Examining Regulatory Frameworks for Digital Currencies and Blockchain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Examining Regulatory Frameworks for Digital Currencies and Blockchain S. HRG. 116–104 EXAMINING REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DIGITAL CURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON EXAMINING THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DIGITAL CURRENCIES AND THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE, THEIR APPLICATION IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM, AND THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS AND DETRIMENTS OF EACH JULY 30, 2019 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 38–950 PDF WASHINGTON : 2020 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS MIKE CRAPO, Idaho, Chairman RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama SHERROD BROWN, Ohio PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania JACK REED, Rhode Island TIM SCOTT, South Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BEN SASSE, Nebraska JON TESTER, Montana TOM COTTON, Arkansas MARK R. WARNER, Virginia MIKE ROUNDS, South Dakota ELIZABETH WARREN, Massachusetts DAVID PERDUE, Georgia BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii THOM TILLIS, North Carolina CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland JOHN KENNEDY, Louisiana CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Nevada MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona DOUG JONES, Alabama JERRY MORAN, Kansas TINA SMITH, Minnesota KEVIN CRAMER, North Dakota KYRSTEN SINEMA, Arizona GREGG RICHARD, Staff Director LAURA SWANSON, Democratic Staff Director JOE CARAPIET, Chief Counsel LEXI HALL, Professional Staff Member BRANDON BEALL, Professional Staff Member ELISHA TUKU, Democratic Chief Counsel COREY FRAYER, Democratic Professional Staff Member CAMERON RICKER, Chief Clerk SHELVIN SIMMONS, IT Director CHARLES J. MOFFAT, Hearing Clerk JIM CROWELL, Editor (II) CONTENTS TUESDAY, JULY 30, 2019 Page Opening statement of Chairman Crapo ................................................................. 1 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 28 Opening statements, comments, or prepared statements of: Senator Brown .................................................................................................. 2 Prepared statement ................................................................................... 28 WITNESSES Jeremy Allaire, Cofounder, CEO, and Chairman, Circle Internet Financial Limited, on behalf of the Blockchain Association .............................................. 4 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 29 Responses to written questions of: Senator Warren ......................................................................................... 59 Senator Cortez Masto ................................................................................ 60 Senator Sinema ......................................................................................... 61 Rebecca M. Nelson, Specialist in International Trade and Finance, Congres- sional Research Service ....................................................................................... 6 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 37 Responses to written questions of: Senator Warren ......................................................................................... 61 Senator Cortez Masto ................................................................................ 68 Mehrsa Baradaran, Professor of Law, University of California Irvine School of Law .................................................................................................................... 8 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 50 Responses to written questions of: Senator Cortez Masto ................................................................................ 73 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUPPLIED FOR THE RECORD Statement submitted by the Chamber of Digital Commerce ............................... 76 Letter submitted by the National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions ................................................................................................................... 91 ‘‘Go Slow on Libra. Speed up on Faster Payments’’, by Jennifer Tescher, Forbes .................................................................................................................... 92 ‘‘A Former Bank CEO Named His Boat ‘Overdraft’. Now That Bank Is in Hot Water Over the Fees’’, by Jonelle Marte, Washington Post ...................... 95 (III) EXAMINING REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS FOR DIGITAL CURRENCIES AND BLOCKCHAIN TUESDAY, JULY 30, 2019 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The Committee met at 10:02 a.m., in room SD–538, Dirksen Sen- ate Office Building, Hon. Mike Crapo, Chairman of the Committee, presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN MIKE CRAPO Chairman CRAPO. This hearing will come to order. Last Congress, this Committee held two hearings examining the digital currency ecosystem. In those hearings, we heard about some of the developments that have occurred within the digital currency marketplace since the creation of bitcoin in 2008; the potential benefits of digital cur- rencies; and concerns about value stability, fraud and illicit uses, market manipulation, and privacy. Since then, Facebook announced its intentions to launch a blockchain-based payment system and digital currency, libra, that will be governed by an association comprised of up to 100 financial and nonfinancial members, including Facebook’s digital wallet serv- ice, Calibra. Facebook’s Libra project has