TYNE AND WEAR PENSION FUND Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 Administered by South Tyneside Council Annual Report 2019/20
2 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund CONTENTS
Key Members and Officers of the Fund 4 External Managers, Custodian, Bank and External Auditors 5 Review of the Year 6 Legal Framework 8 Governance Arrangements 11 Training Policy and Programme 16 Vision Statement 18 Service Plan 19 Risk Management 20 Financial Performance 22 Funding Strategy 28 Statement of the Actuary 31 Membership of the Fund 34 Pensions Administration 41 Administrative Management Performance 46 Additional Voluntary Contributions 48 Investment Report 49 Investment Policies 58 Financial Statements 62 Notes to the Financial Statements 64 Audit Report 96 How to Contact Us 98
3 Annual Report 2019/20
KEY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF THE FUND
THE MEMBERS OF PENSIONS COMMITTEE MEMBERS OF THE LOCAL PENSION BOARD South Tyneside Council Councillor E. Leask (Chair) Employer Representatives Councillor A. Walsh (Vice Chair) J. Woodlingfield (Chair) – Newcastle College Group Councillor W. Flynn M. Brodie – North East Regional Employers’ Organisation Councillor J. Foreman (NEREO) Councillor D. Purvis Councillor P. Hay – South Tyneside Council Councillor A. Hetherington P. Smith – TT2 Councillor G.Thompson Councillor R. Porthouse Trade Union Representatives Gateshead Council N. Wirz (Vice Chair) – Unison J. Pearson – GMB Councillor B. Goldsworthy C. Sharkey – Unison (substitute – Councillor G. Haley) T. Hunter - GMB
Newcastle City Council Members of the Pensions Committee and the Local Pension Councillor J. McCarty Board can be contacted through the Pensions Helpline by (substitute – Councillor G. Bell) emailing [email protected]
North Tyneside Council SENIOR OFFICERS Councillor A. McMullen (substitute – Councillor W. Samuel) Corporate Director Business and Resources (Section 151 Officer) Sunderland City Council S. Reid Councillor J. Heron (email [email protected]) (substitute – Councillor A. Lawson) Head of Pensions Trade Union Representatives I. Bainbridge L. Brown – Unison (email [email protected]) J. Kelly – Unite P. Gordon – Unison Principal Pensions Manager H. Chambers Employers’ Representatives (email [email protected]) C. Wallace – Gentoo P. Goddard – Stagecoach Principal Investment Manager A. Munro – Northumbria University T. Morrison (email [email protected])
Acting Head of Legal Services J. Rumney (email [email protected])
Corporate Assurance Manager P. Hunter (email [email protected])
4 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund ADMINISTRATORS OF THE FUND BONDS The Fund is administered by the in-house Pensions Janus Henderson Global Investors Administration Team. Border to Coast Pensions Partnership
ADVISORS PROPERTY Actuary UK Property Aon Solutions UK Ltd – J. Teasdale Aberdeen Standard Investments
Investment Advisor UK Residential Property Hymans Robertson – P. Potter Aberdeen Standard Investments Hearthstone The advisors to the Fund can be contacted through the Pensions Helpline by emailing [email protected] Global Property Partners Group BANK Lloyds Bank PRIVATE EQUITY Capital International CUSTODIAN Coller Capital HarbourVest Partners Northern Trust Lexington Partners Pantheon Ventures EXTERNAL AUDIT Partners Group Border to Coast Pensions Partnership Ernst & Young LLP – H. Rohimun (Associate Partner) PRIVATE DEBT POOL OPERATOR HPS Investment Partners Border to Coast Pensions Partnership Pemberton Border to Coast Pensions Partnership INVESTMENT MANAGERS Pantheon Ventures INDEXATION INFRASTRUCTURE Legal and General Investment Management AMP Capital EQUITIES Infracapital Partners Group UK Equity Pantheon Ventures Border to Coast Pensions Partnership Border to Coast Pensions Partnership
Global Equity ADDITIONAL VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS Border to Coast Pensions Partnership Prudential Assurance Company Japanese Equity Utmost Life and Pensions Limited Lazard Asset Management
Asian ex Japanese Equity TT International
Emerging Market Equity JP Morgan Asset Management
5 Annual Report 2019/20
REVIEW OF THE YEAR
At the year end the Fund had assets We are delighted to present the under management at Border to Coast valued at £2,499 million, which is 2019/20 Annual Report and Accounts around 29% of the Fund. Further assets are expected to move during 2020/21.
