DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-Element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-Element Data Sean Donelan – Sean@Donelan.Com Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] This guidance attempts to follow the Common Alerting Protocol philosophy -- one CAP message is intended to be distributed by multiple alerting channels. The guidance is intended to improve the consistency of CAP messages across all IPAWS distribution channels. Some items improve interoperability with different implementations, such as specifying case-sensitive versus case- insensitive values. Other items would improve the public presentation of alerts, but don’t affect the operation of the alert system. The guidance does not favor a particular IPAWS distribution channel. Nevertheless, this guidance does recognize some CAP elements are used for specific IPAWS distribution channels. For example, general CAP elements such as Headline, Description and Instructions used by multiple IPAWS distribution channels, should use mixed case text with normal punctuation according to the Info block language. But CMAMtext and CMAMlongtext Parameter elements, used only for WEA, should use only characters which can be transformed into the GSM 7-bit character set. Finally, some poorly specified CAP elements could be used by new IPAWS distribution channels, such as Internet and future alerting systems, if better specified. Geo-location elements and Resource blocks are examples. Interoperability items are always the most difficult to reach agreement, because multiple choices are possible. Different choices may be correct but may not be interoperable. This guidance intentionally makes some choices which are different than individual alerting origination software, but I believe improve the overall alerting ecosystem across all stakeholders. That does not mean those vendors were incorrect. I hope those vendors and customers will consider making compatible changes. CAP Alert Element and Sub-elements Details CAP v1.2 standard Liberal accept Conservative send Notes Alert <alert> Required. The container for all component parts of the alert message. (Required) Message ID <identifier> Must be unique (case- Automatically generate Must be something unique for The identifier of the alert sensitive) within same Sender Message ID when sent. each message. message. ID. Suggestion: A Universally (Required) Unique Identifier (UUID) or 3/13/19 1 Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] Must not include spaces, Use only URL and Filename (GUID), e.g., “123e4567-e89b- commas or restricted Safe Alphabet (RFC4648) [A- 12d3-a456-426655440000.” characters (< and &). Za-z0-9], hyphen and Use database or include underscore. workstation hash to avoid ID An identical Message ID could collisions. be used with multiple Sender Avoid case-sensitive values, Alternative: A structured string IDs. Message IDs are not i.e., use all upper or used to order and group universally unique, only lowercase. When used in events in other systems, such unique with the same Sender Reference ID, could be treated as used by IPAWS tests, NWS ID. as case-sensitive. and NCMEC. Maximum 64 characters. Do not reuse Message IDs with the same Sender ID. Sender ID <sender> Assigned globally unique Automatically populate based Avoid personally identifiable The identifier of the sender of (case-sensitive) name for alert on alerting organization. information, such as operator the alert message. originator. email addresses. “<name>@” (Required) Use only Internet domain portion usually unnecessary. Must not include spaces, name alphabet (RFC1035) [A- commas or restricted Za-z0-9], hyphen and period. Suggest using organization characters (< and &). fully qualified domain name: Avoid mixed case names, i.e., “fema.dhs.gov” Verify (Message ID and Sender use all upper or lowercase. “mshp.dps.missouri.gov” ID) is not a duplicate Alert. When used in Reference ID, “oem.nyc.gov” could be treated as case- Organization domain should sensitive. be consistent with COG. Maximum 64 characters. The Sender ID is always the actual originator, even if the Sender Name is a different 3/13/19 2 Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] agency name. The Sender ID element is not intended to be rendered as part of the public alert. Sent Date/Time <sent> Must have valid date / time / Automatically populate with Use local time and time zone The time and date of the offset format “CCYY-MM- the current time when sending offset of intended alert area or origination of the alert DDThh:mm:ssXzh:zm”. the CAP message. community. message. (Required) Verify the Sent Date/Time is Sent Date/Time must be If a nationwide alert, use recent, i.e., not older than the within +/- two minutes of Eastern time zone offset. expiration time interval for the current time. distribution channel. See notes below. Message Status <status> CAP v1.2 code values “Actual” Required for Public alerts. The code denoting the Allowed values Actual, appropriate handling of the Exercise, System, Test or Draft. alert message. (Required) Message Type <msgType> CAP v1.2 code values Alert, Update or Cancel Alert, Update and Cancel The code denoting the nature Allowed values Alert, Update, message types used for Public of the alert message. Cancel, Ack or Error. alerts. (Required) Source <source> Omit, if not used. May appear as the signature The text identifying the source line in the alert message in of the alert message. Automatically populate based some CAP distribution (Optional) on alert origination point. channels. Should be treated as metadata, not normally rendered as part of the public alert. 