DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Media Law and Ethics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 COMPARATIVE MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS Providing practical and theoretical resources on media law and ethics for the United Kingdom and United States of America and referencing other legal juris- dictions such as France, Japan, India, China and Saudi Arabia, Comparative Media Law and Ethics is suitable for upper undergraduate and postgraduate study and for professionals in the media who need to work internationally. The book focuses on the law of the United Kingdom, the source of common law, which has dominated the English-speaking world, and on the law of the USA, the most powerful cultural, economic, political and military power in the world. Media law and ethics have evolved differently in the USA from the UK. This book investigates why this is the case. In one chapter Tim Crook considers other media law jurisdictions: • common law – a focus on India – the biggest democracy in the world and the largest middle class • civil law – a focus on France – the influential founder of the European Union and host country for the ECHR at Strasbourg • socialist law – a focus on China – the country with the highest economic growth and largest population • Islamic law – a focus on Saudi Arabia – one of the most influential sources of legal religiosity. Tim Crook analyses media law, as it exists, the ethical debates concerning what the law ought to be, and the historical development of legal and regulatory controls of communication. Underlying concepts discussed include the subject of media jurisprudence – the study of the philosophy of media law; media ethicology – the study of the knowledge of ethics/morality in media communication; and media ethicism – the belief systems in the political context that influence journal- istic conduct and content. Throughout, media law and regulation are evaluated in terms of their social and cultural context. The book has a companion website – www.ma-radio.gold.ac.uk/cmle – providing complementary resources and updated developments on the topics explored. If you need to compare different law and ethics systems, are studying interna- Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 tional journalism or want to understand the legalities of working in the media in different jurisdictions, then you should find this an important and useful guide. Tim Crook is Senior Lecturer in Media Law and Ethics and Head of Radio at Goldsmiths College, University of London, as well as being a Visiting Instructor on Media Law to the British Broadcasting Corporation. He has worked profes- sionally in radio, theatre, television and film as a journalist, producer, director and sound designer for more than 30 years and has won more than 60 awards for drama, journalism and production. His previous publications include Radio Drama (1999) and International Radio Journalism (1997). Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 COMPARATIVE MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS Tim Crook Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 First published 2010 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2010. To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk. © 2010 Tim Crook All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Crook, Tim, 1959- Comparative media law and ethics/Tim Crook. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Mass media–Law and legislation. I. Title. K4240.C76 2009 343.09’9–dc22 2009027136 ISBN 0-203-86596-0 Master e-book ISBN Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 ISBN 10: 0-415-55157-9 (hbk) ISBN 10: 0-415-55161-7 (pbk) ISBN 10: 0-203-86596-0 (ebk) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-55157-1 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-55161-8 (pbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-203-86596-5 (ebk) CONTENTS List of illustrations vi Acknowledgements x List of abbreviations xi 1 Primary media law of the UK and USA 1 2 Media jurisprudence, media ethicology and media ethicism 155 3 Defamation law 234 4 Contempt/protecting fair trial law 262 5 Privacy law 274 6 Media regulation 295 7 State and national security law 316 8 Media law and ethics: four genres of jurisdiction 334 9 The legal problematizing of journalism 348 10 Human rights and international law for journalists 370 11 Racial and religious hatred 387 Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 12 Copyright and intellectual property law 400 13 Freedom of information legislation 412 Select glossary 431 Bibliography 451 Index 474 v IlluSTRATIONS Figure 1.1 Legal system of the state of Texas 65 Tables 1.1 The differences in defining UK and US freedom of expression 2 1.2 Expected learning outcomes from reading this book 13 1.3 Social, cultural and legal dynamics of free speech human communication 16 1.4 Metropolitan Police statement regarding complaints about misuse of MPs’ expenses 18 1.5 The distinction between primary and secondary media law 23 1.6 Comparison of the constitutional contexts of UK and US media law 24 1.7 The democratic index in media law and ethics 27 1.8 The Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 36 1.9 Civil rights concepts in the US Constitution 37 1.10 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 49 1.11 Legal system of England and Wales within the United Kingdom and Europe 62 Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 1.12 US federal legal system 66 1.13 Television and radio access to court proceedings 69 1.14 The Attorney General’s letter to the Times, September 2008 84 1.15 Comparison of UK and US media contempt law (protecting the fair trial) 87 1.16 Selective summary of additional UK court reporting laws 90 1.17 The essentials of English and Welsh defamation law 96 1.18 Media privacy law in the United Kingdom 110 vi IlluSTRATIONS 1.19 Privacy law in the USA 112 1.20 The Scottish legal system 136 1.21 Distinctive differences between Scottish law of defamation and that of England and Wales 141 1.22 Media reporting restrictions in the Scottish legal system 148 1.23 Sources of Scottish media law 154 2.1 The three traditions of media ethicological discourse 156 2.2 Immanuel Kant’s ethics (A) 181 2.3 Immanuel Kant’s ethics (B) 182 2.4 John Stuart Mill’s ethics 185 2.5 Pall Mall Gazette 6 July 1885 208 2.6 The Warren Commission on the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald 224 2.7 Resolution 1165 (1998) of the Council of Europe 230 3.1 Advantages of defamation law for US journalists 237 3.2 Advantages of defamation law for UK journalists 238 3.3 Disadvantages of defamation law for US journalists 239 3.4 Disadvantages of defamation law for UK journalists 241 3.5 Debating the justice and injustice of the libel system for claimants and defendants 242 5.1 Dame Butler-Sloss: reasons for lifetime anonymity injunction for child killer Mary Bell 286 5.2 Timeline of events in Maxine Carr case 288 6.1 Who’s to watch the watchdog? The story of The Connection and the Guardian 307 6.2 The Press Complaints Commission’s existing framework of restorative justice remedies in privacy 312 7.1 The case of Mordechai Vanunu: from the Israeli nuclear research centre to the Sunday Times (to jail in Israel) 318 7.2 The case of David Shayler: from MI5 to the Mail on Sunday (and then to jail) 325 9.1 Protection of journalists’ sources: UK and USA 359 10.1 Ethical approaches to peace journalism 371 10.2 Journalism/media and the Geneva Conventions 372 10.3 The International Criminal Court (ICC) 375 12.1 Common law copyright jurisdictions compared: the UK Downloaded by [Saudi Digital Library] at 06:59 13 November 2013 and USA 403 12.2 Intellectual property and copyright transnational agreements 405 12.3 Authors’ rights jurisdictions of France and Germany 405 13.1 Freedom of information legislation – unfolding internationally 413 13.2 Freedom of information: drawbacks for journalism 418 13.3 Comparison of UK and USA freedom of information operations and exemptions 420 vii IlluSTRATIONS 13.4 Guidance table on using the British Freedom of Information Act 2000 422 13.5 Guidance table on using US Freedom of Information Act 1966 and Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996 424 Plates 1 The non-blindfolded ‘Lady of Justice’ atop the dome of the Central Criminal Court, London. (Copyright Tim Crook, 2007) 3 2 US Supreme Court building, Washington, DC, 1943. Farm Security Administration – Office of War Information Collection 12002-68 (DLC) 93845501. No known restrictions on publication. Library of Congress creative commons 3 3 First woman jury, Los Angeles, November 1911. George Grantham Bain Collection, Library of Congress creative commons. Prints and Photographs Division, Washington, DC, 20540 USA.
Recommended publications
  • Sample Chapter

