Viewpoint Can We Test Inflationary Expansion of the Early Universe?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viewpoint Can We Test Inflationary Expansion of the Early Universe? Physics 3, 103 (2010) Viewpoint Can we test inflationary expansion of the early universe? Arthur Kosowsky Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA Published December 6, 2010 A set of proposed relations among observable quantities may allow strong tests of whether a rapid expansion of the very early universe produced the seeds of the large-scale structure we see today. Subject Areas: Particles and Fields, Astrophysics, Cosmology A Viewpoint on: Testing Inflation: A Bootstrap Approach Latham Boyle and Paul J. Steinhardt Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 241301 (2010) – Published December 6, 2010 Inflation in the early universe is a period of exponen- scalar field the inflaton might be, or the energy scale tial expansion that stretched a small causally-connected of the field’s potential energy, or indeed if fundamental patch of the universe by a factor of at least e60 into a size classical scalar fields even exist in nature. large enough to encompass the visible universe today. Inflation is compelling for another reason as well: At the same time this expansion drives the spatial ge- during a period of exponential expansion, quantum ometry of the expanding region to flatness (for pedagog- fluctuations in both the energy density and in the grav- ical reviews, see Refs. [1, 2]). Such a period would ex- itational field will inevitably be stretched by the expan- plain why the universe today appears very nearly spa- sion into small-amplitude classical fluctuations on scales tially flat on average (even though the dynamics of the larger than the horizon (see Ref. [4] for a review). Any expanding universe generically drive it away from flat- causal influences must propagate at a velocity limited ness). It would also explain why the microwave back- by the speed of light. If the wavelength of a virtual ground today has almost the same temperature in all quantum fluctuation gets stretched to a length greater sky directions (even though in the standard cosmology, than ct, with t the age of the universe, then the fluctu- most points of origin for the microwave radiation we ation’s spatially separated parts cannot communicate, see today were never within each others’ causal hori- which prevents it from disappearing, and it becomes zon, meaning they were never in causal contact). But is frozen as a classical perturbation whose wavelength it possible to test whether such an inflationary episode continues to stretch with the expansion of the universe. actually occurred? In a paper in Physical Review Letters, These fluctuations can be precisely those we see to- Latham Boyle of the Canadian Institute for Theoretical day in the temperature fluctuations of the microwave Astrophysics in Toronto and Paul Steinhardt of Prince- background; the inflation-generated density fluctua- ton University propose connections between observable tions grow via gravitational instability into the observed quantities as a check of inflation [3]. large-scale distribution of galaxies, while the gravita- The “flatness” and “horizon” problems are intractable tional field fluctuations become a stochastic background enough in the standard cosmology that most cosmolo- of very-long-wavelength gravitational waves. The per- gists believe inflation occurred, even though we have turbations we can probe today with cosmological ob- no fundamental physical theory that provides a mecha- servations would have been generated during inflation nism to drive inflation. If general relativity is correct, ac- when the universe was around e60 times smaller than it celerating expansion occurs when p < −r/(3c2), where was at the end of inflation. If inflation occurred, it must − p is the mean pressure and r the mean energy density have started when the universe was less than 10 12 sec- of the universe. Energy density is positive by definition, onds old, corresponding to the electroweak energy scale but pressure can be negative in principle (think of a col- of 100 GeV, and may very well have begun at an age lection of masses connected by springs stretched from smaller than 10−32 seconds, corresponding to the scale their equilibrium). Cosmologists often invoke a classical at which grand unification of the strong and electroweak scalar field j, dubbed the “inflaton” field, with some po- forces is conjectured to occur (see Chapter 3 of Ref. [5] tential V(j) as a model for the contents of the universe for a classic discussion of the thermal history of the uni- during inflation. The condition for inflation would be verse). satisfied if the potential energy of the scalar field domi- The density perturbations reflected in the observed nates over its kinetic energy. But we do not know what temperature fluctuations of the cosmic microwave back- DOI: 10.1103/Physics.3.103 c 2010 American Physical Society URL: http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Physics.3.103 Physics 3, 103 (2010) ground and the large-scale distribution