Cciiitttyyy Oofff Rriiiccchhhmmmooonnndd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cciiitttyyy Oofff Rriiiccchhhmmmooonnndd RRRiiiccchhhmmmooonnnddd Housing Element HHoouussiinngg EElleemmeenntt CCCiiitttyyy ooofff RRRiiiccchhhmmmooonnnddd 222000000111---222000000666 HHHooouuusssiiinnnggg EEEllleeemmmeeennnttt NNNooovvveeemmmbbbeeerrr 222000000555 PREPARED FOR: City of Richmond 1401 Marina Way South Richmond, CA 94804 510.620.0606 Contact: Mimi Liem, AICP FUNDED BY: Planning Department, City of Richmond & CED Group HOUSING ELEMENT STRATEGIC TEAM CURRENT AND (FORMER) CITY STAFF Office of the City Manager William Lindsay, City Manager (Phil Batchlor, former Interim City Manager) (Leveron Bryant, former Interim City Manager) (Jay Corey, former Assistant City Manager (Isiah Turner, former City Manager) Planning Department Richard Mitchell, Interim Planning Director (Barry Cromartie, former Planning Director) Mimi Liem, Senior Planner Building Regulations Fred Clement, City Building Official Community and Economic Development Department James Branch, Development Project Manager Steve Duran, Community and Economic Development Director Lisa Hamburger, Deputy Director for Housing and Community Development Jenny Kuykendoll, former Redevelopment Specialist (Harriette Langston, former Community Development Program Manager) Jene’ Levine-Snipes, Development Project Manager Craig Murray, Development Project Manager Theresa Wilkerson, Community Development Program Manager Alan Wolken, Deputy Director for Redevelopment Housing Authority Tim Jones, Executive Director Manuel Rosario, Deputy Director (Dan Nackerman, former Executive Director) CCIITTYY OOFF RRIICCHHMMOONNDD HHOOUUSSIINNGG EELLEEMMEENNTT NOVEMBER 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: 10461 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110 Rancho Cordova, CA 95827 CITY OF RICHMOND City Council Irma Anderson - Mayor Richard Griffin - Vice Mayor Nathaniel Bates (Charles Belcher, Former Councilmember) (Gary Bell, Former Councilmember) Tom Butt (Mindell Penn, Former Councilmember) (Richard Griffin, Former Councilmember) Jim Rogers Maria Viramontes John Marquez Gayle McLaughlin Planning Commission Virginia Finlay- Chair Stephen A. Williams – Vice Chair Ludmyrna Lopez - Secretary Vicki L. Winston Zachary Harris William H. Coleman Nagaraja Rao RICHMOND 2001-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT PAGE i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................E-1 Introduction State Housing Strategy and Policies ....................................................................................................... 1 Regional Housing Policies ..................................................................................................................... 2 City of Richmond Strategic Planning for Housing ................................................................................... 2 Internal Structure.................................................................................................................................... 3 Target Areas for Housing Programs within the City of Richmond............................................................ 4 Funding Sources..................................................................................................................................... 5 City of Richmond Housing Program Housing Goals, Policies and Programs ................................................................................................... 9 Enhance the Quality and Supply of Housing ................................................................................... 10 Promote Universal Access to Housing.............................................................................................. 20 Improve and Preserve Neighborhoods ............................................................................................ 27 Housing Element Programs – Implementation Schedule and Responsible Agencies ......................... 35 Quantified Objectives Summary ...................................................................................................... 36 Background Report Section I: Introduction to the Housing Element.................................................................................... HE-1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... HE-1 Public Participation....................................................................................................................... HE-1 Relationship to Other Elements..................................................................................................... HE-2 Organization ................................................................................................................................ HE-3 Section II: Community Profile.............................................................................................................. HE-5 Population Characteristics ............................................................................................................ HE-5 Population Growth ................................................................................................................ HE-5 Age Composition ................................................................................................................... HE-5 Race and Ethnicity ................................................................................................................. HE-6 Education, Employment and Economic Trends ............................................................................. HE-7 Education .............................................................................................................................. HE-7 Employment........................................................................................................................... HE-7 Economic Trends.................................................................................................................... HE-10 Jobs/Housing Balance .................................................................................................................. HE-10 Household Characteristics ........................................................................................................... HE-11 Household Growth ................................................................................................................ HE-11 Household Composition ........................................................................................................ HE-12 Household Income ................................................................................................................ HE-12 Housing Characteristics ................................................................................................................ HE-15 Historic Residential Construction Trends ................................................................................ HE-15 Housing Conditions................................................................................................................ HE-15 Overcrowded Households...................................................................................................... HE-16 Vacancy Trends...................................................................................................................... HE-17 November 2005 Table of Contents PAGE ii RICHMOND 2001-2006 HOUSING ELEMENT Section III: Housing Needs .................................................................................................................. HE-18 Housing Costs and Overpayment ................................................................................................. HE-18 For Sale Housing Costs........................................................................................................... HE-18 Rental Housing Costs............................................................................................................. HE-18 Rents by Number of Bedrooms............................................................................................... HE-19 Overpayment ........................................................................................................................ HE-19 Housing Affordability.................................................................................................................... HE-20 Maximum Affordable Rents by Income Levels ........................................................................ HE-20 Maximum Affordable Sales Price by Income Levels................................................................ HE-21 Special Housing Needs................................................................................................................. HE-22 Senior Population and Households......................................................................................... HE-22 Large Family Households ....................................................................................................... HE-25 Single Parent and Female Headed Households....................................................................... HE-25 Disabled Persons.................................................................................................................... HE-26 Homeless Persons .................................................................................................................. HE-29 Agricultural Workers.............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CPY Document Title
    Agenda Item 7b Attachment A Proposition 23 Supporters (As of August 17, 2010 ) State and National Organizations State and National Organizations (cont’d) American Council of Engineering Companies – Lumber Association of California and California Nevada American GI Forum of California National Federation of Independent Business American GI Forum Women of California – California (NFIB) Americans for Prosperity National Petrochemical and Refiners Associated California Loggers Association Association of Energy Service Companies National Tax Limitation Committee Black Business Association National Taxpayers Union California Association of Business and Nisei Farmers League Property Owners Printing Industries of California California Automotive Wholesalers Slavic American Chamber of Commerce Association Waste Watchers California Cattlemen’s Association Western Agricultural Processors Association California Citrus Mutual California Coalition of Filipino American Chambers Air Quality/Public Health Officials California Cotton Ginners and Growers Peter Foy, Ventura County Air Pollution Associations Control District Board Member California Dairy Campaign Brad Mitzelfelt, Mojave Desert Air Quality California Dump Truck Owners Association Management District Board Member California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce Reb Monaco, Monterey Bay Unified Air California Independent Oil Marketers Pollution Control District Board Member Association (CIOMA) Kim Yamaguchi, Butte County Air Quality California League of Food Processors Management District Board Member
    [Show full text]
  • N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt
    N E W S Release Office of Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Contact: For Immediate Release Terrance Cheung – Chief of Staff November 12, 2015 Office 510‐620‐6502 Cell 415‐990‐2087 Statement from Richmond Mayor Tom Butt Regarding State’s Decision to Reject Contra Costa County’s Proposal to Expand the West County Detention Facility Richmond Mayor Tom Butt issued the following statement today in response to the California Board of State and Community Corrections’ (BSCC) announcement awarding the top four large California counties that applied for jail construction grants through SB 863. Although Contra Costa County had submitted an $80 million grant to expand the West County Detention Facility, which is located within the City of Richmond, the BSCC ultimately decided to approve applications for San Francisco, Santa Clara, Alameda, and Ventura Counties but not for Contra Costa County. “We supported the expressed intent of the application, which was to provide expanded mental health, education and re-entry services,” said Mayor Tom Butt. “However, the Sheriff’s Office failed to provide a plan of how these programs would be funded at a cost of $4 to $5 million annually and a commitment to permanently close down unneeded facilities in Martinez.” This past August, the Richmond City Council adopted a resolution officially opposing the jail expansion proposal and took legal action challenging the County’s Environmental Impact Report. “The project on its face was simply a major expansion,” said Mayor Butt. “It would have made the West County Detention Facility, by far, the largest jail in the County.” The Sheriff’s Office manages the county’s three detention facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Progressive Alliance Revives Campaign for Stronger Tenant Protections