for the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund. During March 2020, governance and service arrangements of the The report summarises the main Fund had to be adapted to meet the challenges of lockdown measures put issues affecting the Fund and the in to combat the Covid-19 pandemic. In late March the special meeting of Local Government Pension Scheme Pensions Committee and a meeting of the Local Pension Board were (LGPS) over the last year. cancelled. Some decisions were taken under delegated powers until virtual meetings commenced in June 2020. The Fund has been working closely For the merger to become effective a with Northumberland County Council change in the LGPS Regulations 2013 During the Covid-19 pandemic the Pension Fund for a number of years was required. On 20th March 2020 safety and wellbeing of the staff has and in early 2018 the funds came the Government launched a formal been of upmost importance. Whilst together to introduce a shared consultation which lasted 6 weeks. home working was introduced it pensions administration service. On 3rd June, The Local Government has been necessary to maintain a This successful collaboration proved Pension Scheme (Northumberland small presence in the office. It is to be the catalyst for even greater and Tyne and Wear Pension Fund pleasing to note that to date we integration and following a robust due Merger) Regulations 2020, came into have been able to operate a full diligence process during 2019 and force with the effective date of the service to members of the Fund. into early 2020, a decision was taken merger backdated to 1st April 2020. to merge the Northumberland County 2019/20 was a valuation year for the Council Pensions Fund into the Tyne This has been a significant task Fund, and normally this would be and Wear Pension Fund. and a considerable amount of work the main focus of any review of the has been undertaken to ensure that year. The valuation is based on the the member records, the funding position as at 31st March 2019 and strategy and investment strategy is undertaken every three years. This are fully integrated and appropriate establishes the overall funding level for the newly combined Fund. for the Fund and sets the contribution rates for employers for the next three As noted in this and previous annual years. As usual, the valuation brought reports, the administering authority many challenges with regard to the of the Fund is the joint owner of a funding strategy, workload, data quality Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and communications with employers. regulated investment management company called Border to Coast The contributions paid by employers in Pensions Partnership Limited. This the 2019/20 year were set as part of the company was created in response previous valuation, as at March 2016. to the Governments initiative on The reported funding level at that time investment pooling. The company itself was 85% based on the assumptions was created in 2017 and assets started agreed with the actuary. This was a to transfer from the funds during 2018. slight improvement from the figure of 81% at the 2013 valuation. The average future service rate was 18.3% of pay, and the contribution to address the deficit was 6.9% of pay, leading to a total average contribution of 25.2% of pay.
6 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund The triennial valuation of the Fund as at When fully implemented, the asset five year return is 6.0% per annum, 31st March 2019 has set contribution allocation will be 40.5% in equities, which is ahead of the benchmark return rates for the three years from 1st April 22.0% in bonds, 13.0% in property, of 5.3% per annum. The ten year return 2020. The ongoing funding position 7.5% in private equity, 6.0% in is 7.1% per annum, which is also ahead has improved on the back of good private debt, 5.0% in infrastructure, of the benchmark return for this period investment returns to 106%. The low 5.0% in multi asset credit and of 6.7% per annum. Both the relative risk funding level based on gilt yields 1.0% in cash. Significant moves and absolute level of returns is positive. was 68%, which was higher than the to implement these changes were figure of 54% at the 2016 valuation. made before the year end. There has been a tremendous effort by everybody involved in the Fund over As noted above, the contributions For the first ten months of the year the past year. As ever, there has been payable for the next three years have market returns had generally been a significant amount of change and been set as part of the 2019 valuation. positive, despite some volatility during everybody has risen to the challenge The average future service rate being periods of uncertainty regarding Brexit. that this brings. Therefore, we would set at 19.1% of pensionable pay, However, it all changed in late February, like to thank the Pensions Committee, against 18.3% at the 2016 valuation. with the global outbreak of Covid-19. the Local Pension Board and the Amortisation of surpluses over 20 With concerns over future economic staff involved with the Fund for all years decreased the contribution rate activity, equities fell dramatically. In their considerable work during the by 0.6%. In addition, an allowance of this environment it was only the safest year and in the delivery of services 1.2% was added to the contribution assets, primarily government and high to the members and employers. rate to account for a legal case called quality corporate bonds that proved “McCloud”, which sought to remove resilient over the final quarter of the an issue around age discrimination year. It was only after governments in the LGPS. This all led to a total and central banks launched monetary average contribution rate of 19.7%, and budgetary programmes to protect Councillor Eileen Leask against 25.2% at the 2016 valuation. economies, companies and employees Chair of Pensions Committee that some calm did return to markets. At the same time as undertaking the triennial valuation, the Fund The Fund’s diversified investment has also reviewed its investment strategy provided some protection strategy. In particular, consideration against these extreme market was given to de-risking the strategy conditions. The Fund’s total return in Ian Bainbridge to lock in some of the investment 2019/20 was -3.4%, which was 0.4% Head of Pensions gains over recent years. below its benchmark return of -3.0%.
An Asset Liability Modelling (ALM) Inflation as measured by the Consumer exercise was carried out in 2019 using Prices Index, which has risen in the liability data from the 2019 valuation. importance as a measure for the The review resulted in a 15% reduction Scheme, was up by 1.5% over the year. in return seeking growth assets (quoted Average Earnings increased by 3.1%. equities) with a corresponding 10% increase in return seeking income Whilst the Fund underperformed its assets (property, infrastructure, performance benchmark in 2019/20, private debt and multi asset credit) it should be noted that the Fund had and a 5% increase in protection outperformed in each of the previous assets (corporate bonds and cash). five years. On the back of this the Fund’s
7 Annual Report 2019/20
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
INTRODUCTION • The earliest age that the member The Tyne and Wear Pension Fund may choose to release their pension is 55. If the member is part of the Local Government chooses to access before Normal Pension Age then their pension Pension Scheme (the Scheme) and will be subject to reduction. • Immediate payment of retirement is administered by South Tyneside benefits on grounds of redundancy or business efficiency if the Council. The Ministry of Housing, member has attained age 55. • Phased retirement arrangements Communities and Local Government that enable members under specified circumstances to draw (MHCLG) sets out the framework down some or all of their accrued pension rights from the Scheme for the Scheme in regulations that while still continuing to work. • An option to commute pension apply in England and Wales. to lump sum, at the rate of one pound of annual pension for twelve pounds of lump sum, up The main provisions of the Scheme are: SCHEME REGULATIONS to a maximum tax free lump sum The rules of the Scheme are contained • Tiered employee contribution rates. of 25% of capital value of accrued benefit rights at date of retirement. in the following sets of regulations. • A Career Average Re-valued The Local Government Pension Scheme Earnings pension based on • Pensions indexed in line with Regulations 2013 (as amended) 1/49th of salary for each year the Consumer Prices Index. of pensionable service. describe how rights accrue and how • Pensions must come into payment benefits are calculated with effect • A “50:50” arrangement allowing before the 75th birthday. from 1st April 2014. The regulations members to opt to pay 50% • Survivor benefits for life, payable also contain the administrative of their standard contribution to spouses, civil partners provisions for the Scheme. rate. Where this is exercised the and dependant partners member will accrue pension The Local Government Pension (opposite and same sex) at based on 1/98th of salary for each Scheme (Transitional Provisions, a 1/160th accrual rate. Savings and Amendment) Regulations year of pensionable service. • Survivor benefits payable 2014 (as amended) set out how • A Normal Retirement Age of the to children. membership accrued prior to 1st member’s State Pension Age for April 2014 counts. These regulations the release of unreduced benefits. • A death-in-service tax-free also remove the ability of Councillors lump sum of three times • A three level ill health retirement in England and Wales to continue assumed pensionable pay. their participation in the LGPS. package, payable from any age. • A post-retirement lump sum - 100% enhancement of death benefit where death benefits for total incapacity. occurs before age 75 of up to a - 25% enhancement where there maximum of ten years pension. is a prospect of return to gainful • Transfer values to other pension employment after three years but arrangements or index-linked before Normal Retirement Age. deferred benefits for early leavers. - No enhancement where there is • A refund of contributions where a prospect of return to gainful no other benefit is due. employment within three years. This level of ill health pension • Facilities for paying additional ceases on re-employment or voluntary contributions after three years in payment. to provide benefits.
