DOCSLIB.ORG

Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs July 15, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30981 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Summary With five successive elected civilian governments, the Central American nation of Panama has made notable political and economic progress since the 1989 U.S. military intervention that ousted the regime of General Manuel Noriega from power. The current President, Ricardo Martinelli of the centrist Democratic Change (CD) party was elected in May 2009, defeating the ruling Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) in a landslide. Martinelli was inaugurated to a five- year term on July 1, 2009. His Alliance for Change coalition also captured a majority of seats in Panama’s National Assembly that will increase the chances that the new President will be able to secure enough votes to enact his legislative agenda. One of the most significant challenges facing the Martinelli government is dealing with the economic fallout stemming from the global economic recession. Panama’s service-based economy had been booming in recent years, largely because of the Panama Canal expansion project, but the global financial crisis and the related decline in U.S. import demand stemming from the U.S. recession has begun to slow Panama’s economic growth. During the presidential campaign, Martinelli pledged to simplify the tax system by the introduction of a flat tax in order to discourage tax evasion. He also has called for a number of large public infrastructure projects, including a subway system for Panama City, a light rail system on the outskirts of Panama City, regional airports and roads, and a third bridge over the Canal. These and other expenditures could prove difficult as the country continues to feel the impact of the global economic recession. The United States has close relations with Panama, stemming in large part from the extensive linkages developed when the canal was under U.S. control and Panama hosted major U.S. military installations. The current relationship is characterized by extensive counternarcotics cooperation, assistance to help Panama assure the security of the Canal, and a proposed bilateral free trade agreement (FTA). U.S. bilateral assistance amounted to $3.7 million in FY2008, an estimated $6.5 million in FY2009, and a FY2010 request of $9.6 million. This does not include additional assistance that Panama will receive under the Mérida Initiative assisting Mexico and Central American countries in their efforts to combat drug trafficking, gangs, and organized crime. On March 13, 2009, Panama and the United States signed a letter of agreement for $2 million in FY2008 funding under the initiative. Panama will likely receive additional assistance under the initiative, including almost $9 million in FY2009 assistance. In June 2007, the United States and Panama signed a proposed bilateral FTA, which includes enforceable labor and environmental provisions that had been agreed upon in a bipartisan deal between U.S. congressional leaders and the Bush Administration in May 2007. Panama’s National Assembly overwhelmingly approved the agreement in July 2007. The U.S. Congress had been likely to consider implementing legislation in the fall of 2007, but the September 1, 2007 election of Pedro Miguel González to head Panama’s legislature for one year delayed consideration. González is wanted in the United States for his alleged role in the murder of a U.S. serviceman in Panama in 1992. His term expired September 1, 2008, and González did not stand for re-election. As a result, the 111th Congress may turn to consideration of implementing legislation for the FTA. Final issues being worked out relate to worker rights and to Panama’s bank secrecy laws. For more, see CRS Report RL32540, The Proposed U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement, by J. F. Hornbeck; and CRS Report R40622, Agriculture in Pending U.S. Free Trade Agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea, by Remy Jurenas. Congressional Research Service Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Contents Most Recent Developments.........................................................................................................1 Political and Economic Conditions..............................................................................................2 From the Endara to the Torrijos Administration .....................................................................3 Endara Government (1989-1994) ....................................................................................3 Pérez Balladares Government (1994-1999) .....................................................................3 Moscoso Government (1999-2004) .................................................................................4 Torrijos Government (2004-2009)...................................................................................5 Martinelli Government (2009-2014)......................................................................................7 May 2009 Elections ........................................................................................................7 Challenges for the Martinelli Government.......................................................................7 Human Rights.......................................................................................................................8 U.S. Relations........................................................................................................................... 11 Background on the 1989 U.S. Military Intervention............................................................. 11 Status of Manuel Noriega.............................................................................................. 11 Overview of Current U.S.