Final Environmental Assessment for Land Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final Environmental Assessment for Land Management National Conservation Training Center United States Fish and Wildlife Service Shepherdstown, West Virginia February 2011 Note to Readers This Final Environmental Assessment for Land Management at the National Conservation Training Center contains changes that reflect public comments on the draft environmental assessment (EA). One significant change made in response to comments was to reconsider prescribed burning in woodland areas as a possible activity. This was previously discussed as a possibility and had been included in the effects analysis, but did not appear in the Alternative C discussion in the draft EA under “Proposed Activity 3—Use prescribed fire to control or suppress invasive/exotic plant species and reduce ground and ladder fuels.” The effects analysis for this proposed activity was also re- inserted into the “Habitat and Wildlife” section of chapter 3; however, the draft EA did contain discussions of the effects of prescribed fire on the other resource topics. Other changes include more emphasis on wildfire as a potentially destructive force, as well as the potential beneficial effects of fire. NATIONAL CONSERVATION TRAINING CENTER FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR LAND MANAGEMENT Lead Agency: Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Mr.JamesSlack,NCTCDirector For Information Contact: Mr. Phil Pannill, NCTC Land Manager [email protected] The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has prepared this environmental assessment for the National Conservation Training Center (NCTC) to present various management strategies to control invasive plant species, promote the growth of native plants, control other pests, and prepare for a potential wildfire. The FWS is proposing various treatment methods (such as manual, mechanical, biological, cultural, chemical, and prescribed fire) to achieve management objectives. Alternative A: No Action—Continue Current Level of Land Management The no-action alternative for this EA is described as continuation of the current level of management. Grassland Areas. The overall management objective for grassland habitat (other than areas planned for reforestation) is to restore the former agricultural fields to a native grassland biological community to provide optimum feeding, breeding, and wintering habitat for a diversity of grassland- dependent migratory birds, native pollinating invertebrates, and other native wildlife that are present. This would be accomplished through continued haying, mowing, planting desired species, and chemically treating undesirable species. Mixed-deciduous Forest Areas. The overall management objective for the forest areas is to protect or re-establish desired species, eradicate undesirable species, and protect forested areas from unplanned ignitions. This would be accomplished through re-establishing desired species and chemically treating undesirable species Wetland/Riparian Areas. The overall management objective for riparian/wetland areas is to protect, maintain, and enhance the biological diversity of riparian/wetland areas. This would be accomplished through planting desired species and chemically treating undesirable species. Alternative B: Cease All Land Management Activities This alternative proposes that the NCTC would stop all land management actions—this includes mowing, haying, planting desired species, and chemically treating undesirable species. Alternative C: Proposed Action (Preferred Alternative) The same management actions (except haying) that would continue under Alternative A would also continue under Alternative C. The new proposed activities under Alternative C are the use of prescribed fire to control weeds and woody vegetation, over time, and reduce litter buildup (ground fuels) and ladder fuels; and actions to control “other pests.” The overall management objectives for controlling other pests are to prevent unacceptable damage or impediment to forests, grasslands, and riparian areas; habitat restoration sites; landscaped areas; and roads, sidewalks, trails, fences, buildings, and other facilities; protect human health and ensure the safety of workers, staff, and guests; and protect habitat and other environmental factors in the process of conducting control measures. This would be accomplished through use of cultural and mechanical controls and chemically treating undesirable species. iii U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final EA for Land Management Table of Contents Chapter 1. Purpose and Need for Action ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Environmental Assessment Goal and Project Objectives ........................................................................1-1 1.2.1 Environmental Assessment Goal..................................................................................................1-1 1.2.2 Importance of Defining Project Objectives..................................................................................1-1 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Management Actions at the NCTC..................................................................1-2 1.4 Management Direction that Influences the Scope of this Environmental Assessment............................1-4 1.4.1 Land and Resource Management Planning Documents ...............................................................1-4 1.4.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................................................1-4 1.4.3 Fire Management Direction and Policies .....................................................................................1-5 1.5 Decision to Be Made ................................................................................................................................1-5 1.6 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................................1-5 1.7 Public Participation and Information........................................................................................................1-5 1.7.1 NEPA Scoping Process ................................................................................................................1-5 1.7.1.1 What Was Learned During Scoping............................................................................ 1-6 1.7.2 Public Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment........................................ 1-6 1.7.3 Project Mailing List......................................................................................................................1-6 1.8 Permits, Licenses, and Other Consultation Requirements.......................................................................1-7 1.9 Related Plans ............................................................................................................................................1-7 1.9.1 Deer Management Plan ................................................................................................................1-7 1.9.2 Fire Management Plan and Prescribed Burn Plan........................................................................1-7 Chapter 2. Proposed Action and Alternatives ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Description of the Alternatives Considered in Detail ...............................................................................2-1 2.2.1 Alternative A: No-Action Alternative—Continue Current Level of Land Management ............2-1 2.2.1.1 Grassland Areas .......................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1.2 Mixed-Deciduous Forest............................................................................................. 2-4 2.2.1.3 Riparian/Wetland Areas .............................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Alternative B: Cease All Vegetation Management Actions.........................................................2-5 2.2.3 Alternative C: Proposed Action (Preferred Alternative) ..............................................................2-6 2.2.3.1 Grassland Areas .......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2.3.2 Mixed-Deciduous Forest............................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.3.3 Riparian/Wetland Areas .............................................................................................. 2-7 2.2.3.4 Controlling Other Pests under Alternative C............................................................... 2-8 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study.................................................................2-9 2.4 Summary Comparison of Alternatives......................................................................................................2-9 2.5 Resource Protection Measures................................................................................................................2-24 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental