English Commons and Forests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English Commons and Forests Hi UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES i-1 H MKiflK kB ^ ENGLISH COMMONS AND FORESTS. >t*4<j "j- l ENGLISH COMMONS AND FORESTS THE STORY OF THE BATTLE DURING THE LAST THIRTY YEARS FOR PUBLIC RIGHTS OVER THE COMMONS AND FORESTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES. BY Et. Hon. a. SHAW LEFEVEE, M.P. CASSELL and COMPANY, Limited: LONDON, PARIS tfc MELBOURNE. 1894. [all bights reserved.] PREFACE. I had some time ago collected the materials for, and had written, the greater part of this work, with the object of giving an account of the battle, since 1864, for the preservation of the Common lands and Forests of England and Wales. I delayed, however, completing and publishing it in the hope that a more favourable occasion might arise for claiming that the main object of the movement had been accomplished, either b}^ the completion of the long series of lawsuits, which had for so many years been running their course in the law courts for the preven- tion of inclosures under the Statute of Merton, or by the adoption of legislation, which would render such litigation unnecessary in the future. That occasion has now offered itself. During the past year, 1893, two most important results have been achieved. In the first place, Parliament has passed a measure for the virtual repeal of the Statute of Merton, under the assumed sanction of which, all the attempted inclosures of Commons, during the period referred to, were made. In the second place, after a struggle in the law courts of thirteen years, for the saving of Banstead Commons, in what it is hoped will be the last of the great Commons suits, Parliament, in spite of most 415946 vi PREFACE. determined opposition before Select Committees of both Houses, has sanctioned a scheme for the regulation of these Commons, under which they will be placed under the control and management of a body of Conservators elected by the ratepayers of the district. It has therefore decided that a Common may be practically taken out of the control and management of the Lord of the Manor and placed under that of an elective body in the interest of the district. These two important measures may be considered as having Virtually effected a legal revolution in the re- lation of Lords of Manors and their Commoners to the public with respect to Commons. Tlie fitting occasion, therefore, has arisen for putting on record the history of the movement, and for describing in detail the course of litigation which has had so large a part in forming public opinion and in rendering possible this legislation. I should have preferred that some other person than myself should have undertaken this task. But, in fact, of those who were concerned in the initiation of the movement, I find that I am the only survivor, who has continuously taken an active part in directing the policy of the Society for the Preservation of Com- mons, and who is conversant with all its proceedings. I must claim excuse, therefore, if I have occasionally lapsed into a narrative in the first person, and have referred to my own action. I have to render special thanks to Sir Eobert Hunter and Mr. Percival Birkett, who were professionally PREFACE. vii engaged in so many of the great law suits referred to, for the aid they have rendered in supplying me with information, and in assisting me in revising and com- pleting this work. The account of the Banstead Com- mons litigation is mainly derived from a pamphlet by Sir Robert Hunter, whose able pen and wise counsel have contributed so largely to the success of the cause. I am also indebted to Mr. P. H. Lawrence, who took so a in the initiation of the movement large part ; and I desire to acknowledge the kind assistance of Mr. James Hole and Mr. Fithian, who almost from the commencement of the Commons Society have been its Honorary and Acting Secretary. Some of the paragraphs in the opening chapter on the origin and history of Commons are taken from an account I published a few years ago of the then position of the movement for their preservation. The stories of some of the Commons cases, and especially of Epping Forest, may be partially known to the public, or may be found to some extent in the law reports, but they have not, I think, before been fully told, or collected together, with the object of giving a succinct history of the movement, and of explaining the process by which the Courts of Law, Parliament and the public have been gradually and fully convinced of the necessity of preserving our Commons and Forests, and have been instructed how to accomplish this object. G. S. L. January \Wi, 1894. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Origin and History of Commons. page Description of Commons London Commons Rural Commons Origin of Commons Village Communities Folk- Lands Rise of the Feudal System Manors The Statute of Merton Copyholders Customs of Villagers Gateward's ease Agitation against in- closures in sixteenth century Origin of Inclosure Acts Extent of Commons inclosed under Acts Effect on Rural Labourers General Inclosure Act of 1845 Origin of new movement against inclosures 1 26 CHAPTER II. The Committee of 1865 on Metropolitan Commons. Proposals in 1864 for Wimbledon Common Complaints of inclosure of London Commons Committee of 1845 Enquiry into inclosures Proposal for purchase by the Metropolitan Board of Works Report of Select Committee 27 38 CHAPTER III. The Commons Preservation Society. Renewed inclosures of London Commons Epping Forest inclosures Founding of Commons Society to resist inclosures Commencement of suits Proceedings in Courts of Law Sir H. Peek's prizes for Essays on Commons 39 46 CHAPTER IV. Hampstead Heath. Description of Hampstead History of Manor Lord of the Manor's proposals to grant building leases Resistance in Parliament CONTEXTS. PAGE Attempted inelosure in 1866 Resistance of Commoners Com- mencement of suit Compromise effected Purchase of Lord's rights by Metropolitan Board Purchase of Parliament Hill as an addition to Heath 47 57 CHAPTER V. BEKKHAMSTED COMMON. Description of Common History of Manor Inelosure by Lord Brown- low Removal of Fences by Mr. Augustus Smith Commencement of suit Inelosure in 1638 by Duchy of Cornwall Removal of Fences by Edlyn Action of House of Lords The Common during the Commonwealth Story of the suit Lord Romilly's judg- ment 58- CHAPTER VI. Plumstead and Tooting Commons. Description of Plumstead Commons History of Manor Inclosures by Queen's College, Oxford Resistance by Commoners Com- mencement of suit Decision of Lord Romilly Appeal Lord Hatherley's judgment against inelosure Scheme of regulation Addition to Common Description of Tooting Common History of Manor Inelosure by Mr. Thompson Commencement of suit Decisions of Lord Romilly and Lord Hatherley , . 77 88 CHAPTER VII. WlMHLEOON AND WANDSWORTH COMMONS. History of Wimbledon Common Manor Rolls Dispute between Lord of the Manor and Commoners Commencement of suit Investi- gation into rights of common Compromise Scheme for purchase of Lord's rights Regulation of Common History of Wands- worth Common Injury to Common by Railway Companies Disputes between Lord of the Manor and Commoners Litigation Compromise Scheme for Regulation 89 102 CHAPTER VIII. ElM'ING FOltEST. Description of Forest History of Waltham Forest Forest Laws History of Forest Manors Early perambulations Queen Eliza- CONTENTS. xi PAGE beth Exactions of Charles I. Attempts to disafforest Pro- ceedings of Commonwealth Re-constitution of Forest Courts by Charles II. Decay of Forest Courts Disafforesting of Hainault Forest Inclosures of Epping Forest Sale of Forestal rights of Crown Inquiries by House of Commons Renewed inclosures after the Committee of 1865 The Loughton inclosure Story of Lopping rights of Loughton Willingale's assertion of right His imprisonment Commencement of Willingale's suit Prelimi- nary judgment by Lord Romilly Investigations of Forest Records Corporation of London Commencement of suit by Corporation Proceedings in Parliament Fawcett's Motion Mr. Ayrton's Bill Mr. Cowper Temple's motion Epping Forest Commission Sir George Jessel's judgment in the Corporation suit Scheme for management of the Forest Lord Hobhouse's Arbitration The midnight meeting at Loughton The decision in the Lopping case The erection of the Loppers' Hall The final settlement of Epping Forest