alternative C, a decision tool would be the proposed plan and two alternatives on September 27, 2006 (71 FR 56549). applied to determine areas that are and their potential environmental Following a 60-day public comment appropriate for active restoration, which consequences and identifies and period, NPS considered carefully the would occur in park areas that have analyzes appropriate mitigation agency and public comments received, been previously disturbed and in areas strategies. and prepared the FEIS. Not sooner than with potential threatened and In accordance with the Plant 30 days from the date of publication of endangered species habitat or sensitive Protection Act of 2000, (7 U.S.C. 7701 the Notice of Availability for the FEIS in vegetation communities where a more et seq.), the United States Government the Federal Register by the rapid recovery would be desirable. The has designated certain plants as noxious Environmental Protection Agency the active restoration approach for a given weeds; many of these are exotic plant NPS will sign a Record of Decision on treatment area would be determined species. Approximately 1,200 exotic the Final Environmental Impact based on a site-specific evaluation. plant species in Florida and the Statement/South Florida and Caribbean Other areas in the parks would recover Caribbean have become established in Parks Exotic Plant Management Plan. passively. Under Alternative B, New natural areas, and as many as 4 percent After the Record of Decision is signed, Framework for Exotic Plant of those exotic plant species have the NPS will publish a Notice of Management: Increased Planning, displaced native species. Exotic plants Availability of the Record of Decision Monitoring, and Mitigation, the parks compete aggressively with native plants on the Final Environmental Impact would apply a systematic approach that and are often at an advantage because Statement/South Florida and Caribbean would prioritize exotic plants for they have little or no predatory control. Parks Exotic Plant Management Plan in treatment, monitor effects of those Among other problems, exotic plants the Federal Register. treatments on exotic plants and park displace native species, alter native ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the resources, and mitigate any adverse species proportion, degrade or reduce final document will be available online effects to park resources, as determined available habitat for threatened and at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/EVER. through the monitoring program. endangered species, consume nutrients, To request a copy contact Sandra Alternative B would employ an adaptive alter fire patterns, reduce recreational Hamilton, Environmental Quality management strategy, using the results opportunities, and clog waterways. Division, National Park Service, of monitoring to adjust treatment The purpose of the plan/FEIS is to (1) Academy Place, P.O. Box 25287, methods or mitigation methods to reach provide a programmatic plan to manage Denver, Colorado 80225, 303–969–2068. the desired future condition of treated and control exotic plants in nine parks While supplies last, the document can areas in the parks. The effectiveness of in south Florida and the Caribbean; (2) also be picked up in person at the efforts to control exotic plant invasion promote restoration of native species participating parks’ headquarters: Big of native habitats would increase as a and habitat conditions in ecosystems Cypress National Preserve, 33100 result of uniform recording and storage that have been invaded by exotic plants; Tamiami Trail East, Ochopee, Florida of information acquired during and (3) protect park resources and 34141; Biscayne National Park, 9700 SW monitoring and of sharing that values from adverse effects resulting 328 Street, Homestead, Florida 33033; information among the nine park units. from exotic plant presence and control Canaveral National Seashore, 212 S. Under Alternative A, Continue Current activities. Washington Avenue, Titusville, Florida Management, the parks would continue DATES: In December 2003, the NPS met 32796; Dry Tortugas National Park to manage exotic plants under the with various Federal, territorial, State, 40001 State Road 9336, Homestead, existing management framework. and local government agencies to share Florida 33034; Everglades National information among agencies and elicit Park, 40001 State Road 9336, The parks would continue to treat issues, concerns, and other relevant Homestead, Florida 33034; Buck Island infestations of exotic plants on an ad information to address during the Reef National Monument, Danish hoc basis using a variety of physical, planning process. Agency Custom House, Kings Wharf, 2100 mechanical, chemical, and biological representatives participated in meetings Church Street #100, Christiansted, St. methods and through currently in the Virgin Islands, (one on St. John Croix, Virgin Islands 00820; available funding sources. and one on St. Croix), and in a meeting Christiansted National Historic Site; Salt Authority: The authority for publishing in West Palm Beach, Florida. A Notice River Bay National Historic Park and this notice is 40 CFR 1506.6.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52969

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: included in the approved plan. Both a on September 16, at 8:30 a.m., and Sandra Hamilton, Environmental No Action alternative and one adjourn at 4 p.m. During the course of Quality Division, National Park Service, additional ‘‘action’’ alternative the two days, the Board expects to be Academy Place, P.O. Box 25287, (Alternative C, which would have addressed by Secretary of the Interior Denver, Colorado 80225, 303–969–2068. restored approximately a third less Ken Salazar and National Park Service The responsible official for this final wetland habitat) were also identified Director Jonathan Jarvis, and will be EIS is the Regional Director, Southeast and analyzed. As documented in the briefed by park officials on matters Region, National Park Service, 100 Draft and Final EIS, the selected including education, science, funding, Alabama Street, SW., 1924 Building, alternative was deemed to be the and public engagement. Other officials Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ‘‘environmentally preferred’’ course of of the Department of the Interior and the Dated: August 16, 2010. action. National Park Service may address the Gordon Wissinger, Copies: Interested parties desiring to Board, and other miscellaneous topics Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region. review the Record of Decision may and reports may be covered. The Board meeting will be open to the [FR Doc. 2010–21550 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] obtain a copy by contacting the Superintendent, Channel Islands public. The order of the agenda may be BILLING CODE 4310–70–P National Park, 1901 Spinnaker Drive, changed, if necessary, to accommodate Ventura, CA 93001 or via telephone travel schedules or for other reasons. Space and facilities to accommodate the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR request at (805) 658–5700. public are limited and attendees will be Dated: July 13, 2010. National Park Service accommodated on a first-come basis. Patricia L. Neubacher, Anyone may file with the Board a Final Environmental Impact Statement; Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. written statement concerning matters to Prisoners Harbor Wetland Restoration, [FR Doc. 2010–21566 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] be discussed. The Board also will Santa Cruz Island, Channel Islands BILLING CODE 4310–F6–P permit attendees to address the Board, National Park, Santa Barbara County, but may restrict the length of the CA; Notice of Approval of Record of presentations, as necessary to allow the Decision DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Board to complete its agenda within the allotted time. Before including your Summary: Pursuant to § 102(2)(C) of National Park Service address, telephone number, e-mail the National Environmental Policy Act address, or other personal identifying of 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190, as amended) National Park System Advisory Board; information in your comment, you and the regulations promulgated by the Meeting should be aware that your entire Council on Environmental Quality (40 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. comment—including your personal CFR 1505.2), the Department of the identifying information—may be made Interior, National Park Service (NPS) ACTION: Notice of meeting. publicly available at any time. While has prepared and approved a Record of SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in you can ask us in your comment to Decision for the Final Environmental accordance with the Federal Advisory withhold your personal identifying Impact Statement for restoration of Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix, that information from public review, we approximately 3 acres of coastal the National Park System Advisory cannot guarantee that we will be able to wetland on Santa Cruz Island, Channel Board will meet September 15–16, 2010, do so. Islands National Park. The requisite no- in Washington, DC. The Board will have Draft minutes of the meeting will be action ‘‘wait period’’ was initiated April an orientation session on the morning of available for public inspection about 12 16, 2010, with the Environmental September 15, and in the afternoon will weeks after the meeting, at 1201 I Street, Protection Agency’s Federal Register tour park sites in the National Capital NW., Washington, DC 20005. notification of the filing of the Final EIS. Region. On September 16, the Board Dated: August 25, 2010. Decision: As soon as practical the NPS will convene its business meeting from Bernard Fagan, will begin to implement restoration of 8:30 a.m., to 4 p.m. palustrine wetlands and deepwater Chief, Office of Policy. DATES: September 15–16, 2010. habitat at Prisoners Harbor, as well as [FR Doc. 2010–21552 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Location: The Dupont Hotel, meeting remove a berm constricting natural BILLING CODE 4310–70–P flows in lower Canada del Puerto Creek, room Glover Park A, 1500 New in order to reconnect the creek to its Hampshire Avenue, NW.; Washington, floodplain. Other project elements DC 20036; 202–448–3848. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR include removing cattle corrals and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For relocating a scale house to its pre-1960s further information concerning the National Park Service location, removing eucalyptus and National Park System Advisory Board or to request to address the Board, contact Rim of the Valley Corridor Special controlling other non-native species, Resource Study, Los Angeles and and protecting archeological resources. Ms. Shirley Sears Smith, Office of Policy, National Park Service, 1201 I Ventura Counties, CA; Notice of This alternative was identified and Scoping analyzed as the agency-preferred Street, NW., 12th Floor, Washington, DC Alternative B in the Final EIS (and 20005; telephone 202–354–3955; e-mail Summary: Notice is hereby given in includes no substantive modifications to [email protected]. accordance with provisions of the the course of action which was SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On National Environmental Policy Act of described in the Draft EIS). The full September 15, the Board will convene 1969 (Pub. L. 91–190) and the Council range of foreseeable environmental from 8:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m., for an on Environmental Quality’s consequences were assessed, and orientation session for Board members, implementing regulations (40 CFR appropriate mitigation measures followed by a tour of national park sites 1502.9(c)) that public scoping has been (developed in consultation with Tribal of the National Capital Region. The initiated for a conservation planning representatives and other agencies) are Board will convene its business meeting and environmental impact analysis

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52970 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

process to identify and assess potential The NPS will also consider: be made publicly available at any time. impacts of alternative resource Alternative strategies for management, While you can ask us in your comment protection and other considerations protection and use of significant to withhold your personal identifying within the Rim of the Valley Corridor resources within the overall study area, information from public review, we Special Resource Study area in Los including management by other public cannot guarantee that we will be able to Angeles and Ventura counties of agencies or the private sector; technical do so. California. The purpose of the scoping or financial assistance available from At this time the following scoping process is to elicit early public comment established programs or special meetings (public workshops) have been regarding issues and concerns, initiatives and partnerships; alternative scheduled: September 14 in Chatsworth, alternatives, and the nature and extent designations other than a national park, September 15 in Los Angeles, of potential environmental impacts (and or as an expansion unit of Santa Monica September 21 in Santa Clarita, as appropriate, mitigation measures) Mountains National Recreation Area; September 22 in Thousand Oaks, which should be addressed. and cooperative management by NPS October 4 in Calabasas, October 5 in Background: As authorized by the and other entities. Tujunga, and October 6 in Altadena. Consolidated Natural Resources Act of Public Engagement: During the study Complete details of dates, times and 2008 (Pub. L. 110–229–May 2008), the process, a range of alternatives will be locations of the meetings will be posted National Park Service (NPS) is developed in consultation with Federal, on the project Web site (noted below). conducting a special resource study of State and local governments and Complete information will also be the area known as the Rim of the Valley interested members of the public, conveyed to local and regional press Corridor, generally including the groups, and organizations. The NPS will media, and will be advertised in a mountains encircling the San Fernando, conduct an environmental review of the newsletter which will be distributed to La Crescenta, Santa Clarita, Simi, and alternatives and potential consequences stakeholders and interested parties. Conejo Valleys in California. The study of resource protection considerations as Information updates about the study area also includes the majority of the part of the Rim of the Valley Corridor process and opportunities for the public to participate will be distributed via existing Santa Monica Mountains Special Resource Study. At this time, it direct mailings, regional and local news National Recreation Area. The study has not been determined whether an media and the Rim of the Valley will explore many issues including: Environmental Assessment or an Corridor Special Resource Study Web Protection of wildlife habitat and Environmental Impact Statement will be site (http://www.nps.gov/pwro/ linkages between open space areas; prepared, however, this scoping process rimofthevalley). The study team may completion of the Rim of the Valley will aid in the preparation of either also be contacted via e-mail at Trail system; preserving recreational document. The public will have several opportunities to comment and [email protected]. opportunities and facilitating access to participate throughout the study Further Information: Availability of recreation for a variety of users; process. Additionally, the public will be the forthcoming draft environmental protection of rare, threatened or afforded the opportunity to review and document for review and written endangered species and rare or unusual comment on the ensuing environmental comment will be announced by local plant communities and habitats; and document following its release. For and regional news media, the above identifying the needs of communities initial scoping and alternatives listed Web site, and direct mailing. At within and around the study area. development, the most useful comments this time the draft environmental review In conducting the Rim of the Valley are those that provide the NPS with document is anticipated to be available Corridor Special Resource Study, the assistance in identifying issues and for public review and comment in 2013 NPS will evaluate the national concerns which should be addressed, or and the draft and final report to significance of the area’s natural and providing important information Congress available in 2014. Comments cultural resources. The NPS will also germane to this study. All responses to on the draft document will be fully assess the area’s suitability and this Notice will also be used to establish considered and responded to as feasibility to be a unit of the National a mailing list of interested persons, appropriate in the final document. The Park System. Factors which the NPS organizations, and agencies that desire official responsible for the initial study team will evaluate include: to receive further information as the recommendation will be the Regional Whether the study area includes types environmental document is developed. Director, Pacific West Region, National or quality of resources not already The public scoping period for the Rim Park Service. The official responsible for adequately represented in the National of the Valley Corridor Special Resource amending or ratifying the Park System; whether long-term Study will conclude—and all comments recommendation and transmitting the protection and public use of the area are must be postmarked or transmitted no final document to the Secretary of the feasible; and whether the area can be later than—October 29, 2010. Interested Interior will be the Director of the adequately protected and administered individuals, organizations, and agencies National Park Service. The final at a reasonable cost. The wishing to provide written comments document will identify the alternative recommendations of the NPS may vary on issues or concerns should respond that, in the professional judgment of the for different portions of the study area. to: National Park Service, Rim of the Director of the National Park Service, is The authorizing statute directs the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study, the most effective and efficient method NPS to determine the suitability and 570 West Avenue 26, Suite 175, Los for protecting significant resources and feasibility of designating all or a portion Angeles, CA 90065. Comments may also providing for public enjoyment. The of the corridor as a unit of the Santa be transmitted through the study’s Web Secretary of the Interior subsequently Monica Mountains National Recreation site listed below. will forward the completed study along Area. It also directs the NPS to Before including your address, phone with a recommendation regarding the determine the methods and means for number, e-mail address, or other Secretary’s preferred management the protection and interpretation of this personal identifying information in your option for the area to Congress for their corridor by the NPS, other Federal, comment, you should be aware that consideration. It is anticipated that the State, or local government entities or your entire comment—including your final study report will be available in private or non-profit organizations. personal identifying information—may 2014.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52971

Dated: July 30, 2010. address in your request for copies of holding of such a hearing is at the George J. Turnbull, applications, we will attempt to respond discretion of the Service Director. to your request electronically. Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. III. Permit Applications [FR Doc. 2010–21551 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Please make your requests or BILLING CODE 4312–52–P comments as specific as possible. Please Endangered Species confine your comments to issues for Applicant: Knoxville Zoological which we seek comments in this notice, Gardens, Knoxville, TN; PRT-19934A DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and explain the basis for your comments. Include sufficient The applicant requests a permit to Fish and Wildlife Service information with your comments to export two captive-hatched Chinese [FWS-R9-IA-2010-N183] allow us to authenticate any scientific or alligators (Alligator sinensis) to Africam, commercial data you include. [96300-1671-0000-P5] S.A, Puebla, Mexico, for the purpose of The comments and recommendations enhancement of the survival of the Receipt of Applications for Permit that will be most useful and likely to species. influence agency decisions are: (1) AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Applicant: Rocky Mountain Wildlife Those supported by quantitative Conservation Center, Keenesburg, CO; Interior. information or studies; and (2) Those ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications that include citations to, and analyses PRT-18346A for permit. of, the applicable laws and regulations. The applicant requests a permit to We will not consider or include in our import seven captive-born tigers SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and administrative record comments we (Panthera tigris) from Canada and Wildlife Service, invite the public to receive after the close of the comment Mexico, for the purpose of enhancement comment on the following applications period (see DATES) or comments of the survival of the species. to conduct certain activities with delivered to an address other than those endangered species, marine mammals, listed above (see ADDRESSES). Multiple Applicants or both. With some exceptions, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and B. May I Review Comments Submitted The following applicants each request Marine Mammal Protection Act by Others? a permit to import the sport-hunted (MMPA) prohibits activities with listed Comments, including names and trophy of one male bontebok species unless a Federal permit is issued street addresses of respondents, will be (Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) culled that allows such activities. Both laws available for public review at the from a captive herd maintained under requires that we invite public comment address listed under ADDRESSES. The the management program of the before issuing these permits. public may review documents and other Republic of South Africa, for the DATES: We must receive requests for information applicants have sent in purpose of enhancement of the survival documents or comments on or before support of the application unless our of the species. September 29, 2010. We must receive allowing viewing would violate the Applicant: Gus Boniello, Golden requests for marine mammal permit Privacy Act or Freedom of Information Bridge, NY; PRT-19933A public hearings, in writing, at the Act. Before including your address, address shown in the ADDRESSES section phone number, e-mail address, or other Applicant: Frank DeGennaro, Monroe, by September 29, 2010. personal identifying information in your NY; PRT-19931A ADDRESSES: Brenda Tapia, Division of comment, you should be aware that Applicant: Anthony Casola, Bronx, NY; Management Authority, U.S. Fish and your entire comment—including your PRT-19930A Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax personal identifying information—may Drive, Room 212, Arlington, VA 22203; be made publicly available at any time. The following applicant requests a fax (703) 358-2280; or e-mail While you can ask us in your comment permit to re-export a sport-hunted [email protected]. to withhold your personal identifying trophy of one male bontebok information from public review, we (Damaliscus pygargus pygargus) culled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: cannot guarantee that we will be able to from a captive herd maintained under Brenda Tapia, (703) 358-2104 do so. the management program of the (telephone); (703) 358-2280 (fax); Republic of South Africa, for the [email protected] (e-mail). II. Background purpose of enhancement of the survival SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To help us carry out our conservation of the species. I. Public Comment Procedures responsibilities for affected species, the Applicant: Roberto Delgado, Garza Endangered Species Act of 1973, section Garcia, NL MX; PRT-19421A A. How Do I Request Copies of 10(a)(1)(A), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 Applications or Comment on Submitted et seq.), and our regulations in the Code Endangered Marine Mammals and Applications? of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR Marine Mammals Send your request for copies of 17, the Marine Mammal Protection Act Applicant: Dr. Iskande Larkin, applications or comments and materials of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; concerning any of the applications to seq.), and our[Doc the Code of Federal PRT-038448 the contact listed under ADDRESSES. Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 18 require Please include the Federal Register that we invite public comment before The applicant requests amendment notice publication date, the PRT- final action on these permit and renewal of the permit to take wild number, and the name of the applicant applications. Under the MMPA, you and captive-held Florida manatees in your request or submission. We will may request a hearing on any MMPA (Trichechus manatus) for the purpose of not consider requests or comments sent application received. If you request a scientific research. This notification to an e-mail or address not listed under hearing, give specific reasons why a covers activities to be conducted by the ADDRESSES. If you provide an email hearing would be appropriate. The applicant over a 5–year period.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52972 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Applicant: Pennsylvania State or question with the above individual. Sec. 27, SE1⁄4, E1⁄2; NE1⁄2, E1⁄2 SW1⁄4; University, University Park, PA; PRT- You will receive a reply during normal Sec. 33, SE1⁄4, S1⁄2; NE1⁄4, NE1⁄4 NE1⁄4; 14287A hours. Secs. 34 and 35, portions outside the Event Area; The applicant requests a permit to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These T. 33 N., R. 25 E., import biological samples of polar bears temporary restrictions affect public Sec. 4, Lots 2, 3, 4 and 5, portions west of (Ursus maritimus) from Norway for the lands on and adjacent to the Burning the east playa road. purpose of scientific research. This Man Event conducted on the Black Rock Unsurveyed T. 34 N., R. 25 E., 1 notification covers activities to be Desert playa within the Black Rock Sec. 16, S ⁄2; Sec. 21, portion outside the Event Area; conducted by the applicant over a 1– Desert-High Rock Canyon Emigrant 1 1 1 Trails National Conservation Area in Sec. 22, SW ⁄4, W ⁄2; NW ⁄4; year period. Sec. 27, W1⁄2; Concurrent with publishing this portions of Humboldt, Pershing and Sec. 33, portion west of the east playa road notice in the Federal Register, we are Washoe counties, Nevada. The legal and outside the Event Area; forwarding copies of the above description of the affected public lands Sec. 34; W1⁄2, portion west of the east playa applications to the Marine Mammal is: road. Commission and the Committee of I. 2010 Event Area: The public closure area comprises Scientific Advisors for their review. Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada 9,445 acres, more or less. Dated: August 20, 2010 The closure and temporary Unsurveyed T. 33 N., R. 24 E., restrictions are necessary to provide a Brenda Tapia, Secs. 4, and 5, portions within 50 yards of Program Analyst, Branch of Permits, Division the Event Entrance Road; safe environment for the participants of of Management Authority. Unsurveyed T. 331⁄2 N., R. 24 E., the Burning Man Festival and to members of the public visiting the Black [FR Doc. 2010–21475 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Sec. 25; Sec. 26 and 27, portions within event Rock Desert and to protect public land BILLING CODE ????–??–S perimeter fence and 50 yards outside the resources by addressing law fence; enforcement and public safety concerns Sec. 33 and 34, portions within 50 yards DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR associated with the Burning Man of the Event Entrance Road; Festival. The Burning Man Festival is Sec. 35, portions within event perimeter held on public lands administered by Bureau of Land Management fence, 50 yards outside the fence and within 50 yards of the Event Entrance the Bureau of Land Management. It is [LLNVW03000/L51050000.EA0000/ expected to attract approximately LVRCF1000700241A.MO#4500013866;10– Road; 08807; TAS:14X5017] Sec. 36, portions within event perimeter 48,000 participants to a remote rural fence, 50 yards outside the fence and the area, far from urban infrastructure and Notice of Temporary Closures and Airport tie-down area. support, including law enforcement, Restrictions on Specific Uses of Public Unsurveyed T. 34 N., R. 24 E., public safety, transportation, and Lands in Pershing County, NV Secs. 25, 26, 34, and 35, portions within communication services. During the event perimeter fence and 50 yards festival the associated city becomes the AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, outside the fence. tenth largest metropolitan area in Interior. Sec. 36. Unsurveyed T. 34 N., R. 25 E., Nevada. This event is authorized on ACTION: Notice of temporary closures Secs. 21, 28, and 33, portions within event public lands under Special Recreation and restrictions. perimeter fence and 50 yards outside the Permit #NV–025–06–01. fence. The vast majority of Burning Man SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Festival participants do not cause any The event area comprises 3,347 acres, under the authority of the Federal Land problems for the event organizers or the more or less. Policy and Management Act of 1976 BLM. Actions by a few participants at (FLPMA), as amended, the Bureau of II. Public Closure Area: previous events have resulted in law Land Management (BLM) Winnemucca Mount Diablo Meridian, Nevada enforcement and public safety incidents District, Black Rock Field Office will similar to those observed in urban areas implement and enforce the following Unsurveyed T. 33 N., R. 24 E., 1 of similar size. Incidents that have temporary closures and restrictions to Sec. 1, N ⁄2, portion west of the east playa road; required BLM law enforcement action in protect public safety and resources on Sec. 2, N1⁄2; prior years include the following: public lands within and adjacent to the 1 1 Sec. 3, N ⁄2, SW ⁄4; Aircraft crashes; motor vehicle Burning Man Festival on the Black Rock Sec. 4, portion east of Washoe Co. Rd. 34 accidents with injuries within and Desert playa. and outside the Event Area; outside the event (a temporary fence is 1 DATES: The temporary restrictions will Sec. 5, E ⁄2, portion east of Washoe Co. Rd. installed around the event perimeter); 34 and outside the Event Area; be in effect until September 17, 2010. fighting; sexual assaults; assaults on law Sec. 8, NE1⁄4; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 1 enforcement officers; reckless or Sec. 9, N ⁄2; Gene Seidlitz, District Manager, Bureau Sec. 10, NW1⁄4. threatening behavior; crimes against of Land Management, Winnemucca Unsurveyed T. 331⁄2 N., R. 24 E., property; crowd control issues; issues District, 5100 E. Winnemucca Secs. 26 and 27, portions outside the Event associated with possession and use of Boulevard, Winnemucca, NV 89445– Area; alcoholic beverages; persons acting in a 2921, telephone: (775) 623–1500, e-mail: Sec. 28, portion east of Washoe Co. Rd. 34; manner where they may pose a danger [email protected]. Persons who use Sec. 33, portions east of Washoe Co. Rd. 34 to themselves or to others; possession, a telecommunications device for the and outside the Event Area; use, and distribution of controlled deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Secs. 34, 35 and 36, portions outside the Event Area. substances; and increased use of public Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Unsurveyed T. 34 N., R. 24 E., lands outside the event perimeter. 1–800–877–8339 to contact the above Sec. 23, S1⁄2; The Burning Man Festival takes place individual during normal business Sec. 24, S1⁄2; within Pershing County, a rural county hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a Sec. 25 & 26; portions outside the Event with a small population and a small day, 7 days a week, to leave a message Area; Sheriff’s Department. The county has

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52973

limited ability to provide additional law B. Alcohol (d) Presumptive levels: enforcement officers to work at the 1. Possession of an open container of (1) The results of chemical or other Festival. The temporary closure and the an alcoholic beverage by the driver or quantitative tests are intended to temporary restrictions are necessary to operator of any motorized vehicle, supplement the elements of probable enable BLM law enforcement personnel whether or not the vehicle is in motion cause used as the basis for the arrest of to provide for public safety and protect is prohibited. an operator charged with a violation of the environment on public lands, as 2. Possession of alcohol by minors. paragraph (a) of this section. If the well as support state and local law (a) The following are prohibited: alcohol concentration in the operator’s enforcement agencies with enforcement (1) Consumption or possession of any blood or breath at the time of testing is of existing laws. alcoholic beverage by a person under less than alcohol concentrations A temporary closure and restriction 21 years of age on public lands. specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this order, under the authority of 43 CFR (2) Selling, offering to sell, or section, this fact does not give rise to 8364.1, is used because it is more otherwise furnishing or supplying any any presumption that the operator is or appropriate than establishing alcoholic beverage to a person under is not under the influence of alcohol. Supplementary Rules. A temporary 21 years of age on public lands. (2) The provisions of paragraph (d)(1) closure and restriction order is (b) This section does not apply to the of this section are not intended to limit specifically tailored to the time frame selling, handling, serving or the introduction of any other competent and restrictions on uses or activities that transporting of alcoholic beverages by a evidence bearing upon the question of are necessary to provide a safe person in the course of his lawful whether the operator, at the time of the environment for the public and for employment by a licensed alleged violation, was under the participants in the Burning Man manufacturer, wholesaler or retailer of influence of alcohol, a drug or multiple Festival, and protect public land alcoholic beverages. drugs, or any combination thereof. resources, while avoiding imposing 3. Operation of a motor vehicle while 4. Definitions: restrictions that may not be necessary under the influence. (a) Open container: Any bottle, can, or during the remainder of the year. (a) Title 43 CFR 8341.1(f)3 prohibits other container that contains an the operation of an off-road motor The BLM will post information signs alcoholic beverage, if that container vehicle on public land while under the about the temporary restrictions at main does not have a closed top or the lid for influence of alcohol, narcotics, or entry points around the area. This which the seal has been broken. If a dangerous drugs. container has been opened one or more temporary restriction order also will be (b) In addition to the prohibition times and its lid or top has been posted in the BLM Winnemucca District found in 43 CFR 8341.1(f)3, it is replaced, that container is an open Office. Maps of the affected area and prohibited for any person to operate or container. other documents associated with these be in actual physical control of a motor (b) Possession of an open container temporary restrictions are available at vehicle while: the Winnemucca District Office at the (1) The operator is under the includes any open container that is address above. combined influence of alcohol, a drug, physically possessed by a driver or Under the authority of Section 303(a) or drugs to a degree that renders the operator and is adjacent to and of the Federal Land Policy and operator incapable of safe operation of reachable by that driver or operator. Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. that vehicle; or This includes but is not limited to 1733 (a)), 43 CFR 8360.0–7, and 43 CFR (2) The alcohol concentration in the containers in a cup holder or rack 8364.1, the BLM will enforce the operator’s blood or breath is 0.08 grams adjacent to the driver or operator, following closures and restrictions or more of alcohol per 100 milliliters of containers on a vehicle floor next to the within and adjacent to the Burning Man blood or 0.08 grams or more of alcohol driver or operator, and containers on a Festival on the Black Rock Desert playa: per 210 liters of breath. seat or console area next to a driver or operator. I. Event Area—Between August 27, (c) Tests: (1) At the request or direction of any 2010, and September 17, 2010 Inclusive C. Drug Paraphernalia law enforcement officer authorized by A. Aircraft Landing the Department of the Interior to enforce 1. The possession of drug this closure and restriction order, who paraphernalia is prohibited. The event area is closed to aircraft has probable cause to believe that an 2. Definition: Drug paraphernalia landing, taking off, or taxiing. Aircraft is operator of a motor vehicle has violated means all equipment, products and defined in Title 18 U.S.C., section 31 a provision of paragraph (a) or (b) of this materials of any kind which are used, (a)(1) and includes lighter-than-air craft section, the operator shall submit to one intended for use, or designed for use in and ultra-light craft. The following or more tests of the blood, breath, saliva, planting, propagating, cultivating, exceptions apply: or urine for the purpose of determining growing, harvesting, manufacturing, 1. Aircraft operations conducted blood alcohol and drug content. compounding, converting, producing, through the authorized event landing (2) Refusal by an operator to submit preparing, testing, analyzing, packaging, strip and such ultra-light and helicopter to a test is prohibited and proof of repackaging, storing, containing, take-off and landing areas designated for refusal may be admissible in any related concealing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling Burning Man event staff and judicial proceeding. or otherwise introducing into the participants, law enforcement, and (3) Any test or tests for the presence human body a controlled substance in emergency medical services. of alcohol and drugs shall be violation of any state or Federal law, or 2. Helicopters providing emergency determined by and administered at the regulation issued pursuant to law. medical services may land in other direction of an authorized person. D. Disorderly Conduct locations when required for medical (4) Any test shall be conducted by incidents. using accepted scientific methods and 1. Disorderly conduct is prohibited. 3. Landings or take-offs of lighter- equipment of proven accuracy and 2. Definition: Disorderly conduct than-air craft previously approved by reliability operated by personnel means that an individual, with the the BLM authorized officer. certified in its use. intent of recklessly causing public

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52974 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

alarm, nuisance, jeopardy, or violence; demonstration purposes only. During 3. The prohibitions above shall not or recklessly creating a risk thereof: the event, from 12:01 a.m. Monday, apply to county, state, tribal, and (a) Engages in fighting or violent August 30, 2010, through 11:59 p.m. Federal law enforcement personnel, or behavior. Monday, September 6, 2010, such any person authorized by Federal law to (b) Uses language, an utterance or vehicles must display evidence of possess a weapon. ‘‘Art projects’’ that gesture, or engages in a display or act registration at all times in such manner include weapons and are sanctioned by that is physically threatening or that it is visible from the rear of the BRC LLC will be permitted after menacing, or done in a manner that is vehicle while the vehicle is in motion; obtaining authorization from the BLM likely to inflict injury or incite an (e) Motorized skateboards or Go-Peds authorized officer. immediate breach of the peace. with or without handlebars. 4. Definitions: (a) Weapon means a firearm, E. Eviction of Persons 2. Definitions: (a) A motor vehicle is any device compressed gas or spring powered 1. The event area is closed to any designed for and capable of travel over pistol or rifle, bow and arrow, cross person for the following: land and which is self-propelled by a bow, blowgun, spear gun, hand thrown (a) Has been evicted from the event by motor, but does not include any vehicle spear, sling shot, irritant gas device, the permit holder, Black Rock City LLC, operated on rails or any motorized electric stunning or immobilization (BRC LLC), whether or not the eviction wheelchair; device, explosive device, any was requested by the BLM. (b) Motorized wheelchair means a implement designed to expel a (b) Has been ordered by a BLM law self-propelled wheeled device, designed projectile, switch blade knife, any blade enforcement officer to leave the area of solely for and used by a mobility- which is greater than 10 inches in the permitted event. impaired person for locomotion. length from the tip of the blade to the 2. Any person evicted from the event edge of the hilt or finger guard nearest forfeits all privileges to be present I. Public Camping the blade (e.g., swords, dirks, daggers, within the perimeter fence or anywhere The event area is closed to public machetes), or any other weapon the else within the event area even if they camping with the following exception: possession of which is prohibited by possess a ticket to attend the event. Burning Man event ticket holders who state law. Exception: The regulation F. Fires are camped in designated areas does not apply in a kitchen or cooking provided by BRC LLC, and ticket environment or where an event worker The ignition of fires on the surface of is wearing or utilizing a construction the Black Rock Playa without a burn holders who are camped in the authorized ‘‘pilot camp.’’ BRC LLC knife for their duties at the event blanket or burn pan is prohibited. (b) Firearm means any pistol, authorized staff, contractors, and BLM- revolver, rifle, shotgun, or other device G. Fireworks authorized event management-related which is designed to, or may be readily camps are exempt from this closure. The use, sale or possession of converted to expel a projectile by the personal fireworks is prohibited except J. Public Use ignition of a propellant. for uses of fireworks approved by BRC (c) Discharge means the expelling of The event area is closed to use by LLC and used as part of a Burning Man a projectile from a weapon. sanctioned art burn event. members of the public unless that person: Possesses a valid ticket to attend II. Public Closure Area H. Motor Vehicles the event; is an employee or authorized A. Between August 27, 2010, and volunteer with the BLM, a law 1. The event area is closed to motor September 17, 2010, Inclusive vehicle use, except as provided below. enforcement agency, emergency medical Motor vehicles may be operated service provider, fire protection 1. Public Camping within the Event Area under these provider, or another public agency The Public Closure area is closed to circumstances: working at the event and the employee public camping. (a) Participant arrival and departure is assigned to the event; is a person on designated routes; working at or attending the event on 2. Discharge of Weapons (b) Vehicles operated by BRC LLC behalf of the event organizers, BRC LLC; Discharge of weapons as defined in staff or contractors and service or is authorized by BRC LLC to be onsite paragraph (L)(2) of Section (I) is providers on behalf of BRC LLC. During prior to the commencement of the event prohibited. the event, from 12:01 a.m. Monday, for the primary purpose of constructing, August 30, 2010, through 11:59 p.m. creating, designing or installing art, B. Between August 30, 2010, and Monday, September 6, 2010, these displays, buildings, facilities or other September 6, 2010, Inclusive vehicles must display evidence of event items and structures in connection with 1. Aircraft Landing registration at all times in such manner the event. The public closure area is closed to that it is visible from the rear of the K. Waste Water Discharge aircraft landing, taking off, or taxiing vehicle while the vehicle is in motion; except as described in paragraph (A) of The dumping or discharge to the (c) BLM, medical, law enforcement, Section I. and firefighting vehicles; ground of grey water is prohibited. Grey (d) Mutant vehicles, art cars, vehicles water is water that has been used for 2. Disorderly Conduct used by disabled drivers and displaying cooking, washing, dishwashing, or Disorderly conduct as defined in disabled driver license plates or bathing and contains soap, detergent, paragraph (D)(2) of Section I is placards, or other vehicles registered food scraps, or food residue. prohibited. with the Burning Man event organizers L. Weapons and operated within the scope of that 3. Eviction of Persons registration. Prior to commencement of 1. The possession of any weapon is (a) The Public Closure Area is closed the event and official issuance of prohibited. to any person who: registration documents, such vehicles 2. The discharge of any weapon is (1) Has been evicted from the event by may be operated for arrival, testing and prohibited. the permit holder, BRC LLC, whether or

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52975

not the eviction was requested by the INTERNATIONAL TRADE and members of the public are invited BLM. COMMISSION to file comments, not to exceed five (2) Has been ordered by a BLM law pages in length, on any public interest Notice of Receipt of Complaint; enforcement officer to leave the area of issues raised by the complaint. Solicitation of Comments Relating to Comments should address whether the permitted event. the Public Interest issuance of an exclusion order and/or a (b) Any person evicted from the event cease and desist order in this AGENCY: forfeits all privileges to be present U.S. International Trade Commission. investigation would negatively affect the within the public closure area even if he public health and welfare in the United ACTION: or she possesses a ticket to attend the Notice. States, competitive conditions in the event. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in 4. Fireworks the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint the United States, or United States The use, sale or possession of entitled In Re Certain Liquid Crystal consumers. In particular, the Commission is personal fireworks is prohibited. Display Devices and Products Interoperable with the Same, DN 2751; interested in comments that: 5. Public Use the Commission is soliciting comments (i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the orders are used Public use is prohibited, except for: on any public interest issues raised by the complaint. in the United States; (a) passage through, without stopping, (ii) Identify any public health, safety, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: or welfare concerns in the United States the public closure area on the West or Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the East Playa Roads; and relating to the potential orders; Commission, U.S. International Trade (iii) Indicate the extent to which like (b) pedestrians with Burning Man Commission, 500 E Street, SW., or directly competitive articles are tickets outside the fence. Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) produced in the United States or are 205–2000. The public version of the 6. Motor Vehicles otherwise available in the United States, complaint can be accessed on the with respect to the articles potentially The public closure area is closed to Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) subject to the orders; and motor vehicle use, except for passage at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, available for inspection during official through, without stopping, the public Complainant’s licensees, and/or third business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) closure area on the West or East Playa party suppliers have the capacity to in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Roads. Motor vehicle is defined in replace the volume of articles International Trade Commission, 500 E paragraph (H)(2) of Section (I). potentially subject to an exclusion order Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, and a cease and desist order within a 7. Waste Water Discharge telephone (202) 205–2000. commercially reasonable time. General information concerning the Written submissions must be filed no The dumping or discharge to the Commission may also be obtained by later than by close of business, five ground of grey water is prohibited. Grey accessing its Internet server (http:// business days after the date of water is water used for cooking, www.usitc.gov). The public record for publication of this notice in the Federal washing, dishwashing, or bathing and this investigation may be viewed on the Register. There will be further contains soap, detergent, food scraps, or Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) opportunities for comment on the food residue. at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing- public interest after the issuance of any impaired persons are advised that final initial determination in this 8. Weapons information on this matter can be investigation. obtained by contacting the The possession of any weapon as Persons filing written submissions Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) defined in paragraph (L)(4) of Section (I) must file the original document and 12 205–1810. is prohibited except weapons within true copies thereof on or before the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The deadlines stated above with the Office motor vehicles passing through the Commission has received a complaint of the Secretary. Submissions should closure area, without stopping on the filed on behalf of Chimei-Innolux refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. West or East Playa Roads. Corporation, Chimei Optoelectronics 2751’’) in a prominent place on the Any person who violates the above USA, Inc. and Innolux Corporation on cover page and/or the first page. The rules and restrictions may be tried August 24, 2010. The complaint alleges Commission’s rules authorize filing before a United States Magistrate and violations of section 337 of the Tariff submissions with the Secretary by fined no more than $1,000, imprisoned Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the facsimile or electronic means only to the for no more than 12 months, or both. importation into the United States, the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Such violations may also be subject to sale for importation, and the sale within rules (see Handbook for Electronic the enhanced fines provided for at 18 the United States after importation of Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ U.S.C. 3571. certain liquid crystal display devices secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ and products interoperable with the documents/handbook_on_electronic_ Authority: 43 CFR 8364.1. same. The complaint names as filing.pdf). Persons with questions Gene Seidlitz, respondents Sony Corporation of Tokyo, regarding electronic filing should District Manager, Winnemucca District. Japan; Sony Corporation of America of contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). Any person desiring to submit a [FR Doc. 2010–21553 Filed 8–25–10; 4:15 pm] New York, NY; Sony Electronics Corporation of San Diego, CA; and Sony document to the Commission in BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P Computer Entertainment America, LLC confidence must request confidential of Foster City, CA. treatment. All such requests should be The complainant, proposed directed to the Secretary to the respondents, other interested parties, Commission and must include a full

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52976 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

statement of the reasons why the Tariff Act of 1930. The revised Users’ please contact Gary Schaible, National Commission should grant such Manual reaffirms the authority of Firearms Act Branch, 244 Needy Road, treatment. See 19 CFR § 201.6. administrative law judges and the Martinsburg, WV 20226. Documents for which confidential Commission under the Administrative Written comments and suggestions treatment by the Commission is Procedure Act to require attendance at from the public and affected agencies properly sought will be treated a settlement conference, including the concerning the proposed collection of accordingly. All nonconfidential written use of alternative dispute resolution; information are encouraged. Your submissions will be available for public reaffirms the confidential nature of comments should address one or more inspection at the Office of the Secretary. mediation proceedings; provides that of the following four points: This action is taken under the parties will receive materials regarding —Evaluate whether the proposed authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act the program upon the filing of a collection of information is necessary of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), complaint and certify receipt and for the proper performance of the and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) reading/discussion thereof; and functions of the agency, including of the Commission’s Rules of Practice provides that the Commission will whether the information will have and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, maintain an open list of private practical utility; 210.50(a)(4)). mediators in addition to the roster of —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies Issued: August 24, 2010. pre-screened pro-bono mediators. estimate of the burden of the By order of the Commission. The authority for the Commission’s proposed collection of information, determination is contained in the Marilyn R. Abbott, including the validity of the Administrative Procedure Act, as methodology and assumptions used; Secretary to the Commission. amended, see 5 U.S.C. 556(c)(6)–(8), —Enhance the quality, utility, and [FR Doc. 2010–21527 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 572–74, 583, and in sections 335 and clarity of the information to be BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as collected; and amended, 19 U.S.C. 1335, 1337. —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to INTERNATIONAL TRADE Issued: August 25, 2010. respond, including through the use of COMMISSION By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, appropriate automated, electronic, Issuance of Revised Users’ Manual for Secretary to the Commission. mechanical, or other technological Commission Mediation Program for [FR Doc. 2010–21530 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., Investigations Under Section 337 of BILLING CODE 7020–02–P the Tariff Act of 1930 permitting electronic submission of responses. AGENCY: U.S. International Trade DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Overview of this information Commission. collection: ACTION: Notice. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms (1) Type of Information Collection: and Explosives Extension of a currently approved SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that collection. the Commission has issued a revised [OMB Number 1140–0014] (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Users’ Manual for its program for the Agency Information Collection Application For Tax Paid Transfer and mediation of investigations under Registration of Firearms. section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested (3) Agency form number, if any, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the applicable component of the James Worth, Office of the General ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Department of Justice sponsoring the Counsel, U.S. International Trade Collection Under Review: Application collection: Form Number: ATF F 4 Commission, 500 E Street, SW., for Tax Paid Transfer and Registration of (5320.4). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) Firearm. Firearms and Explosives. 205–3065. General information (4) Affected public who will be asked concerning the Commission may also be The Department of Justice (DOJ), or required to respond, as well as a brief obtained by accessing its Internet server Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms abstract: Primary: Business or other for- at http://www.usitc.gov. Hearing- and Explosives (ATF), will be profit. Other: Individual or households. impaired persons are advised that submitting the following information ATF F 4 (5320.4) is required to apply for information on this matter can be collection request to the Office of the transfer and registration of a obtained by contacting the Management and Budget (OMB) for National Firearms Act (NFA) firearm. Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) review and approval in accordance with The information on the form is used by 205–1810. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. NFA Branch personnel to determine the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On The proposed information collection is legality of the application under November 8, 2008, the Commission published to obtain comments from the Federal, State and local law. published notice that it had approved public and affected agencies. Comments (5) An estimate of the total number of the initiation of a voluntary pilot are encouraged and will be accepted for respondents and the amount of time mediation program for investigations ‘‘sixty days’’ until October 29, 2010. This estimated for an average respondent to under section 337 of the Tariff Act of process is conducted in accordance with respond: It is estimated that 11,065 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 5 CFR 1320.10. respondents will complete a 4 hour (‘‘section 337’’). 73 FR 65615 (Nov. 8, If you have comments especially on form. 2008). the estimated public burden or (6) An estimate of the total public The Commission has determined to associated response time, suggestions, burden (in hours) associated with the issue a revised Users’ Manual for its or need a copy of the proposed collection: There are an estimated program for the mediation of information collection instrument with 44,260 annual total burden hours investigations under section 337 of the instructions or additional information, associated with this collection.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52977

If additional information is required proposed collection of information, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE contact: Lynn Bryant, Department including the validity of the Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning methodology and assumptions used; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Staff, Justice Management Division, —Enhance the quality, utility, and Department of Justice, 2 Constitution clarity of the information to be [OMB Number 1140–0040] Square, Room 2E–502, 145 N Street, collected; and NE., Washington, DC 20530. Agency Information Collection —Minimize the burden of the collection Dated: August 24, 2010. Activities: Proposed Collection; of information on those who are to Comments Requested Lynn Bryant, respond, including through the use of Department Clearance Officer, Department of appropriate automated, electronic, ACTION: 60-Day notice of information Justice. mechanical, or other technological collection under review: Application for [FR Doc. 2010–21543 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] collection techniques or other forms an amended Federal firearms license. BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P of information technology, e.g., The Department of Justice (DOJ), permitting electronic submission of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms responses. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and Explosives (ATF), will be Overview of this information submitting the following information Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms collection: collection request to the Office of and Explosives (1) Type of Information Collection: Management and Budget (OMB) for [OMB Number 1140–0009] Extension of a currently approved review and approval in accordance with collection. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Agency Information Collection The proposed information collection is Activities: Proposed Collection; (2) Title of the Form/Collection: published to obtain comments from the Comments Requested Application to Register as an Importer of public and affected agencies. Comments U.S. Munitions Import List Articles. are encouraged and will be accepted for ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information (3) Agency form number, if any, and ‘‘sixty days’’ until October 29, 2010. This Collection Under Review: Application the applicable component of the process is conducted in accordance with to Register as an Importer of U.S. Department of Justice sponsoring the 5 CFR 1320.10. Munitions Import List Articles. collection: Form Number: ATF F 4587 If you have comments especially on (5330.4). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, the estimated public burden or The Department of Justice (DOJ), Firearms and Explosives. associated response time, suggestions, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms or need a copy of the proposed and Explosives (ATF), will be (4) Affected public who will be asked information collection instrument with submitting the following information or required to respond, as well as a brief instructions or additional information, collection request to the Office of abstract: Primary: Business or other for- please contact Patricia Power, Chief, Management and Budget (OMB) for profit. Other: None. The purpose of this Federal Firearms Licensing Center, 244 review and approval in accordance with information collection is to allow ATF Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 20226. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. to determine if the registrant qualifies to Written comments and suggestions The proposed information collection is engage in the business of importing a from the public and affected agencies published to obtain comments from the firearm or firearms, ammunition, and concerning the proposed collection of public and affected agencies. Comments the implements of war, and to facilitate information are encouraged. Your are encouraged and will be accepted for the collection of registration fees. comments should address one or more ‘‘sixty days’’ until October 29, 2010. This (5) An estimate of the total number of of the following four points: process is conducted in accordance with respondents and the amount of time —Evaluate whether the proposed 5 CFR 1320.10. estimated for an average respondent to collection of information is necessary If you have comments especially on respond: It is estimated that 300 for the proper performance of the the estimated public burden or respondents will complete a 30-minute functions of the agency, including associated response time, suggestions, form. whether the information will have or need a copy of the proposed practical utility; information collection instrument with (6) An estimate of the total public —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies instructions or additional information, burden (in hours) associated with the estimate of the burden of the please contact Desiree Winger, Firearms collection: There are an estimated 150 proposed collection of information, and Explosives Imports Branch, 244 annual total burden hours associated including the validity of the Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405. with this collection. methodology and assumptions used; Written comments and suggestions If additional information is required —Enhance the quality, utility, and from the public and affected agencies contact: Lynn Bryant, Department clarity of the information to be concerning the proposed collection of Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning collected; and information are encouraged. Your Staff, Justice Management Division, —Minimize the burden of the collection comments should address one or more Department of Justice, Two Constitution of information on those who are to of the following four points: Square, Room 2E–502, 145 N Street, respond, including through the use of —Evaluate whether the proposed NE., Washington, DC 20530. appropriate automated, electronic, collection of information is necessary mechanical, or other technological Dated: August 24, 2010. for the proper performance of the collection techniques or other forms functions of the agency, including Lynn Bryant, of information technology, e.g., whether the information will have Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. permitting electronic submission of practical utility; Department of Justice. responses. —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies’ [FR Doc. 2010–21545 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Overview of this information estimate of the burden of the BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P collection:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52978 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

(1) Type of Information Collection: Management and Budget (OMB) for importer or manufacturer, or dealer in Extension of a currently approved review and approval in accordance with firearms shall file an application with collection. the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. the required fee with ATF in accordance (2) Title of the Form/Collection: The proposed information collection is with the instructions on the form. The Application For An Amended Federal published to obtain comments from the information requested on the form Firearms License. public and affected agencies. Comments establishes eligibility for the license. (3) Agency form number, if any, and are encouraged and will be accepted for The duration of the license is for a 3 the applicable component of the ‘‘sixty days’’ until October 29, 2010. This year period. Department of Justice sponsoring the process is conducted in accordance with (5) An estimate of the total number of collection: Form Number: ATF F 5 CFR 1320.10. respondents and the amount of time 5300.38. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, If you have comments especially on estimated for an average respondent to Firearms and Explosives. the estimated public burden or respond: It is estimated that 13,000 (4) Affected public who will be asked associated response time, suggestions, respondents will complete a 1 hour and or required to respond, as well as a brief or need a copy of the proposed 15 minute form. abstract: Primary: Business or other for- information collection instrument with (6) An estimate of the total public profit. Other: Individual or households. instructions or additional information, burden (in hours) associated with the The form is used when a Federal please contact Patricia Power, Chief, collection: There are an estimated firearms licensee makes application to Federal Firearms Licensing Center, 244 16,250 annual total burden hours change the location of the firearms Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 20226. associated with this collection. business premises. The applicant must Written comments and suggestions If additional information is required certify that the proposed new business from the public and affected agencies contact: Lynn Bryant, Department premises will be in compliance with concerning the proposed collection of Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning State and local law for that location. information are encouraged. Your Staff, Justice Management Division, (5) An estimate of the total number of comments should address one or more Department of Justice, Two Constitution respondents and the amount of time of the following four points: Square, Room 2E–502, 145 N Street, NE, estimated for an average respondent to —Evaluate whether the proposed Washington, DC 20530. respond: It is estimated that 18,000 collection of information is necessary Dated: August 24, 2010. respondents will complete a 1 hour and for the proper performance of the Lynn Bryant, 15 minute form. functions of the agency, including (6) An estimate of the total public Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. whether the information will have Department of Justice. burden (in hours) associated with the practical utility; [FR Doc. 2010–21535 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] collection: There are an estimated —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 22,500 annual total burden hours estimate of the burden of the BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P associated with this collection. proposed collection of information, If additional information is required including the validity of the contact: Lynn Bryant, Department methodology and assumptions used; DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Clearance Officer, United States —Enhance the quality, utility, and Office of the Secretary Department of Justice, Justice clarity of the information to be Management Division, Policy and collected; and Submission for OMB Review; Planning Staff, Two Constitution —Minimize the burden of the collection Comment Request Square, Room 2E–502, 145 N Street, of information on those who are to NE., Washington, DC 20530. respond, including through the use of ACTION: Submission for OMB Review; Dated: August 24, 2010. appropriate automated, electronic, Comment Request. mechanical, or other technological Lynn Bryant, The Department of Labor (DOL) Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., hereby announces the submission of the Department of Justice. following public information collection [FR Doc. 2010–21525 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] permitting electronic submission of responses. request (ICR) to the Office of BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P Management and Budget (OMB) for Overview of This Information review and approval in accordance with Collection the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (1) Type of Information Collection: (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms Extension of a currently approved A copy of this ICR, with applicable and Explosives collection. supporting documentation; including, (2) Title of the Form/Collection: among other things, a description of the [OMB Number 1140–0018] Application for Federal Firearms likely respondents, proposed frequency License of response, and estimated total burden Agency Information Collection (3) Agency form number, if any, and may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Activities: Proposed Collection; the applicable component of the Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ Comments Requested Department of Justice sponsoring the public/do/PRAMain or by contacting ACTION: 60-Day notice of information collection: Form Number: ATF F 7 Linda Watts Thomas on 202–693–4223 collection under review: Application for (5310.12). Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, (this is not a toll-free number); e-mail _ _ Federal firearms license. Firearms and Explosives. mail to: DOL PRA [email protected]. (4) Affected public who will be asked Interested parties are encouraged to The Department of Justice (DOJ), or required to respond, as well as a brief send comments to the Office of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms abstract: Primary: Business or other for- Information and Regulatory Affairs, and Explosives (ATF), will be profit. Other: Individual or households. Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the submitting the following information Each person intending to engage in Department of Labor—Mine Safety and collection request to the Office of business as a firearms or ammunition Health Administration (MSHA), Office

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52979

of Management and Budget, 725 17th magazines, etc. Section 75.1702–1 necessary for the proper performance of Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, requires that the mine operator submit the Agency, including whether the DC 20503, Telephone: 202–395–4816/ the program for searching miners for information will have practical utility; Fax: 202–395–5806 (these are not toll- smoking materials to MSHA for • Evaluate the accuracy of the free numbers), e-mail: approval. The purpose of the program is Agency’s estimate of the burden of the [email protected] within to ensure that a fire or explosion hazard proposed collection of information, 30 days from the date of this publication does not occur. Section 103(h) of the including the validity of the in the Federal Register. In order to Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. 813, authorizes methodology and assumptions used; ensure the appropriate consideration, MSHA to collect information necessary • Enhance the quality, utility, and comments should reference the to carry out its duty in protecting the clarity of the information to be applicable OMB Control Number (see safety and health of miners. For collected; and below). additional information, see related • Minimize the burden of the The OMB is particularly interested in notice published in the Federal Register collections of information on those who comments which: on June 24, 2010, (Vol. 75 page 36120). are to respond including through the (1) Evaluate whether the proposed Dated: August 24, 2010. use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other collection of information is necessary Linda Watts Thomas, for the proper performance of the technological collection techniques or Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. functions of the agency, including other forms of information technology, whether the information will have [FR Doc. 2010–21472 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] e.g., permitting electronic submission of practical utility; BILLING CODE 4510–43–P responses. (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency: Occupational Safety and Health Administration. agency’s estimate of the burden of the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR proposed collection of information, Type of Review: Extension without including the validity of the Office of the Secretary change of a previously approved methodology and assumptions used; collection. (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and Submission for OMB Review: Title of Collection: Access to clarity of the information to be Comment Request Employee Exposure and Medical collected; and Records (29 CFR 1910.1020) (4) Minimize the burden of the August 24, 2010. OMB Control Number: 1218–0065. collection of information on those who The Department of Labor (DOL) Affected Public: Business or other for- are to respond, including through the hereby announces the submission of the profits. use of appropriate automated, following public information collection Estimated Number of Respondents: electronic, mechanical, or other request (ICR) to the Office of 690,591. technological collection techniques or Management and Budget (OMB) for Estimated Total Annual Burden other forms of information technology, review and approval in accordance with Hours: 665,009. e.g., permitting electronic submission of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Estimated Total Annual Costs Burden responses. (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). (Excludes Hourly Wage Costs): $0. Agency: Mine Safety and Health A copy of the ICR, with applicable Description: Under the authority Administration. supporting documentation; including, granted by the Occupational Safety and Type of Review: Extension without among other things, a description of the Health Act of 1970, OSHA published a change of a currently approved likely respondents, proposed frequency health regulation governing access to collection. of response, and estimated total burden worker exposure monitoring data and Title of Collection: Program to Prevent may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov medical records. This regulation does Smoking Underground and in Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ not require employers to collect any Hazardous Surface Areas. public/do/PRAMain or by contacting information or to establish any new OMB Control Number: 1219–0041. Linda Watts Thomas on 202–693–2443 systems of records. Rather, it requires Affected Public: Business or other for- (this is not a toll-free number)/e-mail: that employers provide workers, their profit. [email protected]. designated representatives, and OSHA Total Estimated Number of Interested parties are encouraged to with access to worker exposure Respondents: 144. send comments to the Office of monitoring and medical records, and Total Number of Responses: 144. Information and Regulatory Affairs, any analyses resulting from these Total Estimated Annual Burden Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the records that employers must maintain Hours: 72. Department of Labor—Occupational under OSHA’s toxic chemical and Total Estimated Annual Cost Burden Safety and Health Administration harmful physical agent standards. In (operating/maintaining): $6,098.40. (OSHA), Office of Management and this regard, the regulation specifies Description: Section 317(c) of the Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC requirements for record access, record Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 20503, Telephone: 202–395–7316/Fax: retention, worker information, trade 1977 (Mine Act), 30 U.S.C. 877(c), and 202–395–5806 (these are not toll-free secret management, and record transfer. 30 CFR 75.1702 prohibit persons from numbers), E-mail: Accordingly, the Agency attributes the smoking or carrying smoking materials [email protected] within burden hours and costs associated with underground or in places where there is 30 days from the date of this publication exposure monitoring and measurement, a fire or explosion hazard. Under the in the Federal Register. In order to medical surveillance, and the other Mine Act and § 75.1702, coal mine ensure the appropriate consideration, activities required to generate the data operators are required to develop comments should reference the OMB governed by the regulation to the health programs to prevent persons from Control Number (see below). standards that specify these activities; carrying smoking materials, matches, or The OMB is particularly interested in therefore, OSHA did not include these lighters underground and to prevent comments which: burden hours and costs in the ICR. smoking in hazardous areas, such as in • Evaluate whether the proposed Access to exposure and medical or around oil houses, explosives information collection requirements are information enables workers and their

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52980 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

designated representatives to become comments should reference the Dated: August 24, 2010. directly involved in identifying and applicable OMB Control Number (see Linda Watts Thomas, controlling occupational health hazards, below). Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. as well as managing and preventing The OMB is particularly interested in [FR Doc. 2010–21514 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] occupationally-related health comments which: BILLING CODE 4510–43–P impairment and disease. Providing the (1) Evaluate whether the proposed Agency with access to the records collection of information is necessary permits it to ascertain whether or not for the proper performance of the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR employers are complying with the functions of the agency, including regulation, as well as the recordkeeping whether the information will have Employment and Training requirements of its other health practical utility; Administration standards; therefore, OSHA access (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the [TA–W–73,376] provides additional assurance that agency’s estimate of the burden of the workers and their designated proposed collection of information, Wacker Neuson Corporation, a representative are able to obtain the data including the validity of the Subsidiary of Wacker Neuson SE, they need to conduct their analyses. methodology and assumptions used; Menomonee Falls, WI; Notice of For additional information, see the (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and Affirmative Determination Regarding related 60-day preclearance notice clarity of the information to be Application for Reconsideration published in the Federal Register, April collected; and 26, 2010, (Vol. 75, page 21662). By application dated August 17, 2010, (4) Minimize the burden of the a company official requested Linda Watts Thomas, collection of information on those who administrative reconsideration of the Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. are to respond, including through the affirmative determination regarding [FR Doc. 2010–21529 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] use of appropriate automated, workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade BILLING CODE 4510–26–P electronic, mechanical, or other Adjustment Assistance (TAA) technological collection techniques or applicable to workers and former other forms of information technology, workers of the subject firm. The DEPARTMENT OF LABOR e.g., permitting electronic submission of certification of eligibility was issued on responses. July 30, 2010. The Notice of Office of the Secretary Agency: Mine Safety and Health determination was published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2010 (75 Submission for OMB Review; Administration. FR 49530). The workers produce a Comment Request Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved variety of construction equipment and ACTION: Notice. collection. are not separately identifiable by Title of Collection: Safety Standards product line. The Department of Labor (DOL) for Underground Coal Mine The initial investigation resulted in a hereby announces the submission of the Ventilation—Belt Entry Used as an positive determination based on the following public information collection Intake Air Course to Ventilate Working findings that a significant proportion or request (ICR) to the Office of Sections and Areas Where Mechanized number of the workers at the subject Management and Budget (OMB) for Mining Equipment Is Being Installed or firm were totally or partially separated, review and approval in accordance with Removed. or threatened with such separation, that the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 OMB Control Number: 1219–0138. the subject firm has shifted to a foreign (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Affected Public: Business or other for- country the production of articles like or A copy of this ICR, with applicable profit. directly competitive with the supporting documentation; including, construction equipment produced by Total Estimated Number of among other things, a description of the the workers, and that this shift of Respondents: 21. likely respondents, proposed frequency production contributed importantly to of response, and estimated total burden Total Number of Responses: 251. worker group separations at the subject may be obtained from the RegInfo.gov Total Estimated Annual Burden firm. Web site at http://www.reginfo.gov/ Hours: 4,255. In the request for reconsideration, the public/do/PRAMain or by contacting Total Estimated Annual Cost Burden company official states that the shift Linda Watts Thomas on 202–693–4223 (operating/maintaining): $303,512. abroad did not contribute importantly to (this is not a toll-free number); e-mail: Description: The Safety Standards for worker separations at the subject firm [email protected]. Underground Coal Mine Ventilation because the article shifted required only Interested parties are encouraged to Belt Entry rule provides safety a few workers and that once the work send comments to the Office of requirements for the use of the conveyor was shifted abroad, the workers were Information and Regulatory Affairs, belt entry as a ventilation intake to reassigned to other product lines. The Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the course fresh air to working sections and company official further states that the Department of Labor—Mine Safety and areas where mechanized mining separated workers have been recalled to Health Administration (MSHA), Office equipment is being installed or removed work because the production of the of Management and Budget, 725 17th in mines with three or more entries. other lines have increased despite the Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, This rule establishes additional shift of production of the one line of DC 20503, Telephone: 202–395–4816/ protective provisions that mine construction equipment to the Fax: 202–395–5806 (these are not toll- operators must follow if they want to Philippines. free numbers), e-mail: use belt air to ventilate working The Department has carefully [email protected] within sections. For additional information, see reviewed the request for reconsideration 30 days from the date of this publication related notice published in the Federal and the existing record, and has in the Federal Register. In order to Register on June 24, 2010 (Vol. 75 page determined that the Department will ensure the appropriate consideration, 36121–36122). conduct further investigation to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52981

determine whether the workers do meet New information shows that workers March 4, 2010 to include on-site leased the eligibility requirements of the Trade leased from Syncreon were employed workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Act of 1974, as amended. on-site at the Twinsburg, Ohio location Management LLC. The notice was of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping published in the Federal Register on Conclusion Plant. The Department has determined March 12, 2010 (75 FR 111914). After careful review of the that these workers were sufficiently At the request of a company official application, I conclude that the claim is under the control of the subject firm to and the State agency, the Department of sufficient weight to justify be considered leased workers. Based on reviewed the certification for workers of reconsideration of the U.S. Department these findings, the Department is the subject firm. The workers are of Labor’s prior decision. The amending this certification to include engaged in the production of automotive application is, therefore, granted. workers leased from Syncreon working axles, a substantial proportion of which Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of on-site at the Twinsburg, Ohio location are shipped to an affiliated plant where August, 2010. of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg Stamping they are used in the assembly of Del Min Amy Chen, Plant. automotive vehicles. Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment The amended notice applicable to New information shows that workers Assistance. TA–W–64,619 is hereby issued as leased from Syncreon were employed [FR Doc. 2010–21398 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] follows: on-site at the Detroit, Michigan location BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Twinsburg of Chrysler, LLC, Detroit Axle Plant. Stamping Plant, including on-site leased The Department has determined that workers from Caravan Knight Facilities these workers were sufficiently under DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Management LLC, Wackenhut Security, CR the control of the subject firm to be Associates, and Syncreon, Twinsburg, Ohio, considered leased workers. Based on Employment and Training who became totally or partially separated these findings, the Department is Administration from employment on or after December 2, amending this certification to include 2007, through February 4, 2011, are eligible workers leased from Syncreon, working [TA–W–64,619] to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are on-site at the Detroit, Michigan location Chrysler, LLC; Twinsburg Stamping also eligible to apply for alternative trade of Chrysler, LLC, Detroit Axle Plant. Plant, Including On-Site Leased adjustment assistance under Section 246 of The amended notice applicable to Workers from Caravan Knight the Trade Act of 1974. TA–W–64,631 is hereby issued as Facilities Management LLC, follows: Wackenhut Security, CR Associates, Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010. All workers of Chrysler, LLC, Detroit Axle and Syncreon, Twinsburg, OH; Del Min Amy Chen, Plant, including on-site leased workers from Amended Certification Regarding Caravan Knight Facilities Management LLC, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Eligibility To Apply for Worker and Syncreon, Detroit, Michigan, who Adjustment Assistance. Adjustment Assistance and Alternative became totally or partially separated from Trade Adjustment Assistance [FR Doc. 2010–21395 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] employment on or after December 8, 2007, BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P through January 12, 2011, are eligible to In accordance with Section 223 of the apply for adjustment assistance under Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C 2273), and Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR also eligible to apply for alternative trade U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the adjustment assistance under Section 246 of Department of Labor issued a Employment and Training the Trade Act of 1974. Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Administration Signed at Washington, DC this 19th day of Worker Adjustment Assistance and [TA–W–64,631] August, 2010. Alternative Trade Adjustment Del Min Amy Chen, Assistance on February 4, 2009, Chrysler, LLC, Detroit Axle Plant, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade applicable to workers of Chrysler, LLC, Including On-Site Leased Workers Adjustment Assistance. Twinsburg Stamping Plant, Twinsburg, from Caravan Knight Facilities [FR Doc. 2010–21396 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Ohio. The notice was published in the Management LLC, and Syncreon, BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Federal Register on March 3, 2009 (74 Detroit, MI; Amended Certification FR 9282). The certification was Regarding Eligibility To Apply for amended on June 29, 2009 and August Worker Adjustment Assistance and DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 28, 2009 to include on-site leased Alternative Trade Adjustment workers from Caravan Knight Facilities Assistance Employment and Training Management LLC, Wackenhut Security, Administration and CR Associates. The notices were In accordance with Section 223 of the [TA–W–73,758] published in the Federal Register on Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and July 14, 2009 (74 FR 34042) and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 Bluescope Buildings North America, September 22, 2009 (74 FR 48297– U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Including Workers Whose 48298), respectively. Department of Labor issued a Unemployment Insurance (UI) Wages At the request of the State agency, the Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Are Reported Through Butler Department reviewed the certification Worker Adjustment Assistance and Manufacturing Company, Laurinburg, for workers of the subject firm. The Alternative Trade Adjustment NC; Amended Certification Regarding workers are engaged in the production Assistance on January 12, 2009, Eligibility To Apply for Worker of metal automotive stampings, a applicable to workers of Chrysler, LLC, Adjustment Assistance substantial proportion of which are Detroit Axle Plant, Detroit, Michigan. shipped to an affiliated plant where The notice was published in the Federal In accordance with Section 223 of the they are used in the assembly of Register on February 2, 2009 (74 FR Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), automotive vehicles. 5870). The notice was amended on 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52982 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

issued a Certification of Eligibility to DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of Apply for Worker Adjustment August, 2010. Assistance on May 18, 2010, applicable Employment and Training Del Min Amy Chen, to workers of BlueScope Buildings Administration Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. North America, Laurinburg, North [TA–W–70,784] Carolina. The notice was published in [FR Doc. 2010–21397 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the Federal Register on June 7, 2010 (75 Chrysler Group LLC, Formally Known BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P FR 32224). as Chrysler LLC, Kenosha Engine Plant, Including On-Site Leased At the request of the State Agency, the Workers From Caravan Knight DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Department reviewed the certification Facilities Management LLC and for workers of the subject firm. The Syncreon, Kenosha, WI; Amended Employment and Training workers are engaged in activities related Certification Regarding Eligibility To Administration to prefabricated metal building Apply for Worker Adjustment components. Notice of Determinations Regarding Assistance Eligibility To Apply for Worker New information shows that some In accordance with Section 223 of the Adjustment Assistance workers separated from employment at Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), In accordance with Section 223 of the BlueScope Buildings North America 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor had their wages reported through a Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 issued a Certification of Eligibility to U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor separate unemployment insurance (UI) Apply for Worker Adjustment tax account under the name Butler herein presents summaries of Assistance on September 2, 2009, determinations regarding eligibility to Manufacturing Company, a division of applicable to workers of Chrysler Group BlueScope Buildings North America. apply for trade adjustment assistance for LLC, formally known as Chrysler, LLC, workers by (TA–W) number issued Accordingly, the Department is Kenosha Engine Plant, Kenosha, during the period of August 9, 2010 amending this certification to properly Wisconsin. The notice was published in through August 13, 2010. reflect this matter. the Federal Register on November 5, In order for an affirmative 2009 (74 FR 57340). The notice was The intent of the Department’s determination to be made for workers of amended on May 10, 2010 to include certification is to include all workers of a primary firm and a certification issued on-site leased workers from Caravan regarding eligibility to apply for worker the subject firm who were adversely Knight Facilities Management LLC. The affected by a shift in the production of adjustment assistance, each of the group notice was published in the Federal eligibility requirements of Section prefabricated metal building Register on June 16, 2010 (75 FR 34170– components to Mexico. 222(a) of the Act must be met. 34171). I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the The amended notice applicable to At the request of the state, the following must be satisfied: TA–W–73,758 is hereby issued as Department reviewed the certification (1) A significant number or proportion follows: for workers of the subject firm. The of the workers in such workers’ firm workers are engaged in activities in have become totally or partially All workers of BlueScope Buildings North production of V–6 automobile engines. America, including workers whose separated, or are threatened to become The company reports that workers totally or partially separated; unemployment insurance (UI) wages are leased from Syncreon were employed reported through Butler Manufacturing (2) The sales or production, or both, on-site at the Kenosha, Wisconsin of such firm have decreased absolutely; Company, Laurinburg, North Carolina, who location of Chrysler Group LLC, became totally or partially separated from and formally known as Chrysler, LLC, employment on or after March 19, 2009, (3) One of the following must be Kenosha Engine Plant. through May 18, 2012, and all workers in the satisfied: The Department has determined that (A) Imports of articles or services like group threatened with total or partial these workers were sufficiently under separation from employment on date of or directly competitive with articles the control of the subject firm to be certification through two years from the date produced or services supplied by such considered leased workers. Based on of certification, are eligible to apply for firm have increased; these findings, the Department is adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of (B) Imports of articles like or directly amending this certification to include Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. competitive with articles into which one workers leased from Sycreon working or more component parts produced by Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of on-site at the Kenosha Engine Plant. such firm are directly incorporated, August, 2010. The amended notice applicable to have increased; Del Min Amy Chen, TA–W–70,784 is hereby issued as (C) Imports of articles directly Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment follows: incorporating one or more component Assistance. All workers at Chrysler Group LLC, parts produced outside the United [FR Doc. 2010–21399 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] formally known as Chrysler, LLC, Kenosha States that are like or directly Engine Plant, including on-site leased competitive with imports of articles BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P workers from Caravan Knight Facilities incorporating one or more component Management LLC and Syncreon, Kenosha, parts produced by such firm have Wisconsin, who became totally or partially increased; separated from employment on or after May (D) Imports of articles like or directly 27, 2008, through September 2, 2011, and all competitive with articles which are workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the produced directly using services date of certification through two years from supplied by such firm, have increased; the date of certification, are eligible to apply and for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of (4) The increase in imports Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. contributed importantly to such

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52983

workers’ separation or threat of In order for an affirmative (A) An affirmative determination of separation and to the decline in the determination to be made for adversely serious injury or threat thereof under sales or production of such firm; or affected secondary workers of a firm and section 202(b)(1); II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the a certification issued regarding (B) An affirmative determination of following must be satisfied: eligibility to apply for worker market disruption or threat thereof (1) A significant number or proportion adjustment assistance, each of the group under section 421(b)(1); or of the workers in such workers’ firm eligibility requirements of Section (C) An affirmative final determination have become totally or partially 222(c) of the Act must be met. of material injury or threat thereof under separated, or are threatened to become (1) A significant number or proportion section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of totally or partially separated; of the workers in the workers’ firm have the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. (2) One of the following must be become totally or partially separated, or 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); satisfied: are threatened to become totally or (2) the petition is filed during the 1- (A) There has been a shift by the partially separated; year period beginning on the date on workers’ firm to a foreign country in the (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or which— production of articles or supply of Downstream Producer to a firm that (A) A summary of the report services like or directly competitive employed a group of workers who submitted to the President by the with those produced/supplied by the received a certification of eligibility International Trade Commission under workers’ firm; under Section 222(a) of the Act, and section 202(f)(1) with respect to the (B) There has been an acquisition such supply or production is related to affirmative determination described in from a foreign country by the workers’ the article or service that was the basis paragraph (1)(A) is published in the firm of articles/services that are like or for such certification; and Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); directly competitive with those (3) Either— or produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier (B) Notice of an affirmative and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed and the component parts it supplied to determination described in importantly to the workers’ separation the firm described in paragraph (2) subparagraph (1) is published in the or threat of separation. accounted for at least 20 percent of the Federal Register; and In order for an affirmative production or sales of the workers’ firm; (3) The workers have become totally determination to be made for adversely or or partially separated from the workers’ affected workers in public agencies and (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm within— a certification issued regarding firm with the firm described in (A) The 1-year period described in eligibility to apply for worker paragraph (2) contributed importantly to paragraph (2); or adjustment assistance, each of the group the workers’ separation or threat of (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), eligibility requirements of Section separation. the 1- year period preceding the 1-year 222(b) of the Act must be met. In order for an affirmative period described in paragraph (2). (1) A significant number or proportion determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by Affirmative Determinations for Worker of the workers in the public agency have Adjustment Assistance become totally or partially separated, or the International Trade Commission and are threatened to become totally or a certification issued regarding The following certifications have been partially separated; eligibility to apply for worker issued. The date following the company (2) The public agency has acquired adjustment assistance, each of the group name and location of each from a foreign country services like or eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) determination references the impact directly competitive with services of the Act must be met. date for all workers of such which are supplied by such agency; and (1) The workers’ firm is publicly determination. (3) The acquisition of services identified by name by the International The following certifications have been contributed importantly to such Trade Commission as a member of a issued. The requirements of Section workers’ separation or threat of domestic industry in an investigation 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the separation. resulting in— Trade Act have been met.

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,956 ...... Jasper Chair Company ...... Jasper, IN ...... November 19, 2008. 73,302 ...... Wolfe Dye & Bleach Works, Inc ...... Shoemakersville, PA ...... January 7, 2009. 73,587 ...... ArcelorMittal Weirton, Inc., Leased Workers from Weirton, WV ...... February 26, 2009. The Hudson Company. 74,001 ...... Connextions, Inc., Sprint Operating Unit ...... Concord, NC ...... April 20, 2009. 74,460 ...... Sing Fei, Inc ...... San Francisco, CA ...... July 24, 2009.

The following certifications have been services) of the Trade Act have been issued. The requirements of Section met. 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,734 ...... Nukote International, Inc ...... Rochester, NY ...... October 30, 2008. 72,896 ...... Staffmark, Working On Site at Leach International Buena Park, CA ...... November 18, 2008. 72,936 ...... Current Medicine Group, LLC, Springs Philadelphia, PA ...... November 19, 2008. Science+Business Media Finance, Inc.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52984 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

73,450 ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Woodland Park, NJ ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Employee Reporting to Woodland Park, NJ. 73,450A ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Winona, MN ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450B ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Greenville, TX ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450C ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Piedmont, SC ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc.. 73,450D ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Anaheim, CA ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450E ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Havre De Grace, MD ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450F ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Smyrna, GA ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450G ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Westwego, LA ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450H ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Mount Pleasant, TN ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450I ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Stamford, CT ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450J ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- North Augusta, SC ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,450K ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employ- Tempe, AZ ...... January 29, 2009. ees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc. 73,513 ...... Farley’s and Sathers Candy Company, Inc., On- Round Lake, MN ...... February 17, 2009. site Leased Workers from Doherty Staffing Solu- tions. 73,577 ...... Aigis Mechtronics, Inc., A Subsidiary of Nortek, Winston-Salem, NC ...... February 22, 2009. Inc., Leased Workers of Adecco Employment Services. 73,635 ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations, St. Louis, MO ...... February 24, 2009. etc., Off-Site Workers Reporting to St. Louis, MO. 73,635A ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & St. Charles, MO ...... February 24, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 73,635B ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Hazelwood, MO ...... February 24, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 73,753 ...... Lodging by Liberty, Inc., Brown Jordan Inter- Liberty, NC ...... March 15, 2009. national, Inc.; BJI Employee Services; etc. 73,775 ...... Eli Lilly and Company, Chemical Process Re- Indianapolis, IN ...... March 22, 2009. search and Development Pilot Plant. 73,796 ...... Keane, Inc., Teachers Insurance Annuity Associa- Denver, CO ...... March 26, 2009. tion—College Retirement Equities Fund. 73,806 ...... Multina, USA ...... Plattsburgh, NY ...... March 18, 2009. 73,849 ...... LTX–Credence Corporation, Leased Workers from Hillsboro, OR ...... March 16, 2009. ATR International, Inc. 73,878 ...... HNTB Corporation, HNTB Holding, LTD., Account- Kansas City, MO ...... April 1, 2009. ing Department. 73,917 ...... Stanadyne Corporation, Pencil Nozzel Injector Di- Jacksonville, NC ...... April 13, 2009. vision, Leased Workers from Pro-Type. 74,012 ...... GM Powertrain Defiance CET, General Motors ..... Defiance, OH ...... April 14, 2009. 74,058 ...... Pentel of America, Ltd., Manufacturing Division ..... Torrance, CA ...... May 6, 2009. 74,112 ...... Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Leased Workers from Tewksbury, MA ...... May 17, 2009. Manpower and Kforce. 74,140 ...... Sweater Project Corp ...... North Bergen, NJ ...... May 11, 2009. 74,223 ...... White’s Metal Works, Inc ...... Bassett, VA ...... June 10, 2009. 74,293 ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Long Beach, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,293A ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Anaheim, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,293B ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & El Segundo, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52985

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

74,293C ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Huntington Beach, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,293D ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Irvine, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,293E ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Lemoore, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,293F ...... The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Seal Beach, CA ...... June 7, 2009. Technology Div. & Information Technology Div. 74,348 ...... The TriZetto Group, Inc., Leased Workers from Greenwood Village, CO ...... July 1, 2009. Syntel Limited, Inforonics, LLC, etc. 74,354 ...... HSBC Card Services, Inc., HSBC North American Tulsa, OK ...... June 18, 2009. Holdings, Security and Fraud Dept., etc. 74,381 ...... Quiksilver Americas, Quiksliver Screenprint Oper- Huntington Beach, CA ...... May 8, 2010. ations, Leased Workers from Rainmaker Staff- ing. 74,391 ...... Travelers Indemnity Company, Claims Services, Wyomissing, PA ...... July 13, 2009. Workers’ Compensation Subrogation. 74,394 ...... Laserwords U.S., Inc., Laserwords Private LTD, Lewiston, ME ...... June 11, 2009. Leased Workers from Kelly Services. 74,433 ...... Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pru- Hartford, CT ...... July 26, 2009. dential Retirement. 74,441 ...... Hagemeyer North America, El Paso Branch ...... El Paso, TX ...... July 19, 2009. 74,442 ...... Hagemeyer North America, Mcallen Branch ...... McAllen, TX ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Depart- Denver, CO ...... July 19, 2009. ment, Off-Site Teleworker Bryan Martin. 74,443A ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Collinsville, VA ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443B ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Decatur, IL ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443C ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Jonesboro, AR ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443D ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Mansfield, OH ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443E ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Lynchburg, VA ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443F ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Enid, OK ...... July 19, 2009. 74,443G ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Grand Junction, CO ...... July 19, 2009. 74,457 ...... Leach International, Esterline Technologies, Buena Park, CA ...... July 22, 2009. Leased Workers from Ultimate Staffing Service, etc. 74,461 ...... Providence Chain Company, Leased Workers Providence, RI ...... July 30, 2009. from Microtech Staffing Group and Occupations Unlimited.

The following certifications have been are certified eligible to apply for TAA) issued. The requirements of Section of the Trade Act have been met. 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,886 ...... Turner Techtronics, Inc ...... Burbank, CA ...... November 17, 2008. 73,165 ...... James Hamilton Construction Company, Tyrone Silver City, NM ...... December 23, 2008. Mine.

The following certifications have been 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have issued. The requirements of Section whose workers are certified eligible to been met.

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

73,431 ...... Milliken & Company, Apparel Division ...... Barnwell, SC ...... January 19, 2009.

Negative Determinations for Worker criteria for worker adjustment assistance (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or Adjustment Assistance have not been met for the reasons threat of separation) of section 222 has specified. not been met. In the following cases, the The investigation revealed that the investigation revealed that the eligibility criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,283 ...... International Business Machines (IBM), Global Endicott, NY. Technology Services Delivery Division, Massa- chusetts Teleworkers.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52986 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,283A ...... International Business Machines (IBM), Domino Endicott, NY. Server Application Development Team, etc., Massachusetts Teleworkers. 74,256 ...... Ferragon Corporation, Ferrous Metal Processing Brooklyn, OH ...... Company.

The investigation revealed that the (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift country) of section 222 have not been criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) in production or services to a foreign met.

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,842 ...... Nabors Well Services, Ltd., Nabors Industries, Ltd San Angelo, TX. 72,971 ...... ASC Machine Tools, Inc ...... Spokane Valley, WA. 73,101 ...... Tyler Pipe Company, Soil/Plumbing Division, North Tyler, TX. Plant. 73,110 ...... Robin Industries, Inc., Cleveland Manufacturing .... Cleveland, OH. 73,374 ...... Marshalltown Company ...... Marshalltown, IA. 73,413 ...... Unit Structures, LLC ...... Magnolia, AR. 73,717 ...... Aperto Networks, Inc., Operations Department ...... Milpitas, CA. 73,723 ...... FirstSolutions, Claims Processing Center ...... Two Harbors, MN. 73,863 ...... SuperMedia, LLC, FKA Idearc Media, LLC, Bensalem, PA. Supermedia Information Services, LLC 73,950 ...... Auto Builders, Inc ...... Ladson, SC. 74,021 ...... Diagnostic Staffing Services, LLC ...... Pittsburgh, PA. 74,281 ...... Humana Insurance Company, Carenetwork, Inc .... Green Bay, WI. 74,321 ...... Beloit Health Systems/Beloit Clinic, The Health In- Beloit, WI. formation Management Transcription Depart- ment. 74,362 ...... Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc York, PA.

Determinations Terminating on the Department’s Web site, as The following determinations Investigations of Petitions for Worker required by Section 221 of the Act (19 terminating investigations were issued Adjustment Assistance U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated because the petitioner has requested After notice of the petitions was investigations of these petitions. that the petition be withdrawn. published in the Federal Register and

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

72,463 ...... Draexlmaier Automotive of America, LLC ...... Duncan, SC. 72,771 ...... HMC Technologies ...... New Albany, MS. 73,827 ...... Architectural Glazing Technologies, On-site Sanford, ME. Leased Workers Bonney Staffing. 74,273 ...... Doyle and Roth Manufacturing Company, Inc ...... Simpson, PA. 74,383 ...... Blen-Col, Inc., DBA L&A Molding (Hudson Color Leominster, MA. Concentrates). 74,451 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Off-Site Worker ...... Denver, CO.

The following determinations workers are covered by active no purpose since the petitioning group terminating investigations were issued certifications. Consequently, further of workers cannot be covered by more because the petitioning groups of investigation in these cases would serve than one certification at a time.

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

73,589 ...... DuPont Performance Coatings, E.I. Dupont De Fenton, MO. Nemours Company OEM. 74,092 ...... Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Serv- Winona, MN. ice Employees. 74,093 ...... Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Serv- Greenville, TX. ice Division. 74,094 ...... Cytec Carbon Fibers, LLC, Corporate Service Divi- Piedmont, SC. sion. 74,095 ...... Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Serv- Anaheim, CA. ice Division. 74,096 ...... Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Serv- Havre de Grace, MD. ice Division. 74,097 ...... Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service Smyrna, GA. Division.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52987

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

74,098 ...... Building Block Chemicals, Corporate Service Divi- Westwego, LA. sion. 74,099 ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Mount Pleasant, TN. 74,100 ...... Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division Stamford, CT. 74,101 ...... Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service North Augusta, SC. Division. 74,102 ...... Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Serv- Tempe, AZ. ice Division. 74,216 ...... Prudential Insurance Company of America, Pru- Moosic, PA. dential Retirement. 74,444 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Collinsville, VA. 74,445 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Decatur, IL. 74,446 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Jonesboro, AR. 74,447 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Mansfield, OH. 74,448 ...... StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department Lynchburg, VA. 74,449 ...... StarTek USA, Inc ...... Enid, OK. 74,450 ...... StarTek USA, Inc ...... Grand Junction, CO.

The following determinations period applicable to the same worker negative determination, and therefore, terminating investigations were issued group. The duplicative petitions did not further investigation would duplicate because the Department issued a present new information or a change in efforts and serve no purpose. negative determination on petitions circumstances that would result in a related to the relevant investigation reversal of the Department’s previous

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date

73,844 ...... J.C. Penney Company, Inc...... Waterford, MI ......

I hereby certify that the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR The petitioners or any other persons aforementioned determinations were showing a substantial interest in the issued during the period of August 9, Employment and Training subject matter of the investigations may 2010 through August 13, 2010. Copies of Administration request a public hearing, provided such these determinations may be requested request is filed in writing with the under the Freedom of Information Act. Investigations Regarding Certifications Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Requests may be submitted by fax, of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Assistance, at the address shown below, courier services, or mail to FOIA Adjustment Assistance not later than September 9, 2010. Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Interested persons are invited to Petitions have been filed with the Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. submit written comments regarding the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) subject matter of the investigations to Department of Labor, 200 Constitution of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or the Director, Division of Trade are identified in the Appendix to this Adjustment Assistance, at the address [email protected]. These notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, shown below, not later than September determinations also are available on the the Director of the Division of Trade 9, 2010. Department’s Web site at http:// Adjustment Assistance, Employment Copies of these petitions may be www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the and Training Administration, has requested under the Freedom of searchable listing of determinations. instituted investigations pursuant to Information Act. Requests may be Dated: August 19, 2010. Section 221 (a) of the Act. submitted by fax, courier services, or Elliott S. Kushner, The purpose of each of the mail, to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office Certifying Officer, Division of Trade investigations is to determine whether of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), Adjustment Assistance. the workers are eligible to apply for U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, [FR Doc. 2010–21394 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] adjustment assistance under Title II, DC 20210 or to [email protected]. BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the Signed at Washington, DC, this 19th day of determination of the date on which total August 2010. or partial separations began or Michael Jaffe, threatened to begin and the subdivision Certifying Officer, Division of Trade of the firm involved. Adjustment Assistance.

APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 8/9/10 AND 8/13/10

Subject firm Date of Date of TA–W (petitioners) Location institution petition

74496 ...... Hallmark Cards, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ...... Kansas City, MO ...... 08/09/10 08/02/10 74497 ...... Deluxe Digital Studios, Inc. (Workers) ...... Moosic, PA ...... 08/09/10 06/28/10 74498 ...... Detroit Terminal (State/One-Stop) ...... Detroit, MI ...... 08/11/10 07/08/10

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52988 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 8/9/10 AND 8/13/10—Continued

Subject firm Date of Date of TA–W (petitioners) Location institution petition

74499 ...... Elmira Terminal (State/One-Stop) ...... Elmira, MI ...... 08/11/10 07/08/10 74500 ...... Grandville Terminal (State/One-Stop) ...... Grandville, MI ...... 08/11/10 07/08/10 74501 ...... Cincinnati River Terminal (Company) ...... Cincinnati, OH ...... 08/11/10 07/08/10 74502 ...... Chicago Summit Terminal (State/One-Stop) ...... Summit, IL ...... 08/11/10 07/08/10 74503 ...... Road 9, Incorporated (State/One-Stop) ...... Greenwood Village, CO ...... 08/11/10 08/10/10 74504 ...... American Girl Brands, LLC (Company) ...... Middleton, WI ...... 08/11/10 08/06/10 74505 ...... Neff Motivation, Inc. (Company) ...... Unadilla, GA ...... 08/11/10 08/09/10 74506 ...... Acxiom CDC (State/One-Stop) ...... Chicago, IL ...... 08/11/10 07/29/10 74507 ...... Hanesbrands, Inc. (Company) ...... Winston-Salem, NC ...... 08/11/10 07/10/10 74508 ...... Hanesbrands, Inc. (Company) ...... Winston-Salem, NC ...... 08/11/10 07/10/10 74509 ...... NYK Business Systems Americas, Incorporated (Com- Seattle, WA ...... 08/12/10 08/06/10 pany). 74510 ...... Ornamental Products, LLC (Company) ...... High Point, NC ...... 08/12/10 08/09/10 74511 ...... Masco Retail Cabinet Group, LLC (Company) ...... Waverly, OH ...... 08/12/10 08/06/10 74512 ...... Masco Retail Cabinet Group, LLC (Company) ...... Seal Township, OH ...... 08/12/10 08/06/10 74513 ...... Masco Retail Cabinet Group, LLC (Company) ...... Seaman, OH ...... 08/12/10 08/06/10 74514 ...... Asten Johnson (Workers) ...... Clinton, SC ...... 08/13/10 08/03/10 74515 ...... Weyerhaeuser (Union) ...... Sweet Home, OR ...... 08/13/10 08/11/10 74516 ...... CCI (Company) ...... Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 08/13/10 08/11/10 74517 ...... Expedia.com (Workers) ...... Dallas, TX ...... 08/13/10 07/31/10 74518 ...... Peco II by Lineage Power (Company) ...... Galion, OH ...... 08/13/10 07/27/10 74519 ...... Freeport McMoran Copper and Gold (Workers) ...... Phoenix, AZ ...... 08/13/10 07/17/10 74520 ...... Automation Engineering (State/One-Stop) ...... Fort Smith, AR ...... 08/13/10 08/11/10 74521 ...... Johnson Material Handling (State/One-Stop) ...... Hackett, AR ...... 08/13/10 08/11/10 74522 ...... HealthPlan Services (Company) ...... Tampa, FL ...... 08/13/10 08/06/10

[FR Doc. 2010–21393 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: NACOSH meeting: Office of Communications, Room N– BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P NACOSH will meet in Room N–N3437 3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 A/B/C, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–1999; e- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DC 20210. mail [email protected]. Submission of comments and requests Instructions: All submissions must Occupational Safety and Health to speak: You may submit comments include the Agency name and docket Administration and requests to speak at the NACOSH number for this Federal Register notice [Docket No. OSHA–2010–0012] meeting, identified by docket number (Docket No. OSHA–2010–0012). for this Federal Register notice (Docket Because of security-related procedures, National Advisory Committee on No. OSHA–2010–0012), by one of the submission by regular mail may result Occupational Safety and Health following methods: in significant delay in receipt. Please Electronically: You may submit contact the OSHA Docket Office for AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health materials, including attachments, information about security procedures Administration (OSHA), Labor. electronically at http:// for making submissions by hand ACTION: Announcement of meeting of www.regulations.gov, the Federal delivery, express delivery, messenger or the National Advisory Committee on eRulemaking Portal. Follow the online courier service. For additional Occupational Safety and Health instructions for making submissions. information about submitting comments (NACOSH) and NACOSH subgroup Facsimile: If your submission, and requests to speak, see the meetings. including attachments, does not exceed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 10 pages, you may fax it to the OSHA this notice. SUMMARY: The National Advisory Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. Comments and requests to speak, Committee on Occupational Safety and Mail, express delivery, messenger or including personal information, are Health (NACOSH) will meet September courier service: Submit three copies of placed in the public docket without 14 and 15, 2010, in Washington, DC. In your submissions to the OSHA Docket change and may be available online. conjunction with the NACOSH meeting, Office, Room N–2625, U.S. Department Therefore, OSHA cautions against its Gulf Oil Spill Subgroup will meet. of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, submitting personal information such as DATES: NACOSH meeting: NACOSH will NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone social security numbers and birthdates. meet from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., on (202) 693–2350 (TTY (887) 889–5627). Docket: To read or download Tuesday, September 14, and Deliveries (hand, express mail, documents in the public docket for this Wednesday, September 15, 2010. messenger, courier service) are accepted NACOSH meeting, go to http:// Submission of comments, requests to during the Department of Labor’s and www.regulations.gov. All documents in speak, and requests for special OSHA Docket Office’s normal business the public docket are listed in the index; accommodation: Comments, requests to hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. e.t. however, some documents (e.g., speak at the NACOSH meeting, and Requests for special accommodation: copyrighted material) are not publicly requests for special accommodations for Submit requests for special available to read or download through the NACOSH meeting must be accommodations for the NACOSH http://www.regulations.gov. All submitted (postmarked, sent, meeting by hard copy, telephone, or e- submissions, including copyrighted transmitted) by September 7, 2010. mail to Ms. Veneta Chatmon, OSHA, material, are available for inspection

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52989

and copying at the OSHA Docket Office NACOSH by any one of the methods material, are available for inspection at the address above. listed in the ADDRESSES section above. and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For The request must state the amount of For information on using http:// press inquiries: MaryAnn Garrahan, time requested to speak, the interest www.regulations.gov to make OSHA, Office of Communications, U.S. represented (e.g., organization name), if submissions and to access the docket, Department of Labor, Room N3647, 200 any and a brief outline of the click on the ‘‘Help’’ tab at the top of the Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, presentation. Requests to address Home page. Contact the OSHA Docket DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–1999. NACOSH may be granted as time Office for information about materials For general information: Ms. Deborah permits and at the discretion of the not available through that webpage and Crawford, OSHA, Directorate of NACOSH chair. for assistance in using the Internet to Evaluation and Analysis, U.S. Interested parties also may submit locate submissions and other documents Department of Labor, Room N–3641, comments, including data and other in the docket. Electronic copies of this 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., information using any one of the Federal Register notice are available at Washington DC 20210; telephone: (202) methods listed in the ADDRESSES section http://www.regulations.gov. This notice, 693–1932; e-mail above. OSHA will provide all as well as news releases and other [email protected]. submissions to NACOSH members prior relevant information, is also available on the OSHA webpage at http:// SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NACOSH to the meeting. www.osha.gov. will meet Tuesday, September 14 and Individuals who need special Wednesday, September 15, 2010, in accommodations to attend the NACOSH Authority and Signature Washington, DC. NACOSH meetings are meeting should contact Ms. Chatmon David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant open to the public. using the contact information listed in Secretary of Labor for Occupational NACOSH is authorized by section 7(a) the ADDRESSES section. Safety and Health, directed the of the Occupational Safety and Health Submissions and Access to Meeting preparation of this notice under the Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651, Record authority granted by section 7 of the 656) to advise the Secretary of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Act of You may submit comments and and the Secretary of Health and Human 1970 (U.S.C. 656), 29 CFR 1912a, and requests to speak (1) Electronically, (2) Services on matters relating to the Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 5–2007 by facsimile, or (3) by hard copy. All administration of the OSH Act. (71 FR 31160). NACOSH is a continuing advisory body submissions, including attachments and and operates in compliance with other materials, must identify the Signed at Washington, DC, on August 26, provisions in the OSH Act, the Federal Agency name and the docket number for 2010. Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. this notice (Docket No. OSHA–2010– David Michaels, App.), and regulations issued pursuant 0012). You also may supplement Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational to those laws (29 CFR 1912a, 41 CFR electronic submissions by uploading Safety and Health. part 102–3). documents electronically. If, instead, [FR Doc. 2010–21680 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] The tentative agenda of the NACOSH you wish to submit hard copies of BILLING CODE 4510–26–P meeting will include updates and supplementary documents, you must discussions on the following topics: submit three copies to the OSHA Docket • Remarks from the Assistant Office using the instructions in the DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Secretary of Labor for Occupational ADDRESSES section above. The Employment and Training Safety and Health (OSHA); additional materials must clearly Administration • Remarks from the Director of the identify your electronic submission by National Institute for Occupational name, date and docket number. [TA–W–74,057] Safety and Health; • Because of security-related OSHA Initiatives: Regulatory, procedures, the use of regular mail may Specialty Minerals, Inc., Franklin, VA; Enforcement and Compliance cause a significant delay in the receipt Notice of Negative Determination Assistance; Regarding Application for • of submissions. For information about Update on the Gulf Oil Spill security procedures concerning Reconsideration activities; submissions by hand, express delivery, • Enhancing workers’ voice in the By applications dated July 9, 2010 messenger or courier service, please workplace; and and July 16, 2010 (filed by a company • Ethics Update. contact the OSHA Docket Office. official and a worker, respectively), In addition, the Gulf Oil Spill Meeting transcripts and minutes as administrative reconsideration of the subgroup was formed at the June 8, well as comments and requests to speak negative determination regarding 2010, NACOSH meeting. The subgroup at the NACOSH meeting are included in workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade will meet from 3 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. on the public record of the NACOSH Adjustment Assistance (TAA) September 14, 2010, in Room N3437A/ meeting (Docket No. OSHA–2010– applicable to workers and former B/C and report back to the full 0012). Comments and requests to speak workers of the subject firm was committee on September 15. are posted without change at http:// requested. The determination was NACOSH meetings are transcribed www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA issued on June 18, 2010. The and detailed minutes of the meetings are cautions interested parties about Department’s Notice of determination prepared. Meeting transcripts and submitting personal information such as was published in the Federal Register minutes are included in the public social security numbers and birthdates. on July 1, 2010 (75 FR 38142). The record of this NACOSH meeting (Docket Although all submissions are listed in workers produced precipitated calcium No. OSHA 2010–0012). the http://www.regulations.gov index, carbonate used in the production of some documents (e.g., copyrighted paper. Public Participation materials) are not publicly available to Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), Interested parties may submit a read or download through that webpage. reconsideration may be granted under request to make an oral presentation to All submissions, including copyrighted the following circumstances:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52990 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts precipitated calcium carbonate to TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., not previously considered that the International Paper Company, Franklin Wednesday, September 15, 2010. determination complained of was Pulp and Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia. PLACE: erroneous; The worker’s request for Department of State, 2201 C (2) If it appears that the determination reconsideration stated that the subject Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520. complained of was based on a mistake firm is a ‘‘supplier/downstream FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: in the determination of facts not producer’’ to ‘‘International Paper’’ and Information on the meeting may be previously considered; or ‘‘closed down as a direct result of what obtained from Melvin F. Williams, Jr., (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying happened at the Franklin paper mill.’’ VP/General Counsel and Corporate Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of The Department determines that Secretary via e-mail at the law justified reconsideration of the International Paper Company, Franklin decision. [email protected] or by Pulp and Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia telephone at (202) 521–3600. The negative determination of the is the ‘‘Franklin paper mill.’’ TAA petition filed on behalf of workers Section 222(c) of the Trade Act of STATUS: Meeting will be closed to the at Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Franklin, 1974, as amended, states that adversely public. Virginia, was based on the finding that affected secondary workers must be MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board there was no shift/acquisition of employed by a firm that is a supplier to of Directors (the ‘‘Board’’) of the production of precipitated calcium a firm that employed a worker group carbonate from the subject firm to a who are adversely affected primary Millennium Challenge Corporation foreign country; nor was there any workers. Therefore, the supply of (‘‘MCC’’) will hold a meeting to discuss increase in imports of articles like or precipitated calcium carbonate to approval of the Jordan Compact; directly competitive with precipitated International Paper Company, Franklin approval of the Selection Criteria & calcium carbonate produced at the Pulp and Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia Methodology Report; Compact subject facility; nor was the component cannot be a basis for certification for Development and Portfolio Update; part produced by the subject firm workers of the subject firm. Threshold Program Review Update; and (precipitated calcium carbonate) The petitioners did not supply facts certain administrative matters. The directly incorporated into a firm’s not previously considered nor provide agenda items are expected to involve the production of an article that was the additional documentation indicating consideration of classified information basis of a primary TAA certification. that there was either (1) a mistake in the and the meeting will be closed to the The company official’s request for determination of facts not previously public. reconsideration stated that the workers considered or (2) a misinterpretation of of the subject firm should be eligible for Dated: August 26, 2010. facts or of the law justifying TAA because ‘‘our customer, reconsideration of the initial Melvin F. Williams, Jr., International Paper (IP) Franklin, determination. VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Virginia is certified as a Primary After careful review of the request for Millennium Challenge Corporation. Producer (see TA–W–70,243). The date reconsideration, the Department [FR Doc. 2010–21748 Filed 8–26–10; 4:15 pm] of the certification is still within the determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not BILLING CODE 9211–03–P relevant period for the separations for been met. which benefits are sought.’’ The company official asserts that workers of Conclusion MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE the subject firm are eligible to apply for After review of the application and CORPORATION TAA as adversely affected secondary investigative findings, I conclude that workers. there has been no error or The initial investigation revealed that [MCC FR 10–07] misinterpretation of the law or of the there are two International Paper facts which would justify Company facilities in Franklin, Virginia, Report on Countries That Are reconsideration of the Department of that employed workers who are eligible Candidates for Millennium Challenge Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the to apply for TAA. Workers at Account Eligibility in Fiscal Year 2011 application is denied. International Paper Company (Lumber and Countries That Would Be Plant) Franklin, Virginia were certified Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of Candidates But For Legal Prohibitions as adversely affected primary workers August, 2010. (TA–W–70,243) and workers at Del Min Amy Chen, AGENCY: Millennium Challenge International Paper Company, Franklin Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Corporation. Assistance. Pulp and Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia ACTION: Notice. were certified as adversely affected [FR Doc. 2010–21392 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] secondary workers (TA–W–72,764). BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P SUMMARY: The Department believes that the Section 608(d) of the company official misidentified the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 requires the Millennium Challenge petition number of International Paper MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE Corporation to publish a report that Company, Franklin Pulp and Paper CORPORATION Mill, Franklin, Virginia because, during identifies countries that are ‘‘candidate the initial investigation, the company [MCC FR 10–08] countries’’ for Millennium Challenge Account assistance during FY 2011. The official confirmed that precipitated Notice of the September 15, 2010, report is set forth in full below. calcium carbonate was incorporated Millennium Challenge Corporation into the paper produced by Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine International Paper Company, Franklin Act Meeting Pulp and Paper Mill, Franklin, Virginia and International Paper Company AGENCY: Millennium Challenge confirmed that the subject firm supplied Corporation.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52991

Dated: August 25, 2010. determination and selection for compact Candidate Countries: Low Income Melvin F. Williams, Jr., negotiation (section 608(d) of the Act). Category Vice President/General Counsel and This report is the first of three 1. Afghanistan Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge required reports listed above. 2. Bangladesh Corporation. 3. Benin Candidate Countries for FY11 Report on Countries That Are 4. Bolivia Candidates for Millennium Challenge The Act requires the identification of 5. Burkina Faso Account Eligibility for Fiscal Year 2011 all countries that are candidates for 6. Burundi and Countries That Would Be MCA assistance for FY11 and the 7. Cambodia Candidates but for Legal Prohibitions identification of all countries that would 8. Cameroon 9. Central African Republic Summary be candidate countries but for specified legal prohibitions on assistance. 10. Chad This report to Congress is provided in Sections 606(a) and (b) of the Act 11. Comoros accordance with section 608(a) of the provide that for FY11 a country shall be 12. Congo, Republic of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as a candidate for MCA assistance if it: 13. Dem. Republic of the Congo amended, 22 U.S.C. 7701, 7707(a) (the • 14. Djibouti ‘‘Act’’). Meets one of the following two 15. Ethiopia The Act authorizes the provision of income tests: 16. Gambia, The Millennium Challenge Account (MCA) Æ Has a per capita income equal to or 17. Ghana assistance for countries that enter into a less than the historical ceiling of the 18. Guinea Millennium Challenge Compact with International Development Association 19. Guinea Bissau the United States to support policies eligibility for the fiscal year involved (or 20. Guyana and programs that advance the progress $1,905 gross national income (GNI) per 21. Haiti of such countries to achieve lasting capita for FY11) (the ‘‘low income 22. Honduras economic growth and poverty category’’); or 23. India reduction. The Act requires the Æ Is classified as a lower middle 24. Kenya Millennium Challenge Corporation income country in the then most recent 25. Kiribati (MCC) to take a number of steps in edition of the World Development 26. Kyrgyz Republic selecting countries with which MCC Report for Reconstruction and 27. Lao PDR will seek to enter into a compact, Development published by the 28. Lesotho including (a) determining the countries International Bank for Reconstruction 29. Liberia that will be eligible for MCA assistance and Development and has an income 30. Malawi for fiscal year 2011 (FY11) based on a greater than the historical ceiling for 31. Mali country’s demonstrated commitment to International Development Association 32. Mauritania (i) just and democratic governance, (ii) eligibility for the fiscal year involved (or 33. Moldova economic freedom, and (iii) investments $1,906 to $3,945 GNI per capita for 34. Mongolia in its people; and (b) considering the FY11) (the ‘‘lower middle income 35. Mozambique opportunity to reduce poverty and category’’); and 36. Nepal generate economic growth in the • 37. Nicaragua country. These steps include the Is not ineligible to receive U.S. 38. Niger submission of reports to the economic assistance under part I of the 39. Nigeria congressional committees specified in Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 40. Pakistan ‘‘ the Act and the publication of notices in amended, (the Foreign Assistance 41. Papua New Guinea ’’ the Federal Register that identify: Act ), by reason of the application of the 42. Philippines (1) The countries that are ‘‘candidate Foreign Assistance Act or any other 43. Rwanda countries’’ for MCA assistance for FY11 provision of law. 44. Sao Tome and Principe based on per capita income levels and Pursuant to section 606(c) of the Act, 45. Senegal eligibility to receive assistance under the Board has identified the following 46. Sierra Leone U.S. law, and countries that would be countries as candidate countries under 47. Solomon Islands candidate countries but for specified the Act for FY11. In so doing, the Board 48. Somalia legal prohibitions on assistance (section has anticipated that prohibitions against 49. Tajikistan 608(a) of the Act); assistance as applied to countries in the 50. Tanzania (2) The criteria and methodology that Department of State, Foreign 51. Togo the MCC Board of Directors (Board) will Operations, and Related Programs 52. Uganda use to measure and evaluate the policy Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 53. Vietnam performance of the ‘‘candidate L. 111–117) (the ‘‘FY10 SFOAA’’), will 54. Yemen countries’’ consistent with the again apply for FY11, even though the 55. Zambia requirements of subsections (a) and (b) Department of State, Foreign of section 607 of the Act in order to Operations, and Related Programs Candidate Countries: Lower Middle determine ‘‘MCA eligible countries’’ Appropriations Act for FY11 has not yet Income Category from among the ‘‘candidate countries’’ been enacted and certain findings under 1. Angola (section 608(b) of the Act); and other statutes have not yet been made. 2. Armenia (3) The list of countries determined by As noted below, MCC will provide any 3. Belize the Board to be ‘‘MCA eligible countries’’ required updates on subsequent changes 4. Bhutan for FY11, identification of such in applicable legislation or other 5. Cape Verde countries with which the Board will circumstances that affect the status of 6. Ecuador seek to enter into compacts, and a any country as a candidate country for 7. Egypt, Arab Republic justification for such eligibility FY11. 8. El Salvador

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52992 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

9. Georgia the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, with the United States until such 10. Guatemala as amended, 22 U.S.C. sections 7101 et diplomatic relations are restored and an 11. Indonesia seq. agreement to furnish such assistance has 12. Jordan 4. Madagascar is subject to section been negotiated and entered into after 13. Kosovo 7008 of the FY10 SFOAA, which the resumption of diplomatic relations. 14. Maldives prohibits assistance to the government 3. Syria is subject to numerous 15. Marshall Islands of a country whose duly elected head of restrictions, including 620A of the 16. Micronesia, Fed. Sts. government is deposed by military coup Foreign Assistance Act, which prohibits 17. Morocco or decree and also section 7086(c) of the assistance to governments supporting 18. Paraguay FY10 SFOAA regarding budget 19. Samoa international terrorism; section 7007 of 20. Sri Lanka transparency. the FY10 SFOAA, which prohibits 21. Swaziland 5. North Korea is subject to numerous direct assistance; and section 7012 of 22. Thailand restrictions, including section 7007 of the FY10 SFOAA and section 620(q) of 23. Timor-Leste the FY10 SFOAA, which prohibits any the Foreign Assistance Act, both of 24. Tonga direct assistance to the government. which prohibit assistance to countries 25. Tunisia 6. Sudan is subject to numerous in default in payment to the U.S. in 26. Turkmenistan restrictions, including section 620A of certain circumstances. 27. Tuvalu the Foreign Assistance Act, which The countries identified above as 28. Ukraine prohibits assistance to governments candidate countries, as well as countries 29. Vanuatu supporting international terrorism; that would be considered candidate section 7012 of the FY10 SFOAA and Countries That Would Be Candidate countries but for the applicability of section 620(q) of the Foreign Assistance Countries but for Legal Prohibitions legal provisions that prohibit U.S. Act, both of which prohibit assistance to That Prohibit Assistance economic assistance, may be the subject countries in default on payment to the of future statutory restrictions, Countries that would be considered U.S. in certain circumstances; section determinations, or changed country candidate countries for FY11, but are 7008 of the FY10 SFOAA, which circumstances that affect their legal ineligible to receive United States prohibits assistance to the government eligibility for assistance under part I of economic assistance under part I of the of a country whose duly elected head of the Foreign Assistance Act by reason of Foreign Assistance Act by reason of the government is deposed by military coup application of the Foreign Assistance application of any provision of the or decree; and section 7070(f) of the Act or any other provision of law for Foreign Assistance Act or any other FY10 SFOAA. FY11. MCC will include any required provision of law, are listed below. As 7. Uzbekistan’s central government is updates on such statutory eligibility that noted above, this list is based on legal subject to section 7076(a) of the fiscal affect countries’ identification as prohibitions against economic year 2009 SFOAA, which is largely candidate countries for FY11, at such assistance that apply for fiscal year 2010 incorporated by reference and carried time as it publishes the notices required and that are anticipated to apply again forward by section 7075 of the FY10 by sections 608(b) and 608(d) of the Act, for FY11. SFOAA. This restriction states that or at other appropriate times. Any such Prohibited Countries: Low Income funds (other than expanded updates with regard to the eligibility or Category international military education and ineligibility of particular countries training funds) may be made available identified in this report will not affect 1. Burma is subject to numerous for assistance to the central government the date on which the Board is restrictions, including section 570 of the of Uzbekistan only if the Secretary of authorized to determine eligible fiscal year 1997 Foreign Operations, State determines and reports to the countries from among candidate Export Financing, and Related Programs Congress that the government is making countries which, in accordance with Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 104–208), substantial and continuing progress in section 608(a) of the Act, shall be no which prohibits assistance to the meeting its commitments under a sooner than 90 days from the date of government of Burma until it makes framework agreement with the United publication of this report. progress on improving human rights States. and implementing democratic 8. Zimbabwe is subject to several [FR Doc. 2010–21518 Filed 8–25–10; 4:15 pm] government, and due to its status as a restrictions, including section 7070(i)(2) BILLING CODE 9211–03–P major drug-transit or major illicit drug of the FY10 SFOAA, which prohibits producing country for 2009 assistance (except for macroeconomic (Presidential Determination No. 2009– growth assistance) to the central NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 30 (9/15/2009)). government of Zimbabwe unless the ADMINISTRATION 2. Cote d’Ivoire is subject to section Secretary of State determines and 7008 of the FY10 SFOAA and similar Agency Information Collection reports to Congress that the rule of law Activities: Proposed Collection; provisions of prior-year appropriations has been restored in Zimbabwe. acts, which prohibit assistance to the Comment Request Prohibited Countries: Lower Middle government of a country whose duly AGENCY: National Archives and Records Income Category elected head of government is deposed Administration (NARA). by military coup or decree. Cote d’Ivoire 1. China is not eligible to receive ACTION: Notice. is also subject to section 7086(c) of the economic assistance from the United FY10 SFOAA, which restricts economic States, absent special authority, because SUMMARY: NARA is giving public notice and security assistance under the of concerns relating to China’s record on that the agency proposes to reinstate use SFOAA for the central government of a human rights. of a voluntary survey of visitors to the country that fails to make its annual 2. Iraq is subject to section 620(t) of Public Vaults, which is part of the national budget publicly available. the Foreign Assistance Act, which National Archives Experience in 3. Eritrea is subject to restrictions due prohibits assistance to any country Washington, DC. The information will to its status as a Tier III country under which has severed diplomatic relations be used to determine how the various

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52993

components of the Public Vaults affect Estimated number of respondents: memorandums that contain additional visitors’ level of satisfaction with the 1,050. information concerning the records Public Vaults and how effectively the Estimated time per response: 10 covered by a proposed schedule. These, venue communicates that records minutes. too, may be requested and will be matter. The information will support Frequency of response: On occasion provided once the appraisal is adjustments in this offering that will (when an individual visits the Public completed. Requesters will be given 30 improve the overall visitor experience. Vaults in Washington, DC). days to submit comments. The public is invited to comment on the Estimated total annual burden hours: ADDRESSES: You may request a copy of proposed information collection 175 hours. any records schedule identified in this pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Abstract: The information collection notice by contacting the Life Cycle Act of 1995. is prescribed by EO 12862 issued Management Division (NWML) using DATES: Written comments must be September 11, 1993, which requires one of the following means: received on or before October 29, 2010 Federal agencies to survey their Mail: NARA (NWML), 8601 Adelphi to be assured of consideration. customers concerning customer service. Road, College Park, MD 20740–6001. E- The general purpose of this voluntary ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent mail: [email protected]. FAX: data collection is to measure customer to: Paperwork Reduction Act Comments 301–837–3698. satisfaction with the Public Vaults and (NHP), Room 4400, National Archives Requesters must cite the control identify additional opportunities for and Records Administration, 8601 number, which appears in parentheses improving the customers’ experience. Adelphi Rd, College Park, MD 20740– after the name of the agency which 6001; or faxed to 301–713–7409; or Dated: August 20, 2010. submitted the schedule, and must electronically mailed to Charles K. Piercy, provide a mailing address. Those who [email protected]. Acting Assistant Archivist for Information desire appraisal reports should so Services. indicate in their request. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or [FR Doc. 2010–21671 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Laurence Brewer, Director, Life Cycle copies of the proposed information BILLING CODE 7515–01–P Management Division (NWML), collection and supporting statement National Archives and Records should be directed to Tamee Fechhelm NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road, at telephone number 301–837–1694, or ADMINISTRATION College Park, MD 20740–6001. fax number 301–713–7409. Telephone: 301–837–1539. E-mail: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant Records Schedules; Availability and [email protected]. to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Request for Comments (Pub. L. 104–13), NARA invites the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each year general public and other Federal AGENCY: National Archives and Records Federal agencies create billions of agencies to comment on proposed Administration (NARA). records on paper, film, magnetic tape, information collections. The comments ACTION: Notice of availability of and other media. To control this and suggestions should address one or proposed records schedules; request for accumulation, agency records managers more of the following points: (a) comments. prepare schedules proposing retention Whether the proposed information periods for records and submit these SUMMARY: The National Archives and collection is necessary for the proper schedules for NARA’s approval, using Records Administration (NARA) performance of the functions of NARA; the Standard Form (SF) 115, Request for publishes notice at least once monthly (b) the accuracy of NARA’s estimate of Records Disposition Authority. These of certain Federal agency requests for the burden of the proposed information schedules provide for the timely transfer records disposition authority (records collection; (c) ways to enhance the into the National Archives of schedules). Once approved by NARA, quality, utility, and clarity of the historically valuable records and records schedules provide mandatory information to be collected; and (d) authorize the disposal of all other instructions on what happens to records ways to minimize the burden of the records after the agency no longer needs when no longer needed for current collection of information on them to conduct its business. Some Government business. They authorize respondents, including the use of schedules are comprehensive and cover the preservation of records of information technology; and (e) whether all the records of an agency or one of its continuing value in the National small businesses are affected by this major subdivisions. Most schedules, Archives of the United States and the collection. The comments that are however, cover records of only one destruction, after a specified period, of submitted will be summarized and office or program or a few series of records lacking administrative, legal, included in the NARA request for Office records. Many of these update research, or other value. Notice is of Management and Budget (OMB) previously approved schedules, and published for records schedules in approval. All comments will become a some include records proposed as which agencies propose to destroy matter of public record. In this notice, permanent. records not previously authorized for NARA is soliciting comments The schedules listed in this notice are disposal or reduce the retention period concerning the following information media neutral unless specified of records already authorized for collection: otherwise. An item in a schedule is Title: National Archives Public Vaults disposal. NARA invites public media neutral when the disposition Survey. comments on such records schedules, as instructions may be applied to records OMB number: 3095–0062 required by 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a). regardless of the medium in which the (reinstatement of previously approved DATES: Requests for copies must be records are created and maintained. information collection). received in writing on or before Items included in schedules submitted Agency form number: N/A. September 29, 2010. Once the appraisal to NARA on or after December 17, 2007, Type of review: Regular. of the records is completed, NARA will are media neutral unless the item is Affected public: Individuals who visit send a copy of the schedule. NARA staff limited to a specific medium. (See 36 the Public Vaults in Washington, DC. usually prepare appraisal CFR 1225.12(e).)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52994 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

No Federal records are authorized for Enforcement (N1–567–10–1, 2 items, 2 13. Department of Housing and Urban destruction without the approval of the temporary items). Master files of an Development, Agency-wide (N1 207– Archivist of the United States. This electronic information system 09–7, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Master approval is granted only after a containing copies of scanned images of files of an electronic information system thorough consideration of their law enforcement investigation records containing reference copies of policy administrative use by the agency of and other administrative and program issuances posted on the agency Web origin, the rights of the Government and records. site. of private persons directly affected by 6. Department of Homeland Security, 14. Department of the Interior, Office the Government’s activities, and U.S. Immigration and Customs of Surface Mining and Reclamation whether or not they have historical or Enforcement (N1–567–10–4, 4 items, 4 Enforcement (N1 471–10–4, 1 item, 1 other value. temporary items). Master files, inputs, temporary item). Master files of an Besides identifying the Federal and outputs of an electronic information electronic information system used by agencies and any subdivisions system containing biographical, coal companies to enter coal production requesting disposition authority, this biometric, and other data relating to data from which they can prepare public notice lists the organizational investigations and law enforcement required filings for multiple agencies. unit(s) accumulating the records or encounters. 15. Department of the Navy (N1–NU– indicates agency-wide applicability in 7. Department of Homeland Security, 10–2, 6 items, 2 temporary items). Hard the case of schedules that cover records U.S. Immigration and Customs copy aperture cards that have been that may be accumulated throughout an Enforcement (N1–567–10–5, 6 items, 6 converted to a digital format. The agency. This notice provides the control temporary items). Master files and aperture cards contain engineering number assigned to each schedule, the outputs of an electronic information drawings of mechanical and electrical total number of schedule items, and the system containing information compiled systems, ships, ordnance, and aircraft. number of temporary items (the records on visa applicants during visa security Proposed for permanent retention are proposed for destruction). It also reviews and recommendations to the the digital versions of the aperture includes a brief description of the State Department regarding issuance of cards, as well as hard copy aperture temporary records. The records the visas. cards not converted to a digital format. schedule itself contains a full 8. Department of Homeland Security, 16. Department of Veterans Affairs, description of the records at the file unit U.S. Immigration and Customs Veterans Benefits Administration (N1– level as well as their disposition. If Enforcement (N1–567–10–6, 7 items, 7 15–09–2, 1 item, 1 temporary item). NARA staff has prepared an appraisal temporary items). Master files and Worksheets used to compare veterans’ memorandum for the schedule, it too outputs of an electronic information reported income with income records of includes information about the records. system containing information used to the Internal Revenue Service and Social Further information about the locate fugitive aliens, as well as Security Administration. disposition process is available on information on activities taken to 17. Export-Import Bank of the United request. accomplish an arrest and information on States, Agency-wide (N1–275–10–2, 1 aliens (both fugitive and non-fugitive) item, 1 temporary item). Master files of Schedules Pending arrested. an electronic information system used 1. Department of Agriculture, Animal 9. Department of Homeland Security, to track financial instruments with and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Immigration and Customs renegotiated terms and/or payment (N1–463–09–10, 1 item, 1 temporary Enforcement (N1–567–10–7, 2 items, 2 schedules. item). Master files of an electronic temporary items). Master files of an 18. Export-Import Bank of the United information system used to track electronic information system States, Agency-wide (N1–275–10–4, 1 organizations and individuals with containing information on gangs, gang item, 1 temporary item). Master files of access to biological agents and toxins. activities, and suspected or confirmed an electronic information system used 2. Department of Agriculture, Food gang members and their associates. to monitor and evaluate risks of and Nutrition Service (N1–462–09–2, 1 10. Department of Homeland Security, financial products. item, 1 temporary item). Master files of U.S. Immigration and Customs 19. Federal Maritime Commission, an electronic information system Enforcement (N1–567–10–10, 2 items, 2 Office of the Secretary (N1–358–09–7, containing data that supports financial temporary items). Master files of an 11 items, 9 temporary items). Reading management and accounting operations. electronic information system files, routine fact finding investigation 3. Department of Health and Human containing biographical information and files, official docket files for non- Services, Agency for Healthcare scanned fingerprint images used for significant cases, interoffice confidential Research and Quality (N1–510–09–11, 3 applicant and employee criminal files, environmental assessments with items, 3 temporary items). Master files history checks. findings of no significant impact, of an electronic information system 11. Department of Homeland Security, environmental/energy impact containing research topic nomination U.S. Immigration and Customs statements, certification files, and data, user comments, report drafts, and Enforcement (N1–567–10–11, 2 items, 2 subject files. Proposed for permanent training materials relating to health care temporary items). Master files and retention are official docket files for effectiveness. outputs of an electronic information significant cases and Chairmen’s and 4. Department of Health and Human system that contains information about Commissioners’ speech and biography Services, Centers for Medicare & immigration bonds posted for aliens files. Medicaid Services (N1–440–09–11, 1 involved in removal proceedings. 20. Federal Mine Safety and Health item, 1 temporary item). Master files of 12. Department of Homeland Security, Review Commission, Docket Office (N1– electronic information systems U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 470–09–2, 5 items, 4 temporary items). containing information used to support Services (N1–566–10–2, 4 items, 4 Audio recordings of Commission quality reviews of Medicare payments temporary items). Master files of an meetings, case files relating to citations for goods and services. electronic information system used to and orders issued to mine operators, 5. Department of Homeland Security, track case files involving internal and master files of an electronic U.S. Immigration and Customs agency investigations. information system used to track cases.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52995