of galaxies are consistent with a power law as a function of scale, n P(k) = Ask s , with observables of the amplitude As and power law index ns, where k is the wave number cor- responding to a given Fourier mode of the primordial density perturbations. We also consider the possibility that the power law index itself can vary with scale, a quantity defined as as = dns/dlnk [6]. The gravitational wave perturbations (or “tensor” perturbations of the FIG. 1: (Left) Design drawing of the BICEP instrument that metric in general relativity) can likewise be described measures variations in the polarization of the cosmic mi- crowave background at a level of one part in ten million. ( ) = nt+1 as a power law with power spectrum P k Atk The 25-cm aperture telescope, with an angular resolution of (with, unfortunately, a different historical convention around a half degree at a microwave frequency of 150 GHz, for the power law index!). The precise definition of am- is designed to limit spurious polarization signals from the in- plitudes depends on the scale at which they are defined. strument at this stringent level. BICEP uses 100 polarization- Assuming that both power spectra are given by these sensitive bolometers cooled to a fraction of a degree Kelvin forms, the set of observables we can hope to probe is to detect the polarized radiation. (Right) Photo of the Back- As, ns, as, At, and nt, with the first two of these be- ground Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization (BICEP) ing well measured already. (A variation with scale of experiment, which has given the current best limits on the the tensor power law is almost surely unobservable.) It tensor-scalar ratio r from measuring microwave background has long been appreciated that in simple models of infla- polarization alone [12]. Such experiments are working to- wards measurements of r with precision of 0.01 that are nec- tion driven by a single scalar field, the two power spec- essary for strong tests of the bootstrap relations proposed by tra describing the density and gravitational-wave per- Boyle and Steinhardt. The image shows the Dark Sector Lab turbations are not independent. Expanding expressions at the South Pole, atop which sits BICEP behind the metal for measurable quantities in series of so-called “slow- ground shield. (Credit: (Left) Adapted from Takahashi et roll” parameters (formed from the expansion rate and al.[10]; (Right) Brian Keating, UCSD) its derivatives during inflation) gives a relation between r = At/As, the ratio of density to tensor perturbation amplitudes, and nt [7]. Unfortunately, obtaining precise coming experiments (Fig. 1) will likely have the sensi- measurements of nt seems unlikely. tivity and systematic error control to detect a tensor am- Boyle and Steinhardt [3] employ a simple alternate plitude as small as r = 0.01 (provided that contaminat- strategy: expand the Hubble parameter (which quanti- ing polarized emission at microwave wavelengths from fies the expansion rate of the universe) during inflation, our own galaxy can be understood well enough) [10]. H(j), as a Taylor expansion in the value of the inflaton The largest observational hurdle for decisive tests of field j around the field value generating the perturba- the full set of bootstrap relations may be measuring as tion scales of interest, j∗ [as in Eq. (2) of their paper]. to sufficient precision; note that the first bootstrap test −4 (Note that, while convenient to parameterize the evolu- predicts as = −5.3 × 10 . Future measurements of 21- tion of H in terms of the effects of some effective infla- cm radiation from neutral hydrogen prior to the reion- ton field f, this is not necessary and the results do not ization of the universe by the first stars and galaxies can, −4 depend on inflation being driven by an actual funda- in principle, probe as at the level of 10 [11], although mental scalar field.) Then, by truncating this expansion this exciting prospect depends partly on control of sys- after two, three, or four terms and requiring that the re- tematic errors that are not well understood at present. sulting functional form for H(j) be valid until the end The bootstrap tests presented here involve only quan- of inflation, Boyle and Steinhardt have generated “boot- tities that are potentially observable with current or up- strap tests”—sets of numerical relations between the ob- coming experiments. In the absence of inflation, there servables r, ns, and as. Current microwave background is no reason why r, ns, and as should have any particu- temperature power spectrum measurements by, for ex- lar relationships between them. If the relationships pre- ample, the WMAP satellite combined with the higher- sented in this paper are observed, this is strong evidence resolution ACT experiment, give ns = 0.962 ± 0.013 in favor of an inflationary origin for primordial pertur- for a model with as = 0, and ns = 1.032 ± 0.039 and bations, and constitutes a direct probe of physics at an as = −0.034 ± 0.018 for models with both ns and as as energy scale far beyond the reach of any particle accel- free parameters [8].