Cost of proceedings 103 160 CHAPTER IX. Ashdown Forest and Malvern Hills. History of Ashdown Forest Proceedings in Commonwealth Dis- afforesting by Charles II. Inclosures by Duchy of Lancaster Duke of Dorset's aggressions Lord De la Warr's suit against the Commoners Decision of Appeal Court in favour of Commoners History of Malvern Chase Disafforesting by Charles I. Recent inclosures Litigation Successful issue 161 173 CHAPTER X. Coulshon, Dartford, and Wigley Commons. Description of Coulsdon Common History of Manor Inclosure by Lord of Manor Excessive gravel-digging Suit on behalf of Messrs. Hall Vice-Chancellor Hall's judgment Purchase of Common by Corporation History of Dartford Heath Destruction of Common by excessivo gravel-digging Suit by Mr. Minet Injunctions to restrain inclosure and excessive gravel-digging History of Wigloy and Cadnam Manors Mr. Sloane Stanley's inclosure. of Wigley Common Mr. Briscoo Eyre's suit Dis- covery of decree of Lord Chancellor Hatton Mr. Justice Field's judgment Conditions of landownership in Manors . 174- xii CONTENTS. CHAPTER XI. Banstead Commons. PAGE Description of Commons History of Manor Mr. Alcock's proposal to dedicate Commons to public Sir John Hartopp's purchase His efforts to extinguish Common rights His attempted inclosures Formation of Banstead Common Preservation Society Commence- ment of suit History of suit Insolvency and flight of Sir John Hartopp's Solicitors His bankruptcy Proceedings of Mortgagees of Manor Further litigation Judgment of Court of Appeal Scheme for Regulating the Commons Opposition of Mortgagees Decision of Parliament Commons taken out of hands of Lord of Manor 188211 CHAPTER XII.
Recommended publications
  • Darwins Footsteps – Keston and Holwood Trail
    Diagram .About the trail of leaf The trail begins and ends at Westerham Road Car Park, only 2 miles Species Darwin Summer (3.5kms) from Down House where Charles Darwin lived and E Duckweed You can find this in E Saw or Studied ponds everywhere in summer. worked from 1842 till his death in 1882. It leads you through the A Round-leaved Sundew In 1881 Darwin experimented with the effect of immersing acid grassland and heath of Keston, past the valley mire of one of Darwin began his studies of this plant duckweed in various solutions, at different strengths, to see the London’s few sphagnum bogs, wet meadows, sweet chestnut when he noticed how many insects effect these had on cell contents. coppice and along a public footpath through the Holwood Estate. were caught on its leaves. This led him All these places were familiar and important to Darwin’s work and Azure damselflies (male F Dragonfly. Look for dragonflies and to investigate how it trapped and blue, female green) life, providing him with different plants and animals to study from digested insects, pioneering work which damselflies around the ponds. Darwin wrote how those of the chalk and clay-with flints closer to his home. Some are led to the publication of ‘Insectivorous in males ‘the appendages at the tip of the tail indicated as you follow the trail, others are more difficult to spot or Plants’ in 1875. His major source for are modified in an may be anywhere along the route and are shown in the pictures A sundew was Keston Bog where it was almost infinite variety opposite.
    [Show full text]
  • Date Plant Collector Locality Vc Inst 1868 5 0 Primula Polyantha Crespigny, E
    natstand: last updated 14/12/2014 URL: www.natstand.org.uk/pdf/DeCrespignyEC002.pdf Person: De Crespigny, Eyre N. Champion (1821 – 1895) Description: Chronologically arranged list of specimens From various British herbaris. Source: Herbaria @ Home and University of Hull Extraction date: 2014 December 13 Annotated by: Richard Middleton Copyright: Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Date Plant Collector Locality vc Inst 1868 5 0 Primula polyantha Crespigny, E. de Normandy, France HLU 1869 0 0 Teucrium scordium Crespigny, E. de Braunton Burrows 4 MANCH 1870 7 0 Oenanthe fluviatilis Crespigny, E. de River Lee, Edmonton 21 HLU 1871 0 0 Ranunculus arvensis Crespigny, E. de 21 MANCH 1871 0 0 Ranunculus arvensis Crespigny, E. de 21 MANCH 1871 0 0 Potamogeton friesii Crespigny, E. de Tottenham,Lea Canal 21 