DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIbLIOGRApHY PRIMARY SOURCEs Al-Farabi, Abu Nasr. Philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, trans. Muhsin Mahdi. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 2001. Aquinas, Thomas. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, trans. C. I. Litzinger. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company, 1964. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologicae, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Bros., 1947–1948. Aristotle. De Anima, trans. Robert Drew Hicks. New York: Barnes and Nobles Library, 2006. Aristotle. Generation of Animals and Parts of Animals, trans. D. M. Balme. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972. Aristotle. Metaphysics, trans. Hippocrates G. Apostle. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1966. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Robert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Aristotle. Politics, trans. Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. Averroes. Epitome on Aristotle’s De Anima, trans. Deborah Black. Toronto, 2009. http://individual.utoronto.ca/dlblack/WebTranslations/AVEREPAN.pdf Averroes. Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics in the Hebrew Version of Samuel Ben Judah, trans. and ed. Lawrence V. Berman. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Science and Humanities, 1999. Babylonian Talmud, ed. Isidore Epstein. London: Soncino Press, 1961. Buridan, John. “Jean Buridan, Questions on Book X of the Ethics,” ed. and trans. John Kilcullen, in The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Volume II: Ethics and Political Philosophy, ed. Arthur Stephen McGrade, John © The Author(s) 2016 175 A. Green, The Virtue Ethics of Levi Gersonides, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40820-0 176 Bibliography Kilcullen, and Matthew Kempshall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 498–586. Buridan, John. Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Paris, 1513. Reprint. 1968, as Super decem libros Ethicorum, Frankfurt a. M.: Minerva. Cohen, Hermann. “Charakteristik der Ethik Maimunis,” in Jüdische Schriften, vol. 3, ed. Bruno Strauss. Berlin: C. A. Schwetschke & Sohn, 1924: 221–289. Esther Rabbah I: An Analytical Translation, trans. and ed. Jacob Neusner. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989. Gaon, Saadya. Book of Beliefs and Opinions, trans. Samuel Rosenblatt. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989. Gaon, Saadya. The Book of Theodicy: Translation and Commentary on the Book of Job, trans. Lenn Evan Goodman. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988. Gersonides, Levi. Commentary on Song of Songs, trans. Menachem Kellner. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998. Gersonides, Levi. Wars of the Lord, trans. Seymour Feldman. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1984. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al ha-Megillot (Commentary on the Five Scrolls), ed. Jacob Leib Levi. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 2003. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al ha-Neviim (Commentary on Joshua, Judges and Samuel), ed. Jacob Leib Levi. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 2008. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al ha-Neviim (Commentary on Kings, Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah), ed. Jacob Leib Levi. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 2008. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al ha-Torah (Commentary on the Pentateuch), vol. i–vi, eds. Baruch Brenner and Eli Fraiman. Maale Adumim: Maaliot, 1992–2008. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al ha-Torah (Commentary on the Pentateuch), vol. v: Deuteronomy, ed. Jacob Leib Levi. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 2000. Gersonides, Levi. Perush ‘al Mishlei (Commentary on Proverbs), ed. Jacob Leib Levi. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 2015. Gersonides, Levi. Supercommentary on Averroes’ Commentary on De Anima, ed. and trans. Stephen Jesse Mashbaum. In Stephen Jesse Mashbaum, Chapters 9–12 of Gersonides’ Super-commentary on Averroes’ Epitome of the De Anima: The Internal Senses. PhD Diss., Brandeis University, 1981: 1–184. Gersonides, Levi. Supercommentary on Averroes’ Commentary on De Animalibus, ed. Ahuva Gaziel. In Ahuva Gaziel, The Biology of Levi Ben Gershom (Gersonides). PhD Diss., Bar-Ilan University, 2008: 91–266. Halevi, Judah. The Kuzari, trans. Henry Slonimsky. New York: Schocken Books, 1974. Ibn Shem Tov, Shem Tov. Sefer ha-Emunot. Ferrara, 1556. Ibn Tibbon, Samuel. “Preface to Translation of Maimonides, Commentary on Avot,” trans. and ed. Menachem Kellner in Menahem Kellner, “Maimonides Bibliography 177 and Samuel Ibn Tibbon on Jeremiah 9:22–23 and Human Perfection,” in Studies in Halakhah and Jewish Thought Presented to Rabbi Professor Menahem Emanuel Rackman on His Eightieth Birthday, ed. Moshe Beer. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1994: 49–57. Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. Herbert James Paton. New York: Harper and Row, 1964. Kant, Immanuel. “On a Supposed Right to Tell Lies from Benevolent Motives,” in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics, trans. Thomas Kingsmill Abbott. London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1889. Kant, Immanuel. “Toward Lasting Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Kant’s Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 93–130. Kaspi, Joseph Ibn. Yoreh De‘ah, ed. and trans. Israel Abrahams in Hebrew Ethical Wills. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1926: 127–161. Maimonides, Moses. Commentary on the Mishnah: Tractate Sanhedrin, trans. and ed. Fred Rosner. New York : Sepher-Hermon Press, 1981. Maimonides, Moses. “Eight Chapters,” in Ethical Writings of Maimonides, eds. Raymond L. Weiss and Charles E. Buttersworth. New York: New York University Press, 1975: 59–104. Maimonides, Moses. “Laws Concerning Character Traits,” in Ethical Writings of Maimonides, eds. Raymond L. Weiss and Charles E. Buttersworth. New York: New York University Press, 1975: 28–58. Maimonides, Moses. Mishneh Torah. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 1956–1968. Maimonides, Moses. The Guide of the Perplexed, trans. Shlomo Pines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963. Marsilius of Padua. The Defender of the Peace (The Defensor Pacis), trans. Alan Gewirth. New York: Columbia University Press, 1956. Naḥmanides, Moses. Commentary on the Torah, vol. i–v, trans. Charles B. Chavel. New York: Shilo Publishing House, 1971–1976. Naḥmanides, Moses. “Sermon on Ecclesiastes,” in Writings of Nachmanides, vol 1. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-Rav Kook, 1962. Naḥmanides, Moses. Supplements to Maimonides’ Book of Commandments. In Sefer ha-Misvoṭ im Hasagot ha-Rambam, ed. Charles Chavel. Jerusalem: Mossad ha-­ Rav Kook, 1981. Ockham, William of. Philosophical Writings: A Selection. New York: Bobbs Merrill Company, 1964. Plato. Phaedo, trans. Benjamin Jowett. Waltham: Golden Cockerel Press, 1930. Plato. Republic, trans. Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books, 1991. Sifre to Deutoronomy, ed. Louis Finkelstein. New York: Ktav Publishers, 1969. 178 Bibliography SECONDARY SOURCEs Allan, Donald James. The Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. Allen, Judson Boyce. The Ethical Poetic of Later Middle Ages. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982. Altmann, Alexander. “Judah Halevi’s Theory of Climates,” Aleph 5 (2005): 215–246. Altmann, Alexander. “Maimonides’ ‘Four Perfections’,” in Essays in Jewish Intellectual History. Hanover: University Press of New England, 1981: 65–76. Anastaplo, George. The Thinker as Artist: From Homer to Plato & Aristotle. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1997. Annas, Julia. “Plato and Aristotle on Friendship and Altruism,” Mind 86, no. 344 (1977): 532–544. Anscombe, Elizabeth. “Modern Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy 33 (1958): 1–19. Ben-Meir, Ruth. Gersonides Commentary on Ecclesiastes: Commentary and Text. PhD Diss., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1993. Ben-Or, Assael. Commandments and Philosophy in Gersonides’ Thought. PhD Diss., Bar-Ilan University, 2000. Benor, Ehud. “Meaning and Reference in Maimonides’ Negative Theology,” Harvard Theological Review 88, no. 3 (1995): 339–360. Berger, David. “Miracles and the Natural Order in Nahmanides,” in Rabbi Moses Nahmanides (Ramban): Explorations in his Religious and Literary Virtuosity, ed. Isadore Twersky. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983: 107–128. Berger, David. “On the Morality of the Patriarchs in Jewish Polemics and Exegesis,” in Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Contributions and Limitations, ed. Shalom Carmy. London: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991: 131–146. Berman, Lawrence V. “A Manuscript Entitled Shoshan Limudim and the Group of Me’aynim in Provence,” in Kiryat Sefer 53 (1978): 368–372. Berlin, Isaiah. Four Essays on Liberty: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969. Berman, Lawrence V. “Greek into Hebrew: Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles: Fourteenth Century Philosopher and Translator” in Jewish Medieval and Renaissance Studies, ed. Alexander Altmann. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967: 289–320. Berman, Lawrence V. “Review of Averroes Commentary on Plato’s Republic by E. I. J. Rosenthal,” Oriens 21 (1968–1969): 436–439. Berman, Lawrence V. “The Political Interpretation of the Maxim: The Purpose of Philosophy is the Imitation of God,” Studia Islamica 15 (1961): 53–61. Braner, Baruch and Eli Fryman, “Gersonides’ Commentary on the Torah,” Maḥanayyim 4, no. 2 (2002–2003): 224–241. Buber, Martin. Kingship of God, trans. Richard Scheimann. New York: Harper and Row, 1967. Bibliography 179 Burger, Ronna. Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates: On the Nicomachean Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009. Buttersworth, Charles. “Philosophy, Ethics, and Virtuous Rule: A Study of Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic,” Cairo Papers in Social Science 9, Monograph 1. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Jews Quote