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Tina Kahniashvili Curriculum Vitae Personal Data Contact Information Address: Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,15213, USA E-mail: [email protected] Tel: (1-412) 268-1818 Fax :(1-412) 681-0648 ResearchID: C-4983-2015 ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0217-9852 Education & Training 2000: Doctor of Sciences (Habilitation) in Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Thesis: “Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Formation” Lebedev Physics Institute (FIAN) of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia 1999: Senior Doctorate Fellowship at Astro-Space Center of Russian Academy of Sciences 1988: Ph.D. in Physics, Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Thesis “Gravitational Instability in the Universe with Weakly Interacting Particles” Supervisors: Profs. V.N. Lukash and I. D. Novikov, 1984: M.S. in Physics with High Honor (Theoretical Physics), Tbilisi State University, Georgia Thesis “Gauge Invariant Theory of Gravitational Perturbations” Supervision of Prof. V.N. Lukash, completed through Student Research (Diploma) Fellowship at Space Research Institute (IKI) Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia 1984: M.S. in Physics Education with High Honor, Tbilisi State University, Georgia 1983: B.S. in Physics with High Honor (Theoretical Physics), Tbilisi State University, Georgia Affiliations Current Positions 2013 (Jul) – present: Associate research professor, Carnegie Mellon University, USA 2010 (Oct) – present: Professor of physics and astronomy, Ilia State University, Georgia 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Telescope Consortium Paul Leath (1995-2000)
    Chapter Fourteen Telescope Consortium Paul Leath (1995-2000) When Allen Robbins stepped down as Department Chairman in 1995, Paul Leath, having recently come back to the Department after fourteen years as Associate Provost and Provost, agreed to lead the Depart- ment as its next Chairman. The Department was indeed fortunate in having such capable leadership for the next period in its history. Having come to the Department as an Assistant Professor in 1967, and having served as Associate Provost and Provost in New Brunswick from 1978 to 1993, he had a wide range of experience in teaching, research, and administration, that served the Department well as it moved to consolidate and expand upon the gains that had been made in the previous decade. Few physics departments are able to draw on a leader with such significant university administrative experience and such personal attributes of leadership. Leath continues to serve as Department Chairman as this History is written. Figure 52 Paul Leath 206 Paul Leath (1995-2000) By 1995 the Department was recognized as one of the leading physics departments in the country, as indicated by the 1994 external review. This assessment of the Department was confirmed by the 1993 survey of research-doctorate programs in physics in the United States, published in 1995 by the National Research Council.1 In that listing, the Rutgers physics program ranked 20th among all institutions in the U.S., and 10th among public universities. This was a dramatic improvement from the 1982 evaluation where the Rutgers program was ranked 33rd among all institutions. In a separate NRC ranking of perceived improve- ment since the 1982 survey, the improvement of the Rutgers program was highest among the top twenty institutions, and second highest overall.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Stephon Haigh-Solomon Alexander ______
    Curriculum Vitae Stephon Haigh-Solomon Alexander ___________________________________________________________________ Title: Professor of Physics Department of Physics Brown University (Tenured) Contact Information: Department of Physics Brown University Box1843 Providence, RI 02912-1843 [email protected] 215-264-7096 Education Ph.D. Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, 2000 Sc. M Electrical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, 1996 Sc. M Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, 1995 B.S. Physics, Haverford College, Haverford, PA, USA, 1993 Research Positions (postdocs) Postdoctoral Researcher, 2002-2005 The Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) Stanford University, CA Postdoctoral Researcher, 2000-2002 Imperial College, London, U.K. Professional Appointments Professor of Physics 2016-present Department of Physics Brown University, RI Ernest Everett 1907 Associate Professor of Natural Sciences 2012-2016 Associate Professor of Physics and Astronomy Dartmouth College, NH Curriculum Vitae Stephon Haigh-Solomon Alexander ___________________________________________________________________ Associate Professor of Physics 2008-2012 Haverford College, PA Assistant Professor of Physics 2005-2008 Penn State University, PA Parallel Visiting Appointments: Visiting Professor of Physics Summer 2015 ETH Zurich, Switzerland Visiting Professor of Physics 2011-2012 Princeton University, NJ Visiting Professor of Physics Fall 2008 The California Institute of Technology, CA Visiting Long Term Scientist 2005-2007
    [Show full text]
  • The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
