New Diabetes Drugs and Heart Failure: What Have We Learnt?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Diabetes Drugs and Heart Failure: What Have We Learnt? Satellite symposium on: Heart failure, diabetes and renal dysfunction HFA Congress, Paris, 1 May 2017 New diabetes drugs and heart failure: What have we learnt? John McMurray BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow & Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow. Why are we talking about heart failure in diabetes? • HF is one of the most common cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes • HF is the most disabling and deadly complication of diabetes • Most patients with HF have either diabetes or pre-diabetic dysglycaemia • Diabetes is one of the most disabling and comorbidities complicating HF So how should we treat diabetes in patients with HF? • What do we know about treatments for diabetes and reducing the risk of developing HF (incident HF)? • What do we know about treatments for diabetes in patients with established HF (prevalent HF)? Outcome trials in T2DM: A timeline ACCORD UGDP UKPDS ADVANCE PROactive VADT 1970 1998 2002 2005 2008 Major CV outcome trials in type 2 diabetes SAVOR- Omarigliptin¶ : DPP4i TIMI 53 CAROLINA (n = 4000) (n = 16,492) N = 6041 Q42017 : SGLT2i 1222 MACE3 MACE4 ? MACE4 : GLP1 EXAMINE CARMELINA TECOS (n = 5380) N = 8300 (n = 14,723) 621 MACE3 MACE4 1300 MACE4 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ertugliflozin REWIND# ELIXA* CVOT LEADER† EXSCEL§ (n = 9622) (n = 6000) (n = 3900) (n = 9341) (n = 14000) FREEDOM§ MACE3 *lixisenatide (Sanofi, post-ACS). 844 MACE4 611 MACE3 MACE3 (n = 4000) MACE3 †liraglutide (Novo Nordisk). ? MACE4 ‡semaglutide (Novo Nordisk). CREDENCE DECLARE- §exenatide (Amylin). (n = 3627) TIMI 58 §§albiglutide (GSK) CANVAS-R Cardiorenal SUSTAIN-6‡ (n = 5700) (n = 27,000) ¶once-weekly DPP4i (Merck). EMPA-REG (n = 3260) Alb.uria MACE3 #dulaglutide (Eli Lilly). OUTCOME MACE3 N = 7034 CANVAS HARMONY §§ MACE3 (n = 4339) (n = 9400) MACE3 MACE3 ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHF, congestive heart failure; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; DPP4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT2i, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; UL, upper limit. Outcome trials in T2DM: A timeline ACCORD UGDP UKPDS ADVANCE PROactive VADT 1970 1998 2002 2005 2008 FDA guidance Rosiglitazone increases risk of myocardial infarction? United States FDA guidance FDA guidance Unacceptable harm must be excluded FDA guidance – what endpoints? The events should include cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke …and can include hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, urgent revascularization procedures ….and possibly other endpoints FDA guidance – what endpoints? The events should include cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke …and can include hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, urgent revascularization procedures ….and possibly other endpoints “Fluid retention” or heart failure? HF in diabetes trials is real and deadly RECORD: Design Patients on monotherapy Randomized to dual therapy add Rosiglitazone Metformin or Sulfonylurea add Sulfonylurea or Metformin Mean follow-up: 5.5 years Rescue therapy: Rosiglitazone group i) intensify to triple oral therapy ii) stop rosiglitazone and start insulin Metformin/SU group i) start insulin RECORD: HF with rosiglitazone Congestive Heart Failure (Adjudicated) What happened to patients who developed HF in RECORD? Any heart failure (fatal or non-fatal): 29 control patients vs. 61 rosiglitazone patients Survived first heart failure event: 29 control patients vs. 57 rosiglitazone patients Subsequent risk of death: 8 control patients (28%) vs. 17 rosiglitazone patients (30%) Major CV outcome trials in type 2 diabetes SAVOR- Omarigliptin¶ : DPP4i TIMI 53 CAROLINA (n = 4000) (n = 16,492) N = 6041 Q42017 : SGLT2i 1222 MACE3 MACE4 ? MACE4 : GLP1 EXAMINE CARMELINA TECOS (n = 5380) N = 8300 (n = 14,723) 621 MACE3 MACE4 1300 MACE4 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ertugliflozin REWIND# ELIXA* CVOT LEADER† EXSCEL§ (n = 9622) (n = 6000) (n = 3900) (n = 9341) (n = 14000) FREEDOM§ MACE3 *lixisenatide (Sanofi, post-ACS). 