    Oral Tradition, 29/1 (2014):5-46 Why Jews Quote Michael Marmur Everyone Quotes1 Interest in the phenomenon of quotation as a feature of culture has never been greater. Recent works by Regier (2010), Morson (2011) and Finnegan (2011) offer many important insights into a practice notable both for its ubiquity and yet for its specificity. In this essay I want to consider one of the oldest and most diverse of world cultures from the perspective of quotation. While debates abound as to whether the “cultures of the Jews”2 can be regarded integrally, this essay will suggest that the act of quotation both in literary and oral settings is a constant in Jewish cultural creativity throughout the ages. By attempting to delineate some of the key functions of quotation in these various Jewish contexts, some contribution to the understanding of what is arguably a “universal human propensity” (Finnegan 2011:11) may be made. “All minds quote. Old and new make the warp and woof of every moment. There is not a thread that is not a twist of these two strands. By necessity, by proclivity, and by delight, we all quote.”3 Emerson’s reference to warp and woof is no accident. The creative act comprises a threading of that which is unique to the particular moment with strands taken from tradition.4 In 1 The comments of Sarah Bernstein, David Ellenson, Warren Zev Harvey, Jason Kalman, David Levine, Dow Marmur, Dalia Marx, Michal Muszkat-Barkan, and Richard Sarason on earlier versions of this article have been of enormous help.
    [Show full text]
  • TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel
    chapter 22 TALMUDIC STUDIES ephraim kanarfogel TRANSITIONS FROM THE EAST, AND THE NASCENT CENTERS IN NORTH AFRICA, SPAIN, AND ITALY The history and development of the study of the Oral Law following the completion of the Babylonian Talmud remain shrouded in mystery. Although significant Geonim from Babylonia and Palestine during the eighth and ninth centuries have been identified, the extent to which their writings reached Europe, and the channels through which they passed, remain somewhat unclear. A fragile consensus suggests that, at least initi- ally, rabbinic teachings and rulings from Eretz Israel traveled most directly to centers in Italy and later to Germany (Ashkenaz), while those of Babylonia emerged predominantly in the western Sephardic milieu of Spain and North Africa.1 To be sure, leading Sephardic talmudists prior to, and even during, the eleventh century were not yet to be found primarily within Europe. Hai ben Sherira Gaon (d. 1038), who penned an array of talmudic commen- taries in addition to his protean output of responsa and halakhic mono- graphs, was the last of the Geonim who flourished in Baghdad.2 The family 1 See Avraham Grossman, “Zik˙atah shel Yahadut Ashkenaz ‘el Erets Yisra’el,” Shalem 3 (1981), 57–92; Grossman, “When Did the Hegemony of Eretz Yisra’el Cease in Italy?” in E. Fleischer, M. A. Friedman, and Joel Kraemer, eds., Mas’at Mosheh: Studies in Jewish and Moslem Culture Presented to Moshe Gil [Hebrew] (Jerusalem, 1998), 143–57; Israel Ta- Shma’s review essays in K˙ ryat Sefer 56 (1981), 344–52, and Zion 61 (1996), 231–7; Ta-Shma, Kneset Mehkarim, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Persons/Founders
    Significant Persons/ Founders Historical Figures Abraham According to Jewish tradition, Abraham was born under the name Abram in the city of Ur in Babylonia in the year 1948 from Creation (circa 1800 BCE). He was the son of Terach, an idol merchant; however, from his early childhood, he questioned the faith of his father and sought the truth. He came to believe that the entire universe was the work of a single Creator, and he began to teach this belief to others. Eventually, the one true Creator that Abram had worshipped called to him and made him an offer: if Abram would leave his home and his family, then God would make him a great nation and bless him. Abram accepted this offer, and the covenant between God and the Jewish people was established. Abram was subjected to ten tests of faith to prove his worthiness for this covenant. God promised the land of Israel to Abram’s descendants. Abram was growing old and his beloved wife, Sarai, was past child-bearing years. She therefore offered her maidservant, Hagar, as a wife to Abram. (This was a common practice in the region at the time.) Hagar bore Abram a son, Ishmael, who, according to both Muslim and Jewish tradition, is the ancestor of the Arabs. When Abram was 100 and Sarai 90, God promised Abram a son by Sarai. God changed Abram’s name to Abraham (father of many), and Sarai’s to Sarah (from “my princess” to “princess”). Sarah bore Abraham a son, Isaac, who was the ancestor of the Jewish people.