Proposed for permanent retention are NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE Fax: 202–653–4600; e-mail: Commission Blue Books containing ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES [email protected]; or by teletype (TTY/ administrative law decisions and orders TDD) for persons with hearing difficulty that merit publication. Submission for OMB Review, at 202/653–4614. Comment Request, Proposed SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 21. Federal Mine Safety and Health Collection: State Library Review Commission, Office of Institute of Museum and Library Administrative Agencies Survey, FY Services (IMLS) is an independent Administrative Law Judges (N1–470– 2011–2013 09–3, 7 items, 7 temporary items). Cases Federal grant-making agency and is the pending files, subject files, AGENCY: Institute of Museum and primary source of federal support for the chronological files, and administrative Library Services, The National Nation’s 123,000 libraries and 17,500 museums. IMLS provides a variety of meeting files. Foundation for the Arts and the Humanities. grant programs to assist the Nation’s 22. Federal Mine Safety and Health ACTION: Submission for OMB Review, museums and libraries in improving Review Commission, Office of General Comment Request. their operations and enhancing their Counsel (N1–470–09–4, 13 items, 10 services to the public. IMLS is temporary items). Cases pending files, SUMMARY: The Institute of Museum and responsible for identifying national tally sheets, chronological files, Library Services announces the needs for, and trends of, museum and petitions for review, rulemaking files, following information collection has library services funded by IMLS; subject files, and FOIA reading room been submitted to the Office of reporting on the impact and materials. Proposed for permanent Management and Budget (OMB) for effectiveness of programs conducted retention are decisional memoranda, review and approval in accordance with with funds made available by IMLS in pre-decisional opinions, and speeches. the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. addressing such needs; and identifying, and disseminating information on, the 23. Federal Mine Safety and Health Chapter 35). This program helps to ensure that requested data can be best practices of such programs. (20 Review Commission, Office of provided in the desired format, U.S.C. Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9108). Chairman, Commissioners, and reporting burden (time and financial Abstract: The State Library Counsels (N1–470–09–5, 16 items, 15 resources) is minimized, collection Administrative Agencies Survey has temporary items). Pending case files, instruments are clearly understood, and been conducted by the Institute of closed case files, petitions for reviews, the impact of collection requirements on Museum and Library Services under the copies of decisions, default orders, cases respondents can be properly assessed. clearance number 3137–0072, which pending before the U.S. Court of A copy of the proposed information expires 9/30/2010. State library Appeals, case tracking files, rulemaking collection request can be obtained by administrative agencies (‘‘StLAs’’) are files, legislative reference files, contacting the individual listed below the official agencies of each State chronological files, subject files, in the ADDRESSES section of this notice. charged by State law with the extension management and meeting files, and EEO DATES: Written comments must be and development of public library records. Speeches by the Chairman and submitted to the office listed in the services throughout the State. (20 U.S.C. Commissioners are proposed for Contact section below on or before Chapter 72, 20 U.S.C. 9122.) The permanent retention. September 25, 2010. purpose of this survey is to provide 24. National Archives and Records OMB is particularly interested in State and Federal policymakers with Administration, Office of Records comments that help the agency to: information about StLAs, including • their governance, allied operations, Services (DAA–0064–2010–0006, 1 Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary developmental services to libraries and item, 1 temporary item). for the proper performance of the library systems, support of electronic Correspondence, applications, functions of the agency, including information networks and resources, attendance records, billing documents, whether the information will have number and types of outlets, and direct and other records relating to records practical utility; services to the public. management workshops, conferences, • Evaluate the accuracy of the Current Actions: This notice proposes and training courses. agency’s estimate of the burden of the clearance of the State Library Agencies 25. National Credit Union proposed collection of information Survey. The 60-day notice for the State Administration, Agency-wide (N1–413– including the validity of the Library Administrative Agencies 09–1, 16 items, 13 temporary items). methodology and assumptions used; Survey, FY 2011–2013, was published • Records relating to individual credit Enhance the quality, utility and in the Federal Register on May 11, unions, including reports of clarity of the information to be 2010, (FR vol. 75, No. 90, pgs. 26282– collected; and 26283). No comments were received. examination, routine correspondence, • and customer complaints. Also included Minimize the burden of the Agency: Institute of Museum and are Community Development Revolving collection of information on those who Library Services. are to respond, including through the Loan Program files and credit union Title: State Library Administrative use of appropriate automated electronic, liquidation files. Proposed for Agencies Survey, FY 2011–2013. mechanical, or other technological permanent retention are credit union OMB Number: 3137–0072. collection techniques or other forms of Agency Number: 3137. regulatory, charter, and insurance files. information technology, e.g. permitting Affected Public: Federal, State and Dated: August 24, 2010. electronic submissions of responses. Local Governments, State Library Michael J. Kurtz, ADDRESSES: Kim A. Miller, Management Administrative Agencies, Libraries, Assistant Archivist for Records Services— Analyst, Office of Policy, Planning, general public. Washington, DC. Research, and Communication, Institute Number of Respondents: 51. [FR Doc. 2010–21672 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] of Museum and Library Services, 1800 Frequency: Annually. Burden hours per respondent: 26. BILLING CODE 7515–01–P M Street, NW., 9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036. Telephone: 202–653–4762; Total burden hours: 1326.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52996 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Total Annual Costs: $34,874. NUCLEAR REGULATORY postulated accidents, and data that the Contact: Comments should be sent to COMMISSION staff needs in its review of applications Office of Information and Regulatory for permits and licenses. [Docket No. 70–7015–ML; ASLBP No. 10– The draft regulatory guide (DG) is Affairs, Attn.: OMB Desk Officer for 899–02–ML–BD01] Education, Office of Management and temporarily identified by its task Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC Areva Enrichment Services, LLC number, DG–8035, which should be 20503, (202) 395–7316. (Eagle Rock Enrichment Facility); mentioned in all related correspondence. DG–8035 is proposed Dated: August 24, 2010. Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 8.2, Kim A. Miller, dated August 1973. This guide provides Management Analyst, Office of Policy, Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and general guidance that the staff of the Planning, Research, and Communication. 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and NRC considers acceptable for the [FR Doc. 2010–21487 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Licensing Board (Board) in the above- administrative practices associated with BILLING CODE 7036–01–P captioned Areva Enrichment Services surveys and monitoring of ionizing proceeding is hereby reconstituted by radiation in licensed institutions, appointing Administrative Judge G. Paul intended primarily for administrative NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Bollwerk, III, to serve as Board Chair in and management personnel in place of Administrative Judge Alex S. organizations that are involved in, or are Advisory Committee for International Karlin, whose other assignments have planning to initiate, activities involving Science & Engineering; Notice of rendered him unavailable to participate the handling of radioactive materials or Meeting in this proceeding. radiation. All correspondence, documents, and The administrative requirements for In accordance with Federal Advisory other materials shall continue to be filed radiation monitoring are mainly Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as in accordance with the NRC E-Filing specified in Title 10 of the Code of amended), the National Science rule. See 10 CFR 2.302 et seq. Federal Regulations, part 20, ‘‘Standards Foundation announces the following for Protection against Radiation’’ (10 meeting: Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of August 2010. CFR part 20), and are applicable to all Name: Advisory Committee for NRC-licensed activities. This part E. Roy Hawkens, International Science and Engineering requires surveys in order to evaluate the (#25104). Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety significance of radiation levels that may and Licensing Board Panel. Date/Time: September 20, 2010; 9 a.m. to be present. In addition, it requires 5:15 p.m.; September 21, 2009; 8:30 a.m. to [FR Doc. 2010–21515 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] radiation monitoring in order to obtain 12 p.m. BILLING CODE 7590–01–P measurements for the evaluation of Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Stafford II, Room 595, potential exposures and doses. Arlington, VA 22230. NUCLEAR REGULATORY II. Further Information Type of Meeting: Open. COMMISSION Contact Person: Robert E. Webber, National The NRC staff is soliciting comments Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, [NRC–2010–0287] on DG–8035. Comments may be Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292–7569. accompanied by relevant information or If you are attending the meeting and need Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance, supporting data and should mention access to the NSF, please contact the Availability DG–8035 in the subject line. Comments individual listed above so your name may be submitted in writing or in electronic added to the building access list. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory form will be made available to the Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, Commission. public in their entirety through the recommendations, and oversight concerning ACTION: Notice of issuance and NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access support for research, education and related availability of Draft Regulatory Guide, and Management System (ADAMS). activities involving U.S. science and DG–8035, ‘‘Administrative Practices in engineering working within a global context, Comments would be most helpful if as well as strategic efforts to promote a more Radiation Surveys and Monitoring.’’ received by October 29, 2010. effective NSF role in international science Comments received after that date will and engineering. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be considered if it is practical to do so, Harriet Karagiannis, U.S. Nuclear but the NRC is able to ensure Agenda Regulatory Commission, Washington, consideration only for comments September 20, 2010 DC 20555–0001, telephone: (301) 251– received on or before this date. 7477 or e-mail Although a time limit is given, Update of 2010 activities. [email protected]. comments and suggestions in Working Groups discussions. connection with items for inclusion in Invited presentations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: guides currently being developed or September 21, 2009 I. Introduction improvements in all published guides Discussion with NSF International The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory are encouraged at any time. Coordinating Committee. Commission (NRC) is issuing for public ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Conversation with NSF Acting comment a draft guide in the agency’s by any one of the following methods. Director. ‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series Please include Docket ID NRC–2010– Planning for the next meeting. was developed to describe and make 0287 in the subject line of your available to the public such information comments. Comments submitted in Dated: August 24, 2010. as methods that are acceptable to the writing or in electronic form will be Susanne Bolton, NRC staff for implementing specific posted on the NRC Web site and on the Committee Management Officer. parts of the NRC’s regulations, Federal rulemaking Web site [FR Doc. 2010–21437 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] techniques that the staff uses in Regulations.gov. Because your BILLING CODE 7555–01–P evaluating specific problems or comments will not be edited to remove

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52997

any identifying or contact information, http://www.regulations.gov by searching NPPD an exemption from the March 31, the NRC cautions you against including on Docket ID: NRC–2010–0287. 2010, implementation date until August any information in your submission that Regulatory guides are not 31, 2010, for three of these additional you do not want to be publicly copyrighted, and Commission approval requirements. NPPD now seeks an disclosed. is not required to reproduce them. exemption from the August 31, 2010, The NRC requests that any party Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day implementation date until December 31, soliciting or aggregating comments of August 2010. 2010, for the same three additional received from other persons for For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. requirements. All other physical submission to the NRC inform those Harriet Karagiannis, security requirements established by persons that the NRC will not edit their this recent rulemaking have already comments to remove any identifying or Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development been implemented by the licensee. Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of contact information, and therefore, they Nuclear Regulatory Research. By application dated July 7, 2010, as should not include any information in supplemented by letter dated July 20, their comments that they do not want [FR Doc. 2010–21522 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 2010, the licensee requested an publicly disclosed. BILLING CODE 7590–01–P exemption in accordance with 10 CFR Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions.’’ The http://www.regulations.gov and search licensee’s letter contains security- NUCLEAR REGULATORY for documents filed under Docket ID related information and, accordingly, COMMISSION NRC–2010–0287. Address questions those portions are not available to the about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher [NRC–2010–0061; Docket No. 50–298] public. The licensee has requested an 301–492–3668; e-mail exemption from the August 31, 2010, [email protected]. Nebraska Public Power District; implementation date, stating that it Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Cooper Nuclear Station; Exemption must complete a number of Chief, Rules, Announcements, and 1.0 Background modifications to the current site security Directives Branch (RAD), Office of configuration before all requirements Administration, Mail Stop: TWB–05– Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD can be met. Specifically, the request is B01M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory or the licensee) is the holder of Facility for three requirements that would be Commission, Washington, DC 20555– Operating License No. DPR–46 which met by December 31, 2010, instead of 0001, or by fax to RAD at (301) 492– authorizes operation of the Cooper the August 31, 2010, deadline. Granting 3446. Nuclear Station (CNS). The license this exemption for the three items You can access publicly available provides, among other things, that the would allow the licensee to complete documents related to this notice using facility is subject to the rules, the modifications designed to update the following methods: regulations, and orders of the Nuclear aging equipment and incorporate state- NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): Regulatory Commission (NRC, the of-the-art technology to meet or exceed The public may examine and have Commission) now or hereafter in effect. the regulatory requirements. copied for a fee publicly available The facility consists of a boiling-water documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1 reactor located in Nemaha County, 3.0 Discussion of Part 73 Schedule F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Nebraska. Exemptions From the March 31, 2010, Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. Full Implementation Date 2.0 Request/Action NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access Pursuant to 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1), ‘‘By and Management System (ADAMS): Title 10 of the Code of Federal March 31, 2010, each nuclear power Publicly available documents created or Regulations (10 CFR), part 73, ‘‘Physical reactor licensee, licensed under 10 CFR received at the NRC are available protection of plants and materials,’’ part 50, shall implement the electronically at the NRC’s Electronic section 73.55, ‘‘Requirements for requirements of this section through its Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/ physical protection of licensed activities Commission-approved Physical Security reading-rm/adams.html. From this page, in nuclear power reactors against Plan, Training and Qualification Plan, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, radiological sabotage,’’ published in the Safeguards Contingency Plan, and Cyber which provides text and image files of Federal Register on March 27, 2009 (74 Security Plan referred to collectively NRC’s public documents. If you do not FR 13926–13993), effective May 26, hereafter as ‘security plans.’ ’’ Pursuant have access to ADAMS or if there are 2009, with a full implementation date of to 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may, problems in accessing the documents March 31, 2010, requires licensees to upon application by any interested located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s protect, with high assurance, against person or upon its own initiative, grant PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, radiological sabotage by designing and exemptions from the requirements of 10 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to implementing comprehensive site CFR part 73 when the exemptions are [email protected]. DG–8035 is security programs. The amendments to authorized by law, and will not available electronically under ADAMS 10 CFR 73.55 published on March 27, endanger life or property or the common Accession Number ML100680456. In 2009, establish and update generically defense and security, and are otherwise addition, electronic copies of DG–8035 applicable security requirements similar in the public interest. By letter dated are available through the NRC’s public to those previously imposed by February 26, 2010 (Agencywide Web site under Draft Regulatory Guides Commission orders issued after the Documents Access and Management in the ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ collection of terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, System (ADAMS) Accession No. the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at and implemented by licensees. In ML100190100), the NRC approved an http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc- addition, the amendments to 10 CFR exemption that allowed NPPD an collections/. The regulatory analysis 73.55 include additional requirements extension from March 31, 2010, until may be found in ADAMS under to further enhance site security based August 31, 2010, of the implementation Accession No. ML102310331. upon insights gained from date for three specific requirements of Federal Rulemaking Web site: Public implementation of the post September the new rule. comments and supporting materials 11, 2001, security orders. By letter dated NRC approval of this exemption, as related to this notice can be found at February 26, 2010, the NRC granted noted above, would allow an extension

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 52998 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

from August 31, 2010, until December regulation. The Attachment to the security orders issued in response to the 31, 2010, of the implementation date for licensee’s letter dated July 7, 2010, events of September 11, 2001. three specific requirements of the new contains security-related information Therefore, the NRC concludes that the rule. As stated above, 10 CFR 73.5 regarding the site security plan, details licensee’s actions are in the best interest allows the NRC to grant exemptions of the specific requirements of the of protecting the public health and from the requirements of 10 CFR part regulation for which the site cannot be safety through the security changes that 73. The NRC staff has determined that in compliance by the August 31, 2010, will result from granting this exemption. granting of the licensee’s proposed deadline, justification for the exemption exemption would not result in a request, a description of the required As per the licensee’s request and the violation of the Atomic Energy Act of changes to the site’s security NRC’s regulatory authority to grant an 1954, as amended, or the Commission’s configuration, and a timeline with exemption from the August 31, 2010, regulations. Therefore, the exemption is critical path activities that would bring deadline for the three items specified in authorized by law. the licensee into full compliance by the Attachment to NPPD’s letter dated In the draft final rule provided to the December 31, 2010. The timeline July 7, 2010, as supplemented by letter Commission, the NRC staff proposed provides dates indicating when (1) dated July 20, 2010, the licensee is that the requirements of the new construction will begin on various required to be in full compliance with regulation be met within 180 days. The phases of the project (e.g., new 10 CFR 73.55 by December 31, 2010. In Commission directed a change from 180 buildings and fences), and (2) critical achieving compliance, the licensee is days to approximately 1 year for equipment will be ordered, installed, reminded that it is responsible for licensees to fully implement the new tested, and become operational. A determining the appropriate licensing requirements. This change was redacted version of the licensee’s mechanism (i.e., 10 CFR 50.54(p) or 10 incorporated into the final rule. From exemption request dated July 7, 2010, CFR 50.90) for incorporation of all this, it is clear that the Commission including attachment, and the licensee’s necessary changes to its security plans. wanted to provide a reasonable letter dated July 20, 2010, are publicly timeframe for licensees to achieve full available at ADAMS Accession Nos. The exemption extends the compliance. ML101900266 and ML102090069, compliance date of three specified As noted in the final rule, the respectively. requirements of 10 CFR 73.55 until Commission also anticipated that Notwithstanding the scheduler December 31, 2010. The Commission licensees would have to conduct site- exemptions for these limited has determined that granting this specific analyses to determine what requirements, the licensee will continue exemption from the requirements of 10 changes were necessary to implement to be in compliance with all other CFR 73.55 involves (i) no significant the rule’s requirements, and that applicable physical security hazards consideration, (ii) no significant changes could be accomplished through requirements as described in 10 CFR change in the types or significant a variety of licensing mechanisms, 73.55 and reflected in its current NRC- increase in the amounts of any effluents including exemptions. Since issuance of approved physical security program. By that may be released offsite, (iii) no the final rule, the Commission has December 31, 2010, CNS will be in full significant increase in individual or rejected a generic industry request to compliance with the regulatory cumulative public or occupational extend the rule’s compliance date for all requirements of 10 CFR 73.55, as issued radiation exposure, (iv) no significant operating nuclear power plants, but on March 27, 2009. construction impact, and (v) no noted that the Commission’s regulations provide mechanisms for individual 4.0 Conclusion for Part 73 Schedule significant increase in the potential for licensees, with good cause, to apply for Exemption Request or consequences from radiological relief from the compliance date, as The NRC staff has reviewed the accidents. In addition, the requirements documented in the letter from R.W. licensee’s submittal and concludes that from which this exemption is sought Borchardt (NRC) to M.S. Fertel (Nuclear the licensee has justified its request for involve 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(G), Energy Institute) dated June 4, 2009 an extension of the compliance date ‘‘Scheduling requirements.’’ (ADAMS Accession No. ML091410309). with regard to three specified Accordingly, the exemption meets the The licensee’s request for an exemption requirements of 10 CFR 73.55 until eligibility criteria for categorical is therefore consistent with the December 31, 2010. exclusion set forth in 10 CFR approach set forth by the Commission Accordingly, the Commission has 51.22(c)(25)(i)–(vi). Therefore, in and discussed in the letter dated June 4, determined that pursuant to 10 CFR accordance with 10 CFR 51.22(b), no 2009. 73.5, ‘‘Specific exemptions,’’ an environmental impact statement or exemption from the August 31, 2010, CNS Schedule Exemption Request environmental assessment need be compliance date is authorized by law prepared in connection with the NRC’s The licensee provided detailed and will not endanger life or property or consideration of this exemption request. information in the Attachment to its the common defense and security, and letter dated July 7, 2010, as is otherwise in the public interest. This exemption is effective upon supplemented by letter dated July 20, Therefore, the Commission hereby issuance. 2010, requesting an exemption. The grants the requested exemption. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day licensee is requesting additional time to The long-term benefits that will be of August 2010. implement certain new requirements realized when the CNS modifications For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. due to the impact on construction are complete justifies extending the full activities of the extremely wet spring compliance date in the case of this Joseph G. Giitter, and flooding of the Missouri River. The particular licensee. The security Director, Division of Operating Reactor licensee describes a comprehensive plan measures that CNS needs additional Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor to expand the protected area with time to complete are new requirements Regulation. upgrades to the security capabilities of imposed by March 27, 2009, [FR Doc. 2010–21637 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] its CNS site and provides a timeline for amendments to 10 CFR 73.55, and are BILLING CODE 7590–01–P achieving full compliance with the new in addition to those required by the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 52999

NUCLEAR REGULATORY published in the Federal Register on with a temporary identification as Draft COMMISSION October 14, 2009, (74 FR 58268–58269). Regulatory Guide, DG–8032. This Detailed meeting agendas and meeting regulatory guide provides guidance on Advisory Committee on Reactor transcripts are available on the NRC the conditions and prerequisites for Safeguards (ACRS); Meeting of the Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- permitting planned special exposure(s) ACRS Subcommittee On ESBWR rm/doc-collections/acrs. Information (PSE(s)), as allowed by Title 10 of the regarding topics to be discussed, Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) The ACRS Subcommittee on changes to the agenda, whether the Part 20, ‘‘Standards for Protection Economic Simplified Boiling Water meeting has been canceled or Against Radiation,’’ the associated Reactor (ESBWR) will hold a meeting on rescheduled, and the time allotted to specific monitoring and reporting September 23–24, 2010, Room T–2B1, present oral statements can be obtained requirements, and examples of 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, from the Web site cited above or by acceptable means of satisfying these Maryland. contacting the identified DFO. requirements. The entire meeting will be open to Moreover, in view of the possibility that Dose limits are established in 10 CFR public attendance, with the exception of the schedule for ACRS meetings may be 20.1201, ‘‘Occupational Dose Limits for a portion that may be closed to protect adjusted by the Chairman as necessary Adults.’’ Section 10 CFR 20.1206, information that is proprietary to to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, ‘‘Planned Special Exposures,’’ provides General Electric—Hitachi Nuclear persons planning to attend should check the conditions and limits for PSEs of Energy (GEH) and its contractors with these references if such adult workers (i.e. radiation doses in pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4). rescheduling would result in a major addition to and accounted for separately The agenda for the subject meeting inconvenience. from the doses received under the limits shall be as follows: specified in 10 CFR 20.1201). In Dated: August 24, 2010. addition, 10 CFR 20.2104, ‘‘Notification Thursday, September 23, 2010 and Duncan White, of Prior Occupational Dose,’’ (10 CFR Friday, September 24, 2010—8:30 a.m. Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, 20.2104(b) and 10 CFR 20.2104(e)(2)) until 5 p.m. Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. specify the requirements for obtaining [FR Doc. 2010–21513 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] The Subcommittee will discuss the prior occupational dose information, 10 safety evaluation reports for Chapter 3, BILLING CODE 7590–01–P CFR 20.2105, ‘‘Records of Planned ‘‘Design of Structures, Components, Special Exposures,’’ and 10 CFR Equipment,’’ Chapter 4, ‘‘Reactor,’’ 20.2106, ‘‘Records of Individual NUCLEAR REGULATORY Monitoring Results,’’ specify the Chapter 6, ‘‘Engineered Safety Features,’’ COMMISSION Chapter 7, ‘‘Instruments and Control requirements for exposure and Systems,’’ and Chapter 9, ‘‘Auxiliary [NRC–2009–0556] monitoring records applicable to PSEs. Systems.’’ The Subcommittee will hear The requirements for reporting PSEs Notice of Issuance of Regulatory Guide ‘‘ presentations by and hold discussions appear in 10 CFR 20.2202, Notification of Incidents’’ (10 CFR 20.2202(e)) and 10 with representatives of the NRC staff, AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory CFR 20.2204, ‘‘Reports of Planned GEH, and other interested persons Commission. Special Exposures.’’ regarding this matter. The ACTION: Notice of Issuance and Subcommittee will gather information, Availability of Regulatory Guide 8.35, II. Further Information analyze relevant issues and facts, and Revision 1, ‘‘Planned Special Exposure.’’ In December 2009, DG–8032 was formulate proposed positions and published with a public comment actions, as appropriate, for deliberation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. period of 60 days from the issuance of by the Full Committee. A. Jervey, Regulatory Guide the guide. Staff’s responses to public Members of the public desiring to Development Branch, Division of comments were received and are located provide oral statements and/or written Engineering, Office of Nuclear in the NRC’s Agencywide Documents comments should notify the Designated Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Access and Management System Federal Official (DFO), Christopher Regulatory Commission, Washington, (ADAMS), under Accession No. Brown (Telephone 301–415–7111 or DC 20555–0001, telephone (301) 251– ML101370019. The public comment E-mail [email protected]) five 7404 or e-mail [email protected]. period closed on March 11, 2010. The days prior to the meeting, if possible, so SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: regulatory analysis may be found in that appropriate arrangements can be ADAMS under Accession No. I. Introduction made. Thirty-five hard copies of each ML101370119. presentation or handout should be The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Electronic copies of Regulatory Guide provided to the DFO thirty minutes Commission (NRC) is issuing a revision 8.35, Revision 1 are available through before the meeting. In addition, one to an existing guide in the agency’s the NRC’s public Web site under electronic copy of each presentation ‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series ‘‘Regulatory Guides’’ at http:// should be e-mailed to the DFO one day was developed to describe and make www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc- before the meeting. If an electronic copy available to the public information such collections/. cannot be provided within this as methods that are acceptable to the In addition, regulatory guides are timeframe, presenters should provide NRC staff for implementing specific available for inspection at the NRC’s the DFO with a CD containing each parts of the agency’s regulations, Public Document Room (PDR) located at presentation at least thirty minutes techniques that the staff uses in Room O–1F21, One White Flint North, before the meeting. Electronic evaluating specific problems or 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, recordings will be permitted only postulated accidents, and data that the Maryland 20852–2738. The PDR’s during those portions of the meeting staff needs in its review of applications mailing address is USNRC PDR, that are open to the public. Detailed for permits and licenses. Washington, DC 20555–0001. The PDR procedures for the conduct of and Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 8.35, can also be reached by telephone at participation in ACRS meetings were ‘‘Planned Special Exposure,’’ was issued (301) 415–4737 or (800) 397–4209, by

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:41 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53000 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

fax at (301) 415–3548, and by e-mail to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Directors Overseas; Peace Corps Medical [email protected]. Denora Miller, Privacy Act Officer, 202– Officers Overseas. Regulatory guides are not 692–1236, [email protected]. SYSTEM NAME: copyrighted, and NRC approval is not SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PC–18—Peace Corps, Former Peace required to reproduce them. Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, provides that Corps Volunteers Database. the public will be given a 30-day period Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day Changes: of August, 2010. in which to comment on a revised * * * * * For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. routine use. The Office of Management Mark P. Orr, and Budget (OMB), which has oversight ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE Acting Chief, Regulatory Guide Development responsibility under the Act, requires a SYSTEM: Branch, Division of Engineering, Office of 40-day period in which to review the Amend the statement of general Nuclear Regulatory Research. revision. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. routine uses to indicate that all of the [FR Doc. 2010–21517 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] 552a, Peace Corps has provided a report Peace Corps’ General Routine Uses BILLING CODE 7590–01–P on this system to OMB and the apply to this system; and state that the Congress. Peace Corps is publishing following specific routines use applies changes which affect the public’s right to this system: or need to know. ‘‘The contents of these records may be PEACE CORPS SYSTEM NAME: disclosed: ‘‘(a) To any educational institutions PC–17—Peace Corps, Volunteer Privacy Act of 1974; Report of an with which the Peace Corps has a Applicant and Service Records System. Altered System of Records Fellows/USA or Masters International Changes: agreement which requires access to ACTION: Notice to amend a system of * * * * * Volunteer or Returned Peace Corps records. ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE Volunteer contact information in order SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND to meet the terms of the agreement. SUMMARY: The Peace Corps is revising THE PURPOSES OF SUCH USES: ‘‘(b) To Returned Peace Corps two of its existing systems of records After specific Routine Use (k)(4) add Volunteer organizations furthering the notices subject to the Privacy Act of Peace Corps’ recruiting or Third Goal 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), PC–17—Volunteer specific Routine Use (l) stating, ‘‘To any educational institutions with which the activities. The information released will Applicant and Service Records System, be limited to contact information.’’ and PC–18—Former Peace Corps Peace Corps has a Fellows/USA or Volunteers Database. The first revision Masters International agreement which This notice is issued in Washington, DC, adds a specific routine use to both PC– requires access to Volunteer or Returned on August 26, 2010. 17 and PC–18. This specific routine use Peace Corps Volunteer contact Earl W. Yates, indicates that the Peace Corps may information in order to meet the terms Associate Director, Management. share Peace Corps Volunteer and of the agreement.’’ [FR Doc. 2010–21493 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] After specific Routine Use (l) add Returned Peace Corps Volunteer contact BILLING CODE 6051–01–P information with educational specific Routine Use (m) stating ‘‘To institutions with which the Peace Corps Returned Peace Corps Volunteer organizations furthering the Peace has a Fellows/Masters International PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY Corps’ recruiting or third goal activities. agreement which requires access to such CORPORATION information. The second revision adds The information released will be limited another specific routine use to both PC– to contact information.’’ Submission of Information Collection 17 and PC–18 indicating that the Peace * * * * * for OMB Review; Comment Request; Termination of Single-Employer Plans, Corps may share Peace Corps Volunteer SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: and Returned Peace Corps Volunteer Missing Participants Delete current entry and replace with information with Returned Peace Corps the following: ‘‘As the record flows from AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Volunteer organizations that are one state to another, or if a record is Corporation. furthering the Peace Corps’ recruiting established for a specific purpose, the and third goal activities. The third ACTION: Notice of request for extension system manager is the agency official revision indicates that all of the Peace of OMB approval, with modifications. responsible for that particular function. Corps’ General Routine Uses apply to People unsure about whom to contact, SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty PC–18. The fourth revision updates the may contact the Peace Corps’ FOIA/ Corporation (‘‘PBGC’’) is requesting that System Manager information for PC–17. Privacy Officer at 1111 20th St., NW., the Office of Management and Budget DATES: This proposed action will be Washington, DC 20526. (‘‘OMB’’), under the Paperwork effective without further notice October (1) The following system managers are Reduction Act, extend approval, with 14, 2010 without further action, unless located at 1111 20th St., NW., modifications, of a collection of adverse comment is received by Peace Washington, DC 20526: Director of information in its regulations on Corps by September 29, 2010. Placement and Staging; Chief of Health Termination of Single Employer Plans ADDRESSES: You may submit comments Benefits and Analysis Division; Chief of and Missing Participants, and by e-mail to [email protected]. Volunteer and Staff Payroll Services implementing forms and instructions Include Privacy Act System of Records Branch; Director, Management (OMB control number 1212–0036, in the subject line of the message. You Information and Assessment Division; expires September 30, 2010). This may also submit comments by mail to Supervisor, Medical Records Manager in notice informs the public of PBGC’s Denora Miller, Privacy Act Officer, the Division of Volunteer Support; request and solicits public comment on Peace Corps, 1111 20th Street, NW., (2) The following system managers the collection of information. Washington, DC 20526. Contact Denora can be contacted at the overseas post of DATES: Comments should be submitted Miller for copies of comments. assignment: Peace Corps Country by September 29, 2010.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53001

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to instructions (including changes outside the scope of this notice. The the Office of Information and Regulatory prompted by changes in ERISA and the purpose of this notice is to allow an Affairs, Office of Management and Internal Revenue Code). The collection additional 30 days for public comments. Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for of information under these regulations The Office of Management and Budget Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and the implementing forms and is particularly interested in comments via electronic mail at instructions has been approved by OMB that: [email protected] or by fax under control number 1212–0036 1. Evaluate whether the proposed to (202) 395–6974. (expires September 30, 2010). PBGC is collection of information is necessary Copies of the request for extension requesting that OMB extend its approval for the proper performance of the (including the collection of information) for three years. An agency may not functions of the agency, including may be obtained without charge by conduct or sponsor, and a person is not whether the information will have writing to the Disclosure Division of the required to respond to, a collection of practical utility; Office of the General Counsel of PBGC information unless it displays a 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the at the above address, visiting the currently valid OMB control number. agency’s estimate of the burden of the Disclosure Division, faxing a request to PBGC estimates that 1,381 plan proposed collection of information, 202–326–4042, or calling 202–326–4040 administrators will be subject to the including the validity of the during normal business hours. (TTY and collection of information requirements methodology and assumptions used; TDD users may call the Federal relay in PBGC’s termination and missing 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and service toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and participants regulations and clarity of the information to be ask to be connected to 202–326–4040.) implementing forms and instructions collected; and The Disclosure Division will e-mail, fax, each year, and that the total annual 4. Minimize the burden of the or mail the request to you, as you burden of complying with these collection of information on those who request. The regulations and forms and requirements is 2,325 hours and are to respond, including through the instructions relating to this collection of $3,327,341. Much of the work use of appropriate automated, information may be accessed on PBGC’s associated with terminating a plan is electronic, mechanical, or other Web site at http://www.pbgc.gov. performed for purposes other than technological collection techniques or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo meeting these requirements. other forms of information technology, Amato Burns, Attorney, or Catherine B. Issued in Washington, DC, this 24th day of e.g., permitting electronic submissions Klion, Manager, Legislative and August, 2010. of responses. Regulatory Department, Pension Benefit John H. Hanley, DATES: Comments are encouraged and Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, Director, Legislative and Regulatory will be accepted until September 29, NW., Washington, DC 20005, 202–326– Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty 2010. This process is conducted in Corporation. 4024 (TTY and TDD users may call the accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1. Federal relay service toll-free at 1–800– [FR Doc. 2010–21463 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 877–8339 and ask to be connected to BILLING CODE 7709–01–P 202–326–4024.) invited to submit written comments on the proposed information collection to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Office of Information and Regulatory OFFICE OF PERSONNEL section 4041 of the Employee Affairs, Office of Management and MANAGEMENT Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., as amended (ERISA), a single-employer Submission for Review: Application for Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk pension plan may terminate voluntarily Officer for the Office of Personnel only if it satisfies the requirements for 10–Point Veteran Preference, 3206– 0001 Management or sent via electronic mail either a standard or a distress to [email protected] or termination. Pursuant to ERISA section AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel faxed to (202) 395–6974. 4041(b), for standard terminations, and Management. section 4041(c), for distress FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A ACTION: 30–Day Notice and request for copy of this ICR, with applicable terminations, and PBGC’s termination comments. regulation (29 CFR part 4041), a plan supporting documentation, may be administrator wishing to terminate a SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel obtained by contacting the Office of plan is required to submit specified Management (OPM) offers the general Information and Regulatory Affairs, information to PBGC in support of the public and other Federal agencies the Office of Management and Budget, 725 proposed termination and to provide opportunity to comment on an 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC specified information regarding the extension of an already existing 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the proposed termination to third parties information collection request (ICR) Office of Personnel Management or sent (participants, beneficiaries, alternate 3206–0001, Application for 10–Point via electronic mail to _ payees, and employee organizations). In Veterans’ Preference. As required by the oira [email protected] or faxed the case of a plan with participants or Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. to (202) 395–6974. beneficiaries who cannot be located L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35), as SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The when their benefits are to be distributed, amended by the Clinger-Cohen Act Standard Form (SF) 15, Application for the plan administrator is subject to the (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is soliciting 10–Point Veterans’ Preference, is used requirements of ERISA section 4050 and comments for this collection on behalf by OPM examining offices and agency PBGC’s missing participants regulation of the Office of Management and appointing officials to adjudicate (29 CFR part 4050). As noted above, Budget. The information collection was individuals’ claims for veterans’ these regulations may be accessed on previously published in the Federal preference in accordance with the PBGC’s Web site at http:// Register on June 14, 2010, at 75 FR Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944. www.pbgc.gov. PBGC is making 33657 allowing for a 60-day public Analysis: clarifying, simplifying, editorial, and comment period. One agency provided Agency: Employee Services, Office of other changes to the existing forms and suggested changes to the form which are Personnel Management.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53002 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Title: Application for 10–Point the instant contracts are functionally Postal Service’s Notice apply to each of Veteran Preference. equivalent to previously submitted the instant contracts. OMB Number: 3206–0001. GEPS contracts, and are supported by The Postal Service contends that the Affected Public: Federal Employees, Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached instant contracts are functionally retirees, individuals and households. to the Notice and originally filed in equivalent to the baseline contract for Number of Respondents: 18,418. Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1–2, GEPS 3 and share the same cost and Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 Attachment 3. The Notice also explains market characteristics as the previously minutes/hour. that Order No. 86, which established filed GEPS contracts. Id. at 4. It states Total Burden Hours: 3,070 hours. GEPS 1 as a product, also authorized that the differences including updates U.S. Office of Personnel Management. functionally equivalent agreements to be and volume or postage commitments of John Berry, included within the product, provided customers, do not alter the contracts’ that they meet the requirements of 39 functional equivalency. Id. The Postal Director. U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290, Service asserts that ‘‘[b]ecause the [FR Doc. 2010–21541 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the Commission approved the GEPS 2 agreements incorporate the same cost BILLING CODE 6325–38–P product.2 In Order No. 503, the attributes and methodology, the relevant Commission approved the GEPS 3 characteristics of these six GEPS product. Additionally, the Postal contracts are similar, if not the same, as POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION Service requested to have the contract in the relevant characteristics of previously [Docket Nos. CP2010–96, CP2010–97, Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the filed contracts.’’ Id. CP2010–98, CP2010–99, CP2010–100, and baseline contract for future functional The Postal Service concludes that its CP2010–101; Order No. 520] equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3 filings demonstrate that each of the new product. GEPS 3 contracts complies with the New Postal Products The instant contracts. The Postal requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is Service filed the instant contracts functionally equivalent to the baseline AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests ACTION: Notice. the Postal Service contends that each that the instant contracts be included contract is in accordance with Order No. SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5. 86. The term of each contract is one year recently—filed Postal Service request to from the date the Postal Service notifies II. Notice of Filing add six Global Expedited Package the customer that all necessary Services 3 (MC2010–28) contracts to the The Commission establishes Docket regulatory approvals have been competitive product list. This notice Nos. CP2010–96 through CP2010–101 received. Notice at 3. addresses procedural steps associated for consideration of matters related to In support of its Notice, the Postal with the filing. the contracts identified in the Postal Service filed four attachments as Service’s Notice. DATES: Comments are due: August 27, follows: These dockets are addressed on a 2010. 1. Attachments 1A, 1B, 1C ,1D, 1E and consolidated basis for purposes of this ADDRESSES: Submit comments 1F—redacted copies of the six contracts order. Filings with respect to a electronically via the Commission’s and applicable annexes; particular contract should be filed in Filing Online system at http:// 2. Attachments 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E and that docket. www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 2F—certified statements required by 39 Interested persons may submit submit their views electronically should CFR 3015.5(c)(2) for each of the six comments on whether the Postal contact the person identified in the FOR contracts; Service’s contracts are consistent with FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 3. Attachment 3—a redacted copy of the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or by telephone for advice on alternatives Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which 3642. Comments are due no later than to electronic filing. establishes prices and classifications for August 27, 2010. The public portions of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GEPS contracts, a description of these filings can be accessed via the Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for Commission’s Web site (http:// [email protected] or 202–789– prices, an analysis of the formulas, and www.prc.gov.) 6820. certification of the Governors’ vote; and The Commission appoints Paul L. 4. Attachment 4—an application for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Harrington to serve as Public non–public treatment of materials to Representative in the captioned Table of Contents maintain redacted portions of the proceedings. contracts and supporting documents I. Introduction under seal. III. Ordering Paragraphs II. Notice of Filing The Notice advances reasons why the III. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the 1. The Commission establishes Docket I. Introduction Mail Classification Schedule language Nos. CP2010–96 through CP2010–101 On August 18, 2010, the Postal for GEPS. The Postal Service identifies for consideration of matters raised by Service filed a notice announcing that it customer–specific information and the Postal Service’s Notice. has entered into six additional Global general contract terms that distinguish 2. Comments by interested persons in Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3) the instant contracts from the baseline these proceedings are due no later than contracts.1 The Postal Service believes GEPS 3 agreement all of which are August 27, 2010. highlighted in the Notice. Id. at 4–5. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. 1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing These modifications as described in the Harrington is appointed to serve as the Six Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited officer of the Commission (Public Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements 2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting and Application for Non–Public Treatment of Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package Representative) to represent the Materials Filed Under Seal, August 18, 2010 Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August interests of the general public in these (Notice). 28, 2009 (Order No. 290). proceedings.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53003

4. The Secretary shall arrange for approved by the Commission prior to Postal Service notes that in FY 2009, publication of this order in the Federal consideration of this request.2 Request commercial Standard Mail Fulfillment Register. at 1, n.1. In that docket, the Postal Parcels and other Standard Mail parcel By the Commission. Service proposes to segment Standard categories had a collective cost coverage Shoshana M. Grove, Mail parcels into two main categories: of 75.23 percent. It requests a 23.3 Marketing Parcels and Fulfillment percent rate increase in Docket No. Secretary. Parcels. Current commercial and R2010–4 for Standard Mail parcel [FR Doc. 2010–21423 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] nonprofit Standard Mail Parcels would categories which, if approved, will yield BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S become Standard Mail Fulfillment a cost coverage in excess of 100 percent. Parcels.3 The Postal Service does not Thus, it contends that commercial propose to transfer nonprofit Standard Standard Mail Parcels, if treated as a POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION Mail Fulfillment Parcels. Request at 1, subcategory of Parcel Select, would [Docket No.MC2010–36; Order No. 521] n.1. The Postal Service suggests that satisfy 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1) and (2). Id. upon their transfer to the competitive at 2. Product List Transfer product list, the Standard Mail The Statement of Supporting AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. Fulfillment Parcels would be classified Justification seeks to demonstrate, as a ‘‘Lightweight’’ subcategory of the pursuant to 39 CFR 3020.32(d), that the ACTION: Notice. Parcel Select product. Id. at 1. The requested change does not propose to SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a minimum weight would be less than 16 classify as competitive a product over recently–filed Postal Service request to ounces.4 which the Postal Service exercises transfer commercial Standard Mail As required by 39 CFR 3020.31 of the sufficient market power that it can, Fulfillment Parcels from the market Commission’s rules, a copy of without losing a significant level of dominant product list to the competitive Governors’ Resolution No. 10–4 is business, set the price of the product product list. This notice addresses included with the Request as substantially above costs, raise prices procedural steps associated with the Attachment A. Attachment B to the significantly, decrease quality, or filing. Request contains the Statement of decrease output. Id. at 3–7. The Supporting Justification required by 39 Statement of Justification also seeks to DATES: Comments are due September CFR 3020.32 of the Commission’s rules. explain the limited extent Standard 17, 2010; reply comments are due Attachment C is the proposed draft MCS Mail Fulfillment Parcels are either October 15, 2010. language and prices incorporating the covered by the postal monopoly or ADDRESSES: Submit comments language proposed in Docket No. within the scope of the exceptions or electronically via the Commission’s R2010–4 as if already approved by the suspensions to the Private Express Filing Online system at http:// Commission with proposed additions Statutes, noting that normally Standard www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot and deletions for this Request. Mail Fulfillment Parcels cannot contain submit their views electronically should The Postal Service summarizes the items required to be sent by First–Class contact the person identified in the FOR required Statement of Supporting Mail. The Postal Service indicates an FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section Justification by noting that the current intention to promulgate mailing by telephone for advice on alternatives classification of parcels weighing less standards in its Domestic Mail Manual to electronic filing. than one pound as market dominant limiting the inclusion of letters in any FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: products, and parcels weighing more Lightweight Parcel Select parcel unless Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, than one pound as competitive covered by an exception or suspension [email protected] or 202–789– products, produces a misalignment in to the Private Express Statues pursuant 6820. the marketplace. Competitors make no to 39 CFR parts 310 or 320. Id. at 7–9. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: such distinction and can offer seamless Pursuant to 39 CFR 3032(f), the Postal shipping options. The transfer would Service states that the primary Table of Contents allow the Postal Service to offer similar competitors to its Standard Mail I. Introduction comprehensive shipping solutions Fulfillment Parcel services are the II. Notice of Filing including contracts covering all parcels ground shipping services offered by III. Ordering Paragraphs regardless of weight. Id. at 3. UPS and FedEx and that each have the The Postal Service’s Statement of I. Introduction flexibility to price parcel products to Supporting Justification offers an maximize profitability. Id. at 9. The Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 explanation why the transfer to the Postal Service states there is likely a CFR 3020 et seq., on August 16, 2010, competitive product list will not result distortionary effect on the marketplace the Postal Service filed a request to in violation of the standards in 39 because Standard Mail Fulfillment transfer its commercial Standard Mail U.S.C. 3633. Id., Attachment B, at 1. The Parcels are priced below full cost Fulfillment Parcels product from the coverage. Because of this market 2 market dominant product list to the See Docket No. R2010–4, Exigent Request of the distortion, the ‘‘[Postal Service] has competitive product list in the Mail United States Postal Service, July 6, 2010. 3 attempted to structure profitable Classification Schedule (MCS) on file As proposed in Docket No. R2010–4, current commercial and nonprofit Standard Mail NFMs contracts with large shippers for 1 with the Commission. would become Standard Mail Marketing Parcels. lightweight parcels but failed because The Postal Service states that, to avoid Because of addressing standards, some current its efforts were undercut by its own customers using commercial Standard Mail NFMs confusion, this filing is based on the Standard Mail parcel prices.’’ Id. at 10. assumption that classification changes for fulfillment would be required to use commercial Standard Mail Fulfillment Parcels. Request at 2–3. The Postal Service claims the transfer proposed in Docket No. R2010–4 will be 4 Id., Attachment C, Competitive Products, should ameliorate any distortionary 2115.2, Size and Weight Limitations; see also id., effect on the current pricing structure. 1 Request of the United States Postal Service to 2115.6 Prices, Machinable Lightweight Parcels Transfer Commercial Standard Mail Parcels to the (greater than 3.3 ounces) and Irregular Lightweight Id. The Postal Service states that it is Competitive Product List, August 16, 2010 Parcels (3.3 ounces or less) and (greater than 3.3 also losing full network First–Class Mail (Request). ounces). package volume where its competitors

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53004 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

offer products with the last mile service RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD (1) Negotiate written agreements with through the Postal Service. Id. the other agency or agencies The Postal Service states that the Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended; participating in the matching programs; views of those who use the product are Notice of Computer-Matching Program (2) Obtain the approval of the mainly concerned that the transfer will (Railroad Retirement Board—Office of matching agreement by the Data lead to price increases. In response, the Personnel Management) Integrity Boards (DIB) of the Postal Service claims prices will need to participating Federal agencies; AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board be increased even absent a transfer to (3) Publish notice of the computer (RRB). the competitive product list. It further matching program in the Federal states that one large customer supports ACTION: Notice of a renewal of an Register; transfer which offers the possibility of existing computer-matching program (4) Furnish detailed reports about contracts for the product. The Postal that expired on August 13, 2010. matching programs to Congress and Service states the transfer will allow OMB; SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy (5) Notify applicants and beneficiaries contracts for complete shipping Act of 1974, as amended, the RRB is solutions and create mutually beneficial that their records are subject to issuing public notice of its renewal of an matching; and comprehensive solutions for shipping ongoing computer-matching program needs. Id. at 11. The Postal Service is (6) Verify match findings before with the Office of Personnel reducing, suspending, terminating, or not aware of any small business that Management (OPM). The purpose of this offers products competing with denying a person’s benefits or notice is to advise individuals applying payments. The last notice for this commercial Standard Mail Fulfillment for or receiving benefits under the Parcels. Id. at 11–12. matching program was published at 73 Railroad Retirement Act of the use made FR 2287–2288 (January 14, 2008). II. Notice of Filings by RRB of this information obtained from OPM by means of a computer B. RRB Computer Matches Subject to The Commission establishes Docket match. the Privacy Act No. MC2010–36 to consider the Postal Service’s proposal to transfer DATES: This matching program becomes We have taken appropriate action to commercial Standard Mail Fulfillment effective as proposed without further ensure that all of our computer- Parcels to the competitive product list. notice on October 12, 2010. We will file matching programs comply with the Interested persons may submit a report of this computer-matching requirements of the Privacy Act, as comments on whether the Postal program with the Committee on amended. Service’s filing in the captioned docket Homeland Security and Governmental Notice of Computer-Matching Program, is consistent with the policies of 39 Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on RRB With the Office of Personnel U.S.C. 3633, 39 U.S.C. 3642, and 39 CFR Oversight and Government Reform of Management (OMB) 3020 subpart B. Comments are due no the House of Representatives; and the A. Name of Participating Agencies later than September 17, 2010. Reply Office of Information and Regulatory comments, if any, are due October 15, Affairs, Office of Management and OPM and RRB. 2010. The Postal Service’s filing can be Budget (OMB). B. Purpose of the Matching Program accessed via the Commission’s Web site ADDRESSES: Interested parties may The purpose of the match is to enable (http://www.prc.gov.) comment on this publication by writing the RRB to (1) identify affected RRB The Commission appoints James to Ms. Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the annuitants who are in receipt of a Waclawski to serve as Public Board, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 Federal public pension benefit but who Representative in this docket. North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois have not reported receipt of this benefit 60611–2092. III. Ordering Paragraphs to the RRB, and (2) receive needed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. It is ordered: Federal public pension benefit Timothy Grant, Chief Privacy Officer, 1. The Commission establishes Docket information for affected RRB annuitants Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North No. MC2010–36 for consideration of the more timely and accurately. Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611– matters raised in this docket. 2092, telephone 312–751–4869 or e-mail C. Authority for Conducting the Match 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, James at [email protected]. Waclawski is appointed to serve as Sections 3(a)(1), 4(a)(1) and 4(f)(1) of officer of the Commission (Public SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the Railroad Retirement Act, as amended, 45 U.S.C. 231b(a)(1), Representative) to represent the A. General interests of the general public in this 231c(a)(1) and 231c(f)(1) require that the proceeding. The Computer-Matching and Privacy RRB reduce the Railroad Retirement 3. Comments by interested persons in Protection Act of 1988, (Pub. L. 100– benefits of certain beneficiaries entitled these proceedings are due no later than 503), amended by the Privacy Act of to Railroad Retirement employee and/or September 17, 2010. 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a) as amended, spouse/widow benefits who are also 4. Reply comments by interested requires a Federal agency participating entitled to a government pension based persons in this proceeding are due no in a computer-matching program to on their own non-covered earnings. We later than October 15, 2010. publish a notice in the Federal Register call this reduction a Public Service 5. The Secretary shall arrange for for all matching programs. Pension (PSP) offset. publication of this order in the Federal The Privacy Act, as amended, Section 224 of the Social Security Act, Register. regulates the use of computer-matching as amended, 42 U.S.C. 424a, provides by Federal agencies when records for the reduction of disability benefits By the Commission. contained in a Privacy Act System of when the disabled worker is also Shoshana M. Grove, Records are matched with other Federal, entitled to a public disability benefit Secretary. State, or local government records. It (PDB). We call this a PDB offset. A civil [FR Doc. 2010–21438 Filed 8–27–2010; 8:45 am] requires Federal agencies involved in service disability benefit is considered a BILLING CODE 7710–FW–S computer-matching programs to: PDB. Section 224(h)(1) requires any

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53005

Federal agency to provide RRB with conditions specified in 5 U.S.C. A. General information in its possession that RRB 552a(o)(2)(D) have been met. The Computer Matching and Privacy may require for the purposes of making Dated: August 24, 2010. Protection Act of 1988, (Pub. L. 100– a timely determination of the amount of By authority of the Board. 503), amended by the Privacy Act of reduction under section 224 of the 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a) as amended, Social Security Act. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the Board. requires a Federal agency participating Section 552a(b)(3) OPM has established in a computer matching program to [FR Doc. 2010–21506 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] routine uses to disclose the subject publish a notice in the Federal Register information to RRB. BILLING CODE 7905–01–P for all matching programs. D. Categories of Records and The Privacy Act, as amended, Individuals Covered RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD regulates the use of computer matching The records to be used in the match by Federal agencies when records and the roles of the matching Privacy Act of 1974, as amended; contained in a Privacy Act System of participants are described as follows: Notice of Computer Matching Program Records are matched with other Federal, OPM will provide the RRB once a year (Railroad Retirement Board and Social State, or local government records. It via secure encrypted electronic transfer, Security Administration, Match requires Federal agencies involved in data extracted from its annuity and Number 1007) computer matching programs to: survivor master file of its Civil Service (1) Negotiate written agreements with Retirement and Insurance Records. The AGENCY: Railroad Retirement Board the other agency or agencies Privacy Act System of Records (RRB). participating in the matching programs; (2) Obtain the approval of the designation is OPM/Central-1, (Civil ACTION: Notice of a renewal of an Service Retirement and Insurance matching agreement by the Data existing computer-matching program Integrity Boards (DIB) of the Records), Published in the Federal that expires on January 6, 2011. Register on October 8, 1999 (64 FR participating Federal agencies; 54930) and amended on May 3, 2000 (65 (3) Publish notice of the computer SUMMARY: As required by the Privacy FR 25775). The RRB Privacy Act System matching program in the Federal Act of 1974, as amended, the RRB is Register; of Records is RRB–22, Railroad issuing public notice of its renewal of an Retirement, Survivor, and Pensioner (4) Furnish detailed reports about ongoing computer-matching program matching programs to Congress and Benefit System, published in the with the Social Security Administration Federal Register on July 26, 2010 (75 FR OMB; (SSA). The purpose of this notice is to 43727). (5) Notify applicants and beneficiaries advise individuals applying for or Normally in December of each year, that their records are subject to OPM transmits to us approximately 2.5 receiving benefits under the Railroad matching; and million electronic records for matching. Retirement Act of the use made by RRB (6) Verify match findings before The records contain these data of this information obtained from SSA reducing, suspending, terminating, or elements: Name, social security number, by means of a computer match. The RRB denying a person’s benefits or date of birth, civil service claim number, is also issuing public notice, on behalf payments. The last notice for this first potential month and year of of the SSA, of their intent to conduct a matching program was published at 73 eligibility for civil service benefits, first computer-matching program based on FR 31516–31517 (June 2, 2008). month, day, year of entitlement to civil information provided to them by the RRB. B. RRB Computer Matches Subject to service benefits, amount of current gross the Privacy Act civil service benefits, and effective date DATES: This matching program becomes We have taken appropriate action to (month, day, year) of civil service effective as proposed without further amount, and where applicable, civil ensure that all of our computer notice on October 12, 2010. We will file matching programs comply with the service disability indicator, civil service a report of this computer-matching FICA covered month indicator, and civil requirements of the Privacy Act, as program with the Committee on amended. service total service months. The RRB Homeland Security and Governmental will match the Social Security number, Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Notice of Computer Matching Program, name, and date of birth contained in the Oversight and Government Reform of RRB With the SSA, Match 1007 OPM file against approximately the 1.2 the House of Representatives; and the A. Name of Participating Agencies million records in our files. For records Office of Information and Regulatory that match, the RRB will extract the Affairs, Office of Management and Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) and civil service payment information. Budget (OMB). the Social Security Administration (SSA). E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching ADDRESSES: Interested parties may Program comment on this publication by writing B. Purpose of the Matching Program This matching program will become to Ms. Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the The RRB will, on a daily basis, obtain effective 40 days after a copy of the Board, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 from SSA a record of the wages reported agreement, as approved by the Data North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois to SSA for persons who have applied for Integrity Board of each agency, is sent 60611–2092. benefits under the Railroad Retirement to Congress and the Office of Act and a record of the amount of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Management and Budget, or 30 days benefits paid by that agency to persons Timothy Grant, Chief Privacy Officer, after publication of this notice in the who are receiving or have applied for Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Federal Register, whichever date is benefits under the Railroad Retirement Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611– later. The matching program will Act. The wage information is needed to 2092, telephone 312–751–4869 or e-mail continue for 18 months after the compute the amount of the tier I annuity at [email protected]. effective date and may be extended for component provided by sections 3(a), an additional 12 months, if the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 4(a) and 4(f) of the Railroad Retirement

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53006 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Act (45 U.S.C. 231b(a), 45 U.S.C. 231c(a) railroad industry at the time of his/her the Data Integrity Board of each agency, and 45 U.S.C. 231c(f)). The benefit death. is sent to Congress and the Office of information is needed to adjust the tier Management and Budget, or 30 days C. Authority for Conducting the Match I annuity component for the receipt of after publication of this notice in the the Social Security benefit. This Section 7(b)(7) of the Railroad Federal Register, whichever date is information is available from no other Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. 231f(b)(7)) latest. The matching program will source. provides that the Social Security continue for 18 months after the Second, the RRB will receive from Administration shall supply effective date and may be extended for SSA the amount of certain Social information necessary to administer the an additional 12 months, if the Security benefits which the RRB pays Railroad Retirement Act. Sections 202, conditions specified in 5 U.S.C. on behalf of SSA. Section 7(b)(2) of the 205(o) and 215(f) of the Social Security 552a(o)(2)(D) have been met. Act (42 U.S.C. 402, 405(o) and 415(f)) Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. Dated: August 24, 2010. relate to benefit provisions, inclusion of 231f(b)(2)) provides that the RRB shall By authority of the Board. make the payment of certain Social railroad compensation together with Beatrice Ezerski, Security benefits. The RRB also requires wages for payment of benefits under this information in order to adjust the certain circumstances, and the re- Secretary to the Board. amount of any annuity due to the computation of benefits. [FR Doc. 2010–21507 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7905–01–P receipt of a Social Security benefit. D. Categories of Records and Section 10(a) of the Railroad Retirement Individuals Covered Act (45 U.S.C. 231i(a)) permits the RRB to recover any overpayment from the All applicants for benefits under the accrual of Social Security benefits. This Railroad Retirement Act and current SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION information is not available from any beneficiaries will have a record of any other source. Social Security wages and the amount of [Disaster Declaration #12258 and #12259] Third, once a year the RRB will any Social Security benefits furnished to receive from SSA a copy of SSA’s the RRB by SSA. In addition, all persons Iowa Disaster #IA–00026 Master Benefit Record for earmarked who ever worked in the railroad industry after 1936 will have a record of AGENCY: U.S. Small Business RRB annuitants. Section 7(b)(7)) of the Administration. Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. their service and compensation 231f(b)(7) requires that SSA provide the furnished to SSA by RRB. ACTION: Amendment 2. The applicable RRB Privacy Act requested information. The RRB needs Systems of Records and their Federal SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the this information to make the necessary Register citation used in the matching Presidential declaration of a major cost-of-living computation adjustments program are: disaster for Public Assistance Only for quickly and accurately for those RRB 1. RRB–5, Master File of Railroad the State of Iowa (FEMA–1930–DR), annuitants who are also SSA Employees’ Creditable Compensation; dated 07/29/2010. beneficiaries. FR 75 43715 (July 26, 2010); Incident: Severe storms, flooding, and SSA will receive weekly from RRB 2. RRB–22, Railroad Retirement, tornadoes. earnings information for all railroad Survivor, Pensioner Benefit System; FR Incident Period: 06/01/2010 and employees. SSA will match the 75 43727 (July 26, 2010). continuing. identifying information of the records The applicable SSA Privacy Act furnished by the RRB against the Effective Date: 08/23/2010. Systems of Records used and their identifying information contained in its Physical Loan Application Deadline Federal Register citation used in the Master Benefit Record and its Master Date: 09/27/2010. matching program are: Earnings File. If there is a match, SSA Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan 1. SSA 60–0058, Master Files of Application Deadline Date: 04/29/2011. will use the RRB earnings to adjust the Social Security Number (SSN) Holders ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan amount of Social Security benefits in its and SSN Applications (the Enumeration applications to: U.S. Small Business Annual Earnings Reappraisal Operation. System); 74 FR 62866 (December 1, Administration, Processing and This information is available from no 2009) other source. 2. SSA/OSR, 60–0059, Earnings Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport SSA will also receive daily from RRB Recording and Self-Employment Income Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. earnings information on selected System (MEF); 71 FR 1819 (January 11, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. individuals. The transfer of information 2006) Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, may be initiated either by RRB or by 3. SSA/OSR 60–0090, Master U.S. Small Business Administration, SSA. SSA needs this information to Beneficiary Record (MBR); 71 FR 1826 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, determine eligibility to Social Security (January 11, 2006) Washington, DC 20416. benefits and, if eligibility is met, to 4. SSA/ODISSIS 60–103, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice determine the benefit amount payable. Supplemental Security Income Record of the President’s major disaster Section 18 of the Railroad Retirement and Special Veteran Benefits; 71 FR declaration for Private Non-Profit Act (45 U.S.C. 231q(2)) requires that 1830 (January 11, 2006) organizations in the State of Iowa, dated earnings considered as compensation 5. SSA/OPB 60–0269, Prisoner 07/29/2010, is hereby amended to under the Railroad Retirement Act be Update Processing System (PUPS); 64 include the following areas as adversely considered as wages under the Social FR 11076 (March 8, 1999) affected by the disaster. Security Act for the purposes of determining entitlement under the E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching Primary Counties: Calhoun, Clarke, Social Security Act if the person has Program Dallas, Keokuk, Washington, less than 10 years of railroad service or This matching program will become Hamilton, Ida. has 10 or more years of service but does effective January 6, 2011 or 40 days after All other information in the original not have a current connection with the a copy of the agreement, as approved by declaration remains unchanged.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53007

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance certain Agency regulations for the 7(a) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Numbers 59002 and 59008) Business Loan Program. (70 FR 69645). Advisory Committee on Veterans James E. Rivera, Because the pilot was designed as a Business Affairs; Meeting Associate Administrator for Disaster temporary program scheduled to expire on September 30, 2006, and was Assistance. AGENCY: U.S. Small Business [FR Doc. 2010–21539 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] extended to September 30, 2010, the Administration. BILLING CODE 8025–01–P waiver of certain Agency regulations also is due to expire on September 30, ACTION: Notice of open Federal Advisory 2010. However, the Agency believes that Committee meeting. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION there is a continuing, substantial need SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice for the specific SBA assistance provided to announce the location, date, time, Gulf Opportunity Pilot Loan Program by this pilot in the affected areas. (GO Loan Pilot) and agenda for the next meeting of the When compared to other similarly- Advisory Committee on Veterans AGENCY: U.S. Small Business sized Section 7(a) loans, the GO Loan Business Affairs. The meeting will be Administration (SBA). portfolio is performing very well, at open to the public. ACTION: Notice of extension of waiver of about one-half the rate of liquidation DATES: Friday, September 24, 2010 from regulatory provisions. and one-quarter the rate of loan 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the Eisenhower purchase compared to all other 7(a) Conference room, side b, located on the SUMMARY: This notice announces the loans of $150,000 or less. In addition, 2nd floor. extension of the ‘‘Notice of waiver of the demand for GO Loans has continued regulatory provisions’’ for SBA’s GO ADDRESSES: U.S. Small Business during FY2010 in response to the Loan Pilot until September 30, 2011. Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Due to the scope and magnitude of the ongoing need to rebuild the Gulf Coast Washington, DC 20416. areas devastated by Hurricanes Katrina devastation to Presidentially-declared SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant disaster areas resulting from Hurricanes and Rita. The annualized number of GO to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Katrina and Rita as well as the further Loans approved in FY 2010 is about the Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., devastation by the BP Oil Spill that same as the number of approvals for FY Appendix 2), SBA announces the began on April 20, 2010, the Agency is 2009 at approximately 560 loans per meeting of the Advisory Committee on extending its full guaranty and year. Also, the Deepwater BP oil spill Veterans Business Affairs. The Advisory streamlined and centralized loan that began April 20, 2010, has further Committee on Veterans Business Affairs processing available through the GO devastated the Gulf Coast region and serves as an independent source of Loan Pilot to small businesses in the adversely affected many small advice and policy recommendation to eligible parishes/counties through businesses. the Administrator of the U.S. Small September 30, 2011. Thus, the Agency believes it is Business Administration. DATES: The waiver of regulatory appropriate to extend this unique and The purpose of the meeting is to provisions published in the Federal vital program through September 30, finalize preparations for the 2010 Register on November 17, 2005, is 2011. Accordingly, the SBA is also Annual Report to SBA’s Administrator, extended under this Notice until extending its waiver of the Agency Associate Administrator for Veterans September 30, 2011. regulations identified in the Federal Business Development, Congress, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail Register notice at 70 FR 69645 through the President. Hepler, Office of Financial Assistance, September 30, 2011. SBA’s waiver of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The U.S. Small Business Administration, these provisions is authorized by meeting is open to the public; however, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC regulations. These waivers apply only to advance notice of attendance is 20416; Telephone (202) 205–7530; those loans approved under the GO requested. Anyone wishing to attend [email protected]. Loan Pilot and will last only for the and/or make a presentation to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On duration of the Pilot, which expires Advisory Committee on Veterans November 8, 2005, SBA initiated the GO September 30, 2011. As part of the GO Business Affairs must contact Cheryl Loan Pilot program which was designed Loan Pilot, these waivers apply only to Simms, Program Liaison, by September to provide expedited small business those small businesses located in, 10, 2010 by fax or e-mail in order to be placed on the agenda. Cheryl Simms, financial assistance to businesses locating to, or relocating in the parishes/ Program Liaison, U.S. Small Business located in those communities severely counties that have been Presidentially- Administration, Office of Veterans impacted by Hurricanes Katrina and declared as disaster areas resulting from Rita. Under this unique initiative, SBA Business Development, 409 3rd Street, Hurricanes Katrina or Rita, plus any SW., Washington, DC 20416, Telephone provides its full (85%) guaranty and contiguous parishes/counties. A list of streamlined and centralized loan number: (202) 619–1697, Fax number: all eligible parishes/counties will be processing to all eligible lenders that 202–481–6085, e-mail address: included in an SBA procedural notice agree to make expedited SBA 7(a) loans [email protected]. available to small businesses located in, that will announce the extension of the Additionally, if you need locating to or re-locating in the parishes/ GO Loan Pilot. accommodations because of a disability counties that have been Presidentially- Authority: 15 U.S.C. 636(a)(24); 13 CFR or require additional information, please declared as disaster areas resulting from 120.3. contact Cheryl Simms, Program Liaison Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, plus any at (202) 619–1697; e-mail address: Eric R. Zarnikow, contiguous parishes/counties. [email protected], SBA, Office of To maximize the effectiveness of the Associate Administrator, Office of Capital Veterans Business Development, 409 GO Loan Pilot, on November 17, 2005, Access. 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. SBA published a notice in the Federal [FR Doc. 2010–21436 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] For more information, please visit our Register waiving for the GO Loan Pilot BILLING CODE 8025–01–P Web site at http://www.sba.gov/vets.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Dated: August 24, 2010. the Exchange, and at the Commission’s value for the OQR, an amount, as Dan S. Jones, Public Reference Room. defined in a table determined by the Exchange, is subtracted from the lowest SBA Committee Management Officer. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s quote bid. To determine the maximum [FR Doc. 2010–21534 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Statement of the Purpose of, and value for the OQR, an amount, as BILLING CODE P Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change defined in a table determined by the Exchange, is added to the highest quote In its filing with the Commission, the offer. Quotes that are not valid width SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE self-regulatory organization included COMMISSION quotes and quotes that are outside of the statements concerning the purpose of, OQR are not included in the Exchange’s [Release No. 34–62759; File No. SR–Phlx– and basis for, the proposed rule change automated opening process. 2010–111] and discussed any comments it received The Exchange proposes to modify the on the proposed rule change. The text PHLX XL system and Exchange Rule Self-Regulatory Organizations; of those statements may be examined at 1017(l) to reflect the new manner in NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of the places specified in Item IV below. which the PHLX XL system calculates Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of The Exchange has prepared summaries, the OQR under certain circumstances. Proposed Rule Change Relating to a set forth in sections A, B, and C below, The manner in which the PHLX XL Change to the Automated Opening of the most significant parts of such system calculates the OQR will depend System statements. upon whether there is a valid ABBO on August 23, 2010. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s markets other than the PHLX. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Statement of the Purpose of, and As stated above, the PHLX XL system Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule currently calculates a lowest bid and ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 Change highest offer to use as a reference price on which to calculate the OQR. Under notice is hereby given that, on August 1. Purpose 9, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. the proposal, Rule 1017(l)(ii) would be The purpose of the proposed rule (‘‘Phlx’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the modified to state that a highest bid and change is to change the manner in Securities and Exchange Commission lowest offer will be used when there are which the PHLX XL® automated options 5 (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule opening quotes or orders on the trading system calculates the Opening change as described in Items I and II Exchange that lock or cross each other Quote Range (‘‘OQR’’) in an options 6 below, which Items have been prepared and there is no imbalance at the series during the automated opening by the Exchange. The Commission is Exchange’s opening price. The purpose process. The OQR is a price range publishing this notice to solicit of this provision is to tighten the range outside of which the Exchange will not comments on the proposed rule change of allowable opening prices and enable open an option series. The proposal also from interested persons. the system to open a series by using reflects new system functionality to PHLX quotes when there are opening I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s state that if, at any point during the trades that will leave no imbalance. Statement of the Terms of Substance of opening process the ABBO becomes The PHLX XL system currently the Proposed Rule Change crossed (e.g., 1.05 bid, 1.00 offer), the calculates the OQR without regard to opening process will be terminated and The Exchange proposes to amend away market(s) in the affected series. the Exchange will not open the affected Rule 1017, Openings in Options, to The Exchange proposes to modify this series. A new opening process for the reflect a system change to (i) modify the provision by enabling the PHLX XL affected series will commence at the manner in which the PHLX XL® system to consider the away market(s) time the ABBO is uncrossed. automated options trading system 3 in the affected series when calculating calculates the Opening Quote Range for OQR the OQR. Under the proposal, Rule 1017(l)(iii) would be modified to an options series during the automated Currently, the PHLX XL system opening process, and (ii) terminate the address the situation where there is an calculates the OQR for a particular imbalance at the price at which the opening process when away markets series based upon the lowest quote bid become crossed during the opening maximum number of contracts can trade on the Exchange and the highest quote that is also at or within the highest process. A new opening process for the offer on the Exchange among quotes that affected series would commence at the quote bid and lowest quote offer, and are compliant with the bid/ask one or more away markets have time the Away Best Bid/Offer (‘‘ABBO’’) differentials set forth in Rule is uncrossed. disseminated opening quotes in the 1014(c)(i)(A)(1)(a) (‘‘valid width affected series. In this situation, the The text of the proposed rule change quotes’’.) 4 To determine the minimum is available on the Exchange’s Web site PHLX XL system will calculate an OQR based upon valid width quotes received at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com, on the 4 Rule 1014(c)(i)(A)(1)(a) permits bid/ask Commission’s Web site at http:// differentials of no more than $.25 between the bid by the Exchange and quotes that are www.sec.gov, at the principal office of and the offer for each option contract for which the disseminated by the away market(s). prevailing bid is less than $2; no more than $.40 In this situation, to determine the where the prevailing bid is $2 or more but less than minimum value for the OQR, an 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). $5; no more than $.50 where the prevailing bid is 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. $5 or more but less than $10; no more than $.80 3 This proposal refers to ‘‘PHLX XL’’ as the where the prevailing bid is $10 or more but less up to the nearest minimum increment. The Exchange’s automated options trading system. In than $20; and no more than $1 where the prevailing Exchange may establish differences other than the May 2009 the Exchange enhanced the system and bid is $20 or more, provided that, in the case of above for one or more series or classes of options. adopted corresponding rules referring to the system equity options, the bid/ask differentials stated 5 The PHLX XL system will consider only as ‘‘Phlx XL II.’’ See Securities Exchange Act Release above shall not apply to in-the-money series where opening valid width quotes on the Exchange in its No. 59995 (May 28, 2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3, the market for the underlying security is wider than determination of the highest quote bid and lowest 2009) (SR–Phlx–2009–32). The Exchange intends to the differentials set forth above. For such series, the quote offer. submit a separate technical proposed rule change bid/ask differentials may be as wide as the 6 An ‘‘imbalance’’ occurs where there is that would change all references to the system from quotation for the underlying security on the unexecutable trading interest at a certain price. See ‘‘Phlx XL II’’ to ‘‘PHLX XL’’ for branding purposes. primary market, or its decimal equivalent rounded Exchange Rule 1017(l)(ii)(A).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53009

amount, as defined in a table to be this situation, to determine the substantive amendments to these determined by the Exchange,7 will be minimum value for the OQR, an existing rules. subtracted from the highest quote bid amount, as defined in a table to be Deployment among valid width quotes on the determined by the Exchange, will be Exchange and on the away market(s). subtracted from the highest quote bid Although the proposed rule change is Under the current method, the among valid width quotes on the effective upon filing, the Exchange minimum value of the OQR is Exchange only. To determine the anticipates that it will deploy the new determined by subtracting the amount maximum value for the OQR, an PHLX XL functionality described herein in the table from the lowest bid on the amount, as defined in a table to be on or around September 15, 2010. Exchange only. To determine the determined by the Exchange, will be 2. Statutory Basis maximum value for the OQR, an added to the lowest quote offer among The Exchange believes that its amount, as defined in a table to be valid width quotes on the Exchange determined by the Exchange, will be proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) only. 9 added to the lowest quote offer among of the Act in general, and furthers the Proposed new Rule 1017(l)(iv)(A)(3) 10 valid width quotes on the Exchange and objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act addresses the situation where there is an in particular, in that it is designed to on the away market(s). Under the imbalance and there are opening quotes current method, the maximum value of promote just and equitable principles of on the Exchange that cross each other, trade, to remove impediments to and the OQR is determined by adding the and there is no away market in the amount in the table to the highest bid perfect the mechanism of a free and affected series. In this situation, the open market and a national market on the Exchange only. This new method minimum value for the OQR will be the of calculating the OQR is intended to system, and, in general to protect lowest quote bid among valid width investors and the public interest. narrow the OQR, and to consider better- quotes on the Exchange, and the priced away markets’ quotations in Specifically, the Exchange believes that maximum value for the OQR will be the determining the reference price from the proposal benefits customers by highest quote offer among valid width which to calculate the OQR. The improving prices and market efficiency quotes on the Exchange. The purpose of Exchange believes that this should at the opening of trading. this provision is to maintain market result in higher quality executions at the efficiency at the opening of trading B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s opening of trading. Statement on Burden on Competition Proposed new Rule 1017(l)(iii)(A)(3) when there is an imbalance, and when The Exchange does not believe that addresses the situation where there are the PHLX market is crossed but there the proposed rule change will impose away markets and the PHLX opening are no away markets that the system can any burden on competition not market is crossed or crosses away consider as the OQR. The PHLX XL necessary or appropriate in furtherance markets. If one or more away markets system will not add to the highest quote of the purposes of the Act. have disseminated opening quotes that offer on the Exchange or subtract from are not crossed, and there are valid the lowest quote bid on the Exchange in C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s width quotes on the Exchange that cross order to ensure that the OQR is as Statement on Comments on the each other or that cross away market narrow as possible when there are Proposed Rule Change Received From quotes, the minimum value for the OQR opening quotes on the PHLX that cross Members, Participants, or Others each other. will be the highest quote bid among No written comments were either quotes on away market(s). The Crossed ABBO During the Opening solicited or received. maximum value for the OQR will be the Process lowest quote offer among quotes on III. Date of Effectiveness of the away market(s). The purpose of this Proposed new Rule 1017(l)(ix) Proposed Rule Change and Timing for provision is to maintain market provides that if, at any point during the Commission Action efficiency at the opening of trading opening process the ABBO becomes The proposed rule change effects a when the PHLX market is crossed but crossed, the opening process will be change in an existing order-entry or there are away markets that the system terminated and the Exchange will not trading system of a self-regulatory can use as the OQR. The PHLX XL open the affected series. A new opening organization that: (i) Does not system will not add to the lowest away process for the affected series will significantly affect the protection of offer or subtract from the highest away commence at the time the ABBO is investors or the public interest; (ii) does bid in this situation in order to prevent uncrossed. The purpose of this not impose any significant burden on an opening trade that would be through provision is to ensure that the PHLX XL competition; and (iii) does not have the the ABBO. system does not route contracts that effect of limiting the access to or Proposed new Rule 1017(l)(iv) cannot be executed on the PHLX to availability of the system. Therefore, the addresses the situation where there is an away markets that may be disseminating proposal is effective upon filing imbalance at the price at which the incorrect prices that cross another pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 11 of the maximum number of contracts can trade market, thus protecting investors in Act and subparagraph (f)(5) of Rule 19b– that is also at or within the highest general from entering into executions at 4 thereunder.12 quote bid and lowest quote offer, and no incorrect prices. At any time within 60 days of the away markets have disseminated Technical Re-Numbering Amendment filing of the proposed rule change, the opening quotes in the affected series.8 In Commission summarily may The Exchange proposes to re-number temporarily suspend such rule change if 7 The Exchange maintains the OQR table on its existing rules 1017(l)(iv)—(vii) to reflect it appears to the Commission that such Web site. Changes to the OQR table are the insertion of new proposed Rule action is necessary or appropriate in the communicated to members by way of an Options Trader Alert (‘‘OTA’’) posted on the Web site. 1017(i)(iv). There are no proposed 9 8 This condition could be due to system issues, 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). order imbalances, and other factors that would would also apply to issues that are singly listed on 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). cause an away market not to disseminate an PHLX, in which case there is no other market that 11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). opening quote. This section of the proposed rule could quote in the affected series. 12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(5).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53010 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

public interest, for the protection of For the Commission, by the Division of II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s investors, or otherwise in furtherance of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated Statement of the Purpose of, and the purposes of the Act. authority.13 Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change IV. Solicitation of Comments Florence E. Harmon, In its filing with the Commission, the Interested persons are invited to Deputy Secretary. Exchange included statements submit written data, views, and [FR Doc. 2010–21473 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] concerning the purpose of and basis for arguments concerning the foregoing, BILLING CODE 8010–01–P the proposed rule change and discussed including whether the proposed rule any comments it received on the change is consistent with the Act. proposed rule change. The text of these Comments may be submitted by any of SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE statements may be examined at the the following methods: COMMISSION places specified in Item IV below. The Electronic Comments Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of [Release No. 34–62760; File No. SR–Phlx– • the most significant aspects of such Use the Commission’s Internet 2010–112] comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ statements. rules/sro.shtml); or Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s • Send an e-mail to rule- of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by Statement of the Purpose of, and [email protected]. Please include File NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. Relating to Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Number SR–Phlx–2010–111 on the Trade Reporting Change subject line. August 24, 2010. 1. Purpose Paper Comments Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the The purpose of the proposed rule • Send paper comments in triplicate Securities Exchange Act of 1934 change is to codify certain factors that to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder, the Exchange may consider to be ‘‘ ’’ Securities and Exchange Commission, notice is hereby given that on August exceptional circumstances when determining whether an Exchange 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 10, 2010, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. member has engaged in a pattern or 20549–1090. (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the practice of late trade reporting.5 All submissions should refer to File Securities and Exchange Commission Currently, OFPA F–2 and Rule 1051 Number SR–Phlx–2010–111. This file (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed require a member or member number should be included on the rule change as described in Items I and organization initiating an options subject line if e-mail is used. To help the II below, which Items have been transaction, whether acting as principal Commission process and review your prepared by the Exchange. The or agent, to report or ensure that the comments more efficiently, please use Commission is publishing this notice to transaction is reported within 90 only one method. The Commission will solicit comments on the proposed rule seconds of the execution to the tape. post all comments on the Commission’s change from interested persons. Each also states that a pattern or Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ practice of late reporting without I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the exceptional circumstances may be Statement of the Terms of the Substance submission, all subsequent considered conduct inconsistent with of the Proposed Rule Change amendments, all written statements just and equitable principles of trade. with respect to the proposed rule The Exchange proposes to modify change that are filed with the The Exchange, pursuant to Section 3 OFPA F–2 and Rule 1051 to state that, Commission, and all written 19(b)(1) of the Act and Rule 19b–4 4 in determining whether exceptional communications relating to the thereunder, proposes to amend Exchange Options Floor Procedure circumstances exist, the Exchange may proposed rule change between the consider late reports resulting from Advice (‘‘OFPA’’) F–2 Allocation, Time Commission and any person, other than open outcry executions in: (i) A hedge Stamping, Matching and Access to those that may be withheld from the order (as defined in Rule 1066(f)); 6 (ii) public in accordance with the Matched Trades, and Exchange Rule provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 1051, General Comparison and 5 The proposal is not intended to limit the available for Web site viewing and Clearance Rule, to state that late reports Exchange to these factors in determining whether printing in the Commission’s Public of transactions in complex spread exceptional circumstances exist. Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., transactions executed in open outcry 6 Rule 1066(f) defines a hedge order is any spread type order (including a spread, straddle and Washington, DC 20549, on official may be considered ‘‘exceptional combination order) for the same account or tied business days between the hours of circumstances’’ under the rule. hedge order as defined below: 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing The text of the proposed rule change (1) Spread Order. A spread order is an order to buy a stated number of option contracts and to sell also will be available for inspection and is available on the Exchange’s Web site copying at the principal office of the a stated number of option contracts in a different at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/ series of the same option and may be bid for or Exchange. All comments received will micro.aspx?id=PHLXRulefilings, at the offered on a total net debit or credit basis. be posted without change; the principal office of the Exchange, and at (A) Inter-Currency Spread Order. In the case of Commission does not edit personal foreign currency options, a spread order may the Commission’s Public Reference identifying information from consist of an order to buy a stated number of option Room. contracts in one foreign currency and to sell the submissions. You should submit only same number of option contracts in a different information that you wish to make foreign currency option. 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). available publicly. All submissions (2) Straddle Order. A straddle order is an order 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– to buy a number of call option contracts and the 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. same number of put option contracts with respect 2010–111 and should be submitted on 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). to the same underlying security (in the case of or before September 20, 2010. 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4. options on a stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53011

a synthetic option (as defined in Rule reporting is currently included in the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 11 1066(g)); 7 or (ii) any other order Exchange’s ‘‘batching’’ program. The in particular, in that it is designed to consisting of multiple option and/or Exchange has observed that a promote just and equitable principles of stock components. disproportionate number of late trade trade, to remove impediments to and Currently, in order to establish reports are due to transactions in perfect the mechanism of a free and whether a member or member complex spread transactions executed open market and a national market organization has engaged in a pattern or in open outcry.9 system, and, in general to protect practice of violating a specific order Hedge orders and synthetic options investors and the public interest. handling rule the Exchange may are presented as a single order [sic] in Specifically, the Exchange believes that aggregate, or ‘‘batch,’’ individual the crowd, often including multiple the proposal benefits customers by violations of order handling OFPAs, and option and/or stock components, on a encouraging Exchange Floor Brokers, consider such ‘‘batched’’ violations as a net debit or credit basis. It is not market makers and specialists to single occurrence of a violation by a unusual for the individual components introduce and/or participate in member or member organization over a of such an order to be executed at legitimate complex transactions in open specific time period.8 Late trade different times (especially in situations outcry without being penalized for late involving the execution of a stock trade reporting in the specific instances or the same underlying foreign currency (in the case component on an away equity market). described above. of options on a foreign currency) and having the same exercise price and expiration date; or an order Therefore, some components of the B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s to sell a number of call option contracts and the order may be executed while other Statement on Burden on Competition same number of put option contracts with respect components are pending execution. In to the same underlying security (in the case of many cases execution of the entire The Exchange does not believe that options on a stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share) hedge or synthetic option order takes the proposed rule change will impose or the same underlying foreign currency (in the case any burden on competition not of options on a foreign currency) and having the longer than 90 seconds to complete, same exercise price and expiration date (e.g., an resulting in late reporting for the necessary or appropriate in furtherance order to buy two XYZ July 50 calls and to buy two individual components upon of the purposes of the Act. XYZ July 50 puts is a straddle order). In the case of adjusted stock option contracts, a straddle order completion of the entire order at the net C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s need not consist of the same number of put and call debit or credit price. Statement on Comments Regarding the contracts if such contracts both represent the same The Exchange believes that the Proposed Rule Change Received From number of shares at option. inclusion of late trade reporting Members, Participants or Others (3) Combination Order. A combination order is an order involving a number of call option contracts violations in the ‘‘batch’’ of violations No written comments were either and the same number of put option contracts in the respecting hedge or synthetic order solicited or received. same underlying security and representing the same transactions in open outcry unfairly number of shares at option (if the underlying penalizes a member or member III. Date of Effectiveness of the security is a stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share) or the same number of foreign currency units (if the organization engaging in legitimate Proposed Rule Change and Timing for underlying security is a foreign currency). A hedge and synthetic option orders and Commission Action combination order includes a conversion (generally, thus proposes, when determining Within 45 days of the date of buying a put, selling a call and buying the underlying stock or Exchange-Traded Fund Share) whether exceptional circumstances publication of this notice in the Federal and a reversal (generally, selling a put, buying a call exist, to consider late reports of Register or within such longer period and selling the underlying stock or Exchange- transactions in such orders executed in up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may Traded Fund Share). In the case of adjusted option open outcry to be ‘‘exceptional designate if it finds such longer period contracts, a combination order need not consist of circumstances’’ under the rule. the same number of shares at option. to be appropriate and publishes its (4) Tied Hedge Order. A tied hedge order is an 2. Statutory Basis reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which option order that is tied to a hedge transaction as the self-regulatory organization defined in Commentary .04 to Rule 1064, following The Exchange believes that its consents, the Commission will: the receipt of an option order in a class determined proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) (A) By order approve or disapprove by the Exchange as eligible for ‘‘tied hedge’’ of the Act 10 transactions. in general, and furthers the the proposed rule change, or A tied hedge order involves buying or selling a (B) institute proceedings to determine stock, security futures or futures position following program the Exchange may aggregate, or ‘‘batch,’’ whether the proposed rule change receipt of an option order, including a complex individual violations of order handling OFPAs, and should be disapproved. order, but prior to announcing such order to the consider such ‘‘batched’’ violations as a single trading crowd, provided that certain conditions are Occurrence only in accordance with the guidelines IV. Solicitation of Comments met. See Rule 1064, Commentary .04. set forth in the Exchange’s Numerical Criteria for Interested persons are invited to 7 Rule 1066(g) defines a synthetic option order as Bringing Cases for Violations of Phlx Order an order to buy or sell a stated number of units of Handling Rules. In addition, the Exchange may submit written data, views, and an underlying stock or a security convertible into batch individual violations of Rule 1014(c)(i)(A) arguments concerning the foregoing, the underlying stock (‘‘convertible security’’) pertaining to quote spread parameters (and including whether the proposed rule coupled with either (i) the purchase or sale of corresponding Options Floor Procedure Advice F– change is consistent with the Act. option contract(s) on the opposite side of the market 6). In the alternative, the Exchange may refer the representing either the same number of units of the matter to the Business Conduct Committee for Comments may be submitted by any of underlying stock or convertible security or the possible disciplinary action when (i) the Exchange the following methods: number of units of the underlying stock or determines that there exists a pattern or practice of convertible security necessary to create a delta violative conduct without exceptional Electronic comments neutral position, or (ii) the purchase or sale of an circumstances, or (ii) any single instance of • Use the Commission’s Internet equal number of put and call option contracts, each violative conduct without exceptional having the same exercise price, expiration date, and circumstances is deemed to be so egregious that comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ each representing the same number of units of stock referral to the Business Conduct Committee for rules/sro.shtml); or as, and on the opposite side of the market from, the possible disciplinary action is appropriate. • Send an e-mail to rule- stock or convertible security portion of the order. 9 This proposal applies only to executions in [email protected]. Please include File 8 Exchange Rule 970.01 states that, for purposes open outcry, and not to complex orders executed Number SR–Phlx–2010–112 on the of imposing fines under the Options Floor and reported automatically by the Exchange’s Procedure Advices (‘‘OFPAs’’), when the number of Complex Order System. See Exchange Rule subject line. violations under Exchange Rules is determined 1080.08. based upon an exception-based surveillance 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53012 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Paper comments clearance in compliance with the object is imported pursuant to a loan • Send paper comments in triplicate Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. agreement with the foreign owner or to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Chapter 35): custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit Securities and Exchange Commission, SSS FORM—22 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC object at the Metropolitan Museum of Title: Claim Documentation Form— 20549–1090. Art, New York, New York, from on or Conscientious Objector. about September 15, 2010, until on or All submissions should refer to File Need and/or Use: The form will be about September 15, 2015, and at Number SR–Phlx–2010–112. This file used to document a claim for possible additional exhibitions or number should be included on the classification as a conscientious objector venues yet to be determined, is in the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the in the event that inductions into the national interest. I have ordered that Commission process and review your Armed Forces are resumed. Public Notice of these Determinations comments more efficiently, please use Respondents: Registrants who claim be published in the Federal Register. only one method. The Commission will to be conscientious objectors. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For post all comments on the Commission’s Burden: A burden of one hour per further information, including a Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ individual respondent. description of the exhibit object, contact rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the Copies of the above identified form Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, submission, all subsequent can be obtained upon written request to Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. amendments, all written statements the Selective Service System, Reports Department of State (telephone: 202– with respect to the proposed rule Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson 632–6469). The mailing address is U.S. change that are filed with the Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209– Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Commission, and all written 2425. Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC communications relating to the Written comments and 20522–0505. proposed rule change between the recommendations for the proposed Commission and any person, other than extension of clearance of the form Dated: August 23, 2010. those that may be withheld from the should be sent within 30 days of the Ann Stock, public in accordance with the publication of this notice to the Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be Selective Service System, Reports and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. available for Web site viewing and Clearance Officer, 1515 Wilson [FR Doc. 2010–21590 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] printing in the Commission’s Public Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209– BILLING CODE 4710–05–P Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 2425. Washington, DC 20549, on official A copy of the comments should be business days between the hours of 10 sent to the Office of Information and DEPARTMENT OF STATE a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Desk also will be available for inspection and Officer, Selective Service System, Office [Public Notice 7140] copying at the principal office of the of Management and Budget, New Exchange. All comments received will Executive Office Building, Room 3235, Culturally Significant Objects Imported be posted without change; the Washington, DC 20503. for Exhibition Determinations: Commission does not edit personal Dated: August 19, 2010. ‘‘Treasures of Moscow: Icons From the identifying information from Andrey Rublev Museum’’ submissions. You should submit only Lawrence G. Romo, information that you wish to make Director. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the publicly available. All submissions [FR Doc. 2010–21416 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] following determinations: Pursuant to should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– BILLING CODE 8015–01–M the authority vested in me by the Act of 2010–112 and should be submitted on October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. or before September 20, 2010. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March DEPARTMENT OF STATE 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and For the Commission, by the Division of Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated [Public Notice 7136] authority.12 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of Florence E. Harmon, Culturally Significant Object Imported October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Deputy Secretary. for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Ivory Mirror Case’’ Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, [FR Doc. 2010–21474 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] I hereby determine that the objects to be BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the included in the exhibition ‘‘Treasures of following determinations: Pursuant to Moscow: Icons from the Andrey Rublev the authority vested in me by the Act of Museum,’’ imported from abroad for SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. temporary exhibition within the United 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March States, are of cultural significance. The Form Submitted to the Office of 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and objects are imported pursuant to a loan Management and Budget for Extension Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. agreement with the foreign owner or of Clearance 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et custodian. I also determine that the AGENCY: Selective Service System. seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of exhibition or display of the exhibit ACTION: Notice. October 1, 1999, and Delegation of objects at the Museum of Russian Icons, Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, Clinton, MA, from on or about October The following form has been I hereby determine that the object to be 23, 2010, until on or about July 25, submitted to the Office of Management included in the exhibition ‘‘Ivory Mirror 2011, and at possible additional and Budget (0MB) for extension of Case,’’ imported from abroad for exhibitions or venues yet to be temporary exhibition within the United determined, is in the national interest. 12 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). States, is of cultural significance. The I have ordered that Public Notice of

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53013

these Determinations be published in State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite DEPARTMENT OF STATE the Federal Register. 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505. [Public Notice 7139] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Dated: August 23, 2010. further information, including a list of Ann Stock, Culturally Significant Objects Imported the exhibit objects, contact Julie for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘The Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of Pre-Raphaelite Lens: British and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of Photography and Painting, 1848–1875’’ State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The [FR Doc. 2010–21584 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] mailing address is U.S. Department of BILLING CODE 4710–05–P SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite following determinations: Pursuant to 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505. the authority vested in me by the Act of DEPARTMENT OF STATE October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. Dated: August 23, 2010. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March Ann Stock, [Public Notice 7137] 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. Culturally Significant Objects Imported 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et [FR Doc. 2010–21567 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Chaos seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of BILLING CODE 4710–05–P and Classicism: Art in France, Italy, October 1, 1999, and Delegation of and Germany, 1918–1936’’ Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be DEPARTMENT OF STATE ‘‘ SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the included in the exhibition The Pre- following determinations: Pursuant to Raphaelite Lens: British Photography [Public Notice 7138] and Painting, 1848–1875,’’ imported the authority vested in me by the Act of from abroad for temporary exhibition October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. Culturally Significant Objects Imported within the United States, are of cultural for Exhibition Determinations: 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March significance. The objects are imported ‘‘Treasures of Heaven: Saints, Relics, 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and pursuant to loan agreements with the and Devotion in Medieval Europe’’ Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. foreign owners or custodians. I also 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the determine that the exhibition or display seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of of the exhibit objects at the National following determinations: Pursuant to October 1, 1999, and Delegation of the authority vested in me by the Act of Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. or about October 31, 2010, until on or I hereby determine that the objects to be 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March about January 30, 2011, and at possible ‘‘ 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and included in the exhibition Chaos and additional exhibitions or venues yet to Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. Classicism: Art in France, Italy, and be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et Germany, 1918–1936,’’ imported from Notice of these Determinations be seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of abroad for temporary exhibition within published in the Federal Register. October 1, 1999, and Delegation of the United States, are of cultural Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000, significance. The objects are imported FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For I hereby determine that the objects to be pursuant to loan agreements with the further information, including a list of included in the exhibition ‘‘Treasures of foreign owners or custodians. I also the exhibit objects, contact Julie Heaven: Saints, Relics, and Devotion in determine that the exhibition or display Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of Medieval Europe,’’ imported from of the exhibit objects at the Guggenheim the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of abroad for temporary exhibition within Museum, New York, NY, from on or State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The the United States, are of cultural about October 1, 2010, until on or about mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite significance. The objects are imported January 9, 2011, and at possible 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505. pursuant to loan agreements with the additional exhibitions or venues yet to foreign owners or custodians. I also be determined, is in the national Dated: August 23, 2010. determine that the exhibition or display interest. Public Notice of these Ann Stock, of the exhibit objects at The Cleveland Determinations is ordered to be Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH, from on published in the Federal Register. and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. or about October 17, 2010, until on or [FR Doc. 2010–21581 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT about January 17, 2011; The Walters Art : For BILLING CODE 4710–05–P Museum, Baltimore, MD, from on or further information, including a list of about February 13, 2011, until on or the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. about May 15, 2011, and at possible Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES additional exhibitions or venues yet to Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State TRADE REPRESENTATIVE be determined, is in the national (telephone: 202/632–6473). The address interest. I have ordered that Public is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fiscal Year 2011 Tariff-rate Quota Notice of these Determinations be Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522– Allocations for Raw Cane Sugar, published in the Federal Register. 0505. Refined and Specialty Sugar, and Sugar-containing Products; Revision FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Dated: August 23, 2010. further information, including a list of Ann Stock, AGENCY: Office of the United States the exhibit objects, contact Julie Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational Trade Representative. Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of ACTION: Notice; revision. the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The [FR Doc. 2010–21587 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: The Office of the United mailing address is U.S. Department of BILLING CODE 4710–05–P States Trade Representative (USTR)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53014 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

published a notice in the Federal valorem export charge on softwood FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Register of August 17, 2010 concerning lumber shipments from Ontario, Melle, Deputy Assistant USTR for the Fiscal Year 2011 tariff-rate quota Quebec, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, Americas, (202) 395–3412, or Suzanne allocations of raw cane sugar, refined until an entire amount of CDN $68 Garner, Assistant General Counsel, (202) and special sugar, and sugar-containing million has been collected. Canada did 395–9663, for questions concerning the products. USTR is revising the effective not begin collecting the additional enforcement of U.S. rights under the date of that notice to September 1, 2010 export charge. In April 2009, the United SLA; Heather Sykes, Chief, Trade Policy from October 1, 2010. States Trade Representative (‘‘Trade Branch, U.S. Customs and Border DATES: Effective Date: September 1, Representative’’) initiated an Protection, Department of Homeland 2010. investigation under Section 302 of the Security, (202) 863–6099, for questions Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Trade concerning entries of softwood lumber ADDRESSES: Inquiries may be mailed or products, or William Busis, Chair of the delivered to Leslie O’Connor, Director of Act’’). In that investigation, the Trade Representative determined that Section 301 Committee and Deputy Agricultural Affairs, Office of Assistant USTR for Monitoring and Agricultural Affairs, Office of the United Canada’s failure to implement the tribunal’s remedy award had the effect Enforcement, (202) 395–3150, for States Trade Representative, 600 17th questions concerning procedures under Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508. of denying U.S. rights under the SLA; and, pursuant to Section 301 of the Section 301. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trade Act, the Trade Representative SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Leslie O’Connor, Office of Agricultural imposed 10 percent ad valorem duties Affairs, telephone: 202–395–6127 or A. Enforcement of U.S. rights under the on imports of softwood lumber products facsimile: 202–395–4579. SLA subject to the SLA from the provinces of For further information concerning SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, and U.S. rights under the SLA and the April 19, 2010, the Secretary of Agriculture Saskatchewan (the April 2009 action). 2009 action, see Initiation of Section announced that sugar entering the Under the April 2009 action, the duties United States under the Fiscal Year 302 Investigation, Determination of are to remain in place until such time Action Under Section 301, and Request 2011 raw sugar tariff-rate quota will be as the United States collects $54.8 permitted to enter the U.S. Customs for Comments: Canada—Compliance million, the U.S. dollar equivalent of With Softwood Lumber Agreement, 74 Territory beginning September 1, 2010, CDN $68 million at the time. The a month earlier than the beginning of FR 16,436 (April 10, 2009) (notice); 74 Government of Canada, however, has FR 17,276 (April 14, 2009) (annex). Fiscal Year 2011 on October 1, 2010. now adopted its own measures to Accordingly, USTR is revising the address Canada’s breach of the SLA. In B. Canada’s Measures Addressing the effective date of its notice of allocation particular, Canada will begin collection Breach of the SLA to accommodate the Secretary’s of an additional 10 percent charge on announcement. All other information Canada has adopted measures to exports of softwood lumber products contained in the August 17, 2010 USTR comply with the February 2009 remedy from the provinces of Ontario, Quebec, notice remains unchanged and will not award by imposing a 10 percent export Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, which be repeated in this notice. charge on exports of softwood lumber will be effective with respect to products subject to the SLA from the Ronald Kirk, softwood lumber products with a provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, United States Trade Representative. shipment date of September 1, 2010 or and Saskatchewan. Canada enacted the [FR Doc. 2010–21524 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] later. Per an understanding between the necessary legislation, in the form of an BILLING CODE 3190–W0–P Governments of the United States and amendment to the Softwood Lumber Canada, Canada will collect the Products Export Charge Act, 2006, with additional 10 percent charge on exports parliamentary approval and royal assent OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES until the total of the amounts collected on July 12, 2010. On August 4, 2010, TRADE REPRESENTATIVE under the U.S. import duty and the Canada issued an Order in Council Canadian charge on exports is equal to setting September 1, 2010 as the date to [Docket No. USTR–2010–0015] CDN $68 million. The Trade begin imposing the 10% charge on Notice and Modification of Action: Representative has determined that shipments of softwood lumber products Canada—Compliance with Softwood Canada’s measures satisfactorily grant from the provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Lumber Agreement the rights of the United States under the Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. SLA. Accordingly, the Trade Per an understanding between the AGENCY: Office of the United States Representative has modified the April Governments of the United States and Trade Representative. 2009 action by removing the 10 percent Canada, Canada will collect the ACTION: Notice and modification of ad valorem duties on imports of additional 10 percent charge on exports action. softwood lumber products subject to the until the total of the amounts collected SLA from the provinces of Ontario, under the U.S. import duty and the SUMMARY: Under the 2006 Softwood Quebec, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, Canadian charge on exports is equal to Lumber Agreement (SLA), Canada effective with respect to imports with a CDN $68 million. The understanding agreed to impose export measures on shipment date of September 1, 2010 or also provides for the United States and Canadian exports of softwood lumber later. Canada to exchange information on the products to the United States. At the ongoing amounts collected under the request of the United States, an arbitral DATES: The modification of the April U.S. import duty and the Canadian tribunal established under the SLA 2009 action is effective with respect to charge on exports. determined in March 2008 that Canada imports of softwood lumber products had breached certain SLA obligations. subject to the SLA from the provinces of C. Public Comment In February 2009, the tribunal issued a Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, and In May 2010, the Section 301 remedy award instructing Canada to Saskatchewan with a shipment date of Committee invited comments from collect an additional 10 percent ad September 1, 2010 or later. interested persons with respect to the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53015

possible modification or termination of E. Section 306 Monitoring points in the United States and beyond; the April 2009 action in the event the Pursuant to Section 306(a) of the (ii) between any point or points in the Government of Canada adopted a law Trade Act, the Trade Representative will United States and any point or points in imposing an additional 10 percent continue to monitor the implementation any member of the European Common export charge on softwood lumber of Canada’s measures imposing a 10 Aviation Area; and (iii) other charter. products from the provinces of Ontario, percent export charge on exports of Docket Number: DOT–OST–2007– Quebec, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. softwood lumber products subject to the 26980. See 75 FR 30097 (May 28, 2010). SLA from the provinces of Ontario, Date Filed: August 11, 2010. Due Date for Answers, Conforming D. Modification of April 2009 Action Quebec, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Pursuant to Section 306(b), if the Trade Applications, or Motion to Modify Section 307 of the Trade Act Representative considers that Canada is Scope: September 1, 2010. authorizes the Trade Representative to not satisfactorily implementing these Description: Application of Jade Cargo modify or terminate an action taken measures, the Trade Representative will International Company Limited under Section 301 if, among other determine what further action to take requesting an amendment of its pending things, ‘‘the foreign country is taking under Section 301. application for a foreign air carrier satisfactory measures to grant the rights permit and requests an exemption William L. Busis, of the United States under a trade authorizing it to engage in: (1) Chair, Section 301 Committee. agreement.’’ Sections 301(a)(2)(B)(i) and Scheduled foreign air transportation of 307(1)(A). Pursuant to the [FR Doc. 2010–21486 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] property and mail from any point or recommendations of the Trade Policy BILLING CODE 3190–W0–P points in the People’s Republic of Staff Committee and the Section 301 China, via any intermediate points, to Committee, and taking account of the any point or points in the United States comments received in response to the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION open to scheduled international May 2010 notice, the Trade operations, and beyond to any points Office of the Secretary Representative has determined: (1) That outside the United States; (2) charter Canada’s adoption of the July 2010 foreign air transportation of property Notice of Applications for Certificates and mail from any point or points in the amendment to the Softwood Lumber of Public Convenience and Necessity Products Export Charge Act, 2006, and People’s Republic of China, on the one and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed hand, and any point or points in the the August 2010 Order in Council Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q) constitute ‘‘satisfactory measures’’; and United States, on the other hand; and (3) During the Week Ending August 14, other charters. (2) to modify the April 2009 action by 2010 removing the 10% import duty on Renee V. Wright, entries of softwood lumber products The following Applications for Program Manager, Docket Operations, from the provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Certificates of Public Convenience and Federal Register Liaison. Manitoba, and Saskatchewan with a Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier [FR Doc. 2010–21508 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Permits were filed under Subpart B shipment date of September 1, 2010 or BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P later. In order to prevent any gap in (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department collection of the charge, the 10% import of Transportation’s Procedural duty will continue to apply to entries Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION after September 1, 2010 with a shipment seq.). The due date for Answers, date of August 31, 2010 or earlier. Conforming Applications, or Motions to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Modify Scope are set forth below for Administration In accordance with the Trade each application. Following the Answer Representative’s determination to period DOT may process the application [Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0242] modify the April 2009 action, and by expedited procedures. Such effective with respect to articles entered, procedures may consist of the adoption Public Listening Session or withdrawn from warehouse for of a show-cause order, a tentative order, consumption, on or after September 1, or in appropriate cases a final order AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety 2010, U.S. Note 13 to subchapter III of without further proceedings. Administration (FMCSA), DOT. chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Docket Number: DOT–OST–2010– ACTION: Announcement of public Schedule of the United States (HTS) is 0202. listening session; request for comment. modified by deleting subdivision (i) and Date Filed: August 9, 2010. inserting the following new subdivision Due Date for Answers, Conforming SUMMARY: FMCSA announces it will in lieu thereof: Applications, or Motion to Modify hold a public listening session to solicit ‘‘(i) The additional duties provided for in Scope: August 30, 2010. input on key challenges facing the subheading 9903.53.01 shall apply to articles Description: Application of Gama motor carrier industry, issues facing entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for Aviation Limited requesting a foreign stakeholders, and concerns that should consumption, on or after September 1, 2010, air carrier permit and exemption be considered by the Agency in if the Canadian export permits associated authority to engage in charter foreign air developing its next 5-year Strategic with the entries display a shipment date transportation of persons, property and Plan. FMCSA invites interested persons prior to September 1, 2010. The additional mail to the full extent authorized by the to participate in this important duties provided for in subheading 9903.53.01 Air Transport Agreement between the opportunity to help build FMCSA’s next shall not apply to articles entered, or European Community and its Member strategic plan. This notice also invites withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, States, and the United States: (i) From written comments, suggestions, and on or after September 1, 2010, if the any point or points behind any Member recommendations from all individuals Canadian export permits associated with the State of the European Union via any and organizations on FMCSA’s mission, entries display a shipment date of September point or points in any Member State and vision, and strategic objectives (goals) 1, 2010 or later.’’ via intermediate points to any point or for the plan.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53016 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

DATES: The public meeting will be held received, go to http:// improving the safety of commercial September 8, 2010, in three consecutive www.regulations.gov at any time or to motor vehicles (CMVs) and saving lives. listening sessions: Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey In carrying out its safety mandate to Safety Partners, 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 reduce crashes, injuries, and fatalities Industry Partners, 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. a.m. and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through involving large trucks and buses, Enforcement Partners, 12 p.m. to 2 Friday, except Federal holidays. All FMCSA engages in a variety of p.m. comments received before the close of regulatory, enforcement, outreach, Submit comments for discussion at business on the comment closing date educational, and research activities. the listening session by September 1, indicated above will be considered and FMCSA’s Administrator has outlined 2010. available for examination in the docket three core principles for the Agency: Additional written comments may be at the above address. Comments • Raise the safety bar to enter the submitted by September 30, 2010. received after the comment closing date motor carrier industry; • Maintain high safety standards to ADDRESSES: Holiday Inn Washington- will be filed in the docket and will be Capitol, 550 C Street, SW., Washington, considered to the extent practicable. In remain in the industry; and • Remove high-risk carriers, drivers, DC 20024. addition to late comments, FMCSA will continue to file relevant information in and vehicles from operations. You may submit comments (identified Following are some of the key issues by DOT Docket ID Number FMCSA– the docket as it becomes available after the comment period closing date, and that the Agency hopes public comments 2010–0242) by any of the following will address. In addition to general methods. Do not submit the same interested persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. comments, we seek any documents, comments by more than one method. studies, or references relevant to the Services for Individuals with However, to allow effective public issues. The public may respond to some Disabilities: For assistance with services participation before the comment period or all of the questions below. FMCSA for individuals with disabilities or to deadline, the Agency encourages use of will consider all comments received but request special assistance, please send the Web site listed below. This provides may not necessarily incorporate every your request to the address listed in the for the most efficient and timely receipt comment into the strategic plan. and processing of your comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT • 1. How should we strengthen Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to section of this notice, or e-mail your FMCSA’s role/mission of improving the http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the request to [email protected] by safety of commercial motor vehicles online instructions for submitting Wednesday, September 1, 2010. (CMV) and saving lives as it relates to comments. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search some of FMCSA’s core program: • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. the electronic form of all comments • Commercial motor vehicle compliance Mail: Docket Management Facility, received in any of our dockets by the and enforcement, commercial driver U.S. Department of Transportation, name of the individual submitting the licensing, household goods protection, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey comment (or signing the comment, if safe and secure transportation of Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– submitted on behalf of an association, hazardous materials? 0001. business, labor union, etc.). You may 2. How can FMCSA have a greater • Hand Delivery: Ground floor, Room review DOT’s complete Privacy Act impact in the reduction of injury and W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Statement in the Federal Register loss of life on the nation’s highways? Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 3. How can FMCSA improve the way p.m., E.T., Monday through Friday, 65, Number 70, pp. 19477–78) or you it does business, provides customer except Federal holidays. may visit http://www.dot.gov/ service, and interacts with all road user Instructions: All submissions must privacy.html. groups? What are some of the challenges include the Agency name and docket you have in interacting with FMCSA number. It is suggested that comment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tretha Chromey, Office of Policy and that prevent you from conducting your submissions be limited to ten (10) pages business effectively? What actions with unlimited attachments. Note that Program Development, Strategic Planning and Program Evaluation should FMCSA take to improve all comments received will be posted interactions between CMV drivers and without change to http:// Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., drivers of private vehicles? Please www.regulations.gov, including any identify possible improvements or ideas personal information provided. Refer to SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–1630 or e-mail for doing better. the Privacy Act heading of this notice 4. How might FMCSA improve or [email protected] or for further information. strengthen its partnership with [email protected]. Office Public Participation: The stakeholders representing State hours are 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday regulations.gov system is generally enforcement agencies, safety advocacy through Friday, except Federal holidays. available 24 hours a day, 365 days a groups, the motor carrier industry, and year. You can find electronic SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The the general public to achieve its safety submission and retrieval help and primary mission of the Federal Motor mission? guidelines under the ‘‘Help’’ section of Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) 5. How should FMCSA balance the Web site. For notification that is to reduce crashes, injuries, and driver-focused, vehicle-focused, and FMCSA received the comments, please fatalities involving large trucks and motor carrier-focused compliance, include a self-addressed, stamped buses. Established as a separate interventions, and enforcement to envelope or postcard, or print the administration within the U.S. achieve its safety mission? acknowledgement page that appears Department of Transportation (DOT) on 6. How will advanced vehicle after submitting comments online. January 1, 2000, FMCSA is technologies (such as crash avoidance, Copies or abstracts of all documents headquartered in Washington, DC. The electronic on-board recorders [EOBRs], referenced in this notice are in the Agency employs more than 1,000 and global positioning systems [GPS]) docket. For access to the docket to read people in all 50 States and the District impact the future of driver behavior, background documents or comments of Columbia, who are dedicated to vehicle safety, and motor carrier safety?

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53017

7. How will changes in the following Estimated Total Burden Hours: 366 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY areas impact the industry, your hours. Office of the General Counsel; organization, and/or FMCSA’s ability to OMB Number: 1545–1338. achieve its mission in the future? Appointment of Members of the Legal • Demographics Type of Review: Extension without Division to the Performance Review • Economics change to a currently approved Board, Internal Revenue Service • New policies in environment, collection. energy, and other areas Title: PS–103–90 (Final) (TD 8578) Under the authority granted to me as 8. What technological changes could Election Out of Subchapter K for Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue positively impact highway safety? Producers of Natural Gas. Service by the General Counsel of the 9. How will technology affect driver Abstract: This regulation contains Department of the Treasury by General behavior? What issues related to certain requirements that must be met Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the vehicle/driver interaction could affect by co-producers of natural gas subject to Civil Service Reform Act, I have safety performance? a joint operating agreement in order to appointed the following persons to the Issued on: August 24, 2010. elect out of subchapter K of chapter 1 Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel: Larry W. Minor, of the Internal Revenue Code. Under section 1.761–2(d)(5)(i), gas producers 1. Chairperson, Clarissa Potter, Associate Administrator for Policy and Deputy Chief Counsel (Technical) Program Development. subject to gas balancing agreements on 2. Sara M. Coe, Deputy Division [FR Doc. 2010–21509 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the regulation’s effective date are to file Form 3115 and certain additional Counsel (Small Business/Self BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P information to obtain the Employed) Commissioner’s consent to a change in 3. Curtis Wilson, Associate Chief method of accounting to either of the Counsel (Passthroughs & Special DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY two new permissible accounting Industries) 4. Andrew Keyso, Deputy Associate Submission for OMB Review; methods in the regulations. Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Comment Request Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits. Accounting) 5. Drita Tonuzi, Deputy Division August 23, 2010. Estimated Total Burden Hours: 5 Counsel (Large & Mid-Size Business) The Department of the Treasury will hours. submit the following public information This publication is required by 5 collection requirements to OMB for OMB Number: 1545–2167. U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). review and clearance under the Type of Review: Extension without Dated: August 23, 2010. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, change to a currently approved William J. Wilkins, collection. Public Law 104–13 on or after the date Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service. of publication of this notice. A copy of Title: Notice 2010–28, Stripping [FR Doc. 2010–21325 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the submissions may be obtained by Transactions for Qualified Tax Credit calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Bonds. BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Officer listed. Comments regarding Abstract: The IRS requires the these information collections should be information to ensure compliance with DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY addressed to the OMB reviewer listed the tax credit bond credit coupon and to the Treasury PRA Clearance stripping requirements, including Office of the General Counsel; Officer, Department of the Treasury, ensuring that no excess tax credit is Appointment of Members of the Legal 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite taken by holders of bonds and coupons Division to the Performance Review 11010, Washington, DC 20220. strips. The information is required in Board, Internal Revenue Service Dates: Written comments should be order to inform holders of qualified tax received on or before September 29, credit bonds whether the credit coupons Under the authority granted to me as 2010 to be assured of consideration. relating to those bonds may be stripped Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as provided under § 54A(i). The respondents are issuers of tax credit Department of the Treasury by General OMB Number: 1545–1270. bonds, including states and local Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Type of Review: Extension without governments and other eligible issuers. Civil Service Reform Act, I have change to a currently approved appointed the following persons to the Respondents: State, Local, and Tribal collection. Legal Division Performance Review Governments. Title: PS–66–93 (Final) Gasohol; Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel: Compressed Natural Gas; PS–120–90 Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,000 1. Christopher Meade, Principal (Final) Gasoline Excise Tax. hours. Deputy General Counsel (Department of Abstract: PS–66–93 Buyers of Bureau Clearance Officer: R. Joseph Treasury) compressed natural gas for a non taxable Durbala, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 2. Richard Byrd, Commissioner (Wage use must give a certificate. Persons who Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 6129, & Investment) pay a ‘‘first tax’’ on gasoline must file a Washington, DC 20224; (202) 622–3634 3. Christopher Wagner, Commissioner report. PS–120–90 Gasoline refiners, OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, (Small Business/Self Employed) traders, terminal operators, chemical Office of Management and Budget, New This publication is required by 5 companies and gasohol blenders must Executive Office Building, Room 10235, U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). notify each other of their registration Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395–7873 status and/or intended use of product Dated: August 23, 2010. before transactions may be made tax- Dawn D. Wolfgang, William J. Wilkins, free. Treasury PRA Clearance Officer. Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service. Respondents: Private Sector: [FR Doc. 2010–21356 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2010–21327 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Businesses or other for-profits. BILLING CODE 4830–01–P BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53018 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Estimated Number of Respondents: opportunity to comment on proposed 405,744. and/or continuing information Internal Revenue Service Estimated Time per Respondent: 10 collections, as required by the hrs, 46 minutes. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Proposed Collection; Comment Estimated Total Annual Burden Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. Request for Form 720 Hours: 4,366,381. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), The following paragraph applies to all soliciting comments concerning Form Treasury. of the collections of information covered 13094, Recommendation for Juvenile by this notice: ACTION: Notice and request for Employment with the Internal Revenue An agency may not conduct or comments. Service. sponsor, and a person is not required to DATES: Written comments should be SUMMARY: The Department of the respond to, a collection of information received on or before October 29, 2010 Treasury, as part of its continuing effort unless the collection of information to be assured of consideration. to reduce paperwork and respondent displays a valid OMB control number. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments Books or records relating to a collection burden, invites the general public and to Gerald J. Shields, Internal Revenue of information must be retained as long other Federal agencies to take this Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution as their contents may become material opportunity to comment on proposed Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. and/or continuing information in the administration of any internal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: collections, as required by the revenue law. Generally, tax returns and Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, tax return information are confidential, Requests for additional information or Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. copies of the form and instructions 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is Request for Comments: Comments should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala soliciting comments concerning Form submitted in response to this notice will at Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, 720, Quarterly Federal Excise Tax be summarized and/or included in the 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Return. request for OMB approval. All Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 622– comments will become a matter of 3534, or through the Internet at DATES: Written comments should be public record. Comments are invited on: [email protected]. received on or before October 29, 2010 (a) Whether the collection of to be assured of consideration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: information is necessary for the proper Title: Recommendation for Juvenile ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments performance of the functions of the Employment with the Internal Revenue to Gerald J. Shields Internal Revenue agency, including whether the Service. Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution information shall have practical utility; OMB Number: 1545–1746. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate Form Number: 13049. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: of the burden of the collection of Abstract: The data collected on Form Requests for additional information or information; (c) ways to enhance the 13094 provides the Internal Revenue copies of the form and instructions quality, utility, and clarity of the Service with a consistent method for should be directed to R. Joseph Durbala information to be collected; (d) ways to making suitability determinations on at Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, minimize the burden of the collection of juveniles for employment within the 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., information on respondents, including Service. Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 622– through the use of automated collection Current Actions: There are no changes 3634, or through the Internet at techniques or other forms of information being made to the form at this time. [email protected]. technology; and (e) estimates of capital Type of Review: Extension of a SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: or start-up costs and costs of operation, currently approved collection. Title: Quarterly Federal Excise Tax maintenance, and purchase of services Affected Public: Individuals and not- Return. to provide information. for-profit institutions. Estimated Number of Respondents: OMB Number: 1545–0023. Approved: August 23, 2010. Form Number: 720. 2,500. Abstract: Form 720 is used to report R. Joseph Durbala, Estimated Number of Respondents: 5 (1) excise taxes due from retailers and IRS Tax Analyst. minutes. manufacturers on the sale or [FR Doc. 2010–21476 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Estimated Total Annual Burden manufacture of various articles, (2) the BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Hours: 208. tax on facilities and services, (3) The following paragraph applies to all environmental taxes, (4) luxury tax, and of the collections of information covered (5) floor stocks taxes. The information DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY by this notice: supplied on Form 720 is used by the IRS An agency may not conduct or to determine the correct tax liability. Internal Revenue Service sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information Additionally the data is reported by the Proposed Collection; Comment unless the collection of information IRS to Treasury so that funds may be Request for Form 13094 transferred from the general revenue displays a valid OMB control number. fund to the appropriate trusts funds. AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Books or records relating to a collection Current Actions: There are no changes Treasury. of information must be retained as long being made to the form at this time. ACTION: Notice and request for as their contents may become material Type of Review: Extension of a comments. in the administration of any internal currently approved collection. revenue law. Generally, tax returns and Affected Public: Business or other for- SUMMARY: The Department of the tax return information are confidential, profit organizations, individuals, not- Treasury, as part of its continuing effort as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. for-profit institutions, farms, and to reduce paperwork and respondent Request for Comments: Comments Federal, State, local or tribal burden, invites the general public and submitted in response to this notice will governments. other Federal agencies to take this be summarized and/or included in the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53019

request for OMB approval. All Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 information to be collected; (d) ways to comments will become a matter of Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, minimize the burden of the collection of public record. Comments are invited on: DC 20224, or at (202) 622–3634, or information on respondents, including (a) Whether the collection of through the internet at through the use of automated collection information is necessary for the proper [email protected]. techniques or other forms of information performance of the functions of the technology; and (e) estimates of capital SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: agency, including whether the Title: Section 707 Regarding or start-up costs and costs of operation, information shall have practical utility; Disguised Sales, Generally. maintenance, and purchase of services (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate OMB Number: 1545–1909. to provide information. of the burden of the collection of Regulation Project Number: REG– Approved: August 23, 2010. information; (c) ways to enhance the 149519–03. R. Joseph Durbala, quality, utility, and clarity of the Abstract: Section 707(a)(2) provides, IRS Tax Analyst. information to be collected; (d) ways to in part, that if there is a transfer of minimize the burden of the collection of [FR Doc. 2010–21481 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] money or property by a partner to a BILLING CODE 4830–01–P information on respondents, including partnership and a related transfer of through the use of automated collection money or property by the partnership to techniques or other forms of information another partner, the transfers will be DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY technology; and (e) estimates of capital treated as a disguised sale of a or start-up costs and costs of operation, partnership interest between the Internal Revenue Service maintenance, and purchase of services partners. The regulations provide rules [REG–147144–06; (TD 9446)] to provide information. relating to disguised sales of partnership Approved: August 23, 2010. interests and require that the partners or Proposed Collection; Comment R. Joseph Durbala, the partnership disclose the transfers Request for Regulation Project IRS Tax Analyst. and certain assumptions of liabilities, AGENCY: with certain attendant facts, in some Internal Revenue Service (IRS), [FR Doc. 2010–21479 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Treasury. BILLING CODE 4830–01–P situations. Current Actions: There is no change to ACTION: Notice and request for this existing regulation. comments. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Type of Review: Extension of SUMMARY: The Department of the currently approved collection. Treasury, as part of its continuing effort Internal Revenue Service Affected Public: Business or other for- to reduce paperwork and respondent [REG–149519–03] profit organizations. burden, invites the general public and Estimated Number of Respondents: other Federal agencies to take this Proposed Collection; Comment 22,500. opportunity to comment on proposed Request for Regulation Project Estimated Time per Respondent: 2 and/or continuing information hours. collections, as required by the AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Estimate Total Annual Burden Hours: Treasury. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 7,500. Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. ACTION: Notice and request for The following paragraph applies to all comments. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is of the collections of information covered soliciting comments concerning an by this notice: SUMMARY: The Department of the existing regulation, REG–147144–06, Treasury, as part of its continuing effort An agency may not conduct or (TD 9446) Section 1.367(a)–8, Gain to reduce paperwork and respondent sponsor, and a person is not required to Recognition Agreements With Respect burden, invites the general public and respond to, a collection of information to Certain Transfers of Stock or other Federal agencies to take this unless the collection of information Securities by United States Persons to opportunity to comment on proposed displays a valid OMB control number. Foreign Corporations. Books or records relating to a collection and/or continuing information DATES: Written comments should be of information must be retained as long collections, as required by the received on or before September 29, as their contents may become material Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 2010 to be assured of consideration. Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is to Gerald Shields, Internal Revenue soliciting comments concerning an tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution existing regulation of proposed Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. rulemaking, REG–149519–03, Section Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this notice will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 707 Regarding Disguised Sales, Requests for additional information or Generally. be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval. All copies of the regulation should be DATES: Written comments should be comments will become a matter of directed to Joel Goldberger, at (202) received on or before October 29, 2010 public record. Comments are invited on: 927–9368, or at Internal Revenue to be assured of consideration. (a) Whether the collection of Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments information is necessary for the proper Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, to Gerald J. Shields, Internal Revenue performance of the functions of the or through the Internet at Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution agency, including whether the [email protected]. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. information shall have practical utility; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate Title: Gain Recognition Agreements Requests for additional information or of the burden of the collection of With Respect to Certain Transfers of copies of the regulations should be information; (c) ways to enhance the Stock or Securities by United States directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal quality, utility, and clarity of the Persons to Foreign Corporations.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53020 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

OMB Number: 1545–2056. maintenance, and purchase of services Current Actions: This is a Final Regulation Project Number: REG– to provide information. Regulation and Removal of Temporary 147144–06. (TD 9446). Approved: August 20, 2010. Regulations. Abstract: This document contains Gerald Shields, Type of Review: Extension of a final regulations under section 367(a) of IRS Supervisory Tax Analyst. currently approved collection. the Internal Revenue Code (Code) concerning gain recognition agreements [FR Doc. 2010–21483 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Affected Public: Individuals, business filed by United States persons with BILLING CODE 4830–01–P or other for-profit organizations, not-for- respect to transfers of stock or securities profit institutions, and Federal, state, to foreign corporations. The regulations local or tribal governments. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY finalize temporary regulations Estimated Number of Respondents: published on February 5, 2007 (T.D. Internal Revenue Service 1,125. 9311, 2007–1 C.B. 635). The regulations Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 primarily affect United States persons [REG–120616–03 (TD 9346 Final that transfer (or have transferred) stock Regulations and Removal of Temporary hour, 25 minutes. or securities to foreign corporations and Regulations)] Estimated Total Annual Burden that will enter (or have entered) into a Hours: 281. gain recognition agreement with respect Proposed Collection: Comment Request for Regulation Project The following paragraph applies to all to such a transfer. of the collections of information covered Current Actions: There is no change to AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), by this notice. this existing regulation. Treasury. Type of Review: Extension of a An agency may not conduct or ACTION: Notice and request for sponsor, and a person is not required to currently approved collection. comments. Affected Public: Business or other for- respond to, a collection of information profit organizations. SUMMARY: The Department of the unless the collection of information Estimated Number of Respondents: Treasury, as part of its continuing effort displays a valid OMB control number. 170. to reduce paperwork and respondent Books or records relating to a collection Estimated Time per Respondent: 2 burden, invites the general public and of information must be retained as long hours. other Federal agencies to take this as their contents may become material Estimated Total Annual Burden opportunity to comment on proposed in the administration of any internal Hours: 240. and/or continuing information revenue law. Generally, tax returns and The following paragraph applies to all collections, as required by the tax return information are confidential, of the collections of information covered Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. by this notice: Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. Request for Comments: Comments An agency may not conduct or 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is submitted in response to this notice will sponsor, and a person is not required to soliciting comments concerning an be summarized and/or included in the respond to, a collection of information existing final regulation, REG–120616– request for OMB approval. All unless the collection of information 03 (TD 9346), Entry of Taxable Fuel, comments will become a matter of displays a valid OMB control number. (§§ 48.4081–1 and 48.4081–3). public record. Comments are invited on: Books or records relating to a collection DATES: Written comments should be (a) Whether the collection of of information must be retained as long received on or before October 29, 2010 information is necessary for the proper as their contents may become material to be assured of consideration. in the administration of any internal performance of the functions of the ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments agency, including whether the revenue law. Generally, tax returns and to Gerald Shields, Internal Revenue tax return information are confidential, information shall have practical utility; Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. Request for Comments: Comments of the burden of the collection of submitted in response to this notice will FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: information; (c) ways to enhance the be summarized and/or included in the Requests for additional information or quality, utility, and clarity of the request for OMB approval. All copies of the regulation should be information to be collected; (d) ways to comments will become a matter of directed to Joel Goldberger, at (202) minimize the burden of the collection of public record. Comments are invited on: 927–9368, or at Internal Revenue information on respondents, including (a) Whether the collection of Service, Room 6129, 1111 Constitution through the use of automated collection information is necessary for the proper Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, techniques or other forms of information or through the Internet, at performance of the functions of the technology; and (e) estimates of capital [email protected]. agency, including whether the or start-up costs and costs of operation, information shall have practical utility; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: maintenance, and purchase of services (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate Entry of Taxable Fuel. to provide information. of the burden of the collection of OMB Number: 1545–1897. information; (c) ways to enhance the Regulation Project Number: REG– Approved: August 23, 2010. quality, utility, and clarity of the 120616–03 (T.D. 9346 Final Regulations Gerald Shields, information to be collected; (d) ways to and Removal of Temporary IRS Supervisory Tax Analyst. minimize the burden of the collection of Regulations). [FR Doc. 2010–21484 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] information on respondents, including Abstract: The regulation imposes joint BILLING CODE 4830–01–P through the use of automated collection and several liability on the importer of techniques or other forms of information record for the tax imposed on the entry technology; and (e) estimates of capital of taxable fuel into the U.S. and revises or start-up costs and costs of operation, definition of ‘‘enterer’’.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53021

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 2848, 2848(SP) Power of Attorney and Form Number: 2848; 2848(SP). Declaration of Representative. Abstract: Form 2848 or Form Internal Revenue Service DATES: Written comments should be 2848(SP) is issued to authorize someone received on or before October 29, 2010 to act for the taxpayer in tax matters. It Proposed Collection; Comment to be assured of consideration. grants all powers that the taxpayer has Request for Form 2848, 2848(SP) ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments except signing a return and cashing refund checks. The information on the AGENCY: to Gerald Shields, Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Service (IRS), form is used to identify representatives Treasury. Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. and to ensure that confidential ACTION: Notice and request for information is not divulged to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: comments. unauthorized persons. Requests for additional information or Current Actions: There are no changes SUMMARY: The Department of the copies of the form and instructions being made to the form at this time, Treasury, as part of its continuing effort should be directed to Joel Goldberger at however, changes to the burden to reduce paperwork and respondent Internal Revenue Service, room 6129, estimates previously approved will be burden, invites the general public and 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., submitted to properly reflect the current other Federal agencies to take this Washington, DC 20224, or at (202) 927– estimates. opportunity to comment on proposed 9368, or through the Internet at Type of Review: Extension of a and/or continuing information [email protected]. currently approved collection. collections, as required by the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Affected Public: Individuals or Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Title: Power of Attorney and households, business or other for-profit Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. Declaration of Representative; Poder organizations, not-for-profit institutions, 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is Legally Declaracion y del Representante. and farms. soliciting comments concerning Form OMB Number: 1545–0150. The burden estimate is as follows:

Number of re- Time per re- sponses sponse Total hours

Form 2848 (paper) ...... 358,333 1.66 594,833 Form 2848 (on line) ...... 100,000 1.61 161,000 Form 2848 (SP) ...... 80,000 2.26 180,800

538,333 ...... 935,633

The following paragraph applies to all of automated collection techniques or Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, of the collections of information covered other forms of information technology; Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. by this notice: and (e) estimates of capital or start-up 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is An agency may not conduct or costs and costs of operation, soliciting comments concerning an sponsor, and a person is not required to maintenance, and purchase of services existing final regulation, CO–88–90 (TD respond to, a collection of information to provide information. 8530), Limitation on Net Operating Loss unless the collection of information Approved: August 23, 2010. Carryforwards and Certain Built-In displays a valid OMB control number. Gerald Shields, Losses Following Ownership Change; Books or records relating to a collection Special Rule for Value of a Loss IRS Supervisory Tax Analyst. of information must be retained as long Corporation Under the Jurisdiction of a as their contents may become material [FR Doc. 2010–21485 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Court in a Title 11 Case (Section 1.382– in the administration of any internal BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 9). revenue law. Generally, tax returns and DATES: Written comments should be tax return information are confidential, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY received on or before October 29, 2010 as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. to be assured of consideration. Request for Comments: Comments Internal Revenue Service ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments submitted in response to this notice will [CO–88–90] to Gerald J. Shields, Internal Revenue be summarized and/or included in the Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution request for OMB approval. All Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. comments will become a matter of Proposed Collection; Comment public record. Request for Regulation Project FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or Comments are invited on: (a) Whether AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), copies of the regulations should be the collection of information is Treasury. necessary for the proper performance of directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal ACTION: Notice and request for Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 the functions of the agency, including comments. whether the information shall have Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the SUMMARY: The Department of the DC 20224, or at (202) 622–3634, or agency’s estimate of the burden of the Treasury, as part of its continuing effort through the Internet at collection of information; (c) ways to to reduce paperwork and respondent [email protected]. enhance the quality, utility, and clarity burden, invites the general public and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: of the information to be collected; (d) other Federal agencies to take this Title: Limitation on Net Operating ways to minimize the burden of the opportunity to comment on proposed Loss Carryforwards and Certain Built-In collection of information on and/or continuing information Losses Following Ownership Change; respondents, including through the use collections, as required by the Special Rule for Value of a Loss