8 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund AMENDMENT LGPS must have equal representation protection arrangements in the judicial of employer representatives and and firefighters pension schemes. The REGULATIONS member representatives, who Local Government Pension Scheme The LGPS (Amendment) must not be officers or councillors Advisory Board also put on hold the Regulations 2019 came into force of the administering authority consultation on proposed changes. responsible for the discharge of local on 31 December 2019. Changes The ‘McCloud’ case ruling stated government pension functions. The to the LGPS were as follows: that current arrangements in these Fund has a Local Pension Board. • Changes to survivor benefits for schemes were unlawful on the grounds same opposite sex civil partners The Regulations also include an of age discrimination. Although employer cost cap. The Secretary of relating to judges and firefighters They amend the LGPS (Transitional State is required, if valuation reports the ruling could have significant Provisions, Savings and Amendment) indicate that costs have varied implications for all public sector Regulations 2014 by introducing by more than the margin allowed schemes, including the LGPS. survivor benefits payable under the for in the Regulations, to make The full impact of McCloud remains earlier regulations for opposite-sex changes to the Scheme to bring unclear. Nonetheless funds were civil partnerships. A person who is the costs back to the defined level. surviving opposite-sex civil partner of advised to make an allowance a deceased member will be provided The Local Government Pension for the ‘McCloud liabilities’ in the with a survivor pension calculated on Scheme Advisory Board is required 2019 Valuation. TWPF made an the basis that the survivor is a widow to monitor the overall costs of the allowance for McCloud liabilities by or widower, depending on their gender. Scheme and the proportion of those adding a 1.2% loading factor to the costs met by employers and members. future service rate for employers. The Local Government Pension MHCLG commenced a consultation MANAGEMENT AND Scheme Advisory Board is also on proposals for a remedy in relation GOVERNANCE required to make recommendations to McCloud on 16 July 2020 which to the Secretary of State for changes The Local Government Pension is not expected to be implemented to the Scheme where costs have Scheme (Amendment) (Governance) before the end of the 2020/21 varied beyond defined margins. Regulations 2015 amended the financial year. It is widely expected Local Government Pension Scheme The results of the cost control that whatever is implemented it will Regulations 2013 and contain process could lead to either, changes result in a considerable administrative additional provisions covering in employee contributions which burden for administering authorities. governance of the new Scheme. need to be paid into the LGPS as Also in July 2020, HMT has part of Scheme membership, or to The additional provisions provided announced that: for the setting up of, and making changes in the pension benefits appointments to, Local Pension Boards eventually payable by the LGPS. • the pause of the cost control mechanism will be lifted and the and the Scheme Advisory Board. In September 2018 the results of the cost control element of the 2016 valuation of public service pension Under the Public Service Pensions Valuation will be completed; and Act 2013, the MHCLG continue to schemes were announced. The initial be responsible for policy and the results for the LGPS showed that the • the costs of addressing the making of regulations. There is a cost of the Scheme had fallen. This discrimination in the McCloud Local Government Pension Scheme led to the Scheme Advisory Board judgment will be classed as Advisory Board which advises suggesting some proposed changes “member costs” and included in MHCLG on regulatory changes it to contribution rates for the lower the cost cap mechanism review. paid along with improvements in the considers being appropriate. The inclusion of the projected McCloud benefits package. A consultation on liabilities in the cost cap mechanism At individual Fund level, each Fund the proposed changes was expected review will reduce, or possibly even wipe continues to be administered by its in advance of the HM Treasury out, the proposed package of benefit designated administering authority. mechanism being undertaken. Each Fund must also have a Local improvements that had been due to Pension Board that is tasked with However, in January 2019 the take place with effect from 1 April 2019. Government ‘paused’ the cost cap assisting the administering authority The unpausing of the cost cap review process following a ruling by the Court in securing compliance with mechanism relates to the HMT review of Appeal in December 2018 over two regulations, other legislation and only, although it is expected that cases (known as ‘McCloud’) regarding the requirements of the Pensions the SAB review will soon follow. Regulator. Local Pension Boards age discrimination and transitional
9 Annual Report 2019/20
POOLING OF INVESTMENTS Investments have also been made in The ISS should describe the the private equity and infrastructure Fund’s investment strategy and its In the July 2015 Budget, the Chancellor programmes through Limited Partnerships investments and must cover: announced the Government’s intention structures. A commitment has also • a requirement to invest money in to work with the LGPS administering been made to a Limited Partnership a wide variety of investments authorities to ensure that investments for Private Debt but no investments were pooled while maintaining have been made by the year-end. • an assessment of the suitability overall investment performance. of investments held Following the successful merger of After considering a number of options Tyne and Wear Pension Fund and • the approach to risk the Fund decided to work with eleven Northumberland County Council • the approach to pooling other administering authorities of Pension Fund, the shareholding in investments LGPS pension funds and created the Border to Coast has been adjusted Border to Coast Pension Partnership. to reflect the fact that there are • the policy and approach to This is a major strategic collaboration now eleven rather than twelve social, environmental and between the partner funds, with shareholders, with one vote each. corporate governance the aim of delivering improved The adjustments to accommodate performance as well as cost savings the changes in share ownership • the policy on the exercise of over the medium to long term. were made in June 2020, after the rights (including voting rights) attaching to investment In 2017/18 Border to Coast Pensions end of the 2019/20 financial year. Partnership Limited (Border to Coast) The ISS must also set out the was established and registered as INVESTMENT REGULATIONS maximum percentage of the Fund a company limited by shares, with that it will invest in particular The Local Government Pension each of the twelve administering investments or asset classes. Scheme (Management and Investment authorities as equal shareholders. of Funds) Regulations 2016 came The 2016 Regulations also introduce The transfer of investments to Border into force on 1st November 2016, new powers for the Secretary of State to Coast commenced in July 2018, replacing the 2009 Regulations. to make a direction, if satisfied that an when three internally managed funds The 2016 Regulations introduced administering authority is failing to act moved some of their assets to Border a mixture of new legislative in accordance with this guidance. The to Coast. The Tyne and Wear Pension requirements, updates to the 2009 power of direction can be used to: Fund made its first investment with regulations and dropped other Border to Coast in November 2018. • require changes to the requirements altogether. Overall the investment strategy As at 31st March 2020, assets to the new regulations are less prescriptive. value of £14 billion have been invested • require investment in specific These Regulations set out the through Border to Coast on behalf of assets or asset classes payments that must be made into and the partner funds. Tyne and Wear has out of the pension fund, restrict powers • transfer the investment functions to approximately £2.5 billion invested in of borrowing, and require fund money the Secretary of State or a person three sub funds covering, UK equities, to be in a separate bank account. The nominated by the Secretary of State global equities and corporate bonds. Regulations require the administering • require the administering authority authority to maintain and publish an to comply with any instructions Investment Strategy Statement (ISS). This regulation essentially allows the Secretary of State to intervene in whatever manner is deemed necessary to address a perceived problem. The Secretary of State must consult with the administering authority and take due consideration of reports and representations, before any direction can be issued. Although this does appear quite draconian, its use is likely to be a last resort.
10 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS
The Council’s Constitution has been South Tyneside Council is the updated to reflect the Governments initiative on the pooling of investments. administering authority of the Local The main change is that the Committee will no longer be responsible for appointing, dismissing and monitoring Government Pension Fund for the the performance of investment managers. Instead over time this Tyne and Wear County area. responsibility will pass to the Border to Coast Pensions Partnership, the Fund’s chosen pooling operator. PENSIONS COMMITTEE The Committee will however, continue to The Council has set up a Pensions Committee (the Committee) to control and be responsible for setting the investment resolve all matters relating to the Fund. The Council’s Constitution requires the strategy and strategic benchmark. It will Committee to: also be responsible for monitoring the • Prepare, maintain and publish the Where investments are made performance of Border to Coast. Governance Compliance Statement. through the pool operator, this will be The overall governance structure, done by the operator itself. • Ensure that the Fund complies with including the wider responsibilities of the the Local Government Pension • Work with the pool operator to Committee, is set out in the Governance Scheme Regulations and all implement the Fund’s investment Compliance Statement that the Fund has other legislation that governs the strategy. to prepare, maintain and publish under administration of the Fund. the Local Government Pension Scheme • Ensure appropriate participation in Regulations 2013. The Statement was last • Prepare, maintain and publish the the pool operator Joint Committee. reviewed by the Committee in February Funding Strategy Statement. 2020 and demonstrates that the Fund is • Monitor the performance and compliant with guidance provided by the • Prepare, maintain and publish the effectiveness of the investment pool Secretary of State for Ministry of Housing Pensions Administration Strategy. operator. Communities and Local Government. • Ensure that the Fund is valued as • Prepare, maintain and publish the During 2019/20 the Committee had required and receive and consider Corporate Governance Policy. eighteen members. South Tyneside reports on each valuation. • Prepare and maintain a Responsible Council nominates eight members and • Ensure appropriate arrangements Investment Policy which takes the other four district councils within the are in place for the administration of account of the policy of the pool County area nominate one member each. benefits. operator. The trades unions and the employers collectively nominate three members each, • Set the Admissions Policy. • Ensure appropriate arrangements for who sit on the Committee in an advisory the Local Pension Board are in place • Prepare, maintain and publish the capacity. Changes to the membership and maintain and publish information Communications Policy Statement. have been made in 2020/21 to allow for about the Local Pension Board. the merger with Northumberland County • Ensure appropriate additional • Provide guidance to the Council as Council Pension Fund. voluntary contributions administering authority as to the arrangements are in place. The Committee meets quarterly to exercise of its rights as a shareholder consider pension matters. Additional • Prepare, maintain and publish the in Border to Coast Pensions meetings are called should any matter Investment Strategy Statement. Partnership. require an in-depth review. • Set the investment objectives • Receive and consider reports from The Committee has set up an and policy and the strategic asset the Joint Committee and maintain Investment Panel to provide a allocation in the light of the Fund’s an effective mechanism for making greater focus on, and scrutiny over, liabilities. recommendations to the Joint the investment strategy and the Committee. • Select, appoint and dismiss an performance of the managers. The investment pooling operator to • Identify and manage the risks Panel consists of three members manage the Fund’s assets. associated with investment pooling. of the Committee, the Investment Advisor, the Head of Pensions and • Ensure that appropriate measures • Appoint, dismiss and assess the Principal Investment Manager. It are in place to monitor and report the performance of investment reports its findings to the Committee on the ongoing costs of investment managers and custodians where and makes recommendations on pooling. direct investments are maintained. any action that is required.
