DOCSLIB.ORG

Centralia Parks and Recreation Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Centralia Parks and Recreation Master Plan Centralia Parks and Recreation Master Plan March 2007 This page left blank intentionally A VITAL MISSION There are many paths to healthy leisure activity leading to personal enjoyment and satisfaction. The Centralia Parks and Recreation Department recognizes the need for a diversity of choices, offering an opportunity for creative, wholesome and enjoyable leisure activities of benefit to the individual user, the family and the community. The Centralia Parks and Recreation Department formulates, stimulates and encourages frequent and regular communications with citizens in order to assure that programs, goals and objectives are consistent with community needs and desires. As stewards of the community and environment, we recognize the need to preserve and enhance the resources we have today for future generations – Centralia Parks and Recreation Department This page left blank intentionally Centralia Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan March 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Centralia City Council Tim Browning, Mayor Bonnie Canaday, Mayor Pro-Tem Lee Coumbs Ted Shannon Carol Lee Rickard Dan Keahey Bill Moeller Centralia Parks Advisory Board Jim Wilkinson, Chair Jim Thomas Sean Meehan Susan Beck Robert Ellingson City of Centralia J. D. Fouts, City Manager Emil Pierson, Community Development Director Linda Whitcher, Senior Planner Julie Liseth, Recreation Supervisor Lois King, Parks & Recreation Office Manager Jan Sorenson, Recreation Assistant Rick Lawrence, Maintenance Supervisor Barry Hughes, Lead Park Technician Prepared by: Steve Duh, Principal, Conservation Technix, Inc. David Sacamano, Principal, Illahee Group, Inc. Mike Shepherd, The Write Thing This page left blank intentionally TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................- 3 - PLANNING AREA & CONTEXT..........................................................................................................................- 7 - 1A. Introduction................................................................................................................................................- 7 - 1B. Community Overview...............................................................................................................................- 7 - 1C. Natural Features and Land Use...............................................................................................................- 8 - 1D. Historical Highlights – Trade, Transportation, Tourism.....................................................................- 9 - 1E. Growth of Parks & Recreation..............................................................................................................- 11 - 1F. Population and Demographics ..............................................................................................................- 13 - VISION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................- 17 - 2A. A Vision For Centralia Parks & Recreation.........................................................................................- 17 - 2B. Goals and Objectives ..............................................................................................................................- 18 - DEFINITIONS & STANDARDS ..........................................................................................................................- 23 - 3A. Neighborhood Parks ...............................................................................................................................- 23 - 3B. Community Parks ....................................................................................................................................- 24 - 3C. Natural Areas & Open Space Corridors ..............................................................................................- 25 - 3D. Trails...........................................................................................................................................................- 25 - 3E. Special Facilities........................................................................................................................................- 26 - 3F. Service Standards .....................................................................................................................................- 27 - 3G. Modifications to Park System Classification from 1991 Plan...........................................................- 27 - EXISTING INVENTORY.......................................................................................................................................- 29 - PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT......................................................................................................................................- 49 - 5A. Community-Based Plans.........................................................................................................................- 49 - 5B. Public Opinion .........................................................................................................................................- 51 - NEEDS ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................................................- 53 - 6A. Assessment of Demand & Need...........................................................................................................- 53 - 6B. Neighborhood and Community Parks .................................................................................................- 54 - 6C. Natural Areas and Open Space Corridors ...........................................................................................- 55 - 6D. Trails...........................................................................................................................................................- 56 - 6E. Recreation Programs ...............................................................................................................................