    Sample Chapter

    Copyright material – 9780230301870 Contents Table of Cases vii Table of Legislation xv Editors and Contributors xix Preface by Mark Stephens xxiii Part I The Legal, Ethical and Editorial Landscape 1 Privacy: A Judicial Perspective 3 David Eady 2 The Rights of Journalism and the Needs of Audiences 35 Onora O’Neill 3 Why We Write: Three Magic Words – ‘The Public Interest’ 46 Alan Rusbridger Part II The Practitioner’s View – Protecting Free Expression and Curbing Abuses 4 The Ultimate Balancing Test 63 Pia Sarma 5 Privacy Protection – Luxury Goods or Essential Commodity? 78 Amber Melville-Brown 6 ‘People are so much more interesting than things’: Protecting Free Expression 104 Gavin Millar QC 7 ‘You say tomato …’: A Comparison of English and US Privacy Law Principles 128 Robert Balin and Yuli Takatsuki Part III Confronting Current and Future Challenges 8 Privacy and Free Expression: Competing or Complementary Rights? 151 Michael Harris and Kirsty Hughes 9 The Internet as a Lens: Concepts of Privacy in Online Spaces 167 Jeffrey Hermes Index 193 v Copyright material – 9780230301870 PART I The Legal, Ethical and Editorial Landscape Copyright material – 9780230301870 Copyright material – 9780230301870 1 Privacy: A Judicial Perspective David Eady Introduction: the wider context Towards the end of the 20th century, there developed in most of the ‘west- ern’ democracies a concern to protect personal privacy and, if possible, by means of enforceable legal remedies. There were a number of factors under- lying this general trend, some driven by technological developments in the handling and dissemination of information, others by more elusive social or moral considerations.
  • Bloggers and Netizens Behind Bars: Restrictions on Internet Freedom In