    The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Division of Theoretical Astrophysics Institute for Theory and Computation Current and Former TA / ITC Postdoctoral Fellows and Graduate Students The Division of Theoretical Astrophysics and the Institute for Theory and Computation (ITC) at Harvard University is a center for excellence in theoretical astrophysics that integrates conceptual theory and computational modeling. The ITC was established in 2004 and is regarded by many as the most prominent theory center in astrophysics in the world. Former postdoctoral fellows and graduate students have gone on to premier and competitively sought-after postions in astrophysics after completing their research fellowships at the ITC. POSTDOCTORAL FELLOWS YEAR of NAME DEPARTURE CURRENT TITLE CURRENT INSTITUTION RESEARCH INTERESTS AWARDS Analysis of various data sets including cosmic microwave background maps from WMAP, galaxy survey maps from the Assistant University of Waterloo and Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the 2 Micron All Sky Survey to Distinguished Research Niayesh Afshordi 2007 Professor Perimeter Institute constrain the matter content of the universe Fellow Computational astrophysical & geophysical fluid dynamics, formation of satrs & planets, vortex dynamics in protoplanetary Assistant disks, transits of giant planets around other sun-like stars, the APS Nicholas Metropolis Joseph Barranco 2007 Professor San Francisco State University Kuiper belt award, NSF Fellow Member, Daniel Baumann 2009 Astrophysics Princeton, Institute for Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics
    Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8917 Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics (ULNP) publishes authoritative texts cov- ering topics throughout pure and applied physics. Each title in the series is suitable as a basis for undergraduate instruction, typically containing practice problems, worked examples, chapter summaries, and suggestions for further reading. ULNP titles must provide at least one of the following: • An exceptionally clear and concise treatment of a standard undergraduate subject. • A solid undergraduate-level introduction to a graduate, advanced, or non- standard subject. • A novel perspective or an unusual approach to teaching a subject. ULNP especially encourages new, original, and idiosyncratic approaches to physics teaching at the undergraduate level. The purpose of ULNP is to provide intriguing, absorbing books that will continue to be the reader’s preferred reference throughout their academic career. Series Editors Neil Ashby Professor Emeritus, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA William Brantley Professor, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA Michael Fowler Professor, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA Michael Inglis Professor, SUNY Suffolk County Community College, Selden, NY, USA Heinz Klose Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany Helmy Sherif Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Charles Keeton Principles of Astrophysics Using Gravity and Stellar Physics to Explore the Cosmos 123 Charles Keeton Department of Physics and Astronomy Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ, USA ISSN 2192-4791 ISSN 2192-4805 (electronic) ISBN 978-1-4614-9235-1 ISBN 978-1-4614-9236-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-9236-8 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014935057 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Microwave Background
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server The Cosmic Microwave Background Arthur Kosowsky Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8019 ABSTRACT This set of lectures provides an overview of the basic theory and phenomenol- ogy of the cosmic microwave background. Topics include a brief historical review; the physics of temperature and polarization fluctuations; acoustic oscillations of the primordial plasma; the space of inflationary cosmological models; cur- rent and potential constraints on these models from the microwave background; and constraints on inflation. These lectures were given at the Italian Society of Gravitational Physics Summer School \Relativistic Cosmology: Theory and Observation" in Como, Italy (May 2000). 1. Introduction It is widely accepted that the field of cosmology is entering an era dubbed \precision cosmology." Data directly relevant to the properties and evolution of the universe is flooding in by the terabyte (or soon will be). Such vast quantities of data were the purview only of high energy physics just a few years ago; now expertise from this area is being coopted by some astromers to help deal with our wealth of information. In the past decade, cosmology has gone from a data-starved science in which often highly speculative theories went uncon- strained to a data-driven pursuit where many models have been ruled out and the remaining \standard cosmology" will be tested with stringent precision. The cosmic microwave background radiation is at the center of this revolution. The radiation present today as a 2.7 K thermal background originated when the universe was denser by a factor of 109 and younger by a factor of around 5 104.