    [Show full text]
  • CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? 1. Who Was the Author of the Agudah? How Did He Die? 2. What City Served As the Spiritual Center
    c"qa CAN YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS? 1. Who was the author of the Agudah? How did he die? 2. What city served as the spiritual center of Ashkenazic Jewry in the period following the Black Plague? 3. Who were France's chief Rabbis during that period? 4. Name three works that are devoted to the preservation of Jewish custom. 5. Who wrote Terumas HaDeshen? This and much more will be addressed in the eleventh lecture of this series: "The Development of Ashkenazic Liturgy and Custom: The Life and Times of the Maharil". To derive maximum benefit from this lecture, keep these questions in mind as you listen to the tape and read through the outline. Go back to these questions once again at the end of the lecture and see how well you answer them. PLEASE NOTE: This outline and source book was designed as a powerful tool to help you appreciate and understand the basis of Jewish History. Although the lectures can be listened to without the use of the outline, we advise you to read the outline to enhance your comprehension. Use it as well as a handy reference guide and for quick review. THE EPIC OF THE ETERNAL PEOPLE Presented by Rabbi Shmuel Irons Series VII Lecture #11 THE DEVELOPMENT OF ASHENAZIC LITURGY AND CUSTOM THE LIFE AND TIMES OF THE MAHARIL I. Germany in the Late Middle Ages A. micitwn g"z oi` dzrc mipe`bd eazke ,l"fe xg` mrh aezk (b"k 'iq oileg) dceb`a mpn` df xn ifg `z .l"kr dlk zkqn 'it` rceiy dzr g"z oi` d"erac l"p cer .oilgen j` ,ux` ipe`b eid f`y reciy (h"w zpya dxegyd dtbnd xg`) zexifbd mcew did xagnd ozgiye mipey`x ly mdipxtve ,el`nyl epini oia rcei ea oi`y dfd mezid xecd dzre jiiy `le .dfa wtwtl el yiy dfd xeca yi melk ,mipexg` ly ozxezne oqixkn `ticr ceak oiprl `le ,xnz` eil` renyle ,`pic oiprl `eddc ,('a ,d"k d"x) 'ek execa gzti dfa fq oniq l"ixdn z"ey 'ebe hteyd l`e on opitlick The [author of the] Sefer Agudah (Chullin 23), however, writes the following reason: "The Gaonim wrote that presently scholars do not demand [that the knife used for slaughter be shown them].