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53022 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Corporation Under the Jurisdiction of a Approved: August 17, 2010. taxpayers (e.g. individuals, businesses, Court in a Title 11 Case. R. Joseph Durbala, etc.) and housing credit agencies. OMB Number: 1545–1324. IRS Tax Analyst. Current Actions: There is no change to Regulation Project Number: CO–88– [FR Doc. 2010–21461 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] this existing regulation. 90 (TD 8530). BILLING CODE 4830–01–P Type of Review: Extension of a Abstract: This regulation provides currently approved collection. guidance on determining the value of a loss corporation following an ownership DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Affected Public: Business or other for- change to which section 382(1)(6) of the profit organizations. Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Code applies. Under Estimated Number of Respondents: Code sections 382 and 383, the value of [PS–19–92] 2,230. the loss corporation, together with Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 certain other factors, determines the rate Proposed Collection; Comment hour, 50 minutes. at which certain pre-change tax Request for Regulation Project attributes may be used to offset post- Estimated Total Annual Burden AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Hours: 4,008. change income and tax liability. Treasury. Current Actions: There is no change to ACTION: Notice and request for The following paragraph applies to all this existing regulation. comments. of the collections of information covered Type of Review: Extension of a by this notice: currently approved collection. SUMMARY: The Department of the An agency may not conduct or Affected Public: Business or other for- Treasury, as part of its continuing effort sponsor, and a person is not required to to reduce paperwork and respondent profit organizations. respond to, a collection of information burden, invites the general public and Estimated Number of Respondents: unless the collection of information other Federal agencies to take this 3,250. displays a valid OMB control number. Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15 opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information Books or records relating to a collection minutes. of information must be retained as long Estimated Total Annual Burden collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as their contents may become material Hours: 813. in the administration of any internal The following paragraph applies to all Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is revenue law. Generally, tax returns and of the collections of information covered tax return information are confidential, by this notice: soliciting comments concerning an existing proposed regulations, PS–19–92 as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. An agency may not conduct or (Final) Carryover Allocations and Other sponsor, and a person is not required to Request for Comments: Comments Rules Relating to the Low-Income respond to, a collection of information submitted in response to this notice will Housing Credit, TD 9420—Section 42 unless the collection of information be summarized and/or included in the Utility Allowance Regulations Update. displays a valid OMB control number. request for OMB approval. All Books or records relating to a collection DATES: Written comments should be comments will become a matter of of information must be retained as long received on or before October 29, 2010 public record. Comments are invited on: as their contents may become material to be assured of consideration. (a) Whether the collection of in the administration of any internal ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments information is necessary for the proper revenue law. Generally, tax returns and to Gerald J. Shields, Internal Revenue performance of the functions of the tax return information are confidential, Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution agency, including whether the as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. information shall have practical utility; Request for Comments: Comments FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate submitted in response to this notice will Requests for additional information or of the burden of the collection of be summarized and/or included in the copies of the regulations should be information; (c) ways to enhance the request for OMB approval. All directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal quality, utility, and clarity of the comments will become a matter of Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 information to be collected; (d) ways to public record. Comments are invited on: Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, minimize the burden of the collection of (a) Whether the collection of DC 20224, or at (202) 622–3634, or information on respondents, including information is necessary for the proper through the Internet at through the use of automated collection [email protected]. performance of the functions of the techniques or other forms of information agency, including whether the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: technology; and (e) estimates of capital information shall have practical utility; Title: Carryover Allocations and Other or start-up costs and costs of operation, (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate Rules Relating to the Low-Income maintenance, and purchase of services of the burden of the collection of Housing Credit. to provide information. information; (c) ways to enhance the OMB Number: 1545–1102. quality, utility, and clarity of the Regulation Project Number: PS–19–92 Approved: August 23, 2010. information to be collected; (d) ways to (Final), TD 9420 (Final). R. Joseph Durbala, minimize the burden of the collection of Abstract: The regulations provide the IRS Tax Analyst. information on respondents, including Service the information it needs to [FR Doc. 2010–21477 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] through the use of automated collection ensure that low-income housing tax BILLING CODE 4830–01–P techniques or other forms of information credits are being properly allocated technology; and (e) estimates of capital under section 42. This is accomplished or start-up costs and costs of operation, through the use of carryover allocation maintenance, and purchase of services documents, election statements, and to provide information. binding agreements executed between

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53023

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Estimated Number of Respondents: 1. U.S.C. 3507. The Office of Thrift Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hr. Supervision within the Department of Internal Revenue Service Estimated Total Annual Burden the Treasury will submit the proposed Hours: 1. [CO–99–91] information collection requirement The following paragraph applies to all described below to the Office of Proposed Collection; Comment of the collections of information covered Management and Budget (OMB) for Request for Regulation Project by this notice: review, as required by the Paperwork An agency may not conduct or Reduction Act. Today, OTS is soliciting AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), sponsor, and a person is not required to public comments on its proposal to Treasury. respond to, a collection of information extend this information collection. unless the collection of information ACTION: Notice and request for DATES: Submit written comments on or comments. displays a valid OMB control number. before October 29, 2010. Books or records relating to a collection SUMMARY: The Department of the of information must be retained as long ADDRESSES: Send comments, referring to Treasury, as part of its continuing effort as their contents may become material the collection by title of the proposal or to reduce paperwork and respondent in the administration of any internal by OMB approval number, to burden, invites the general public and revenue law. Generally, tax returns and Information Collection Comments, Chief other Federal agencies to take this tax return information are confidential, Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift opportunity to comment on proposed as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., and/or continuing information Request for Comments: Comments Washington, DC 20552; send a facsimile collections, as required by the submitted in response to this notice will transmission to (202) 906–6518; or send Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, be summarized and/or included in the an e-mail to Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. request for OMB approval. All [email protected]. 3506(c)(2)(A)). Currently, the IRS is comments will become a matter of OTS will post comments and the related soliciting comments concerning an public record. Comments are invited on: index on the OTS Internet Site at existing final regulation, CO–99–91 (TD (a) Whether the collection of http://www.ots.treas.gov. In addition, 8490), Limitations on Corporate Net information is necessary for the proper interested persons may inspect Operating Loss (section 1.382–3). performance of the functions of the comments at the Public Reading Room, DATES: Written comments should be agency, including whether the 1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To received on or before October 29, 2010 information shall have practical utility; make an appointment, call (202) 906– to be assured of consideration. (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 5922, send an e-mail to [email protected], or send a ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments of the burden of the collection of facsimile transmission to (202) 906– to Gerald J. Shields, Internal Revenue information; (c) ways to enhance the 7755. Service, room 6129, 1111 Constitution quality, utility, and clarity of the Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. information to be collected; (d) ways to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: minimize the burden of the collection of can request additional information Requests for additional information or information on respondents, including about this proposed information copies of the regulations should be through the use of automated collection collection from Richard B. Gaffin (202) directed to R. Joseph Durbala at Internal techniques or other forms of information 906–6181, Office of Thrift Supervision, Revenue Service, room 6129, 1111 technology; and (e) estimates of capital 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, or start-up costs and costs of operation, 20552. maintenance, and purchase of services DC 20224, or at (202) 622–3634, or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: to provide information. through the Internet at OTS may not conduct or sponsor an [email protected]. Approved: August 23, 2010. information collection, and respondents SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: R. Joseph Durbala, are not required to respond to an Title: Limitations on Corporate Net IRS Tax Analyst. information collection, unless the Operating Loss. [FR Doc. 2010–21478 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] information collection displays a OMB Number: 1545–1345. BILLING CODE 4830–01–P currently valid OMB control number. As Regulation Project Number: CO–99– part of the approval process, we invite 91. comments on the following information Abstract: This regulation modifies the DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY collection. application of the segregation rules Comments should address one or under Internal Revenue Code section Office of Thrift Supervision more of the following points: 382 in the case of certain issuances of a. Whether the proposed collection of Sound Incentive Compensation stock by a loss corporation. The information is necessary for the proper Guidance regulation provides exceptions to the performance of the functions of OTS; segregation rules for certain small AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision b. The accuracy of OTS’s estimate of issuances of stock and for certain other (OTS), Treasury. the burden of the proposed information issuances of stock for cash. The ACTION: Notice and request for comment. collection; regulation also provides that taxpayers c. Ways to enhance the quality, may make an irrevocable election to SUMMARY: The Department of the utility, and clarity of the information to apply the exceptions retroactively. Treasury, as part of its continuing effort be collected; Current Actions: There is no change to to reduce paperwork and respondent d. Ways to minimize the burden of the this existing regulation. burden, invites the general public and information collection on respondents, Type of Review: Extension of a other Federal agencies to comment on including through the use of currently approved collection. proposed and continuing information information technology. Affected Public: Business or other for- collections, as required by the We will summarize the comments profit organizations. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 that we receive and include them in the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:41 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES 53024 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

OTS request for OMB approval. All addressing misaligned compensation Authorized Purchaser of American comments will become a matter of incentives, especially where issues of Eagle Gold Bullion Coins. The revised public record. In this notice, OTS is competition may make it difficult for qualification requirements are soliciting comments concerning the individual firms to act alone. Through documented in the revised ‘‘Procedures following information collection. their actions, supervisors could help to to Qualify for Bulk Purchase of Gold Title of Proposal: Sound Incentive better align the interests of managers Bullion Coins.’’ (This document can be Compensation Guidance. and other employees with organizations’ accessed at http://www.usmint.gov/ OMB Number: 1550–0129. long-term health and reduce concerns consumer/ Form Number: N/A. that making prudent modifications to index.cfm?action=AmericanEagles) Description: The guidance is based on incentive compensation arrangements These changes apply to new three key principles that are designed to might have adverse competitive applications effective immediately. ensure that incentive compensation consequences. Significant modifications include arrangements at a financial institution Type of Review: Extension of a clarifications to the ‘‘Purpose’’ section do not encourage employees to take currently approved collection. and ‘‘Marketing Support’’ section, and excessive risks. These principles Affected Public: Businesses or other adjustments to the ‘‘Experienced Market- provide that incentive compensation for-profit. Maker in Gold Bullion Coins’’ section arrangements should: Estimated Number of Respondents: • Provide employees incentives that 757. and ‘‘Tangible Net Worth’’ section. do not encourage excessive risk-taking Estimated Burden Hours per Changes to the accounting certification beyond the organization’s ability to Responses: 40 hours. requirements and agreement terms and effectively identify and manage risk; Estimated Frequency of Response: On conditions are also incorporated. A new • Be compatible with effective occasion. section has been added entitled ‘‘Right controls and risk management; and Estimated Total Burden: 30,280 to Temporarily Refrain from the Review • Be supported by strong corporate hours. of New Applications,’’ during periods in governance, including active and Dated: August 24, 2010. which the allocation of a bullion effective oversight by the organization’s Ira L. Mills, product is required. Other minor board of directors. Paperwork Clearance Officer, Office of Chief changes have been made which provide These principles and the guidance are Counsel, Office of Thrift Supervision. further clarifications to various consistent with the Principles for Sound [FR Doc. 2010–21490 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] production descriptions and/or the gold Compensation Practices adopted by the BILLING CODE 6720–01–P bullion coin program in accordance Financial Stability Board (FSB) in April with 31 U.S.C. 5112(a)(7–11) and (i). 2009, as well as the Implementation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B. B. Standards for those principles issued by DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Craig, Associate Director for Sales and the FSB in September 2009. This guidance will promote the United States Mint Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th prompt improvement of incentive Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20220; or compensation practices in the banking Change to ‘‘Procedures To Qualify for call 202–354–7500. industry by providing a common Bulk Purchase of Gold Bullion Coins’’ Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5112(a)(7–11) and (i). prudential foundation for incentive AGENCY: United States Mint, Department Dated: August 20, 2010. compensation arrangements across of the Treasury. Edmund C. Moy, banking organizations and promoting ACTION: Notice. the overall movement of the industry Director, United States Mint. towards better practices. Supervisory SUMMARY: The United States Mint has [FR Doc. 2010–21495 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] action could play a critical role in revised the requirements to become an BILLING CODE P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Monday, August 30, 2010

Part II

Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 902 50 CFR Part 679 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Chinook Salmon Bycatch Management in the Bering Sea Pollock Fishery; Final Rule

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53026 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AK; and by e-mail to annually for Bering Sea pollock, [email protected], or fax to Aleutian Islands pollock, and Bogoslof National Oceanic and Atmospheric 202–395–7285. pollock. Amendment 91 applies only to Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: management of the Bering Sea pollock Gretchen Harrington or Seanbob Kelly, fishery and will not affect the 15 CFR Part 902 907–586–7228. management of pollock fisheries in the Aleutian Islands or the status of pollock SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 50 CFR Part 679 manages the groundfish fisheries in the fishing in the Bogoslof District. The Bering Sea pollock fishery is [Docket No. 090511911–0307–02] exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the managed under the American Fisheries Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands RIN 0648–AX89 Act (AFA) (16 U.S.C. 1851 note), which Management Area (BSAI) under the ‘‘rationalized’’ the pollock fishery by Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Fishery Management Plan for identifying the vessels and processors Zone Off Alaska; Chinook Salmon Groundfish of the Bering Sea and eligible to participate in the fishery and Bycatch Management in the Bering Aleutian Islands Management Area allocating pollock among those eligible Sea Pollock Fishery (FMP). The North Pacific Fishery participants. Under the AFA, 10 percent Management Council (Council) of the Bering Sea pollock TAC is AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries prepared the FMP under the authority of Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and allocated to the CDQ Program. After the the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery CDQ Program allocation is subtracted, Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Conservation and Management Act Commerce. an amount needed for the incidental (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 catch of pollock in other Bering Sea ACTION: Final rule. et seq. Regulations governing U.S. groundfish fisheries is subtracted from fisheries and implementing the FMP SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to the TAC. The remaining ‘‘directed appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679. implement Amendment 91 to the fishing allowance’’ is then allocated This final rule implements Fishery Management Plan for among the AFA inshore sector (50 Amendment 91 to the FMP. In April Groundfish of the Bering Sea and percent), the AFA catcher/processor 2009, the Council unanimously Aleutian Islands Management Area sector (40 percent), and the AFA recommended Amendment 91 to the (FMP). Amendment 91 is an innovative mothership sector (10 percent). Pollock Secretary of Commerce. NMFS approach to managing Chinook salmon allocations to the CDQ Program and the published a Notice of Availability of bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock other three AFA sectors are further this amendment in the Federal Register fishery that combines a prohibited allocated annually between two on February 18, 2010 (75 FR 7228) with species catch (PSC) limit on the amount seasons—40 percent to the A season comments invited through April 19, of Chinook salmon that may be caught (January 20 to June 10) and 60 percent 2010. NMFS published the proposed incidentally with an incentive plan to the B season (June 10 to November 1). rule on March 23, 2010 (75 FR 14016) agreement and performance standard The CDQ Program pollock allocation with comments invited through May 7, designed to minimize bycatch to the is further allocated among the six non- 2010. NMFS approved Amendment 91 extent practicable in all years. This profit corporations (CDQ groups) that on May 14, 2010. NMFS received 71 action is necessary to minimize Chinook represent the 65 communities eligible letters of public comment on salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea for the CDQ Program under section Amendment 91 and the proposed rule. pollock fishery to the extent practicable 305(i)(1)(D) of the Magnuson-Stevens NMFS summarized these letters into while maintaining the potential for the Act. The CDQ Program also is described 102 separate comments, and responds to full harvest of the pollock total in more detail in the ‘‘Classification’’ them under Response to Comments, allowable catch. Amendment 91 is section of this final rule. CDQ groups below. intended to promote the goals and typically sell or lease their pollock objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens The Bering Sea Pollock Fishery allocations to harvesting partners, including vessels owned, in part, by Fishery Conservation and Management This final rule applies to owners and Act, the FMP, and other applicable individual CDQ groups. Although CDQ operators of catcher vessels, catcher/ groups are not required to partner with laws. processors, motherships, inshore AFA-permitted vessels to harvest CDQ DATES: Effective September 29, 2010. processors, and the six Western Alaska pollock, the vessels harvesting CDQ ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of Community Development Quota (CDQ) pollock have been AFA permitted- Amendment 91, the Final Program groups participating in the vessels. The CDQ pollock allocations Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) have most often been harvested by the Record of Decision (ROD), the Final fishery in the Bering Sea subarea of the catcher/processors or catcher vessels Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and the BSAI. The Bering Sea pollock fishery is delivering to a mothership. However, Biological Opinion prepared for this the largest single species fishery, by some pollock CDQ has been delivered to action may be obtained from http:// volume, in the United States. The first inshore processing plants in past years. www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS wholesale gross value of this fishery was The AFA allows for the formation of Alaska Region Web site at http:// more than 1.4 billion dollars in 2008. In fishery cooperatives within the non- alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. 2010, the Bering Sea pollock total CDQ sectors. The purpose of these AFA Written comments regarding the allowable catch (TAC) is 813,000 metric cooperatives is to further subdivide each burden-hour estimates or other aspects tons. sector’s pollock allocation among of the collection-of-information Currently, pollock in the BSAI is participants in the sector or cooperative requirements contained in this rule may managed as three separate units: the through private contractual agreements. be submitted to NMFS Alaska Region, Bering Sea subarea, the Aleutian Islands The cooperatives manage these P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802, subarea, and the Bogoslof District of the allocations to ensure that individual Attn: Ellen Sebastian, Records Officer; Bering Sea subarea. Separate overfishing vessels and companies do not harvest in person at NMFS Alaska Region, 709 limits, acceptable biological catch more than their agreed upon share. The West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau, limits, and TAC limits are specified cooperatives also facilitate transfers of

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53027

pollock among the cooperative members Chinook Salmon Bycatch in the Bering most likely due to a combination of and enforce contract provisions. Sea Pollock Fishery factors, including changes in abundance Each year, catcher vessels eligible to Chinook salmon are accidently caught and distribution of Chinook salmon and pollock, and changes in fleet behavior to deliver pollock to the seven eligible in the nets as fishermen target pollock. The Magnuson-Stevens Act defines avoid salmon bycatch. AFA inshore processors may form Chinook salmon bycatch also varies bycatch as fish that are harvested in a inshore cooperatives associated with a seasonally and by sector. In most years, fishery that are not sold or kept for particular inshore processor. NMFS the majority of Chinook salmon bycatch personal use. Therefore, Chinook permits the inshore cooperatives, occurs during the A season. Since 2002, salmon caught in the pollock fishery are allocates pollock to them, and manages catcher vessels in the inshore sector considered bycatch under the these allocations through a regulatory typically have caught the highest Magnuson-Stevens Act, the FMP, and prohibition against an inshore number of Chinook salmon and had the NMFS regulations at 50 CFR part 679. cooperative exceeding its pollock highest bycatch rates by sector in both Bycatch of any species, including allocation. The amount of pollock the A and B seasons. As discussed in discard or other mortality caused by allocated to each inshore cooperative is the EIS (see ADDRESSES), the variation in fishing, is a concern of the Council and based on the member vessels’ pollock bycatch rates among sectors and seasons NMFS. National Standard 9 of the catch history from 1995 through 1997, is due, in part, to the different fishing Magnuson-Stevens Act requires the as required under section 210(b) of the practices and patterns each sector uses Council to select, and NMFS to to fully harvest their pollock allocations. AFA (16 U.S.C. 1851 note). These implement, conservation and catcher vessels are not required to join In years of historically high Chinook management measures that, to the salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea an inshore cooperative. Those that do extent practicable, minimize bycatch not join an inshore cooperative are pollock fishery (2003 through 2007), the and bycatch mortality. rate of Chinook salmon bycatch managed by NMFS under the ‘‘inshore Culturally and economically valuable open access fishery.’’ averaged 52 Chinook salmon per 1,000 species like Chinook salmon, which are tons of pollock harvested. With so few The AFA catcher/processor sector is fully allocated and, in some cases, salmon relative to the large amount of made up of the catcher/processors and facing conservation concerns, are pollock harvested, Chinook salmon catcher vessels eligible under the AFA classified as prohibited species in the encounters are difficult to predict or to deliver pollock to catcher/processors. groundfish fisheries off Alaska under avoid. Industry agreements that require Owners of the catcher/processors that the FMP. The prohibited species are vessel-level cooperation to share are listed by name in the AFA and still Chinook salmon, all other species of information about areas of high Chinook active in the pollock fishery have salmon (a category called ‘‘non-Chinook salmon encounter rates probably are the formed a cooperative called the Pollock salmon’’), steelhead trout, Pacific best tool that the industry currently has Conservation Cooperative (PCC). halibut, king crab, Tanner crab, and to quickly identify areas of high bycatch Owners of the catcher vessels eligible to Pacific herring. Bycatch of prohibited and to avoid fishing there. However, deliver pollock to the catcher/processors species is highly regulated and closely predicting these encounter rates will managed. The FMP requires that have formed a cooperative called the continue to be difficult, primarily groundfish fishermen avoid bycatch of High Seas Catchers’ Cooperative because of the current lack of prohibited species. Additionally, any (HSCC). understanding of the biological and salmon bycatch must either be donated oceanographic conditions that influence The AFA mothership sector is made to the Prohibited Species Donation the distribution and abundance of up of three motherships and the catcher (PSD) Program under § 679.26, or salmon in the areas where the pollock vessels eligible under the AFA to returned to sea as soon as practicable, fishery occurs. deliver pollock to these motherships. with minimum injury, after an observer These catcher vessels have formed a has determined the number of salmon Chinook Salmon Stocks and Fisheries cooperative called the Mothership Fleet and collected any scientific data or in Western Alaska Cooperative (MFC). The MFC does not biological samples. Chinook salmon taken in the pollock include the owners of the three The Bering Sea pollock fishery fishery originate from Alaska, the motherships. The primary purpose of catches up to 95 percent of the Chinook Pacific Northwest, Canada, and Asian the cooperative is to sub-allocate the salmon taken incidentally as bycatch in countries along the Pacific Rim. mothership sector pollock allocation the BSAI groundfish fisheries. From Estimates vary, but more than half of the among the catcher vessels authorized to 1992 through 2001, the average Chinook Chinook salmon bycatch in the pollock harvest this pollock and to manage these salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea fishery may be destined for western allocations. pollock fishery was 32,482 fish. Bycatch Alaska. Western Alaska includes the increased substantially from 2002 Bristol Bay, Kuskokwim, Yukon, and NMFS does not manage the sub- through 2007, to an average of 74,067 Norton Sound areas. In general, western allocations of pollock among members Chinook salmon per year. A historic Alaska Chinook salmon stocks declined of the PCC, HSCC, or MFC. The high of approximately 122,000 Chinook sharply in 2007 and remained depressed cooperatives control the harvest by their salmon were taken in the Bering Sea in 2008 and 2009. Chapter 5 of the EIS member vessels so that the pollock pollock fishery in 2007. However, provides additional information about allocation to the sector is not exceeded. Chinook salmon bycatch has declined in Chinook salmon biology, distribution, NMFS monitors pollock harvest by all recent years to 20,559 in 2008 and and stock assessments by river system members of the catcher/processor sector 12,414 in 2009. For the 2010 pollock A or region (see ADDRESSES). NMFS is and mothership sector. NMFS retains season, and the pollock B season that expanding biological sampling to the authority to close directed fishing opened on June 10, bycatch rates are improve data on the origins of salmon for pollock by a sector if vessels in that comparable to the low bycatch rates in caught as bycatch in the pollock fishery. sector continue to fish once the sector’s 2009. The causes of the decline in Chinook salmon support subsistence, seasonal allocation of pollock has been Chinook salmon bycatch in 2008, 2009, commercial, personal use, and sport harvested. and 2010 are unknown. The decline is fisheries in their regions of origin. The

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53028 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

State of Alaska Board of Fisheries Amendment 84 established in Federal Bering Sea Chinook Salmon Bycatch adopts regulations through a public regulations the salmon bycatch Management process to conserve fisheries resources intercooperative agreement (ICA), which This final rule implements the and allocate them to the various users. allows vessels participating in the provisions of Amendment 91, as The State of Alaska Department of Fish Bering Sea pollock fishery to use their approved by NMFS. The preamble to and Game (ADF&G) manages the salmon internal cooperative structure to reduce the proposed rule (75 FR 14016; March commercial, subsistence, sport, and Chinook and non-Chinook salmon 23, 2010) provides a full description of personal use fisheries. The first bycatch using a method called the the provisions implemented with this management priority is to meet voluntary rolling hotspot system final rule and the justification for them. spawning escapement goals to sustain (VRHS). Through the VRHS, industry In summary, this final rule establishes salmon resources for future generations. members provide each other real-time two Chinook salmon PSC limits (60,000 The next priority is for subsistence use salmon bycatch information so that they Chinook salmon and 47,591 Chinook under both State and Federal law. can avoid areas of high Chinook or non- salmon) for the Bering Sea pollock Chinook salmon serves as a primary Chinook salmon bycatch rates. The fishery. For each PSC limit, NMFS will subsistence food in some areas. VRHS was implemented voluntarily by issue A season and B season Chinook Subsistence fisheries management the fleet in 2002. Amendment 84 salmon PSC allocations to the catcher/ includes coordination with U.S. Federal exempts vessels participating in the processor sector, the mothership sector, agencies where Federal rules apply salmon bycatch reduction ICA from the inshore cooperatives, and the CDQ under the Alaska National Interest salmon savings area closures, and groups. Chinook salmon allocations Lands Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. revised the Chum Salmon Savings Area remaining from the A season can be 3101–3233. closure to apply only to vessels directed ‘‘ ’’ In recent years of low Chinook salmon fishing for pollock, rather than to all used in the B season ( rollover ). returns, the in-river harvest of western vessels using trawl gear. The Entities can transfer PSC allocations Alaska Chinook salmon has been exemptions to savings area closures for within a season and can also receive severely restricted and, in some cases, participants in the VRHS ICA were transfers of Chinook salmon PSC to river systems have not met escapement implemented by NMFS in 2006 and cover overages (‘‘post-delivery goals. Surplus fish beyond escapement 2007 through an exempted fishing transfers’’). needs and subsistence use are made permit. Regulations implementing NMFS will issue transferable available for other uses. Commercial Amendment 84 were approved in 2007 allocations of the 60,000 Chinook fishing for Chinook salmon may provide (72 FR 61070; October 29, 2007), and salmon PSC limit to those sectors that the only source of income for many NMFS approved the salmon bycatch participate in an incentive plan people who live in remote villages. reduction VRHS ICA in January 2008. agreement (IPA) and remain in Chapter 3 of the RIR provides an Amendment 84 requires that parties to compliance with the performance overview of the importance of the ICA be AFA cooperatives and CDQ standard. Sector and cooperative subsistence harvests and commercial groups. All AFA cooperatives and CDQ allocations would be reduced if harvests (see ADDRESSES). groups participate in the VRHS ICA. members of the sector or cooperative Using a system specified in decided not to participate in an IPA. Current Management of Chinook regulations, the VRHS ICA assigns Vessels and CDQ groups that do not Salmon Bycatch in the Bering Sea and vessels in a cooperative to certain tiers, participate in an IPA would fish under Aleutian Islands based on bycatch rates of vessels in that a restricted opt-out allocation of Over the past 15 years, the Council cooperative relative to a base rate, and Chinook salmon. If a whole sector does and NMFS have implemented several implements large area closures for not participate in an IPA, all members management measures to limit Chinook vessels in tiers associated with higher of that sector would fish under the opt- salmon bycatch in the BSAI trawl bycatch rates. The VRHS ICA managers out allocation. fisheries. In 1995, NMFS implemented monitor salmon bycatch in the pollock The IPA component is an innovative an annual PSC limit of 48,000 Chinook fisheries and announce area closures for approach for fishery participants to salmon and specific seasonal no- areas with relatively high salmon design industry agreements with trawling zones in the Chinook Salmon bycatch rates. Monitoring and incentives for each vessel to avoid Savings Area that would close when the enforcement are accomplished through Chinook salmon bycatch at all times and limits were reached (60 FR 31215; private contractual arrangements. The thus reduce bycatch below the PSC November 29, 1995). In 2000, NMFS efficacy of voluntary closures and limits. This final rule establishes reduced the Chinook Salmon Savings bycatch reduction measures must be performance-based requirements for the Area closure limit to 29,000 Chinook reported to the Council annually. IPAs. To ensure participants develop salmon, redefined the Chinook Salmon While the annual reports suggest that effective IPAs, this final rule requires Savings Area as two non-contiguous the VRHS ICA has reduced Chinook that participants submit annual reports areas of the BSAI (Area 1 in the AI salmon bycatch rates compared to what to the Council that evaluate whether the subarea and Area 2 in the BS subarea), they would have been without the ICA, IPA is effective at providing incentives and established new closure periods (65 the highest historical Chinook salmon for vessels to avoid Chinook salmon at FR 60587; October 12, 2000). bycatch occurred in 2007, when the ICA all times while fishing for pollock. Chinook salmon bycatch management was in effect under an exempted fishing The sector-level performance standard measures were most recently revised permit. This high level of bycatch ensures that the IPA is effective and that under Amendments 84 to the FMP. The illustrated that, while the management sectors cannot fully harvest the Chinook Council adopted Amendment 84 in measures implemented under salmon PSC allocations under the October 2005 to address increases in Amendment 84 provided the pollock 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit in Chinook and non-Chinook salmon fleet with tools to reduce salmon most years. Each year, each sector will bycatch that were occurring despite PSC bycatch, these measures contain no be issued an annual threshold amount limits that triggered closure of the effective upper limit on the amount of that represents that sector’s portion of Chinook and Chum Salmon Savings salmon bycatch that could occur in the 47,591 Chinook salmon. For a sector to Areas. Bering Sea pollock fishery. continue to receive Chinook salmon

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53029

PSC allocations under the 60,000 Recordkeeping and Reporting Adjustments to the Performance Chinook salmon PSC limit, that sector Standard’s Annual Threshold Amount NMFS changed the time limit in the must not exceed its annual threshold NMFS changed the final rule to final rule for operators of catcher/ amount 3 times within 7 consecutive subtract a vessel’s opt-out allocation processors, catcher vessels delivering to years. If a sector fails this performance from a sector’s annual threshold amount standard, it will permanently be motherships, and motherships to record in a method similar to the Council’s allocated a portion of the 47,591 the CDQ group number in the paper or recommended method for determining Chinook salmon PSC limit. electronic logbooks to within 2 hours the sector allocation under the 60,000 NMFS will issue transferable after completion of weighing on the Chinook salmon PSC limit. allocations of the 47,591 Chinook scale all catch in the haul. NMFS is salmon PSC limit to all sectors, preparing a separate proposed rule to Entities for the Catcher/Processor and cooperatives, and CDQ groups if no IPA revise and standardize reporting time Mothership Sectors is approved, or to the sectors that limits to address the time limit for To improve the implementation of exceed the performance standard. recording scale weights of each haul and sector entities, NMFS modified the final Transferability of PSC allocations is other required information because rule to clarify that: (1) NMFS will expected to mitigate the variation in the these requirements affect more vessels authorize only one entity to represent encounter rates of Chinook salmon the catcher/processor sector and only bycatch among sectors, CDQ groups, than those regulated under Amendment 91. These additional revisions are one entity to represent mothership and cooperatives in a given season by sector; (2) under the 60,000 Chinook allowing eligible participants to obtain a expected to be effective by January, 2011. salmon PSC limit, the entity for each larger portion of the PSC limit in order sector has to represent all IPA to harvest their pollock allocation or to Bering Sea Pollock Offload Monitoring participating vessel owners in that transfer surplus allocation to other sector; and (3) vessel owners in the entities. When a PSC allocation is NMFS modified the final rule to (1) catcher/processor sector and mothership reached, the affected sector, inshore allow a catcher vessel to begin a new sector must be a member of the sector cooperative, or CDQ group would have trip before the salmon census and entity to join an IPA. NMFS changed the to stop fishing for pollock for the sampling are complete from the vessel’s deadline for the entity application from remainder of the season even if its prior trip and (2) clarify that a shoreside November 1 to October 1, to coincide pollock allocation had not been fully or stationary processor must give the with the deadline for the IPA harvested. observer the opportunity to complete application, and added a December 1 This final rule also removes from the count of salmon and collect deadline for the entity representative to regulations the 29,000 Chinook salmon biological samples before sorting a new make changes to the vessels that are PSC limit in the Bering Sea, the Chinook pollock offload. In 2011, NMFS’ members of the entity. NMFS also Salmon Savings Areas in the Bering Sea, observer sampling policy and observer changed the regulations to clarify that exemption from Chinook Salmon an entity representative may sign more Savings Area closures for participants in duties for the Bering Sea pollock fishery will be modified for monitoring offloads than one IPA on behalf of the vessel the VRHS ICA, and Chinook salmon as owners participating in that IPA. a component of the VRHS ICA. This at shoreside processors and stationary final rule does not change any floating processors. The plant observer Joint and Several Liability regulations affecting the management of on duty will be tasked with monitoring NMFS removed joint and several Chinook salmon in the Aleutian Islands each offload for proper salmon sorting, liability provisions for cooperatives and or non-Chinook salmon in the BSAI. verifying the count of salmon, and the entities representing the catcher/ The Council is currently considering a collecting biological samples and processor sector and mothership sector. separate action to modify the non- scientific data. In the proposed rule, these provisions Chinook salmon management measures Catch Monitoring and Control Plan created some confusion and they are to minimize non-Chinook salmon (CMCP) Requirements unnecessary because NOAA has bycatch. independent authority to exercise its Summary of Regulation Changes in NMFS has modified the final rule to discretion to seek to impose joint Response to Public Comments clarify that the observation area and the liability if the evidence supports doing observer work station may be located in so. This section provides a summary of separate areas, while also requiring the the substantive changes made to the Post-Delivery Transfers observer work station be adjacent to the final rule in response to public location where the observer counts all NMFS changed the final rule to clarify comments. Section 304(b)(3) of the that a vessel is prohibited from fishing Magnuson-Stevens Act requires NMFS salmon and collects scientific data or biological information. NMFS also for an entity that has exceeded its to consult with the Council before Chinook salmon PSC allocation. making any revisions to proposed modified the final rule to require that all regulations and to publish in the salmon be stored in a ‘‘salmon storage Incentive Plan Agreements Federal Register an explanation of any container.’’ The observation area must NMFS changed the final rule to: differences between proposed and final now provide a clear, unobstructed view (1) Modify the minimum participation regulations. At its June 2010 meeting, of the salmon storage container to requirement for an IPA to clarify that NMFS consulted with the Council on ensure no salmon of any species are parties to an IPA must collectively the revisions to the proposed rule to removed without the observer’s represent at least 9 percent of the Bering improve the implementing regulations knowledge. NMFS made these changes Sea pollock quota; (2) modify the IPA and respond to public comments. All of to the final rule to give processors more requirement to better reflect the Council the specific regulation changes, and the flexibility to achieve the goals of motion that says that an IPA must reasons for making these changes, are allowing an observer to monitor all the describe incentives for each vessel to contained under Response to sorting of salmon as well as verify the avoid Chinook salmon bycatch under Comments, below. count of the salmon. any condition of pollock and Chinook

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53030 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

salmon abundance in all years; (3) still changes the submission deadline our information on Chinook salmon change the deadline for amendments to for the final annual AFA cooperative bycatch in the pollock fishery. the IPA list of participants from reports from February 1 to April 1 to International fishing boats are November 1 to December 1 to provide coincide with the deadlines for a new prevented from fishing in the U.S. vessel owners more time to join an IPA; Chinook salmon IPA annual report and exclusive economic zone, and observing and (4) clarify the regulatory language the non-Chinook salmon ICA annual vessels fishing in international waters is for an amendment to an IPA. report. Having the same deadline for all outside the scope of this action. To clarify a CDQ group’s participation three of these reports allows the Council Comment 3: Under Amendment 91, in one or more approved IPAs, NMFS to discuss any of these annual reports at observers on catcher vessels would be added a requirement in the final rule one time during its April Council performing a monitoring and that, for a CDQ group to be a member meeting. At its June 2010 meeting, the compliance role. While we agree that it of an IPA, the CDQ group must list each Council recommended that NMFS is not necessary to require an observer vessel harvesting pollock CDQ on behalf pursue a proposed rule to remove the with a level-two endorsement for of that CDQ group in the IPA. regulations requiring a preliminary AFA catcher vessels delivering to inshore report. plants, we do not recommend specifying Electronic Monitoring observer training level in the NMFS removed the proposed rule’s AI Chinook Salmon Allocation for the regulations. Doing so could restrict requirement that the video monitor CDQ Program future flexibility if the observer’s role display the ‘‘activities within the tank,’’ NMFS corrected the proposed rule to should change to accommodate other and clarified in the final rule that the retain allocations of the trawl gear PSC needs. Response: NMFS agrees and does not purpose of the video monitor is to limits to the CDQ Program as a specify the observer training levels for enable the observer to view any area prohibited species quota (PSQ) reserve. observers on catcher vessels in this final where crew could sort salmon and view The proposed rule, at rule. Species identification and the salmon contained in the storage § 679.21(e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i), inadvertently sampling methodologies for the container. Also, for clarity and eliminated the 7.5 percent consistency, NMFS revised the final shoreside observers are covered during apportionment of the PSC limit for AI the three week training course that all rule to allow NMFS staff or other Chinook salmon set forth in paragraph authorized personnel, including certified observers receive. Observers (e)(1)(viii). This correction is necessary with a level-two endorsement, as observers, the ability to view any video to ensure that CDQ participants will be footage from earlier in the trip. defined at § 679.50(j)(1)(v)(D), are subject to the AI salmon area closure trained in at-sea sample station Tables 47a, 47b, 47c, and 47d to Part based on the PSC limit established for requirements, at-sea motion 679 the CDQ sector by Amendment 82 to the compensated scale testing, and observer BSAI FMP (70 FR 9856, March 1, 2005). In the final rule, NMFS changed duties under the CDQ Program. Training column G in Tables 47a, 47b, and 47c Response to Comments for level-two observers does not include and column E in Table 47d to show new duties for shoreside vessel and Observer Issues each vessel’s annual amount of Chinook plant observers under Amendment 91. salmon for the opt-out allocation that Comment 1: This action proposes two Comment 4: The inshore sector will be deducted from the sector’s positive management actions: increasing represents approximately 76 percent of annual threshold amount for the observer coverage to 100 percent and the pollock catcher vessels, assuming performance standard if a vessel opts- implementing the census approach to that each mothership services eight out of an IPA. NMFS also modified the catch accounting. harvesting vessels. The vast majority of percent of the inshore sector’s pollock Response: NMFS agrees with this catcher vessels have had extremely lax allocation in column D of Table 47c to comment. This final rule will improve observer coverage for several years. Over include four decimal places. the collection of Chinook salmon a dozen crew members of the inshore information by increasing observer fleet have commented that over the last Additional Changes From the Proposed decade the salmon bycatch is under- Rule coverage to 100 percent for all vessels and shoreside processing facilities, and reported by an average of 40 percent NMFS made the following changes by requiring a census of Chinook (range of under-reporting was stated as from the proposed rule to the final rule salmon in every haul or fishing trip. between 20 and 70 percent). to clarify regulatory language or correct Response: Under this final rule, every mistakes in the proposed rule. Comment 2: The majority of Alaskans catcher vessel in the inshore sector will depend on fish to feed themselves. Yet have an observer onboard at all times. AFA Preliminary Report salmon bycatch in the pollock fishery is This is an increase in observer coverage In the final rule, NMFS corrects the uncertain and unregulated. Solving this for catcher vessels less than 125 feet proposed language at § 679.61(f)(1) to mystery starts with observing the length overall (LOA). Additionally, retain the requirement for a preliminary pollock fishery and international fishing every salmon caught by each vessel in AFA cooperative report. The proposed boats. the Bering Sea pollock fishery will be rule anticipated the publication of Response: Amendment 91 regulates counted. another rule that would have provided Chinook salmon bycatch in the Bering Comment 5: The monitoring and notice and an opportunity for public Sea pollock fishery and will minimize enforcement measures in the proposed comment to remove this AFA reporting Chinook salmon bycatch to the extent rule ensure that the appropriate requirement. Until such a process is practicable. Additionally, with the conservation and management measures completed, NMFS cannot remove the regulations implementing Amendment are adequately applied to Chinook regulations requiring a preliminary 91, NMFS will increase observer salmon bycatch. report at § 679.61(f)(1). Retaining the coverage for all vessels and shoreside Response: NMFS agrees. This final preliminary report does not change the processing facilities, and require a rule will improve the collection of information collection burden on AFA census of Chinook salmon in every haul Chinook salmon information by cooperatives; however, the final rule or fishing trip. This will greatly improve increasing observer coverage for vessels

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53031

and shoreside processing facilities, by Observers aboard catcher/processors requires shoreside processors and requiring a census of Chinook salmon in and motherships will still complete stationary floating processors to report every haul or fishing trip, by requiring their normal sampling duties. Observers salmon numbers by species for each video monitoring to assist observers have routinely reported the number of landing. The final rule, at aboard catcher/processors and salmon collected during a haul. The § 679.5(f)(1)(vii), requires all catcher/ motherships, and by implementing responsibility for ensuring that all processors and motherships to report electronic reporting by haul or delivery. salmon are removed from the catch and the salmon numbers by species for each Comment 6: A third plant observer counted will fall upon the vessel with haul. should not be considered as part of the observer providing third party Comment 9: NMFS should consider Amendment 91 and is not necessary verification. The use of electronic the 100 percent observer requirement on because the two full-time observers monitoring systems will supplement the the previously unobserved segment of currently available at each inshore plant observer’s ability to monitor proper the pollock fleet as an opportunity to plus the vessel observer provide more sorting and ensure that no salmon are research claims by other unobserved than adequate coverage. removed from the storage container sectors with similarly configured vessels Response: NMFS agrees and neither until an observer has had the regarding cost, practicality, and the proposed rule nor the final rule opportunity to verify the count and convenience. require a third plant observer. Under the collect scientific data and biological Response: The AFA catcher vessels final rule, one plant observer is on duty samples on a haul by haul basis. that will be subject to increased for each delivery with the assistance of Comment 8: The proposed rule is observer coverage under this final rule the vessel observer. Together, two written such that the burden of ensuring are not members of a previously observers can meet the assigned duties that all salmon are collected, unobserved segment of the pollock fleet. of monitoring proper sorting of salmon, enumerated, and identified to species All of the vessels that will be subject to verifying salmon counts, and collecting appears to fall on the observer. A census 100 percent observer coverage currently scientific data and biological samples. can be accomplished, but it requires are subject to 30 percent observer Shoreside processors may voluntarily shifting the responsibility for sorting coverage, so they already carry obtain a third plant observer. However, and identifying salmon bycatch from the observers during part of the year. the duties of a third observer would be observer to the vessel and processing Therefore, NMFS already has no different than those currently plant crews. The regulations should information about the costs, practicality, required of plant observers. require the vessel or processing plant and convenience of carrying observers Comment 7: The proposed rule crew to sort all salmon and separate on these vessels. NMFS needs inaccurately assumes that observers can salmon by species. Observers should information about cost and practicality add salmon census duties to their other only be responsible for independently of carrying observers on vessels less responsibilities and still accomplish tallying the salmon and verifying than 60 feet LOA that are not required their other work. Currently, observers species, gathering biological samples, to carry any observers under current are assigned a variety of data collection and transmitting data as directed by regulations. However, there are no projects that support scientists and NMFS. Furthermore, placing such onus active fishing vessels of this size class managers. To accomplish the goals of on the vessel or processing plant crew in the Bering Sea pollock fishery. the proposed census system, an would allow for fewer disruptions to Comment 10: The proposed rule additional person dedicated to the fishing operations. would stop all sorting and processing oversight of salmon sorting may be This system already exists under when the observer cannot be present. necessary. Otherwise, the observer is § 679.21(c), prohibited species bycatch This inaccurately assumes that the dedicated to Amendment 91 management, and through the observers observer is present during all sorting responsibilities, and other data sampling protocols established by the periods. Observers on at-sea processors collection would have to be greatly FMA Division. The regulations at must complete a myriad of activities reduced or eliminated altogether. § 679.21(c) direct vessels to sort all that may require them to move to other Response: NMFS recognizes that salmon bycatch into bins and separate parts of the vessel. Similarly, on some observer duties may need to change to by haul until the number of salmon can catcher vessels hauls are sorted on a allow observers to complete salmon be determined by the observer. level below the trawl deck; therefore, monitoring as outlined in this final rule. Observers estimate these salmon counts crew can be on deck dumping the bag, The Fisheries Monitoring and Analysis are approximately 95 percent accurate. while the observer is below sorting the (FMA) Division of the Alaska Fisheries Response: NMFS disagrees that the catch. Observers are also required to Science Center makes policy decisions regulations place the burden on the take breaks. about the tasks an observer performs, observer to ensure that all salmon are Response: NMFS disagrees that the informed by regulation and management collected, enumerated, and identified to regulations would stop all sorting and necessity. As is customary for each new species. The observer provides third processing when the observer cannot be regulation and calendar year, the FMA party verification and reports salmon present, and has made no changes to the Division may require duties performed bycatch. The FMA Division has final rule in response to this comment. in 2010 be added or removed for 2011. historically tasked observers to collect Although the observer must verify that Under the FMA Division observer information that sometimes parallels a census of all salmon is conducted, sampling policy for 2011, observer industry reporting requirements; this observers aboard catcher/processors and duties will be adjusted to allow for the role remains the same under this final motherships are not required to conduct monitoring of pollock offloads at rule. the census. Under the final rule, at shoreside processors and stationary For the inshore sector, the final rule, § 679.21(c)(2)(i), the vessel operator is floating processors. The FMA Division at § 679.21(c)(2)(i) and (iii), is clear that responsible for ensuring that all salmon determines the specific observer duties the responsibility for ensuring all are sorted, stored, and counted by necessary to ensure the proper data is salmon are sorted, stored, and species. Therefore, the regulations do collected while recognizing the accounted properly falls upon the vessel not require that sorting and processing limitations on the observer’s time and operator or shoreside processor. must halt if an observer is not present energy. Additionally, § 679.5(e)(5)(i)(C)(3) or is completing other duties. Instead,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53032 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

the final rule, at § 679.28(j), requires an NMFS disagrees that it is unnecessary to before the salmon census and sampling electronic monitoring system to enable structure regulations regarding the are complete from the vessel’s prior trip, observers to review sorting they may observation and count of salmon that and (2) clarify that a shoreside or have not been able to witness. Sorting are directly tied to the vessel observer. stationary processor must give the is required to stop only if the salmon Observations reported by the NMFS observer the opportunity to complete storage container is full; see observers will serve as independent the count of salmon and collect § 679.21(c)(2)(i)(B). This will allow the third party information to verify biological samples before sorting a new observer to clearly delineate salmon that whether the counts and identification of pollock offload. have been sampled from those that have salmon reported by industry are correct NMFS removed the restriction on a not been sampled and counted. and accurate. Regulations are necessary vessel’s ability to begin a new trip, at For catcher vessels, no salmon may be to ensure the observer has unobstructed § 679.21(c)(2)(ii)(C) of the proposed rule. removed or discarded at sea and all access to these fish in such a way that Instead, NMFS revised the prohibition salmon must be delivered to a shoreside the data can be reliably collected and at § 679.7(d)(8)(ii)(C)(6) to clarify that a processor; see § 679.7(d)(7)(E) and reported. shoreside or stationary floating § 679.21(c)(2)(ii)(B). Additionally, Comment 13: The proposed rule, at processor cannot begin sorting a pollock catcher vessels that have the ability to § 679.7(k)(8)(iii), prohibits the operator CDQ offload before the observer has sort below deck do not have many of a catcher vessel from starting a new completed the count of salmon and the opportunities to sort out salmon while fishing trip for pollock in the Bering Sea collection of scientific data or biological the codend is being dumped. NMFS if the observer assigned to the catcher samples. Similarly, NMFS revised acknowledges that there may be a small vessel for the next fishing trip has not § 679.7(k)(8)(iii) to prohibit shoreside opportunity to remove salmon while the completed counting the salmon and processors and stationary floating codend is being dumped; however, collecting scientific data or biological processors from sorting the next pollock these vessels would be in violation of samples from the previous delivery by offload until the observer has completed the requirement to retain all salmon. that vessel. Similarly, duties related to a previous pollock Comment 11: The final rule should § 679.21(c)(2)(ii)(C) requires that before offload. Moreover, NMFS added require vessels to assign and maintain a the vessel can begin a new fishing trip, § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(F) to the final rule to salmon sorter at the sorting belt the observer assigned to that vessel for prevent a shoreside or stationary throughout the processing of a haul. the next fishing trip must be given the floating processor from beginning the Such a salmon sorter should also be opportunity to complete the count of next pollock offload until the observer required to identify and sort salmon by salmon and collect scientific data or has notified the plant operator that species into designated bins that can be biological samples from the previous opportunity has been provided to easily monitored by the observer. delivery. These provisions contradict complete the count of salmon and Response: The final rule, at language in the preamble (pages 14029 collect scientific data or biological § 679.21(c)(3), requires the operators of and 14030) that a vessel may begin a samples. vessels and the managers of shoreside or new trip before the salmon census and stationary floating processors to sampling are complete for the vessel’s Comment 14: The proposed rule, at designate, and identify to the observer, prior trip so long as the vessel leaves § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(D), requires that the a crew person or employee responsible with a different observer than it carried vessel offload and sorting must cease in for ensuring all sorting, retention, and on the prior trip. the event salmon are too numerous to be storage of salmon occurs in accordance These provisions are overly contained in the observation area and with the regulations at § 679.21(c)(2). prescriptive, would increase costs to the observer must be given the However, the regulations do not require participants while reducing flexibility, opportunity to count the salmon in the vessel operators and shoreside or and would require contractors to observation area and collect scientific stationary floating processor managers maintain a large pool of observers data or biological samples. In addition, to sort salmon by species. Due to the onshore to ensure that catcher vessels the proposed rule, at variety of vessel and shoreside could start a new fishing trip prior to § 679.28(g)(7)(vii)(F), requires that the configurations, adding the necessary the observer completing their duties. observation area must contain an area space required for sorting salmon by And, it should not be the responsibility designated to store salmon. However, species may be impractical for some of the observer assigned to the catcher there may not be enough room to operations. Vessel operators or vessel for the next trip to collect the contain all salmon within sight of the processors may choose to separate data from the previous trip. These observer at all times. The final rule salmon by species in order to expedite responsibilities should be shared by the should allow the salmon to be removed, the verification of the salmon count and vessel and plant observers. The final in the presence of the observer, once the collection of biological samples or rule should require only that no catcher salmon have been counted and sampled. scientific data. vessel may start a new fishing trip Moreover, vessels should be allowed to Comment 12: Vessel operators unless it has an observer onboard. resume offloading and sorting as soon as participating in an IPA are responsible Which observer the vessel carries and space becomes available in the to track their own salmon counts whether a vessel or plant observer observation area. throughout each season. Therefore, it is completes the salmon census and all Response: NMFS agrees and has unnecessary to structure regulations sampling for a prior delivery should not revised the final rule to clarify that, at regarding the observation and count of matter. In light of additional observer any point during the offload, if salmon salmon that are directly tied to the coverage and changing duties involved are too numerous to be contained in the vessel observer. in Chinook salmon bycatch accounting, salmon storage container, the sorting of Response: NMFS agrees that vessel a more flexible approach to duty the offload must cease and the observer operators, cooperative managers, and assignment is necessary. must be allowed to count all the salmon managers of shoreside processing Response: NMFS agrees and for the and collect scientific data and biological facilities are responsible for ensuring reasons set forth by the commenter, it samples adjacent to the observer work proper sorting, counting, and has modified the final rule to (1) allow station. Once these duties have been identification of salmon. However, a catcher vessel to begin a new trip completed, the salmon may be removed

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53033

in the presence of the observer and the either the plant or the vessel observer, rate. Additional sorting crew may also sorting of the offload may continue. and does not designate which observer be needed in the catch sorting area NMFS made the following changes in will be tasked with monitoring the during times when salmon bycatch is the final rule to give processors more offload. No changes are required to the high or small salmon are present. flexibility to achieve the goals of regulations because either observer may Recordkeeping and Reporting allowing an observer to monitor all the perform these duties. sorting of salmon and verify the count The FMA Division makes policy Comment 17: Current regulations of salmon. These changes are necessary decisions about the tasks an observer require operators of trawl catcher/ because processing facilities vary greatly performs. In the past, vessel observers processors to record the scale weight for in the methods used to sort and weigh monitored offloads of shoreside pollock the haul and the CDQ group number fish. deliveries. Beginning in 2011, observer within 2 hours after completion of gear In response to comments that the program policy will place the primary retrieval. However, it is unlikely that all observation area may not provide responsibility for monitoring the proper of the catch from a haul will be weighed enough space to hold the salmon storage sorting of salmon, verifying the count of within 2 hours of gear retrieval. Pollock area, NMFS revised the final rule at salmon, and collecting scientific data often are held in tanks before weighing § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(C), (D), and (E) by and biological samples upon the and processing for hours after the gear removing the requirement to store and observers stationed at the processing is retrieved. In addition, vessel count salmon in the observation area. facility. The vessel observer may operators and CDQ group Instead, the final rule requires salmon to provide the plant observer breaks or representatives want to know the weight be stored in a ‘‘salmon storage other assistance as needed during the of the haul and the number of Chinook container.’’ No additional revisions are offload. salmon in the haul before deciding needed because the final rule, at Comment 16: The proposed rule, at whether to assign the haul to the CDQ § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(D), allows shoreside § 679.21(c)(2)(i)(D) and group. The time limit for recording scale processors or stationary processors to § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(B), requires that that weight and CDQ group number should remove the salmon from the storage no salmon pass the observer sample be changed to within 2 hours after the container if the salmon become too collection point, or no salmon pass from completion of weighing of the catch numerous to contain in this location. the last point where sorting of fish from the haul. This solution provides NMFS added a requirement, at occurs into the factory area of a adequate time for the crew to safely § 679.28(g)(7)(vi)(C), that the processing plant. These requirements move the fish across the scale without observation area must provide a clear, are unreasonable as it is inevitable that putting unnecessary pressure on the unobstructed view of the salmon storage salmon occasionally pass beyond the observer to monitor the haul and container to ensure no salmon of any sorting area because salmon can be complete their other duties faster than species are removed without the difficult to identify in the large volume they reasonably can. It also ensures that observer’s knowledge. of pollock. This could occur even when the vessel operator enters the haul data NMFS revised paragraph every effort is made to identify and with minimal delay for the benefit of § 679.28(g)(7)(vii) to allow for the separate salmon out at the observer other vessels in their sector that depend observation area and the observer work sample collection point and/or sorting on that data to avoid hot spots and to station to be in separate locations, while area. Rather than penalize a plant manage under the PSC allocation and also requiring the observer work station operator, the regulations should provide performance standard. be adjacent to the location where the the flexibility for salmon identified at Response: NMFS agrees and has observer counts all salmon and collects any point in the process to be counted modified the final rule, at § 679.5, to scientific data or biological information. and sampled without penalty. change the time limit for recording the Last, NMFS revised the regulations at Response: NMFS disagrees and has CDQ group number in the logbooks, for § 679.28(g)(7)(x)(F) to clarify that the made no changes to the final rule in the reasons described in the comment. CMCP requirement to include the response to this comment. As identified Proper accounting of pollock catch location of the salmon storage container in the EIS on page 65, Chinook salmon and salmon bycatch to an AFA sector, is only for shoreside or stationary PSC allocations may create strong inshore cooperative, or CDQ group floating processors taking pollock economic incentives to misreport requires identification of whether a haul deliveries. salmon bycatch because each salmon by a catcher/processor or a delivery by Comment 15: Revise sections counted against Chinook salmon PSC a catcher vessel to either a mothership, § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(D) and (E) to refer to allocation could ultimately constrain shoreside processor, or stationary ‘‘an observer’’ rather than ‘‘the observer.’’ the full harvest of a sector’s, floating processor is assigned to a Using ‘‘the observer’’ implies that the cooperative’s, or CDQ group’s pollock specific CDQ group. If no CDQ group is required functions would always be allocation. The factory areas of identified with the haul or delivery, that done by the catcher vessel observer, processing plants are large and complex. pollock, associated salmon bycatch, and which is illogical because an offload Preventing observers from seeing other catch in the haul or delivery is could take up to 24 hours. Using ‘‘an Chinook salmon that enter the factory attributed to the sector or inshore observer’’ would add flexibility for would not be difficult. In order for PSC cooperative to which the vessel or program participants and more limits to be effective, NMFS needs to processor belongs. For catcher/ accurately reflect the current shared ensure that there is a credible salmon processors and motherships, observer responsibilities of vessel and plant bycatch monitoring system in place at data is used to determine the weight of observers when a catcher vessel delivers shoreside processing plants. This would pollock and number of salmon to a shoreside or stationary floating ensure that observers have access to all associated with the haul or delivery, processor. salmon, prior to the fish being conveyed and the CDQ group number must be Response: NMFS disagrees and has into the factory. NMFS acknowledges properly identified in the observer data made no changes to the final rule in that the reduction in the flow of fish at the time the data is transmitted by the response to this comment. The final through the initial catch sorting area observer from the vessel to NMFS. The rule, at § 679.21(c)(2)(iii)(D) and (E), could slow pollock processing, since primary and official source of the CDQ uses the phrase ‘‘the observer’’ to refer to fish would enter the factory at a slower group number for the observer is the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53034 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

vessel logbook. Observers also record completion of gear retrieval.’’ Hail The same issue raised in this and transmit the total weight of each weight is the vessel operator’s estimate comment about the time needed to haul or delivery from the scale onboard of the total weight of the haul. Although assess catch composition before the vessel. Although the scale weight of current ELB regulations require the assigning the catch in the haul to a CDQ each haul or delivery also is required to vessel operator to enter all data group or the partner vessel also applies be recorded in the vessel logbook, currently required for the DCPLs, the to catcher vessels delivering to observers can obtain this information ELB time limits currently do not include motherships. Current regulations at directly from the scale and do not need the same requirement that applies to the § 679.5(c)(4)(ii)(A) require the operator to rely on the vessel logbooks as the DCPL that operators of catcher/ of a catcher vessel using trawl gear to only source of data for scale weights. processors required to weigh catch on a record the CDQ group number in its Under current regulations, operators scale approved by NMFS must record DFL within 2 hours after completion of of catcher vessels and catcher/ the scale weight of the haul. In addition, gear retrieval. Catcher vessels delivering processors using any gear type and the although the ELB time limits list the unsorted codends do not retrieve gear operators of motherships are required to information that must be recorded onboard the catcher vessel, but just record the CDQ group number in their within 2 hours after completion of gear transfer the codend from the catcher logbooks within 2 hours after the retrieval, they do not include the vessel to the mothership. The trawl net completion of gear retrieval. This additional DCPL time limit to record all is hauled onboard the mothership, requirement has existed for logbooks for other required information by noon of dumped into holding tanks and held, many years so that vessel operators can the day following completion of sorted, weighed, and processed in much document whether catch in a haul or set production. NMFS revised the final rule the same manner as is done on a is occurring in CDQ or non-CDQ to require operators of catcher/ catcher/processor. Therefore, fisheries. The primary reasons for processors to report, in the ELBs, the assessment of the composition of the requiring the vessel operators to CDQ group number within 2 hours after catch and obtaining information needed indicate in their logbooks that they were completion of weighing all of the catch by the vessel operator to assign the fishing on behalf of a CDQ group are: (1) in the haul on the scale. catch to a CDQ group or the mothership To document why a vessel may be NMFS is preparing a separate sector is not available until after the directed fishing for a groundfish species proposed rule to revise and standardize catch is weighed and the salmon sorted, when the non-CDQ fisheries for that time limits in § 679.5 for daily fishing identified, and counted on the species were closed; (2) to record logbooks (DFLs), DCPLs, and ELBs and mothership. production and retained catch To maintain consistency with the will address the time limit for recording separately in the CDQ and non-CDQ revisions made for time limits that the scale weight of each haul and all fisheries for purposes of calculating apply to the catcher/processors, NMFS other required information in this maximum retainable amounts of also revised the final rule that governs separate rulemaking because these groundfish not open for directed fishing; time limits for recording the CDQ group requirements affect more than the and (3) to provide information for number in the catcher vessel’s DFL and vessels regulated under Amendment 91. proper accounting of catch to allocated the mothership’s DCPL. NMFS revised This separate rulemaking is expected to quotas. the final rule, at § 679.5(c)(4)(ii)(A)(1), to be effective by January 1, 2011. The requirement to record both the add the statement that specific scale weight of the haul and the CDQ However, until these revisions are information must be recorded within 2 group number within 2 hours of made, operators of catcher/processors hours after completion of gear retrieval, completion of gear retrieval applies to fishing under Amendment 91 are not except that catcher vessels harvesting daily cumulative production logbooks required to record scale weights of each pollock CDQ and delivering unsorted (DCPLs) for catcher/processors using haul in the ELB within 2 hours of codends to a mothership must record trawl gear under regulations at completion of gear retrieval. CDQ group number within 2 hours after § 679.5(c)(4)(ii)(B). However, as NMFS changed the final rule to add completion of weighing all catch in the described in the proposed rule, under a requirement that the operator of the haul on the mothership. Amendment 91 AFA catcher/processors vessel must provide the information For the mothership DCPL, NMFS or any catcher/processor harvesting recorded in the ELB to the observer or revised the final rule, at pollock CDQ will no longer be filling an authorized officer upon request at § 679.5(c)(6)(ii)(A), to add the statement out DCPLs (the paper logbooks). Vessel any time after the specified deadlines that specific information must be operators are required to record all and before the ELB logsheet is printed. recorded within 2 hours after information previously required in the This requirement is needed because the completion of receipt of each groundfish DCPL in an electronic logbook (ELB). CDQ group number is required to be delivery, except that the CDQ group This final rule adds text to the recorded in the ELB within 2 hours after number for catcher vessels harvesting introductory paragraph of the trawl weighing of the catch, but the vessel pollock CDQ and delivering unsorted catcher/processor DCPL requirements to operator is only required to print a copy codends to a mothership must be clarify that the operators of AFA of the ELB logsheet for the observer’s recorded within 2 hours after the catcher/processors or any catcher/ use by noon each day to record the completion of weighing all catch from processor harvesting pollock CDQ are previous day’s ELB information. The the haul on the mothership. Mothership required to use an ELB and no longer observer may need access to the operators may use either the DCPL or report using a DCPL. information about the CDQ group ELB. Mothership DCPLs do not require Regulations at § 679.5(f)(2)(iii)(B)(1) number recorded in the ELB prior to the reporting of the scale weight of each require that vessel operators using an daily printing of the ELB logsheet page delivery, so no revisions are needed. ELB must ‘‘Record the haul number or to submit observer data to NMFS in a Finally, current regulations require set number, time and date gear set, time timely manner. As stated in the that the operator of a vessel using an and date gear hauled, begin and end comment, timely submission of observer ELB must notify NMFS by fax that he or position, CDQ group number (if data will be essential to the industry to she will be using an ELB. NMFS applicable), and hail weight for each manage Chinook salmon bycatch under modified the final rule so that this haul or set within 2 hours after Amendment 91. requirement applies only to operators

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53035

voluntarily using an ELB. AFA catcher/ the salmon. Making the requested balances the need to minimize Chinook processors required to use an ELB under change is outside the scope of this salmon bycatch to the extent practicable Amendment 91 will not be required to action. Vessel operators should notify while providing the pollock fleet the notify NMFS by fax that they are using NOAA Office of Law Enforcement of flexibility to harvest the pollock TAC. an ELB because NMFS will know that any equipment failures, including a This decision is fully supported by the they are using an ELB. refrigeration break down, that impedes EIS and RIR prepared for this action (see Comment 18: The final rule should a vessel’s full compliance with ADDRESSES). NMFS has complied with revise the time limit to record scale regulations. all applicable laws, Executive Orders, weight of the haul and CDQ group Comment 20: In the interest of and international obligations in number to within 2 hours after the catch reducing the carbon footprint of the approving and implementing from a haul is weighed and the salmon pollock fleet, we support the proposal to Amendment 91. in the haul are counted, whichever remove the reference requiring the Comment 23: A very strong case was occurs later. This deadline would better discard of salmon into Federal waters made by directly affected communities, comport with fish processing operations once they have been counted or and those organizations whose entire and the practical requirements for otherwise sampled. However, whenever existence is for the purpose of storing pollock in holding tanks. possible and practical, Chinook salmon conserving Yukon River Chinook Response: NMFS agrees that the time bycatch should be committed to the PSD salmon, for implementing a 30,000 limit for recording whether the catch program. Chinook salmon cap with a 58/42 A/B from a haul by a catcher/processor is Response: NMFS acknowledges this season split. attributed to a CDQ group should be comment. Response: The analyses for this action changed. See response to comment 17. examined the impacts of hard caps PSC Limits and Allocations The final rule revises this time limit to ranging from 29,300 to 87,500 Chinook within 2 hours of the completion of Comment 21: A 20,000 to 25,000 salmon. See NMFS response to weighing all catch in the haul. NMFS Chinook salmon bycatch cap is required comment 21. Four seasonal believes that the time limit is for the Chinook salmon population to apportionment options were analyzed in appropriately linked to the completion recover. the EIS, including the 58/42 of weighing of the haul and does not Response: As discussed in the EIS apportionment. Amendment 91 agree that the time limit should be (see ADDRESSES), no available apportions the PSC limits as 70 percent linked to when the observer has information indicates that caps at the in the A season and 30 percent in the completed counting the salmon in the levels recommended in this comment B season. Seventy percent is higher than haul. would recover the Chinook salmon the average historical distribution of Two hours after weighing the catch in population. Annual bycatch caps of Chinook salmon bycatch to the A season the haul should provide sufficient time 20,000 to 25,000 Chinook salmon were to provide more of the Chinook salmon for the observer to sort, identify species, considered and eliminated from further PSC allocation during the highest value and count all of the salmon in a haul. analysis by the Council. Based on pollock fishing season. However, the 70/ However, if unusual circumstances recommendations from the Council’s 30 A/B season split is combined with prevent the observer from completing Salmon Bycatch Workgroup, the initial the rollover of 100 percent of the the count of all salmon in the haul hard cap numbers under consideration remaining A season allocation to the B within this time limit, vessel crew can ranged from 14,000 to 114,000 fish. At season. This rollover provision assist the observer or count the salmon the December 2007 Council meeting, the promotes salmon savings in the A in the haul independent of the observer Council raised the lowest hard cap season by providing incentives for with enough detail to assess the catch under consideration to 29,323 Chinook sectors to minimize bycatch to the composition from the haul for purposes salmon, which is representative of the 5- extent practicable in preparation for the of deciding whether to assign a haul to year average prior to 2001. The Council B season, but also locks in the a CDQ group or to the catcher/processor noted that including this number in the maximum proportion of bycatch sector. In addition, the time when the analysis was sufficiently conservative allowed in the A season. catch from a haul is completely weighed and that caps below 29,323 would not Comment 24: The 47,591 Chinook on the scale is readily available to the meet the purpose and need for this salmon PSC limit is too high. Declining vessel operator from information stored action. The EIS has a complete analysis Chinook salmon numbers prove that and printed by the scale. Conversely, of the cap level options (see ADDRESSES). salmon stocks cannot sustain the time when an observer completes Comment 22: A hard cap of 29,323 exploitation at that level. counting salmon would require separate Chinook salmon would ensure salmon Response: NMFS disagrees. The EIS and additional documentation by the returns meet the needs of user groups. analyzes the environmental impacts of observer. A cap at this level is consistent with the Chinook salmon bycatch at the 47,591 Comment 19: The proposed rule, at (1997 to 2001) average Chinook salmon Chinook salmon PSC limit (see § 679.21(c)(2)(ii)(A), requires an bycatch and would approach the Yukon ADDRESSES). This analysis provides the operator of a vessel making inshore River Salmon Agreement requirement best available information on the deliveries to store all salmon taken as that the United States increase in-river predicted impacts of bycatch at this bycatch in a refrigerated saltwater tank. returns by reducing losses to marine level. The 47,591 is the approximate 10- This regulation should be removed fisheries. As the EIS describes, a cap at year average of Chinook salmon bycatch because at times catch must be stored on this level would have provided the from 1997 to 2006, and represents both deck if tanks are full, a refrigeration ‘‘greatest benefit’’ in salmon savings for the performance standard for sectors break-down could result in a violation, Western and Interior Alaska stocks from with vessels participating in an IPA and and certain times of the year water 2003–2007. the PSC limit if no IPA is approved by temperatures are sufficiently cold that it Response: NMFS acknowledges the NMFS. is unnecessary to refrigerate. comment and notes that a similar hard While Chinook salmon bycatch in the Response: NMFS did not add this cap was considered in the EIS. The pollock fishery may be a contributing requirement with the proposed rule, we Council recommended and NMFS factor in the decline of Chinook salmon, only removed the ability to freeze or ice approved Amendment 91 because it best as the EIS analysis shows, the absolute

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53036 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

numbers of the ocean bycatch that Performance Standard allocation in most years. For a sector to would have returned to western Alaska Comment 26: Under the proposed continue to receive Chinook salmon are expected to be relatively small due rule, if a vessel opts-out of an IPA, an PSC allocations under the 60,000 to ocean mortality and the large number amount equal to that vessel’s portion of Chinook salmon PSC limit, that sector of other river systems contributing to opt-out allocation of 28,496 Chinook may not exceed its portion of 47,591 in the total Chinook bycatch. Although the salmon is subtracted from that sector’s any three years within seven reasons for the decline of Chinook PSC allocation; however, an amount consecutive years. If a sector fails this salmon are not completely understood, equal to that vessel’s portion of 47,591 performance standard, it will scientists believe they are Chinook salmon is also subtracted from permanently be allocated a portion of predominately natural. Changes in that sector’s annual threshold amount. the 47,591 Chinook salmon PSC limit. ocean and river conditions, including The proposed rule has no rationale for Comment 28: The performance unfavorable shifts in temperatures and subtracting an opt-out vessel’s portion standard allows the pollock fleet to food sources, likely cause poor survival of 47,591 Chinook salmon from the catch 60,000 Chinook salmon in two out of Chinook salmon. sector’s annual threshold amount. This of seven years with no penalty. The rationale cited by the Council was that Comment 25: The 60,000 Chinook proposed adjustment method will in certain years the pollock fishery salmon PSC limit is nearly double the unnecessarily restrict fishing opportunities for vessels that choose to simply cannot avoid bycatch despite cap levels of 29,323–32,500 Chinook behavioral changes. No analysis is salmon recommended by those who become members of an IPA and will, in turn, jeopardize the attainment of presented in the EIS to support this oversee management of the Chinook conclusion. salmon fisheries in-river and by those optimum yield in the pollock fishery. Response: The EIS (see ADDRESSES) who depend on the Chinook salmon. The final rule should accommodate the vessels that choose to opt-out of an IPA discusses the function of the sector-level The 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit performance standard to prevent each would allow the pollock industry to by subtracting the vessels opt-out allocation from the sector’s annual sector from exceeding its portion of waste more Chinook salmon than the 47,951 Chinook salmon in more than 3 entire subsistence catch on the Yukon threshold amount. Response: NMFS consulted with the years in any 7 consecutive years. Note River. Council on the two methods to calculate that since the performance standard is Response: Amendment 91 involves a sector’s annual threshold amount, the on a sector basis, if one sector exceeded more management measures than a method in the proposed rule or the its performance standard and fished up simple 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC method recommended by public to its allocation under the 60,000 PSC limit. The performance standard will comment. The Council recommended limit, total bycatch would still be below ensure that average bycatch does not that the final rule be changed to subtract 60,000 Chinook salmon. Bycatch would exceed the recent 10-year average. The a vessel’s opt-out allocation from the only reach 60,000 Chinook salmon in a IPAs are intended to further reduce sector’s annual threshold amount. This given year if all sectors fished up to bycatch below that amount by providing is the same method that the Council had their allocation of 60,000 Chinook vessels incentives to avoid Chinook recommended for calculating the sector salmon. Therefore, the performance salmon at all times. As a result, allocations under the 60,000 Chinook standard is the tool that will prevent Amendment 91 is intended to achieve, salmon PSC limit and will result in bycatch from exceeding, on average, the on average, greater Chinook salmon slightly higher annual threshold historical 10-year average. savings in low abundance years than a amounts for sectors with vessels that The EIS analysis shows that the single hard cap and achieve Chinook opt-out of an IPA than the method in the number of Chinook salmon caught as salmon bycatch below the performance proposed rule. To make this change, bycatch in the pollock fishery is highly standard in most years. However, the NMFS changed column G in Tables 47a, variable from year to year, from sector 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit 47b, and 47c and column E in Table 47d to sector, and even from vessel to vessel. provides for the inherent variability in of the final rule to show each vessel’s Current information about Chinook Chinook salmon bycatch among vessels, annual Chinook salmon opt-out salmon is insufficient to determine the sectors, and years by allocating allocation that will be deducted from reasons for high or low encounters of sufficient Chinook salmon for times the sector’s annual threshold amount. Chinook salmon in the pollock fishery when Chinook salmon bycatch is Comment 27: The performance or the degree to which encounter rates unavoidably high. standard allows the pollock fleet to are related to Chinook salmon exceed the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC abundance or other conditions. The NMFS will monitor all salmon limit in some years without penalty, uncertainty and variability in Chinook bycatch by each vessel in the pollock although consistently exceeding the salmon bycatch led the Council to create fishery through a census, 100 percent performance standard could trigger a a program with a 60,000 Chinook observer coverage, and an expanded lower bycatch cap for future years. salmon PSC limit, a performance biological sampling program. Annual Response: Under Amendment 91, the standard, and IPAs. The 60,000 Chinook reports and the proposed economic data pollock fleet is prevented from salmon PSC limit represents a reduction collection program are designed to exceeding the 60,000 Chinook salmon in bycatch from the recent high bycatch evaluate whether and how incentive PSC limit in every year. Each year, years and is approximately one-half of plans influence a vessel’s operational NMFS will allocate the 60,000 Chinook the 2007 Chinook salmon bycatch. The decisions to avoid Chinook salmon salmon PSC limit to the mothership 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit bycatch. If information becomes sector, catcher/processor sector, inshore assumes that the fleet can and will available to indicate that Amendment cooperatives, and CDQ groups if an IPA change behavior to avoid Chinook 91 is not providing the expected is formed and approved by NMFS. The salmon or face closure the pollock Chinook salmon savings, NMFS will sector-level performance standard of fishery. The performance standard and work with the Council to take additional 47,591 Chinook salmon is a tool to the IPAs aim to ensure that the fleet will actions to minimize Chinook salmon ensure that each sector does not fully further change behavior to avoid bycatch to the extent practicable. harvest its Chinook salmon PSC Chinook salmon bycatch.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53037

Eligible Entities IPA participating vessel owners because the IPA application requires that the Comment 29: The proposed rule, at the allocation is for use by all IPA IPA list each vessel that will be § 679.21(f)(8)(ii), is unclear about what participating members of the sector, and participating in that IPA. Comment 31: The joint and several would happen if NMFS received more the entity is responsible for managing liability provision, at than one application for the entity to the use of the allocation by all IPA § 679.21(f)(8)(iii)(A), is unreasonably represent a sector and receive the participating members. Vessel owners broad and makes the members of an Chinook salmon PSC allocation. No that choose to opt-out of an IPA would entity formed for the purposes of more than one entity should be not participate in the sector entity. applying for and holding transferable authorized to represent the catcher/ NMFS added a requirement, at quotas jointly and severally liable for processor sector, but not all of the § 679.21(f)(8)(ii)(A), that the sector entity representative must affirm on the any violation of applicable regulations owners of the AFA permitted vessels in application form that each eligible and for any penalties. Requiring vessel the sector should be required to be vessel owner, from whom the applicant owners to subject themselves to such members in a single entity. onerous and open-ended joint and The final rule should contain an received written notification requesting several liability exposure raises serious explanation of the criteria that NMFS to join the sector entity, has been allowed to join the sector entity subject issues of fairness and due process. The intends to use to determine which of to the terms and conditions that have prospect of such liability is likely to two or more entity applications will be been agreed on by, and are applicable have a chilling effect on the willingness selected to represent the catcher/ to, all other parties to the sector entity. of an individual company to enter into processor sector. One criterion should NMFS moved a similar requirement for the entity formation arrangements be that an applicant must represent the IPA membership from the proposed required to enjoy the benefits of a majority (i.e., 75 percent) of the eligible language at § 679.21(f)(12)(ii) to the IPA transferable bycatch allocation in the vessel owners in that sector. By using application requirements at first place. Without an entity, that sector these criteria, NMFS would authorize an § 679.21(f)(12)(iii)(A) to better align the would not receive transferable Chinook entity with the broadest representation participation requirements for both salmon PSC allocations, which may of participants. This super-majority applications. NMFS also added a jeopardize its ability to harvest its threshold will ensure that the terms requirement, at § 679.21(f)(12)(ii)(B), pollock. This is an inappropriate under which the entity is formed will that vessels owners in the catcher/ standard that not only unfairly imposes reflect the views of the strong majority processor sector or mothership sector liability on innocent vessel owners, but of participants but at the same time will must be a member of the sector entity it was included in the proposed rule prevent the creation of hold out to join an IPA. without opportunity for comment opportunities that would result from a To address the issue of what would earlier in the process and without the unanimous approval requirement. The happen if NMFS received more than one benefit of Council input. For these rule should not require unanimous sector entity application, NMFS added reasons, and without benefit of any participation by the owners of every § 679.21(f)(8)(ii)(E) to the final rule to rationale for including such provisions eligible vessel. This standard would clarify that if more than one entity in the first place, the joint and several give inappropriate leverage to application is submitted to NMFS, liability provisions should be removed participants with very little investment NMFS will approve the application for for the final rule. in the fishery and could disrupt the the entity that represents the most Response: NMFS has removed from entire allocation and IPA process. eligible vessel owners in the sector. At the final rule the joint and several Response: NMFS consulted with the § 679.21(f)(8)(ii)(D), NMFS changed the liability provisions for cooperatives and Council on the best way to address the deadline for the entity application from the entities representing the catcher/ sector entity issues raised in public November 1 to October 1 to coincide processor sector and mothership sector. comment, and the Council with the deadline for the IPA These provisions created some recommended that NMFS change the application. NMFS added confusion, as discussed in the comment, final rule to improve the § 679.21(f)(8)(ii)(F) to the final rule to and they are unnecessary because implementation of sector entities and enable vessel owners to join an NOAA has independent authority to better align IPA and sector entity approved sector entity by December 1 of exercise its discretion to seek to impose participation. The requirement that the each year, so that the entity can joint liability if the evidence supports mothership and catcher/processor sector represent all eligible vessels in the doing so. entities must represent all of the vessel sector and receive a transferable PSC Transfers owners in that sector to receive a allocation. transferable PSC allocation was Comment 30: The proposed rule, at Comment 32: The proposed rule, at explained in the EIS and is a result of § 679.7(f)(8)(iii)(A)(4), allows an entity § 679.21(f)(9)(ii), states that vessels the fact that Amendment 91 only allows representative to sign an IPA on behalf fishing on behalf of an entity that has for NMFS to make a single allocation to of the vessel owners in that entity. The exceeded its Chinook salmon PSC those sectors. However, the proposed final rule should allow the entity allocation for a season may not start a rule did not provide the necessary representative to sign more than one new pollock fishing trip for the structure for the sector entity to form IPA to provide for the eventuality that remainder of that season. This implies without introducing the problems members of the same entity join that if a vessel was fishing on the identified in public comments. different IPAs. pollock allocation from an AFA entity NMFS modified the final rule, at Response: NMFS agrees and has and the entity had exceeded its Chinook § 679.21(f)(8)(i)(C) and (D), to make it modified this paragraph, now at salmon PSC limit, the vessel could not clear that NMFS will authorize only one § 679.21(f)(8)(iii)(B) in the final rule, to start a new fishing trip for a CDQ entity. entity to represent the catcher/processor allow an entity representative to sign That is not the intent. Clarify that once sector and one entity to represent the more than one IPA. The IPA an entity has exceeded its Chinook mothership sector. NMFS also clarified representative may sign an IPA on salmon PSC allocation, a vessel cannot that, under the 60,000 Chinook salmon behalf of the vessel owners in that entity start a new fishing trip for that same PSC limit, the entity has to represent all that intend to join that IPA. Note that entity.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53038 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Response: NMFS agrees and has meets the minimum participation Response: NMFS agrees that if a modified the final rule at requirement. vessel is eligible to participate in more § 679.21(f)(9)(ii) to clarify that a vessel Comment 35: The preamble to the than one sector, then that vessel can is prohibited from fishing for an entity proposed rule explains that a CDQ participate in an IPA for each sector. that has exceeded its Chinook salmon group can only join one IPA. This Comment 37: Clarify whether a CDQ PSC allocation. The Council motion restriction would force a CDQ group group must submit a separate proposed states that any recipient of a post with vessels fishing in different AFA IPA if they decide to participate in an delivery transfer during a season may sectors to join one IPA and adopt the IPA together with members of another not fish for the remainder of that season. same incentive program. A CDQ group AFA sector. The recipient of a post delivery transfer has investments in fishing vessels in Response: The IPA representative is the entity, not a vessel. The several pollock sectors, and can allocate must submit an application for approval prohibitions at § 679.7(d)(8)(ii)(C)(2) and CDQ pollock among them, and should of a proposed IPA to NMFS. A CDQ (k)(8)(iv)(B) accurately reflect this. have the ability to join multiple IPAs. group that is a member of that proposed Comment 33: In the proposed rule, at Response: NMFS concurs that a CDQ IPA will be listed in the IPA; this CDQ § 679.21(f)(10)(ii), it is difficult to group should not be required to group does not need to separately determine whether seasonal pollock participate in only one approved IPA. submit the same proposed IPA. fishery closures will affect a sector of CDQ groups are not restricted in what Comment 38: Two different deadlines the fishery or the entire fishery. The vessels they may authorize to catch are identified for IPAs; October 1 and November 1. Which is correct? final rule should make it clear that pollock CDQ on their behalf as long as Response: Both deadlines are correct. sector-specific seasonal closures will be those vessels meet all other applicable requirements in 50 CFR part 679 and October 1 is the deadline for submitting employed to manage this portion of the a proposed IPA or amended IPA under fishery. other Federal regulations. Therefore, a CDQ group may have vessels from § 679.21(f)(12)(iv). November 1 is the Response: NMFS disagrees that this different AFA sectors fishing for pollock deadline in the proposed rule for the paragraph needs to be changed. This in the Bering Sea on its behalf. Different IPA representative to submit regulation makes it clear that NMFS will AFA sectors may develop different IPAs amendments to the list of participants in close fishing for those vessels fishing and the CDQ group or the vessel owner the IPA. Note that, in response to under a non-transferable allocation. For may want the partner vessel to comment 39, NMFS changed this any given year, NMFS can establish participate in the same IPA that the deadline for amendments to the IPA list non-transferable allocations, including a vessel participates in for its non-CDQ of participants, at non-transferable allocation for the group fishing. Although described in the § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(C)(2), to December 1. of opt-out vessels. The non-transferable preamble, no regulations were included Comment 39: NMFS should add a opt-out allocation will apply to all in the proposed rule that would require deadline for when NMFS will notify vessels that have opted out and could the CDQ groups to participate in only participants whose IPA is rejected to include vessels from different sectors. one IPA. Therefore, no changes in the allow them sufficient time to amend Therefore, the NMFS closures will not final rule are needed. their application or join a different IPA. necessarily be sector-specific. However, NMFS added a requirement The proposed rule, at Incentive Plan Agreement (IPA) to the final rule to clarify requirements § 679.21(f)(12)(iv)(D)(2), provides an associated with a CDQ group’s applicant one 30-day period to address Comment 34: The proposed rule, at participation in an IPA. To receive a any deficiencies in the proposed IPA § 679.21(f)(12)(i)(A), incorrectly transferable Chinook salmon PSC that NMFS identifies. The final rule characterizes the minimum allocation under the 60,000 PSC limit, a should allow for a 45-day period to participation requirement. The first CDQ group must participate in an address, in writing, the IPA deficiencies sentence should read, ‘‘participation by approved IPA. If a CDQ group is identified by NMFS. Additionally, the the owners of AFA permitted vessels or participating in an IPA, it cannot also November 1 deadline at CDQ groups that combined represent at participate in the opt-out fishery § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(C)(2) for amendments least 9 percent of the Bering Sea because the Chinook salmon allocation to the IPA’s list of participants should directed pollock fishery is required for to a CDQ group cannot be subdivided be changed to December 1 to purposes of this paragraph (f)(12)(i).’’ based on the participation of its partner accommodate NMFS’ review and The accompanying table should be vessels in an approved IPA. Therefore, notification process and the potential deleted. to implement the Council’s intent and to for amending and/or switching IPAs. Response: NMFS agrees and has address this comment submitted by five Response: NMFS will expeditiously corrected this paragraph for the final of the six CDQ groups, NMFS added a review the IPAs and notify the IPA rule to clarify that parties to an IPA requirement in the final rule, at representative of any deficiencies as must collectively represent at least 9 § 679.21(f)(12)(ii)(C), that states, for a soon as possible; therefore, a deadline percent of the Bering Sea pollock quota. CDQ group to be a member of an IPA, for NMFS review is not necessary. The The correct method for determining the the CDQ group must list in the IPA each 30-day period for an IPA representative percent represented by each party to an vessel harvesting Bering Sea pollock to address any identified deficiencies IPA is described in detail in the CDQ on behalf of that CDQ group that was put in regulations to ensure that preamble to the proposed rule (75 FR will participate in that IPA. deficiencies could be addressed and 14028; March 23, 2010). Comment 36: If a vessel is eligible to NMFS could approve an IPA before the NMFS disagrees that the participate in more than one sector, that upcoming fishing year. Therefore, accompanying table should be deleted. vessel should be able to participate in NMFS did not change this 30-day The table contains necessary more than one IPA. This would occur period in the final rule. NMFS agrees information for participants to for a vessel that is in the catcher/ that the deadline for amendments to the understand how NMFS will calculate processor sector and fishing for a CDQ list of participants for an IPA should be the percent of Bering Sea pollock used group or for a vessel that can fish in the changed from November 1 to December for each AFA permitted vessel and CDQ mothership sector and inshore 1 and has made this change in the final group in determining whether an IPA cooperative sector. rule at § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(C)(2).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53039

Comment 40: The proposed rule, at below the performance standard for the penalties. IPAs are included as a § 679.21(f)(12)(iii)(B)(3)(i), says that the sector in which the vessel participates. performance-based provision and the IPA must contain a written description Under § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(D), NMFS will Federal regulations are flexible in of the incentives that will be disapprove an IPA or an amendment to allowing the pollock fleet to modify the implemented under the IPA to ensure an IPA that does not meet this IPAs as performance information that the operator of each vessel requirement. becomes available to ensure that the participating in the IPA will avoid Comment 42: For the requirement that IPAs meet the goals in Amendment 91. Chinook salmon at all times while the IPA contains incentives to ensure Additionally, the final rule requires directed fishing for pollock. This does that the operator of each vessel will the IPA representative to submit an not correctly reflect the Council motion, avoid Chinook salmon while fishing for annual report to the Council that will be which says that an IPA must describe pollock, ‘‘avoid’’ should be changed to the primary tool through which the incentives for each vessel to avoid ‘‘minimize to the extent practicable’’ to Council will evaluate whether its goals Chinook salmon bycatch under any use the same language as National for the IPAs are being met. Also, the condition of pollock and Chinook Standard 9. proposed economic data collection salmon abundance in all years. In other Response: The Council motion program that the Council and NMFS are words, the IPA is to describe the recommending Amendment 91 developing is designed to provide incentives that promote salmon specifically requires that an IPA must quantitative information to evaluate avoidance. The incentives will not describe incentives for each vessel to how an IPA influences a vessel’s ensure that participants avoid salmon at avoid Chinook salmon bycatch under operational decisions to avoid Chinook all times. The final rule should reflect any condition of pollock and Chinook salmon bycatch. See response to the Council motion. salmon abundance. This final rule comment 44. Response: NMFS agrees and has implements Amendment 91. Comment 44: Under Amendment 91, changed the IPA requirement in the Additionally, this IPA requirement is there is no opportunity for a substantive final rule, at § 679.21(f)(12)(iii)(B)(3)(i), consistent with National Standard 9. review of the IPAs by either NMFS or to reflect the Council motion. National Standard 9 states that the Council, and no analysis of expected Comment 41: The final rule, at conservation and management measures performance is conducted by NMFS in § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(D), should include the shall, to the extent practicable, (A) approving the plans. The IPA criteria that NMFS would use to minimize bycatch and (B) to the extent requirements do not specify the types of disapprove of an IPA as identified in the bycatch cannot be avoided, minimize incentives that must be contained in the preamble (75 FR 14029; March 23, the mortality of such bycatch. This plans. Under this review process, only 2010). The reasons for disapproval suggests the general goal is to avoid the Council addresses the efficacy of the should also include where the IPA lacks bycatch and if it cannot be avoided, incentive programs, yet the incentive a component intended to prevent the minimize its mortality. In other words, programs submitted to NMFS may not sector from exceeding the performance the fact that part (B) uses the word be the same programs initially standard. As the performance standard ‘‘avoided’’ suggests that that word submitted to the Council. In effect, no applies to all members of a sector who accurately encapsulates the principal one, including the public, NMFS, and participate in IPAs, rather than to each aim of part (A) of National Standard 9. the Council, has the opportunity to IPA individually, the IPAs should be Therefore, the requirement to avoid assess the efficacy of the final incentive required to include provisions to keep bycatch is consistent with National programs submitted to NMFS. the entire sector below the performance Standard 9’s parameters, namely, Moreover, the Council has no authority standard. This is particularly important bycatch must be minimized to the to approve or deny the IPAs. An FMP in the event that vessels in any one extent practicable. Moreover, amendment would have to be initiated sector participate in more than one IPA. Amendment 91 is designed to minimize to change the requirements. And, this criteria should also be added bycatch to the extent practicable, as Response: The comment is correct to the final rule at required by National Standard 9, and that there is no process to review the § 679.21(f)(12)(v)(D)(1)(ii) for the IPAs are one aspect in achieving that potential efficacy of the IPAs prior to disapproval of a proposed amendment goal. the first year of implementation. After to an IPA. Comment 43: The IPAs operate the first year of implementation, Response: NMFS disagrees that outside of regulatory control, and we substantive review of the IPAs will additional criteria for disapproval have no assurances that actual bycatch occur annually as part of the Council’s should be specified in the regulations. will be any lower than the limits placed public process and will be based on the The requirements in the regulations that in regulation. performance of the IPAs. The IPA an IPA must meet for NMFS approval Response: The IPAs will not operate annual report is the primary tool are directly related to the Council outside of regulatory control. through which the Council will evaluate motion, and NMFS will disapprove an Regulations establish the performance whether its goals for the IPAs are being IPA that does not meet these based requirements that each IPA must met. The IPA annual report must requirements. The proposed rule accomplish. Any number of different contain: (1) A comprehensive preamble provides examples of ways incentive plans could meet these description of the incentive measures in that an IPA would not meet the regulatory requirements. The effect in the previous year; (2) a requirements specified in the requirements for the IPA are description of how these incentive regulations, but these are just examples performance based because fishery measures affected individual vessels; (3) and there are other ways NMFS may participants have more tools available to an evaluation of whether incentive decide an IPA does not meet the them to create incentives to minimize measures were effective in achieving regulatory requirements. Additionally, bycatch at the vessel level than could be salmon savings beyond levels that under § 679.21(f)(12)(iii)(B)(3)(v), an IPA proscribed through Federal regulation. would have been achieved in the must describe how the IPA ensures that As designed, an IPA can be more absence of the measures; and (4) a the operator of each vessel governed by responsive and adaptive than Federal description of any amendments to the the IPA will manage his or her Chinook regulations and can use tools not terms of the IPA that were approved by salmon bycatch to keep total bycatch available to managers, such as fees and NMFS since the last annual report and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53040 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

the reasons that the amendments to the performance under the IPAs. Without an number of different incentive plans IPA were made. analysis of the IPAs, there is no could meet these objectives. As The proposed economic data justification for allowing a higher cap if designed, an IPA can be more collection program, once implemented, IPAs are in place. The agency argues responsive and adaptive than Federal would provide information to the that the IPAs need not be analyzed regulations and can use tools not analysts and the Council for because it is the cap levels themselves available to Federal managers, such as determining the effectiveness of the which are being analyzed. One must fees and penalties. IPAs were included IPAs. The data collection program will then assume that the Council has as a performance-based provision, and focus on (1) evaluating the effectiveness effectively chosen a 60,000 hard cap. the Federal regulations are flexible in of the IPA incentives, the PSC limits, Assuming arguendo that this is the case, allowing the pollock fleet to modify the and the performance standard in terms the Council’s rhetoric does not match its IPAs as performance information of minimizing salmon bycatch in times action. In deliberations and in follow-up becomes available to ensure that the of high and low levels of salmon to the public, Council members have IPAs meet the goals in Amendment 91. abundance, and (2) evaluating how stressed that this is not really a 60,000 IPA performance will be reviewed Amendment 91 affects where, when, hard cap because of the IPAs and the annually (see response to comment 44). and how pollock fishing and salmon performance standard. If the IPAs are If information becomes available to bycatch occur. The proposed data truly insignificant enough such that indicate that Amendment 91 is not collection program would also provide they need not be analyzed in the EIS, providing the expected Chinook salmon data for NMFS and the Council to study they also cannot be justification for the savings, NMFS will work with the and verify conclusions drawn by two scenario approach. Council to take additional actions to industry in the IPA annual reports. Due Response: NMFS disagrees. As minimize Chinook salmon bycatch to to the complex nature of economic data explained in EIS chapter 9, as long as the extent practicable. collection, the data collection program the EIS analyzes and discloses the Additionally, requiring, as the will be implemented after Amendment consequences of adopting the PSC limits comment suggests, that fishery 91. specified in the alternatives, and the participants finalize an IPA years before By design, IPAs are adaptive and can IPAs are a feature of the alternative that it would be used in order for it to be be modified as necessary. The IPAs may provides additional incentives to avoid analyzed would remove the adaptive be amended in response to the Council’s Chinook salmon bycatch within these nature of the IPAs and therefore remove review to better achieve the program cap levels, the Secretary of Commerce some of its effectiveness. And, doing so goals. Furthermore, if analysis prepared can approve and implement would not have changed the analysis of after the incentive plans are in effect Amendment 91 without an analysis in the environmental impacts. demonstrates that the Council’s goals the EIS of the specific IPAs the pollock Non-Chinook Bycatch are not being met, then NMFS and the industry may submit. Council could re-initiate analysis of The EIS analyzes the environmental Comment 47: The section at alternative Chinook salmon bycatch impacts of Chinook salmon bycatch at § 679.21(g)(2)(iii)(C) on ICA Chum management measures and recommend the 60,000 and 47,591 Chinook salmon Salmon Savings Area Notices should be revised or new management measures in PSC limits. This analysis provides the re-written to more accurately describe the future. best available information on the the original intention of Amendment 84. Comment 45: It is important that the predicted impacts of bycatch at these While the twice weekly notices are public review and objectively assess levels because these PSC limits are the required, ICA Chum Salmon Savings how the IPAs are functioning. The maximum amount of bycatch that could Area closures only occur if and when qualitative approach suggested in the be caught in any given year. The EIS areas with bycatch in excess of the proposed rule is not adequate. The final discusses the function of the sector-level based rate, as described in paragraph rule should recommend that an IPA and performance standard to prevent each (g)(2)(iii)(B), are identified. The its associated annual report contain sector from exceeding its portion of sentence, ‘‘For any ICA Salmon Savings objective, measurable, specific, and 47,951 in more than three years in any Area notice, the maximum total area verifiable quantitative values or seven consecutive years. Note that since closed must be at least 3,000 square estimates for each of the IPA the performance standard is on a sector miles for ICA Chum Salmon Area components. basis, if a given sector exceeded its closures’’ is confusing and does not Response: NMFS agrees that careful performance standard and fished up to accurately reflect the original intention review and assessment of the IPAs are its PSC allocation, total bycatch would of the 3,000 square mile standard. The important. The Council motion still be below 60,000 Chinook salmon. original intention was to assure that the specified the requirements for the IPA Bycatch could only reach 60,000 ICA, not the notice, contain language annual report to the Council and no Chinook salmon in a given year if each that allows for the maximum areas changes to these requirements were sector fished up to its PSC allocation. available for a Chum Salmon Savings made in the final rule. The proposed Therefore, the performance standard is Area closure to be no less than 3,000 economic data collection program that the tool that will prevent bycatch from square miles. There was never an the Council and NMFS are developing exceeding, on average, the historical 10- intention to require 3,000 square miles is designed to provide quantitative year average of 47,591 Chinook salmon. be closed by each notice as this sentence information to evaluate how an IPA The EIS makes no assumptions as to may be interpreted to mean. influences a vessel’s operational whether the IPAs will be effective; Response: Substantive revisions to the decisions to avoid Chinook salmon rather, the IPA component is an regulations at § 679.21(g) governing the bycatch. innovative approach that is designed to non-Chinook salmon portions of the Comment 46: The EIS does not provide incentives for each vessel to VRHS ICA are not within the scope of analyze the IPAs, which were relied avoid bycatch at all times with the goal this final rule. Revisions to the upon to justify Amendment 91. NEPA of reducing bycatch below the PSC management of chum salmon bycatch in requires that IPAs be analyzed as limits. The requirements for an IPA are the Bering Sea pollock fishery was not alternatives within the EIS if selection performance based (i.e., they address considered among the alternatives of a higher hard cap is based on what an IPA should accomplish); any analyzed for Amendment 91. The

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53041

Council currently is analyzing requirements for a PSD program permit able to view all the areas required with alternatives to address chum salmon may apply to NMFS to become an a minimal amount of equipment. bycatch, and NMFS will request that it authorized distributor. To date, only one Additionally, while the requirement consider these comments in developing authorized distributor, SeaShare, is for a census of salmon will be the same its alternatives and analysis. permitted to handle donated salmon. for catcher/processors, motherships, and Comment 48: The last sentence in Because of the logistics of handling and shoreside processors, the duties of an § 679.21(g)(2)(iii)(E) states that ‘‘Bycatch shipping the fish, and the limited observer differ. The observers aboard rates for Chinook salmon must be resources for the program, only Pacific catcher/processors and motherships calculated separately from non-Chinook Northwest residents have benefited from must conduct species composition salmon, and cooperatives must be the donated salmon. The PSD program sampling while the sorting of catch is assigned to tiers based on non-Chinook is currently a voluntary program, with occurring. Therefore, observers may not salmon bycatch.’’ This sentence is not participants paying the cost of handling be able to monitor the sorting at all necessary and should be removed. the fish. Having more authorized times due to their other duties. Video Response: NMFS concurs and distributors that could provide donated monitoring is required to verify all removed this sentence in the final rule. salmon to Western Alaska communities salmon are sorted from the catch into This requirement does not appear in would be a good way to reduce salmon the appropriate storage container prior current regulations governing the VRHS waste in the pollock fishery. More to entering the processing area of the ICA and was added in the proposed rule information about the PSD program is factory and remain in the storage in an attempt to clarify how the ICA available on the NMFS Alaska Region container until removed under the would operate with the removal of Web site (http://alaskafisheries.noaa. direction of the observer. The primary regulations related to Chinook salmon. gov/ram/psd.htm). duties for observers assigned to However, the intent of the regulations in shoreside processors differ from the this paragraph is clear without this Equipment and Operational observer duties on a catcher/processor additional sentence. Requirements or mothership. While the offload is PSD Program Comment 51: The proposed rule, at occurring at a shoreside processor, § 679.28(j)(1)(viii), specifies that a video observers ensure that all salmon are Comment 49: The proposed rule, at monitor is needed for viewing ‘‘within properly sorted from the catch and are § 679.21(c)(2)(i)(D), requires catcher/ the tank.’’ Because salmon are sorted not required to complete other duties processors and motherships to ensure from the catch after the catch is during an offload. that no salmon of any species pass the removed from fish storage tanks, there is Comment 53: The video system will observer sample collection point. This no reason to require a camera in a fish work well to augment the observer’s role seems to prohibit salmon from passing storage tank. The final rule should as a salmon census monitor. Proposed the observer sample collection point remove the phrase ‘‘within the tank.’’ regulations at § 679.28(j) require the and into the factory area, yet salmon installation of a video system to allow Response: NMFS agrees and has intended for the PSD program must be observers to view all areas where processed and frozen, and these revised the final rule to eliminate the salmon might be sorted. Observers ‘‘ activities take place in the factory area. requirement to display the activities would be able to randomly scan the ’’ The final rule should clearly indicate within the tank . The final rule, at monitors to assure proper handling of that it is acceptable for crew to process § 679.28(j)(1)(viii), clarifies that the the salmon. If the vessel reported and freeze donation program salmon in purpose of the 16-bit video monitor is salmon bycatch numbers from the the factory areas after the salmon have to enable the observer to view all areas unobserved periods that varied from been counted. where the sorting of salmon of any those of the observed periods, the Response: NMFS disagrees that a species takes place, in addition to the observer could review the video to change in the final rule is necessary to salmon contained in the storage determine whether salmon were being allow for the transfer or processing of container. missed by the crew. salmon under the PSD program, at Comment 52: The preamble states (75 Response: NMFS agrees. The § 679.26. The final rule, at FR14029–14030; March 23, 2010) that electronic monitoring systems are a tool § 679.21(c)(2)(i)(A), requires that the NMFS would use the same method for for the observers to use to determine operators of catcher/processors or accounting for Chinook salmon bycatch whether proper sorting occurs during motherships must first sort salmon for all AFA sectors, yet the video periods when they may not be able to bycatch into an approved salmon monitoring requirement applies only to monitor and verify that no salmon have storage location. Once the observer has the catcher/processor and mothership been removed from the salmon storage determined the salmon count and sectors. The inshore sector should have container before they have the collected biological samples, the salmon the option to use the same video system opportunity to count the number of can be removed from the area, as as a method of ensuring compliance. salmon and collect biological samples described in § 679.21(c)(1), and can then Response: NMFS disagrees that the and scientific data. be processed for the PSD program. inshore sector should have the option to Comment 50: Salmon taken as use video monitoring. In the EIS, NMFS Tables 47a to 47d to Part 679 bycatch are either discarded at sea or examined the possibility of requiring Comment 54: It is vitally important processed for food banks in the Pacific video at shoreside processors but found that NMFS provide the vessel owners, Northwest, far from the Western Alaska that this was not a reasonable option listed in table 47c, with the total pounds families which depend on salmon. because factories are so complex that it of pollock being accredited to each Response: NMFS encourages would be logistically impossible to vessel during the three AFA inshore participation in the PSD program to cover all areas where a salmon could history years, 1995 to 1997. These reduce waste and provide high quality appear in the factory. On the other pound estimates must be compared to protein to those in need. Regulations at hand, the areas to be monitored on the owner’s records and the vessel § 679.26 require any salmon donated to catcher/processors and motherships are owners must be provided the be handled by an authorized distributor. limited in space and complexity. Thus, opportunity to provide contradictory Any organization that can meet the electronic monitoring systems will be information to NMFS.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53042 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Response: NMFS cannot provide the Following the passage of the AFA by programs. Further, the regulations AFA catcher vessel’s catch history due Congress in 1998, NMFS compiled the implementing the AFA-related FMP to the confidentiality requirements Official AFA Records for each vessel amendments provided an opportunity established by the State of Alaska on potentially qualifying for an AFA for, and placed the burden on, each fish ticket data (AS 16.05.815). Under permit. As specified at § 679.4(l), the applicant for AFA permits to correct any Federal regulations at § 679.62(a), the information included vessel ownership, inconsistencies with the Official AFA Regional Administrator used State of documentation of harvests made by Record, including catch histories. Alaska fish ticket records to establish vessels during the AFA qualifying Following that appeals process and in the Official AFA Record to determine periods, vessel characteristics, and response to challenges by cooperatives, (1) a catcher vessel’s eligibility for an documented amounts of pollock NMFS revised the Official AFA Record. AFA permit and (2) a catcher vessel’s processed by pollock processors during NMFS responded to each challenge that official AFA inshore cooperative catch the AFA qualifying period. For inshore provided individual vessel catch history. Due to the confidential nature catcher vessels, individual catch histories as evidence of discrepancies of these records, NMFS does not release histories were required to determine between cooperative records and the or verify historic catch data for an fishery eligibility and annual catch Official AFA Record. In order to verify individual AFA pollock catcher vessel. allocations under the AFA. NMFS relied claims, NMFS compared the State of Alaska fish tickets document on State of Alaska fish tickets to cooperatives records to the Official AFA the harvest of fish sold, discarded, or establish a comprehensive account of all Record and, if necessary, observer retained by the fisherman for personal groundfish catch by catcher vessel information. In several cases this vetting use. The information collected includes because fish tickets are required for any process resulted in corrections to the species composition, weight, gear used, groundfish landed in State waters or Official AFA Record and the date harvested, who caught the fish, delivered to plants or processing vessels calculations of a cooperative’s allocation processor’s license code, and other operated in State waters. See response of Bering Sea pollock TAC. Therefore, information specific to each fishery. As to comment 54. the quota share percentages in Column records of purchase between the Since the 2000 directed pollock D of Table 47c, which were derived processors and the fishermen, fish ticket fishing season, the catch histories of from the Official AFA Record, represent data are confidential. The owners of fish individual AFA eligible vessels have the best information available for tickets can request fishing records from been used to calculate each allocating Chinook salmon PSC limits. any local office of ADF&G. In order to cooperative’s percentage allocation of The creation of another appeals process receive a vessel’s catch history, vessel the inshore sector’s portion of the TAC. or other revisions to the pollock quota owners that are not also owners of the NMFS converts individual vessel catch share allocations that were established histories into annual quota share under the AFA and relied on by NMFS fish tickets must obtain confidentiality percentages assigned to each vessel in a to allocate pollock to cooperatives for wavers. AFG&G clears the waivers prior process described in regulation at the past 10 years are beyond the scope to releasing the certified fish tickets. § 679.62(a). The annual Bering Sea of this action. Should the Council Comment 55: The proposed rule, at pollock allocation to each inshore determine that further refinement of column D of Table 47c to part 679, cooperative is equal to the aggregated Table 47c is necessary, additional inaccurately lists the percent of inshore member vessel quota share percentages. rulemaking would be required. sector pollock assigned to each catcher The resulting cooperative percentages Furthermore, NMFS disagrees that the vessel. AFA catcher vessels have relied are then applied to the inshore sector’s percentages listed in Table 47c on cooperative catch data to determine portion of the Bering Sea pollock TAC disadvantage vessel owners. Under each vessel’s individual share of the to determine each cooperative’s pollock Amendment 91, NMFS uses these vessel inshore sector’s pollock allocation. The allocations. level percentage assignments listed in shares of each catcher vessel’s inshore Each year NMFS announces the Table 47c to calculate the opt-out pollock allocation in Table 47c differ harvest specification for the directed allocation at § 679.21(f)(4)(i)(C) or open significantly from cooperative records pollock fishery in the Bering Sea access fishery allocation, the annual and from the percentages some vessel subarea. NMFS posts the sum of threshold amount at § 679.21(f)(6)(ii)(C), owners and cooperatives previously member vessel’s official catch histories, and the IPA minimum participation for believed NMFS had applied to pollock the percentage of inshore sector catcher vessels under section allocations. NMFS should afford each allocation, and the corresponding § 679.21(f)(12)(i)(A)(3). NMFS allocates catcher vessel owner the opportunity to allocation for each inshore pollock transferable Chinook salmon PSC challenge the percentage of the inshore cooperative and open access fishery, allocations to each inshore cooperative, sector’s pollock allocation because these should one exist. These tables are not to the individual vessels. The values are used to calculate vessel-level posted on the Alaska Region Web site management of PSC allocations is Chinook salmon limits and may (http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/ handled within each cooperative determine a vessel’s ability to harvest sustainablefisheries/afa/afa_sf.htm). through private contracts with member pollock. To not do so will unjustly NMFS previously provided an vessels and such transactions are not disadvantage many catcher vessel appeals process under which the within the scope of this action. owners. owners of vessels and processors could Comment 56: Chinook salmon PSC Response: NMFS disagrees that appeal NMFS’ determinations relating limits are based on the historical changes are necessary to the percent of to AFA eligibility or AFA inshore pollock harvest; therefore, it is inshore pollock assigned to each catcher cooperative allocations. Both the important that these figures be identical vessel in column D of Table 47c to part emergency interim rule (65 FR 380, to the cooperative’s records. Carry the 679. The values NMFS assigned to each January 5, 2000) and the final rule percentages on the table to four decimal AFA eligible inshore catcher vessel implementing AFA related amendments places (ten-thousandths place) rather were calculated from the Official AFA (67 FR 79692, December 30, 2002) than two. Record, defined at § 679.2, which established an appeals process similar Response: NMFS agrees and has represents the best scientific to the process for appealing individual revised the final rule to include the information available. fishing quota and license limitation percentages in Column D of Table 47c

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53043

in four decimal places. NMFS notes that related to Chinook salmon abundance or harvest and process the annual pollock the Chinook salmon associated with other conditions. The uncertainty and TAC while, at the same time, each vessel has not changed. variability in Chinook salmon bycatch minimizing to the extent practicable the led the Council to create a program with fishery’s bycatch of Chinook salmon— Amendment 91 a combination of management measures all as required by the Magnuson-Stevens Comment 57: Use an emergency that together achieve its objective to Act and the national standards regulation to immediately implement a minimize bycatch to the extent embodied therein. hard cap of 32,500 Chinook salmon. practicable in all years while providing Response: NMFS acknowledges the This lower cap level will provide the fleet the flexibility to harvest the comment. protection to salmon populations while pollock TAC. Comment 61: The Amendment 91 text allowing the pollock fishery to operate. Since Amendment 91 divides the PSC should be clarified. As written, one of Response: Emergency action is not limit between the A and B seasons and the Amendment 91 changes to the FMP warranted at this time in light of the allocates the PSC limits to the sectors, executive summary states ‘‘Attainment reductions from the high Chinook cooperatives, CDQ groups, and, of a Chinook salmon PSC allocation salmon bycatch years. In 2008, the potentially, non-transferable allocations, closes directed fishing for pollock in the pollock fleet caught 19,928 Chinook the actual allocations are small and Bering Sea subarea.’’ It would be more salmon. In 2009, the pollock fleet caught could be limiting to an entity that is accurate to State that ‘‘Under certain 12,410 Chinook salmon. For the 2010 trying to avoid bycatch in a high circumstances, attainment of a sector’s pollock A season, and the pollock B bycatch year. In these years, the or sub-sector’s Chinook salmon PSC season that opened on June 10, bycatch flexibility of the higher PSC limit is allocation may close directed fishing for rates are comparable to the low bycatch necessary for each sector, cooperative, pollock by that sector or sub-sector in rates in 2009. or CDQ group to harvest its pollock the Bering Sea subarea.’’ Comment 58: The Council has allocation. Thus, Amendment 91 Response: NMFS disagrees. justified a higher cap on the basis that provides the flexibility for the fleet Additional clarification is not required they must balance National Standard 9 potentially to harvest its TAC, which is because the executive summary with National Standard 1, which one aspect of achieving optimum yield provides readers a general description of requires that conservation and in the long term. Amendment 91 the BSAI groundfish fisheries and the management measures prevent balances this flexibility with the conservation and management measures overfishing, while achieving, on a performance standard and IPA promulgated under the FMP. The continuing basis, the optimum yield components that provide incentives for Chinook salmon bycatch management from each fishery for the United States each vessel to avoid Chinook salmon at program is described in detail at section fishing industry. However, the EIS all times while fishing for pollock. 3.6.2 of the FMP, while other aspects of shows that even at the lowest cap level Comment 59: Amendment 91 is in the program are specified in this final analyzed, 29,300 Chinook salmon, direct conflict with NMFS’ stated rule implementing Amendment 91. Also optimum yield was achieved overall management goal of avoiding bycatch of note that the term ‘‘sub-sector’’ does not throughout the time period analyzed in a prohibited species like Chinook appear in the FMP, in the regulations at the EIS. This time period includes the salmon. The hard cap amounts do not 50 CFR Part 679, or in the Council’s highest bycatch on record, and the three reduce bycatch but are an allowance for final action recommending Amendment highest bycatch levels in the past higher bycatch. 91. eighteen years, so the fact that optimum Response: NMFS disagrees. Comment 62: Amendment 91 appears yield was achieved even with these Amendment 91 achieves the stated to be more weighted to the concerns of bycatch levels suggests that a bycatch management goal to minimize Chinook the profitability of industrial fisheries cap at the lowest level analyzed, 29,300 salmon bycatch to the extent practicable than to the real impacts to communities, Chinook salmon, is indeed practicable while achieving optimum yield by the subsistence way of life, and the for the pollock fleet, and would comport maintaining flexibility for the pollock protection of Chinook salmon stocks. with National Standard 1. This being fleet to harvest the TAC. The PSC limits Rules need to be put in place that the case, a 60,000 hard cap is not are not an allowance for higher bycatch, prioritize the conservation of Chinook necessary to meet National Standard 1 they are one aspect of the program that salmon returns over the continuation of or the practicability requirement of imposes an absolute limit on Chinook the pollock fishery in a way that allows National Standard 9, and in fact seems salmon bycatch. Amendment 91 also them to remove too many Chinook designed more to protect the pollock contains a performance standard to salmon. fishery’s revenues than the health of ensure that Chinook salmon bycatch Response: Amendment 91 prioritizes Western Alaska’s salmon and those who will not exceed, on average, the recent the conservation of Chinook salmon by depend upon them. 10-year average Chinook salmon the pollock fishery. However, it does so Response: Amendment 91 complies bycatch and will be much lower than in a way that provides the pollock fleet with National Standards 9 and 1, and bycatch levels several years prior to and the flexibility to determine how best to the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit is including 2007. The IPAs will provide avoid Chinook salmon while harvesting one component of this program. In incentives for each vessel to avoid pollock. In developing this program, developing this program, the Council Chinook salmon bycatch at all times. NMFS and the Council analyzed and recognized that the number of Chinook Therefore, Amendment 91 aims to considered the impacts to communities, salmon caught as bycatch in the pollock achieve greater reductions in Chinook subsistence, and Chinook salmon stocks fishery is highly variable from year to salmon bycatch than the PSC limit and in the EIS and RIR (see ADDRESSES). year, from sector to sector, and even performance standard. Comment 63: The Council’s rejection from vessel to vessel. Current Comment 60: Members of the Bering of bycatch proposals submitted by the information about Chinook salmon is Sea pollock fishery remain cautiously most affected communities is not insufficient to determine the reasons for optimistic that Amendment 91 and its reassuring that future fishery high or low encounters of Chinook implementing regulations will provide management in the Arctic will be salmon in the pollock fishery or the the incentives and tools necessary to responsive to community concerns and degree to which encounter rates are enable the pollock industry to fully that protective measures will be

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53044 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

implemented to avoid negatively or the unpredictability of these rates behavior and fishing patterns that are impacting critical stocks of fish on (see ADDRESSES). Additionally, as the easily changed (e.g., time area closures). which Arctic coastal communities rely. analysis shows, if the low PSC limit Response: Amendment 91 is premised Response: The Council’s Fishery were allocated to sectors, cooperatives, on that fact that the pollock fleet can Management Plan for Fish Resources of and CDQ groups, it could result in and will reduce bycatch substantially the Arctic Management Area includes in allocations so small that it could below the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC its management policy the use of effectively preclude pollock fishing by a limit and is specifically designed, adaptive management through vessel or group of vessels. On the other through the performance standard and community-based or rights-based hand, not allocating the PSC limit could IPAs, to provide incentives for each management. The objectives of the plan result in a race for fish, which would vessel to change fishing behavior to include Alaska Native and community undermine the rationalized management avoid Chinook salmon at all times. With considerations. In managing Arctic of the AFA and the current pollock Amendment 91, additional command fisheries, the Council promotes fishery management. and control management measures, such management measures that, while Comment 66: The pollock fleet’s as time area closures, are not necessary meeting conservation objectives, are Chinook salmon bycatch significantly to minimize bycatch to the extent designed to avoid significant disruption impairs the sustainability of western practicable. of existing social and economic Alaska Chinook salmon runs. Comment 70: Overall, the proposed structures and incorporate local and Response: As explained in the EIS rule provides a good overview of the traditional knowledge in fishery analysis, the degree to which levels of issues and challenges involving salmon management, encouraging Alaska Native bycatch are related to declining returns bycatch reduction in the pollock fishery. participation and consultation in fishery of Chinook salmon is unknown (see The proposed rule clearly presents and management. ADDRESSES). While Chinook salmon describes in sufficient detail the Before any fishery may develop in the bycatch in the pollock fishery may be a measures managers intend to use to Arctic, an analysis must be provided of contributing factor in the decline of address salmon bycatch in the pollock the historic commercial, sport, or Chinook salmon, the absolute numbers fishery while assisting the public in understanding the potential impacts of subsistence harvest of the potential of the ocean bycatch that would have target and bycatch species and of the those measures. returned to western Alaska are expected customary and traditional subsistence Response: NMFS acknowledges this to be relatively small due to ocean use patterns and evaluation of impacts comment. mortality and the large number of other on existing users. The combination of Comment 71: The Council justified a river systems contributing to the total the FMP’s policy and objectives with higher cap on the basis of the possibility Chinook bycatch. Although the reasons the Council’s efforts to work with Native of a ‘‘lightning strike’’—or a single haul for the decline of Chinook salmon are communities through its Rural Outreach of pollock with a high amount of not completely understood, scientists Committee, should ensure concerns of Chinook salmon bycatch. The Council believe they are predominately natural. Arctic communities are considered in did not consider other methods to Changes in ocean and river conditions, Arctic fisheries management decisions. address this concern, such as a bycatch including unfavorable shifts in Arctic communities will be able to work pool in which each vessel contributes a temperatures and food sources, likely with the Council to ensure sustainable portion of their bycatch allocation to caused poor survival of Chinook management of Arctic marine fish cover a vessel that has a lightning strike salmon. resources. event. Comment 64: The salmon bycatch in Comment 67: Cease operation of the Response: The Council considered the pollock fishery is impacting the pollock fishery until the Chinook public testimony that lightning strikes Copper River salmon fisheries. As salmon rebound to acceptable levels. of Chinook salmon bycatch occur, Chinook salmon runs decrease Response: NMFS acknowledges this especially in the catcher vessel fleet, in elsewhere, the harvest pressure on comment; however, the closure of the understanding the unpredictability of Copper River stocks increase. Bering Sea pollock fishery is beyond the Chinook salmon bycatch. To address Response: NMFS acknowledges that scope of this action. this, Amendment 91 does not allocate salmon fishing effort may shift from Comment 68: The burden of Chinook salmon PSC to vessels. In a areas with low Chinook salmon returns conservation should be shared with the sense, the Chinook salmon PSC to more favorable fishing areas; pollock fleet. Rural subsistence users allocations are a type of bycatch pool in however, many factors likely contribute have carried this burden by themselves that they will be allocated to the to decreases in run strength. ADF&G for too long. In many parts of rural mothership sector, the catcher/processor manages the Copper River salmon Alaska commercial, sport, and sector, inshore cooperatives, and CDQ fisheries to address conservation subsistence fisheries have been severely groups to manage among participating concerns. restricted, yet escapement goals are not vessels. Comment 65: No data was presented met. Comment 72: Remand the Chinook to the Council or made available to the Response: NMFS acknowledges this salmon bycatch issue back to the public which would support the comment. Council with a strong statement about rationale that a low cap and low Comment 69: Available evidence the failure of Amendment 91 to allocations could preclude pollock suggests that practicable and easily adequately protect and conserve fishing by vessels or groups of vessels. achievable ways to reduce bycatch Chinook salmon stocks, to provide for Response: NMFS disagrees. The EIS below Amendment 91 cap levels exist. subsistence uses (including the small and RIR analysis show that a low PSC Amendment 91 falsely relies upon a scale in-river commercial fisheries), and limit could limit the pollock fishery presumption that further reductions in to meet the United States’ obligation harvests below the pollock TAC in bycatch are not practicable; however, no under the Yukon River Salmon many years because a low PSC limit evidence is presented in the EIS or Agreement. Acknowledge NMFS’ would not accommodate the high Council record that this is the case. emergency regulatory authority under variability in Chinook salmon encounter Evidence suggests that the high bycatch the Magnuson-Stevens Act should rates experienced in the pollock fishery, years may be a function of fishing bycatch reach 32,000 Chinook salmon

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53045

during the period of the remand. preventing future bycatch from ever tagged fish released from these stocks, Continuing under the status quo while exceeding 60,000 Chinook salmon. indicates that the take of these ESA- the Council reconsiders Amendment 91 Comment 74: All quotas should be cut listed stocks in the BSAI groundfish is far more acceptable and presents less by 50 percent. You are starving all fisheries is rare. of a risk to Chinook salmon stocks and marine life that needs fish to stay alive. The final rule will improve the the subsistence way of life than a 60,000 It is disgusting that you allow the collection of Chinook salmon Chinook salmon PSC limit. The Council commercial fish profiteers to walk away information by requiring the retention, can act quickly on a remand because the with one million dollars for a week’s sorting, and counting of every Chinook EIS analyzed a full range of alternatives. work. Those fish belong to all salmon in every haul or fishing trip. Response: On May 14, 2010, NMFS Americans, not just local profiteers. Each Chinook salmon with a clipped approved Amendment 91. As Response: Amendment 91 will adipose fin, indicating a coded-wire tag demonstrated in the EIS and ROD, minimize Chinook salmon bycatch to may be present, will be sampled for Amendment 91 minimizes Chinook the extent practicable and reduce the coded-wire tags. Because of this salmon bycatch to the extent practicable impacts of the pollock fleet on Chinook improved sampling process, NMFS will and achieves optimum yield on a salmon. The environmental impacts of know the actual number of coded-wire continuing basis. NMFS has determined Amendment 91 and its alternatives were tagged ESA-listed salmon taken by the that Amendment 91 is consistent with analyzed in the EIS (see ADDRESSES). Bering Sea pollock fishery. the National Standards and other Comment 75: The Council and NMFS Comment 76: The transboundary applicable law. have an obligation to consider the escapement goals were not met in 2007 Amendment 91, through the IPA Endangered Species Act (ESA) in setting or 2008; therefore, the statement that component, is intended to result in the bycatch caps. The effects of Chinook ‘‘. . . salmon escapement targets are Chinook salmon bycatch levels below salmon bycatch on the viability of listed being met in general . . .’’ is not true. the PSC limit and performance Pacific Northwest Chinook salmon The transboundary escapement goal was standard. Amendment 91 is a highly species are unknown; therefore, take only met in one out of three years innovative program, however, there is may exceed permissible levels. because of massive curtailment of the inherent uncertainty over how effective Response: NMFS and the Council subsistence fishing and a commercial this novel approach will be in considered the ESA in setting the PSC fishing stand down. minimizing bycatch over all years and at limits. NMFS Alaska Region conducted Response: NMFS acknowledges this all levels of Chinook salmon and a formal section 7 consultation under comment. The EIS and RIR contain pollock abundance. NMFS will be the ESA for Amendment 91 with the information on the Yukon River monitoring the bycatch closely during NMFS Northwest region. In the escapement through 2009 (see the season, and if information becomes December 2, 2009, biological opinion ADDRESSES). available to indicate that Amendment (see ADDRESSES), the Administrator, Comment 77: The Council process in 91 is not providing the expected NMFS Northwest Region, determined adopting Amendment 91 allowed Chinook salmon savings, NMFS will that fishing activities conducted under blatant conflicts of interest and work with the Council to take additional Amendment 91 and its implementing disregarded the Obama administration’s actions to minimize Chinook salmon regulations are not likely to jeopardize position on conflict of interest bycatch to the extent practicable. the continued existence of any standards. The pollock industry was Comment 73: Amendment 91 rewards endangered or threatened salmon represented by voting Council members the pollock fleet for less than species or result in the destruction or with past and/or future financial ties to responsible fishing behavior practiced adverse modification of critical habitat. the pollock fishery. When one distills by some of the fleet in 2006 and 2007. There is no permissible level of take the Council’s decision, it is clear that it Amendment 91 is based, in part, on for ESA-listed salmon. The take that is was not guided by science, facts, or law, rationale and bycatch averages that expected to occur with the action is but by misplaced policies facilitated by incorporate these high years of established in the incidental take a process that allows for at least the ‘‘voluntary’’ compliance. This ‘‘trust me’’ statement included in the biological appearance of a conflict of interest. approach in VRHS approach has failed opinion for this action. The incidental Response: NMFS disagrees. NOAA miserably. The pollock industry should take statement determined that the Office of General Counsel reviewed all bear the burden of its past excesses amount or extent of expected take of of the financial disclosure forms that rather than reaping rewards. ESA-listed Chinook salmon in the Council members had filed pursuant to Response: Amendment 91 is a direct Bering Sea pollock fishery would be § 600.235(b) and (c)(1), and concluded response to the high Chinook salmon equivalent to the amount of ESA-listed that the action would not have a bycatch in 2006 and 2007, and does not Chinook salmon taken under the significant and predictable effect on a reward the fleet for that bycatch. First, Chinook salmon PSC limits established financial interest disclosed in their the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit is by Amendment 91. If this level of take reports. Therefore, no Council member below the three highest years of bycatch is exceeded, NMFS would be required was precluded from voting. and is approximately half the amount of to reinitiate section 7 consultation. Comment 78: Proposed FMP revisions the highest year, 2007. Second, while Information on the bycatch of ESA- are problematic because they would the VRHS ICA was in place in 2007, listed stocks is from the recovery of create or perpetuate a bycatch standard after that year, the pollock fleet made coded-wire tagged fish from ESA-listed that is inconsistent with the Magnuson- significant changes to the system for stocks. The only ESA-listed stocks that Stevens Act and the accompanying 2008, 2009, and 2010, which, in have been recovered from bycatch in the national standards. Each revision addition to other factors, have resulted BSAI groundfish fisheries are from the utilizes or depends on a requirement some of the lowest Chinook salmon Lower Columbia River and Upper that groundfish fishermen ‘‘avoid’’ the bycatch since 1990. NMFS expects that Willamette River Chinook salmon bycatch of prohibited species including these changes to fishing practices will stocks. All of these recoveries have been Chinook salmon. This mandate goes remain under Amendment 91, and from the Bering Sea pollock fishery. The significantly further than the Amendment 91 provides incentives for frequency of coded-wire tag recovery, in requirement of National Standard 9, further reductions in bycatch while relation to the number of coded-wired which requires fishermen to ‘‘minimize

