DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Cockburn Natural Area Management Strategy 2012-20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Cockburn Natural Area Management Strategy 2012-20 Document Information Document Title: Natural Area Management Strategy 2012 - 2022 Prepared by: Chris Beaton, City of Cockburn Doc. Status: Draft Version: 4.1 Document Control Version Description: Date: Authorised By: History: 1.0 First Draft 06/04/2011 Chris Beaton 2.0 Second Draft 04/01/2012 Chris Beaton 3.0 Third Draft 02/05/2012 Chris Beaton 4.0 Final Draft 11/05/2012 Chris Beaton 4.1 Graphic design and final formatting 06/06/2012 Chris Beaton 4.2 Appendices included 25/06/2012 Chris Beaton 4.3 Revised costings and maps 17/07/2012 Chris Beaton Page | 2 Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 SUMMARY OF KEY ACTIONS ........................................................................................ 7 SUMMARY OF KEY ACTIONS CON ’T .............................................................................. 8 SUMMARY OF KEY ACTIONS CON ’T .............................................................................. 9 SUMMARY OF KEY ACTIONS CON ’T ............................................................................ 10 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 11 WHAT IS A NATURAL AREA AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT ? ...................................... 11 CITY OF COCKBURN NATURAL AREAS ........................................................................ 12 VALUES .................................................................................................................... 12 FLORA ..................................................................................................................... 13 FAUNA ..................................................................................................................... 14 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER STRATEGIES AND DOCUMENTS ........................................ 15 CITY OF COCKBURN STRATEGIC PLAN 2006 - 2016 .................................................... 16 CITY OF COCKBURN SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY 2012-2016 ....................................... 16 PLAN FOR THE DISTRICT 2010-20 .............................................................................. 16 BUSHLAND CONSERVATION POLICY (SPD1) ............................................................... 17 WETLAND CONSERVATION POLICY (SPD5) ................................................................ 17 SUSTAINABILITY POLICY (SC37) ................................................................................ 17 LANDOWNER BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION GRANT PROGRAM (AEW5) ...................... 17 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE STRATEGY /G REENING PLAN ...................................................... 17 RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLANS ................................................................................ 17 PRIORITISING RESERVES ................................................................................................. 19 PRIORITISATION OF BUSHLAND RESERVES FOR MANAGEMENT .................................... 19 VEGETATION CONDITION ........................................................................................... 19 SIZE ...................................................................................................................... 21 SHAPE ..................................................................................................................... 22 PERIMETER TO AREA RATIO ....................................................................................... 23 CONNECTIVITY ......................................................................................................... 23 VISIBILITY /C OMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................ 24 MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES ...................................................................................... 24 THREATS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT .............................................................................. 28 ENVIRONMENTAL WEEDS .......................................................................................... 28 FERAL ANIMALS ........................................................................................................ 30 ILLEGAL ACCESS ...................................................................................................... 33 ILLEGAL RUBBISH DUMPING ....................................................................................... 34 FIRE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................. 35 Frequent fires can impact on species diversity ....................................................... 36 Natural Area Management Strategy 2012 – 2022 DISEASES EFFECTING BUSHLAND .............................................................................. 37 STORMWATER DRAINAGE .......................................................................................... 39 CLIMATE CHANGE ..................................................................................................... 40 REHABILITATION, REGENERATION & REVEGETATION ................................................. 42 WETLAND MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 44 ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS AND LINKAGES. .................................................................. 45 NORTH /S OUTH LINKAGES . ......................................................................................... 46 EAST /W EST LINKAGES . ............................................................................................. 46 EAST /W EST ROAD LINKAGES .................................................................................... 47 RAIL LINKAGES ......................................................................................................... 50 WESTERN POWER TRANSMISSION LINES .................................................................... 51 BP REFINERY OIL PIPE LINE ...................................................................................... 52 RESIDENTIAL LINKAGES ............................................................................................ 54 OTHER INITIATIVES ................................................................................................... 55 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................ 55 WILDLIFE CROSSINGS ............................................................................................... 56 SUMMARY OF KEY STRATEGIC ACTIONS ..................................................................... 57 OPERATIONAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................... 64 OPERATIONAL COSTS ............................................................................................... 64 CURRENT OPERATIONAL FUNDING 2012/13 ............................................................... 66 CURRENT STAFFING 2012/13 .................................................................................... 67 FUTURE OPERATIONAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................ 69 SOURCES OF FUNDING .............................................................................................. 74 MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...................................................................................... 74 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI’ S) ................................................................... 74 5 YEAR PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 76 NATURAL AREA MANAGEMENT STRATEGY REVIEW ................................................... 76 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 77 GLOSSARY ......................................................................................................................... 78 Appendices A. Weed Management Strategy March 2012...................................................................78 B. Bushland Maintenance Team Reserve Allocations July 2012.................................108 C. Principles of the Bradley Method of Bushland Regeneration..................................109 D. Dieback Hygiene Procedures......................................................................................110 E. Bushland Maintenance Costs......................................................................................111 F. 5 Year Natural Area Management Plan.......................................................................112 Page | 4 SUMMARY The purpose of this Natural Area Management Strategy is to outline the approach used to manage the Cities vested natural areas and to build and enhance Council’s capacity to effectively manage our natural areas for the conservation of biodiversity. The ultimate goal is for all of the Cities natural areas to have a vegetation condition rating of good or better based on the Keighery 1994 definition of vegetation condition. Presently the City of Cockburn has management responsibility for more than 82 separate bushland reserves, many of which contain wetlands. The total area contained within reserves is approximately 1091 hectares. Most of the larger reserves containing vegetation are under active management. The smaller reserves generally contain small pockets of poor quality bushland and current resources are not adequate to actively
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Wetland Invertebrate and Fish Biodiversity for the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (Gss)
    ASSESSMENT OF WETLAND INVERTEBRATE AND FISH BIODIVERSITY FOR THE GNANGARA SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY (GSS) Bea Sommer, Pierre Horwitz and Pauline Hewitt Centre for Ecosystem Management Edith Cowan University, Joondalup WA 6027 Final Report to the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation November 2008 Assessment of wetland invertebrate and fish biodiversity for the GSS (Final Report) November 2008 This document has been commissioned/produced as part of the Gnangara Sustainability Strategy (GSS). The GSS is a State Government initiative which aims to provide a framework for a whole of government approach to address land use and water planning issues associated with the Gnangara groundwater system. For more information go to www.gnangara.water.wa.gov.au i Assessment of wetland invertebrate and fish biodiversity for the GSS (Final