- 57 - 6F. Levels of Service Summary & Overall Future Need..........................................................................- 58 - TRAIL GUIDELINES ..............................................................................................................................................- 61 - 7A: Current & Projected Demand................................................................................................................- 61 - 7B: Trail Planning Recommendations .........................................................................................................- 62 - 7C: Trail Facility Guidelines..........................................................................................................................- 63 - 7D: Funding......................................................................................................................................................- 65 - 7E: Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................- 66 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES........................................................- 67 - Capital Projects: A 6-Year Outlook .....................................................................................................................- 67 - Implementation Strategies.....................................................................................................................................- 71 - APPENDIX A: ADOPTING ORDINANCE......................................................................................................- 75 - APPENDIX B: PARK INVENTORY DETAILS...............................................................................................- 77 - APPENDIX C: COMMUNITY FEEDBACK .....................................................................................................- 81 - APPENDIX D: FINANCING & INCENTIVES................................................................................................- 95 - APPENDIX E: PRESS & MEDIA EXHIBITS..................................................................................................- 105 - City of Centralia Parks and Recreation Plan - 2 - This page left blank intentionally EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Centralia is blessed with a rich natural environment. Rivers, woods, rolling hills and prairies present a vast array of recreational opportunities for people of all ages and interests. The city itself has maintained its historic, small-town charm. Visitors come here for the enjoyment of just these advantages. Centralia and Lewis County provide relief from the hectic pace of urban life. Cautious planning keeps our environment healthy and can be a significant factor in keeping our economy strong. In 1991, the City of Centralia adopted a Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan of considerable scope. The aim was to provide a basis for making choices that could dramatically alter the character and quality of parks and other recreational facilities over the long term if not adequately planned. The comprehensive study analyzed supply, demand and need for public and private park and recreation facilities. In the years since the plan was adopted, the city and other recreation providers have met and dealt with significant challenges, such as facility and maintenance problems from limited capital spending
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan
    SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE 2014 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ` Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Bridging the Gap in Emergency Management Services 915 No. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 Tel 253.301.1330 Fax 253.460.8220 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL SEPTEMBER 2014 Prepared for: Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe P.O. Box 130 Tokeland, WA 98590 Prepared by: ` Bridgeview Consulting, LLC Bridging the Gap in Emergency Management Services 915 No. Laurel Lane Tacoma, WA 98406 Tel 253.301.1330 Fax 253.460.8220 Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... E-1 Chapter 1. Introduction to the Planning Process ................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Plan Development Methodology ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe Profile ................................................................................................ 3-1 Chapter 4. Planning Area Natural Environment ................................................................................................ 4-1 Chapter 5. Demographics, Development and Regulation .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Project NEPA Environmental Impact Statement
    Appendix C References Cited in the Environmental Impact Statement September 2020 Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Project NEPA Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX C: REFERENCES CITED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Chapter 1, Introduction CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality), 1999. Memorandum from: George T. Frampton, Jr., Acting Chair, to: Heads of Federal Agencies. Regarding: Designation of Non-Federal Agencies to be Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. July 28, 1999. Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers), 2018. Memorandum for the Record. Regarding: Determination of the Requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Chehalis River Basin Dam Proposal. January 31, 2018. Corps, 2019. Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction NEPA EIS Scoping Summary Report. January 2019. CRBFA (Chehalis River Basin Flood Authority), 2019. Flood Authority Master Contact List 5-15-2019. Last modified May 15, 2019. Accessed July 27, 2020. Accessed at: https://www.ezview.wa.gov/Portals/_1492/images/Updated%20-- %20Flood%20Authority%20Contact%20Sheet%20--%205-15-2019.pdf. Work Group (Governor’s Chehalis Basin Work Group), 2018. Letter to: Jay Inslee, Office of the Governor. Regarding: Chehalis Basin Board’s Capital Budget Recommendation for 2019-2021. November 26, 2018. Chapter 2, Purpose and Need CBP (Chehalis Basin Partnership), 2004. Chehalis Basin Watershed Management Plan. Accessed at: http://chehalisbasinpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/cbp_wmp.pdf. NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program), 2015. Loss Statistics from January 1, 1978 to July 31, 2015. Updated July 2015; accessed October 2, 2015. Accessed at: http://bsa.nfipstat.fema.gov/reports/1040.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Supp III a Basin Description
