DOCSLIB.ORG

Control of Cerebellar Granule Cell Output by Sensory-Evoked Golgi Cell Inhibition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Control of Cerebellar Granule Cell Output by Sensory-Evoked Golgi Cell Inhibition Control of cerebellar granule cell output by sensory-evoked Golgi cell inhibition Ian Duguid1,2,3, Tiago Branco1,4, Paul Chadderton5, Charlotte Arlt, Kate Powell6, and Michael Häusser3 Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research and Department of Neuroscience, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom Edited by Masao Ito, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako, Japan, and approved September 1, 2015 (received for review May 25, 2015) Classical feed-forward inhibition involves an excitation–inhibition Results sequence that enhances the temporal precision of neuronal re- Sensory-Evoked Phasic and Spillover Golgi Cell Inhibition Precedes sponses by narrowing the window for synaptic integration. In Mossy Fiber Excitation in Granule Cells. Cerebellar granule cells the input layer of the cerebellum, feed-forward inhibition is thought receive direct phasic and indirect or “spillover” GABAergic in- to preserve the temporal fidelity of granule cell spikes during mossy put from Golgi cells (6, 16, 20, 21). To investigate the temporal fiber stimulation. Although this classical feed-forward inhibitory cir- dynamics of sensory-evoked inhibition in vivo, we recorded cuit has been demonstrated in vitro, the extent to which inhibition spontaneous and sensory-evoked excitatory (Vhold = −70 mV) shapes granule cell sensory responses in vivo remains unresolved. and inhibitory (Vhold = 0 mV) currents from the same granule Here we combined whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in vivo and cells in Crus II (Fig. 1 A–D). Granule cells were identified based dynamic clamp recordings in vitro to directly assess the impact of on their characteristic electrophysiological properties (Table S1), Golgi cell inhibition on sensory information transmission in the depth from the pial surface (>250 μm), and morphology (Fig. granule cell layer of the cerebellum. We show that the majority 1B). To evoke behaviorally relevant somatosensory input, we of granule cells in Crus II of the cerebrocerebellum receive sensory- applied brief air puffs (60 ms) to the whiskers and ipsilateral evoked phasic and spillover inhibition prior to mossy fiber excita- perioral surface (22, 23). Sensory stimulation triggered bursts of tion. This preceding inhibition reduces granule cell excitability and mossy fiber excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs; 4.9 ± 0.6 sensory-evoked spike precision, but enhances sensory response events; burst frequency, 104.0 ± 10.3 Hz; burst duration, 54.8 ± 4.0 reproducibility across the granule cell population. Our findings ms) (23–25). The same sensory stimulus also triggered phasic in- NEUROSCIENCE suggest that neighboring granule cells and Golgi cells can receive hibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs; 5.6 ± 0.6 events; burst segregated and functionally distinct mossy fiber inputs, enabling Golgi frequency, 65.5 ± 8.8 Hz; burst duration, 93.3 ± 15.1 ms) in the cells to regulate the size and reproducibility of sensory responses. same granule cells (n = 9 of 9 cells) (Fig. 1 C and D). Each cerebellum | Golgi cells | granule cells | inhibition | synaptic integration Significance lassical feed-forward inhibition (FFI) involves a sequence of Understanding how synaptic inhibition regulates sensory re- Cexcitation rapidly terminated by inhibition. This temporal sponses is a fundamental question in neuroscience. In cere- sequence narrows the time window for synaptic integration and bellar granule cells, sensory stimulation is thought to evoke an enforces precise spike timing (1–7). FFI is thought to be im- excitation–inhibition sequence driven by direct input from portant for regulating the temporal fidelity of spike responses in mossy fibers and followed by classical disynaptic feed-forward many neural systems, including the motor system, where rapid inhibition from nearby Golgi cells. We made, to our knowl- and adaptable changes in muscle activity are essential for coor- edge, the first voltage-clamp recordings of sensory-evoked dinated motor control (8–10). The cerebellum plays a central inhibition in granule cells in vivo and show that, surprisingly, role in fine sculpting of movements, and damage to the cerebellum sensory-evoked inhibition often precedes mossy fiber excita- produces severe motor deficits, most notably enhanced temporal tion activated by the same stimulus. We demonstrate how such “ ” variability of voluntary movements (11, 12). These findings suggest preceding inhibition can shape granule cell responses to that cerebellar circuits have the ability to preserve precise timing sensory stimulation. Our findings challenge the existing view that classical feed-forward inhibition is the dominant mode of information during behavior (5, 6, 13), and in vitro studies have inhibition, suggesting that parallel inhibitory networks regu- shown that feed-forward inhibitory networks in the input layer of late sensory information transmission through the granular layer. the cerebellum provide a mechanism for maintaining the temporal fidelity of information transmission (6, 14, 15). Author contributions: I.D., T.B., P.C., C.A., K.P., and M.H. designed research; I.D., T.B., P.C., Synaptic inhibition in the granule cell layer is generated by C.A., and K.P. performed research; I.D. and T.B. analyzed data; and I.D., T.B., and M.H. Golgi cells, GABAergic interneurons that provide direct in- wrote the paper. hibitory input to granule cells (6, 15–17). The prevailing view is The authors declare no conflict of interest. that, when mossy fibers are activated, granule cells receive both This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. monosynaptic excitation and disynaptic FFI from Golgi cells, Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. providing temporally precise inhibitory input that narrows the 1I.D. and T.B. contributed equally to this work. window for the temporal summation of discrete mossy fiber 2 – Present address: Centre for Integrative Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Uni- inputs (6, 14, 18). This classical excitation inhibition sequence versity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, Scotland. forms the basis of a variety of contemporary cerebellar models 3To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or m.hausser@ (7, 9, 18, 19). However, the exact temporal relationship be- ucl.ac.uk. tween sensory-evoked excitation and inhibition in granule cells 4Present address: Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge has never been determined in vivo. Here, we combined in vivo CB2 0QH, United Kingdom. whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from granule cells and 5Present address: Department of Bioengineering, South Kensington Campus, Imperial in vitro dynamic clamp experiments to investigate both the College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. temporal dynamics of Golgi-cell–mediated inhibition and its 6Present address: UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London EC1V 9EL, United Kingdom. importance for shaping sensory responses in the input layer of This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. the cerebellum. 1073/pnas.1510249112/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510249112 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 GoC the excitatory synaptic conductance measured in the same granule A PF B cell (Fig. S1). After the short latency excitatory/inhibitory responses in granule cells, we observed a prolonged reduction in spontaneous IPSC rate (duration, 340.0 ± 89.9 ms, n = 6/9 cells), reflecting long- GC lasting pauses in Golgi cell firing after sensory stimulation (28, 29). Air puff Given that Golgi cells fire one or two temporally precise spikes MF1 during the onset of sensory stimulation (28, 29)—albeit with vari- Stimulus Stimulus able onset latencies (28, 29)—and that each granule cell receives C (-70 mV) D 50 ms direct input from at least five to seven Golgi cells (21, 30), our 15 pA (0 mV) data are consistent with sensory-evoked inhibition being the re- 15 pA sult of pooled input from multiple Golgi cells. 50 ms To investigate whether evoked IPSCs occurred according to the classical excitation–inhibition sequence (6), we examined the relative timing of EPSCs and IPSCs in the same cell during sensory stimulation. Surprisingly, in the majority of granule cells, the mean onset latency of sensory-evoked inhibition was shorter 250 ms 250 ms than the latency of direct mossy fiber input evoked by the same 1.6 ± ± 3.0 sensory stimulus (IPSC latency, 10.5 1.1 ms; EPSC latency, 14.6 1.2 2.2 ms; n = 9), contrary to the expectation for a strictly feed-forward 2.0 0.8 pathway (Fig. 1 F–I). This result suggests that sensory-evoked phasic 1.0 0.4 IPSCs per bin EPSCs per bin inhibition of granule cells is mediated by Golgi cells activated by a 0.0 0.0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 subset of mossy fibers distinct from those providing direct mono- Time (ms) Time (ms) synaptic granule cell excitation (i.e., FFI) or disynaptic feed-forward Sensory-evoked Phasic Spillover excitation from granule cells (i.e., feedback inhibition) (15, 31–34). E (spillover subtracted) (phasic subtracted) Importantly, this reversed temporal