Report) November 2008 Executive Summary This report sought to review existing sources of information for aquatic fauna on the Gnangara Mound in order to: • provide a synthesis of the richness, endemism, rarity and habitat specificity of aquatic invertebrates in wetlands; • identify gaps in aquatic invertebrate data on the Gnangara Mound; • provide a synthesis of the status of freshwater fishes on the Gnangara Mound; • assess the management options for the conservation of wetlands and wetland invertebrates. The compilation of aquatic invertebrate taxa recorded from wetlands on both the Gnangara Mound and Jandakot Mound) between 1977 and 2003, from 18 studies of 66 wetlands, has revealed a surprisingly high richness considering the comparatively small survey area and the degree of anthropogenic alteration of the plain. The total of over 550 taxa from 176 families or higher order taxonomic levels could be at least partially attributed to sampling effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Authority U of Western Australia WATER RESOURCES DIRECTORATE Groundwater Branch
    Water Authority ÔU of Western Australia WATER RESOURCES DIRECTORATE Groundwater Branch rg 2 of E Eup0a 1 1111 IAY V • : V VOMTALPR0TE.CT!0 (kJTHOWfl I MOUIWI STREET P2TH v CONTENTS Flora and Vegetation .• • . Part A • Part B Avifauna and Terresthal Vertebrates : V . V , Part C Aquatic Invertebrate Fauna and Water Quality VManagement Part D Social Criteria for the of Wetlands. • . Part E Miscellaneous Aspects :. Part F Rare and Restncted Flora V V Part G Air Quality V •. t V V PREAMBLE PART A - Flora and Vegetation (E.M. Mauiske and Associates) 2 PART B - Avifauna and Terrestrial Vertebrates (Ninox Wildlife Consulting) PART C - Aquatic Invertebrate Fauna (J. Davis) 67 C PART D - Social Criteria for the Management of Wetlands (GJ. Syme and D.K. Macpherson) 94 PART E - Miscellaneous (Brian J. O'Brien and Associates Pty Ltd) 128 JANDAKOT GROUNDWATER SCHEME STAGE 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA STUDY GROUP VOLUME 2 a Flora and Vegetation PART A Prepared For: Brain J O'Brien & Associates Pty Ltd Prepared by: E M Mattiske & B L Koch September 1988 PREAMBLE Volume 2 The Water Authority of Western Australia now draws 3 million cubié metres of water each year from the shallow, underground aquifer south of Perth known as the Jandakot Mound. It presently pumps this water from .15 surface aquifer wells and two artesian bores on the eastern side of the mound. By comparison, present licensed wells draw more than twice this amount for agriculture and other private and industrial use.' In Stage 2 of the Jandakot Groundwater Scheme, the Authority is planning on a net private plus Authority use about double the present amounts, with the Authority bores 'similar to the present but on the western side of the aquifer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary Council Information Bulletin October 2020
    COUNCIL INFORMATION BULLETIN October 2020 October 2020 Council Information Bulletin PAGE 2 City of Rockingham Council Information Bulletin October 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Planning and Development Services Bulletin 10 1. Health Services 10 1. Health Services Team Overview 10 2. Human Resource Update 10 3. Project Status Reports 10 3.1 FoodSafe 10 3.2 Industrial and Commercial Waste Monitoring 10 3.3 Mosquito Control Program 11 3.4 Environmental Waters Sampling 11 3.5 Food Sampling 11 4. Information Items 12 4.1 Food Recalls 12 4.2 Food Premises Inspections 12 4.3 Public Building Inspections 12 4.4 Outdoor Event Approvals 13 4.5 Permit Approvals 13 4.6 Complaint - Information 14 4.7 Noise Complaints – Detailed Information 14 4.8 Health Approvals 14 4.9 Septic Tank Applications 15 4.10 Demolitions 15 4.11 Swimming Pool and Drinking Water Samples 15 4.12 Rabbit Processing 15 4.13 Hairdressing and Skin Penetration Premises 15 2. Building Services 16 1. Building Services Team Overview 16 2. Human Resource Update 16 3. Project Status Reports 16 4. Information Items 16 4.1 Monthly Building Permit Approvals - (All Building Types) 16 4.2 Other Permits 17 4.3 Monthly Caravan Park Site Approvals 17 3. Compliance and Emergency Liaison 18 1. Compliance and Emergency Liaison Team Overview 18 2. Human Resource Update 18 3. Project Status Reports 18 4. Information Items 18 4.1 Ranger Services Action Reports 18 4.2 Building and Development Compliance 19 4.3 Emergency Management - CRMs - September 2020 20 4.4 Fire Management Plans 20 4.5 Prescribed Burning 20 4.6 Disaster Resilience Workshop 21 4.7 Evacuation Centre Activation Exercise 22 4.8 SmartWatch Key Result Areas 22 October 2020 Council Information Bulletin PAGE 3 City of Rockingham Council Information Bulletin October 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Belliar Lakes