844 MACE4 611 MACE3 MACE3 (n = 4000) MACE3 †liraglutide (Novo Nordisk). ? MACE4 ‡semaglutide (Novo Nordisk). CREDENCE DECLARE- §exenatide (Amylin). (n = 3627) TIMI 58 §§albiglutide (GSK) CANVAS-R Cardiorenal SUSTAIN-6‡ (n = 5700) (n = 27,000) ¶once-weekly DPP4i (Merck). EMPA-REG (n = 3260) Alb.uria MACE3 #dulaglutide (Eli Lilly). OUTCOME MACE3 N = 7034 CANVAS HARMONY §§ MACE3 (n = 4339) (n = 9400) MACE3 MACE3 ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHF, congestive heart failure; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; DPP4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT2i, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; UL, upper limit. Glucagon-like peptide-1/ Incretin therapies New approaches to reducing blood glucose Inhibit gastro- GLP-1 agonists/analogues intestinal absorption e.g. exenatide (α-glucosidase inhib’s) Stimulate insulin Incretins release Reduce •(GIP) blood glucose •GLP-1 Inhibit glucagon DPP4 release Breakdown Inhibit renal products DPP4 inhibitors re-absorption (“gliptins”) (SGLT2 inhibitors) Major DPP-4 inhibitor CV outcome trials 1 2 3 4 5 DPP-4 inhibitor Saxagliptin Alogliptin Sitagliptin Linagliptin Linagliptin Comparator Placebo Placebo Placebo SU Placebo No. of patients 16,492 5,380 14,723 6,041 ~8,3000 Trial initiation/ May 2010 Sept. 2009 Nov. 2008 Oct. 2010 July 2013 completion May 2013 June 2013 June 2015 Sept. 2018 Jan. 2018 Excluded DPP-4i DPP-4i DPP-4i DPP-4i DPP-4i background GLP-1 RA GLP-1 RA GLP-1 RA GLP-1 RA GLP-1 RA therapy Rosiglitazone TZD SGLT-2i CVD/CV risk CVD/ subclinical CVD & Patients ACS CVD factors (RF) CVD/CVRF UACR/renal dysf. SAVOR-TIMI53 Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus SAVOR-TIMI53 Design: T2DM aged ≥40 yr. with established CV disease or aged ≥55 yr. (≥60 yr. women) with ≥1 risk factor for CV disease. HbA1c 6.5-12.0%. Superiority design. Patients enrolled: 16,492 patients. Mean age 65 yr. 33% female. 79% CV disease. Mean HbA1c 8.0%. BMI 31 kg/m2. Median duration of diabetes 10.0 yr. Insulin treated 41%. Placebo-corrected decrease in HbA1c: 0.3% at 2 yr (0.2% end-of-study). Primary outcome: CV death, MI or ischaemic stroke. Intervention: Randomized 1:1 to placebo or saxagliptin 5mg/d (2.5 mg if eGFR ≤50 ml/min/1.73m2). Follow-up: Median 2.1 years. NEJM 2013; 369:1317-1326 SAVOR-TIMI53: Primary outcome NEJM 2013; 369:1317-1326 SAVOR-TIMI53 % MI HF Stroke* CV death 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 n = 278 228 141 260 * Ischaemic stroke NEJM 2013; 369:1317-1326 SAVOR-TIMI53 % MI HF Stroke* CV death saxagliptin 4 p = 0.007 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 n = 278 265 228 289 141 157 260 269 * Ischaemic stroke NEJM 2013; 369:1317-1326 It was real heart failure! Subsequent risk in patients hospitalized with heart failure Placebo Saxagliptin HR Death 25.9% 26.3% 1.01 (0.72-1.43) Readmission for HF 25.0% 27.7% 1.06 (0.75-1.50) The DPP-4 inhibitor trials DPP-4 inhibitor trials First hospitalization for heart failure Cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure McGuire et al JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:126-35. More questions than answers? Is the increase in heart failure hospitalization with saxagliptin real or spurious? What about alogliptin? If the effect in SAVOR-TIMI-53 is real, is it a drug- specific effect? How likely is it that one (or two) drugs in a class are different than the others? If it is real, why does it occur? No plausible explanation to date. Potential CV actions of DDP-4 inhibitors Oyama & Node Circ J. 2014;78(4):819-24. New approaches to reducing blood glucose Inhibit gastro- GLP-1 agonists/analogues intestinal absorption e.g. exenatide (α-glucosidase inhib’s) Stimulate insulin Incretins release Reduce •(GIP) blood glucose •GLP-1 Inhibit glucagon DPP4 release Breakdown Inhibit renal products DPP4 inhibitors re-absorption (“gliptins”) (SGLT2 inhibitors) Major CV outcome trials in type 2 diabetes SAVOR- Omarigliptin¶ : DPP4i TIMI 53 CAROLINA (n = 4000) (n = 16,492) N = 6041 Q42017 : SGLT2i 1222 MACE3 MACE4 ? MACE4 : GLP1 EXAMINE CARMELINA TECOS (n = 5380) N = 8300 (n = 14,723) 621 MACE3 MACE4 1300 MACE4 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Ertugliflozin REWIND# ELIXA* CVOT LEADER† EXSCEL§ (n = 9622) (n = 6000) (n = 3900) (n = 9341) (n = 14000) FREEDOM§ MACE3 *lixisenatide (Sanofi, post-ACS). 844 MACE4 611 MACE3 MACE3 (n = 4000) MACE3 †liraglutide (Novo Nordisk). ? MACE4 ‡semaglutide (Novo Nordisk). CREDENCE DECLARE- §exenatide (Amylin). (n = 3627) TIMI 58 §§albiglutide (GSK) CANVAS-R Cardiorenal SUSTAIN-6‡ (n = 5700) (n = 27,000) ¶once-weekly DPP4i (Merck). EMPA-REG (n = 3260) Alb.uria MACE3 #dulaglutide (Eli Lilly). OUTCOME MACE3 N = 7034 CANVAS HARMONY §§ MACE3 (n = 4339) (n = 9400) MACE3 MACE3 ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHF, congestive heart failure; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; DPP4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP1, glucagon-like peptide 1; HR, hazard ratio; SGLT2i, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; UL, upper limit. Major GLP-1 RA CV outcome trials 1 2 3 4 5 REWIND 6 7 ITCA 650/ GLP-1 RA Lixisenatide Liraglutide Semaglutide Exenatide Dulaglutide Albiglutide exenatide Comparator Placebo Placebo Placebo Placebo Placebo Placebo Placebo No. of 6068 9340 3297 ~14000 ~4000 ~9600 ~9400 patients Trial initiation/ June 2010 Sept. 2010 Feb. 2013 June 2010 March 2013 July 2011 June 2015 completion April 2015 Oct. 2015 Jan. 2016 April 2018 July 2018 April 2019 Aug. 2019 Excluded DPP-4i DPP-4i DPP-4i GLP-1 - ? - therapy pramlintide pramlintide pramlintide agonists CVD/
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacokinetics of Omarigliptin, a Once-Weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor
    Available online a t www.derpharmachemica.com ISSN 0975-413X Der Pharma Chemica, 2016, 8(12):292-295 CODEN (USA): PCHHAX (http://derpharmachemica.com/archive.html) Mini-review: Pharmacokinetics of Omarigliptin, a Once-weekly Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Nermeen Ashoush a,b aClinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, British University in Egypt, El- Sherouk city, Cairo 11837, Egypt. bHead of Health Economics Unit, Center for Drug Research and Development (CDRD), Faculty of Pharmacy, British University in Egypt, El-Sherouk city, Cairo 11837, Egypt. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are novel oral hypoglycemic drugs which have been in clinical use for the past 10 years. The drugs are safe, weight neutral and widely prescribed. There are currently many gliptins approved by FDA, namely sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin with several more in advanced stages of development. The gliptins may possess cardiovascular protective effects and their administration may promote β-cell survival; claims currently being evaluated in clinical and preclinical studies. The gliptins are an optional second-line therapy after metformin; they are generally well tolerated with low risk of hypoglycemia. The various compounds differ with respect to their pharmacokinetic properties; however, their clinical efficacy appears to be similar. The clinical differences between the various compounds
    [Show full text]
  • Renato Wilberto Zilli Eficácia Em Longo Prazo Das
    RENATO WILBERTO ZILLI EFICÁCIA EM LONGO PRAZO DAS GLIFLOZINAS VERSUS GLIPTINAS NO TRATAMENTO DO DIABETES MELLITUS TIPO 2 APÓS FALÊNCIA DA METFORMINA COMO MONOTERAPIA: REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA E METANÁLISE EM REDE Tese apresentada ao Programa de Ciências Médicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Área de Concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos Orientador: Prof. Dr. Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva (Versão corrigida. Resolução CoPGr 6018/11, de 13 de outubro de 2011. A versão original está disponível na Biblioteca da FMUSP) São Paulo 2017 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) Preparada pela Biblioteca da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo ©reprodução autorizada pelo autor Zilli, Renato Wilberto Eficácia em longo prazo das gliflozinas versus gliptinas no tratamento do diabetes mellitus tipo 2 após falência da metformina como monoterapia : revisão sistemática e metanálise em rede / Renato Wilberto Zilli ‐‐ São Paulo, 2017. Tese(doutorado)--Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Programa de Ciências Médicas. Área de concentração: Processos Imunes e Infecciosos. Orientador: Fabiano Pinheiro da Silva. Descritores: 1.Diabetes mellitus tipo 2 2.Metanálise 3.Terapia combinada 4.Falha de tratamento 5.Metformina 6.Inibidores da dipeptidil peptidase IV 7.Transportador 2 de glucose‐sódio/inibidores 8.Empagliflozina 9.Dapagliflozina 10.Saxagliptina USP/FM/DBD ‐302/17 Esta tese de doutorado está de acordo com as seguintes normas, em vigor no momento desta publicação: Referências: adaptado de International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (Vancouver). Guia de apresentação e dissertações, teses e monografias. Elaborado por Anneliese Cordeiro da Cunha, Maria Julia de A.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Efficacy of Omarigliptin (MK-3102), a Novel Once-Weekly