relationship did not depend on the anesthetic regime used (Fig. S2). Given that brief stimulation of the upper lip and perioral surface has been shown to generate precise, short-latency (∼7–10 ms) output from Golgi cells (28, 29) Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus 10 pA ∼ – 30 ms and highly variable, longer-latency ( 15 25 ms) excitatory input in granule cells (Fig. 1F) (23), our data suggest that some Golgi cells Stimulus Stimulus FIG H 30 -10 receive direct trigeminal input before neighboring granule cells re- )sm ) s 25 ( ycn ( m ceiving delayed corticopontine input (35, 36). ( ycne 20 -5 0 mV etal t -70 mV al 15 tesno ts tesno CSPI CSPI Properties of Golgi Cell Inhibition During Sustained Sensory-Evoked 10 0 - - Mossy Fiber Input. Mossy fiber input to the granule cell layer can C ruB 5 S PE occur in short high-frequency bursts (24, 29, 37) or as sustained, 10 pA 10 pA 0 5 – 20 ms 10 ms IPSC EPSC time-varying synaptic input (22, 38 40), depending on the nature of the stimulus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cerebellar Microcircuit As an Adaptive Filter: Experimental and Computational Evidence
    REVIEWS The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence Paul Dean*, John Porrill*, Carl-Fredrik Ekerot‡ and Henrik Jörntell‡ Abstract | Initial investigations of the cerebellar microcircuit inspired the Marr–Albus theoretical framework of cerebellar function. We review recent developments in the experimental understanding of cerebellar microcircuit characteristics and in the computational analysis of Marr–Albus models. We conclude that many Marr–Albus models are in effect adaptive filters, and that evidence for symmetrical long-term potentiation and long-term depression, interneuron plasticity, silent parallel fibre synapses and recurrent mossy fibre connectivity is strikingly congruent with predictions from adaptive-filter models of cerebellar function. This congruence suggests that insights from adaptive-filter theory might help to address outstanding issues of cerebellar function, including both microcircuit processing and extra-cerebellar connectivity. (BOX 2) Purkinje cell In 1967, Eccles, Ito and Szentagothai published their of spike . Simple spikes are normal action poten- 1 By far the largest neuron of the landmark book The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , tials and are thought to be modulated by the many PFs cerebellum and the sole output which described for the first time the detailed microcir- that contact the PC dendritic tree. By contrast, complex of the cerebellar cortex. cuitry of an important structure in the brain. Perhaps the spikes are unique to PCs. The CF input to the PC is one Receives climbing fibre input and integrates inputs from most striking feature of the cerebellar cortical microcircuit of the most powerful synaptic junctions of the CNS, and parallel fibres and (BOX 1) is that Purkinje cells (PCs), which provide the sole complex spikes occur only when the CF fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalent Presence of Periodic Actin–Spectrin-Based Membrane Skeleton in a Broad Range of Neuronal Cell Types and Animal Species
    Prevalent presence of periodic actin–spectrin-based membrane skeleton in a broad range of neuronal cell types and animal species Jiang Hea,b,c,1,2, Ruobo Zhoua,b,c,2, Zhuhao Wud, Monica A. Carrascoe,3, Peri T. Kurshanf,g, Jonathan E. Farleyh,i, David J. Simond, Guiping Wanga,b,c, Boran Hana,b,c, Junjie Haoa,b,c, Evan Hellera,b,c, Marc R. Freemanh,i, Kang Shenf,g, Tom Maniatise, Marc Tessier-Lavigned, and Xiaowei Zhuanga,b,c,4 aHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; cDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; dLaboratory of Brain Development and Repair, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; eDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032; fHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; gDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; hHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605; and iDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605 Contributed by Xiaowei Zhuang, April 8, 2016 (sent for review March 25, 2016; reviewed by Bo Huang and Feng Zhang) Actin, spectrin, and associated molecules form a periodic, submem- structure, short actin filaments are organized into repetitive, brane cytoskeleton in the axons of neurons. For a better understand- ring-like structures that wrap around the circumference of the ing of this membrane-associated periodic skeleton (MPS), it is axon with a periodicity of ∼190 nm; adjacent actin rings are important to address how prevalent this structure is in different connected by spectrin tetramers, and actin short filaments in the neuronal