3/13/19 3 Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] See notes below. Scope <scope> CAP v1.2 code values “Public” Required for Public alerts. The code denoting the Allowed values Public, Public alerts are assumed to intended distribution of the Restricted or Private. be appropriate for immediate alert message. public release. (Required) Restriction <restriction> Required when Scope is Omit, if not used. CAP public distribution The text describing the rule for Restricted. channels should NOT render limiting distribution of the May be present even when Must not be present in Public CAP messages containing a restricted alert message. Scope is not Restricted. alerts. Restriction element, even if (Conditional) the Scope element is Public. Alert Originators should not rely on (public) exchange partners obeying the contents of the Restriction element. Addresses <addresses> Required when Scope is Omit, if not used. Not used by CAP public The group listing of intended Private, optional when Scope distribution channels. recipients of the alert is Public or Restricted. May be used for CAPEXCH, message. Space delimited string of all even when Scope is Public, to (Conditional) COG-ID(s) that the message notify other COGs. will be posted to. Handling Code <code> “IPAWSV1.0” Required for Public alerts. The code denoting the special handling of the alert message. (Optional, multiple occurrences allowed) Note <note> Omit, if not used. Not used by Public CAP The text describing the distribution channels. purpose or significance of the If present, should contain A Note element should be alert message. plain text, without control present when Message Status (Optional) 3/13/19 4 Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] codes or formatting is Exercise or Message Type is characters. Error. Reference IDs <references> Required when Message Type Cancel, Update, Ack or Error All related messages that have The group listing identifying is Update, Cancel, Ack or Error. should automatically populate not yet expired must be earlier message(s) referenced May be present when from unexpired, previous CAP referenced for Update and by the alert message. Message Type is Alert. message(s). Cancel messages. (Optional) If present, must reference earlier CAP message or Preserve exact element values Do not include Reference IDs messages and structured as from original CAP message, of expired CAP message(s). “sender,identifier,sent” including case. with 3 data elements and 2 Alerting organizations should commas. not Update or Cancel If multiple CAP messages are messages with different referenced, each reference ID Sender IDs, except in structure must be separated extraordinary circumstances. by whitespace. CAP exchange partners should check for exact match, including case-sensitive. If no previous message found, may check for case-insensitive match. Incident IDs <incidents> If multiple incident identifiers Omit if not used. Not used by Public CAP The group listing naming the are referenced, they shall be distribution channels. referent incident(s) of the separated by whitespace. May be used for CAPEXCH. alert message. Incident names containing (Optional) whitespace shall be surrounded by double-quotes. Notes on Sent Date/Time element: 3/13/19 5 Guidance for IPAWS Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Elements and Sub-element Data Sean Donelan – [email protected] All time elements (Sent, Effective, Onset, Expires) in CAP message should use the local time zone of the alerting area of responsibility. If an alerting organization’s area of responsibility spans multiple time zones, choose a consistent local convention. For example, statewide Amber alerts could use the local time and time zone offset of the state capital. Avoid using Coordinated Universal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—House H9539
    October 10, 2000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H9539 the hard work of these agencies; but we SECTION 1. TIME ZONE ESTABLISHED. the name Chamorro. The time zone will know that much work needs to be (a) IN GENERAL.ÐThe first section of the honor the historic unity of Guam and done. Act of March 19, 1918 (15 U.S.C. 261; com- the Commonwealth of the Marianas monly known as the Calder Act) is amend- H. Res. 575 will not stop criminal ac- and the people who live in the region. tivity. It will not protect our citizens edÐ (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``eight I congratulate the gentleman from from sinister behavior, but it does take zones'' and inserting ``nine zones''; and Guam (Mr. UNDERWOOD) for his work on this important step: it brings to light (2) in the second sentenceÐ this bill; and, of course, I congratulate the relevant issues facing Internet (A) by striking ``; and that of the eighth'' his staff and all the staff members that usage, and hopefully it will help edu- and inserting ``; that of the eighth''; and have been involved in this. cate the American people of the need (B) by inserting before the period the fol- Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of to be watchful of Internet activity, es- lowing: ``; and that of the ninth zone on the my time. pecially as it affects our Nation's chil- one hundred and fiftieth meridian of lon- Mr. OXLEY. Mr. Speaker, I continue dren. gitude east from Greenwich.''. to reserve the balance of my time.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermo Scientific Model 42Iq Instrument Manual
    42iQ Instruction Manual NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer 117435-00 • 1Mar2019 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 iQ Series Instrument Platform............................................................. 1-1 Principle of Operation ........................................................................ 1-3 Specifications ...................................................................................... 1-5 Dimensions ......................................................................................... 1-7 Chapter 2 Installation and Setup ...................................................................................... 2-1 Unpacking and Inspection .................................................................. 2-1 Cover Removing and Replacing .......................................................... 2-2 Mounting Options .............................................................................. 2-3 Bench Mount ................................................................................... 2-3 Rack Mount ..................................................................................... 2-4 Setup Procedure .................................................................................. 2-6 Startup ................................................................................................ 2-8 Chapter 3 Operation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intern Brochure 2022-2023