11 Annual Report 2019/20
LOCAL PENSION BOARDS • To ensure the effective and efficient MANAGEMENT OF governance and administration of The Public Service Pensions Act 2013 the Fund, and CONFLICTS OF INTEREST and the Scheme Regulations require Declaration of potential conflicts the Council to establish a Local Pension • To provide the Pensions Committee with such information as it requires of interest is a requirement for Board to assist the Pensions Committee Committee members, Local Pension in ensuring that the Fund complies with to be satisfied from time to time that none of the members of the Board members and the Fund’s legislation relating to its governance and officers. administration, its own rules and any Local Pension Board or person to requirements of the Pensions Regulator. be appointed as a member of the A Register of Interests is maintained for Local Pension Board has a conflict members and officers. The responsibilities to be discharged by of interest. the Local Pension Board include: Declaration of interests is the opening The Local Pension Board reports agenda item at Committee, Local • To secure compliance with the to Pensions Committee. The Board Pension Board and Investment Panel Local Government Pension Scheme consists of eight voting members, meetings. Depending on the level of (Amendment) (Governance) four Member representatives and four conflict, an individual may be required Regulations 2015 and the Local Employer representatives. to take no part in discussions or voting, Government Pension Scheme The Board is required to produce an or may be required to leave the meeting Regulations 2013 (as amended) whilst the matter is addressed. and any other legislation relating to annual report. A copy of this annual the governance and administration report is available on the Fund’s of the Fund. website at http://www.twpf.info/ article/57170/Annual-Reports-for- • To secure compliance with any Local-Pension-Board requirements imposed by The Pensions Regulator in relation to the Fund.
NO. OF INVESTMENT TOTAL HOURS VOTING NO. OF MEETINGS PANEL MEETINGS OF TRAINING PENSIONS COMMITTEE RIGHTS ATTENDED ATTENDED ATTENDED Cllr. E. Leask Y 3 of 6 3 of 4 12.0 Cllr. A. Walsh Y 6 of 6 3 of 4 74.0 Cllr. W. Flynn Y 4 of 6 3 of 4 67.0 Cllr. J. Foreman Y 5 of 6 1 as observer 65.0 Cllr. D. Purvis Y 6 of 6 N/A 18.0 Cllr. A. Hetherington Y 3 of 6 N/A 37.5 Cllr. G. Thompson Y 5 of 6 N/A 46.0 Cllr. R Porthouse Y 6 of 6 N/A 54.0 Cllr. B. Goldsworthy Y 6 of 6 1 as observer 38.5 Cllr. G. Haley (substitute) Y 2 of 6 1 as observer 49.5 Cllr. J. McCarty Y 2 of 6 N/A 15.0 Cllr. G. Bell (substitute) Y 2 of 6 N/A 22.5 Cllr. A. McMullen Y 3 of 6 N/A 45.0 Cllr. W. Samuel (substitute) Y 1 of 6 N/A 0.0 Cllr. J. Heron Y 2 of 6 N/A 22.5 Cllr. A. Lawson (substitute) Y 4 of 6 N/A 46.0 L. Brown (Trade Union Representative) N 4 of 6 N/A 38.0 J. Kelly (Trade Union Representative) N 4 of 6 N/A 23.0 P. Gordon (Trade Union Representative) N 5 of 6 N/A 45.0 P. Goddard (Employer Representative) N 4 of 6 N/A 24.0 A. Munro (Employer Representative) N 5 of 6 N/A 46.0 C. Wallace (Employer Representative) N 3 of 6 N/A 33.0
12 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund NO. OF INVESTMENT TOTAL HOURS VOTING NO. OF MEETINGS PANEL MEETINGS OF TRAINING LOCAL PENSION BOARD RIGHTS ATTENDED ATTENDED ATTENDED J. Woodlingfield Y 3 of 3 N/A 29.0 N. Wirz Y 3 of 3 N/A 89.0 Cllr. P. Hay Y 1 of 3 N/A 45.0 P. Smith Y 2 of 3 N/A 15.0 M. Brodie Y 1 of 3 N/A 22.5 C. Sharkey Y 2 of 3 N/A 22.5 J. Pearson Y 2 of 3 N/A 45.0 T. Hunter Y 1 of 3 N/A 38.0
ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS IMPACT OF COVID-19 take place, the Committee was briefed in writing and a decision taken under AND AT TRAINING ON MEETINGS delegated powers. Attendance at meetings of the In late 2019 an outbreak of a novel The second was the quarterly meeting Committee, the Local Pension Board, coronavirus was first detected in of the Local Pension Board. There were the Investment Panel and at training China. During early 2020 it started to no decisions of material significance is summarised in the table above. spread internationally and the first scheduled for this meeting. The cases were reported in the UK in late The table also shows which members issues on the agenda have all been January/early February 2020. On 11th of the Committee and Local Pension rescheduled for later consideration. March the World Health Organisation Board had voting rights. In practice, the declared a global pandemic. On 4th April, councils were given the Committee and Local Pension Board powers to hold meetings and to take generally operates by consensus, with Lockdown measures in the UK were decisions remotely. This has led to all members having an equal right to introduced in March 2020. These meetings of the Pensions Committee make their views known. lockdown measures had a direct impact and the Local Pension Board being held on two meetings of the Fund. The substitute members on Pensions remotely (virtually by Zoom) in June and Committee from the district councils The first was a special meeting of July 2020, respectively. Future meetings are given full access to meetings and Pensions Committee which was called may take place remotely or in person to the training events. They may only to take a final decision on the 2019 depending on Government guidance vote when the first named member valuation. Whilst the meeting did not in place at the time. from their council is not attending a Committee meeting. The members of the Investment Panel and the Chair and Vice Chair of the Local Pension Board are offered additional training opportunities in recognition of the additional governance duties placed upon them.