    2106 Diabetes Care Volume 38, November 2015 fi Wayne H.-H. Sheu,1 Ira Gantz,2 Safety and Ef cacy of Omarigliptin Menghui Chen,2 Shailaja Suryawanshi,2 Arpana Mirza,2 Barry J. Goldstein,2 (MK-3102), a Novel Once-Weekly Keith D. Kaufman,2 and Samuel S. Engel2 DPP-4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Care 2015;38:2106–2114 | DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0109 OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to determine the optimal dose of omarigliptin, a once- weekly (q.w.) dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and evaluate the long-term safety of that dose. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week, dose-range finding study, 685 oral antihy- perglycemic agent-na¨ıve or washed-out subjects with type 2 diabetes were random- ized to one of five once-weekly doses of omarigliptin (0.25 mg, 1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, or 25 mg) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in HbA1c, and secondary end points were 2-h postmeal glucose (PMG) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. Subjects who completed the base study were eligible to enter a 66-week extension study. RESULTS Once-weekly treatment for 12 weeks with omarigliptin provided dose-related reduc- 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, De- partment of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES AND THERAPEUTICS tions in HbA , 2-h PMG, and FPG.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events Associated with Glucose-Lowering Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-Analysis
    Online Supplementary Content Palmer SC, Mavridis D, Nicolucci A, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with glucose-lowering drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9400. eMethods. Summary of Statistical Analysis eTable 1. Search Strategies eTable 2. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 3. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 4. Description of Included Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea eTable 5. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 6. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Dual Therapy Added to Metformin eTable 7. Risks of Bias in Clinical Trials Evaluating Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy When Added to Metformin plus Sulfonylurea eTable 8. Estimated Global Inconsistency in Networks of Outcomes eTable 9. Estimated Heterogeneity in Networks eTable 10. Definitions of Treatment Failure Outcome eTable 11. Contributions of Direct Evidence to the Networks of Treatments eTable 12. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy eTable 13. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Associations for Drug Classes When Used in Dual Therapy (in Addition to Metformin) eTable 14. Network Meta-analysis Estimates of Comparative Treatment Effects for Drug Classes Given as Triple Therapy eTable 15. Meta-regression Analyses for Drug Classes Given as Monotherapy (Compared With Metformin) eTable 16. Subgroup Analyses of Individual Sulfonylurea Drugs (as Monotherapy) on Hypoglycemia eTable 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Mastering the Outpatient Type 2 Management Objectives
    Jorge De Jesús MD Mastering the outpatient Type 2 Management Objectives: After this presentation you will be able to recognize: .Diabetes Mellitus is a progressive disease .Prevention is possible for selected high risk individuals • Outline the clinical considerations in the selection of pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes, including degree of A1C lowering achieved, patient- specific concerns, adverse drug reactions, and contraindications • Discuss the role and timing of combination therapy in achieving A1C goals • Explain the implications of recent, large randomized clinical trials on clinical decision-making • Modifications in 2019 ADA guidelines based on recent RCT trials Individualize Choose A1c goal 7% for most patients < 7% younger with few comorbidities Older group with multiple Comorbidities could be around 8% Glucose-lowering medication in type 2 diabetes: overall approach. American Diabetes Association Dia Care 2019;42:S90-S102 10: COST !!! ©2019 by American Diabetes Association Case 1: Carmen 55 year-old female with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes Active: she takes care of her grandchildren while their mother works On physical examination , she is alert oriented Too busy to exercise. Eats the cooperative no acute distress same food as her grandchildren Height: 64” Weight 188# BMI=33 No alcohol BP=160/100 Foot Exam : normal pulses ; normal sensory Has hypertension and sleep apnea Fundoscopy , no retinopathy A1c=7.4%; creatinine .9 mg /dL; No history of pancreatitis, no no microalbuminuria; abnormal liver function, or CHF LDL=146
