DOCSLIB.ORG

Southeast Sacramento Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southeast Sacramento Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Study Southeast Sacramento Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Study Candidate Improvements December 23, 2008 Prepared for: City of Sacramento and Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency RS08-2556 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Background.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Previous Work Products ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Candidate Improvements.................................................................................................................................. 9 Candidate Improvement Type ............................................................................................................................. 9 Candidate Improvement Fact Sheets and Evaluation....................................................................................... 10 Other Project Components Influencing Walking and Cycling............................................................................ 11 1 – Utility Corridor Trail – La Riviera Drive to the City Limit .............................................................................. 14 2 – College Greens LRT Station Access........................................................................................................... 16 3 – Folsom Boulevard / Jackson Road / Notre Dame Drive Intersection .......................................................... 19 4 – Granite Park / North – South Spur Trail ...................................................................................................... 22 5 – Cucamonga Avenue Connection................................................................................................................. 24 6 – 21st Avenue Bike Boulevard ........................................................................................................................ 27 7 – CalTraction Corridor: Rail With Trail............................................................................................................ 30 8 – 21st Avenue Crossing of UPRR ................................................................................................................... 33 9 – “Southern Pacific” Rail Trail......................................................................................................................... 35 10 – 14th Avenue................................................................................................................................................ 37 11 – Florin Perkins Road ................................................................................................................................... 39 12 – CalTraction / Florin Perkins Road Crossing .............................................................................................. 41 13 – Way-finding Signage: The American River Bike Trail and LRT Stations .................................................. 43 14 – Power Inn LRT Station Access.................................................................................................................. 45 15 – Fruitridge Road.......................................................................................................................................... 48 16 – Elder Creek Road ...................................................................................................................................... 50 17 – School and Community Connections on Local Streets ............................................................................. 52 18 – Way-finding Signs: Neighborhood Serving................................................................................................ 54 19 – Elder Creek Road / Logan Street Crossing ............................................................................................... 57 20 – Lemon Hill Avenue .................................................................................................................................... 59 21 – 65th Street .................................................................................................................................................. 61 22 – Power Inn Road......................................................................................................................................... 64 23 – Folsom / LRT Rail Trail.............................................................................................................................. 67 24 – Depot Park Path ........................................................................................................................................ 70 25 – Bradford Drive and Wilkinson Street ......................................................................................................... 73 26 – 83rd Street and 84th Street Enhancements ................................................................................................ 75 27 – Morrison Creek Trail .................................................................................................................................. 77 28 – CalTraction Surface Streets ...................................................................................................................... 79 29 – 21st Avenue Parkway................................................................................................................................. 81 APPENDICES Appendix A: Biking and Walking Audit Materials Appendix B: Referenced Improvement Concepts (Prepared By Others) Appendix C: Comment Letters Received on Draft Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Candidate Improvement Overview ........................................................................................................... 13 Figure 2: Candidate Improvements Map Key .......................................................................................................... 83 Figure 2A: Candidate Improvements – Northeast ................................................................................................... 84 Figure 2B: Candidate Improvements – Southeast................................................................................................... 85 Figure 2C: Candidate Improvements – North Central ............................................................................................. 86 Figure 2D: Candidate Improvements – South Central............................................................................................. 87 Figure 2E: Candidate Improvements – Northwest................................................................................................... 88 Figure 2F: Candidate Improvements – Southwest .................................................................................................. 89 Figure 2G: Candidate Improvements – Power Inn Light Rail Station Access .........................................................90 Figure 2H: Candidate Improvements – College Greens Light Rail Station Access................................................. 91 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Utility Corridor Trail Evaluation Matrix........................................................................................................ 15 Table 2: College Greens LRT Station Access Evaluation Matrix............................................................................. 18 Table 3: Folsom Boulevard / Jackson Road / Notre Dame Drive Intersection Evaluation Matrix........................... 21 Table 4: Granite Park / North – South Spur Trail Evaluation Matrix ........................................................................ 23 Table 5: Cucamonga Avenue Connection Evaluation Matrix .................................................................................. 26 Table 6: 21st Avenue Bike Boulevard Evaluation Matrix .......................................................................................... 29 Table 7: CalTraction Rail With Trail Evaluation Matrix ............................................................................................ 32 Table 8: 21st Avenue Access Across UPRR Evaluation Matrix ............................................................................... 34 Table 9: Southern Pacific Rail Trail Evaluation Matrix............................................................................................. 36 Table 10: 14th Avenue Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................................................. 38 Table 11: Florin Perkins Road Evaluation Matrix..................................................................................................... 40 Table 12: CalTraction / Florin Perkins Road Evaluation Matrix ............................................................................... 42 Table 13: Way-finding Signage – American River Bike Trail and LRT Stations Evaluation Matrix ......................... 44 Table 14: Power Inn LRT Station Access Evaluation Matrix ................................................................................... 47 Table 15: Fruitridge Road Evaluation Matrix...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Resources Survey and Evaluation Technical Report
    Historical Resources Survey and Evaluation Technical Report Specific Plan for the Sacramento Center for Innovation Prepared for City of Sacramento Prepared by www.meadhunt.com and November 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1 1. Project Description ............................................................................. 2 2. Regulatory Environment .................................................................... 4 A. Sacramento Register .................................................................. 4 B. California Register ...................................................................... 6 3. Research Design and Survey Methodology ..................................... 8 A. Research design ......................................................................... 8 (1) Previous studies ............................................................... 8 (2) Sources of additional research ....................................... 12 (3) Native American outreach .............................................. 12 B. Survey methodology ................................................................. 12 4. Built Environment ............................................................................. 13 A. Historic context ......................................................................... 13 (1) Settlement, agriculture, and residential development .... 13 (2) Transportation and commerce ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 65Th Street Station Area Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
    65th Street Station Area Plan Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared for: City of Sacramento May 2010 05068 | JCS | 10 65th Street Station Area Plan Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared for: City of Sacramento Prepared by: May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2. CHANGES TO THE DRAFT EIR ............................................................................................... 2-1 3. LIST OF AGENCIES AND PERSONS COMMENTING ............................................................. 3-1 4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSES Letter 1: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................................................................................. 4-3 Letter 2: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) ................................................. 4-7 Letter 3: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research ......................................................... 4-11 Letter 4: County of Sacramento ........................................................................................... 4-15 Letter 5: Sacramento Area Sewer District (SASD) ............................................................... 4-19 Letter 6: Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) ........................................................ 4-23 Letter 7: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) ................ 4-27 Letter 8: Sacramento Regional Transit District ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hazel Station Special Planning Area
