Jurisdiction of the Panel to Determine the Questions in the NQCL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jurisdiction of the Panel to Determine the Questions in the NQCL IN THE MATTER OF THE ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION ACT R.S.A. 2000, C. E-10; AND THE OIL SANDS CONSERVATION ACT, R.S.A. 2000, C. 0-7; AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT, S.C. 1992, c.37; AND IN THE MATTER OF A JOINT PANEL REVIEW BY THE ALBERTA ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION PANEL AND THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA; AND IN THE MATTER OF ERCB APPLICATION No. 1554388 and CEAR No. 59540, JACKPINE MINE EXPANSION, FORT MCKAY, ALBERTA SUBMISSION BY ATHABASCA CHIPEWYAN FIRST NATION AS REPRESENTED BY WOODWARD & CO. LAWYERS LLP in response to the October 12, 2012 letter from Counsel to the Joint Review Panel to Shell Canada Energy and the Parties Submitted to: Joint Review Panel Energy Resources Conservation Board 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor Place Bell Canada Per: Gary Perkins & Meighan LaCasse Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 Counsel for the Joint Review Panel Attention : Jill Adams, Panel Manager Email: Email : [email protected] Submitted by: Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Per: Jenny Biem & Eamon Murphy Woodward & Co. Lawyers LLP Counsel for Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation 2nd Floor, 844 Courtney Street Email: Victoria, BC V8W 1C4 Jurisdiction of the Panel to determine the questions in the NQCL I. Introduction 1. The Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (“ACFN”) submitted to the Joint Review Panel (the “Panel”) on October 1, 2012 its Notice of Question of Constitutional Law (the “NQCL”). In the NQCL, the ACFN asked the Panel to determine whether each of the Crown in right of Alberta, and the Crown in right of Canada, have discharged the duty to consult and accommodate ACFN with respect to the potential adverse effects of Shell’s Jackpine Mine Expansion (the “Project”) on ACFN’s treaty rights. 2. Alberta applied to the Panel, by letter dated October 9, 2012, for an order dismissing ACFN’s NQCL. Shell wrote to the Panel on October 11, 2012 in support of Alberta’s application. 3. The Panel, by way of correspondence to all parties dated October 12, 2012, requested submissions on matters relating to the NQCLs that may bear on the Panel’s jurisdiction. Alberta and Shell provided additional submissions on jurisdiction on October 15, 2012 and Canada provided submissions on October 15, 2012. 4. ACFN’s submissions herein are in response to Alberta’s letter of October 9, 2012, Shell’s letter dated October 11, 2012, the Panel’s letter dated October 12, 2012, Alberta’s additional submissions, particularly paragraphs 33-50 and 62-63, Shell’s additional submissions and Canada’s submissions of October 15, 2012. 5. ACFN submits that the governing legislation, the Panel’s mandate, and the relevant Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions, all make it clear that the Board has the jurisdiction and the responsibility to assess the adequacy of Crown consultation and accommodation in determining Shell’s application for approval of the Project. [ 1 ] Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 II. Jurisdiction of the Board ....................................................................................... 2 a) According to the Panel’s mandate, the governing legislation and the Supreme Court of Canada .................................................................................................... 2 b) With reference to the Public Interest ..................................................................... 8 c) Panel Jurisdiction over Alberta ............................................................................ 10 i) Taking a supervisory role ................................................................................. 10 ii) Irrelevant whether the Crown is a party to application ...................................... 12 iii) Panel is a Crown entity .................................................................................... 14 III. The Panel is the Proper Forum to Decide Consultation Questions .............. 16 IV. It is not premature to assess the adequacy of the Crown’s consultation .... 20 V. Judicial Comity and Stare Decisis ...................................................................... 25 VI. Summary of submissions as they relate to the Panel request of October 12, 2012. ................................................................................................................... 27 i) Adequacy of the NQCL .................................................................................... 27 ii) Extent to which the reasoning in the Osum decision should apply in this case 27 iii) Whether the Panel should assess the adequacy of consultation at the outset of the hearing ....................................................................................................... 