MANCH 1872 0 0 Galium tricornutum Crespigny, E. de Croydon 17 MANCH 1872 0 0 Potamogeton crispus Crespigny, E. de Tottenham 21 MANCH 1872 0 0 Potamogeton lucens Crespigny, E. de Tottenham,Lea Canal 21 MANCH 1873 0 0 Schoenoplectus x carinatus Crespigny, E. de Mortlake 17 MANCH 1873 0 0 Anemone nemorosa Crespigny, E. de Hampstead Heath 21 MANCH 1873 0 0 Anemone nemorosa Crespigny, E. de Pinner 21 MANCH 1874 0 0 Potamogeton berchtoldii Crespigny, E. de Woolwich 16 MANCH 1874 0 0 Campanula trachelium Crespigny, E. de Merstham 17 SLBI 1874 0 0 Dianthus deltoides Crespigny, E. de Thames Ditton 17 MANCH 1874 0 0 Carex pallescens Crespigny, E. de Pinner 21 MANCH 1874 0 0 Cochlearia anglica Crespigny, E. de Banks of the Thames, 16 HLU Woolwich, London 1874 6 0 Carex vesicaria Crespigny, E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedside 11 12 03.Indd
    Wandsworth SocietetyÈ ˘ ˘˘ ˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘ ˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘˘ The Bedside 1971 - FORTY YEARS ON - 2011 Mistletoe istletoe, forming as numerous illustrations show, it was remembered that a vile- evergreen clumps on the association of kissing and tasting tea, made from mistletoe apple and many other mistletoe was well established by which grew on hawthorn, was broad-leaved trees, Victorian times. used to treat measles. Other is a strange plant. It people have collected informa- Mabsorbs water and nutrients from tion on mistletoe being used to its host trees, but as it has chlo- treat hysteria in Herefordshire and rophyll it is able to make its own prevent strokes in Essex. food. If sufficiently mature seeds are Pliny the Elder in the first century used mistletoe can be easily A.D. described Druids in France grown on apple trees. Seeds cutting mistletoe from oak trees extracted from Christmas mistle- in a ritual which involved golden toe are not mature, so it’s neces- sickles, dressing in white cloaks, sary to collect berries in April, slaughtering white bulls. Because squeeze out the seeds and insert of this, mistletoe was considered them in a notch cut in the tree’s to be a pagan plant and banned bark. After a couple of months from churches. small plants emerge, but many of these seem to die within a Mistletoe was associated with year. Survivors grow rapidly and Christmas since the mid-17th live for many years. However, century. By the 19th century this mistletoe produces female and association was well established, male flowers on different plants, and people who had mistletoe- and although I’ve left a trail of bearing trees on their land were mistletoe plants behind me as I’ve bothered by people who raided The situation is complicated by moved around, I haven’t yet man- them.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley May 2018
    Traffic noise maps of public parks in Bromley May 2018 This document shows traffic noise maps for parks in the borough. The noise maps are taken from http://www.extrium.co.uk/noiseviewer.html. Occasionally, google earth or google map images are included to help the reader identify where the park is located. Similar documents are available for all London Boroughs. These were created as part of research into the impact of traffic noise in London’s parks. They should be read in conjunction with the main report and data analysis which are available at http://www.cprelondon.org.uk/resources/item/2390-noiseinparks. The key to the traffic noise maps is shown here to the right. Orange denotes noise of 55 decibels (dB). Louder noises are denoted by reds and blues with dark blue showing the loudest. Where the maps appear with no colour and are just grey, this means there is no traffic noise of 55dB or above. London Borough of Bromley 1 1.Betts Park 2.Crystal Palace Park 3.Elmstead Wood 2 4.Goddington Park 5.Harvington Sports Ground 6.Hayes Common 3 7.High Elms Country Park 8.Hoblingwell Wood 9.Scadbury Park 10.Jubilee Country Park 4 11.Kelsey Park 12.South Park 13.Norman Park 5 14.Southborough Recreation Ground 15.Swanley Park 16.Winsford Gardens 6 17. Spring Park 18. Langley Park Sports Ground 19. Croydon Road Rec 7 20. Crease Park 21. Cator Park 22. Mottingham Sports Ground / Foxes Fields 8 23. St Pauls Cray Hill Country Park 24. Pickhurst Rec 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Consultation