    [Show full text]
  • Official Protocol Title: NCT Number: NCT02906709 Document Date
    Official Protocol Title: A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial and Subsequent Open-Label, Extension Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Omarigliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin Monotherapy in Addition to Diet and Exercise Therapy NCT number: NCT02906709 Document Date: 10-Mar-2017 Product: MK -3102 1 Protocol/Amendment No.: 039-01 THIS PROTOCOL AND ALL OF THE INFORMATION RELATING TO IT ARE CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., A SUBSIDIARY OF MERCK & CO., INC., WHITEHOUSE STATION, NJ, U.S.A. SPONSOR: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (hereafter referred to as the Sponsor or Merck) One Merck Drive P.O. Box 100 Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, 08889-0100, U.S.A. Protocol-specific Sponsor Contact information can be found in the Investigator Trial File Binder (or equivalent). TITLE: A Phase IV, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Trial and Subsequent Open-Label, Extension Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Omarigliptin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Insulin Monotherapy in Addition to Diet and Exercise Therapy EudraCT NUMBER: Not Applicable MK-3102-039-01 Final Protocol 10-Mar-2017 04MKJ4 Confidential Product: MK-3102 2 Protocol/Amendment No.: 039-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF CHANGES...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/018931 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/018931 Al 4 February 2016 (04.02.2016) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07K 14/495 (2006.01) A61K 38/18 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C07K 14/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 15/0425 10 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, 28 July 2015 (28.07.2015) MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (25) Filing Language: English SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (26) Publication Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/03 1,063 30 July 2014 (30.07.2014) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 62/195,908 23 July 2015 (23.07.2015) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, (71) Applicant: NGM BIOPHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Omarigliptin Decreases Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in A
    Hattori Diabetol Metab Syndr (2020) 12:24 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00533-3 Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome RESEARCH Open Access Omarigliptin decreases infammation and insulin resistance in a pleiotropic manner in patients with type 2 diabetes Sachiko Hattori* Abstract Background: Omarigliptin is a potent, selective, oral dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor with a half-life that allows weekly dosing. Infammation or insulin resistance might be pathological mediators of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Whether omarigliptin has anti-infammatory efects that result in decreased levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and anti-insulin resistance efects that decrease levels of homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were investigated. Patients were allocated to continue with daily DPP4 inhibitors (control, n 28) or to switch from daily DPP4 inhibitors to weekly omarigliptin (omarigliptin, n 56). Fasting blood and urine samples= were collected before, and every 3 months after intervention for 1 year. = Results: Omarigliptin tended to elicit reductions in fasting blood glucose (FBG), LDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, aspar- tate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) with logarithmic transformation (log ACR), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but the diferences did not reach statistical signifcance compared with control. Values for HDL-cholesterol tended to increase, but also did not reach statistical signifcance compared with control. Omarigliptin signifcantly decreased HOMA-IR, remnant-like particle cholesterol (RLP-C), and hsCRP with logarithmic transformation (log hsCRP) compared with control. However, omarigliptin did not afect hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), and estimated glomerular fltration rates (eGFR).
