DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes Have Been Seen by the Administration)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(1)890/19-20 (These minutes have been seen by the Administration) Ref : CB1/PL/DEV Panel on Development Minutes of meeting held on Tuesday, 28 April 2020, at 2:30 pm in Conference Room 1 of the Legislative Council Complex Members present : Hon Tony TSE Wai-chuen, BBS (Chairman) Hon LUK Chung-hung, JP (Deputy Chairman) Hon Abraham SHEK Lai-him, GBS, JP Hon Jeffrey LAM Kin-fung, GBS, JP Hon Starry LEE Wai-king, SBS, JP Hon CHAN Hak-kan, BBS, JP Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG Mei-fun, SBS, JP Hon Paul TSE Wai-chun, JP Hon Mrs Regina IP LAU Suk-yee, GBS, JP Hon Michael TIEN Puk-sun, BBS, JP Hon Frankie YICK Chi-ming, SBS, JP Hon CHAN Chi-chuen Hon CHAN Han-pan, BBS, JP Hon LEUNG Che-cheung, SBS, MH, JP Hon Alice MAK Mei-kuen, BBS, JP Dr Hon Fernando CHEUNG Chiu-hung Dr Hon Helena WONG Pik-wan Ir Dr Hon LO Wai-kwok, SBS, MH, JP Hon Alvin YEUNG Hon Andrew WAN Siu-kin Hon CHU Hoi-dick Dr Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, JP Hon LAM Cheuk-ting Hon Holden CHOW Ho-ding Hon Wilson OR Chong-shing, MH Hon Tanya CHAN - 2 - Hon CHEUNG Kwok-kwan, JP Hon LAU Kwok-fan, MH Hon Kenneth LAU Ip-keung, BBS, MH, JP Dr Hon CHENG Chung-tai Hon Jeremy TAM Man-ho Hon Vincent CHENG Wing-shun, MH, JP Hon CHAN Hoi-yan Members attending : Hon HO Kai-ming Hon KWONG Chun-yu Member absent : Hon HUI Chi-fung Public officers : Agenda item III attending Mr Vincent MAK Shing-cheung, JP Deputy Secretary (Works)2 Development Bureau Mr Thomas CHAN Tak-yeung Principal Assistant Secretary (Works)3 Development Bureau Mr CHAN Chung-kun Assistant Director/New Territories Water Supplies Department Mr CHEUNG Yip-kui Chief Engineer/Technical Support Water Supplies Department Agenda item IV Mr Michael WONG Wai-lun, JP Secretary for Development Mr José YAM Ho-san Commissioner for Heritage Development Bureau - 3 - Mr Robin LEE Hong-nin Chief Assistant Secretary (Works)2 Development Bureau Ms Susanna SIU Lai-kuen Executive Secretary (Antiquities and Monuments) Antiquities and Monuments Office Mr Edward TSE Cheong-wo Project Director 3 Architectural Services Department Ms Jackie LEE Ka-lai Senior Project Manager 330 Architectural Services Department Mrs Doris FOK LEE Sheung-ling Assistant Director (Leisure Services)1 Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr Ricky CHAN Wai-kit Senior Engineer/11 (E) Civil Engineering and Development Department Agenda item V Miss Cheryl CHOW Ho-kiu Principal Assistant Secretary (Planning and Lands)2 Development Bureau Mr Michael LEUNG Chung-lap, JP Project Manager (East) Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr Kelvin LEUNG Siu-kau Chief Engineer/East 2 Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr Stephen KWOK Chun-wai Senior Engineer/21(East) Civil Engineering and Development Department - 4 - Clerk in attendance : Ms Doris LO Chief Council Secretary (1)2 Staff in attendance : Miss Rita YUNG Senior Council Secretary (1)2 Mr Keith WONG Council Secretary (1)2 Ms Christina SHIU Legislative Assistant (1)2 Action I Information paper(s) issued since the last meeting (LC Paper No. CB(1)463/19-20(01) ― Administration's paper on shortlisted brownfield clusters for public housing development LC Paper No. CB(1)500/19-20(01) ― Administration's paper on progress report on funding scheme to support the use of vacant government sites by non-government organizations for the financial year 2019-20) Members noted that the above information papers had been issued since the meeting on 20 January 2020. II Items for discussion at the next meeting (LC Paper No. CB(1)514/19-20(01) ― List of outstanding items for discussion LC Paper No. CB(1)514/19-20(02) ― List of follow-up actions) 2. Members agreed that the next regular meeting would be scheduled for Tuesday, 26 May 2020, from 2:30 pm to 5:00 pm to discuss the following items proposed by the Administration: (a) Government's preparedness for increasing landslide risk due to climate change; - 5 - Action (b) Management of typhoon season flood risk; and (c) Standards for glass windows of buildings. III Proposed Member's Bill to amend the Waterworks Regulations (Cap. 102 sub. leg. A) (LC Paper No. CB(1)453/18-19(01) ― Letter dated 10 January 2019 from Hon Alice MAK on her proposed Member's Bill (Waterworks (Waterworks Regulations) (Amendment) Bill 2019) to amend the Waterworks Regulations (Cap. 102 sub. leg. A)) 3. At the invitation of the Chairman, Ms Alice MAK briefed members on the Waterworks (Waterworks Regulations) (Amendment) Bill 2019 ("the Bill") which she intended to introduce as a Member's Bill into the Legislative Council ("LegCo") to amend the Waterworks Regulations (Cap. 102 sub. leg. A) ("WWR") to prohibit a consumer from profiteering from the sale of water provided by the Water Authority from the waterworks. Details were set out in the LegCo Brief on the Bill which was