    Bloggers and Netizens Behind Bars: Restrictions on Internet Freedom In

    VIETNAM COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS QUÊ ME: ACTION FOR DEMOCRACY IN VIETNAM Ủy ban Bảo vệ Quyền làm Người Việt Nam BLOGGERS AND NETIZENS BEHIND BARS Restrictions on Internet Freedom in Vietnam Article 1: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 2: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Article 4: No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, January 2013 / n°603a - AFP PHOTO IAN TIMBERLAKE Cover Photo : A policeman, flanked by local militia members, tries to stop a foreign journalist from taking photos outside the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Court during the trial of a blogger in August 2011 (AFP, Photo Ian Timberlake). 2 / Titre du rapport – FIDH Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5
  • Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases

    Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases

    Fickle Justice: Judicial Idiosyncrasy in UK Privacy Cases PAUL WRAGGt I. INTRODUCTION In 1990, the Federal Court of Australia rejected counsel's submission that English authorities on the "public interest" defense in breach of confidence claims ought to be adopted. The court dismissively described those authorities as "not so much a rule of law as an invitation to judicial idiosyncrasy."' The same comment seems equally applicable today. As is well-established in British common law, when deciding claims for misuse of private information (which replaces breach of confidence),2 the court must decide whether the claimant's reasonable expectation of privacy is outweighed by the contribution to a debate of public interest that the publication makes.3 As the case law shows, this is usually a delicate balance that may involve fine distinctions. Yet despite judicial recognition that the "applicable principles [should] be stated with reasonable clarity ' 4 so as to avoid accusations of judicial idiosyncrasy, the approach taken to determining the question of "public interest" remains an invitation to such, especially where celebrities' private lives are involved. Recent developments suggest broad diversity in the methodology of evaluating the worth of privacy-invading expression in which both skeptical and generous approaches are evident. These idiosyncratic factors are the subject of discussion in this Article.5 By examining the recent case law, it will be argued that since the public interest test pervades a range of measures relating to the misuse of private information tort, the issue of judicial idiosyncrasy must be addressed by an appellate court. The adoption of the skeptical approach as tLecturer in Law, School of Law, University of Leeds, UK.
  • TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual

    TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual

    2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match.
  • Lachaux V Aol Jmt Fnl 300715

    Lachaux V Aol Jmt Fnl 300715

    Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB) Case Nos: HQ14D05024 HQ14D05025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HQ15D00253 QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION HQ15D00344 HQ15D00553 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 30/07/2015 Before: MR JUSTICE WARBY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Bruno Lachaux Claimant - and - Independent Print Limited Defendant Bruno Lachaux Claimant -and- Evening Standard Limited Defendant Bruno Lachaux Claimant -and- AOL (UK) Limited Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adrienne Page QC and Godwin Busuttil (instructed by Taylor Hampton Solicitors Ltd) for the Claimant David Price QC (of David Price Solicitors & Advocates) for Independent Print Ltd. & Evening Standard Ltd. Manuel Barca QC and Hannah Ready (instructed by Lewis Silkin) for AOL Hearing dates: 20-21 July 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. MR JUSTICE WARBY Mr Justice Warby : A. INTRODUCTION 1. This is the trial of preliminary issues in these libel claims, pursuant to orders made by Nicola Davies J on 1 April 2015 and Nicol J on 29 June 2015. 2. The claimant is an aerospace engineer, a French national who currently teaches at a military college in Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates (‘UAE’), which is where he lives. He brings these claims against three different news publishers in respect of five articles first published between 20 January and 10 February 2014. 3. Two of the five articles were published online in the HuffingtonPost by AOL (UK) Ltd (‘AOL’), represented by Mr Barca QC and Ms Ready.
  • SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism Stephen Bates

    SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism Stephen Bates

    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 33 | Number 3 Article 3 1-1-2011 More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism Stephen Bates Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen Bates, More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism, 33 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 379 (2011). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. More SPEECH: Preempting Privacy Tourism by * STEPHEN BATES I. Libel Tourism .................................................................................................................... 380 II. Breach of Privacy in Britain ............................................................................................. 388 III. Publication of Private Facts in the United States ........................................................... 395 IV. Counterarguments ............................................................................................................. 401 V. Conclusion .........................................................................................................................
  • Annual Report 2016

    Annual Report 2016

    Annual Report 2016 2 Annual Review 2016 Our Theory of Change Intro MLDI provides quality legal defence to journalists in need MLDI conducts strategic litigation to advance media freedom standards Journalists face legal Journalists and media are challenges that threaten able to publish on issues their ability to report of public interest freely and independently MLDI supports partners to deliver media defence projects A better informed citizenry able to hold their governments accountable MLDI provides specialist training to lawyers on freedom of expression law 2 Annual Review 2016 Introduction MLDI defends and fosters 2016 saw a sharp decline in press freedom around the 2016 also saw some important positive developments. a free media throughout world. Media freedom in Turkey, already severely curtailed, Several courts demonstrated significant willingness to the world by providing legal was decimated (see page 17), while press freedom defend the right to freedom of expression in the face of deteriorated in nearly two-thirds of countries according to restrictive legislation or executive action to limit media support. We do this by Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index. freedom. Over the year, MLDI won journalists and bloggers administering an emergency Journalists continued to be imprisoned. MLDI supported their freedom and gained ground-breaking judgments at defence fund available cases of journalists imprisoned in Turkey, Azerbaijan, national and international courts. We worked to widen the to independent media, Ethiopia, Macedonia and Vietnam – among others. Reports space for media freedom and freedom of expression, and journalists and bloggers of torture and ill-treatment of journalists and bloggers in to keep the digital space free, open and secure.
  • European Court of Human Rights Intervention in Szurovecz V

    European Court of Human Rights Intervention in Szurovecz V

    EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS INTERVENTION IN SZUROVECZ V. HUNGARY (APPLICATION NO. 15428/16) Introduction 1. These written comments are made on behalf of the Media Legal Defence Initiative, Index on Censorship, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, European Publishers Council, PEN International, Hungarian Helsinki Committee, the Dutch Association of Journalists, and the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (the “Interveners”).1 2. The value of investigative reporting in a democracy cannot be overstated. It gives publicity to matters that would otherwise go unexposed. It informs members of the public about places or practices that have a significant impact on society, but are otherwise inaccessible or unknown to them. As has been observed on numerous occasions “[s]unlight is said to be the best of disinfectants”.2 In recent years, investigative reporters have exposed mass state surveillance,3 tax evasion by the global elite,4 instances of modern slavery,5 the plight of refugees in detention centres,6 animal cruelty,7and sexual abuse in religious institutions.8 A key component of effective investigative reporting is physical access to locations. Physical access enables journalists to understand the context in which stories are taking place and to observe directly the conditions and conduct in such locations. There are many recent examples of journalists successfully exposing matters of 1 These written comments are submitted pursuant to Rule 44(3) of the Rules of Court of 1 January 2016, following permission granted by the President of the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights (the "ECHR") in a letter dated 12 September 2016.
  • Before the Court of Appeals of the Kingdom of Cambodia

    Before the Court of Appeals of the Kingdom of Cambodia

    Before the Court of Appeals of the Kingdom of Cambodia Observations by Media Defence-Southeast Asia and the Media Legal Defence Initiative in the case of Mam Sonando concerning the appeal against criminal judgment No. 65 K.B5 dated 01 October 2012 February 2013 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE KINGDOM OF CAMBODIA OBSERVATIONS BY MEDIA DEFENCE – SOUTHEAST ASIA AND THE MEDIA LEGAL DEFENCE INITIATIVE I. Introduction 1. This submission from Media Defence Southeast Asia (MD-SEA) and the Media Legal Defence Initiative (MLDI) to the Court of Appeals of the Kingdom of Cambodia outlines Cambodia’s obligations under international law regarding freedom of expression. These observations are submitted to the Court of Appeals to assist the Court in its consideration of the appeal of Mr Mam Sonando against his conviction on 1 October 2012 to 20 years imprisonment on charges of instigating violence against the state, instigating insurrection, instigating rebellion with aggravating circumstances and instigating the unlawful interference in the performance of public functions. This judgment was handed down by the Magistrate Court of Phnom Penh on 1 October 2012 (judgment No. 65 K.B5). 2. MD-SEA and MLDI are concerned that the Magistrate Court did not take into account Cambodia’s binding legal obligations as regards free expression in general, and failed to consider Mr Sonando’s role as a journalist in particular. These observations are intended to assist the Court of Appeals in taking these issues duly into account in its consideration of Mr Sonando’s appeal. Interest of Media Defence-Southeast Asia and the Media Legal Defence Initiative 3.
  • 158 the Indexer Vol

    158 the Indexer Vol

    Book reviews Edited by Maureen MacGlashan and Nancy Mulvany Indexing Continuing the theme of real-world value, Jane Greenberg describes the role of user education in ‘User comprehension and The thesaurus: review, renaissance, and revision. Sandra K. Roe searching with information retrieval thesauri’. Her studies indicate and Alan R. Thomas. Haworth Information Press, 2004. xiv, 209 a rise in valid retrieval rates after students have a short introduc- pp., index. ISBN: 0-7890-1979-5 (pbk): $19.95. tion to thesauri components and their use in searching in highly This collection of essays is an essential addition to the library of controlled databases. Thesauri are not the simplest method of taxonomists and indexers interested in enlarging their work to search available, but her study finds students are more open to include thesauri. Bringing together many of the major theorists and using this method once they understand the concepts and benefits. practitioners, the editors have provided a wide view of thesauri and The thesaurus interface is an important component: it must allow their importance in contemporary search activities. This is truly a interaction in the process. resource book: the essays cover many important aspects of But the latest, hottest use of thesauri is occurring on the Wild thesaurus construction, and list a truly amazing amount of further West of the web. Eric H. Johnson discusses the drawbacks of web resources on every aspect. It’s a great starting point from which the searching in browsers and the need for a web services thesaurus interested reader can carry on. application. He describes how XML thesaurus protocols could Jean Aitchison and Stella Dextre Clarke summarize the history facilitate the user’s search experience, the kind of functionality of thesauri, allowing the reader to realize just how much of a foun- such an application would need, and the possibilities of cross- dation was laid 50 years ago.
  • Celebrity Privacy and the Development of the Judicial Concept of Proportionality

    Celebrity Privacy and the Development of the Judicial Concept of Proportionality

    Celebrity privacy and the development of the judicial concept of proportionality: How English law has balanced the rights to protection and interference Robin Callender Smith Queen Mary University of London Centre for Commercial Law Studies Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Date submitted: 11 August 2014 Examined by viva 6 November 2014 External examiner: Professor Ian Lloyd (Southampton University) Internal examiner: Dr. Andrew Scott (London School of Economics) Passed without corrections Statement of Originality I, Robin Callender Smith, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Robin Callender Smith 11 August 2014 2 Details of collaboration and publications R Callender Smith, Press Law (Sweet & Maxwell 1978).
  • Media and the Law: an Overview of Legal Issues and Challenges

    Media and the Law: an Overview of Legal Issues and Challenges

    Media and the Law: An Overview of Legal Issues and Challenges A Report to the Center for International Media Assistance By Peter Noorlander July 20, 2011 The Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA), a project of the National Endowment for Democracy, aims to strengthen the support, raise the visibility, and improve the effectiveness of media assistance programs by providing information, building networks, conducting research, and highlighting the indispensable role independent media play in the cre- ation and development of sustainable democracies around the world. An important aspect of CIMA’s work is to research ways to attract additional U.S. private sector interest in and support for international media develop- ment. The center was one of the of the main nongovernmental organizers of World Press Freedom Day 2011 in Washington, DC. CIMA convenes working groups, discussions, and panels on a variety of topics in the field of media development and assistance. The center also issues reports and recommendations based on working group discussions and other investigations. These reports aim to provide policymakers, as well as donors and practitioners, with ideas for bolstering the effectiveness of media assistance. Marguerite H. Sullivan Senior Director Center for International Media Assistance National Endowment for Democracy 1025 F Street, N.W., 8th Floor Washington, DC 20004 Phone: (202) 378-9700 Fax: (202) 378-9407 Email: [email protected] URL: http://cima.ned.org About the Author Peter Noorlander Peter Noorlander is a lawyer who specializes in media law and human rights. He is currently legal director of the Media Legal Defence Initiative (MLDI), an NGO that provides legal aid and helps journalists defend their rights.