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53046 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

bycatch to the extent practicable.’’ The Amendment 91 and insisting on the under regulations where catching fish is effect of the proposed revisions would smaller bycatch rates proposed and not possible provides nothing but an be to arbitrarily eliminate the ‘‘to the supported by the most directly impacted opportunity to incur costs. It is the extent practicable’’ qualifier of National communities. catching of fish and the creation of Standard 9; replacing it with language Response: NMFS has complied with economic profits that produces that could jeopardize attainment of all applicable laws, Executive Orders, optimum yield. optimum yield from the fishery as and international obligations in Response: NMFS disagrees with the required by National Standard 1. The approving and implementing commenter’s description of optimum statutory language, minimize to the Amendment 91, as documented in the yield and the statement that the extent practicable, should be utilized in EIS and ROD (see ADDRESSES). proposed regulations make it impossible establishing the regulatory mandate. Comment 80: Amendment 91 does not to catch pollock. National Standard 1 Response: Amendment 91 does not comply with National Standard 8. requires that ‘‘conservation and change prohibited species management Western Alaska communities depend on management measures shall prevent under the FMP, except to implement the Chinook salmon as a subsistence overfishing while achieving, on a specific provisions of the Chinook resource and for commercial fishing. continuing basis, the optimum yield salmon bycatch management program, Every additional fish that escapes the from each fishery for the U.S. fishing as recommended by the Council. pollock fleet will make a difference to industry’’ (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(1)). The Prohibited species, which include communities where fishing is already Magnuson-Stevens Act expressly Pacific halibut, Pacific herring, Pacific severely restricted. The impacts of defines optimum yield in a salmon and steelhead, king crab, and Amendment 91 on the pollock fishery comprehensive manner. Specifically, it Tanner crab, are the most regulated and are minor in comparison. means ‘‘the amount of fish which * * * closely managed category of bycatch. Response: Amendment 91 complies (A) will provide the greatest overall The FMP states that catch of all with National Standard 8. National benefit to the Nation, particularly with prohibited species must be avoided. Standard 8 states, ‘‘Conservation and respect to food production and This is not a new requirement or management measures shall, consistent recreational opportunities, and taking modified language under Amendment with the conservation requirements of into account the protection of marine 91. Amendment 91 only changes the this Act (including the prevention of ecosystems; [and] (B) is prescribed as FMP text in the paragraphs in question overfishing and rebuilding of overfished such on the basis of the maximum to provide for the new regulatory stocks), take into account the sustainable yield from the fishery, as requirement to retain salmon in the importance of fishery resources to reduced by any relevant economic, pollock fishery so that all salmon can be fishing communities by utilizing social, or ecological factor. ***.’’ 16 counted. Changing the FMP’s provision economic and social data based on the U.S.C. 1802(33). that prohibited species must be avoided best scientific information available, in Under National Standard 1, the would require consideration and order to (A) provide for the sustained optimum yield standard must be recommendation by the Council. participation of such communities, and achieved over the long-run but not The FMP is consistent with National (B) to the extent practicable, minimize necessarily with precision each Standard 9. National Standard 9 states adverse economic impacts on such individual fishing year. Accordingly, as that conservation and management communities’’ (16 U.S.C. 1851(a)(8)). the preamble states, achieving optimum measures shall, to the extent practicable, The EIS and RIR analyze the yield in the BSAI groundfish fishery (A) minimize bycatch and (B) to the importance of Chinook salmon and does not equate to ensuring the ability extent bycatch cannot be avoided, pollock resources to fishing to harvest the entire pollock TAC in any minimize the mortality of such bycatch. communities. Amendment 91 mitigates given year. For the BSAI management This suggests the general goal is to avoid the impacts of status quo bycatch on area, NMFS has established that the bycatch, but if it cannot be avoided, to Chinook salmon fishing communities optimum yield is a range from 1.4 to 2.0 minimize bycatch mortality. In other and does not negatively affect the million metric tons (see words, the fact that part (B) uses the sustained participation of these fishing § 679.20(a)(1)(i)). The record indicates word ‘‘avoided’’ suggests that that word communities. Amendment 91 balances that the regulations implementing accurately encapsulates the principal the needs of these communities with the Amendment 91 will not impede the aim of part (A) of National Standard 9. ability to ascertain direct impacts to BSAI groundfish fishery from meeting Therefore, the FMP is consistent with salmon streams from bycaught salmon. this standard. National Standard 9’s parameters, Understanding that this action cannot Comment 82: The Amendment 91 namely, that bycatch must be rebuild salmon streams, this action is PSC limits will not meet the obligations minimized to the extent practicable. likely to return more fish to these under National Standard 9 to reduce For Chinook salmon, Amendment 91, streams than many of the other bycatch, but rather will maintain by design, provides the flexibility for alternatives considered by the Council. bycatch levels that are higher than the fleet potentially to harvest its TAC, Amendment 91 also balances the needs historical averages. which is one aspect of achieving of pollock fishing communities with Response: NMFS disagrees. National optimum yield in the long term. need to minimize Chinook salmon Standard 9 requires that conservation Management of the other prohibited bycatch in developing a program that and management measures shall, to the species is outside the scope of this provides the fleet the flexibility to extent practicable, (A) minimize bycatch action. harvest the pollock TAC. and (B) to the extent bycatch cannot be Comment 79: NOAA has the Comment 81: The description of avoided, minimize the mortality of such responsibility to modify the Council’s National Standard 1 in the preamble is bycatch. Amendment 91 minimizes recommendations to fulfill Federal an inaccurate interpretation of optimum bycatch to the extent practicable. obligations under ANILCA, ESA, Pacific yield. The preamble states that Amendment 91 is more than just a Salmon Treaty, Environmental Justice, providing the opportunity for the fleet 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit. and Federal responsibility to tribal to harvest its TAC is one aspect of Amendment 91 complies with National governments. NOAA should fulfill these achieving optimum yield in the long Standard 9 because the performance obligations by not implementing term. The mere opportunity to fish standard ensures Chinook salmon

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53047

bycatch will not exceed, on average, the the impacts of Chinook salmon bycatch successful prosecution would have a recent 10-year average and will be lower in the Bering Sea pollock fishery and deterrent effect on Chinook salmon than bycatch levels several years prior has taken steps to improve the bycatch violators. In short, since the to and including 2007. Additionally, if collection and analysis of genetic data deterrent effect of the $25,000 fine per the IPAs work as intended, the bycatch starting in the 2011 pollock fishery. vessel per season under § 313(g)(1) is should be well below that amount. If Requiring the pollock industry to pay relatively inconsequential, and given fishery participants do not form any for this research, however, is outside of the length of time and agency resources IPAs, then the 47,591 PSC limit will be the scope of Amendment 91. necessary for successful investigations in effect, which is the approximate 10- Comment 86: Develop and fund a and prosecutions of violations of a fine- year average of Chinook salmon bycatch comprehensive research program to per-salmon-penalty program, any from 1997 to 2006. adaptively manage salmon at all life- prosecution(s) under that program Comment 83: NMFS’ interpretation of stages. This gravel-to-gravel research would not likely result in swift § 210(a)(1)(B) of the AFA in relation to plan, which would emphasize hiring enforcement of salmon bycatch section 402(b)(2) of the Magnuson- and development of local experts, exceedences or the collection of Stevens Act, as described in the would include community-based substantial and timely funds for preamble (75 FR 14032; March 23, salmon research such as habitat research. 2010), is entirely appropriate. Chinook assessments, integration of traditional Comment 88: Reducing bycatch of salmon, as well as other species in the knowledge, in-river and ocean sampling salmon in the commercial groundfish Bering Sea, are public resources held in for genetic stock identification, and fisheries and implementing trust by the Federal Government. As Chinook salmon’s temporal and spatial comprehensive research and monitoring public trust resources, the collective use of ocean habitat. are crucial to maintaining and restoring owners of those resources, the American Response: NMFS agrees that research salmon runs, and should remain a people, have a right to know how those on salmon at all life stages is important priority for NMFS and the Council. and notes that ADF&G, NMFS, the resources are being used or otherwise Response: NMFS acknowledges the University of Alaska, and many other affected. Therefore, NMFS should make comment. available to the public data on not just institutions currently conduct such Comment 89: Although NMFS has Chinook salmon bycatch, but on all research. A gravel-to-gravel research acknowledged the potential for bycatch in the pollock fishery on a plan is outside of the scope of unintended negative consequences of vessel-by-vessel basis. Amendment 91. Response: NMFS acknowledges the Comment 87: Use Magnuson-Stevens Amendment 91 on the northern fur seal comment and notes that making an AFA Act authority, in § 313(g)(1), to levy populations, we urge NMFS to carefully pollock fishing vessel’s bycatch data fines of up to $25,000 per vessel as an monitor this action for any negative available to the public, for species other incentive to reduce bycatch and make effects. The EIS for this action suggests than Chinook salmon, is outside the these funds available to offset costs that a hard cap could benefit the fur seal scope of Amendment 91. including conservation and if the fleet shifts away from pollock prey Comment 84: Amendment 91 can be management measures and much- areas, or the fishery is closed before construed as a limited access allocation needed research. reaching its total allowable catch. of Chinook salmon to the pollock fleet. Response: NMFS and the Council However, it is too early to determine the Accordingly, the Council could use its considered using this provision of the impact of hard caps on fur seals because Magnuson-Stevens Act 303A(e) Magnuson-Stevens Act and determined, of data limitations and the complexity authority to recover the costs of the based on guidance from NOAA Office of of the ecosystem. We encourage caution management, data collection, analysis, General Counsel, that it was not in this approach. and enforcement of the program. appropriate for minimizing Chinook Response: NMFS agrees that much Response: Section 304(d)(2) of the salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea needs to be learned about the potential Magnuson-Stevens Act provides NMFS pollock fishery. Section 313(g)(1) of the effects of the pollock fishery on authority to collect fees for cost recovery Magnuson-Stevens Act authorizes the northern fur seals and about fur seal of a limited access privilege program. Council and NMFS to impose a ‘‘system biology. A description of past and That section specifies that the fee shall of fines’’ on a per-salmon caught basis, ongoing research is available on the not exceed 3 percent of the ex-vessel and to use those fines to offset the costs National Marine Mammal Laboratory’s value of the fish harvested under the of bycatch reduction research. The fine, Web site (http://www.afsc.noaa.gov/ program. This does not apply to the however, is limited to $25,000 per nmml/species/species_nfs.php). This Chinook salmon bycatch management vessel per season. research includes studies that should program because the Chinook salmon The use of the term ‘‘fine’’ in provide additional information incidentally caught in the pollock § 313(g)(1) makes this provision a regarding the pollock fishery fishery are not sold and therefore have penalty-based program. A concern with interactions with northern fur seals. no ex-vessel value. a penalty-based program is that it NMFS is actively pursuing research on Comment 85: Necessary information creates greater problems of proof. To northern fur seals to help us understand on contributions of different Chinook prove a violation, NOAA would have to the reasons for the decline and potential salmon stocks to the bycatch has not demonstrate that the vessel in question threats to the population. The research been determined. The pollock industry had exceeded a specific bycatch level. projects investigate a broad range of should be required to pay for a robust Experience shows that successful topics related to fisheries interactions genetic research program to determine prosecution of this type of case requires around the Pribilof Islands, including the exact Chinook salmon stock a commitment of agency resources that studies to quantify area-specific food contributions as this knowledge is is difficult to sustain. Further, since an habits and animal conditions, describe critical in determining impacts to enforcement action can take a foraging behavior in different various watersheds and communities hit significant amount of time to bring to environments, delineate foraging hard by the decline of Chinook salmon. successful conclusion, there can be no habitats, and model habitat suitability in Response: NMFS agrees that genetic certainty that any fine would be relation to fur seals and their overlap research is important for understanding recovered quickly, or that even a with commercial fisheries.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53048 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Comment 90: Amendment 91 would unharmed. Ongoing experiments to Salmon Bycatch Workgroup. The allow more salmon to be caught as design and perfect excluder devices are Salmon Bycatch Workgroup had bycatch in a single year than would showing promise, and it is hoped that members that represented western enter into the Canadian portion of the they, too, will make significant Alaska, held public meetings, and Yukon River system in any given year’s contributions to industry efforts to keep developed the first draft of the healthy run. This is an insult to Chinook bycatch as low as practicable. alternative set. When NMFS started the Canadian First Nations. The Pacific Response: NMFS acknowledges the EIS scoping process on December 28, Salmon Treaty and First Nation tribes comment. 2007, NMFS initiated the consultation are ignored even though they are Comment 93: Acknowledge the process for this action by mailing letters severely impacted. importance of salmon to ecosystems to Alaska tribal governments, Alaska Response: The substantive issues other than marine. Low Chinook salmon Native corporations, and related involving Chinook salmon bycatch on returns are not only bad for the people organizations. These letters provided the Canadian portion of the Yukon River who depend on them for sustenance and information about the proposed action and the Pacific Salmon Treaty were income, but declining runs present and the EIS process, and solicited considered in the development of substantial negative impacts to river consultation and coordination with Amendment 91. The EIS and RIR for systems, riparian habitat, upland Alaska Native representatives. The this action (see ADDRESSES) recognize watershed habitat, and the ocean primary purpose of scoping is to obtain that Chinook salmon taken as bycatch in nutrient conveyor belt. public comments on the range of the pollock fishery originate from Response: NMFS agrees and alternatives and issues to analyze. Based Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, Canada, acknowledges the comment. on scoping, public testimony, and the and Asian countries along the Pacific Comment 94: Chinook salmon workgroup recommendations, the Rim. Estimates vary, but more than half bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock Council refined the range of alternatives of the Chinook salmon may be destined fishery may lead user groups to give up and developed the analysis over seven for rivers in western Alaska including their way of life. If user groups cannot Council meetings, finalizing the the Yukon River. The EIS and RIR continue to catch more pollock and alternative set and recommending the address the substantive issues involving more salmon, they will starve and die. preferred alternative in April 2009. the portion of Chinook salmon taken as Response: NMFS acknowledges the Western Alaska residents commented bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock comment. that the Draft EIS and RIR poorly fishery that originated from the Yukon Tribal Consultation Issues characterized subsistence and its River. importance to rural user groups. In NMFS acknowledges that in 2007 and Comment 95: Tribes and their leaders response to these comments, NMFS, the 2008, the United States did not meet the were shut out of meaningful Council, and the State of Alaska made Yukon River escapement goals participation in the decision-making significant improvements to this established with Canada by the Yukon process. The Council limited Chinook analysis for the final EIS and RIR (see River Agreement. However, in 2009 the salmon bycatch management options ADDRESSES). This additional analysis United States exceeded these before any significant effort was made to was presented to the Council before escapement goals, allowing for harvest involve Alaskan Native tribes. NMFS they took final action to recommend sharing between the United States and and Council staff’s attempts at outreach Amendment 91. Canada. and government-to-government tribal Comment 96: Subsistence users of the Comment 91: The final rule should consultations were awkward, held too Yukon River, the vast majority of whom acknowledge the current contribution late in the process, and participation are Alaska Native and have the lowest that the VRHS provides to Chinook was limited. As a result, the analysis per capita income in the United States, salmon bycatch reduction efforts, poorly characterized subsistence and its are clearly bearing a disproportionately especially in low abundance years when importance to rural user groups. It is high adverse environmental impact the challenge will be to keep bycatch as evident by their actions that the under Amendment 91. Under the far below the PSC limit as is practicable. majority of Council members paid no concept of Environmental Justice, why The preamble does not explain that meaningful attention to the concerns of does Amendment 91 result in tribal while the VRHS was in place in 2007, the tribes who all spoke with a strong subsistence users bearing virtually all of the highest bycatch year, bycatch likely and unified voice on this issue. the consequences resulting from past, would have been significantly higher Conversely, the Council meetings present, and future wasteful bycatch by without the VRHS. After 2007, major involved many pollock industry the pollock fleet? This violates all modifications were made to the VRHS representatives and presentations. measures of fairness and fails to satisfy that have clearly helped to keep Response: NMFS and the Council any consideration of environmental Chinook salmon bycatch down in 2008, made significant efforts to involve justice. The pollock fleet can best afford 2009, and 2010. Based on the Alaska Native tribes and western Alaska to make sacrifices in order to performance from 2008 to 2010, the residents early in the process. As accomplish meaningful reductions in VRHS remains one of the most effective detailed in the EIS (see ADDRESSES), the Chinook salmon bycatch. tools the industry has to keep Chinook Council conducted extensive outreach Response: NMFS acknowledges the salmon bycatch within acceptable to Alaskan communities to explain this comment. The EIS prepared for this levels. action, the supporting analysis, and the action analyzes the environmental Response: The RIR prepared for this Council decision-making process. In justice impacts of this action (see action contains a complete description conjunction with the Council outreach, ADDRESSES). of the VRHS, its performance, and NMFS consulted with interested Alaska Comment 97: NOAA conducted only modifications since it was developed. Native representatives, as described in one true tribal consultation, with the Comment 92: Industry efforts are the Tribal Summary Impact Statement Bering Straits tribes. This consultation ongoing to develop an effective salmon in the Classification section of this occurred with only a small fraction of ‘‘excluder’’ that fishermen can preamble. the Alaska federally recognized tribes incorporate into their trawl nets so as to In February 2007, the Council began affected by Amendment 91. NOAA enable salmon to escape from the nets developing this action by creating the failed to formally respond to or follow-

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53049

up on the concerns raised by the tribes and conducting NMFS consultation and inherently, intended to protect Alaskan in the single inadequate tribal coordination policy. Natives’ rights of subsistence fishing. consultation that was held. Response: NMFS acknowledges this Classification Response: NMFS disagrees. NMFS comment. NMFS continues to encourage conducted a consultation with every the participation of rural Alaska in the Pursuant to sections 304(b) and 305(d) tribe that requested a consultation. As decision-making processes and strives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS detailed in the Tribal Summary Impact to improve our tribal consultation and Assistant Administrator has determined Statement, below, NMFS held five outreach efforts. NMFS is considering that Amendment 91 and this final rule consultations with fifteen Alaska Native the recommendation to hire a tribal are consistent with the FMP, other tribes. Following the Nome consultation liaison as we assess the resources provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens referenced by the commenter, NMFS needed to meet tribal consultation Act, and other applicable law. addressed the concerns raised by the requests and responsibilities under This final rule has been determined to tribal representatives in written Executive Order 13175. be not significant for the purposes of responses in the Comment Analysis Comment 101: Tribal leaders, even Executive Order 12866. Report, and amended the EIS analysis to those representing regions with 20, 30, Final Environmental Impact Statement reflect the concerns raised at the and 50 tribes, were allowed an (EIS) and Final Regulatory Impact consultation. impossibly scant three minutes of time Review (RIR) Comment 98: We support NMFS’ during the ‘‘public’’ comment part of the efforts to implement and refine its April 2009 meeting to express their An EIS and RIR were prepared to procedures for effective and adequate concerns and positions. Pollock fishery serve as the central decision-making consultation and coordination with representatives, on the other hand, were documents for the Secretary of Alaska Native tribes. allowed several hours to present their Commerce to approve, disapprove, or Response: NMFS acknowledges this incentive plans. partially approve Amendment 91, and comment. Comment 99: Fewer than 5 percent of Response: During the April 2009 for NMFS to implement Amendment 91 the people who live in the Yukon River Council meeting, public testimony was through Federal regulations (see drainage have heard of the Council limited to 4 minutes for associations ADDRESSES). The EIS was prepared to despite the FMP containing provisions and organizations and 2 minutes for disclose the expected impacts of this for consulting with Alaska Natives and individuals. Because the preliminary action and its alternatives on the human rural communities. During the April preferred alternative included a environment. The RIR for this action 2009 Council meeting, NMFS stated that provision to allow the pollock industry was prepared to assess the costs and the analysis for this action did not to develop incentive plan agreements, benefits of available regulatory include freshwater information, even and the Council’s selection of a final alternatives. though salmon are anadromous. The preferred alternative depended on the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Tanana Chiefs Conference, the ability to understand what such (FRFA) Association of Village Council agreements may entail, the Council Presidents, the First Nations tribes of requested that each primary sector of This final regulatory flexibility Canada, and the Office of Subsistence the pollock industry provide a analysis (FRFA) incorporates the Initial Management should have all been presentation on the progress and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), a consulted regarding the declining potential content of the incentive plans summary of the significant issues raised salmon runs. Traditional ecological as part of the background presentations by the public comments in response to knowledge must be considered. prior to public comment. These the IRFA, NMFS’ responses to those Response: The State of Alaska presentations assisted the Council and comments, and a summary of the manages Chinook salmon fisheries and the public in understanding how the analyses completed to support the the EIS and RIR prepared for this action incentive plan agreements may be action. (see ADDRESSES) contain extensive developed before making a decision. NMFS published the proposed rule on information from the State of Alaska on Comment 102: The Secretary of March 23, 2010 (75 FR 14016) with Chinook salmon in-river abundance, Commerce has a trust obligation to comments invited through May 7, 2010. fisheries, and management. ADF&G was protect the opportunity for Alaska An IRFA was prepared and summarized a cooperating agency in preparing the Natives to continue their subsistence in the ‘‘Classification’’ section of the EIS and the EIS relied on subsistence way of life. preamble to the proposed rule. The information from ADF&G’s Office of Response: NMFS agrees that the description of this action, its purpose, Subsistence Management. Federal Government has a trust and its legal basis are described in the As explained in the EIS, the Council responsibility to protect the Alaskan preamble to the proposed rule and are conducted extensive outreach to Natives’ rights of subsistence hunting not repeated here. Alaskan communities to explain this and fishing. However, the NMFS received 71 letters of public action, the supporting analysis, and the environmental statutes under which the comment on Amendment 91 and the Council decision-making process. In Council and NMFS act prescribe a proposed rule. None of these comments conjunction with the Council’s outreach solicitous stance toward the addressed the IRFA. NMFS received activities, NMFS consulted with environment. As a result, where the comment letters on Amendment 91 and interested Alaska Native government acts responsibly regarding the proposed rule from five of the six representatives, as described in the the environment, it implements and CDQ groups, which compose all the Tribal Summary Impact Statement. protects the parallel concerns of Native small entities directly affected by this Comment 100: We applaud NMFS Alaskans. In this instance, the Council action. In total six unique comments efforts to incorporate more personal and NMFS are taking action to minimize were received from the small entities. meetings with tribal representatives. We the Chinook salmon bycatch to the Two of these comments (17 and 34) recommend that NMFS establish an extent practicable. This action is resulted in revisions to the final rule Alaska Native Tribal Liaison position intended to protect an important natural from the proposed rule, while the other for the purpose of further implementing resource and therefore is also, three (35, 36, 37, and 39) resulted in

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53050 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

further clarification in the preamble to EIS, RIR, and FRFA for this action voluntarily started the VRHS in 2002 for the final rule. considered four alternative management Chinook salmon, and in 2008 NMFS actions to the preferred alternative. approved the regulations implementing Number and Description of Small As the ‘‘preferred alternative,’’ Amendment 84 to the BSAI FMP. In Entities Regulated by This Action Alternative 5 constitutes the ‘‘final rule.’’ 2008 and 2009, all CDQ groups were This action applies only to those The remaining four alternatives (in voluntarily participating in an ICA, so entities that participate in the directed various combinations of options and they were exempt from the closure of pollock trawl fishery in the Bering Sea. suboptions) constitute the suite of the Chinook Salmon Savings Area. These entities include the AFA- ‘‘significant alternatives,’’ under the final Alternative 1 would likely impose the affiliated pollock fleet and the six CDQ rule, for RFA purposes. Each is least burden on the CDQ groups, groups that receive allocations of Bering addressed below. Please refer to section because it does not impose a Chinook Sea pollock. 2.5 of the EIS for the detailed impacts salmon PSC limit that could prevent the The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analyses. Data on cost and operating full harvest of their respective pollock requires consideration of affiliations structure within the CDQ sector are allocations. While the annual reports among entities for the purpose of unavailable, so a wholly quantitative indicate that the VRHS ICA has reduced assessing if an entity is small for RFA evaluation of the size and distribution of Chinook salmon encounter rates purposes. The AFA pollock burdens cannot be provided. The compared to what they would have been cooperatives are a type of affiliation. All following is a summary of the contents without the ICA, the highest historical of the non-CDQ entities directly of those more extensive analyses, Chinook salmon bycatch occurred in regulated by this action were members specifically focusing on the aspects 2007, when the ICA was in effect under of AFA cooperatives in 2008 and, which pertain to small entities. an exempted fishing permit. This high therefore, NMFS considers them Under the status quo alternative level of bycatch indicates that the status ‘‘affiliated’’ large (non-small) entities for (Alternative 1), the Chinook Salmon quo management measures, despite RFA purposes. Savings Area, established by their giving the pollock fleet the tools to Due to their status as non-profit Amendment 84 to the FMP, creates reduce salmon bycatch, contain no corporations, the six CDQ groups are separate non-CDQ and CDQ Chinook effective upper limit on the amount of identified as ‘‘small’’ entities under the salmon PSC limits. NMFS closes the Chinook salmon bycatch taken in the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Chinook Salmon Savings Area upon fishery. NMFS and the Council remain guidelines. This action directly attainment of the non-CDQ Chinook concerned that the status quo regulates the six CDQ groups, and salmon PSC limit. The CDQ Program management has the potential for high NMFS considers the CDQ groups to be receives allocations of 7.5 percent of the amounts of Chinook salmon bycatch as small entities for RFA purposes. As Chinook salmon PSC limit (or 2,175 experienced in 2007. described in regulations implementing Chinook salmon) as PSQ reserve. NMFS The hard cap alternative (Alternative the RFA (13 CFR 121.103), the CDQ further allocates PSQ reserves among 2) would establish an upper limit to groups’ affiliations with other large the six CDQ groups, based on a Chinook salmon bycatch in the pollock entities do not qualify them as large recommendation by the State of Alaska fishery. A range of suboption caps, from entities. Revenue derived from in 2005. The State of Alaska 29,323 to 87,500 Chinook salmon, were groundfish allocations and investments recommended that the percentage considered, based on various averages of in BSAI fisheries enable these non-profit allocation of Chinook salmon PSQ and Chinook salmon bycatch in the pollock corporations to better comply with the non-Chinook salmon PSQ among the fishery over a range of historical year burdens of this action, when compared CDQ groups be the same as the CDQ combinations from 1997 through 2006. to many of the large AFA-affiliated groups’ percentage allocations of Analysis in sections 6.10.3 and 7.3 of entities. Nevertheless, the only small pollock. The percentage allocation of the RIR examined the potential impacts entities that are directly regulated by Chinook salmon PSQ by CDQ group is on CDQ groups over this range. All this action are the six CDQ groups. as follows: Aleutian Pribilof Island Chinook salmon caught by vessels No duplication, overlap, or conflict Community Development Association participating in the pollock fishery between this action and existing Federal (APICDA) 14 percent, Bristol Bay would accrue toward the cap. Under rules has been identified. Economic Development Corporation this alternative, upon reaching a A FRFA must describe the steps the (BBEDC) 21 percent, Central Bering Sea Chinook salmon PSC limit, all directed agency has taken to minimize the Fisherman’s Association (CBSFA) 5 pollock fishing would stop, regardless of significant economic impact on small percent, Coastal Villages Region Fund potential forgone pollock harvests. entities consistent with the stated (CVRF) 24 percent, Norton Sound As described in the EIS section 2.2, objectives of applicable statutes, Economic Development Corporation this alternative includes several including a statement of the factual, (NSEDC) 22 percent, and Yukon Delta different options for management of a policy, and legal reasons for selecting Fisheries Development Association PSC limit, including separate PSC limits the alternative adopted in the final rule (YDFDC) 14 percent. Allocations of for the CDQ Program and the remaining and why each one of the other salmon PSQ to the CDQ groups are AFA sectors, and hard caps divided by significant alternatives to the rule transferable among the CDQ groups. season, by sector, or a combination of considered by the agency which affect Unless exempted because of both. In addition, the Council included the impact on small entities was participation in the VRHS ICA, a CDQ an option to allow small entities (i.e., rejected. ‘‘Significant alternatives’’ are group is prohibited from directed CDQ groups) and non-CDQ groups to those that achieve the stated objectives fishing for pollock in the Chinook transfer Chinook PSC allocations among for the action, consistent with prevailing Salmon Savings Area when the Chinook sectors, between the A and B seasons, or law, with potentially lesser adverse salmon PSQ is reached. As described a combination of both, that would allow economic impacts on small entities, as earlier in the preamble to this final rule, small entities more flexibility to harvest a whole. the VRHS ICA provides real-time the full TAC in high Chinook salmon NMFS approved and is implementing salmon PSC information, so that the encounter years. Amendment 91 following fleet can avoid areas of high Chinook Regardless of the hard cap level or recommendations by the Council. The salmon interception rates. The fleet allocation option chosen, the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53051

establishment of an upper limit on the fisheries, many of these CDQ PSC allocations under Alternative 4 amount of Chinook salmon bycatch in stakeholders also depend on sustainable would limit the burden on the small the pollock fishery would require Chinook salmon runs for subsistence, entities by increasing their annual participants in the CDQ Program to stop cultural, and spiritual practices; allocation of the Chinook salmon PSC directed fishing for pollock if a hard cap therefore, this issue is not strictly a limit. Under component 2 of this were reached, because further directed matter of finances. The Council alternative, a sector’s allocation of fishing for pollock would likely result in ultimately rejected Alternative 2 in Chinook salmon bycatch would be exceeding the Chinook salmon hard cap. recognition that a hard cap alone would calculated at 75 percent historical As the analysis in section 6.10 of the not achieve the Council’s objectives for bycatch and 25 percent AFA pollock RIR demonstrates, the lower the hard this action. quota, with allowances for the CDQ cap selected, the higher the probability The modified area triggered closure sector. Estimates of historic bycatch in of a fishery closure and potential for alternative (Alternative 3) is similar to the CDQ sector were based on lower forgone pollock revenues to the CDQ the status quo in that regulatory time bycatch hauls when compared to non- groups. and area closures would be invoked CDQ sectors, due in part to agreement Although this alternative would have when specified Chinook salmon PSC with the catcher/processor fleet established an upper limit to Chinook limits are reached, but NMFS would contracted to harvest pollock on behalf salmon bycatch, the hard cap alternative remove the VRHS ICA exemptions to of the CDQ sector. These historical alone would fail to promote Chinook the closed areas. This alternative would bycatch estimates would have resulted salmon avoidance during years of low incorporate new cap levels for triggered in a lower initial allocation of Chinook salmon encounter rates and could result closures, sector allocations, and transfer salmon to CDQ groups, potentially in a loss of revenues to CDQ groups, due provisions and could impose a lower increasing forgone revenue loss for to the closure of the fishery before the burden on the CDQ groups than the small entities. Therefore, component 2 TAC has been harvested. Additionally, preferred alternative. If triggered, NMFS estimates the historic CDQ bycatch rates this alternative could create a race for would close only the seasonal areas, by blending CDQ bycatch rates with Chinook salmon bycatch, similar to a described in section 2.3 of the EIS, to those of sectors harvesting pollock on race for fish in an open access fishery, directed pollock fishing. This behalf of the CDQ groups. The resulting which could increase the likelihood of alternative would not necessarily higher PSC allocations would decrease wasteful fishing practices, a truncated prevent small entities from the full the probability of forgone pollock directed fishing season, and forgone harvest of their pollock TAC, because revenue and the financial burden of this pollock harvest. The final rule retains fishing effort outside of the closed areas action on the CDQ groups. NMFS components of Alternative 2 that will could continue until the fishing season provides a description of the sector limit the burden on the small entities ended. allocation in section 2.4 of the EIS (see and further increase the flexibility for ADDRESSES). While Alternative 3 appears to reduce small entities through an IPA to During public comment on the Draft the economic impacts of forgone pollock minimize Chinook bycatch, to the extent EIS, a different sector allocation was practicable, at all levels of salmon or revenue on small entities, when proposed to component 2 of Alternative pollock abundance, while establishing compared to the hard cap alternative, it 4. The suggested allocation would an upper limit on Chinook salmon does not provide any incentive to further reduce the burden on the small bycatch. Furthermore, the Council minimize Chinook salmon bycatch entities by allocating Chinook salmon rejected Alternative 2 in partial below the trigger amount. This based on 25 percent history and 75 AFA response to public testimony described alternative would shift the fleet’s fishing pollock allocation. Such an allocation below. effort to areas that may (or, as would further benefit CDQ groups by During public comment, the Council experienced in recent seasons, may not) increasing the PSC allocations to the received varying perspectives from CDQ have a lower risk of Chinook salmon CDQ groups above the amount provided participants on the costs and benefits of encounters, but would not achieve the under component 2 of Alternative 4. the range of PSC limits under Council’s objectives to promote Chinook The Council considered and rejected consideration. NMFS received written salmon avoidance at the vessel level, this suggestion because such an comments from three of the six CDQ establish a maximum limit on Chinook allocation would not adequately groups. While two CDQ groups (BBEDC salmon bycatch in the pollock fishery, represent the different fishing practices and YDFDA) argued for a lower limit or hold the industry accountable for and patterns each sector utilizes to fully than this final rule provides, it was minimizing Chinook salmon bycatch. harvest their pollock allocations. asserted by some, (including members At its June 2008 meeting, the Council Despite the advantages of Alternative of CVRF communities) that a hard cap developed a preliminary preferred 4, the Council did not recommend this higher than 68,000 Chinook salmon alternative (Alternative 4) that contains alternative, noting that it failed to meet would increase the possibility that they components of Alternatives 1 through 3. the Chinook salmon conservation could both harvest their full pollock Alternative 4 would set a hard cap for objective of this action by setting too allocation, under AFA, and receive full all vessels participating in the pollock high a PSC limit and by not establishing royalty and profit sharing payments fisheries and includes provisions for a a performance standard to promote and from those allocations. The importance voluntary ICA that must encourage ensure that the pollock fishery of the pollock resource, as a source of Chinook salmon avoidance, at all levels minimized Chinook salmon bycatch to revenue for these small entities, of pollock and Chinook salmon the extent practicable. However, by indicates that any loss of pollock catch abundance and encounter rates. This unanimous vote, the Council selected a represents an increased economic alternative would minimize the burden preferred alternative that retained burden on the CDQ groups (small on small entities by setting a relatively component 2 from Alternative 4, which entities). Public comment from CDQ high PSC limit (68,392 Chinook is designed to reduce the economic members revealed the complexity of the salmon), allowing participants in an ICA burden on the CDQ groups. issue for CDQ groups and communities. to share the burden of reducing Chinook The preferred alternative (Alternative Although CDQ communities derive bycatch, and allowing sector level PSC 5), which constitutes the ‘‘final action’’ revenue from pollock and other BSAI allocation transfers. under this element of the FRFA, reflects

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53052 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

the least burdensome of management • Applications to transfer Chinook PSC; all other transfers by CDQ groups structures available, in terms of directly salmon PSC allocations to another will continue to be accomplished using regulated small entities, while fully eligible entity; the CDQ or PSQ Transfer Application. achieving the conservation and • Development and submission of The existing application has been management purposes consistent with proposed IPAs and amendments to revised to provide this instruction. applicable statutes. As described approved IPAs; and Participation in an IPA is voluntary, elsewhere in the final rule for this • An annual report from each IPA but it is necessary to receive transferable action, Alternative 5 combines a limit representative documenting information allocations of a portion of the 60,000 on the amount of Chinook salmon that and data relevant to the Chinook salmon Chinook salmon PSC limit. Therefore, it may be caught incidentally with a novel bycatch management program. is likely that the CDQ groups will approach designed to minimize bycatch, The CDQ groups enter contracts with participate in one or more IPAs. A CDQ to the extent practicable, in all years and partner vessels to harvest their pollock group may participate in an IPA with should result in a greater reduction of allocations. Many of these vessels are at vessel owners from other AFA sectors, Chinook salmon bycatch over time than least partially owned by the CDQ or the CDQ groups may develop an IPA the PSC limits and performance groups. Although the accounting of that applies only to CDQ groups and standard. Chinook salmon bycatch by partner vessels fishing on behalf of the CDQ vessels fishing under CDQ allocations groups. Each vessel harvesting pollock The uncertainty and variability in will accrue against each respective CDQ CDQ on behalf of a CDQ group must be Chinook salmon bycatch led the Council group’s seasonal PSC limit, most of the listed in an approved IPA in which the and NMFS to create an innovative and recordkeeping, reporting, and CDQ group also is a participant, as comprehensive management program, compliance requirements in the final required by § 679.21(f)(12)(ii)(C). If a which limits the burden on CDQ groups rule apply to the vessels harvesting CDQ group participates in an IPA, it through performance rather than design pollock, as well as the processors will share the costs of developing and standards. Alternative 5 establishes a processing pollock delivered by catcher managing the IPA and meeting the system of transferable PSC allocations vessels. For example, under existing reporting requirements. However, these and a performance standard to provide requirements at § 679.5, landings and costs are offset by the increased CDQ groups with the flexibility to production reports that include allocation of Chinook salmon PSC for decide how best to comply with the information about Chinook salmon IPA participants. requirements of this action, given the bycatch are required to be submitted by The professional skills necessary to other constraints imposed on the processors. prepare the reporting and recordkeeping pollock fishery (e.g., pollock TAC, NMFS clarifies that, in the future, if requirements that will apply to the CDQ market conditions, area closures a CDQ group chooses to have pollock groups under this action include the associated with other rules, gear CDQ delivered to a shoreside processing ability to read, write, and understand restrictions, climate and oceanographic plant, the catcher vessel used to harvest English; the ability to use a computer change). the pollock CDQ would need to and the Internet to submit electronic NMFS decided to implement the designate the trip as a CDQ trip and transfer request applications; and the Council’s recommended alternative comply with the retention and observer authority to take actions on behalf of the because it best balances a suite of coverage requirements for catcher CDQ group. Each of the six CDQ groups management measures that enable vessels, and the pollock would have to has executive and administrative staffs NMFS to manage Chinook salmon be delivered to a processor with an capable of complying with the reporting bycatch in the pollock fishery, while approved CMCP. These steps will and recordkeeping requirements of this meeting all statutory, regulatory, and ensure that all salmon bycatch from the action and the financial resources to national policy requirements, goals, and pollock CDQ fisheries are properly contract for any additional legal or objectives. Following a comprehensive counted and reported. technical expertise that they require to review of the relevant environmental, The CDQ groups already receive advise them. transferable Chinook and non-Chinook economic, and social consequences of Small Entity Compliance Guide the alternatives, NMFS did not identify salmon PSQ allocations and have any additional alternatives to those received such allocations under the NMFS has posted a small entity analyzed in the EIS, RIR, and the FRFA CDQ Program since 1999. Therefore, compliance guide on the NMFS Alaska that had the potential to further reduce NMFS will not require CDQ groups to Region Web site (http:// the economic burden on small entities, apply for recognition as entities eligible alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/ while achieving the objectives of this to receive transferable Chinook salmon sustainablefisheries/bycatch/ action. The EIS section 2.6, contains a PSC allocations. The CDQ groups are default.htm) to satisfy the Small detailed discussion of alternatives already authorized to transfer their Business Regulatory Enforcement considered and eliminated for further salmon PSQ allocations to and from Fairness Act of 1996, which requires a analysis (see ADDRESSES). other CDQ groups, using existing plain language guide to assist small transfer applications submitted to entities in complying with this rule. Recordkeeping and Reporting NMFS. Contact NMFS to request a hard copy of Requirements New under this action is the the guide (see ADDRESSES). authorization for the CDQ groups to In addition to revising some existing transfer Chinook salmon PSC Tribal Summary Impact Statement (E.O. requirements, this rule will add allocations to and from AFA entities, 13175) recordkeeping and reporting outside of the CDQ Program, including Executive Order 13175 of November requirements needed to implement the the AFA inshore cooperatives and the 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the preferred alternative including those entities representing the AFA catcher/ Executive Memorandum of April 29, related to— processor sector and the AFA 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the • Reporting Chinook salmon bycatch mothership sector. Because of this new American Indian and Alaska Native by vessels directed fishing for pollock in feature, CDQ groups will use a new Policy of the U.S. Department of the Bering Sea; application form to transfer Chinook Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53053

responsibilities of NMFS in matters Once the Draft EIS was released on Regional Administrator provided affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of December 5, 2008, NMFS sent another information about the upcoming final Public Law 108–199 (188 Stat. 452), as letter to Alaska Native representatives action by the Council and the Draft EIS amended by section 518 of Public Law announcing the release of the document comment period and listened to the 109–447 (118 Stat. 3267), extends the and soliciting comments concerning the concerns and issues raised by the tribal consultation requirements of Executive scope and content of the Draft EIS. The representatives. The concerns expressed Order 13175 to Alaska Native letter included a copy of the executive in the consultation were provided in a corporations. summary of the Draft EIS and provided letter from the Bering Sea Elders Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, information on how to obtain a printed Advisory Group. NMFS is obligated to consult and or electronic copy of the Draft EIS. On October 19, 2009, NMFS held a coordinate with federally recognized NMFS also mailed 23 copies of the Draft tribal consultation teleconference with tribal governments and Alaska Native EIS to the Alaska Native representatives the Alakanuk Tribal Council and the Claims Settlement Act regional and who had requested a copy or provided Native Village of Kipnuk. The Regional village corporations on a government-to- written comments to NMFS during Administrator provided information on government basis. Specifically, scoping. NMFS received 14 letters of the Chinook and chum salmon bycatch Executive Order 13175 requires Federal comment on the Draft EIS from in the Bering Sea in 2009 and listened agencies to: (1) Regularly consult and representatives of tribal governments, to the concerns and issues raised by the collaborate with Indian tribal tribal organizations, or Alaska Native tribal representatives. governments and Alaska Native corporations. These comments were Following the release of the EIS and corporations in developing Federal summarized and responded to in the RIR on December 7, 2009, NMFS sent regulatory practices that significantly or Comment Analysis Report (CAR) in another letter to Alaska Native uniquely affect their communities; (2) Chapter 9 of the EIS and the comment representatives announcing the release of the EIS and providing information on reduce the imposition of unfunded letters are posted on the NMFS Alaska how to participating in the rulemaking mandates on Indian tribal governments; Region Web site (see ADDRESSES). process. These letters included a copy of and (3) streamline the applications NMFS conducted tribal consultations the EIS and RIR executive summary and process for and increase the availability at the request of representatives from provided information on how to obtain of waivers to Indian tribal governments. the following federally recognized tribes: The Nome Eskimo Community; a printed or electronic copy of the EIS Section 5(b)(2)(B) of Executive Order the Chinik Eskimo Community and RIR. NMFS also mailed 28 copies of 13175 requires NMFS to prepare a tribal (representing the village of Golovin); the the EIS and RIR to the Alaska Native summary impact statement as part of the Stebbins Community Association; the representatives who requested a copy or final rule. This statement must contain: Native Village of Unalakleet; the Native who had provided written comments to (1) A description of the extent of the Village of Kwigillingok; the Native NMFS. NMFS received one comment agency’s prior consultation with tribal Village of Kipnuk; the Alakanuk Tribal from an Alaska Native organization on officials; (2) a summary of the nature of Council; the Native Village of Koyuk; the EIS that was summarized and their concerns; (3) a statement of the the Native Village of Elim; the Native responded to in the ROD (see extent to which the concerns of tribal Village of Gambell; Native Village of ADDRESSES). officials have been met; and (4) the Savoonga; Saint Michael; Shaktoolik; On October 13, 2009, NMFS received agency’s position supporting the need to King Island; and the Native Village of a request from the Native Village of issue the regulation. Eyak. Unalakleet for tribal consultation on a A Description of the Extent of the NMFS held a tribal consultation in number of fishery management issues Agency’s Prior Consultation With Nome, Alaska, on January, 22, 2009, in regarding the Bering Sea. On February Tribal Officials conjunction with a Council outreach 16, 2010, NMFS conducted a tribal meeting on Chinook salmon bycatch. consultation in Unalakleet, Alaska, that On December 28, 2007, when NMFS Consulting in person with NMFS in included tribal representatives from the started the EIS scoping process for this Nome were representatives of the Nome Native Village of Unalakleet, the Native action, NMFS mailed letters to Alaska Eskimo Community, the Chinik Eskimo Village of Koyuk, Stebbins Community tribal governments, Alaska Native Community, and the Native Village of Association, Native Village of Elim, the corporations, and related organizations Elim. Representatives of the Stebbins Native Village of Gambell, the Native (‘‘Alaska Native representatives’’). The Community Association and the Native Village of Savoonga, Saint Michael, letter provided information about the Village of Unalakleet participated by Shaktoolik, and King Island. Among proposed action, the EIS process, and telephone. Council staff provided other issues, Amendment 91, general solicited consultation and coordination information on the Draft EIS, the rulemaking and tribal consultation with Alaska Native representatives. alternatives, and the schedule for processes, salmon research, and NMFS received 12 letters providing Council action. As part of the fisheries bycatch management were scoping comments from representatives consultation, NMFS staff provided discussed. The report NMFS prepared of tribal governments and Alaska Native additional information and listened to on this consultation is available on the Corporations. These comments were the concerns and issues raised by the NMFS Alaska Region Web site (see summarized and included in the tribal representatives. The Nome Eskimo ADDRESSES). scoping report available on the NMFS Community submitted a letter to NMFS On March 24, 2010, NMFS continued Alaska Region Web site (see with its comments during the tribal the consultation process by sending ADDRESSES). Additionally, a number of consultation. NMFS considered and another letter to all Alaska Native tribal representatives and tribal responded to these comments in the representatives when the Notice of organizations provided written public CAR. Availability for Amendment 91 and the comments and oral public testimony to NMFS also held a tribal consultation proposed rule were published in the the Council during Council outreach teleconference on March 17, 2009, with Federal Register. The letter included a meetings on Amendment 91 and at the the Native Village of Kwigillingok and copy of these documents and notified numerous Council meetings at which the Bering Sea Elders Advisory Group, representatives of the opportunity to Amendment 91 was discussed. which has 37 tribes as members. The comment and consult. NMFS received

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53054 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

45 letters of comment on Amendment accurately document the importance of Alaska Native tribes and western Alaska 91 and the proposed rule from tribal the subsistence way of life. The analysis residents early in the process of members and representatives of tribal includes the best available information developing Amendment 91. As governments, tribal organizations, or from the ADF&G Office of Subsistence explained in the EIS, the Council Alaska Native corporations. The and current literature, and the conducted extensive outreach to comment summaries and NMFS’ traditional knowledge shared with Alaskan communities to explain this responses are provided in this preamble NMFS and the Council in consultations action, the supporting analysis, and the under Response to Comments. and comments. This additional analysis Council decision-making process. In On May 18, 2010, NMFS held a tribal was presented to the Council before it conjunction with the Council outreach, consultation teleconference with the took final action to recommend NMFS provided information to all tribes Native Village of Eyak. The Regional Amendment 91 and was the analysis at each step in the process and Administrator provided information on used by the agency to approve consulted with interested Alaska Native Amendment 91 and Chinook salmon Amendment 91. representatives, as described in ‘‘A and listened to the concerns and issues To address the second concern, the Description of the Extent of the raised by the tribal representatives. EIS applied the best available scientific Agency’s Prior Consultation with Tribal information to conduct an adult A Summary of the Nature of Tribal Officials.’’ equivalent analysis to determine the Concerns In response to the tribal concerns, impacts of the pollock fishery on the NMFS and the Council have also taken The concerns expressed in annual returns of Chinook salmon to the consultations and reflected in written steps to improve these processes. In river systems in Western Alaska. As November 2009, NMFS conducted a comments from tribal representatives explained in the EIS analysis, the degree and members center on four themes. workshop with interested tribal officials to which levels of bycatch are related to on tribal consultations and has First, Chinook salmon is vitally declining returns of Chinook salmon is important to tribal members, and they responded to the recommendations unknown. While Chinook salmon made at that workshop. More suffer great hardships when Chinook bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock salmon abundance is low. Second, tribal information on NMFS’ tribal fishery may be a contributing factor in consultation process is available on the representatives attribute low Chinook the decline of Chinook salmon, the EIS NMFS Alaska Region Web site (http:// salmon in-river returns directly to analysis shows that the absolute alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/tc/). The bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock numbers of the ocean bycatch that Council also created the Rural fishery. Third, tribal members want would have returned to western Alaska Community Outreach Committee to Chinook salmon bycatch greatly are expected to be relatively small due develop outreach plans for specific curtailed by a hard cap of between zero to ocean mortality and the large number Council actions and educational and 32,000 Chinook salmon. Fourth, of other river systems contributing to workshops for rural communities on NMFS should improve its consultation the total Chinook salmon bycatch. environmental law and the Council process and include tribal perspectives Although the reasons for the decline of process. More information on the early in decision-making. The Alaska Chinook salmon are not completely tribal representatives’ specific concerns understood, scientists believe they are Council’s outreach efforts is available on raised during the consultations before predominately natural. Changes in the Council’s Web site (http:// the EIS was finalized were summarized ocean and river conditions, including alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/ and responded to in the EIS (see unfavorable shifts in temperatures and default.htm). ADDRESSES). The Alaska tribal food sources, likely caused poor NMFS’ Position Supporting the Need To representatives’ specific concerns raised survival of Chinook salmon. Issue the Regulation after the EIS was published are NMFS considered the recommended addressed in the Response to Comments hard caps from tribal members, and the This final rule is needed to implement in this final rule. most recommended limit of 32,500 Amendment 91, a complex and Chinook salmon was analyzed in the innovative program to minimize bycatch A Statement of the Extent to Which the EIS and RIR. As discussed above, NMFS to the extent practicable in the pollock Concerns of Tribal Officials Have Been has determined Amendment 91 is a fishery. This final rule is also needed to Met better program than a hard cap alone implement increased observer coverage One of the primary factors in because it includes a mechanism, the and ensure that every salmon caught in initiating this action was concern over IPA, that provides incentives for pollock the pollock fishery is counted so that the potential impacts of Chinook salmon fishing vessels to avoid Chinook salmon NMFS has accurate salmon bycatch bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock bycatch under any condition of pollock data. NMFS is also expanding the fishery on the return of Chinook salmon and Chinook salmon abundance in all biological sampling to improve data on to western Alaska river systems and the years. Amendment 91 will achieve the the origins of salmon caught as bycatch recognition of the importance of conservation objectives of minimizing in the pollock fishery. Chinook salmon to the people in Chinook salmon bycatch to the extent Collection-of-Information Requirements western Alaska. While the final program practicable, but includes management is not the program advocated by many measures that provide the fleet the This rule contains collection-of- Alaska Native representatives, it will flexibility to harvest the pollock TAC information requirements subject to the minimize bycatch to the extent within the specified Chinook salmon Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which practicable. PSC limits. have been approved by the Office of To address their first concern that the NMFS and the Council have made Management and Budget (OMB). The draft analysis poorly characterized the great efforts to conduct outreach, collections are listed below by OMB subsistence fishery for Chinook salmon communication, and consultations with control number. and its importance to rural user groups, Alaska Native tribes, organizations, OMB Control No. 0648–0213 NMFS, the Council, and the State of Alaska Native corporations, and Alaska made significant improvements communities. NMFS and the Council Public reporting burden per response to the final EIS and RIR analysis to made significant efforts to involve is estimated to average 30 minutes for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53055

eLandings Catcher/Processor Trawl Gear Application for Proposed Chinook Dated: August 13, 2010. Electronic Logbook. Incentive Plan Agreement (IPA); 8 hours Samuel D. Rauch III, for the Chinook IPA annual report; 40 OMB Control No. 0648–0393 Deputy Assistant Administrator, for hours for the initial non-Chinook Inter- Regulatory Programs, National Marine Public reporting burden per response Cooperative Agreement (ICA); 8 hours Fisheries Service. is estimated to average 8 hours for the for the non-Chinook ICA annual report; Application for Approval as an Entity to 12 hours the annual AFA cooperative ■ For the reasons set out in the Receive Transferable Chinook Salmon report; 5 minutes for the IPA agent of preamble, NMFS amends 15 CFR PSC Allocation form and 15 minutes for service (this item will be removed Chapter IX and 50 CFR Chapter VI as the Application for Transfer of Chinook because it is part of the ICA); and 5 follows: Salmon PSC Allocations. minutes for the ICA agent of service (this item will be removed because it is TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND OMB Control No. 0648–0515 part of the IPA). FOREIGN TRADE Public reporting burden per response Public reporting burden includes the CHAPTER IX—NATIONAL OCEANIC is estimated to average 20 minutes for time for reviewing instructions, the eLandings Catcher/Processor or searching existing data sources, AND ATMOSPHERIC Mothership Production Report. gathering and maintaining the data ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF This rule also contains new needed, and completing and reviewing COMMERCE collection-of-information requirements the collection of information. subject to the PRA. These information Send comments regarding this burden PART 902—NOAA INFORMATION collections have been submitted to and estimate, or any other aspect of this data COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER approved by the OMB. collection, including suggestions for THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: reducing the burden, to NMFS (see OMB CONTROL NUMBERS OMB Control No. 0648–0609 ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to Public reporting burden per response [email protected], or fax to ■ 1. The authority citation for part 902 is estimated to average 30 minutes for (202) 395–7285. continues to read as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision the Groundfish/Halibut CDQ and Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Prohibited Species Quota (PSQ) of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be Transfer Request. ■ 2. In § 902.1, in the table in paragraph subject to a penalty for failure to comply (b), under the entry ‘‘50 CFR’’, OMB Control No. 0648–0610 with, a collection of information subject ■ Public reporting burden per response to the requirements of the PRA, unless a. Remove entries for ‘‘679.28(b), (c), is estimated to average 40 hours for the that collection of information displays a (d), and (e)’’ and ‘‘679.28(g)’’; and AFA CMCP; 5 minutes for the currently valid OMB control number. ■ b. Add entries in alphanumeric order Inspection Request for Inshore CMCP; 8 List of Subjects for ‘‘679.21(f) and (g)’’; and ‘‘679.28(b), hours for the CMCP Addendum; 1 hour (c), (d), (e), (g), and (j)’’. 15 CFR Part 902 for the Electronic Monitoring System; The additions read as follows: and 2 hours for the Inspection Request Reporting and recordkeeping for Electronic Monitoring System. requirements. § 902.1 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act. OMB Control No. 0648–0401 50 CFR Part 679 * * * * * Public reporting burden per response Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and is estimated to average 40 hours for the recordkeeping requirements. (b) * * *

Current OMB control No. CFR part or section where the information collection requirement is located (all numbers begin with 0648–)

******* 50 CFR

******* 679.21(f) and (g) ...... –0393 and –0608.

******* 679.28(b), (c), (d), (e), (g), and (j) ...... –0610.

*******

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53056 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

TITLE 50—WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES entity representing the catcher/ (ICA) is a voluntary non-Chinook processor sector, the entity representing salmon bycatch avoidance agreement, as CHAPTER VI—FISHERY the mothership sector, or the entity described at § 679.21(g) and approved CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT, representing the cooperative or a CDQ by NMFS, for directed pollock fisheries NATIONAL OCEANIC AND group and owners of all vessels directed in the Bering Sea subarea. ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION, fishing for pollock CDQ on behalf of that * * * * * DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CDQ group. Observed means observed by one or * * * * * PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE more observers (see subpart E of this Chinook salmon bycatch incentive part). EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF plan agreement (IPA) is a voluntary * * * * * ALASKA private contract, approved by NMFS under § 679.21(f)(12), that establishes ■ 5. In § 679.5, ■ 3. The authority citation for part 679 incentives for participants to avoid ■ a. Revise paragraphs (c)(4)(i)(B), continues to read as follows: Chinook salmon bycatch while directed (c)(4)(ii)(A)(1), (c)(6)(ii)(A), Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et fishing for pollock in the Bering Sea (e)(10)(iii)(M), (f)(1) introductory text, seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447. subarea. (f)(1)(iv), (f)(2)(iii)(B)(1), (f)(7) ■ 4. In § 679.2, * * * * * introductory text, and paragraph ■ a. Remove the definitions for ‘‘Bycatch Fishing trip means: (f)(7)(i); and rate’’, ‘‘Chinook Salmon Savings Area of (1) Retention requirements (MRA, IR/ ■ b. Add paragraph (f)(1)(vii). the BSAI’’, ‘‘Fishing month’’, ‘‘Observed IU, and pollock roe stripping) and R&R The revisions and additions read as or observed data’’, and ‘‘Salmon bycatch requirements under § 679.5. follows: reduction intercooperative agreement (i) Catcher/processors and (ICA)’’; motherships. An operator of a catcher/ § 679.5 Recordkeeping and reporting ■ b. In the definition for ‘‘Fishing trip’’, processor or mothership processor (R&R). revise paragraph (1) introductory text, vessel is engaged in a fishing trip from * * * * * paragraph (1)(i) introductory text, and the time the harvesting, receiving, or (c) * * * processing of groundfish is begun or paragraph (1)(ii), and add new (4) * * * resumed in an area until any of the paragraph (6); (i) * * * ■ ‘‘ following events occur: * * * c. Add new definitions for Agent for (B) Except as described in paragraph service of process’’, ‘‘Chinook salmon (ii) Catcher vessels. An operator of a catcher vessel is engaged in a fishing (f)(1)(iv) or (vii) of this section, the bycatch incentive plan agreement operator of a catcher/processor that is (IPA)’’, ‘‘Non-Chinook salmon bycatch trip from the time the harvesting of groundfish is begun until the offload or required to have an FFP under reduction intercooperative agreement § 679.4(b) and that is using trawl gear to ’’ ‘‘ ’’ transfer of all fish or fish product from (ICA) , and Observed . harvest groundfish is required to use a The addition and revisions read as that vessel. combination of catcher/processor trawl follows: * * * * * (6) For purposes of § 679.7(d)(9) for gear DCPL and eLandings to record and § 679.2 Definitions. CDQ groups and § 679.7(k)(8)(ii) for report daily processor identification * * * * * AFA entities, the period beginning when information, catch-by-haul landings Agent for service of process means, for a vessel operator commences harvesting information, groundfish production purposes of § 679.21(f), a person any pollock that will accrue against a data, and groundfish and prohibited appointed by the members of an AFA directed fishing allowance for pollock in species discard or disposition data. inshore cooperative, a CDQ group, or an the BS or against a pollock CDQ Under paragraph (f)(1)(vii) of this entity representing the AFA catcher/ allocation harvested in the BS and section, the operators of AFA catcher/ processor sector or the AFA mothership ending when the vessel operator processors or any catcher/processor sector, who is authorized to receive and offloads or transfers any processed or harvesting pollock CDQ are required to respond to any legal process issued in unprocessed pollock from that vessel. use an ELB and no longer report using the United States with respect to all * * * * * a DCPL. owners and operators of vessels that are Non-Chinook salmon bycatch (ii) * * * members of the inshore cooperative, the reduction intercooperative agreement (A) * * *

DATA ENTRY TIME LIMITS, CATCHER VESSEL TRAWL GEAR

Required information Time limit for recording

(1) Haul number, time and date gear set, time and date gear hauled, Within 2 hours after completion of gear retrieval, except that catcher beginning and end positions, CDQ group number (if applicable), total vessels harvesting pollock CDQ in the BS and delivering unsorted estimated hail weight for each haul. codends to a mothership must record CDQ group number within 2 hours after completion of weighing all catch in the haul on the mothership.

*******

* * * * * (ii) * * * (6) * * *

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53057

DATA ENTRY TIME LIMITS, MOTHERSHIP

Record in Required information Time limit for recording DCPL eLandings

(A) All catcher vessel or buying sta- X ...... Within 2 hours after completion of receipt of each groundfish delivery, ex- tion delivery information. cept that the CDQ group number for catcher vessels harvesting pollock CDQ in the BS and delivering unsorted codends to a mothership must be recorded within 2 hours after completion of weighing all catch in the haul on the mothership.

*******

* * * * * catcher/processor trawl gear ELB and ■ d. Revise paragraphs (d)(7), (d)(8); (e) * * * eLandings to record and report ■ e. Revise paragraph (k)(3)(vi); and (10) * * * groundfish and PSC information. In the ■ f. Add paragraph (k)(8). (iii) * * * ELB, the operator must enter processor The additions and revisions read as (M) PSC numbers—(1) Non-AFA identification information, catch-by- follows: catcher/processors and all motherships. haul information, and prohibited § 679.7 Prohibitions. Daily number of PSC animals (Pacific species discard or disposition data for salmon, steelhead trout, Pacific halibut, all salmon species in each haul. In * * * * * (c) * * * king crabs, and Tanner crabs) by species eLandings, the operator must enter (1) [Reserved] codes and discard and disposition processor identification, groundfish codes. production data, and groundfish and * * * * * (2) AFA and CDQ catcher/processors. prohibited species discard or (d) * * * (7) Catch Accounting—(i) General— The operator of an AFA catcher/ disposition data for all prohibited (A) For the operator of a catcher/ processor or any catcher/processor species except salmon. processor using trawl gear or a harvesting pollock CDQ must enter * * * * * daily the number of non-salmon PSC mothership, to harvest or take deliveries (2) * * * of CDQ or PSQ species without a valid animals (Pacific halibut, king crabs, and (iii) * * * scale inspection report signed by an Tanner crabs) by species codes and (B) * * * discard and disposition codes. Salmon (1) Recording time limits. Record the authorized scale inspector under PSC animals are entered into the haul number or set number, time and § 679.28(b)(2) on board the vessel. (B) For the operator of a vessel electronic logbook as described in date gear set, time and date gear hauled, required to have an observer sampling paragraphs (f)(1)(iv) and (v) of this begin and end position, CDQ group station described at § 679.28(d), to section. number (if applicable), and hail weight harvest or take deliveries of CDQ or PSQ * * * * * for each haul or set within 2 hours after species without a valid observer (f) * * * completion of gear retrieval. If a catcher/ sampling station inspection report (1) Responsibility. The operator of a processor using trawl gear and required issued by NMFS under § 679.28(d)(8) on vessel voluntarily using an ELB must to weigh all catch on a scale approved notify the Regional Administrator by fax board the vessel. by NMFS, record the CDQ group (C) For the manager of a shoreside at 907–586–7465 to notify NMFS that number (if applicable) within 2 hours processor or stationary floating the operator is using a NMFS-approved after completion of weighing all of the processor, or the manager or operator of ELB instead of a DFL or DCPL, prior to catch in the haul. The operator of a a buying station that is required participating in any Federal fishery. vessel must provide the information elsewhere in this part to weigh catch on * * * * * recorded in the ELB to the observer or a scale approved by the State of Alaska (iv) Catcher/processor trawl gear ELB. an authorized officer upon request at under § 679.28(c), to fail to weigh catch Except as described in paragraph any time after the specified deadlines. on a scale that meets the requirements (f)(1)(vii) of this section, the operator of * * * * * of § 679.28(c). a catcher/processor using trawl gear (7) ELB data submission. The operator (D) For the operator of a catcher/ may use a combination of a NMFS- must transmit ELB data to NMFS at the processor or a catcher vessel required to approved catcher/processor trawl gear specified e-mail address in the carry a level 2 observer, to combine ELB and eLandings to record and report following manner: catch from two or more CDQ groups in groundfish information. In the ELB, the (i) Catcher/processors or motherships. the same haul or set. operator may enter processor Directly to NMFS as an e-mail (E) For the operator of a catcher vessel identification information and catch-by- attachment or other NMFS-approved using trawl gear or any vessel less than haul information. In eLandings, the data transmission mechanism, by 2400 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that is groundfish operator must enter processor hours, A.l.t., each day to record the CDQ fishing as defined at § 679.2, to identification, groundfish production previous day’s hauls. discard any groundfish CDQ species or data, and groundfish and prohibited * * * * * salmon PSQ before it is delivered to a species discard or disposition data. ■ 6. In § 679.7, processor, unless discard of the * * * * * ■ a. Remove and reserve paragraph groundfish CDQ is required under other (vii) AFA and CDQ trawl catcher/ (c)(1); provisions or, in waters within the State processors. The operator of an AFA ■ b. Remove paragraphs (d)(6) and (d)(9) of Alaska, discard is required by laws of catcher/processor or any catcher/ through (d)(23); the State of Alaska. processor harvesting pollock CDQ must ■ c. Redesignate paragraph (d)(24) as (F) For the operator of a vessel using use a combination of NMFS-approved (d)(6) and paragraph (d)(25) as (d)(9); trawl gear, to release CDQ catch from

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53058 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

the codend before it is brought on board September 1 and October 14 after the drawing of the processing plant in the the vessel and weighed on a scale CDQ group’s non-Chinook salmon PSQ approved CMCP. approved by NMFS under § 679.28(b) or is attained, unless the vessel is * * * * * delivered to a processor. This includes, participating in a non-Chinook salmon (8) Salmon bycatch—(i) Discard of but is not limited to, ‘‘codend dumping’’ bycatch reduction ICA under salmon. For any person, to discard any and ‘‘codend bleeding.’’ § 679.21(g). salmon from a catcher vessel, catcher/ (G) For the operator of a catcher/ (C) Chinook salmon—(1) Overages of processor, mothership, or inshore processor using trawl gear or a Chinook salmon PSC allocations. For a processor, or transfer or process any mothership, to sort, process, or discard CDQ group, to exceed a Chinook salmon salmon under the PSD Program at CDQ or PSQ species before the total PSC allocation issued under § 679.21(f) § 679.26, if the salmon were taken catch is weighed on a scale that meets as of June 25 for the A season allocation incidental to a directed fishery for the requirements of § 679.28(b), and as of December 1 for the B season pollock in the BS before the number of including the daily test requirements allocation. salmon has been determined by an described at § 679.28(b)(3). (2) For the operator of a catcher vessel observer and the collection of scientific (H) For a CDQ representative, to use or catcher/processor, to start a new methods other than those approved by data or biological samples from the fishing trip for pollock CDQ in the BS salmon has been completed. NMFS to determine the catch of CDQ in the A season or in the B season, if the and PSQ reported to NMFS on the CDQ (ii) Catcher/processors and CDQ group for which the vessel is motherships. For the operator of a catch report. fishing has exceeded its Chinook (ii) Fixed gear sablefish—(A) For a catcher/processor or a mothership, to salmon PSC allocation issued under CDQ group, to report catch of sablefish begin sorting catch from a haul from a § 679.21(f) for that season. CDQ for accrual against the fixed gear directed fishery for pollock in the BS sablefish CDQ reserve, if that sablefish (3) For the operator of a catcher/ before the observer has completed CDQ was caught with fishing gear other processor or mothership, to catch or counting the salmon and collecting than fixed gear. process pollock CDQ in the BS without scientific data or biological samples (B) For any person on a vessel using complying with the applicable from the previous haul. fixed gear that is fishing for a CDQ requirements of § 679.28(j). (iii) Shoreside processors and group with an allocation of fixed gear (4) For the operator of a catcher/ stationary floating processors. For the sablefish CDQ, to discard sablefish processor or a mothership, to begin manager of a shoreside processor or harvested with fixed gear unless sorting catch from a haul from a stationary floating processor to begin retention of sablefish is not authorized directed fishery for pollock CDQ in the sorting a new BS pollock offload before under § 679.23(e)(4)(ii) or, in waters BS before the observer has completed the observer has completed the count of within the State of Alaska, discard is counting the salmon and collecting salmon and the collection of scientific required by laws of the State of Alaska. scientific data or biological samples data or biological samples from the (8) Prohibited species catch—(i) from the previous haul. previous offload. Crab—(A) Zone 1. For the operator of an (5) For the operator of a catcher (iv) Overages of Chinook salmon PSC eligible vessel, to use trawl gear to vessel, to deliver pollock CDQ to a allocations—(A) For an inshore harvest groundfish CDQ in Zone 1 after shoreside processor or stationary cooperative, the entity representing the the CDQ group’s red king crab PSQ or floating processor that does not have a AFA catcher/processor sector, or the C. bairdi Tanner crab PSQ in Zone 1 is catch monitoring and control plan entity representing the AFA mothership attained. approved under § 679.28(g). sector, to exceed a Chinook salmon PSC (B) Zone 2. For the operator of an (6) For the manager of a shoreside allocation issued under § 679.21(f) as of eligible vessel, to use trawl gear to processor or stationary floating June 25 for the A season allocation and harvest groundfish CDQ in Zone 2 after processor, to begin sorting a pollock as of December 1 for the B season the CDQ group’s PSQ for C. bairdi CDQ offload before the observer has allocation. Tanner crab in Zone 2 is attained. completed the count of salmon and the (B) For a catcher vessel or catcher/ (C) COBLZ. For the operator of an collection of scientific data or biological processor, to start a fishing trip for eligible vessel, to use trawl gear to samples from the previous offload. pollock in the BS in the A season or in harvest groundfish CDQ in the C. opilio * * * * * Bycatch Limitation Zone after the CDQ the B season if the vessel is fishing (k) * * * group’s PSQ for C. opilio Tanner crab is under a transferable Chinook salmon attained. (3) * * * PSC allocation issued to an inshore (ii) Salmon—(A) Discard of salmon. (vi) Catch monitoring and control cooperative, the entity representing the For any person, to discard salmon from plan (CMCP)—(A) Take deliveries or AFA catcher/processor sector, or the a catcher vessel, catcher/processor, process groundfish delivered by a vessel entity representing the AFA mothership mothership, shoreside processor, or SFP engaged in directed fishing for BSAI sector under § 679.21(f) and the inshore or transfer or process any salmon under pollock without following an approved cooperative or entity has exceeded its the PSD Program at § 679.26, if the CMCP as described at § 679.28(g). A Chinook salmon PSC allocation for that salmon were taken incidental to a copy of the CMCP must be maintained season. directed fishery for pollock CDQ in the on the premises and made available to * * * * * Bering Sea, until the number of salmon authorized officers or NMFS-authorized ■ personnel upon request. 7. In § 679.21, has been determined by an observer and ■ a. Remove and reserve paragraph (a); the collection of scientific data or (B) Allow sorting of fish at any ■ biological samples from the salmon has location in the processing plant other b. Revise paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (b)(3), been completed. than those identified in the CMCP under (c), (e)(1)(vi), (e)(3)(i)(A)(3)(i), (B) Non-Chinook salmon. For the § 678.28(g)(7). (e)(7)(viii), (e)(7)(ix), and (g); and operator of an eligible vessel, to use (C) Allow salmon of any species to ■ c. Add paragraphs (b)(6) and (f). trawl gear to harvest pollock CDQ in the pass beyond the last point where sorting The revisions and additions read as Chum Salmon Savings Area between of fish occurs, as identified in the scale follows:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53059

§ 679.21 Prohibited species bycatch salmon are too numerous to be salmon and the collection of scientific management. contained in the salmon storage data or biological samples from the (a) [Reserved] location, all sorting must cease and the previous offload of catch from the BS (b) * * * observer must be given the opportunity pollock fishery. (2) * * * to count the salmon in the storage (3) Assignment of crew to assist (ii) After allowing for sampling by an location and collect scientific data or observer. Operators of vessels and observer, if an observer is aboard, sort biological samples. Once the observer managers of shoreside processors and its catch immediately after retrieval of has completed all counting and SFPs that are required to retain salmon the gear and, except for salmon sampling duties for the counted salmon, under paragraph (c)(1) of this section prohibited species catch in the BS the salmon must be removed by vessel must designate and identify to the pollock fisheries under paragraph (c) of personnel from the approved storage observer aboard the vessel, or at the this section and § 679.26, return all location, in the presence of the observer. shoreside processor or SFP, a crew prohibited species, or parts thereof, to (C) Before sorting of the next haul person or employee responsible for the sea immediately, with a minimum of may begin, the observer must be given ensuring all sorting, retention, and injury, regardless of its condition. the opportunity to complete the count of storage of salmon occurs according to (3) Rebuttable presumption. Except as salmon and the collection of scientific the requirements of (c)(2) of this section. provided under paragraph (c) of this data or biological samples from the (4) Discard of salmon. Except for section and § 679.26, there will be a previous haul. salmon under the PSD Program at rebuttable presumption that any (D) Ensure no salmon of any species § 679.26, all salmon must be returned to prohibited species retained on board a pass the observer sample collection the sea as soon as is practicable, fishing vessel regulated under this part point, as identified in the scale drawing following notification by an observer was caught and retained in violation of of the observer sample station. that the number of salmon has been this section. (ii) Operators of vessels delivering to determined and the collection of scientific data or biological samples has * * * * * shoreside processors or stationary been completed. (6) Addresses. Unless otherwise floating processors must: (A) Store in a refrigerated saltwater specified, submit information required * * * * * tank all salmon taken as bycatch in under this section to NMFS as follows: (e) * * * trawl operations. (1) * * * by mail to the Regional Administrator, (B) Deliver all salmon to the processor (vi) BS Chinook salmon. See NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK receiving the vessel’s BS pollock catch. paragraph (f) of this section. 99802; by courier to the Office of the (iii) Shoreside processors or stationary Regional Administrator, 709 West 9th * * * * * floating processors must: (3) * * * St., Juneau, AK 99801; or by fax to 907– (A) Comply with the requirements in (i) * * * 586–7465. Forms are available on the § 679.28(g)(7)(vii) for the receipt, (A) * * * NMFS Alaska Region Web site (http:// sorting, and storage of salmon from (3) *** alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/). deliveries of catch from the BS pollock (i) Chinook salmon. For BS Chinook (c) Salmon taken in the BS pollock fishery. salmon, see paragraph (f) of this section. fisheries. Regulations in this paragraph (B) Ensure no salmon of any species For AI Chinook salmon, 7.5 percent of apply to vessels directed fishing for pass beyond the last point where sorting the PSC limit set forth in paragraph pollock in the BS, including pollock of fish occurs, as identified in the scale (e)(1)(viii) of this section. CDQ, and processors taking deliveries drawing of the plant in the CMCP. * * * * * from these vessels. (C) Sort and transport all salmon of (7) * * * (1) Salmon discard. The operator of a any species to the salmon storage (viii) AI Chinook salmon. If, during vessel and the manager of a shoreside container identified in the CMCP (see the fishing year, the Regional processor or SFP must not discard any § 679.28(g)(7)(vi)(C) and (x)(F)). The Administrator determines that catch of salmon or transfer or process any salmon must remain in that salmon Chinook salmon by vessels using trawl salmon under the PSD Program at storage container and within the view of gear while directed fishing for pollock § 679.26, if the salmon were taken the observer at all times during the in the AI will reach the annual limit of incidental to a directed fishery for offload. 700 Chinook salmon, as identified in pollock in the BS, until the number of (D) If, at any point during the offload, paragraph (e)(1)(viii) of this section, salmon has been determined by the salmon are too numerous to be NMFS, by notification in the Federal observer and the observer’s collection of contained in the salmon storage Register will close the AI Chinook any scientific data or biological samples container, the offload and all sorting Salmon Savings Area, as defined in from the salmon has been completed. must cease and the observer must be Figure 8 to this part, to directed fishing (2) Salmon retention and storage— given the opportunity to count the for pollock with trawl gear on the (i) Operators of catcher/processors or salmon and collect scientific data or following dates: motherships must: biological samples. The counted salmon (A) From the effective date of the (A) Sort and transport all salmon then must be removed from the area by closure until April 15, and from bycatch from each haul to an approved plant personnel in the presence of the September 1 through December 31, if storage location adjacent to the observer observer. the Regional Administrator determines sampling station that allows an observer (E) At the completion of the offload, that the annual limit of AI Chinook free and unobstructed access to the the observer must be given the salmon will be attained before April 15. salmon (see § 679.28(d)(2)(i) and (d)(7)). opportunity to count the salmon and (B) From September 1 through The salmon storage location must collect scientific data or biological December 31, if the Regional remain in view of the observer from the samples. Administrator determines that the observer sampling station at all times (F) Before sorting of the next offload annual limit of AI Chinook salmon will during the sorting of the haul. of catch from the BS pollock fishery be attained after April 15. (B) If, at any point during sorting of may begin, the observer must be given (ix) Exemptions. Trawl vessels the haul or delivery for salmon, the the opportunity to complete the count of participating in directed fishing for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53060 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

pollock and operating under a non- listed in paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this (A) At least one IPA is approved by Chinook salmon bycatch reduction ICA section, a portion of either the 47,591 NMFS under paragraph (f)(12) of this approved by NMFS under paragraph (g) Chinook salmon PSC limit or the 60,000 section; and of this section are exempt from closures Chinook salmon PSC limit. (B) That AFA sector has not exceeded in the Chum Salmon Savings Area (i) An AFA sector will receive a its performance standard under described at paragraph (e)(7)(vii) of this portion of the 47,591 Chinook salmon paragraph (f)(6) of this section. section. See also § 679.22(a)(10) and PSC limit if: (3) Allocations of the BS Chinook Figure 9 to part 679. (A) No Chinook salmon bycatch salmon PSC limits—(i) Seasonal * * * * * incentive plan agreement (IPA) is apportionment. NMFS will apportion (f) BS Chinook Salmon Bycatch approved by NMFS under paragraph the BS Chinook salmon PSC limits Management—(1) Applicability. This (f)(12) of this section; or annually 70 percent to the A season and paragraph contains regulations (B) That AFA sector has exceeded its 30 percent to the B season, which are governing the bycatch of Chinook performance standard under paragraph described in § 679.23(e)(2)(i) and (ii). salmon in the BS pollock fishery. (f)(6) of this section. (ii) AFA sectors. Each year, NMFS (2) BS Chinook salmon prohibited (ii) An AFA sector will receive a will make allocations of the applicable species catch (PSC) limit. Each year, portion of the 60,000 Chinook salmon BS Chinook salmon PSC limit to the NMFS will allocate to AFA sectors, PSC limit if: following four AFA sectors:

AFA sector: Eligible participants are:

(A) Catcher/processor (C/P) AFA catcher/processors and AFA catcher vessels delivering to AFA catcher/processors, all of which are permitted under § 679.4(l)(2) and § 679.4(l)(3)(i)(A), respectively. (B) Mothership ...... AFA catcher vessels harvesting pollock for processing by AFA motherships, all of which are permitted under § 679.4(l)(3)(i)(B) and § 679.4(l)(4), respectively. (C) Inshore ...... AFA catcher vessels harvesting pollock for processing by AFA inshore processors, all of which are permitted under § 679.4(l)(3)(i)(C). (D) CDQ Program ...... The six CDQ groups authorized under section 305(i)(1)(D) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to participate in the CDQ Program.

(iii) Allocations to each AFA sector. salmon PSC limits to each AFA sector maximum amount of Chinook salmon NMFS will allocate the BS Chinook as follows: PSC allocated to each sector in each (A) If a sector is managed under the season and annually is: 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit, the

A season B season Annual total AFA sector % Allocation # of Chinook % Allocation # of Chinook % Allocation # of Chinook

(1) C/P...... 32.9 13,818 17.9 3,222 28.4 17,040 (2) Mothership...... 8.0 3,360 7.3 1,314 7.8 4,674 (3) Inshore...... 49.8 20,916 69.3 12,474 55.6 33,390 (4) CDQ Program ...... 9.3 3,906 5.5 990 8.2 4,896

(B) If the sector is managed under the amount of Chinook salmon PSC in each 47,591 Chinook salmon PSC limit, the season and annually: sector will be allocated the following

A season B season Annual total AFA sector % Allocation # of Chinook % Allocation #of Chinook % Allocation # of Chinook

(1) C/P...... 32.9 10,960 17.9 2,556 28.4 13,516 (2) Mothership...... 8.0 2,665 7.3 1,042 7.8 3,707 (3) Inshore ...... 49.8 16,591 69.3 9,894 55.6 26,485 (4) CDQ Program ...... 9.3 3,098 5.5 785 8.2 3,883

(iv) Allocations to the AFA catcher/ (B) If no entity is approved by NMFS allocation under paragraph processor and mothership sectors—(A) to represent the AFA catcher/processor (f)(3)(iii)(A)(3) or (B)(3) of this section NMFS will issue transferable Chinook sector or the AFA mothership sector, among the inshore cooperatives and the salmon PSC allocations under paragraph then NMFS will manage that sector inshore open access fishery based on the (f)(3)(iii)(A) or (B) of this section to under a non-transferable Chinook percentage allocations of pollock to each entities representing the AFA catcher/ salmon PSC allocation under paragraph inshore cooperative under § 679.62(a). processor sector and the AFA (f)(10) of this section. NMFS will issue transferable Chinook mothership sector if these sectors meet (v) Allocations to inshore cooperatives salmon PSC allocations to inshore the requirements of paragraph (f)(8) of and the AFA inshore open access cooperatives. Any Chinook salmon PSC this section. fishery. NMFS will further allocate the allocated to the inshore open access inshore sector’s Chinook salmon PSC fishery will be as a non-transferable

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53061

allocation managed by NMFS under the Program under paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(A)(4) this part. NMFS will issue transferable requirements of paragraph (f)(10) of this or (B)(4) of this section among the six Chinook salmon PSC allocations to CDQ section. CDQ groups based on each CDQ group’s groups. (vi) Allocations to the CDQ Program. percentage of the CDQ Program pollock (vii) Accrual of Chinook salmon NMFS will further allocate the Chinook allocation in Column B of Table 47d to bycatch to specific PSC allocations. salmon PSC allocation to the CDQ

If a Chinook salmon PSC allocation is: Then all Chinook salmon bycatch:

(A) A transferable allocation to a sector-level entity, inshore coopera- By any vessel fishing under a transferable allocation will accrue against tive, or CDQ group under paragraph (f)(8) of this section. the allocation to the entity representing that vessel. (B) A non-transferable allocation to a sector or the inshore open ac- By any vessel fishing under a non-transferable allocation will accrue cess fishery under paragraph (f)(10) of this section. against the allocation established for the sector or inshore open ac- cess fishery, whichever is applicable. (C) The opt-out allocation under paragraph (f)(5) of this section ...... By any vessel fishing under the opt-out allocation will accrue against the opt-out allocation.

(viii) Public release of Chinook (D) The amount of Chinook salmon will reduce the seasonal allocation of salmon PSC information. For each year, bycatch that accrues towards each the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit to NMFS will release to the public and transferable or non-transferable the catcher/processor sector, the publish on the NMFS Alaska Region allocation; and mothership sector, the inshore sector, or Web site (http:// (E) Any changes to these allocations the CDQ Program under paragraph alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/): due to transfers under paragraph (f)(9) of (f)(3)(iii)(A) of this section, if the owner (A) The Chinook salmon PSC this section, rollovers under paragraph of any permitted AFA vessel in that allocations for each entity receiving a (f)(11) of this section, and deductions sector, or any CDQ group, does not transferable allocation; from the B season non-transferable participate in an approved IPA under (B) The non-transferable Chinook allocations under paragraphs (f)(5)(v) or paragraph (f)(12) of this section. The salmon PSC allocations; (f)(10)(iii) of this section. amount of Chinook salmon subtracted (C) The vessels fishing under each (4) Reduction in allocations of the from each sector’s allocation for those transferable or non-transferable 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit—(i) not participating in an approved IPA is allocation; Reduction in sector allocations. NMFS calculated as follows:

Reduce the A season alloca- Reduce the B season alloca- tion by the sum of the amount tion by the sum of the amount of Chinook salmon associated of Chinook salmon associated For each sector: with each vessel or CDQ with each vessel or CDQ group not participating in an group not participating in an IPA: IPA:

(A) Catcher/processor ...... From Column E in Table 47a + From Column F in Table 47a = The annual amount of Chi- to this part. to this part. nook salmon subtracted from each sector’s Chinook salmon PSC allocation list- ed at paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(A) of this section. (B) Mothership ...... From Column E in Table 47b ...... From Column F in Table 47b to this part. to this part. (C) Inshore ...... From Column E in Table 47c ...... From Column F in Table 47c to this part. to this part. (D) CDQ Program ...... From Column C in Table 47d ...... From Column D in Table 43d to this part. to this part.

(ii) Adjustments to the inshore sector an approved IPA based on the CDQ group represents of the Chinook and inshore cooperative allocations— proportion each participating salmon PSC initially allocated among (A) If some members of an inshore cooperative represents of the Chinook the participating CDQ groups that year. cooperative do not participate in an salmon PSC initially allocated among (iv) All members of a sector do not approved IPA, NMFS will only reduce the participating inshore cooperatives participate in an approved IPA. If all the allocation to the cooperative to that year. members of a sector do not participate which those vessels belong, or the (iii) Adjustment to CDQ group in an approved IPA, the amount of inshore open access fishery. allocations. If a CDQ group does not Chinook salmon that remains after (B) If all members of an inshore participate in an approved IPA, the subtracting the amount in paragraph cooperative do not participate in an amount of Chinook salmon that remains (f)(4)(i) of this section for the non- approved IPA, the amount of Chinook in the CDQ Program’s allocation, after participating sector will not be salmon that remains in the inshore subtracting the amount in paragraph sector’s allocation, after subtracting the (f)(4)(i)(D) of this section for the non- reallocated among the sectors that do amount in paragraph (f)(4)(i)(C) of this participating CDQ group, will be have members participating in an section for the non-participating inshore reallocated among the CDQ groups approved IPA. This portion of the cooperative, will be reallocated among participating in an approved IPA based 60,000 PSC limit will remain the inshore cooperatives participating in on the proportion each participating unallocated for that year.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53062 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(5) Chinook salmon PSC opt-out allocation. The following table describes requirements for the opt-out allocation:

(i) What is the amount of Chinook salmon PSC The opt-out allocation will equal the sum of the Chinook salmon PSC deducted under para- that will be allocated to the opt-out allocation graph (f)(4)(i) of this section from the seasonal allocations of each sector with members not in the A season and the B season? participating in an approved IPA. (ii) Which participants will be managed under Any AFA permitted vessel or any CDQ group that is a member of a sector eligible under para- the opt-out allocation? graph (f)(2)(ii) of this section to receive allocations of the 60,000 PSC limit, but that is not participating in an approved IPA. (iii) What Chinook salmon bycatch will accrue All Chinook salmon bycatch by participants under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section. against the opt-out allocation? (iv) How will the opt-out allocation be man- All participants under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section will be managed as a group under the aged? seasonal opt-out allocations. If the Regional Administrator determines that the seasonal opt- out allocation will be reached, NMFS will publish a notice in the FEDERAL REGISTER closing directed fishing for pollock in the BS, for the remainder of the season, for all vessels fishing under the opt-out allocation. (v) What will happen if Chinook salmon bycatch NMFS will deduct from the B season opt-out allocation any Chinook salmon bycatch in the A by vessels fishing under the opt-out allocation season that exceeds the A season opt-out allocation. exceeds the amount allocated to the A sea- son opt-out allocation? (vi) What will happen if Chinook salmon bycatch If Chinook salmon bycatch by vessels fishing under the opt-out allocation in the A season is by vessels fishing under the opt-out allocation less than the amount allocated to the opt-out allocation in the A season, this amount of Chi- is less than the amount allocated to the A nook salmon will not be added to the B season opt-out allocation. season opt-out allocation? (vii) Is Chinook salmon PSC allocated to the No. Chinook salmon PSC allocated to the opt-out allocation is not transferable. opt-out allocation transferable?

(6) Chinook salmon bycatch Alaska Region Web site (http:// threshold amount by the number of performance standard. If the total alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/). At the end of Chinook salmon associated with each annual Chinook salmon bycatch by the each year, NMFS will evaluate the vessel not participating in an approved members of a sector participating in an Chinook salmon bycatch by all IPA IPA. If any CDQ groups do not approved IPA is greater than that participants in each sector against that participate in an approved IPA, NMFS sector’s annual threshold amount of sector’s annual threshold amount. will reduce the CDQ Program’s annual Chinook salmon in any three of seven (ii) Calculation of the annual threshold amount by the number of consecutive years, that sector will threshold amount. A sector’s annual Chinook salmon associated with each threshold amount is the annual number receive an allocation of Chinook salmon CDQ group not participating in an of Chinook salmon that would be under the 47,591 PSC limit in all future approved IPA. NMFS will subtract the years. allocated to that sector under the 47,591 following numbers of Chinook salmon (i) Annual threshold amount. Prior to Chinook salmon PSC limit, as shown in each year, NMFS will calculate each the table in paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(B) of from each sector’s annual threshold sector’s annual threshold amount. this section. If any vessels in a sector do amount for vessels or CDQ groups not NMFS will post the annual threshold not participate in an approved IPA, participating in an approved IPA: amount for each sector on the NMFS NMFS will reduce that sector’s annual

The amount of Chinook salmon associated with each vessel or CDQ group not participating in an For each sector: IPA:

(A) Catcher/processor ...... From Column G of Table 47a to this part; (B) Mothership ...... From Column G of Table 47b to this part; (C) Inshore ...... From Column G of Table 47c to this part; (D) CDQ Program ...... From Column E of Table 47d to this part.

(iii) If NMFS determines that a sector or CDQ group within that sector until Tables 47a through 47c to this part has exceeded its performance standard participates in an approved IPA. can be revised as necessary. by exceeding its annual threshold (7) Replacement vessels. If an AFA (8) Entities eligible to receive amount in any three of seven permitted vessel listed in Tables 47a transferable Chinook salmon PSC consecutive years, NMFS will issue a through 47c to this part is no longer allocations—(i) NMFS will issue notification in the Federal Register that eligible to participate in the BS pollock transferable Chinook salmon PSC the sector has exceeded its performance fishery or if a vessel replaces a currently allocations to the following entities, if standard and that NMFS will allocate to eligible vessel, the portion and number these entities meet all of the applicable of Chinook salmon associated with that that sector the amount of Chinook requirements of this part. vessel in Tables 47a through 47c to this (A) Inshore cooperatives. NMFS will salmon in the table in paragraph part will be assigned to the replacement issue transferable Chinook salmon PSC (f)(3)(iii)(B) of this section in all vessel or distributed among other allocations to the inshore cooperatives subsequent years. All members of the eligible vessels in the sector based on permitted annually under § 679.4(l)(6). affected sector will fish under this lower the procedures in the law, regulation, or The representative and agent for service allocation regardless of whether a vessel private contract that accomplishes the of process (see definition at § 679.2) for vessel removal or replacement action an inshore cooperative is the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53063

cooperative representative identified in (2) NMFS will issue transferable the Chinook salmon PSC allocations are the application for an inshore Chinook salmon allocations under the effective. cooperative fishing permit issued under 47,591 Chinook salmon PSC limit to an (E) Approval. If more than one entity § 679.4(l)(6), unless the inshore entity representing the mothership application is submitted to NMFS, cooperative representative notifies sector if that entity represents all of the NMFS will approve the application for NMFS in writing that a different person owners of AFA permitted vessels in this the entity that represents the most will act as its agent for service of sector. eligible vessel owners in the sector. process for purposes of this paragraph (ii) Request for approval as an entity (F) Amendments to the sector entity. eligible to receive transferable Chinook (f). An inshore cooperative is not (1) An amendment to sector entity salmon PSC allocations. A required to submit an application under contract, with no change in entity representative of an entity representing paragraph (f)(8)(ii) of this section to participants, may be submitted to NMFS receive a transferable Chinook salmon the catcher/processor sector or the at any time and is effective upon written PSC allocation. mothership sector may request approval notification of approval by NMFS to the (B) CDQ groups. NMFS will issue by NMFS to receive transferable transferable Chinook salmon PSC Chinook salmon PSC allocations on entity representative. To amend a allocations to the CDQ groups. The behalf of the members of the sector. The contract, the entity representative must representative and agent for service of application must be submitted to NMFS submit a complete application, as process for a CDQ group is the chief at the address in paragraph (b)(6) of this described in paragraph (f)(8)(ii) of this executive officer of the CDQ group, section. A completed application section. unless the chief executive officer consists of the application form and a (2) To make additions or deletions to notifies NMFS in writing that a different contract, described below. the vessel owners represented by the person will act as its agent for service (A) Application form. The applicant entity for the next year, the entity of process. A CDQ group is not required must submit a paper copy of the representative must submit a complete to submit an application under application form with all information application, as described in paragraph paragraph (f)(8)(ii) of this section to fields accurately filled in, including the (f)(8)(ii) of this section, by December 1. receive a transferable Chinook salmon affidavit affirming that each eligible (iii) Entity Representative. (A) The PSC allocation. vessel owner, from whom the applicant entity’s representative must— (C) Entity representing the AFA received written notification requesting (1) Act as the primary contact person catcher/processor sector. NMFS will to join the sector entity, has been for NMFS on issues relating to the authorize only one entity to represent allowed to join the sector entity subject operation of the entity; the catcher/processor sector for to the same terms and conditions that (2) Submit on behalf of the entity any purposes of receiving and managing have been agreed on by, and are applications required for the entity to transferable Chinook salmon PSC applicable to, all other parties to the receive a transferable Chinook salmon allocations on behalf of the catcher/ sector entity. The application form is PSC allocation and to transfer some or processors eligible to fish under available on the NMFS Alaska Region all of that allocation to and from other transferable Chinook salmon PSC Web site (http:// entities eligible to receive transfers of allocations. alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/) or from Chinook salmon PSC allocations; (1) NMFS will issue transferable NMFS at the address or phone number (3) Ensure that an agent for service of Chinook salmon allocations under the in paragraph (b)(6) of this section. process is designated by the entity; and 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit to the (B) Contract. A contract containing (4) Ensure that NMFS is notified if a entity representing the catcher/ the following information must be substitute agent for service of process is processor sector if that entity represents attached to the completed application designated. Notification must include all of the owners of AFA permitted form: vessels in this sector that are (1) Information that documents that the name, address, and telephone participants in an approved IPA. all vessel owners party to the contract number of the substitute agent in the (2) NMFS will issue transferable agree that the entity, the entity’s event the previously designated agent is Chinook salmon allocations under the representative, and the entity’s agent for no longer capable of accepting service 47,591 Chinook salmon PSC limit to an service of process named in the on behalf of the entity or its members entity representing the catcher/ application form represent them for within the 5-year period from the time processor sector if that entity represents purposes of receiving transferable the agent is identified in the application all of the owners of AFA permitted Chinook salmon PSC allocations. to NMFS under paragraph (f)(8)(ii) of vessels in this sector. (2) A statement that the entity’s this section. (D) Entity representing the AFA representative and agent for service of (B) All vessel owners that are mothership sector. NMFS will authorize process are authorized to act on behalf members of an inshore cooperative, or only one entity to represent the of the vessel owners party to the members of the entity that represents mothership sector for purposes of contract. the catcher/processor sector or the receiving and managing transferable (3) Certification of applicant. mothership sector, may authorize the Chinook salmon PSC allocations on Signatures, printed names, and date of entity representative to sign a proposed behalf of the vessels eligible to fish signature for the owners of each AFA IPA submitted to NMFS, under under transferable Chinook salmon PSC permitted vessel identified in the paragraph (f)(12) of this section, on allocations. application. behalf of the vessel owners that intend (1) NMFS will issue transferable (C) Contract duration. Once to participate in that IPA. This Chinook salmon allocations under the submitted, the contract attached to the authorization must be included in the 60,000 Chinook salmon PSC limit to an application is valid until amended or contract submitted to NMFS, under entity representing the mothership terminated by the parties to the contract. paragraph (f)(8)(ii)(B) of this section, for sector if that entity represents all of the (D) Deadline. An application and the sector-level entities and in the owners of AFA permitted vessels in this contract must be received by NMFS no contract submitted annually to NMFS sector that are participants in an later than 1700 hours, A.l.t., on October by inshore cooperatives under approved IPA. 1 of the year prior to the year for which § 679.61(d).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53064 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(iv) Agent for service of process. The in progress at the time the entity’s (10) Non-transferable Chinook salmon entity’s agent for service of process allocation is first exceeded. Under PSC allocations—(i) All vessels must— § 679.7(d)(8)(ii)(C)(2) and (k)(8)(iv)(B), belonging to a sector that is ineligible to (A) Be authorized to receive and vessels fishing on behalf of an entity receive transferable allocations under respond to any legal process issued in that has exceeded its Chinook salmon paragraph (f)(8) of this section, any the United States with respect to all PSC allocation for a season may not start catcher vessels participating in an owners and operators of vessels that are a new fishing trip for pollock in the BS inshore open access fishery, and all members of an entity receiving a on behalf of that same entity for the vessels fishing under the opt-out transferable allocation of Chinook remainder of that season. allocation under paragraph (f)(5) of this salmon PSC or with respect to a CDQ (iii) Application for transfer of section will fish under specific non- group. Service on or notice to the Chinook salmon PSC allocations— transferable Chinook salmon PSC entity’s appointed agent constitutes (A) Completed application. NMFS will allocations. service on or notice to all members of process a request for transfer of Chinook (ii) All vessels fishing under a non- the entity. salmon PSC provided that a paper or transferable Chinook salmon PSC (B) Be capable of accepting service on electronic application is completed, allocation, including vessels fishing on behalf of the entity until December 31 with all information fields accurately behalf of a CDQ group, will be managed of the year five years after the calendar filled in. Application forms are available together by NMFS under that non- year for which the entity notified the on the NMFS Alaska Region Web site transferable allocation. If, during the Regional Administrator of the identity (http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/) or fishing year, the Regional Administrator of the agent. from NMFS at the address or phone determines that a seasonal non- (v) Absent a catcher/processor sector number in paragraph (b)(6) of this transferable Chinook salmon PSC or mothership sector entity. If the section. allocation will be reached, NMFS will catcher/processor sector or the (B) Certification of transferor— publish a notice in the Federal Register mothership sector does not form an (1) Non-electronic submittal. The closing the BS to directed fishing for entity to receive a transferable allocation transferor’s designated representative pollock by those vessels fishing under of Chinook salmon PSC, the sector will must sign and date the application that non-transferable allocation for the be managed by NMFS under a non- certifying that all information is true, remainder of the season or for the transferable allocation of Chinook correct, and complete. The transferor’s remainder of the year. salmon PSC under paragraph (f)(10) of designated representative must submit (iii) For each non-transferable this section. the paper application as indicated on Chinook salmon PSC allocation, NMFS (9) Transfers of Chinook salmon the application. will deduct from the B season allocation PSC—(i) A Chinook salmon PSC (2) Electronic submittal. The any amount of Chinook salmon bycatch allocation issued to eligible entities transferor’s designated entity in the A season that exceeds the amount under paragraph (f)(8)(i) of this section representative must log onto the NMFS available under the A season allocation. may be transferred to any other entity online services system and create a (11) Rollover of unused A season receiving a transferable allocation of transfer request as indicated on the allocation—(i) Rollovers of transferable Chinook salmon PSC by submitting to computer screen. By using the allocations. NMFS will add any NMFS an application for transfer transferor’s NMFS ID, password, and Chinook salmon PSC allocation described in paragraph (f)(9)(iii) of this Transfer Key, and submitting the remaining at the end of the A season, section. Transfers of Chinook salmon transfer request, the designated after any transfers under paragraph PSC allocations among eligible entities representative certifies that all (f)(9)(ii) of this section, to an entity’s B are subject to the following restrictions: information is true, correct, and season allocation. (A) Entities receiving transferable complete. allocations under the 60,000 PSC limit (C) Certification of transferee— (ii) Rollover of non-transferable may only transfer to and from other (1) Non-electronic submittal. The allocations. For a non-transferable entities receiving allocations under the transferee’s designated representative allocation for the mothership sector, 60,000 PSC limit. must sign and date the application catcher/processor sector, or an inshore (B) Entities receiving transferable certifying that all information is true, open access fishery, NMFS will add any allocations under the 47,591 PSC limit correct, and complete. Chinook salmon PSC remaining in that may only transfer to and from other (2) Electronic submittal. The non-transferable allocation at the end of entities receiving allocations under the transferee’s designated representative the A season to that B season non- 47,591 PSC limit. must log onto the NMFS online services transferable allocation. (C) Chinook salmon PSC allocations system and accept the transfer request (12) Chinook salmon bycatch may not be transferred between seasons. as indicated on the computer screen. By incentive plan agreements (IPAs)— (ii) Post-delivery transfers. If the using the transferee’s NMFS ID, (i) Minimum participation requirements. Chinook salmon bycatch by an entity password, and Transfer Key, the More than one IPA may be approved by exceeds its seasonal allocation, the designated representative certifies that NMFS. Each IPA must have participants entity may receive transfers of Chinook all information is true, correct, and that represent the following: salmon PSC to cover overages for that complete. (A) Minimum percent pollock. Parties season. An entity may conduct transfers (D) Deadline. NMFS will not approve to an IPA must collectively represent at to cover an overage that results from an application for transfer of Chinook least 9 percent of the BS pollock quota. Chinook salmon bycatch from any salmon PSC after June 25 for the A The percentage of pollock attributed to fishing trip by a vessel fishing on behalf season and after December 1 for the B each sector, AFA permitted vessel, and of that entity that was completed or is season. CDQ group is as follows:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53065

The percent of BS pollock quota Percent of BS pollock quota used to calculate IPA minimum participation For each sector attributed to each for each AFA permitted vessel and CDQ group is the value in sector

(1) Catcher/processor ...... 36 Column H in Table 47a to this part. (2) Mothership ...... 9 Column H in Table 47b to this part. (3) Inshore ...... 45 Column H in Table 47c to this part. (4) CDQ Program ...... 10 Column F in Table 47d to this part.

(B) Minimum number of unaffiliated submitting proposed amendments to the application must be received by NMFS AFA entities. Parties to an IPA must IPA and the annual report required no later than 1700 hours, A.l.t., on represent any combination of two or under paragraph (f)(12)(vii) of this October 1 of the year prior to the year more CDQ groups or corporations, section. for which the IPA is proposed to be partnerships, or individuals who own (3) Description of the incentive plan. effective. AFA permitted vessels and are not The IPA must contain a written (B) Duration. Once approved, an IPA affiliated, as affiliation is defined for description of the following: is effective starting January 1 of the year purposes of AFA entities in § 679.2. (i) The incentive(s) that will be following the year in which NMFS (ii) Membership in an IPA.—(A) No implemented under the IPA for the approves the IPA, unless the IPA is vessel owner or CDQ group is required operator of each vessel participating in approved between January 1 and to join an IPA. the IPA to avoid Chinook salmon January 19, in which case the IPA is (B) For a vessel owner in the catcher/ bycatch under any condition of pollock effective starting in the year in which it processor sector or mothership sector to and Chinook salmon abundance in all is approved. Once approved, an IPA is join an IPA, that vessel owner must be years; effective until December 31 of the first a member of the entity representing that (ii) The rewards for avoiding Chinook year in which it is effective or until sector under paragraph (f)(8). salmon, penalties for failure to avoid December 31 of the year in which the (C) For a CDQ group to be a member Chinook salmon at the vessel level, or IPA representative notifies NMFS in of an IPA, the CDQ group must sign the both; writing that the IPA is no longer in IPA and list in that IPA each vessel (iii) How the incentive measures in effect, whichever is later. An IPA may harvesting BS pollock CDQ, on behalf of the IPA are expected to promote not expire mid-year. No party may join reductions in a vessel’s Chinook salmon that CDQ group, that will participate in or leave an IPA once it is approved, bycatch rates relative to what would that IPA. except as allowed under paragraph have occurred in absence of the (iii) Request for approval of a (f)(12)(v)(C) of this section. incentive program; proposed IPA. The IPA representative (v) NMFS review of a proposed IPA— (iv) How the incentive measures in must submit an application for approval the IPA promote Chinook salmon (A) Approval. An IPA will be approved of a proposed IPA to NMFS at the savings in any condition of pollock by NMFS if it meets the following address in paragraph (b)(6) of this abundance or Chinook salmon requirements: section. A completed application abundance in a manner that is expected (1) Meets the minimum participation consists of the application form and the to influence operational decisions by requirements in paragraph (f)(12)(i) of proposed IPA, described below. vessel operators to avoid Chinook this section; (A) Application form. The applicant salmon; and (2) Is submitted in compliance with must submit a paper copy of the (v) How the IPA ensures that the the requirements of paragraph (f)(12)(ii) application form with all information operator of each vessel governed by the and (iv) of this section; and fields accurately filled in, including the IPA will manage his or her Chinook (3) Contains the information required affidavit affirming that each eligible salmon bycatch to keep total bycatch in paragraph (f)(12)(iii) of this section. vessel owner or CDQ group, from whom below the performance standard (B) IPA identification number. If the applicant received written described in paragraph (f)(6) of this approved, NMFS will assign an IPA notification requesting to join the IPA, section for the sector in which the number to the approved IPA. This has been allowed to join the IPA subject vessel participates. number must be used by the IPA to the same terms and conditions that (4) Compliance agreement. The IPA representative in amendments to the have been agreed on by, and are must include a written statement that all IPA. applicable to, all other parties to the parties to the IPA agree to comply with (C) Amendments to an IPA. IPA. The application form is available all provisions of the IPA. Amendments to an approved IPA may on the NMFS Alaska Region Web site (5) Signatures. The names and be submitted to NMFS and will be (http://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/) or signatures of the owner or reviewed under the requirements of this from NMFS at the address or phone representative for each vessel and CDQ paragraph (f)(12). number in paragraph (b)(6) of this group that is a party to the IPA. The (1) An amendment to an approved section. representative of an inshore cooperative, IPA, with no change in the IPA (B) Proposed IPA. The proposed IPA or the representative of the entity participants, may be submitted to NMFS must contain the following information: formed to represent the AFA catcher/ at any time and is effective upon written (1) Name of the IPA. The same IPA processor sector or the AFA mothership notification of approval by NMFS to the name submitted on the application sector under paragraph (f)(8) of this IPA representative. To amend an IPA, form. section may sign a proposed IPA on the IPA representative must submit a (2) Representative. The name, behalf of all vessels that are members of complete application, as described in telephone number, and e-mail address that inshore cooperative or sector level paragraph (f)(12)(iii) of this section. of the IPA representative who submits entity. (2) An amendment to the list of IPA the proposed IPA on behalf of the (iv) Deadline and duration— participants must be received by NMFS parties and who is responsible for (A) Deadline for proposed IPA. An no later than 1700 hours, A.l.t., on

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53066 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

December 1 and will be effective at the appeal under the procedures set forth at address in paragraph (b)(6) of this beginning of the next year. To amend § 679.43. If the applicant fails to file an section. the list of participants, the IPA appeal of the IAD pursuant to § 679.43, (ii) Deadline. For any ICA participant representative must submit an the IAD will become the final agency to be exempt from closure of the Chum application form, as described in action. If the IAD is appealed and the Salmon Savings Area as described at paragraph (f)(12)(iii)(A) of this section. final agency action is a determination to paragraph (e)(7)(ix) of this section and at (3) An amendment to the list of approve the proposed IPA, then the IPA § 679.22(a)(10), the ICA must be filed in participants related to a replacement will be effective as described in compliance with the requirements of vessel, under paragraph (f)(7) of this paragraph (f)(12)(iv)(B) of this section. this section, and approved by NMFS. section, may be submitted to NMFS at (4) While appeal of an IAD The proposed non-Chinook salmon any time. To amend the list of disapproving a proposed IPA is bycatch reduction ICA or any participants for a replacement vessel, pending, proposed members of the IPA amendments to an approved ICA must the IPA representative must submit the subject to the IAD that are not currently be postmarked or received by NMFS by application form, as described in members of an approved IPA will fish December 1 of the year before the year paragraph (f)(12)(iii)(A) of this section, under the opt-out allocation under in which the ICA is proposed to be and include a copy of the AFA permit paragraph (f)(5) of this section. If no effective. Exemptions from closure of issued under § 679.4 for the replacement other IPA has been approved by NMFS, the Chum Salmon Savings Area will vessel. NMFS will issue all sectors allocations expire upon termination of the initial (D) Disapproval—(1) NMFS will of the 47,591 Chinook salmon PSC limit ICA, expiration of the initial ICA, or if disapprove a proposed IPA or a as described in paragraph (f)(3)(iii)(B) of superseded by a NMFS-approved proposed amendment to an IPA for this section. amended ICA. either of the following reasons: (vi) Public release of an IPA. NMFS (2) Information requirements. The ICA (i) If the proposed IPA fails to meet will make all proposed IPAs and all must include the following provisions: any of the requirements of paragraphs approved IPAs and the list of (i) Participants—(A) The names of the (f)(12)(i) through (iii) of this section, or participants in each approved IPA AFA cooperatives and CDQ groups (ii) If a proposed amendment to an participating in the ICA. Collectively, IPA would cause the IPA to no longer available to the public on the NMFS Alaska Region Web site (http:// these groups are known as parties to the be consistent with the requirements of ICA. Parties to the ICA must agree to paragraphs (f)(12)(i) through (iv) of this alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/). (vii) IPA Annual Report. The comply with all provisions of the ICA. section. (B) The name, business mailing (2) Initial Administrative representative of each approved IPA must submit a written annual report to address, business telephone number, Determination (IAD). If, in NMFS’ business fax number, and business e- review of the proposed IPA, NMFS the Council at the address specified in § 679.61(f). The Council will make the mail address of the ICA representative. identifies deficiencies in the proposed (C) The ICA also must identify one annual report available to the public. IPA that require disapproval of the entity retained to facilitate vessel (A) Submission deadline. The annual proposed IPA, NMFS will notify the bycatch avoidance behavior and report must be postmarked or received applicant in writing. The applicant will information sharing. be provided 30 days to address, in by the Council no later than April 1 of (D) The ICA must identify at least one writing, the deficiencies identified by each year following the year in which third party group. Third party groups NMFS. An applicant will be limited to the IPA is first effective. include any organizations representing one 30-day period to address any (B) Information requirements. The western Alaskans who depend on non- deficiencies identified by NMFS. annual report must contain the Chinook salmon and have an interest in Additional information or a revised IPA following information: non-Chinook salmon bycatch reduction received after the 30-day period (1) A comprehensive description of but do not directly fish in a groundfish specified by NMFS has expired will not the incentive measures in effect in the fishery. be considered for purposes of the review previous year; (ii) The names, Federal fisheries of the proposed IPA. NMFS will (2) A description of how these permit numbers, and USCG evaluate any additional information incentive measures affected individual documentation numbers of vessels submitted by the applicant within the vessels; subject to the ICA. 30-day period. If the Regional (3) An evaluation of whether (iii) Provisions that dictate non- Administrator determines that the incentive measures were effective in Chinook salmon bycatch avoidance additional information addresses achieving salmon savings beyond levels behaviors for vessel operators subject to deficiencies in the proposed IPA, the that would have been achieved in the ICA, including: Regional Administrator will approve the absence of the measures; and (A) Initial base rate. The initial B proposed IPA under paragraphs (4) A description of any amendments season non-Chinook salmon base rate (f)(12)(iv)(B) and (f)(12)(v)(A) of this to the terms of the IPA that were shall be 0.19 non-Chinook salmon per section. However, if, after consideration approved by NMFS since the last annual metric ton of pollock. of the original proposed IPA and any report and the reasons that the (B) Inseason adjustments to the non- additional information submitted during amendments to the IPA were made. Chinook base rate calculation. the 30-day period, NMFS determines (g) BS Non-Chinook Salmon Bycatch Beginning July 1 of each fishing year that the proposed IPA does not comply Management—(1) Requirements for the and on each Thursday during the B with the requirements of paragraph non-Chinook salmon bycatch reduction season, the B season non-Chinook base (f)(12) of this section, NMFS will issue intercooperative agreement (ICA)—(i) rate shall be recalculated. The an initial administrative determination Application. The ICA representative recalculated non-Chinook base rate shall (IAD) providing the reasons for identified in paragraph (g)(2)(i)(B) of be the three week rolling average of the disapproving the proposed IPA. this section must submit a signed copy B season non-Chinook bycatch rate for (3) Administrative Appeals. An of the proposed non-Chinook salmon the current year. The recalculated base applicant who receives an IAD bycatch reduction ICA, or any proposed rate shall be used to determine bycatch disapproving a proposed IPA may amendments to the ICA, to NMFS at the avoidance areas.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53067

(C) ICA Chum Salmon Savings Area first offense, $15,000 for the second fishing effort away from Chum Salmon notices. On each Thursday and Monday offense, and $20,000 for each offense Savings Areas, and after June 10 of each year for the thereafter. (B) The results of the compliance duration of the pollock B season, the (v) Provisions requiring the parties to audit required at § 679.21(g)(2)(v). conduct an annual compliance audit, entity identified under paragraph ■ 8. In § 679.22, revise paragraphs and to cooperate fully in such audit, (g)(2)(i)(C) of this section must provide (a)(10) and (h) to read as follows: notice to the parties to the salmon including providing information bycatch reduction ICA and NMFS required by the auditor. The compliance § 679.22 Closures. audit must be conducted by a non-party identifying one or more areas designated (a) * * * ‘‘ICA Chum Savings Areas’’ by a series entity, and each party must have an (10) Chum Salmon Savings Area. of latitude and longitude coordinates. opportunity to participate in selecting Directed fishing for pollock by vessels The Thursday notice must be effective the non-party entity. If the non-party using trawl gear is prohibited from from 6 p.m. A.l.t. the following Friday entity hired to conduct a compliance August 1 through August 31 in the through 6 p.m. A.l.t. the following audit discovers a previously Chum Salmon Savings Area defined at Tuesday. The Monday notice must be undiscovered failure to comply with the Figure 9 to this part (see also effective from 6 p.m. A.l.t. the following terms of the ICA, the non-party entity Tuesday through 6 p.m. A.l.t. the must notify all parties to the ICA of the § 679.21(e)(7)(vii)). Vessels directed following Friday. For any ICA Salmon failure to comply and must fishing for pollock in the BS, including Savings Area notice, the maximum total simultaneously distribute to all parties pollock CDQ, and operating under a area closed must be at least 3,000 square of the ICA the information used to non-Chinook salmon bycatch reduction miles for ICA Chum Savings Area determine the failure to comply ICA approved under § 679.21(g) are closures. occurred and must include such exempt from closures in the Chum (D) Fishing restrictions for vessels notice(s) in the compliance report. Salmon Savings Area. assigned to tiers. For vessels in a (vi) Provisions requiring data * * * * * cooperative assigned to Tier 3, the ICA dissemination in certain circumstances. (h) CDQ fisheries closures. See Chum Salmon Savings Area closures If the entity retained to facilitate vessel § 679.7(d)(8) for time and area closures announced on Thursdays must be bycatch avoidance behavior and that apply to the CDQ fisheries once the closed to directed fishing for pollock, information sharing under paragraph non-Chinook salmon PSQ and the crab including pollock CDQ, for seven days. (g)(2)(i)(C) of this section determines PSQs have been reached. For vessels in a cooperative assigned to that an apparent violation of an ICA * * * * * Chum Salmon Savings Area closure has Tier 2, the ICA Chum Salmon Savings ■ Area closures announced on Thursdays occurred, that entity must promptly 9. In § 679.26, revise paragraph (c)(1) must be closed through 6 p.m. Alaska notify the Board of Directors of the to read as follows: local time on the following Tuesday. cooperative to which the vessel § 679.26 Prohibited Species Donation Vessels in a cooperative assigned to Tier involved belongs. If this Board of Program. 1 may operate in any area designated as Directors fails to assess a minimum * * * * * an ICA Chum Salmon Savings Area. uniform assessment within 180 days of (c) * * * (E) Cooperative tier assignments. receiving the notice, the information (1) A vessel or processor retaining Initial and subsequent base rate used by the entity to determine if an prohibited species under the PSD calculations must be based on each apparent violation was committed must program must comply with all cooperative’s pollock catch for the prior be disseminated to all parties to the ICA. two weeks and the associated bycatch of (3) NMFS review of the proposed ICA applicable recordkeeping and reporting non-Chinook salmon taken by its and amendments. NMFS will approve requirements. A vessel or processor members. Base rate calculations shall the initial or an amended ICA if it meets participating in the BS pollock fishery include non-Chinook salmon bycatch all the requirements specified in and PSD program must comply with and pollock caught in both the CDQ and paragraph (g) of this section. If NMFS applicable regulations at §§ 679.7(d) and non-CDQ pollock directed fisheries. disapproves a proposed ICA, the ICA (k), 679.21(c), and 679.28, including Cooperatives with non-Chinook salmon representative may resubmit a revised allowing the collection of data and bycatch rates of less than 75 percent of ICA or file an administrative appeal as biological sampling by an observer prior the base rate shall be assigned to Tier 1. set forth under the administrative to processing any fish under the PSD Cooperatives with non-Chinook salmon appeals procedures described at program. bycatch rates of equal to or greater than § 679.43. * * * * * 75 percent, but less than or equal to 125 (4) ICA Annual Report. The ICA ■ 10. In § 679.28, percent of the base rate shall be assigned representative must submit a written ■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(7) and to Tier 2. Cooperatives with non- annual report to the Council at the (d)(8) as paragraphs (d)(8) and (d)(9), Chinook salmon bycatch rates of greater address specified in § 679.61(f). The respectively; than 125 percent of the base rate shall Council will make the annual report ■ b. Add paragraphs (d)(7), (g)(7)(vi)(C), be assigned to Tier 3. available to the public. and (g)(7)(x)(F); (iv) Internal monitoring and (i) Submission deadline. The ICA ■ c. Revise newly redesignated enforcement provisions to ensure annual report must be postmarked or paragraph (d)(9)(i)(H) and paragraphs compliance of fishing activities with the received by the Council by April 1 of (g)(2)(i), (g)(7)(vii)(A) and (C), provisions of the ICA. The ICA must each year following the year in which (g)(7)(ix)(A), and (g)(7)(x)(D) and (E); include provisions allowing any party of the ICA is first effective. the ICA to bring civil suit or initiate a (ii) Information requirements. The ■ d. Add paragraph (j); and binding arbitration action against ICA annual report must contain the ■ e. Redesignate paragraphs (i)(1)(iii), another party for breach of the ICA. The following information: (iv), and(v) as paragraphs (i)(1)(ii), (iii), ICA must include minimum annual (A) An estimate of the number of non- and (iv), respectively. uniform assessments for any violation of Chinook salmon avoided as The revisions and additions read as savings area closures of $10,000 for the demonstrated by the movement of follows:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53068 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

§ 679.28 Equipment and operational for pollock in the BS, including vessels (ii) The system must include at least requirements. directed fishing for pollock CDQ in the one external USB (1.1 or 2.0) port or * * * * * BS, the observer work station must be other removable storage device (d) * * * adjacent to the location where salmon approved by NMFS. (7) Catcher/processors and will be counted and biological samples (iii) The system must use motherships in the BS pollock fishery, or scientific data are collected. commercially available software. including pollock CDQ. Catcher/ * * * * * (iv) Color cameras must have at a processors directed fishing for pollock (C) Proximity of observer work station. minimum 470 TV lines of resolution, in the BS or motherships taking The observation area must be located auto-iris capabilities, and output color deliveries from vessels directed fishing near the observer work station. The video to the recording device with the for pollock in the BS also must meet the plant liaison must be able to walk ability to revert to black and white video following requirements: between the work station and the output when light levels become too (i) A container to store salmon must observation area in less than 20 seconds low for color recognition. (v) The video data must be be located adjacent to the observer without encountering safety hazards. sampling station; maintained and made available to (ii) All salmon stored in the container * * * * * NMFS staff, or any individual must remain in view of the observer at (ix) * * * authorized by NMFS, upon request. the observer sampling station at all (A) Orienting new observers to the These data must be retained onboard the times during the sorting of each haul; plant and providing a copy of the vessel for no less than 120 days after the and approved CMCP; date the video is recorded, unless NMFS (iii) The container to store salmon * * * * * has notified the vessel operator that the must be at least 1.5 cubic meters. (x) * * * video data may be retained for less than * * * * * (D) The location of each scale used to this 120-day period. (9) * * * weigh catch; (vi) The system must provide (i) * * * (E) Each location where catch is sufficient resolution and field of view to (H) For catcher/processors using trawl sorted including the last location where observe all areas where salmon could be gear and motherships, a diagram drawn sorting could occur; and sorted from the catch, all crew actions to scale showing the location(s) where (F) For shoreside processors or in these areas, and discern individual all catch will be weighed, the location stationary floating processors taking fish in the salmon storage container. where observers will sample unsorted deliveries from vessels directed fishing (vii) The system must record at a catch, and the location of the observer for BS pollock, including vessels speed of no less than 5 frames per sampling station including the observer directed fishing for pollock CDQ in the second at all times when fish are being sampling scale. For catcher/processors BS, the location of the salmon storage sorted or when salmon are stored in the directed fishing for pollock in the BS or container. salmon storage location. (viii) A 16-bit or better color monitor, motherships taking deliveries from * * * * * for viewing all areas where sorting of catcher vessels directed fishing for (j) Electronic monitoring on catcher/ salmon of any species takes place and pollock in the BS, including pollock processors and motherships in the BS the salmon storage container in real CDQ, the diagram also must include the pollock fishery, including pollock CDQ. time, must be provided within the location of the last point of sorting in The owner or operator of a catcher/ observer sampling station. The monitor the factory and the location of the processor or a mothership must provide salmon storage container required under must— and maintain an electronic monitoring (A) Have the capacity to display all paragraph (d)(7) of this section. system that includes cameras, a cameras simultaneously; * * * * * monitor, and a digital video recording (B) Be operating at all times when fish (g) * * * system for all areas where sorting of are flowing past the sorting area and (2) * * * salmon of any species takes place and salmon are in the storage container; and (i) AFA and CDQ pollock, the location of the salmon storage (C) Be securely mounted at or near * * * * * container described at paragraph (d)(7) eye level. (7) * * * of this section. These electronic (ix) NMFS staff, or any individual (vi) * * * monitoring system requirements must authorized by NMFS, must be able to (C) For shoreside processors or be met when the catcher/processor is view any earlier footage from any point stationary floating processors taking directed fishing for pollock in the BS, in the trip and be assisted by crew deliveries from vessels directed fishing including pollock CDQ, and when the knowledgeable in the operation of the for pollock in the BS, including vessels mothership is taking deliveries from system. directed fishing for pollock CDQ in the catcher vessels directed fishing for (x) A vessel owner or operator must BS, the observation area must provide a pollock in the BS, including pollock arrange for NMFS to inspect the clear, unobstructed view of the salmon CDQ. electronic monitoring system and storage container to ensure no salmon of (1) What requirements must a vessel maintain a current NMFS-issued any species are removed without the owner or operator comply with for an electronic monitoring system inspection observer’s knowledge. electronic monitoring system? report onboard the vessel at all times the (vii) * * * (i) The system must have sufficient vessel is required to provide an (A) Location of observer work station. data storage capacity to store all video approved electronic monitoring system. (1) The observer work station must be data from an entire trip. Each frame of (2) How does a vessel owner arrange located in an area protected from the stored video data must record a time/ for NMFS to conduct an electronic weather where the observer has access date stamp in Alaska local time (A.l.t.). monitoring system inspection? The to unsorted catch. At a minimum, all periods of time when owner or operator must submit an (2) For shoreside processors or fish are flowing past the sorting area or Inspection Request for an Electronic stationary floating processors taking salmon are in the storage container must Monitoring System to NMFS by fax deliveries from vessels directed fishing be recorded and stored. (206–526–4066) or e-mail

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53069

([email protected]). The report to the vessel owner, if the codends to a processor or another request form is available on the NMFS electronic monitoring system meets the vessel, must have at least one observer Alaska Region Web site (http:// requirements of paragraph (j)(1) of this aboard the vessel at all times while it is alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/) or from section. The electronic monitoring directed fishing for pollock CDQ in the NMFS at the address or phone number system report is valid for 12 months BS. in paragraph (b)(6) of this section. from the date it is issued by NMFS. The * * * * * NMFS will coordinate with the vessel electronic monitoring system inspection (5) AFA and AI directed pollock owner to schedule the inspection no report must be made available to the fishery. later than 10 working days after NMFS observer, NMFS personnel, or to an (i) * * * receives a complete request form. authorized officer upon request. (D) AFA catcher vessels in the BS (3) What additional information is ■ 11. In § 679.50, pollock fishery. A catcher vessel using required for an electronic monitoring ■ a. Revise paragraph (c)(1) introductory trawl gear, except a catcher vessel that system inspection? text, paragraph (c)(4)(iv), and (c)(5) delivers only unsorted codends to a (i) A diagram drawn to scale showing heading; and processor or another vessel, must have all locations where salmon will be ■ b. Add a new paragraph (c)(5)(i)(D). at least one observer aboard the vessel sorted, the location of the salmon The addition and revisions read as at all times while it is directed fishing storage container, the location of each follows: for pollock in the BS. camera and its coverage area, and the * * * * * location of any additional video § 679.50 Groundfish Observer Program. ■ equipment must be submitted with the * * * * * 12. In § 679.61, revise paragraph request form. (c) * * * (f)(2)(vi) to read as follows: (ii) Any additional information (1) Unless otherwise specified in § 679.61 Formation and operation of requested by the Regional paragraphs (c)(4) through (7) of this fishery cooperatives. Administrator. section, observer coverage is required as * * * * * (4) How does a vessel owner make a follows: (f) * * * change to the electronic monitoring * * * * * (2) * * * system? Any change to the electronic (4) * * * (vi) The number of salmon taken by monitoring system that would affect the (iv) Catcher vessel using trawl gear— species and season, and list each system’s functionality must be (A) Groundfish CDQ fishing. A catcher vessel’s number of appearances on the submitted to, and approved by, the vessel equal to or greater than 60 ft (18.3 weekly ‘‘dirty 20’’ lists for non-Chinook Regional Administrator in writing m) LOA using trawl gear, except a salmon. before that change is made. catcher vessel that delivers only * * * * * (5) Where will NMFS conduct unsorted codends to a processor or electronic monitoring system another vessel or a catcher vessel §§ 679.2, 679.5, 679.7, 679.20, 679.21, 679.26, inspections? Inspections will be directed fishing for pollock CDQ in the 679.27, 679.28, 679.32, 679.61, and § 679.93 conducted on vessels tied to docks at BS, must have at least one level 2 [Amended] Dutch Harbor, Alaska; Kodiak, Alaska; observer as described at paragraph ■ 13. At each of the locations shown in and in the Puget Sound area of (j)(1)(v)(D) of this section aboard the the ‘‘Location’’ column of the following Washington State. vessel at all times while it is groundfish table, remove the phrase indicated in (6) What is an electronic monitoring CDQ fishing. the ‘‘Remove’’ column and replace it system inspection report? After an (B) BS pollock CDQ fishery. A catcher with the phrase indicated in the ‘‘Add’’ inspection, NMFS will issue an vessel using trawl gear, except a catcher column for the number of times electronic monitoring system inspection vessel that delivers only unsorted indicated in the ‘‘Frequency’’ column.

Location Remove Add Frequency

§ 679.2 Definition ‘‘AFA trawl catcher/ AFA trawl catcher/processor ...... AFA catcher/processor ...... 1 processor’’. § 679.2 Definition for ‘‘Amendment 80 AFA trawl catcher/processor ...... AFA catcher/processor ...... 1 vessel’’ paragraph (2)(i). § 679.5(c)(3)(v)(F) and (c)(4)(v)(G) ...... certified observer(s) ...... observer(s) ...... 2 § 679.5(c)(6)(v)(E) ...... certified observer(s) ...... observer(s) ...... 1 § 679.7(d)(18) ...... § 679.28(d)(8) ...... § 679.28(d)(9) ...... 1 § 679.20(a)(5)(i)(A)(3)(i) ...... § 679.62(e) ...... § 679.62(a) ...... 1 § 679.20(a)(7)(iii)(B) ...... AFA trawl catcher/processor ...... AFA catcher/processor ...... 1 § 679.21(e)(3)(v) ...... AFA trawl catcher/processor ...... AFA catcher/processor ...... 2 § 679.26(c)(1) ...... § 679.7(c)(1) ...... § 679.7(c)(2) ...... 1 § 679.27(j)(5)(iii) ...... § 679.28(d)(7)(i) ...... § 679.28(d)(8)(i) ...... 1 § 679.28(d)(2)(ii) ...... § 679.28(d)(7)(ii)(A) ...... paragraph (d)(8)(ii)(A) of this section ...... 1 § 679.28(d)(2)(ii) ...... § 679.28(d)(7)(ii)(B) ...... paragraph (d)(8)(ii)(B) of this section ...... 1 § 679.32(b) ...... § 679.7(d)(7) through (10) ...... § 679.7(d)(8) ...... 1 § 679.32(d)(2)(ii)(B)(1) ...... § 679.28(d)(8) ...... § 679.28(d)(9) ...... 1 § 679.32(d)(4)(ii) ...... § 679.28(d)(8) ...... § 679.28(d)(9) ...... 1 § 679.61(f)(1) ...... February 1 ...... April 1 ...... 1 § 679.93(c)(9) ...... § 679.28(i) ...... § 679.28(i)(1) ...... 1

■ 14. Revise Figure 8 to part 679 to read as follows: BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53070 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

BILLING CODE 3510–22–C

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES ER30AU10.000 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53071

■ 15. Tables 47a through 47d to part 679 are added to read as follows:

TABLE 47a TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA CATCHER/PROCESSOR SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PER- CENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH CATCHER/PROCESSOR UNDER § 679.21(f)

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent C/P sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (8,093) (8,093) threshold amount of 13,516

Vessel name USCG vessel AFA permit Percent A season B season Annual Percent documentation No. No.