generated renewed interest in dig- ital currencies and blockchain generally, including how they inter- act with U.S. and international regulatory frameworks, the poten- tial benefits and challenges they pose, and concerns around issues like anti– money-laundering and counterterrorism efforts, including data privacy, consumer protections, commerce, and monetary pol- icy. A few weeks ago, the head of Calibra, David Marcus, joined the Committee to provide an update on Facebook’s proposed digital currency. During that hearing, Mr. Marcus emphasized some important points and commitments, including that there are a number of reg- ulators globally that are currently engaged on the Facebook project, including the Federal Reserve, FSOC, FinCEN, Financial Conduct Authority, the G7, and more; Calibra and the Libra Association will have the highest standards when it comes to data privacy, and no financial data or account data that is actually collected in Calibra will be shared with Facebook; and that the Libra Association will be headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, but will still register with FinCEN and have oversight from U.S. regulators. (1) 2 Though while Libra may have begun this conversation, the blockchain and cryptocurrency system is diverse. It seems to me that these technologies and other digital innovations are inevitable; they could be beneficial; and I believe the U.S. should lead in their development. That cannot happen without clear rules of the road. As the U.S. develops a more comprehensive regulatory approach, care must be taken in determining what gaps may be present in the existing framework. In mid-July, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin said, ‘‘To be clear, the U.S. welcomes responsible innovation, including new technologies that may improve the efficiency of the financial system and expand access to financial services. That being said, with respect to Facebook’s libra and other developments in cryptocurrencies, our overriding goal is to maintain the integrity of our financial system and protect it from abuse.’’ He also noted that Treasury has serious concerns regarding the growing misuse of digital currencies by money launderers, terrorist financiers, and other bad players. As digital currency efforts move forward, I am particularly inter- ested in better understanding how these technologies may impact individuals’ ability to exercise control over their data, including the right to receive information about and access their data, correct in- accuracies, and delete their data. During this hearing, I look forward to learning more about how the market for digital currencies has grown and evolved over the last decade; different types of digital currencies in the marketplace, including their differences with Facebook’s proposed digital cur- rency; how other countries are approaching the regulation of digital currencies and blockchain technology, and what we might learn from their successes and failures; potential gaps in existing regu- latory frameworks; whether distributive ledger technology can help to facilitate meaningful privacy for individuals’ data; and ap- proaches Congress should consider in developing a comprehensive regulatory regime for digital currencies, including ensuring individ- uals have real control over their data. With the appropriate balance of regulation, digital currencies and their innovative underlying technology could provide meaning- ful benefits, and I look forward to learning more about the eco- system during this hearing. Senator Brown. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR SHERROD BROWN Senator BROWN. Thank you, Chairman Crapo, and welcome to our three witnesses. Thank you all for joining us, some of you more than once. Thank you. At this Committee’s hearing earlier this month, many of us of both parties, as you could hear from the Chair, voiced concerns, se- rious concerns about Facebook’s plan to run its own currency out of a Swiss bank account. By and large, we mostly heard deflections and dodging.
Recommended publications
  • BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTION: Surviving and Thriving in the 2Nd Era of the Internet
    BLOCKCHAIN REVOLUTION: Surviving and Thriving in the 2nd Era of the Internet Alex Tapscott TWITTER: @alextapscott Swiss Re January 23rd, 2017 © 2016 Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott. All Rights Reserved. The Technological Revolution mobility social big web data internet machine of things learning the cloud drones & robotics 2 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. The Technological Revolution mobility social big web data internet BLOCKCHAIN machine of things learning the cloud drones & robotics 3 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. The Internet of Information Web Photos Sites Word INFORMATION PDFs Docs PPT Voice Slides 4 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. The Internet of Information ▶ The Internet of Value Social Reputation Capital Intellectual Money property Loyalty Attestations Identity points ASSETS Contracts Deeds Carbon credits Energy ASSETS Coupons Other Financial Assets Bonds Premiums Music Art Votes Stocks Other Futures Receivables Swaps IOUs Visual Art Film 5 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. The Middleman 6 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. BLOCKCHAIN: The Second Era of the Internet 7 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. Just Another Block in the Chain 1 2 3 4 5 Block 53 Block50.dat Block51.dat Previous Block52.dat block: 00000zzxvzx5 Timestamp Proof of work: 00000090b41b 04.19.2016.09.14.5 x 3 Block53.dat Transaction: 94lxcv14 Community Reference to Distributed ledger New blocks added Permanent validation previous blocks time-stamp 8 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. 9 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. 10 | © 2016 The Tapscott Group. All Rights Reserved. Seven Transformations for a Prosperous World 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bitcoin Governance Network: the Multi-Stakeholder Solution to the Challenges of Cryptocurrency
    A BITCOIN GOVERNANCE NETWORK: The Multi-stakeholder Solution to the Challenges of Cryptocurrency Alex Tapscott Director, Institutional Equity Sales Canaccord Genuity Cryptocurrencies are products of the digital revolution and the networked age. As distributed networks with no central issuer and no central command, they are also a distinctly global phenomenon that will force national governments to not only re-evaluate a number of substantive regulatory issues but perhaps also re-think the very nature of governance itself. Cryptocurrencies are wresting control over many issues from traditional decision-makers. Multi-stakeholder governance, founded on principles of transparency and inclusiveness and legitimized by consensus, is the 21st century solution. When leaders of the old paradigm adapt and collaborate more closely with private enterprise, civil society organizations and other stakeholders in the network, then bitcoin and other cryptocurrency technologies can fulfill their potential and gain widespread adoption. © Global Solution Networks 2014 A Bitcoin Governance Network: The Multi-stakeholder Solution to the Challenges of Cryptocurrency i Table of Contents Idea in Brief 1 The Challenge for Governments 2 How Cryptocurrencies Work 4 Bitcoin Volatility and Price 5 Opportunities and Challenges 6 Opportunities 6 Challenges 11 A Bitcoin Governance Network 13 GSN Types for a Bitcoin Governance Network 16 Standards Networks 16 Policy Networks 18 Knowledge Networks 19 Watchdog Networks 20 The GSN Approach: Core Principles, Conclusions and
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain in Japan
    Blockchain in Japan " 1" Blockchain in Japan " "The impact of Blockchain is huge. Its importance is similar to the emergence of Internet” Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan1 1 Japanese Trade Ministry Exploring Blockchain Tech in Study Group, Coindesk 2" Blockchain in Japan " About this report This report has been made by Marta González for the EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, a joint venture between the European Commission and the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). The Centre aims to promote all forms of industrial, trade and investment cooperation between Europe and Japan. For that purpose, it publishes a series of thematic reports designed to support research and policy analysis of EU-Japan economic and industrial issues. To elaborate this report, the author has relied on a wide variety of sources. She reviewed the existing literature, including research papers and press articles, and interviewed a number of Blockchain thought leaders and practitioners to get their views. She also relied on the many insights from the Japanese Blockchain community, including startups, corporation, regulators, associations and developers. Additionally, she accepted an invitation to give a talk1 about the state of Blockchain in Europe, where she also received input and interest from Japanese companies to learn from and cooperate with the EU. She has also received numerous manifestations of interest during the research and writing of the report, from businesses to regulatory bodies, revealing a strong potential for cooperation between Europe and Japan in Blockchain-related matters. THE AUTHOR Marta González is an Economist and Software Developer specialized in FinTech and Blockchain technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokenize the Musician
    Tokenize the Musician Stanley Sater* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 107 II. THE MUSIC INDUSTRY ...................................................................... 110 A. Control Concentrated Among the Few ............................. 110 B. A Record Label’s Deal ..................................................... 110 III. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND ECONOMICS ................................... 113 A. The Music Industry’s First Asset-Backed Security ........... 113 B. Blockchain Tokens: A New Financial Instrument ............ 114 1. The Economics of Blockchain Tokens ........................... 118 2. Initial Coin Offerings ...................................................... 119 IV. TOKENIZING THE MUSICIAN ............................................................. 120 A. Gramatik: The Tokenized Musician ................................. 122 B. Regulating ICOs ............................................................... 123 V. CONCLUSION .................................................................................... 128 I. INTRODUCTION The centralization of the music industry has led to an imbalance of power and misaligned incentives for those involved.1 With technological advancements, the cost of both creating and distributing music is negligible compared to prior decades.2 Musicians can connect directly to fans, yet major record labels retain their domineering status as middlemen, extracting exorbitant fees from this content exchange.3 As record sales
    [Show full text]
  • Alex Tapscott on the Impact of Paypal Accepting Payment Through Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies
    Is it time to invest in Gold, or maybe just in Gold Miners? It seems like nowadays when we start a conversation about investing in gold one has to also include commentary on Bitcoin. There’s no doubt some investment funds that traditionally found safe haven in gold have drifted over to the much more volatile domain of cryptocurrencies. That’s just part of the evolution of the market and, as an investor, one has to adapt. Nevertheless, I will argue that whatever the reason you have for putting a portion of your portfolio into gold or cryptocurrency, you definitely need to have a strong stomach to manage the day-to-day gyrations in Bitcoin, Ethereum, for example, and the like. Not that gold doesn’t have its moments, like the weekend of August th6 when it essentially plummeted 7% over the weekend, but that was relatively short lived. Arguably gold has traded in a range from $1,700 to $1,950 for the last year. Bitcoin on the other hand has a one year range of roughly $10,000 to $63,000. I dare say a bit of a difference. Now before you start complaining and telling me to go get my walker, because I’m a dinosaur and haven’t kept up with the times, I need to point out that this isn’t an article about the merits of gold versus crypto. This is solely an article about exploring the potential of investing in gold currently and that’s it. The commentary on crypto is simply to highlight that gold may not be the “go-to” alternative investment it once was.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain Technology: an Interconnected Legal Framework for an Interconnected System
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Case Western Reserve University School of Law _______________________________________________________________ Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet • Vol. 9 • 2018 _______________________________________________________________ BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY: AN INTERCONNECTED LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR AN INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM By Marina Fyrigou-Koulouri* ABSTRACT In 2018, someone hiding behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto created Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency operating without a central bank or authority. However, the true revolution seems to be its underlying technology; blockchain. Today, a lot of discussion is taking place around the legal issues of this nascent technology. This paper focuses on blockchain and the law. After exploring blockchain’s basic features, it will propose an international regulatory framework suitable for this technology’s characteristics and its borderless nature. * Marina Fyrigou-Koulouri is a lawyer holding a Dual Master’s Degree in International Finance and Law - LLM (University of Pennsylvania) and Master in Economics and Business (Sciences Po) - as well as a Wharton Business and Law Certificate from Wharton School. She obtained her Law Degree from Democritus University of Thrace, Greece. Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet • Vol. 9 • 2018 Blockchain Technology: An Interconnected Legal Framework for an Interconnected System _______________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION On October 31, 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto, following his vision to create a purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash, published a paper1 developing a protocol for digital cash that used Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a digital cryptocurrency; however, the underlying technology Bitcoin uses is the Blockchain.2 Now, Blockchain is considered the technology most likely to have the greatest impact on the world in the next decades.
    [Show full text]
  • SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement: Q3 2013–Q4 2020
    Economic and Financial Consulting and Expert Testimony SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Q3 2013–Q4 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Number of Enforcement Actions 2 Allegations in Enforcement Actions 3 Allegations in Litigations vs. Administrative Proceedings 4 ICOs as Unregistered Securities Offering Allegations 6 Defendants in Litigations vs. Administrative Proceedings 7 Litigation Duration 9 Litigation Venue 10 Litigation Allegations by Venue 11 Appendices 12 Methodology 22 Endnotes 23 About the Author 26 i Cornerstone Research | SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement: Q3 2013–Q4 2020 Table of Figures Figure 1: Number of SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Actions and Trading Suspensions 2 Figure 2: Allegations in SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Actions 3 Figure 3a: Allegations of Fraud in the Offer or Sale of Securities in SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Actions 4 Figure 3b: Allegations in SEC Cryptocurrency Litigations 5 Figure 3c: Allegations in SEC Cryptocurrency Administrative Proceedings 5 Figure 4: ICOs as Unregistered Securities Offering Allegations in SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Actions 6 Figure 5a: Defendants in SEC Cryptocurrency Litigations 7 Figure 5b: Respondents in SEC Cryptocurrency Administrative Proceedings 8 Figure 6: Time from Complaint to Resolution in SEC Cryptocurrency Litigations 9 Figure 7: Courts and Presiding Judges in SEC Cryptocurrency Litigations 10 Figure 8: Types of Allegations in SEC Cryptocurrency Litigations by Court Venue 11 Appendix 1: SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement Actions 12 Appendix 2: SEC Cryptocurrency Trading Suspension Orders 19 Appendix 3: SEC Cryptocurrency Press Releases, Public Statements and Speeches, and Investor Alerts 20 ii Cornerstone Research | SEC Cryptocurrency Enforcement: Q3 2013–Q4 2020 Executive Summary The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought its first cryptocurrency-related enforcement action in July 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain Technologies and Its Applications to Cryptocurrencies (Aps 1050)
    Master Engineering ELITE Programme Sabatino Costanzo & Loren Trigo University of Toronto BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGIES AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO CRYPTOCURRENCIES (APS 1050) --COURSE DESCRIPTION— Bitcoin is a particular implementation of Blockchain technology that has led to a disruptive “product”: a set of digital cryptocurrencies with the potential to compete with fiat currencies. This course will provide students with the concepts and mechanics of the Blockchain technologies starting from Bitcoin. Unlike ECE1770, this course is not focused on middleware software design per se, but on how the Blockchain middleware can serve as a platform that supports products (cryptocurrencies, tokens) and applications that are relevant for businesses and other users. Students become acquainted with the history and typology of Blockchain technologies; develop and apply a set of selection criteria for the evaluation of Blockchain consensus strengths, weaknesses and risks; trace a likely path for the adoption of Blockchain technologies-- beginning with the identification of processes where Blockchain ledgers lead to efficiencies, to the emergence of new business models where the use of cryptography is essential. For this reason, this course includes a gentle but complete introduction to cryptography that covers all the essentials from asymmetric encryption to “zero-knowledge-proof-of-knowledge” proofs. On a practical level, participants acquire a concrete understanding of Blockchain technologies through the installation, operation and modification of a number of Blockchain technologies that operate in real-world testnet networks: starting from the operation/modification of a simple Bitcoin node; moving on to the operation of Bitcoin and Ethereum wallets, and to the operation/modification of Ethereum clients or DApps providing a business service, and ending with the trading of a cryptocurrency account.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable and Publishers, Libraries, and Most Impor- People
    Why IT Matters to Higher Education EDUCAUSMARCH/APRIL 2017 E Transforming Our Libraries from Analog to Digital: A 2020 Vision Brewster Kahle THE Back to the Future of BLOCKCHAIN Edtech: A Meditation John O’Brien REVOLUTION & HIGHER EDUCATION Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott PLUS: Out of the Black Box Safiya U. Noble and Sarah T. Roberts Making higher ed amazing Personalized software and services for your unique institution. Learn why Jenzabar is chosen more often than any other student information system.* jenzabar.com/educause ©2017 Jenzabar, Inc. All rights reserved. Jenzabar® is a registered trademark of Jenzabar, Inc. The Jenzabar logo is a trademark of Jenzabar, Inc. *Based on total new institution sales of higher education student information systems during the 2009 – 2015 period. Why IT Matters to Higher Education ▲ Finding the Future in the Past EDUCAUSr e vıeEw ▼ MARCH/APRIL 2017 VOLUME 52, NUMBER 2 FEATURES 10 10 The Blockchain Revolution and Higher Education Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott The blockchain provides a rich, secure, and transparent platform on which to create a global network for higher learning. This Internet of value can help to reinvent higher education in a way the Internet of information alone could not. 26 Transforming Our Libraries from Analog to Digital: A 2020 Vision Brewster Kahle By 2020, we can build a collaborative digital library collection and circulation system in which thousands of libraries unlock their analog collections for a new generation of learners, enabling free, long-term, public access to knowledge. 26 38 Back to the Future of Edtech: A Meditation John O’Brien Fascinating “paleofuture” edtech artifacts illuminate both the past and the present—and offer insights into how we might think about the future of educational technology as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining a Security on the Blockchain
    \\jciprod01\productn\G\GWN\87-6\GWN603.txt unknown Seq: 1 24-APR-20 10:26 ESSAY What Is an ICO? Defining a Security on the Blockchain Seth Holoweiko* ABSTRACT 2017 brought the rise of the initial coin offering (“ICO”), a novel fun- draising concept that enables organizations to raise funds from anyone with an internet connection and a cryptocurrency wallet by selling tokens that will have some future purpose related to the companies’ products or services. But thus far, few ICOs have complied with Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations regarding the offering of securities to outside investors despite most tokens having the characteristics of securities, which would bring them into the SEC’s regulatory scope. In late 2017, the SEC began regularly enforcing registration and disclosure regulations against organizations launch- ing ICOs, prompting many organizations to structure their ICOs such that their tokens appear to fall outside the definition of a security. But the SEC has continued its enforcement efforts, arguing that the organizations’ attempts to circumvent regulatory requirements in form do not change the substance un- derlying the transactions. This Essay presents an expanded argument that tokens that have no prac- tical use when sold, which are instead sold to raise funds for the underlying organization, constitute “investment contracts” and are therefore securities. It then argues that the SEC’s interpretation of securities to include tokens should * J.D. 2019, The George Washington University Law School; B.A. 2012, Michigan State University. Many thanks to Professor Michael B. Abramowicz, Justice Richard L. Gabriel, Karen Hackett, Daniel Chaffin, Elizabeth King, and Kimla Weeks for their roles leading to this Essay’s writing.