    Nutrient Contribution To Hyper-Eutrophic Wetlands In Perth, Western Australia by Danny Burkett, Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Deakin University September, 2005 Acknowledgements Acknowledgement is given to the various organisations that provided the water quality data used in this thesis including Western Australia’s Water Corporation, the Water and Rivers Commission and the City of Cockburn. I would also like to thank my supervisors, Professor Frank Stagnitti of Deakin University and Dr Andrew Bath from the Water Corporation for their guidance in the compilation of this thesis. CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 9 1.1. Contamination, eutrophication and degradation 1.2. Nutrients 1.3. Wetlands and Lakes 1.4. Aims, significance and outcomes of this research 1.5. Chapter Summaries 2. SITE DESCRIPTION............................................................................. 16 2.1. The Beeliar Lakes setting and climate 2.2. Organisations involved in Lake Management 3. LITERATURE REVIEW....................................................................... 24 3.1. Eutrophication 3.2. Nutrients - Nitrogen 3.3. Nutrients - Phosphorus 3.4. Influence of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Water bodies 3.5. Vulnerability for Contamination in the catchment 3.6. Sources of contamination 3.7. Lake Specific Studies 3.8. Lake Classification Methods 3.9. Lake capture zones 3.10. Chapter summary 4. MATERIALS AND METHODS............................................................ 58 4.1. Available data 4.2. Characteristics of water resource data and analysis methods in general 4.3. Lake capture zones 4.4. Overview of possible computer models 4.5. Chapter summary 5. RESULTS ............................................................................................... 67 5.1. Groundwater data analysis overview 5.2. Lake Data Analysis 5.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Management in South J Andakot and for the Beeliar Wetlands
    ::I7' Drainage Management in South J andakot and for the Beeliar Wetlands Report to the Environmental Protection Authority by A Technical Advisory Group • \ Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 371 March 1989 DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH JANDAKOT AND FOR THE BEELIAR WETLANDS Report to the Environmental Protection Authority by A Technical Advisory Group Environmental Protection Authority Perth, Western Australia Bulletin 371 March 1989 ISBN 0 7309 1924 2 ISSN 1030-0120 FORWARD The Environmental Protection Authority is currently examining a drainage management plan submitted by the State Planning Commission for land east of Thomsons Lake, South Jandakot. The drainage management plan outlines drainage mechanisms intended to allow urban development of the land. Public submissions were sought on the plan by the Environmental Protection Authority, closing 20 January 1989. The Environmental Protection Authority established a Technical Advisory Group to provide advice on the plan, in particular its ability to protect the Beeliar wetlands. The Technical Advisory Group has reported, and the Environmental Protection Authority has decided to release this report for public information. It should be noted that the report is an advisory document and that the Environmental Protection Authority has not yet determined whether it supports the recommendations it contains. The Environmental Protection Authority is reviewing the Technical Advisory Group's report, the proponent's response to that report, and submissions received during the public review period, and will be reporting to the Minister for Environment. The Environmental Protection Authority will advise the Minister whether it believes the drainage management plan is satisfactory and in particular whether water levels in the urban areas would be adequately controlled, the Beeliar wetlands protected, and surplus water put to good use.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous!Groups! Landcorp!Baldivis!Development!Project!! ! !! Prepared'for:' Strategen'on'behalf'of'landcorp' ' ' Survey'date:'' 25'March'2013' ' '
    Karnup Sand Mining Project 2. Existing environment 2.1 Regional setting The Project is located approximately 48 km south of the Perth CBD in an area of mixed land uses including sand mining, transport (Kwinana Freeway), rural residential and agriculture. The Project is also surrounded by conservation reserves including Rockingham Lakes Regional Park located approximately 5 km southwest, Lake Walyungup approximately 5 km northwest and Serpentine National Park located approximately 22 km east of the Project area. The Project area is located within the Perth Basin on the Swan Coastal Plain. The Perth Basin is an intensely faulted trough, extending north to northwest for approximately 1000 km (GHD 2014). The basin has filled with a sedimentary sequence of varying continental and marine origin, thinning towards the east and overlain with coastal dune, alluvial and colluvial deposits (Davidson 1995). 2.2 Geology The Rockingham Mapsheet in the Perth Metropolitan Region 1:50,000 Environmental Geology Series describes the geology across the majority of the Project area as ‘Bassendean Sand’ (Figure 4) which comprises predominately of light grey sand at the surface, becoming yellow with depth, fine to medium grained, sub-rounded, moderately well sorted sand of aeolian origin (Gozzard 1983). The underlying geology at six pockets in the Project area is described as ‘Peaty Clay’ comprising dark grey and black peaty clay with variable organic content and some sand in places, of lacustrine origin (Gozzard 1983). These pockets are associated with the six wetlands present in the Project area. Two small slithers of ‘Sand derived from Tamala Limestone’ occur within the Project area adjacent to the western boundary which is described as pale yellowish brown, medium to coarse-grainer, sub angular quartz, trace of feldspar, moderately sorted, or residual origin (Gozzard 1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Baldivis Tramway Management Plan