13 Annual Report 2019/20
WIDER GOVERNANCE Shareholder functions relate to The Board of Border to Coast Limited is the ownership of the company made up of two Executive Directors, and ARRANGEMENTS and are subject to company law five Non-Executive Directors, including The Fund holds annual meetings for the and key company documents. The a Chair. Two of the five Non-Executive employers and for the trades unions. Administering Authority acts through a Directors are nominated by the twelve nominated shareholder representative funds in Border to Coast through the The agenda for these meetings includes who will either vote by attendance at Joint Committee and are there partly to presentations by the Actuary and the shareholder meetings of the company ensure the local government ethos is Investment Advisor and covers the or by signing written resolutions as maintained. actuarial position, the benefits structure permitted by company law. and investment performance. The Board will be directly accountable A Joint Committee was established to the funds in their roles as both on the 6th June 2017 which has focus Shareholders in relation to company BORDER TO COAST on the oversight role, particularly matters and the Joint Committee for PENSIONS PARTNERSHIP on ‘investor’ issues (as distinct investor matters. from shareholder issues). Investor LIMITED Under the new pooling arrangements rights relate to the investments with the Pensions Committee will remain In response to the Government’s Border to Coast as governed by legal responsible for setting the funding initiative on the pooling of the LGPS documents for each investment. Each strategy and the high level investment assets, the Fund, along with eleven administering authority is represented strategy, e.g. the appropriate asset others has created its own Financial on the Joint Committee. The first allocation for the Fund. The main Conduct Authority (FCA) regulated meeting of the Joint Committee took difference will be that the Fund will no investment management company. place on the 6th June 2017. In 2018/19 longer be appointing and monitoring a scheme member representative was Border to Coast Pensions Partnership investment managers directly. Instead appointed to the Joint Committee in an Limited was formally established on the Fund will be monitoring the observer capacity. 31st May 2017 with South Tyneside performance of the investments in the Council, as administering authority It has been determined that the Chair Pool. of the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund, of the Pensions Committee, or any The Local Pensions Board will continue agreeing to join and become a other person nominated from time to in its role in assisting the Pensions shareholder in Border to Coast Limited. time, will represent the Fund on both Committee in ensuring compliance the Joint Committee and in voting at The Administering Authority has with regulations and the effective and Shareholder Meetings. to distinguish between its role as a efficient governance of the Fund. shareholder, in Border to Coast Limited, versus its role as an investor. The two are fundamentally different functions.
14 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund IMPLICATIONS OF INFORMATION THE MERGER WITH ON THE FUND NORTHUMBERLAND Information on the Fund is held on COUNTY COUNCIL PENSION the Fund’s website at www.twpf.info. FUND ON THE GOVERNANCE The information that is available ARRANGEMENTS includes: During 2019/20 a significant amount • The agenda and minutes for both of due diligence was undertaken on the Pensions Committee and the merger of Northumberland County Local Pension Board meetings. Council Pension Fund into Tyne and • The Service Plan, which presents Wear Pension Fund. The decisions the Fund’s aims and objectives to implement merger were all largely over three year rolling periods. undertaken in 2019/20, however the regulations to implement merger did • The Governance Compliance not come into force until 3rd June Statement, which sets out the 2020 and the effective date was then governance arrangements. backdated to 1st April 2020. • The Actuary’s Report on The merger has required some the 2019 valuation and the changes to be made to the governance Funding Strategy Statement. arrangements for the Fund. This is • The Investment Strategy primarily changes to the constitution Statement, concerning to allow for Councillor representatives the approach to the from Northumberland County Council to investment of the Fund. join the Pensions Committee. • The Corporate Governance The merger also has implications for Policy, which sets out the Fund’s the governance of Border to Coast. With approach to environmental, the merger, the number of administering social and governance issues. authorities owning Border to Coast have effectively reduced from twelve to • The Communications Policy eleven and the membership of the Joint Statement, which sets out Committee also amended accordingly. the services we provide The actions taken to affect these to members, prospective changes were all taken in early 2020/21. members and employers. • The Pension Administration Strategy, which is designed to assist the Fund and the employers to work effectively together to fulfil their joint responsibilities. • A wide range of documents that set out the Fund’s working arrangements.