American Dynasty ...... 951307 3681 4.93 324 76 400 1.78 American Triumph ...... 646737 4055 7.25 475 111 586 2.61 Northern Eagle ...... 506694 3261 6.07 398 93 491 2.19 Northern Hawk ...... 643771 4063 8.45 554 129 683 3.04 Northern Jaeger ...... 521069 3896 7.38 485 113 598 2.66 Ocean Rover ...... 552100 3442 6.39 420 98 518 2.30 Alaska Ocean ...... 637856 3794 7.30 479 112 591 2.63 Island Enterprise ...... 610290 3870 5.60 367 86 453 2.01 Kodiak Enterprise ...... 579450 3671 5.90 387 90 477 2.13 Seattle Enterprise ...... 904767 3245 5.48 359 84 443 1.97 Arctic Storm ...... 903511 2943 4.58 301 70 371 1.65 Arctic Fjord ...... 940866 3396 4.46 293 68 361 1.60 Northern Glacier ...... 663457 661 3.12 205 48 253 1.12 Pacific Glacier ...... 933627 3357 5.06 332 77 409 1.82 Highland Light ...... 577044 3348 5.14 337 79 416 1.85 Starbound ...... 944658 3414 3.94 259 60 319 1.42 Ocean Peace ...... 677399 2134 0.50 33 8 41 0.18 Katie Ann ...... 518441 1996 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 U.S. Enterprise ...... 921112 3004 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 American Enterprise ...... 594803 2760 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 Endurance ...... 592206 3360 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 American Challenger ...... 633219 4120 0.78 51 12 63 0.28 Forum Star ...... 925863 4245 0.61 40 9 49 0.22 Muir Milach ...... 611524 480 1.13 74 17 91 0.41 Neahkahnie ...... 599534 424 1.66 109 25 134 0.60 Ocean Harvester ...... 549892 5130 1.08 71 16 87 0.39 Sea Storm ...... 628959 420 2.05 134 31 165 0.74 Tracy Anne ...... 904859 2823 1.16 76 18 94 0.42

Total ...... 100.00 6,563 1,530 8,093 36.00

TABLE 47b TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA MOTHERSHIP SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH MOTHERSHIP UNDER § 679.21(f)

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent MS sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (2,220) (2,220) threshold amount of 3,707

Vessel name USCG Vessel AFA Permit Percent A season B season Annual Percent Documentation No. No.

American Beauty ...... 613847 1688 6.000 96 37 133 0.54 Pacific Challenger...... 518937 657 9.671 154 60 214 0.87 Nordic Fury ...... 542651 1094 6.177 99 39 138 0.55 Pacific Fury ...... 561934 421 5.889 94 37 131 0.53

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53072 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

TABLE 47b TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA MOTHERSHIP SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH MOTHERSHIP UNDER § 679.21(f)—Continued

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent MS sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (2,220) (2,220) threshold amount of 3,707

Vessel name USCG Vessel AFA Permit Percent A season B season Annual Percent Documentation No. No.

Margaret Lyn ...... 615563 723 5.643 90 35 125 0.51 Misty Dawn ...... 926647 5946 3.569 57 22 79 0.32 Vanguard ...... 617802 519 5.350 85 33 118 0.48 California Horizon ...... 590758 412 3.786 61 24 85 0.34 Oceanic ...... 602279 1667 7.038 112 44 156 0.63 Mar-Gun ...... 525608 524 6.251 100 39 139 0.56 Mark 1...... 509552 1242 6.251 100 39 139 0.56 Aleutian Challenger ...... 603820 1687 4.926 79 31 110 0.44 Ocean Leader ...... 561518 1229 6.000 96 37 133 0.54 Papado II ...... 536161 2087 2.953 47 18 65 0.27 Morning Star ...... 618797 7270 3.601 57 23 80 0.32 Traveler ...... 929356 3404 4.272 68 27 95 0.38 Vesteraalen ...... 611642 517 6.201 99 39 138 0.56 Alyeska ...... 560237 395 2.272 36 14 50 0.20 Western Dawn ...... 524423 134 4.150 66 26 92 0.37

Total ...... 100.000 1,596 624 2,220 9.00

TABLE 47c TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA INSHORE SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH CATCHER VESSEL UNDER § 679.21(f)

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (15,858) (15,858) threshold amount of 26,485

Vessel name USCG Vessel AFA Permit Percent A Season B Season Annual Percent documentation No. No.

AJ ...... 599164 3405 0.6958 69 41 110 0.31 Alaska Rose...... 610984 515 1.6835 167 100 267 0.76 Alaskan Command ...... 599383 3391 0.3711 37 22 59 0.17 Aldebaran ...... 664363 901 1.4661 146 87 233 0.66 Alsea ...... 626517 2811 1.6635 165 99 264 0.75 Alyeska ...... 560237 395 1.2192 121 72 193 0.55 American Beauty ...... 613847 1688 0.0425 4 2 6 0.02 American Eagle ...... 558605 434 1.0682 106 63 169 0.48 Anita J ...... 560532 1913 0.4999 50 30 80 0.22 Arctic Explorer ...... 936302 3388 1.6236 161 96 257 0.73 Arctic Wind ...... 608216 5137 1.1034 110 65 175 0.50 Arcturus ...... 655328 533 1.5450 153 91 244 0.70 Argosy ...... 611365 2810 1.6330 162 97 259 0.73 Auriga ...... 639547 2889 3.0981 308 184 492 1.39 Aurora ...... 636919 2888 3.0990 308 184 492 1.39 Bering Rose ...... 624325 516 1.7238 171 102 273 0.78 Blue Fox ...... 979437 4611 0.3140 31 19 50 0.14 Bristol Explorer ...... 647985 3007 1.5398 153 91 244 0.69 Caitlin Ann ...... 960836 3800 0.9357 93 55 148 0.42 Cape Kiwanda ...... 618158 1235 0.2282 23 13 36 0.10 Chelsea K ...... 976753 4620 4.6467 462 275 737 2.09

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53073

TABLE 47c TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA INSHORE SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH CATCHER VESSEL UNDER § 679.21(f)—Continued

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (15,858) (15,858) threshold amount of 26,485

Vessel name USCG Vessel AFA Permit Percent A Season B Season Annual Percent documentation No. No.

Collier Brothers ...... 593809 2791 0.1534 15 9 24 0.07 Columbia ...... 615729 1228 1.4429 143 85 228 0.65 Commodore ...... 914214 2657 1.2595 125 75 200 0.57 Defender ...... 554030 3257 3.4822 346 206 552 1.57 Destination ...... 571879 3988 2.1528 214 128 342 0.97 Dominator ...... 602309 411 1.7505 174 104 278 0.79 Dona Martita ...... 651751 2047 2.1033 209 125 334 0.95 Elizabeth F ...... 526037 823 0.3835 38 23 61 0.17 Excalibur II ...... 636602 410 0.5200 52 31 83 0.23 Exodus Explorer ...... 598666 1249 0.2990 30 18 48 0.13 Fierce Allegiance ...... 588849 4133 0.9377 93 56 149 0.42 Flying Cloud ...... 598380 1318 1.6410 163 97 260 0.74 Gold Rush ...... 521106 1868 0.4062 40 24 64 0.18 Golden Dawn ...... 604315 1292 1.7532 174 104 278 0.79 Golden Pisces ...... 599585 586 0.2706 27 16 43 0.12 Great Pacific ...... 608458 511 1.2361 123 73 196 0.56 Gun-Mar ...... 640130 425 2.2201 221 132 353 1.00 Half Moon Bay ...... 615796 249 0.5859 58 35 93 0.26 Hazel Lorraine ...... 592211 523 0.3847 38 23 61 0.17 Hickory Wind ...... 594154 993 0.3055 30 18 48 0.14 Intrepid Explorer ...... 988598 4993 1.1458 114 68 182 0.52 Leslie Lee ...... 584873 1234 0.5480 54 32 86 0.25 Lisa Melinda ...... 584360 4506 0.2192 22 13 35 0.10 Majesty ...... 962718 3996 0.9958 99 59 158 0.45 Marcy J ...... 517024 2142 0.1799 18 11 29 0.08 Margaret Lyn ...... 615563 723 0.0341 3 2 5 0.02 Mar-Gun ...... 525608 524 0.1043 10 6 16 0.05 Mark I ...... 509552 1242 0.0452 4 3 7 0.02 Messiah ...... 610150 6081 0.2291 23 14 37 0.10 Miss Berdie ...... 913277 3679 0.6110 61 36 97 0.27 Morning Star ...... 610393 208 1.6981 169 101 270 0.76 Ms Amy ...... 920936 2904 0.4882 48 29 77 0.22 Nordic Explorer ...... 678234 3009 1.1045 110 65 175 0.50 Nordic Fury ...... 542651 1094 0.0207 2 1 3 0.01 Nordic Star ...... 584684 428 1.0103 100 60 160 0.45 Northern Patriot ...... 637744 2769 2.4115 240 143 383 1.09 Northwest Explorer ...... 609384 3002 0.2387 24 14 38 0.11 Ocean Explorer ...... 678236 3011 1.3744 137 81 218 0.62 Morning Star ...... 652395 1640 0.5290 53 31 84 0.24 Ocean Hope 3 ...... 652397 1623 0.4175 41 25 66 0.19 Ocean Leader ...... 561518 1229 0.0545 5 3 8 0.02 Oceanic ...... 602279 1667 0.1348 13 8 21 0.06 Pacific Challenger ...... 518937 657 0.1680 17 10 27 0.08 Pacific Explorer ...... 678237 3010 1.2895 128 76 204 0.58 Pacific Fury ...... 561934 421 0.0121 1 1 2 0.01 Pacific Knight ...... 561771 2783 2.1816 217 129 346 0.98 Pacific Monarch ...... 557467 2785 1.5992 159 95 254 0.72 Pacific Prince...... 697280 4194 2.4099 239 143 382 1.08 Pacific Ram ...... 589115 4305 0.2035 20 12 32 0.09 Pacific Viking ...... 555058 422 1.0909 108 65 173 0.49 Pegasus ...... 565120 1265 0.6950 69 41 110 0.31 Peggy Jo ...... 502779 979 0.3324 33 20 53 0.15 Perseverance ...... 536873 2837 0.2954 29 17 46 0.13 Poseidon ...... 610436 1164 1.2411 123 73 196 0.56 Predator ...... 547390 1275 0.1968 20 12 32 0.09 Progress ...... 565349 512 1.0118 100 60 160 0.46 Providian ...... 1062183 6308 0.3822 38 23 61 0.17 Raven ...... 629499 1236 0.7116 71 42 113 0.32

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES 53074 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

TABLE 47c TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE AFA INSHORE SECTOR’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CALCULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH CATCHER VESSEL UNDER § 679.21(f)—Continued

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Column G Column H Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent sector Chinook Chinook Chinook used to cal- pollock salmon for salmon for salmon de- culate IPA the opt-out the opt-out ducted from minimum allocation allocation the annual participation (15,858) (15,858) threshold amount of 26,485

Vessel name USCG Vessel AFA Permit Percent A Season B Season Annual Percent documentation No. No.

Royal American ...... 624371 543 0.9698 96 57 153 0.44 Royal Atlantic ...... 559271 236 1.3095 130 78 208 0.59 Sea Wolf ...... 609823 1652 1.5156 151 90 241 0.68 Seadawn ...... 548685 2059 1.4108 140 84 224 0.63 Seeker ...... 924585 2849 0.3695 37 22 59 0.17 Sovereignty ...... 651752 2770 2.3513 234 139 373 1.06 Star Fish ...... 561651 1167 1.5114 150 90 240 0.68 Starlite ...... 597065 1998 1.2252 122 73 195 0.55 Starward ...... 617807 417 1.2611 125 75 200 0.57 Storm Petrel ...... 620769 1641 1.2334 123 73 196 0.56 Sunset Bay ...... 598484 251 0.5596 56 33 89 0.25 Topaz ...... 575428 405 0.0828 8 5 13 0.04 Traveler ...... 929356 3404 0.0413 4 2 6 0.02 Vanguard ...... 617802 519 0.0565 6 3 9 0.03 Viking ...... 565017 1222 1.6575 165 98 263 0.75 Viking Explorer ...... 605228 1116 1.1881 118 70 188 0.53 Walter N ...... 257365 825 0.4031 40 24 64 0.18 Western Dawn ...... 524423 134 0.3952 39 23 62 0.18 Westward I ...... 615165 1650 1.5544 154 92 246 0.70

Total ...... 100.00 9,933 5,925 15,858 45.00

TABLE 47d TO PART 679—PERCENT OF THE CDQ PROGRAM’S POLLOCK ALLOCATION, NUMBERS OF CHINOOK SALMON USED TO CALCULATE THE OPT-OUT ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL THRESHOLD AMOUNT, AND PERCENT USED TO CAL- CULATE IPA MINIMUM PARTICIPATION ASSIGNED TO EACH CDQ GROUP UNDER § 679.21(f)

Column A Column B Column C Column D Column E Column F Percent of Number of Number of Number of Percent used to CDQ Program Chinook salmon Chinook salmon Chinook salmon calculate IPA pollock for the opt-out for the opt-out deducted from the minimum allocation allocation annual threshold participation (2,325) (2,325) amount of 3,883

CDQ group Percent A season B season Annual Percent

APICDA ...... 14.00 260 66 326 1.40 BBEDC ...... 21.00 389 99 488 2.10 CBSFA ...... 5.00 93 23 116 0.50 CVRF ...... 24.00 445 113 558 2.40 NSEDC ...... 22.00 408 103 511 2.20 YDFDA ...... 14.00 260 66 326 1.40

Total ...... 100.00 1,855 470 2,325 10.00

[FR Doc. 2010–20618 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:21 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUR2.SGM 30AUR2 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES Monday, August 30, 2010

Part III

Department of Defense Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel Management Demonstration Project, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL); Notice

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53076 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE implementing issuances and notices to accepted in total by the four Laboratory appropriate stakeholders. Commanders. Office of the Secretary FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: After the authorizing legislation AFRL: Ms. Michelle Williams, AFRL/ passed, a Demonstration Project Office Science and Technology Reinvention DPL, 1864 4th Street, Wright-Patterson with four employees was established in Laboratory Personnel Management AFB, Ohio 45433–7130. September 1994. Under the guidance of Demonstration Project, Department of DoD: Ms. Betty A. Duffield, CPMS– the Air Force Materiel Command the Air Force, Air Force Research PSSC, Suite B–200, 1400 Key Director of Science and Technology, the Laboratory (AFRL) Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209–5144. Project Office was charged with further developing and implementing the AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Secretary of Defense (Civilian Personnel demonstration concept. Initially, the 1. Background Policy), (DUSD (CPP)), Department of Project Office solicited volunteers from Defense (DoD). The STRL demonstration projects are across the then four Laboratories and the servicing civilian personnel offices ACTION: Notice. ‘‘generally similar in nature’’ to the Navy’s China Lake Demonstration to staff six integrated product teams. SUMMARY: Section 342(b) of the National Project. The terminology ‘‘generally Sixty civilian managers and employees Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for similar in nature’’ does not imply an from most of the four Laboratories’ Fiscal Year (FY) 1995, as amended (title emulation of various features, but rather geographic locations and appropriate 10, U.S.C. 2358 note) by section 1109 of ‘‘that the effectiveness of Federal base level personnel offices worked for NDAA for FY 2000 and section 1114 of laboratories can be enhanced by nine months to develop the detailed NDAA for FY 2001, authorizes the allowing greater managerial control over concept and implementation for each Secretary of Defense to conduct personnel functions,’’ * * * which initiative. After a thorough study, the original 27 personnel demonstration projects at *** ‘‘can help managers to operate initiatives were reduced to 20. Seven of DoD laboratories designated as STRLs. with more authority, responsibility, and these initiatives were published in the The above-cited legislation authorizes skill to increase work force and original Federal Register and appear DoD to conduct demonstration projects organizational effectiveness and herein. The remaining initiatives were to determine whether a specified change efficiency.’’ 1 subject to either DoD or AF regulation in personnel management policies or In August 1994, a special action and waivers were sought at those levels. procedures would result in improved ‘‘Tiger Team’’ was formed by the Federal personnel management. Section Director of Science and Technology for 2. Overview 1107 of Public Law 110–181, as Air Force Materiel Command in This Federal Register notice (FRN) amended by section 1109 of Public Law response to the proposed DoD supersedes the four previous AFRL 110–417 requires the Secretary of legislation allowing reinvention Demonstration Project FRNs. Defense to execute a process and plan laboratories to conduct personnel Substantive changes include updating to employ the personnel management demonstration projects. The team was the Demonstration Project Reduction-in- demonstration project authorities chartered to take full opportunity of this Force (RIF) procedures; expanding the granted to the Office of Personnel legislation and develop solutions that coverage of the Demonstration Project to Management under section 4703, title 5, would alleviate or resolve many of the include AFRL employees in Business U.S.C., at the STRLs enumerated in prevalent and well-documented Management and Professional, section 9902(c)(2) of title 5, U.S.C., as Laboratory personnel issues. The team Technician, and Mission Support redesignated in Public Law 111–84, composition included managers from occupations; and the ability to establish section 1105, and 73 FR 73248, to the original four Air Force Laboratories an Above GS–15 authority (broadband enhance the performance of these (which merged and became AFRL in level V). In this FRN, AFRL is also laboratories. AFRL is listed as one of the August 1997), retired and current adopting flexibilities from other STRL designated STRLs. Laboratory directors, and subject matter personnel demonstration projects. This notice announces the approval of experts from civilian personnel and Additional flexibilities include using an an amendment to modify existing manpower. This team developed 27 alternative examining process; demonstration project initiatives, to initiatives which together represented implementing the Distinguished adopt flexibilities from other Science sweeping changes in the entire Scholastic Achievement Appointment and Technology Reinvention spectrum of human resource authority; expanding the use of Laboratories (STRLs) enumerated in management for the Laboratory. Several temporary promotions and details; section 9902(c)(2) of title 5, United initiatives were designed to assist the authorizing pay setting flexibilities; and States Code (U.S.C.), as redesignated in Laboratory in hiring and placing highly- requiring the Demonstration Project to Public Law 111–84, section 1105, and to qualified Scientist and Engineer (S&E) be cost disciplined. Also, the expanded expand coverage of the AFRL Personnel candidates to fulfill mission plan reduces the number of factors from Demonstration Project to AFRL requirements. Others focused on six to four, with corresponding employees in Business Management and developing, motivating, and equitably descriptors for each broadband level in Professional, Technician, and Mission compensating employees based on their a career path. Support occupations. contribution to the mission. Initiatives AFRL requested no waivers to DATES: The adoption of the listed STRL to effectively manage workforce veterans’ preference statutes. Therefore, demonstration project flexibilities and turnover and maintain organizational AFRL will fully comply with all expansion of coverage of the personnel excellence were also developed. These veterans’ preference act obligations. management demonstration project to 27 initiatives were endorsed and The original AFRL Personnel the remaining eligible AFRL employees Management Demonstration Project may be implemented beginning on the 1 Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 77, Friday, April plan was published in 61 FR 60399, 18, 1980, Proposed Demonstration Project: An date of publication of this notice in the Integrated Approach to Pay, Performance Appraisal, November 27, 1996. This Demonstration Federal Register. Implementation of the and Position Classification for More Effective Project plan involves simplified, flexibilities will be through AFRL Operation of Government Organizations. delegated position classification; two

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53077

types of appointment authorities; an requirements. Such flexibility is key to (2) Participating Employees and Labor extended probationary period; the success of the Demonstration Participation broadbanding; and a Contribution-based Project. The issues raised by the Comments: A commenter expressed Compensation System (CCS). Three commenter are not specific to the concern about his perception that amendments to the final plan were Demonstration Project and should be inclusion of bargaining unit positions in published in the Federal Register. The addressed through other mechanisms, the Demonstration Project would not be first amendment to clarify which such as ‘‘Ask the Commander’’ forums or negotiated in good faith. The commenter employees are subject to the extended discussions within the technology suggested that the AFRL and Air Force probationary period; provide the CCS directorate. Material Command (AFMC) bonus to eligible employees subject to Comments: A commenter asked a Commanders or the Chief of Staff of the the General Schedule (GS) 15, step 10 Air Force personally engage in all future series of questions as to whether job pay cap; and change the names of the Demonstration Project union analyses were completed prior to the descriptor ‘‘Cooperation and negotiations and include Federal Supervision’’ and CCS Factor 6, initial implementation of the Mediation and Conciliation Service ‘‘Cooperation and Supervision,’’ to Demonstration Project and prior to the involvement. ‘‘Teamwork and Leadership’’ was expansion of the Demonstration Project. Response: AFRL is currently in published in 65 FR 3498, January 21, Response: While job analyses are one communication with potentially 2000. The second amendment changed acceptable way of designing a new affected unions. After publication of the the amount of time required to be performance management system, AFRL final Federal Register notice, AFRL will assessed under CCS from 180 to 90 senior management chose not to use this work with affected unions to negotiate calendar days and was published in 70 methodology. Rather, AFRL utilized openly to reach a consensus position on FR 60495, October 18, 2005. The third existing Office of Personnel this important issue at appropriate amendment eliminating mandatory levels and times. factor weights was published in 74 FR Management (OPM) classification 15463, April 6, 2009. standards, which have been determined (3) Description of Hiring Process Flexibilities published in this Federal by OPM to be reliable and valid, to Comments: A commenter suggested Register notice shall be available for use design the classification and CCS factors that the Federal Register notice should by all STRLs listed in section 9902(c)(2) and descriptors used within the clearly state what veterans’ preference of title 5, United States Code, as Demonstration Project. AFRL did not hiring obligations are under the redesignated in Public Law 111–84, have total independence in designing Demonstration Project and how section 1105, if they wish to adopt them this system because of the requirement compliance is being measured in a in accordance with DoD Instruction to remain competitive with other public and transparent manner. The 1400.37; pages 73248 to 73252 of Federal agencies. Due to the provision commenter also suggested establishing volume 73, Federal Register; and the of seamless broadband movement, and measuring (through CCS) goals for fulfilling of any collective bargaining which is one of the signature initiatives veterans’ preference interviews and obligations. being tested in the AFRL demonstration hiring under the Demonstration Project. 3. Summary of Comments project, it was critical that the Additionally, the commenter stated that performance management system (CCS) veterans’ preference applies to merit Nine e-mails from nine commenters and, in particular, the factors and promotions under the GS system and containing numerous comments were descriptors, be tied to the established inquired as to how it pertains to received regarding the AFRL Laboratory Federal Classification System. While broadband movements in the Demonstration Project, Federal Register, OSD now has approval authority, OPM Demonstration Project. 75 FR 27866, dated May 18, 2010. The and OSD were highly involved in the Response: AFRL requested no waivers following is a summary of these written original design of the factors and to veterans’ preference rules and comments by topical area and a descriptors used in the classification regulations. Therefore, AFRL will fully response to each. In some cases, and CCS processes. By approving the comply with all veterans’ preference commenters were contacted directly and obligations. Clarifying language has 1996 AFRL Federal Register notice provided extensive replies to their been added to the Overview section of publication, DoD and OPM signaled comments. this Federal Register notice. their agreement with the validity of the (1) Problems With the Present System Additionally, AFRL monitors its classification and CCS processes. The external hiring of veterans to ensure Comments: One commenter expressed same methodology was used for the they are treated fairly in the selection his concern about his perception of the expanded workforce that was used in process. Results are briefed semi- routine filling of certain vacant the 1990s for the S&Es. annually to the AFRL Corporate Board, positions such as senior program Comments: One commenter expressed a body of senior leaders within the management, deputy chief information concern about her perception that the Laboratory. It is noted that veterans’ officer, deputy director, etc., with Demonstration Project was not preference does not apply to merit personnel who possess a scientific or successful. promotions in the GS system or to engineering degree which reduces job broadband movements in the Response: A survey has been opportunities for individuals assigned Demonstration Project. to other professional series. conducted bi-annually since the Comments: One commenter Response: Managers must still inception of the Demonstration Project. recommended that the Distinguished identify each position to the proper Survey results show approximately 80% Scholastic Achievement Appointment series based on the duties of the of AFRL Demonstration Project Authority include candidates who are position. The Demonstration Project employees are in favor of the within the top 10 percent of a believes that first and second-level Demonstration Project and show a high university’s major school of supervisors are in the best position to level of support for expansion of the undergraduate studies. determine the appropriate occupational Demonstration Project authorities to the Response: Recommendation has been series needed to satisfy mission non-bargaining unit members. adopted.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53078 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Comments: OSD has indicted that the Implementing instructions will be Comments: A commenter expressed Distinguished Scholastic Achievement described in internal AFRL issuances. concern that the authority to grant a Appointment Authority may not be the Comments: A commenter inquired as relocation bonus to a Student Career appropriate venue for an expedited to whether expanded temporary Experience Program (SCEP) student hiring authority for the occupational promotions and details will be limited could be abused. The commenter also series in the Business Management and to actions within the same career path. recommended that a Continuing Service Professional career path (DO Response: Temporary promotions and Agreement (CSA) be required for SCEP broadband). Additional research on details are permitted across career paths students receiving a relocation bonus hiring difficulties for these positions, provided qualification requirements are and suggested that management ensure the new OPM hiring reform initiatives, met. that their home of record is not located use of current expedited hiring Comments: A commenter requested within the commuting area of the work authorities covering some of the DO clarification as to how the Broadbanding location. positions, and potential impact on OPM Structure table, in the Broadbanding Response: Safeguards are being put in qualifications standards may be section, will be used for initial place through internal AFRL issuances. warranted. employee conversion into the Management will be required to justify Response: The Distinguished Demonstration Project. each bonus granted and maintain Scholastic Achievement Appointment Response: The commenter is referring documentation to this effect. The Authority will not be utilized for the to the methodology used to establish the recommendation to require a CSA was Business Management and Professionals banding structure. This should not be considered but not adopted. A student’s at this time. AFRL will work with OSD confused with the determination of home of record will be documented and on possible streamlined hiring what band an employee will be placed maintained by management. initiatives for various positions within in upon conversion into the Laboratory Comments: A commenter suggested the DO career path at a later date. The Demonstration Project. Employees will specific minimum requirements (e.g., Description of Hiring section has been move into the career path and length of time, CCS rating, etc.) that updated to reflect this change. broadband level that coincides with must be met before a basic pay increase Comments: One commenter their permanent GS grade and can be granted under the accelerated recommended removing the following occupational series, unless their basic compensation authority for local interns words from the criteria for converting an salary falls outside the pay range, a or risk rampant accelerated employee serving on a modified term situation which would require a special compensation, which will impact the appointment to a career appointment: review. For clarification, the Conversion Demonstration Project cost discipline ‘‘Be selected under merit staffing to the Demonstration Project section has philosophy. procedures for the permanent position.’’ been changed to state ‘‘Employees are Response: Safeguards, such as The employee would have been initially converted into the career path and minimum delta Overall Contribution selected under competitive procedures broadband level which includes their Score (OCS) and one basic pay increase and there is no requirement to apply permanent GS/GM grade and per year, are being implemented merit system principles again to fill the occupational series of record, unless through internal AFRL issuances. there are extenuating circumstances position permanently. (5) Broadbanding Response: Recommendation has been which require individual attention, such Comments: A commenter pointed out adopted. as special pay rates or pay retention.’’ Comments: A commenter pointed out that in paragraph 3, reference to ‘‘Table Comments: A commenter 2’’ should be ‘‘Table 1.’’ recommended clarifying that since one that there is no mention of a temporary appointment authority (only career and Response: The reference to this table of the requirements for a non- was changed. competitive conversion of a modified modified term). Response: The Demonstration Project Comments: A commenter expressed term employee is to have served a will continue to use the temporary concern that there could be a potential minimum of two years of continuous appointment authority as provided issue in recruiting for broadband level I, service in the term appointment this under title 5, U.S.C. and title 5, CFR. at the GS–7 equivalency, due to the period of employment may be counted Clarifying language has been added. education requirements and/or toward the completion of the extended applicants’ lack of required specialized probationary period. (4) Pay Setting Outside the CCS experience. There would be more Response: Clarification has been Comments: A commenter flexibility for management if the added to the Extended Probationary recommended that a bonus may be broadband level I began at the GS–5 Period Section. given in lieu of a basic pay increase. equivalency versus the GS–7 Comments: A commenter stated that Response: Recommendation has been equivalency in the DO career path. AFRL must ensure that opportunities for adopted. Response: Comment was considered. non-competitive temporary promotions Comments: A commenter Management made a conscious decision and details are based on the criteria in recommended that ‘‘CCS bonus’’ be to set the minimum equivalent grade at title 5, Code of Federal Regulations referred to as ‘‘CCS incentive.’’ the GS–7 for the DR and DO career (CFR) 335.103(b)(1). Response: Recommendation was paths. The DR career path has been set Response: This Federal Register considered but not adopted. ‘‘CCS at this level since the inception of the notice waives 5 CFR 335.103(c) to allow bonus’’ better describes the intent of this Demonstration Project and senior for non-competitive temporary authority. management was not willing to reduce promotions and details in excess of 120 Comments: The same commenter expectations for the DO career path. days. However, AFRL will ensure recommended that retention, Comments: A commenter had decisions are made consistent with recruitment, and relocation ‘‘payments’’ concerns over using the same number merit principles; are based on job- be referred to as retention, recruitment, structure for the different broadbands in related criteria as spelled out in 5 CFR and relocation ‘‘incentives.’’ the different career paths. 335.103(b)(1); and will require Response: Recommendation has been Response: The assigned pay plan (i.e., appropriate approvals on all actions. adopted. DR, DO, DU, or DX) first identifies the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53079

career path for a given position/person. above the first-level supervisor of the participation are examples of The broadband level (i.e., I, II, III, or IV) position under review. Clarification has opportunities which may impact an is then assigned based on the duties of been added to the Classification employee’s CCS score and should be the position. This is an accepted Authority section. discussed in feedback sessions between nomenclature and the same structure Comments: Recommend that language the employee and supervisor. The CCS used by other demonstration projects be clarified to include that supervisors factors and descriptors are tools that and alternative personnel systems. or Senior Personnel Advisors (SPAs) may be used as the employee’s roadmap Comments: The commenter had may create an electronic Statement of to higher level contribution. concerns about the lack of information Experience and Duties (SDE). Comments: A commenter expressed in the Federal Register notice regarding Response: Recommendation has been concern over the lack of information on broadband V positions. adopted. a CCS bonus. Response: The broadband V (or Above Response: The authority to authorize (7) CCS GS–15) position concept is an OSD a bonus was included in this Federal initiative that was tested in Army and Comments: Commenters expressed Register notice in order to provide Navy Laboratory demonstration concerns about their perceptions supervisors and managers access to an projects. AFRL did not participate in the regarding equity and fairness of additional tool to appropriately initial trial of this concept, which quantitative ratings of individual recognize outstanding contributions consisted of 40 positions. This FRN employee performance and indicated based on the level and type of provides a basic description of support of qualitative measures of group contributions as well as their overall broadband V positions. OSD will performance instead. Also, comments impact on mission. AFRL does not publish a Federal Register notice and were received on how one’s opportunity intend to utilize this bonus authority manage the final authority, to include for advancement may be impacted by until a determination has been made as salary ranges, for these positions. OPM the pay pool to which assigned. to the need and adequate processes are has been consulted by OSD on this Therefore, the commenters support the implemented to describe how this initiative and is interested in the use of one AFRL-wide pay pool. bonus will be paid. AFRL implementing proposal. Response: The concerns regarding issuances will be updated prior to the quantitative ratings and the use of this authority. (6) Classification commenter’s support of qualitative Comments: A commenter cited Comments: In the Classification measures were very technical in nature concerns about her perception of Authority and Reduction-in-Force and have therefore been directly fairness and transparency of the Meeting sections, a commenter noted that addressed in detail to the commenter. of Managers (MoM), CCS, and the ‘‘technical director’’ should read In regard to the concern over seamless broadband movement process. ‘‘technology director.’’ advancement opportunities, the use of Response: The MoM is a process that Response: This was changed. multiple pay pools allows employees to allows supervisors to discuss employee Comments: Under Classification be assessed in an environment where a contributions and come to agreement on Process, recommend that pay plan and number of managers are aware of each equivalent levels of contribution. Every broadband level be added to the second employee’s contribution relative to his/ employee is encouraged to provide sentence of paragraph (a). her peers. An AFRL-wide pay pool details to their supervisor of their yearly Response: Recommendation has been would be unwieldy and would not yield accomplishments for each factor. This adopted. the checks and balances currently in helps supervisors understand how Comments: A comment was received place with the directorate-based pay employees perceive their work and its regarding application of acquisition pools. role in helping to meet the mission. professional development requirements Comments: A commenter questioned Supervisors use these self-assessments to positions and the impact on the reliability of factor weights. and their own knowledge of each broadband movements. Response: While the November 1996 employee’s contributions as a starting Response: This Demonstration Project AFRL Federal Register notice and April point for determining preliminary CCS Federal Register notice documents 2009 Federal Register notice described scores. Overall Contribution Scores are changes to title 5, U.S.C. and to title 5, use of factor weights, it is now AFRL’s not assigned by individual supervisors; CFR. These suggestions are not a part of intent not to utilize factor weights with rather they are assigned by the group of either title 5 requirements and therefore, the change to four factors for S&Es and supervisors attending the MoMs. This are not appropriate for Federal Register establishment of four factors for the process reduces possible unfairness publication. However, AFRL follows expanded workforce. Therefore, the issues when only one person assigns a Defense Acquisition Workforce description of factor weights was not in score, encourages communication Improvement Act (DAWIA) the May 2010 Federal Register notice within the directorate, and includes requirements for coding acquisition publication, nor in this one. This extra layers of checks and balances by positions. The Demonstration Project publication supersedes all previous providing a mechanism to ensure must operate within the DAWIA laws Federal Register notices. equitability of scores across branches and, as such, ensures that these Comments: A comment was received and divisions and, ultimately, the requirements are met prior to allowing that the Federal Register notice makes directorate/pay pool. Supervisors seamless, competitive, or non- no mention of how long-term additional discuss contributions with each competitive broadband movements to duties or Integrated Project Team duties employee after scores have been occur. may be used to increase an employee’s finalized. Employees may utilize the Comments: Comments were received contribution level. grievance process, which provides for as to what level the Classification Response: The AFRL contribution- third party review, if they do not agree Authority may be delegated. based system empowers employees to with the CCS score assigned. Response: This authority is delegated seek additional opportunities which are To facilitate transparency and to the technology directors or pay pool taken into consideration when openness in the CCS process, there are managers, who may further delegate to determining overall contribution level. two mandatory feedback sessions built not lower than one management level Long-term additional duties and team into the CCS process. Supervisors are

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53080 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

required to discuss employee commenter. No changes were made to Response: A broadband movement contributions, professional development the CCS design as a result of this may be granted when the employee and training needs, and expectations comment. consistently contributes at the level as with each employee after the rating described in the broadband level (8) SPL cycle ends and midway through the descriptors for the next higher cycle. In addition, supervisors and Comments: One commenter pointed broadband level, receives basic pay employees are encouraged to maintain out that the Mission Support SPL and commensurate with the higher open lines of communication and the Technician SPL are transposed. broadband level, demonstrates the discuss expectations throughout the Response: The Mission Support SPL ability to maintain the higher level year. and the Technician SPL are now correct. contribution, and has met any The seamless broadband movement is additional criteria established by the (9) Pay Pools facilitated by increases in score and Pay Pool Manager. As described in basic pay based on the assessment of Comments: A commenter expressed greater detail in the Broadband employee contributions, as well as concerns that a pay pool of 35 Movement section of this notice, consideration of many other aspects. As employees would be too small to yield broadband movement is based on a stated in the Broadband Movement statistically valid results. combination of OCS and basic pay. section, ‘‘If an employee’s contributions Response: A pay pool of 35 is Delta is not a direct contributing factor impact and broaden the scope, nature, consistent with the approach used by to broadband movement. However, intent and expectations of the position OPM for other demonstration projects. continual growth, which is the and are reflective of higher level factor The AFRL pay pools are defined by difference between current and previous descriptors, the classification of the technology directorate/functional area year’s score, would be an indication of position is updated accordingly.’’ In to implement the ‘‘same mission’’ consistently contributing at higher addition, an employee’s basic pay must principal. With this definition, the levels. be at a level consistent with the higher smallest pay pool for the 2009 cycle had Comments: A commenter expressed a broadband level. Therefore, two 59 employees. concern that employees may be assigned employees may receive the same score In the Demonstration evaluation duties outside their SDE and perhaps but broadband movement may not be effort, only descriptive statistics are would not be given appropriate job appropriate for both employees. An used at the pay pool level of analysis. skills/experience coding. employee’s proven ability to maintain The entire Laboratory Demonstration Response: The SDE has been the higher level contribution, level of Project population is used for more structured generally so that employees education, completion of Professional complex statistical analyses that use may seek opportunities for additional Military Education (PME), breadth of confidence intervals. This minimizes experience and contribution. If the skill experience, and demonstrated the potential for any group of interest in codes of a position change over time, a leadership are all factors in a Pay Pool a given analysis to be so small that the personnel action is processed to Manager’s decisions when approving resulting confidence interval is so large document this change. broadband movements. The mandatory as to mask important differences in feedback sessions and open lines of (11) Voluntary Pay Reduction and Pay communication between employees and results for the groups. AFRL senior Raise Declination leadership reviews CCS results on a supervisors provide employees with Comments: One commenter expectations so that employees yearly basis and is satisfied with the results of the statistical analysis. recommended including that a understand what is needed for a voluntary pay reduction or pay raise broadband movement. This provides (10) Broadband Level Movements declination could also be requested by transparency and openness in the employees during the 30-day period seamless broadband movement process. Comments: One commenter expressed concern over a lack of information as to immediately following a CCS grievance Additionally, the AFRL Corporate decision. Board reviews the extensive evaluations whether an employee could be moved to a higher broadband level if his or her Response: Recommendation has been that are conducted after each rating adopted. cycle and issues corporate guidance on immediate supervisor is at the higher managing pay pools to ensure broadband level. For example, could an (12) Voluntary Emeritus Corps consistency, greater transparency, etc. employee be moved to a broadband Comments: A commenter Bi-annual surveys of all employees are level III if their supervisor is a recommended requiring that volunteers conducted and, based upon results, broadband level III? not be permitted to report for duty prior focus groups or additional surveys are Response: The Demonstration system to finalization of the required accomplished in order to identify, and is not hierarchical; meaning a agreement. then correct, unintended consequences supervisor’s broadband level is based on Response: Recommendation has been or negative perceptions. Supervisors are the contributions he/she has made to adopted. required to take mandatory courses on the organization, and not based on the (13) Conversion the CCS process, CCS software, and broadband levels of subordinate providing effective CCS feedback. employees, as is typical under other Comments: For clarification, a Technology directorate-specific personnel systems. Therefore, commenter recommended rewording continuing training is also offered to supervisors may supervise employees at the first sentence of the Conversion to employees. lower, the same, or higher broadband Another Personnel System section to Comments: A commenter presented a levels. Due to the comment received, state: The pay-setting rules of the lengthy technical paper expressing clarifying language was added to the gaining pay system will apply when concern over the design of the Classification section of this Federal employees leave the AFRL Contribution-based Compensation Register notice. broadbanding system to accept Federal System. Comments: A commenter asked if a employment in another personnel Response: A paper addressing these specified amount of growth or delta is system. concerns was sent directly to the required for broadband movement. Response: Suggestion is adopted.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53081

Comments: A commenter requested (16) Waivers to title 5, CFR A. Waivers to Title 5, United States Code clarification as to whether, and to what B. Waivers to Title 5, Code of Federal Comments: Recommend part 213, Regulations extent, a supervisor has the discretion to section 213.3202, Tenure Group, be set the initial broadband level for Appendix A. Career Path Occupational Series waived to allow Excepted Service Appendix B. Descriptors Sorted by Career converting employees. employees to be in tenure group I. Path, Broadband Level, and Factor Response: Supervisors will not make Response: Recommendation has been Appendix C. Descriptors Sorted By Career the initial broadband level adopted. Path, Factor, and Broadband Level Comments: Recommend that part 340, determination upon conversion. For I. Executive Summary clarification, the Conversion to the subpart A, subpart B, and subpart C, Demonstration Project section has been Other than Full-Time Career The original Project was designed by changed to state ‘‘Employees are Employment, be waived to also allow the Department of the Air Force (AF), converted into the career path and for Excepted Service employees to be in with participation of and review by the broadband level which includes their tenure group I. DoD and the Office of Personnel permanent GS/GM grade and Response: Recommendation has been Management (OPM). The purpose was occupational series of record, unless adopted. to achieve the best workforce for the Laboratory mission, prepare the there are extenuating circumstances (17) Professional Military Education workforce for change, and improve which require individual attention, such (PME) Requirement as special pay rates or pay retention. workforce quality. The Project Comments: A commenter framework addressed all aspects of the (14) Reduction-in-Force recommended that the Demonstration human resources life cycle model. There Project include a permanent provision were three major areas of change: (1) Comments: One commenter that graduation from the in-residence recommended that trial period Laboratory-controlled rapid hiring; (2) a United States Air Force Senior Contribution-based Compensation employees also be included in tenure Noncommissioned Officer Academy group I for RIF purposes. System; and (3) a streamlined removal permanently satisfies the AFMC process. Response: Recommendation has been Professional Military Education (PME) Initially, the Project covered only adopted. Clarification as to who serves requirement. professional S&E positions and probationary and trial periods, and how Response: The Demonstration Project employees. This Federal Register notice it impacts RIF, was added to the RIF and Federal Register notice documents incorporates a design for coverage of not Probationary Period sections. changes to title 5, U.S.C. and title 5, only S&E employees but also the AFRL Comments: A commenter suggested CFR. This suggestion is outside the employees in Business Management and clarification as to how contribution will scope of both title 5, U.S.C. and title 5, Professional, Technician, and Mission affect RIF retention. CFR requirements and therefore, is not Support occupations. appropriate for Federal Register Response: There are no additional II. Introduction years of service added to service publication. As the commenter noted, computation dates based on policies related to this matter have been A. Purpose crafted at the HQ AFMC level. contribution scores, rather, contribution The purpose of the Project is to scores are used as a sort factor. The Dated: August 24, 2010. demonstrate that the effectiveness of Reduction-in-Force section has been Mitchell S. Bryman, DoD laboratories can be enhanced by clarified. Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison allowing greater managerial control over Officer, Department of Defense. (15) Appendix A personnel functions and, at the same Table of Contents time, expanding the opportunities Comments: For occupational series available to employees through a more 0199, change Social Science Student to I. Executive Summary responsive and flexible personnel II. Introduction system. This Demonstration Project, in Social Science Student Trainee. Also, A. Purpose for occupational series 0401, change B. Problems With the Present System its entirety, attempts to provide Trainee General Biological Science to C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits managers, at the lowest practical level, General Biological Science. D. Participating Employees and Labor the authority, control, and flexibility Response: Changes are accepted. Participation needed to achieve a quality Laboratory E. Project Design and quality products. Comments: The list of DO pay plan III. Personnel System Changes occupational series was inadvertently A. Hiring and Appointment Authorities B. Problems With the Present System truncated. Recommend the following B. Pay Setting Outside the Contribution- The success of the Demonstration occupational series be included: 0018 Based Compensation System Project for S&E personnel has convinced Safety and Occupational Health C. Broadbanding AFRL management that the same system D. Classification Management, 0028 Environmental should be implemented for the Protection Specialist, 0030 Fitness and E. Contribution-Based Compensation System remaining AFRL workforce. The Sports Specialist, 0080 Security F. Dealing With Inadequate Contributions Laboratory Demonstration Project Administration, 0099 Security Student G. Voluntary Emeritus Corps implemented a broadbanding structure Trainee, 0101 Social Scientist, 0110 H. Reduction-in-Force Procedures that replaced the 15 grades under the GS Economist, 0669 Medical Records IV. Training classification structure. This flexibility Administration, 1040 Language V. Conversion has enabled management to offer Specialist, 1060 Photography, 1071 A. Conversion to the Demonstration Project competitive starting salaries and Audiovisual Production, 1082 Writing B. Conversion to Another Personnel System seamlessly progress employees through and Editing, 1083 Technical Writing the broadband levels based on and Editing, 1084 Visual Information. VI. Project Duration and Changes VII. Evaluation Plan contribution to the mission. The CCS Response: These DO occupational VIII. Demonstration Project Costs has provided management an effective, series are added. IX. Required Waivers to Law and Regulation efficient, and flexible method for

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53082 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

assessing, compensating, and managing system tailored to the mission and With this expansion effort, a total of the S&E workforce. CCS has created needs of the Laboratory results in: (a) 155 occupational series are included in more employee involvement in the Increased quality of the workforce and the Project. During the course of the assessment process, increased the Laboratory products they produce; Project, other series may be included or communication between supervisors (b) increased timeliness of key moved to a more appropriate career and employees, promoted a clear personnel processes; (c) trended path. For instance, a path for physicians accountability of contribution, workforce data that reveals increased and dentists may be added to the Project facilitated employee career progression, retention of ‘‘excellent contributors’’ and at a later date. and provided an understandable basis increased separation rates of ‘‘poor The series included in the initial for basic pay changes. contributors;’’ and (d) increased implementation of the Project were The civilian GS personnel system has employee satisfaction with the placed in the S&E career path (pay plan several major inefficiencies, which Laboratory. hinder management’s ability to recruit DR). The success of the Demonstration and retain the best-qualified personnel. D. Participating Employees and Labor Project for the S&Es has proven that it Line managers have only limited Participation is prudent to expand the flexibilities to flexibility to administer personnel There are approximately 5,025 the AFRL workforce in Business resources, and existing personnel employees assigned to AFRL, with the Management and Professional, regulations are often in conflict with majority located in or at Arlington, Technician, and Mission Support management’s ability to support world- Virginia; Brooks City Base, Texas; occupations. This Federal Register class research. Current personnel action Edwards Air Force Base (AFB), notice proposes implementation of three processes cause delays in recruiting, California; Eglin AFB, Florida; Hanscom new career paths for the Business reassigning, promoting, and removing AFB, Massachusetts; Kirtland AFB, New Management and Professional (pay plan employees. AFRL received no hiring Mexico; Rome, New York; Tyndall AFB, DO), Technician (pay plan DX), and authorities with the initial Florida; and Wright-Patterson AFB, Mission Support (pay plan DU) Demonstration Project implementation. Ohio. Employees are also located at sites occupations. The new career paths are Laboratories that implemented their around the world. constructed based on career progression authorities at a later time received Of the 5,025 AFRL employees, and occupational responsibilities, taking hiring flexibilities that AFRL now approximately 2,630 are currently in the into consideration the AFRL workforce, wishes to pursue. Demonstration Project. The National the existing S&E career path and the The GS classification system requires Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) design of other Defense laboratory lengthy, narrative, individual position and the American Federation of broadbanding systems. The career paths descriptions, which have to be classified Government Employees (AFGE) along with the occupational series by the use of complex and often represent professional and included are listed in Appendix A. outdated position classification nonprofessional employees at many Series may be added or deleted as standards. The classification process sites within AFRL. At this time, there mission work evolves and new under the AFRL Demonstration Project are approximately 140 employees in the competencies are needed. has been highly successful, can be NFFE and AFGE bargaining units that accomplished quickly and efficiently, are in the Demonstration Project. AFRL E. Project Design is proceeding to fulfill its obligation to and has given managers control over For the expansion design, the AFRL consult or negotiate with the unions, as their workforce. Demonstration Project Office recruited appropriate, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. The current RIF system, for both GS volunteers from the 10 AFRL 4703(f) and 7117. AFRL plans to and demonstration project employees, directorates. Most team members were initially convert the non-bargaining unit does not adequately recognize drawn from the career fields being contribution as a major criterion in RIF workforce into the Project with the hope of successfully negotiating with the considered for expansion, although situations. The RIF rules are complex some engineers were on the team to and difficult to understand and impacted unions to convert the remaining Business Management and assist with understanding the current administer. The RIF process disrupts authorities. The team considered operations, due to displacement of Professional, Technician, and Mission Support workforce into the Project at a existing AFRL authorities in addition to employees within their competitive authorities and design elements of the levels and in the exercise of bump and later date. In determining the original scope of other DoD Personnel Management retreat rights. Demonstration Project laboratories and The same flexibilities for attracting the Demonstration Project, primary other Federal alternative personnel and retaining highly talented employees consideration was given to the number systems. from which AFRL currently benefits for and diversity of occupations within the the S&E workforce should not be limited Laboratory and the need for adequate Although some of the original to the S&E career path. The success of development and testing of the initiatives addressed recruiting and the Laboratory is dependent on its total Contribution-based Compensation hiring issues, the Demonstration Project workforce not just S&E personnel; thus, System. Additionally, DoD human was not able to implement hiring the demonstration project flexibilities resource management design goals and flexibilities with the original should be extended to the entire priorities for the entire civilian publication. Additionally, the RIF Laboratory workforce. The new workforce were considered. While the changes were denied at the last minute, authorities will provide additional intent of this Project is to provide the leaving only a change in how additional management tools that will enable AFRL Commander/Executive Director service credit was awarded based on the AFRL to attract and retain the best and and subordinate supervisors with CCS scores. This Federal Register brightest employees for all career paths. increased control and accountability for adopts hiring authorities currently their total workforce, the decision was utilized by other DoD STRL Personnel C. Changes Required/Expected Benefits made to initially restrict development Demonstration Projects and implements The AFRL Demonstration Project has efforts to GS/GM positions within the a redesigned RIF methodology, which demonstrated that a human resource professional S&E specialties. simplifies and strengthens the process.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53083

III. Personnel System Changes Candidates may be appointed Demonstration Project. Regular career provided they meet the minimum appointments, temporary appointments, A. Hiring and Appointment Authorities standards for the position as published excepted service appointments, and 1. Description of Hiring Process in OPM’s operating manual, modified term appointments are At this time, AFRL is implementing a ‘‘Qualification Standards for General utilized. The modified term streamlined examining process as Schedule Positions’’ and the candidate appointment is described below. has a cumulative grade point average of demonstrated in other Defense 4. Modified Term Appointments Personnel Management Demonstration 3.5 (on a 4.0 scale) or better in their field of study (or other equivalent score) or The Laboratory conducts many Project laboratories. This applies to all Research and Development (R&D) positions in AFRL, with the exception are within the top 10 percent of a university’s major school of projects that range from three to six of Senior Executive Service (SES), years. The current four-year limitation Scientific or Professional (ST), and undergraduate or graduate studies, such as Business School, Law School, etc. on term appointments imposes a burden broadband V positions and any on the Laboratory by forcing the examining process covered by court 2. Qualification Determinations termination of some term employees order. This authority includes the A candidate’s basic eligibility is prior to completion of projects they coordination of recruitment and public determined using OPM’s ‘‘Qualification were hired to support. This disrupts the notices, the administration of the Standards Handbook for General R&D process and reduces the examining process, the certification of Schedule Positions.’’ Selective Laboratory’s ability to serve its candidates, and selection and placement factors may be established in customers. Under the Demonstration appointment consistent with merit accordance with OPM’s Qualification Project, AFRL has the authority to hire system principles, to include existing Handbook when judged to be critical to individuals under modified term authorities under title 5, U.S.C. and title successful position contribution. These appointments. These appointments are 5, CFR. The ‘‘rule of three’’ is eliminated, factors are communicated to all used to fill positions for a period of similar to the authorities granted to: (1) candidates for particular position more than one year but not more than Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), 64 FR vacancies and must be met for basic five years when the need for an 33970, June 24, 1999; (2) Naval Sea eligibility. employee’s services is not permanent. (NAVSEA) Systems Command Warfare S&E (pay plan DR) and Business The modified term appointment differs Centers, 62 FR 64049, December 3, Management and Professional (pay plan from term employment as described in 1997; and (3) Communications- DO) occupations: The DR and DO pay 5 CFR part 316 in that it may be made Electronics Research, Development, and plans’ broadband level I minimum for a period not to exceed five years, Engineering Center (CERDEC), 66 FR eligibility requirements are consistent rather than four years. In addition, the 54871, October 30, 2001. When there are with the GS–07 qualifications. AFRL Commander/Executive Director no more than 15 qualified applicants Broadband level II minimum eligibility and pay pool managers are authorized to and no preference eligibles, all eligible requirements are consistent with the extend a term appointment one applicants are immediately referred to GS–12 qualifications. Broadband levels additional year. Employees hired under the selecting official without rating and III and IV are single-grade broadband the modified term appointment ranking. Rating and ranking are required levels and consistent the minimum authority may be eligible for conversion only when the number of qualified qualifications for the respective GS to career appointments. To be candidates exceeds 15 or there is a mix grades of 14 and 15. converted, the employee must: (1) Have of preference and nonpreference Technician (pay plan DX): The DX been selected for the term position applicants. Statutes and regulations pay plan broadband level I minimum under competitive procedures, with the covering veterans’ preference are eligibility requirements are consistent announcement specifically stating that observed in the selection process and with the GS–01 qualifications. the individual(s) selected for the term when rating and ranking are required. Broadband level II minimum eligibility position(s) may be eligible for AFRL’s Distinguished Scholastic requirements are consistent with the conversion to career appointment at a Achievement Appointment Authority GS–05 qualifications. Broadband level later date; (2) served a minimum of two (DSAA) uses an alternative examining III minimum eligibility requirements are years of continuous service in the term process which provides the authority to consistent with the GS–08 position; and (3) have a current delta appoint individuals with undergraduate qualifications. Broadband IV minimum CCS rating greater than ¥0.3. or graduate degrees through the doctoral eligibility requirements are consistent 5. Extended Probationary Period level to professional positions up to the with the GS–11 qualifications. equivalent of GS–12 in series identified Mission Support (pay plan DU): The A new employee needs time and in the S&E career path. This enables DU pay plan broadband level I opportunities to demonstrate adequate AFRL to respond quickly to hiring minimum eligibility requirements are contribution for a manager to render a needs for eminently qualified consistent with the GS–01 thorough evaluation. The purpose of the candidates possessing distinguished qualifications. Broadband level II extended probationary period or trial scholastic achievements. This flexibility minimum eligibility requirements are period is to allow supervisors an is similar in nature to the authority consistent with the GS–05 adequate period of time to fully evaluate granted to: (1) The Army Missile qualifications. Broadband level III an S&E employee’s contribution and Research, Development, and minimum eligibility requirements are conduct. An extended probationary or Engineering Center (AMRDEC), 64 FR consistent with the GS–07 trial period of three years applies to all 12216, March 11, 1999; (2) Army qualifications. Broadband IV minimum newly hired S&E employees and SCEP Research Laboratory (ARL), 65 FR 3500, eligibility requirements are consistent students earning a scientific or January 21, 2000; (3) Army Engineer with the GS–09 qualifications. engineering degree, including Research and Development Center individuals entering the Demonstration (ERDC), 64 FR 12216, March 11, 1999; 3. Appointment Authority Project after a break in service of 30 and (4) NAVSEA, 62 FR 64064, The career-conditional appointment calendar days or more. Employees who December 3, 1997. authority is not used under the enter the Demonstration Project with a

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53084 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

break in service of less than 30 calendar positions and temporary promotions of is similar to the authority granted to days are not required to complete an not more than one year within a 24- AMRDEC in 62 FR 34876, June 27, 1997. extended probationary or trial period if month period without competition, with their previous service was in the same the ability to extend one additional year, C. Broadbanding line of work as determined by the to positions within the Demonstration The use of broadbanding provides a employee’s actual duties and Project. This is similar to the authority stronger link between pay and responsibilities upon reappointment. granted to the NRL in 64 FR 33970, June contribution to the mission of the Employees on non-status 24, 1999. Laboratory than what exists in the GS appointments will be subject to the trial system. It is simpler, less time period required by their appointing B. Pay Setting Outside the CCS consuming, and not as costly to authority. Upon conversion from a non- Management has authority to maintain. In addition, such a system is status appointment to a competitive establish appropriate basic pay for more easily understood by managers service appointment, employees will be employees moving within and into the and employees, is easily delegated to required to serve a three-year Demonstration Project through internal managers, coincides with recognized probationary period. However, and external competitive and non- career paths, and complements the other employees serving on a modified term competitive authorities. The basic pay personnel management aspects of the appointment will serve a three-year trial of newly hired personnel entering the Demonstration Project. period. Upon conversion to competitive Demonstration Project is set at a level service, the period of employment consistent with the expected In the Demonstration Project, the served on a modified term appointment contribution of the position based on broadbanding system replaces the GS will be counted toward the completion the individual’s academic structure. Initially, only S&E positions of the extended probationary period. qualifications, competencies, in AFRL were covered. This Federal Student Career Experience Program experience, scope and level of difficulty Register notice provides the authority to (SCEP) students earning a scientific or of the position, and/or expected level of expand coverage of the Demonstration engineering degree are required to serve contribution. Pay pool managers may Project to Business Management and the extended probationary period upon establish specific pay setting criteria. Professional, Technician, and Mission non-competitive conversion to career Basic pay is limited to that equal to GS– Support occupations. ST and SES appointment. The requirements in 5 15, step 10. A bonus may be considered employees are not covered. CFR 315.802(c) apply when determining in addition to or in lieu of a basic pay Table 1 shows the four broadband creditable service. increase. levels in each career path, labeled I, II, Current permanent Federal employees The authorities for retention, III, and IV, with the exception of newly hired into the Demonstration Project are recruitment, and relocation incentives expanded broadband V for the S&E not required to serve a new probationary granted under 5 CFR part 575 have been career path. The broadband levels are or trial period. Any employee appointed delegated to the AFRL Commander/ designed to facilitate pay progression prior to the date of this Federal Register Executive Director and pay pool and to allow for more competitive notice will not be affected. Supervisory managers. Eligibility and documentation recruitment of quality candidates at probationary periods are made differing rates within the appropriate consistent with 5 CFR part 315. requirements, as described in 5 CFR part Probationary periods for employees in 575, are still in effect. broadband level(s). The S&E career path other career paths remain unchanged. Recruitment of students is currently broadband level I includes the current Aside from extending the time period, limited to the local commuting area GS–07 through GS–11; level II, GS–12 all other features of the current because college students frequently and GS/GM–13; level III, GS/GM–14; probationary or trial period are retained cannot afford to relocate to accept job level IV, GS/GM–15; and level V, above including the potential to remove an offers within the Laboratory and GS/GM–15. The Business Management employee without providing the full continue to attend school in a different and Professional career path broadband substantive and procedural rights commuting area. Therefore, AFRL level I includes the current GS–07 afforded a non-probationary employee requires the ability to expand through GS–11; level II, GS–12 and GS/ when the employee fails to demonstrate recruitment to top universities and GM–13; level III, GS/GM–14; and level proper conduct, competency, and/or incentivize mobility by paying IV, GS/GM–15. The Mission Support adequate contribution during the additional expenses to students career path broadband level I includes extended probationary period. accepting employment outside of their the current GS–01 through GS–04; level When terminating probationary or geographic area. The authority to pay II, GS–05 and GS–06; level III, GS–07 trial employees, AFRL provides relocation incentives is expanded to and GS–08; and level IV, GS–09 and 10. employees with written notification of allow management to pay a bonus each The Technician career path broadband the reasons for their separation and time the co-operative education student level I includes the current GS–01 provides the effective date of the action. returns to duty to the Laboratory. through GS–04; level II, GS–05 through GS–07; level III, GS–08 through GS–10; 6. Expanded Temporary Promotions and 1. Local Interns and level IV, GS–11 and 12. Comparison Details Outside of the rating cycle, a manager to the GS grades was useful in setting Under GS rules, details and temporary may grant a basic pay increase to an the upper and lower dollar limits of the promotions to higher graded positions entry-level Business Management and broadband; however, once employees cannot exceed 120 days without being Professional and S&E employee are moved into the Demonstration made competitively. AFRL may effect (broadband I) whose contribution Project, GS grades and steps no longer details to higher broadband level justifies accelerated compensation. This apply.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53085

TABLE 1. BROADBANDING STRUCTURE

The broadbanding plan for the S&E new competencies emerges within the information pertinent to the position. occupational family is being expanded Laboratory environment. Laboratory supervisors follow a to include a broadband V to provide the computer assisted process to produce 2. Classification Factors and Descriptors ability to accommodate positions having the SDE. duties and responsibilities that exceed The present system of OPM 5. Skill Codes the GS–15 classification criteria. This classification standards is used for the broadband is based on the Above GS– identification of proper series and The AF presently uses skill code sets 15 Position concept found in other occupational titles of positions within within the Defense Civilian Personnel STRL personnel management the Demonstration Project. OPM grading Data System (DCPDS) as a means to demonstration projects that was created criteria are not used as part of the reflect duties of current positions and to solve a critical classification problem. Demonstration Project. Rather, the employees’ competencies and previous The STRLs have positions warranting appropriate career path broadband level experiences. Each code represents a classification above GS–15 because of factor descriptors are used to determine specialization within the occupation. their technical expertise requirements the broadband level. These same factor Specializations are those described in including inherent supervisory and descriptors are used for the annual CCS classification or qualification standards managerial responsibilities. However, employee assessments. For and those agreed upon by functional these positions are not considered to be classification, only broadband level I managers and personnel specialists to appropriately classified as ST positions descriptors are applied for each of the be important to staffing patterns and because of the degree of supervision and factors for a broadband level I position, career paths. These codes may be used level of managerial responsibilities. for example. Therefore, the factors are to refer candidates for employment with Neither are these positions sorted first by level and then by factor. the AF; for placement of current appropriately classified as SES positions (The broadband level of the position is employees into other positions; and for because of their requirement for reviewed and appropriately adjusted training consideration under advanced specialized scientific or based on a yearly assessment of the competitive procedures. To facilitate the engineering expertise and because the employee’s level of contribution to the movement of personnel into, out of, and positions are not at the level of general organization in relation to these same within the Demonstration Project, the managerial authority and impact factor descriptors, the position’s duties, AF system of skills coding continues to required for an SES position. and the corresponding CCS score.) be used, as long as it is required by the The original Above GS–15 Position Specific broadband level factor AF. Laboratory supervisors select concept was to be tested for a five-year descriptors for each career path are appropriate skill code sets to describe period. The number of trial positions outlined in Appendix B and may be the work of each employee through the was set at 40 with periodic reviews to changed in future internal AFRL automated SDE classification process, as determine appropriate position issuances, as needed. described below. requirements. The Above GS–15 3. Classification Authority 6. Classification Process Position concept is currently being The AFRL Laboratory Commander has The SDE is accomplished utilizing an evaluated by DoD management for its delegated classification authority. This automated system: effectiveness and continued authority is delegated to the technology (a) The supervisor identifies the applicability to the current STRL directors or pay pool managers, who organizational location, SDE number, scientific, engineering, and technology may further delegate to not lower than and the employee’s name. The workforce needs. The degree to which one management level above the first- supervisor selects the appropriate AFRL plans to participate in this level supervisor of the position under occupational series, pay plan, concept and develop classification, review. The first-level supervisor broadband level, and title; the level compensation and performance provides classification factor descriptors corresponding to the management policy, guidance, and recommendations. Personnel specialists broadband level that is most implementation processes will be based provide on-going consultation and commensurate with the level of on the final outcome of this evaluation. guidance to managers and supervisors contribution necessary to accomplish Additional guidance will be included in throughout the classification process. the duties and responsibilities of the internal AFRL issuances. position; the CCS job category (if 4. Statement of Duties and Experience D. Classification applicable); the functional classification Under the Demonstration Project’s code; and the DCPDS supervisory level. 1. Occupational Series classification system, the automated The Demonstration Project initiatives The OPM occupational series scheme, Statement of Duties and Experience include a dual track career progression. which frequently provides well- (SDE) replaces the AF Form 1378, The dual track provides the option for recognized disciplines with which Civilian Personnel Position Description. Demonstration Project employees to employees wish to be identified, is The SDE includes a description of pursue either the management track or maintained and facilitates movement of position-specific information; references the technical/functional track. CCS is personnel into and out of the the broadband level factor descriptors structured to allow an individual to Demonstration Project. Other series may for the assigned broadband level and advance within his/her career by be added to the Project as the need for career path; and provides data element increasing his/her contributions to the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.001 53086 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

organization and is not dependent upon classification codes as appropriate. The descriptors (as shown in Appendix C) which track an employee pursues. The FLSA status selection must be in are used by the rating official to Demonstration Project system is not accordance with OPM guidance. determine the employee’s actual hierarchical, meaning a supervisor’s Management analysts and personnel contribution score. Each factor has four grade is based on the contributions he/ specialists may advise Laboratory levels of increasing contribution she has made to the organization, and management as necessary. corresponding to the four broadband not based on the grades of subordinate E. Contribution-based Compensation levels. Employees can score within, employees, as is typical under other System (CCS) above, or below their broadband level, personnel systems. Therefore, for example, a broadband level II supervisors may supervise employees at 1. Overview employee could score in the broadband the same or higher broadband level. For The purpose of the Contribution- level I, III, or IV range. Therefore, for the Business Management and Professional based Compensation System is to CCS process, descriptors for all four and S&E positions, prefixes may be provide an effective, efficient, and levels of the career path factors are added to the titles to identify the flexible method for assessing, presented to better assist the supervisor associated broadband level (i.e., compensating, and managing the with the employee assessment. Associate, Senior, and Principal). The Laboratory workforce. It is essential for The annual CCS assessment scoring supervisor then completes a standard the development of a highly productive process (section III, E.3.) begins with statement relating to the level of workforce and to provide management, employee input, which provides an certification and functional area for the at the lowest practical level, the opportunity to state the perceived Acquisition Professional Development authority, control, and flexibility accomplishments and level of Program (APDP) if applicable. needed to achieve a quality laboratory contribution. Scores have a direct (b) The supervisor creates a brief and quality products. CCS allows for relationship with basic pay; therefore, description of position-specific more employee involvement in the the significance of an employee’s actual information by typing free-form at the assessment process, increases appropriate point. The supervisor score is not known until it is compared communication between supervisors to his/her expected score. An chooses statements pertaining to and employees, promotes a clear employee’s basic pay determines an physical requirements; competencies accountability of contribution, expected score when plotted on the required to perform the work; and facilitates employee career progression, appropriate career path Standard Pay special licenses or certifications needed provides an understandable basis for Line (SPL) (section III, E.2.). For (other than APDP). Based on the basic pay changes, and delinks awards instance, a Mission Support employee supervisory level of the position, the from the annual assessment process. with a basic pay of $30,117 in 2009 system produces mandatory statements (Funds previously allocated for pertaining to affirmative employment, performance-based awards are reserved would have an expected score of 2.25, safety, and security programs. for distribution under a separate while a Business Management and (c) The supervisor selects up to three Laboratory awards program.) The CCS Professional employee with a basic pay AF skill code sets (as long as used process described herein applies to of $69,738 would have the same within the AF) appropriate to the broadband levels I through IV. The expected score. The comparison position, in addition to other position assessment process for broadband V between expected score and actual score data, such as position sensitivity, Fair positions will be documented in AFRL provides an indication of equitable Labor Standards Act (FLSA) status, drug implementing issuances. compensation, undercompensation, or testing requirements, etc. These data CCS is a contribution-based overcompensation. (Typically, elements are maintained as a separate assessment system that goes beyond a employees who are overcompensated page of the SDE (i.e., an addendum) as performance-based rating system. That are not meeting contribution this information can change frequently. is, it measures the employee’s expectations and may be placed on a By maintaining this information as an contribution to the organization’s Contribution Improvement Plan (CIP), addendum, the need to create and mission, the contribution level, and how which is described in further detail in classify a new SDE each time one of well the employee performed a job. section III, F.) Broadband levels in each these elements must be updated is Contribution is simply defined as the career path have the same expected eliminated. measure of the demonstrated value of score range, as depicted in Table 2 (d) The supervisor accomplishes the what an employee did in terms of below which also includes the basic pay SDE with a recommended classification, accomplishing or advancing the ranges for each broadband level. As the then signs and dates the document. The organizational objectives and mission general basic pay rates increase SDE is sent to the individual in the impact. CCS promotes proactive basic annually, the minimum and maximum organization with delegated pay adjustment decisions on the basis of basic pay rates of broadband levels I classification authority for approval and an individual’s overall contribution to through IV for each career path are classification, which is documented by the organization. adjusted accordingly. Individual that person signing and dating the SDE. The same factor descriptors are used employees receive basic pay increases The computer assisted system for classification and for the annual CCS based on their assessments under the incorporates definitions for the CCS job employee assessments. For the CCS Contribution-based Compensation categories (if applicable), supervisory assessment process, the descriptors are System. There are no changes to title 5, levels, occupational series as well as sorted first by factor and then by level U.S.C., regarding locality pay under the their corresponding skill code sets (if as shown in Appendix C. The Demonstration Project. applicable), and the functional appropriate career path factor BILLING CODE 5001–06–C

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:28 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53087

2. Standard Pay Line (SPL) across the broadband levels within each ‘‘least squares error fit’’ analysis, the best A mathematical relationship between career path. Third, the relationship may straight line fit to this weighted data assessed contribution and basic pay not yield disincentives or inequities was computed. compensation was defined in order to between employees or groups of Specifically, the equation of the create the SPLs for each career path employees; it must demonstrate original S&E SPL for CY95 was: BASIC used in CCS. Initially, various equitable (i.e., consistent) growth at PAY = $13,572 + ($15,415 × CCS mathematical relationships between each CCS score. Mathematical analysis SCORE). The SPL for CY96 was each CCS score and the appropriate demonstrated that the most reasonable calculated from the SPL for CY95 plus corresponding basic pay rate were relationship is a straight line—‘‘the the general pay increase (‘‘G’’) given to examined and analyzed given the SPL.’’ GS employees in January 1996. The following systemic constraints. First, Derivation of the initial S&E career equation for the CY96 SPL was: BASIC CCS necessitates that the relationship be path SPL was based on distributing the PAY = $13,843 + ($15,723 × CCS described by a single equation that GS grades and steps of the incoming SCORE). The CY97 SPL was the CY96 yields a reasonable correlation between population across the corresponding SPL increased by the ‘‘G’’ for CY97. basic pay rates in the broadband levels broadband levels and plotting these Currently, the equation for the 2009 and those of the corresponding GS against the GS basic pay rates. Although S&E SPL is BASIC PAY = $19,613 + grade(s). Second, neither the equation the data are not continuous, there is a ($22,278 × CCS SCORE). Figure 1 nor its derivative(s) can exhibit linear trend. Each of these data points provides a pictorial representation of singularities within or between levels. was weighted by the actual calendar the DR 2009 SPL. Since the Business That is, the equation must be year 1995 (CY95) population data for Management and Professional career continuous, smooth, and well-defined the Demonstration Laboratory. Using a path has the same banding structure as

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.002 53088 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

the existing S&E career path, the same SPL equation is used for that career path as shown in Figure 2.

For the other two career paths, was utilized. A CCS score of 1.0 was set was then drawn between these two Technician and Mission Support, a as equivalent to the basic pay of a step points, creating the SPL. Consequently, different approach was used to design one of the lowest GS grade in the career the 2009 Mission Support SPL is BASIC the SPL. In order to encompass all path, while a CCS score of 4.9 is PAY = $6,862 + ($10,678 × CCS SCORE) employees across the career path, a equivalent to the basic pay of step ten and the 2009 Technician SPL is BASIC straight-line slope-intercept equation of the highest GS grade. A straight line

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.003 EN30AU10.004 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53089

PAY = $2,034 + ($15,506 × CCS SCORE) as shown in Figures 3 and 4.

For each of the career paths, the lines Rails were then constructed at + and— each year. Continuing this calculation of were extended to 0.75 and 5.25, in order 0.3 CCS around the SPL for all career the SPL maintains the same to provide a broader range of basic pay paths. The area encompassed by the relationships between the basic GS pay rates (i.e., an overall score of 0.75 rails denotes the acceptable contribution scale and the SPL in the Demonstration corresponds with the minimum basic and compensation relationship. Project. Locality pay is not included in pay of the career path and an overall Each SPL, and therefore, the basic pay the SPLs. Locality pay is added to the score of 5.25 corresponds with the rates, are increased by the amount of the basic pay rate based upon each maximum basic pay of the career path). general basic pay increase authorized employee’s official duty station.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.005 EN30AU10.006 53090 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

3. The CCS Assessment Process of Managers (MoM)) to review and approved, paid leave are counted The rating official is the first-level discuss all proposed employee toward the 90-day time period. When an employee cannot be supervisor of record for at least 90 days assessments and preliminary CCS evaluated readily by the normal CCS during the rating cycle. If the current scores. Giving authority to the group of assessment process due to special immediate supervisor has been in place managers to determine scores ensures circumstances that take the individual for less than 90 days during the rating that contributions are assessed and away from normal duties or duty station cycle, the second-level supervisor serves measured similarly for all employees. (e.g., long-term full-time training, as the initial rating official. If the During the MoMs, the preliminary factor reserve military deployments, extended second-level supervisor is in place for scores are further refined into decimal sick leave, leave without pay, etc.), the less than 90 days during the rating scores. For example, if the contribution level for a factor is at the lowest level rating official documents the rating as cycle, the next higher level supervisor ‘‘presumptive due to circumstance’’ in in the employee’s rating chain conducts of level I, a factor score of 1.0 is assigned. Higher levels of contribution the CCS software. The rating official the assessment. then assesses the employee using one of The annual assessment cycle begins are assigned factor scores increasing in 0.1 increments up to 4.9. A factor score the following options: on October 1 and ends on September 30 (a) Recertify the employee’s last of the following year. At the beginning of 0.0 can be assigned if the employee does not demonstrate a minimum level contribution assessment; or of the annual assessment period, the (b) assign a score at the intersection of broadband level factor descriptors are I contribution. Likewise, a factor score of 5.9 can be assigned if the employee the employee’s basic pay and the SPL. provided to employees so that they Basic pay adjustments, i.e., decisions demonstrates a contribution that know the basis on which their to give or withhold basic pay increases, exceeds the broadband level IV contribution is assessed. are based on the relationship between descriptor. Rating officials must A midyear review, in the March to the employee’s actual CCS contribution document justification for each April timeframe, is conducted for score and the employee’s current basic proposed factor score. employees. At this time, the employee’s pay (as discussed in section III, E.5). professional qualities, competences, Factor scores are then averaged to give Decisions for broadband movement developmental needs, and mission an overall CCS score. Each broadband (section III, E.6.) are also based on this contribution are discussed, as is future range is defined for overall CCS scores relationship. Final pay determinations development and career opportunities. from 0.75 to 5.25 as shown in Table 2. and broadband level changes are made Additionally, supervisors are provided The maximum overall CCS score for by the pay pool manager. feedback on their supervisory qualities broadband level IV is set at 5.25, to be and skills. To highlight its importance, consistent with the maximum overall 4. Pay Pools all feedback sessions are certified as CCS scores for other broadband levels Pay pool structure is under the completed by the rating official (4.25 for broadband level III, 3.25 for authority of the Laboratory Commander/ conducting the feedback session. While broadband level II, and 2.25 for Executive Director, with each pay pool one documented formal midyear broadband level I). Therefore, when the manager at the SES or full colonel level. feedback is required, supervisors can/ average of CCS factor scores exceeds The following minimal guidelines should conduct informal feedback 5.25, the overall CCS score is set to 5.25 apply: (a) A pay pool is typically based sessions throughout the rating period. with the individual identified to upper on the organizational structure/ The preferable method for all feedback management as having exceeded the functional specialty and should include sessions is face-to-face. (Dealing with maximum contribution defined by the a range of basic pay rates and inadequate employee contribution is broadband. The maximum contribution levels; (b) a pay pool must addressed in section III, F.) compensation for each broadband is the be large enough to constitute a At the end of the annual assessment basic pay corresponding with an n.25 reasonable statistical sample, i.e., 35 or period, employees summarize their overall CCS score (i.e., 2.25, 3.25, 4.25, more employees; (c) a pay pool must be contributions in each factor for their and 5.25). large enough to encompass a second rating official. Employee written self- Once the scores have been finalized, level of supervision since the CCS assessments are highly encouraged to the pay pool manager approves the process uses a group of supervisors in ensure that all contributions scores for the entire pay pool. Pay pool the pay pool to determine assessments accomplished during the rating cycle managers have the ability to look across and recommend basic pay adjustments; are identified to management for the entire pay pool and may address (d) the pay pool manager holds yearly consideration. The rating official anomalies through the appropriate pay adjustment authority; and (e) determines preliminary CCS scores management chain. However, CCS neither the pay pool manager nor using the employee’s input and the scores cannot be changed by managerial supervisors within the pay pool rating official’s assessment of the overall levels above the original group of recommend or set their own individual contribution to the Laboratory mission supervisors that participated in the pay. based on the appropriate broadband respective lowest level MoM. The amount of money available for level factor descriptors. For each factor, Contribution feedback and any training basic pay increases within a pay pool is the rating official places the employee’s and/or career development needs are determined by the general increase (‘‘G’’) contribution at a particular broadband then discussed with the individual and an incentive amount (‘‘I’’) drawn level (I, II, III, or IV) and general range employees. from money that would have been (i.e., high, medium, or low) to arrive at If, on October 1, the employee has available for step increases and career the preliminary score. (Inadequate served under CCS for less than 90 days, ladder promotions, previously utilized employee contribution is addressed in the rating official waits for the under the General Schedule. The section III, F.) subsequent annual cycle to assess the incentive amount is set by the AFRL The rating officials (e.g., branch employee. The employee is considered Corporate Board and is considered chiefs) and their next level supervisor ‘‘presumptive due to time’’ and is adjustable to ensure cost discipline over (e.g., the respective division chief) then assigned a score at the intersection of the life of the Demonstration Project. meet as a group (e.g., first-level Meeting their basic pay and the SPL. Periods of The dollars derived from ‘‘G’’ and ‘‘I’’

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53091

included in the pay pool are computed identified to upper management as scores are then plotted on the based on the basic pay of eligible having exceeded the maximum appropriate SPL graph based on their employees in the pay pool as of allowable compensation and will be current basic pay as shown in Figure 5. September 30 of each year. Pay pool paid a bonus to cover any difference The position of those points in relation dollars are not transferable between pay between the GS–15, step 10, basic pay to the SPL provides a relative measure pools. and the basic pay associated with his or (Delta Y) of the degree of 5. Basic Pay Adjustment Guidelines her overall CCS score. Locality pay is overcompensation or added based upon each Demonstration undercompensation for each employee. The maximum compensation is limited to GS–15, step 10, basic pay. Project employee’s official duty station. This permits all employees within a pay Any employee who’s basic pay would Employees’ annual contributions are pool to be rank-ordered by DY, from the exceed a GS–15, step 10, based on his determined by the CCS process most undercompensated employee to or her overall CCS score, will be described in section E.3. Their CCS the most overcompensated.

BILLING CODE: 500–06–P the employee’s current basic pay and derived from the factor descriptors. In general, those employees who fall the basic pay associated with their new Because the factor descriptors are below the SPL (indicating overall CCS score. This may be written at progressively higher levels of undercompensation, for example, appropriate in a situation when the work and are the same factor descriptors employee X in Figure 5) should expect employee’s continued contribution at used in the classification process, higher to receive greater basic pay increases this level is uncertain. Bonus criteria scores reflect that the employee’s than those who fall above the line will be documented in AFRL contribution is equivalent to the level (indicating overcompensation, for implementing issuances. associated with the score he/she is example, employee Z). A CCS Each pay pool manager sets the assessment that falls on either rail is awarded. The broadband level of a necessary guidelines for the gradation of position may be increased when an considered to be within the rails. Over pay adjustments in the pay pool within time, employees will migrate closer to employee consistently contributes at the these general rules: (1) Final decisions higher broadband level through the standard pay line. The following are standard and consistent within the increased expertise and by performing provides more specific guidelines: (a) pay pool; (2) are fair and equitable to all expanded duties and responsibilities Those who fall above the upper rail (for stakeholders; (3) maintain cost commensurate with the higher example, employee Z) are given an discipline over the Project life; and (4) broadband level factor descriptors. If an increase ranging from zero to a be subject to review. maximum of ‘‘G;’’ (b) those who fall employee’s contributions impact and within the rails (for example, employee 6. Broadband Level Movements broaden the scope, nature, intent and Y) are given a minimum of ‘‘G;’’ and (c) Under the Demonstration Project, expectations of the position and are those who fall below the lower rail (for non-competitive broadband movement reflective of higher level factor example, employee X) are given at least may occur once a year during the CCS descriptors, the classification of the their basic pay times ‘‘G’’ and ‘‘I.’’ If the process, if certain conditions are met. A position is updated accordingly. This pay increase results in a broadband key concept of the Demonstration form of movement through broadband movement for employees who do not Project is that career growth may be levels is referred to as a seamless meet APDP requirements that portion of accomplished by movement through the broadband movement and can only the increase that takes them beyond the broadband levels by significantly happen within the same career path; top of the broadband is withheld. The increasing levels of employee employees cannot cross over career pay pool manager may give a bonus to contribution toward the AFRL mission. paths through this process. The criteria an employee as compensation, in whole An employee’s contribution is a is similar to that used in an accretion of or part, to cover any difference between reflection of his/her CCS score, which is duties scenario and must be met for an

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.007 53092 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

employee to move seamlessly to the year using various staffing avenues, to broadband level I is that basic pay from higher broadband level and for this include details, reassignments, or the SPL corresponding to a CCS score of movement to occur, that is: (1) The competitive selection procedures (as 0.75. And the maximum basic pay for employee’s current position is absorbed applicable and/or required) for broadband level I is that basic pay from into the reclassified position, with the competitive promotions or temporary the SPL corresponding to a CCS score of employee continuing to perform the promotions (typically used for filling 2.25. The minimum basic pay for a same basic duties and responsibilities supervisory positions). Employees may broadband level II is that basic pay from (although at the higher level); and (2) be considered for vacancies at higher the SPL corresponding to a CCS score of the employee’s current position is broadband level positions consistent 1.75. And the maximum basic pay for reclassified to a higher broadband level with the Demonstration Project broadband level II is that basic pay from as a result of additional higher level competitive selection procedures. the SPL corresponding to a CCS score of duties and responsibilities. No Any resulting changes in broadband 3.25. Likewise, the minimum basic pay additional broadband movement is levels that occur through the CCS for level III would be the basic pay from guaranteed since there are no positions process are not accompanied by pay the SPL corresponding to a CCS score of targeted to a higher broadband level increases normally associated with 2.75 and so on for the different within this system. It may take a formal promotion actions, but rather, broadband levels. This definition number of years for contribution levels they are processed and documented provides a basic pay overlap between to increase to the extent a broadband with a pay adjustment action to include broadband levels that is consistent with level move is warranted, and not all appropriate changes/remarks (e.g., and similar to basic pay overlaps in the employees achieve the increased change in title (if appropriate), change GS schedule. contribution levels required for such in broadband level, and Figure 6 shows the basic pay overlap moves. accomplishment of a new SDE (section areas between broadband contribution The simplified classification and III, D.6.). The terms ‘‘promotion’’ and levels. These basic pay overlap areas are broadbanding structure allows ‘‘demotion’’ are not used in connection divided into three zones designated as management to assign duties consistent with the CCS process. CL (consideration for change to lower with the broadband level of a position The banding structure creates an level), CH (consideration for change to without the necessity to process a overlap between adjacent broadband higher level), and E (eligible for change personnel action and provides managers levels which facilitates broadband to higher or lower level). All the E zones authority to move employees between movement. Specifically, the basic pay have the same width, 0.5 CCS, and positions within their current overlap between two levels is defined height. The E zone is described as the broadband level, at any time during the by the basic pay rates at—to + 0.25 CCS box formed by the intersection of the year. However, management also has the around two whole number scores. For integer + and¥0.25 CCS lines and the option to fill vacancies throughout the instance, the minimum basic pay for a SPL.

The E zones serve to stabilize the broadband level changes. An employee to increase or reduce the employee’s movement between adjacent broadband whose contribution score falls within an level. levels. This allows for annual E zone is eligible for a change in Those who consistently achieve fluctuations in contribution scores for broadband level but one should not be increased contribution assessments people near the top or bottom of a level, given unless the supervisor has a progress through their broadband level without creating the need for repeated compelling reason to request the change and find their basic pay climbing into

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.008 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53093

the corresponding CH zone. Once the document all decisions to approve or the upper rail of the SPL or extenuating employee’s CCS score is demonstrated disapprove such requests. This type of circumstances exist that may have to be consistently within the CH zone, basic pay change is not considered to be contributed to the employee’s overall a pay pool determination should be an adverse personnel action. score and are expected to be temporary made as to whether the criteria for in nature. A copy of this memorandum 8. CCS Grievance Procedures movement to a higher broadband level is provided to the employee and to is justified unless the supervisor has a An employee may grieve the higher levels of management. The compelling reason not to request the assessment received under CCS, using second option is to take formal action by change (e.g., temporary assignment; not the administrative grievance system. placing the employee on a Contribution a continuing assignment; unique Non-bargaining unit employees, and Improvement Plan (CIP), providing the circumstances for specific rating period, bargaining unit employees covered by a employee an opportunity to improve. etc.). Conversely, regression through the negotiated grievance procedure which The CIP must inform the employee, in broadband levels works the same way in does not permit grievances over writing, that unless the contribution the opposite direction. Those who performance ratings, must file increases and is sustained at a higher consistently receive decreasing assessment grievances under level, the employee may be reduced in contribution assessments regress administrative grievance procedures. pay or removed. through their broadband level and do Bargaining unit employees, whose The supervisor will afford the not receive any basic pay adjustments negotiated grievance procedures cover employee a reasonable opportunity (a greater than ‘‘G.’’ They will find that the performance rating grievances, must file minimum of 60 days) to demonstrate CL zone at the bottom of their current assessment grievances under those increased contribution commensurate broadband level eventually aligns with negotiated procedures. Additional CCS with the duties and responsibilities of their current basic pay. If the grievance information to include the the employee’s position. As part of the employee’s CCS score is demonstrated possible use of Alternative Dispute employee’s opportunity to demonstrate to be consistently within the CL zone, Resolution is documented in AFRL increased contribution, management a pay pool determination should be implementing issuances. will offer appropriate assistance to the made as to whether the employee F. Dealing With Inadequate employee. Once an employee has been afforded should be moved to the lower Contribution broadband level unless the supervisor a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate has a compelling reason not to request CCS is a contribution-based increased contribution, but fails to do the change (e.g., temporary assignment; assessment system that goes beyond a so, management has sole and exclusive not a continuing assignment; unique performance-based rating system. discretion to initiate reduction in pay or circumstances for specific rating period; Contribution is measured against removal. If the employee’s contribution etc.). If an employee moves completely factors, each having four levels of increases to a higher level and is again above the CH zone or below the CL increasing contribution corresponding determined to deteriorate in any area zone, the employee is considered to be to the four broadband levels. Employees within two years from the beginning of in the mandatory zone and is are plotted against the SPL based on the opportunity period, management automatically moved in broadband their score and current basic pay, which has sole and exclusive discretion to level, as long as APDP requirements are determines the amount of initiate reduction in pay or removal met (if applicable). If APDP overcompensation or with no additional opportunity to requirements are not met, that portion of undercompensation. When an improve. If an employee has contributed the basic pay increase that takes them employee’s contribution plots in the appropriately for two years from the beyond the top of the broadband is area above the upper rail of the SPL beginning of an opportunity period and withheld. (section III, E.3.), the employee is the employee’s overall contribution overcompensated for his/her level of once again declines, management will 7. Voluntary Pay Reduction and Pay contribution and is considered to be in afford the employee an additional Raise Declination the Automatic Attention Zone (AAZ). opportunity to demonstrate increased Under CCS, an employee may This section addresses reduction in contribution before determining voluntarily request a pay reduction or a pay or removal of Demonstration Project whether or not to propose a reduction voluntary declination of a pay raise employees based solely on inadequate in pay or removal. which would effectively place an contribution, as determined by the An employee whose reduction in pay overcompensated employee’s pay closer amount of overcompensation. The or removal is proposed is entitled to at to or below the SPL. Since an objective following procedures are similar to and least a 30-day advance notice of the of CCS is to properly compensate replace those established in 5 CFR part proposed action that identifies specific employees for their contribution, the 432 pertaining to performance-based instances of inadequate contribution by granting of such requests is consistent reduction in grade and removal actions. the employee on whom the action is with this goal. Under normal Adverse action procedures under 5 CFR based. Management may extend this circumstances, all employees should be part 752 remain unchanged. advance notice for a period not to encouraged to advance their careers The immediate supervisor has two exceed an additional 30 days. through increasing contribution rather options when an employee plots in the Management will afford the employee a than being undercompensated at a fixed AAZ. The first option is to write a reasonable time to answer the notice of level of contribution. memorandum for record documenting proposed action orally and/or in To handle these special the employee’s inadequate writing. circumstances, employees must submit contributions. The supervisor states in A decision to reduce pay or remove a request for voluntary pay reduction or writing the specifics on where the an employee for inadequate pay raise declination during the 30-day employee failed to contribute at an contribution may only be based on those period immediately following the adequate level and provide rationale for instances of inadequate contribution annual payout or a CCS grievance not taking a formal action. Examples that occurred during the two-year decision and document the reasons for where this might be used is when an period ending on the date of issuance of the request. Management must properly employee’s contribution plots just above the notice of proposed action.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53094 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

Management will issue written notice of job training or mentoring to less (e) support provided by the its decision to the employee at or before experienced employees. (This authority Laboratory (travel, administrative, office the time the action will be effective. is similar in nature to that utilized by space, supplies); Such notice will specify the instances of S&Es in AFRL and described in the (f) a one page SDE; inadequate contribution by the CERDEC demonstration project plan, 66 (g) a provision that states no employee on which the action is based FR 54871, October 30, 2001.) additional time will be added to a and will inform the employee of any This authority includes employees volunteer’s service credit for such applicable appeal or grievance rights as who have retired or separated from purposes as retirement, severance pay, specified in 5 CFR 432.106. Federal service. Voluntary Emeritus and leave as a result of being a member Management will preserve all relevant Corps assignments are not considered of the Voluntary Emeritus Corps; documentation concerning a reduction employment by the Federal government (h) a provision allowing either party in pay or removal which is based on (except for purposes of on-the-job injury to void the agreement with ten working inadequate contribution and make it compensation). Thus, such assignments days written notice; and available for review by the affected do not affect an employee’s entitlement (i) the level of security access required (any security clearance required by the employee or designated representative. to buyouts or severance payments based assignment is managed by the At a minimum, the records will consist on an earlier separation from Federal Laboratory while the volunteer is a of a copy of the notice of proposed service. member of the Emeritus Corps). action; the written answer of the To be accepted into the Emeritus employee or a summary thereof when Corps, a volunteer must be H. Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Procedures the employee makes an oral reply; and recommended by a manager within the the written notice of decision and the The competitive area may be Laboratory. Everyone who applies is not determined by career paths (pay plans), reasons therefore, along with any automatically entitled to a voluntary supporting material including lines of business, product lines, assignment. The Laboratory organizational units, funding lines, documentation regarding the Commander/Executive Director and/or opportunity afforded the employee to occupational series, functional area, pay pool manager must clearly technology directorate, and/or demonstrate increased contribution. document the decision process for each When a reduction in pay or removal geographical location, or a combination applicant (whether accepted or rejected) action is not taken because of of these elements, and must include all and retain the documentation contribution improvement by the Demonstration Project employees throughout the assignment. employee during the notice period and within the defined competitive area. Documentation of rejections will be the employee’s contribution continues The RIF system has a single round of maintained according to applicable to be deemed adequate for two years competition to replace the current two- records management requirements. from the date of the advanced written round process. Once the position to be To encourage participation, the notice, any entry or other notation of the abolished has been identified, the proposed action will be removed from volunteer’s Federal retirement pay incumbent of that position may displace management records relating to the (whether military or civilian) will not be another employee when the incumbent employee, in accordance with affected while serving in a voluntary has a higher retention standing and is applicable directives. capacity. fully qualified for the position occupied These provisions also apply to an Volunteers are not permitted to by the employee with a lower standing. employee whose contribution monitor contracts on behalf of the Retention standing is based on tenure, deteriorates during the year. In such government or to participate on any veterans’ preference, overall CCS score, instances, the group of supervisors who contracts or solicitations where a and length of service. There is no meet during the CCS assessment process conflict of interest exists. augmented service credit based on may reconvene any time during the year An agreement is established between contribution scores (i.e., there are no to review an employee whose the volunteer, the pay pool manager, additional years of service added to contribution is not appropriate for his or and the servicing Civilian Personnel service computation dates based on her basic pay and decide if the Office. The agreement is reviewed by contribution scores). Probationary and employee should be placed on a CIP. the local Staff Judge Advocate trial period employees are in tenure representative responsible for ethics group I for RIF purposes. G. Voluntary Emeritus Corps determinations under the DoD Joint Displacement is limited to one Under the Demonstration Project, the Ethics Regulation, DoD Directive broadband level below the employee’s AFRL Laboratory Commander/Executive 5500.7–R. Volunteers are not permitted present level within the career path. Director and pay pool managers have to report for duty prior to finalization of Broadband level I employees can the authority to offer retired or the agreement, which will include, as a displace within their current broadband separated S&E, Business Management minimum: level. A preference eligible employee and Professional, Mission Support, and (a) A statement that the voluntary with a compensable service connected Technical employees voluntary assignment does not constitute an disability of 30 percent or more may assignments in the Laboratory. The appointment in the Civil Service and is displace up to two broadband levels Voluntary Emeritus Corps ensures without compensation; below the employee’s present level continued quality research, mentoring, (b) the volunteer waives any and all within the career path. A broadband support, and program management claims against the Government because level I preference eligible employee while reducing the overall basic pay of the voluntary assignment except for (with a compensable service connected line by allowing higher paid employees purposes of on-the-job injury disability of 30 percent or more) can to accept retirement incentives with the compensation as provided in 5 U.S.C. displace within their current broadband. opportunity to retain a presence in the 8101(1)(B); Employees bumped to lower broadband laboratory community. The program is (c) volunteer’s work schedule; levels maintain their existing basic pay beneficial during manpower reductions (d) length of agreement (defined by for the remainder of the current CCS as senior personnel accept retirement length of project or time defined by cycle. Any future basic pay increases are and return to provide valuable on-the- weeks, months, or years); dependent upon CCS assessments.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53095

An employee whose current overall into the career path and broadband level to the Demonstration Project will be CCS scores places him/her in the area which includes their permanent GS/GM converted to the new modified term above the upper rail, may only displace grade and occupational series of record, appointments provided they were hired an employee in the same zone during unless there are extenuating for their current positions under that same period. The same ‘‘undue circumstances which require individual competitive procedures. disruption’’ standard currently utilized attention, such as special pay rates or In order to ensure full employee serves as the criteria to determine if an pay retention. Adverse action provisions compensation toward previous employee is fully qualified. The do not apply to the conversion process performance, AFRL may conduct a GS displaced individual may similarly as there is no change in total adjusted annual or close-out appraisal which displace another employee. If/When pay. may include a performance award. If an there is no position in which an Under the GS pay structure, annual CCS assessment is not possible employee can be placed by this process employees progress through their due to the conversion date (i.e., less or assigned to a vacant position, that assigned grade in step increments. In than a 90-day evaluation period), employee will be separated. the Demonstration Project, basic pay employees will be entitled to the general After completion of the first rating progression through the levels depends pay increase typically effective in cycle, employees are provided credit for on contribution to the mission and there January. contribution based on their actual OCS. are no scheduled within-grade increases B. Conversion to Another Personnel After completion of the second rating (WGIs). Rules governing WGI under the System cycle, employees are provided current AF performance plan will contribution credit based on the average continue in effect until the 1. Demonstration Project Termination implementation date. Adjustments to of their last two contribution scores. (a) In the event the Project ends, a After completion of the third rating the employees’ basic pay for WGI equity will be computed effective the date of conversion back to the former or to an cycle, employees are provided applicable Federal Civil Service system contribution credit based on the average conversion. WGI equity is acknowledged by increasing basic pay may be required. The grade of of their last three contribution scores. employees’ positions in the new system The expected CCS score is used for rates by a prorated share based upon the number of days an employee has will be based upon the position employees who have not yet received a classification criteria of the gaining CCS assessment. completed towards the next higher step. Employees at step ten on the date of system. Employees, when converted to IV. Training implementation are not eligible for WGI their positions classified under the new system, may be eligible for pay retention An extensive training program is equity adjustments since they are under 5 CFR part 536, if applicable. currently in place for participants in the already at the top of the step scale. As (b) However, an employee will not be Demonstration Project. Supervisory under the GS system, supervisors are provided a lower grade than the grade training is required for all new able to withhold these partial step held by the employee immediately supervisors of Demonstration Project increases if the employee’s performance preceding a conversion, lateral employees, to include comprehensive has fallen below fully successful. reassignment, or lateral transfer into the CCS training, providing effective CCS All employees are eligible for future project, unless since that time the feedback training, and CCS software locality pay increases of the employee has either undergone a training. Additional training is planned geographical areas of their official duty reduction in band or a reduction within for and will be made available to station. Special Salary Rates are not the same pay band due to unacceptable support personnel and every employee applicable to Demonstration Project performance. who converts into the Demonstration employees. Employees on special salary Project. Training will adequately rates at the time of conversion receive 2. Employees Voluntarily Leave the describe the features as they pertain to a new basic pay rate which is computed Demonstration Project by dividing their highest adjusted basic each career path and will address If a Demonstration Project employee employee concerns to ensure that pay (i.e., special pay rate or, if higher, the locality rate) by the computation of accepts a position in the GS or another everyone has a comprehensive pay system, the following procedures understanding of the program. Training one plus the locality pay factor for their area. Multiply the new basic pay rate by will be used to convert the employee’s requirements vary from an overview of the locality pay factor and add the result broadband level to a GS-equivalent the Demonstration Project, to a more to the new basic pay rate to obtain the grade and the employee’s detailed package for the employees now adjusted basic pay, which is equal to the Demonstration Project basic pay to the entering the Demonstration Project, as adjusted basic pay prior to conversion. GS-equivalent rate of pay for pay setting well as very specific instructions for Grade and pay retention entitlements purposes. The equivalent GS grade and both civilian and military supervisors, are eliminated. At the time of GS rate of pay must be determined managers, and others who provide conversion, an employee on grade before movement out of the personnel and payroll support. retention will be converted to the career Demonstration Project and any V. Conversion path and broadband level based on the accompanying geographic movement, assigned permanent position of record, promotion, or other simultaneous A. Conversion to the Demonstration not the retained grade. The employee’s action. Project basic pay and adjusted basic pay while An employee in a broadband level Initial entry into the Demonstration on grade retention status will be used in corresponding to a single GS grade is Project for covered employees is setting appropriate pay upon conversion provided that grade as the GS- accomplished through a full employee and in determining the amount of any equivalent grade. An employee in a protection approach that ensures each WGI buy-in. An employee’s adjusted broadband corresponding to two or employee an initial place in the basic pay will not be reduced upon more grades is determined to have a GS- appropriate broadband level without conversion. equivalent grade corresponding to one loss of pay, using an 890 Nature of Employees serving under regular term of those grades according to the Action Code. Employees are converted appointments at the time of conversion following rules:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53096 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

(a) The employee’s adjusted base pay VI. Project Duration and Changes Engineering (DDR&E) and Civilian under the demonstration project Public Law 103–337 removed any Personnel Policy (CPP), DoD. OPM’s (including any locality payment or mandatory expiration date for this Personnel Resources and Development staffing supplement) is compared with Demonstration Project. The Project Center (PRDC) served as external step 1 rates in the highest applicable GS evaluation plan adequately addresses evaluator for the first five years of the rate range. For this purpose, a GS rate how each intervention is Project to ensure the integrity of the range includes a rate in: comprehensively evaluated. evaluation process, outcomes, and i. The GS base schedule; Many aspects of a Demonstration interpretation of results. After the five- ii. The locality rate schedule for the Project are experimental. Minor year point decision to continue the locality pay area in which the position modifications may be made from time to Demonstration Project, AFRL opted out is located; or time as experience is gained, results are of OPM’s external evaluation effort and iii. The appropriate special rate analyzed, and conclusions are reached continued its own internal evaluation. schedule for the employee’s on how the system is working. AFRL intends to continue the same occupational series, as applicable. Flexibilities published in this Federal level of evaluation with the addition of If The series is a two-grade interval Register shall be available for use by all the expanded project coverage. series, only odd-numbered grades are STRLs, if they wish to adopt them. considered below GS–11. The main purpose of the evaluation is (b) For lateral reassignments, the VII. Evaluation Plan to determine the effectiveness of the equivalent GS grade and rate will Authorizing legislation mandates personnel system changes as they are become the employee’s converted GS evaluation of the Demonstration Project expanded to cover additional segments grade and rate after leaving the to assess the merits of Project outcomes of the AFRL population and to ensure Demonstration Project (before any other and to evaluate the feasibility of that there are no unintended adverse action). applications to other Federal outcomes of the changes. To the extent (c) For transfers, promotions, and organizations. The overall evaluation possible, cause-and-effect relationships other actions, the converted GS grade consists of two components—external between the changes and personnel and rate will be used in applying any and internal evaluation. The external system effectiveness criteria will be GS pay administration rules applicable evaluation for the AF Laboratory established. The evaluation approach in connection with the employee’s Demonstration is part of a larger effort uses the intervention impact model movement out of the Project (e.g., involving evaluation of demonstration shown in Table 3, which specifies each promotion rules, highest previous rate projects in reinvention laboratories in personnel system change as an rules, and/or pay retention rules), as if three military services. External intervention; the expected effects of the GS converted grade and rate were evaluation was originally overseen by each intervention; the corresponding actually in effect immediately before the the Office of Merit Systems Oversight measures of these effects; and the data employee left the Demonstration and Effectiveness, OPM, and the sources for obtaining the measures. Project. Director, Defense Research and BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53097

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.009 53098 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VIII. Demonstration Project Costs waived to allow for a Voluntary provisions described in this Federal The goal of this Demonstration Project Emeritus Corps.) Register notice.) is a system in which payroll costs and Chapter 33, section 3308: Competitive Chapter 53, sections 5301–5307: resource utilization can be controlled Service; Examinations; Educational Related to pay comparability system and consistent with the organization’s fiscal Requirements Prohibited. (This section General Schedule pay rates. (This strategies. This Demonstration Project is waived with respect to the scholastic waiver applies to the extent necessary to consists of a system of pay incentives achievement appointment authority.) allow: (1) Demonstration Project and processes that are flexible and can Chapter 33, sections 3317(a) and employees to be treated as GS operate in harmony with the operational 3318(a): Competitive Service; Related to employees and (2) basic rates of pay and financial needs of the larger certification and selection from under the Demonstration Project to be organization. The costs of the Project are registers. (These sections are waived to treated as scheduled rates of basic pay. borne by AFRL. Costs associated with eliminate the ‘‘rule of three.’’) Chapter 53, sections 5331–5336: the Demonstration Project include Chapter 33, section 3319: Alternative These waivers apply to the extent DCPDS and software automation, Ranking and Selection Procedures. (This necessary to allow: (1) Demonstration training, WGI buy-in, buy-up to section is waived to eliminate quality Project employees to be treated as GS minimum for band, and Project categories.) employees; (2) to allow the provisions of evaluation. The timing of the Chapter 33, section 3321: Competitive this Federal Register notice pertaining expenditures depends on the Service; Probationary Period. (This to setting rates of pay; and (3) waive implementation schedule. Because section waived only to the extent sections 5335 and 5336 in their entirety. automation requirements will be necessary to replace ‘‘grade’’ with Chapter 53, sections 5361–5366: minimized as a result of existing ‘‘broadband level.’’) Grade and Pay Retention. (These software system similarities, costs are Chapter 33, section 3341: Details; sections waived to the extent necessary estimated to be below $100K. Within Executive or Military to: (1) Replace ‘‘grade’’ with Departments. (This section is adapted to ‘‘broadband;’’ (2) allow Demonstration IX. Required Waivers to Law and the extent necessary to waive the time project employees to be treated as GS Regulation limits for details.) employees; and (3) sections 5362–5366 The following waivers and Chapter 35, section 3502: Order of are waived in their entirety to allow adaptations of certain title 5, U.S.C. and Retention. (This section waived to the provisions of this Federal Register title 5, CFR provisions are required only extent necessary to allow provisions of pertaining to grade and pay retention.) to the extent that these statutory and the RIF plan as described in this Federal Chapter 55, sections 5545 and 5547: regulatory provisions limit or are Register notice.) Related to premium pay. (These sections inconsistent with the actions Chapter 43, sections 4301–4305: waived to the extent necessary to allow contemplated under this demonstration Related to performance appraisal. Demonstration Project employees to be project. Nothing in this plan is intended (These sections are waived to the extent treated as GS employees.) to preclude the demonstration project necessary to allow provisions of the Chapter 57, sections 5753–5755: from adopting or incorporating any law contribution-based compensation Related to recruitment, relocation, or regulation enacted, adopted, or system as described in this Federal retention payments, and supervisory amended after the effective date of this Register notice.) differential. (These sections waived to demonstration project. Chapter 51, sections 5101–5102(a)(5), the extent necessary to allow: (1) 5103, and sections 5104–5112: Related Employees and positions under the A. Waivers to title 5, U.S.C. to classification standards and grading. Demonstration Project to be treated as Chapter 31, section 3111: Acceptance (These sections are waived to the extent employees and positions under the GS of Volunteer Service. (This section is necessary to allow classification and (2) that management may offer a

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.010 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53099

bonus to incentivize geographic changes as described in this Federal Part 531, subpart B: Determining Rate mobility to a SCEP student.) Register notice and (2) expand of Pay; subpart D: Within-Grade Chapter 75, sections 7501(1), discretionary exemptions to agency Increases; subpart E: Quality Step 7511(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(1)(B), and promotion programs.) Increases. (These subparts are waived in (a)(1)(C)(ii): Related to removal, Part 337, section 337.101(a): Rating their entirety to allow for the pay setting suspension, and reduction in grade or Applicants. (This section is waived provisions as described in this Federal pay. (These sections are waived to the when there are 15 or fewer qualified Register notice.) extent that they refer to one or two years applicants and no preference eligibles.) Part 531, subpart F: Locality of continuous service to allow up to a Part 340, subpart A, subpart B, and Payments. (This subpart is waived to the three-year probationary period for subpart C: Other than Full-Time Career extent necessary to allow: (1) S&Es.) Employment. (These subparts are Demonstration Project employees to be Chapter 75, section 7512(3): Related waived to the extent necessary to allow treated as GS employees; (2) replace to adverse action. (This section waived for a Voluntary Emeritus Corps and to ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘broadband;’’ and (3) to to the extent necessary to: (1) Replace allow excepted service employees to be allow basic rates of pay under the ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘broadband level;’’ and (2) in tenure group I.) Demonstration Project to be treated as exclude reductions in broadband level Part 351, Reduction-in-Force. (This scheduled rates of basic pay.) not accompanied by a reduction in pay.) part is waived to the extent necessary to Part 536, subpart A, subpart B, and Chapter 75, section 7512(4): Related allow provisions of the RIF plan as subpart C: Grade and Pay Retention. to adverse action. (This section is described in this Federal Register (These subparts are waived in their waived to the extent necessary to notice. In accordance with this FRN, entirety.) provide that adverse action provisions AFRL will define the competitive area, Part 550, section 550.703: Severance do not apply to conversions from GS retention standing, and displacement Pay. (This section is waived to the special rates to Demonstration Project limitations.) Specific waivers include: extent to allow AFRL to define pay, as long as total pay is not reduced.) sections 351.402–351.404: Scope of reasonable offer.) B. Waivers to Title 5, CFR Competition; sections 351.501–351.504: Part 550, section 550.902: Hazard Pay. Retention Standing; sections 351.601– (Definition of ‘‘employee,’’ is waived Part 213, section 213.3202: Tenure 351.608: Release from Competitive only to the extent necessary to allow Group. (Amended to allow excepted Level; and section 351.701: Assignment Demonstration Project employees to be service employees to be in tenure group Involving Displacement. treated as GS employees.) I.) Part 300, sections 300.601–300.605: Part 430, subpart A and subpart B: Part 575, sections 575.103(a), Time-in-Grade Restrictions. (Time-in- Performance Management; Performance 575.203(a), 575.303(a), and subpart D: grade restrictions are eliminated in this Appraisal. (These subparts are waived Recruitment and Relocation Bonuses; demonstration project.) to the extent necessary to allow Retention Allowances; Supervisory Part 308, sections 308.101–308.103: provisions of the contribution-based Differentials. (These sections are Volunteer Service. (Amended to allow compensation system as described in adapted to the extent necessary to allow for a Voluntary Emeritus Corps.) this Federal Register notice.) employees and positions under the Part 315, sections 315.801(a); (b)(1); Part 432, sections 432.101–432.105: Demonstration Project to be treated as (c) and (e); and sections 315.802(a) and Regarding performance based reduction employees and positions under the (b)(1): Related to probationary period. in grade and removal actions. (These General Schedule. Subpart D is waived (Amended to allow for extended sections are waived to the extent in its entirety; pay is based on employee probationary or trial period of 3 years necessary to: (1) Replace ‘‘grade’’ with contribution.) for all newly hired S&E employees.) ‘‘broadband;’’ (2) exclude reductions in Part 575, sections 575.201; 575.202; Part 315, section 315.901 and 315.907: broadband level not accompanied by a 575.205(a), (b); 575.206(a)(1); (b), (c); Probation on Initial Appointment to a reduction in pay; and (3) allow 575.207(a)(3); and 575.208(a)(1)(i), Supervisory or Managerial Position. provisions of CCS and addressing (a)(1)(iv), and (a)(3): Relocation (This section waived only to the extent inadequate contribution as described in Incentives. (These sections waived to necessary to replace ‘‘grade’’ with this Federal Register notice.) the extent necessary to allow: (1) ‘‘broadband level.’’) Part 511, subpart A, subpart B: Relocation incentives to new SCEP Part 316, sections 316.301, 316.303, Classification under the General students; (2) employees and positions and 316.304: Term Employment. (These Schedule. (These subparts are waived to under the Demonstration Project to be sections are waived to allow modified the extent necessary to allow treated as employees and positions term appointments as described in this classification provisions outlined in this under the General Schedule; and (3) Federal Register notice.) Federal Register notice.) relocation incentives to SCEP students Part 332, sections 332.401 and Part 511, sections 511.601–511.612: whose worksite is in a different 332.404: Order on Registers and Order Classification Appeals. (These sections geographic location than that of the of Selection from Certificates. (These are waived to the extent necessary to: (1) college enrolled.) sections are waived to the extent Replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘broadband;’’ (2) Part 591, subpart B: Cost-of-Living necessary to allow: (1) No rating and add to the list of issues that are neither Allowance and Post Differential— ranking when there are 15 or fewer appealable or reviewable, the Nonforeign Areas. (This subpart is qualified applicants and no preference assignment of series under the project adapted to the extent necessary to allow eligibles; (2) the hiring and appointment plan to appropriate career paths; and (3) employees and positions under the authorities as described in this Federal to allow informal appeals to be decided Demonstration Project to be treated as Register notice; and (3) elimination of by the AFRL pay pool manager. Formal employees and positions under the the ‘‘rule of three.’’) appeal rights are unchanged.) General Schedule.) Part 335, section 335.103(c): Agency Part 530, subpart C: Special Rate Part 752, sections 752.101 and Promotion Programs. (This section is Schedules for Recruitment and 752.301: Adverse Actions. (This section waived to the extent necessary to: (1) Retention. (This subpart is waived in its is waived to the extent that they refer to Allow non-competitive temporary job entirety.) one or two years of continuous service

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53100 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

to allow up to a three-year probationary exclude reductions in broadband level do not apply to conversions from GS period for S&Es.) not accompanied by a reduction in pay.) special rates to Demonstration Project Part 752, section 752.401(a)(3): Part 752, section 752.401(a)(4): pay, as long as total pay is not reduced.) Reduction in Grade. (This section is Reduction in Pay. (This section is waived to the extent necessary to waived to the extent necessary to BILLING CODE 5001–06–P replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘broadband’’ and to provide that adverse action provisions

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.012 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53101

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.013 53102 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C conformity. Capability is recognized Participates in technology area planning Appendix B: Descriptors Sorted by within own organization. within own organization. Contributes Career Path, Broadband Level, and Communication Factor: Prepares technical ideas to proposal preparation Factor information to use within own and new technology development. organization and technical area. Efficiently performs tasks utilizing Scientists and Engineers Career Path Exchanges information with other available resources, including one’s own (DR): functional areas or external contacts. time, to successfully accomplish Level I Descriptors Documents routine information in a assigned work. Provides inputs to risk clear and timely manner. Effectively management and process Problem Solving Factor: Applies utilizes communications tools to improvements. Contributes within own knowledge of science, technology, or contribute to reports, documents, organization to the development and processes to assigned tasks. Efforts are presentations, etc. Presents routine transition of technology solutions. Seeks within the technology area or own information in a clear and timely out and uses relevant outside organization. Analyzes and resolves manner. Actively listens and responds technologies to support own technical routine to moderately-difficult problems appropriately. Develops speaking skills and functional activities. within assigned area, often under the for basic briefings and effectively Teamwork and Leadership Factor: guidance of senior personnel. Develops adjusts to the audience with guidance. Performs work within a team that limited variations to established Provides reports, documents, and improves capability of a technology area methods and/or techniques. Uses presentations to senior personnel for or organization. Coordinates actions and judgment in selecting, interpreting, and review. Makes necessary revisions per gains understanding of other areas adapting known scientific principles. guidance from senior personnel. sufficiently to make appropriate Considers existing approaches and Technology Management Factor: recommendations. As team member, researches novel alternatives. Efficiently Interacts within technical area on makes positive contributions in provides solutions that resolve assigned routine issues to communicate assigned areas to meet team goals. problems with some oversight/ information and coordinate actions Shares relevant knowledge and assistance from senior personnel. within area of assigned responsibility. information with others. Develops Completed work is reviewed for Conducts duties in support of technical positive working relationships with soundness, appropriateness, and goals within own organization. peers and superiors alike. Maintains

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.014 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53103

currency in area of expertise. Actively within and beyond own organization interpretation, and/or evaluation. seeks guidance/opportunities to that ensure the technology mission. Approaches to solving problems require improve/expand skills. Receives close Recognizes opportunities and interpretation, deviation from guidance from others. Performs duties formulates plans within own traditional methods, or research of in a professional, responsive, and organization. Generates key ideas and trends and patterns to develop new cooperative manner in accordance with contributes technically to proposal methods, scientific knowledge, or established policies and procedures. preparation and marketing to establish organizational principles. Actively new business opportunities. Identifies engages organizational planning Level II Descriptors and advocates for resources necessary to activities. Defines and leads work efforts Problem Solving Factor: Develops or support and contribute to mission that are focused on organizational modifies new methods, approaches, or requirements. Demonstrates knowledge priorities. Results of work are scientific knowledge to solve of corporate processes by effective considered authoritative. Expertise is challenges. Efforts involve multiple application of resources. Actively recognized at the national level across technology areas or organizations. manages cost, schedule, and resource the Laboratory, service, DoD agencies, Applies knowledge of science/ risks seeking timely remedies. Engages industry, and/or academia. technology to analyze and resolve others in using resources more Communication Factor: multifaceted issues/problems with efficiently and suggests innovative ideas Communicates complex technical, minimal guidance. Develops to optimize available resources. programmatic, and/or management comprehensive modifications to Implements the development and information across multiple established methods and/or techniques. transition/transfer of technology organizational levels to drive decisions Uses judgment and originality in solutions, within or beyond own by senior leaders. Collaborates with developing innovative approaches to organization, based upon awareness of broad functional and technical areas. define and resolve highly complex customer requirements. Evaluates and Leads documentation of diverse and situations. Approaches to solving incorporates appropriate outside highly complex information, concepts, problems require initiative and technology to support research and and ideas in a highly responsive and resourcefulness in interpreting and development. effective manner. Authors and enables applying scientific principles that are Teamwork and Leadership Factor: authoritative reports, documents, and applicable but may be conflicting or not Performs work as a key team member or presentations pertaining to multiple clearly understood. Consults leads others to improve capability of a areas of expertise. Leads presentation of appropriately to develop objectives, technology area or organization. diverse and highly complex priorities, and deadlines. Plans and Integrates efforts or works across information, concepts, and ideas in a carries out work that is well aligned disciplines. Provides consultation on highly responsive and effective manner. with organizational goals. Completed complex issues. As lead or key team Seeks opinions and ideas from others work is generally accepted upon review. member, makes significant and carefully considers and Expertise is recognized internally and contributions to meet team goals in incorporates diverse viewpoints. externally by academia, industry, or support of the organizational goals. Demonstrates expert speaking skills and government peers. Works collaboratively with others in a adaptability for critical briefings. Communication Factor: Provides dynamic environment, demonstrating Produces required forms of information to peers, senior technical respect for other people and alternative communication with minimal guidance leaders, and/or managers within and viewpoints. Recognizes when others from others. Reviews communications beyond own organization to influence need assistance and provides support. of others for appropriate and accurate decisions or recommend solutions. Assists in the development and training content. Exchanges information with established of internal/external team members. Technology Management Factor: internal/external networks. Documents Works to develop/improve self in order Leads technology partners in highly complex information, concepts, and to more effectively accomplish team complex technical areas to develop ideas in a clear, concise, well-organized, goals. May recommend selection of team strategies for research and development and timely manner. Authors reports, members. Receives general guidance in programs. Leads development and documents, and presentations terms of established policies, objectives, execution at a broad level in the pertaining to area(s) of expertise. and decisions from others. Discusses Laboratory to advance the technology Presents complex information, concepts, novel concepts and significant mission. Leads/contributes significantly and ideas in a clear, concise, well- departures from previous practices with to program definition and/or planning. organized, and timely manner. Actively supervisor or team leader. Pursues near-term business listens to others’ questions, ideas, and opportunities by exploiting internal concerns and considers diverse Level III Descriptors and/or external resources. Identifies and viewpoints. Demonstrates effective Problem Solving Factor: Performs develops mission relevant solutions speaking skills for advanced briefings, duties across a broad range of activities while leveraging collaborations across tailoring presentations to facilitate that require substantial depth of the Laboratory. Monitors evolution of understanding. Reviews own analysis and expertise. Implements or cost, schedule, and resource risk. communication products prior to recommends decisions which impact Anticipates changes in resource submittal to peers, senior technical science or technology. Applies and requirements and develops and leaders, managers, and/or external expands knowledge of science/ advocates solutions in advance. Leads contacts, resulting in minimal revision. technology to resolve critical, others in using resources more May assist with the communications of multifaceted problems and/or develops efficiently and implements innovative others. new theories or methods. Adapts to ideas to stretch limited resources. Leads Technology Management Factor: tasks involving changes or competing development and transition/transfer Collaborates with technical area requirements. Uses judgment and activities based upon extensive stakeholders to develop strategies for ingenuity in making decisions/ customer interactions and appropriate effective execution within a particular developing technologies for areas with partnerships. Develops technology technology area. Executes activities substantial uncertainty in methodology, solutions by exploiting external

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53104 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

technology to enhance research and activities. Builds collaborative Cultivates and sustains a professional development. relationships across broad functional environment of cooperation, cohesion, Teamwork and Leadership Factor: and technical areas and engages with and teamwork. Formulates short- and Leads critical aspects of team or leaders at the national and/or long-term teaming/collaboration technology area with focused international level. Promotes a culture strategies across organizations/ accountability for quality and of excellence in synthesizing and disciplines. Establishes team charters. effectiveness. Integrates efforts across documenting diverse and highly Builds coalitions to establish integrated disciplines. Sought out for consultation complex information, concepts, and approaches that meet overall on complex issues that affect internal/ ideas. Authors and directs authoritative organizational mission requirements. external organizations and/or reports, documents, and presentations Mentors and develops future relationships. Effectively seeks out and integrating multiple disciplines. organizational leaders and personnel capitalizes on opportunities for Develops strategies to improve through evaluations/feedback. Fosters a collaboration to achieve significant presentations of diverse and highly culture that encourages and rewards results that support organizational goals. complex information, concepts, and mentoring and development. Is sought out for consultation and ideas. Fosters an atmosphere of respect Proactively develops/improves self in leadership roles. Seeks out for others at all levels and promotes order to more effectively accomplish opportunities to share knowledge with expression of alternative viewpoints. agency goals. Identifies and addresses others. Volunteers to lead or serve on Displays mastery of speaking skills and skill deficiencies and selects team cross-functional/integrated teams. Leads delivers compelling, authoritative members. Works within the framework and supports the development and briefings. Establishes guidance and of agency policies, mission objectives, training of subordinates and/or internal/ oversight requirements for and time and funding limitations with external team members. Actively seeks communication in their organizational minimal oversight. Establishes policy out mentoring opportunities. or technical area. Responsible and and/or provides guidance/direction to Proactively develops/improves self in accountable for overall development of others. Responsible for position and order to more effectively accomplish reports, documents, and presentations performance management. organizational goals. Recommends of self and others within area of selection and/or selects team members. responsibility. Business Management and Professional Receives only broad policy/guidance. Technology Management Factor: Career Path (DO): Provides guidance/direction to others. Integrates wide-ranging activities at a Level I Descriptors May participate in position and national/international level, involving performance management. multiple technical areas, to develop Problem Solving Factor: Applies strategic technology solutions. Directs Level IV Descriptors knowledge of business management or a program/process formulation and professional field to perform duties Problem Solving Factor: Defines, implementation to achieve the mission supporting and/or improving the leads, and manages an overall goals at the Laboratory/multi-agency efficiency and productivity of the technology area which includes level. Leads requirements generation, organization. Analyzes and resolves multidisciplinary science and strategic planning, and prioritization. difficult but routine problems within technology (S&T) and/or non-S&T Creates business opportunities based assigned area of responsibility, aspects. Makes critical decisions which upon market awareness and exploitation sometimes under the guidance of a significantly impact science or of internal and/or external resources. senior specialist. Includes minor technology. Applies considerable Identifies, proposes, and develops adaptation to established methods and judgment to resolve critical, diverse and timely mission relevant techniques. Plans and carries out work multifaceted problems spanning solutions while leveraging national/ based on established guidelines and multiple disciplines. Expertly international collaborations. Manages supervisor’s stated priorities and accomplishes tasks or resolves issues and defends the resources needed to involving significant uncertainties, deadlines. Completed work is evaluated achieve organizational goals and for soundness, appropriateness, and changes, or competing requirements. expertly guides the implementation of Using broadly stated organizational conformity to policy and requirements. these resources in a dynamic Uses judgment in selecting, interpreting, goals fosters a culture which rewards environment. Leads, promotes, and ingenuity and generates/implements and adapting guidelines that are readily enables process improvements to available. innovative ideas for developing new maximize resource utilization. Leads technologies. Develops innovative world class research and development Communication Factor: Factual approaches which significantly expand programs based upon anticipating information and material is normally the scientific knowledge base and/or the customer requirements and leveraging presented to individuals within overall effectiveness of the organization. national/international activities. immediate office or within own Sets objectives and plans, designs, and Develops innovative solutions that organization, but may involve external directs work to meet evolving exploit emerging technology and fosters contacts. Communicates routine organizational goals. Agency provides an environment of technology information in a clear and timely only broadly defined missions and exploitation. manner. Develops formal written functions. Leadership is recognized at Teamwork and Leadership Factor: communication often with supervisory the national/international level across Leads/manages all aspects of review and revision. Actively listens various laboratories, services, DoD, subordinate/team efforts with complete and appropriately responds to questions industry and/or academia. accountability for mission and program and concerns from others. Uses tone Communication Factor: success. Utilizes situational awareness that respects others’ ideas, comments, Communicates with a wide range of to promote competitive positioning of and questions. With guidance, peers/organizations across multiple the organization. Has broad and effectively adjusts communications to levels inside and outside the Laboratory substantial impact on organizational the audience’s level of understanding. to influence major technical, decisions affecting internal/external Has speaking skills required to deliver programmatic, and/or management organizations and/or relationships. basic briefings.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53105

