An Audit of Restorative Proctocolectomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Audit of Restorative Proctocolectomy 680 Gut1993;34:680-684 An audit ofrestorative proctocolectomy Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.34.5.680 on 1 May 1993. Downloaded from M R B Keighley, S Grobler, I Bain Abstract (most being of the double limb J variety) at the A total of 168 restorative proctocolectomies dentate line. This procedure resulted in con- have been performed without mortality during siderable damage to the sphincter and was the past nine years. Morbidity from pelvic replaced by a technique of abdominal muco- sepsis (12%), ileoanal stricture (15%), and sectomy3 and sutured ileoanastomosis for the pouch related fistulas (16%) have become less next 58 operations. With an intra-anal sutured with increasing experience of the operation. ileoanal anastomosis, mesenteric vascular Pouch excision, which occurred in 30% of the division was required to deliver the apex of the first 50 patients was undertaken in only 4% in pouch to the dentate line in 24 of the first 76 the last 68 patients. Despite this, intestinal (32%) cases. With increasing confidence of low obstruction (18%) continues to complicate the sutured anastomosis, loop ileostomy has been operation. We have abandoned restorative dispensed with in selected cases (well nourished proctocolectomy after failed ileorectal anasto- patients with no steroid medication and with no mosis in patients with slow transit constipation technical difficulties in the construction of the as half have now requested pouch excision anastomosis). By 1988 we had begun to adopt the because of poor results. Failure to identify double stapling technique for ileoanal anasto- Crohn's disease continues to influence the mosis (anal transection with a transverse linear outcome: in 10 patients now known to have stapler: RL30 (Ethicon) and the end to end Crohn's disease six developed post operative circular stapler with detachable anvil: CEEA fistulas, three have required pouch excision. (Autosuture)), incorporating a stapling tech- Sexual impairment has occurred in three male nique (linear staple cutter PLC 75 (Ehicon)) for patients (4%). Ten women had children after pouch construction.4 In most cases the ileoanal operation, eight uncomplicated vaginal anastomosis lies at the top of the anal columns deliveries occurred without impaired con- and hence the anal transition zone is retained; tinence. Seven ofnine patients over 60 years of however, in patients with polyposis we usually age have had a successful outcome. Our data perform a mucosectomy and a sutured anasto- http://gut.bmj.com/ also indicate that the operation may be justified mosis at the denate line. After a trial of loop in distal disease if urgency is socially incon- ileostomy in totally stapled restorative procto- venient. Frequency of defecation is usually colectomy5 loop ileostomy is now only used in less than three per 24 hours in patients with selected cases (four in the last 18 cases after familial adenomatous polyposis but remains closure of the trial). Rectal excision was origin- variable in those with ulcerative colitis. ally performed keeping close to the bowel and (Gut 1993; 34: 680-684) preserving the superior haemorrhoidal vessels on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. (n=29). Thereafter all rectal excisions have included the mesorectum, care being taken at the Restorative proctocolectomy is a useful opera- pelvic brim to identify and preserve the pelvic tion for ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous nerves and not to enter Dennonvilliers fascia polyposis, and some diseases where colonic during the anterior rectal dissection. function is severely disturbed. The aim of the operation is to ablate the diseased bowel while preserving normal function of the anal Results sphincter.'2 PATIENTS We have analysed our results chronologically Methods into three groups; the first and second 50 cases and the last 68. We fully accept that there have EVOLUTION OF STANDARD TECHNIQUE been changes in technique during this time, as We have used restorative proctocolectomy for described earlier, and as Table 1 shows, in all nine years, initially with a modest annual opera- sutured ileoanal anastomosis some form of tion rate but as confidence has grown and the mucosectomy was performed. The variable use indications for the operation seemed to have ofloop ileostomy is shown. expanded, so the frequency of operation has Most patients (n= 123) were operated on for Department of Surgery, increased (1984, 4; 1985, 9; 1986, 16; 1987, 21; presumed ulcerative colitis but 10 (8%) are now Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham 1988, 24; 1989, 22; 1990, 24; 1991, 30; so far in known to have Crohn's disease and a further 10 M R B Keighley 1992, 18). Indications for restorative procto- (8%) have certain features ofCrohn's disease and S Grobler colectomy now include not only ulcerative colitis have been labelled indeterminate colitis. Twenty I Bain and familial adenomatous polyposis but high six patients have had a restorative proctocolec- Correspondence to: adenomatous Professor M R B Keighley, grade dysplasia, megacolon constipation, and tomy for familial polyposis of Department of Surgery, certain cases of distal colitis. whom 20 had a synchronous proctocolectomy Queen Elizabeth Hospital, construction and four of these Birmingham B15 2TN. In the first 18 cases the lower third of the and pouch only an muco- a There Accepted for publication rectum was retained and extensive anal patients had covering loop ileostomy. 