15 Annual Report 2019/20
THE TRAINING POLICY AND PROGRAMME
The Pensions Committee has adopted the key recommendations of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) Code of Practice on Public Sector Pensions Finance Knowledge and Skills.
The Pensions Panel of the Institute COMMITTEE AND LOCAL New members were invited to has prepared a ‘Knowledge and Skills attend induction briefing sessions Framework’ for persons involved with PENSION BOARD TRAINING with the Fund’s Officers that the Local Government Scheme. Two The Committee has adopted the included an assessment of their frameworks have been produced, one Pensions Panel Framework for Elected individual training needs. for Elected Representatives and Non Representatives and Non Executives The programme for 2019/20 covered Executives and another for Pensions as the basis of its Training Policy topics such as: Practitioners. and Programme. This recognises • Service Planning and Budgeting CIPFA has also developed a Local the Institute’s Code of Practice and Pension Board Knowledge and Skills the requirements of the Investment • Conflicts of interest and Fiduciary Framework, which has been used Principles. The Local Pension Board Responsibility by the Local Pension Board. has assessed its requirements against their own CIPFA framework. • The 2019 valuation The Committee and the Local Pension • The Review of the Investment Board consider training requirements Strategy at each of their quarterly meetings and • Climate Change devise a programme that builds on the training previously delivered to address • Investment Pooling – the issues that will arise in coming Governance Arrangements years. The same training opportunities • Management Information are available to the Committee and the Local Pension Board. • Pensions Processing The programme in 2019/20 was • Investment Beliefs based around two residential training • The Global Economic Outlook seminars and additional sessions delivered at the quarterly meetings. • Property Investment Border to Coast, the Investment • Small Cap Equity Investment Managers, the Investment Advisor and the Actuary assisted with the delivery of • Multi Asset Credit this programme. In addition, Border to Coast delivered an annual conference • Benchmarking which was made available to members of the Committee and individual members also identified training events which they elected to attend. Additional selected training seminars and conferences that were offered by industry wide bodies were attended by the Committee Members that sat on the Investment Panel, and the Chair and Vice Chair of the Local Pension Board. This recognises the higher governance duties placed upon those roles.
16 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund The training programme for 2020/21 OFFICER TRAINING is to cover topics such as: The Pensions Service participates in the general approach to officer training • Service Planning and the Budget and development that is provided by South Tyneside Council. • Risk Management The requirement for pension specific training has been addressed through the • A Review of the Main Asset Classes adoption of the Pensions Panel Framework for Pensions Practitioners. • Border to Coast Business Case for Our training initiatives include: Property • Career grades, where advancement • Officers participate in the pension • Feedback on the Hymans LGPS is geared to an ongoing administration software supplier’s National Knowledge Assessment assessment of knowledge and user groups and technical capability. development groups. • Management of Cash Flow with Reduced Contribution Income • Attendance at a range of seminars • At least one day a month set aside and conferences that are offered by for training. • Global Economic Outlook industry wide bodies. • The pension administration • The Impact of Covid-19 on Markets • Access to the guidance, software has been developed and the Fund circulars and training sessions to include processing guidance • Pensions Administration that are available through the notes and links to internal policies, Local Government Employers external key documents and • The Impact of McCloud organisation. websites. • The Approach to Exit Valuations • A “buddy system” is in place to train • The use of standard checklists • Benchmarking and support staff who are learning and spreadsheets. about new areas of work and to provide ongoing support.
17 Annual Report 2019/20
VISION STATEMENT
Our goal is to provide an efficient, affordable and attractive pension arrangement that is regarded by employers and members as being an important and valued part of the employment package and to be recognised as being amongst the leading UK pension funds.
WE WILL: WE WILL KNOW WE ARE • promote membership of the Fund SUCCEEDING WHEN: • keep contributions as low and • we are consistently achieving as stable as possible through our investment objective effective management of the Fund • there are sufficient assets to • work with our partners to provide meet the liabilities high quality services to employers • we are consistently achieving and members our standards of service to • make pensions issues employers and members. understandable to all.