27 iv) Whether the Court of Queen’s Bench is the more appropriate forum for some or all of the issues ................................................................................................ 28 VII. List of Authorities .............................................................................................. 29 II. Jurisdiction of the Board a) According to the Panel’s mandate, the governing legislation and the Supreme Court of Canada 6. To determine the Panel’s mandate and jurisdiction in this matter, reference must be made to three sources: the Amended Agreement To Establish a Joint Review Panel for the Jackpine Mine Expansion Project (the “Terms of Reference”); the Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act (“APJA”), and; the Designation Of Constitutional Decision Makers Regulation (Alberta Regulation 69/2006) (the “Regulation”). 7. The Terms of Reference, which the ERCB agreed to, provide: 6.1 The Joint Review Panel may receive information from Aboriginal groups related to the nature and scope of asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights in the area of the project, as well as information on the potential adverse environmental effects that the project may have on asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights. The Joint Review Panel may also receive information provided in this regard by other participants, federal authorities or government, and provincial departments or government. 6.2 The Joint Review Panel shall reference in its report: a. the information provided by participants regarding the manner in which the project may adversely affect asserted or established Aboriginal and treaty rights; and b. the information provided by participants regarding the strength of claim in respect of Aboriginal and treaty rights asserted by a participant, including information about the location, extent, bases and exercise of those asserted Aboriginal and treaty rights in the area of the project. For the purposes of its report, the Joint Review Panel shall document claims of Aboriginal and treaty rights as presented by participants and consider the effects of the project on the Aboriginal and treaty rights so presented. The Joint Review Panel may use this information to make recommendations that relate to the manner in which the project may adversely affect the Aboriginal and treaty rights asserted by participants. 6.3 Notwithstanding articles 6.1 and 6.2, the Joint Review Panel is not required by this agreement to make any determinations as to: a. the validity of Aboriginal or treaty rights asserted by a participant or the strength of such claims; b. the scope of the Crown’s duty to consult an Aboriginal group; or c. whether the Crown has met its respective duties to consult or accommodate in respect of rights recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. [ 2 ] 6.4 Nothing in this article 6 limits the application of Part 2 of the Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act to the ERCB, and the Joint Review Panel (in its capacity as a division of the ERCB) remains at all times subject to the requirements of, and entitled to exercise the powers under Part 2 of the Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act, including but not limited to section 13 thereof. (emphasis added) 8. Alberta’s submissions omit any reference, at all, to the Terms of Reference. Canada’s submissions quote section 6 (see paragraphs 6 and 88) but omit any reference to subsection 6.4. Subsection 6.4 is fundamental to determining whether the Panel can assess the adequacy of the Crown’s duty to consult; any restrictions that may have been placed on the jurisdiction of the Panel are removed. 9. The APJA provides, under Part 2: 10 (d) “question of constitutional law” means (ii) a determination of any right under the Constitution of Canada or the Alberta Bill of Rights. Lack of jurisdiction 11 Notwithstanding any other enactment, a decision maker has no jurisdiction to determine a question of constitutional law unless a regulation made under section 16 has conferred jurisdiction on that decision maker to do so. (emphasis added) 10. The Regulation provides: Authorization 2 The decision makers listed in column 1 of the Schedule have jurisdiction to determine the questions of constitutional law set out opposite them in column 2. Schedule 1: Workers’ Compensation questions of constitutional Board law arising from the federal or provincial distribution of powers under the Constitution of Canada Energy Resources all questions of Conservation Board constitutional law [ 3 ] 11. The Alberta Hansard proceedings1 dated March 21, 2005 set out the rationale for amendments to the APJA, in part arising out of the Supreme Court of Canada decision Paul v. British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission), a case centered on section
Recommended publications