6 October 1992 sectomy was performed with a sutured pouch were eight patients who had a previous subtotal An audit ofrestorative proctocolectomy 681 TABLE I Change in morbidity with experience: comparison ofgroups this figure has now fallen to 25% in the last 68 operations. There were three important early First 50 Second 50 Last 68 (1984-7) (1988-90) (1990-) complications - namely, infarction of the pouch pelvic bleeding and pelvic sepsis (n=6), (n=6), Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.34.5.680 on 1 May 1993. Downloaded from Age (median (range)) (y) 32(11-78) 36(16-68) 34(21-78) Age over 60 2 2 5 (n=21). These complications often coexisted Diagnosis: and with the exception of pelvic sepsis, their Ulcerative colitis (n= 103) 33 27 43 Probable Crohn's disease (n= 10) 3 3 4 incidence has not fallen with increased experi- Possible Crohn's disease (n= 10) 4 3 3 ence with the operation. There were three Familial adenomatous polyposis (n=26) 5 7 14 Constipation (failed ileorectal anastomosis) (n=8) 3 3 2 diabetic patients, in the series, and two of them Megacolon and megarectum (n= 10) 2 7 1 had severe sepsis after operation. Although Dysplasia and polyps (n= 1) 0 0 1 Operation: pouch ischaemia was in the past associated with Statured ileoanal anastomosis* (anal mucosectony) 50(18) 15 (0) 4 (0) radical mesenteric vascular division, this Stapled ileoanal anastomosis 0 35 64 Loop ileostomy 45 19 28 complication is still seen. Two recent cases were from malrotation ofthe pouch and another from *The remainder had abdominal mucosectomy. mesenteric vein thrombosis complicating pelvic sepsis. colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation who had developed recur- Late morbidity rent difficulty with defecation that necessitated Late complications included stenosis of the large doses of laxatives to control secondary ileoanal anastomosis (n=25, 15%). This event constipation. These eight were treated by seems to be less frequent after the use of stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Similarly, there anastomosis at the top of the anal column (8% were 10 patients with longstanding acquired compared with sutured ileoanal anastomosis megacolon and megarectum with normal ileal 22%). function and acceptable anal sphincter activity Intestinal obstruction that necessitated admis- who have been treated by restorative procto- sion to hospital occurred in 31 (18%) patients. colectomy. The double stapling technique was Episodes of intestinal obstruction usually occur- never applicable in these cases because of the red in the first year of operation but in seven widely dilated and thick walled anus; hence a patients admission to hospital with obstruction hand sewn ileoanal anastomosis was required. occurred after the first 12 months. In 14 patients There were seven patients over the age of 60 operative intervention was necessary for relief of who have had a restorative proctocolectomy, one obstruction and in six of these 10 to 50 cm of ofwhom had longstanding polyps and high grade small bowel required resection, either because of http://gut.bmj.com/ dysplasia; the rest had ulcerative colitis. operative damage (n=3) or infarction from the obstruction (n=3). The frequency ofobstruction seems to have remained constant throughout the COMPLICATIONS series even though there has been a tendency to use loop ilesostomy more sparingly with increas- Mortality ing experience. There has been no operative mortality but two Twenty seven fistulas occurred after opera- on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. late deaths have occurred; one patient had a fatal tion. Fistulas either presented early (n= 13), in motorcycle accident and a further patient who which case they usually resulted from a break- suffered chronic small bowel obstruction after down of an ileoanal anastomosis or a suture line pouch surgery developed fatal septicaemia after deshiscence in the pouch to the abdominal wall, pouch excision seven years after the original perineum, or vagina (two cases that were later operation (Table II). proved to have Crohn's disease). Alternatively fistulas have presented later after operation (n= 14) due to unrecognised Crohn's disease Early morbidity (n=4), chronic obstruction at the ileoanal Table II shows the details of morbidity. Over anastomosis (n=3), from a stitch sinus (n=l), half of all patients developed a clinically import- or from possible reactivation of latent crypto- antcomplication in thefirst 100 operations (52%); glandular infections (n=6). Table III shows the anatomical varieties of fistulas, their relation to the underlying bowel disorder, and outcome. Fortunately this complication seems to have TABLE II Changes in morbidity with experience occurred less often with increasing experience.