    Roehampton Supplementary Planning Document Statement of Consultation September 2015 Roehampton SPD Statement of Consultation - September 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Consultation Undertaken 4 3 Overview of Responses 6 4 Representations and the Council’s Response 8 Comments on the Introduction and Background 8 Comments on Key Issues and Challenges 8 Comments on Vision and Strategic Objectives 9 Comments on Core Principle 1 - Housing 9 Comments on Core Principle 2 - Services and Local Centres 12 Comments on Core Principle 3 - Community Facilities 13 Comments on Core Principle 4 - Landscape and Recreation 14 Comments on Core Principle 5 - Heritage 14 Comments on Core Principle 6 - Urban Design 16 Comments on Core Principle 7 - Transport and Access 16 Comments on Core Principle 8 - Sustainability 17 Comments on Delivery 19 Other Comments 19 Appendices 21 1 Consultation Letters 21 2 List of Consultees 22 3 Consultation Web pages 34 4 SPD Summary Boards 37 5 Consultation Advertisement 38 6 E-News Advertisements 39 7 Social Media Advertising 40 8 Consultation Representations 41 2 Wandsworth Council Introduction Local planning authorities may prepare Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) to provide greater detail on Local Plan policies. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) supports the production of SPDs where they can help applicants to make successful applications. To support the implementation of the Council’s Core Strategy (October 2010, second submission version October 2014), Development Management Policies Document (DMPD) (February 2012, second submission version October 2014), Site Specific Allocations Document (SSAD) (February 2012, second submission version October 2014) and the current Local Plan Review, the council is committed to preparing a number of SPDs, which are detailed in the Local Development Scheme (LDS) (2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Keston Commons
    o m e t o YO We l c U R H e a t h l a n d H e r i t a g e h We s t w ic kh a m , Hayes a n d K eston C o m mon s H P a Bromley ic y k e h s WestWest WickhamWickham CommonCommon TQTQ 400652 - 9 ha ur st Lane S t re Tel 020 8660 8533 e Hayes Common Hayes Station t Hayes Common TQ 406652 - 79 ha B d a a s o t Keston Common TQ 417640 - 21 ha o R n y R e o l Tel 01689 862815 k a C a ro d yd O P on Road A232 3 3 VegetationVegetation on each of the thrthreeee ccommonsommons P 2 is dominateddominated byby secsecondaryondary oak-biroak-birchch West Wickham P P A d H Common a e Keston o woodland,woodland, thathatt has grgrownown up sincsincee the last wwarar a t R Common h f i m but the visitorvisitor will also fi nd signifi cantcant areasareas of e a ld h r R e o heathlandheathland and acid grassland,grassland, favouringfavouring a wide varietyvariety of t a s d P e characteristiccharacteristic invertebrates,invertebrates, birdsbirds and reptiles.reptiles. P W WestWest WickhamWickham CommonCommon featuresfeatures wonderfulwonderful veteranveteran oak pollards,pollards, patchespatches of relictrelict heaheathlandthland and acid grgrassland.assland. HaHayesyes CCommonommon incincorporatesorporates bbothoth long established and recently restored areas of heathland and acid grassland. It boasts an assortment of uncommon plants including bell heather, lousewort and heath milkwort.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Tooting Commons Management Advisory Committee
    1 From the Tooting Commons Management Advisory Committee. Planning Application Balham Boxing and Youth Club 336 Cavendish Road and Football Pitch East of 336 Cavendish Road SW12 0PP. Planning Application number 2019/4206: Executive summary 1. TCMAC approaches the application to refurbish and upgrade the triangle site from the point of view of its role as a guardian of the Tooting commons and in the light of the planning law and guidelines that apply to the London Borough of Wandsworth. 