Business Management Factor: be conflicting or stated only in general members. Supports development and Interacts with customers on routine terms. Uses considerable judgment and training of subordinates. Participates in issues to communicate information and originality in developing innovative mentoring and position/performance coordinate actions within area of approaches to define and resolve highly management. assigned responsibility. Conducts duties complex situations. Level III Descriptors in support of business goals of the Communication Factor: organization. Provides timely, flexible, Communicates important concepts to Problem Solving Factor: Performs and responsive products and/or services influence decisions or recommend duties across a broad range of activities to customers under guidance of senior solutions with specialists and that require substantial depth of specialist or supervisor. Contributes management officials in own analysis and organizational problem ideas for improvement of established organization. Occasionally solving skills. Implements or services based on knowledge of a variety communicates with individuals at recommends decisions which of business management or professional higher levels and in other organizations. significantly impact agency policies/ programs and systems and an Communicates moderately complex programs. Resolves critical problems or understanding of customer needs. information, concepts, and ideas in a develops new theories for work Demonstrates knowledge of available clear, concise, well-organized, and products or services which affect the resources and the process for acquiring timely manner. Written communication work of other experts, the development the resources needed to accomplish typically requires minimal revision. of major aspects of business assigned work. Makes effective use of Actively listens to others’ questions, management programs or missions, or available resources including one’s own ideas, and concerns. Uses respectful impacts a large number of people. time. tone that considers diverse viewpoints Assignments involve continual program Teamwork and Leadership Factor: and appropriately responds to questions changes or conflicting requirements. Makes positive contributions to all or requests. Effectively adjusts Supervisor outlines general objectives. aspects of the overall team’s communications to facilitate Independently plans and carries out the responsibilities. Pursues opportunities understanding. Tailors presentations work. Complex issues are resolved for training and professional growth. and briefings to meet an audience’s without reference to supervisor except Actively participates in team training needs and level of understanding. for matters of a policy nature. Results activities. Performs work that affects the Business Management Factor: Works are considered technically authoritative accuracy, reliability, or acceptability of with customers to define/anticipate and are normally accepted without broader projects and programs. problems and develop strategies for significant change. Uses judgment and Coordinates joint actions and gains effective resolution within a particular ingenuity in making decisions in major understanding of other areas sufficient program area. Supports execution of areas of uncertainty in methodology, to make appropriate recommendations. activities that advance the business- interpretation and/or evaluation. Works flexibly with others to related goals of the organization. Guidelines require interpretation, accomplish team goals. Treats others Develops innovative or useful deviation from traditional methods, or fairly and professionally. Shares suggestions for designing and adapting research of trends and patterns to relevant knowledge and information customer-focused products and/or develop new methods, criteria, or with others. May participate as a services. Displays flexibility in propose new policies. member of cross-functional teams. May responding to changing customer needs. Communication Factor: Influences select or recommend selection of staff or Contributes key ideas and/or strategies consensus among management officials team members. to develop, implement, and promote within AFRL, AF, and in other agencies new/improved programs or services and organizations to accept ideas and Level II Descriptors applicable to business management or a implement recommendations designed Problem Solving Factor: Develops professional field. Identifies and to improve effectiveness of major new methods, criteria, policies, or advocates for resources necessary to programs and policies. Communicates precedents for business management or support and contribute to mission complex information, concepts, and a professional field. Modifies or adapts requirements. Maximizes use of ideas in an accurate, clear, concise, established methods and approaches to available resources. well-organized, and timely manner. complex issues that affect a wide range Teamwork and Leadership Factor: Written communication typically of organizational activities. May Contributes as lead or key member of accepted without revision. Seeks administer one or more complex the team performing the substantive opinions and ideas from others as programs within a functional area. analytical or professional duties in appropriate. Actively listens to others’ Applies substantial knowledge of support of the organizational mission. questions, ideas, and concerns. Uses business management or a professional Effectively carries out integrated tone that respects and carefully field to analyze and resolve highly advisory and program work. Leads/ considers diverse viewpoints, complex issues and problems. Includes mentors/provides oversight to responding appropriately. Clearly refinement of methods or development specialists at same or lower level. communicates complex information, of new ones. Consults with supervisor Regularly consulted by management concepts, and ideas through briefings to develop deadlines, priorities, and officials on complex issues due to depth and presentations to a wide range of objectives. Plans and carries out work, and breadth of expertise. Works audiences. effectively resolving most conflicts that collaboratively and flexibly with others Business Management Factor: Works arise. Keeps supervisor informed of to accomplish team goals. Treats others jointly with customers to identify highly potentially controversial issues. fairly and professionally. Shares complex, sensitive, or controversial Completed work is reviewed primarily relevant knowledge and information problems and develop strategies for for meeting requirements and producing with others. Recognizes when others effective resolution. Contributes to expected results. Uses initiative and need assistance and provides support. refinement of the business-related goals resourcefulness in interpreting and May participate as a member of cross- of the organization. Establishes applying policies, precedents, and functional/integrated teams. Selects or successful working relationships with guidelines that are applicable but may recommends selection of staff or team customers to address and resolve highly

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53106 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

complex and/or controversial issues. and non-specific. Generates/implements Champions respect and value for others. Anticipates customer needs in order to innovative ideas for increasing overall Selects or recommends selection of staff, avoid potential problems resulting in effectiveness of the organization. team members, and subordinate improved customer satisfaction. Communication Factor: Interacts with supervisors. Initiates development and Develops effective plans and strategies high-ranking officials to include AF training of subordinates. Directs or for highly complex programs or services level and other agencies and recommends mentoring and position/ involving broad business management departments to influence major program performance management. Develops or a professional field. Successfully policies and/or defend controversial future team leaders and supervisors. carries out and maintains such decisions. May also communicate with programs/services at a high level of leaders at the local, State, and/or Technician Career Path (DX): customer awareness and satisfaction. national levels for similar purposes. Level I Descriptors Anticipates changes in workload Tailors style to communicate critical Problem Solving Factor: Applies basic information effectively to diverse requirements and advocates for knowledge to perform well-defined audiences at different levels. Accurately resources in advance of when they are work activities with guidance. Performs communicates complex information, needed. Actively assists others in using specific procedures which are typically concepts, and ideas in a clear, concise, resources more efficiently and suggests a segment of a project of broader scope. well-organized, and timely manner. innovative ideas to stretch limited Work products affect the accuracy, Written communication is accepted resources. reliability, or acceptability of further Teamwork and Leadership Factor: without revision. Receptive to procedures, processes, or services. Effectively seeks out and capitalizes on alternative viewpoints. Clearly Performs duties that involve related and opportunities for the work unit to communicates complex information and established steps, processes, or achieve significant results that support ideas to a range of audiences. Shows organizational goals. Is sought out for respect for others and responds methods. Operates and adjusts varied consultation and leadership roles. appropriately to people at all levels. equipment and instrumentation to Guides the critical aspects of Delivers compelling policy level perform standardized tests or operations programmatic and business briefings. involved in testing, data analysis, and management efforts of individuals and/ Business Management Factor: presentation. Executes routine or teams with focus on accountability, Interacts at senior management levels to assignments without explicit quality, and effectiveness. Has impact negotiate and resolve conflicts instructions if standard work methods on business recommendations that concerning activity-wide policies and can be used. Resolves recurring routine affect both internal and external programs. Resolutions are problems with little supervision. Uses relationships. Leads and provides communicated across the organization/ judgment in locating and selecting the oversight to effectively manage agency. Contributes to the definition most appropriate procedures, making integrated advisory and program and improvement of processes that minor deviations to adapt the guidelines services. Regularly consulted by affect the business goals of the to specific cases. management officials on highly complex organization. Fosters successful working Communication Factor: Acquires or issues. Seeks out opportunities to share relationships with high-level officials exchanges information with individuals knowledge with others. Volunteers to both inside and outside the organization on same team or within own lead or serve on cross-functional/ that help achieve overall mission goals. organization for routine and recurring integrated teams. Selects or Develops innovative and useful issues. May involve limited external recommends selection of staff, team approaches for improving or expanding contacts. Communicates routine members, and/or subordinate products and/or services, resulting in information in a clear and timely supervisors. Initiates development and highly valued services that improve manner. Written communication may training of subordinates. Participates in overall customer satisfaction. Generates require some revision. Actively listens mentoring, motivation, coaching, strategic plans and objectives to and appropriately responds to questions instruction, and position/performance develop, implement, and promote and concerns from others. Uses tone management. broadly-based programs and services to that respects others’ ideas, comments, meet organizational needs. Ensures and questions. With guidance, Level IV Descriptors overall effectiveness and customer- effectively adjusts communications to Problem Solving Factor: Defines, oriented focus of managed programs, facilitate understanding. leads, and manages an overall business processes, and services. Identifies, Business Management Factor: management or professional program acquires, defends, and manages the Interacts with customers to area which includes a full range of resources needed to achieve communicate information and complex functional areas. Makes critical organizational goals. coordinate routine actions within area decisions which significantly change, Teamwork and Leadership Factor: of assigned responsibility. Conducts interpret, or develop important agency Formulates short- and long-term duties in support of business goals of policies/programs. Applies considerable strategies across subordinate units to the organization. Provides timely, judgment and ingenuity to interpret achieve significant results in support of flexible, and responsive products and/or existing guidelines and develop policies the organization’s goals and long-term services to customers under guidance of and procedures for broadly based vision. Leads and manages all aspects of senior technician or supervisor. projects/programs. Independently plans, subordinate/team efforts with complete Contributes ideas for improvement of designs, and carries out programs, accountability for mission and program products and services to project lead/ projects, studies, etc., such that overall success. Utilizes situational awareness supervisor based on an understanding of program objectives are met. Supervisor to promote competitive positioning of customer needs. Efficiently utilizes provides only broadly defined missions the organization. Builds coalitions to available resources, including one’s own and functions. Results of work are establish integrated approaches to meet time, to successfully accomplish considered technically authoritative and overall organizational mission assigned work. are almost always accepted without requirements. Sets and maintains a tone Teamwork and Leadership Factor: change. Guidelines are broadly stated of cooperation, cohesion, and teamwork. Makes positive contributions to specific

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53107

aspects of the team’s responsibilities. communications to ensure an effective work plans. Requires little to no Actively takes initiative to expand level of understanding. Clearly responds technical advice or guidance. Technical knowledge and assume more to questions or requests, following up decisions and recommendations are responsibilities. Pursues opportunities when appropriate. normally accepted by higher authority. for training and professional growth. Business Management Factor: Works Applies extensive knowledge to unusual Actively participates in team training with customers to define/anticipate or highly difficult assignments. activities. Provides work product that is problems and develop strategies for Reviews, analyzes, and integrates work a complete project of relatively effective resolution within technical performed by others along with conventional and limited scope or a areas. Supports execution of activities adaptations from changes in technology portion of a larger project. Work that advance the business-related goals as they relate to the possible impact on requires a limited degree of of the organization. Develops innovative projects, systems, or processes coordination and integration of diverse or useful suggestions for designing and Communication Factor: phases carried out by others. Personal adapting customer-focused products Communicates with employees and interactions foster cooperation and and/or services. Displays flexibility in management officials both within own teamwork. Works effectively with others responding to changing customer needs. organization and in organizations to accomplish tasks. Treats others Contributes key ideas and/or strategies outside the agency to resolve problems, respectfully and professionally. to develop, implement, and apply new/ accept ideas, and implement Provides information and assistance to improved methods and procedures recommendations designed to improve others as needed. Attempts to handle applicable to technical areas. effectiveness of operating systems, minor work-related disagreements in a Anticipates, identifies, and advocates programs, equipment, or services. positive manner. for resources necessary to support and Communicates complex information in contribute to mission requirements. a clear, concise, well-organized, and Level II Descriptors Maximizes use of available resources. timely manner. Written communication Problem Solving Factor: Plans and Teamwork and Leadership Factor: is typically accepted without revision. conducts work which is a complete Makes positive contributions to Seeks opinions and ideas from others as project of relatively limited scope or a multiple aspects of the team’s appropriate. Actively listens to others’ portion of a large and more diverse responsibilities. Shares knowledge and questions, ideas, and concerns. Uses project. Work affects the operation of experience with team members. respectful tone that considers diverse systems, equipment, testing operations, Provides a work product that is a viewpoints, responding appropriately. research conclusions, or similar complete conventional project, or a Communicates complex information, activities. Applies practical knowledge portion of a larger, more diverse project. concepts, and ideas through briefings or of different but established technical Projects require coordination of several presentations to audiences in a manner methods, principles, and practices independent parts, each requiring that facilitates understanding. Clearly within a narrow area to design, plan, independent analysis and solution. responds to questions or requests with and carry out projects. Assignments Works collaboratively and flexibly with follow up when appropriate. require study, analysis, and others to accomplish team goals. Treats Business Management Factor: Works consideration and selection of several others respectfully and professionally. with customers to identify highly possible courses of action. Supervisor Shares relevant knowledge and complex or controversial problems and outlines overall requirements, providing information with others. Effectively develop strategies for effective general instructions regarding contributes as a participating member resolution. Contributes to refinement of objectives, time limitations, and on other teams. Supports development the business-related goals of the priorities. Plans and carries out and training of subordinates and/or co- organization. Establishes successful successive steps and handles problems workers. Participates in mentoring and working relationships with customers to in accordance with accepted practices position/performance management. address and resolve highly complex or instructions. Completed work is and/or controversial issues. Anticipates Level III Descriptors evaluated for technical soundness, customer needs in order to avoid appropriateness, and conformity. Problem Solving Factor: Establishes potential problems resulting in Applies knowledge and experience to a criteria, formulates projects, assesses improved customer satisfaction. broad range of assignments. Seeks novel program effectiveness, and investigates Develops effective plans and strategies solutions where appropriate. Adapts a variety of unusual conditions or for highly complex products or services previous plans/techniques to fit new problems in areas which affect a wide involving a broad technical area. situations. range of major activities. Identifies areas Successfully carries out and maintains Communication Factor: for investigation or improvement. Work services at a high level of customer Communicates with co-workers and affects the design of systems, awareness and satisfaction. Anticipates management officials in own equipment, testing operations, research changes in workload requirements and organization in order to plan and conclusions, or similar activities. advocates for resources in advance of coordinate work, communicate Applies considerable knowledge of a when they are needed. Actively assists important technical concepts and wide range of technical methods, others in using resources more requirements, or recommend solutions. principles, and practices to design, plan, efficiently and suggests innovative ideas Also, communicates with various and carry out complex projects. to stretch limited resources. individuals at higher levels and in other Assignments are frequently complicated Teamwork and Leadership Factor: Is organizations. Communicates by many operations which equipment or sought out for consultation and serves information in a clear, concise, well- systems must perform, and many as a mentor to other team members. organized, and timely manner. Written variables that must be considered. Seeks out opportunities to share communication typically requires Precedents are sometimes absent or experience and lessons learned with minimal revision. Actively listens to obscure. Handles conflicting issues. other team members, both internal and others’ questions, ideas, and concerns. Supervisor outlines general external to own organization. Manages Uses respectful tone that considers requirements and objectives. Analyzes highly difficult assignments in diverse viewpoints. Tailors problems and develops approaches/ functional areas. Acts as a spokesperson

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53108 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

authorizing important modifications facilitates understanding. Receptive to Mission Support Career Path (DU) which conform to broad policy. alternative or dissenting viewpoints. Level I Descriptors Coordinates assignments with subject Shows respect for others and responds matter experts in other areas. Reviews, appropriately to people at all levels. Problem Solving Factor: Performs analyzes, and integrates work performed clerical/assistant/support work Business Management Factor: by other groups or individuals outside involving the application of a body of Interacts at senior management levels to the organization. Builds effective standardized rules, procedures, or partnerships across units. Volunteers negotiate and resolve conflicts affecting operations to resolve a variety of and actively serves in leadership roles a wide-range of activities. Contributes to standard, recurring requirements. Work on integrated teams. Regularly the definition and improvement of affects the quality and timeliness of consulted by others on significant processes that affect the business goals products or services within the issues. Deals with challenging conflicts of the organization. Fosters successful immediate office. Applies standard in a manner that motivates and working relationships with high-level rules, procedures, or operations to encourages cooperation. Develops officials both inside and outside the accomplish repetitive tasks and resolve options to resolve disagreements that organization that help achieve overall routine matters. Carries out recurring may require resolution at a higher level. mission goals. Develops innovative and and routine work following supervisor’s Provides recommendations for creation useful approaches for evaluating and direction regarding work to be done, of teams. Develops and identifies new improving operations, equipment, and/ priorities, and specific procedures/ training needs for the professional or activities resulting in highly valued guidelines to be followed. Completed work is reviewed for accuracy, growth of team members. Provides services that improve overall customer timeliness, and adherence to mentoring and position/performance satisfaction. Stays appraised of current management. instructions. Uses judgment in selecting technologies and methods to develop and applying guidelines which are Level IV Descriptors techniques for new or modified work readily available. Problem Solving Factor: Provides methods, approaches, or procedure for Communication Factor: expert advisory services and leadership substantive functions and services to Communicates with individuals for broad and complex programs, meet organizational and customer primarily in own organization in order systems, and processes that advance the needs. Ensures overall effectiveness and to exchange information and present state of the art. Plans, organizes, and/or customer-oriented focus of managed findings. Communicates routine directs extensive development efforts programs, processes, and services. Plans information in a clear and timely associated with the latest advancements and allocates resources to accomplish manner. Written communication may in technology. Projects are multi- multiple customer needs require some revision. Clearly disciplinary and are greatly affected by simultaneously across the organization. communicates status of assigned tasks. advances in technology. Projects are Develops and implements innovative Actively listens and appropriately also characterized by highly complex approaches to attain goals and minimize responds to questions and concerns problems for which precedents are resource expenditures. from others. Uses tone that respects others’ ideas, comments, and questions. lacking. Uses judgment and ingenuity to Teamwork and Leadership Factor: convert objectives into programs or Business Management Factor: Recognized as a prominent contributor policies. Adjusts broad activities to Interacts with customers on routine to key technical fields as a leader of a align with changing program needs. issues to communicate information and Supervisor outlines only broad policy productive team directly contributing to clarify instructions for tasking within and operational objectives/ the organization’s mission. Considered a area of assigned responsibility. requirements. Technical supervision is leader in the conception and Conducts administrative duties in limited to reviewing broad hypotheses formulation of innovative concepts and support of business goals of the and overall approach. Interpretations ideas. Serves as an expert in own field organization. Provides timely, flexible, are generally accepted as technically and is regularly sought out for and responsive products and/or services authoritative. Creates new techniques, consultation and/or takes leadership on to customers under guidance of senior establishing criteria and/or developing important committees dealing with team member or supervisor. Suggests new information. Approach is not easily significant technical issues. Responsible ideas for improvement of products and determined and novel approaches or for ensuring team composition is services based on an understanding of considerable modification of existing sufficient to meet program objectives. customer needs. Efficiently utilizes techniques is required. May contribute Contributes to achieving organizational available resources to successfully to or publish technical papers on goals by building flexible and effective accomplish assigned work. modification of existing theories or partnerships. Successfully resolves Appropriately prioritizes work; manages technology. sensitive conflicts. Actively works to own time. Communication Factor: Interacts with ensure the continuous transfer of Teamwork and Leadership Factor: individuals or groups in various Contributes to specific aspects of the knowledge and skills throughout the agencies and departments to influence team’s responsibilities. Pursues work unit by serving as a technical and/or defend controversial decisions. opportunities for training and Tailors style to communicate critical resource and initiating or overseeing the professional growth. Actively information effectively to diverse development of formal knowledge participates in team training activities. audiences at different levels. sharing systems. Selects or recommends Provides work product or service of Communicates complex information in selection of staff and/or team members. limited scope that requires a minimal a clear, concise, well-organized, and Develops and identifies new training degree of coordination and integration timely manner. Written communication needs for the professional growth of of work carried out by others. Personal is accepted without revision. Prepares subordinates. Directs and provides attitude/conduct fosters cooperation and and delivers briefings to communicate mentoring and position/performance teamwork needed to accomplish tasks. complex information and ideas to a management. May formally supervise at Treats others fairly and professionally. range of audiences in a manner that team-level. Provides information and assistance to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53109

others as requested/needed. Attempts to performing substantive clerical/ Actively listens to others’ questions, handle minor work-related assistant/support duties in support of ideas, and concerns. Uses respectful disagreements in a positive manner. the organizational mission. Assists in tone that considers diverse viewpoints the development and training of and clearly responds to questions or Level II Descriptors individuals or team members. requests, following up to ensure Problem Solving Factor: Applies well- Participates in mentoring and assists understanding. Tailors communications developed knowledge and skills to with team management. Effectively to ensure an effective level of effectively perform a full range of carries out important mission support understanding. moderately complex clerical/assistant/ work. Leads/mentors/provides oversight Business Management Factor: Serves support work. Work affects the quality to employees at same or lower level. as a central point of contact to provide and timeliness of products or services Regularly assists specialists/managers authoritative explanations of within the organization. Applies on support issues due to depth of requirements, regulations, and standard rules, procedures, or knowledge and breadth of expertise. procedures, and to effectively resolve operations to accomplish a variety of Works flexibly with others to problems or disagreements affecting tasks and resolve moderately complex accomplish team goals. Treats others assigned areas. Contributes to matters. Supervisor defines objectives, fairly and professionally. Seeks refinement of the business-related goals priorities, and deadlines. Independently opportunities to share relevant of the organization. Establishes plans and carries out steps required to knowledge and information with others. successful working relationships with complete assignments. Resolves May participate as a member on other customers to address and resolve recurring problems/deviations without teams. complex and/or controversial mission assistance. Completed work is reviewed support issues. Anticipates customer for accuracy, timeliness, and Level III Descriptors needs in order to avoid potential compliance with established methods/ Problem Solving Factor: Performs problems resulting in improved procedures/guidelines. Takes initiative clerical/assistant/support work customer satisfaction. Develops and to identify, locate, and appropriately involving application of an extensive implements effective plans and apply guidelines and procedures. body of rules, procedures, and strategies for improving important Communication Factor: operations to resolve a wide variety of products or services involving a broad Communicates with co-workers and complex organizational support mission support area. Successfully management officials in own activities. Work may occasionally have provides services with a high level of organization in order to plan and influence beyond immediate customer awareness and satisfaction. coordinate work, communicate organization. Work has a direct impact Anticipates changes in workload important concepts and requirements, on the effectiveness and efficiency of requirements and advocates for or recommend solutions. Also, the work products and services of resources in advance of when they are communicates with counterparts at specialists within the organization. needed. Actively assists others in using various levels both inside and outside Applies considerable knowledge of the resources more efficiently and suggests the organization. Communicates rules, procedures, and operations to innovative ideas to stretch limited information in a clear, concise, well- accomplish a variety of tasks within the resources. organized, and timely manner. Written assigned area of responsibility. Applies Teamwork and Leadership Factor: communication typically requires guidelines and techniques to resolve Effectively seeks out and capitalizes on minimal revision. Actively listens and complex problems involving related, opportunities to assist specialists/ appropriately responds to questions and procedural processes. Supervisor managers in achieving significant concerns from others. Shows respect for defines overall objectives, priorities, and results that support organizational goals. others’ ideas, comments, and questions. deadlines. Works independently, Is sought out for consultation. With guidance, effectively adjusts resolving difficult problems that may Accomplishes and/or guides the critical communications to facilitate arise. Completed work is reviewed for aspects of mission support efforts with understanding. accuracy and compliance with focus on accountability, quality, and Business Management Factor: established methods/procedures. effectiveness. Assists in development of Effectively interacts with customers to Selects, interprets, and applies guidelines and processes that affect understand their needs, answer guidelines which are available but not mission performance. Leads and/or questions, and provide routine completely applicable or have gaps in provides oversight for integrated information about products and/or specificity. Uses considerable judgment mission support services. Regularly services. Supports execution of by applying modified or new guidelines consulted by others on significant activities that advance the business- to resolve unique problems. May assist issues. Seeks out opportunities to share related goals of the organization. Takes in the development of new guidelines knowledge with others. Volunteers to initiative to develop innovative ideas for for administrative procedures. lead or serve on cross-functional/ adapting customer-focused products Communication Factor: Routine integrated teams. May recommend and/or services. Displays flexibility in contacts are with co-workers, managers selection of staff or team members. responding to changing customer needs. in organizations for which services are Initiates development and training of Develops effective plans and strategies performed, and staff at higher echelons subordinates. Participates in mentoring for improving the effectiveness of to coordinate work, communicate and position/performance management. important products or services for an important concepts and requirements, Develops others through mentoring, identified mission support area. or recommend solutions. May also coaching, and instruction. Successfully provides services with a interact with individuals in other high level of customer satisfaction. agencies, departments, or public office. Level IV Descriptors Identifies and advocates for resources Communicates moderately complex Problem Solving Factor: Applies necessary to support and contribute to information, concepts, and ideas in a expert-level knowledge and skills to mission requirements. clear, concise, well-organized, and effectively perform a wide-range of Teamwork and Leadership Factor: timely manner. Written communication highly complex organizational support Contributes as a member of the team typically accepted without revision. activities. Work often has influence

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 53110 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

beyond immediate organization. Work effectively to diverse audiences at effectiveness and customer-oriented has a direct and significant impact on different levels. Communicates complex focus of managed programs, processes, the effectiveness and efficiency of the information, concepts, and ideas in a and services. Identifies, acquires, work products and services of clear, concise, well-organized, and defends, and manages the resources specialists and management officials timely manner. Written communication needed to accomplish duties directly within the organization. Typically leads is accepted without revision. Seeks supporting organizational goals. other mission support personnel in opinions and ideas from others as Balances competing resource defining and carrying out overall appropriate. Actively listens to others’ requirements to ensure alignment with organizational support objectives. questions, ideas, and concerns. Uses mission objectives. Develops guidelines, techniques, respectful tone that considers diverse Teamwork and Leadership Factor: procedures, and/or operations for the viewpoints, responding appropriately. Recognized as a significant contributor most complex and difficult problems Communicates complex information, within a key mission support area by within the subject matter area for the concepts, and ideas through briefings or organization. Operates with a great deal presentations to a range of audiences in serving as a leader of a productive team of independence. Plans and carries out a manner that facilitates understanding. or a leader in the conception and assignments such that overall program Business Management Factor: formulation of relevant concepts and objectives are met. Recommendations Interacts at senior management levels to ideas. Serves as an expert in own field are generally accepted as technically negotiate and resolve conflicts affecting and is regularly sought out for authoritative. Work is evaluated only for a wide-range of mission support consultation and/or takes leadership on conformance with broad objectives and activities. Assists in the definition and important committees dealing with is almost always accepted without improvement of processes that affect the significant mission support issues. change. Applies considerable judgment business goals of the organization. Contributes to achieving organizational and ingenuity to interpret existing Fosters successful working relationships goals by building flexible and effective policies/procedures and develop new with high-level officials both inside and partnerships. Manages the most guidelines and techniques that have a outside the organization that help sensitive conflicts in a positive manner. direct impact on specific programs/ achieve overall mission goals. Actively works to foster collaboration by services within the organization. Establishes innovative and useful serving as a leadership resource. Selects Communication Factor: Routine approaches for evaluating and or recommends selection of staff, team contacts are with co-workers, managers improving mission support operations, members, and subordinate supervisors. in organizations for which services are processes, and/or activities resulting in Formal supervisors in this broadband performed, and staff at higher echelons highly valued services that improve conduct performance evaluation/rating to coordinate work, communicate overall customer satisfaction. Takes of subordinates. Initiates development important concepts and requirements, initiative to develop and implement and training of subordinates. Directs or or recommend solutions. May also techniques for new or modified recommends mentoring and position/ interact with high-ranking individuals methods, approaches, or procedures for performance management. Develops in other agencies, departments, or substantive mission support functions others through motivation, mentoring, public office. Tailors style to and services to meet organizational and coaching, and instruction. communicate critical information customer needs. Ensures overall BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53111

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.016 53112 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.017 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53113

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.018 53114 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.019 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53115

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.020 53116 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.021 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53117

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.022 53118 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.023 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53119

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.024 53120 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.025 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53121

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.026 53122 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.027 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53123

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.028 53124 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.029 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices 53125

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.030 53126 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Notices

[FR Doc. 2010–21355 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–C

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUN2.SGM 30AUN2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES2 EN30AU10.031 Monday, August 30, 2010

Part IV

Department of Defense General Services Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration 48 CFR Chapter 1 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Final Rules

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53128 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and National Aeronautics and Space DATES: For effective dates see separate Administration (NASA). documents, which follow. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION ACTION: Summary presentation of rules. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The analyst whose name appears in the table NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SUMMARY: This document summarizes below in relation to each FAR case. SPACE ADMINISTRATION the Federal Acquisition Regulation Please cite FAC 2005–45 and the (FAR) rules agreed to by the Civilian specific FAR case numbers. For 48 CFR Chapter 1 Agency Acquisition Council and the information pertaining to status or Defense Acquisition Regulations publication schedules, contact the [Docket FAR 2010–0076, Sequence 7] Council (Councils) in this Federal Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501– Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005–45. A Federal Acquisition Regulation; 4755. Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; companion document, the Small Entity Introduction Compliance Guide (SECG), follows this FAC. The FAC, including the SECG, is AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), available via the Internet at http:// General Services Administration (GSA), www.regulations.gov.

LIST OF RULES IN FAC 2005–45

Item Subject FAR case Analyst

I ...... Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition—Related Thresholds ...... 2008–024 Jackson. II ...... Definition of Cost or Pricing Data ...... 2005–036 Chambers. III ...... American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act)—Buy American Re- 2009–008 Davis. quirements for Construction Materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: • The FedBizOpps preaward and without the certification. Because the Summaries for each FAR rule follow. post-award notices (Part 5) remain at rule clarifies existing requirements, it For the actual revisions and/or $25,000 because of trade agreements. will have only minimal impact on the amendments made by these FAR cases, • Commercial items test program Government, offerors, and automated refer to the specific item number and ceiling (FAR 13.500) is raised from systems. subject set forth in the documents $5,500,000 to $6,500,000. following these item summaries. • The cost or pricing data threshold Item III—American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery FAC 2005–45 amends the FAR as (FAR 15.403–4) is raised from $650,000 Act)—Buy American Requirements for specified below: to $700,000. • The prime contractor Construction Materials (FAR Case Item I—Inflation Adjustment of subcontracting plan (FAR 19.702) floor 2009–008) Acquisition—Related Thresholds (FAR is raised from $550,000 to $650,000, and Case 2008–024) the construction threshold of $1,000,000 This final rule converts the interim increases to $1,500,000. rule published in the Federal Register at This final rule amends the FAR to 74 FR 14623, March 31, 2009, to a final implement section 807 of the Ronald W. Item II—Definition of Cost or Pricing rule with changes. This final rule Reagan National Defense Authorization Data (FAR Case 2005–036) implements section 1605 of Division A Act for Fiscal Year 2005. Section 807 This final rule amends the FAR by of the American Recovery and requires an adjustment every 5 years of redefining ‘‘cost or pricing data,’’ adding Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) of acquisition-related thresholds for a definition of ‘‘certified cost or pricing 2009. It prohibits the use of funds inflation using the Consumer Price data,’’ and changing the term appropriated for or otherwise made Index for all urban consumers, except ‘‘information other than cost or pricing available by the Recovery Act for any for Davis-Bacon Act, Service Contract data,’’ to ‘‘data other than certified cost project for the construction, alteration, Act, and trade agreements thresholds. or pricing data.’’ The rule clarifies the maintenance, or repair of a public The Councils have also used the same existing authority for contracting building or public work unless all of the methodology to adjust nonstatutory FAR officers to require certified cost or iron, steel, and manufactured goods acquisition-related thresholds in 2010. pricing data or data other than certified used in the project are produced in the This is the second review of FAR cost or pricing data, and the existing United States. Section 1605 mandates acquisition-related thresholds. The requirements for submission of the application of the Recovery Act Buy Councils published a proposed rule in various types of pricing data. The rule American requirement in a manner is required to eliminate confusion and the Federal Register at 75 FR 5716, consistent with U.S. obligations under February 4, 2010. misunderstanding, especially regarding international agreements. Least The effect of the final rule on heavily- the authority of the contracting officer to request data other than certified cost or developed countries continue to be used thresholds is the same as stated in treated as designated countries per the preamble to the proposed rule: pricing data when there is no other means to determine that proposed congressional direction. Section 1605 • The micro-purchase base threshold prices are fair and reasonable. Most also provides for waivers under certain of $3,000 (FAR 2.101) is not changed. significantly, the rule clarifies that data limited circumstances. • The simplified acquisition other than certified cost or pricing data threshold (FAR 2.101) is raised from may include the identical types of data $100,000 to $150,000. as certified cost or pricing data but

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53129

Dated: August 18, 2010. schedules, contact the Regulatory subject to the acquisition-related Edward Loeb, Secretariat at (202) 501–4755. Please threshold will continue to grow, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. cite FAC 2005–45, FAR case 2008–024. because more and more contracts will Amy G. Williams, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: be below the stated thresholds. Acting Deputy Director, Defense Procurement A. Background b. Prime Contractor Subcontracting Plan and Acquisitions Policy (Defense Acquisition Thresholds (FAR 19.702) Regulations System). The first review of acquisition-related Joseph A. Neurauter, thresholds to implement section 807 of Comment: One respondent stated that Deputy Associate Administrator and Senior the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense they were particularly pleased with the Procurement Executive, Office of Acquisition Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 proposal to increase the threshold Policy, U.S. General Services Administration. (Pub. L. 108–375) was conducted under values in FAR part 19 relative to the Sheryl J. Goddard, FAR Case 2004–033 during FY 2005. need to submit an acceptable Acting Assistant Administrator for The final rule for the first review was subcontracting plan. They consider the Procurement, National Aeronautics and published in the Federal Register at 71 current threshold to be administratively Space Administration. FR 57363, September 28, 2006. This is burdensome. The respondent further [FR Doc. 2010–21024 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] the second review of FAR acquisition- recommended that the Councils should BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P related thresholds. DoD, GSA, and pursue legislative action to raise the NASA published a proposed rule in the threshold to a minimum of one million Federal Register at 75 FR 5716, dollars. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE February 4, 2010. The preamble to the Another respondent recommended proposed rule contained a detailed increasing the prime contractor GENERAL SERVICES explanation of— subcontracting plan threshold to ADMINISTRATION • What an acquisition-related $700,000, to be the same as the threshold is; increased cost or pricing data threshold. • NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND What acquisition-related thresholds Response: The final rule raises the SPACE ADMINISTRATION are not subject to escalation adjustment subcontracting threshold to $650,000, as under this case; • required by the law that this case is 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, How the Councils analyze statutory implementing. Pursuing legislative 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 28, 32, 36, 42, 50, and nonstatutory acquisition-related changes is outside the scope of this case. and 52 thresholds; and • The effect of this rule on the most c. Miller Act (FAR 28.102 and 52.228– [FAC 2005–45; FAR Case 2008–024; Item heavily-used thresholds. 15) I; Docket 2010–0079, Sequence 1] Eight respondents submitted Comment: Three respondents comments on the proposed rule, which RIN 9000–AL51 addressed the proposed increase in the are addressed in the following section. Miller Act threshold. These respondents Federal Acquisition Regulation; The final rule has been coordinated emphasized the importance of Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition— with the Department of Labor and the performance and payment bonds as a Related Thresholds Small Business Administration in areas protection for subcontractors and of the regulation for which they are the AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), taxpayers. lead agency. Any changes to Cost General Services Administration (GSA), • Accounting Standards thresholds will One respondent stated that the law and National Aeronautics and Space ‘‘ be dealt with under a separate case. is an unfortunate and contradictory Administration (NASA). statutory requirement.’’ The respondent ACTION: Final rule. B. Analysis of Public Comments considered that the threshold increase 1. Statutory Thresholds will undermine the original protective SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency purposes of the bonding requirements Acquisition Council and the Defense a. All Statutory Thresholds set forth in the Miller Act, because more Acquisition Regulations Council Comment: One respondent, while Federal construction projects will be (Councils) have agreed on a final rule recognizing that this is a statutory undertaken without the benefit of amending the Federal Acquisition requirement, believed that no inflation payment bond protection. In particular, Regulation (FAR) to implement section adjustments should be made at this this respondent noted that 807 of the Ronald W. Reagan National time. The respondent views the subcontractors are frequently small Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal threshold increases as a way to reduce businesses, for whom lack of a payment Year 2005. Section 807 requires an Government oversight of Federal bond may be disastrous. The respondent adjustment every 5 years of acquisition- contracts and considers such reduction requested the Councils explain related thresholds for inflation using the unwise, because of various accurately to Congress the significant Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban congressional oversight hearings and negative impact that such increases will consumers, except for Davis-Bacon Act, reports of Inspectors General and the have. Service Contract Act, and trade Government Accountability Office that • Another respondent stated that the agreements thresholds. The Councils have revealed ‘‘widespread systemic threshold increase is bad public policy, have also used the same methodology to gaps in Government contracting and the Councils should reconsider adjust nonstatutory FAR acquisition- oversight.’’ whether such thresholds are related thresholds in 2010. Response: As noted, this is a statutory ‘‘acquisition-related thresholds’’ as DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010. requirement. Further, the intent is not to contemplated by the Act. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For reduce Government oversight but to • The third respondent urged the clarification of content, contact Mr. maintain the status quo, by adjusting Councils not to increase the Miller Act Michael Jackson, Procurement Analyst, thresholds to keep pace with inflation. surety bond threshold, but did not at (202) 208–4949. For information If thresholds are not adjusted for suggest rationale for noncompliance pertaining to status or publication inflation, the number of contracts with the statutory requirement.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53130 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Response: The Councils do not agree this threshold would have a detrimental Likewise, the current matrix is again that adjustment of thresholds for impact, especially on small businesses. available and the Councils have inflation will have the negative impact Response: Although there is no provided a revised Web address to perceived by these respondents. As statutory requirement to increase the access it. already stated, inflation adjustment of nonstatutory thresholds, the same b. Effective Date thresholds is a means of maintaining the rationale applies as to why escalation to status quo. It will not decrease the adjust for inflation is a good idea. If One respondent expressed concern number of contracts that are subject to there was any rationale for the level at over the large number of systems the Miller Act, but will prevent the which the thresholds were originally changes that this rule will require and relative number of contracts subject to put in place by policy, the thresholds the difficulty of implementation in a the Miller Act from increasing. The will become further and further out of short period of time. The respondent rationale that there should be some level line with the original policy decision if recommended providing ample time below which the Miller Act is not they are left unchanged. In addition to between the release of firm applicable is maintained by adjustment this general rationale, the Councils add requirements and the required of the threshold for inflation. The law the following two particular responses: implementation. • (40 U.S.C. 3132) provides alternate In particular, the approval levels for Response: Although the Councils payment protection for contracts that limited source justifications at FAR hoped to publish this final rule in time exceed $30,000, so that contracts below 8.405–6 were selected to be consistent to allow 60 days for implementation, the Miller Act threshold are not entirely with the statutory thresholds at FAR they were unable to meet that goal. The without payment protection. 6.304(a). Therefore, it is reasonable to effective date of October 1, 2010, allows As to whether the Miller Act escalate these thresholds the same as the only a little more than the standard 30 threshold is an acquisition-related thresholds at FAR 6.304(a) to maintain days for implementations, but this threshold, this threshold clearly meets the consistency. effective date is consistent with the the definition that was set forth in the • Although the respondent cited the statutory requirements and the desired law, as consistently interpreted by the threshold for subcontracting plans procedures for implementation of Councils since the enactment of the law governed by FAR 19.702 as an example changes that impact the Federal in 2004. The law defines an acquisition- of a nonstatutory threshold, this Procurement Data System at the related threshold as a threshold that is threshold is actually a statutory beginning of the fiscal year. set forth in law (the Miller Act), as a threshold (15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)), which factor in defining the scope of the must therefore be escalated. C. Changes Between the Proposed Rule applicability of a policy, procedure, and the Final Rule requirement, or restriction provided in 3. Increase Penalties that law to the procurement of property Comment: One respondent Although there were no changes or services by an executive agency. As recommended that the Councils should between the proposed rule and the final this definition is applied to the Miller also increase the maximum dollar rule as the result of public comments, Act threshold, the Miller Act requires amount of penalties when increasing the some of the thresholds changed due to payment and performance bonds when acquisition-related threshold contained lower inflation than was projected at the agencies acquire construction that is in the same statute. According to the time of publication of the proposed rule. valued at more than the Miller Act respondent, by not increasing the The proposed rule was based on a threshold (raised by this rule from penalty for failure to disclose projected consumer price index (CPI) of $100,000 to $150,000). unallowable activities, the Councils are 222 in April 2010. The final rule is providing contractors a greater incentive based on an actual CPI of 217.631 2. Nonstatutory Thresholds to violate the law. through the end of March 2010. The end Comment: One respondent was Response: The penalties are set by of March, 6 months before the effective particularly concerned about the statute. The law that the FAR Council is date of the rule, is used as the cutoff in proposed increase in nonstatutory implementing did not authorize the order to allow time for approval and thresholds. In particular, this FAR Council to increase penalties, only publication of the final rule. respondent cited three examples of the acquisition-related thresholds. Because the actual CPI is more than threshold increases which the 4 points lower than the projected CPI, respondent considered questionable: 4. Implementation proposed thresholds of at least $13 • Approval levels for limited source Two Government employees provided million are generally proportionally justifications at FAR 8.405–6. The comments relating to the lower. Thresholds of less than $13 respondent stated that increasing such implementation of the rule. million were generally unchanged, due approval levels appears inconsistent to rounding. a. Provide a Matrix with the President’s March 4, 2009, The effect of the final rule on heavily- Memorandum. Comment: One respondent requested used thresholds is the same as stated in • The threshold at FAR 22.1103 for a matrix of the changes in order to save the preamble to the proposed rule: use of the solicitation provision FAR everyone from having to do the analysis • The micro-purchase base threshold 52.222–46, Evaluation of Compensation and matrix development. (Although the of $3,000 (FAR 2.101) is not changed. for Professional Employees. The comment was submitted in response to • respondent stated that when contractors the FAR rule, the respondent requested The simplified acquisition pay very low wages and benefits, work that the Councils provide a Defense threshold (FAR 2.101) is raised from quality can suffer and the Government Federal Acquisition Regulation $100,000 to $150,000. • may bear hidden costs because of the Supplement (DFARS) matrix, so this The FedBizOpps preaward and need to provide income assistance to may have been intended as a comment post-award notices (FAR part 5) remain low income families. on the DFARS inflation adjustment at $25,000 because of trade agreements. • The threshold for subcontracting rule.) • Commercial items test program plans governed by FAR 19.702. The Response: In 2006, the URL of a ceiling (FAR 13.500) is raised from respondent stated that the increase of matrix was provided at FAR 1.109(d). $5,500,000 to $6,500,000.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53131

• The cost or pricing data threshold • 9000–0026, Change Order List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 2, 3, (FAR 15.403–4) is raised from $650,000 Accounting—FAR Sections Affected: 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, to $700,000. 43.205(f) and 52.243–6; 28, 32, 36, 42, 50, and 52 • The prime contractor • 9000–0027, Value Engineering Government procurement. subcontracting plan (FAR 19.702) floor Requirements—FAR Sections Affected: Dated: August 18, 2010. is raised from $550,000 to $650,000, and Subparts 48.1 and 48.2, 52.248–1, the construction threshold of $1,000,000 52.248–2, and 52.248–3; Edward Loeb, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. increases to $1,500,000. • 9000–0034, Examination of Records This final rule is a significant 5 CFR 1320.5(b) by Comptroller General ■ Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA regulatory action and, therefore, was and Contract Audit—FAR Sections amend 48 CFR parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, subject to review under section 6(b) of Affected: 52.215–2, 52.212–5, and 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 22, 23, 28, 32, 36, Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 52.214–26; 42, 50, and 52 as set forth below: Planning and Review, dated September • 9000–0045, Bid, Performance, and ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule Payment Bonds—FAR Sections parts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, under 5 U.S.C. 804. Affected: Subparts 28.1 and 28.2, 17, 19, 22, 23, 28, 32, 36, 42, 50, and 52 D. Regulatory Flexibility Act 52.228–1, 52.228–2, 52.228–13, 52.228– continues to read as follows: The Department of Defense, the 15, and 52.228–16; Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. General Services Administration, and • 9000–0058, Schedules for chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). Construction Contracts—FAR Section the National Aeronautics and Space PART 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION Affected: 52.236–15; Administration certify that this final REGULATIONS SYSTEM rule will not have a significant • 9000–0060, Accident Prevention 48 economic impact on a substantial CFR 52.236–13, Plans and 1.109 [Amended] number of small entities within the Recordkeeping—FAR Section Affected: ■ 2. Amend section 1.109 by removing meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility 52.236–13; from paragraph (d) ‘‘http:// Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the • 9000–0066, Professional Employee acquisition.gov/far/facsframe.html’’ and adjustment of acquisition-related Compensation Plan—FAR Sections adding ‘‘http://www.regulations.gov thresholds for inflation maintains the Affected: Subpart 22.11 and 52.222–46; (search FAR case 2008–024)’’ in its status quo. The Councils note that the • 9000–0073, Advance Payments— place. set-aside threshold of $100,000 FAR Sections Affected: Subpart 32.4 increases to $150,000, which is not a and 52.232–12; PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS detriment to small business. Although • 9000–0077, Quality Assurance several respondents were concerned Requirements—FAR Sections Affected: 2.101 [Amended] about the impact of some of the Subparts 46.1 through 46.3, 52.246–2 ■ 3. Amend section 2.101 in paragraph threshold changes on small businesses through 52.246–8, 52.246–10, 52.246– (b)(2) by— (see comment and response at B.1.c. and 12, and 52.246–15; ■ a. Amending the definition ‘‘Major B.2.), the Councils reiterate that • 9000–0080, Integrity of Unit system’’ by removing from paragraph (1) adjusting a threshold in an amount Prices—FAR Sections Affected: ‘‘$173.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$189.5 sufficient to keep pace with current 15.408(f) and 52.215–14; million’’, and removing ‘‘$814.5 million’’ inflation is neutral in impact on small • 9000–0091, Anti-Kickback and adding ‘‘$890 million’’; and businesses because it just maintains the Procedures—FAR Sections Affected: removing from paragraph (2) ‘‘$1.8 status quo. 3.502, and 52.203–7; million’’ and adding ‘‘$2 million’’ in its E. Paperwork Reduction Act • 9000–0094, Debarment and place; ■ ‘‘ The Paperwork Reduction Act does Suspension, FAR Sections Affected: 9.1, b. Amending the definition Micro- ’’ apply; however, these changes to the 9.4, 52.209–5, and 52.212–3(h); purchase threshold by removing from ‘‘ ’’ FAR do not impose additional • 9000–0101, Drug-Free Workplace— paragraph (3)(ii) $25,000 and adding ‘‘ ’’ information collection requirements to FAR Section Affected: 52.223–6(b)(5); $30,000 in its place; and ■ c. Amending the definition the paperwork burden previously • 9000–0115, Notification of ‘‘Simplified acquisition threshold’’ by approved under OMB Control Numbers: Ownership Changes—FAR Sections removing from the introductory • 9000–0006, Subcontracting Plans/ Affected: 15.408(k) and 52.215–19; paragraph ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding Subcontracting Report for Individual • 9000–0133, Defense Production Act ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place; and removing Contract (SF 294)—FAR Sections Amendments—FAR Sections Affected: from paragraph (1) ‘‘$250,000’’ and Affected: Subpart 19.7 and 52.219–9; 34.1 and 52.234–1; • 9000–0007, Summary Subcontract adding ‘‘$300,000’’ in its place. • 9000–0134, Environmentally Sound Report—FAR Sections Affected: Subpart Products—FAR Sections Affected: PART 3—IMPROPER BUSINESS 19.7, 53.219, and SF 295; • 23.406 and 52.223–4; PRACTICES AND PERSONAL 9000–0013, Cost or Pricing Data • CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Exemption—FAR Sections Affected: 9000–0135, Prospective Subparts 15.4, 42.7, 52.214–28, 52.215– Subcontractor Requests for Bonds, FAR 3.502–2 [Amended] 12, 52.215–13, 52.215–20, and 52.215– 28.106–4(b), 52.228–12; ■ • 4. Amend section 3.502–2 by 21; 1215–0072, OFCCP Recordkeeping removing from the introductory text of • 9000–0018, Certification of and Reporting Requirements—Supply paragraph (i) ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding Independent Price Determination and and Service; and ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. Parent Company and Identifying Data— • 1215–0119, Requirements of a Bona FAR Sections Affected: 3.103 and 3.302; Fide Thrift or Savings Plan (29 CFR part 3.804 [Amended] • 9000–0022, Duty-Free Entry—FAR 547) and Requirements of a Bona Fide ■ 5. Amend section 3.804 by removing 48 CFR 52.225–8—FAR Section Profit-Sharing Plan or Trust (29 CFR ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its Affected: 52.225–8; part 549). place.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53132 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

3.808 [Amended] ■ c. Removing from paragraph ■ a. Removing from paragraph (b)(1) ■ 6. Amend section 3.808 by removing (d)(2)(i)(C) ‘‘$2 million’’ and adding ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its from paragraphs (a) and (b) ‘‘$100,000’’ ‘‘$2.5 million’’ in its place. place, and removing ‘‘$250,000’’ and and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. adding ‘‘$300,000’’ in its place; 7.107 [Amended] ■ b. Removing from paragraph (c)(1)(ii) PART 5—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ■ 13. Amend section 7.107 by— ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ ACTIONS ■ a. Removing from paragraph (b)(1) in its place, and removing ‘‘$11 million’’ ‘‘$86 million’’ and adding ‘‘$94 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place; 5.101 [Amended] in its place; and and ■ 7. Amend section 5.101 by removing ■ b. Removing from paragraph (b)(2) ■ c. Removing from paragraph (g)(2) from the introductory text of paragraph ‘‘$8.6 million’’ and adding ‘‘$9.4 million’’ ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 (a)(2) ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in in its place, and removing ‘‘$86 million’’ million’’, and removing ‘‘$11 million’’ its place. and adding ‘‘$94 million’’ in its place. and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place. 5.205 [Amended] PART 8—REQUIRED SOURCES OF 13.005 [Amended] ■ 8. Amend section 5.205 by removing SUPPLIES AND SERVICES ■ 19. Amend section 13.005 by from paragraph (d)(2) ‘‘$10,000’’ and removing from paragraph (a)(5) adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. 8.405–6 [Amended] ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its ■ 14. Amend section 8.405–6 by— place. 5.206 [Amended] ■ a. Removing from paragraph (h)(1) ■ 9. Amend section 5.206 by— ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its 13.201 [Amended] ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a)(1) place; ■ 20. Amend section 13.201 by ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its ■ b. Removing from paragraph (h)(2) removing from paragraph (g)(1)(ii) place; and ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its ‘‘$25,000’’ and adding ‘‘$30,000’’ in its ■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(2) place, and removing ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and place. ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place; 13.303–5 [Amended] place, and removing ‘‘$10,000’’ and ■ c. Removing from the introductory adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. text of paragraph (h)(3) ‘‘$11.5 million’’ ■ 21. Amend section 13.303–5 by— ‘‘ ’’ ■ a. Removing from paragraph (b)(1) 5.303 [Amended] and adding $12.5 million in its place, removing ‘‘$57 million’’ and adding ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ ■ 10. Amend section 5.303 by removing ‘‘$62.5 million’’ in its place, and in its place, and removing ‘‘$11 million’’ from the introductory text of paragraph removing ‘‘$78.5 million’’ and adding and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place; (a) ‘‘$3.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$4 ‘‘$85.5 million’’ in its place; and and ■ million’’ in its place. ■ d. Removing from paragraph (h)(4) b. Removing from paragraph (b)(2) ‘‘$57 million’’ and adding ‘‘$62.5 ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ PART 6—COMPETITION in its place, and removing ‘‘$11 million’’ REQUIREMENTS million’’ in its place, and removing ‘‘$78.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$85.5 and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place. 6.304 [Amended] million’’ in its place. 13.500 [Amended] ■ 11. Amend section 6.304 by— ■ PART 12—ACQUISITION OF 22. Amend section 13.500 by— ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a)(1) ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$5.5 COMMERCIAL ITEMS ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ in its place; 12.102 [Amended] place, and removing ‘‘$11 million’’ and ■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(2) ■ 15. Amend section 12.102 by adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place; and ■ ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its removing from the introductory text of b. Removing from the introductory place, and removing ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and paragraph (f)(2) ‘‘$16 million’’ and text of paragraph (e) ‘‘$11 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place; adding ‘‘$17.5 million’’ in its place; and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ in its place. ■ c. Removing from the introductory removing from paragraph (g)(1)(ii) ‘‘$27 text of paragraph (a)(3) ‘‘$11.5 million’’ 13.501 [Amended] million’’ and adding ‘‘$29.5 million’’ in ■ 23. Amend section 13.501 by— and adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place, its place. removing ‘‘$57 million’’ and adding ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a)(2)(i) ‘‘$62.5 million’’ in its place, and 12.203 [Amended] ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place, and removing ‘‘$550,000’’ and removing ‘‘$78.5 million’’ and adding ■ 16. Amend section 12.203 by adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place; ‘‘$85.5 million’’ in its place; and removing ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding ■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(2)(ii) ■ d. Removing from paragraph (a)(4) ‘‘$6.5 million’’ in its place, and removing ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its ‘‘$57 million’’ and adding ‘‘$62.5 ‘‘$11 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ place, and removing ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and million’’ in its place, and removing in its place. ‘‘$78.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$85.5 adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place; ■ million’’ in its place. PART 13—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION c. Removing from paragraph (a)(2)(iii) PROCEDURES ’’$11.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 PART 7—ACQUISITION PLANNING million’’ in its place, removing ‘‘$57 13.000 [Amended] million’’ and adding ‘‘$62.5 million’’ in 7.104 [Amended] ■ 17. Amend section 13.000 by its place, and removing ‘‘$78.5 million’’ ■ 12. Amend section 7.104 by— removing ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding and adding ‘‘$85.5 million’’ in its place; ■ a. Removing from paragraph ‘‘$6.5 million’’ in its place, and removing and (d)(2)(i)(A) ‘‘$7.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$11 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12 million’’ ■ d. Removing from paragraph (a)(2)(iv) ‘‘$8 million’’ in its place; in its place. ‘‘$57 million’’ and adding ‘‘$62.5 ■ b. Removing from paragraph million’’ in its place, and removing (d)(2)(i)(B) ‘‘$5.5 million’’ and adding 13.003 [Amended] ‘‘$78.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$85.5 ‘‘$6 million’’ in its place; and ■ 18. Amend section 13.003 by— million’’ in its place.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53133

PART 15—CONTRACTING BY 16.504 [Amended] 19.805–1 [Amended] NEGOTIATION ■ 34. Amend section 16.504 by ■ 42. Amend section 19.805–1 by removing from the introductory texts of removing from paragraph (a)(2) ‘‘$5.5 15.304 [Amended] paragraphs (c)(1)(ii)(D)(1) and million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ in its ■ 24. Amend section 15.304 by (c)(1)(ii)(D)(3) ‘‘$100 million’’ and place, and removing ‘‘$3.5 million’’ and removing from paragraph (c)(4) adding ‘‘$103 million’’ in its place; and adding ‘‘$4 million’’ in its place. ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its removing from the introductory text of 19.1202–2 [Amended] place, and by removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ paragraph (c)(2)(i) ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and ■ and adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place. adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place. 43. Amend section 19.1202–2 by removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$550,000’’ 15.403–1 [Amended] 16.506 [Amended] and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place, and ■ 25. Amend section 15.403–1 by ■ 35. Amend section 16.506 by removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and adding ‘‘$1.5 removing from paragraph (c)(3)(iv) ‘‘$16 removing from paragraphs (f) and (g) million’’ in its place. ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$17.5 million’’ in 19.1306 [Amended] million’’ in its place. its place. ■ 44. Amend section 19.1306 by 15.403–4 [Amended] PART 17—SPECIAL CONTRACTING removing from paragraph (a)(2)(i) ‘‘$5.5 METHODS million’’ and adding ‘‘$6.5 million’’ in its ■ 26. Amend section 15.403–4 by place; and removing from paragraph removing from the introductory texts of 17.108 [Amended] (a)(2)(ii) ‘‘$3.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$4 paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(1)(iii) ■ 36. Amend section 17.108 by million’’ in its place. ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding ‘‘$700,000’’ in its removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$11.5 place. million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in 19.1406 [Amended] ■ 45. Amend section 19.1406 by 15.404–3 [Amended] its place; and removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘$114.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$125 removing from paragraph (a)(2)(i) ‘‘$5.5 ■ 27. Amend section 15.404–3 by million’’ in its place. million’’ and adding ‘‘$6 million’’ in its removing from paragraph (c)(1)(i) ‘‘$11.5 place; and removing from paragraph million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in PART 19—SMALL BUSINESS (a)(2)(ii) ‘‘$3 million’’ and adding ‘‘$3.5 its place. PROGRAMS million’’ in its place. 15.407–2 [Amended] 19.502–2 [Amended] PART 22—APPLICATION OF LABOR ■ 28. Amend section 15.407–2 by ■ 37. Amend section 19.502–2 by— LAWS TO GOVERNMENT removing from paragraph (c)(1) and the ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a) ACQUISITIONS ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its introductory text of paragraph (c)(2) 22.305 [Amended] ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 place each time it appears (twice), and ■ 46. Amend section 22.305 by million’’ in its place. removing ‘‘$250,000’’ and adding ‘‘$300,000’’ in its place; and removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$100,000’’ 15.408 [Amended] ■ b. Removing from paragraph (b) and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. ■ 29. Amend section 15.408 in Table ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its 22.602 [Amended] place. 15–2, ‘‘II. Cost Elements’’ which follows ■ 47. Amend section 22.602 by paragraph (n), by removing from 19.508 [Amended] removing ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘ ’’ ‘‘ ’’ paragraph A(2) $11.5 million and ■ ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. adding ‘‘$12.5 million’’ in its place. 38. Amend section 19.508 by removing from paragraph (e) ‘‘$100,000’’ 22.603 [Amended] ‘‘ ’’ PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACTS and adding $150,000 in its place. ■ 48. Amend section 22.603 by ‘‘ ’’ 16.206–2 [Amended] 19.702 [Amended] removing from paragraph (b) $10,000 ■ 39. Amend section 19.702 by— and adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. ■ 30. Amend section 16.206–2 by ■ a. Removing from paragraph (a)(1) removing from the introductory 22.605 [Amended] ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its paragraph ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ■ 49. Amend section 22.605 by place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. removing from paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place; and (a)(3), and (a)(5) ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ■ 16.206–3 [Amended] b. Removing from paragraph (a)(2) ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place each time it ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its ■ 31. Amend section 16.206–3 by appears (six times). place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$100,000’’ adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place. 22.1103 [Amended] and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. ■ 50. Amend section 22.1103 by 19.704 [Amended] 16.207–3 [Amended] removing ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ■ 40. Amend section 19.704 by ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place. ■ 32. Amend section 16.207–3 by removing from paragraph (a)(9) removing from paragraph (d) ‘‘$100,000’’ ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its 22.1402 [Amended] and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and ■ 51. Amend section 22.1402 by 16.503 [Amended] adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place. removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. ■ 33. Amend section 16.503 by 19.708 [Amended] removing from paragraph (b)(2) ‘‘$100 ■ 41. Amend section 19.708 by 22.1408 [Amended] million’’ and adding ‘‘$103 million’’ in removing from paragraph (b)(1) ■ 52. Amend section 22.1408 by its place; and removing from paragraph ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its removing from the introductory text of (d)(1) ‘‘$11.5 million’’ and adding ‘‘$12.5 place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and paragraph (a) ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding million’’ in its place. adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place. ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53134 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

PART 23—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY PART 50—EXTRAORDINARY ■ f. In Alternate II by— AND WATER EFFICIENCY, CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE ■ 1. Removing from the Alternate RENEWABLE ENERGY SAFETY ACT heading ‘‘(Apr 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL 2010)’’ in its place; SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE 50.102–1 [Amended] ■ 2. Removing from paragraph WORKPLACE ■ 62. Amend section 50.102–1 by (e)(1)(ii)(C) ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘$55,000’’ ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place, and removing 23.406 [Amended] and adding ‘‘$65,000’’ in its place. ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place; and ■ 53. Amend section 23.406 by 50.102–3 [Amended] ‘‘ ’’ ■ 3. Removing from paragraph removing from paragraph (d) $100,000 ■ 63. Amend section 50.102–3 by and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. (e)(1)(ii)(F) ‘‘(June 1998)’’ and adding removing from paragraph (b)(4) ‘‘$28.5 ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its place. PART 28—BONDS AND INSURANCE million’’ and adding ‘‘$31.5 million’’ in its place; and removing from paragraphs 52.213–4 [Amended] 28.102–1 [Amended] (e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) ‘‘$55,000’’ and ■ 69. Amend section 52.213–4 by— ■ ■ adding ‘‘$65,000’’ in its place. a. Removing from the clause heading 54. Amend section 28.102–1 by ‘‘(Jul 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in removing from paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS its place; ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its AND CONTRACT CLAUSES ■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(2)(vii) place. ‘‘(Jun 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in 52.203–7 [Amended] 28.102–2 [Amended] its place; ■ 64. Amend section 52.203–7 by ■ c. Removing from paragraph (b)(1)(ii) ■ 55. Amend section 28.102–2 by removing from the clause heading ‘‘(July ‘‘(Dec 1996)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in removing from the headings of 1995)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its its place, and removing ‘‘$10,000’’ and paragraphs (b) and (c) ‘‘$100,000’’ and place; and removing from paragraph adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place; and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. (c)(5) ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ ■ d. Removing from paragraph (b)(1)(iv) in its place. 28.102–3 [Amended] ‘‘(June 1998)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in 52.203–12 [Amended] its place, and removing ‘‘$10,000’’ and ■ 56. Amend section 28.102–3 by adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. removing from paragraphs (a) and (b) ■ 65. Amend section 52.203–12 by ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Sep 52.219–9 [Amended] place. 2007)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its ■ 70. Amend section 52.219–9 by— place; and removing from paragraphs ■ a. Removing from the clause heading PART 32—CONTRACT FINANCING (g)(1) and (g)(3) ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘(Jul 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. its place; 32.404 [Amended] ■ b. Removing from paragraph (d)(9) 52.204–8 [Amended] ■ ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its 57. Amend section 32.404 by ■ removing from paragraph (a)(7)(i) 66. Amend section 52.204–8 by place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its removing from the provision heading adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place; ‘‘ ’’ ‘‘ ’’ place. (Feb 2009) and adding (Oct 2010) in ■ c. Removing from the introductory its place; and removing from paragraph text of paragraph (d)(11)(iii) ‘‘$100,000’’ PART 36—CONSTRUCTION AND (c)(1)(ii) ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place; and ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS ‘‘$150,000’’ in its place. ■ d. Removing from paragraph 52.212–3 [Amended] (l)(2)(i)(C) ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding 36.501 [Amended] ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place, and removing ■ 67. Amend section 52.212–3 by ■ 58. Amend section 36.501 by ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ removing from the provision heading in its place. removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘(Aug 2009)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ its place; and removing from paragraph 52.222–20 [Amended] in its place each time it appears (twice). (e) ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in ■ 71. Amend section 52.222–20 by PART 42—CONTRACT its place. removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Dec ’’ ‘‘ ’’ ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT 52.212–5 [Amended] 1996) and adding (Oct 2010) in its place; and removing from the SERVICES ■ 68. Amend section 52.212–5 by— introductory paragraph ‘‘$10,000’’ and ■ 42.709 [Amended] a. Removing from the clause heading adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. ‘‘(Jul 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in ■ 59. Amend section 42.709 by its place; 52.222–36 [Amended] removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘$650,000’’ ■ b. Removing from paragraph (b)(12)(i) ■ 72. Amend section 52.222–36 by and adding ‘‘$700,000’’ in its place. ‘‘(Apr 2008)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Jun 42.709–6 [Amended] its place; 1998)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its ■ c. Removing from paragraph (b)(25) place; and removing from paragraph (d) ■ 60. Amend section 42.709–6 by ‘‘(Jun 1998)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding ‘‘$15,000’’ in its removing ‘‘$650,000’’ and adding its place; place. ‘‘$700,000’’ in its place. ■ d. Removing from paragraph (e)(1)(ii) ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its 52.225–8 [Amended] 42.1502 [Amended] place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and ■ 73. Amend section 52.225–8 by ■ 61. Amend section 42.1502 by adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place; removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Feb removing from paragraph (e) ‘‘$550,000’’ ■ e. Removing from paragraph (e)(1)(vi) 2000)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its place each ‘‘(Jun 1998)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in place; and removing from the time it appears (twice). its place; and introductory texts of paragraphs (c)(1)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53135

and (j)(2) ‘‘$10,000’’ and adding Acquisition Regulations Council when data other than certified cost or ‘‘$15,000’’ in its place. (Councils) have agreed on a final rule pricing data should be obtained to amending the Federal Acquisition protect the Government from paying 52.228–15 [Amended] Regulation (FAR) to clarify the unreasonable prices. ■ 74. Amend section 52.228–15 by distinction between ‘‘certified cost or Even the basic articulation of policy removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Nov pricing data’’ and ‘‘data other than regarding the use of data to establish the 2006)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its certified cost or pricing data’’, and to fairness and reasonableness of offered place; and removing from the clarify requirements for submission of prices in the introductory paragraph of introductory text of paragraph (b) cost or pricing data. FAR 15.402(a) has lacked a certain level ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010. of clarity that creates uncertainty. For place. many years, this paragraph has FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For appropriately cautioned contracting clarification of content, contact Mr. 52.244–6 [Amended] officers not to obtain more information Edward N. Chambers, Procurement ■ 75. Amend section 52.244–6 by— than is necessary—and the FAR must Analyst, at (202) 501–3221. For ■ a. Removing from the clause heading continue to do so. However this information pertaining to status or ‘‘(Jun 2010)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in paragraph should also, but currently publication schedules, contact the its place; does not, expressly mention the Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501– ■ b. Removing from paragraph (c)(1)(iii) underlying statutory authority to collect ‘‘$550,000’’ and adding ‘‘$650,000’’ in its 4755. Please cite FAC 2005–45, FAR ‘‘data other than certified cost or pricing place, and removing ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and case 2005–036. data.’’ Because of this omission, some adding ‘‘$1.5 million’’ in its place; and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: contracting officers may be under the ■ c. Removing from paragraph (c)(1)(vi) A. Background misperception that there is a greater ‘‘(Jun 1998)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in responsibility to avoid asking its place. Subpart 15.4 of the FAR describes the unnecessarily for the submission of cost contracting officer’s responsibility to or pricing data than there is, in the first 52.248–1 [Amended] purchase supplies and services at fair instance, to determine whether and how ■ 76. Amend section 52.248–1 by and reasonable prices and the use of much of this data may be required, in removing from the clause heading ‘‘(Feb data and information in meeting this a given case, to establish price fairness 2000)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its requirement. This subpart incorporates and reasonableness. In fact, both place; and removing from paragraph (l) the requirements of the Truth In responsibilities—i.e., obtaining data that ‘‘$100,000’’ and adding ‘‘$150,000’’ in its Negotiations Act (TINA), 10 U.S.C. are adequate for evaluating the place. 2306a and 41 U.S.C. 254b, which reasonableness of the price and taking address the requirements for the appropriate care not to ask for more data 52.248–3 [Amended] submission of cost or pricing data and ■ than is necessary—are inextricably 77. Amend section 52.248–3 by the circumstances under which a interrelated and equally important. As ‘‘ removing from the clause heading (Sep contractor must certify to their accuracy, such, the FAR needs to communicate 2006)’’ and adding ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’ in its completeness, and currency. this message more clearly. place; and removing from paragraph (h) The Councils believe that the DoD, GSA, and NASA published a ‘‘$55,000’’ and adding ‘‘$65,000’’ in its implementation of TINA in FAR subpart proposed rule in the Federal Register at place. 15.4 is not sufficiently clear. In 72 FR 20092, April 23, 2007, to revise [FR Doc. 2010–21025 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] particular, there is confusion regarding the FAR definition of ‘‘cost or pricing BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P the right of the Government to request data’’; change the term ‘‘information ‘‘data other than certified cost or pricing other than cost or pricing data’’ to ‘‘data data,’’ the obligation of the offeror to other than certified cost or pricing data’’; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE provide this data, and the definition of add a definition of ‘‘certified cost or this term. pricing data’’ to make the terms and GENERAL SERVICES This lack of clarity is due, in large definitions consistent with TINA and ADMINISTRATION part, to definitions that overlap and are more understandable to the general not identical to TINA. For example, the reader; change terminology throughout NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND term ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ is defined in the FAR; and clarify the need for SPACE ADMINISTRATION the FAR to mean certified cost or contracting officers to obtain ‘‘data other pricing data, whereas TINA does not than certified cost or pricing data’’ when 48 CFR Parts 2, 4, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, make certification part of the definition there is no other means to determine fair 27, 30, 31, 32, 42, 44, 49, and 52 of this term. This regulatory refinement and reasonable pricing during price [FAC 2005–45; FAR Case 2005–036; Item has led to confusion regarding the level analysis. II; Docket 2007–0001, Sequence 15] of information that a contracting officer Based on comments received on the may request to establish fair and proposed rule, a public meeting held on RIN 9000–AK74 reasonable pricing including a November 1, 2007, and additional Federal Acquisition Regulation; misunderstanding by some that the data deliberations (which are all discussed in Definition of Cost or Pricing Data elements that comprise cost or pricing greater detail below), the Councils have data cannot be requested by the adopted a final rule that— AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), Government unless the data are required • Clarifies terminology used in the General Services Administration (GSA), by law to be submitted to the FAR to make it consistent with TINA, and National Aeronautics and Space contracting officer in a certified form. resulting in (i) refinements to the Administration (NASA). This confusion has been exacerbated by regulatory definition of cost or pricing ACTION: Final rule. the FAR’s use of the phrase ‘‘information data, (ii) the addition of a definition for other than cost or pricing data,’’ which ‘‘certified cost or pricing data,’’ (iii) the SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency has made it difficult for contracting addition of a definition for ‘‘data other Acquisition Council and the Defense officers to understand the circumstances than certified cost or pricing data,’’ and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53136 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(iv) deletion of the phrase ‘‘information not request more data than is necessary. ‘‘and’’ is appropriate and those have other than cost or pricing data’’; By doing so, the FAR will provide a been retained. The final rule recognizes • Clarifies responsibilities regarding more complete articulation of the policy that the contracting officer may need to the request for, and submission of, ‘‘data underlying the use of ‘‘data other than request data other than certified cost or other than certified cost or pricing data’’ certified cost or pricing data’’ in pricing data, in addition to certified cost to establish fair and reasonable pricing, establishing price fairness and or pricing data, to establish fair and both in the case when ‘‘certified cost or reasonableness, in furtherance of the reasonable pricing. pricing data’’ is required and is not contracting officer’s duty to serve as a 3. Some respondents were concerned required; responsible steward of the taxpayer’s about the broadening of the definition of • Retains the current order of resources. ‘‘information other than cost or pricing preference for determining the type of data’’ by adding the words ‘‘and cost or pricing data required to establish B. Public Comments judgmental information.’’ fair and reasonable prices when The first comment period closed on Response: Data used to support an certified cost or pricing data are not June 22, 2007. Comments were received offer will necessarily contain some required; from 11 respondents. As a result of the information that is non-factual, i.e., • Retains and reinforces important comments received, a public meeting judgmental information. Due to its statements to explain why contracting was scheduled with notice provided at nature, judgmental information cannot officers must not require, unnecessarily, 72 FR 61854 on November 1, 2007. The be certified. Even in situations where the submission of ‘‘data other than public meeting was held on November ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’ are certified cost or pricing data’’; 15, 2007, and was followed by a one required, judgmental information is not • Clarifies the instructions for offerors week period for submission of certified, and it is part of ‘‘data other preparing a contract pricing proposal additional comments. Several than certified cost or pricing data’’ that when cost or pricing data are required respondents submitted additional supplements certified cost or pricing so that such instructions are consistent comments. The public comments are data. The final rule deletes the phrase with the clarified terminology and addressed in the following analysis: ‘‘information other than cost or pricing policies for determining the type and data,’’ but includes ‘‘judgmental quantity of data necessary to establish a General Comments information’’ and ‘‘judgmental factors’’ in fair and reasonable price; and Some respondents noted that the the definition of ‘‘data other than • Supplements existing coverage to proposed changes should alleviate certified cost or pricing data.’’ The final clarify current coverage and achieve confusion. Others raised the following rule also includes additional language to greater understanding by contracting general concerns regarding various provide consistency with FAR 15.408, officers and contractors. aspects of the proposed rule. Table 15–2 (i.e., any information This rule neither expands nor 1. Some respondents were concerned reasonably required to explain the diminishes the existing rights of that the proposed rule will result in estimating process, including the contracting officers to request cost or contracting officers by-passing normal judgmental factors applied and the pricing data (whether certified or other market research and pricing techniques mathematical or other methods used in than certified) or other information, or and require contractors to submit full the estimate, including those used in the existing responsibilities of the cost or pricing data as if the Truth in projecting from known data; and the offeror to submit such data or other Negotiations Act (TINA) applied. nature and amount of any contingencies information. Similarly, the rule does not Response: The current FAR, as well as included in the proposed price). require, encourage, or authorize the proposed and final rule, protect Aligning the definition of ‘‘data other contracting officers to obtain cost or against this practice. Contracting than certified cost or pricing data’’ and pricing data or other information unless officers must generally follow the order the text of the language in FAR 15.408, it is needed to determine that prices of preference at FAR 15.402, and are Table 15–2, keeps the definition offered are fair and reasonable, which required by that section to ‘‘obtain the consistent with the current FAR may include the request for such data in type and quantity of data necessary to requirements and TINA. The Councils connection with a cost realism analysis. establish a fair and reasonable price, but note that the existence of a judgment is As the rule explains, requiring not more data than is necessary.’’ In factual, but the nature and amount of contractors to submit more data than theory, this could include all of the the judgment are not. what is needed can ‘‘lead to increased elements prescribed under FAR 15.408, 4. Many respondents were concerned proposal preparation costs, generally Table that the proposed rule inappropriately extend acquisition lead time, and 15–2. However, in most cases the data adds the phrase ‘‘data other than consume additional contractor and necessary for a contracting officer to certified cost or pricing data’’ Government resources.’’ determine cost fairness and throughout the proposed rule when only Whether a contractor must submit reasonableness, or cost realism, will fall certified cost or pricing data apply. ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’ is based short of this level of data. The rule Response: The final rule deletes that on the requirements of TINA and its should not result in contracting officers addition in some instances. There are stated exceptions. With respect to ‘‘data requiring contractors to submit full cost other instances where both phrases: other than certified cost or pricing data,’’ or pricing data as if certification will be ‘‘Certified cost or pricing data’’ and ‘‘data the introductory policy statement in required when it is not necessary. other than certified cost or pricing data’’ FAR 15.402(a) has been clarified to tie 2. Public comments did point out an are applicable. See the response to together the contracting officer’s error where the proposed rule changed General Comments number 2. longstanding statutory responsibility to the FAR to require certified cost or 5. Several respondents were request the data and information pricing data ‘‘and’’ data other than concerned that offerors of commercial necessary to establish a fair and certified cost or pricing data. items would be required to submit cost reasonable price—as stated in TINA at Response: The final rule corrects data in all instances. 10 U.S.C. 2306a(d)(1) and 41 U.S.C. several instances where ‘‘and’’ was Response: Such an outcome would be 254b(d)(1)—with the caution that, in incorrectly used, replacing it with ‘‘or’’. contrary to the intent of the rule, which doing so, the contracting officer must However, there are circumstances where does not alter the current intent of the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53137

FAR regarding the type and quantity of indicate non-acceptability of price lists 8. Comment: The proposed language data to determine if the price of a and catalogs as a price analysis stand that adds ‘‘certified cost or pricing data commercial item is fair and reasonable. alone technique. and data other than certified cost or FAR 15.403–1(c)(3) specifically exempts Response: Neither of the referenced pricing data’’ at FAR 15.408, Table commercial items from certified cost or texts is part of this rulemaking. 15–2, means that the offeror could pricing data requirements, and this rule Nonetheless, we note that the references withhold disclosure or certification of does not change that exception. Also, do not conflict. Both references list cost or pricing data related to its FAR 15.403–3(c)(2) sets limitations on various techniques and types of subcontractors, in cases when the the type of cost data or pricing data that information the contracting officer may subcontractor is not required to certify. can be requested regarding commercial use, either individually or collectively. Response: When ‘‘certified cost or items. When contracting officers The type and extent of data needed is pricing data’’ is required, the prime determine that they can use price based on the contracting officer’s contractor is responsible for certifying analysis to determine the price to be fair business judgment. FAR 13.106– the completeness of all cost or pricing and reasonable, the order of preference 3(a)(2)(iii) simply adds a cautionary data, which includes subcontractor at FAR 15.402 means cost data will note when using catalog prices. price quotes and cost data when the generally not be obtained for pricing 4. Comment: Change language in the subcontractor is not required to certify commercial items. Contracting officers proposed FAR 15.403–3(a)(1)(ii) from ‘‘If to its data. The requirement for the are to obtain only that information the contracting officer cannot obtain prime contractor to certify that it has needed to determine a fair and adequate data from sources other than submitted all of the facts regarding reasonable price, which, in some cases, the offeror, the contracting officer shall subcontractor cost data or pricing data, may include contractor cost data require’’ to ‘‘If the contracting officer even if the subcontractor is not required (without certification) for commercial determines that adequate data from to submit ‘‘certified cost or pricing data,’’ items. sources other than the offeror is not is implicitly in the certification available, the contracting officer shall Specific Comments language at FAR 15.406–2(a). require.’’ 9. Comment: Throughout the 1. Comment: Add a definition of ‘‘cost Response: We concur that the proposed rule, including the clauses, data,’’ which is referenced at FAR contracting officer should determine change ‘‘required certified cost or 15.402(a)(2)(ii). when adequate data is not available and Response: We do not believe a pricing data and data other than have clarified the final rule accordingly. ’’ separate definition is required. The certified cost or pricing data back to However, ‘‘data’’ is plural and requires ‘‘required certified cost or pricing data, revised definition of ‘‘data other than the verb ‘‘are available’’ rather than ‘‘is certified cost or pricing data’’ and the or data other than certified cost or available’’. pricing data.’’ existing definition of ‘‘information other 5. Comment: The new language at Response: The phrases ‘‘certified cost than cost or pricing data’’ both FAR 15.404–1(b) confuses the difference or pricing data’’ and ‘‘data other than encompass cost data and pricing data between cost analysis and price analysis certified cost or pricing data’’ are joined depending on what is needed by the when it states that ‘‘Price analysis may with ‘‘and’’ when they are used to refer contracting officer, using the order of include evaluating data other than to both types of data collectively. The preference at FAR 15.402(a). The certified cost or pricing data obtained phrases are joined with ‘‘or’’ when the definition simply breaks out various from the offeror or contractor when phrases are used to refer to either one aspects of ‘‘data other than certified cost there is no other means for determining or the other type of data. See the or pricing data.’’ The cost data refers to a fair and reasonable price.’’ Price response to General Comments number data related to a contractor’s costs. analysis should only be applied to sales 2. 2. Comment: Separate enumeration of data obtained from the offeror. ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ in FAR Response: The referenced paragraph 10. Comment: FAR 52.214–26, Audit 4.803(a)(17)(i) ‘‘Content of Contract is a discussion of ‘‘price’’ analysis. The and Records—Sealed Bidding, expand Files’’ is unnecessary because it is referenced text simply points out that in the Government’s rights by allowing the repetitive with existing definitions in performing price analysis, the Government to audit and review the FAR 2.101. contracting officer may require data contractor’s records when certified cost Response: The final rule revises FAR other than certified cost or pricing data. or pricing data are not required. There 4.803(a)(17)(i) to read ‘‘certified cost or Price analysis is not limited to sales is no authority to do this. pricing data’’ consistent with the revised data. Response: This change was in error definition. The requirement at FAR 6. Comment: Language at FAR and the final rule deletes that addition. 4.803(a)(17) is for documenting the 15.404–1(b)(2)(ii) needs clarification. 11. Comment: The proposed rule contract file for the contracting officer’s Response: Changes have been made to inappropriately adds the phrase ‘‘data determination of a fair and reasonable FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(ii) to clarify the text. other than certified cost or pricing data’’ price, and lists the types of data that 7. Comment: In reference to FAR to clauses and FAR 15.408, Table 15–2, should be maintained. ‘‘Certified cost or 15.408, Table 15–2, changing the word when only certified cost or pricing data pricing data’’ includes all data that ‘‘information’’ to the phrase ‘‘data other apply. conforms to FAR 15.408, Table 15–2, than certified cost or pricing data’’ Response: The final rule adds while ‘‘data other than certified cost or means that the contractor does not have clarifying language to indicate that, pricing data’’ includes only the level of to certify all the cost or pricing data. when certified cost or pricing data is data the contracting officer needs to Changing these terms is changing the required, data other than certified cost determine the price fair and reasonable. requirement under TINA. or pricing data may also be required. Whichever is required to be submitted, Response: The final rule utilizes the See the responses to General Comments this section makes it clear that it shall term ‘‘information’’ in a few instances, numbers 2 and 4, and Specific be documented in the contract file. not as a term of art as it had been used Comments number 9. 3. Comment: FAR 13.106–3(a)(2)(iii) in FAR part 15 prior to this revision, but 12. Comment: Why is Alternate I of contradicts FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(iv) as generically. The requirements under FAR 52.215–21(b) marked reserved? It FAR 13.106–3(a)(2)(iii) appears to TINA have not been changed. shouldn’t be.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53138 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Response: The final rule retains pricing data, is either unavailable or when it is needed to determine a fair Alternate I. inadequate to establish that prices and reasonable price. The proposed rule 13. Comment: The Councils are offered for a commercial item are fair is consistent with the existing FAR, the inappropriately prescribing the use of and reasonable. However, the FAR requirements of TINA, the Federal FAR 15.408, Table 15–2, for both policy is to only require submission of Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’ and ‘‘data ‘‘data other than certified cost or pricing (Pub. L. 103–355), and the Clinger other than certified cost or pricing data’’. data,’’ and only to the extent necessary Cohen Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–106). It By doing so, the Councils are advocating to support the contracting officer’s does not add any requirements that do cost analysis on commercial items. determination of a fair and reasonable not already exist in the statutes and Response: This comment is similar to price. FAR. See the response to Specific the Specific Comments numbers 7 and 17. Comment: The proposed rule Comments number 16. 9. The language in the table and clauses demands that the contracting officer 19. Comment: The proposed rule adds is revised in the final rule. FAR 15.408, obtains additional data (and ‘‘all facts’’) the requirement that price be ‘‘fair’’ and Table 15–2, applies only when certified regardless of needs and reverses the ‘‘reasonable’’ in circumstances where the cost or pricing data are required. presumption of the present FAR, which previous FAR required only However, when certified cost or pricing asserts that the contracting officer demonstration of price data are required, data other than should not obtain more information ‘‘reasonableness.’’ certified cost or pricing data may also be than needed. The proposed rule requires Response: Under the existing FAR, required. Additionally, cost analysis can greatly increased amounts of the contracting officer must determine be used when an item that was thought information even where certified cost or prices to be fair and reasonable (see FAR initially to be commercial is found not pricing data is not required. This is 15.402(a)). The final rule makes no to have sufficient sales data or other contrary to the language of the statute changes to this basic policy. information for determining the price to (TINA). 20. Comment: The proposed rule also be fair and reasonable. In each situation, Response: The language in FAR obligates the contracting officer to and in accordance with FAR 1.602–2, 15.402(a); FAR 15.408, FAR Table 15–2; require submission of ‘‘data other than the contracting officer must exercise and the clauses are revised in the final certified cost or pricing data.’’ This is a business judgment as to the level and rule. When certified cost or pricing data profound change because the contractor type of data needed to determine that are required, data other than certified must submit both certified cost or prices are fair and reasonable following cost or pricing data may also be pricing data and something else. the order of preference at FAR 15.402(a). required. The contracting officer is Response: See section A, Background. See the responses to General Comments cautioned to obtain data other than Also, see responses to Specific numbers 2 and 4, and to Specific certified cost or pricing as necessary to Comments numbers 7, 9, and 11. Comments numbers 7 and 9. establish a fair and reasonable price. See 21. Comment: The proposed rule at 14. Comment: The rule will not section A, Background; see also the FAR 15.404–1(b)(1) adds a new term, address situations when a contracting responses to the Specific Comments ‘‘price or cost data.’’ What is ‘‘price or officer inappropriately determines an numbers 7, 9, and 16. cost data?’’ item to be commercial. 18. Comment: The proposed FAR Response: The language has been Response: Commercial item 15.403–3(c)(1) implies that contractors removed. The final rule clarifies the determinations are beyond the scope of face vague and unbounded disclosure language at FAR 15.404–1(b) to correct this rule. This rule is to clarify what obligations (i.e., ‘‘cost data, or any other ‘‘price or cost data’’ to ‘‘data other than data are needed to determine whether information the contracting officer certified cost or pricing data’’. prices are fair and reasonable as requires’’ and ‘‘at a minimum, 22. Comment: What is ‘‘commercial required by FAR part 15. The appropriate data on * * * prices’’) that item analysis’’ at FAR 15.404–1(b)? procedures for making the likely will be highly varied in Response: The phrase has been determination under FAR part 12 are application to different procurements. deleted. outside the scope of this rule about the This costly burden is unnecessary— 23. Comment: The proposed rule at definitions of phrases associated with certainly where it applies to exempt FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(ii) creates extensive cost or pricing data, and the procurements, e.g., commercial items. additional disclosure requirements, requirements for their submission. Proposed changes conflict with TINA. which affect the eligibility for the 15. Comment: Cost data should only Response: TINA and the existing FAR ‘‘commercial item’’ exemption. These be used when there are no other means permit a contracting officer to obtain all include very particular demands to determine whether price is fair and data that is needed, in the contracting concerning ‘‘prior price,’’ ‘‘terms and reasonable. officer’s discretion (which may vary conditions,’’ ‘‘market and economic Response: The order of preference at among contracting officers), to factors,’’ ‘‘differences between the FAR 15.402(a) has been restructured, determine the price to be fair and similar item and the item being but is essentially unchanged. Certified reasonable. See the order of preference procured’’ and encouragement to use cost or pricing data must be obtained at FAR 15.402(a), Pricing Policy. The expert technical advice to evaluate when required by TINA. When certified present rule does not change that. The ‘‘minor modifications.’’ The effect of cost or pricing data are not required, the intent is to leave latitude for contracting these requirements is to reduce the order of preference at FAR 15.402(a) officers to exercise business judgment availability and utility of the must generally be followed. (FAR 1.602–2) in obtaining whatever ‘‘commercial item’’ exception and to 16. Comment: Contracting officers data are required in order to be able to create, again, a whole class of should never have to rely on cost data determine a price fair and reasonable, ‘‘surrogate’’ data that is uncertified but from the offeror to determine if the price following the order of preference at FAR nevertheless burdensome and expensive for a commercial item is fair and 15.402(a). No negotiated procurements, to produce. reasonable. including procurements of commercial Response: The contracting officer Response: The contracting officer items, are ‘‘exempt’’ from a contracting must be able to determine that the price retains the authority to request cost data officer requiring submission of data is fair and reasonable. The fair and where other information, including other than certified cost or pricing data reasonable price can be the commercial

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53139

price. To the extent there are sufficient Councils anticipate the development of needed to determine price commercial sales of the item being training to help the workforce reasonableness, but cannot require procured for the same or similar understand and apply the rule. certification of cost or pricing data quantities, both the validity of the 26. Comment: Recommend Councils (should cost or pricing data be needed) comparison and the reasonableness of conduct a public meeting. if the certification requirement of TINA the previous prices can be established, Response: A public meeting was held does not apply. However, some and the company shares that on November 15, 2007, to ensure that all contractors incorrectly believed that the commercial sales data with the interested parties had an opportunity to FAR definition of ‘‘information other contracting officer when it cannot be provide additional input. The public than cost or pricing data’’ in effect prior obtained by the Government through meeting was followed by the to this final rule, precluded the normal market research, so that the opportunity for interested parties to contracting officer from obtaining contracting officer can determine a fair submit comments. uncertified cost or pricing data. and reasonable price, obtaining further 27. Comment: Existing regulations Section 2306a(h) of Title 10, as well ‘‘data other than certified cost or pricing delineate that data provided in support as section 254b(h) of Title 41 of the U.S. data’’ will not be necessary. See section of proposals fall into two distinct Code, define both ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ A, Background, and the responses to categories: ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ and and the circumstances under which that Specific Comments numbers 7, 9, and ‘‘information other than cost or pricing data must be certified. When the data 11. data.’’ The primary differentiator must be certified, that data becomes 24. Comment: The rule will create between cost or pricing data and ‘‘certified cost or pricing data.’’ If, after confusion when commercial items are information other than cost or pricing submittal, no certification is required, being procured by putting contracting data is that the former requires the data becomes ‘‘data other than officers in a position where the only safe certification in accordance with FAR certified cost or pricing data.’’ Sections alternative will be to demand the 15.406–2, while the latter is any type of 2306a(d)(1) and 254b(d)(1) state: ‘‘When maximum amount of data from an information that does not require certified cost or pricing data are not offeror. certification per FAR 15.406–2. The required * * * the contracting officer Response: There is no fundamental existing regulations clearly state that shall require submission of data other change from the existing requirements ‘‘information other than cost or pricing than certified cost or pricing data to the that contracting officers: ‘‘shall not data’’ is ‘‘any type of information that is extent necessary to determine the obtain more data or information than not required to be certified’’ and that the reasonableness of the price * * * the necessary.’’ To the extent there are definition ‘‘includes cost or pricing data contracting officer shall require that the sufficient commercial sales of the item for which certification is determined data submitted include, at a minimum, for the same or similar quantities, both inapplicable after submission.’’ As a appropriate information on prices at the validity of the comparison and the result, there is no ambiguity as to the which the same or similar items have reasonableness of the previous price can type of data that can be requested or previously been sold. * * *’’ The be established, and the company shares obtained through the submission of statutory requirement is to obtain data that information with the contracting ‘‘information other than cost or pricing necessary to determine the officer when it cannot be obtained by data.’’ The Councils have changed the reasonableness of the price. The the Government through normal market type of non-certifiable data to include contracting officer cannot require research, so that the contracting officer ‘‘cost data’’ rather than what was certification of the data submitted if can determine a fair and reasonable previously referred to as ‘‘cost TINA does not require it to be certified. price, additional data requests will not information.’’ The FAR Council’s intent If the contracting officer has no other be required. This is not a departure from to clarify that the two terms result in means to determine the reasonableness the existing FAR requirement. See underlying data that is the same, of the price (the main requirement of section A, Background. appears to be in direct conflict with the TINA), then the contracting officer shall 25. Comment: We believe the FAR statutory definition. That statute does require the submission of the necessary Council is expressing dissatisfaction not eliminate the possibility that the data needed to make that determination, with the ability of the acquisition data may be the same but it provides a including, at a minimum, prices at workforce to do price analysis rather different standard for ‘‘other which the same or similar items have than the more familiar cost analysis and information.’’ Accordingly, there are two been previously sold. TINA does not recommend providing adequate training different types of data defined in TINA, prohibit obtaining cost or pricing data rather than making significant changes ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ that is required to when ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’ is to established regulations. be certified and ‘‘other information’’ that not required to be obtained, but TINA Response: See section A, Background, is not required to be certified. (10 U.S.C. 2306(d)), as well as the FAR, and the Background section of the Response: We believe this comment provide requirements to ensure the proposed rule Federal Register notice demonstrates the confusion reported to contracting officer does not require (72 FR 20092, April 23, 2007), the Councils. TINA and FAR 15.402(a) more data than is necessary to concerning the confusion over the require that the contracting officer shall determine that the prices are fair and current FAR language, and further require submission of data other than reasonable. expressed in these public comments certified cost or pricing data to the 28. Comment: The proposed rule about existing FAR requirements. extent necessary to determine the would lead contracting officers to Training of our acquisition workforce in reasonableness of the price. We agree expect offerors to maintain traditional all types of proposal analysis is an with the respondent’s comment that the Government cost accounting data for ongoing effort. The workforce needs the definition of ‘‘information other than commercial items. cooperation of contractors to submit cost or pricing data’’, in effect prior to Response: There is no requirement for required data so that contracting officers this final rule, included cost or pricing anything more than the type of can ensure a fair and reasonable price. data for which certification is commercial data customarily We believe this final rule helps clarify determined inapplicable after maintained. See FAR 15.403–3(a)(2), requirements for submitting data submission. The contracting officer FAR 15.403–3(c)(2), and FAR 15.403– consistent with the existing FAR. The must obtain whatever level of data is 5(b)(2).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53140 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

29. Comment: Use of the word items. The proposed rule would helpful to the DoD acquisition ‘‘claimed’’ at FAR 15.403–1(c)(3)(i) ‘‘require’’ contracting officers to demand workforce, years of experiences reveals a great deal about the underlying that offerors proposing commercial throughout Government show that the philosophy that is perpetuated items submit ‘‘data other than certified current FAR language is causing throughout the proposed rule. cost or pricing data’’ if the contracting confusion over what a contractor is Response: The word ‘‘claimed’’ in FAR officer believes it is necessary to required to submit to support prices. 15.403–1(c)(3)(i) is not new; it is part of determine prices fair and reasonable. This confusion leads to inefficient the existing language. There is no Proposed paragraph (b) of FAR 52.215– procurement processes and sometimes inference of intent on the use of the 20 then states that if the offeror is not leads to the Government paying word. The intent of the rule is to make granted an exception from TINA, then unreasonable prices. The revised it clear that contracting officers must the offeror shall submit ‘‘data other than language clarifies the regulation, and is obtain the level of data needed in order certified cost or pricing data.’’ consistent with TINA, by requiring the to meet the requirements of TINA (10 Response: FAR 52.215–20 clause contracting officer to obtain only the U.S.C. 2306a(d)(1) and 41 U.S.C. requires offerors to submit ‘‘data other data necessary to determine the fairness 254b(d)(1)), which states that ‘‘* * * the than certified cost or pricing data’’ if the and reasonableness of the price. contracting officer shall require contracting officer believes it is 36. Comment: The current FAR rules, submission of data * * * necessary to necessary to determine prices to be fair when properly exercised, are already determine the reasonableness of the and reasonable. The final rule clarifies capable of achieving fair and reasonable price * * *.’’ in paragraph (b) of the contract clause prices and, in this respondent’s opinion, 30. Comment: FAR subpart 15.4 FAR 52.215–20 that the data required the definitions are clear and should not be used to determine under Table 15–2 includes ‘‘data other unambiguous, and contracting officers whether or not an item being offered is than certified cost or pricing data’’ as have significant latitude under current a commercial item. well as ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’. regulations to acquire data from Response: FAR subpart 15.4 is not 33. Comment: Within the proposed contractors to support price used to determine whether or not an rule, the Councils have made significant reasonableness of commercial items. item is a commercial item. However, it changes that result in the reprioritizing Response: See section A, Background, is appropriate in FAR subpart 15.4 to of the Government’s pricing policy as and also the responses to Specific require contracting officers to detailed at FAR 15.402. Comments numbers 7, 9, 11, and 23. affirmatively decide if an item being Response: In response to comments, 37. Comment: There are no proposed offered meets the definition of the final rule reorganizes the FAR changes to make contracting officers ‘‘commercial item’’ before asking a 15.402(a) to clarify the policy, but the aware that cost data from commercial contractor to provide cost or pricing policy remains essentially unchanged. companies will most likely not be in a data, if cost analysis is the contracting See section A, Background. form that complies with their officer’s only means to determine the 34. Comment: The proposed rule expectations, training, or experience. price to be fair and reasonable. revisions at FAR 15.402(a) suggests that Cost data from commercial companies 31. Comment: The proposed change to the ‘‘data other than certified cost or will not comply with Cost Accounting FAR 15.403–3(c), Commercial Items, pricing data’’ is preferred over ‘‘certified Standards, FAR part 31, and are not states that even if an offeror provides cost or pricing data’’, even when generally suitable for certification under catalog or market pricing, the certification is required by FAR 15.403– the Truth in Negotiations Act. The FAR contracting officer cannot assume that 4. council should not use terminology that such information would be sufficient to Response: In response to comments, is part of a cost-based contracting establish a fair and reasonable price, the final rule reorganizes FAR 15.402(a) process. and therefore, the contracting officer to emphasize that certified cost or Response: Current regulations and ‘‘shall require’’ the offeror to submit data pricing data shall be obtained when TINA already require contractors to other than certified cost or pricing data required by TINA. When certified cost provide certified cost or pricing data, to support further analysis. or pricing data are not required, the and data other than certified cost or Response: There was no substantive order of preference at FAR 15.402(a)(2) pricing data as necessary, that will change in the language in question; it is should generally be followed. enable the contracting officer to essentially the existing language. The 35. Comment: The DoD-specific issues determine fair and reasonable prices. language gives no mention to ‘‘market cited in the proposed rule and at the The rule clarifies the regulations by pricing.’’ Considering FAR subpart 15.4 public meeting have been adequately using language consistent with TINA in its entirety, if there is adequate addressed by the Director of Defense more precisely. The rule does not market pricing, the contracting officer is Procurement and Acquisition Policy expand the contracting officer’s prohibited from requiring data from the through recent policy memos, policy authority to request data from contractor (FAR 15.402(a) and FAR guidance, and contract pricing training. commercial companies when needed for 15.403–3(a)). The current language and These actions should be given a chance the determination that prices are fair revised language in this final rule only to work before further regulatory and reasonable. The challenge the requires submission of data other than changes are made that would impede comment reflects may be real, but it is certified cost or pricing data in the U.S. Government’s access to the not affected by the rule. accordance with the order of preference commercial marketplace. 38. Comment: The proposed rule at FAR 15.402(a), and then only to the Response: The purpose of the FAR would revise the order of preference of level of detail needed to support a rulemaking is to eliminate confusion data at FAR 15.402(a) and would determination of a fair and reasonable throughout the Government and to eliminate the distinction between ‘‘cost price. clarify for all agencies and their or pricing data’’ and ‘‘information other 32. Comment: The proposed change to contractors definitions and associated than cost or pricing data.’’ FAR 52.215–20, illustrates the responsibilities for the request and Response: The order of preference is tremendous confusion the proposed rule submission of certified cost or pricing not changed. By eliminating the will cause and the onerous nature of the data and data other than certified cost ambiguous phrase ‘‘information other pricing requirements for commercial or pricing data. While DoD guidance is than cost or pricing data,’’ the rule

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53141

clarifies and maintains the distinction customarily used by the general public to obtain cost data or pricing data. between ‘‘certified cost or pricing data’’ or non-governmental entities for Further, most acquisitions involving and ‘‘data other than certified cost or purposes other than governmental small entities are under the threshold pricing data,’’ tracking the statutory purposes, a term used consistently in for the submission of certified cost or distinctions. As stated in other the definition of commercial item at pricing data of $700,000, the new TINA responses herein, the revised definitions FAR 2.101. This section also threshold (see FAR Case 2008–024, Item clearly describe what is required by appropriately directs contracting I of this FAC). Finally, this rule will TINA and intended by this rule. TINA officers to obtain technical assistance. benefit all entities, both large and small, defines ‘‘cost or pricing data,’’ and then 41. Comment: The proposed rule fails by clarifying the requirements for the prescribes when such data shall be to address the confusion in pricing submission of ‘‘certified cost or pricing certified. The nature and extent of ‘‘cost noncompetitive (sole-source) data’’ and ‘‘data other than certified cost or pricing data’’ is the same regardless commercial items and guides the or pricing data.’’ of whether it is certified or not. The contracting officer to perform price statute also prescribes when a contractor analysis of previous DoD (Government) D. Paperwork Reduction Act must provide ‘‘data other than certified prices to determine price The Paperwork Reduction Act does cost or pricing data’’ (which includes reasonableness. apply; however, these changes to the ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ and judgmental Response: The intent of the rule is for FAR do not impose additional information) without being required to contracting officers to follow the order information collection requirements to certify it. Under the current law and of preference, which includes price the paperwork burden previously regulations, a contracting officer is analysis (including price analysis of approved under OMB Control Number empowered to obtain all the data and previous Government and non- 9000–0013. judgmental information needed to Government sales). The Councils determine a fair and reasonable price, recognize, however, that there has been List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 4, 12, but is restricted as to which data, and confusion over the type and amount of 14, 15, 16, 19, 27, 30, 31, 32, 42, 44, 49, when that data, must be certified. data that can be required by a and 52 39. Comment: By eliminating the term contracting officer, particularly in non- Government procurement. ‘‘information’’ and substituting the term competitive (sole-source) acquisitions of Dated: August 18, 2010. ‘‘data’’ the rule would add ambiguity as commercial items. Accordingly, for the to the legal status of the submission by sake of clarification, changes were made Edward Loeb, commercial companies that cannot at FAR 15.402(a)(2)(ii)(A), FAR 15.403– Director, Acquisition Policy Division. provide FAR compliant cost data. 1(c)(3)(i), and FAR 15.403–3(c) to ■ Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA Response: The use of the term ‘‘data’’ emphasize the need for the contracting amend 48 CFR parts 2, 4, 12, 14, 15, 16, is consistent with the statute and with officer to review the history of sales to 19, 27, 30, 31, 32, 42, 44, 49, and 52 as the Government’s need to obtain factual non-governmental and governmental set forth below: information to be used as a basis for entities, determine whether an item is a ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR reasoning, discussion, or calculation. commercial item, and decide whether parts 2, 4, 12, 14, 15, 16, 19, 27, 30, 31, The rule does not change the existing certified cost or pricing data are 32, 42, 44, 49, and 52 continues to read strong limitations in the FAR on the required. The changes to FAR 15.402(a) as follows: circumstances under which a provide sufficient flexibility to the Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. contracting officer can obtain certified contracting officer to address the chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). cost or pricing data from commercial specific contracting situation. As sources. It does not change the current revised, this rule clarifies that TINA PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS restrictions on the amount of data a authorizes a contracting officer to obtain AND TERMS contracting officer can obtain (i.e., only data other than certified cost or pricing that data to the extent necessary to data to the extent necessary to establish ■ 2. Amend section 2.101 in paragraph determine fair and reasonable prices.) a fair and reasonable price, even when (b)(2) by— The rule also retains the existing the acquisition is for a commercial item. ■ a. Adding, in alphabetical order, the flexibility to use contractor data formats. Therefore, the rule sets forth appropriate definition ‘‘Certified cost or pricing 40. Comment: The ‘‘of a type’’ guidance for determining fair and data’’; language in the proposed rule at FAR reasonable prices. ■ b. Revising the introductory text of the 15.404–1(b)(2)(i) and FAR This is a significant regulatory action definition ‘‘Cost or pricing data’’; 15.401(b)(ii)(C) introduces ambiguity as and, therefore, was subject to review ■ c. Adding, in alphabetical order, the to the meaning of a commercial item. It under Section 6(b) of Executive Order definition ‘‘Data other than certified cost is recommended that the ‘‘of a type’’ 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, or pricing data’’; and language be deleted from the proposed dated September 30, 1993. This rule is ■ d. Removing the definition rule as it seems to add no clarity to the not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. ‘‘Information other than cost or pricing definition of a commercial item or how data’’. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act commercial items are to be priced. The added and revised text reads as Response: We believe the respondent The Department of Defense, the follows: meant FAR 15.404–1(b)(2)(ii) and FAR General Services Administration, and 15.404–1(b)(2)(ii)(C). The references in the National Aeronautics and Space 2.101 Definitions the comment either do not have the ‘‘of Administration certify that this final * * * * * a type’’ text, or the reference is rule will not have a significant (b) * * * erroneous. These subparagraphs of the economic impact on a substantial (2) * * * FAR provide requirements for price number of small entities within the Certified cost or pricing data means analysis and appropriately directs meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility ‘‘cost or pricing data’’ that were required contracting officers to consider price Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the to be submitted in accordance with FAR comparisons even in situations when rule does not expand or diminish the 15.403–4 and 15.403–5 and have been the proposed item is ‘‘of a type’’ that is existing rights of the contracting officer certified, or are required to be certified,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53142 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

in accordance with 15.406–2. This 4.803 Contents of contract files. the threshold for submission of certified certification states that, to the best of the * * * * * cost or pricing data at 15.403–4(a)(1). person’s knowledge and belief, the cost (a) * * * * * * * * or pricing data are accurate, complete, (17) Data and information related to and current as of a date certain before the contracting officer’s determination PART 15—CONTRACTING BY contract award. Cost or pricing data are of a fair and reasonable price. This may NEGOTIATION required to be certified in certain include— ■ procurements (10 U.S.C. 2306a and 41 (i) Certified cost or pricing data; 8. Amend section 15.204–5 by U.S.C. 254b). (ii) Data other than certified cost or revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: * * * * * pricing data; Cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. (iii) Justification for waiver from the 15.204–5 Part IV—Representations and 2306a(h)(1) and 41 U.S.C. 254b) means requirement to submit certified cost or Instructions. pricing data; or all facts that, as of the date of price * * * * * (iv) Certificates of Current Cost or agreement, or, if applicable, an earlier (b) * * * date agreed upon between the parties Pricing Data. (5) Certified cost or pricing data (see that is as close as practicable to the date * * * * * Table 15–2 of 15.408) or data other than of agreement on price, prudent buyers (b) * * * certified cost or pricing data. and sellers would reasonably expect to (4) Certified cost or pricing data, * * * * * Certificates of Current Cost or Pricing affect price negotiations significantly. ■ 9. Amend section 15.402 by revising Cost or pricing data are factual, not Data, or data other than certified cost or pricing data; cost or price analysis; and the introductory text and paragraph (a) judgmental; and are verifiable. While to read as follows: they do not indicate the accuracy of the other documentation supporting prospective contractor’s judgment about contractual actions executed by the 15.402 Pricing policy. estimated future costs or projections, contract administration office. Contracting officers shall— they do include the data forming the * * * * * (a) Purchase supplies and services basis for that judgment. Cost or pricing from responsible sources at fair and data are more than historical accounting PART 12—ACQUISITON OF reasonable prices. In establishing the data; they are all the facts that can be COMMERCIAL ITEMS reasonableness of the offered prices, the contracting officer— reasonably expected to contribute to the 12.102 [Amended] soundness of estimates of future costs (1) Shall obtain certified cost or ■ and to the validity of determinations of 5. Amend section 12.102 in paragraph pricing data when required by 15.403– costs already incurred. They also (f)(2)(ii) by removing ‘‘Cost or pricing’’ 4, along with data other than certified include, but are not limited to, such and adding ‘‘Certified cost or pricing’’ in cost or pricing data as necessary to factors as— its place. establish a fair and reasonable price; or (2) When certified cost or pricing data * * * * * 12.504 [Amended] are not required by 15.403–4, obtain Data other than certified cost or ■ 6. Amend section 12.504 in paragraph data other than certified cost or pricing pricing data means pricing data, cost (a)(7) by removing ‘‘provide cost’’ and data as necessary to establish a fair and data, and judgmental information adding ‘‘provide certified cost’’ in its reasonable price, generally using the necessary for the contracting officer to place. following order of preference in determine a fair and reasonable price or determining the type of data required: to determine cost realism. Such data PART 14—SEALED BIDDING (i) No additional data from the offeror, may include the identical types of data if the price is based on adequate price as certified cost or pricing data, ■ 7. Amend section 14.201–7 by competition, except as provided by consistent with Table 15–2 of 15.408, removing from paragraph (a)(1)(ii) ‘‘of 15.403–3(b). but without the certification. The data cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its (ii) Data other than certified cost or may also include, for example, sales place; and by revising paragraphs (b)(1) pricing data such as— data and any information reasonably and (c)(1) to read as follows: (A) Data related to prices (e.g., required to explain the offeror’s established catalog or market prices, 14.201–7 Contract clauses. estimating process, including, but not sales to non-governmental and limited to— * * * * * governmental entities), relying first on (1) The judgmental factors applied (b)(1) When contracting by sealed data available within the Government; and the mathematical or other methods bidding, the contracting officer shall second, on data obtained from sources used in the estimate, including those insert the clause at 52.214–27, Price other than the offeror; and, if necessary, used in projecting from known data; and Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or on data obtained from the offeror. When (2) The nature and amount of any Pricing Data—Modifications—Sealed obtaining data from the offeror is contingencies included in the proposed Bidding, in solicitations and contracts if necessary, unless an exception under price. the contract amount is expected to 15.403–1(b)(1) or (2) applies, such data * * * * * exceed the threshold for submission of submitted by the offeror shall include, certified cost or pricing data at 15.403– at a minimum, appropriate data on the PART 4—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 4(a)(1). prices at which the same or similar * * * * * 4.704 [Amended] items have been sold previously, (c)(1) When contracting by sealed adequate for evaluating the ■ 3. Amend section 4.704 in paragraph bidding, the contracting officer shall reasonableness of the price. (b) by removing ‘‘for cost’’ and adding insert the clause at 52.214–28, (B) Cost data to the extent necessary ‘‘for certified cost’’ in its place. Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing for the contracting officer to determine ■ 4. Amend section 4.803 by revising Data—Modifications—Sealed Bidding, a fair and reasonable price. paragraphs (a)(17) and (b)(4) to read as in solicitations and contracts if the (3) Obtain the type and quantity of follows: contract amount is expected to exceed data necessary to establish a fair and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53143

reasonable price, but not more data than any modification, as defined in relates shall be considered as having is necessary. Requesting unnecessary paragraph (3)(i) of that definition, that been required to provide certified cost data can lead to increased proposal does not change the item from a or pricing data. Consequently, award of preparation costs, generally extend commercial item to a noncommercial any lower-tier subcontract expected to acquisition lead time, and consume item, is exempt from the requirement for exceed the certified cost or pricing data additional contractor and Government certified cost or pricing data. If the threshold requires the submission of resources. Use techniques such as, but contracting officer determines that an certified cost or pricing data unless— not limited to, price analysis, cost item claimed to be commercial is, in * * * * * analysis, and/or cost realism analysis to fact, not commercial and that no other ■ 12. Revise section 15.403–2 to read as establish a fair and reasonable price. If exception or waiver applies, (e.g. the follows: a fair and reasonable price cannot be acquisition is not based on adequate established by the contracting officer price competition; the acquisition is not 15.403–2 Other circumstances where from the analyses of the data obtained based on prices set by law or regulation; certified cost or pricing data are not or submitted to date, the contracting and the acquisition exceeds the required. officer shall require the submission of threshold for the submission of certified (a) The exercise of an option at the additional data sufficient for the cost or pricing data at 15.403–4(a)(1)) price established at contract award or contracting officer to support the the contracting officer shall require initial negotiation does not require determination of the fair and reasonable submission of certified cost or pricing submission of certified cost or pricing price. data. data. * * * * * * * * * * (b) Certified cost or pricing data are not required for proposals used solely ■ 10. Amend section 15.403 by revising (iii) * * * for overrun funding or interim billing the section heading to read as follows: (B) For acquisitions funded by DoD, NASA, or Coast Guard, such price adjustments. 15.403 Obtaining certified cost or pricing modifications of a commercial item are ■ 13. Revise section 15.403–3 to read as data. exempt from the requirement for follows: * * * * * submission of certified cost or pricing ■ 11. Amend section 15.403–1 by— 15.403–3 Requiring data other than data provided the total price of all such certified cost or pricing data. ■ a. Revising the section heading, modifications under a particular (a)(1) In those acquisitions that do not paragraph (a), the introductory text of contract action does not exceed the require certified cost or pricing data, the paragraph (b), the heading to paragraph greater of the threshold for obtaining (c) introductory text, and paragraph contracting officer shall— certified cost or pricing data in 15.403– (i) Obtain whatever data are available (c)(3)(i); 4 or 5 percent of the total price of the ■ b. Removing from paragraph from Government or other secondary contract at the time of contract award. sources and use that data in determining (c)(3)(iii)(A) ‘‘of cost’’ and adding ‘‘of (C) For acquisitions funded by DoD, certified cost’’ in its place; a fair and reasonable price; NASA, or Coast Guard such (ii) Require submission of data other ■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(3)(iii)(B) modifications of a commercial item are and (c)(3)(iii)(C); than certified cost or pricing data, as not exempt from the requirement for defined in 2.101, from the offeror to the ■ d. Removing from paragraph (c)(3)(iv) submission of certified cost or pricing ‘‘for cost’’ and adding ‘‘for certified cost’’ extent necessary to determine a fair and data on the basis of the exemption reasonable price (10 U.S.C. 2306a(d)(1) in its place; and provided for at 15.403–1(c)(3) if the total ■ e. Revising the introductory text of and 41 U.S.C. 254b(d)(1)) if the price of all such modifications under a contracting officer determines that paragraph (c)(4). particular contract action exceeds the The revised text reads as follows: adequate data from sources other than greater of the threshold for obtaining the offeror are not available. This 15.403–1 Prohibition on obtaining certified certified cost or pricing data in 15.403– includes requiring data from an offeror cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 2306a and 41 4 or 5 percent of the total price of the to support a cost realism analysis; U.S.C. 254b). contract at the time of contract award. (iii) Consider whether cost data are (a) Certified cost or pricing data shall * * * * * necessary to determine a fair and not be obtained for acquisitions at or (4) Waivers. The head of the reasonable price when there is not below the simplified acquisition contracting activity (HCA) may, without adequate price competition; threshold. power of delegation, waive the (iv) Require that the data submitted by (b) Exceptions to certified cost or requirement for submission of certified the offeror include, at a minimum, pricing data requirements. The cost or pricing data in exceptional cases. appropriate data on the prices at which contracting officer shall not require The authorization for the waiver and the the same item or similar items have certified cost or pricing data to support supporting rationale shall be in writing. previously been sold, adequate for any action (contracts, subcontracts, or The HCA may consider waiving the determining the reasonableness of the modifications) (but may require data requirement if the price can be price unless an exception under 15.403– other than certified cost or pricing data determined to be fair and reasonable 1(b)(1) or (2) applies; and as defined in FAR 2.101 to support a without submission of certified cost or (v) Consider the guidance in section determination of a fair and reasonable pricing data. For example, if certified 3.3, chapter 3, volume I, of the Contract price or cost realism)— cost or pricing data were furnished on Pricing Reference Guide cited at 15.404– * * * * * previous production buys and the 1(a)(7) to determine the data an offeror (c) Standards for exceptions from contracting officer determines such data shall be required to submit. certified cost or pricing data are sufficient, when combined with (2) The contractor’s format for requirements—*** updated data, a waiver may be granted. submitting the data should be used (see (3) * * * If the HCA has waived the requirement 15.403–5(b)(2)). (i) Any acquisition of an item that the for submission of certified cost or (3) The contracting officer shall contracting officer determines meets the pricing data, the contractor or higher- ensure that data used to support price commercial item definition in 2.101, or tier subcontractor to whom the waiver negotiations are sufficiently current to

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53144 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

permit negotiation of a fair and (2) Limitations relating to commercial must consider both increases and reasonable price. Requests for updated items (10 U.S.C. 2306a(d)(2) and 41 decreases (e.g., a $200,000 modification offeror data should be limited to data U.S.C. 254b(d)(2)). (i) The contracting resulting from a reduction of $500,000 that affect the adequacy of the proposal officer shall limit requests for sales data and an increase of $300,000 is a pricing for negotiations, such as changes in relating to commercial items to data for adjustment exceeding $700,000). This price lists. the same or similar items during a requirement does not apply when (4) As specified in section 808 of the relevant time period. unrelated and separately priced changes Strom Thurmond National Defense (ii) The contracting officer shall, to for which certified cost or pricing data Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 the maximum extent practicable, limit would not otherwise be required are (Pub. L. 105–261), an offeror who does the scope of the request for data relating included for administrative convenience not comply with a requirement to to commercial items to include only in the same modification. Negotiated submit data for a contract or subcontract data that are in the form regularly final pricing actions (such as in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of maintained by the offeror as part of its termination settlements and total final this subsection is ineligible for award commercial operations. price agreements for fixed-price unless the HCA determines that it is in (iii) The Government shall not incentive and redeterminable contracts) the best interest of the Government to disclose outside the Government data are contract modifications requiring make the award to that offeror, based on obtained relating to commercial items certified cost or pricing data if— consideration of the following: that is exempt from disclosure under (A) The total final price agreement for (i) The effort made to obtain the data. 24.202(a) or the Freedom of Information such settlements or agreements exceeds (ii) The need for the item or service. Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)). the pertinent threshold set forth at (iii) Increased cost or significant harm (3) For services that are not offered paragraph (a)(1) of this subsection; or to the Government if award is not made. and sold competitively in substantial (b) Adequate price competition. When (B) The partial termination settlement quantities in the commercial plus the estimate to complete the adequate price competition exists (see marketplace, but are of a type offered 15.403–1(c)(1)), generally no additional continued portion of the contract and sold competitively in substantial exceeds the pertinent threshold set forth data are necessary to determine the quantities in the commercial reasonableness of price. However, if at paragraph (a)(1) of this subsection marketplace, see 15.403–1(c)(3)(ii). there are unusual circumstances where (see 49.105(c)(15)). 14. Amend section 15.403–4 by (2) Unless prohibited because an it is concluded that additional data are revising the section heading, and necessary to determine the exception at 15.403–1(b) applies, the paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to read as head of the contracting activity, without reasonableness of price, the contracting follows: officer shall, to the maximum extent power of delegation, may authorize the practicable, obtain the additional data 15.403–4 Requiring certified cost or contracting officer to obtain certified from sources other than the offeror. In pricing data (10 U.S.C. 2306a and 41 U.S.C. cost or pricing data for pricing actions addition, the contracting officer should 254b). below the pertinent threshold in request data to determine the cost (a)(1) The contracting officer shall paragraph (a)(1) of this subsection, realism of competing offers or to obtain certified cost or pricing data only provided the action exceeds the evaluate competing approaches. if the contracting officer concludes that simplified acquisition threshold. The (c) Commercial items. (1) At a none of the exceptions in 15.403–1(b) head of the contracting activity shall minimum, the contracting officer must applies. However, if the contracting justify the requirement for certified cost use price analysis to determine whether officer has reason to believe exceptional or pricing data. The documentation the price is fair and reasonable circumstances exist and has sufficient shall include a written finding that whenever the contracting officer data available to determine a fair and certified cost or pricing data are acquires a commercial item (see 15.404– reasonable price, then the contracting necessary to determine whether the 1(b)). The fact that a price is included officer should consider requesting a price is fair and reasonable and the facts in a catalog does not, in and of itself, waiver under the exception at 15.403– supporting that finding. make it fair and reasonable. If the 1(b)(4). The threshold for obtaining (b) When certified cost or pricing data contracting officer cannot determine certified cost or pricing data is are required, the contracting officer whether an offered price is fair and $700,000. Unless an exception applies, shall require the contractor or reasonable, even after obtaining certified cost or pricing data are prospective contractor to submit to the additional data from sources other than required before accomplishing any of contracting officer (and to have any the offeror, then the contracting officer the following actions expected to exceed subcontractor or prospective shall require the offeror to submit data the current threshold or, in the case of subcontractor submit to the prime other than certified cost or pricing data existing contracts, the threshold contractor or appropriate subcontractor to support further analysis (see 15.404– specified in the contract: tier) the following in support of any 1). This data may include history of (i) The award of any negotiated proposal: sales to non-governmental and contract (except for undefinitized (1) The certified cost or pricing data governmental entities, cost data, or any actions such as letter contracts). and data other than certified cost or other information the contracting officer (ii) The award of a subcontract at any pricing data required by the contracting requires to determine the price is fair tier, if the contractor and each higher- officer to determine that the price is fair and reasonable. Unless an exception tier subcontractor were required to and reasonable. under 15.403–1(b)(1) or (2) applies, the furnish certified cost or pricing data (but (2) A Certificate of Current Cost or contracting officer shall require that the see waivers at 15.403–1(c)(4)). Pricing Data, in the format specified in data submitted by the offeror include, at (iii) The modification of any sealed 15.406–2, certifying that to the best of a minimum, appropriate data on the bid or negotiated contract (whether or its knowledge and belief, the cost or prices at which the same item or similar not certified cost or pricing data were pricing data were accurate, complete, items have previously been sold, initially required) or any subcontract and current as of the date of agreement adequate for determining the covered by paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this on price or, if applicable, an earlier date reasonableness of the price. subsection. Price adjustment amounts agreed upon between the parties that is

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53145

as close as practicable to the date of ■ c. Revising the heading of paragraph officer’s only means to determine the agreement on price. (b); price to be fair and reasonable. (c) If certified cost or pricing data are ■ d. Adding three sentences to the end (2) * * * requested and submitted by an offeror, of paragraph (b)(1); (i) * * * Normally, adequate price but an exception is later found to apply, ■ e. Revising the second sentence of competition establishes a fair and the data must not be considered paragraph (b)(2)(i), and paragraphs reasonable price (see 15.403–1(c)(1)). certified cost or pricing data as defined (b)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(vii); (ii) Comparison of the proposed prices in 2.101 and must not be certified in ■ f. Revising paragraph (c)(1); to historical prices paid, whether by the accordance with 15.406–2. ■ g. Removing from the introductory Government or other than the * * * * * text of paragraph (c)(2)(i) ‘‘cost or’’ and Government, for the same or similar ■ 15. Revise section 15.403–5 to read as adding ‘‘cost data or’’ in its place; items. This method may be used for follows: ■ h. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(v); commercial items including those ‘‘of a ■ i. Removing from paragraph (d)(3) type’’ or requiring minor modifications. 15.403–5 Instructions for submission of ‘‘contractors’’ and adding ‘‘contractors’ ’’ (A) The prior price must be a valid certified cost or pricing data and data other in its place; basis for comparison. If there has been than certified cost or pricing data. ■ j. Removing from paragraph (e)(1) a significant time lapse between the last (a) Taking into consideration the ‘‘may’’ and adding ‘‘should’’ in its place, acquisition and the present one, if the policy at 15.402, the contracting officer and removing ‘‘equipment, real’’ and terms and conditions of the acquisition shall specify in the solicitation (see adding ‘‘equipment or real’’ in its place; are significantly different, or if the 15.408 (l) and (m))— ■ k. Adding paragraph (e)(3); and reasonableness of the prior price is (1) Whether certified cost or pricing ■ l. Removing from the third sentence of uncertain, then the prior price may not data are required; paragraph (f)(2) ‘‘may’’ and adding be a valid basis for comparison. (2) That, in lieu of submitting certified ‘‘should’’ in its place. cost or pricing data, the offeror may (B) The prior price must be adjusted The revised and added text reads as to account for materially differing terms submit a request for exception from the follows: requirement to submit certified cost or and conditions, quantities and market pricing data; 15.404–1 Proposal analysis techniques. and economic factors. For similar items, the contracting officer must also adjust (3) Any requirement for data other (a) * * * than certified cost or pricing data; and the prior price to account for material (4) Cost analysis may also be used to differences between the similar item (4) The requirement for necessary evaluate data other than certified cost or preaward or postaward access to and the item being procured. pricing data to determine cost (C) Expert technical advice should be offeror’s records. reasonableness or cost realism when a (b)(1) Format for submission of obtained when analyzing similar items, fair and reasonable price cannot be or commercial items that are ‘‘of a type’’ certified cost or pricing data. When determined through price analysis alone certification is required, the contracting or requiring minor modifications, to for commercial or non-commercial ascertain the magnitude of changes officer may require submission of items. certified cost or pricing data in the required and to assist in pricing the format indicated in Table 15–2 of * * * * * required changes. 15.408, specify an alternative format, or (6) * * * Any discrepancy or mistake * * * * * of fact (such as duplications, omissions, permit submission in the contractor’s (vii) Analysis of data other than and errors in computation) contained in format (See 15.408(l)(1)), unless the data certified cost or pricing data (as defined the certified cost or pricing data or data are required to be submitted on one of at 2.101) provided by the offeror. the termination forms specified in other than certified cost or pricing data submitted in support of a proposal shall * * * * * subpart 49.6. (c) * * * (1) Cost analysis is the (2) Format for submission of data be brought to the contracting officer’s attention for appropriate action. review and evaluation of any separate other than certified cost or pricing data. cost elements and profit or fee in an * * * * * When required by the contracting offeror’s or contractor’s proposal, as (b) Price analysis for commercial and officer, data other than certified cost or needed to determine a fair and non-commercial items. (1) * * * Unless pricing data may be submitted in the reasonable price or to determine cost an exception from the requirement to offeror’s own format unless the realism, and the application of judgment obtain certified cost or pricing data contracting officer decides that use of a to determine how well the proposed applies under 15.403–1(b)(1) or (b)(2), at specific format is essential for costs represent what the cost of the a minimum, the contracting officer shall evaluating and determining that the contract should be, assuming reasonable obtain appropriate data, without price is fair and reasonable and the economy and efficiency. format has been described in the certification, on the prices at which the solicitation. same or similar items have previously * * * * * (3) Format for submission of data been sold and determine if the data is (2) * * * supporting forward pricing rate adequate for evaluating the (v) Review to determine whether any agreements. Data supporting forward reasonableness of the price. Price cost data or pricing data, necessary to pricing rate agreements or final indirect analysis may include evaluating data make the offeror’s proposal suitable for cost proposals shall be submitted in a other than certified cost or pricing data negotiation, have not been either form acceptable to the contracting obtained from the offeror or contractor submitted or identified in writing by the officer. when there is no other means for offeror. If there are such data, the ■ 16. Amend section 15.404–1 by— determining a fair and reasonable price. contracting officer shall attempt to ■ a. Removing from paragraphs (a)(2) Contracting officers shall obtain data obtain and use them in the negotiations and (a)(3) ‘‘when cost’’ and adding other than certified cost or pricing data or make satisfactory allowance for the ‘‘when certified cost’’ in its place; from the offeror or contractor for all incomplete data. ■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(4) and the acquisitions (including commercial item * * * * * second sentence of paragraph (a)(6); acquisitions), if that is the contracting (e) * * *