Recommended publications
  • Practice Parameters for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Howard Ross, M.D
    PRACTICE PARAMETERS Practice Parameters for the Surgical Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis Howard Ross, M.D. • Scott R. Steele, M.D. • Mika Varma, M.D. • Sharon Dykes, M.D. Robert Cima, M.D. • W. Donald Buie, M.D. • Janice Rafferty, M.D. Prepared by the Standards Practice Task Force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons he American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons the most common surgical indication for UC. Whether is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care it is secondary to an inability to control symptoms, poor Tby advancing the science, prevention, and manage- quality of life, risks/side effects of chronic medical therapy ment of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and (especially long-term corticosteroids), noncompliance, or anus. The Standards Committee is composed of Society growth failure, patients may opt for surgery in the elective members who are chosen because they have demonstrat- or semielective setting.3 Complete removal of all the poten- ed expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. tial disease-bearing tissue is theoretically curative in UC. This Committee was created to lead international efforts Operative options include an abdominal colectomy or total in defining quality care for conditions related to the co- proctocolectomy with either a permanent end ileostomy or lon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by develop- surgical construction of a “new” rectum through an IPAA ing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available that restores GI continuity.4,5 All these procedures may evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescrip- be performed by using open or minimally invasive tech- tive.
    [Show full text]
  • European Evidence Based Consensus on Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis Tom Øresland*, Willem A
    Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 2015, 4–25 doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012 ECCO Guidelines/Consensus Paper ECCO Guidelines/Consensus Paper European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis Tom Øresland*, Willem A. Bemelman, Gianluca M. Sampietro, Antonino Spinelli, Alastair Windsor, Marc Ferrante, Philippe Marteau, Oded Zmora, Paulo Gustavo Kotze, Eloy Espin-Basany, Emmanuel Tiret, Giuseppe Sica, Yves Panis, Arne E. Faerden, Livia Biancone, Imerio Angriman, Zuzana Serclova, Anthony de Buck van Overstraeten, Paolo Gionchetti, Laurents Stassen, Janindra Warusavitarne Michel Adamina, Axel Dignass, Rami Eliakim, Fernando Magro, André D’Hoore, On behalf of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) Received July 14 2014; revised August 23 2014; accepted August 27 2014. ⁎Corresponding author at: Clinic for Surgical Sciences, Univ. of Oslo at Dept. of Digestive Surgery, Akershus Univ. Hospital, 1478 Lorenskog, Norway. Keywords: ulcerative colitis; surgery; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; cancer 1. Introduction and also for all national representatives of ECCO for the second vot- ing procedure. The WGs finally met in Belgrade on September 25th The goal of this consensus initiated by the European Crohn's and 2013 for a final face-to-face discussion and to vote and consent on Colitis Organisation (ECCO) was to establish European consensus the statements. Technically this was done by projecting the statements guidelines for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The strategy and revising them on screen until a consensus was reached. Consensus to reach the consensus involved several steps and follows the standard was defined as agreement by more than 80% of participants, termed a operating procedures for consensus guidelines of ECCO.