  • Brown Earth Church Renovations Will Preserve Historic Bell Tower
    www.grantcountyreview.com • [email protected] • 605-432-4516 Volume 141, Number 19 • Milbank, South Dakota • Wednesday, October 7, 2020 Fourth Quarter Food Giveaway Scheduled Brown Earth Church Renovations Today, October 7 Cancer Fundraiser Grant County individuals and Hartman’s Family Foods in families who are in need are wel- will Preserve Historic Bell Tower Milbank is once again sponsor- come to receive a free set of boxes of ing “change for a change,” a food at the food giveaway that will fundraising option to fight be today, Wednesday, October 7. Serving as an entry to the historic breast cancer. During October, The event will be staged at the Grant Brown Earth Indian Church, the Breast Cancer Awareness County 4-H grounds from 4 to 5 dual-purpose bell tower is undergo- Month, the store invites cus- p.m. There are no income guidelines ing renovations to preserve it. Kevin tomers to round up to the next to partake. Locke of Midwest Landmark Con- dollar when they make a pur- The giveaway will be conducted as struction Company is the contractor chase and the extra change goes a drive-through event. Although the for the project. to Grant County’s It Only Takes food will be prepackaged from Feed- Located northeast of Stockholm, a Spark Cancer Walk. See the ad ing South Dakota, the Grant County the church is owned by the Grant inside for details. Christian Service Council coordi- County Historical Society. nated the giveaway. The boxes will The repair estimate came in at include dry products, frozen food $10,687, and the Grant County Com- and fresh produce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Futility of the Great Lockdown Melodrama
    Q ua dr a nt $8.90 Australia I M arch 2021 How the I highest levels V ol.65 of the police, judiciary and N o.3 politicians in Australia, M plus victim arch 2021 lobby groups, compensation The Futility of the Great lawyers, and journalists, Lockdowneter urphy Melodrama used bogus P M accusations Losing Faith in the Future of Democracy of child sexual David Martin Jones abuse to NEW China:NEW Our Generation’s Greatest Challenge persecute, Ted O’Brien convict The Indigenous Invasion of Aboriginal Australia and jail an Patrick McCauley innocent man. Australian Imams Stand Up for Sharia Mark Durie Black Lives Matter: Myths and Facts William D. Rubinstein THE PERSECUTION OF GEORGE PELL uncovers the To get their man, lawyers, judges and a Royal campaign aimed not only at personally destroying one Commission reversed long-standing legal principles, On George Pell’s Prison Journal Anne Henderson of Australia’s most influential religious leaders, but also including the presumption of innocence, the onus of of trashing the reputation of the Catholic Church. Had proof, and guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Every claim On Woody Allen Rob Long it succeeded, the campaign would have set damaging of child sexual abuse, they insisted, must be believed. On Pearl Buck Ross Terrill precedents for the rule of law in Australia. Pell spent 400 This is the story of profound injustice heaped on one days in prison before a unanimous judgment of the High individual and the social and legal damage caused by On Charles III Joe Dolce Court finally set him free.
    [Show full text]
  • Funny Feelings: Taking Love to the Cinema with Woody Allen
    FUNNY FEELINGS: TAKING LOVE TO THE CINEMA WITH WOODY ALLEN by Zorianna Ulana Zurba Combined Bachelor of Arts Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, 2004 Masters of Arts Brock University, St. Catherines, Ontario, 2008 Certificate University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 2009 A dissertation presented to Ryerson University and York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Program of Communication and Culture. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2015 ©Zorianna Zurba 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this dissertation. This is a true copy of the dissertation, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University and York University to lend this dissertation to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I further authorize Ryerson University and York University to reproduce this dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my dissertation may be made electronically available to the public. ii Funny Feelings: Taking Love to the Cinema with Woody Allen Zorianna Zurba, 2015 Doctor of Philosophy in Communication and Culture Ryerson University and York University Abstract This dissertation utilizes the films of Woody Allen in order to position the cinema as a site where realizing and practicing an embodied experience of love is possible. This dissertation challenges pessimistic readings of Woody Allen’s film that render love difficult, if not impossible. By challenging assumptions about love, this dissertation opens a dialogue not only about the representation of love, but the understanding of love.
