No. 32, November 9, 1973

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

WfJRIlERS VANIIIARD 25¢ No. 32 9 November 1973 ixon! or 1I NOVEMBER 5-If the U,S, labor movement were to­ ary trade union bureaucracy which stands at the masses, which they have either acquiesced to and/or day under revolutionary leadership, Richard Nixon leadership of the organized labor movement and has heartily endorsed (such as Nixon's policy of im­ would Ion g since have been ousted as president cravenly acquiesced to every phase of Nixon's state perialist slaughter of the workers and peasants of through a general strike against state wage controls wage control poliCies, Southeast Asia). These traitors to the working-class and the imperialist war in Indochina, and a sharp The recent decision of the AFL-CIO bureaucrats movement place their confidence in the bourgeois struggle would have begun to decide the fundamental to come out for the impeachment of Nixon should be U.S. Congress to get rid of Nixon who has become question of our time: which class shall rule? Instead, seen as nothing more than rats deserting a sinking an embarrassing liability to both themselves and while the Nixon government totters, with influential ship. These misleaders of the labor movement oppose their imperialist masters, And this Congress, itself bourgeois newspapers such as the New York Times Nixon for the same reasons as do their bourgeois a den of thieves, is only now moving ponderously calling for Nixon's resignation or impeachment, even masters, because of Nixon's "high crimes and mis­ and with great reluctance to consider the question simple struggles to maintain wage levels in the face demeanors" , •. against the proprieties and niceties of impeachment, projecting a report by March of of violent inflation are effectively suppressed, Chiefly of bourgeois democracy. Nowhere do they hold him next year, responsible for this state of affairs is the reaction- responsible for his crimes against the working Dump the Bureaucrats-For a Labor Party Based on the Trade Unions: Key to the removal of Nixon, of Congress, and of the whole capitalist state order which exists to en­ - sure the continued exploitation of the working class, is the removal of the reactionary misleaders of labor, -- How to accomplish this task? The response of the -=- ostensIbly socialist left to the Watergate crisis is -=-~ indicative of their respective orientations, The over­ whelming majority seeks to deal with the pro-capital­ -iiiiiiiii ist bureaucracy by ignoring it, playing up to reformist - out-bureaucrats or mystically transforming it into an instrument of the working class. The ex-Trotskyist, reformist Socialist Workers Party, which by now has devoted many tens of pages and thousands of words continued on page 14 - Nlx~n w;th 8rezhnev (!eft) iostJl:r,e. Soviet commen!otor~ backed Nixon, CPUSA called for irnpe:lchment. NEAR EAST CEASEFIRE: More War Ahead! The continuing war between Israel vention to police Israel should disabuse and the surrounding Arab states has everyone (even the vicarious Arab been temporarily halted by a ceasefire nationalists so abundant on the U,S, imposed by the U.Se and USSR Even left) of the notion that the Arab states more so than in the previous wars, were struggling against American im­ this ceasefire guarantees the continua­ perialism. In fact, a major aim of tion of bloodletting in the Near East. the Arab states in going to war was Because of Israeli intranSigence, par­ to create a situation in which the U.S, ticularly its desire to force the sur­ would be pressured by the Soviet Union render of the Egyptian III Army after and West European powers into curbing the ceasefire, war could break out Israeli expansionism. "''{jt. again any day. Both sides were reluctant to accept the first ceasefire of October 22, Is­ U.S./USSR Detente Buried in rael only quantitatively more so than the Sands of Sinai Trucks with UN ceasefire observers entering the city of Suez. Egypt and Syria, The Meir government With Sadat's appealfor direct great­ tried hard to get a three-day postpone­ power intervention, Brezhnev saw an ment in order to expand its conquests opportunity to maneuver the U,S, into . on the west bank of the Suez CanaL a j oint action against Israel and appar­ When the U,S, refused to accede to ently applied some pressure to that ·SL Polarizes Toronto " this, the Israeli command simply ig­ effect, Nixon reacted by dramatically nored the UN ceasefire and continued reminding Brezhnev that Israel was Wom~n's~- Conference ..... 