-Panamanian Relations ................................................................12 Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering ............................................................................14 Tax Haven Status ................................................................................................................16 U.S. Trade Relations and a Potential Free Trade Agreement.................................................17 Operation and Security of the Panama Canal.......................................................................19 Historical Background and the Panama Canal Treaties ..................................................19 Canal Transition and Current Status ..............................................................................20 Canal Expansion Project ...............................................................................................21 Contamination of Firing Ranges and San Jose Island...........................................................22 Figures Figure 1. Map of Panama ..........................................................................................................24 Contacts Author Contact Information ......................................................................................................25 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................25 Congressional Research Service Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Most Recent Developments On July 1, 2009, Ricardo Martinelli was inaugurated President. On May 3, 2009, Panama held presidential and legislative elections. In the presidential race, Ricardo Martinelli of the centrist Democratic Change (CD) party won in a landslide with 60% of the vote, defeating Balbina Herrera of the ruling the ruling Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD). Martinelli’s Alliance for Change coalition also captured a majority of seats in Panama’s National Assembly that will increase the chances that the new President will be able to secure enough votes to enact his legislative agenda. On January 27, 2009, presidential candidate Ricardo Martinelli of the Democratic Change party struck a deal with the candidate of the Panameñista Party, Juan Carlos Varela, to become his running mate in an electoral coalition dubbed the Alliance for Change. On September 17, 2008, President Bush met with President Torrijos at the White House, where talks included the status of the bilateral free trade agreement. On September 7, 2008, former housing minister Balbina Herrera of the ruling Democratic Revolutionary Party won her party’s presidential primary for the May 6, 2009, presidential election. In the primary, Balbina narrowly defeated Juan Carlos Navarro, the mayor of Panama City. On September 1, 2008, Pedro Miguel González, wanted in the United States for his alleged role in the murder of a U.S. serviceman in Panama in 1992, ended his one-year term as president of Panama’s National Assembly, and a new Assembly president was elected. In August 2008, President Torrijos approved five decree laws reorganizing Panama’s law enforcement and security services. This included the creation of a National Border Service and a National Intelligence and Security Service. On July 6, 2008, businessman Juan Carlos Varela easily won the presidential primary election as a candidate for the opposition Panameñista Party. On May 19, 2008, lawyers for former Panamanian leader Manuel Noriega asked a U.S. appeals court to block his extradition to France on drug-money laundering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations
    Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs November 27, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30981 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Summary With five successive elected civilian governments, the Central American nation of Panama has made notable political and economic progress since the 1989 U.S. military intervention that ousted the regime of General Manuel Antonio Noriega from power. Current President Ricardo Martinelli of the center-right Democratic Change (CD) party was elected in May 2009, defeating the ruling center-left Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) in a landslide. Martinelli was inaugurated to a five-year term on July 1, 2009. Martinelli’s Alliance for Change coalition with the Panameñista Party (PP) also captured a majority of seats in Panama’s National Assembly. Panama’s service-based economy has been booming in recent years – with a growth rate of 7.6% in 2010 and 10.6% in 2011 – largely because of the ongoing Panama Canal expansion project, now slated for completion in early 2015. The CD’s coalition with the PP fell apart at the end of August 2011when President Martinelli sacked PP leader Juan Carlos Varela as Foreign Minister. Varela, however, retains his position as Vice President. Tensions between the CD and the PP had been growing throughout 2011, largely related to which party would head the coalition’s ticket for the 2014 presidential election. Despite the breakup of the coalition, the strength of the CD has grown significantly since 2009 because of defections from the PP and the PRD and it now has a majority on its own in the legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Panama This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Panama. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 sabine.donner@bertelsmann-stiftung.de Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 hauke.hartmann@bertelsmann-stiftung.de Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 robert.schwarz@bertelsmann-stiftung.de Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 sabine.steinkamp@bertelsmann-stiftung.de BTI 2018 | Panama 3 Key Indicators Population M 4.0 HDI 0.788 GDP p.c., PPP $ 23015 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.6 HDI rank of 188 60 Gini Index 51.0 Life expectancy years 77.8 UN Education Index 0.708 Poverty3 % 7.0 Urban population % 66.9 Gender inequality2 0.457 Aid per capita $ 2.2 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary The election and the beginning of the mandate of Juan Carlos Varela in July 2014 meant a return to political normality for the country, which had experienced a previous government under President Martinelli (2009-2014) characterized by a high perception of corruption and authoritarian tendencies in governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Crecimiento Económico Sin Equidad Agudiza Contradicciones Sociales