appended to Ms MAK's letter dated 10 January 2019 (LC Paper No. CB(1)453/18-19(01)). Existing regulatory regime and enforcement against overcharging of water cost by sub-divided flat owners 4. Ms Alice MAK said that many tenants of sub-divided flats were overcharged by the flat owners for use of water. To address this problem, she proposed to amend the Waterworks Ordinance (Cap. 102) ("WWO") in 2018 to stipulate that any person who sells a supply to another person at a price exceeding the charges for water shall be guilty of an offence, but the Administration submitted that her proposed amendment to WWO was unnecessary as the existing Regulation 47 (Prohibition of sale of water) of WWR could serve the same purpose of prohibiting a consumer from making profits by selling or offering for sale water from the waterworks. In spite of the existing regulation, she noted with disappointment that no prosecution of relevant cases was instituted whilst the overcharging problem still prevailed. To make the relevant provision clearer in order to facilitate enforcement, she proposed to amend Regulation 47 of WWR to allow only the recovery of the - 6 - Action charges for water as stated in Regulation 46 of WWR. She called on members and the Administration to support her legislative proposal, and further urged the responsible government bureaux to expeditiously legislate for rent control and against overcharging of electricity tariffs as well, with a view to relieving the hardship of the tenants of sub-divided flats. 5. The Deputy Chairman, Mr Andrew WAN, Mr LAM Cheuk-ting, Mr LAU Kwok-fan, Dr Helena WONG and Mr LEUNG Che-cheung expressed similar concerns about the overcharging of water cost and electricity tariffs by sub-divided flat owners, and the lack of enforcement action under Regulation 47 of WWR by the Administration. The Deputy Chairman pointed out that pursuant to Regulation 47 of WWR, the recovery of the cost of water, including water charge and maintenance cost of the inside service, was allowed, hence leaving room for some sub-divided flat owners to maneuver the cost of water to be charged from their tenants. 6. Deputy Secretary (Works)2, Development Bureau ("DS(W)2/DEVB") indicated that the Administration was open to Ms Alice MAK's proposed amendment to Regulation 47 of WWR. The Administration considered that the proposed amendment would not cause much difficulty operationally, yet, it might be worth considering whether more detailed provisions should be included, such as restricting how the sub-divided flat owners should recover the water charges from the tenants. 7. On the existing enforcement actions, Assistant Director/New Territories, Water Supplies Department, said that the Water Supplies Department ("WSD") had adopted a proactive approach to address the issue of overcharging of water cost at sub-divided flats. Apart from liaising with organizations that might know such cases for referral and conducting investigation into referral cases, WSD also conducted inspections at buildings with sub-divided flats. However, as most tenants of sub-divided flats were unwilling to report such cases or provide evidence, WSD only received very few referral or reported cases and no prosecution on overcharging of water cost could be instituted after investigation so far. Nevertheless, WSD would continue with the above actions. 8. Mrs Regina IP suggested raising the penalty level (currently a fine at level 3, i.e. $10,000) for offences against Regulation 47 of WWR for greater deterrent effect. DS(W)2/DEVB responded that a holistic review of WWO and WWR was currently underway. The Administration would consider the need for revising the penalty level for relevant offences under WWO and WWR. - 7 - Action Installation of separate water meters for sub-divided flats 9. Mr LAU Kwok-fan, Dr Helena WONG and Mr CHAN Han-pan called on the Administration to facilitate the installation of separate water meters for individual sub-divided flats to avoid overcharging by the flat owners, and that the progressively increasing tariff structure of water charges could be applicable to individual sub-divided flats. 10. DS(W)2/DEVB indicated that the landlords or the tenants of premises (including sub-divided flats) were allowed to apply for installation of separate water meters. WSD would approve their applications provided that their premises could fulfill the requirements stipulated by WSD. In response to the difficulties frequently encountered by the tenants of sub-divided flats when applying for separate water meters, WSD had relaxed the existing relevant requirements for making such applications. Upon installation of a separate water meter for a sub-divided flat, the first 12 cubic metres of fresh water used by the tenant in each of the four-month billing cycle would be free of charge.
Recommended publications
  • HONG KONG STYLE URBAN CONSERVATION Dr. Lynne D. Distefano, Dr. Ho-Yin Lee Architectural Conservation Programme Department Of