    Guam-PIC Intern Brochure 2022 Intern Brochure 2022-2023 1 Guam-PIC Intern Brochure 2022 Aim: The Guam Psychology Internship Consortium’s (Guam-PIC) aim is to prepare, train, and retain psychologists to provide culturally competent collaborative health care for the underserved and diverse people of Guam. The Guam Psychology Internship Consortium (Guam-PIC) represents the collaborative effort of two agencies – Guam Behavioral Health and Wellness Center (GBHWC) in Tamuning, Guam, and Guam’s Department of Corrections (DOC) in Mangilao, Guam. These agencies have partnered to share resources and faculty for the purpose of providing a diversified educational program for psychology interns, focusing on training in culturally relevant and competent services for Guam’s diverse and often underserved population, in addition to the professional competencies outlined by the American Psychological Association and another specific to Guam-PIC. Guam-PIC has partnered with the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education’s Behavioral Health Program (WICHE BHP) in the development of the internship consortium to provide consultation and support. The WICHE BHP has the building of the behavioral health workforce in the western United States as a central tenant to its mission and a track record of assisting in the development of successful and accredited psychology internship consortia and/or internships in eight other western states and territories. Accreditation Status The Guam Psychology Internship Consortium (Guam-PIC) is not accredited by the American Psychological Association. APPIC Membership Status Guam-PIC is a not a member of APPIC and will not participate in the APPIC/National Matching Service Match for 2022-2023. The Guam Psychology Internship Consortium will be accepting DIRECT APPLICATION from interested candidates for the 2022-2023 internship year.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent History Seven of Seven GUAM PRESERVATION TRUST
    Recent History Seven of Seven GUAM PRESERVATION TRUST Guam Preservation Trust (GPT) is dedicated to preserving Guam’s historic sites and culture as well as educating the public about those issues. Although primarily tasked with restoring historic structures, which are listed in the Guam Register of Historic Places and/or the National Register of Historic Places, GPT also funds various types of cultural preservation projects. GPT was created as a nonprofit public corporation in 1990 by Public Law 20-151, and is governed by a Board of Directors. In the 2011 National Preservation Trust Awards, the Guam Preservation Trust won the "Trustees' Award for Organizational Excellence" for our long-term preservation of Guam's history and building a sense of community pride. GPT’s mandated purposes are: • To seek outside grants and donations • To acquire title to threatened Guam properties for the preservation of their historical value, whether in fee simple, by leasehold, or by easement, and whether through donation, transfer, dedication or purchase • To award grants for: I. Historic Property Documentation and Register Nomination II. Public Interpretation and Presentation III. Architectural History IV. Repair, Restoration or Renovation of Historic Buildings and Structures V. Ethnography and Oral History VI. Archival Research VII. Archaeological Research VIII. Miscellaneous Throughout it’s 22 year existence, Guam Preservation Trust has funded approximately $20 million dollars towards varying historic preservation projects such as the restoration of 15 historic structures, archaeological studies, oral histories, documentaries, conferences, resource publications and many others. One grantee GPT is particularly proud of is Guampedia.com. GPT has been a partner of the Guampedia Foundation, Inc from the very beginning of its planning efforts to funding IT costs, its 2008 launch and hundreds of entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H9537
    October 10, 2000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H9537 her husband's dealer of six years under the Whereas there are an estimated 200 million veloping a nationally recognized pro- Utah DDLA law. pages of pornography, hate, violence, and gram called Operation Blue Ridge MAKING IT A FEDERAL CASE abuse on the Internet; Thunder, Sheriff Brown and his office This legislation, intended to extend the Whereas there are multitudes of strangers have targeted pedophiles that use the who use the Internet to enter homes, talk to drug dealer liability to the Federal level, Internet to reach children. While law would establish a vehicle for persons in the and ``groom'' children, and will take inde- cent advantages of those children if given a enforcement officials in Bedford Coun- 38 states that have not enacted a similar law ty, Virginia and elsewhere have been (and to those in the twelve states listed chance; above if the Federal law is preferable). How- Whereas children have been raped, as- successful in apprehending on-line ever, the amendment would only allow an in- saulted, kidnapped, and deprived of their in- predators, there is no substitute for dividual who used drugs to recover damages nocence by individuals they met on the having parents and children that are if they worked with authorities to provide Internet; and aware and educated on the dangers information on all of that individual's nar- Whereas September 2000 is Internet Safety that exist on the Internet and how to cotics sources. Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representa- keep children safe from online preda- The Latham amendment is different from tors.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement #2-2016 Sept 2 2016.Indd
    NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO THE 2016 NACHA OPERATING RULES September 2, 2016 SUPPLEMENT #2-2016 1. Third-Party Sender Registration Effective Date: September 29, 2017 2. Minor Rules Topics Effective Dates: August 18, 2016 September 23, 2016 March 16, 2018 3. Network Administration Fees Effective Date: January 1, 2017 © 2016 NACHA — The Electronic Payments Association®. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, retransmitted, transferred or displayed, in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including by photocopy, digital transmission, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission of NACHA. This material is not intended to provide any warranties, legal advice, or profes- sional assistance of any kind. SUPPLEMENT #2-2016 TO THE NACHA OPERATING RULES Supplement #2-2016 to the NACHA Operating Rules On August 18, 2016, the NACHA Voting Membership approved eleven amendments to the NACHA Operating Rules (Rules). The effective dates for the eleven topics covered by these rule changes range from August 18, 2016 to March 16, 2018. The effective date for each topic is included in the discussion of each rule change. This supplement also contains the 2017 ACH Network Administration Fees as approved by NACHA’s Board of Directors. The new fee schedule is effective January 1, 2017. This supplement provides ACH Network participants with a summary of the key components of each change, along with details regarding the technical changes to Rules language. To ensure compliance with the most current rules, this Supplement should be used in conjunction with the 2016 edition of the Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Final Format August 2015
    Wayreading Chamorro Literature from Guam By Craig Santos Perez A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies In the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Beth Piatote, Chair Professor Elizabeth DeLoughrey Professor Thomas J. Biolsi Professor Hertha D. Wong Summer 2015 © Copyright Craig Santos Perez 2015 Abstract Wayreading Chamorro Literature from Guam by Craig Santos Perez Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies University of California, Berkeley Professor Beth Piatote, Chair This dissertation maps and navigates contemporary literature by indigenous Chamorro authors from the Pacific island of Guam. Because Guam has experienced more than three centuries of colonization by three different imperial nations, Chamorro language, beliefs, customs, practices, identities, and aesthetics have been suppressed, changed, and sometimes completely replaced. As a result of these colonial changes, many anthropologists and historians have claimed that authentically indigenous Chamorro culture no longer exists. Similarly, literary scholars have argued that contemporary Chamorro literature is degraded and inauthentic because it is often composed in a written form as opposed to an oral form, in English as opposed to Chamorro, and in a foreign genre (such as a novel) as opposed to an indigenous genre (such as a chant). This discourse of inauthenticity, I suggest, is based on an understanding of Chamorro culture and literature as static essences that once existed in a "pure" and "authentic" state before colonialism, modernity, and globalization. Countering these arguments, I view Chamorro culture as a dynamic entity composed of core, enduring values, customs, and practices that are continually transformed and re-articulated within various historical contexts and political pressures.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 Before the FEDERAL
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Advanced Television Systems ) and Their Impact upon the Existing ) MM Docket No. 87-268 Television Broadcast Service ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION OF THE SIXTH REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: February 17, 1998 ; Released: February 23, 1998 By the Commission: Commissioner Ness issuing a separate statement; Commissioner Furchtgott-Roth dissenting in part and issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. No. I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND 5 III. DTV ALLOTMENT ISSUES 12 A. General DTV Allotment Plan 12 B. Selection of the DTV Core Spectrum 34 C. Out-of-Core Allotments 47 D. DTV Power 59 E. DTV Adjacent Channel Operation 87 F. Low Power TV and TV Translator Stations 96 G. Land Mobile Sharing Issues 128 H. Use of Existing Transmitter Sites 131 I. Noncommercial Allotments and NTSC Station Modifications 133 J. International Coordination 138 K. Negotiations and Frequency Coordinators 141 L. Other Allotment Issues 148 M. Technical Issues 159 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 IV. REQUESTS FOR MODIFICATION OF INITIAL ALLOTMENTS A. General Treatment of Allotment Change Requests 187 B. Petitions Granted or Made Moot 193 C. Requests for Changes by Low Power Interests 312 D. Petitions Addressing Service Replication and Maximization Issues 362 E. Petitions Requesting Unspecified Alternative Channels 402 F. Petitions Objecting to Allotment of Channels Outside the Core Spectrum 413 G. Other Petitions Requesting Specific Changes to the DTV Table of Allotments 442 V. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 672 APPENDIX A- Petitioning and Commenting/Opposing Parties APPENDIX B- DTV Table of Allotments APPENDIX C- DTV Allotment Changes to Avoid Adjacent Channel Interference APPENDIX D- Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis APPENDIX E- Amendments to the Rules 2 Federal Communications Commission FCC 98-24 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin
    United States Department of Land Resource Regions and Agriculture Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Natural Resources Conservation Service Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin United States Department of Agriculture Handbook 296 Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service United States Department of Agriculture Handbook 296 Issued 2006 ii The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250- 9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Citation: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land Resource Regions and Major Land Resource Areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. Cover: Upper left.—An area of Land Resource Region Q (Pacific Basin Region).