    [Show full text]
  • November 19, 2014 Duquesne University
    Spectroscopy Society of Pittsburgh November Meeting Wednesday – November 19, 2014 Duquesne University 5:30 PM Technology Forum Speaker’s Presentation - Laura Falk Hall located in Mellon Hall 5:30 to 6:30PM Social Hour - City View Café (6th Floor of Union) 6:30PM Dinner - City View Café (6th Floor of Union) 8:00PM Business Meeting– Laura Falk Hall located in Mellon Hall 8:15PM Technical Program Speaker’s Presentation– Laura Falk Hall located in Mellon Hall Deadline for Dinner Reservations 11/13/14 at NOON On-line Reservations TECHNICAL PROGRAM - 8:15 PM Arthur Kosowsky -- Professor of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Pittsburgh “Microwave Background Polarization and the Beginning of the Universe” We live in a universe whose properties are remarkably well described by a very early epoch of accelerating expansion, termed inflation. One generic prediction of inflation is a relic background of stochastic gravitational radiation. These gravitational wave perturbations leave a distinctive imprint in the polarization of the microwave background. In March 2014, the BICEP experiment at the South Pole announced the detection of this signal for the first time, although subsequent analysis cast doubt on whether polarized emission from dust in the Milky Way galaxy might be contaminating the signal. I will review the current state of observations and give an overview of upcoming observational efforts at measuring the polarization spectrum which will definitively distinguish the cosmological and galactic signals. If the BICEP signal has a significant cosmological component from inflation, this opens the door to the remarkable possibility of detecting the gravitational radiation background directly with a space-based laser interferometer.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ATACAMA COS},Mlogy TELESCOPE: PHYSICAL
    SU13l\!ITTED 2011l JUNE 25: ACCEPTED 2010 SEPTnmER X Preprint typeset using E~TEX style eIllulateapj v. lIllO/Of) THE ATACAMA COS},mLOGY TELESCOPE: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND PT.;'RITY OF A GALAXY CLUSTER SAMPLE SELECTED VIA THE SUNYAEV-ZEUDOVICH EFFECT l 2 2 1 FELIPE MENANTEAU ,JORGE GONZiI.LEZ . JEAN-BAPTISTE JUIN , TOBIAS A. l\IARRIAGE: , ERIK D. REESE!, 2 2 VIVIANA ACQUAVIVAl'l, PAULA AGUIRRE , JOHN vVILLIAl\l ApPEL:'. ANDREvV J. BAKERI, L. FELIPE BARlUENTOS , 7 I i ELlA S. BAl'TISTELd' , J. RICHARD BOND , SUDEEP DAS', AMRUTA J. DESHPANDE , MARK J. DEVLIN , SIMON DICKER", 7 JOANNA DUNKLEY", ROLANDO DUNNER2. THOMAS ESSINGER-HILEMAN'\ JOSEPH VI.'. FOWLER:;, A!\'lIR HAJIAN , lO 11 I2 MARK HALPERN]{), MATTHEW HASSELFIELD , CARLOS HERN ..l.NDEZ-MONTEAGUD0 , l\IATT HILTON , ADAM D. HINCKS~', 2 l RENEE HLOZEK!'. KEVIN M. HUFFENBERGERl:l, JOHN P. HUGHESl.±, LEOPOLDO INFANTE , KENT D. IRWIN!~, JEFF KLEIN , 1 16 I ARTHUR KOSOWSKy " YEN-TING LIN , DANICA MARSDEN , KAVILAN l\IOODLEyI2, MICHAEL D. NIEMACKI~, 17 l l\:IICHAEL R. NOLTA', LYMAN A. PAGE'" LUCAS PARKER'" BRUCE PARTRIDGE , NEELIMA SEHGAL " JON SIEVERS'. i I 21l 2l DAVID N. SPERGEL", SUZANNE T. STAGGS" DANIEL SWETZ· , ERIC SWITZER :!, ROBERT THORNTON . Hy TRAC " l2 RYAN WARNE AND ED VVOLLACK22, submitted 2010 June 25; accepted 2010 Septembe-r 8 ABSTRACT vVe present optical and X-ray properties for the first confirmed galaxy cluster sample selected by the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect from 148 GHz maps over 455 square degrees of sky made with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope. These maps. coupled with multi-band imaging on 4-meter-class optical telescopes, have yielded a sample of 23 galaxy clusters with redshifts between 0.118 and 1.066.
    [Show full text]