    HONG KONG STYLE URBAN CONSERVATION Dr. Lynne D. Distefano, Dr. Ho-Yin Lee Architectural Conservation Programme Department Of

    Theme 1 Session 1 HONG KONG STYLE URBAN CONSERVATION Dr. Lynne D. DiStefano, Dr. Ho-Yin Lee Architectural Conservation Programme Department of Architecture The University of Hong Kong [email protected], [email protected] Katie Cummer The University of Hong Kong [email protected] Abstract. This paper examines the evolution of the field of conservation in the city of Hong Kong. In parti- cular, highlighting the ways in which conservation and urban development can be complementary forces instead of in opposition. The city of Hong Kong will be briefly introduced, along with the characteristics that define and influence its conservation, before moving on to the catalyst for Hong Kong’s conservation para- digm shift. The paper will proceed to highlight the various conservation initiatives embarked upon by the Hong Kong SAR’s Development Bureau, concluding with a discussion of the bureau’s accomplishments and challenges for the future. Introduction: Hong Kong Yet, Hong Kong is more than its harbour and more than a sea of high rises. Hong Kong’s main island, Usually, when people think of Hong Kong, the first what is properly called Hong Kong Island, is one of image that comes to mind is the “harbourscape” of some 200 islands and one of three distinct parts of the north shore of Hong Kong Island (Figure 1). This the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. is a landscape of high-rise buildings pressed together Hong Kong Island was leased to the British as a and protected at the back by lush hills, terminating in treaty port in 1841. From the beginning, the City of what is called “The Peak.
  • (Translation) Minutes of the 23 Meeting of the 4 Wan Chai District

    (Translation) Minutes of the 23 Meeting of the 4 Wan Chai District

    (Translation) Minutes of the 23rd Meeting of the 4th Wan Chai District Council Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Date: 7 July 2015 (Tuesday) Time: 2:30 p.m. Venue: District Council Conference Room, Wan Chai District Office, 21/F Southorn Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai, H.K. Present Chairperson Mr SUEN Kai-cheong, SBS, MH, JP Vice-Chairperson Mr Stephen NG, BBS, MH, JP Members Ms Pamela PECK Ms Yolanda NG, MH Ms Kenny LEE Ms Peggy LEE Mr Ivan WONG, MH Mr David WONG Mr CHENG Ki-kin Dr Anna TANG, BBS, MH Ms Jacqueline CHUNG Dr Jeffrey PONG 1 23 DCMIN Representatives of Core Government Departments Ms Angela LUK, JP District Officer (Wan Chai), Home Affairs Department Ms Renie LAI Assistant District Officer (Wan Chai), Home Affairs Department Ms Daphne CHAN Senior Liaison Officer (Community Affairs), Home Affairs Department Mr CHAN Chung-chi District Environmental Hygiene Superintendent (Wan Chai), Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Mr Nelson CHENG District Commander (Wan Chai), Hong Kong Police Force Ms Dorothy NIEH Police Community Relation Officer (Wan Chai District), Hong Kong Police Force Mr FUNG Ching-kwong Assistant District Social Welfare Officer (Eastern/Wan Chai)1, Social Welfare Department Mr Nelson CHAN Chief Transport Officer/Hong Kong, Transport Department Mr Franklin TSE Senior Engineer 5 (HK Island Div 2), Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr Simon LIU Chief Leisure Manager (Hong Kong East), Leisure and Cultural Services Department Ms Brenda YEUNG District Leisure Manager (Wan Chai), Leisure and
  • LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) for Discussion on 22 February

    LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) for Discussion on 22 February

    LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) For discussion on 22 February 2008 Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs Subcommittee on Heritage Conservation Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the latest position regarding the declaration of King Yin Lei (including the associated buildings and its garden) (the “Building”) as a proposed monument on 15 September 2007 (L.N. 175 of 2007 refers) and seek Members’ views on the preservation proposals. BACKGROUND 2. The declaration of the Building as a proposed monument was made by the Authority (i.e. Secretary for Development) on 15 September 2007 after consultation with the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB) under section 2A of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53). The purposes of the declaration are to give the Building temporary statutory protection from further damage (the Building faced an immediate threat as some works had been carried out at the site to remove the roof tiles, stone features and window frames of the Building), to allow a period of up to 12 months for the Authority to consider in a comprehensive manner whether it should be declared as a monument and to discuss with the owner feasible options for preservation of the Building. Unless it is withdrawn earlier, the proposed monument declaration will expire after 14 September 2008. ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE VALUE 3. Subsequent to the proposed monument declaration, the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) has engaged experts both locally and from the Mainland to assess the heritage value of the Building and the scale of damage to the Building, and to advise on possible restoration options.
  • (Batch VI – Former North Kowloon Magistracy) Guide to Application

    (Batch VI – Former North Kowloon Magistracy) Guide to Application

    Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme (Batch VI – Former North Kowloon Magistracy) Guide to Application Table of Contents Page I. Introduction 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Objectives of the Scheme 1 II. Application 2.1 Eligibility 2 2.2 Application Procedures 2 2.3 Deadline for Submission 4 2.4 Methods of Submission of Application 5 2.5 Open-day-cum-briefing 6 2.6 Notification of Results 6 2.7 Withdrawal 8 2.8 Assistance to Applicants During the Application Process 8 III. Assessment of Project Proposals 3.1 Advisory Committee on Built Heritage Conservation 9 3.2 Assessment Criteria 9 IV. Scope of Funding and Other Support 4.1 Funding Support to Special Purpose Companies 13 4.2 Other Support to Selected Applicants / Special Purpose 16 Companies V. Administrative and Financial Arrangements 5.1 Contractual Requirements 17 5.2 Payment Arrangements 17 5.3 Books of Accounts and Records 18 5.4 Project Bank Account and Interest 18 I Table of Contents Page 5.5 Title to Fixed Assets 19 5.6 Project Income and Residual Funds 19 5.7 Use of Information and Data 20 5.8 Procurement and Staff Employment 20 5.9 Insurance 22 5.10 Financial Guarantees, Undertakings and Indemnities 22 VI. Monitoring Mechanism 6.1 Renovation of Historic Buildings 24 6.2 Upkeep of Historic Buildings 26 6.3 Regular Progress Reports and Final Evaluation Report 26 6.4 Audited Financial Statements 27 6.5 Visits and Progress Review Meetings 28 6.6 Commencement of Social Enterprise Operation 28 6.7 Tenancy Agreement 28 6.8 Premature Termination of Project 29 VII.
  • Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong

    Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong

    LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) For discussion on 22 February 2008 Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs Subcommittee on Heritage Conservation Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the latest position regarding the declaration of King Yin Lei (including the associated buildings and its garden) (the “Building”) as a proposed monument on 15 September 2007 (L.N. 175 of 2007 refers) and seek Members’ views on the preservation proposals. BACKGROUND 2. The declaration of the Building as a proposed monument was made by the Authority (i.e. Secretary for Development) on 15 September 2007 after consultation with the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB) under section 2A of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53). The purposes of the declaration are to give the Building temporary statutory protection from further damage (the Building faced an immediate threat as some works had been carried out at the site to remove the roof tiles, stone features and window frames of the Building), to allow a period of up to 12 months for the Authority to consider in a comprehensive manner whether it should be declared as a monument and to discuss with the owner feasible options for preservation of the Building. Unless it is withdrawn earlier, the proposed monument declaration will expire after 14 September 2008. ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE VALUE 3. Subsequent to the proposed monument declaration, the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) has engaged experts both locally and from the Mainland to assess the heritage value of the Building and the scale of damage to the Building, and to advise on possible restoration options.
  • Pre-Arriv Al Guide