    [Show full text]
  • 1010 5Th Ave New York, New York 10028 Mount Sinai Medical Center 1
    JOEL J. BAUER, MD CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: Joel J. Bauer, MD 2nd PLLC ADDRESS: 1010 5th Ave New York, New York 10028 Mount Sinai Medical Center 1 Gustave Levy Place, Box 1259 New York, NY 10029 TELEPHONE: (646)-859-1400 CITIZENSHIP: USA EDUCATION: Bachelor of Arts, cum laude 1963 University of Vermont Doctor of Medicine 1967 New York University Medical School POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING: Intern in Surgery 1967-68 The Mount Sinai Hospital New York, NY Resident in Surgery 1968-72 The Mount Sinai Hospital New York, NY Chief Resident in Surgery 1972-73 The Mount Sinai Hospital New York, NY General Surgeon 1973-74 US Air Force, Rickenbacker Air Force Base Chief of Surgery 1974-75 US Air Force, Rickenbacker Air Force Base CERTIFICATION: American Board of Surgery Certificate 20025 April 1, 1974 LICENSURE: New York 102125 HONORS: Kidder Award, 1963 (Senior, First in Scholarship, Leadership & Character) Phi Beta Kappa, 1963 President, Boulder Society, 1963 “Best Doctors in New York” New York Magazine, 1998-00, 2004- 2008 “Top 100 Doctors: Minimally Invasive” New York Magazine, 2002 “One Thousand Great Americans” International Biographical Centre “The Lifetime of Achievement One Hundred” IBC, 2003 “America’s Top Doctors” Castle Connolly, 2001, 2003-2008 “Guide to America’s Top Surgeons” Castle Connolly, 2003-2004, 2006, 2008 “America’s Top Surgeons”, by the Consumer Research Council of America, 2002, 2003, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2015 1 JOEL J. BAUER, MD “Top Doctors: New York Metro Area” Castle Connolly American Biographical Society, 2005 Robert Paradny Award
    [Show full text]
  • Total Proctocolectomy with End Ileostomy for Acute Onset of Ulcerative Colitis During Chemoradiotherapy for Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Mohri et al. Surgical Case Reports (2020) 6:121 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00886-x CASE REPORT Open Access Total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy for acute onset of ulcerative colitis during chemoradiotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma (successfully treated by surgery): a case report Koichi Mohri* , Kazuhiro Hiramatsu, Yoshihisa Shibata, Taro Aoba, Masahiro Fujii, Atsuki Arimoto, Akira Ito and Takehito Kato Abstract Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) developing during chemotherapy is very rare. Here, we describe a case of acute onset during chemoradiotherapy for lung adenocarcinoma, requiring a total proctocolectomy. Case presentation: A 52-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for chemoradiotherapy of lung cancer. He had no obvious history of gastrointestinal diseases, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy was initiated. Thirteen days after 2 cycles of cisplatin and vinorelbine, he experienced persistent hematochezia. Findings of the colonoscopy revealed edematous thickening from the rectum to the transverse colon, suggesting UC, drug-induced colitis, or infectious colitis. Results from bacterial culture were negative for Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Immunohistological staining for cytomegalovirus was also negative. Although he was clinically diagnosed with UC and treated with intravenous glucocorticoid, his symptoms gradually worsened and an abdominal X-ray revealed megacolon. Thirty-five days after conservative therapy, a total proctocolectomy with end permanent ileostomy was performed. Based on pathological findings and clinical course, he was diagnosed with UC. Conclusion: Although the pathogenesis of UC during chemotherapy has been unknown, chemotherapy could be one of the causes of UC in this case. UC should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients with progressive colitis during chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Indications and Options for Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis
    Indications and Options for Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis Jaime L. Bohl, MD*, Kathryn Sobba, MD KEYWORDS Inflammatory bowel disease Surgery Ulcerative colitis Total proctocolectomy Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis KEY POINTS Current elective indications for surgical therapy in ulcerative colitis include cancer, risk for cancer (dysplasia), stricture, medical intractability, overwhelming side effects of medical treatment, and unresponsive extraintestinal manifestations. Patients with ulcerative colitis may require emergency surgery in the setting of acute se- vere colitis that fails to respond to rescue therapy, fulminant colitis, toxic megacolon, perforation, or stricture. Total abdominal colectomy is a surgical treatment option that allows patients who require emergency surgery to reestablish nutrition and withdraw immunosuppressive medication so that pelvic surgery and ileoanal pouch formation is performed when the patient is in good health. Anastomotic techniques included double-stapled anastomosis and hand-sewn tech- niques with mucosectomy. Outcomes for both techniques are acceptable and the clinical circumstances, such as dysplasia, need for oncologic margins, and pouch reach into the pelvis, should determine the technique used. INTRODUCTION Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by inflamma- tion that is limited to the mucosa of the colon and rectum.1 The disease starts at the rectum and extends proximally for varying lengths and in its greatest extent can reach the cecum.2 Approximately 500,000 people in the United States carry a diag- nosis of UC, with an incidence of around 12 per 100,000 per year.3 Surgery to remove the colon and rectum is considered curative. Between 4% and 9% of Disclosures: Neither author has a disclosure to make.
    [Show full text]