    Análisis de coyuntura – marzo de 2008. Panamá: Crecimiento económico sin equidad agudiza contradicciones sociales Los ajustes económicos y la represión selectiva han hecho sentir sus efectos en Panamá a principios de 2008 recrudeciendo los movimientos reivindicativos en los sectores laborales así como en las comunidades cuyo medios de vida son amenazados por las políticas gubernamentales. Los trabajadores de la construcción así como los empleados públicos del sector social (educación y salud) y las comunidades afectadas por proyectos ajenos a plan de desarrollo alguno, como los mineros, las hidroeléctricas y turísticos han redoblado sus protestas contra el neoliberalismo. El gobierno y los inversionistas, sin embargo, se felicitan por la tasa de crecimiento anual del producto interno bruto que promedia el 10 por ciento. Este incremento, que el mismo gobierno no puede explicar, se suma al “boom” de la construcción y a las expectativas creadas por la ampliación del Canal de Panamá. El país, por su lado, sigue con el 40 por ciento de las familias por debajo de la línea de pobreza, el 46 por ciento de los trabajadores en el sector informal y con los indicadores de inequidad aumentando. Para coronar la situación, el gobierno se encuentra agobiado por acusaciones de corrupción que afectan todos los niveles públicos y privados. La Autoridad del Canal de Panamá (ACP) anunció que tanto en 2007 como 2008 los tránsitos disminuirán significativamente. La tendencia es consecuencia de la crisis económica de EEUU que disminuyó las importaciones del exterior. La desaceleración del movimiento marítimo afectará los ingresos por peajes del Canal. Elecciones de 2009 Las contradicciones se agudizan faltando poco más de un año (mayo de 2009) para celebrarse las elecciones generales.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Careers, Corruption, and Impunity
    Political careers, corruPtion, and imPunity Panama’s assembly, 1984 – 2009 carlos Guevara mann University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana © 2011 University of Notre Dame Introduction The scene could have hardly been more illustrative of this book’s topic. On January 16, 2002, before a crowd of cameramen and reporters, Pana - manian legislator Carlos Afú, then of Partido Revolucionario Demo - crático (PRD),1 extracted a stack of paper money from his jacket. Those six thousand dollars, he said, were the first installment of a payment for his vote in favor of a multimillion-dollar contract between the govern- ment of Panama and a private consortium, Centro Multimodal Indus- trial y de Servicios (CEMIS).2 Legislator Afú claimed to have received the money from fellow party and assembly member Mateo Castillero, chair- man of the chamber’s Budget Committee. Disbursement of the bribe’s balance—US$14,000—was still pending. That was the only kickback he had received, claimed Afú, alluding to the accusation of another fel- low party and assembly member, Balbina Herrera,3 that Afú had received “suitcases filled with money” to approve the appointment of two gov- ernment nominees to the Supreme Court. Afú’s declarations sent shock waves throughout the country and seemed to confirm the perception of Panama’s political system as one in which corruption, impunity, and clientelism prevail. As political figures exchanged accusations and added more sleaze to the story, commenta- tors, media, and civil society organizations called for a sweeping inves- tigation of the “Afúdollars” case. But the tentacles of the CEMIS affair 1 © 2011 University of Notre Dame 2 | Political Careers, Corruption, and Impunity were spread too broadly throughout Panama’s political establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Noreiga's Abduction from Panama: Is Military Invasion an Appropriate Substitute for International Extradition
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 13 Number 4 Article 6 6-1-1991 Noreiga's Abduction from Panama: Is Military Invasion an Appropriate Substitute for International Extradition Frances Y. F. Ma Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Frances Y. F. Ma, Noreiga's Abduction from Panama: Is Military Invasion an Appropriate Substitute for International Extradition, 13 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 925 (1991). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol13/iss4/6 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@lmu.edu. Noriega's Abduction from Panama: Is Military Invasion an Appropriate Substitute for International Extradition? I. INTRODUCTION The United States indicted General Manuel Antonio Noriega, Commander-in-Chief of the Panama Defense Forces ("PDF") and de facto leader of Panama, on February 4, 1988.' The twelve-count in- dictment accused Noriega of accepting a $4.6 million bribe from the Medellin cartel to protect shipments of cocaine, launder money, sup- ply drug labs, and shield drug traffickers from the law. It also ac- cused Noriega of allowing smugglers to use Panama as a way station for United States-bound cocaine, using his official position to provide protection for international drug traffickers, and arranging for the 2 shipment of cocaine-processing chemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S
    Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs January 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30981 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Summary With five successive elected civilian governments, the Central American nation of Panama has made notable political and economic progress since the 1989 U.S. military intervention that ousted the regime of General Manuel Noriega from power. The current President, Ricardo Martinelli of the center-right Democratic Change (CD) party was elected in May 2009, defeating the ruling center-left Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD) in a landslide. Martinelli was inaugurated to a five-year term on July 1, 2009. Martinelli’s s Alliance for Change coalition also captured a majority of seats in Panama’s National Assembly that will increase the chances that the President will be able to secure enough votes to enact his legislative agenda. A significant challenges facing the Martinelli government has been dealing with the economic fallout stemming from the global economic recession, but while the growth of Panama’s service- based economy has slowed, it has avoided the economic contraction experienced by many Latin American economies. The Panama Canal expansion project has played a large role in stimulating economic growth. During the presidential campaign, Martinelli pledged to simplify the tax system by the introduction of a flat tax in order to discourage tax evasion. He also has called for a number of large public infrastructure projects, but these and other expenditures could prove difficult as the country continues to feel the impact of the global economic recession.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S
    Order Code RL30981 Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Updated October 14, 2008 Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Panama: Political and Economic Conditions and U.S. Relations Summary With four successive elected civilian governments, the Central American nation of Panama has made notable political and economic progress since the 1989 U.S. military intervention that ousted the regime of General Manuel Noriega from power. The current President, Martín Torrijos of the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD), was elected in May 2004 and inaugurated to a five-year term in September 2004. Torrijos, the son of former populist leader General Omar Torrijos, won a decisive electoral victory with almost 48% of the vote in a four-man race. Torrijos’ electoral alliance also won a majority of seats in the unicameral Legislative Assembly. The most significant challenges facing the Torrijos government have included dealing with the funding deficits of the country’s social security fund; developing plans for the expansion of the Panama Canal; and combating unemployment, poverty, and crime. In 2006, the government unveiled its ambitious plans to build a third lane and new set of locks that will double the Canal’s capacity, and the project began in September 2007. Panama’s service-based economy has been booming in recent years, but income distribution remains highly skewed, with large disparities between the rich and poor. The United States has close relations with Panama, stemming in large part from the extensive linkages developed when the canal was under U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama Has Voted: After Torrijos Comes Martinelli
    PANAMA HAS VOTED: AFTER TORRIJOS COMES MARTI- NELLI Karl-Dieter Hoffmann On May 3 of this year, the Panamanians elected their next president, their next parliament, the members of the corregimientos – the lowest tier in the country’s administrative hierarchy – and Panama’s representatives in the Central American Parliament. At nearly 60 percent of the vote, the out- standing winner of the presidential election was Ricardo Martinelli of the Cambio Democrático (CD). By contrast, the candidate of the still-ruling Par- tido Revolucionario Democrático (PRD), Balbina Herrera, received no more than 37.7 percent, and the third contestant, ex-president Guillermo Endara, was unable to convince more than 2.3 percent of the electorate. Five years earlier, Mr Martinelli entered the contest at the head of the CD which he had founded but was unable to sway more than 5.3 percent of the voters. However, the entrepreneur who, unlike his predecessors Mireya Moscoso (1999–2004) and Martín Torrijos (2004–2009) does not belong to one of the legendary political families, had better luck this time around. This may appear surprising in view of the fact that his predecessor, Mr Torrijos, was quite successful especially in economic matters, and that the house he will be handing over is well-ordered. Moreover, Mr Torrijos’ defeat is shared by the PRD which suffered great losses in the parliamentary elections and even had to stomach the loss of the mayoralty of the capital. The March elections were fought by eight organizations, three of which had only been established a short while before. Although the latter has been weakened lately by internal quarrels, the PRD and the Partido Panameñista (PP) may be regarded as stable elements in Panama’s volatile party struc- ture.
    [Show full text]
  • Upstart Upsets Traditional Parties in Panama, but Ricardo Martinelli Is Not Much of an Alternative LADB Staff
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository NotiCen Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 1-29-2009 Upstart Upsets Traditional Parties In Panama, But Ricardo Martinelli Is Not Much Of An Alternative LADB Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen Recommended Citation LADB Staff. "Upstart Upsets Traditional Parties In Panama, But Ricardo Martinelli Is Not Much Of An Alternative." (2009). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/noticen/9673 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in NotiCen by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact amywinter@unm.edu. LADB Article Id: 050933 ISSN: 1089-1560 Upstart Upsets Traditional Parties In Panama, But Ricardo Martinelli Is Not Much Of An Alternative by LADB Staff Category/Department: Panama Published: Thursday, January 29, 2009 With presidential elections four months away, dark-horse candidate Ricardo Martinelli of the Cambio Democratico (CD) party is extending an impressive lead over Balbina Herrera of the mainstream Partido Revolucionario Democratico (PRD). Were Martinelli to win, he would deliver a blow to the traditional parties, which have never lost, and to the power elites whose stranglehold on electoral law has kept the presidency within their comfort zone. But whether businessman Martinelli represents any real change beyond that is a question that those on the outside looking in have answered with a resounding "no!" He is not an outsider, having served in the administrations of former Presidents Ernesto Perez Balladares (1994-1999) and Mireya Moscoso (1999-2004).