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy 482 Literature Review of Oral Treatment
    Med. Surg. J. – Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat., Iaşi – 2020 – vol. 124, no. 3 PHARMACY REVIEWS LITERATURE REVIEW OF ORAL TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS Mousa Sha’at1, Cristina Mihaela Ghiciuc2, Alexandra Bujor1*, D. V. Timofte2, Alina Ștefanache1, Lăcrămioara Ochiuz1 “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iasi 1. Faculty of Pharmacy 2. Faculty of Medicine *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] LITERATURE REVIEW OF ORAL TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS (Abstract): Type 2 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the most common form of diabetes that affects more than 90% of diabetic patients, is characterized by insulin re- sistance, β-pancreatic cells dysfunction, and increased hepatic glucose synthesis. The aim of the present paper was to review data on the efficacy of conventional oral dosage forms com- pared to controlled oral drug delivery systems for treating diabetes. Although the number of oral antidiabetic drugs has significantly increased in recent years, clinically there are still important limitations in terms of therapeutic efficacy, tolerability, and adverse effects, par- ticularly regarding weight gain and medium and long-term glucose control. The last genera- tion of oral pharmaceutical formulations such as modified-release tablets overcame some limitations, while injectable formulations with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists sig- nificantly increased the effectiveness of anti-diabetic medication and significantly reduced diabetes-specific comorbidities. Metformin extended-release formulation seems to be more effective than metformin conventional-release formulation in improving glyco-metabolic control, lipid profile, and levels of some adipocytokines in T2DM. Sustained-release glipiz- ide formulation increases the compliance compared to immediate-release glipizide because it seems to achieve similar glucose control with decreased insulin secretion and to decrease the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin Monotherapy for Treating Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT VOLUME 21 ISSUE 2 JANUARY 2017 ISSN 1366-5278 Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin monotherapy for treating type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation Rhona Johnston, Olalekan Uthman, Ewen Cummins, Christine Clar, Pamela Royle, Jill Colquitt, Bee Kang Tan, Andrew Clegg, Saran Shantikumar, Rachel Court, J Paul O’Hare, David McGrane, Tim Holt and Norman Waugh DOI 10.3310/hta21020 Canagliflozin, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin monotherapy for treating type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation Rhona Johnston,1 Olalekan Uthman,2 Ewen Cummins,1 Christine Clar,3 Pamela Royle,2 Jill Colquitt,4 Bee Kang Tan,2 Andrew Clegg,5 Saran Shantikumar,2 Rachel Court,2 J Paul O’Hare,2 David McGrane,6 Tim Holt7 and Norman Waugh2* 1McMDC, Harrogate, UK 2Warwick Evidence, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK 3Berlin, Germany 4Effective Evidence, Waterlooville, UK 5University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK 6Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK 7University of Oxford, Oxford, UK *Corresponding author Declared competing interests of authors: David McGrane has spoken at educational meetings sponsored by AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Novo Nordisk, Janssen, and has served on Advisory Boards for Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk. J Paul O’Hare has received lecture fees, advisory board meeting fees, and grants for research from Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. All fees are paid through University of Warwick to fund access to insulin projects in sub-Saharan Africa. Published January 2017 DOI: 10.3310/hta21020 This report should be referenced as follows: Johnston R, Uthman O, Cummins E, Clar C, Royle P, Colquitt J, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Document
    BMJ Confidential: For Review Only Sodium-Glucose Transport Protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Journal: BMJ Manuscript ID BMJ-2020-058523 Article Type: Research BMJ Journal: BMJ Date Submitted by the 17-May-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Palmer, Suetonia; University of Otago Christchurch, Medicine Tendal, Britta; Monash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Mustafa, Reem; University of Kansas School of Medicine, Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension; McMaster University, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact Vandvik, Per; Innlandet Hospital Trust-divisjon Gjøvik, Department of Medicine Li, Sheyu; Sichuan University, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital Hao, Qiukui; Sichuan University West China Hospital; McMaster University Department of Medicine, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact Tunnicliffe, David; The University of Sydney, School of Public Health Ruospo, Marinella; University of Bari, Department of Emergency and Transplantation Natale, Patrizia; The University of Sydney, School of Public Health Saglimbene, Valeria; University of Bari, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation Nicolucci, Antonio; Center for Outcomes Research and clinical Epidemiology (CORESEARCH) Johnson, David; Translational Research Institute Tonelli, Marcello; University of Calgary, Cumming
    [Show full text]
  • Stembook 2018.Pdf
    The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances FORMER DOCUMENT NUMBER: WHO/PHARM S/NOM 15 WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1 © World Health Organization 2018 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. The use of stems in the selection of International Nonproprietary Names (INN) for pharmaceutical substances. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018 (WHO/EMP/RHT/TSN/2018.1). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data.
    [Show full text]