2. The relevant thrust of the law and guidelines is to balance organised sporting use of commons against other demands on them. That balance is to be met in the context of a national, metropolitan, and local move towards de-urbanisation for the sake of the health of human users, the improvement of the natural ecosystem, and in mitigation of climate change. 3.. TCMAC recognises the advantages promised by the development and appreciates the time and effort taken by the council and developer to mitigate damage to the environment, to those many users of the common who will not benefit from it, and (to a degree) to those who live alongside Tooting Bec common. 4. It notes, however, considerable public disquiet at the prospect of the site being ‘privatised’, so that what was once freely open to the public will now be enclosed and the activities within subject to charging. 5. Planning documents treat the Tooting commons not as a park or recreation ground but as a common. Tooting Bec and Tooting Graveney are a mixture of natural habitat and open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Bromley and the Neighbourhood.*
    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 24 1900 ( 139 ) NOTES ON BROMLEY AND THE NEIGHBOURHOOD.* BY PHILIP NOltMAN. BROMLEY, no doubt, sprang up as a town originally from being the residence of the Bishops of Rochester, who were connected with the place for so many centuries. The earlier history of its church and manor has been very well written by Dr. Beeby in Volume XIII. of Archceologia Gantiana (not to mention previous authors), and by Mr. Clinch in his Anti- quarian Jottings, published in 1889. I will not needlessly o-o over the old ground, but will confine myself, as much as possible, to a record of curious facts about this town and neighbourhood likely otherwise to be f orgotten, and of changes in its physical and social conditions from the time that my family first came to reside here until my own boyhood. Much of the information contained in this Paper is derived from a manuscript written by my father, who was one of the original members of the Kent Archseological Society, a contributor to its publications, and keenly attached to his native district. My great-grandfather James Norman settled at Bromley Common about the year 1755, in a house built at the beginning of last century, and known as the Rookery, which is still standing, though much transformed and added to. It had been previously occupied by the Chase family and others; the Chase arms remain, painted on the ceiling of the staircase. Bromley was then a small country town, with two annual fairs and weekly markets, first granted as long ago as the reign of Henry VI.
    [Show full text]
  • London Green Grid
    GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE MARCH 2012 LONDON PLAN 2011 IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID 3 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN ENVIRONMENTS: THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID MARCH 2012 SPG THE ALL LONDON GREEN GRID GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY MARCH 2012 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978-1-84781-505-7 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk Crown Copyright All right reserved. GLA 10032216 (2011) The ALGG Project Team – Jane Carlsen, Peter Heath, Pete Massini, Jamie Dean, John O’Neil, Levent Kerimol, Matthew Carrington, Maurizio Biadene and Honoré van Rijswijk. Vector graphics by Design for London utilising baseline data from GIGL. Borough by borough workshops were coordinated by Design for London and consultant design advisors; J+L Gibbons, Adams and Sutherland with Jonathan Cook, Gross Max, East Architecture and Landscape, Lyn Kinnear, Peter Beard / Landroom, 5th Studio, Shape. These were attended by representatives from the London Boroughs and adjacent districts and counties, Transport for London, Environment Agency, Natural England, Groundwork London, London Parks and Greenspaces Forum, Geographic Information Greater London (GIGL), London Wildlife Trust and English Heritage. The Mayor would like to extend thanks to all who contributed to the work of the Area Framework Partnerships and to all those who responded to the consultation. Particular thanks are extended to the Mayor’s Design Advisory Panel and its ALGG Expert Panel: Terry Farrell, Val Kirby, Peter Neal and Ken Worpole.
    [Show full text]
  • Wandsworth Local Development Framework
    Wandsworth Local Development Framework DMPD & SSAD Proposed Submission Statement of Consultation (Committee version) April 2011 DMPD & SSAD Proposed Submission Statement of Consultation DMPD & SSAD Proposed Submission Consultation Report 1 Introduction 3 2 Consultation Undertaken – who was invited to comment and how they were invited to comment 4 3 Representations and Council's response 7 Development Management Policies Document 7 General comments on DMPD as a whole 7 Chapter 2 – Sustainable Development Principles 9 Chapter 3 – Housing 22 Chapter 4 – Town Centres and Shopping 32 Chapter 5 – Industry, Employment and Waste 41 Chapter 6 – Open Space, the Natural Environment and the Riverside 46 Chapter 7 – Community Facilities 50 Chapter 8 – Transport 51 Appendices 54 Site Specific Allocations Document 56 General Comments on the SSAD as a whole 56 Introduction 58 Chapter 2 - Nine Elms 59 Chapter 3 - Central Wandsworth and the Wandle Delta 75 Chapter 4 - Clapham Junction 83 Chapter 5 - Tooting 87 Chapter 6 - Putney 88 Chapter 7 - Balham 99 Chapter 8 - Roehampton 99 Chapter 9 - Other sites 101 DMPD & SSAD Proposed Submission Statement of Consultation Chapter 10 - Other Thames Riverside sites 102 Appendices 104 4 Next steps 106 DMPD & SSAD Proposed Submission Statement of Consultation 1 Introduction 1.1 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 introduced a new system of development plans, requiring the Council’s Unitary Development Plan (2003) to be replaced by a series of documents within the new Local Development Framework (LDF). The first stage is the production of the Core Strategy which sets out the Council's spatial vision, strategic objectives and spatial strategy on how the borough should develop over the next fifteen years along with core policies and information on monitoring and implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Jubilee Country Park Spring Newsletter 2018
    Friends of Jubilee Country Park Spring Newsletter 2018 Chairman’s Report by Susan Folkes Welcome to our new members and thank you to everyone who has renewed their membership and donated for 2018. If you haven’t yet done so – there’s still time! This year has seen many changes among our active volunteers. A major loss to the Friends was Marcus Jordan, our biodiversity expert, who passed away suddenly in October. Many members may not be aware of how much he did for the park. Jennie Randall has put that right below in her tributes to him and another greatly missed Friend, Bob Land. Paula Murphy, our treasurer, is moving to pastures new and I am taking a break after four hectic years as chairman. Peter Runacres, a member for many years, is taking over the role of treasurer and Zara Jolly has taken on the role of secretary and jumped in at the deep end to produce this newsletter. Penny Russell has joined the events team and we have three new volunteers at the Monday work party. Many thanks to our volunteer bakers who stocked our coffee mornings in Petts Wood. These successful events were started by Jan Coulbert who, sadly, passed away this time last year. Thank you everyone else who has worked so hard to make this year such a success and to keep the group going. We began our first community project with a field trip in September, which involved almost 80 children, parents and teachers from Bromley High School and volunteer Friends. This project was to photograph nature in the park in autumn for a digital nature trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromley Common
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 113 ) BROMLEY COMMON. BY PHILIP NORMAN, LL.D., F.S.A. IN the parish of Bromley, as generally throughout England under the manorial system, there were certain waste lands, here called Bromley Common, which form the main subject of this paper. But before describing them a few words must be said about what were known as the commonable or half year lands,* amounting to some hundreds of acres. These were originally either pastured or cultivated by the plough for the benefit of the Lord of the Manor, from the 5th April to the 10th October in each year, and then thrown open to the tenants of the manor to make what they could of them. As the science of agriculture advanced such a method could not be suitable, for land thus treated was of small value to anyone. It is not surprising therefore that in 1764 an Act of Parliament was passed "for extinguishing the right of common in, over, and upon, certain commonable lands and grounds within the manor and parish of Bromley," which gave up this land to the Bishop of Rochester, Lord of the Manor, or rather to his representative, the then lessee Mr. Wil- liam Scott (the permanent rights of the Bishop being expressly- reserved), on payment of a yearly sum of £40 to the church- wardens aud overseers of the poor, "in full compensation of all manner of right of common, or common of pasture, of the freeholders and inhabitants of the parish, and all other persons claiming right of common." The half-year lands were afterwards let on lives, a not unusual system of tenure * Sometimes called by the older generation Lammas lands.
    [Show full text]