    HAZEL STATION SPECIAL PLANNING AREA Zoning Code of Sacramento County Title X Chapter XX County of Sacramento, California Planning and Community Development Department 827 7th Street, Room 230 Sacramento, CA 95814 Updated March 5, 2009 Table of Contents 1 -- Introduction page 1 TLC and Market Analysis SACOG Blueprint Folsom Boulevard Specific Plan 2 -- SPA Process page 4 3 -- Community and Stakeholder Involvement in the Development of the SPA for the Hazel Station Area page 5 4 -- Hazel Station Special Planning Area page 7 XX-1 Definitions page 8 XX-2 The Regulating Plan page 9 XX-2.1 Purpose XX-2.2 Intent XX-3 Findings page 10 XX-4 Existing & Future Conditions page 11 XX-4.1 Existing Land Use XX-4.2 “Known” Future Conditions XX-5 The Land Use Plan Concept page 15 XX-5.1 Smart Growth XX-5.2 Market for TOD XX-5.3 TOD Zones XX-5.3.1 CORE Zone XX-5.4 Transit Supportive Uses XX-5.5 Infill Opportunities XX-6 Recommended Land Uses page 17 XX-6.1 CORE. Zone (Zone 1) XX-6.2 Zone 2 Overlay Mixed-Use TOD Supportive Commercial XX-6.3 Zone 3 Mixed Use Residential Medium Density XX-6.4 Zone 4 Mixed Use Residential Low-Medium Density XX-7 Permitted Land Uses page 21 Hazel Station SPA i March 5, 2009 XX-8 Development Framework page 22 XX-8.1 Parking Standards XX-8.2 Circulation Plan XX-8.2.1 Circulation and Connectivity XX-8.3 Standards for Folsom Boulevard XX-8.4 RT Site Development Concept Plan XX-8.5 Open Space Plan XX-9 Review Authority page 29 XX-10 Site Planning and Development Standards page 29 XX-10.1 Amenity XX-10.2 Security XX-10.3 Block Size
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report May 2012
    Final Report May 2012 Prepared by: Transit Renewal 2010-2017, Final Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................ 3 2. RT Market Analysis .................................................. 5 3. Service Analysis ..................................................... 27 4. TransitRenewal Performance Measures ............... 69 5. Public Outreach ..................................................... 75 6. Service Recommendations .................................... 91 Page 1 Transit Renewal 2010-2017, Final Report 1. Introduction The 2011-2012 Sacramento Regional Transit Comprehensive Operational Analysis, commonly known as “TransitRenewal”, includes a review of existing market conditions and transit service and aims to position the RT network to sustainably meet future transit demand within the service area. Sustainability is the method of using a resource without depleting or damaging it for future use. Sustainable transit planning focuses on meeting transit needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet such needs1. TransitRenewal responds to changing economic circumstances and RT’s new financial realities. In 2010, RT implemented substantial service reductions which included discontinuing several bus routes, reducing service levels, and reducing spans. TransitRenewal responds to RT’s plan to regain previous FY 2010 service levels and intends to identify core areas of the RT system where investment will have a maximum benefit, and will guide RT
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Lake Natoma Bike Trail Initial Study
    NEW BUSINESS Agenda Item No.: 9a CC Mg.: 06112/2012 Date: May 24, 2012 TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Parks and Recreation Department SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 9002 - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE LAKE NATOMA BIKE TRAIL PROJECT BACKGROUNDIISSUE The Parks and Recreation Department has been working with staff from California State Parks and the Bureau of Reclamation to complete the last segment of the Lake Natoma Bike Trail and provide for a continuous trail around Lake Natoma. The last segment of trail in the Historic District is the most challenging and has many constraints including restricted right-of-way and environmental concerns. This last trail segment is one of the highest priority projects identified in the adopted Bikeway Master Plan. In March 2009, the City Council awarded a contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates to prepare a feasibility study to examine alternative trail alignments through this corridor and to prepare a detailed analysis of the engineering and environmental impacts to determine the most cost-effective and the most environment-friendly alignment. In May 2010, the Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the proposed alignment and gave it unanimous support. The project was also presented to the local business owners along Leidesdorf Street and received positive feedback. The Lake Natoma Bike Trail Project as identified in the 2007 Bikeway Master Plan extends from the terminus of the existing Class I trail behind the Lake Natoma Inn to the Historic Truss Bridge, and ultimately connecting to the American River Parkway bike trail. The overall length of the project is approximately 3,000 linear feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Folsom Boulevard Widening/Ramona Avenue Extension Project
    FOLSOM BOULEVARD WIDENING/RAMONA AVENUE EXTENSION PROJECT SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EA #928303 Federal Aid No. 5002(068) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) De Minimis Impact Finding Prepared for the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of Sacramento The environmental review, consultation, and any other action required in accordance with applicable Federal laws for this project is being, or has been, carried out by Caltrans under its assumption of responsibility pursuant to 23 USC 327 and 49 USC 303. July 2011 General Information About This Document What’s in this document: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), as assigned by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is the lead agency for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the City of Sacramento is the lead agency for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Sacramento and Caltrans prepared this Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Assessment (EIR/EA), which examines the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives being considered for the proposed project located in Sacramento County, California. The document tells you why the project is being proposed, what alternatives we have considered for the proposed project, how the existing environment could be affected by the proposed project, the potential impacts of each of the alternatives, and the proposed avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures. What you should do: • Please read the document. • Additional copies of it, and of the technical studies we relied on in preparing it, are available for review at the City, Community Development Department at 300 Richards Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA, 95811.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Packet