    Richmond Progressive Alliance revives campaign for stronger tenant protections Apartment building in Richmond, 23rd Street/Nevin Avenue (Photo by Fabian Graber) By Fabian Graber Posted May 11, 2015 9:00 am Advocates for stronger tenant protections in Richmond received support last week when the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA) decided to join their efforts. The RPA is an influential political player in the city, with members—Jovanka Beckles, Eduardo Martinez, and Gayle McLaughlin— holding three of the seven seats on the city council. The group’s steering committee voted on Wednesday “to reaffirm and update its historical position” in support of just cause protections against eviction and a “fair rent” ordinance, said Marilyn Langlois, a coordinator with the organization. Just cause for eviction policies commonly list a set of conditions under which a tenant can be rightfully evicted, while fair rent policies, sometimes also referred to as rent control or rent stabilization, aim to limit yearly rent increases to a certain percentage. Langlois said the RPA’s steering committee also voted to join “a growing community” of organizations advocating these issues, spearheaded by the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Page 1 of 3 (ACCE), a non-profit community organization that recently supported Richmond tenants in a partial rent strike. The debate on how to tackle rising rents in Richmond has gained momentum over the past months. In February, the city council, on the initiative of Vice Mayor Jael Myrick, directed the City Manager’s office to draft a just cause ordinance within 90 days, which the council would consider at a future meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions
    AGENDA ITEM 7.C. MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 4, 2018 TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bryan Cook, City Manager By: Peggy Kuo, City Clerk SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is requested to receive and file the League of California Cities (League) annual resolution and approve the voting delegate and voting alternate to use their discretion to vote on the proposed resolutions. BACKGROUND: 1. On April 3, 2018, City Council designated Councilmember Chavez as the voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate for the League's Annual Business Meeting. 2. Only August 1, 2018, the City received a copy of the League of California Cities Annual Conference Resolutions Packet. ANALYSIS: At its annual business meeting, the League adopts policy resolutions on issues of statewide importance that have direct bearing on municipal affairs and are of broad municipal interest. The League's primary means for developing policy is through their standing policy committees and Board of Directors. Additionally, any city, elected or appointed city official, or League Division, Department, or Policy Committee may submit a resolution sixty days before the business meeting. This year's General Assembly and business meeting will be held during the annual City Council September 4, 2018 Page 2 of 3 conference on Friday, September 14, in Long Beach. The City Council has appointed Councilmember Chavez as the City's voting delegate and Mayor Man as the voting alternate. During the conference, the respective League Policy Committees and General Resolutions Committee will consider making recommendations on one Resolution before they are voted on by the delegates in General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporters List May 30, 2018
    Supporters List May 30, 2018 NOTABLE ENDORSEMENTS Governor Jerry Brown Senator Kevin de León, President pro Tempore (Former) Senator Toni Atkins, President pro Tempore Assembly Member Anthony Rendon, Speaker Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (Former) American Heart Association American Lung Association Association of California Water Agencies Audubon California California Association of Local Conservation Corps California Chamber of Commerce California Council of Land Trusts California Democratic Party California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO California State Parks Foundation Cordoba Corporation Environmental Defense Fund Heal the Bay Humane Society of the United States League of California Cities Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce Monterey Bay Aquarium Peninsula Open Space Trust Save the Redwoods League Sempervirens Fund Sierra Club California Silicon Valley Leadership Group State Building and Construction Trades Council of California The Nature Conservancy The Trust for Public Land The Wildlands Conservancy TreePeople This list connotes organizations supporting original legislation and/or bond measure. Paid for by Californians for Clean Water and Safe Parks, sponsored by Conservation Groups. Committee major funding from Committee for Clean Water Natural Resources and Parks. Yes on Proposition 68, Conservation Action Fund for clean water and parks, sponsored by environmental organizations and The Nature Conservancy. Supporters List May 30, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2020 the Richmond City Council
    RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2020 The Richmond City Council Evening Open Session was called to order at 5:02 p.m. by Mayor Thomas K. Butt via teleconference. Due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, Contra Costa County and Governor Gavin Newsom issued multiple orders requiring sheltering in place, social distancing, and reduction of person-to-person contact. (See, for example, March 31, 2020, County Order extending the shelter-in-place order until May 3, 2020, and March 19, 2020, statewide shelter-in-place order). Accordingly, Governor Gavin Newsom issued executive orders that allowed cities to hold public meetings via teleconferencing (Executive Order N-29-20). DUE TO THE SHELTER IN PLACE ORDERS, attendance at the City of Richmond City Council meeting was limited to Councilmembers, essential City of Richmond staff, and members of the news media. Public comment was confined to items appearing on the agenda and was limited to the methods provided below. Consistent with Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting utilized teleconferencing only. The following provides information on how the public participated in the meeting. The public was able to view the meeting from home on KCRT – Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 99, or live-streamed online at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/ 3178/KCRT-Live. Written public comments were received via email and eComment. Comments received by 3:00 p.m. on April 21, 2020, were put into the record and considered before Council action and were submitted by email to [email protected]. Comments received via email during the meeting and up until the public comment period on the relevant agenda item closed, were read into the record.
    [Show full text]
  • DELIVERS Farhl R[^-/OLJ'
    DELIVERS fARhL r[^-/OLJ' May 6, 2020 Attn: Bill Gates, Chair City Council Board of Supervisors I Civic Center Plaza Maricopa County Irvine, CA 92606 301 West Jefferson Street Phoenix, AZ 85003 City oflrvine Economic Development Department Attn: Wallin Gustin City Manager Interim State Rapid Response Coordinator 1 Civic Center Plaza Employer Engagement Administration Irvine, CA 92606 Arizona Department of Economic Security PO Box 6123 Michelle Steel, Chair Mail Drop 5574 Orange County Board of Supervisors Phoenix, AZ 85012 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 Kate Gallego, Mayor Phoenix City Hal] Sam Liccardo, Mayor 200 W. Washington Street City of San Jose Phoenix, AZ 85003 San Jose City Hall 200 East Santa Clara Street Christine MacKay, Director San Jose, CA 95113 City of Phoenix Community & Economic Development Kim Walsh, Deputy City Manager/ 200 W. Washington Street Dh'ector of Economic Development Phoenix, AZ 85003 City of San Jose Department of Economic Development Jennifer Gouvaia, Deputy Chief San Jose City Mail Program and Technical Assistance Section 200 East Santa Clara Street CA Employment Development Branch San Jose, CA 95113 Worforce Services Division 722 Capitol Mail, MIC 50 Employment Services Sacramento, CA 95814 1879 Senter Road San Jose, CA 95112 WARN Act Coordinator Statewide Services Unit Joe Smitian, President Workforce Services Division Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Employment development department Clerk of the Board PO Box 826880, MIC 69/Room 3099 Boards and Commissions Sacramento, CA 94280-0001 70 West Hedding Street East Wing,! Oth Floor San Jose, CA 95110 Christina L. Shea, Mayor Pauline Cutter, Mayor City oflrvine City of San Leandro 835 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Restore America's Parks
    Restore America’s Parks October 11, 2019 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House of Representatives United States Senate United States House of Representatives U.S. Capitol Building, Room S-230 U.S. Capitol Building, Room 232 Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Dear Leader McConnell and Speaker Pelosi: We are elected leaders of cities, towns, and counties that are adjacent to national park sites. The preservation of these sites is critical to the health of our local economies. That is why we urge you to advance legislation, S. 500 and H.R. 1225, that would dedicate federal funding for their repair. As you may know, the National Park System has a nearly $12 billion deferred maintenance backlog that affects the upkeep of historic artifacts and buildings, water systems, roads and trails, and many visitor facilities. As gateways to national parks, we understand first-hand the economic importance of sustaining these special places in ways that attract visitation and tourism. Our communities provide the lodging, gas, food establishments, and other amenities that tourists require before, during, and after their park visits. According to the National Park Service, in 2018, the 318 million visitors to national parks contributed more than $40 billion in national economic output, which supported 329,000 jobs. Those jobs are economic lifelines for many of our residents. We are proud neighbors and partners of America’s national parks and understand the important roles these places play in protecting and providing access to our natural and cultural heritage. We need to repair and maintain these cherished sites, not only for the economic benefits they supply, but to keep intact our National Park System, which historian Wallace Stegner called “America’s best idea.” Please provide your leadership in guiding S.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA) Erupted in Richmond, California, and the City Would Never Be the Same
    How did the RPA get started? By Juan Reardon Between the fall of 2003 and the fall of 2004 the Richmond Progressive Alliance (RPA) erupted in Richmond, California, and the city would never be the same. Here are a few notes about the years 2003-2004 and why, how and who got the Richmond Progressive Alliance started that year. Why was it started? The short answer: to make our lives better, healthier, happier starting right here, in our city and communities. Many organizations existed already in our city before the RPA, and they continue, fortunately, to exist today. Charitable groups, churches, educational centers, and activists struggling for the environment, for equality, for justice, against police brutality, for immigrant rights and many other great causes. The good people involved in so many struggles were already transforming Richmond into a better place one struggle at a time, one stand at a time, one embrace at a time. Why add one more? As in the case of many other cities, the individuals and organizations doing good work to educate the community and improve the lives of residents were absent from the tables where the key decisions were being made. The vast majority of city council members, and the mayor, were individuals who were either placed in office by the corporate forces ruling our city (Chevron, developers, Police & Firefighters Union, and others), or were people who emerged with good intentions to improve our lives, but soon enough were convinced that to keep their seats and career prospects they had to bow to the mighty corporate dollar that ruled local politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Tom Butt Mayor of Richmond, California Sponsored By
    Resolution No. Submitted by: The Honorable Tom Butt Mayor of Richmond, California Sponsored by: The Honorable Kirk Caldwell Mayor of Honolulu, Hawaii The Honorable Martine Watkins Mayor of Santa Cruz, California The Honorable Libby Schaaf Mayor of Oakland, California The Honorable Jackie Biskupski Mayor of Salt Lake City, Utah The Honorable Pauline Russo Cutter Mayor of San Leandro, California The Honorable Suzanne Jones Mayor of Boulder, Colorado The Honorable Jack Young Mayor of Baltimore, Maryland SUPPORTING CITIES’ RIGHTS AND EFFORTS TO MITIGATE CLIMATE CHANGE DAMAGES AND PROTECT TAXPAYERS FROM RELATED ADAPTATION COSTS WHEREAS, the United States Conference of Mayors has adopted multiple resolutions over the past several years concerning the impacts of climate change on cities, including findings that: • Scientific evidence is increasingly clear that human activities are largely responsible for the accelerating changes in the global climate [2016]; • Climate change poses a major threat to the health and livelihood of American cities, with impacts as wide-ranging as increased flooding, drought, reduced water supply, fire, public health impacts, habitat loss, and invasive species [2016]; • Climate change, if unchecked, will have mounting impacts on human health, natural systems, and infrastructure, creating new costs for individuals, businesses, and governments [2016]; • Climate change has had a disproportionate impact on low income and disadvantaged communities [2016]; • The Third National Climate assessment shows that cities will continue
    [Show full text]
  • Rosie the Riveter/ World War II Home Front National Historical Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Rosie the Riveter/ World War II Home Front National Historical Park General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park Richmond, California; Lead Agency: National Park Service ABSTRACT The purpose of the General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment is to present and analyze alternatives for guiding the management of Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park for the next 15 to 20 years. The national historical park is a new unit of the national park system and was authorized by an act of Congress on October 24, 2000 (Public Law 106-352). The General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment presents three alternatives for managing Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park. The “no-action” alternative, alternative A, describes the existing park management and trends and serves as a basis for comparison in evaluating the two action alternatives. In the no-action alternative, visitors would continue to use self-guiding tools or join guided tours to see World War II home front historic sites and structures in Richmond, California. Each park site would continue to be adapted to accommodate contemporary uses. The National Park Service would continue to gather home front stories and operate a small self-service visitor orientation center at Richmond City Hall. Alternative B would provide visitors with opportunities to explore Richmond’s World War II-era historic sites and structures in order to experience the scale, diversity, and complexity of the American home front story.
    [Show full text]
  • April 7, 2020 (Public Comments Attached)
    RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, April 7, 2020 The Richmond City Council Evening Open Session was called to order at 5:37 p.m. by Mayor Thomas K. Butt via teleconference. On March 16, 2020, the Health Officer of Contra Costa County issued an Order through April 7, 2020, that directed that all individuals living in the County to shelter at their place of residence except that they may leave to provide or receive certain essential services or engage in certain essential activities and work for essential businesses and governmental services. On March 17, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20, authorizing legislative bodies to hold public meetings via teleconferencing. Executive Order N-29-20 further provides that a legislative body that held a meeting via teleconference and allowed members of the public to observe and address the meeting telephonically or otherwise electronically, consistent with notice and accessibility requirements as set forth in the Order, shall have satisfied any requirement that the body allows members of the public to attend the meeting and offer public comment. Such a body need not make available any physical location from which members of the public may observe the meeting and offer public comment. On March 19, 2020, Governor Newsom issued a statewide shelter-in-place order. The public was able to view the meeting from home on KCRT – Comcast Channel 28 or AT&T Uverse Channel 99, or live-streamed online at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/ 3178/KCRT-Live. Written public comments were received via email and eComment by 4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]