    Pre-Arriv Al Guide

    PRE-ARRIVAL GUIDE 2013–14 II SCAD HONG KONG PRE-ARRIVAL GUIDE CONTENTS HONG KONG AND SHAM SHUI PO LIVING IN HONG KONG Hong Kong 1 Hong Kong identity card 6 Sham Shui Po district 1 Residence halls 6 Electricity 6 ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE Water 7 Passports/visas 2 Renters insurance 7 Immigration requirements 2 Currency 7 Arrival 3 Currency exchange 7 Check-in at student residence 3 Banking 7 Departure 3 Weather 8 Clothing 8 ORIENTATION AND ENGLISH Books and art supplies 8 LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT Travel 8 Orientation 3 POLICIES ESL assessment 3 Making payments to SCAD Hong Kong 8 HEALTH AND SAFETY SCAD Card 9 Insurance 4 CONDUCT AND BEHAVIOR Health 4 Student handbook 9 Safety 4 Conduct 9 Emergencies 5 Alcohol 9 Lost passport 5 Drugs 9 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION Smoking 9 MTR 5 CONTACT INFORMATION 9 Buses, trams, taxis and ferries 5 Air 5 FACILITIES MAP 10 Octopus Card 5 COMMUNICATION Time 6 Telephones 6 Mobile phones 6 Computers/Internet 6 VoIP 6 SCAD HONG KONG PRE-ARRIVAL GUIDE III CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR ACCEPTANCE TO SCAD! HONG KONG AND SHAM SHUI PO Hong Kong: An international gateway to Asia, Hong Kong is a bustling global metropolis accessible by several major airlines A short plane ride from metropolitan centers of Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia, Hong Kong is also in close proximity to Japan, Korea and Australia Mainland China and the city of Guangzhou, the country’s third largest city, are a short train ride away Hong Kong is a one-hour trip by boat from the island of Macau, a former Portuguese colony with a unique blend of
  • For Discussion on 15 July 2011

    For Discussion on 15 July 2011

    CB(1)2690/10-11(03) For discussion on 15 July 2011 Legislative Council Panel on Development Progress Report on Heritage Conservation Initiatives and Revitalisation of the Old Tai Po Police Station, the Blue House Cluster and the Stone Houses under the Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme PURPOSE This paper updates Members on the progress made on the heritage conservation initiatives under Development Bureau’s purview since our last progress report in November 2010 (Legislative Council (LegCo) Paper No. CB(1)467/10-11(04)), and invites Members’ views on our future work. It also seeks Members’ support for the funding application for revitalising the Old Tai Po Police Station, the Blue House Cluster and the Stone Houses under the Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme (Revitalisation Scheme). PROGRESS MADE ON HERITAGE CONSERVATION INITIATIVES Public Domain Revitalisation Scheme Batch I 2. For the six projects under Batch I of the Revitalisation Scheme, the latest position is as follows – (a) Former North Kowloon Magistracy – The site has been revitalised and adaptively re-used as the Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD) Hong Kong Campus for the provision of non-local higher education courses in the fields of art and design. Commencing operation in September 2010, SCAD Hong Kong is the first completed project under the Revitalisation Scheme. For the Fall 2010 term, 141 students were enrolled, of which about 40% are local students. In April 2011, SCAD Hong Kong obtained accreditation from the Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications for five years for 14 programmes it offers at the Hong Kong campus.
  • Matters Arising and Progress Report

    Matters Arising and Progress Report

    For information BOARD PAPER on 22 March 2012 AAB/33/2011-12 MEMORANDUM FOR MEMBERS OF THE ANTIQUITIES ADVISORY BOARD PROGRESS REPORT PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the progress of major heritage issues and activities of the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) since November 2011. HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES Declaration of Monuments King’s College and School House of St. Stephen’s College 2. With the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB)’s support and the Chief Executive’s approval, the School House of St. Stephen’s College and the east, south and north wings of the school building together with parts of the retaining walls and boundary walls of King’s College were declared as monuments under the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (the Ordinance) (Cap. 53) by notice in the Gazette on 2 December 2011. The schools arranged publicity activities on 17 December 2011 to celebrate the declaration. Ho Tung Gardens 3. The AAB supported the declaration of Ho Tung Gardens as a monument at its meeting on 24 October 2011. A notice of the intended declaration was served on the owner of Ho Tung Gardens on 25 October 2011 under section 4(2) of the Ordinance. The owner submitted a petition to the Chief Executive under section 4(3) of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (the Ordinance) to object to the intended declaration of Ho Tung Gardens as a monument and request the Chief Executive to direct that the intended monument declaration shall not be made. The Chief Executive has subsequently directed under section 4(4) of the Ordinance that the objection be 2 referred to the Chief Executive in Council for consideration.
  • Application for Amendment of Plan Under Section 12A of the Town Planning Ordinance

    Application for Amendment of Plan Under Section 12A of the Town Planning Ordinance

    MPC Paper No. Y/H5/5B For Consideration by the Metro Planning Committee on 13.12.2019 APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT OF PLAN UNDER SECTION 12A OF THE TOWN PLANNING ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO. Y/H5/5 Applicant Yuba Company Limited represented by AECOM Asia Limited Site 1, 1A, 2 and 3 Hillside Terrace, 55 Ship Street (Nam Koo Terrace), 1- 5 Schooner Street, 53 Ship Street (Miu Kang Terrace) and adjoining Government Land, Wan Chai, Hong Kong Site Area About 2,427.9m2 (including about 300m2 government land) Lease Inland Lot (IL) 2140, IL 1940, IL 2272 & Ext. IL 1564, IL1669, IL 2093 R.P. and IL 2093 s.A R.P. - Standard non-offensive trades clause (IL 2140) - Virtually unrestricted except non-offensive trades clause (the remaining ILs) Plan Draft Wan Chai Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/H5/27 (at the time of submission of the application) Draft Wan Chai OZP No. S/H5/28 currently in force (the zoning of the site remains unchanged) Zonings “Open Space” (“O”) (84%), “Residential (Group C)” (“R(C)”) (14%) and “Government, Institution or Community” (“G/IC”) (2%) Proposed To rezone the application site from “O”, “R(C)” and “G/IC” to Amendment “Comprehensive Development Area” (“CDA”) 1. The Proposal 1.1 The applicant proposes to rezone the application site (the Site) (Plan Z-1) from “O”, “R(C)” and “G/IC” to “CDA” to facilitate a development which comprises residential and commercial uses and preservation of the Grade 1 historical building of Nam Koo Terrace (NKT). The applicant submitted a Proposed Indicative Scheme in the current application to demonstrate that the proposed land uses and development parameters are acceptable.
  • Evolution and Adaptive Re-Use

    Evolution and Adaptive Re-Use

    Full paper template for Retrofit 2012 Conference: Evolution and adaptive re-use: A study of a successful model, the conversion of the North Kowloon Magistracy into the Savannah College of Arts and Design Bob Dickensheet1 , Raymond Chan2 and Andrew Platten3 1Professor Historic Preservation, School of Building Arts, Savannah College of Art and Design, Savannah, Georgia, USA 2Researcher, Centre for Urban Built Environment, Hong Kong College of Technology, Hong Kong 3 Associate Dean, Faculty of Arts, Environment and Technology, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: This paper reports an innovative study of adaptive reuse of a heritage building as a socially sustainable education project. This study relates to the need for many universities throughout the world the need to expand the education platform to meet the growing need of evolving industries and careers. This has created a financial challenge for these institutions as well as presenting an opportunity to work with existing buildings that represent a significant element of the local historic and heritage architecture. In the urban environment, the expansion of Universities often comes at the cost of loosing older campus structures or the loss of neighbouring housing or commercial architecture. The adoption of adaptive reuse provides a vehicle for both the retention of contributing historic architecture, a continuation of community life as well as presenting a cost saving to the institution. The very concept of sustainability and the preservation of heritage infers that something is to be allowed to continue, such as a building. This study will identify successful planning methods and review the relevant technological solutions, which support the concept of successful reuse and sustainable design.
  • Board Minutes AAB/4/2007-08 ANTIQUITIES ADVISORY BOARD