    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Meeting Agenda Department of Transportation | Videoconference Online: https://zoom.us/j/98579907165 Phone: 1 (669) 900-6833, ID: 98579907165# WEDNESDAY September 9, 2020 - 6:00 p.m. Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. 1. Roll Call / Welcome and Introductions Members: Thomas Cassera, Robert Goss, Katherine Koumis, Sue Schooley, Erin Stumpf, Jack Wursten, Dave Comerchero 2. Public Comment on Non-agenda Topics 3. Review and Approve Meeting Minutes of July 8, 2020 Action Item See attached July 8, 2020 draft meeting minutes. 4. South Watt Avenue Improvement Project Informational Heather Yee, SACDOT, (916) 874-9182, [email protected] See attached staff report, vicinity map, and striping plan. 5. Slow Streets Review and Comment Jack Wursten, Sacramento County Bicycle Advisory Committee Member, (916) 517-2722, [email protected] See attached article. 6. Active Transportation Plan Update Review and Comment Mikki McDaniel, SACDOT, (916) 875-4769, [email protected] See attached for the Existing Conditions Report and Document Review. 7. Letters of Support – ATP Cycle 5 Action Mikki McDaniel, SACDOT, (916) 875-4769, [email protected] See attached for letters of support for three projects: Watt Avenue Complete Streets Phase 1, Folsom Boulevard Complete Streets Phase 2, and South Sacramento County Safe Routes to School – Ethel Baker, Nicholas, and Pacific Elementary Schools 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5 TRANSPORTATION and CIRCULATION Regional Roadway
    4.5 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This section describes potential impacts on the transportation system associated with adoption of the proposed Rancho Cordova General Plan. The impact analysis evaluates the local and regional roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and aviation components of the overall transportation system. 4.5.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT The existing physical conditions of the transportation system are described below. This description is organized by transportation system component within the “study area”, which includes roadway and transportation facilities within the City, the Planning Area outside of the current City limits as well as consideration of facilities and regional traffic conditions outside of the Planning Area. Regional Roadway System Rancho Cordova’s transportation system is predominantly focused around the roadway network. Although automobile travel is the primary function for the roadway network, it also serves a variety of other modes: trucks, buses, bicycling, and walking. Rancho Cordova’s roadway network has two distinct characteristics; it is urban within developed areas of the City (north of Douglas Road, west of Sunrise Boulevard) and rural within undeveloped areas of the City (east of Sunrise Boulevard, south of U.S. 50). Work, shopping, recreation, school, and goods movement trips are responsible for most of the travel demand on the transportation system. Recreation attractions include regional parks within or adjacent to the City and the American River Parkway which borders the north side of the City. Rancho Cordova is currently an employment and retail center for the region, which results in the importation of trips into the City. There are several transportation constraints near the City that create congestion during peak periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation and Circulation 4.4 Transportation and Circulation
    4.4 – TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.4 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION This section describes potential impacts on the transportation system associated with adoption of the Rancho Cordova Redevelopment Plan. The impact analysis evaluates the roadway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and aviation components of the overall transportation system. 4.4.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT The existing physical conditions for the transportation system are described below. This description is organized by transportation system component, beginning with the regional roadway system and public transit, non-motorized transportation, and aviation. Regional Roadway System Rancho Cordova’s transportation system is focused around the roadway network. Although the City does have alternative travel modes, the majority of people use the automobile as their primary travel mode. Although automobile travel is the primary function for the roadway network, it also serves a variety of other modes: trucks, buses, bicycling, and walking. Rancho Cordova’s roadway network has two distinct characteristics; it is urban within developed areas of the City (north of Douglas Road, west of Sunrise Boulevard and the entire Redevelopment Project Area) and rural within undeveloped areas of the City (east of Sunrise Boulevard, south of U.S. 50). Work, shopping, recreation, school, and goods movement trips are responsible for most of the travel demand on the transportation system. Recreation attractions include regional parks within or adjacent to the City and the American River Parkway Area which borders the north side of the City. Rancho Cordova is currently an employment and retail center for the region, which results in the importation of trips into the City. There are several transportation constraints near the City and the Redevelopment Project Area that create congestion during peak periods.
    [Show full text]