    [Show full text]
  • Annie Hall Janu- Nnie Hall (1977) Will Be Screened on Ary 10 at 6Pm at the American Centre, No A44, Galle Road, Colombo 3
    'Balloth Ekka Ba', 'Bakamuna' and 'Madhura Javanika' at Lionel Wendt he hillarious comedy 'Balloth nayake. With music of Shantha Peiris, of our time 'Bakamuna Veedi Basi' Jackson Anthony, Rodney Warnakula, Ekka Ba'written and directed by stage set designed by Luvolin Vander- (Owl in the Street) with a cast of Bandula Vijeweera, Anula Bulathsin- TRavindra Ariyarathna, Rajitha vol and stage management of Asoka experinced actors like Shyam Fer- hala, Saman Gunawardena and Rath- Dissanayake's latest political satire De Zoysa and Shantha Udaya Kumara, nando, Jayani Senanayaka, Dhar- nashila Perera. 'Bakamuna Veedi Basi' (Owl in the the drama will be an experience too mapriya Dias, Prasad Sooriyaarach- Music is composed by Rohana Street) and Dayananda Gunawarde- costly to miss, while costume design chi, Sampath Jayaweera and Pri- Beddage and Bandula na's 'Madhura Javanika' (Joyous by Gihan Fernando and Demal Fer- yankara Ratnayaka. Vijeweera.'Madhura Javanika' is an Scenes) will be staged at the Lionel nando, lighting of Upali Weerasinghe 'Bakamuna Veedi Basi' uses power- accomplished musical which includes Wendt theatre, Colombo 7 on January and make up art of Saman Hemarath- ful lines and metaphor to expose the folk music, dance, extravagant cos- 20, 21 and 22 at 3.30 pm and 7 pm. na will create an unforgettable visual audience to the diverse power strug- tumes and spectacular stage set- 'Balloth Ekka Ba' stars renowned experience. gles seen in today's tumultuous polit- ting. artistes such as Wijaya Nandasiri, Sugath Jayasinghe presents the ical arena. Jude Srimal is the chief organiser of Roshan Pilapitiya, Gihan Fernando, drama on behalf of the Easl J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivan Illich's Medical Nemesis and the 'Age of the Show': on the Expropriation of Death
    Fordham University Masthead Logo DigitalResearch@Fordham Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Philosophy Collections Winter 2017 Ivan Illich’s Medical Nemesis and the ‘Age of the Show’: On the Expropriation of Death Babette Babich Fordham University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Medical Humanities Commons, and the Public Health and Community Nursing Commons Recommended Citation Babich, Babette, "Ivan Illich’s Medical Nemesis and the ‘Age of the Show’: On the Expropriation of Death" (2017). Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections. 86. https://fordham.bepress.com/phil_babich/86 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at DigitalResearch@Fordham. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters in Academic Book Collections by an authorized administrator of DigitalResearch@Fordham. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOI: 10.1111/nup.12187 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ivan Illich’s Medical Nemesis and the ‘age of the show’: On the Expropriation of Death Babette Babich, Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, Fordham University, New York, NY, USA Abstract What Ivan Illich regarded in his Medical Nemesis as the ‘expropriation of health’ is Correspondence Babette Babich, Department of Philosophy, exacerbated by the screens all around us, including our phones but also the patient Fordham University, New York, NY, USA. monitors and increasingly the iPads that intervene between nurse and patient. To Email: [email protected] explore what Illich called the ‘age of the show’, this essay uses film examples, like Creed and the controversial documentary Vaxxed, and the television series Nurse Jackie.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Abstracts: Volume XI, Numbers 1-30. TNSTTTUTION Toxc Univ
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 314 116 JC 900 032 AU1HOR Roueche, Suanne D., Ed. TITLE Innovation Abstracts: Volume XI, Numbers 1-30. TNSTTTUTION Toxc Univ. , National Inst. for Staff and Organizational Development. SPONS AGENCY Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek, Mich.; Richardson (Sid W.) Foundation, Fort Worth, Tex. PUB DATE 89 NOTE 62p. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) -- Reports - Descriptive (141 JOURNAL CIT Innovation Abstracts; vii n1-30 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Abstracts; Classroom Communication; Community Colleges; Critical Thinking; *Ins*ructional Innovation; *Learning Strategies; Personnel Selection; Scholarship; *Teacher Role; *Teacher Student Relationship; *Teaching Methods; Two Year Colleges ABSTRACT This serles of one- to two-page abstracts highlights a variety of innovative approaches to teaching and learning in the community college. Topics covered in the abstracts include: (1) cooperative planning for institutional excellence;(2) rewarding s;holarship among community college faculty;(3) in-class debates as a learning strategy;(4) instructional approaches for remedial mathematics d English composition;(5) providing incentives fr. faculty publishing; (6) creating supportive environments for change and for effective adult learning;(7) strategies for helping students with declining grade point averages;(8) using a lottery approach to get students to "volunteer" to answer review questions; (9) study groups and study partners;(10) motivating adult basic education students;(11) helping students prepare for biology
    [Show full text]
  • GRAMMAR with LAUGHTER EXERCISES for INSTANT LESSONS
    GRAMMAR with LAUGHTER www.IELTS4U.blogfa.comPHOTO.COPIABLE EXERCISES FOR INSTANT LESSONS George Woolard STRAIGHTFORWARD, EASYTO-USE MATERIAL FOR BUSY TEACHERS Language Teaching Publications 114a Church Road, Hove, BN3 2EB, England Tel: 00 44 (1) 273 736344 Fax: 00 44(1)273 775361 ISBN 1 899396 01 2 © LTP 1999 Copyright This book is fully protected by copyright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright owner. Permission to Photocopy All of the students' material in this book is intended for photocopying. Permission is hereby given to photocopy all such pages for use by individual teachers in their classes. No private or institutional copying which could be construed as re-publication is allowed without the permission of the copyright owner. The Author George Woolard is an experienced ELT teacher and teacher trainer who has worked in Greece and Malaysia. He now teaches at Stevenson College, Edinburgh. His first book for LTP was the www.IELTS4U.blogfa.comhighly successful Lessons with Laughter. The Illustrator Bill Stott is a well known British cartoonist. His work has appeared in many magazines and newspapers. Sales of his books of cartoons exceed two million. He has spent the past 30 years teaching, drawing and living on Merseyside. He is a distinguished after-dinner speaker. Acknowledgements Cover design by Anna Macleod Cartoons by Bill Stott Printed in England by Commercial Colour Press, London E7 Introduction Humour and motivation Grammar with Laughter is a book which uses jokes to highlight grammatical patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Kaimin, May 12, 1977 Associated Students of the University of Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 5-12-1977 Montana Kaimin, May 12, 1977 Associated Students of the University of Montana Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of the University of Montana, "Montana Kaimin, May 12, 1977" (1977). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 6618. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/6618 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ■ m o n t a n a - k a i m i n University of Montana • Student Newspaper Thursday, May 12, 1977 Missoula, Mont. Vol. 79, No. 98 Judge threatens dismissal in ‘Red Lodge Five’ case By G. ROBERT CROTTY timidated and threatened a witness Ortner said yesterday that "I’ll spill Montana Kalmln Raportar in a pending criminal matter” in his my guts to thegrand jury if it’s called. dealings with former Missoula "There are tons of improprieties District Court Judge Robert Deputy Sheriff Tim Ortner — who going on in this county. Oh yeah, I’ve Wilson will dismiss the “Red Lodge took part in the Wogamon raid as got a lot to tell.” Five" drug case on Monday unless Red Lodge police chief.
    [Show full text]
  • Clicking for Love
    Clicking for Love BOSTON GLOBE January 10, 2016 Clicking for Love The Curious, Odious, Hilarious World of Online Dating By Alfie Kohn [NOTE: This is the complete version of an essay that was greatly abridged for publication in the Boston Globe‘s Sunday Magazine.] It was when the first woman I’d exchanged messages with invited me to give her a call that I suddenly realized just how screwy and contrived on-line dating really is. She and I had “met,” I should explain, on a dating site whose name rhymes with “No way, stupid!” Participants are invited to answer a seemingly endless list of questions, many of them deeply personal, from which an algorithm derives your compatibility scores with everyone else on the site. These percentages can reach into the high 90s, signaling just how much you have in common with each individual — including individuals from whom, had you met at a party, you would be excusing yourself after 45 seconds to freshen your drink.1 Anyway, as I was dialing this particular woman, I suddenly realized two things. A: I didn’t know her name. B: I knew a great deal about her preferences regarding oral sex. I knew many dozens of details, as a matter of fact, not only about her sexual predilections but about her romantic history, personal hygiene practices, ethical standards, religious convictions, and political beliefs. She was a complete stranger to me, and yet I had a whopping pile of information about her (as well as a writing sample and a photo of uncertain vintage).