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53146 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(3) The contracting officer should performed cost or price analysis of (5) If certified cost or pricing data request technical assistance in proposed subcontractor prices, or has were not required in the case of any evaluating pricing related to items that negotiated the subcontract prices before price negotiation exceeding the certified are ‘‘similar to’’ items being purchased, negotiation of the prime contract, in cost or pricing data threshold, the or commercial items that are ‘‘of a type’’ determining the reasonableness of the exception used and the basis for it. or requiring minor modifications, to prime contract price. This does not (6) If certified cost or pricing data ascertain the magnitude of changes relieve the contracting officer from the were required, the extent to which the required and to assist in pricing the responsibility to analyze the contractor’s contracting officer— required changes. submission, including subcontractor’s (i) Relied on the certified cost or * * * * * certified cost or pricing data. pricing data submitted and used them in negotiating the price; ■ 17. Amend section 15.404–2 by— (b) * * * (3) When required by paragraph (c) of (ii) Recognized as inaccurate, ■ a. Revising the section heading; this subsection, submit subcontractor incomplete, or noncurrent any certified ■ b. Removing from the second sentence certified cost or pricing data to the cost or pricing data submitted; the in paragraph (a)(1) and the introductory Government as part of its own certified action taken by the contracting officer text of paragraph (a)(2) ‘‘must’’ and cost or pricing data. and the contractor as a result; and the adding ‘‘shall’’ in its place; (c) Any contractor or subcontractor effect of the defective data on the price ■ c. Revising the introductory text of that is required to submit certified cost negotiated; or paragraph (a)(2)(iii) and paragraph or pricing data also shall obtain and (iii) Determined that an exception (a)(2)(iii)(F); and analyze certified cost or pricing data applied after the data were submitted ■ d. Removing from the introductory before awarding any subcontract, and, therefore, considered not to be text of paragraph (c)(1) ‘‘may’’ and purchase order, or modification certified cost or pricing data. adding ‘‘should’’ in its place. expected to exceed the certified cost or (7) * * * Where the determination of The revised text reads as follows: pricing data threshold, unless an a fair and reasonable price is based on 15.404–2 Data to support proposal exception in 15.403–1(b) applies to that cost analysis, the summary shall address analysis. action. each major cost element. When (a) * * * * * * * * determination of a fair and reasonable (2) * * * (2) The contracting officer should price is based on price analysis, the (iii) Information to help contracting require the contractor or subcontractor summary shall include the source and officers determine commerciality and a to submit to the Government (or cause type of data used to support the fair and reasonable price, including— submission of) subcontractor certified determination. * * * * * cost or pricing data below the * * * * * (F) Identifying general market thresholds in paragraph (c)(1) of this ■ 21. Amend section 15.407–1 by— conditions affecting determinations of subsection and data other than certified ■ a. Revising the section heading; commerciality and a fair and reasonable cost or pricing data that the contracting ■ b. Removing from the first sentence in price. officer considers necessary for paragraph (a) ‘‘any cost’’ and adding * * * * * adequately pricing the prime contract. ‘‘any certified cost’’ in its place; * * * * * ■ c. Revising paragraph (b)(1); ■ 18. Amend section 15.404–3 by— ■ d. Removing from paragraphs (b)(2) ■ ■ 19. Amend section 15.406–2 by a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(3); and (b)(3)(ii) ‘‘the cost’’ and adding ‘‘the ■ revising the introductory text of b. Revising the introductory text of certified cost’’ in its place; paragraph (c); paragraph (a), and paragraph (e) to read ■ e. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(iv); ■ c. Removing from the introductory as follows: ■ f. Removing from paragraph (b)(4) text of paragraph (c)(1) 15.406–2 Certificate of current cost or ‘‘understated cost’’ and adding ‘‘subcontractor(s), cost’’ and adding pricing data. ‘‘understated certified cost’’ in its place; ‘‘subcontractor(s), certified cost’’ in its ■ (a) When certified cost or pricing data g. Removing from paragraph (b)(5)(ii) place; are required, the contracting officer ‘‘the cost’’ and adding ‘‘the certified cost’’ ■ d. Removing from paragraph (c)(1)(ii) shall require the contractor to execute a in its place; ‘‘pertinent cost’’ and adding ‘‘pertinent ■ Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing h. Removing from the first sentence in certified cost’’ in its place; Data, using the format in this paragraph, paragraph (b)(7)(iii) ‘‘defective cost’’ and ■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(2); adding ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in its ■ f. Removing from paragraphs (c)(3) and must include the executed certificate in the contract file. place; and (c)(4) ‘‘Subcontractor cost’’ and ■ i. Removing from the first sentence in adding ‘‘Subcontractor certified cost’’ in * * * * * paragraph (e) ‘‘Defective Cost’’ each time its place; and (e) If certified cost or pricing data are it appears (twice) and adding ‘‘Defective ■ g. Removing from paragraph (c)(5) requested by the Government and Certified Cost’’ in its place; and ‘‘Government cost’’ and adding submitted by an offeror, but an ■ j. Removing from the first sentence in ‘‘Government certified cost’’ in its place. exception is later found to apply, the the introductory text of paragraph (f) The revised text reads as follows: data shall not be considered certified and the first sentence of paragraph (f)(2) cost or pricing data and shall not be ‘‘subcontractor cost’’ and adding 15.404–3 Subcontract pricing certified in accordance with this considerations. ‘‘subcontractor certified cost’’ in its subsection. place. (a) The contracting officer is ■ 20. Amend section 15.406–3 by The revised text reads as follows: responsible for the determination of a revising paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6), and fair and reasonable price for the prime the second and third sentences of 15.407–1 Defective certified cost or pricing contract, including subcontracting costs. paragraph (a)(7) to read as follows: data. The contracting officer should consider * * * * * whether a contractor or subcontractor 15.406–3 Documenting the negotiation. (b)(1) If, after award, certified cost or has an approved purchasing system, has (a) * * * pricing data are found to be inaccurate,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53147

incomplete, or noncurrent as of the date ■ d. In Table 15–2, which follows (k) Notification of Ownership of final agreement on price or an earlier paragraph (n), by— Changes. The contracting officer shall date agreed upon by the parties given on ■ 1. Revising the table heading, the insert the clause at 52.215–19, the contractor’s or subcontractor’s introductory text, and Notes 1 and 2; Notification of Ownership Changes, in Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing ■ 2. Revising the first sentence of solicitations and contracts for which it Data, the Government is entitled to a paragraph B., and paragraph C. of the I. is contemplated that certified cost or price adjustment, including profit or fee, General Instructions; and pricing data will be required or for of any significant amount by which the ■ 3. Revising the introductory text of which any preaward or postaward cost price was increased because of the paragraph A. and paragraph A.(2) of the determination will be subject to subpart defective data. This entitlement is II. Cost Elements. 31.2. ensured by including in the contract one The revised text reads as follows: (l) Requirements for Certified Cost or of the clauses prescribed in 15.408(b) Pricing Data and Data Other Than and (c) and is set forth in the clauses at 15.408 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. Certified Cost or Pricing Data. 52.215–10, Price Reduction for Considering the hierarchy at 15.402, the Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data, * * * * * contracting officer shall insert the and 52.215–11, Price Reduction for (b) Price Reduction for Defective provision at 52.215–20, Requirements Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Certified Cost or Pricing Data. The for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data—Modifications. The clauses give contracting officer shall, when Data Other Than Certified Cost or the Government the right to a price contracting by negotiation, insert the Pricing Data, in solicitations if it is adjustment for defects in certified cost clause at 52.215–10, Price Reduction for reasonably certain that certified cost or or pricing data submitted by the Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data, pricing data or data other than certified contractor, a prospective subcontractor, in solicitations and contracts when it is cost or pricing data will be required. or an actual subcontractor. contemplated that certified cost or This provision also provides * * * * * pricing data will be required from the instructions to offerors on how to contractor or any subcontractor (see (3) * * * request an exception from the 15.403–4). (iv) Certified cost or pricing data were requirement to submit certified cost or (c) Price Reduction for Defective required; however, the contractor or pricing data. The contracting officer Certified Cost or Pricing Data— subcontractor did not submit a shall— Modifications. The contracting officer Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing shall, when contracting by negotiation, (1) Use the provision with its Data relating to the contract. insert the clause at 52.215–11, Price Alternate I to specify a format for * * * * * Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or certified cost or pricing data other than the format required by Table 15–2 of 15.407–2 [Amended] Pricing Data—Modifications, in solicitations and contracts when it is this section; ■ 22. Amend section 15.407–2 in contemplated that certified cost or * * * * * paragraph (c)(1) by removing ‘‘requiring pricing data will be required from the (4) Replace the basic provision with cost’’ and adding ‘‘requiring certified contractor or any subcontractor (see its Alternate IV if certified cost or cost’’ in its place. 15.403–4) for the pricing of contract pricing data are not expected to be ■ 23. Amend section 15.407–3 by modifications, and the clause prescribed required because an exception may revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: in paragraph (b) of this section has not apply, but data other than certified cost been included. or pricing data will be required as 15.407–3 Forward pricing rate agreements. (d) Subcontractor Certified Cost or described in 15.403–3. (a) When certified cost or pricing data Pricing Data. The contracting officer (m) Requirements for Certified Cost or are required, offerors are required to shall insert the clause at 52.215–12, Pricing Data and Data Other Than describe any forward pricing rate Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Certified Cost or Pricing Data— agreements (FPRAs) in each specific Data, in solicitations and contracts Modifications. Considering the pricing proposal to which the rates when the clause prescribed in paragraph hierarchy at 15.402, the contracting apply and to identify the latest cost or (b) of this section is included. officer shall insert the clause at 52.215– pricing data already submitted in (e) Subcontractor Certified Cost or 21, Requirements for Certified Cost or accordance with the FPRA. All data Pricing Data—Modifications. The Pricing Data and Data Other Than submitted in connection with the FPRA, contracting officer shall insert the clause Certified Cost or Pricing Data— updated as necessary, form a part of the at 52.215–13, Subcontractor Certified Modifications, in solicitations and total data that the offeror certifies to be Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications, in contracts if it is reasonably certain that accurate, complete, and current at the solicitations and contracts when the certified cost or pricing data or data time of agreement on price for an initial clause prescribed in paragraph (c) of other than certified cost or pricing data contract or for a contract modification. this section is included. will be required for modifications. This (See the Certificate of Current Cost or * * * * * clause also provides instructions to Pricing Data at 15.406–2.) (g) Pension Adjustments and Asset contractors on how to request an * * * * * Reversions. The contracting officer shall exception from the requirement to ■ 24. Amend section 15.408 by— insert the clause at 52.215–15, Pension submit certified cost or pricing data. ■ a. Revising paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), Adjustments and Asset Reversions, in The contracting officer shall— and (g); solicitations and contracts for which it (1) Use the clause with its Alternate ■ b. Removing from paragraph (j) ‘‘that is anticipated that certified cost or I to specify a format for certified cost or cost’’ and adding ‘‘that certified cost’’ in pricing data will be required or for pricing data other than the format its place; which any preaward or postaward cost required by Table 15–2 of this section; ■ c. Revising paragraph (k), the determinations will be subject to part (2) Use the clause with its Alternate introductory text of paragraph (l), and 31. II if copies of the proposal are to be sent paragraphs (l)(1), (l)(4), and (m); and * * * * * to the ACO and contract auditor;

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53148 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

(3) Use the clause with its Alternate (i) The judgmental factors applied and those used in projecting from known III if submission via electronic media is the mathematical or other methods used data, and the nature and amount of any required; and in the estimate, including those used in contingencies included in the price). (4) Replace the basic clause with its projecting from known data; and The Contracting Officer may require you Alternate IV if certified cost or pricing (ii) The nature and amount of any to submit cost or pricing data in support data are not expected to be required contingencies included in the proposed of proposals in lower amounts. because an exception may apply, but price. Subcontractor certified cost or pricing data other than certified cost or pricing * * * * * data must be accurate, complete and data will be required as described in current as of the date of final price 15.403–3. II. Cost Elements agreement, or an earlier date agreed * * * * * * * * * * upon by the parties, given on the prime A. Materials and services. Provide a contractor’s Certificate of Current Cost Table 15–2—Instructions for Submitting consolidated priced summary of or Pricing Data. The prime contractor is Cost/Price Proposals When Certified individual material quantities included responsible for updating a prospective Cost or Pricing Data Are Required in the various tasks, orders, or contract subcontractor’s data. For standard This document provides instructions line items being proposed and the basis commercial items fabricated by the for preparing a contract pricing proposal for pricing (vendor quotes, invoice offeror that are generally stocked in when certified cost or pricing data are prices, etc.). Include raw materials, inventory, provide a separate cost required. parts, components, assemblies, and breakdown, if priced based on cost. For interorganizational transfers priced at Note 1: There is a clear distinction between services to be produced or performed by submitting certified cost or pricing data and others. For all items proposed, identify cost, provide a separate breakdown of merely making available books, records, and the item and show the source, quantity, cost elements. Analyze the certified cost other documents without identification. The and price. Conduct price analyses of all or pricing data and submit the results of requirement for submission of certified cost subcontractor proposals. Conduct cost your analysis of the prospective source’s or pricing data is met when all accurate analyses for all subcontracts when proposal. When submission of a certified cost or pricing data reasonably certified cost or pricing data are prospective source’s certified cost or available to the offeror have been submitted, submitted by the subcontractor. Include pricing data is required as described in either actually or by specific identification, to this paragraph, it must be included as the Contracting Officer or an authorized these analyses as part of your own certified cost or pricing data part of your own certified cost or pricing representative. As later data come into your data. You must also submit any data possession, it should be submitted promptly submissions for subcontracts expected to the Contracting Officer in a manner that to exceed the appropriate threshold in other than certified cost or pricing data clearly shows how the data relate to the FAR 15.403–4. Submit the subcontractor obtained from a subcontractor, either offeror’s price proposal. The requirement for certified cost or pricing data and data actually or by specific identification, submission of certified cost or pricing data other than certified cost or pricing data along with the results of any analysis continues up to the time of agreement on as part of your own certified cost or performed on that data. price, or an earlier date agreed upon between pricing data as required in paragraph * * * * * the parties if applicable. IIA(2) of this table. These requirements PART 16—TYPES OF CONTRACTS Note 2: By submitting your proposal, you also apply to all subcontractors if grant the Contracting Officer or an authorized required to submit certified cost or 16.202–2 [Amended] representative the right to examine records pricing data. ■ that formed the basis for the pricing proposal. 25. Amend section 16.202–2 by * * * * * removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘valid That examination can take place at any time (2) All Other. Obtain certified cost or before award. It may include those books, cost’’ and adding ‘‘valid certified cost’’ in records, documents, and other types of pricing data from prospective sources its place. for those acquisitions (such as factual data (regardless of form or whether ■ 26. Amend section 16.203–2 by subcontracts, purchase orders, material the data are specifically referenced or revising paragraph (b) to read as follows: included in the proposal as the basis for order, etc.) exceeding the threshold set pricing) that will permit an adequate forth in FAR 15.403–4 and not 16.203–2 Application. evaluation of the proposed price. otherwise exempt, in accordance with * * * * * FAR 15.403–1(b) (i.e., adequate price (b) In contracts that do not require I. General Instructions competition, commercial items, prices submission of certified cost or pricing * * * * * set by law or regulation or waiver). Also data, the contracting officer shall obtain B. In submitting your proposal, you provide data showing the basis for adequate data to establish the base level must include an index, appropriately establishing source and reasonableness from which adjustment will be made referenced, of all the certified cost or of price. In addition, provide a summary and may require verification of data pricing data and information of your cost analysis and a copy of submitted. accompanying or identified in the certified cost or pricing data submitted ■ 27. Amend section 16.603–2 by proposal. * * * by the prospective source in support of revising the first sentence of paragraph C. As part of the specific information each subcontract, or purchase order that (c) to read as follows: required, you must submit, with your is the lower of either $12.5 million or proposal— more, or both more than the pertinent 16.603–2 Application. (1) Certified cost or pricing data (as certified cost or pricing data threshold * * * * * defined at FAR 2.101). You must clearly and more than 10 percent of the prime (c) Each letter contract shall, as identify on your cover sheet that contractor’s proposed price. Also submit required by the clause at 52.216–25, certified cost or pricing data are any information reasonably required to Contract Definitization, contain a included as part of the proposal. explain your estimating process negotiated definitization schedule (2) Information reasonably required to (including the judgmental factors including (1) dates for submission of the explain your estimating process, applied and the mathematical or other contractor’s price proposal, required including— methods used in the estimate, including certified cost or pricing data and data

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53149

other than certified cost or pricing data; cost’’ and adding ‘‘including certified certified cost or pricing data and data and, if required, make-or-buy and cost’’ in its place. other than certified cost or pricing data subcontracting plans, (2) a date for the and shall compare them to the start of negotiations, and (3) a target date PART 27—PATENTS, DATA, AND Government estimate. COPYRIGHTS for definitization, which shall be the * * * * * earliest practicable date for 27.202–5 [Amended] definitization. * * * PART 42—CONTRACT ■ 32. Amend section 27.202–5 by * * * * * ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT removing from paragraph (a)(1)(i) SERVICES ■ 28. Amend section 16.603–4 by ‘‘which cost’’ and adding ‘‘which revising the second sentence of certified cost’’ in its place. 42.705–1 [Amended] paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows: ■ 39. Amend section 42.705–1 in PART 30—COST ACCOUNTING 16.603–4 Contract clauses. paragraph (b)(5)(iii) by giving separate STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION * * * * * indention to paragraphs (b)(5)(iii)(A), (b) * * * 30.201–5 [Amended] (B), (C), and (D) and by removing from (3) * * * If at the time of entering ■ 33. Amend section 30.201–5 in (b)(5)(iii)(D) ‘‘of cost’’ and adding ‘‘of into the letter contract, the contracting paragraph (c)(6) by removing ‘‘Whether certified cost’’ in its place. officer knows that the definitive cost’’ and adding ‘‘Whether certified ■ 40. Amend section 42.1304 by contract will be based on adequate price cost’’ in its place. revising paragraph (d) to read as competition or will otherwise meet the follows: criteria of 15.403–1 for not requiring PART 31—CONTRACT COST 42.1304 Government delay of work. submission of certified cost or pricing PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES data, the words ‘‘and certified cost or * * * * * 31.205–6 [Amended] pricing data in accordance with FAR (d) The contracting officer shall retain 15.408, Table 15–2 supporting its ■ 34. Amend section 31.205–6 in in the file a record of all negotiations proposal’’ may be deleted from paragraph (j)(3)(i)(B), the second leading to any adjustment made under paragraph (a) of the clause. * * * sentence of paragraph (j)(3)(ii), and the the clause, and related certified cost or pricing data, or data other than certified * * * * * second sentence of paragraph (o)(5) by removing ‘‘which cost’’ and adding cost or pricing data. ■ PART 19—SMALL BUSINESS ‘‘which certified cost’’ in its place. 41. Amend section 42.1701 by— ■ PROGRAMS a. In paragraph (b), revising the first PART 32—CONTRACT FINANCING sentence, and removing the last ■ sentence; and 29. Amend section 19.705–4 by— 32.601 [Amended] ■ a. Removing from the introductory ■ b. Revising the second sentence of ■ text and paragraph (a) introductory text 35. Amend section 32.601 in paragraph (c). The revised text reads as ‘‘must’’ and adding ‘‘shall’’ in its place; paragraph (b)(2) by removing ‘‘defective follows: cost’’ and adding ‘‘defective certified and 42.1701 Procedures. ■ b. Revising paragraph (d)(3) to read as cost’’ in its place. * * * * * follows: 32.607–2 [Amended] (b) The ACO shall obtain the 19.705–4 Reviewing the subcontracting ■ 36. Amend section 32.607–2 in contractor’s forward pricing rate plan. paragraph (g)(3) by removing ‘‘Defective proposal and require that it include cost * * * * * Cost’’ and adding ‘‘Defective Certified or pricing data that are accurate, (d) * * * Cost’’ in its place. complete, and current as of the date of (3) Ensure that the subcontracting submission (but see 15.407–3(c)). * * * goals are consistent with the offeror’s PART 33—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, (c) * * * The agreement shall provide certified cost or pricing data or data AND APPEALS for cancellation at the option of either party and shall require the contractor to other than certified cost or pricing data. 33.207 [Amended] submit to the ACO and to the cognizant * * * * * ■ 37. Amend section 33.207 in contract auditor any significant change ■ 30. Amend section 19.806 by revising paragraph (d) by removing ‘‘regarding in cost or pricing data used to support the second and third sentences of cost’’ and adding ‘‘regarding certified the FPRA. paragraph (a) to read as follows: cost’’ in its place. * * * * * 19.806 Pricing the 8(a) contract. PART 36—CONSTRUCTION AND PART 44—SUBCONTRACTING (a) * * * If required by subpart 15.4, ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES the SBA shall obtain certified cost or ■ pricing data from the 8(a) contractor. If 38. Amend section 36.214 by— ■ 42. Amend section 44.202–2 by ■ a. Revising the introductory text of the SBA requests audit assistance to revising paragraph (a)(8) to read as paragraph (b); and determine the proposed price to be fair follows: and reasonable in a sole source ■ b. Removing from paragraph (b)(1) ‘‘of acquisition, the contracting activity cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its 44.202–2 Considerations. shall furnish it to the extent it is place. ■ (a) * * * available. The revised text reads as follows: (8) Has the contractor performed * * * * * 36.214 Special procedures for price adequate cost or price analysis or price negotiation in construction contracting. comparisons and obtained certified cost 19.807 [Amended] * * * * * or pricing data and data other than ■ 31. Amend section 19.807 by (b) The contracting officer shall certified cost or pricing data? removing from paragraph (b) ‘‘including evaluate proposals and associated * * * * *

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53150 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

■ 43. Amend section 44.303 by revising (b) Certified cost or pricing data. If the 52.214–28 Subcontractor Certified Cost or paragraph (c) to read as follows: Contractor has been required to submit Pricing Data—Modifications—Sealed certified cost or pricing data in connection Bidding. 44.303 Extent of review. with the pricing of any modification to this * * * * * * * * * * contract, the Contracting Officer, or an (c) Pricing policies and techniques, authorized representative of the Contracting Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing including methods of obtaining certified Officer, in order to evaluate the accuracy, Data—Modifications—Sealed Bidding completeness, and currency of the certified (Oct 2010) cost or pricing data, and data other than cost or pricing data, shall have the right to certified cost or pricing data; examine and audit all of the Contractor’s * * * * * * * * * * records, including computations and (b) Before awarding any subcontract projections, related to— expected to exceed the threshold for 44.305–3 [Amended] submission of certified cost or pricing data at * * * * * ■ FAR 15.403–4(a)(1), on the date of agreement 44. Amend section 44.305–3 in ■ 51. Amend section 52.214–27 by— on price or the date of award, whichever is paragraph (a)(1) by removing ‘‘Cost’’ and ■ a. Revising the section heading; later, or before pricing any subcontract adding ‘‘Certified cost’’ in its place. ■ b. Revising the clause heading and modifications involving aggregate increases and/or decreases in costs, plus applicable PART 45—GOVERNMENT PROPERTY date of the clause; ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘of profits, expected to exceed the threshold for submission of certified cost or pricing data at 45.104 [Amended] cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its FAR 15.403–4(a)(1), the Contractor shall ■ 45. Amend section 45.104 by place; require the subcontractor to submit certified removing from paragraph (a)(4) ‘‘of cost’’ ■ d. Removing from paragraph (b) cost or pricing data (actually or by specific and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its ‘‘furnished cost’’ and adding ‘‘furnished identification in writing), as part of the place. certified cost’’ in its place; removing subcontractor’s proposal in accordance with ‘‘Contractor cost’’ and adding FAR 15.408, Table 15–2 (to include any PART 49—TERMINATION OF ‘‘Contractor certified cost’’ in its place; information reasonably required to explain CONTRACTS and removing ‘‘(a) above’’ and adding the subcontractor’s estimating process such as the judgmental factors applied and the ‘‘(a) of this clause’’ in its place; 49.603–1 [Amended] mathematical or other methods used in the ■ e. Removing from paragraph (c) ‘‘(b) estimate, including those used in projecting ■ 46. Amend section 49.603–1 in above’’ and adding ‘‘(b) of this clause’’ in from known data, and the nature and amount paragraph (b)(7)(x) of the agreement by its place, and removing ‘‘defective cost’’ of any contingencies included in the price), removing ‘‘defective cost’’ and adding and adding ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in unless an exception under FAR 15.403–1(b) ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in its place. its place; applies. ■ * * * * * 49.603–2 [Amended] f. Removing from paragraph (d)(1)(i) ‘‘current cost’’ and adding ‘‘current ■ 53. Amend section 52.215–2 by— ■ 47. Amend section 49.603–2 in certified cost’’ in its place; and removing ■ a. Revising the date of the clause; paragraph (b)(8)(vii) of the agreement by from paragraph (d)(1)(ii) ‘‘the cost’’ and ■ b. Revising the introductory text of removing ‘‘defective cost’’ and adding adding ‘‘the certified cost’’ in its place; paragraph (c); and ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in its place. ■ g. Removing from paragraph ■ c. Removing from introductory text of paragraph (g) ‘‘paragraph (a)’’ and adding 49.603–3 [Amended] (d)(2)(i)(B) ‘‘the cost’’ and adding ‘‘the certified cost’’ in its place; and ‘‘paragraph (g)’’ in its place; and ■ 48. Amend section 49.603–3 in ‘‘ ■ h. Removing from paragraph (e)(2) removing from paragraph (g)(2) which paragraph (b)(7)(xv) of the agreement by ’’ ‘‘ ’’ ‘‘submitted cost’’ and adding ‘‘submitted cost and adding which certified cost removing ‘‘defective cost’’ and adding certified cost’’ in its place; in its place. ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in its place. The revised text reads as follows: The revised text reads as follows: 49.603–4 [Amended] 52.215–2 Audit and Records-Negotiation. 52.214–27 Price Reduction for Defective ■ 49. Amend section 49.603–4 in Certified Cost or Pricing Data— * * * * * paragraph (b)(4)(viii) of the agreement Modifications—Sealed Bidding. Audit and Records—Negotiation (Oct ‘‘ ’’ by removing defective cost and adding * * * * * 2010) ‘‘defective certified cost’’ in its place. Price Reduction for Defective Certified * * * * * PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications— (c) Certified cost or pricing data. If the AND CONTRACT CLAUSES Sealed Bidding (Oct 2010) Contractor has been required to submit certified cost or pricing data in connection ■ 50. Amend section 52.214–26 by— * * * * * with any pricing action relating to this ■ a. Revising the date of the clause; ■ 52. Amend section 52.214–28 by— contract, the Contracting Officer, or an ■ b. Revising the introductory text of ■ a. Revising the section heading; authorized representative of the Contracting paragraph (b); and ■ Officer, in order to evaluate the accuracy, b. Revising the clause heading and completeness, and currency of the certified ■ c. Removing from paragraph (e) ‘‘of date of the clause; cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its cost or pricing data, shall have the right to ■ c. Giving separate indention to examine and audit all of the Contractor’s place. paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) and by records, including computations and The revised text reads as follows: removing from paragraph (a)(1) ‘‘of cost’’ projections, related to— 52.214–26 Audit and Records—Sealed and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its * * * * * Bidding. place; ■ 54. Amend section 52.215–9 by— * * * * * ■ d. Revising paragraph (b); and ■ a. Revising the date of Alternate I and ■ e. Removing from paragraph (d) ‘‘of paragraph (d)(1); and Audit and Records—Sealed Bidding cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its ■ b. Revising the date of Alternate II and (Oct 2010) place. paragraph (d)(1). * * * * * The revised text reads as follows: The revised text reads as follows:

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53151

52.215–9 Changes or Additions to Make- certified cost’’ in its place; and removing pricing data (actually or by specific or-Buy Program. ‘‘Contractor cost’’ and adding identification in writing), in accordance with * * * * * ‘‘Contractor certified cost’’ in its place; FAR 15.408, Table 15–2 (to include any Alternate I (Oct 2010). *** ■ e. Revising paragraph (c); information reasonably required to explain (d) * * * ■ f. Removing from paragraph (d)(1)(i) the subcontractor’s estimating process such (1) Support its proposal with certified cost ‘‘current cost’’ and adding ‘‘current as the judgmental factors applied and the mathematical or other methods used in the or pricing data in accordance with FAR certified cost’’ in its place; and removing 15.408, Table 15–2 when required by FAR estimate, including those used in projecting 15.403, and data other than certified cost or from paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and from known data, and the nature and amount pricing data, to permit evaluation; and (d)(2)(i)(B) ‘‘the cost’’ and adding ‘‘the of any contingencies included in the price), certified cost’’ in its place; and unless an exception under FAR 15.403–1 * * * * * ■ g. Removing from paragraph (e)(2) Alternate II (Oct 2010). *** applies. (d) * * * ‘‘submitted cost’’ and adding ‘‘submitted * * * * * (1) Support its proposal with certified cost certified cost’’ in its place. ■ 58. Amend section 52.215–13 by— or pricing data in accordance with FAR The revised text reads as follows: ■ a. Revising the section heading; 15.408, Table 15–2, when required by FAR 52.215–11 Price Reduction for Defective ■ b. Revising the clause heading and 15.403, and data other than certified cost or date of the clause; pricing data, to permit evaluation; and Certified Cost or Pricing Data— Modifications. ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a)(1) ‘‘of * * * * * * * * * * cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its ■ 55. Amend section 52.215–10 by— place; ■ a. Revising the section heading; Price Reduction for Defective Certified ■ d. Revising paragraph (b); and ■ b. Revising the clause heading and Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications ■ e. Removing from paragraph (d) ‘‘of date of the clause; (Oct 2010) cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a)(1) * * * * * place; ‘‘furnished cost’’ and adding ‘‘furnished The revised text reads as follows: certified cost’’ in its place, and removing (c) Any reduction in the contract price under paragraph (b) of this clause due to 52.215–13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or from paragraph (a)(2) ‘‘Contractor cost’’ defective data from a prospective Pricing Data—Modifications. and adding ‘‘Contractor certified cost’’ in subcontractor that was not subsequently its place; awarded the subcontract shall be limited to * * * * * ■ d. Revising paragraph (b); the amount, plus applicable overhead and Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing ■ e. Removing from paragraph (c)(1)(i) profit markup, by which (1) the actual ‘‘current cost’’ and adding ‘‘current subcontract or (2) the actual cost to the Data—Modifications (Oct 2010) certified cost’’ in its place, and removing Contractor, if there was no subcontract, was * * * * * from paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (c)(2)(i)(B) less than the prospective subcontract cost (b) Before awarding any subcontract ‘‘the cost’’ and adding ‘‘the certified cost’’ estimate submitted by the Contractor; expected to exceed the threshold for in its place; and provided, that the actual subcontract price submission of certified cost or pricing data at ■ f. Removing from paragraph (d)(2) was not itself affected by defective certified FAR 15.403–4, on the date of agreement on cost or pricing data. ‘‘submitted cost’’ and adding ‘‘submitted price or the date of award, whichever is later; certified cost’’ in its place. * * * * * or before pricing any subcontract The revised text reads as follows: ■ 57. Amend section 52.215–12 by— modification involving a pricing adjustment ■ a. Revising the section heading; expected to exceed the threshold for 52.215–10 Price Reduction for Defective ■ b. Revising the clause heading and submission of certified cost or pricing data at FAR 15.403–4, the Contractor shall require Certified Cost or Pricing Data. date of the clause; ■ the subcontractor to submit certified cost or * * * * * c. Revising paragraph (a); pricing data (actually or by specific ■ d. Removing from the introductory Price Reduction for Defective Certified identification in writing), in accordance with text of paragraph (c) and paragraph Cost or Pricing Data (Oct 2010) FAR 15.408, Table 15–2 (to include any (c)(1) ‘‘of cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified information reasonably required to explain * * * * * cost’’ in its place; and the subcontractor’s estimating process such (b) Any reduction in the contract price ■ e. Removing from paragraph (c)(2) as the judgmental factors applied and the under paragraph (a) of this clause due to ‘‘Subcontractor Cost’’ and adding mathematical or other methods used in the defective data from a prospective ‘‘Subcontractor Certified Cost’’ in its estimate, including those used in projecting subcontractor that was not subsequently place. from known data, and the nature and amount awarded the subcontract shall be limited to The revised text reads as follows: of any contingencies included in the price), the amount, plus applicable overhead and unless an exception under FAR 15.403–1 profit markup, by which (1) the actual 52.215–12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or applies. subcontract or (2) the actual cost to the Pricing Data. Contractor, if there was no subcontract, was * * * * * * * * * * less than the prospective subcontract cost 52.215–14 [Amended] estimate submitted by the Contractor; Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing provided, that the actual subcontract price ■ 59. Amend section 52.215–14 by— was not itself affected by defective certified Data (Oct 2010) ■ a. Revising the date of the clause to cost or pricing data. * * * * * read ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; and * * * * * (a) Before awarding any subcontract ■ b. Removing from the last sentence of ■ 56. Amend section 52.215–11 by— expected to exceed the threshold for paragraph (a) ‘‘of cost’’ and adding ‘‘of ■ a. Revising the section heading; submission of certified cost or pricing data at certified cost’’ in its place. ■ b. Revising the clause heading and FAR 15.403–4, on the date of agreement on price or the date of award, whichever is later; 52.215–15 [Amended] date of the clause; or before pricing any subcontract ■ ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a) ‘‘of modification involving a pricing adjustment 60. Amend section 52.215–15 by cost’’ and adding ‘‘of certified cost’’ in its expected to exceed the threshold for revising the date of the clause to read place; submission of certified cost or pricing data at ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; and removing from ■ d. Removing from paragraph (b) FAR 15.403–4, the Contractor shall require paragraph (b)(2) and the second ‘‘furnished cost’’ and adding ‘‘furnished the subcontractor to submit certified cost or sentence of paragraph (c) ‘‘which cost’’

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53152 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

and adding ‘‘which certified cost’’ in its are required, including the access to records will be acceptable, or the description may be place. necessary to permit an adequate evaluation inserted as the result of negotiations.] ■ 61. Amend section 52.215–20 by— of the proposed price in accordance with * * * * * ■ a. Revising the section heading; 15.403–3.] Alternate IV (Oct 2010). *** ■ b. Revising the provision heading and ■ 62. Amend section 52.215–21 by— (a) Submission of certified cost or pricing date of the provision; ■ a. Revising the section heading; data is not required. ■ c. Revising the introductory text of (b) Provide data described below: [Insert ■ b. Revising the clause heading and paragraph (a); and removing from the description of the data and the format that date of the clause; first sentence of paragraph (a)(1) are required, including the access to records ■ ‘‘submitting cost’’ and adding c. Revising the introductory text of necessary to permit an adequate evaluation ‘‘ ’’ paragraph (a); and removing from the of the proposed price in accordance with submitting certified cost in its place; 15.403–3.] ■ d. Revising the introductory text of introductory text of paragraph (a)(1) paragraph (b) and paragraph (b)(1); ‘‘submitting cost’’ and adding ■ 63. Amend section 52.216–25 by— ■ e. Revising Alternate I; and ‘‘submitting certified cost’’ in its place; ■ a. Revising the date of the clause; ■ f. Revising the date of Alternate IV ■ d. Removing from paragraph ■ b. Revising paragraph (a); and and paragraphs (a) and (b). (a)(1)(ii)(A)(1) ‘‘from cost’’ and adding ■ c. Removing from the paragraph (b) The revised text reads as follows: ‘‘from certified cost’’ in its place; ‘‘and cost’’ and adding ‘‘and certified ■ e. Revising the introductory text of cost’’ in its place. 52.215–20 Requirements for Certified Cost The revised text reads as follows: or Pricing Data and Data Other Than paragraph (b) and paragraph (b)(1); Certified Cost or Pricing Data. ■ f. Revising Alternate I; and 52.216–25 Contract Definitization. * * * * * ■ g. Revising the date of Alternate IV * * * * * and paragraphs (a) and (b). Requirements for Certified Cost or The revised text reads as follows: Contract Definitization (Oct 2010) Pricing Data and Data Other Than (a) A ____ [insert specific type of contract] Certified Cost or Pricing Data (Oct 52.215–21 Requirements for Certified Cost definitive contract is contemplated. The 2010) or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Contractor agrees to begin promptly Certified Cost or Pricing Data— negotiating with the Contracting Officer the (a) Exceptions from certified cost or pricing Modifications. terms of a definitive contract that will data. * * * * * include (1) all clauses required by the * * * * * Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) on the (b) Requirements for certified cost or Requirements for Certified Cost or date of execution of the letter contract, (2) all pricing data. If the offeror is not granted an Pricing Data and Data Other Than clauses required by law on the date of exception from the requirement to submit Certified Cost or Pricing Data— execution of the definitive contract, and (3) certified cost or pricing data, the following Modifications (Oct 2010) any other mutually agreeable clauses, terms, applies: and conditions. The Contractor agrees to (1) The offeror shall prepare and submit (a) Exceptions from certified cost or pricing submit a ____ [insert specific type of proposal certified cost or pricing data, data other than data. (e.g., fixed-price or cost-and-fee)] proposal, certified cost or pricing data, and supporting * * * * * including data other than certified cost or attachments in accordance with the (b) Requirements for certified cost or pricing data, and certified cost or pricing instructions contained in Table 15–2 of FAR pricing data. If the Contractor is not granted data, in accordance with FAR 15.408, Table 15.408, which is incorporated by reference an exception from the requirement to submit 15–2, supporting its proposal. with the same force and effect as though it certified cost or pricing data, the following * * * * * were inserted here in full text. The applies: instructions in Table 15–2 are incorporated (1) The Contractor shall submit certified 52.230–2 [Amended] as a mandatory format to be used in this cost or pricing data, data other than certified ■ contract, unless the Contracting Officer and cost or pricing data, and supporting 64. Amend section 52.230–2 by the Contractor agree to a different format and attachments in accordance with the revising the date of the clause to read change this clause to use Alternate I. instructions contained in Table 15–2 of FAR ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; and removing from the * * * * * 15.408, which is incorporated by reference first sentences of paragraphs (a)(3) and Alternate I (Oct 2010). As prescribed in with the same force and effect as though it (d) ‘‘submitted cost’’ and adding 15.408(1) (and see 15.403–5(b)(1)), substitute were inserted here in full text. The ‘‘submitted certified cost’’ in its place. the following paragraph (b)(1) for paragraph instructions in Table 15–2 are incorporated (b)(1) of the basic provision: as a mandatory format to be used in this 52.230–5 [Amended] (b)(1) The offeror shall submit certified cost contract, unless the Contracting Officer and ■ 65. Amend section 52.230–5 by or pricing data, data other than certified cost the Contractor agree to a different format and or pricing data, and supporting attachments change this clause to use Alternate I. revising the date of the clause to read in the following format: [Insert description of ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; and removing from the * * * * * first sentence of paragraph (a)(3) and the the data and format that are required, and Alternate I (Oct 2010). As prescribed in include access to records necessary to permit 15.408(m) and 15.403–5(b)(1), substitute the introductory text of paragraph (d) an adequate evaluation of the proposed price following paragraph (b)(1) for paragraph ‘‘submitted cost’’ and adding ‘‘submitted in accordance with 15.408, Table 15–2, Note (b)(1) of the basic clause. certified cost’’ in its place. 2. The description may be inserted at the (b)(1) The Contractor shall submit certified 52.232–17 [Amended] time of issuing the solicitation, or the cost or pricing data, data other than certified Contracting Officer may specify that the cost or pricing data, and supporting ■ 66. Amend section 52.232–17 by offeror’s format will be acceptable, or the attachments prepared in the following revising the date of the clause to read description may be inserted as the result of format: [Insert description of the data and negotiations.] ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; and removing from the format that are required and include access first sentence of paragraph (a) ‘‘Defective * * * * * to records necessary to permit an adequate ’’ ‘‘ Alternate IV (Oct 2010). *** evaluation of the proposed price in Cost and adding Defective Certified (a) Submission of certified cost or pricing accordance with 15.408, Table 15–2, Note 2. Cost’’ in its place. data is not required. The description may be inserted at the time 52.244–2 [Amended] (b) Provide data described below: [Insert of issuing the solicitation, or the Contracting description of the data and the format that Officer may specify that the offeror’s format ■ 67. Amend section 52.244–2 by—

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53153

■ a. Revising the date of the clause to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For b. Public Building or Public Work read ‘‘(Oct 2010)’’; clarification of content, contact Ms. c. Manufactured Construction Material/ ■ b. Removing from paragraph (e)(1)(v) Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, Unmanufactured Construction Material ‘‘accurate cost’’ and adding ‘‘accurate at (202) 219–0202. For information 5. Exceptions ’’ a. Class Exceptions certified cost in its place; pertaining to status or publication b. Public Interest ■ c. Removing from paragraph schedules, contact the Regulatory c. Nonavailability (e)(1)(vii)(C) ‘‘reason cost’’ and adding Secretariat at (202) 501–4755. Please d. Unreasonable Cost ‘‘reason certified cost’’ in its place; and cite FAC 2005–45, FAR case 2009–008. 6. Determinations That an Exception Applies ■ d. Removing from paragraphs SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: a. Process and Publication (e)(1)(vii)(D) and (e)(1)(vii)(E) b. Requests for Specific Exceptions ‘‘subcontractor’s cost’’ and adding A. Background 7. Exemption for Acquisitions Below the ‘‘subcontractor’s certified cost’’ in its This final rule implements the unique Simplified Acquisition Threshold place. ‘‘Buy American—Recovery Act’’ 8. Remedies for Noncompliance provision, section 1605 of the Recovery 9. Funding Mechanisms [FR Doc. 2010–21026 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] a. Modifications to Existing Contracts Act, by revising FAR subpart 25.6, and BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P b. Treatment of Mixed Funding related provisions and clauses at FAR 10. Interim Rule Improper part 52, with conforming changes to 11. Inconsistencies Between This Rule and DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAR subparts 2.1, 5.2, 25.0, and 25.11. Pre-Existing FAR Rule and the OMB An interim rule was published in the Grants Guidance GENERAL SERVICES Federal Register at 74 FR 14623, March a. Inconsistency With Pre-Existing FAR ADMINISTRATION 31, 2009. The public comment period b. Inconsistency With the OMB Grants ended June 1, 2009. Guidance NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND As required by section 1605, the final 12. Need for Additional Guidance SPACE ADMINISTRATION rule makes it clear that there will be full 1. Comments on Section 1605 of the compliance with U.S. obligations under Recovery Act 48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 25, and 52 all international trade agreements when Comments: Although the respondents undertaking construction covered by [FAC 2005–45; FAR Case 2009–008; Item expressed general support for the goals such agreements with Recovery Act III; Docket 2009–0008, Sequence 1] of the Recovery Act to stimulate the U.S. funds. The new required provisions and economy, many were concerned about RIN 9000–AL22 clauses implement U.S. obligations the Recovery Act Buy American under our trade agreements in the same restrictions of section 1605. For Federal Acquisition Regulation; way as they are currently implemented American Recovery and Reinvestment example: in non-Recovery Act construction Several entities representing other Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act)—Buy contracts. The Caribbean Basin American Requirements for countries objected to the potential countries are excluded from the restrictions on trade. They alleged that Construction Material ‘‘ definition of Recovery Act designated the Recovery Act Buy American ’’ AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), country, because the treatment requirement in section 1605 is not in General Services Administration (GSA), provided to them is not as a result of a conformity with the U.S. pledge to and National Aeronautics and Space U.S. international obligation. refrain from raising new barriers in the Administration (NASA). B. Discussion and Analysis framework of the Summit on Financial ACTION: Final rule. The Regulatory Secretariat received Markets and the World Economy, 35 responses, but 2 responses lacked November 2008, and the G20 pledge, SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency April 2009. They alleged that it will Acquisition Council and the Defense attached comments and 1 response appeared unrelated to the case. The have a negative impact on the world Acquisition Regulations Council (the trade and economy. One respondent Councils) have adopted as final, with responses included multiple comments on a wide range of issues addressed in stated that it is not rational for the U.S. changes, an interim rule amending the to take trade protection actions such as Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to the interim rule. Each issue is discussed by topic in the following sections. the ‘‘Buy American—Recovery Act’’ implement the American Recovery and provision, because it will not be useful Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Table of Contents for the American and global economy in Act) with respect to the ‘‘Buy 1. Comments on Section 1605 of the promoting recovery from the current American—Recovery Act’’ provision, Recovery Act downturn. Another respondent stated section 1605 in Division A. 2. Applicability of Section 1605 of the that, to the extent 1605 imposes more DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010. Recovery Act restrictive requirements than previously Applicability Date: The rule applies to a. Relation to the Buy American Act existed, it represents a new barrier to solicitations issued and contracts b. Applicability to Construction Projects/ trade in goods between the United awarded on or after the effective date of Contracts c. Applicability to Construction Materials States and Canada. One respondent this rule. Contracting officers shall or Supplies found several aspects of section 1605 modify, on a bilateral basis, in d. Manufacture vs. Substantial problematic because of their ‘‘inherent accordance with FAR 1.108(d)(3), Transformation or Tariff Shift lack of clarity.’’ existing contracts to include the e. Iron and Steel Some United States industry appropriate FAR clause for future work, f. Components associations also had concerns about if Recovery Act funds will be used. In g. Summary Matrix of Requirements for section 1605. One objected that the real- the event that a contractor refuses to Domestic Construction Material life burdens of complying with these 3. Applicability of International Agreements accept such a modification, the a. Trade Agreements country-of-origin requirements cannot contractor will not be eligible for award b. G20 Summit Pledge be overstated. This respondent of any work that uses Recovery Act 4. Other Definitions concluded that, where the U.S. funds. a. Construction Material Government places a premium on

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53154 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

promoting its important socio-economic these restrictions mirror the Buy material not covered by the Recovery goals, this requires companies interested American Act, but there are specific Act. in selling in the Federal marketplace to differences (no component test, different b. Applicability to Construction segregate their inventories based on standards for unreasonable cost, no Projects/Contracts country of origin and implement costly exception for impracticable, etc.). The compliance regimes. Another Councils and OMB determined that it i. How To Identify a ‘‘Construction’’ respondent noted a risk that the was reasonable to interpret section 1605 Contract Recovery Act Buy American provisions as including all of the ‘‘Buy American— Comments: A respondent wanted to may have numerous unintended Recovery Act’’ restrictions that Congress know whether the contracting agency consequences on the United States and intended to apply to iron, steel, and will be required to affirmatively harm American workers and companies manufactured goods covered by the stipulate whether a contract is and the global economy. A third Recovery Act, i.e., these goods are not considered a ‘‘construction’’ contract respondent commented that ‘‘Congress’ also covered by the Buy American Act. and require that this language be flowed well-meaning intentions, like all Since Congress was clearly aware of the down to subcontractors. protectionist measures, could Buy American Act when creating the Response: Construction contracts are inadvertently hurt the downstream U.S. Recovery Act domestic source easily identifiable by the presence of restrictions and exceptions, if Congress users.’’ construction provisions and clauses in had wanted the component test or other Response: Comments on the merits of the solicitation and contract, such as the aspects of the Buy American Act to section 1605 of the Recovery Act are clauses prescribed in FAR subpart 36.5 apply, they would have included them. outside the scope of this case, because as well as the Buy American Act Congress incorporated those aspects of the Councils cannot change the law. provisions and clauses for construction the Buy American Act that they wanted This final rule is focused on the contracts in FAR clauses 52.225–9 to apply, and excluded or modified optimal implementation of section 1605 through 52.225–12 or now the Recovery those aspects that they did not want to in the FAR, i.e., the Councils have Act Buy American, FAR provisions at apply. The Councils have determined attempted to find the balance between 52.225–21 through 52.225–24. It is the domestic-sourcing requirements and that section 1605 of the Recovery Act supersedes the Buy American Act with responsibility of the prime contractor to simplicity and clarity of comply with contract clauses and implementation, so that the rule does regard to the acquisition of manufactured construction materials impose on subcontractors whatever not become so onerous that it does more conditions are necessary to enable the harm than good to U.S. industry. used on a project funded with Recovery Act funds. Therefore, the component prime contractor to meet the contract 2. Applicability of Section 1605 of the test does not apply to construction requirements. Recovery Act material used in projects funded by the ii. Use of terms ‘‘contract’’ and ‘‘project’’ Recovery Act. a. Relation to the Buy American Act Comments: Two respondents There are two main issues raised by ii. Does the Buy American Act apply to contended that the interim rule is respondents with regard to the unmanufactured construction material unclear in several places regarding the applicability of the Buy American Act used in Recovery Act projects? scope of coverage because the terms in contracts funded with Recovery Act Comments: Several non-U.S. ‘‘projects’’ and ‘‘contracts’’ appear to be funds. respondents objected that the interim used interchangeably. • FAR 25.602(a) states that ‘‘None of i. Does the Buy American Act apply to rule applies the Buy American Act to unmanufactured construction material. the funds appropriated or otherwise manufactured construction material made available by the Recovery Act may used in Recovery Act projects? One of them stated that the interim rule has expanded the scope of the Recovery be used for a project for the Comments: A few respondents Act by way of arbitrary interpretation construction, alteration, maintenance or contended that the Buy American Act and constitutes an unjustified limitation repair of a public building or public still applies to goods covered by section of the use of foreign unmanufactured work * * *’’ 1605 of the Recovery Act—that both construction materials, given that the • FAR 25.603(c), implementing the standards must be met. These use of foreign unmanufactured Trade Agreements Act, states that ‘‘For respondents objected that the interim construction materials is not prohibited construction contracts with an rule deviated from existing law and by the Recovery Act. A respondent estimated acquisition value * **’’ regulations that should still govern the believed that ‘‘statutory authority does • FAR 52.225–21(b)(2) states, ‘‘The purchase of goods covered by the not exist to extend the provisions contractor shall use only domestic Recovery Act. According to these required by section 1605 to construction material in performing this respondents, any final rule must, at a unmanufactured goods’’ and asked that contract * * *.’’ minimum, preserve the basic this be struck from the final rule. Response: Construction ‘‘project’’ is requirements of assembly in the United Another objected that the additional 6 often a more inclusive term than States and the 51 percent domestic percent evaluation factor applied to construction ‘‘contract.’’ Large component rule, because the Buy unmanufactured construction material construction projects may involve more American Act still applies. Another is only stipulated in the FAR, and than one construction contract. The respondent claimed that this rule cannot should not be permitted under the spirit term ‘‘project’’ may also be used to waive the Buy American Act’s of the ‘‘G20 Statement.’’ denote a segment of a contract, if the component test without additional Response: Section 1605 did not funds are clearly segregated. To clarify authority. address unmanufactured construction this meaning, the Councils have added Response: The Recovery Act sets out material. The interim rule coverage of a statement in the policy section at FAR specific domestic source restrictions for unmanufactured construction material 25.602 and also clarified in the iron, steel, and manufactured goods is not based on extending the coverage provision and clause prescriptions at incorporated into Recovery Act of section 1605, but on continuing to FAR 25.1102(e)(2) that the contract must construction projects. In many ways, apply the Buy American Act to that indicate if the Recovery Act provision

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53155

and clause only apply to certain line American equipment manufacturers. them on subsequent contracts. items in the contract. This respondent stated that construction Therefore, their purchase is not The scope of this rule is established, equipment manufacturers provide the generally subject to restrictions in the in accordance with section 1605(a) of machines that improve operations and terms of the contract. the Recovery Act, as applying reduce costs of any infrastructure ii. Applicability to Supplies Purchased restrictions to ‘‘a project for the project. The process to verify and prove by the Government construction, alteration, maintenance, or 100 percent U.S. content of each piece repair of a public building or public of equipment is onerous. Comment: One respondent expressed work.’’ The final rule has clarified at Some respondents expressed support concern that the interim rule, in the FAR 25.602 that the agency determines for the Councils’ approach in FAR definition of construction material, the scope of the project and conveys this subpart 25.6 of treating iron, steel, and stated that manufactured goods that are to the contractor through the specified manufactured goods as another way of purchased by the Government are applicability of the Recovery Act describing ‘‘construction material: As supplies and, therefore, excluded from provision and clause in the contract. that term has been understood and the definition of manufactured goods, as However, the statute can only be applied with respect to 41 U.S.C. 10a– used in section 1605. implemented through clauses that go 10d in FAR subpart 25.2 and its Response: The statement that items into a specific construction contract. associated clauses.’’ purchased by the Government are Each contract can only impose Response: One of the goals in supplies, not construction material, has requirements applicable to that implementation of the Recovery Act was been a standard part of the definition of particular contract. Therefore, the term to make the definitions and procedures construction material for many years. It ‘‘contract’’ is used when the interim rule as close to existing FAR definitions and is a true statement that items purchased ‘‘ is addressing a requirement that is procedures as possible, except where by the Government are not construction ’’ specific to a contractor or contract, differences are required by the Recovery material as it is defined in the FAR. particularly as used in the provisions Act. However, section 1605 does require that and clauses. Therefore, when applied to a all manufactured goods incorporated construction contract, FAR subpart 25.6 into the project must be produced in the c. Applicability to Construction and the associated construction clauses United States, whether purchased by the Materials or Supplies use the standard definition of contractor as construction material or i. Equating ‘‘Manufactured Goods Used ‘‘construction material’’ at FAR 25.003 purchased by the Government as an in the Project’’ to ‘‘Construction that is familiar to contractors and item of supply. If the Government Material’’ contracting officers. There is a long directly purchases manufactured goods series of Government Accountability and delivers them to the site for Comments: There were many Office (GAO) decisions and case law incorporation into the project, such concerns about the interpretation in the that then can be applied without material must comply with the ‘‘Buy interim rule of the applicability of completely starting over. For use in a American—Recovery Act’’ restriction of section 1605 to manufactured goods, construction contract, the Councils section 1605, even though it is not namely that the rule equates interpreted ‘‘manufactured goods used construction material as defined in the manufactured goods used in the project in the project’’ to be comparable to the FAR. The final rule clarifies this in the to construction material. long-standing definition of policy section. Furthermore, for added A respondent contended that the ‘‘construction material’’ as an ‘‘article, clarity, the final rule deletes from the narrow interpretation of manufactured material, or supply brought to the definition of ‘‘construction material’’ in goods ‘‘ignores common sense and well- construction site by the contractor or a FAR clauses 52.225–21 and 52.225–23 established precedent.’’ According to the subcontractor for incorporation into the the phrase about items purchased by the respondent, the rule equates building or work.’’ Review of the Government not being construction manufactured goods to construction existing case law clarifies the many material, because it appears to cause material and limits the applicability to possible nuances relating to confusion and because the information construction materials that are construction material and its delivery to about actions the Government may take incorporated into a public building or the site. Rather than ‘‘ignoring well is not pertinent to the contractor for work. established precedent,’’ the Councils performance of the construction Another respondent stated that the relied on well-established precedent. contract. rule should apply to all manufactured The FAR has never applied domestic goods—not just construction materials, source restrictions to such items as iii. Contractor-Purchased Supplies for contending that manufactured goods hazmat suits, tool belts, masks, tarps, Delivery to the Government ‘‘used in the project’’ means ‘‘all hazmat covers, safety straps, construction Comments: A respondent requested suits, tool belts, masks, tarps, covers, clothing, and gloves, which are used in that the final rule clarify that, to the safety straps, construction clothing, a construction project by the contractor extent purchases of supplies made with gloves, etc. purchased by the contractor but are not incorporated into the Recovery Act funds are not covered as as part of doing the work.’’ construction project. Further, the construction material, they are subject A respondent stated that regulations interim rule did not apply the Recovery to normal Buy American Act/Trade for public works projects must require Act Buy American requirement of Agreements Act requirements. that all manufactured goods, including section 1605 to equipment used at the Response: Contractor-purchased textile products, must be manufactured construction site, because it is not supplies that are for delivery to the in the United States, as intended by the incorporated into the construction Government, not for incorporation into Recovery Act. project. These items are not deliverables the project, continue to be covered by On the other hand, a respondent to the Government, but remain the the pre-existing FAR regulations on the expressed concern that the perceived property of the contractor. The Buy American Act and trade requirement that all manufactured contractor may already have purchased agreements, as applicable. This rule products on the construction site are these items before commencement of only applies to construction contracts covered is proving disastrous for the contract, and may continue to use funded with Recovery Act funds or

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53156 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

supplies purchased by the Government qualify as a U.S.-made end product, restriction is worded consistently with for incorporation into the project. because the Buy American Act has been the Buy American Act, it is reasonable waived for U.S.-made end products to implement in a similar fashion. d. Manufacture vs. Substantial when the World Trade Organization ‘‘Substantial transformation’’ has never Transformation or Tariff Shift Government Procurement Agreement been applied in the FAR to domestic There were many comments on the applies. However, this is not the case for construction material, just to designated issue of manufacture and substantial domestic construction material. Even country construction material that is transformation. when trade agreements apply, domestic subject to trade agreements. i. Buy American Act and Substantial construction material must meet the Therefore, the final rule continues to Transformation Buy American requirements of domestic utilize the FAR language that parallels manufacture, not substantial the pre-existing construction contract Comments: Several respondents transformation. Therefore, those definition of domestic construction believed that the Buy American Act respondents who argue that the Buy material, requiring manufacture in the includes a requirement for substantial American Act requires substantial United States. transformation. One respondent stated transformation are simply wrong. that the rule should use the ‘‘long- iii. Definition of Manufacture standing definition’’ of a domestic ii. Should ‘‘manufacture’’ in this rule Comments: Other respondents were manufactured good, i.e., final include the standard of substantial concerned about the definition of substantial transformation must occur in transformation? ‘‘manufacture.’’ A respondent stated that the United States. Another respondent Comment: Further elaborating on the interim rule does not provide a clear stated that the Buy American Act of substantial transformation, two definition of what constitutes 1933 includes a substantial respondents recommended that the manufacture, i.e., how to determine transformation test. A respondent also Councils should adopt a clear rule whether sufficient activity has taken stated that the Buy American Act defining the concept of domestic place in the United States for a material requires substantial transformation in manufacture consistent with the ‘‘well- to be considered produced in the United the United States. The respondent was established standard’’ of substantial States. Likewise, two respondents noted concerned that the interim rule only transformation as the first part of the the various interpretations of requires assembly in the United States. two-pronged test for domestic ‘‘manufacture,’’ i.e., some believe it is Response: Whether or not the Buy construction material. The respondent similar or identical in concept to American Act requires ‘‘manufacture’’ or stated that the rule should not confer substantial transformation under ‘‘substantial transformation’’ is not domestic status simply as a result of Customs’ rules, while others believe it is directly relevant to this rule, but only minor processing or mere assembly in closer to the Buy American Act— might be used as a matter of comparison the United States. According to these Construction clause test for for interpretation of section 1605. The respondents, by not adopting substantial manufacture. One of these respondents Councils have determined that the Buy transformation, the interim rule has asked that the final rule clarify the American Act does not apply to created ambiguity. These respondents definition. Yet another respondent manufactured construction material. pointed out a clear administrative stated that, although the rule does not Many of the respondents, whether process in the Federal Government for define ‘‘manufacture,’’ the regulations contending that the Buy American Act making substantial transformation suggest that the test will be similar to still applies or using the Buy American determinations. They also stated that the requirement of U.S. manufacture Act for purposes of comparison and U.S. Customs and Border Protection applied under the Buy American Act. interpretation, have misinterpreted the (Customs) considers the totality of the This may in some cases be less Buy American Act. The Buy American circumstances and makes demanding than the substantial Act includes the requirement for determinations on a case-by-case basis. transformation test, which examines domestic manufactured goods to be The respondents questioned why the whether an article is transformed into a ‘‘manufactured’’ in the United States. interim rule omitted any reference to new and different article of commerce, This term has been used consistently in substantial transformation. having a new name, character, and use. the FAR as the first prong of the test for Three respondents recommended Response: The Councils have domestic manufactured end products allowing either manufacture (perhaps considered in the past including a and construction material. There is no combined with the component test) or definition of ‘‘manufacture’’ in the FAR substantial transformation test included substantial transformation. According to but did not do so because of the case- in the Buy American Act. The term one of the respondents, allowing both specific nature of its application. The ‘‘substantial transformation’’ only comes models to determine when a product definition may be different for canned into the FAR to implement trade has been manufactured in the United beans than for an aircraft. However, for agreements. The rule of origin for States ensures greatest flexibility. This those who find the word ‘‘manufacture’’ designated country end products and respondent believed that this is only confusing and cite the long-standing designated country construction relevant below the Trade Agreements tradition of interpretation of ‘‘substantial material requires products to be wholly Act threshold, i.e., above the threshold, transformation,’’ there is also a the product of, or be ‘‘substantially the requirements defined under those longstanding record of interpretation of transformed’’ in the designated country. pre-existing regulations would apply. ‘‘manufacture’’ under the Buy American Even under trade agreements, there is Response: Section 1605 of the Act. (See for example B–175633 of no requirement for substantial Recovery Act does not require November 3, 1975, which addressed the transformation of products produced in substantial transformation. It requires issue of whether a radio had been the United States, because U.S.-made that manufactured goods be ‘‘produced’’ manufactured in the United States. The end products are not designated country in the United States. The Councils have GAO did not find against the Army products. Actually, the definition of interpreted the law to equate position that, if the final manufacturing ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’ allows either ‘‘production’’ of manufactured goods to process takes place in the United States, ‘‘substantial transformation’’ or ‘‘manufacture.’’ To the extent that the the end product is ‘‘manufactured in the ‘‘manufacture’’ in the United States to Recovery Act domestic source United States.’’)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53157

iv. Tariff Shift manufactured construction material be Alternatively, the respondent offered Comments: A respondent proposed manufactured in the United States, the another definition of ‘‘steel used in a that the rules of origin under 19 CFR law requires that the iron and steel also construction material’’—‘‘all steel goods part 102, currently used for NAFTA be produced in the United States. If the except steel goods delivered to the country-of-origin determinations, be 51 percent component test of the Buy construction site directly from a steel applied to decisions regarding whether American Act were sufficient, then it mill (or its warehouse/distributor) for construction materials are considered would have been unnecessary to impose use as a construction material.’’ Response: The Councils agree that a domestic. According to the respondent, section 1605 at all. The Recovery Act clearer distinction is required for Customs is currently proposing that the could have continued to apply the Buy circumstances when the Recovery Act CFR part 102 rules (also known as ‘‘tariff American Act without revision. Buy American restriction of section shift’’ rules) be applied for all country- iii. Iron or Steel as a Component of 1605 applies to iron or steel of-origin determinations (See Federal Construction Material That Consists components. The intent of the interim Register at 73 FR 43385, July 25, 2008). Wholly or Predominantly of Iron or rule was not to draw a line between iron Tariff shift rules consider the Steel or steel used as a construction material, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the and iron or steel used in a construction United States classification of the article Comments: One respondent also requested clarification that construction material, as suggested by one before and after manufacturing. If the respondent, but between construction classification shifts, then the article materials (such as welded steel pipe) that are produced in the United States material that consisted wholly or takes on a new country of origin. predominantly of iron or steel and Response: Companies that contract using steel that was rolled in the United construction material in which iron or with the Government are accustomed to States from foreign slab are ‘‘produced in the United States’’ within the steel are minor components. The the well-established meaning of the suggestion that manufactured steel term ‘‘manufacture’’ as applied under meaning of the Recovery Act. A respondent stated that the FAR rule goods not delivered to the construction the Buy American Act and now the site directly from the mill should be Recovery Act. should allow contractors to utilize imported steel slab as raw material feed exempt would not be fulfilling the e. Iron and Steel stock—and substantially transform that intent of the law. On the other hand, the requirement that every piece of iron and i. Similarity to Federal Transportation slab in the United States into flat rolled steel, no matter how miniscule, must be Laws steel (hot rolled, cold rolled, galvanized, etc.) products, which in turn are used by melted and rolled in the United States, Comments: Three respondents other manufacturers to produce a wide would be quite unworkable, and would pointed out that the section 1605 variety of construction materials. Absent be counterproductive to the overall restrictions on iron and steel are similar such an approach, construction material intent of the law. to the Recovery Act Buy American The interim rule separated using these steel products could be requirements within the statutory and manufactured construction material into deemed foreign construction materials, regulatory framework of Federal two main categories: Iron or steel used simply because the steel slab from transportation laws (U.S. Department of as a construction material and ‘‘other’’ which it was made was imported. Transportation highways and transit manufactured construction material. According to the respondent, this will program), which mandate that 100 The interim rule made clear that result in U.S. buyers shying away from percent of the iron and steel used in a manufactured construction material that these U.S. manufactured construction project be domestically manufactured consisted wholly of iron or steel must be materials, thus eliminating U.S. jobs. and also impose comparable standards produced in the United States, of unreasonable cost. Another respondent, a carbon steel including all stages of production Response: The drafters of the FAR finishing mill, was concerned that steel except metallurgical processes involving interim rule recognized the similarity to can be either the construction material refinement of steel additives. It also the restrictions applicable to the Federal itself or a component of some other stated that ‘‘other’’ manufactured Transit Administration, and modeled manufactured product (such as welded construction material would require the FAR interim rule restriction on iron steel pipe). The respondent noted that a manufacture in the United States, but and steel after 49 CFR part 661, ‘‘Buy manufactured good may consist of only imposed no requirement on the America Requirements.’’ one component. components or subcomponents in this One respondent approved of the category of ‘‘other’’ manufactured ii. 51 Percent Component Test distinction between ‘‘steel used as a construction material. Comments: One respondent wanted construction material’’ and ‘‘steel used The interim rule is not clear, however, the FAR to go back to the 51 percent in a construction material’’ but with regard to treatment of construction component test of the Buy American requested clarification of the boundaries material that consists predominantly, Act for what constitutes iron and steel of these two categories in the final rule. but not wholly, of iron or steel. Some products manufactured in the United The respondent proposed that the respondents assumed that all States in order to ensure compliance boundary should be between— construction material would fall in the with our international agreements, assist • Steel goods delivered to the ‘‘other’’ category unless it was wholly of in getting projects started, limit delays, construction site directly from a steel iron or steel. Others interpreted, as was and ensure competition. mill (or its warehouse distributor) (e.g., intended, that the ‘‘other’’ category was Response: Reverting to the 51 percent structural steel items (H-beams, I-beams, to cover material which did not consist component test of the Buy American etc.), reinforcing rod, and plate); and wholly or predominantly of iron or Act to determine what constitutes iron • Steel goods that have been further steel. or steel products manufactured in the processed from intermediate, non- The Councils re-examined the United States would not fully construction material products requirement of the statute and how best implement section 1605 of the Recovery produced by a steel mill, into to convey these requirements in the Act. Section 1605 singled out iron and manufactured goods delivered to the regulations. Because iron and steel are steel. In addition to requiring that construction site. singled out for specific mention in the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53158 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

statute, the Councils conclude that a American restriction does not apply to intended to be under the precedent primary objective of the Act is to iron or steel used as components of established under the Buy American promote the use of domestic iron and other manufactured goods. One Act. Yet another respondent stated that steel. The Councils have determined respondent stated that the Recovery Act the interim rule does not meet the that a clearer way to express the Buy American requirements of section requirements of section 1605 because requirements of the law would be to 1605 must apply to all iron and steel, domestic content requirements for interpret the requirement for iron or including all iron and steel components components and subcomponents parts steel to be produced in the United States and subcomponents used in have been omitted. This respondent also as being in addition to (rather than a manufactured construction material. objected that the interim rule has subset of) the requirement for all One respondent believed that this ignored a long history of applying a manufactured construction material to provision of the interim rule creates a domestic content rule in determining if be manufactured in the United States. loophole, in that the use of foreign steel a good is produced in the United States The statute did not include the word reinforcing bar (rebar) used in concrete for purposes of enforcing domestic ‘‘other.’’ All manufactured construction slab would be allowed, because the steel source restrictions. According to the material must be manufactured in the rebar would be considered a component respondent, OMB acknowledges that the United States. This interpretation of a manufactured product (the concrete two-part test relied upon is from the supports the requirement that iron or slab). Buy American Act, then simply waives steel, whether or not it has reached the On the other hand, a different the domestic content part of the 1933 stage of being manufactured respondent believed that the fact that Act’s text. Desiring an expeditious flow construction material, must be produced the regulations permit foreign steel or of funding cannot trump the statutory at all stages in the United States. This iron used as components or requirement to procure domestically is similar to some other domestic source subcomponents of other manufactured produced goods. Longstanding restrictions on particular materials or construction material to be considered interpretation of domestic manufactured components such as the restrictions on domestic construction materials as long goods under the Buy American Act also domestic melting or production of as the manufacturing is done in the comports with Congressional intent to specialty metals at 10 U.S.C. 2533b. The United States is a sound and practical save and create manufacturing jobs. intent of the Councils was to balance decision. This respondent commented • A respondent was disturbed that full implementation of the law with that the rule allows U.S. companies the interim rule explicitly rejected the feasibility of compliance. Therefore, the flexibility to prudently source from both use of a component test, one of the final rule applies this restriction on American and foreign vendors to minimal Buy American Act standards domestic production of iron and steel manage costs, while promoting U.S. for rule of origin. The respondent only when the iron or steel is a manufacture. contended that allowing for the use of component of construction material that Response: The interim rule would not non-domestic component parts will consists wholly or predominantly of allow foreign steel rebar (as a have a significant impact on the job- iron or steel. (The respondent was component of concrete slab) because the creation ability of the stimulus. correct that there may be just one rule applies to construction material • Two respondents stated that the component in a construction material). brought to the construction site. The Councils should adopt a clear rule In view of this policy clarification, the steel rebar is brought separately to the defining the concept of domestic proposal to treat foreign slab as a construction site and is therefore itself manufacture consistent with the well- ‘‘component’’ of other manufactured construction material, not a component established standard of substantial goods, not requiring production in the of the concrete slab, which is poured transformation and a 50 percent United States, is not acceptable, because and formed on the construction site. component content standard (by cost). the resultant construction material As stated in the prior section, iron The FAR should not confer domestic consists wholly or predominantly of and steel components are only exempt status simply as a result of minor iron or steel, and allowing foreign slab from the restriction of section 1605 if processing or mere assembly in the would not meet the objectives of the the construction material does not United States. law. consist wholly or predominantly of iron Response: The Councils in the interim The Councils have made changes to or steel. rule did not, as respondents claim, the policy at FAR 25.602 to clarify the acknowledge dependence on the two- restriction on the production of iron and f. Components prong Buy American Act test and then steel and have revised the definitions of Comments: Three respondents agreed waive the component test. The Councils ‘‘domestic construction material’’ in FAR with the interim rule approach of not relied on the difference in wording 25.601 and paragraph (a) of the FAR including a requirement relating to the between section 1605 and the Buy clauses at 52.225–21 and 52.225–23, origin of components. They argue that American Act. The preamble to the specifying that all of the iron or steel in an expansive and practical definition of interim rule specifically stated: manufactured construction material that manufactured goods is needed to allow ‘‘Because section 1605 does not specify consists wholly or predominantly of the contractor leeway in getting the a requirement that significantly all the iron or steel shall be produced in the project done on time and within budget. components of construction material United States, but the origin of the raw Many other respondents strongly must also be domestic, as does the Buy materials of the iron or steel is not argued for inclusion of a ‘‘component American Act, the definition of restricted. test,’’ often citing the Buy American Act domestic construction material under as a precedent. this interim rule does not include a iv. Iron or Steel as Components of • One respondent stated that the costs requirement relating to the origin of the Manufactured Construction Material of all the domestic components in the components of domestic manufactured That Does Not Consist Wholly or final product must exceed 50 percent of construction material’’ (see Federal Predominantly of Iron or Steel the cost of all the components. Register at 74 FR 14624, March 31, Comments: Some respondents • A respondent stated that Congress’ 2009). The Buy American Act requires objected to the provision in the interim deliberate inclusion of the term manufacture in the United States rule that the Recovery Act Buy ‘‘manufactured goods’’ was plainly ‘‘substantially all from articles,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53159

materials, or supplies mined, produced, amends FAR 25.001(c)(1) by waiving the domestic end products that meet the or manufactured * * * in the United component test for commercially component test of the Buy American States’’ (41 U.S.C. 10b). On the other available off-the-shelf items for all Act) more like the agencies treat eligible hand, section 1605 only requires the procurements, regardless of whether the products (the trade agreements do not manufactured goods to be ‘‘produced’’ in procurement is funded with Recovery apply any component test to eligible the United States. If Congress intended Act funds. products from designated countries). the component test to apply, it could Response: The interim rule did not Today’s markets are globally integrated have easily so stated in section 1605. introduce the component test waiver for with foreign components often Comments: In fact, a few respondents COTS items at FAR 25.001(c)(1). The indistinguishable from domestic even suggested carrying the component components. The difficulty in tracking test further than the Buy American Act final rule for that change was published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 2713, the country of origin of components is interpretation of the 50 percent a disincentive for firms to contract with domestic component test. A respondent January 15, 2009, and became effective February 17, 2009. However, the the Government. stated that statutory language could be Comments: A number of respondents interpreted to mean a 100 percent rationale for that waiver may provide support for the decision that the that agreed with not including the domestic content requirement. Another component test for domestic products respondent stated that, if OMB wanted component test is not appropriate for implementation of the Recovery Act. still requested a definition of to be aggressive, it could write a rule ‘‘component’’ in the rule. with an even more stringent component The Administrator of OFPP waived the test (see Berry Amendment), especially component test of the Buy American Response: There are two basic with respect to textile and apparel Act for COTS items because ‘‘a waiver definitions of ‘‘component’’ in the FAR, products. of the component test would allow a at 2.101 and 25.003, and associated Buy Response: Even if section 1605 were COTS item to be treated as a domestic American Act clauses. In the final rule, not silent on the issue of a 100 percent end product if it is manufactured in the there is no separate definition of domestic component requirement, it United States, without tracking the component in FAR subpart 25.6, so the would be almost impossible to comply origin of its components. Waiving only definition at FAR 25.003 applies to FAR with such a requirement in this current the component test of the Buy American subpart 25.6. However, for increased global economy. It would cause Act for COTS items, and still requiring clarity, the appropriate definition of immense difficulty to American the end product to be manufactured in ‘‘component’’ has been included in the manufacturers, and section 1605 does the United States, reduces significantly FAR clauses at 52.225–21 and 52.225– not require it. the administrative burden on 23. Comments: One respondent was contractors and the associated cost to g. Summary Matrix of Requirements for ’’ confused about the waiver by the the Government. The FAR procedures Domestic Construction Material Administrator of OFPP of the for evaluation of foreign offers in component test for COTS items because acquisitions of supplies covered by The following matrix summarizes the of the technical correction made to FAR trade agreements is predicated on requirements for domestic construction 25.001 by the interim rule. The agencies treating offers of U.S.-made material in projects that use Recovery respondent noted that the interim rule end products (i.e., offers that may not be Act funds.

REQUIREMENTS FOR DOMESTIC CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IN PROJECTS THAT USE RECOVERY ACT FUNDS

Type of construction Applicable Production of construction Production of Production of other material statute material iron/steel components

Manufactured—wholly or Section 1605 of Recovery Manufacture in U.S...... All processes in U.S. (ex- No requirement. predominantly iron or Act. cept steel additives). steel. Manufactured—not wholly Section 1605 of Recovery Manufacture in U.S...... No requirement ...... No requirement. or predominantly iron or Act. steel. Unmanufactured ...... Buy American Act ...... Mined or produced in U.S. XXX ...... XXX.

3. Applicability of International trading partners and could lead them to construction contracts, with one Agreements retaliate with their own protectionist exception. The Caribbean Basin measures. A third respondent claimed countries are excluded from the a. Trade Agreements that the interim rule did not ensure definition of ‘‘Recovery Act designated Comments: As provided by section consistency with international country,’’ because the treatment 1605(d), the Recovery Act Buy obligations. provided to them is not as a result of American provisions must be applied in Response: As required by section any U.S. international obligation but is a manner consistent with United States 1605, the FAR rule provides for full the result of a United States initiative. obligations under international compliance with U.S. obligations under The new cost evaluation standards do agreements. One respondent requested all international trade agreements when not apply to manufactured construction that the final regulations should ensure undertaking construction covered by material from Recovery Act designated compliance with existing international such agreements with Recovery Act countries. obligations, but did not specify any funds. The new required provisions and Comments: One respondent stated shortcomings in the interim rule in this clauses implement U.S. obligations that, as drafted, the interim rule implied regard. Another respondent considered under our trade agreements in much the that all construction material from that the interim rule is creating great same way as they are currently Recovery Act designated countries is consternation with our international implemented in non-Recovery Act exempt from the Recovery Act Buy

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53160 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

American requirements set forth in products in inventories with foreign G20 Summit do not constitute section 1605 and the Buy American Act. products. international agreements, as This implication is inconsistent with Response: The Recovery Act does not contemplated by section 1605. The FAR the law because, according to the permit such methodology. rule cannot create new exemptions. respondent, not all Recovery Act b. G20 Summit Pledge 4. Other Definitions designated country construction material is exempt. FAR subpart 25.4 Comments: The countries of the G20 a. Construction Material limits the foreign products eligible for stated at the summit that they would refrain from raising new trade barriers to Comments: Three respondents stated equal consideration with domestic that, in some circumstances, if foreign offers. Even if end products for resale or trade in goods and services. According to various respondents, the new law and pieces are delivered to the jobsite and set asides for small business are assembled there instead of being produced in Recovery Act designated the interim rule, by adding the restrictions on the production of iron delivered as part of an assembled countries, for example, they would not construction material, those pieces be deemed eligible products per FAR and steel and increasing the test for unreasonable costs, raise new barriers to would presumably be in violation. The subpart 25.4. Likewise, one respondent respondents believe that this rule will pointed out that FAR subpart 25.4 does trade, even though the Recovery Act Buy American requirement must be encourage or force some assemblies to not apply to procurements set aside for be done offsite in order to maintain small businesses and requested applied consistent with U.S. international obligations. A respondent compliance. They recommend allowing clarification in the final rule on the contracting officer some level of continuation of this policy. stated that overly restrictive implementation of the Recovery Act discretion. Response: The FAR subpart 25.4 will undermine the ability of the U.S. Response: The definition of exception for resale of end products is companies with global supply chains to construction material in the rule as an inapplicable to construction contracts. participate in the Recovery Act. article, material, or supply brought to FAR subpart 25.4 states that it does According to a respondent, it will lead the construction site by the contractor or not apply to acquisitions set aside for to closed markets overseas to the subcontractor for incorporation into the small businesses. FAR 25.603(c) has a detriment of American exports, building or work is unchanged from the cross reference to FAR subpart 25.4. products, and jobs. first sentence of the current FAR 25.003. Comments: Two respondents A respondent stated that ambiguities That is how Government construction considered that the situation created by in the interim rule were open to subject to the FAR has worked for many the interim rule with regard to sources interpretation by Government agencies years. of iron and steel is unfair. Namely, on multiple levels. In the absence of Comments: One respondent further designated countries have unrestricted examples of permissible procurement objected that the new FAR clause ability to provide iron and steel from from foreign sources, the business 52.225–23 included a definition of anywhere, whereas domestic sources community must await test cases to construction material that singles out must provide iron and steel melted in determine whether, for example, the ‘‘emergency life safety systems’’ as the United States. According to these letter of the law in terms of the WTO discrete and complete, allowing them to respondents, this would incentivize GPA signatory exceptions to the be evaluated as a single and distinct designated country steel firms to stop exclusionary principles will truly apply. construction material, regardless of how shipping slabs to the U.S. and to The respondent believed that this and when the parts or components are substitute finished construction ambiguity serves as a de facto obstacle delivered to the construction site. The materials. The result would be a loss of to foreign suppliers engaging in respondent stated that there are U.S. jobs in both the steel-finishing and commerce or any form of business numerous other types of systems, such construction-material manufacturing alliance with American bidders. as environmental control sectors. A non-U.S. respondent stated that communications systems, that are Response: In its trade agreements, the access to the U.S. procurement market integrated into the building in such a United States commits to apply to has been further limited in areas not fashion that warrant being treated in a products from designated countries the covered by the WTO GPA. Their similar manner that the FAR should rule of origin that is used in the normal preference would be non-application of consider. course of trade between these countries, the new requirements to European Response: This is the current FAR i.e., ‘‘wholly the product of’’ or Union member countries. definition of construction material (see, ‘‘substantially transformed’’ in the Two foreign respondents also wanted for example, FAR 52.225–9(a)). designated country. In projects funded to emphasize that the United States by the Recovery Act, we cannot add should uphold the G20 statement in b. Public Building or Public Work new restrictions on the products of our implementing the Recovery Act Buy Comment: A respondent stated that trading partners that are not applied to American provisions. One stated that, there is no definition or cross reference other procurements covered by our for acquisitions below the WTO GPA for ‘‘public building’’ or ‘‘public work.’’ agreements. threshold of $7,443,000 for Response: The interim rule at FAR Comments: A respondent construction, the new discriminatory 25.602 referenced the definition of recommended that the final FAR rule procurement requirements would apply ‘‘public building or public work’’ at FAR should provide for the use of an in relation to goods from Recovery Act 22.401. For the definition in the final inventory accounting methodology to designated countries. rule, please see FAR 25.601. determine the origin of fungible goods Response: These concerns essentially that are commingled American and go back to the requirements of section c. Manufactured Construction Material/ foreign inventories. This respondent 1605 of the Recovery Act. The FAR rule Unmanufactured Construction Material noted that NAFTA permits this must implement the law. Section 1605 Comment: One respondent expressed methodology to avoid unfairly provides for application consistent with concern that the definitions of disqualifying companies that produce United States obligations under manufactured and unmanufactured eligible products but commingle such international agreements. Pledges at the create no clear standard for determining

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53161

when a good is a domestic construction components will only be tracked if the Response: The public interest material. construction material is a manufactured exception is designed to be used flexibly Response: The standard for construction material that consists and only as a last resort when the determining whether a good is a wholly or predominantly of iron or nonavailability or unreasonable cost domestic construction material is not steel. exceptions do not fit. However, it is not found in the definitions of designed to circumvent the new b. Public Interest ‘‘manufactured construction material’’ statutory standards for determination of and ‘‘unmanufactured construction Comments: One respondent wanted a unreasonable cost of domestic material.’’ It is found in the definition of nationwide public interest waiver construction material. ‘‘ ’’ domestic construction material at FAR issued to enable Recovery Act funds to c. Nonavailability 25.601 and in the policy at FAR 25.602. be deployed now, when most needed, In the final rule, the Councils have rather than await publication of ‘‘Buy Comments: Four respondents queried expanded the definition of ‘‘domestic American regulations.’’ The respondent the nonavailability waiver at FAR construction material’’ at FAR 25.601 to stated that ‘‘(t)he U.S. Environmental 25.603. One of these respondents include the more detailed standards Protection Agency (EPA) has taken the believed that the nonavailability relating to iron and steel that were prudent approach of using the ‘public exception should be modified to require included in the policy statement. interest’ exception to issue a nationwide consideration of the geographical scope waiver of the Recovery Act Buy of the market in which production takes 5. Exceptions American requirement for State place so that foreign products are not a. Class Exceptions Revolving Loan Fund projects for which unfairly discriminated against. Response: The Councils disagree. The Comment: One respondent posited debt was incurred between October 1, 2008 and February 17, 2009.’’ statute contained no such provision, that blanket waivers or broad temporary and to add one now would contradict Two respondents noted that the waivers would be appropriate and the intention of the U.S. Congress in ‘‘public interest’’ exception does not should be broadly defined in the FAR. enacting the Recovery Act. The statute specify criteria for the agency head to Another respondent noted that the provides an exception for use. One of these respondents asked if statute was changed during conference nonavailability of domestic there are special procedures that should to include, at paragraph (b), the phrase manufactured construction material. be included in the FAR. ‘‘category of cases’’ for which section This does not result in any Response: The Councils believe that 1605 would not apply and wondered discrimination against foreign the first comment is moot, given that the why the FAR doesn’t mention or take construction material, but actually Recovery Act regulations were advantage of this language. allows the purchase of foreign published in the Federal Register at 74 Response: The Councils note that construction material when domestic FR 14623, March 31, 2009. Further, the neither the statute nor the FAR manufactured construction material is EPA class exception referred to by the precludes the use of class waivers in unavailable. appropriate circumstances. respondent was for State Revolving Comment: Another respondent Comments: Four respondents stated Loan Fund projects, an area that is recommended that the final rule provide that the FAR should include a de covered by the OMB guidance, not the for a time-limited, streamlined process minimis waiver in order to limit FAR. for issuing nonavailability waivers. detrimental impacts of a very small- With regard to the second comment, Response: The reason for issuing a value item preventing a company from the Councils note that the language for nonavailability exception is that the providing an entire system on a project. this exception is modeled on the public items in question are truly not available One respondent suggested a waiver for interest exception currently in use for ‘‘in the United States in sufficient and any construction material that costs less the Buy American Act at FAR 25.103(a). reasonably available commercial than 10 percent of the entire project The public interest exception may only quantities of a satisfactory quality.’’ cost. Another respondent believed that be authorized by the agency head (with (FAR 25.603(a)(1)). The Councils believe such minimal use should not trigger the power of redelegation) and is used that contracting officers should not 25 percent evaluation factor because infrequently. The FAR includes no unfairly rush the process of determining such de minimis usage will not threaten special procedures so that agency heads whether these conditions apply to an the commercial viability of relevant U.S. retain appropriate flexibility. item. industry. Two respondents used the Comment: Another respondent Comment: Another point of view example of piping where specific wanted to know whether each State uses expressed by a respondent was that the gaskets and fittings must be added on the same criteria or procedures. final rule should require an offeror site and are not always manufactured Response: The FAR is not used by proposing a nonavailability waiver to domestically. State or local governments; it is used by provide, in addition to the items already Response: Because construction Federal agencies to contract with listed, the following: (1) Supplier material is defined as the article, appropriated funds. Each agency has a information or pricing information from material, or supply delivered to the unique mission, and it would not be a reasonable number of domestic construction site, and there is no appropriate to require them all to use suppliers indicating availability/ component test (except for iron or steel), the same criteria. delivery date for construction materials, it is not possible for the delivery of an Comment: A respondent suggested (2) information documenting efforts to entire system to be considered non- that the public interest exception be find available domestic sources, (3) a domestic because of a very small value interpreted flexibly, considering project schedule, and (4) relevant foreign component of the system, as economic efficiency and overall quality excerpts from project plans, long as the component is not delivered of goods so that, ‘‘even if non-American specifications, and permits indicating separately to the construction site. iron, steel, and manufactured goods may the required quantity and quality of Further, the clarification of ‘‘produced not satisfy the 25 percent rule, they can construction materials. in the United States’’ (FAR 25.602(a)(1)) still be accepted under the public This respondent also requested that makes clear that iron and steel interest exception.’’ the contract list all foreign material

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53162 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

used, including construction material Response: The Councils had no provide the notice to the Federal from designated countries. discretion about the requirement to add Register within 3 business days after the Response: The Councils’ intention 25 percent to the contract cost when determination is made. Except in was to use the same requirements for foreign iron, steel, or manufactured unusual workload circumstances, this this exception as have been used for goods are proposed to be used in a change should result in publication in Buy American Act non-availability construction project or public work. The the Federal Register in less than 2 determinations for some 15 years. It factor is specifically required by the weeks. would be an unnecessary burden to list language of section 1605(b)(3) of Public The final rule includes, at FAR designated country construction Law 111–5. 25.603(b), a requirement to provide to material, because section 1605 requires Comment: Another respondent the Administrator for Federal compliance with trade agreements, and suggested that the table at FAR 52.225– Procurement Policy and to the Recovery there is no restriction on the use of 23(d) should include another category Accountability and Transparency Board designated country construction entitled ‘‘Recovery Act designated a copy of a determination made in material when trade agreements apply. country material.’’ accordance with FAR 25.603(a) Comment: A respondent noted that it Response: The respondent gave no concurrent with its provision to the seems inconsistent, if designated reason for this suggestion, and the Federal Register. country materials are not considered Councils cannot accept the Comments: Six respondents foreign construction items, not to recommendation. The statute provides demanded that OMB provide full consider them when making the an exception for unreasonable cost of transparency in the process of obtaining determinations in FAR 25.603(a) and domestic material, not for unreasonable waivers of section 1605’s application by (b). cost of designated country construction requiring that all waiver requests be posted publicly on line. Several of these Response: Designated country material. The statute requires a respondents wanted the waiver request material is considered to be foreign. comparison of the price differential between domestic manufactured to be posted promptly and publicly on d. Unreasonable Cost construction material (including iron line (the internet or Recovery.gov); one Comment: One respondent stated that and steel) and foreign manufactured wanted the waiver request to be posted ‘‘it is quite apparent that a preference for construction material (other than within 3 days of its receipt; and one offers excluding foreign construction designated country manufactured respondent wanted waiver requests to material lacks the necessary legal construction material). In an acquisition be e-mailed to any trade associations justification and constitutes an obvious subject to trade agreements, the material and domestic manufacturers desiring to prejudice against foreign construction that is obtained from designated be on an alert list. Response: While section 1605 does material.’’ countries is not part of the evaluation require publication of exceptions made Response: The Councils disagree. The because it is not domestic construction material. to the requirement to use U.S.-produced paragraphs in the solicitation provisions iron, steel, and manufactured goods on evaluation of offers (FAR clauses 6. Determinations That an Exception used in the project, there is no 52.225–22(c) and 52.225–24(c)) clearly Applies requirement in the statute to publish state that the preference is for an offer a. Process and Publication requests for an exception. Therefore, no that does not include foreign change is being made to the FAR to construction material excepted at the Comments: Two respondents stated introduce such a requirement. request of the offeror on the basis of that the use of waivers should be Comment: One respondent considered unreasonable cost. This does not encouraged and simplified. that FAR 25.604(a) confuses constitute a prejudice against all foreign Response: The Councils have made inapplicability with exceptions and construction material. Inclusion of the exception process as streamlined as appears to refer to one of the exceptions Recovery Act designated country is possible within the terms of the as a rationale for that ‘‘inapplicability’’ construction material will not cause the statute. Agencies already have authority determination. The respondent believed Government to discriminate against an to use class exceptions. that the concept of the Buy American offer. This is in accordance with the Comments: Two respondents believed clause not being applicable is distinct law, as promulgated by the U.S. that the specific two-week timeframe for from a situation where the Buy Congress and applied consistent with publication of a waiver in the Federal American clause may apply, but an U.S. international obligations. Register should be replaced with exception has been granted. Comments: Two respondents stated language requiring publication in the Response: The FAR language for this that the evaluation of foreign fastest practicable manner. In addition, case uses the exact wording from the construction materials, and the the Office of Federal Procurement current FAR Buy American Act authority provided to submit alternate Policy (OFPP) requested that a copy of coverage. Contracting officers are not offers with equivalent domestic the nonavailability determination be waiving section 1605 of the Recovery material, constitutes a prejudice against provided to the OFPP Administrator. Act or the Buy American Act, but foreign construction material. Response: The statute specifically determining whether an exception Response: The Councils disagree and called for publication in the Federal applies, and then, if an exception does note that the FAR is implementing U.S. Register (Pub. L. 111–5, section apply, determining that section 1605 of law. Further, the implementation 1605(c)). However, the law does not set the Recovery Act or the Buy American scheme is fully compliant with U.S. a time frame for such publication. The Act is inapplicable. international agreements. Councils agree with the respondents Comments: Two respondents that timely publication is desirable, but b. Requests for Specific Exceptions commented that the 25 percent the Federal Register often must Comments: Three respondents stated evaluation factor likely renders the accommodate workload priorities that that the recent addition of commercial unreasonable cost exception moot are out of the control of contracting off-the-shelf (COTS) items to exceptions because it is so high that it will be officers. Therefore, FAR 25.603(b)(2) is from the Buy American Act for impossible to meet. revised to require the agency head to construction materials (FAR 25.225–9

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53163

and –11) and the exception at FAR a class determination. In addition, the Response: This recommendation has 25.103(e) for commercial information offeror may request, and the contracting been partially accepted. While the technology (IT) should be available for officer may grant, an exception on an agency Inspector General is available for Recovery Act-funded construction individual contract in accordance with referral of suspected fraud, it is not the projects. FAR 25.603. only option in this situation. FAR Response: The Councils do not agree. 25.607(c)(4) is revised to include both The COTS item exception only exempts 7. Exemption for Acquisitions Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold the agency’s Inspector General and other COTS items from the component test of possible officials. the Buy American Act. This rule does Comments: Two respondents not apply a component test to any of the requested that the final rule exempt 9. Funding Mechanisms manufactured construction material purchases under the simplified a. Modifications to Existing Contracts subject to section 1605 of the Recovery acquisition threshold (SAT) from the Act except iron and steel. By definition, Recovery Act. Comments: Three respondents unmanufactured construction material Response: The determination was strongly recommended that the does not have components. made under the interim rule that section Recovery Act limitations should not be With regard to the commercial IT 1605 of the Recovery Act would apply applied to task orders issued under exception, it applies only to the Buy to all contracts, including those below Governmentwide Acquisition Contracts American Act. The Recovery Act the SAT (see Interim Rule, (GWACs) or Multiple Award Contracts exceptions are explicitly stated in Supplementary Information, Section C (MACs). section 1605 and are not identical to the (see Federal Register at 74 FR 14625, Response: The Councils cannot make Buy American Act exceptions. March 31, 2009)). The Councils remain Comments: Two respondents committed to this position in order to the change requested by these requested that commercial items, as a fully implement the goals of the respondents because the Recovery Act category, be exempt from coverage Recovery Act. Therefore, any project, of restrictions follow the appropriations. under section 1605. whatever dollar value, financed with Any construction project or public work Response: The Councils decline to Recovery Act funds is subject to these funded with Recovery Act money must make this change, as the Congress did limitations. comply with the restrictions in section not exempt commercial items from 1605, whether the contracting vehicle 8. Remedies for Noncompliance section 1605 applicability. for the project is a contract or task order. Comments: One respondent requested Comment: One of these respondents b. Treatment of Mixed Funding also asked that other typically non- that the final rule include a safe-harbor construction materials not primarily provision protecting companies Comments: Seven respondents were made of iron or steel be excluded from receiving Recovery Act funds without concerned that the interim rule failed to coverage. proper notice from the Government or provide any clarity about how projects Response: The Councils do not the purchasing company. with mixed funding (some Recovery Act understand the respondent’s use of the Response: The Councils believe that funds and other Federal appropriations) term ‘‘other typically non-construction this is unnecessary, given the would be treated. Several respondents materials.’’ The Councils have used the protections already built into the use of expressed a strong preference for standard FAR definition of Recovery Act funds. First, any treating mixed-funded projects as not ‘‘construction material’’ without change. appropriation of Recovery Act funds covered by the Recovery Act limitations. Under this definition, if it is receives a special designation that incorporated into a public building or identifies it as Recovery Act money. In Response: Given that the statute was public work, then the material is addition, FAR 4.1501, 5.704, and 5.705, designed so that the section 1605 construction material. along with the contract checklist issued limitations are tied to the source of Comment: One respondent by the Recovery Accountability and funding, the Councils do not have the recommended that the FAR waive Transparency Board, require contracting option of complying with respondents’ application of section 1605 for all officers to indicate, in the solicitation or preference. Any Federal construction or manufactured goods not made primarily award, which products or services are public works contract effort that is of iron and steel. funded under the Recovery Act. funded by any funds, however Response: The Councils decline for Comment: One respondent stated that miniscule, appropriated by the Recovery the reason that the Congress specifically the regulations must provide adequate Act must, by law, comply with the included manufactured goods in the remedies, such as debarment, for non- section 1605 requirements. However, coverage of section 1605. compliance with section 1605. It the regulations do provide that a Comment: A respondent wanted the claimed that only such meaningful contract may be funded with Recovery Councils to issue a class waiver from the remedies can serve to deter Act funds and non-Recovery Act funds Buy American Act requirements for misbehavior. if the funds are properly segregated by electronic fluorescent lighting ballasts. Response: All of the usual remedies line item or sub-line item. In addition, Response: The FAR includes, at FAR available through the FAR or Federal contracting officers are required to 25.104(a), a list of items that have been law are equally available as remedies for indicate, in the solicitation or award, determined nonavailable in accordance noncompliance with section 1605 which products or services are funded with FAR 25.103(b)(1)(i). A class regulations. No additional remedies are under the Recovery Act. However, if the determination made in accordance with needed. contracting officer does not properly the above reference does not necessarily Comment: One respondent segregate Recovery Act and non- mean that there is no domestic source recommended replacing the Recovery funds, then the law requires for the listed items, but that domestic requirement, at FAR 25.607(c)(4), to the mixed-funded line items or sources can only meet 50 percent or less refer apparent fraudulent contracts to be treated as if they were of total U.S. Government and noncompliance to ‘‘the agency’s entirely Recovery-Act funded. (See nongovernment demand. The Inspector General’’ rather than to ‘‘other discussion of ‘‘project’’ at 2.b. above and respondent is free to make a request for appropriate agency officials.’’ in the FAR text at 25.602–1(c).)

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53164 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

10. Interim Rule Improper guidance governing grants under the must comply with international Recovery Act. agreements when conducting Comment: One respondent believed it One respondent noted that the OMB procurements for Recovery Act projects was inappropriate to publish an interim grants guidance includes examples of that are covered by such agreements. rule, as it deprived interested parties of ‘‘public building.’’ The respondent Further, contracting authorities that the right to comment. The need to have would like to know whether a public rules available as soon as the Recovery do not comply with the FAR, and building in the FAR is the same as a thereby with international Act funds were made available to public building in the OMB guidance. Federal agencies for obligation, commitments, should be reported and Response: The Councils agree and are subject to sanctions. according to the respondent, was not a note that the final rule was developed sufficient justification for the absence of in close coordination with OMB grant Comment: One of those respondents prior public comment. officials. The Councils point out, thought that the FAR does not explain Response: The Administration however, that grants, financial what regime must be followed in cases directed the Councils to publish an assistance, and loans are not subject to where an entity covered by the World interim rule in order to provide the Buy American Act. Therefore, the Trade Organization Government contracting agencies with the necessary coverage cannot be the same in these Procurement Agreement (WTO GPA) direction quickly. In any case, two regulations regarding conducts procurement jointly with an respondents were given an opportunity unmanufactured construction material. entity that is not covered by the WTO to comment fully on the interim rule, Further, the OMB guidance applies to GPA. and each comment has been thoroughly all assistance recipients, including Response: If one entity in a joint considered by the Councils. States. Trade agreements do not apply procurement is covered by the GPA or 11. Inconsistencies Between This Rule uniformly at the State level. another international agreement, but and Pre-Existing FAR Rule and the OMB The final revised FAR provisions another entity that is also involved in Grants Guidance include the definition from FAR 22.401 the same procurement is not covered by and add examples of public buildings the GPA or another international a. Inconsistency With Pre-Existing FAR and public works from the OMB grants agreement, the procurement will be Comments: One respondent objected guidance. conducted in a manner that ensures that that this rule will require well- It is our understanding that the OMB U.S. obligations under international intentioned and compliant companies to grants coverage will be conformed to the agreements are honored. That means establish yet more processes and FAR terminology to use ‘‘manufacture’’ that in such a case, products from systems (many of which will be largely in lieu of ‘‘substantially transformed.’’ Recovery Act designated countries will duplicative of existing Buy American The Councils and OMB are not aware of not be subject to the restrictions of Act/Trade Agreements Act compliance any other areas where the OMB section 1605 of the Recovery Act. guidance and this FAR rule are not requirements) to comply with the C. Applicability to Contracts at or Recovery Act. The respondent claimed aligned. Comment: One respondent requested Below the Simplified Acquisition that this creates significant cost burdens that the Councils consider requesting Threshold and delays in construction projects. EPA, Federal Transit/Highways Another respondent stated that any Section 4101 of Public Law 103–355, Administration, and other agencies that change in current supply chains made the Federal Acquisition Streamlining have issued their own guidance to in order to comply with this rule will Act (FASA) (41 U.S.C. 429), governs the withdraw it. limit competition, cause delays, and applicability of laws to contracts or Response: The Councils decline. increase costs. A respondent objected to subcontracts in amounts not greater There is no reason to request any agency the creation of yet another list of than the simplified acquisition to withdraw contracting guidance that is designated countries. threshold. It is intended to limit the in compliance with the FAR. applicability of laws to them. FASA Response: The Councils used pre- Language in the Recovery Act existing FAR language and processes to provides that if a provision of law exempted the Federal Highway contains criminal or civil penalties, or if the extent that it was possible to do so Administration (FHA) from section and still meet the requirements of the the Federal Acquisition Regulatory 1605. It is appropriate that FHA Council makes a written determination Recovery Act. The Recovery Act also maintain separate regulations. specified the new requirements for iron that it is not in the best interest of the and steel and the 25 percent contract 12. Need for Additional Guidance Federal Government to exempt contracts or subcontracts at or below the evaluation factor. Comments: Two respondents stated simplified acquisition threshold, the Recovery Act-designated countries that there is confusion about the scope law will apply to them. were identified from the language of the of applicability of this rule and statute, the Committee report, and requested that the FAR more clearly The FAR Council determined, for the consultation with the United States spell out that contracting authorities are interim rule, that it should apply to Trade Representative. Caribbean Basin obliged to comply with international contracts or subcontracts at or below the countries were not included as Recovery commitments and request relevant and simplified acquisition threshold, as Act-designated countries because they user-friendly guidance. defined at FAR 2.101. The public are not covered by an international Response: The Councils note that comments received did not cause the agreement. changes in the final rule have FAR Council to modify this position for differentiated projects that are subject to the final rule. b. Inconsistency With the OMB Grants the Recovery Act rules from projects This is a significant regulatory action Guidance that are subject to existing Buy and, therefore, was subject to review Comments: Four respondents American Act and trade agreements under Section 6(b) of Executive Order expressed a strong preference that the requirements. The Councils have made 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, final rule should have the closest it abundantly clear in the final rule and dated September 30, 1993. This rule is possible alignment with the OMB this preamble that Federal agencies not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53165

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act 2.101 Definitons. and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–5) (Recovery Act) with regard to The Department of Defense, the * * * * * manufactured construction material and General Services Administration, and (b) * * * the Buy American Act with regard to the National Aeronautics and Space (2) * * * Component *** unmanufactured construction material. Administration certify that this final (2) 52.225–1 and 52.225–3, see the It applies to construction projects that rule will not have a significant definition in 52.225–1(a) and 52.225– use funds appropriated or otherwise economic impact on a substantial 3(a); provided by the Recovery Act. number of small entities within the (3) 52.225–9 and 52.225–11, see the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility ■ 7. Amend section 25.601 by revising definition in 52.225–9(a) and 52.225– Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because it will the definition ‘‘Domestic construction 11(a); and only impact an offeror that wants to use material’’; and adding, in alphabetical (4) 52.225–21 and 52.225–23, see the non-U.S. iron, steel, and manufactured order, the definition ‘‘Public building or definition in 52.225–21(a) and 52.225– goods in a construction project in the public work’’. 23(a). United States. The Councils stated in The revised and added text reads as the interim rule their belief that there * * * * * follows: are adequate domestic sources for these PART 5—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT 25.601 Definitions. materials, and the Office of Management ACTIONS and Budget (OMB) guidance M–09–10 * * * * * issued February 18, 2009, entitled 5.207 [Amended] Domestic construction material means the following: ‘‘Initial Implementing Guidance for the ■ 3. Amend section 5.207 by removing American Recovery and Reinvestment (1) An unmanufactured construction from paragraph (c)(13)(iii) the word material mined or produced in the Act of 2009,’’ provides a strong ‘‘Other’’. preference for using small businesses for United States. (The Buy American Act Recovery Act projects wherever PART 25—FOREIGN ACQUISITION applies.) possible. No comments to the contrary (2) A manufactured construction were received from small entities in ■ 4. Amend section 25.001 by adding a material that is manufactured in the response to the interim rule. new sentence to the end of paragraph United States and, if the construction (c)(4) to read as follows: material consists wholly or E. Paperwork Reduction Act predominantly of iron or steel, the iron 25.001 General. The Paperwork Reduction Act does or steel was produced in the United apply; however, the information * * * * * States. (Section 1605 of the Recovery collection requirements imposed by the (c) * * * Act applies.) FAR provisions 52.225–22 and 52.225– (4) * * * If the construction material * * * * * 24 are currently covered by the consists wholly or predominantly of Public building or public work means approved information collection iron or steel, the iron or steel must be a building or work, the construction, requirements for FAR provisions produced in the United States. prosecution, completion, or repair of 52.225–9 and 52.225–11 (OMB Control ■ 5. Amend section 25.003 by revising which is carried on directly or number 9000–0141, entitled Buy the definition ‘‘Domestic construction indirectly by authority of, or with funds America Act—Construction—FAR material’’ to read as follows: of, a Federal agency to serve the interest of the general public regardless of Sections Affected: Subpart 25.2; 52.225– 25.003 Definitions. 9; and 52.225–11). No public comments whether title thereof is in a Federal were received regarding the data * * * * * agency (see 22.401). These buildings elements, the burden, or any other part Domestic construction material and works may include, without of the collection. means— limitation, bridges, dams, plants, (1)(i) An unmanufactured highways, parkways, streets, subways, List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 2, 5, 25, construction material mined or tunnels, sewers, mains, power lines, and 52 produced in the United States; pumping stations, heavy generators, Government procurement. (ii) A construction material railways, airports, terminals, docks, manufactured in the United States, if— Dated: August 18, 2010. piers, wharves, ways, lighthouses, (A) The cost of the components buoys, jetties, breakwaters, levees, and Edward Loeb, mined, produced, or manufactured in canals, and the construction, alteration, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. the United States exceeds 50 percent of maintenance, or repair of such buildings ■ Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA the cost of all its components. and works. Components of foreign origin of the amend 48 CFR parts 2, 5, 25, and 52 as * * * * * set forth below: same class or kind for which nonavailability determinations have ■ 8. Revise section 25.602 to read as ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR been made are treated as domestic; or follows: parts 2, 5, 25, and 52 continues to read (B) The construction material is a as follows: 25.602 Policy. COTS item; Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. (2) Except that for use in subpart 25.6, 25.602–1 Section 1605 of the Recovery chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). see the definition in 25.601. Act. PART 2—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS * * * * * Except as provided in 25.603— AND TERMS ■ 6. Revise section 25.600 to read as (a) None of the funds appropriated or follows: otherwise made available by the ■ 2. Amend section 2.101 in paragraph Recovery Act may be used for a project (b)(2), in the definition ‘‘Component’’, by 25.600 Scope of subpart. for the construction, alteration, revising paragraphs (2) and (3); and This subpart implements section 1605 maintenance, or repair of a public adding paragraph (4) to read as follows: in Division A of the American Recovery building or public work unless the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53166 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

public building or public work is 25.602–2 Buy American Act. provide a notice to the Federal Register located in the United States and— Except as provided in 25.603, use within three business days after the (1) All of the iron, steel, and only unmanufactured construction determination is made, with a copy to manufactured goods used as material mined or produced in the the Administrator for Federal construction material in the project are United States, as required by the Buy Procurement Policy and to the Recovery produced or manufactured in the United American Act or, if trade agreements Accountability and Transparency Board. States. apply, unmanufactured construction The notice shall include— (i) All manufactured construction material mined or produced in a (i) The title ‘‘Buy American Exception material must be manufactured in the designated country may also be used. under the American Recovery and United States. ■ 9. Revise section 25.603 to read as Reinvestment Act of 2009’’; (ii) Iron or steel components. (A) Iron follows: (ii) The dollar value and brief or steel components of construction description of the project; and material consisting wholly or 25.603 Exceptions. (iii) A detailed justification as to why predominantly of iron or steel must be (a)(1) When one of the following the restriction is being waived. produced in the United States. This exceptions applies, the contracting (c) Acquisitions under trade does not restrict the origin of the officer may allow the contractor to agreements. (1) For construction elements of the iron or steel, but incorporate foreign manufactured contracts with an estimated acquisition requires that all manufacturing construction materials without regard to value of $7,804,000 or more, also see processes of the iron or steel must take the restrictions of section 1605 of the subpart 25.4. Offers proposing the use of place in the United States, except Recovery Act or foreign construction material from a designated metallurgical processes involving unmanufactured construction material country shall receive equal refinement of steel additives. without regard to the restrictions of the consideration with offers proposing the (B) The requirement in paragraph Buy American Act: use of domestic construction material. (a)(1)(ii)(A) of this section does not (i) Nonavailability. The head of the (2) For purposes of applying section apply to iron or steel components or contracting activity may determine that 1605 of the Recovery Act to evaluation subcomponents in construction material a particular construction material is not of manufactured construction material, that does not consist wholly or mined, produced, or manufactured in designated countries do not include the predominantly of iron or steel. the United States in sufficient and Caribbean Basin Countries. (iii) All other components. There is no reasonably available commercial ■ 10. Amend section 25.604 by revising restriction on the origin or place of quantities of a satisfactory quality. The paragraph (c)(1), and by removing from production or manufacture of determinations of nonavailability of the paragraph (c)(2) ‘‘the unmanufactured’’ components or subcomponents that do articles listed at 25.104(a) and the and adding ‘‘the domestic not consist of iron or steel. procedures at 25.103(b)(1) also apply if unmanufactured’’ in its place. (iv) Examples. (A) If a steel guardrail any of those articles are acquired as The revised text reads as follows: consists predominantly of steel, even construction materials. (ii) Unreasonable cost. The 25.604 Preaward determination though coated with aluminum, then the contracting officer concludes that the concerning the inapplicability of section steel would be subject to the section 1605 of the Recovery Act or the Buy cost of domestic construction material is 1605 restriction requiring that all stages American Act. unreasonable in accordance with of production of the steel occur in the 25.605. * * * * * United States, in addition to the (iii) Inconsistent with public interest. (c) * * * requirement to manufacture the The head of the agency may determine (1) Manufactured construction guardrail in the United States. There that application of the restrictions of material. The contracting officer must would be no restrictions on the other section 1605 of the Recovery Act to a compare the offered price of the contract components of the guardrail. particular manufactured construction using foreign manufactured (B) If a wooden window frame is material, or the restrictions of the Buy construction material (i.e., any delivered to the site as a single American Act to a particular construction material not manufactured construction material, there is no unmanufactured construction material in the United States, or construction restriction on any of the components, would be inconsistent with the public material consisting predominantly of including the steel lock on the window interest. iron or steel and the iron or steel is not frame; or (2) In addition, the head of the agency produced in the United States) to the (2) If trade agreements apply, the may determine that application of the estimated price if all domestic manufactured construction material Buy American Act to a particular manufactured construction material shall either comply with the unmanufactured construction material were used. If use of domestic requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this would be impracticable. manufactured construction material subsection, or be wholly the product of (b) Determinations. When a would increase the overall offered price or be substantially transformed in a determination is made, for any of the of the contract by more than 25 percent, Recovery Act designated country; reasons stated in this section, that then the contracting officer shall (b) Manufactured materials purchased certain foreign construction materials determine that the cost of the domestic directly by the Government and may be used— manufactured construction material is delivered to the site for incorporation (1) The contracting officer shall list unreasonable. into the project shall meet the same the excepted materials in the contract; * * * * * domestic source requirements as and ■ 11. Amend section 25.605 by— specified for manufactured construction (2) For determinations with regard to ■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and material in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) the inapplicability of section 1605 of the (a)(2); of this section; and Recovery Act, unless the construction ■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (b) (c) A project may include several material has already been determined to through (d) as paragraphs (c) through contracts, a single contract, or one or be domestically nonavailable (see list at (e); more line items on a contract. 25.104), the head of the agency shall ■ c. Adding a new paragraph (b); and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53167

■ d. Removing from the newly (3) When using clause 52.225–23, list (1) * * * designated paragraph (c) ‘‘If two’’ and foreign construction material in (i) Section 1605 of the American Recovery adding ‘‘Unless paragraph (b) applies, if paragraph (b)(3) of the clause as follows: and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) two’’ in its place. (i) Basic clause. List all foreign (Pub. L. 111–5), by requiring, unless an exception applies, that all manufactured The revised and added text reads as construction materials excepted from construction material in the project is follows: the Buy American Act or section 1605 manufactured in the United States and, if the of the Recovery Act, other than construction material consists wholly or 25.605 Evaluating offers of foreign manufactured construction material construction material. predominantly of iron or steel, the iron or from a Recovery Act designated country steel was produced in the United States (a) * * * or unmanufactured construction (produced in the United States means that all (1) Use an evaluation factor of 25 material from a designated country. manufacturing processes of the iron or steel percent, applied to the total offered (ii) Alternate I. List in paragraph (b)(3) must take place in the United States, except price of the contract, if foreign of the clause all foreign construction metallurgical processes involving refinement manufactured construction material is of steel additives); and material excepted from the Buy (ii) The Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. incorporated in the offer based on an American Act or section 1605 of the exception for unreasonable cost of 10a–10d) by providing a preference for Recovery Act, other than— unmanufactured construction material mined comparable domestic construction (A) Manufactured construction or produced in the United States over material requested by the offeror. material from a Recovery Act designated unmanufactured construction material mined (2) In addition, use an evaluation country other than Bahrain, Mexico, or or produced in a foreign country. factor of 6 percent applied to the cost of Oman; or * * * * * foreign unmanufactured construction (B) Unmanufactured construction (4) The Contracting Officer may add other material incorporated in the offer based material from a designated country foreign construction material to the list in on an exception for unreasonable cost of other than Bahrain, Mexico, or Oman. paragraph (b)(3) of this clause if the comparable domestic unmanufactured Government determines that— construction material requested by the PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS (i) The cost of domestic construction offeror. AND CONTRACT CLAUSES material would be unreasonable; (b) If the solicitation specifies award (A) The cost of domestic manufactured on the basis of factors in addition to cost ■ 14. Amend section 52.225–21 by— construction material, when compared to the or price, apply the evaluation factors as ■ a. Revising the section heading; cost of comparable foreign manufactured ■ b. Revising the heading and the date construction material, is unreasonable when specified in paragraph (a) of this section the cumulative cost of such material will and use the evaluated price in of the clause; increase the cost of the contract by more than ■ determining the offer that represents the c. In paragraph (a) by— 25 percent; best value to the Government. ■ 1. Adding, in alphabetical order, the (B) The cost of domestic unmanufactured definition ‘‘Component’’; * * * * * construction material is unreasonable when ■ 2. Removing the last sentence from the the cost of such material exceeds the cost of ■ 12. Amend section 25.607 by revising definition ‘‘Construction material’’; and comparable foreign unmanufactured paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows: ■ 3. Revising the definition ‘‘Domestic construction material by more than 6 percent; (ii) The construction material is not mined, 25.607 Noncompliance. construction material’’; and ■ d. Revising paragraphs (b)(1)(i), produced, or manufactured in the United * * * * * (b)(1)(ii), and (b)(4). States in sufficient and reasonably available (c) * * * quantities and of a satisfactory quality; The revised and added text reads as (4) If the noncompliance is (iii) The application of the restriction of follows: sufficiently serious, consider exercising section 1605 of the Recovery Act to a appropriate contractual remedies, such 52.225–21 Required Use of American Iron, particular manufactured construction as terminating the contract for default. Steel, and Manufactured Goods—Buy material would be inconsistent with the American Act—Construction Materials. public interest or the application of the Buy Also consider preparing and forwarding American Act to a particular unmanufactured a report to the agency suspending or * * * * * construction material would be impracticable debarring official in accordance with Required Use of American Iron, Steel, or inconsistent with the public interest. subpart 9.4. If the noncompliance * * * * * appears to be fraudulent, refer the and Manufactured Goods—Buy ■ 15. Amend section 52.225–22 by— matter to other appropriate agency American Act—Construction Materials (Oct 2010) ■ a. Revising the section heading; officials, such as the agency’s inspector ■ b. Revising the heading and the date general or the officer responsible for (a) * * * of the provision; criminal investigation. Component means an article, material, or ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a) the ■ 13. Amend section 25.1102 by supply incorporated directly into a ‘‘ ’’ construction material. word Other ; redesignating paragraph (e)(2) as ■ d. In paragraph (c) by— paragraph (e)(3); adding a new * * * * * ■ 1. Adding in paragraph (c)(1) paragraph (e)(2); and revising the newly Domestic construction material means the introductory text ‘‘in accordance with designated paragraph (e)(3) to read as following— FAR 25.604’’ after the word ‘‘applies’’; (1) An unmanufactured construction follows: ■ 2. Revising paragraph (c)(1)(i); material mined or produced in the United ■ 3. Adding in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) ‘‘an 25.1102 Acquisition of construction. States. (The Buy American Act applies.) (2) A manufactured construction material exception for the’’ after the words ‘‘based * * * * * that is manufactured in the United States on’’; and (e) * * * and, if the construction material consists ■ 4. Redesignating paragraph (c)(2) as (2) If these Recovery Act provisions wholly or predominantly of iron or steel, the paragraph (c)(3); adding a new and clauses are only applicable to a iron or steel was produced in the United paragraph (c)(2); and revising the newly project consisting of certain line items States. (Section 1605 of the Recovery Act designated paragraph (c)(3); and in the contract, identify in the schedule applies.) ■ e. Removing from paragraph (d)(1) the line items to which the provisions * * * * * ‘‘paragraph (b)(2)’’ and adding and clauses apply. (b) * * * ‘‘paragraph (b)(3)’’ in its place.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53168 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

The revised and added text reads as 52.225–23 Required Use of American Iron, Nondesignated country means a country follows: Steel, and Manufactured Goods—Buy other than the United States or a designated American Act—Construction Materials country. 52.225–22 Notice of Required Use of Under Trade Agreements. * * * * * American Iron, Steel, and Manufactured * * * * * (b) Construction materials. (1) The Goods—Buy American Act—Construction restrictions of section 1605 of the American Materials. Required Use of American Iron, Steel, Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. * * * * * and Manufactured Goods—Buy L. 111–5) (Recovery Act) do not apply to American Act—Construction Materials Recovery Act designated country Notice of Required Use of American Under Trade Agreements (Oct 2010) manufactured construction material. The Iron, Steel, and Manufactured Goods— restrictions of the Buy American Act do not Buy American Act—Construction (a) * * * apply to designated country unmanufactured Materials (Oct 2010) Component means an article, material, or construction material. Consistent with U.S. supply incorporated directly into a obligations under international agreements, * * * * * construction material. this clause implements— (c) * * * * * * * * (i) Section 1605 of the Recovery Act by (1) * * * Designated country means any of the requiring, unless an exception applies, that (i) 25 percent of the offered price of the following countries: all manufactured construction material in the contract, if foreign manufactured (1) A World Trade Organization project is manufactured in the United States construction material is incorporated in the Government Procurement Agreement (WTO and, if the construction material consists offer based on an exception for unreasonable GPA) country (Aruba, Austria, Belgium, wholly or predominantly of iron or steel, the cost of comparable manufactured domestic Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, iron or steel was produced in the United construction material; and Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, States (produced in the United States means * * * * * Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, that all manufacturing processes of the iron (2) If the solicitation specifies award on the Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea (Republic or steel must take place in the United States, basis of factors in addition to cost or price, of), Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, except metallurgical processes involving the Contracting Officer will apply the Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, refinement of steel additives); and evaluation factors as specified in paragraph Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, (ii) The Buy American Act by providing a (c)(1) of this provision and use the evaluated Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, preference for unmanufactured construction price in determining the offer that represents Switzerland, Taiwan, or United Kingdom); material mined or produced in the United States over unmanufactured construction the best value to the Government. (2) A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) country material mined or produced in a (3) Unless paragraph (c)(2) of this provision (Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Chile, Costa nondesignated country. applies, if two or more offers are equal in Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, (2) The Contractor shall use only domestic price, the Contracting Officer will give Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Morocco, construction material, Recovery Act preference to an offer that does not include Nicaragua, Oman, Peru, or Singapore); designated country manufactured foreign construction material excepted at the (3) A least developed country (Afghanistan, construction material, or designated country request of the offeror on the basis of Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina unmanufactured construction material in unreasonable cost of comparable domestic Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Central African performing this contract, except as provided construction material. Republic, Chad, Comoros, Democratic in paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this clause. * * * * * Republic of Congo, Djibouti, East Timor, (3) The requirement in paragraph (b)(2) of Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gambia, ■ this clause does not apply to the construction 16. Amend section 52.225–23 by— Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Kiribati, Laos, ■ materials or components listed by the a. Revising the section heading; Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Government as follows: ■ b. Revising the heading and the date Maldives, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, [Contracting Officer to list applicable of the clause; Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Samoa, Sao Tome and excepted materials or indicate ‘‘none’’.] Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Solomon ■ (4) The Contracting Officer may add other c. In paragraph (a) by— Islands, Somalia, Tanzania, Togo, Tuvalu, ■ construction material to the list in paragraph 1. Adding, in alphabetical order, the Uganda, Vanuatu, Yemen, or Zambia); or (b)(3) of this clause if the Government definitions ‘‘Component’’, ‘‘Designated (4) A Caribbean Basin country (Antigua determines that— country’’, ‘‘Designated country and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, (i) The cost of domestic construction construction material’’, and Belize, British Virgin Islands, Dominica, material would be unreasonable; ‘‘Nondesignated country’’; Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Montserrat, (A) The cost of domestic manufactured Netherlands Antilles, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. ■ construction material is unreasonable when 2. Removing the last sentence from the Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, or definition ‘‘Construction material’’; the cumulative cost of such material, when Trinidad and Tobago). compared to the cost of comparable foreign ■ 3. Revising the definition ‘‘Domestic Designated country construction material manufactured construction material, other construction material’’; and means a construction material that is a WTO than Recovery Act designated country ■ 4. Removing from the definition GPA country construction material, an FTA construction material, will increase the country construction material, a least overall cost of the contract by more than 25 ‘‘Recovery Act designated country’’ developed country construction material, or paragraph (2) the word ‘‘Israel,’’; percent; a Caribbean Basin country construction (B) The cost of domestic unmanufactured ■ d. Revising paragraph (b); material. construction material is unreasonable when ■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(3); Domestic construction material means the the cost of such material exceeds the cost of following: ■ f. Removing from the table heading in comparable foreign unmanufactured (1) An unmanufactured construction construction material, other than designated paragraph (d) ‘‘Foreign and’’ and adding material mined or produced in the United ‘‘ ’’ country construction material, by more than Foreign (Nondesignated Country) and States. (The Buy American Act applies.) 6 percent; in its place; and (2) A manufactured construction material (ii) The construction material is not mined, ■ g. In Alternate I by— that is manufactured in the United States produced, or manufactured in the United ■ and, if the construction material consists States in sufficient and reasonably available i. Revising the date of the alternate; wholly or predominantly of iron or steel, the and commercial quantities of a satisfactory iron or steel was produced in the United quality; or ■ ii. Revising paragraph (b). States. (Section 1605 of the Recovery Act (iii) The application of the restriction of The revised and added text reads as applies.) section 1605 of the Recovery Act to a follows: * * * * * particular manufactured construction

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 53169

material would be inconsistent with the ■ b. Revising the heading and the date DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE public interest or the application of the Buy of the provision; American Act to a particular unmanufactured ■ c. Removing from paragraph (a) the GENERAL SERVICES construction material would be impracticable word ‘‘Other’’; and ADMINISTRATION or inconsistent with the public interest. ■ d. Revising paragraph (c). (c) * * * The revised text reads as follows: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND (3) Unless the Government determines that SPACE ADMINISTRATION an exception to section 1605 of the Recovery 52.225–24 Notice of Required Use of Act or the Buy American Act applies, use of American Iron, Steel, and Manufactured foreign construction material other than Goods—Buy American Act—Construction 48 CFR Chapter 1 manufactured construction material from a Materials Under Trade Agreements. Recovery Act designated country or * * * * * [Docket FAR 2010–0077, Sequence 7] unmanufactured construction material from a designated country is noncompliant with the Notice of Required Use of American Federal Acquisition Regulation; applicable Act. Iron, Steel, and Manufactured Goods— Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–45; * * * * * Buy American Act—Construction Small Entity Compliance Guide Alternate I (Oct 2010). *** Materials Under Trade Agreements (b) Construction materials. (1) The (Oct 2010) AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), restrictions of section 1605 of the American General Services Administration (GSA), Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. * * * * * L. 111–5) (Recovery Act) do not apply to (c) Evaluation of offers. (1) If the and National Aeronautics and Space Recovery Act designated country Government determines that an exception Administration (NASA). based on unreasonable cost of domestic manufactured construction material. The ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide. restrictions of the Buy American Act do not construction material applies in accordance apply to designated country unmanufactured with FAR 25.604, the Government will construction material. Consistent with U.S. evaluate an offer requesting exception to the SUMMARY: This document is issued obligations under international agreements, requirements of section 1605 of the Recovery under the joint authority of the this clause implements— Act or the Buy American Act by adding to Secretary of Defense, the Administrator (i) Section 1605 of the Recovery Act, by the offered price of the contract— of General Services and the (i) 25 percent of the offered price of the requiring, unless an exception applies, that Administrator of the National contract, if foreign manufactured all manufactured construction material in the construction material is included in the offer Aeronautics and Space Administration. project is manufactured in the United States based on an exception for the unreasonable This Small Entity Compliance Guide has and, if the construction material consists cost of comparable manufactured domestic been prepared in accordance with wholly or predominantly of iron or steel, the construction material; and section 212 of the Small Business iron or steel was produced in the United (ii) 6 percent of the cost of foreign States (produced in the United States means Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of unmanufactured construction material that all manufacturing processes of the iron 1996. It consists of a summary of rules included in the offer based on an exception or steel must take place in the United States, appearing in Federal Acquisition for the unreasonable cost of comparable Circular (FAC) 2005–45 which amend except metallurgical processes involving domestic unmanufactured construction refinement of steel additives); and material. the FAR. Interested parties may obtain (ii) The Buy American Act by providing a (2) If the solicitation specifies award on the further information regarding these preference for unmanufactured construction basis of factors in addition to cost or price, rules by referring to FAC 2005–45, material mined or produced in the United the Contracting Officer will apply the which precedes this document. These States over unmanufactured construction evaluation factors as specified in paragraph documents are also available via the material mined or produced in a (c)(1) of this provision and use the evaluated Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. nondesignated country. cost or price in determining the offer that (2) The Contractor shall use only domestic represents the best value to the Government. DATES: For effective dates see separate construction material, Recovery Act (3) Unless paragraph (c)(2) of this provision documents, which follow. designated country manufactured applies, if two or more offers are equal in construction material, or designated country price, the Contracting Officer will give FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The unmanufactured construction material, other preference to an offer that does not include analyst whose name appears in the table than Bahrainian, Mexican, or Omani foreign construction material excepted at the below. Please cite FAC 2005–45 and the construction material, in performing this request of the offeror on the basis of specific FAR case number. For contract, except as provided in paragraphs unreasonable cost. information pertaining to status or (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this clause. * * * * * publication schedules, contact the ■ 17. Amend section 52.225–24 by— [FR Doc. 2010–21027 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] Regulatory Secretariat at (202) 501– ■ a. Revising the section heading; BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P 4755.