    [Show full text]
  • BLOCKCHAIN and the CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER How Distributed Ledger Technology Will Change Strategy Design and Delivery
    BROUGHT TO YOU BY BLOCKCHAIN AND THE CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER How Distributed Ledger Technology Will Change Strategy Design and Delivery Kirsten D. Sandberg, Ricardo Viana Vargas, Edivandro Carlos Conforto, and Tahirou Assane Oumarou Blockchain Research Institute and Brightline Initiative July 2019 A BLOCKCHAIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE BIG IDEA WHITEPAPER Realizing the new promise of the digital economy In 1994, Don Tapscott coined the phrase, “the digital economy,” with his book of that title. It discussed how the Web and the Internet of information would bring important changes in business and society. Today the Internet of value creates profound new possibilities. In 2017, Don and Alex Tapscott launched the Blockchain Research Institute to help realize the new promise of the digital economy. We research the strategic implications of blockchain technology and produce practical insights to contribute global blockchain knowledge and help our members navigate this revolution. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations are initially proprietary to our members and ultimately released to the public in support of our mission. To find out more, please visitwww.blockchainresearchinstitute.org . Blockchain Research Institute, 2019 Except where otherwise noted, this work is copyrighted 2019 by the Blockchain Research Institute and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License. To view a copy of this license, send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA, or visit creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode. This document represents the views of its author(s), not necessarily those of Blockchain Research Institute or the Tapscott Group. This material is for informational purposes only; it is neither investment advice nor managerial consulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Cryptocurrency Exchanges
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 62 (2020-2021) Issue 6 Article 4 5-2021 Decentralized Finance: Regulating Cryptocurrency Exchanges Kristin N. Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Repository Citation Kristin N. Johnson, Decentralized Finance: Regulating Cryptocurrency Exchanges, 62 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1911 (2021), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol62/iss6/4 Copyright c 2021 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr DECENTRALIZED FINANCE: REGULATING CRYPTOCURRENCY EXCHANGES KRISTIN N. JOHNSON* ABSTRACT Global financial markets are in the midst of a transformative movement. The creation of Bitcoin and Facebook’s proposed distri- bution of Diem mark a watershed moment in the evolution of the financial markets ecosystem. Purportedly, peer-to-peer distributed digital ledger technology eliminates legacy financial market inter- mediaries such as investment banks, depository banks, exchanges, clearinghouses, and broker-dealers. Yet careful examination reveals that cryptocurrency issuers and the firms that offer secondary market cryptocurrency trading services have not quite lived up to their promise. Notwithstanding crypto- enthusiasts’ calls for disintermediation, evidence reveals that platforms that facilitate cryptocurrency trading frequently employ the long-adopted intermediation practices of their traditional coun- terparts. In fact, when emerging technologies fail, cryptocoin and token trading platforms partner with and rely on traditional financial services firms. As a result, these platforms face many of the * Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law, Emory University School of Law. J.D., University of Michigan Law School; B.S.
    [Show full text]