    [Show full text]
  • Annie Hall.Pptx
    11/24/10 Week Nine Agenda Discuss Annie Hall Collect Homework Assign Final Writing Prompt Clips from other 1970s films A Clockwork Orange Taxi Driver Godfather I & II ANNIE HALL Two 10 minute Breaks (at ~5:30 & ~6:30) and other classics of the 1970s 1965 through 1985 Early “Funnier” Comedies (‘65-75) Increasing Seriousness (1977-85) What’s New, Pussycat Annie Hall What’s Up, Tiger Lily Interiors Take the Money & Run Manhattan Bananas Stardust Memories Everything You Always Midsummer Night’s Sex Wanted to Know about Sex But … Afraid to Ask Comedy Through the Years Zelig Sleeper Purple Rose of Cairo Woody Allen’s Career: Stages & Development Love and Death 1986 through 1998 1999-present Sweet and Lowdown Cassandra’s Dream Intellectual Deepening (1980s) Mid-1990s Decline Small Time Crooks (2007) Hannah & Her Sisters Shadows and Fog Hollywood Ending Vicky Cristina Radio Days Husbands and Wives Barcelona (2008) Anything Else (2003) September Manhattan Murder Whatever Works (‘09) Melinda and Melinda Another Woman Mystery (2004) You Will Meet a Tall New York Stories Mighty Aphrodite Dark Stranger (2010) Match Point (2005) Crimes and Deconstructing Harry Midnight in Paris Misdemeaners Scoop (2006) (2011) 1 11/24/10 From New York to Europe Life-sized statue of “In the United States things have Allen in Oviedo, Spain changed a lot, and it’s hard to Annie Hall make good small films now. “A Nervous Comedy” “The avaricious studios couldn’t care less about good films – if they get a good film they’re twice as happy but money-making films are their goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode Guide
    Last episode aired Monday May 21, 2012 Episodes 001–175 Episode Guide c www.fox.com c www.fox.com c 2012 www.tv.com c 2012 www.fox.com The summaries and recaps of all the House, MD episodes were downloaded from http://www.tv.com and processed through a perl program to transform them in a LATEX file, for pretty printing. So, do not blame me for errors in the text ^¨ This booklet was LATEXed on May 25, 2012 by footstep11 with create_eps_guide v0.36 Contents Season 1 1 1 Pilot ...............................................3 2 Paternity . .5 3 Occam’s Razor . .7 4 Maternity . .9 5 Damned If You Do . 11 6 The Socratic Method . 13 7 Fidelity . 15 8 Poison . 17 9 DNR ............................................... 19 10 Histories . 21 11 Detox . 23 12 Sports Medicine . 25 13 Cursed . 27 14 Control . 29 15 Mob Rules . 31 16 Heavy . 33 17 Role Model . 35 18 Babies & Bathwater . 37 19 Kids ............................................... 39 20 Love Hurts . 41 21 Three Stories . 43 22 Honeymoon . 47 Season 2 49 1 Acceptance . 51 2 Autopsy . 53 3 Humpty Dumpty . 55 4 TB or Not TB . 57 5 Daddy’s Boy . 59 6 Spin ............................................... 61 7 Hunting . 63 8 The Mistake . 65 9 Deception . 67 10 Failure to Communicate . 69 11 Need to Know . 71 12 Distractions . 73 13 Skin Deep . 75 14 Sex Kills . 77 15 Clueless . 79 16 Safe ............................................... 81 17 AllIn............................................... 83 18 Sleeping Dogs Lie . 85 19 House vs. God . 87 20 Euphoria (1) . 89 House, MD Episode Guide 21 Euphoria (2) . 91 22 Forever .
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Luc Godard and Critical Legal Studies (Because We Need the Eggs)
    Michigan Law Review Volume 87 Issue 7 1989 Jean-Luc Godard and Critical Legal Studies (Because We Need the Eggs) Jeffrey L. Harrison University of Florida Amy R. Mashburn Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A. Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey L. Harrison & Amy R. Mashburn, Jean-Luc Godard and Critical Legal Studies (Because We Need the Eggs), 87 MICH. L. REV. 1924 (1989). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol87/iss7/5 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY JEAN-LUC GODARD AND CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES (BECAUSE WE NEED THE EGGS) Jeffrey L. Harrison* and Amy R. Mashburn** ... and nobody, nobody knows what's going to happen to anyone be­ sides the forlorn rags of growing old .... Jack Kerouac, On the Road 1 Film directors, although faced with an endless number of decisions about lighting, camera placement, and editing, must nonetheless make these choices seem inevitable and necessary.2 A director who chooses to make style itself the focus of a film will pay severe commercial pen­ alties. The resulting "invisible style," according to film scholar Robert Ray, is both the consequence and ratification of a capitalistic worldview that promotes the avoidance of critical thinking.3 Like "positivism" in law, the dominant cinematic paradigm consists of con­ cealing choices and implying certainty.4 The French New Wave, a film movement born in the late 1950s, represents an effort to defy and expose this artistic positivism.
    [Show full text]