LIST OF RULES IN FAC 2005–45

Item Subject FAR case Analyst

I ...... Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds ...... 2008–024 Jackson. II ...... Definition of Cost or Pricing Data ...... 2005–036 Chambers. III ...... American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act)—Buy American Re- 2009–008 Davis. quirements for Construction Materials.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: subject set forth in the documents Item I—Inflation Adjustment of Summaries for each FAR rule follow. following these item summaries. Acquisition-Related Thresholds (FAR For the actual revisions and/or FAC 2005–45 amends the FAR as Case 2008–024) amendments made by these FAR cases, specified below: This final rule amends the FAR to refer to the specific item number and implement section 807 of the Ronald W.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 53170 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Rules and Regulations

Reagan National Defense Authorization the construction threshold of $1,000,000 Item III—American Recovery and Act for Fiscal Year 2005. Section 807 increases to $1,500,000. Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery requires an adjustment every 5 years of Act)—Buy American Requirements for acquisition-related thresholds for Item II—Definition of Cost or Pricing Construction Materials (FAR Case inflation using the Consumer Price Data (FAR Case 2005–036) 2009–008) Index for all urban consumers, except This final rule amends the FAR by This final rule converts the interim for Davis-Bacon Act, Service Contract redefining ‘‘cost or pricing data,’’ adding rule published in the Federal Register at Act, and trade agreements thresholds. a definition of ‘‘certified cost or pricing 74 FR 14623, March 31, 2009, to a final The Councils have also used the same data,’’ and changing the term rule with changes. This final rule methodology to adjust nonstatutory FAR ‘‘information other than cost or pricing implements section 1605 of Division A acquisition-related thresholds in 2010. ’’ ‘‘ of the American Recovery and This is the second review of FAR data, to data other than certified cost or pricing data.’’ The rule clarifies the Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act) of acquisition-related thresholds. The 2009. It prohibits the use of funds Councils published a proposed rule in existing authority for contracting officers to require certified cost or appropriated for or otherwise made the Federal Register at 75 FR 5716, available by the Recovery Act for any February 4, 2010. pricing data or data other than certified cost or pricing data, and the existing project for the construction, alteration, The effect of the final rule on heavily- maintenance, or repair of a public used thresholds is the same as stated in requirements for submission of the various types of pricing data. The rule building or public work unless all of the the preamble to the proposed rule: iron, steel, and manufactured goods • is required to eliminate confusion and The micro-purchase base threshold used in the project are produced in the misunderstanding, especially regarding of $3,000 (FAR 2.101) is not changed. United States. Section 1605 mandates • the authority of the contracting officer to The simplified acquisition application of the Recovery Act Buy threshold (FAR 2.101) is raised from request data other than certified cost or American requirement in a manner $100,000 to $150,000. pricing data when there is no other • consistent with U.S. obligations under The FedBizOpps preaward and means to determine that proposed international agreements. Least post-award notices (FAR part 5) remain prices are fair and reasonable. Most developed countries continue to be at $25,000 because of trade agreements. significantly, the rule clarifies that data • treated as designated countries per Commercial items test program other than certified cost or pricing data congressional direction. Section 1605 ceiling (FAR 13.500) is raised from may include the identical types of data also provides for waivers under certain $5,500,000 to $6,500,000. as certified cost or pricing data but limited circumstances. • The cost or pricing data threshold without the certification. Because the Dated: August 18, 2010. (FAR 15.403–4) is raised from $650,000 rule clarifies existing requirements, it Edward Loeb, to $700,000. will have only minimal impact on the • Director, Acquisition Policy Division. The prime contractor Government, offerors, and automated subcontracting plan (FAR 19.702) floor systems. [FR Doc. 2010–21044 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] is raised from $550,000 to $650,000, and BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:53 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUR3.SGM 30AUR3 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with RULES3 Monday, August 30, 2010

Part V

Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration

29 CFR Part 2570 Prohibited Transaction Exemption Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans; Proposed Rule

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53172 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Proposed Regulation. All written defined in section 407(d)(2) of ERISA). responses will be available to the Most of the transactions prohibited by Employee Benefits Security public, without charge, online at http:// section 406 of ERISA are likewise Administration www.regulations.gov and http:// prohibited by section 4975 of the Code, www.dol.gov/ebsa, and at the Public which imposes an excise tax on those 29 CFR Part 2570 Disclosure Room, Room N–1513, transactions to be paid by each RIN 1210–AA98 Employee Benefits Security ‘‘disqualified person’’ (defined in section Administration, U.S. Department of 4975(e)(2) of the Code in virtually the Prohibited Transaction Exemption Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., same manner as the term ‘‘party in Procedures; Employee Benefit Plans Washington, DC 20210. interest’’) who engages in the prohibited FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. transactions. AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Mark W. Judge, Office of Exemption Both ERISA and the Code contain Administration, Labor. Determinations, Employee Benefits various statutory exemptions from the ACTION: Proposed rule. Security Administration, Room N–5700, prohibited transaction rules; these U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, exemptions were enacted by Congress to SUMMARY: This document contains a DC 20210, telephone (202) 693–8550. prevent the disruption of a number of proposed rule that, if adopted, would This is not a toll-free number. customary business practices involving supersede the existing procedure SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: employee benefit plans. The governing the filing and processing of enumerated statutory exemptions applications for administrative A. Background generally afford relief for, among other exemptions from the prohibited Part 4 of Title I of ERISA establishes things, loans to participants, the transaction provisions of the Employee an extensive framework of standards provision of services necessary for the Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and rules governing the conduct of plan operation of a plan for no more than (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of fiduciaries; collectively, these rules are reasonable compensation, loans to 1986 (the Code), and the Federal designed to safeguard the integrity of employee stock ownership plans, and Employees’ Retirement System Act of employee benefit plans. As part of this deposits in certain financial institutions 1986 (FERSA). The Secretary of Labor is structure, section 406 of ERISA regulated by state or federal agencies.2 authorized to grant exemptions from the generally prohibits the fiduciary of a In addition, section 408(a) of ERISA prohibited transaction provisions of plan from causing such plan to engage authorizes the Secretary of Labor to ERISA, the Code, and FERSA and to in a variety of transactions with certain grant administrative exemptions (on establish an exemption procedure to related parties, unless a statutory or either an individual or a class basis) provide for such relief. The proposed administrative exemption applies to the from the restrictions of ERISA sections rule would clarify and consolidate the transaction. These related parties 406 and 407(a) in instances where the Department of Labor’s exemption (which include plan fiduciaries, Secretary makes findings on the record procedures and provide the public with sponsoring employers, unions, service that such relief is (i) administratively a more comprehensive description of providers, and other persons who may feasible, (ii) in the interests of the plan the prohibited transaction exemption be in a position to exercise improper and its participants and beneficiaries, process. influence over a plan) are defined as and (iii) protective of the rights of participants and beneficiaries of such DATES: Comment Date: Written ‘‘parties in interest’’ in section 3(14) of ERISA.1 Section 406 also generally plan. Similarly, section 4975(c)(2) of the comments on the proposed regulation Code authorizes the Secretary of the should be received by the Department of prohibits a plan fiduciary from (i) dealing with the assets of a plan in his Treasury or his delegate to grant Labor on or before October 14, 2010. administrative exemptions from the Effective Date: The Department or her own interest or for his or her account, (ii) acting in any transaction prohibitions of Code section 4975(c)(1) proposes to make this regulation upon making the same findings. Before effective 60 days after the date of involving the plan on behalf of a party whose interests are adverse to those of an exemption is granted, notice of its publication of the final rule in the pendency must be published in the Federal Register. the plan or its participants and beneficiaries, or (iii) receiving any Federal Register. Interested persons ADDRESSES: To facilitate the receipt and consideration for his or her own must be given the opportunity to processing of responses, the Department personal account from a party dealing comment on the proposed exemption. If encourages interested persons to submit with the plan in connection with a the transaction involves potential their responses electronically by e-mail transaction involving plan assets, unless fiduciary self-dealing or conflicts of to: [email protected] or by using the an exemption specifically applies to interest, an opportunity for a public Federal eRulemaking portal at http:// such conduct. hearing must be provided. www.regulations.gov (follow To supplement these provisions, Sections 408(a) of ERISA and instructions for submission of sections 406 and 407(a) of ERISA 4975(c)(2) of the Code also direct the comments). Persons submitting impose restrictions on the nature and Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of responses electronically are encouraged extent of plan investments in assets the Treasury, respectively, to establish not to submit paper copies. Persons such as ‘‘employer securities’’ (as procedures for granting administrative interested in submitting written defined in section 407(d)(1) of ERISA) 2 responses in paper form should send or and ‘‘employer real property’’ (as The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. deliver their responses (preferably, at 109–280, 120 Stat. 780), enacted on August 17, 2006, amended both ERISA and the Code to least three copies) to the Office of 1 The transactions that are generally prohibited by establish additional statutory exemptions for certain Exemption Determinations, Employee section 406 include sales, exchanges, or leases of transactions, such as those involving the block Benefits Security Administration, Room property; loans or extensions of credit; and the trading of securities or other property between a N–5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 furnishing of goods, services, or facilities. In plan and a party in interest, the cross trading of a addition, section 406 generally prohibits a plan security between a plan and any other account Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, fiduciary from allowing the transfer to (or use by managed by the same investment manager, and the DC 20210, Attention: Prohibited or for the benefit of) a party in interest of any assets execution of certain foreign exchange transactions Transaction Exemption Procedures of a plan. between a plan and a bank or broker-dealer.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53173

exemptions. In this connection, section Benefits Security Administration. See Voluntary Fiduciary Correction 3003(b) of ERISA directs the Secretary Secretary of Labor’s Order 6–2009. Program) and PTE 2003–39 (class of Labor and the Secretary of the Four years after the enactment of exemption providing relief for the Treasury (the Secretaries) to consult and FERSA, the Department published a receipt of consideration by a plan from coordinate with each other with respect final regulation (29 CFR 2570.30 et seq. a party in interest in connection with to the establishment of rules applicable (1991), reprinted in 55 FR 32847 the release of a claim in settlement of to the granting of exemptions from the (August 10, 1990)) setting forth a revised actual or threatened litigation). prohibited transaction restrictions of exemption procedure that superseded In considering individual exemption ERISA and the Code. In addition, under ERISA Procedure 75–1. This regulation, requests from applicants, the section 3004 of ERISA, the Secretaries which became effective on September Department has consistently exercised are authorized to develop rules on a 10, 1990, reflects the jurisdictional its authority under ERISA section 408(a) joint basis that are appropriate for the changes made by Presidential by carefully examining the decision- efficient administration of ERISA. Reorganization Plan No. 4 and extends making process utilized by a plan’s Pursuant to the foregoing statutory the scope of the exemption procedure to fiduciaries with respect to a transaction. provisions, the Secretaries jointly issued applications for relief from the FERSA In applying this policy, the Department an exemption procedure on April 28, prohibited transaction rules. In determines whether it can make 1975 (ERISA Procedure 75–1, 40 FR addition, the 1990 final regulation findings that the transaction is designed 18471, also issued as Rev. Proc. 75–26, codified various informal exemption to adequately safeguard the interests of 1975–1 C.B. 722). Under this procedure, guidelines developed by the Department the plan’s participants and beneficiaries. a person seeking an exemption under since the adoption of ERISA Procedure Therefore, the Department requires, as a both section 408(a) of ERISA and 75–1. condition of every exemption, that the section 4975 of the Code was obliged to As noted previously, section 408(a) of terms of the subject transaction be no file an exemption application with both ERISA authorizes the Secretary of Labor less favorable to the plan than the terms the Internal Revenue Service and the to grant administrative exemptions on which the plan could obtain in an Department of Labor. However, the either an individual or a class basis. arm’s-length transaction with an requirement of seeking exemptive relief Class exemptions provide general relief unrelated party. Depending on the facts for the same transaction from two from the restrictions of ERISA, the Code, and circumstances of a particular separate federal departments soon and/or FERSA to those parties in transaction, additional conditions for proved administratively cumbersome. interest who engage in the categories of exemptive relief generally are required. To resolve this problem, section 102 transactions described in the exemption The Department has followed this of Presidential Reorganization Plan No. and who also satisfy the conditions policy in considering requests for either 4 of 1978 (3 CFR 332 (1978), reprinted stipulated by the exemption. In their prospective or retroactive exemptive in 5 U.S.C. app. at 672 (2006), and in broad applicability and policy relief. In general, the Department does 92 Stat. 3790 (1978)), effective on implications, class exemptions possess not make determinations concerning the December 31, 1978, transferred the several of the characteristics of agency appropriateness, attractiveness, or authority of the Secretary of the rulemaking; accordingly, persons who prudence of the investment proposals Treasury to issue exemptions under are in conformity with all of the submitted by exemption applicants. section 4975 of the Code, with certain requirements of a class exemption are However, the Department ordinarily enumerated exceptions, to the Secretary not ordinarily required to seek an will not give favorable consideration to of Labor. As a result, the Secretary of individual exemption for the same an exemption request if the Department Labor now possesses authority under transaction from the Department. believes that the proposed transactions section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, as well Individual exemptions, by contrast, are inconsistent with the fiduciary as under section 408(a) of ERISA, to involve case-by-case determinations as responsibility provisions of sections 403 issue individual and class exemptions to whether the specific facts represented and 404 of ERISA. Accordingly, the from the prohibited transaction by an applicant concerning an Department requires that an exemption restrictions of ERISA and the Code. The exemption transaction (as well as the transaction be designed to minimize the Secretary of Labor has delegated this conditions applicable to such a potential for conflicts of interest or self- authority, along with most of the transaction) support a finding by the dealing. This approach allows qualified Secretary’s other responsibilities under Department that the requirements for professionals or responsible fiduciaries ERISA, to the Assistant Secretary of relief from the prohibited transaction to assess the prudence of a transaction Labor for the Employee Benefits provisions of ERISA, the Code, and/or independently and in a manner that is Security Administration. See Secretary FERSA have been satisfied in a protective of the plan’s assets. of Labor’s Order 6–2009, 74 FR 21524 particular instance. Moreover, the structure of the (May 7, 2009). While the vast majority of transaction under consideration should FERSA, enacted in 1986, contained administrative exemptions issued by the preclude unilateral action by the prohibited transaction rules similar to Department have been the product of applicant which could disadvantage the those found in ERISA and the Code that requests for relief from individual investing plan. are applicable to parties in interest with applicants and/or the employee benefits In keeping with the policy of respect to the Federal Thrift Savings community, section 408(a) of ERISA evaluating the decisional processes Fund established by FERSA. The also authorizes the Department to surrounding a transaction, many of the Secretary of Labor is directed under initiate exemptions on its own motion. exemptions issued by the Department FERSA to prescribe, by regulation, a Recent examples of such Department- are conditioned on the retention of an procedure for granting administrative initiated exemptions include Prohibited independent fiduciary to represent the exemptions from certain of those Transaction Exemption (PTE) 2002–51 interests of the plan, particularly where prohibited transactions. See 5 U.S.C. (class exemption, as amended in 2006, a plan fiduciary has interests with section 8477(c)(3). The Secretary of providing relief from the sanctions respect to a transaction which may Labor has delegated this rulemaking contained in section 4975 of the Code conflict with his or her fiduciary duties authority under FERSA to the Assistant for certain eligible transactions to the plan. In these situations, an Secretary of Labor for the Employee identified in the Department’s independent fiduciary typically will

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53174 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

exercise his or her authority to During its first two decades of the Federal Register.4 Shortly thereafter, negotiate, approve, and/or monitor an evaluating individual exemption the Department established a public exemption transaction on behalf of the requests, the Department observed that e-mail portal on its Web site for ERISA- plan. Similarly, valuations and other a significant proportion involved related questions and created individual assessments relevant to an exemption transactions, terms, and safeguards e-mail accounts for its employees; these are expected to be made by qualified which were remarkably similar to those developments enabled exemption professionals independent of the party contained in previously granted applicants and others to transmit in interest proposing to deal with the exemptions. Accordingly, to facilitate exemption-related messages and plan’s assets in the subject transaction. the prompt consideration of such documents to the Department on a Over time, the Department has issued routine applications, the Department virtually instantaneous basis. guidance explaining its policies and published an administrative class In 2002, Congress enacted the E- practices relating to the consideration of exemption, PTE 96–62 (61 FR 39988 Government Act (Pub. L. 107–347, 116 exemption applications. In 1985, the (July 31, 1996), as amended at 67 FR Stat. 2915) to facilitate Internet-based Department published a statement of 44622 (July 3, 2002)). Under this class public access to, and participation in, policy concerning the issuance of exemption (commonly referred to as the Federal rulemaking process; to retroactive exemptions from the EXPRO), the Department may authorize implement the requirements of this prohibited transaction provisions of exemptive relief, on an expedited basis, statute, the Office of Management and section 406 of ERISA and section 4975 for certain prospective transactions that Budget (OMB) launched a Web site, of the Code (ERISA Technical Release would otherwise be prohibited under http://www.regulations.gov, in 2003. 85–1, January 22, 1985). This statement ERISA, the Code, or FERSA, provided This Web site (which was upgraded in noted that, in evaluating future that the applicant satisfies all of the 2005 with the introduction of an applications for retroactive exemptions, conditions of the EXPRO exemption. electronic regulatory docket the Department would ordinarily take Among other things, PTE 96–62 management system) enables into account a variety of objective stipulates that the transaction for which individuals and organizations to access factors in determining whether a plan an applicant seeks authorization must and comment upon proposed fiduciary had exhibited good faith be substantially similar in all material rulemaking documents issued by conduct in connection with the past respects to at least two other Federal agencies, as well as prohibited prohibited transaction for which relief is transactions for which the Department transaction exemptions proposed by the sought (such as whether the fiduciary recently granted administrative relief Department. In addition, the Department has recently established a had utilized a contemporaneous from the same restriction.3 Under PTE dedicated e-mail address, independent appraisal or reference to an 96–62, authorization may be available in [email protected], which permits objective third-party source, e.g., a stock as few as 78 days from the interested persons to submit comments exchange, in establishing the fair market acknowledgement of the receipt by the electronically concerning a proposed value of the plan assets acquired or Department of a written submission filed in accordance with the class exemption. disposed of by the plan in connection The proposed regulation contained in exemption. From 1996 to 2009, more with the transaction at issue). However, this document updates the prohibited than 400 applicants obtained expedited while noting that the satisfaction of transaction exemption procedure to relief from the Department pursuant to such objective criteria might be reflect changes in the Department’s the requirements of PTE 96–62. indicative of a fiduciary’s good faith exemption practices since the current In the years since the current conduct, the release cautioned that the procedure was implemented in 1990. exemption procedure was adopted in Department would routinely examine Among other things, key elements of the the totality of facts and circumstances 1990, the accelerated development and exemption policies and guidance surrounding a past prohibited expanded usage of various electronic currently found in ERISA Technical transaction before reaching a final media for the transmission of Release 85–1 and the 1995 Exemption determination on whether a retroactive information—including the Internet, Publication would be consolidated exemption is warranted. electronic mail (e-mail), and facsimile within the text of a unitary, In 1995, the Department issued a machines—has provided the comprehensive final regulation, thus publication, Exemption Procedures Department with more technologically reducing the regulatory burdens on Under Federal Pension Law (the 1995 advanced means for discharging its applicants for exemptive relief. Exemption Publication). In addition to responsibilities to the public. This rapid Adoption of these revised procedures providing a brief overview of the transformation has also altered the should also encourage the prompt and exemption process, the 1995 Exemption manner in which the Department fair consideration of all exemption Publication included definitions for ordinarily processes and disseminates applications by clarifying the types of technical terms such as ‘‘qualified prohibited transaction exemptions. In information and documentation independent fiduciary,’’ ‘‘qualified 1996, the Department established a Web generally required for a complete filing, independent appraiser,’’ and ‘‘qualified site, http://www.dol.gov, which featured by affording expanded opportunities for appraisal report.’’ These definitions, the electronic posting of notices of the electronic submission of information derived from conditions contained in proposed and final prohibited and comments relating to an exemption, previously granted exemptions, transaction exemptions as published in and by providing plan participants and provided important guidance about the other interested persons with a more Department’s standards concerning the 3 Additional information concerning the thorough understanding of the requirements for obtaining administrative relief independence, knowledge, and under PTE 96–62 (as amended) may be obtained by exemption under consideration. competence of third-party experts accessing the complete text of the class exemption retained by a plan to review and/or at the Department’s Web site: http://www.dol.gov/ 4 In addition, the texts of all Federal Register oversee an exemption transaction, as ebsa/Regs/ClassExemptions. A chronological listing notices relating to prohibited transaction of all final authorizations granted by the exemptions published since 1995 are available in well as the contents of the reports and Department pursuant to PTE 96–62 since 1996 may electronic format at the following Web site representations ordinarily required from also be found at: http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/Regs/ maintained by the U.S. Government Printing Office: such experts. expro_exemptions.html. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53175

B. Overview of Proposed Changes to the exemption applications that are filed § 2570.34(c), setting forth the Exemption Procedure Regulation solely under section 408(a) of ERISA or requirements for specialized statements The current exemption procedure solely under section 4975(c)(2) of the from qualified, independent appraisers, regulation at 29 CFR part 2570, subpart Code. would replace and clarify the content of section 2570.34(b)(5)(iii) of the existing B consists of 23 discrete sections Section 2570.31 Definitions (§ 2570.30 through § 2570.52), arranged regulation. This section requires that the Section 2570.31 of the current independent appraisal report submitted by topic and generally reflecting the exemption procedure regulation defines chronological order of steps involved in by the appraiser on behalf of the plan be the following terms for purposes of the current and not more than one year old processing an exemption application. exemption procedures: Affiliate, class This proposed revision to the exemption on the date of the transaction. Further, exemption, Department, exemption there must be a written update by the procedure retains the section-by-section transaction, individual exemption, party topical structure of the existing qualified independent appraiser in interest and pooled fund. The reaffirming the accuracy of the prior regulation, along with most of the Department proposes to add three operative language. However, the appraisal as of the date of the additional definitions, a qualified transaction. If an appraisal report is a Department also proposes several appraisal report, a qualified important substantive amendments; year old or more, a new appraisal must independent appraiser, and a qualified be submitted to the Department by the these changes are summarized below on independent fiduciary, to the regulation. a section-by-section basis. applicant. In addition, the appraisal These three definitions are referred to in must include the appraiser’s rationale, Section 2570.30 Scope of the the glossary of the Department’s 1995 credentials, and a statement regarding Regulation Exemption Publication, and are the appraiser’s independence from the commonly used in individual and class parties involved in the transaction. The Section 2570.30(a) of the proposed exemptions. regulation describes the statutory appraiser would be required to submit provisions of ERISA, the Code, and Section 2570.33 Applications the a copy of its engagement letter with the FERSA under which the Department is Department Will Not Ordinarily plan (i.e., the appraiser’s client is the authorized to establish procedures Consider plan) outlining the appraiser’s specific duties. Among other things, the governing the granting of administrative Under § 2570.33(c) of the current appraiser’s report must specify the exemptions, and cites appropriately the regulation, an application for an valuation methodology applied by the Department’s jurisdictional mandate individual exemption ordinarily will appraiser, and should include pertaining to exemptions under not receive separate consideration if the documentation that supports the Presidential Reorganization Plan No. 4 Department is considering a class appraiser’s conclusions on valuation. In of 1978. A revised section 2570.30(b) exemption relating to the same type of addition, the applicant also must describes the extent of exemptive relief transaction or transactions. Under the disclose the percentage of the generally permissible under section proposed regulation, however, this appraiser’s compensation that was 408(a) of ERISA and corresponding general rule may be waived in instances derived from any party in interest (or sections of the Code and FERSA, where (i) the issuance of the final class any affiliate of the party in interest) including the availability (under limited exemption may not be imminent, and involved in the exemption transaction. circumstances) of retroactive relief for (ii) the applicant can demonstrate that As a general matter, the appraisers past prohibited transactions. exigent circumstances compel it to seek retained in connection with an An updated § 2570.30(c) describes the immediate exemptive relief from the exemption transaction must not receive authority of the Department to propose Department in order to protect the more than a de minimis amount of and issue administrative exemptions on interests of the plan and its participants compensation from the parties in its own motion. Currently, this authority (such as the sale of an illiquid asset that interest to the transaction or their is referenced somewhat awkwardly at has decreased in value). the beginning of § 2570.32(a) under the affiliates. section heading that describes ‘‘Persons Section 2570.34 Information To Be Statements from qualified who may apply for exemptions.’’ Apart Included in Every Exemption independent fiduciaries—A new from repositioning this regulatory Application § 2570.34(d), setting forth the language, the revised § 2570.30(c) also Section 2570.34 of the current requirements for specialized statements specifies the provisions of the updated regulation describes the information to from qualified, independent fiduciaries, exemption procedure regulation be included in every exemption would replace and clarify the content of generally applicable to exemptions application. An expanded section 2570.34(b)(5)(iv) of the existing initiated on the Department’s own § 2570.34(a)(2) would require the regulation. Many of the exemptions motion. inclusion of a chronology of the events previously issued by the Department In addition, proposed § 2570.30(d) leading to the exemption transaction. In have been conditioned on the incorporates language found in the text addition, as detailed below, section designation of an independent fiduciary of prior granted exemptions 2570.34 would be amended (through the who is qualified to represent the emphasizing that the scope of addition of new subsections (c) and (d)) interests of the plan, particularly where exemptive relief available from the to incorporate key elements of the the plan’s named or other fiduciary has Department does not extend to certain exemption policy and guidance interests with respect to a transaction other fiduciary provisions of ERISA or currently found in the 1995 Exemption which may conflict with its fiduciary to the exclusive benefit rule found in Publication, specifically with respect to duties to the plan. Accordingly, certain section 401(a) of the Code. Proposed the required content of the specialized past exemptions issued by the sections 2570.30(e) and (f) replicate statements that are obtained from Department (generally involving non- language in the current regulation independent appraisers and fiduciaries complex transactions) have required the relating to the provision of oral advice in support of an exemption transaction. designation of an independent fiduciary by Department employees concerning Statements from qualified or second fiduciary (e.g., the employer an exemption, and the handling of independent appraisers—A new or an officer of the employer who is

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53176 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

independent of the party engaging in the by independent, third-party experts submission of all correspondence exemption transaction with the plan). other than independent appraisers or relating to such matters. However, the See, for example, PTE 2008–01, 73 FR fiduciaries. The new section would revised § 2570.35(a)(7) would reserve 3274 (Jan. 17, 2008) and PTE 2009–06, clarify the language currently found at the Department’s right to require the 74 FR 8992 (Feb. 27, 2009). However, section 2570.34(b)(5)(iii) of the existing production of additional relevant even where an employer or a plan regulation. This new section would also information or documentation sponsor is independent of the parties require: a copy of the expert’s concerning any of these matters, and engaging in the exemption transaction, engagement letter with the plan (i.e., the would stipulate that a denial of the such parties may nevertheless lack the third-party expert’s client is the plan) exemption application will result if the expertise necessary to represent the describing the specific duties the expert additional requested information is not interests of the plan in certain types of will undertake on behalf of a plan; a provided. transactions. In such situations, the summary of the expert’s qualifications Disclosure of prior convictions— Department may condition relief upon to serve in such capacity (including the Under § 2570.35(a)(6) of the current the plan’s retention of a ‘‘qualified expert’s training, experience, and regulation, an individual exemption independent fiduciary’’ who is neither facilities); and a detailed description of application must describe whether an the plan’s named fiduciary nor a plan any relationship that the expert may applicant or any of the parties in fiduciary who ordinarily provides have with the party in interest engaging interest involved in the exemption fiduciary services to the plan. In such in the transaction with the plan, or its transaction has, during the thirteen cases, the qualified independent affiliates, that may influence the actions years preceding the application, been fiduciary is responsible both for of the expert. convicted of any crime described in determining whether such transaction is section 411 of ERISA. Section 411, Section 2570.35 Information To Be in the interests of the plan and of its however, does not list all crimes that Included in Applications for Individual participants and beneficiaries, and for involve the abuse or misuse of a Exemptions Only exercising its discretionary authority as position of trust by a person with to whether a plan should proceed with Sections 2570.35(a)(5), (6), and (7) of respect to client funds or securities. the transaction that is the subject of a the current regulation requires Accordingly, the Department proposes prohibited transaction request. exemption applications to disclose to amend this section by requiring Under § 2570.34(d), the Department information regarding whether the individual exemption applications to would require the disclosure of the applicant or any of the parties to the disclose prior convictions of applicants following information from a qualified exemption transaction is or has been, or parties in interest involving the independent fiduciary: A copy of such within a specified number of years past, broader range of crimes described in fiduciary’s engagement letter with the a defendant in any lawsuit or criminal section I(g) of PTE 84–14 (known as the plan describing the duties the fiduciary action concerning conduct as a fiduciary QPAM class exemption) 5 that occurred will undertake on behalf of the plan; a or other party in interest with respect to in the thirteen years prior to the filing detailed explanation of why the any employee benefit plan of the exemption application. Among proposed transaction is in the interests (§ 2570.35(a)(5)), convicted of a crime other things, section I(g) of PTE 84–14 of the participants and beneficiaries; a described in section 411 of ERISA disqualifies certain individuals who statement that, in instances where the (§ 2570.35(a)(6)), or under investigation have been convicted of felonies arising transaction is ongoing, the fiduciary or examination or engaged in litigation out of the conduct of the business of a agrees to monitor the proposed or a continuing controversy with certain broker, dealer, investment adviser, bank, transaction throughout its duration on Federal agencies (§ 2570.35(a)(7)). insurance company or fiduciary from behalf of the plan, taking any Section 2570.35(a)(7) also requires serving as a QPAM under the class appropriate action to safeguard the disclosure of whether any plan affected exemption; in addition, the class interests of the plan; what qualifications by the exemption transaction has been exemption bars any individual the fiduciary has to perform these duties under such investigation or convicted of a crime described in ERISA on behalf of the plan and the level of examination, or has been engaged in section 411 from serving as a QPAM. ERISA experience the person has; and a litigation or a continuing controversy, The Department believes that representation to the effect that such and further obligates the applicant to incorporating the disclosure of this fiduciary understands and submit copies of all correspondence additional information concerning the acknowledges his or her ERISA duties with the specified Federal agencies criminal records of the applicant and and responsibilities in acting as a regarding the substantive issues other parties in interest participating in fiduciary on behalf of the plan. The involved in such proceedings which the exemption transaction is necessary fiduciary must also disclose if it is relate to compliance with the provisions to evaluate the credibility and integrity related in any way to the employer or of ERISA, provisions of the Code of such parties, some of whom may its principals, as well as the percentage relating to plans, or provisions of possess substantial discretion regarding of its current compensation that was FERSA. the exemption transaction or may make derived from any party in interest (or Disclosure of prior investigations, representations upon which the any affiliate of the party in interest) examinations, and lawsuits—In an effort Department relies in determining involved in the exemption transaction. to reduce administrative burdens on whether the statutory criteria for an As a general matter, an independent applicants, the Department proposes to exemption have been satisfied. fiduciary retained in connection with an amend § 2570.35(a)(5) so as not to Disclosure of payment of civil exemption transaction must receive no require disclosure of lawsuits relating monetary penalties and excise taxes more than a de minimis amount of solely to routine benefit claims. In assessed by the Treasury and Labor compensation from the parties in addition, the Department proposes to Departments in connection with prior interest to the transaction or their amend § 2570.35(a)(7) to permit an prohibited transactions—The current affiliates. applicant to submit a brief statement version of § 2570.35(a)(14)(v) requires Statements from other experts—A describing the Federal investigation, new § 2570.34(e) sets forth the content examination, litigation or controversy 5 See 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as amended requirements for statements submitted involving the plan in lieu of the by 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53177

an applicant to disclose whether any shown in such annual report that is Section 2570.37 Duty To Amend and excise taxes due under sections 4975(a) represented by all investments of this Supplement Exemption Application and (b) of the Code by reason of a type; and (4) The applicable statutory or As in the current regulation, this consummated exemption transaction administrative exemption covering section would require an applicant to have been paid. The Department these investments (if any). notify the Department in writing if it proposes to amend this provision to also Disclosure of net worth statement— discovers that any material fact or require disclosure as to whether any The Department proposes to add a new representation contained in the civil monetary penalties due under subsection (§ 2570.35(b)(4)) which application or in any documents or section 502(i) or (l) of ERISA have been would require that each application for testimony provided in support of the paid. In addition, the applicant would an individual exemption furnish a net application is inaccurate, if any such be required to furnish documentary worth statement for any party in interest fact or representation changes during evidence (such as a cancelled check) that provides a personal guarantee with this period, or if, during the pendency demonstrating payment of all applicable respect to an exemption transaction. of the application, anything occurs excise taxes or civil penalties. Retroactive exemptions—The which may affect the continuing Disclosure of party-in-interest accuracy of such fact or representation. investments—The general purpose of Department proposes the addition of a new subsection, § 2570.35(d), to provide The Department proposes to amend this the disclosure provision at section to clarify that an applicant must § 2570.35(a)(16) is to enable the guidance to applicants who are seeking retroactive relief for past prohibited also notify the Department of any Department to determine whether the material fact or representation that has transactions. This new subsection exemption transaction, in conjunction been omitted from the exemption would incorporate the standards for with other plan investments involving application. The determination whether, retroactive exemptions issued by the parties in interest, would unduly under the totality of the facts and Department in ERISA Technical Release concentrate the plan’s assets in certain circumstances, a particular statement 85–1 (January 22, 1985). The investments so as to raise questions contained in (or omitted from) an Department believes that the inclusion under the fiduciary responsibility exemption application constitutes a of these standards as part of an updated provisions of section 404 of ERISA. material fact or representation is made and comprehensive exemption Under the current version of by the Department. To the extent that a procedure regulation will provide § 2570.35(a)(16), the extent of applicant material representation is omitted, greater clarity to applicants for disclosure is limited to whether or not becomes inaccurate or changes, the the assets of the affected plan(s) are retroactive relief, thereby facilitating the prohibited transaction exemptive relief invested in loans to any party in interest prompt evaluation of such applications. will no longer be available starting on involved in the exemption transaction, Among other things, the new subsection the first day on which any one of these property leased to any such party in reaffirms that, as a general matter, the events occur. interest, or securities issued by any Department will only consider granting party in interest involved in the retroactive relief for transactions already Section 2570.39 Opportunities To exemption transaction. Where such entered into where an applicant can Submit Additional Information investments exist, the current regulation satisfactorily demonstrate that the Under the current rule, in instances requires an applicant to include an safeguards necessary for the grant of a where the Department has issued a additional statement detailing the prospective exemption were in place at tentative denial letter to an applicant nature and extent of these investments, the time of the consummated pursuant to § 2570.38 and the applicant and whether a statutory or transaction. In this regard, an applicant has timely notified the Department of its administrative exemption covers such should provide evidence that it acted in intent to submit additional written investments. In the interest of greater good faith at the time of the subject information in support of the exemption transparency, the Department proposes transaction by taking reasonable and application, the applicant must submit to amend this section to require an appropriate steps to protect the plan such information within 30 days from applicant to disclose whether or not the from abuse and unnecessary risk. The the date on which it expressed its intent assets of the affected plan(s) have been new subsection also enumerates a to provide the information. In order to invested directly or indirectly in any variety of objective considerations that promote the uniform and efficient other transactions (e.g., securities the Department ordinarily takes into consideration of such additional lending or extensions of credit), whether account when evaluating whether the information, the Department proposes to exempt or non-exempt, with the party in conduct of the applicant at the time of amend this section by requiring that the interest involved in the exemption a previously consummated transaction applicant submit the additional written transaction; accordingly, such satisfies the good faith standard. information within 40 days from the disclosure would not be limited to plan Section 2570.36 Where To File an date of the tentative denial letter. An investments in loans or leases involving Application applicant may only request an extension the party in interest, or securities issued of time to submit the additional by the party in interest. In cases where The Department is revising this information in situations where reasons any such investments exist, the section to apprise applicants of the fax beyond its control render it unable to applicant must also provide the and e-mail information necessary to furnish the information within the 40- Department with additional information expedite delivery of the application or day limit. Such requests for an describing, among other things: (1) The any other relevant information relating extension of time for the submission of type of investment to which the to the application. In addition, the additional information also must be statement pertains; (2) The aggregate fair Department is amending this section to made by the applicant before the market value of all investments of this require applicants to submit two paper expiration of the foregoing 40-day type as reflected in the plan’s most copies of applications: One for the period. The Department will only grant recent annual report; (3) The Department’s file and one for the such requests for extension in unusual approximate percentage of the fair analyst’s working copy, as well as an circumstances and for a limited period market value of the plan’s total assets as electronic version of the application. of time as determined, respectively, by

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53178 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

the Department in its sole discretion. If Under the current rule, in instances manner and time period of providing the applicant is unable to timely submit where a conference has already been the notice to interested persons. After such additional written information, the held, the applicant may submit to the furnishing notification, an applicant Department will issue a final denial Department within 20 days of the must provide the Department with a letter pursuant to § 2570.41. The conference any additional data, declaration under penalty of perjury Department proposes to further amend arguments, or precedents discussed at certifying that notice was given to the § 2570.39 to indicate that the applicant the conference but not previously or persons and in the time and manner that may notify the Department of its intent adequately presented in writing. The the Department deems adequate. to submit additional information Department proposes to amend this Supplemental statement—The electronically via the e-mail address provision by permitting the applicant to Department proposes to modify the provided in the tentative denial letter. request an extension of time for the current text of the supplemental submission of this additional statement by expressly permitting Section 2570.40 Conferences information where reasons beyond the interested persons to submit comments Under the current rule, the applicant’s control render it unable to or requests for a hearing concerning a Department will attempt to schedule (in submit the information within the proposed exemption electronically (at response to a request made by an foregoing 20-day limit. Such requests for either [email protected] or http:// applicant under § 2570.38(b)) a an extension must be made before the www.regulations.gov) or by facsimile. conference concerning a tentative denial expiration of the 20-day period. The The supplemental statement also would letter within the 45-day period Department will only grant such be modified to contain a statement following the later of (1) the date the requests for extension in unusual advising those individuals submitting Department receives the applicant’s circumstances and for a brief period of comments or requests for a hearing on request for a conference, or (2) the date time as determined, respectively, by the an exemption to refrain from disclosing the Department notifies the applicant, Department in its sole discretion. sensitive personal data, such as Social after reviewing additional information Security numbers. submitted pursuant to § 2570.39, that it Section 2570.42 Notice of Proposed Methods of providing notice—Under is not prepared to propose the requested Exemption the current regulation, the method used exemption. The Department proposes to Under section 2570.42 of the by an applicant to furnish notice to amend this section by substituting a proposed regulation, the Department interested persons must be reasonably simplified procedure that is intended to would publish a notice of proposed calculated to ensure that such persons facilitate the prompt and efficient exemption in the Federal Register if, actually receive the notice. In all cases, scheduling of such conferences. In after reviewing the record pertaining to personal delivery and delivery by first- instances where the applicant has the exemption transaction (including class mail are considered reasonable expressed both a request for a any information submitted by an methods of providing notice. The conference and an intent to submit applicant), the Department tentatively Department proposes to amend this additional information in support of the concludes that the proposed exemption provision to also permit applicants to application, pursuant to proposed satisfies the statutory criteria for the utilize electronic means (such as e-mail) § 2570.39, the Department would granting of an exemption. In addition to to deliver notice to interested persons of schedule a conference at a mutually providing notice of the pendency of the a pending exemption, provided that the convenient date and time that occurs exemption before the Department, the applicant can satisfactorily prove within 20 days after the date on which revised section would describe the electronic delivery to the entire class of the Department has provided contents of the notice of proposed interested persons. notification to the applicant that it exemption. Summary of proposed exemption— remains unprepared to propose the Since the current exemption procedure Section 2570.43 Notification of requested exemption based upon the was adopted in 1990, the Department Interested Persons by Applicant additional information submitted by the has noted that recipients of the Notice applicant. Alternatively, in instances Section 2570.43 of the current of Proposed Exemption and where the applicant requests a regulation describes the methods that an supplemental statement sometimes have conference without expressing an intent applicant may use to notify interested difficulty understanding these to submit additional information persons of a proposed exemption and documents. Many recipients, especially pursuant to proposed § 2570.39, the the required content of the notice. In plan participants, contact the Department would schedule a addition to a copy of the Notice of Department to express concern that conference at a mutually convenient Proposed Exemption published in the their benefits under the plan may be date and time that occurs within 40 Federal Register, the applicant must adversely affected by the exemption days after the date of the issuance of the include in the notification to interested transaction. As a consequence, the tentative denial letter. An applicant may persons a supplemental statement. Department devotes considerable time only request an extension of time to Section 2570.43 also states that, once explaining to plan participants and schedule a conference in situations the Department has published a notice beneficiaries the basis for the proposed where reasons beyond its control render of proposed exemption, the applicant exemption and informing plan it unable to attend a conference within must notify the interested persons participants and beneficiaries of their the foregoing time frames. Such requests described in the application in the right to submit written comments to the for an extension of time for scheduling manner indicated in the application Department relating to the proposed a conference must also be made before unless the Department has informed the exemption. the expiration of the respective 20-day applicant beforehand that it considers In order to provide notice recipients and 40-day periods. The Department the method of notification described in with a clearer understanding of the will only grant such requests for the application to be inadequate. Where exemption transaction under extension in unusual circumstances and the Department has determined the consideration, the Department proposes for a brief period of time as determined, proposed method of notification to be to amend § 2570.43 (through addition of respectively, by the Department in its inadequate, the applicant must obtain new subsections (d) and (e)) to require sole discretion. the Department’s consent as to the that certain exemption applicants (e.g.,

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53179

those seeking exemptive relief for Prior notice of a hearing on an Section 2570.49 Limits to the Effect of relatively complex transactions) provide exemption application has always been Exemptions notice recipients with an additional provided by the Department, and is also Under § 2570.49(a), (b) and (c) of the statement that succinctly explains the implicit in the existing language of current regulation, the Department essential facts and circumstances § 2570.46(c) and § 2570.47(b), under describes the limits on the effect of surrounding the proposed exemption. which an applicant may satisfy its own exemptions. This section would be This additional supplementary notice of hearing obligations to amended by adding a new subsection statement, to be known as a Summary interested persons by furnishing such (d) stipulating that, for transactions that of Proposed Exemption (SPE), must be individuals with a copy of the hearing are continuing in nature, an exemption written in a manner calculated to be notice previously published by the does not protect parties in interest from understood by the average recipient. Department in the Federal Register liability with respect to an exemption Among other things, the SPE must (provided that such copy is provided by transaction if, subsequent to the objectively describe the exemption the applicant within 10 days of its granting of an exemption, there are transaction and the parties thereto, the publication by the Department). The material changes to the original facts reasons why the plan seeks to engage in current language of the regulation, and representations underlying such the transaction, and the conditions and however, does not make clear the exemption or if one or more of the safeguards proposed to protect the plan Department’s obligation to provide exemption’s conditions are not met. and its participants from potential abuse notice of a hearing in connection with Thus, for example, in the case of a or unnecessary risk of loss in the event an administrative exemption that was continuing exemption transaction such the Department grants the exemption. proposed by the Department on its own as a loan or a lease, if any of the material Applicants who are directed to provide motion. Accordingly, the texts of facts were to change after the exemption interested persons with an SPE would § 2570.46(b) and § 2570.47(a) would be is granted, the exemption would cease also be required to furnish the modified to state expressly that, in to apply as of the date of such change. Department with a copy of such instances where a hearing on a proposed In the event of any such change, the summary for review prior to its exemption is indicated, the Department parties in interest involved in the distribution to interested persons. will publish a notice of such hearing in exemption transaction may apply for a Sections 2570.44 Withdrawal of the Federal Register. new exemption to protect themselves Exemption Application from liability on or after the date of such Section 2570.48 Grant of Exemption change. Section 2570.44 has been modified to clarify that if an applicant chooses to Section 2570.48 of the proposed C. Request for Comments withdraw an application for exemption, regulation describes the standards that The Department invites comments such withdrawal generally shall not must be satisfied for the Department to from interested persons on all aspects of prejudice any subsequent applications grant a final exemption. The language of the proposed regulation. Comments for exemption filed by the applicant. the current exemption procedure should be addressed to the Office of regulation inadvertently omits the Exemption Determinations, Employee Sections 2570.46 and 2570.47 statutory requirement contained in both Benefits Security Administration, Room Hearings section 408(a) of ERISA and section N–5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Under § 2570.46 of the current 4975(c)(2) of the Code which stipulates Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, regulation, the Department requires that that, prior to granting an exemption, the DC 20210, Attention: Prohibited persons who may be adversely affected Department must make a finding that Transaction Exemption Procedures by the grant of an exemption from the such relief is (1) administratively Proposed Regulation. Commenters are fiduciary self-dealing provisions of feasible, (2) in the interests of the plan’s encouraged to submit their comments section 406(b) of ERISA and participants and beneficiaries, and (3) electronically to [email protected] or corresponding sections of the Code and protective of the rights of the http://www.regulations.gov (follow FERSA must be given an opportunity to participants and beneficiaries of the instructions for submission of demonstrate the existence of issues that plan. Accordingly, the text of the comments). All written responses will can only be fully explored in the context proposed regulation has been revised to be available to the public, without of a hearing. When persuasive evidence conform to this statutory mandate.6 In charge, online at http:// of the existence of such issues is adopting this change, however, the www.regulations.gov and http:// provided, the Department will grant the Department wishes to emphasize that www.dol.gov/ebsa, and at the Public requested hearing. This procedure is the tripartite administrative findings Disclosure Room, Room N–1513, consistent with the requirements of stipulated in section 408(a) of ERISA Employee Benefits Security ERISA section 408(a), which precludes and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code Administration, U.S. Department of the Department from granting an have always constituted an integral part Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., exemption from the fiduciary self- of the record in each of its prior Washington, DC 20210. dealing restrictions unless the exemption grants. In addition, the Comments on this proposal should be Department affords an opportunity for a language of § 2570.48 has been submitted to the Department on or hearing and makes a determination on broadened to encompass not only before October 14, 2010. the record with respect to the three exemptions granted to applicants, but D. Regulatory Impact Analysis statutory findings required for granting also exemptions that were initiated an exemption. In addition, under through the Department’s own motion. Executive Order 12866 § 2570.47 of the current regulation, the Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR Department may schedule a hearing on 6 Apart from the satisfaction of this statutory 51735), the Department must determine its own motion concerning a proposed prerequisite, the legislative history of ERISA makes whether a regulatory action is it clear that the Department retains broad discretion ‘‘ ’’ exemption if it determines that such a in determining whether the grant of an exemption significant and therefore subject to hearing would be useful in exploring is appropriate in a particular instance. H.R. Rep. review by the Office of Management and issues relevant to the exemption. No. 1280, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 311 (1974). Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of the

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53180 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

Executive Order defines a ‘‘significant (B) Evaluate the accuracy of the 3004 of ERISA, moreover, the Secretary regulatory action’’ as an action that is agency’s estimate of the burden of the of Labor and the Secretary of the likely to result in a rule (1) having an collection of information, including the Treasury are authorized to develop annual effect on the economy of $100 validity of the methodology and jointly rules appropriate for the efficient million or more, or adversely and assumptions used; administration of ERISA. materially affecting a sector of the (C) Enhance the quality, utility, and Under section 102 of Reorganization economy, productivity, competition, clarity of the information to be Plan No. 4 of 1978 (Reorganization Plan jobs, the environment, public health or collected; and No. 4), the foregoing authority of the safety, or State, local or tribal (D) Minimize the burden of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue governments or communities (also collection of information on those who exemptions under section 4975 of the referred to as ‘‘economically are to respond, including through the Code was transferred, with certain significant’’); (2) creating serious use of appropriate automated, enumerated exceptions not discussed inconsistency or otherwise interfering electronic, mechanical, or other herein, to the Secretary of Labor. with an action taken or planned by technological collection techniques or Accordingly, the Secretary of Labor now another agency; (3) materially altering other forms of information technology, possesses the authority under section the budgetary impacts of entitlement e.g., by permitting electronic submission 4975(c)(2) of the Code, as well as under grants, user fees, or loan programs or the of responses. section 408(a) of ERISA, to issue rights and obligations of recipients Comments should be sent to the individual and class exemptions from thereof; or (4) raising novel legal or Office of Information and Regulatory the prohibited transaction rules of policy issues arising out of legal Affairs, Office of Management and ERISA and the Code. mandates, the President’s priorities, or Budget, Room 10235, New Executive On April 28, 1975, the Department the principles set forth in the Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; published ERISA Procedure 75–1 in the Order. Pursuant to the terms of the Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Register (40 FR 18471). This Executive Order, it has been determined Employee Benefits Security procedure provided necessary that this action is not ‘‘significant’’ Administration. Although comments information to the affected public within the meaning of section 3(f) of the may be submitted through October 29, regarding the procedure to follow when Executive Order and therefore is not 2010, OMB requests that comments be requesting an exemption. On August 10, subject to review by OMB. received within 30 days of publication 1990, the Department issued its current of the Proposed Rule for the Prohibited exemption procedure regulation, which Paperwork Reduction Act Transaction Exemption Procedures to replaced ERISA Procedure 75–1, for As part of its continuing effort to ensure their consideration. applications for prohibited transaction reduce paperwork and respondent PRA Addressee: Address requests for exemptions filed on or after September burden, the Department of Labor copies of the ICR to G. Christopher 10, 1990. (29 CFR 2570.30 et seq., 55 FR conducts a preclearance consultation Cosby, Office of Policy and Research, 32836, Aug. 10, 1990). program to provide the general public U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Under the current exemption and Federal agencies with an Benefits Security Administration, 200 procedure regulation, in order to make opportunity to comment on proposed Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N– exemption determinations, the and continuing collections of 5718, Washington, DC 20210. Department requires full information information in accordance with the Telephone: (202) 693–8410; Fax: (202) regarding all aspects of the transaction, Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA 219–5333. These are not toll-free the parties, and the assets involved, 95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps numbers. A copy of the ICR also may be which is an information collection to ensure that the public understands obtained at http://www.RegInfo.gov. request (ICR) for purposes of the PRA. the Department’s collection Sections 2570.34 and 2570.35 of the Background instructions, respondents can provide current exemption procedure regulation the requested data in the desired format, Both ERISA and the Code contain describe the information that must be the reporting burden (time and financial various statutory exemptions from the supplied by the applicant, such as: resources) is minimized, and the prohibited transaction rules. In Identifying information (name, type of Department can properly assess the addition, section 408(a) of ERISA plan, EIN number, etc.); an estimate of impact of collection requirements on authorizes the Secretary of Labor to the number of plan participants; a respondents. grant administrative exemptions from detailed description of the exemption Currently, the Department is soliciting the restrictions of ERISA sections 406 transaction and the parties for which an comments concerning the information and 407(a), while section 4975(c)(2) of exemption is requested; a statement collection request (ICR) included in the the Code authorizes the Secretary of the regarding which section of ERISA is Proposed Rule for the Prohibited Treasury or his delegate to grant thought to be violated and whether Transaction Exemption Procedures. A exemptions from the prohibitions of transaction(s) involved have already copy of the ICR may be obtained by Code section 4975(c)(1). Sections 408(a) been entered into; a statement of contacting the person listed in the PRA of ERISA and 4975(c)(2) of the Code also whether the transaction is customary in Addressee section below. direct the Secretary of Labor and the the industry; a statement of the hardship The Department has submitted a copy Secretary of the Treasury, respectively, or economic loss, if any, which would of the proposed rule to OMB in to establish procedures to carry out the result if the exemption were denied; a accordance with 44 U.S.C. 3507(d) for purposes of these sections. statement explaining why the proposed review of its information collections. Under section 3003(b) of ERISA, the exemption would be administratively The Department is particularly Secretary of Labor and the Secretary of feasible, in the interests of the plan and interested in comments that: the Treasury are directed to consult and protective of the rights of plan (A) Evaluate whether the collection of coordinate with each other with respect participants and beneficiaries; and information is necessary for the proper to the establishment of rules applicable several other statements. In addition, performance of the functions of the to the granting of exemptions from the the applicant must certify that the agency, including whether the prohibited transaction restrictions of information supplied is accurate and information will have practical utility; ERISA and the Code. Under section complete.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53181

The amended rule proposed by the persons of a pending exemption, clerical time will be spent preparing the Department would expand the ICR provided that the applicant can documentation for the application that contained in sections 2570.34 and demonstrate satisfactory proof of will be used by the outside counsel. 2570.35 of the current exemption electronic delivery to the entire class of Therefore, the Department estimates procedure regulation in several respects. interested persons. that preparing the application will For instance, the current requirement of In order to assess the hour and cost require 560 in-house legal professional specialized statements from qualified burden of the revision to the current ICR hours (56 applications times 10 hours) independent appraisers, where associated with the exemption and 560 clerical hours (56 applications applicable, would be clarified to include procedure regulation, the Department times 10 hours) for a total of 1,120 hours the appraiser’s rationale, credentials, updated its estimate of the number of at an equivalent cost of $79,861.8 and a statement regarding the exemption requests it expects to receive For the notice to interested persons, appraiser’s independence from the and the hour and cost burden associated the Department estimates that 25 parties involved in the transaction. In with providing information required to applications will be published annually, this connection, the appraisal report be submitted by applicants, including and that approximately 17,175 notices prepared by the independent appraiser the new information required under this to interested parties will be distributed.9 must be current and not more than one proposal. The Department also adjusted The Department estimates the 5 minutes year old as of the date of the transaction. its estimate of the labor rates for of clerical time will be spent assisting In addition, the content of specialized professional and clerical help, and the outside counsel with distribution of the statements submitted by qualified size of plans filing exemption requests notices. Therefore, distribution of independent fiduciaries, where with the Department. In the revised notices will require approximately 1,431 applicable, would be clarified to require estimate, the costs of hiring outside hours at an equivalent cost of $36,740 the disclosure of information service providers (such as, law firms ((5 minutes/60 minutes) times 17,175 concerning the independent fiduciary’s specializing in ERISA, outside times $25.67, the hourly clerical rate). qualifications, duties, independence appraisers, and financial experts) are Annual Cost Burden from the parties involved in the accounted for as a cost burden. transaction, and current compensation. Requirements related to these services An application for a prohibited The content of specialized statements are more explicitly specified in the transaction exemption generally is from other kinds of experts would also proposed rule than they were in the prepared and submitted by, or under the be clarified in the new regulation to previous procedure, and any paperwork direction of, attorneys with specialized require disclosure of information costs associated with these requirements knowledge of ERISA. The Department concerning the expert’s qualifications are built into the estimated fees for assumes that these same attorneys will and their independence from the parties outside services. Additionally, mailing also prepare and distribute the notice to involved in the transaction. costs of the application are now built interested persons. Because of the large In addition, a new requirement into the fees of the outside firm, as are amount of paperwork that is prepared contained in section 2570.43(d) and (e) costs for the new SPEs required under and submitted (applications average of the proposal, if adopted, would the proposal in certain circumstances. approximately 60 pages with varying provide the Department with the numbers of supporting documents), the Annual Hour Burden discretion to require an applicant to Department estimates that legal fees will furnish interested persons with a Between 2005 and 2008, the total approximately $17,500 on average Summary of Proposed Exemption (SPE). Department received an average of 56 per case. This estimate includes The Department expects this requests annually for prohibited potential meetings with DOL personnel requirement to be used in instances transaction exemptions. For purposes of as well as preparation of supplementary where the proposed transaction is this analysis, the Department assumes documents that are requested following relatively complex, and the notice of that approximately the same number of some of these meetings and an SPE for proposed exemption may not be readily applications will be received annually some of the more complex cases. The understandable by interested persons over the next three years.7 The Department estimates that the costs for (i.e., participants and beneficiaries) paperwork burden consists of the time the combined services of the qualified because of the complexity of the required to prepare the information the independent fiduciary and appraiser/ transaction. Among other things, the outside legal counsel will use to prepare expert will total approximately $10,000. SPE must objectively describe the and submit an application for exemption transaction and the parties exemption and notice of an application 8 The hourly wage estimates used in this analysis thereto, the reasons why the plan seeks to interested persons. Because notices are estimates for 2008 and are based on data from to engage in the transaction, and the are only distributed once a proposed the Bureau of Labor Statistics National Occupational Employment Survey (May 2008) and conditions and safeguards proposed to application for an exemption has been the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost protect the plan and its participants published in the Federal Register, the Index (March 2009). Total labor costs (wages plus from potential abuse or unnecessary risk Department estimates, based on the benefits plus overhead) for clerical staff were of loss in the event the Department number of notices published between estimated to average $25.67 per hour over the period based on metropolitan wage rates for clerical grants the exemption, and be written in 2005 and 2008, that 25 applications staff. Total labor cost for legal staff was estimated a manner calculated to be understood by annually will proceed to the notice to average $116.93 per hour based on metropolitan the average recipient. Applicants who stage. wage estimates for attorneys. The 560 clerical hours must provide interested persons with an The Department estimates that, on are estimated to cost $14,375 and the 560 legal SPE also would be required to furnish average, 10 hours of in-house legal professional hours $65,486. This totals to $79,861. 9 Based on a weighted average of 2006 Form 5500 the Department with a copy of the SPE professional and 10 hours of in-house Pension data. The data is split into plans with more for its review and approval before the than 100 participants and those with fewer than 100 SPE is distributed to interested persons. 7 This number excludes applications seeking participants. The Department estimates that half of Finally, the Department also proposes expedited exemptive relief under Prohibited the applications are from small plans (those with Transaction Class Exemption 96–62. The estimated less than 100 participants) and half from larger to amend § 2570.43 to permit applicants burden hours associated with PTE 96–62 are plans (those with 100 or more participants). This to utilize electronic means (such as e- provided in a separate ICR under OMB Control gives a weighted average of 687 participants per mail) to deliver notice to interested Number 1210–0098. plan, which when multiplied by 25 yields 17,175.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53182 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

The new requirements contained in the which are likely to have a significant comments on this certification and the proposal are incorporated into these economic impact on a substantial potential impact of the rule on small cost estimates. Thus, the Department number of small entities. Unless the entities. estimates that the cost per exemption head of an agency certifies that a Congressional Review Act application of the outside law firm, proposed rule is not likely to have a independent fiduciary, and appraiser/ significant economic impact on a The proposed rule being issued here expert will be approximately $27,500, substantial number of small entities, will, when finalized, be subject to the which when multiplied by the section 603 of the RFA requires that the provisions of the Congressional Review estimated 56 cases is expected to result agency present an initial regulatory Act provisions of the Small Business in a cost burden of approximately flexibility analysis at the time of the Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of $1,540,000. publication of the notice of proposed 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) and will be The Department estimates that 17,175 rulemaking describing the impact of the transmitted to Congress and the notices to interested persons will be rule on small entities and seeking public Comptroller General for review. sent, and that 13,470 of the notices (80 comment on such impact. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act percent) will distributed via first class For purposes of the RFA, the mail with a material cost of $.05 per Department continues to consider a For purposes of the Unfunded page and distribution costs of $.44 per small entity to be an employee benefit Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. notice. This generates an estimated cost plan with fewer than 100 participants.11 104–4), the proposed rule does not of $6,733. The Department further Further, while some large employers include any federal mandate that may estimates that 2,576 of the notices (15 may have small plans, in general small result in expenditures by State, local, or percent of the total number of notices) employers maintain most small plans. tribal governments, or impose an annual will be distributed electronically and Thus, the Department believes that burden exceeding $100 million or more, 859 (5 percent) will be distributed by assessing the impact of this proposed adjusted for inflation, on the private alternative means approved by the rule on small plans is an appropriate sector. Department.10 substitute for evaluating the effect on Federalism Statement The Department estimates that SPEs small entities. The definition of small entity considered appropriate for this Executive Order 13132 (August 4, will be requested with respect to 8 1999) outlines fundamental principles submissions (15% of the 56 purpose differs, however, from a definition of small business that is of federalism and requires federal submissions) per year, and that the SPEs agencies to adhere to specific criteria in will be sent with the notices. Based on based on size standards promulgated by the Small Business Administration the process of their formulation and an average plan size of 687 participants implementation of policies that have per plan, this results in the distribution (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) pursuant to the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et substantial direct effects on the States, of 5,496 SPEs, of which 4,397 (80 or the relationship between the national percent) will be mailed. The material seq.). The Department therefore requests comments on the appropriateness of the government and the States, or on the cost associated with mailing the 4,397 distribution of power and SPEs at $.05 per page is $220. Therefore, size standard used in evaluating the impact of this proposed rule on small responsibilities among the various the total cost burden for distribution of levels of government. This proposed the notices and SPEs is estimated to be entities. By this standard, the Department rule does not have federalism approximately $6,953 ($6,733 for the implications, because it has no notices + $220 for the cost of including estimates that nearly half the requests for exemptions are from small plans. substantial direct effect on the States, on the SPEs). the relationship between the national Type of Review: New collection. Thus, of the approximately 613,000 government and the States, or on the Agency: Employee Benefits Security ERISA-covered small plans, the distribution of power and Administration, Department of Labor. Department estimates that 28 small responsibilities among the various Title: Proposed Rule for Prohibited plans (.000046% of small plans) file levels of government. Section 514 of Transaction Exemption Procedures. prohibited transaction exemption ERISA provides, with certain exceptions OMB Number: 1210–0060. applications each year. The Department specifically enumerated, that the Affected Public: Business or other for- does not consider this to be a substantial provisions of Titles I and IV of ERISA profit; not-for-profit institutions. number of small entities. Therefore, Respondents: 56. based on the foregoing, pursuant to supersede any and all laws of the States Responses: 22,727. section 605(b) of RFA, the Assistant as they relate to any employee benefit Frequency of Response: Occasionally. Secretary of the Employee Benefits plan covered under ERISA. The Estimated Total Annual Burden Security Administration hereby certifies requirements implemented in the rule Hours: 2,551. that the proposed rule, if promulgated, do not alter the fundamental provisions Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost: will not have a significant economic of the statute with respect to employee $1,546,953. impact on a substantial number of small benefit plans, and as such would have entities. The Department invites no implications for the States or the Regulatory Flexibility Act relationship or distribution of power The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 11 The basis for this definition is found in section between the national government and U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes 104(a)(2) of the Act, which permits the Secretary of the States. Labor to prescribe simplified annual reports for certain requirements with respect to pension plans that cover fewer than 100 List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 2570 Federal rules that are subject to the participants. Pursuant to the authority of section Administrative practice and notice and comment requirements of 104(a)(3), the Department has previously issued at procedure, Employee benefit plans, section 553(b) of the Administrative 29 CFR 2520.104–20, 2520.104–21, 2520.104–41, 2520.104–46 and 2520.104b–10 certain simplified Employee Retirement Income Security Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and reporting provisions and limited exemptions from Act, Federal Employees’ Retirement reporting and disclosure requirements for small System Act, Exemptions, Fiduciaries, 10 The Department notes that it determines plans, including unfunded or insured welfare plans whether it is appropriate to distribute notices by covering fewer than 100 participants and satisfying Party in interest, Pensions, Prohibited means other than mailing on a case-by-case basis. certain other requirements. transactions, Trusts and trustees.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53183

For the reasons set forth in the (1) Section 408(a) of the Employee alone, nor will the Department grant preamble, the Department proposes to Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 exemptions orally. An applicant for an amend subchapter G, part 2570 of (ERISA); administrative exemption may request chapter XXV of title 29 of the Code of (2) Section 4975(c)(2) of the Internal and receive oral advice from Federal Regulations as follows: Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code); 1 or Department employees in preparing an (3) The Federal Employees’ exemption application. However, such PART 2570—PROCEDURAL Retirement System Act of 1986 (FERSA) advice does not constitute part of the REGULATIONS UNDER THE (5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3)). administrative record and is not binding EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME (b) Under these rules of procedure, on the Department in its processing of SECURITY ACT the Department may conditionally or an exemption application or in its unconditionally exempt any fiduciary or examination or audit of a plan. 1. The authority citation for part 2570 transaction, or class of fiduciaries or (f) The Department will generally treat reads as follows: transactions, from all or part of the any exemption application that is filed Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8477; 29 U.S.C. restrictions imposed by section 406 of solely under section 408(a) of ERISA or 1002(40), 1021, 1108, 1132, and 1135; sec. ERISA and the corresponding solely under section 4975(c)(2) of the 102, Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 3 restrictions of the Code and FERSA. Code as an exemption request filed CFR 332 (1978), reprinted in 5 U.S.C. app. at While administrative exemptions under both section 408(a) and section 672 (2006), and in 92 Stat. 3790 (1978); granted under these rules are ordinarily 4975(c)(2) if it relates to a transaction Secretary of Labor’s Order 6–2009, 74 FR prospective in nature, an applicant may that would be prohibited both by ERISA 21524 (May 7, 2009). also obtain retroactive relief for past and the corresponding provisions of the 2. Revise subpart B to part 2570 to prohibited transactions if certain Code. read as follows: safeguards described in this subpart were in place at the time the transaction § 2570.31 Definitions. Subpart B—Procedures Governing the was consummated. For purposes of these procedures, the Filing and Processing of Prohibited (c) These rules govern the filing and following definitions apply: Transaction Exemption Applications processing of applications for both (a) An affiliate of a person means— Sec. individual and class exemptions that (1) Any person directly or indirectly 2570.30 Scope of rules. the Department may propose and grant through one or more intermediaries, 2570.31 Definitions. pursuant to the authorities cited in controlling, controlled by, or under 2570.32 Persons who may apply for paragraph (a) of this section. The common control with the person; exemptions. Department may also propose and grant (2) Any director of, relative of, or 2570.33 Applications the Department will exemptions on its own motion, in which partner in, any such person; not ordinarily consider. (3) Any corporation, partnership, 2570.34 Information to be included in every case the procedures relating to exemption application. publication of notices, hearings, trust, or unincorporated enterprise of 2570.35 Information to be included in evaluation and public inspection of the which such person is an officer, applications for individual exemptions administrative record, and modification director, or a 5 percent or more partner only. or revocation of previously granted or owner; and 2570.36 Where to file an application. exemptions will apply. (4) Any employee or officer of the 2570.37 Duty to amend and supplement (d) The issuance of an administrative person who— exemption applications. exemption by the Department under (i) Is highly compensated (as defined 2570.38 Tentative denial letters. these procedural rules does not relieve in section 4975(e)(2)(H) of the Code), or 2570.39 Opportunities to submit additional (ii) Has direct or indirect authority, information. a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified person with respect to a responsibility, or control regarding the 2570.40 Conferences. custody, management, or disposition of 2570.41 Final denial letters. plan from certain other provisions of 2570.42 Notice of proposed exemption. ERISA, the Code, or FERSA, including plan assets. 2570.43 Notification of interested persons any prohibited transaction provisions to (b) A class exemption is an by applicant. which the exemption does not apply, administrative exemption, granted 2570.44 Withdrawal of exemption and the general fiduciary responsibility under section 408(a) of ERISA, section applications. provisions of ERISA which require, 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and/or 5 U.S.C. 2570.45 Requests for reconsideration. among other things, that a fiduciary 8477(c)(3), which applies to any parties 2570.46 Hearings in opposition to discharge his or her duties respecting in interest within the class of parties in exemptions from restrictions on interest specified in the exemption who fiduciary self-dealing. the plan solely in the interests of the participants and beneficiaries of the meet the conditions of the exemption. 2570.47 Other hearings. (c) Department means the U.S. 2570.48 Decision to grant exemptions. plan and in a prudent fashion; nor does 2570.49 Limits on the effect of exemptions. it affect the requirement of section Department of Labor and includes the 2570.50 Revocation or modification of 401(a) of the Code that the plan must Secretary of Labor or his or her delegate exemptions. operate for the exclusive benefit of the exercising authority with respect to 2570.51 Public inspection and copies. employees of the employer maintaining prohibited transaction exemptions to 2570.52 Effective date. the plan and their beneficiaries. which this subpart applies. (d) Exemption transaction means the Subpart B—Procedures Governing the (e) The Department will not propose or issue exemptions upon oral request transaction or transactions for which an Filing and Processing of Prohibited exemption is requested. Transaction Exemption Applications 1 Section 102 of Presidential Reorganization Plan (e) An individual exemption is an administrative exemption, granted § 2570.30 Scope of rules. No. 4 of 1978 (3 CFR 332 (1978), reprinted in 5 U.S.C. app. at 672 (2006), and in 92 Stat. 3790 under section 408(a) of ERISA, section (a) The rules of procedure set forth in (1978)), effective December 31, 1978, generally 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and/or 5 U.S.C. transferred the authority of the Secretary of the this subpart apply to prohibited Treasury to issue administrative exemptions under 8477(c)(3), which applies only to the transaction exemptions issued by the section 4975(c)(2) of the Code to the Department of specific parties in interest named or Department under the authority of: Labor. otherwise defined in the exemption.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53184 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

(f) A party in interest means a person received for preparing fiduciary reports subtitle B of Title I of ERISA or section described in section 3(14) of ERISA or and other related duties) from the 8477 or 8478 of FERSA or an 5 U.S.C. 8477(a)(4) and includes a parties in interest to the transaction or application involving a party in interest disqualified person, as defined in their affiliates. For purposes of who is the subject of such an section 4975(e)(2) of the Code. determining whether the compensation investigation or who is a defendant in (g) Pooled fund means an account or received by the fiduciary is de minimis, an action by the Department or the fund for the collective investment of the all compensation received by the Internal Revenue Service to enforce the assets of two or more unrelated plans, fiduciary is taken into account. Such de above-mentioned provisions of ERISA including (but not limited to) a pooled minimis amount will ordinarily or FERSA. separate account maintained by an constitute 1% or less of the annual (b) An application for an individual insurance company and a common or income of the qualified independent exemption relating to a specific collective trust fund maintained by a fiduciary. In all events, the burden is on transaction or transactions ordinarily bank or similar financial institution. the applicant to demonstrate the will not be considered if the Department (h) A qualified appraisal report is any independence of the fiduciary. has under consideration a class appraisal report that satisfies all of the exemption relating to the same type of requirements set forth in this subpart at § 2570.32 Persons who may apply for transaction or transactions. exemptions. § 2570.34(c)(4). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the (i) A qualified independent appraiser (a) The Department will initiate Department may consider an is any individual or entity with exemption proceedings upon the application for an individual exemption appropriate training, experience, and application of: where there is a pending class facilities to provide a qualified appraisal (1) Any party in interest to a plan who exemption if the issuance of the final report on behalf of the plan regarding is or may be a party to the exemption class exemption may not be imminent, the particular asset or property transaction; and the applicant can demonstrate that appraised in the report, that is (2) Any plan which is a party to the time constraints necessitate independent of and unrelated to any exemption transaction; or consideration of the transaction on an party in interest engaging in the (3) In the case of an application for an individual basis. exemption transaction and its affiliates; exemption covering a class of parties in (c) If for any reason the Department the determination as to the interest or a class of transactions, in decides not to consider an exemption independence of the appraiser is made addition to any person described in application, it will inform the applicant by the Department on the basis of all paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this of that decision in writing and of the relevant facts and circumstances. As a section, an association or organization reasons therefore. general matter, an independent representing parties in interest who may appraiser retained in connection with be parties to the exemption transaction. § 2570.34 Information to be included in an exemption transaction must not (b) An application by or for a person every exemption application. receive more than a de minimis amount described in paragraph (a) of this (a) All applications for exemptions of compensation (including amounts section, may be submitted by the must contain the following information: received for performing the appraisal) applicant or by an authorized (1) The name(s) of the applicant(s); from the parties in interest to the representative. An application (2) A detailed description of the transaction or their affiliates. For submitted by a representative of the exemption transaction including purposes of determining whether the applicant must include proof of identification of all the parties in compensation received by the appraiser authority in the form of: interest involved, a description of any is de minimis, all compensation (1) A power of attorney; or larger integrated transaction of which received by the appraiser is taken into (2) A written certification from the the exemption transaction is a part, and account. Such de minimis amount will applicant that the representative is a chronology of the events leading up to ordinarily constitute 1% or less of the authorized to file the application. the transaction; annual income of the qualified (c) If the authorized representative of (3) The identity of any representatives independent appraiser. In all events, the an applicant submits an application for for the affected plan(s) and parties in burden is on the applicant to an exemption to the Department interest and what individuals or entities demonstrate the independence of the together with proof of authority to file they represent; appraiser. the application as required by paragraph (4) The reasons a plan would have for (j) A qualified independent fiduciary (b) of this section, the Department will entering into the exemption transaction; is any individual or entity with direct all correspondence and inquiries (5) The prohibited transaction appropriate training, experience, and concerning the application to the provisions from which exemptive relief facilities to act on behalf of the plan representative unless requested to do is requested and the reason why the regarding the exemption transaction in otherwise by the applicant. transaction would violate each such accordance with the fiduciary duties provision; and responsibilities prescribed by § 2570.33 Applications the Department will (6) Whether the exemption ERISA, that is independent of and not ordinarily consider. transaction is customary for the industry unrelated to any party in interest (a) The Department will not ordinarily or class involved; engaging in the exemption transaction consider: (7) Whether the exemption and its affiliates; the determination as to (1) An application that fails to include transaction is or has been the subject of the independence of a fiduciary is made all the information required by an investigation or enforcement action by the Department on the basis of all §§ 2570.34 and 2570.35 of this subpart by the Department or by the Internal relevant facts and circumstances. As a or otherwise fails to conform to the Revenue Service; and general matter, an independent requirements of these procedures; or (8) The hardship or economic loss, if fiduciary retained in connection with an (2) An application involving a any, which would result to the person exemption transaction must receive no transaction or transactions which are or persons on behalf of whom the more than a de minimis amount of the subject of an investigation for exemption is sought, to affected plans, compensation (including amounts possible violations of part 1 or 4 of and to their participants and

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53185

beneficiaries from denial of the (B) A corporate officer or partner (5) If the subject of the appraisal exemption. where the applicant is a corporation or report is real property, the qualified (b) All applications for exemption partnership; independent appraiser shall submit a must also contain the following: (C) A designated officer or official written representation that he or she is (1) A statement explaining why the where the applicant is an association, a member of a professional organization requested exemption would be— organization or other unincorporated of appraisers that can sanction its (i) Administratively feasible; enterprise; members for acts of malfeasance; (ii) In the interests of affected plans (D) The plan fiduciary that has the (6) If the subject of the appraisal and their participants and beneficiaries; authority, responsibility, and control report is an asset other than real and with respect to the exemption property, the qualified independent (iii) Protective of the rights of transaction where the applicant is a appraiser shall submit a written participants and beneficiaries of affected plan. representation describing the appraiser’s plans. (c) Specialized statements, as prior experience in valuing assets of the (2) With respect to the notification of applicable, from a qualified same type; and interested persons required by independent appraiser on behalf of the (7) The qualified independent § 2570.43: plan, such as appraisal reports or appraiser shall submit a written (i) A description of the interested analyses of market conditions, representation disclosing the percentage persons to whom the applicant intends submitted to support an application for of its current income that was derived to provide notice; exemption must be accompanied by a from any party in interest involved in (ii) The manner in which the statement of consent from such the transaction or its affiliates; in applicant will provide such notice; and appraiser acknowledging that the general, such percentage shall be (iii) An estimate of the time the statement is being submitted to the computed by comparing, in fractional applicant will need to furnish notice to Department as part of an application for form: all interested persons following exemption. Such statements must also (i) The amount of the appraiser’s publication of a notice of the proposed contain the following written projected personal or business income exemption in the Federal Register. information: from the current federal income tax year (3) If an advisory opinion has been (1) A copy of the qualified (including amounts received from requested by any party to the exemption independent appraiser’s engagement preparing the appraisal report) that will transaction from the Department with letter with the plan describing the be derived from the party in interest or respect to any issue relating to the specific duties the appraiser shall its affiliates (expressed as a numerator); exemption transaction— undertake; and (i) A copy of the letter concluding the (2) A summary of the qualified (ii) The appraiser’s gross personal or Department’s action on the advisory independent appraiser’s qualifications business income for the prior federal opinion request; or income tax year (expressed as a (ii) If the Department has not yet to serve in such capacity; (3) A detailed description of any denominator). concluded its action on the request: (d) For those exemption transactions relationship that the qualified (A) A copy of the request or the date requiring the retention of a qualified independent appraiser has had or may on which it was submitted together with independent fiduciary to represent the have with any party in interest engaging the Department’s correspondence interests of the plan, a statement must in the transaction with the plan, or its control number as indicated in the be submitted by such fiduciary that affiliates, that may influence the acknowledgment letter; and contains the following written appraiser; (B) An explanation of the effect of the information: issuance of an advisory opinion upon (4) A written appraisal report (1) A signed and dated declaration the exemption transaction. prepared by the qualified independent under penalty of perjury that, to the best (4) If the application is to be signed appraiser, on behalf of the plan, which of the qualified independent fiduciary’s by anyone other than an individual satisfies the following requirements: knowledge and belief, all of the party in interest seeking exemptive (i) The report must describe the representations made in such statement relief on his or her own behalf, a method(s) used in determining the fair are true and correct; statement which— market value of the subject asset(s) and (2) A copy of the qualified (i) Identifies the individual signing an explanation of why such method best independent fiduciary’s engagement the application and his or her position reflects the fair market value of the letter with the plan describing the or title; and asset(s); fiduciary’s specific duties; (ii) Explains briefly the basis of his or (ii) The report must take into account (3) An explanation for the conclusion her familiarity with the matters any special benefit that the party in that the fiduciary is a qualified discussed in the application. interest or its affiliate(s) may derive independent fiduciary, which also must (5)(i) A declaration in the following from control of the asset(s), such as include a summary of that person’s form: owning an adjacent parcel of real qualifications to serve in such capacity, Under penalty of perjury, I declare property or gaining voting control over as well as a description of any prior that I am familiar with the matters a company; and experience by that person in acting as a discussed in this application and, to the (iii) The report must be current and qualified independent fiduciary with best of my knowledge and belief, the not more than one year old from the respect to a plan; representations made in this application date of the transaction, and there must (4) A detailed description of any are true and correct. be a written update by the qualified relationship that the qualified (ii) This declaration must be dated independent appraiser affirming the independent fiduciary has had or may and signed by: accuracy of the appraisal as of the date have with the party in interest engaging (A) The applicant, in its individual of the transaction. If the appraisal report in the transaction with the plan or its capacity, in the case of an individual is a year old or more, a new appraisal affiliates; party in interest seeking exemptive shall be submitted to the Department by (5) An acknowledgement by the relief on his or her own behalf; the applicant. qualified independent fiduciary that it

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53186 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

understands its duties and (2) A summary of the expert’s transaction has, within the last 13 years, responsibilities under ERISA in acting qualifications to serve in such capacity; been either convicted or released from as a fiduciary on behalf of the plan; and imprisonment, whichever is later, as a (6) The qualified independent (3) A detailed description of any result of: any felony involving abuse or fiduciary’s opinion on whether the relationship that the expert has had or misuse of such person’s position or proposed transaction would be in the may have with any party in interest employment with an employee benefit interests of the plan and of its engaging in the transaction with the plan or a labor organization; any felony participants and beneficiaries, and plan, or its affiliates, that may influence arising out of the conduct of the protective of the rights of participants the actions of the expert. business of a broker, dealer, investment and beneficiaries of such plan, along (f) An application for exemption may adviser, bank, insurance company or with a statement of the reasons on also include a draft of the requested fiduciary; income tax evasion; any which the opinion is based; exemption which describes the felony involving the larceny, theft, (7) Where the proposed transaction is transaction and parties in interest for robbery, extortion, forgery, continuing in nature, a declaration by which exemptive relief is sought and counterfeiting, fraudulent concealment, the qualified independent fiduciary that the specific conditions under which the embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, it is authorized to take all appropriate exemption would apply. or misappropriation of funds or actions to safeguard the interests of the securities; conspiracy or attempt to § 2570.35 Information to be included in commit any such crimes or a crime of plan, and shall, during the pendency of applications for individual exemptions only. the transaction: which any of the foregoing crimes is an (a) Except as provided in paragraph element; or any other crime described in (i) Monitor the transaction on behalf (c) of this section, every application for section 411 of ERISA, and a description of the plan on a continuing basis; an individual exemption must include, of the circumstances of any such (ii) Ensure that the transaction in addition to the information specified conviction. For purposes of this section, remains in the interests of the plan and, in § 2570.34 of this subpart, the a person shall be deemed to have been if not, take any appropriate actions following information: ‘‘convicted’’ from the date of the available under the particular (1) The name, address, telephone judgment of the trial court, regardless of circumstances; and number, and type of plan or plans to whether that judgment remains under (iii) Enforce compliance with all which the requested exemption applies; appeal; conditions and obligations imposed on (2) The Employer Identification (7) Whether, within the last five years, any party dealing with the plan with Number (EIN) and the plan number (PN) any plan affected by the exemption respect to the transaction; and used by such plan or plans in all transaction or any party in interest (8) The qualified independent reporting and disclosure required by the involved in the exemption transaction fiduciary shall submit a written Department; has been under investigation or representation disclosing the percentage (3) Whether any plan or trust affected examination by, or has been engaged in of such fiduciary’s current income that by the requested exemption has ever litigation or a continuing controversy was derived from any party in interest been found by the Department, the with, the Department, the Internal involved in the transaction or its Internal Revenue Service, or by a court Revenue Service, the Justice affiliates; in general, such percentage to have violated the exclusive benefit Department, the Pension Benefit shall be computed by comparing, in rule of section 401(a) of the Code, Guaranty Corporation, or the Federal fractional form: section 4975(c)(1) of the Code, section Retirement Thrift Investment Board 406 or 407(a) of ERISA, or 5 U.S.C. (i) The amount of the fiduciary’s involving compliance with provisions of 8477(c)(3), including a description of projected personal or business income ERISA, provisions of the Code relating the circumstances surrounding such from the current federal income tax year to employee benefit plans, or provisions violation; that will be derived from the party in of FERSA relating to the Federal Thrift (4) Whether any relief under section interest or its affiliates (expressed as a Savings Fund. If so, the applicant must 408(a) of ERISA, section 4975(c)(2) of numerator); and provide a brief statement describing the the Code, or 5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3) has investigation, examination, litigation or (ii) The fiduciary’s gross personal or been requested by, or provided to, the controversy. The Department reserves business income (excluding fixed, non- applicant or any of the parties on behalf the right to require the production of discretionary retirement income) for the of whom the exemption is sought and, additional information or prior federal income tax year (expressed if so, the exemption application number documentation concerning any of the as a denominator). or the prohibited transaction exemption above matters. In this regard, a denial of (e) Specialized statements, as number; the exemption application will result applicable, from other third-party (5) Whether the applicant or any of from a failure to provide additional experts, including but not limited to the parties in interest involved in the information requested by the economists or market specialists, exemption transaction is currently, or Department. submitted on behalf of the plan to has been within the last five years, a (8) Whether any plan affected by the support an application for exemption defendant in any lawsuit or criminal requested exemption has experienced a must be accompanied by a statement of action concerning such person’s reportable event under section 4043 of consent from such expert conduct as a fiduciary or party in ERISA, and, if so, a description of the acknowledging that the statement is interest with respect to any plan (other circumstances of any such reportable being submitted to the Department as than a lawsuit with respect to a routine event; part of an application for exemption. claim for benefits), and a description of (9) Whether a notice of intent to Such statements must also contain the the circumstances of such lawsuit or terminate has been filed under section following written information: criminal action; 4041 of ERISA respecting any plan (1) A copy of the expert’s engagement (6) Whether the applicant (including affected by the requested exemption, letter with the plan describing the any person described in and, if so, a description of the specific duties the expert will § 2570.34(b)(5)(ii)) or any of the parties circumstances for the issuance of such undertake; in interest involved in the exemption notice;

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53187

(10) Names, addresses, and taxpayer (ii) The aggregate fair market value of (i) The estimated number of plans that identifying numbers of all parties in all investments of this type as reflected are participating (or will participate) in interest involved in the subject in the plan’s most recent annual report; the pooled fund; and transaction; (iii) The approximate percentage of (ii) The minimum and maximum (11) The estimated number of the fair market value of the plan’s total limits imposed by the pooled fund (if participants and beneficiaries in each assets as shown in such annual report any) on the portion of the total assets of plan affected by the requested that is represented by all investments of each plan that may be invested in the exemption as of the date of the this type; and pooled fund. application; (iv) The statutory or administrative (4) Additional requirements for (12) The percentage of the fair market exemption covering these investments, applications for individual exemption value of the total assets of each affected if any; involving pooled funds in which certain plan that is involved in the exemption (17) The approximate aggregate fair plans participate. (i) This paragraph applies to any transaction; market value of the total assets of each application for an individual exemption (13) Whether the exemption affected plan; involving one or more pooled funds in transaction has been consummated or (18) The person(s) who will bear the which any plan participating therein— will be consummated only if the costs of the exemption application and (A) Invests an amount which exceeds exemption is granted; of notifying interested persons; and 20% of the total assets of the pooled (14) If the exemption transaction has (19) Whether an independent fund, or already been consummated: fiduciary is or will be involved in the (B) Covers employees of: (i) The circumstances which resulted exemption transaction and, if so, the (1) The party sponsoring or in plan fiduciaries causing the plan(s) to names of the persons who will bear the maintaining the pooled fund, or any engage in the transaction before cost of the fee payable to such fiduciary. affiliate of such party, or obtaining an exemption from the (b) Each application for an individual (2) Any fiduciary with investment Department; exemption must also include: discretion over the pooled fund’s assets, (ii) Whether the transaction has been (1) True copies of all contracts, deeds, or any affiliate of such fiduciary. terminated; agreements, and instruments, as well as (ii) The exemption application must (iii) Whether the transaction has been relevant portions of plan documents, include, with respect to each plan corrected as defined in Code section trust agreements, and any other described in paragraph (c)(4)(i) of this 4975(f)(5); documents bearing on the exemption section, the information required by (iv) Whether Form 5330, Return of transaction; paragraphs (a)(1) through (3), (a)(5) Excise Taxes Related to Employee (2) A discussion of the facts relevant through (7), (a)(10), (a)(12) through (16), Benefit Plans, has been filed with the to the exemption transaction that are and (a)(18) and (19), of this section. The Internal Revenue Service with respect to reflected in these documents and an information required by this paragraph the transaction; and analysis of their bearing on the must be furnished in reference to the plan’s investment in the pooled fund (v) Whether any excise taxes due requested exemption; (e.g., the names, addresses and taxpayer under section 4975(a) and (b) of the (3) A copy of the most recent financial identifying numbers of all fiduciaries Code, or any civil penalties due under statements of each plan affected by the responsible for the plan’s investment in section 502(i) or (l) of ERISA by reason requested exemption; and the pooled fund [§ 2570.35(a) (10)], the of the transaction have been paid. If so, (4) A net worth statement with respect percentage of the assets of the plan the applicant should submit to any party in interest that is providing invested in the pooled fund documentation (e.g., a canceled check) a personal guarantee with respect to the [§ 2570.35(a)(12)], whether the plan’s demonstrating that the excise taxes or exemption transaction. investment in the pooled fund has been civil penalties were paid. (c) Special rule for applications for consummated or will be consummated individual exemption involving pooled (15) The name of every person who only if the exemption is granted funds: has investment discretion over any plan [§ 2570.35(a)(13)], etc.). assets involved in the exemption (1) The information required by (iii) The information required by transaction and the relationship of each paragraphs (a)(8) through (12) of this paragraph (c)(4) of this section is in such person to the parties in interest section is not required to be furnished addition to the information required by involved in the exemption transaction in an application for individual paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) of this section and the affiliates of such parties in exemption involving one or more relating to information furnished by interest; pooled funds; reference to the pooled fund. (16) Whether or not the assets of the (2) The information required by (5) The special rule and the additional affected plan(s) have been invested, paragraphs (a)(1) through (7) and (a)(13) requirements described in paragraphs directly or indirectly, in any other through (19) of this section and by (c)(1) through (4) of this section do not exempt or non-exempt transactions with paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this apply to an individual exemption the party in interest involved in the section must be furnished in reference request solely for the investment by a exemption transaction (including, but to the pooled fund, rather than to the plan in a pooled fund. Such an not limited to, plan investments in loans plans participating therein. (For application must provide the or leases involving the party in interest, purposes of this paragraph, the information required by paragraphs (a) securities lending with the party in information required by paragraph and (b) of this section. interest, extensions of credit with the (a)(16) of this section relates solely to (d) Retroactive exemptions: party in interest, or plan investment in other investment transactions between (1) Generally, the Department will securities issued by the party in the pooled fund or funds and any favorably consider requests for interest), and, if such investments exist, parties in interest involved in the retroactive relief, in all exemption a statement which indicates: exemption transaction.); applications, where the safeguards (i) The type of investment to which (3) The following information must necessary for the grant of a prospective the statement pertains; also be furnished— exemption were in place at the time at

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53188 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

which the parties entered into the criteria under section 408(a) of ERISA investigation or enforcement action by transaction. An applicant for a and section 4975(c)(2) of the Code. the Department, the Internal Revenue retroactive exemption must demonstrate (3) The Department, as a general Service, the Justice Department, the that it acted in good faith by taking matter, will not favorably consider Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, reasonable and appropriate steps to requests for retroactive exemptions or the Federal Retirement Thrift protect the plan from abuse and where transactions or conduct with Investment Board involving compliance unnecessary risk at the time of the respect to which an exemption is with provisions of ERISA, provisions of transaction. requested resulted in a loss to the plan. the Code relating to employee benefit (2) Among the factors that the In addition, the Department will not plans, or provisions of FERSA relating Department would take into account in favorably consider requests for to the Federal Thrift Savings Fund, the making a finding that an applicant acted exemptions where the transactions are applicant must promptly notify the in good faith include the following: inconsistent with the general fiduciary Department. (i) The participation of an responsibility provisions of sections 403 (c) The Department may require an independent fiduciary acting on behalf or 404 of ERISA or the exclusive benefit applicant to provide documentation it of the plan who is qualified to negotiate, requirements of section 401(a) of the considers necessary to verify any approve and monitor the transaction; Code. statements contained in the application (ii) The existence of a or in supporting materials or contemporaneous appraisal by a § 2570.36 Where to file an application. documents. qualified independent appraiser or The Department’s prohibited (d) The determination as to whether, reference to an objective third party transaction exemption program is under the totality of the facts and source, such as a stock or bond index; administered by the Employee Benefits circumstances, a particular statement (iii) The existence of a bidding Security Administration (EBSA). Any contained in (or omitted from) an process or evidence of comparable fair exemption application governed by exemption application constitutes a market transactions with unrelated third these procedures may be mailed via material fact or representation shall be parties; first-class mail to: Employee Benefits made by the Department. To the extent (iv) That the applicant has submitted Security Administration, Office of that a material representation is omitted, an accurate and complete application Exemption Determinations, U.S. becomes inaccurate, or changes, the for exemption containing Department of Labor, Room N–5700, prohibited transaction exemptive relief documentation of all necessary and 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., will no longer be available starting on relevant facts and representations upon Washington, DC 20210. Alternatively, the earliest date of these events. which the applicant relied. In this applications may be e-mailed to the regard, additional weight will be given Department at: [email protected] or § 2570.38 Tentative denial letters. to facts and representations which are transmitted via facsimile.2 (a) If, after reviewing an exemption prepared and certified by a source Notwithstanding the foregoing methods file, the Department tentatively independent of the applicant; of transmission, applicants are also concludes that it will not propose or (v) That the applicant has submitted required to submit two paper copies of grant the exemption, it will notify the evidence that the plan fiduciary did not applications—one for the Department’s applicant in writing. At the same time, engage in an act or transaction knowing file and one for the analyst’s working the Department will provide a brief that such act or transaction was copy. statement of the reasons for its tentative prohibited under section 406 of ERISA denial. and/or section 4975 of the Code. In this § 2570.37 Duty to amend and supplement (b) An applicant will have 20 days regard, the Department will accord exemption applications. from the date of a tentative denial letter appropriate weight to the submission of (a) While an exemption application is to request a conference under § 2570.40 a contemporaneous, reasoned legal pending final action with the of this subpart and/or to notify the opinion of counsel, upon which the Department, an applicant must Department of its intent to submit plan fiduciary relied in good faith before promptly notify the Department in additional information under § 2570.39 entering the act or transaction; writing if he or she discovers that any of this subpart. If the Department does (vi) That the applicant has submitted material fact or representation contained not receive a request for a conference or a statement of the circumstances which in the application or in any documents a notification of intent to submit prompted the submission of the or testimony provided in support of the additional information within that time, application for exemption and the steps application is inaccurate, if any such it will issue a final denial letter taken by the applicant with regard to the fact or representation changes during pursuant to § 2570.41. transaction upon discovery of the this period, or if, during the pendency (c) The Department need not issue a violation; of the application, anything occurs that tentative denial letter to an applicant (vii) That the applicant has submitted may affect the continuing accuracy of before issuing a final denial letter where a statement prepared and certified by an any such fact or representation. In the Department has conducted a hearing independent person familiar with the addition, an applicant must promptly on the exemption pursuant to either types of transactions for which relief is notify the Department in writing if it § 2570.46 or § 2570.47. requested demonstrating that the terms learns that a material fact or and conditions of the transaction representation has been omitted from § 2570.39 Opportunities to submit additional information. (including, in the case of an investment, the exemption application. the return in fact realized by the plan) (b) If, at any time during the pendency (a) An applicant may notify the were at least as favorable as that of an exemption application, the Department of its intent to submit obtainable in a similar transaction with applicant or any other party in interest additional information supporting an an unrelated party; and who would participate in the exemption exemption application either by (viii) Such other undertakings and transaction becomes the subject of an telephone or by letter sent to the address assurances with respect to the plan and furnished in the applicant’s tentative its participants that may be offered by 2 The current facsimile number for the Office of denial letter, or electronically via the e- the applicant which are relevant to the Exemption Determinations is (202) 219–0204. mail address provided in the tentative

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53189

denial letter. At the same time, the (b) An applicant is entitled to only respectively, by the Department in its applicant should indicate generally the one conference with respect to any sole discretion. type of information that will be exemption application. An applicant (f) If the applicant fails to either submitted. will not be entitled to a conference, timely schedule or appear for a (b) An applicant will have 40 days however, where the Department has conference agreed to by the Department from the date of the tentative denial held a hearing on the exemption under pursuant to paragraphs (d) or (e) of this letter described in § 2570.38(a) to either § 2570.46 or § 2570.47 of this section, the applicant will be deemed to submit in writing all of the additional subpart. have waived its right to a conference. information he or she intends to provide (c) Insofar as possible, conferences will be scheduled as joint conferences (g) Within 20 days after the date of in support of the application. All such any conference held under this section, information must be accompanied by a with all applicants present where: (1) More than one applicant has the applicant may submit to the declaration under penalty of perjury Department (electronically or in paper attesting to the truth and correctness of requested an exemption with respect to the same or similar types of form) any additional data, arguments, or the information provided, which is precedents discussed at the conference dated and signed by a person qualified transactions; (2) The Department is considering the but not previously or adequately under § 2570.34(b)(5) of this subpart to presented in writing. If, for reasons sign such a declaration. applications together as a request for a class exemption; beyond its control, the applicant is (c) If, for reasons beyond its control, (3) The Department contemplates not unable to submit the additional an applicant is unable to submit all the granting the exemption; and information within this 20-day limit, the additional information he or she intends (4) More than one applicant has applicant may request an extension of to provide in support of his application requested a conference. time to furnish the information, within the 40-day period described in (d) In instances where the applicant provided that such request is made paragraph (b) of this section, he or she has requested a conference pursuant to before the expiration of the 20-day limit may request an extension of time to § 2570.38(b) and also has submitted described in this paragraph. The furnish the information. Such requests additional information pursuant to Department will only grant such an must be made before the expiration of § 2570.39, the Department will schedule extension in unusual circumstances and the 40-day period and will be granted a conference under this section for a for a brief period of time as determined, only in unusual circumstances and for date and time that occurs within 20 respectively, by the Department in its a limited period of time as determined, days after the date on which the sole discretion. respectively, by the Department in its Department has provided either oral or sole discretion. written notification to the applicant § 2570.41 Final denial letters. (d) If an applicant is unable to submit that, after reviewing the additional The Department will issue a final all of the additional information he or information provided by the applicant denial letter denying a requested she intends to provide in support of his pursuant to § 2570.39, it is still not exemption where: exemption application within the 40- prepared to propose the requested (a) The conditions for issuing a final day period specified in paragraph (b) of exemption. If, for reasons beyond its denial letter specified in § 2570.38(b) or this section, or within any additional control, the applicant cannot attend a § 2570.39(e) of this subpart are satisfied; period of time granted pursuant to conference within the 20-day limit (b) After issuing a tentative denial paragraph (c) of this section, the described in this paragraph, the letter under § 2570.38 of this subpart applicant may withdraw the exemption applicant may request an extension of and considering the entire record in the application before expiration of the time for the scheduling of a conference, case, including all written information applicable time period and reinstate it provided that such request is made submitted pursuant to § 2570.39 and later pursuant to § 2570.44. before the expiration of the 20-day limit. § 2570.40(e) of this subpart, the (e) The Department will issue, The Department will only grant such an Department decides not to propose an without further notice, a final denial extension in unusual circumstances and exemption or to withdraw an exemption letter denying the requested exemption for a brief period of time as determined, already proposed; or pursuant to § 2570.41 where— respectively, by the Department in its (1) The Department has not received sole discretion. (c) After proposing an exemption and all the additional information that the (e) In instances where the applicant conducting a hearing on the exemption applicant was required to submit within has requested a conference pursuant to under either § 2570.46 or § 2570.47 of the 40-day period described in § 2570.38(b) of this subpart but has not this subpart and after considering the paragraph (b) of this section, or within submitted additional information entire record in the case, including the any additional period of time granted pursuant to § 2570.39, the Department record of the hearing, the Department pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section; will schedule a conference under this decides to withdraw the proposed (2) The applicant did not request a section for a date and time that occurs exemption. conference pursuant to § 2570.38(b) of within 40 days after the date of the § 2570.42 Notice of proposed exemption. this subpart; and issuance of the tentative denial letter (3) The applicant has not withdrawn described in § 2570.38(a). If, for reasons If the Department tentatively decides the application as permitted by beyond its control, the applicant cannot that an administrative exemption is paragraph (d) of this section. attend a conference within the 40-day warranted, it will publish a notice of a limit described in this paragraph, the proposed exemption in the Federal § 2570.40 Conferences. applicant may request an extension of Register. In addition to providing notice (a) Any conference between the time for the scheduling of a conference, of the pendency of the exemption before Department and an applicant pertaining provided that such request is made the Department, the notice will: to a requested exemption will be held in before the expiration of the 40-day limit. (a) Explain the exemption transaction Washington, DC, except that a telephone The Department will only grant such an and summarize the information and conference will be held at the extension in unusual circumstances and reasons in support of proposing the applicant’s request. for a brief period of time as determined, exemption;

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53190 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

(b) Describe the scope of relief and Benefits Security Administration, Room with a brief summary of the proposed any conditions of the proposed ______, 6 U.S. Department of Labor, 200 exemption (Summary of Proposed exemption; Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC Exemption), written in a manner ______7 (c) Inform interested persons of their 20210, Attention: Application No. . calculated to be understood by the right to submit comments to the Comments and hearing requests may also be transmitted to the Department electronically average recipient, which objectively Department (either electronically or in at [email protected] or at http:// describes: writing) relating to the proposed www.regulations.gov (follow instructions for (1) The exemption transaction and the exemption and establish a deadline for submission), and should prominently parties in interest thereto; receipt of such comments; and reference the application number listed (2) Why such transaction would (d) Where the proposed exemption above. In addition, comments and hearing violate the prohibited transaction includes relief from the prohibitions of requests may be transmitted to the provisions of ERISA, the Code, and/or section 406(b) of ERISA, section Department via facsimile at ______.8 FERSA from which relief is sought; 4975(c)(1)(E) or (F) of the Code, or Individuals submitting comments or requests (3) The reasons why the plan seeks to section 8477(c)(2) of FERSA, inform for a hearing on this matter are advised not engage in the transaction; and to disclose sensitive personal data, such as interested persons of their right to (4) The conditions and safeguards social security numbers. proposed to protect the plan and its request a hearing under § 2570.46 of this The Department will make no final subpart and establish a deadline for decision on the proposed exemption until it participants and beneficiaries from receipt of requests for such hearings. reviews all comments received in response to potential abuse or unnecessary risk of the enclosed notice. If the Department loss in the event the Department grants § 2570.43 Notification of interested decides to hold a hearing on the exemption the exemption. persons by applicant. request before making its final decision, you (e) Applicants who are required to (a) If a notice of proposed exemption will be notified of the time and place of the provide interested persons with the is published in the Federal Register in hearing. Summary of Proposed Exemption accordance with § 2570.42 of this (b) The method used by an applicant described in paragraph (d) of this subpart, the applicant must notify to furnish notice to interested persons section shall furnish the Department interested persons of the pendency of must be reasonably calculated to ensure with a copy of such summary for review the exemption in the manner and time that interested persons actually receive and approval prior to its distribution to period specified in the application. If the notice. In all cases, personal interested persons. Such applicants the Department determines that this delivery and delivery by first-class mail shall also provide confirmation to the notification would be inadequate, the will be considered reasonable methods Department that the Summary of applicant must obtain the Department’s of furnishing notice. If the applicant Proposed Exemption was furnished to consent as to the manner and time elects to furnish notice electronically, interested persons as part of the written period of providing the notice to he or she must provide satisfactory statement and declaration required of interested persons. Any such proof of electronic delivery to the entire exemption applicants by paragraph (c) notification must include: class of interested persons. of this section. (1) A copy of the notice of proposed (c) After furnishing the notification exemption as published in the Federal described in paragraph (a) of this § 2570.44 Withdrawal of exemption Register; and section, an applicant must provide the applications. (2) A supplemental statement in the Department with a written statement (a) An applicant may withdraw an following form: confirming that notice was furnished in application for an exemption at any accordance with the foregoing time by oral or written (including You are hereby notified that the United electronic) notice to the Department. A States Department of Labor is considering requirements of this section. This granting an exemption from the prohibited statement must be accompanied by a withdrawn application generally shall transaction restrictions of the Employee declaration under penalty of perjury not prejudice any subsequent Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the attesting to the truth of the information applications for an exemption submitted Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the provided in the statement and signed by by an applicant. Federal Employees’ Retirement System Act of a person qualified under § 2570.34(b)(5) (b) Upon receiving an applicant’s 1986. The exemption under consideration is of this subpart to sign such a notice of withdrawal regarding an summarized in the enclosed [Summary of declaration. No exemption will be application for an individual Proposed Exemption, and described in exemption, the Department will confirm 3 granted until such a statement and its greater detail in the accompanying] Notice by letter the applicant’s withdrawal of of Proposed Exemption. As a person who accompanying declaration have been may be affected by this exemption, you have furnished to the Department. the application and will terminate all the right to comment on the proposed (d) In addition to the provision of proceedings relating to the application. exemption by [date].4 [If you may be notification required by paragraph (a) of If a notice of proposed exemption has adversely affected by the grant of the this section, the Department, in its been published in the Federal Register, exemption, you also have the right to request discretion, may also require an the Department will publish a notice 5 a hearing on the exemption by [date].] applicant to furnish interested persons withdrawing the proposed exemption. All comments and/or requests for a hearing (c) Upon receiving an applicant’s should be addressed to the Office of 6 Apart from the satisfaction of this statutory notice of withdrawal regarding an Exemption Determinations, Employee prerequisite, the legislative history of ERISA makes application for a class exemption or for it clear that the Department retains broad discretion an individual exemption that is being 3 To be added in instances where the Department in determining whether the grant of an exemption requires the applicant to furnish a Summary of is appropriate in a particular instance. H.R. Rep. considered with other applications as a Proposed Exemption to interested persons as No. 1280, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. 311 (1974). request for a class exemption, the described in § 2570.43(d). 7 The applicant will fill in the exemption Department will inform any other 4 The applicant will write in this space the date application number, which is stated in the notice applicants for the exemption of the of the last day of the time period specified in the of proposed exemption, as well as in all withdrawal. The Department will notice of proposed exemption. correspondence from the Department to the 5 To be added in the case of an exemption that applicant regarding the application. continue to process other applications provides relief from section 406(b) of ERISA or 8 The current facsimile number for the Office of for the same exemption. If all applicants corresponding sections of the Code or FERSA. Exemption Determinations is (202) 219–0204. for a particular class exemption

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules 53191

withdraw their applications, the decision to deny the exemption, it will hearing on the exemption. Such Department may either terminate all send a letter to the applicant reaffirming notification must be given in the form, proceedings relating to the exemption or that decision. time, and manner prescribed by the propose the exemption on its own (e) If, after reviewing a request for Department. Ordinarily, however, motion. reconsideration, the Department adequate notification can be given by (d) If, following the withdrawal of an decides, based on the new facts and providing to interested persons a copy exemption application, an applicant arguments submitted, to reconsider its of the notice of hearing published by the decides to reapply for the same final denial letter, it will notify the Department in the Federal Register exemption, he or she may contact the applicant of its intent to reconsider the within 10 days of its publication, using Department in writing (including application in light of the new any of the methods approved in electronically) to request that the information presented. The Department § 2570.43(b). application be reinstated. The applicant will then take whatever steps remained (d) After furnishing the notice should refer to the application number at the time it issued its final denial letter required by paragraph (c) of this section, assigned to the original application. If, to process the exemption application. an applicant must submit a statement at the time the original application was (f) If, at any point during its confirming that notice was given in the withdrawn, any additional information subsequent processing of the form, manner, and time prescribed. This to be submitted to the Department under application, the Department decides statement must be accompanied by a § 2570.39 was outstanding, that again that the exemption is declaration under penalty of perjury information must accompany the unwarranted, it will issue a letter attesting to the truth of the information request for reinstatement of the affirming its final denial. provided in the statement, which is application. However, the applicant signed by a person qualified under need not resubmit information § 2570.46 Hearings in opposition to § 2570.34(b)(5) to sign such a previously furnished to the Department exemptions from restrictions on fiduciary self-dealing. declaration. in connection with a withdrawn application unless reinstatement of the (a) Any interested person who may be § 2570.47 Other hearings. application is requested more than two adversely affected by an exemption (a) In its discretion, the Department years after the date of its withdrawal. which the Department proposes to grant may schedule a hearing on its own (e) Any request for reinstatement of a from the restrictions of section 406(b) of motion where it determines that issues withdrawn application submitted, in ERISA, section 4975(c)(1)(E) or (F) of the relevant to the exemption can be most accordance with paragraph (d) of this Code, or section 8477(c)(2) of FERSA fully or expeditiously explored at a section, will be granted by the may request a hearing before the hearing. A notice of such hearing shall Department, and the Department will Department within the period of time be published by the Department in the take whatever steps remained at the specified in the Federal Register notice Federal Register. time the application was withdrawn to of the proposed exemption. Any such (b) An applicant for an exemption process the application. request must state: must notify interested persons of any (1) The name, address, telephone hearing on an exemption scheduled by § 2570.45 Requests for reconsideration. number, and e-mail address of the the Department in the manner described (a) The Department will entertain one person making the request; in § 2570.46(c). In addition, the request for reconsideration of an (2) The nature of the person’s interest applicant must submit a statement exemption application that has been in the exemption and the manner in subscribed as true under penalty of finally denied pursuant to § 2570.41 if which the person would be adversely perjury like that required in the applicant presents in support of the affected by the exemption; and § 2570.46(d). application significant new facts or (3) A statement of the issues to be arguments, which, for good reason, addressed and a general description of § 2570.48 Decision to grant exemptions. could not have been submitted for the the evidence to be presented at the (a) The Department may not grant an Department’s consideration during its hearing. exemption under section 408(a) of initial review of the exemption (b) The Department will grant a ERISA, section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, application. request for a hearing made in or 5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3) unless, following (b) A request for reconsideration of a accordance with paragraph (a) of this evaluation of the facts and previously denied application must be section where a hearing is necessary to representations comprising the made within 180 days after the issuance fully explore material factual issues administrative record of the proposed of the final denial letter and must be identified by the person requesting the exemption (including any comments accompanied by a copy of the hearing. A notice of such hearing shall received in response to a notice of Department’s final letter denying the be published by the Department in the proposed exemption and the record of exemption and a statement setting forth Federal Register. The Department may any hearing held in connection with the the new information and/or arguments decline to hold a hearing where: proposed exemption), it finds that the that provide the basis for (1) The request for the hearing does exemption is: reconsideration. not meet the requirements of paragraph (1) Administratively feasible; (c) A request for reconsideration must (a) of this section; (2) In the interests of the plan (or the also be accompanied by a declaration (2) The only issues identified for Thrift Savings Fund in the case of under penalty of perjury attesting to the exploration at the hearing are matters of FERSA) and of its participants and truth of the new information provided, law; or beneficiaries; and which is signed by a person qualified (3) The factual issues identified can (3) Protective of the rights of under § 2570.34(b)(5) to sign such a be fully explored through the participants and beneficiaries of such declaration. submission of evidence in written plan (or the Thrift Savings Fund in the (d) If, after reviewing a request for (including electronic) form. case of FERSA). reconsideration, the Department decides (c) An applicant for an exemption (b) In each instance where the that the facts and arguments presented must notify interested persons in the Department determines to grant an do not warrant reversal of its original event that the Department schedules a exemption, it shall publish a notice in

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 53192 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules

the Federal Register which summarizes exemption or if one or more of the Department of Labor, 200 Constitution the transaction or transactions for which exemption’s conditions cease to be met. Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. exemptive relief has been granted and (b) Upon request, the staff of the specifies the conditions under which § 2570.50 Revocation or modification of Public Disclosure Room will furnish exemptions. such exemptive relief is available. photocopies of an administrative record, (a) If, after an exemption takes effect, or any specified portion of that record, § 2570.49 Limits on the effect of changes in circumstances, including for a specified charge per page. exemptions. changes in law or policy, occur which (a) An exemption does not take effect call into question the continuing § 2570.52 Effective date. or protect parties in interest from validity of the Department’s original This subpart is effective with respect liability with respect to the exemption findings concerning the exemption, the to all exemptions filed with or initiated transaction unless the material facts and Department may take steps to revoke or by the Department under section 408(a) representations contained in the modify the exemption. of ERISA, section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, application and in any materials and (b) Before revoking or modifying an and/or 5 U.S.C. 8477(c)(3) at any time documents submitted in support of the exemption, the Department will publish after [DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF application were true and complete. a notice of its proposed action in the PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE]. (b) An exemption is effective only for Federal Register and provide interested Applications for exemptions under the period of time specified and only persons with an opportunity to section 408(a) of ERISA, section under the conditions set forth in the comment on the proposed revocation or 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and/or 5 U.S.C. exemption. modification. Prior to the publication of 8477(c)(3) filed on or after September such notice, the applicant will be 10, 1990 but before [DATE 60 DAYS (c) Only the specific parties to whom notified of the Department’s proposed an exemption grants relief may rely on AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF action and the reasons therefore. THE FINAL RULE] are governed by part the exemption. If the notice granting an Subsequent to the publication of the exemption does not limit exemptive 2570 of chapter XXV of title 29 of the notice, the applicant will have the Code of Federal Regulations (title 29 relief to specific parties, all parties to opportunity to comment on the the exemption transaction may rely on CFR part 2570 as revised July 1, 1991). proposed revocation or modification. * * * * * the exemption. (c) Ordinarily the revocation or (d) For transactions that are modification of an exemption will have Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of continuing in nature, an exemption does prospective effect only. August 2010. not protect parties in interest from Michael L. Davis, liability with respect to an exemption § 2570.51 Public inspection and copies. Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employee transaction if, during the continuation (a) The administrative record of each Benefits Security Administration, Department of the transaction, there are material exemption will be open to public of Labor. changes to the original facts and inspection and copying at the EBSA [FR Doc. 2010–21073 Filed 8–27–10; 8:45 am] representations underlying such Public Disclosure Room, U.S. BILLING CODE 4510–29–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:54 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\30AUP2.SGM 30AUP2 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS2 i

Reader Aids Federal Register Vol. 75, No. 167 Monday, August 30, 2010

CUSTOMER SERVICE AND INFORMATION CFR PARTS AFFECTED DURING AUGUST

Federal Register/Code of Federal Regulations At the end of each month, the Office of the Federal Register General Information, indexes and other finding 202–741–6000 publishes separately a List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA), which aids lists parts and sections affected by documents published since Laws 741–6000 the revision date of each title. 590...... 47726 Presidential Documents 2 CFR Executive orders and proclamations 741–6000 The United States Government Manual 741–6000 3373...... 52857 10 CFR 72...... 49813 Other Services 3 CFR Proposed Rules: Electronic and on-line services (voice) 741–6020 Proclamations: 26...... 51958 Privacy Act Compilation 741–6064 8544...... 46835 37...... 47494 Public Laws Update Service (numbers, dates, etc.) 741–6043 8545...... 48855 430...... 52892 TTY for the deaf-and-hard-of-hearing 741–6086 8546...... 50843 431...... 51423 8547...... 52211 ELECTRONIC RESEARCH Executive Orders: 11 CFR World Wide Web 13549...... 51609 9405...... 49813 Full text of the daily Federal Register, CFR and other publications 13550...... 51615 9407...... 49813 is located at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/index.html Administrative Orders: 9409...... 49813 Federal Register information and research tools, including Public Memorandums: 9410...... 49813 Inspection List, indexes, and links to GPO Access are located at: Memo. of August 3, 9420...... 49813 http://www.archives.gov/federallregister 2010 ...... 47433 9428...... 49813 E-mail Memo. of August 17, Proposed Rules: 2010 ...... 51617 9428...... 47729 FEDREGTOC-L (Federal Register Table of Contents LISTSERV) is Notices: an open e-mail service that provides subscribers with a digital Notice of August 12, 12 CFR form of the Federal Register Table of Contents. The digital form 2010 ...... 50681 of the Federal Register Table of Contents includes HTML and 34...... 51623 PDF links to the full text of each document. 5 CFR 205...... 50683 To join or leave, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov and select 208...... 51623 Ch. LXXX...... 52607 Online mailing list archives, FEDREGTOC-L, Join or leave the list 211...... 51623 532...... 49351 (or change settings); then follow the instructions. 226...... 46837 2416...... 48273 328...... 49363 PENS (Public Law Electronic Notification Service) is an e-mail 8301...... 51369 service that notifies subscribers of recently enacted laws. 330...... 49363 Proposed Rules: To subscribe, go to http://listserv.gsa.gov/archives/publaws-l.html 347...... 49363 532...... 45557 and select Join or leave the list (or change settings); then follow 365...... 51623 563...... 51623 the instructions. 6 CFR FEDREGTOC-L and PENS are mailing lists only. We cannot 610...... 51623 respond to specific inquiries. 5 ...... 50845, 50846, 51619 701...... 47171 707...... 47173 Reference questions. Send questions and comments about the 7 CFR Federal Register system to: [email protected] 741...... 51623 The Federal Register staff cannot interpret specific documents or 46...... 51917 761...... 51623 regulations. 205...... 51919 Proposed Rules: Reminders. Effective January 1, 2009, the Reminders, including 305...... 52213 1...... 49423 Rules Going Into Effect and Comments Due Next Week, no longer 457...... 52218 3...... 52283 appear in the Reader Aids section of the Federal Register. This 652...... 48273 16...... 49423 information can be found online at http://www.regulations.gov. 922...... 51924 28...... 49423 984...... 51926 CFR Checklist. Effective January 1, 2009, the CFR Checklist no 208...... 52283 1000...... 51929 longer appears in the Federal Register. This information can be 225...... 52283 1423...... 50847 found online at http://bookstore.gpo.gov/. 325...... 52283 1427...... 50847 567...... 52283 1980...... 52429 614...... 50936 FEDERAL REGISTER PAGES AND DATE, AUGUST 3022...... 49357 741...... 47236 45047–45474...... 2 51609–51916...... 23 Proposed Rules: 750...... 47236 45475–46836...... 3 51917–52210...... 24 46...... 51693 908...... 49314 46837–47170...... 4 52211–52428...... 25 357...... 46859 1209...... 49314 993...... 51956 1213...... 47495 47171–47432...... 5 52429–52606...... 26 989...... 47490 1780...... 49314 47433–47698...... 6 52607–52856...... 27 47699–48272...... 9 52856–53192...... 30 8 CFR 48273–48548...... 10 13 CFR 48549–48856...... 11 214...... 47699 121...... 48549 48857–49350...... 12 217...... 47701 134...... 47435 49351–49812...... 13 274a...... 47699 49813–50682...... 16 14 CFR 50683–50842...... 17 9 CFR 13...... 52859 50843–51170...... 18 Proposed Rules: 21...... 50688, 52860 51171–51368...... 19 307...... 47726 23...... 50850, 50853 51369–51608...... 20 381...... 47726 25 ...... 46838, 46840, 47176,

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:03 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4712 Sfmt 4712 E:\FR\FM\30AUCU.LOC 30AUCU hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 ii Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Reader Aids

49815, 52614 270...... 47064 602...... 49380, 49394 51379, 51945, 52462, 52463, 29...... 50688 274...... 47064 Proposed Rules: 52465 39 ...... 47180, 47182, 47184, 1 ...... 49427, 49428, 51433, Proposed Rules: 47190, 47194, 47197, 47199, 18 CFR 51707, 52485 165...... 50952 47201, 47203, 47207, 47208, 11...... 48553 31...... 51707, 52485 173...... 49869 49365, 49368, 49370, 49375, 376...... 48553 40...... 51707, 52485 174...... 49869 49377, 50854, 50856, 50859, Proposed Rules: 300...... 48880 181...... 49869 50863, 50865, 50867, 50869, 35...... 47499 301 ...... 51707, 52485, 52486 187...... 49869 50871, 50874, 50877, 50878, 51651, 51654, 51656, 51657, 19 CFR 27 CFR 34 CFR 51659, 51931, 52233, 52235, 4...... 52446 Proposed Rules: Proposed Rules: 52238, 52240, 52242, 52246, 10...... 50695, 52446 478...... 47254 222...... 49432 52250, 52253, 52255, 52263, 12...... 52446, 52453 36 CFR 52435 18...... 52446 28 CFR 47...... 52859 24...... 50695 2...... 51179 242...... 48857, 52627 71 ...... 47709, 48550, 48551, 101...... 52446 79...... 48274 37 CFR 50694, 51171, 51172, 51173, 103...... 52446 51174, 51175, 51176, 51177, 111...... 52456 29 CFR 201...... 47464, 52267 51661, 51662 118...... 52446 1926...... 47906 38 CFR 91 ...... 48552, 48857, 52859 122...... 52446 4022...... 49407 95...... 52437 141...... 52446 17...... 52627 97 ...... 45047, 45049, 51663, Proposed Rules: 146...... 52446 404...... 48416 51666 39 CFR 159...... 52446 2570...... 53172 111 ...... 47717, 51668, 51947 Proposed Rules: 162...... 50695, 52446 4062...... 48283 25...... 49865 163...... 50695, 52453 4063...... 48283 40 CFR 33...... 49865 178...... 50695 39 ...... 45075, 45558, 45560, 192...... 52446 30 CFR Ch. I ...... 49556 46861, 46864, 46868, 46873, 35...... 49414 938...... 48526 47242, 47245, 47247, 47249, 20 CFR 52 ...... 45057, 45480, 45483, Proposed Rules: 46845, 47218, 48566, 48579, 47734, 48281, 48615, 48617, 404...... 52619 48618, 48620, 48623, 50941, 56...... 49429 48582, 48860, 48864, 50708, Proposed Rules: 50942, 50945, 51187, 51693, 57...... 49429 50711, 51949, 52467, 52470 1...... 49596 51696, 51698, 51701, 51705, 938...... 46877 55...... 51950 10...... 49596 52290, 52292, 52480, 52482, 63...... 51570 25...... 49596 31 CFR 52652, 52907, 52912, 52914 70...... 48582 404...... 51336 71 ...... 47252, 47736, 47737, 215...... 51373 81...... 45485, 47218 416...... 51336 49866, 49868, 50947, 50948, 317...... 52459 180 ...... 46847, 47465, 47475, 672...... 52671 52484, 52654 351...... 52459 50884, 50891, 50896, 50902, 701...... 50718 234...... 45562 353...... 52459 50914, 50922, 50926, 51382, 359...... 52459 244...... 45562 21 CFR 51388, 52269 250...... 45562 560...... 48562 258...... 50930 510...... 52621 259...... 45562 561...... 49836 261...... 51671, 51678 520...... 52621 399...... 45562 Proposed Rules: 271...... 47223, 50932 522...... 52621 10...... 51713 272 ...... 45489, 47223, 51392 15 CFR 1308...... 47451 50...... 45563 300...... 47482, 48867 734...... 45052 Proposed Rules: 1515...... 48585 32 CFR 748...... 45052 870...... 52294 Proposed Rules: 902...... 53026 884...... 52294 199 ...... 47452, 47458, 47460, 2...... 52619 892...... 52294 47710, 47712, 50880, 50882, 49...... 48880 16 CFR 1308...... 47503 50883 51 ...... 45075, 45210, 51960 305...... 49818 706...... 47210 22 CFR 52 ...... 45075, 45076, 45080, 310...... 48458, 51934 776...... 52860 45082, 45210, 45568, 46880, 1215...... 51177 40...... 45475 Proposed Rules: 48627, 48628, 48894, 48895, 1216...... 51178 42...... 45475 68...... 47504 50730, 51188, 52692, 52701, 1420...... 52616 62...... 48555 161...... 47515 52916 1500...... 49379 120...... 46843 199...... 47519, 50950 55...... 51968 Proposed Rules: 124...... 52622 60...... 47520 698...... 52655 125...... 52622, 52625 33 CFR 70...... 48628 126...... 52622 1...... 49408 72...... 45075, 45210 17 CFR 129...... 52622 3 ...... 47211, 48564, 50884 78...... 45075, 45210 200...... 47444, 49820 Proposed Rules: 100 ...... 47212, 47215, 50700, 81 ...... 45571, 46881, 47746 201...... 47444 124...... 48625 51936 93...... 49435 202...... 47444 126...... 48625 114...... 49408 97...... 45075, 45210 275...... 49234 115...... 49408 98...... 48744 24 CFR 279...... 49234 116...... 49408 112...... 45572 Proposed Rules: 200...... 51914 117 ...... 45477, 47217, 47461, 131...... 45579 1 ...... 47738, 50718, 50950, Proposed Rules: 48276, 49408, 50700, 50707, 257...... 51434 51429 401...... 52689 51938, 51940, 51942, 52461 261...... 51434 20...... 50950 118...... 49408 264...... 51434 30...... 47738 26 CFR 138...... 49411 265...... 51434 140...... 47738 1 ...... 49380, 49394, 49821, 147...... 50700, 51943 268...... 51434 151...... 50950 51934, 52266, 52267 150...... 51374 271...... 47256, 51434 210...... 47064 31...... 49821 165 ...... 45055, 45478, 47211, 272...... 45583, 47256 239...... 47064 53...... 46844 47713, 47715, 48564, 49412, 300...... 47521, 48895 240...... 47064, 51429 54...... 46844 49843, 49847, 49848, 50700, 302...... 51434 249...... 47064 301...... 49821, 52458 50884, 51180, 51374, 51377, 704...... 49656

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:03 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4712 Sfmt 4712 E:\FR\FM\30AUCU.LOC 30AUCU hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Reader Aids iii

710...... 49656 2518...... 51395 8...... 53129 49 CFR 711...... 49656 2522...... 51395 12...... 53129, 53135 40...... 49850 799...... 51734 2525...... 51395 13...... 53129 192...... 48593 1039...... 47520 2526...... 51395 14...... 53135 193...... 48593 1042...... 47520 2527...... 51395 15...... 53129, 53135 195...... 48593 1065...... 47520 2528...... 51395 16...... 53129, 53135 390...... 51419 1068...... 47520 2529...... 51395 17...... 53129 541...... 47720 2530...... 51395 19...... 53129, 53135 594...... 48608 41 CFR 2531...... 51395 22...... 53129 595...... 47489 102-117...... 51392 2532...... 51395 23...... 53129 830...... 51953 2533...... 51395 42 CFR 25...... 53153 Proposed Rules: 2534...... 51395 27...... 53135 410...... 45700, 49030 27...... 47753 2550...... 51395 28...... 53129 412...... 50042 37...... 47753 2551...... 51395 30...... 53135 413...... 49030, 50042 38...... 47753 2552...... 51395 31...... 53135 414...... 49030 171...... 52070 Proposed Rules: 32...... 53129, 53135 415...... 50042 172...... 52070 170...... 45584 36...... 53129 416...... 45700 173...... 52070 419...... 45700 46 CFR 42...... 53129, 53135 175...... 52070 424...... 50042, 52629 44...... 53135 176...... 52070 Proposed Rules: 49...... 53135 431...... 48816 401...... 51191 178...... 52070 440...... 50042 50...... 53129 180...... 52070 441...... 50042 47 CFR 52 ...... 53129, 53135, 53153 192...... 45591 447...... 48816 1...... 45494 202...... 51416, 52650 213...... 52490 457...... 48816 2...... 45058 205...... 45072 541...... 50733 482...... 50042 25...... 45058 207...... 45072 571...... 50958 485...... 50042 27...... 45058 208...... 45072 578...... 49879 489...... 50042 73 ...... 47488, 52649, 52872 209...... 45072 95...... 52472 211...... 45072 Proposed Rules: 50 CFR 73...... 50730 97...... 46854 212...... 51416, 52650 405...... 52487 101...... 45496 215 ...... 45072, 48276, 48278 17 ...... 45497, 50814, 52272 216...... 45072 409...... 52487 Proposed Rules: 20...... 52873 410...... 46169, 52487 Ch. I ...... 49870 217...... 45072, 48276 83...... 51420 411...... 46169, 52487 1 ...... 45590, 47142, 49871, 219...... 45072 100...... 48857, 52627 412...... 46169, 52487 52186 225...... 45072, 48279 218...... 45527 413...... 46169, 49215 2...... 49871 228...... 45072 600...... 50715 414...... 52487 25...... 49871 231...... 48278 622...... 50934 415...... 52487 27...... 47142 232...... 45072 635...... 50715, 51182 416...... 46169 54...... 48236 234...... 51416, 52650 648 ...... 48613, 48874, 49420, 419...... 46169 61...... 48629 237...... 45072 51683, 52650, 52890 424...... 52487 64...... 48629, 51735 243...... 48276 660...... 51183, 51684 482...... 46169 73...... 46885 246...... 45072 679 ...... 49422, 51185, 52478, 489...... 46169 74...... 52186 247...... 51416 52891, 53026 95...... 47142 250...... 45072 680...... 50716 44 CFR 101...... 52186 252 ...... 45072, 48278, 48279, Proposed Rules: 64 ...... 49417, 52861, 52865 49849, 51416 17 ...... 45592, 46844, 48294, 67...... 52868 48 CFR 541...... 48872 48896, 48914, 50739, 51204, 204...... 50713 Ch. I...... 53128, 53169 552...... 48872 51223, 51969 Proposed Rules: 1...... 53129 Ch. 14 ...... 48873 20...... 47682, 52398 67...... 47751, 50955 2 ...... 53129, 53135, 53153 Proposed Rules: 253...... 52300 3...... 53129 4...... 50731 622...... 49447, 49883 45 CFR 4...... 53135 211...... 52917 648...... 48920 1173...... 52857 5...... 53129, 53153 246...... 52917 665 ...... 45085, 51237, 52921 1611...... 47487 6...... 53129 252...... 52917 679...... 51741 2510...... 51395 7...... 53129 Ch. 34 ...... 51884 680...... 48298

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:03 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4712 Sfmt 4712 E:\FR\FM\30AUCU.LOC 30AUCU hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3 iv Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 167 / Monday, August 30, 2010 / Reader Aids

www.gpoaccess.gov/plaws/ the Elbert P. Tuttle United (Aug. 16, 2010; 124 Stat. index.html. Some laws may States Court of Appeals 2497) LIST OF PUBLIC LAWS not yet be available. Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘John C. Godbold Last List August 16, 2010 This is a continuing list of H.R. 511/P.L. 111–231 Federal Building’’. (Aug. 16, public bills from the current To authorize the Secretary of 2010; 124 Stat. 2494) session of Congress which Agriculture to terminate certain H.R. 5278/P.L. 111–235 have become Federal laws. It easements held by the Public Laws Electronic may be used in conjunction Secretary on land owned by To designate the facility of the Notification Service with ‘‘P L U S’’ (Public Laws the Village of Caseyville, United States Postal Service Update Service) on 202–741– Illinois, and to terminate located at 405 West Second (PENS) 6043. This list is also associated contractual Street in Dixon, Illinois, as the available online at http:// arrangements with the Village. ‘‘President Ronald W. Reagan www.archives.gov/federal- (Aug. 16, 2010; 124 Stat. Post Office Building’’. (Aug. PENS is a free electronic mail register/laws.html. 2489) 16, 2010; 124 Stat. 2495) notification service of newly H.R. 2097/P.L. 111–232 The text of laws is not H.R. 5395/P.L. 111–236 enacted public laws. To Star-Spangled Banner subscribe, go to http:// published in the Federal To designate the facility of the Commemorative Coin Act listserv.gsa.gov/archives/ Register but may be ordered United States Postal Service (Aug. 16, 2010; 124 Stat. publaws-l.html in ‘‘slip law’’ (individual located at 151 North Maitland pamphlet) form from the 2490) H.R. 3509/P.L. 111–233 Avenue in Maitland, Florida, Superintendent of Documents, as the ‘‘Paula Hawkins Post Note: This service is strictly Agricultural Credit Act of 2010 U.S. Government Printing Office Building’’. (Aug. 16, for E-mail notification of new (Aug. 16, 2010; 124 Stat. Office, Washington, DC 20402 2010; 124 Stat. 2496) laws. The text of laws is not (phone, 202–512–1808). The 2493) available through this service. text will also be made H.R. 4275/P.L. 111–234 H.R. 5552/P.L. 111–237 PENS cannot respond to available on the Internet from To designate the annex Firearms Excise Tax specific inquiries sent to this GPO Access at http:// building under construction for Improvement Act of 2010 address.

VerDate Mar 15 2010 21:03 Aug 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4712 Sfmt 4711 E:\FR\FM\30AUCU.LOC 30AUCU hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS3