Demolitions in the West Bank 2016

Copy Link

Palestine refugees displaced by demolitions 2016 Palestine refugees displaced and aected by demolitions west bank throughout the West Bank, including East Jerusalem Jenin Governorate by Israeli authorities in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem 19 refugees displaced united nations relief and works agency for palestine refugees in the near east www.unrwa.org Tubas Governorate refugees from a total of 1,628 Palestinians displaced by 38 refugees displaced 613 demolitions in 2016. 22 refugees aected 1 - 100 Tulkarm Governorate 329 refugee-owned structures demolished 23 refugees aected 101 - 200 Nablus Governorate (out of 1,094 structures in total) 1 refugees displaced 61 refugees aected 200 + This is the highest number of structures demolished and Palestinians Qalqiliya Governorate displaced since the UN began systematically recording statistics in 2009 80 refugees aected Jericho Governorate 82 refugees displaced Fourth Geneva of Palestinians displaced are refugees 148 refugees aected Convention 38% (refugees are individuals and their of refugee owned structures Article 53 (1950): descendants originally displaced as 50% demolished were residential a result of the rst Arab-Israeli war) Ramallah Governorate Any destruction by the Occupying 17 refugees displaced Power of real or personal property 23 refugees aected “belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to Why? Jerusalem Governorate other public authorities, or to social or 355 refugees displaced As a result of Israel’s restrictive planning and permit regime in Area C 684 refugees aected cooperative organizations, is prohibited, and East Jerusalem, many Palestinians build without permits, though of refugees displaced except where such destruction is mostly on private land, to meet their housing needs and risk having are minors rendered absolutely necessary by their structures demolished. Except in cases of immediate security 47% military operations. needs, an occupying power must act to safeguard the interests of the protected population. As the occupying power, Israel has obligations are female ” under international law to administer the Palestinian territory for the 49% benet of the protected Palestinian population, and strict conditions of refugees displaced apply to the destruction of private property, related exclusively to Bethlehem Governorate 81% occurred in Area C (495) military necessity or the security of the protected population. 21 refugees displaced and 14% in East Jerusalem (84)* 1,628 69 refugees aected 1600 total Palestinians displaced 1400 1,211 UNRWA response to demolitions 1200 Cash assistance provided to 136 displaced 1,094 1,103 1000 889 refugee families comprising 785 individuals 777 800 619 606 613 600 Palestine refugees 411 displaced 375 400 278 363 287 Hebron Governorate 80 refugees displaced 200 143 216 refugees aected 56 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total gures from OCHA. Refugee disaggregated gures from UNRWA * The term aected by demolitions refers to the demolitions of livelihood structures, uninhabited residential structures, water-related structures and other types of infrastructure This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed **Note: 75% of all displacements occured in Area C (1,225) & 17% in East Jerusalem (281). The remaining 8% of Palestinian displacements occured in Area A or Area B (122) herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains..

Recommended publications

Far'a Refugee Camp

west bank west unrwa profile: far’a camp tubas governorate Overview UNRWA in Far’a Camp Far’a camp is located in a rural area General Information UNRWA in Far’a Camp 17 km northeast of Nablus. The camp • Established: 1950 Main UNRWA installations: is geographically isolated, thus many • Size: 0.26 sq km • Three schools services can only be accessed in Jenin • Population before 1967 (OCHA): • One health centre and Nablus. Though Far’a camp’s 7,060 UNRWA employees working in isolation is in many ways detrimental • Estimated population (PCBS): 7,100 Far’a camp: 110 to the residents’ livelihoods, the lack • Registered persons (UNRWA): 8,500 • Education: 72 of nearby city centres makes the land • Estimated density: 32,692 per sq km • Health: 19 surrounding the camp affordable in • Places of origin: Areas north-east of • Relief and social services: 3 price, unlike most other camps located Haifa • Sanitation services:11 next to urban centres. This gives some • Administration: 5 Far’a camp refugees the opportunity to move outside the camp. As such, Education Far’a camp has fewer issues than other camps in relation to overcrowding. There are three schools in Far’a camp: two UNRWA girls’ schools that serve over 750 students and one UNRWA boys’ school that serves over 800 students. Facilities in the schools include libraries and computer and science laboratories. UNRWA psychosocial counsellors Unemployment is a major concern are present in the schools and remedial classes in Arabic and mathematics are offered on for the residents of Far’a camp. While Saturdays.
Impacts of Climate Change on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank

COMPOUNDING VULNERABILITY: IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PALESTINIANS IN GAZA AND THE WEST BANK MICHAEL MASON, MARK ZEITOUN, AND ZIAD MIMI Coping with (and adapting to) climatological hazards is commonly understood in intergovernmental and aid agency fora as a purely tech- nical matter. This article examines the UN Development Programme’s stakeholder consultations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip in order to challenge the donor-driven technical-managerial framing of Palestinian climate vulnerability by showing how Israeli occupa- tion practices exacerbate environmental stresses. While emphasizing the importance of social, economic, and political contexts in shap- ing populations’ responses to climate change in general, the authors demonstrate the multiple ways in which the occupation speci!cally compounds hazards reveals it as constitutive of Palestinian climate vulnerability. AT THE DECEMBER 2009 !fteenth conference of the parties (COP15) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen, 130 heads of state and government af!rmed their commit- ments to address climate change, including Palestinian Authority (PA) Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Israeli President Shimon Peres. Observ- ers hoping that shared climate risks would be an area for Palestinian- Israeli cooperation were disappointed. Both leaders acknowledged that signi!cant climate change was forecasted by the end of this century for the Eastern Mediterranean region: its impacts, Fayyad noted, included decreased precipitation, signi!cant warming, more frequent extreme weather events, and a rise in sea level.1 There was also a shared recogni- tion that the key hazards posed by these changes—greater water scarcity, falling agricultural productivity, an increased probability of "ash "oods, and saline intrusion into groundwater—will be accentuated by a growing population.
Occupied Palestinian Territory (Including East Jerusalem)

Reporting period: 29 March - 4 April 2016 Weekly Highlights For the first week in almost six months there have been no Palestinian nor Israeli fatalities recorded. 88 Palestinians, including 18 children, were injured by Israeli forces across the oPt. The majority of injuries (76 per cent) were recorded during demonstrations marking ‘Land Day’ on 30 March, including six injured next to the perimeter fence in the Gaza Strip, followed by search and arrest operations. The latter included raids in Azzun ‘Atma (Qalqiliya) and Ya’bad (Jenin) involving property damage and the confiscation of two vehicles, and a forced entry into a school in Ras Al Amud in East Jerusalem. On 30 occasions, Israeli forces opened fire in the Access Restricted Area (ARA) at land and sea in Gaza, injuring two Palestinians as far as 350 meters from the fence. Additionally, Israeli naval forces shelled a fishing boat west of Rafah city, destroying it completely. Israeli forces continued to ban the passage of Palestinian males between 15 and 25 years old through two checkpoints controlling access to the H2 area of Hebron city. This comes in addition to other severe restrictions on Palestinian access to this area in place since October 2015. During the reporting period, Israeli forces removed the restrictions imposed last week on Beit Fajjar village (Bethlehem), which prevented most residents from exiting and entering the village. This came following a Palestinian attack on Israeli soldiers near Salfit, during which the suspected perpetrators were killed. Israeli forces also opened the western entrance to Hebron city, which connects to road 35 and to the commercial checkpoint of Tarqumiya.
Al 'Auja Town Profile

Al 'Auja Town Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation 2012 Palestinian Localities Study Jericho Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, town committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Jericho Governorate Background This report is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, village, and town in the Jericho Governorate. These booklets came as a result of a comprehensive study of all localities in Jericho Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment;" the project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID). The project's objectives are to survey, analyze, and document the available natural, human, socioeconomic and environmental resources, and the existing limitations and needs assessment for the development of the rural and marginalized areas in the Jericho Governorate. In addition, the project aims at preparing strategic developmental programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current political, social, and economic instability with special emphasize on agriculture, environment and water.
Palestine Abdel Jabbar Abu Halawa, Suleiman Abu Mfarreh, Mitsuo Yoshida

Proc. Of the 4th International E-Conference on Advances in Engineering, Technology and Management - ICETM 2021 Copyright © Institute of Research Engineers and Doctors. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-63248-191-7 DOI: 10.15224/978-1-63248-191-7-16 Recycling Agricultural Organic Waste as Reducing Waste and Generating Income in Jericho City - Palestine Abdel Jabbar Abu Halawa, Suleiman Abu Mfarreh, Mitsuo Yoshida Abstract— Generation of agricultural organic solid waste (green plant waste and animal manure) is rising significantly in II. Materials and Method Palestine; due to demand on agriculture as a source of income, and the development of the agricultural sector as a national strategy. This paper explains about the experiences of two A. Description of the Study Area agricultural organic waste recycling plants belonging to the Jericho city, the oldest city in the world, is located in the private sector in recycling of agricultural organic solid waste in southern part of the Jordan Rift Valley which is extending Jericho city as a case study of recycling of agricultural waste from Africa in the south to Turkey in the North joining the for not only reducing waste amount but also creating new income source. The various aspects covered in this paper are crossroads of the east-west corridor and north-south the introduction, needs, methodology, results, and the corridor. recommendations on how to develop this sector, the various The city is located about 300 m below the see level. It is issues and obstacles to develop a sustainable agricultural 35 km east of Jerusalem and about 14 km northwest of the organic waste recycling focusing on the main two challenges: Dead Sea and 8 km west of the Jordan River and extends raising farmers awareness, and securing legal framework for over 37,481 dunums (roughly, 1 dunum = 1,000 m²).
West Bank Unrwa Profile: Ein El-Sultan Camp

unrwa west bank Photo by Dominiek Benoot proﬁle: ein el-sultan camp jericho governorate Overview UNRWA in Ein el-Sultan camp Ein el-Sultan camp is located in the Jordan General information UNRWA in Ein el-Sultan camp Valley and borders Jericho. Originally, • Established: 1948 Main UNRWA installations: 20,000 refugees lived in the camp; • Size: .87 sq km • One school however, most camp residents fled to • Population before 1967 (OCHA): 19,467 • One health centre Jordan during the 1967 hostilities, leaving • Estimated population (PCBS): 3,800 • One distribution centre • Registered persons (UNRWA): 2,500 UNRWA employees working in behind only 2,000 residents. After the • Ein el-Sultan camp : 61 Israeli withdrawal from Jericho following Estimated density: 4,022 per sq km • Places of origin: Villages in Ramleh, Lydd • Education: 43 the Oslo Accords in 1994, the population and the area of west Hebron • Health: 8 in the camp increased to more than 3,500 • Relief and Social Services: 3 people. • Sanitation services: 5 • Administration: 2 Nearly all of the original UNRWA shelters Education in the camp were damaged during the first intifada. Subsequent reconstruction Serving more than 1,000 students, the UNRWA Ein el-Sultan Coeducational School is one of the largest UNRWA schools in the West Bank. It is also one of the few UNRWA coeducational provided larger shelters, more public schools. In 2014, UNRWA reconstructed the oldest sections of the school, some of which spaces and wider streets. This makes Ein were constructed as early as 1952. This reconstructive work added new classrooms and air el-Sultan camp seem more spacious than conditioning and renovated the playground.
Operationalizing the Humanitarian-Development Nexus, Council Conclusions, 19 May 2017

1. INTRODUCTION 8 Strategic and Operational Expected Outcomes 10 2. WHY A NEXUS APPROACH FOR THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY? 14 Processes triggered by the WBPC 17 3. CONTEXT ANALYSIS FOR DESIGNING A NEXUS STRATEGY 24 3.1 The Matrix 24 3.2 The Analysis 27 3.2.1 Crisis Typology 27 3.2.2 Context Determinants 30 3.2.3 Comparative Advantage: “Italian System” 32 4. OPERATIONALIZATION OF THE NEXUS TO THE PALESTINIAN CONTEXT 38 Table of Contents 4.1 Territorial Approach: connect communities with territorial planning 39 4.2 Mainstreaming International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law and International Refugee Law provision in needs analysis 46 4.3 Strengthening resilience of Palestinian communities and governance mechanisms 56 5. CASE STUDIES RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED NEXUS APPROACH: Coherence and Complementarity 70 5.1. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs: DEVELOPMENT FUNDING 72 5.2. WeWorld-GVC Investment and UNICEF Funding: Humanitarian and LRRD Funds 77 5.3. EU DG NEAR Funding: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 82 Annex 1: Community Protection Approach - Operationalizing the Nexus 87 Annex 2: Context Analysis and Mapping Matrix 89 Abbreviations and Acronyms LRRD Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development MDLF Municipal Development Lending Fund Area C Team Area C Coordination Office MoLG Ministry of Local Government ACF Action Contre la Faim MoU Memorandum of Understanding AICS Italian Agency for Development and Cooperation Office MS Member States CBO Community-Based Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organization CPC Community
Chapter 5. Development Frameworks

Chapter 5 JERICHO Regional Development Study Development Frameworks CHAPTER 5. DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS 5.1 Socioeconomic Framework Socioeconomic frameworks for the Jericho regional development plan are first discussed in terms of population, employment, and then gross domestic product (GDP) in the region. 5.1.1 Population and Employment The population of the West Bank and Gaza totals 3.76 million in 2005, according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) estimation.1 Of this total, the West Bank has 2.37 million residents (see the table below). Population growth of the West Bank and Gaza between 1997 and 2005 was 3.3%, while that of the West Bank was slightly lower. In the Jordan Rift Valley area, including refugee camps, there are 88,912 residents; 42,268 in the Jericho governorate and 46,644 in the Tubas district2. Population growth in the Jordan Rift Valley area is 3.7%, which is higher than that of the West Bank and Gaza. Table 5.1.1 Population Trends (1997-2005) (Unit: number) Locality 1997 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 CAGR West Bank and Gaza 2,895,683 3,275,389 3,394,046 3,514,868 3,637,529 3,762,005 3.3% West Bank 1,873,476 2,087,259 2,157,674 2,228,759 2,300,293 2,372,216 3.0% Jericho governorate 31,412 37,066 38,968 40,894 40,909 42,268 3.8% Tubas District 35,176 41,067 43,110 45,187 45,168 46,644 3.6% Study Area 66,588 78,133 82,078 86,081 86,077 88,912 3.7% Study Area (Excl.
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

U N I T E D N A T I O N S N A T I O N S U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians - Weekly Briefing Notes 23 February – 1 March 2005 INSIDE: Physical Protection – Deaths, and Injuries ▪ Shelter and Property – People displaced/ House demolitions/Demolition orders ▪ Natural Resources - Land levelling/Requisitions/Tree Uprooting ▪ Facilitation of Humanitarian Assistance - Incidents involving safety and movement of ambulances, medical teams, humanitarian organisations ▪ Access and Movement for Civilians - Curfews, Access to Education, Access to Employment, Closures/Movement Restrictions ▪ Additional Protection Issues 1. Physical Protection Deaths and Injuries Palestinians: Deaths: 3 (includes the suicide bomber in Tel Aviv) Injured: 14 (approximate) Israelis: Deaths: 5 (due to suicide attack in Tel Aviv on 25 February) Injured: 53 (approximate, of which 50 were injured from the suicide attack in Tel Aviv) Internationals: Deaths: 0 Injured: 0 Selected incidents: • 25 February: A suicide bombing in Tel Aviv killed 5 Israelis and injured 50. • 25 February: One Palestinian was killed and another two were detained next to Sufa crossing (Gaza) when they were spotted approaching the border fence by IDF troops. • 28 February: Two Israeli settlements’ security guards were injured in the settlement of Menora near Saffa village, Ramallah, when Palestinian militants fired at their security vehicle patrolling in the settlement • 1 March: One Palestinian was moderately injured after he reportedly was beaten up by settlers from Male Shameron in Qalqiliya Governorate.
Summary of Consultation on Effects of the COVID-19 on Women in Palestine

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics A Summary of Statistical Indicators on Women in Palestine during the Covid19 Crises Most Vulnerable Women Segments Around 10,745 women Health care health system workers and a total of 31,873 workers men and women 900 women working in workers in Palestine Women working in Israel Israel and settlements and settelements mostly in agriculture 175891 total females with chronic Women with Chronic disease 69,112 women suffer from at least one Chronic Disease (60+) Disease The percentage of poverty Female Childen with disease 9,596 female among households headed children with chronic by women in 2017 was 19% in the WB and 54% in Poor women Gaza Strip Elderly women In 2020 there are 140 287 60+ women 92,584 women heading households (61241 WB, Women Heading households 31343 Gaza Strip – 41,017 of highest in Jericho women have Women with disabilities at least one type of disability 1 Social Characteristics 1. The elderly (the most vulnerable group) • The number of elderly people (60+ years) in the middle of 2020 is around 269,346, (5.3% women, 140,287, and 129,059 men) • The percentage of elderly in Palestine was 5.0% of the total population in 2017 (5.4% for the elderly females, 4.6% for the elderly males), and in the West Bank it is higher than in the Gaza Strip (5.4 % In the West Bank and 4.3% in the Gaza Strip). • At the governorate level, the highest percentage of elderly people was in the governorates of Tulkarm, Ramallah, Al-Bireh, Bethlehem, and Jerusalem (6.5%, 6.0%, 6.0%, and 5.9%, respectively).
Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 26 April – 2 May 2006

U N I TOCHA E D Weekly N A Briefing T I O NotesN S 26 April – 2 May 2006 N A T I O N S| 1 U N I E S OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS P.O. Box 38712, East Jerusalem, Phone: (+972) 2-582 9962 / 582 5853, Fax: (+972) 2-582 5841 [email protected], www.ochaopt.org Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes 26 April – 2 May 2006 Of note this period • Comprehensive external closure continued for the seventh consecutive week (since 11 March) with no movement of Palestinian workers and traders in Israel. The IDF announced on 1 May that the closure would also include national staff of international organisations. • Internal movement within the West Bank and into the Jordan Valley remained very restricted. Restrictions for Palestinians from the northern West Bank to move south of Nablus governorate continue to remain in place. Movement through Tayasir and Hamra checkpoints (Tubas) remain restricted. Humanitarian organisations and ambulances are facing major access problems at ‘Asira ash Shamaliya checkpoint in Nablus. 1. Physical Protection 30 20 10 0 Children Women Injuries Deaths Deaths Deaths Palestinians 25 2 - 1 Israelis 1--- Internationals ---- • During the week the IDF fired more than 90 artillery tank shells, particularly into the northern areas and east of Gaza City (Gaza Strip) resulting in Palestinian injuries. The IAF also conducted one air strike (targeted killing) in the Gaza Strip killing one Palestinian man and injuring another. • At least 23 home made (Qassam) rockets were fired by Palestinian militants from the Gaza Strip toward targets inside Israel.
Tubas City Profile

Tubas City profile Produced by The Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem In cooperation with Funded by February, 2006 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Community. The views expressed herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of the European Community Socio-Economic Surveillance System Tubas Governorate Table of Content LOCATION AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS 2 HISTORY 3 DEMOGRAPHY 3 RELIGIOS AND ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES 5 ECONOMY 5 EDUCATION 7 HEALTH 8 INFRASTRUCTURE 9 AGRICULTURE 10 IMPACT OF OCCUPATION PRACTICES 10 PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 11 REFERENCES 11 1 Socio-Economic Surveillance System Tubas Governorate Tubas city profile Location and Physical characteristics TUBAS is a Palestinian city which is located in the north eastern part of the West Bank. The city is located to the west of the Governorate of Tubas. It is bordered by Tayasir and Alaqaba villages to the east, Aqqaba to the north, Aljadedah and Sereas villages (Jenin Governorate) to the west and Tamun and Alfarha to the south. Map 1: Tubas city location and borders The total area of Tubas city is 295,123 dunums, which represents approximately 55.6 % of the Tubas Governorate's land area. 3000 dunums are classified as 'built up' areas, whilst 150,000 dunums are agricultural, and 180,000 further dunums have been confiscated by Israeli occupation. Tubas city is the administrative center of the Governorate of Tubas and also the largest locality. Whereas most of the governorate is in the Jordan valley, Tubas itself is located in the hills of the West Bank at the moderate elevation of 362 m above sea level.