4 , - fighting, in what has become something after all an ally of the U ,So against the of a Zionist military tradition, harking Soviet Union, not vice versa: on October back to the innumerable ceasefires of 24 he ordered a full military alert. the 1948-49 waL Contrary to Kissinger's pious protests, ,How Arab Regimes Crushed the With the Israeli military advances of the alert was in good part for domestic October 22-24, the attitude of the consumption, a reassertion of Nixcil1' s ~ ",'Resistance ...' . Palestinia,.n~ . - 5,: ' Egyptian government toward continuing posture as the tough Commander-in­ the war changed; it launched a diplo­ Chief. The most that the U.S, govern­ matic offensive to pressure the great ment could subsequently claim in justi­ powers into enforcing the ceasefire on fication of its world-wide "Condition 3" the original October 22 lines. Sadat's military alert was the "ambiguity" of appeal for direct U.S, military inter- continued on page 10 -letters _________ The· Tortll Sputters 25 October 1973 fluenced by the restrictive McCarran­ When we reSigned from the Class Walter Immigration Act of 1952. A Struggle League we stated in our res­ Dear Comrades, Special Mobile Force of the Border ignation statement (which the Comrades The reason we bother to print below The article, "No U.S. AidtoIsrael!" Patrol was put into action throughout of the SL Political Bureau no doubt a fairly unimportant letter requires (Workers Vanguard No. 31), contains a the barrios as far north as Chicago have access to as a Comrade in Chicago some explanation. Our letter, dated 13 statement requiring explanation. The and Spokane-called "Operation Wet­ resigned from the CSL to join the SL October 1973, was in direct reply to article says that "Abdullah of Jordan back." In this short period, 1,910,282 after our resignation statement was one, dated 5 October, from Sy Landy even had a secret meeting with Golda were deported but within a few years p r i n ted in the CSL Dis c u s s ion of the Revolutionary Socialist League. Meir to see if they could reach agree­ the proj ect was dropped and once again Bulletin): Comrade Landy's letter, regarding the ment on carving up Palestine." hundreds of thousands of Mexican citi­ setting up of SL-RSL public debates, While Meir and King Abdullah did zens migrated to the U.S. "This [critical support to Arnold Miller together with a statement that "to date have a meeting (on 30 April 1948), no in the UM W election, among other we have not received a reply, " was then Mexican nationals represent an un­ things-D.R.] is a further repudiation agreement was reached as Abdullah's limited source of cheap labor that the of a trade union strategy and program printed in the November issue of the proposal-a bi-national Palestine and capitalists w 0 u 1 d rather hire over which represented a strong left impulse RSL's monthly Torch. Transjordan ruled as a constitutional American workers who cause too much in trade union work. It is a clear eluci­ Presumably an early press dead line monarchy-was unacceptable to the trouble with union organizing, which is dation of the CSL to Sink into trade un­ precluded acknowledgement of our let­ Jewish Agency. not a problem with "illegals" who dare ion opportunism. Arnold Miller! While ter and thereby facilitated the RSL's Later, however, Abdullah and the not speak out lest they be deported. This we will wait for the facts as to whether resounding assertion (under the proud or not David Fender called the cops in former Prime Minister of Israel, Ben­ situation has created a real SOurce of head line /I Where We Stand ") that our St. Louis, we know for a fact that Arnold Gurion, signed an agreement which gave resentment particularly am 0 n g un­ "refusal to respond" reflects our "fear" -- Israel fifty percent more territory than Miller called the cops (the govt.) into and demonstrates our "shrill, infantile skilled workers who blame the "for­ the United Mineworkers. It is to this was granted it by the U.N. Hence the eigners" for taking their jobs. In the agent of the bourgeoisie that the CSL posturing. " episode's significance as one of the interest of proletarian internationalism leadership gives its critical support!" So, perforce, we print the letter our­ first acts of Israeli expansionism. these national Chauvinist tendencies -CSL Disc. Bul., Vol. II, No.2, p. 1 selves, though with little expectation of must be fought against. AlthoughMexi­ thereby shifting the RSL leadership off Comradely, can nationals do not represent as large The Spartacist League has in the past its macho New Left hangover-its who­ Andy S. a section of the U.S. working class as attacked the Workers League for claim­ is-and-isn't-chicken game-playing. New York City do the blacks or are as large in pro­ ing "only the Workers League ..• " when The RSL's ultimately intolerable portion to the West European foreign in fact the SL and at times other groups internal political contradictions, re­ called for the same thing that the #ork­ flected in its present conduct, are in­ o workers, they are indeed a significant force, particularly in the Southwest, ers League was claiming sole rights to.
Recommended publications
  • How the SWP's Bureaucratic Factionalism Is Wrecking Respect

    How the SWP's Bureaucratic Factionalism Is Wrecking Respect

    How the SWP's bureaucratic factionalism is wrecking Respect https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1330 Britain How the SWP's bureaucratic factionalism is wrecking Respect - IV Online magazine - 2007 - IV393 - October 2007 - Publication date: Wednesday 31 October 2007 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/4 How the SWP's bureaucratic factionalism is wrecking Respect No one who supports left unity could be anything other than deeply disheartened by the turn of events inside Respect, which has created a crisis that threatens the future of the organisation. The current crisis is unnecessary and the product of the political line and methods of organisation of the Socialist Workers Party. [https://internationalviewpoint.org/IMG/jpg/respect23-2.jpg] Happier days - Respect founding conference The real meaning of the crisis, its roots and underlying dynamics are however being obscured by the SWP's propaganda offensive, an attempt to whip its own members into line and throw up a smokescreen to fool the left in Britain and internationally. How so? The crisis was started by a letter from Respect MP George Galloway to members of the National Council on August 23, a time it should be remembered that a general election seemed a short-term possibility. In his letter Galloway drew attention to organisational weaknesses of Respect, the decline of its membership and political life in general, but also to the (not unrelated) lack of accountability of the National Officers, including the Respect national Secretary John Rees. These criticisms reflected those that had been made for several years by supporters of Socialist Resistance.
  • GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS

    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS

    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS ABEYANCE – The placement of a pending grievance (or motion) by mutual agreement of the parties, outside the specified time limits until a later date when it may be taken up and processed. ACTION - Direct action occurs when any group of union members engage in an action, such as a protest, that directly exposes a problem, or a possible solution to a contractual and/or societal issue. Union members engage in such actions to spotlight an injustice with the goal of correcting it. It further mobilizes the membership to work in concerted fashion for their own good and improvement. ACCRETION – The addition or consolidation of new employees or a new bargaining unit to or with an existing bargaining unit. ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE - A general wage increase that covers all the members of a bargaining unit, regardless of classification, grade or step level. Such an increase may be in terms of a percentage or dollar amount. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE – An agent of the National Labor Relations Board or the public sector commission appointed to docket, hear, settle and decide unfair labor practice cases nationwide or statewide in the public sector. They also conduct and preside over formal hearings/trials on an unfair labor practice complaint or a representation case. AFL-CIO - The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is the national federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of fifty-six national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers.
  • Variations from Pattern Bargaining : a Closer Look Étude Des Difficultés D'adaptation Aux Conventions-Clés Kenneth O

    Variations from Pattern Bargaining : a Closer Look Étude Des Difficultés D'adaptation Aux Conventions-Clés Kenneth O

    Document generated on 09/28/2021 10:24 a.m. Relations industrielles Industrial Relations Variations from Pattern Bargaining : A Closer Look Étude des difficultés d'adaptation aux conventions-clés Kenneth O. Alexander Volume 14, Number 2, April 1959 Article abstract A union encounters forces which are of sufficient strength to override URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1022316ar pressures to negotiate comparable settlements. To gain further insight into the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1022316ar nature of these forces and the union's reaction, the author interviewed union officials of the UAW in Detroit and made a study of 140 collective agreements See table of contents carried on through the UAW in various industries in the same area. Publisher(s) Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval ISSN 0034-379X (print) 1703-8138 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Alexander, K. O. (1959). Variations from Pattern Bargaining : A Closer Look. Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations, 14(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.7202/1022316ar Tous droits réservés © Département des relations industrielles de l’Université This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Laval, 1959 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Variations from Pattern Bargaining : A Closer Look Kenneth O.
  • Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE) National Report Germany

    Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE) National Report Germany

    RESEARCH REPORT SERIES IZA Research Report No. 86 Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE) National Report Germany IZA Nikos Askitas Werner Eichhorst Benedikt Fahrenholtz Nicolas Meys Margard Ody OCTOBER 2018 Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue in the Age of Collaborative Economy (IRSDACE) National Report Germany Authors: Nikos Askitas (IZA) Werner Eichhorst (IZA, University of Bremen) Benedikt Fahrenholtz (IZA) Nicolas Meys (IZA) Margard Ody (IZA) IRSDACE National Report Germany Page 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 1 Figures .................................................................................................................................. 2 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 2 Work in the platform economy.................................................................................... 9 2.1 What is the current state of play on work in the platform economy? ............................ 9 2.2 What are the main challenges and impacts for workers? ........................................... 13 2.3 The Role of industrial relations and social dialogue in platform economy work .......... 17 3 Discourse, perceptions and experiences on work in the platform economy among established industrial relations actors, processes and outcomes ......... 22 3.1 Discourse, perceptions
  • Development & Resistance

    Development & Resistance

    Development & Resistance to the Empire of Capital John Saul Realizing “developmental socialism” which, as recently as the changes seem equally necessary now – for, as Colin Leys and I 1970s, seemed a prospect worth fighting for has come, to many, have much more recently noted, “the dream of a transformative capi- to seem much less so now. True, the goal still has moral force, this talism in Africa remains just that: a dream.” This is true even if, con- encompassing the judgment that people can resolve economic fronted with an ever more ascendant globalized capitalism, the goal and political tensions and potential contradictions collectively and of a developmental socialism, key to the only genuine “develop- democratically rather than having to build centrally on competi- ment” that is really possible for Africa, seems at least as difficult to tion and the entrepreneurial greed of the few as the ultimate cen- realize as it did when Arrighi and I first wrote. tral keys to the welfare of everybody else. One cannot afford to Of course, the African case may be, globally, the most ex- be naïve, of course. Quite apart from questions of divergent class treme example of capitalist failure. Nonetheless, more generally, interests, it is also true that “human nature,” however much mis- the logic of socialism (but also the extreme difficulty of realizing shaped and distorted it may be within a world of ascendant mar- it) seems clear, at least to those who care to look. For Africa, like ket norms, will, even in the best and most propitious of times, be much of the rest of the underdeveloped world, is now “invited” pulled between the claim of individuality (and family) on the one (in fact, largely forced – by the IMF, World Bank, WTO and the hand and that of humane collectivity on the other.
  • Battle for Workers Rights in Australia by Aggie Mccallum

    Battle for Workers Rights in Australia by Aggie Mccallum

    Socialist Fight Issue No. 5 Winter 2010-11 Price: Concessions: 50p, Waged: £2.00 Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault Contents Page 2: Editorial: Only a United Anti-cuts Campaign based on strikes and occupations will defeat the Coalition assault. Page 5: Three days in the life of an Unemployed Workers Centre. Page 6: Ireland on the Rack: Defend the welfare state, de- fend the Republican Prisoners By AJ Byrne. Page 7: After the Irish bailout: The financial wolf pack tar- gets new victims By Nick Beams. Page 8: Ireland: The Creepy Millionaires’ Budget By Michael Taft. Page 9: Jimmy Reid: “It cannae be Lenin — he’s deid” Obitu- ary By Tony Fox. Page 12: The Jerry Hicks Campaign: Good Trot, Bad Trot and Trot in the Middle By Gerry Downing. Page 14: Obama’s America: The Furlough—Intent and Im- pact By Jake Cooper. Page 16: Mumia Abu-Jamal, on Pennsylvania's death row for 29 years By Dave Lindorfff. Page 18: Class Struggle in Zimbabwe by Ady, RIL - FI (Zimbabwe). Page 20: Trotskyist Turn in Nepal? By Rajesh Tyagi (New Wave). Page 20: Comment on the above By Ret Marut. Page 21: Women's Oppression: Two opposing views of the sex industry. Page 24: Letters pages. Page 28: Dubstep rebellion - the British banlieue comes to Millbank By Paul Mason Page 29: The Recession and Theories of Imperialism: It has to be Lenin! By Ret Marut. Page 31: Debating the Thermidor: “Me No Dirty Commie” By Gerry Downing. Page 33: Ark Tribe….Battle for Workers Rights in Australia By Aggie McCallum.
  • Collective Power and Individual Rights in the Collective Agreement •Fi a Comparison of Swedish and American

    Collective Power and Individual Rights in the Collective Agreement •Fi a Comparison of Swedish and American

    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 72 JANUARY 1963 NUMBER 3 COLLECTIVEPOWER AND INDIVIDUALRIGHTS IN THE COLLECTIVEAGREEMENT-A COMPARISON OF SWEDISHAND AMERICANLAW CLYDEW.SUMMERSt ONE of the central problems inherent in collective bargaining is defining the relative rights of the individual and the organizations in fixing and enforcing the terms and conditions of employment. Both Sweden and the United States have confronted this problem in its most insistent form, for in both countries government relies upon free collective bargaining as an instrument for regulat- ing the labor market. Both countries by statute protect the right to organize and bargain collectively; both require recognition of unions and compel nego- tiations; and both make collective agreements legally enforceable. This public reliance on collective bargaining and legal protection of its processes imposes on the law a pressing obligation to define the status of the individual under the collective agreement. Both countries have rejected the simple solution of giving the organization total dominance and wholly submerging the individual. Deeply rooted beliefs in the importance of the individual, and the desire to preserve for him some measure of independence have compelled the law to confront the difficult prob- lem of accommodating the rights of the individual and the rights of the collec- tive parties. The efforts in the two countries to resolve this problem provide interesting parallels and contrasts which illuminate the problem and suggest the range of possible solutions. In the United States, the dominant pattern of collective bargaining, and the stereotype on which the law is built, is bargaining between a union and a single employer.' The problem of individual rights is therefore conceived solely in tProfessor of Law, Yale Law School.
  • The New Tendency, Autonomist Marxism, and Rank-And-File Organizing in Windsor, Ontario During the 1970S

    The New Tendency, Autonomist Marxism, and Rank-And-File Organizing in Windsor, Ontario During the 1970S

    STRUGGLING FOR A NEW LEFT: THE NEW TENDENCY, AUTONOMIST MARXISM, AND RANK-AND-FILE ORGANIZING IN WINDSOR, ONTARIO DURING THE 1970S A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Sean Antaya 2018 Canadian Studies and Indigenous Studies M.A. Graduate Program September 2018 ABSTRACT Thesis Title: Struggling for a New Left: The New Tendency, Autonomist Marxism, and Rank- and-File Organizing in Windsor, Ontario during the 1970s Author’s Name: Sean Antaya Summary: This study examines the emergence of the New Left organization, The New Tendency, in Windsor, Ontario during the 1970s. The New Tendency, which developed in a number of Ontario cities, represents one articulation of the Canadian New Left’s turn towards working-class organizing in the early 1970s after the student movement’s dissolution in the late 1960s. Influenced by dissident Marxist theorists associated with the Johnson-Forest Tendency and Italian workerism, The New Tendency sought to create alternative forms of working-class organizing that existed outside of, and often in direct opposition to, both the mainstream labour movement and Old Left organizations such as the Communist Party and the New Democratic Party. After examining the roots of the organization and the important legacies of class struggle in Windsor, the thesis explores how The New Tendency contributed to working-class self activity on the shop-floor of Windsor’s auto factories and in the community more broadly. However, this New Left mobilization was also hampered by inner-group sectarianism and a rapidly changing economic context.
  • Wage Bargaining Institutions - from Crisis to Crisis Jelle Visser

    Wage Bargaining Institutions - from Crisis to Crisis Jelle Visser

    ISSN 1725-3187 Fellowship initiative The future of EMU EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Papers 488 | April 2013 Wage Bargaining Institutions - from crisis to crisis Jelle Visser Economic and Financial Aff airs Economic Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The Papers are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by staff and to seek comments and suggestions for further analysis. The views expressed are the author’s alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: [email protected] This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from the website ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications A great deal of additional information is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (ec.europa.eu) KC-AI-13-488-EN-N ISBN 978-92-79-28570-7 doi: 10.2765/42942 © European Union, 2013 European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Wage Bargaining Institutions - from crisis to crisis Jelle Visser Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, AIAS University of Amsterdam EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Papers 488 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Economic Paper is published as part of DG ECFIN's Fellowship Initiative 2012-13. The initiative was coordinated by a steering group comprising of Anne
  • Will the New Industrial Relations Last? : Implications for the American Labor

    Will the New Industrial Relations Last? : Implications for the American Labor

    n* WORKING PAPER ALFRED P. SLOAN SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan Michael J. Piore December 1983 SSM WP //1505-83 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 50 MEMORIAL DRIVE CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02139 Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan Michael J. Piore December 1983 SSM WP //1505-83 Will the New Industrial Relations Last? Implications for the American Labor Movement Thomas A. Kochan and Michael J. Piore Massachusetts Institute of Technology November, 1983 This paper was prepared for a forthcoming issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science devoted to the future of the labor movement. Portions of this paper were presented at an MIT/Union Leadership Conference held in Boston in June, 1983. The content of the paper draws on some of the findings emerging out of a collaborative research project studying "U.S. Industrial Relations in Transition" underway in the Industrial Relations Section at MIT. Funds for this project are provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, however, the authors are solely responsible for the contents of this paper. Abstract This paper reviews changes occurring in the U.S. industrial relations system at the workplace, in collective bargaining, and at the level of strategic decision making within business and labor organizations. By relating these current developments to longer term pressures on the post New Deal industrial relations system, we suggest that the system is undergoing fundamental transformation. To adapt to these changes unions will need to redefine their roles at the workplace by reorganizing work and fostering worker participation, adjust their wage bargaining objectives to promote employment continuity and compensation systems that are more closely tied to firm performance, and play a more direct and central role in business strategy decisions within the firm.
  • How the Germans Brought Their Communism to Yemen

    How the Germans Brought Their Communism to Yemen

    Miriam M. Müller A Spectre is Haunting Arabia Political Science | Volume 26 This book is dedicated to my parents and grandparents. I wouldn’t be who I am without you. Miriam M. Müller (Joint PhD) received her doctorate jointly from the Free Uni- versity of Berlin, Germany, and the University of Victoria, Canada, in Political Science and International Relations. Specialized in the politics of the Middle East, she focuses on religious and political ideologies, international security, international development and foreign policy. Her current research is occupied with the role of religion, violence and identity in the manifestations of the »Isla- mic State«. Miriam M. Müller A Spectre is Haunting Arabia How the Germans Brought Their Communism to Yemen My thanks go to my supervisors Prof. Dr. Klaus Schroeder, Prof. Dr. Oliver Schmidtke, Prof. Dr. Uwe Puschner, and Prof. Dr. Peter Massing, as well as to my colleagues and friends at the Forschungsverbund SED-Staat, the Center for Global Studies at the University of Victoria, and the Political Science Depart- ment there. This dissertation project has been generously supported by the German Natio- nal Academic Foundation and the Center for Global Studies, Victoria, Canada. A Dissertation Submitted in (Partial) Fulfillment of the Requirements for the- Joint Doctoral Degree (Cotutelle) in the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences ofthe Free University of Berlin, Germany and the Department of Political Scien- ceof the University of Victoria, Canada in October 2014. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer- cial-NoDerivs 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non- commercial purposes, provided credit is given to the author.
  • Yemen's Revolutionary Moment, Collective Memory and Contentious

    Yemen's Revolutionary Moment, Collective Memory and Contentious

    The London School of Economics and Political Science Citizen Revolt for a Modern State: Yemen’s Revolutionary Moment, Collective Memory and Contentious Politics sur la longue durée Tobias Thiel A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, 2015 Yemen’s Revolutionary Moment, Collective Memory and Contentious Politics | 2 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 98,247 words. Yemen’s Revolutionary Moment, Collective Memory and Contentious Politics | 3 ABSTRACT 2011 became a year of revolt for the Middle East and North Africa as a series of popular uprisings toppled veteran strongmen that had ruled the region for decades. The contentious mobilisations not only repudiated orthodox explanations for the resilience of Arab autocracy, but radically asserted the ‘political imaginary’ of a sovereign and united citizenry, so vigorously encapsulated in the popular slogan al-shaʿb yurīd isqāṭ al-niẓām (the people want to overthrow the system).