    Supplement Section III — Basin Description Information Base Part A — Basin Description The Chehalis River Basin is the largest river basin in western Washington. With the exception of the Columbia River basin, it is the largest in the state. The basin extends over eight counties. It encompasses large portions of Grays Harbor, Lewis, and Thurston counties, and smaller parts of Mason, Pacific, Cowlitz, Wahkiakum, and Jefferson counties. For purposes of water resources planning under the Washington State Watershed Planning Act of 1998, the Chehalis Basin was divided into two Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs), WRIA 22 and WRIA 23, depicted here with surrounding WRIA numbers and in relation to the whole state of Washington. Chehalis Basin Watershed — County Land Areas County Area (sq.mi.) Area (acres) Percentage Grays Harbor 1,390 889,711 50.3% Thurston 323 206,446 11.7% Lewis 770 493,103 27.9% Mason 206 132,146 7.5% Pacific 66 42,040 2.4% Cowlitz 8 5,427 0.3% Jefferson 2 1,259 0.07% Wahkiakum .1 37 0.002% Total 2,766 1,770,169 Source: Chehalis Watershed GIS Watershed Boundaries The basin is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the east by the Deschutes River Basin, on the north by the Olympic Mountains, and on the south by the Willapa Hills and Cowlitz River Basin. Elevations vary from sea level at Grays Harbor to the 5,054-foot Capitol Peak in the Olympic National Forest. The basin consists of approximately 2,766 square miles. The Chehalis WRIA 22 River system flows through three distinct eco-regions before emptying into Grays Harbor near Aberdeen (Omernik, 1987): • The Cascade ecoregion (including the Olympic Mountains) is char- acterized by volcanic/sedimentary bedrock formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Lane Fc^Ido. Date: September 27, 1993 «3*Sfs' Subject: Review of Data Re: Possible Native Presence Mountain Goat Olympic National Park
    Memorandum O/JLcv VJ». To: Paul Gleeson l«vu/s- fx«£»*-4'5-lz.y From: Barbara Lane fc^ido. Date: September 27, 1993 «3*SfS' Subject: Review of data re: possible native presence mountain goat Olympic National Park Enclosed is a final copy of my report "Western Washington Indian Knowledge of Mountain Goat in the Nineteenth Century: Historic, Ethnographic, and Linguistic Data". Please substitute the enclosed for the copy sent to you earlier and destroy the earlier draft. On rereading the earlier paper I discovered numerous minor typographical and editorial matters which have been corrected in the final version enclosed herewith. Also enclosed is a signed copy of the contract associated with this project. Thank you for inviting me to participate in this review. I found the subject matter stimulating. Dr. Schultz's article is a real contribution to the history of exploration in the region. WY-U3-1WM ll^l^HH hKUTI IU l.fUb-O.iUJJ'} K.tU 1 Western Washington Indian Knowlege of Mountain Goat in the Nineteenth Century : Historic, Ethnographic, and Linguistic Data Introductory remarks This commentary is written in response to a request from the National Park Service for a review of materials concerning evidence relating to presence or absence of mountain goat in the Olympic Mountains prior to introduction of this species in the 1920s. Dr. Lyman (1988) noted that the view that mountain goat were not native to the Olympic Peninsula is based on an absence of biological reports, absence of historical and ethnographic records, and lack of archaeofaunal evidence of pre-1920s presence of the species in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • COAST SALISH SENSES of PLACE: Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World
    COAST SALISH SENSES OF PLACE: Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World by BRIAN DAVID THOM Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Montréal March, 2005 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Brian Thom, 2005 Abstract This study addresses the question of the nature of indigenous people's connection to the land, and the implications of this for articulating these connections in legal arenas where questions of Aboriginal title and land claims are at issue. The idea of 'place' is developed, based in a phenomenology of dwelling which takes profound attachments to home places as shaping and being shaped by ontological orientation and social organization. In this theory of the 'senses of place', the author emphasizes the relationships between meaning and power experienced and embodied in place, and the social systems of property and territory that forms indigenous land tenure systems. To explore this theoretical notion of senses of place, the study develops a detailed ethnography of a Coast Salish Aboriginal community on southeast Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Through this ethnography of dwelling, the ways in which places become richly imbued with meanings and how they shape social organization and generate social action are examined. Narratives with Coast Salish community members, set in a broad context of discussing land claims, provide context for understanding senses of place imbued with ancestors, myth, spirit, power, language, history, property, territory and boundaries. The author concludes in arguing that by attending to a theorized understanding of highly local senses of place, nuanced conceptions of indigenous relationships to land which appreciate indigenous relations to land in their own terms can be articulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicating the Cultural Values of a Sacred Mountain Through Collaboration with the Sts’Ailes Nation of British Columbia
    COMMUNICATING THE CULTURAL VALUES OF A SACRED MOUNTAIN THROUGH COLLABORATION WITH THE STS’AILES NATION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by In Ae Kim B.Sc., Kangwon National University, 2003 M.Sc., Seoul National University, 2005 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Forestry) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2016 © In Ae Kim, 2016 Abstract This research provides communication strategies for First Nations and forestry agencies in British Columbia. I have used a community-based, participatory, and case study approach to conduct an in-depth study of conflict resolution between Sts’ailes, a Coast Salish First Nation located near Vancouver, and the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (hereinafter the Ministry of Forests). This study identifies the cultural uses of forest resources among Sts’ailes people and communication challenges central to the conflict, and suggests strategies that can help to achieve meaningful communication and collaboration between First Nations people and forestry staff. The ultimate purpose of this study is to explore cultural values related to forest management among the Sts’ailes Nation and to explore the dynamics of their communication process, focusing on Kweh-Kwuch-Hum, a sacred mountain located on Sts’ailes traditional land. This study asks how First Nations can make themselves heard when “speaking” about cultural values within the context of forest management. It describes Sts’ailes people’s ways of using and maintaining access to forestlands and resources. The cultural values of forest uses are important to the revitalization of the Sts’ailes way of life, cultural identity and well- being.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Newsletter
    The Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation CHEHALIS “People of the Sands” May 2014TRIBAL NEWSLETTERFree Governor Inslee Tours the Chehalis Roundtable Discussion Improve Small Reservation to Discuss Tribal Issues By Jeff Warnke, Director of Business Growth in Indian Country Government Public Relations The Chehalis Tribal Loan Fund was invited to a Roundtable with On April 17, Governor Jay Inslee Senator Maria Cantwell and became the first Governor in recent newly presidential appointed memory to visit the Chehalis Small Business Administration Reservation for the sole purpose Administrator Maria Contreras- of meeting with the Business Sweet Committee to discuss issues with the Tribe and tour the Reservation. The Chehalis Tribal Loan Fund was Governor Inslee was touring in one of three Native CDFI’s invited Lewis County and on his way back to participate with Washington to Olympia for a meeting on the State Community Development Oso mud slide relief, but he made Financial Institutes (CDFI) in a time to stop at the Tribal Center roundtable discussion. The CDFI where he met with Tribal Leaders Program is under the Department for more than two hours. The During his visit to the Chehalis Reservation, Governor Jay of the Treasury. The vision of meeting started with a dialogue Inslee discuss flooding issues on the Chehalis River with the Community Development between the Governor and the Chairman David Burnett. Financial Institutions Fund is to Chairman discussing how the State Governor Inslee was especially the Legislature, Washington State economically empower America’s and Tribe can work together on interested in hearing about state provided more than two million under-served and distressed common issues such as tax policy, funded projects on the Reservation dollars to construct the bridge communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 49, Number 2 Fall 2015
    Journal of Northwest Anthropology Volume 49, Number 2 Fall 2015 Richland, WA JOURNAL OF NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGY FORMERLY NORTHWEST ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH NOTES EDITORS Darby C. Stapp Deward E. Walker, Jr. Richland, WA University of Colorado ASSOCIATE EDITORS C. Melvin Aikens (University of Oregon), Haruo Aoki (University of California), Virginia Beavert (Yakama Nation), Don E. Dumond (University of Oregon), Don D. Fowler (University of Nevada), Raymond D. Fogelson (University of Chicago), Rodney Frey (University of Idaho), Ronald Halfmoon (Lapwai), Tom F.S. McFeat (University of Toronto), and Jay Miller (Lushootseed Research) Julia G. Longenecker Operations Manager Kara N. Powers Editorial Assistant Heather Hansen Production Assistant Composed by Northwest Anthropology LLC, Richland, WA; Printed by CreateSpace. Missing issue claim limit 18 months. For back issues and catalogue of prices contact Coyote Press, P O Box 3377, Salinas, CA 93912. <http://www.californiaprehistory.com> POLICY Journal of Northwest Anthropology, published semiannually by Northwest Anthropology LLC, in Richland, Washington, is a refereed journal and welcomes contributions of professional quality dealing with anthropological research in northwestern North America. Regular issues are published semiannually. Theoretical and interpretive studies and bibliographic works are preferred, although highly descriptive studies will be considered if they are theoretically significant. The primary criterion guiding selection of papers will be how much new research they can be expected to stimulate or facilitate. SUBSCRIPTIONS The subscription price is $45.00 U.S. per annum for individuals and small firms, $60.00 for institutional subscriptions, $30.00 for students with proof of student status, and $25.00 for all electronic subscriptions; payable in advance. Remittance should be made payable to Northwest Anthropology LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Settler Colonialism and Indigenous Power in Southwest Washington Territory
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2014 "We pay you for your land and stay amongst you folks": settler colonialism and indigenous power in Southwest Washington Territory Kaden M. (Kaden Mark) Jelsing Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Jelsing, Kaden M. (Kaden Mark), ""We pay you for your land and stay amongst you folks": settler colonialism and indigenous power in Southwest Washington Territory" (2014). WWU Graduate School Collection. 390. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/390 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “We pay you for your land and stay amongst you folks”: Settler Colonialism and Indigenous Power in Southwest Washington Territory By Kaden Mark Jelsing Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair, Dr. Christopher C. Friday Dr. Kevin A. Leonard Dr. Jennifer Seltz Master’s Thesis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for Native American Students: a Report on Colleges and Universities in Washington State
    Pathways for Native American Students: A Report on Colleges and Universities in Washington State Report Development Team Kayeri Akweks, Washington Board for Community & Technical Colleges Nadine Bill, Northwest Indian College Loretta Seppanen, Washington Board for Community & Technical Colleges Barbara Leigh Smith, The Evergreen State College A Report from the Partnership for Native American College Access & Success Project Copyright @2009, 2nd printing 2010 Antioch University-Seattle Grays Harbor College Muckleshoot Tribal College Northwest Indian College The Evergreen State College With support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Lumina Foundation for Education We encourage using and sharing this report for educational purposes, but please use appropriate attribution when using and citing this report: citation format: Akweks, K., Bill, N., Seppanen, L., Smith, B. (2010) Pathways for Native American Students: A Report on Colleges and Universities in Washington State. The Evergreen State College: Olympia, Wa. Pathways for Native American Students: A Report on Colleges and Universities in Washington State TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................III Executive Summary .......................................................IV Part 1: Native American/Alaskan Native Participation in Postsecondary Education in Washington State Introduction . ...............................................................1 Methodology ....................................................... 2 Structure of
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Newsletter “Bette” Tanner
    greatwolf.com www.luckyeagle.com www.eagleslandinghotel.net FREE Vol. Interesting Information March 2011 3/5 on Page 3: CHEHALIS The Book "Glimpses of Gate" Program shares neighbors memories of past TRIBAL Chehalis Reservation people. Part 3 News Casino announces Tribal members Program Requests advancement in organization. Information Recognizing the NEWSLETTER Great Wolf Internship Program. 2011 Graduating Seniors “People of the Sands” Featured Tribal Member, Julie Miller The Education Department is getting an early start at planning the Graduation Celebration for the 2011 graduating seniors. Exercise Room Available The Education Department is asking all parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles to let Get in shape and use the exercise room at the us know if you have a student who will be Community Center, page 2 graduating this year. Also, if your student is graduating with honors, let us know which Clinic News, page 2 school your child is graduating from and we will do our part to make sure your student is Avoid Penalties as tax deadline looms, page 2 recognized. Any information is helpful, and thanks for your participation. Seniors, keep up the good work and we’re looking forward Community Center Gym Hosts Tribe Steps to seeing you this summer. We could be looking forward to the largest graduating Up When the class of Chehalis Youth in a long time. It’s First Men’s All-Indian Please turn your information to Jason Call for Help Gillie at 360-709-1888 or JJ Shortman at 360-709-1749. Graduation will soon be Basketball Tournament is Heard upon us, so our program encourages families to get their information to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Attitudes of Non-Indigenous Individuals Residing Near an Indigenous Community in Washington State*
    Language Attitudes of Non-Indigenous Individuals Residing Near an Indigenous Community in Washington State* Russell Hugo Department of Linguistics, University of Washington, Guggenheim Hall 4th Floor, Box 352425, Seattle, WA 98195-2425 [email protected] Summary: Non-indigenous community members residing near an Indigenous Nation were interviewed in order to learn about their attitudes regarding indigenous and minority language education. A card-sorting instrument was piloted (QIIAS), which served to mediate discussion with minimal priming and allow participants to control of their comparative scale while maintaining data comparability. Keywords: Indigenous languages, attitudes, new instrument, out-group * The author would like to especially thank all of the participants for their generous contributions of time for this project. In addition, thank you to Prof. Amy Snyder Ohta, the UW Working Papers in Linguistics and the anonymous reviewers, the kind individuals who provided feedback at AAAL 2015, the UW Sociolinguistics Brownbag Group, the UW Multilingualists Group, Mike Furr, Hyunjung Ahn, the Oakville Library and the Marysville Library for their help and to Lois Gnegy for help with recruitment. University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics (UWWPL). Volume 33 (2015). Copyright @ 2015 by Russell Hugo 53 Hugo 54 1 Introduction A recent survey of educators affiliated with Washington State public schools with a substantial population of Indigenous students inquired about Indigenous language education. The survey found that a lack of demand was a primary reason put forth as to why a school did not offer an indigenous language (Hugo, 2010). Demand can come from a larger out-group or from institutional support (e.g., grants and state wide funding), or from a more local level (§Theoretical Framework).
    [Show full text]