    [Show full text]
  • Minor Rules Topics Ballots #2-16 Through #11-16 Rules Description
    Minor Rules Topics Ballots #2-16 through #11-16 Rules Description July 28, 2016 PART I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY These ballots would amend the NACHA Operating Rules (Rules) to address a variety of minor topics. Minor changes to the Rules have little-to-no impact on ACH participants and no significant economic impact. Minor changes can include (1) editorial changes to improve clarity or readability of language; (2) changes to correct inconsistencies between various rules; (3) changes to clarify intent; or (4) minor modifications to incorporate current practices. Specifically, the following rule changes are proposed by these ballots. Although each proposed rule is a separate issue for voting purposes, several are related to the same subject area within the rules and are grouped together for ease of discussion. Same Day ACH Funds Availability for Same Day Entries in Time Zones East of the Continental United States (effective September 23, 2016 and March 16, 2018) Alignment of ENR and Same Day Language (effective September 23, 2016) Alignment of TRC/TRX and Same Day Language (effective September 23, 2016) Clarifications for Reinitiation Standard Entry Description (effective upon approval) Applicability to RCK (effective upon approval) Non-Applicability to Corrected Entries Related to R03/R04 Returns (effective upon approval) Rules Enforcement Monitoring of Class 2 Violations (effective upon approval); Protection of the National Association from Liability for Enforcement of the Rules (effective upon approval); Appeal Process for Suspension
    [Show full text]
  • Third-Party Sender Registration
    Table of Contents AHA! Page . .page 1 Since PSU Last Year . page. 2 Third-Party Sender Registration . .page 8 Fraud Trends . page. 19 Regulatory Update . page. 20 Payment Trends . .page 23 Same Day ACH Debits . .page 31 Certificate of Completion . page. 37 PARTICIPANT GUIDE ii ©2017. EPCOR®. All Rights Reserved. AHA! Page PARTICIPANT GUIDE 1 ©2017. EPCOR®. All Rights Reserved. Since PSU Last Year EMV Compliance Mandate – October 2015 Liability Shift Who Is Liable? Liability Condition – Counterfeit (Issuer or Merchant) • Mag stripe only card Issuer • Mag stripe only terminal Merchant • Chip card Issuer • Mag stripe only terminal Merchant • Mag stripe only card Issuer • Chip terminal Merchant • Chip card Issuer • Chip terminal Merchant PARTICIPANT GUIDE 2 ©2017. EPCOR®. All Rights Reserved. Since PSU Last Year Same Day ACH Status Merchant and Card Notes: ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________ U .S . Treasury Proposal and NACHA Request for Comment on IAT Notes: ________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • 42Iqls Instruction Manual
    42iQLS Instruction Manual Low Source NO-NO2-NOx Analyzer 117436-00 • 1Sep2019 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 iQ Series Instrument Platform............................................................. 1-1 Principle of Operation ........................................................................ 1-3 Specifications ...................................................................................... 1-5 Dimensions ......................................................................................... 1-7 Chapter 2 Installation and Setup ...................................................................................... 2-1 Unpacking and Inspection .................................................................. 2-1 Cover Removing and Replacing .......................................................... 2-2 Mounting Options .............................................................................. 2-3 Bench Mount ................................................................................... 2-3 Rack Mount ..................................................................................... 2-4 Setup Procedure .................................................................................. 2-6 Startup ................................................................................................ 2-8 Chapter 3 Operation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]