    Board Minutes AAB/4/2007-08 ANTIQUITIES ADVISORY BOARD

    Board Minutes AAB/4/2007-08 ANTIQUITIES ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF THE OPEN SESSION OF THE 131 st MEETING HELD ON FRIDAY 20 NOVEMBER 2007 AT 2:35 P.M. IN CONFERENCE ROOM, HERITAGE DISCOVERY CENTRE KOWLOON PARK, HAIPHONG ROAD, TSIM SHA TSUI, KOWLOON Present: Mr Edward Ho, SBS, JP (Chairman) The Hon Bernard Charnwut Chan, GBS, JP Mrs Mariana Cheng Cho Chi-on, BBS, JP Mr David Cheung Ching-leu Mr Philip Kan Siu-lun Mr Kwong Hoi-ying Mr Billy Lam Chung-lun, SBS, JP Mr Andrew Lam Siu-lo Prof Lau Chi-pang Mr Laurence Li Lu-jen Prof Bernard Lim Wan-fung Dr Ng Cho-nam, BBS Mr Almon Poon Chin-hung, JP Dr Linda Tsui Yee-wan Ir Dr Greg Wong Chak-yan, JP Mr Bryan Wong Kim-yeung Mr Yeung Yiu-chung, BBS, JP Miss Vivian Yu Yuk-ying Ms Lisa Yip Sau-wah, JP Ms Heidi Kwok (Secretary) Senior Executive Officer (Antiquities and Monuments) Leisure and Cultural Services Department Absent with Apologies: Prof Leslie Chen Hung-chi Mr Raymond Cheung Man-to Ms Susanna Chiu Lai-kuen Mr Patrick Fung Pak-tung, SC Mr James Hong Shu-kin The Hon Patrick Lau Sau-shing, SBS, JP Mr Ng Yat-cheung, JP Prof Simon Shen Xu-hui Ms Miranda Szeto Siu-ching 2 In Attendance: Development Bureau Miss Janet Wong, JP Deputy Secretary (Works)1 Leisure and Cultural Services Department Mr Thomas Chow, JP Director of Leisure and Cultural Services Dr Louis Ng Assistant Director (Heritage and Museums) Ms Esa Leung Executive Secretary (Antiquities and Monuments) Ms Cissy Ho Curator (Historical Buildings and Structures) Mr Kevin Sun Curator (Archaeology) Mrs Ada Yau Curator (Education and Publicity) Mr Hessler Lee Principal Marketing Coordinator (Heritage and Museums) Miss Addy Wong Senior Marketing Coordinator (Heritage and Museums) Ms Yvonne Chan Executive Officer I (Antiquities and Monuments) Planning Department Mr Anthony Kwan Assistant Director/Metro Architectural Services Department Mr S L Lam Senior Property Services Manager/Eastern and Antiquities Opening Remarks The Chairman started the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
  • Batch III of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme Press Conference

    Batch III of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme Press Conference

    Batch III of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme Press Conference 7 October 2011 Background of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme z In the 2007-08 Policy Address, the Chief Executive announced a range of initiatives to enhance heritage conservation. z Launching of “Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme” to put Government-owned historic buildings to good adaptive re-use. z The Government has reserved $2 billion for the “Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme” (including revitalising the Former Police Married Quarters on Hollywood Road into “PMQ”). 2 2 1 Objectives of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme z To preserve and put historic buildings into good and innovative use. z To transform historic buildings into unique cultural landmarks. z To promote active public participation in the conservation of historic buildings. z To create job opportunities, in particular at the district level. 3 3 Set up of the Advisory Committee on Revitalisation of Historic Buildings z The Committee is chaired by Mr Bernard Chan with 9 non- official members from the fields of historical research, architecture, surveying, social enterprise, finance, etc. z To provide advice on the implementation of the Revitalisation Scheme and other revitalisation projects. z To help assess applications under the Scheme. z To monitor the subsequent operation of the selected projects. 4 4 2 Assessment Criteria of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme The Advisory Committee examines and assesses the applications in accordance with the following five assessment criteria: z Reflection of historical value and significance z Technical aspects z Social value and social enterprise operation z Financial viability z Management capability and other considerations 5 5 Review of Batch I of Revitalisation Scheme z Batch I of the Revitalisation Scheme was launched in February 2008.