types, different subcellular compartments, and across rings are capped by adducin (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Glycine Transporters Are Differentially Expressed Among CNS Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, May 1995, 1~75): 3952-3969 Glycine Transporters Are Differentially Expressed among CNS Cells Francisco Zafra,’ Carmen Arag&?,’ Luis Olivares,’ Nieis C. Danbolt, Cecilio GimBnez,’ and Jon Storm- Mathisen* ‘Centro de Biologia Molecular “Sever0 Ochoa,” Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autbnoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, and *Anatomical Institute, University of Oslo, Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway Glycine is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the spinal In addition, glycine is a coagonist with glutamate on postsyn- cord and brainstem and is also required for the activation aptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (Johnson and of NMDA receptors. The extracellular concentration of this Ascher, 1987). neuroactive amino acid is regulated by at least two glycine The reuptake of neurotransmitter amino acids into presynaptic transporters (GLYTl and GLYTZ). To study the localization nerve endings or the neighboring fine glial processes provides a and properties of these proteins, sequence-specific antibod- way of clearing the extracellular space of neuroactive sub- ies against the cloned glycine transporters have been stances, and so constitutes an efficient mechanism by which the raised. lmmunoblots show that the 50-70 kDa band corre- synaptic action can be terminated (Kanner and Schuldiner, sponding to GLYTl is expressed at the highest concentra- 1987). Specitic high-affinity transport systems have been iden- tions in the spinal cord, brainstem, diencephalon, and retina, tified in nerve terminals and glial cells for several amino acid and, in a lesser degree, to the olfactory bulb and brain hemi- neurotransmitters, including glycine (Johnston and Iversen, spheres, whereas it is not detected in peripheral tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholine Modulates Cerebellar Granule Cell Spiking by Regulating the Balance of Synaptic Excitation and Inhibition
    2882 • The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2020 • 40(14):2882–2894 Systems/Circuits Acetylcholine Modulates Cerebellar Granule Cell Spiking by Regulating the Balance of Synaptic Excitation and Inhibition X Taylor R. Fore, Benjamin N. Taylor, Nicolas Brunel, and XCourt Hull Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina 27710 Sensorimotor integration in the cerebellum is essential for refining motor output, and the first stage of this processing occurs in the granule cell layer. Recent evidence suggests that granule cell layer synaptic integration can be contextually modified, although the circuit mechanisms that could mediate such modulation remain largely unknown. Here we investigate the role of ACh in regulating granule cell layer synaptic integration in male rats and mice of both sexes. We find that Golgi cells, interneurons that provide the sole source of inhibition to the granule cell layer, express both nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors. While acute ACh application can modestly depolarize some Golgi cells, the net effect of longer, optogenetically induced ACh release is to strongly hyperpolarize Golgi cells. Golgi cell hyperpolarization by ACh leads to a significant reduction in both tonic and evoked granule cell synaptic inhibition. ACh also reduces glutamate release from mossy fibers by acting on presynaptic muscarinic receptors. Surprisingly, despite these consistent effects on Golgi cells and mossy fibers, ACh can either increase or decrease the spike probability of granule cells as measured by noninvasive cell-attached recordings. By constructing an integrate-and-fire model of granule cell layer population activity, we find that the direction of spike rate modulation can be accounted for predominately by the initial balance of excitation and inhibition onto individual granule cells.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Cerebellar Function