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Plato in Palestine: Philosophy in a Divided World
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. 1 TEACHING PLATO IN PALESTINE Can philosophy save the Middle East? It can. This, at least, is the thesis of Sari Nusseibeh as I learn from a friend upon arriving in Israel in February 2006. Nusseibeh is not only a prominent Palestinian intellectual and the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s former chief repre- sentative in Jerusalem, but also a philosopher by training (and, I think, by nature, too). “Only philosophy,” the friend tells me he argued during the Shlomo Pines memorial lec- ture in West Jerusalem three years before (aptly titled “On the Relevance of Philosophy in the Arab World Today”). By the time I leave Israel, I’m convinced that he’s on to something. I am here to teach a seminar at Al-Quds University, the Palestinian university in Jerusalem, together with Nus- seibeh, who has been president of Al- Quds since 1995. My idea is to discuss Plato’s political thought with the students and then examine how medieval Muslim and Jewish philosophers built on this thought to interpret Islam and Judaism as philosophical religions. I hope to raise some basic questions about philosophy and its rela- For general queries, contact [email protected] Fraenkel.indb 3 2/17/2015 8:56:12 AM © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectile Motion Acc
    PHY1033C/HIS3931/IDH 3931 : Discovering Physics: The Universe and Humanity’s Place in It Fall 2016 Prof. Peter Hirschfeld, Physics Announcements • HW 1 due today; HW 2 posted, due Sept. 13 • Lab 1 today 2nd hour • Reading: Gregory Chs. 2,3 Wertheim (coursepack), Lindberg (coursepack) • HW/office hours 10:40 M,T, 11:45 W email/call to make appt. if these are bad Last time Improvements to Aristotle/Eudoxus Appolonius of Perga (~20 -190 BCE) : proposed: 1) eccentric orbits (planet goes in circle at const. speed, but Earth was off center) 2) epicycles (planet moves on own circle [epicycle] around a point that travels in another circle [deferent] around E. His model explained • variation in brightness of planets • changes in angular speed Ptolemy (AD 100 – c. 170): Almagest summarized ancient ideas about solar system. He himself proposed “equant point”: eccentric point about which planet moved with constant angular speed. Not true uniform circular motion, but explained data better. Ptolemaic universe (Equant point suppressed) • Note: this picture puts planets at a distance relative to Earth corresponding to our modern knowledge, but Ptolemaic system did not predict order of planets (or care!) • Exception: inner planets had to have orbits that kept them between Earth and Sun • Why epicycles? Not asked. Clicker quickies Q1: Ptolemy’s model explained retrograde motion of the planets. This means that A. Some planets moved clockwise while others moved counterclockwise along their orbits B. Some planets moved outside the plane of the ecliptic C. Some planets were observed to stop in the sky, move apparently backwards along their path, forward again D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logic of Where and While in the 13Th and 14Th Centuries
    The Logic of Where and While in the 13th and 14th Centuries Sara L. Uckelman Department of Philosophy, Durham University Abstract Medieval analyses of molecular propositions include many non-truthfunctional con- nectives in addition to the standard modern binary connectives (conjunction, dis- junction, and conditional). Two types of non-truthfunctional molecular propositions considered by a number of 13th- and 14th-century authors are temporal and local propositions, which combine atomic propositions with ‘while’ and ‘where’. Despite modern interest in the historical roots of temporal and tense logic, medieval analy- ses of ‘while’ propositions are rarely discussed in modern literature, and analyses of ‘where’ propositions are almost completely overlooked. In this paper we introduce 13th- and 14th-century views on temporal and local propositions, and connect the medieval theories with modern temporal and spatial counterparts. Keywords: Jean Buridan, Lambert of Auxerre, local propositions, Roger Bacon, temporal propositions, Walter Burley, William of Ockham 1 Introduction Modern propositional logicians are familiar with three kinds of compound propositions: Conjunctions, disjunctions, and conditionals. Thirteenth-century logicians were more liberal, admitting variously five, six, seven, or more types of compound propositions. In the middle of the 13th century, Lambert of Auxerre 1 in his Logic identified six types of ‘hypothetical’ (i.e., compound, as opposed to atomic ‘categorical’, i.e., subject-predicate, propositions) propo- sitions: the three familiar ones, plus causal, local, and temporal propositions [17, 99]. Another mid-13th century treatise, Roger Bacon’s Art and Science of Logic¶ , lists these six and adds expletive propositions (those which use the connective ‘however’), and other ones not explicitly classified such as “Socrates 1 The identity of the author of this text is not known for certain.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Buridan Qui a Étudié Les Arts Libéraux S’Est Intéressé Aux Dis- Cussions Sur Le Modèle De L’Univers Et Sur La Théorie Du Mouvement D’Aristote