    Baldivis Tramway MASTER PLAN JUNE 2014 2 City of Rockingham Baldivis Tramway Master Plan Master Plan Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 6 5. Precinct Three 23 1.1 Vision 6 5.1 Site characteristics 23 1.2 Purpose 6 5.2 Goal Seven – Improving horse riding facilities without impacting on other management objectives 23 1.3 Overarching objectives 6 5.2.1 Proposed Bridle Facilities Concept Area 25 1.4 Study area 6 5.3 Goal Eight - Managing conflicting uses of the reserve and conflicting objectives of trail users 25 1.5 Tramway reserve history 6 5.4 Management actions for Precinct Three 25 1.6 Social context 6 1.7 Current use 8 6. Precinct Four 26 6.1 Site characteristics 26 2. Structure of the Baldivis Tramway Master Plan – Planning Precincts 8 6.2 Goal Nine - Restricting unauthorised access and controlling recreational use to preserve the natural environment 27 6.2.1 Proposed End of Trip Concept Area 28 3. Precinct One 8 6.3 Goal Ten - Ensure adequate fire safety throughout the reserve 28 3.1 Site characteristics 8 6.4 Management actions for Precinct Four 28 3.2 Goal One - Sustainable recreation and improved infrastructure 11 3.2.1 Proposed Wetland Concept Area 13 7. Signage Strategy 29 3.3 Goal Two - Providing suitable revegetation and ecological restoration areas to provide offsets for external 13 development 13 8. References 30 3.4 Goal Three – Identify pedestrian traffic management solutions at major road crossings to ensure user safety 13 3.5 Management actions for Precinct One 13 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeliar Regional Park Management Plan
    Beeliar Regional Park Final Management Plan 2006 PLANNING TEAM This plan was co-ordinated by a consultancy team led by Thompson Palmer Pty Ltd working closely with the managers of Beeliar Regional Park – the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM), the City of Melville, the City of Cockburn, the Town of Kwinana and Murdoch University. The Planning Team prepared the plan for the Conservation Commission of Western Australia. Brendan Dooley CALM Tim Bowra CALM Paddy Strano City of Cockburn Ian Davis City of Melville Rosalind Murray Town of Kwinana John McGowan Murdoch University i How to Use This Plan. This plan is divided into sections as set out in the table of contents. Within each section are subsections. Each subsection begins with the objectives to be achieved by management, followed by a discussion of the main issues, and then strategies, accompanied by the agencies responsible for achieving each objective and a priority rating. Priority ratings provide an indication of the relative importance of a strategy. The management agencies names have been abbreviated and a list of all abbreviations used and their meaning is listed in Appendix A. Key Performance Indicators are listed in the plan and outline performance measures, targets, and reporting requirements. A number of issues raised in the plan are interrelated and are dealt with under more than one section. Where this is the case, the discussion refers the reader to other related sections. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Numerous individuals and groups have contributed valuable ideas and information in the preparation of this management plan and their efforts are gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Baldivis Parks Estate
    PART TWO explanatory section EAST BALDIVIS LOCAL STRUCTURE PLAN 1.Planning Background Structure Plan Area 2.Site Conditions and Constraints 3.Land Use and Subdivision Requirements P AGE | 1 EAST BALDIVIS STRUCTURE PLAN – PART TWO EXPLANATORY REPORT 1 PLANNING BACKGROUND 1.1 Introduction & Purpose The purpose of East Baldivis Structure Plan is to provide a basis for zoning (including residential density), subdivision and development of Lots 104, 105, 541, 543, 544 and 1000 Baldivis Road, Baldivis, generally for residential purposes. The information contained in this section provides justification and support for the comprehensive and co- ordinated design response provided for the site. 1.2 Background In February 2012, the WAPC resolved to lift the ‘Urban Deferment’ zoning exclusively for Australand Holdings Ltd (now Frasers Property) and Bonvest Pty Ltd Co-Venture (‘Co-Venture’) landholdings (MRS Amendment 1229/27 gazetted 13th March 2012 refers.) This was primarily in response to the proponent demonstrating the ability to provide service infrastructure (namely sewer) to the East Baldivis Local Structure Plan (‘Structure Plan’) area; the key issue impeding development of the broader East Baldivis cell. Subsequent to the Lifting of Urban Deferment, in June 2012 the City of Rockingham initiated a Town Planning Scheme Amendment (Amendment No. 122) to rezone the Structure Plan area from ‘Rural’ and ‘Special Rural’ to ‘Development’; this being undertaken in accordance with Section 124 of the Planning and Development Act 2005. The rezoning of the land was gazetted on 26 March 2013. The Structure Plan was lodged following the exclusive Lifting of Urban Deferment of the Co-Venture landholding.