    NUMBERS 112. FEBRUARY 191 MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES 25 A Theory of Cerebellar Function JAMES S. ALBUS Cybernetics and Subsystem Development Section Datu Techltiques Branch Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland Communicated by Donald H. Perkel ____ ABSTRACT A comprehensive theory of cerebellar function is presented, which ties together the known anatomy and physiology of the cerebellum into a pattern -recognition data processing system. The cerebellum is postulated to be functionally and structurally equivalent to a modification of the classical Perceptron pattern -classification device. Itis suggested that the mossy fiber -+ granule cell -+ Golgi cell input network performs an expansion recoding that enhances the pattern -discrimination capacity and learning speed of the cerebellar Purkinje response cells. Parallel fiber synapses of the dendritic spines of Purkinje cells, basket cells, and stellate cells are all postulated to be specifically variable in response to climbing fiber activity. It is argued that this variability is the mechanism of pattern storage. It is demonstrated that, in order for the learning process to be stable, pattern storage must be accomplished principally by weakening synaptic weights rather than by strengthening them. 1. INTRODUCTION A great body of facts has been known for many years concerning the general organization and structure of the cerebellum. The regularity and relative simplicity ofthe cerebellar cortex have fascinated anatomists since the earliest days of systematic neuronanatomical observations. In just the past 7 or 8 years, however, the electron microscope and refined micro- neurophysiological techniques have revealed critical structural details that make possible comprehensive theories of cerebellar function. A great deal of the recent physiological data about the cerebellum come from an elegant series of experiments by Eccles and his coworkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebellar Granule Cells Encode the Expectation of Reward Mark J
    LETTER doi:10.1038/nature21726 Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward Mark J. Wagner1*, Tony Hyun Kim1,2*, Joan Savall1, Mark J. Schnitzer1,3 & Liqun Luo1 The human brain contains approximately 60 billion cerebellar identical stimuli and licking responses. In both tasks, reward signals granule cells1, which outnumber all other brain neurons combined. were widespread throughout multiple cerebellar lobules. Tracking Classical theories posit that a large, diverse population of granule the same granule cells over several days of learning revealed that cells allows for highly detailed representations of sensorimotor cells with reward-anticipating responses emerged from those that context, enabling downstream Purkinje cells to sense fine contextual responded at the start of learning to reward delivery, whereas changes2–6. Although evidence suggests a role for the cerebellum in reward-omission responses grew stronger as learning progressed. cognition7–10, granule cells are known to encode only sensory11–13 The discovery of predictive, non-sensorimotor encoding in granule and motor14 context. Here, using two-photon calcium imaging cells is a major departure from the current understanding of these in behaving mice, we show that granule cells convey information neurons and markedly enriches the contextual information available about the expectation of reward. Mice initiated voluntary forelimb to postsynaptic Purkinje cells, with important implications for movements for delayed sugar-water reward. Some granule cells cognitive processing in the cerebellum. responded preferentially to reward or reward omission, whereas Mice voluntarily grasped the handle of a manipulandum (Methods) others selectively encoded reward anticipation. Reward responses and pushed it forward up to 8 mm for delayed receipt of a sucrose-water were not restricted to forelimb movement, as a Pavlovian task evoked reward (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Resonant Synchronization in Heterogeneous Networks of Inhibitory Neurons
    The Journal of Neuroscience, November 19, 2003 • 23(33):10503–10514 • 10503 Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive Resonant Synchronization in Heterogeneous Networks of Inhibitory Neurons Reinoud Maex and Erik De Schutter Laboratory of Theoretical Neurobiology, Born-Bunge Foundation, University of Antwerp, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium Brain rhythms arise through the synchronization of neurons and their entrainment in a regular firing pattern. In this process, networks of reciprocally connected inhibitory neurons are often involved, but what mechanism determines the oscillation frequency is not com- pletely understood. Analytical studies predict that the emerging frequency band is primarily constrained by the decay rate of the unitary IPSC. We observed a new phenomenon of resonant synchronization in computer-simulated networks of inhibitory neurons in which the synaptic current has a delayed onset, reflecting finite spike propagation and synaptic transmission times. At the resonant level of network excitation, all neurons fire synchronously and rhythmically with a period approximately four times the mean delay of the onset of the inhibitory synaptic