    Jean Buridan qui a étudié les arts libéraux s’est intéressé aux dis- cussions sur le modèle de l’univers et sur la théorie du mouvement d’Aristote. Il a redécouvert et diffusé la théorie de l’impetus. Éla- borée à Alexandrie, cette théorie visait à combler une lacune de la théorie du mouvement d’Aristote. Jean Buridan 1295-1358 Jean Buridan Discussion du géocentrisme Si la terre reste toujours immobile au Jean Buridan est né à Béthune au Pas de centre du monde; ou non ... [et] si, en Calais, en 1295 et est mort vers 1358. supposant que la terre est en mouve- Il étudie à l’université de Paris où il est ment de rotation autour de son cen- un disciple de Guillaume d’Occam. Tra- tre et de ses propres pôles, tous les phé- ditionnellement, pour se préparer à une nomènes que nous observons peuvent carrière en philosophie, les aspirants étu- être sauvés? dient la théologie. Buridan choisit d’étu- dier les arts libéraux (voir encadré) plu- Peut-on, en considérant que la Terre est tôt que la théologie et il préserve son in- en rotation sur elle-même, expliquer dépendance en demeurant clerc séculier tous les phénomènes que nous obser- plutôt qu’en se joignant à un ordre reli- vons ? Buridan donne une série d’argu- gieux. ments en accord avec la rotation de la Buridan enseigne la philosophie à Pa- Terre et une autre série à l’encontre de ris et est élu recteur de Angleterre Calais Belgique cette hypothèse. Il écrit : Lille Allemagne l’Université en 1328 et en Béthune Il est vrai, sans aucun doute, que si la 1340.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos
    Jews, Gentiles, and the Modern Egalitarian Ethos: Some Tentative Thoughts David Berger The deep and systemic tension between contemporary egalitarianism and many authoritative Jewish texts about gentiles takes varying forms. Most Orthodox Jews remain untroubled by some aspects of this tension, understanding that Judaism’s affirmation of chosenness and hierarchy can inspire and ennoble without denigrating others. In other instances, affirmations of metaphysical differences between Jews and gentiles can take a form that makes many of us uncomfortable, but we have the legitimate option of regarding them as non-authoritative. Finally and most disturbing, there are positions affirmed by standard halakhic sources from the Talmud to the Shulhan Arukh that apparently stand in stark contrast to values taken for granted in the modern West and taught in other sections of the Torah itself. Let me begin with a few brief observations about the first two categories and proceed to somewhat more extended ruminations about the third. Critics ranging from medieval Christians to Mordecai Kaplan have directed withering fire at the doctrine of the chosenness of Israel. Nonetheless, if we examine an overarching pattern in the earliest chapters of the Torah, we discover, I believe, that this choice emerges in a universalist context. The famous statement in the Mishnah (Sanhedrin 4:5) that Adam was created singly so that no one would be able to say, “My father is greater than yours” underscores the universality of the original divine intent. While we can never know the purpose of creation, one plausible objective in light of the narrative in Genesis is the opportunity to actualize the values of justice and lovingkindness through the behavior of creatures who subordinate themselves to the will 1 of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings on the Encounter Between Jewish Thought and Early Modern Science
    HISTORY 449 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA W 3:30pm-6:30 pm Fall, 2016 GOD AND NATURE: READINGS ON THE ENCOUNTER BETWEEN JEWISH THOUGHT AND EARLY MODERN SCIENCE INSTRUCTOR: David B. Ruderman OFFICE HRS: M 3:30-4:30 pm;W 1:00-2:00 OFFICE: 306b College Hall Email: [email protected] SOME GENERAL WORKS ON THE SUBJECT: Y. Tzvi Langerman, "Jewish Science", Dictionary of the Middle Ages, 11:89-94 Y. Tzvi Langerman, The Jews and the Sciences in the Middle Ages, 1999 A. Neher, "Copernicus in the Hebraic Literature from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century," Journal History of Ideas 38 (1977): 211-26 A. Neher, Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century: David Gans (1541-1613) and His Times, l986 H. Levine, "Paradise not Surrendered: Jewish Reactions to Copernicus and the Growth of Modern Science" in R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, eds. Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences (Boston, l983), pp. 203-25 H. Levine, "Science," in Contemporary Jewish Religious Thought, eds. A. Cohen and P. Mendes-Flohr, l987, pp. 855-61 M. Panitz, "New Heavens and a New Earth: Seventeenth- to Nineteenth-Century Jewish Responses to the New Astronomy," Conservative Judaism, 40 (l987-88); 28-42 D. Ruderman, Kabbalah, Magic, and Science: The Cultural Universe of a Sixteenth- Century Jewish Physician, l988 D. Ruderman, Science, Medicine, and Jewish Culture in Early Modern Europe, Spiegel Lectures in European Jewish History, 7, l987 D. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe, 1995, 2001 D. Ruderman, Jewish Enlightenment in an English Key: Anglo-Jewry’s Construction of Modern Jewish Thought, 2000 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Edition
    Meorot A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly Edah Journal) Marheshvan 5768 CONTENTS Editor’s Introduction to the Marheshvan 5768 Edition Eugene Korn ARTICLES Farteitcht un Farbessert (On “Correcting” Maimonides) Menachem Kellner Ethics and Warfare Revisited Gerald J. Blidstein Michael J. Broyde Women's Eligibility to Write Sifrei Torah Jen Taylor Friedman Dov Linzer Authority and Validity: Why Tanakh Requires Interpretation, and What Makes an Interpretation Legitimate? Moshe Sokolow REVIEW ESSAY Maimonides Contra Kabbalah: A Review of Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism by Menachem Kellner James A. Diamond Meorot 6:2 Marheshvan 5768 A Publication of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbini cal School © 2007 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE t Meorot: A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly The Edah Journal) Statement of Purpose Meorot is a forum for discussion of Orthodox Judaism’s engagement with modernity, o published by Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School. It is the conviction of Meorot that this discourse is vital to nurturing the spiritual and religious experiences of Modern Orthodox Jews. Committed to the norms of halakhah and Torah, Meorot is dedicated to free inquiry and will be ever mindful that “Truth is the seal of the Holy One, Blessed be He.” r Editors Eugene Korn, Editor Nathaniel Helfgot, Associate Editor Joel Linsider, Text Editor o Editorial Board Dov Linzer (YCT Rabbinical School), Chair Michael Berger Moshe Halbertal (Israel) e Naftali Harcsztark Norma Baumel Joseph Simcha Krauss Barry Levy Adam Mintz Tamar Ross (Israel) A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse M Meorot will publish two online editions per year, and will be available periodically in hard- copy editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Morrisey by Harvey
    Fall 1990 Volume 18 Number 1 Leo Strauss Some Remarks on the Political translated by Science of Maimonides and Farabi Robert Bartlett Joseph Cropsey On Ancients and Moderns Laurie M. Johnson Rethinking the Diodotean Argument Jacob A. Howland Socrates and Alcibiades: Eros, Piety, and Politics Drew A. Hyland Plato's Three Waves and the Question of Utopia Pamela K. Jensen Beggars and Kings: Cowardice and Courage in Shakespeare's Richard II Christopher A. Colmo Reason and Revelation in the Thought of Leo Strauss Discussion David Lowenthal Comment on Colmo Book Review Will Morrisey Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power by Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr. Interpreiauon Editor-in-Chief Hilail Gildin General Editors Seth G. Benardete Charles E. Butterworth Hilail Gildin Robert Horwitz (d. 1987) Howard B. White (d. 1974) Consulting Editors Christopher Bruell Joseph Cropsey Ernest L. Fortin John Hallowell Wilhelm Hennis Harry V. Jaffa ; David Lowenthal Muhsin Mahdi Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr. Arnaldo Momigliano (d. 1987) Michael Oakeshott Ellis Sandoz Leo Strauss (d. 1973) Kenneth W. Thompson Editors Wayne Ambler Maurice Auerbach Fred Baumann Michael Blaustein Patrick Coby Christopher A. Colmo Edward J. Erler Maureen Feder-Marcus Joseph E. Goldberg Pamela K. Jensen Grant B. Mindle James W. Morris Will Morrisey Gerald Proietti Charles T. Rubin Leslie G. Rubin John A. Wettergreen (d. 1989) Bradford P. Wilson Hossein Ziai* Michael Zuckert Catherine Zuckert Manuscript Editor Lucia B. Prochnow Subscriptions Subscription rates per volume (3 issues): individuals $21 libraries and all other institutions $34 students (five-year limit) $ 1 2 Postage outside U.S.: Canada $3.50 extra; elsewhere $4 extra by surface mail (8 weeks or longer) or $7.50 by air.
    [Show full text]