    [Show full text]
  • Millars Landing
    North East Baldivis Structure Plan Lots 460 – 463 Baldivis Road, Baldivis Part Two – Explanatory Report PR115795-1 2017 Page 7 North East Baldivis Structure Plan Lots 460 – 463 Baldivis Road, Baldivis 1.0 Planning Background 1.1 Introduction and Purpose This Structure Plan hereinafter referred to as the North East Baldivis Structure Plan (NEBSP) has been prepared on behalf of Upside Property Pty Ltd and Woodbrooke Property Pty Ltd which are wholly owned subsidiaries of Cedar Woods Properties Limited. The purpose of the NEBSP is to facilitate the orderly future subdivision and development of the subject site, and to provide a range of housing types and densities to satisfy the demand for residential housing within the locality. In addition to the planning considerations canvassed within this report, the preparation of this structure plan has been informed by a number of technical and design investigations, which are referred to in this report and the accompanying technical appendices. This structure plan has been prepared in accordance with the design requirements outlined in Liveable Neighbourhoods, and responds to requirements outlined in the City of Rockingham Town Planning Scheme No 2 (TPS 2). The format of this structure plan follows that set out in the Western Australian Planning Commission’s (WAPC) Structure Plan Framework (August 2015), consisting of three parts: Part 1: Implementation Section: Contains the Structure Plan Map and outlines the requirements that will be applied when assessing subdivision and development applications. Part 2: Explanatory Section: Discusses the key outcomes and planning implications of the background and technical reports and describes the broad vision and more detailed planning framework being proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockingham Town Planning Scheme No.2
    Chase III Estate Lots 129 & 302 Zig Zag Road, Baldivis LOCAL STRUCTURE PLAN Prepared By: Taylor Burrell Barnett On Behalf Of: PEET Ltd FEBRUARY 2016 DOCUMENT STATUS 07/067 Revision Reviewer Date Issued 0 LB 06/05/2014 1 DR 25/02/2015 Prepared By: Taylor Burrell Barnett Town Planning and Design 2 DR 29/02/2016 187 Roberts Road SUBIACO WA 6008 Phone: 9382 2911 Fax: 9382 4586 [email protected] This structure plan is prepared under the provisions of the City of Rockingham Town Planning Scheme No.2 IT IS CERTIFIED THAT THIS STRUCTURE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION ON: 16 October 2015 Signed for and on behalf of the Western Australian Planning Commission an officer of the Commi ibn duly authorised by the Commission pursuant to Section 16 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 for that purpose, in the presence of: Date of Expiry: 16 October 2025 TABLE OF CHANGES OR DEPARTURES FROM STRUCTURE PLAN Table 2: Table of modifications to Part One and structure plan map Change or Date Approved Date Structure Date Adopted Departure Description of Change or Departure by the WAPC Plan commences by the Council No. (if required) operation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Local Structure Plan (LSP) is prepared to facilitate the coordinated development of Lots 129 and 302 Zig Zag Road, Baldivis, hereafter referred to as the ‘structure plan area’, ‘subject site’ or ‘LSP’. The subject site is located within the South West Corridor of the Perth Metropolitan Region within the municipalitye of th City of Rockingham, some 2 km north of the Baldivis Town Centre and immediately east of the Baldivis Nature Park and Reserve, on the opposite side of Baldivis Road adjacent the former Tramway reservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Park Phase 2 Structure Plan WAPC Ref SPN 2044 2.5 MB
    HERITAGE PARK (PHASE 2) STRUCTURE PLAN Lots 986 and 993 Baldivis Road, Baldivis OCTOBER 2017 Rockingham Park Pty Ltd DOCUMENT STATUS VERSION COMMENT PREPARED BY REVIEWED BY REVIEW DATE APPROVED BY ISSUE DATE 1 Client Draft TV TV 12.04.2016 JH 13.04.2016 2 Lodgement TV TV 26.04.2016 KB 29.04.2016 3 WAPC Modifications TV KB 19.09.2017 KV 25.10.2017 HERITAGE PARK (PHASE 2) STRUCTURE PLAN LOTS 986 AND 993 BALDIVIS ROAD, BALDIVIS OCTOBER 2017 Prepared for: Rockingham Park Pty Ltd PO Box 907 CLAREMONT WA 6910 T: 9442 1800 F: 9442 1899 Prepared by: Creative Design + Planning 28 Brown Street EAST PERTH WA 6004 T: 9325 0200 F: 9325 4818 E: [email protected] In Collaboration With: Mortons Urban Solutions Unit 4/100 Railway Road SUBIACO WA 6008 T: 9380 9700 E: [email protected] Emerge Associates Suite 4, 6 Centro Avenue SUBIACO WA 6008 T: 9380 4988 F: 9380 9636 E: [email protected] Strategen 50 Subiaco Square Road SUBIACO WA 6008 T: 9380 3100 F: 9380 4606 E: [email protected] RPS 2, 27-31 Troode Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 T: 92111 1111 F: 9211 1122 E: [email protected] KCTT 830B Beaufort Street INGLEWOOD WA 6052 T: 9272 7770 Lloyd George Acoustics PO Box 717 HILLARYS WA 6923 T: 9401 7770 F: 9300 4199 E: [email protected] LD Total 172 Burswood Road BURSWOOD WA 6100 T: 6436 1111 E: [email protected] Disclaimer and Copyright This document was commissioned by and prepared for the exclusive use of Rockingham Park Pty Ltd and CD+P.
    [Show full text]