current. The amplitude and decay time constant of the synaptic current have relatively minor effects on the emerging frequency band. By varying the axonal delay of the inhibitory connections, networks with a realistic synaptic kinetics can be tuned to frequencies from 40 to Ͼ200 Hz. This resonance phenomenon arises in heterogeneous networks with, on average, as few as five connec- tions per neuron. We conclude that the delay of the synaptic current is the primary parameter controlling the oscillation frequency of inhibitory networks and propose that delay-induced synchronization is a mechanism for fast brain rhythms that depend on intact inhibitory synaptic transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • GABAA,Slow: Causes and Consequences Marco Capogna1 and Robert A
    Review GABAA,slow: causes and consequences Marco Capogna1 and Robert A. Pearce2 1 MRC Anatomical Neuropharmacology Unit, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TH, UK 2 Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53711, USA GABAA receptors in the CNS mediate both fast synaptic current with a decay constant of > 30 ms. We focus pri- and tonic inhibition. Over the past decade a phasic marily on data obtained in the hippocampus because this is current with features intermediate between fast synap- the area where it has been studied most intensively and tic and tonic inhibition, termed GABAA,slow, has received where the distinction between fast and slow IPSCs ob- increasing attention. This has coincided with an served in individuals neurons is the clearest. However, it ever-growing appreciation for GABAergic cell type diver- should be noted that phasic IPSCs display a broad range of sity. Compared with classical fast synaptic inhibition, kinetics, some of which are intermediate between those of GABAA,slow is slower by an order of magnitude. In this fast and slow IPSCs [16,17]. Direct comparison between review, we summarize recent studies that have en- studies is complicated by the impact on IPSC kinetics of the hanced our understanding of GABAA,slow. These include recording conditions – including the concentration of chlo- the discovery of specialized interneuron types from ride [18], the voltage [19], and the different methods of which this current originates, the factors that could kinetic characterization and analysis [15,20–22]. Never- underlie its characteristically slow kinetics, its contribu- theless, consistent and clear distinctions between different tion to specific aspects of integrative function and net- kinetic classes of IPSCs indicate that fast and slow IPSCs work oscillations, and its potential usefulness as a novel are not simply the two ends of a single broad distribution; drug target for modulating inhibitory synaptic transmis- instead these arise from distinct classes of presynaptic sion in the CNS.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerebellum and Activation of the Cerebellum IO ST During Nonmotor Tasks
    Cerebellum (Kandel & Schwartz & Jessell, 4th ed.) Granule186 cells are irreducibly smallChapter (6-8 7 μm) stellate cell basket cell outer synaptic layer PC rs cap PC layer grc Go inner 6 μm synaptic layer Figure 7.15 Largest cerebellar neuron occupies more than a 1,000-fold greater volume than smallest neuron. Thin section (~1 μ m) through monkey cerebellar cortex. Purkinje cell body (PC) and nucleus are far larger than those of granule cell (grc). The latter cluster to leave space for mossy fiber terminals to form glomeruli with grc dendritic claws and space for Golgi cells (Go). Note rich network of capillaries (cap). Fine, scat- tered dots are mitochondria. Courtesy of E. Mugnaini. brain ’ s most numerous neuron, this small cost grows large (see also chapter 13). Much of the inner synaptic layer is occupied by the large axon terminals of mossy fibers (figures 7.1 and 7.16). A terminal interlaces with multiple (~15) dendritic claws, each from a different but neighboring granule cell, and forms a complex knot (glomerulus ), nearly as large as a granule cell body (figures 7.1 and 7.16). The mossy fiber axon fires at an unusually high mean rate (up to 200 Hz) and is therefore among the brain’ s thickest (figure 4.6). To match the axon’ s high rate, a terminal expresses 150 active zones, 10 per postsynaptic granule cell (figure 7.16). These sites are capable of driving … and most expensive. 190 Chapter 7 10 4 8 3 9 19 10 10 × 6 × 2 2 4 ATP/s/cell ATP/s/cell ATP/s/m 1 2 0 0 astrocyte astrocyte Golgi cell Golgi cell basket cell basket cell stellate cell stellate cell granule cell granule cell mossy fiber mossy fiber Purkinje cell Purkinje Purkinje cell Purkinje Bergman glia Bergman glia climbing fiber climbing fiber Figure 7.18 Energy costs by cell type.