    [Show full text]
  • RCP 29-2 PDF.Indb
    revista DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA / VOLUMEN 29 / Nº 2 / 2009 / 533 – 564 PANAMÁ : P A R AÍSO IM P E R FE C TO Panama: Imperfect Paradise CLARA INÉS LUNA Centro de Iniciativas Democráticas de Panamá (CIDEM) SALVADOR SÁNCHEZ Centro de Iniciativas Democráticas de Panamá (CIDEM) RESUMEN El 2008 estuvo marcado por la continuación de un proceso electoral interno en los partidos políticos, que se prolongó largamente y que se libró sin cuartel, presagiando el tono de los comicios generales de mayo de 2009. También ha sido un año especial por la inusual inflación que movilizó a importantes sectores para exigir mejoras salariales, más subsidios e, incluso, control de precios. No obstante, el país siguió creciendo a tasas muy por encima del promedio latinoamericano y registró una importante caída en la pobreza y la indigencia. Desde afuera Panamá puede parecer un paraíso, pero su evidente imperfección corre el riesgo de profundizarse. Palabras clave: Panamá, democracia, crecimiento económico, elecciones, gobernabilidad. ABSTRACT 2008 was marked by the continuation of an internal election process within political parties, which lasted long and was fought without quarter, presaging the tone of the general elections of May 2009. It has also been a special year because an unusual inflation that mobilized union members, medical associations, carriers, educators and retirees, demanding better incomes, more benefits and even price controls, to the central government. However, the country continued to grow at rates well above the average for Latin America and recorded a significant decline in poverty and indigence. Panama from the outside may seem like a paradise, but its obvious imperfection risk further.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans in Panama
    AMERICANS IN PANAMA: A CENTURY OF OCCUPATION AND INVASION A Thesis by DAVID VILLAR Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Elizabeth Cobbs Committee Members, Joseph G. Dawson III Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon Jason C. Parker Head of Department, David Vaught August 2017 Major Subject: History Copyright 2017 David Villar ABSTRACT Most scholarly works on Operation Just Cause, the code name for the 1989 invasion of Panama by the United States, have focused on the capture of General Manuel Noriega. This focus ignores the complexity of U.S.-Panamanian relations and the long history of American citizens in Panama, however, and reinforces a puppet narrative. This thesis argues instead that the primary motive for Operation Just Cause was to protect the 35,500 American citizens at risk in Panama. By discounting this population, previous works offer limited insights into the invasion. Fully accounting for this large and vulnerable population makes clear that the use of military force represented a prudent response to a very real threat. The removal of Noriega was merely the means to an end: the protection of American citizens. Political, diplomatic, and economic pressure did not convince Noriega, who was never a “puppet,” to step down. In fact, they worsened the situation for Americans and compelled the Bush Administration to use the only remaining option: military force. ii DEDICATION "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." - Douglas Adams iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor, Elizabeth Cobbs.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Panama, De Conniff Y Bigler: Una Lectura De Nuestra Evolución Política Reciente
    Invest. Pens. Crit. (ISSN 1812-3864; eISSN 2644-4119) DOI: https://doi.org/10.37387/ipc.v8i3.175 Vol. 8, No. 3, Septiembre – Diciembre 2020 pp. 108 - 118 ______________________________________________________________________________ Modern Panama, de Conniff y Bigler: Una lectura de nuestra evolución política reciente. Carlos Guevara Mann1,*, Joaquín Denis2 1Profesor de Ciencias Políticas y Director de la Maestría en Relaciones Internacionales de Florida State University, Panamá. 2Estudiante, Florida State University, Panamá (2018-2020); University of Massachusetts (2020-). *Autor para Correspondencia. E-mail: cguevara@fsu.edu Recibido: 16 de mayo de 2020 Aceptado: 25 de junio de 2020 ____________________________________________________ Cambridge University Press, una de las editoriales universitarias más prestigiosas, publicó en 2019 Modern Panama: From Occupation to Crossroads of the Americas, cuyos autores son el conocido historiador Michael L. Conniff y el diplomático Gene E. Bigler, ambos estadounidenses. La versión en español, Panamá moderno: De territorio ocupado a centro de las Américas fue publicada simultáneamente por la Fundación Ciudad del Saber y Novo Art. Esta reseña se basa en el texto original (en inglés), al cual corresponden las referencias y los números de página indicados a continuación. Un pasado de tensiones Modern Panama cubre nuestra historia reciente a partir de 1980. El primer capítulo, sin embargo, se remonta a los orígenes de Panamá como Estado nominalmente independiente, tras su separación de Colombia en 1903. Este capítulo enfatiza las tensiones entre Panamá y Estados Unidos a lo largo del siglo XX, que culminaron en los acontecimientos del 9 de enero de 1964. En esa ocasión, tres días de protesta nacionalista dejaron un trágico saldo de 25 muertos (incluidos cuatro soldados estadounidenses).
    [Show full text]