    [Show full text]
  • Plexin-B2 Controls the Development of Cerebellar Granule Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, April 4, 2007 • 27(14):3921–3932 • 3921 Development/Plasticity/Repair Plexin-B2 Controls the Development of Cerebellar Granule Cells Roland H. Friedel,1*Ge´raldine Kerjan,2* Helen Rayburn,1 Ulrich Schu¨ller,3 Constantino Sotelo,2,4 Marc Tessier-Lavigne,1 and Alain Che´dotal2 1Department of Biological Sciences, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, 2Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite´ Mixte de Recherche 7102, Universite´ Paris 6, 75005 Paris, France, 3Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, and 4Ca´tedra de Neurobiologı´a del Desarrollo “Remedios Caro Almela,” Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, Universidad Miguel Herna´ndez de Elche, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas, 03550 San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain Cerebellar granule cell progenitors proliferate postnatally in the upper part of the external granule cell layer (EGL) of the cerebellum. Postmitotic granule cells differentiate and migrate, tangentially in the EGL and then radially through the molecular and Purkinje cell layers. The molecular control of the transition between proliferation and differentiation in cerebellar granule cells is poorly understood. We show here that the transmembrane receptor Plexin-B2 is expressed by proliferating granule cell progenitors. To study Plexin-B2 function, we generated a targeted mutation of mouse Plexin-B2. Most Plexin-B2Ϫ/Ϫ mutants die at birth as a result of neural tube closure defects. Some mutants survive but their cerebellum cytoarchitecture is profoundly altered. This is correlated with a disorganization of the timing of granule cell proliferation and differentiation in the EGL. Many differentiated granule cells migrate inside the cerebellum and keep proliferating.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathway Specific Drive of Cerebellar Golgi Cells Reveals Integrative Rules of Cortical Inhibition
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/356378; this version posted June 27, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Pathway specific drive of cerebellar Golgi cells reveals integrative rules of cortical inhibition Sawako Tabuchi1, Jesse I. Gilmer1,2, Karen Purba1, Abigail L. Person1 1. Department of Physiology & Biophysics 2. Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Colorado Denver University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora, CO 80045 Abstract: 222 words Significance Statement: 115 Introduction: 644 Discussion: 1,587 words Figures: 6 Tables: 0 Abbreviated title: Golgi cell structure-function relationship Address for Correspondence: Abigail L. Person, Ph.D. Department of Physiology & Biophysics University of Colorado School of Medicine 12800 East 19th Ave RC-1 North Campus Box 8307 Aurora, CO 80045 USA email: [email protected] (303) 724-4514 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. Acknowledgements: We thank Ms Samantha Lewis for expert technical support during the project. This work was supported by the Japan Society for The Promotion of Science (JSPS) Overseas Research Fellowship and The Uehara Memorial Foundation research fellowship to S.T.; NS084996 ; a Kingenstein Foundation fellowship; and a Boettcher foundation Webb-Waring biomedical research award to A.L.P. Imaging experiments were performed in the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Advance Light Microscopy Core supported in part by Rocky Mountain Neurological Disorders Core Grant Number P30NS048154 and by NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSI Grant Number UL1 TR001082. Engineering support was provided by the Optogenetics and Neural Engineering Core at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, funded in part by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30NS048154.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Antioxidants in Cerebellar Development. a Review of Literature
    Int. J. Morphol., 31(1):203-210, 2013. The Role of Antioxidants in Cerebellar Development. A Review of Literature Rol de los Antioxidantes en el Desarrollo del Cerebelo. Una Revisión de la Literatura I. O. Imosemi IMOSEMI, I. O. The role of antioxidants in cerebellar development. A review of literature. Int. J. Morphol., 31(1):203-210, 2013. SUMMARY: Developmental pathologies may result from endogenous or xenobiotic-enhanced formation of reacting oxygen species (ROS), which oxidatively damage cellular macromolecules and/or alter signal transduction, and that the embryonic processes regulating the balance of ROS formation, oxidative DNA damage and repair, and ROS-mediated signal transduction may be important determinants of teratological risk. ROS can oxidize molecular targets such as DNA, protein, lipid in a process called oxidative stress resulting in cellular dysfunction and in utero death or teratogenicity. This review, consisting of literature search of journals and chapters in books aims at highlighting the importance of the cerebellum in controlling various motor activities in the body, as well as substances affecting cerebellar development with a view of providing an insight to the role antioxidants play in cerebellar development. It is interesting to note that the developing brain (especially the cerebellum, cerebrum and hippocampus) is highly vulnerable to the deleterious effects of ROS. Studies have shown that exposure to oxidants in the first trimester is associated with an increased risk of major congenital anomalies, as most vital organs in the body develop and some become functional within this period in offspring. Antioxidants may prevent oxidative damage in degenerative diseases including ageing, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, stroke and Parkinson’s disease as such play a critical role in wellness and health maintenance.
    [Show full text]