18 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund SERVICE PLAN
• Enhanced the approach to • Invest further assets with Border The vision and environmental, social and governance to Coast where appropriate. The (ESG) by deciding to invest in a new next product being developed for aims of the Fund range of funds with Legal and General investment by Tyne and Wear is that overweights companies with Multi Asset Credit. In addition, are set out in our strong credentials in these areas. further commitments will be made • Reduced pensions processing to the private equity, infrastructure Service Plan. backlogs to levels that existed before and private debt programmes. the introduction of the 2014 Scheme. • Consider the implications of McCloud on both workload This is a three year rolling plan that • Delivered benefit statements to active and deferred members and resources and implement is reviewed annually. It sets out the changes as appropriate. objectives and actions that we must and pensioners statements in concentrate on in order to achieve electronic form and in paper format • Undertake a procurement process our vision. The Pensions Committee to those opting to continue to for the appointment of an Actuary approves the Plan at a special receive them in paper format. and Investment Advisor. meeting in February of each year. • Further expanded and developed • Undertake a procurement The Plan can be viewed on the online services to employers process for a new pensions the Fund’s website. to provide for increased electronic administration system. passing of data and processing. • Complete and implement a review In 2019/20, we have: • Continued to develop and of the organisational structure of • Completed the triennial valuation enhance the online services for all the Pensions Service to ensure that of the Fund as at 31st March categories of members to ensure it is fit for purpose going forward. 2019 and set appropriate that this becomes an integral part • Implement and embed a new range contribution rates for employers. of the service going forward. of management information. • Reviewed and updated the Funding • Implemented the new reporting • Respond to any changes that Strategy as part of the delivery of requirements introduced by the result from the Scheme Advisory the 2019 valuation, to ensure that it Chartered Institute of Public Board Good Governance review. targets solvency, whilst managing the Finance and Accountancy for the cost of the Scheme for employers. Fund’s annual report and accounts. • Continue to enhance the service offered to employers and members • Completed the due diligence on In 2020/21, we will: and in particular the approach the merger of the Northumberland • Implement the merger of to electronic communications County Council Pension Fund and service delivery. into Tyne and Wear Pension Northumberland County Council Fund. The merger regulations Pension Fund into the Tyne and Wear came into force on 3rd June Pension Fund. This will include THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 2020 and the effective date was the amalgamation of members ON THE SERVICE PLAN backdated to 1st April 2020. records, the funding strategy and the investment strategy. At the time the service plan was • Finalised the asset liability developed and agreed by Committee modelling and the review of the • Keep the Funding Strategy under review to ensure that it continues in early February 2020, Covid-19 was Investment Strategy and have not featured as a significant issue. started to implement changes. to target solvency whilst managing the cost of the scheme employers. This has clearly changed and the • Continued to invest assets delivery of the service at the same with Border to Coast Pensions • From April 2020, use the Aon Risk Analyzer system to monitor time as Covid-19 restrictions is proving Partnership. During the year extremely challenging and it is one of asset transfers have taken estimated Fund level movements in the funding level and reporting the main areas of focus at the current place for global equities and time and will continue to be the case investment grade corporate the results to the Pensions Committee and employers. for much of the remainder of 2020/21. bonds. Investments have also This may also impact on the delivery been made in the private equity • Continue to implement the changes of some of the actions noted above for and infrastructure programmes. to the Investment Strategy as a the service plan for the coming year. A commitment has also been result of the review undertaken made to Private Debt programmes in 2019/20. This will primarily but no investments have been result in increased allocations to made by the year-end. private debt and infrastructure and a corresponding reduction in the allocation to quoted equities. 19 Annual Report 2019/20
RISK MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION The Fund must identify and manage the strategic and operational risks to which it is exposed to. Therefore, our Service Plan includes an objective to embed risk management within all our actions, thereby ensuring that risk is addressed as an inherent part of the management of the Fund.
FUND LEVEL APPROACH AND THE RISK REGISTER THE ROLE OF THE This approach is supported by a Fund level assessment of the major risks to which COMMITTEE AND THE the Fund is exposed to. This identifies and assesses risks over the areas of: LOCAL PENSION BOARD
• Governance This leads to an assessment of the net The Local Pension Board receives the risk register in full each quarter, • Assets impact of each risk, after controls have been applied, as either: identifying any risks that are critical • Liabilities and Funding Strategy and also any changes during the • Legal • Minor quarter, alongside a commentary on the changing risk environment. • Service Delivery • Moderate • Reputation. • High The Committee receives • Critical. an annual report. The impact of each risk is assessed as The risk register review immediately either: The strategy for the management of before the impact of Covid-19 identified each risk is set as either: • Negligible that no risks were assessed as Critical. • Marginal • Treat A further review of the risk register responding to the impact of Covid-19, • Significant • Tolerate early into the 2020/21 financial year, • Transfer • Substantial. added six new risks and increased • Terminate the Activity. the rankings of nine risks. One risk The likelihood of each risk arising is which related to the funding level then assessed as either: This process is undertaken at least worsening due to investment returns quarterly by the Fund’s officers. • Improbable being below the levels assumed in • Possible the triennial valuation, was assessed as Critical. Since the quarter end, • Probable markets have recovered significantly • Near Certain. and, therefore this position is likely to be reversed at the next review of the risk register. A copy of the risk register is available on the Fund’s website. The management of risk is included in the Committee and Board training programme by way of workshops that are moderated by the Fund’s internal auditors.
20 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund THE ROLE OF Assurance over third party FUNDING STRATEGY operations, such as those of the INTERNAL AUDIT investment managers and the The approach to managing the risks The Council’s Internal Audit custodian, is obtained through a inherent in the funding strategy Service carries out a range of review of each organisation’s Report is set out in the Funding Strategy audits each year, based on a on Internal Controls, e.g. the AAF Statement, in particular in the three year rolling programme that 01/06 and SSAE 16 reports. Identification of Risks and Counter ensures appropriate coverage. Measures section. The document may The Fund has appointed an external be viewed on the Fund’s website. The Risk Register is considered in the investment advisor to provide preparation of the audit programme. appropriate advice. This role is currently These risks are also addressed within Every audit report is made available to undertaken by Hymans Robertson. the Risk Register, principally within the Liabilities and Funding Strategy section. the Committee and the Board and a The Fund undertakes an asset liability summary report is considered annually. modelling exercise every three years to In recognition of the specialised nature ensure that the strategic benchmark PENSIONS of the Fund compared to other local and investment management structure ADMINISTRATION is appropriate to the liabilities. This authority functions, a private sector The risks associated with the exercise examines the financial partner has been appointed to assist administration of pensions are position, the membership profile, and with the more complex audit areas. This addressed within the Risk Register, the nature of the liabilities and analyses role is currently undertaken by Deloitte. principally within the Service the expected ranges of outcomes Delivery and Legal sections. INVESTMENT RISK from differing investment policies. It is undertaken in valuation years, based The Pensions Administration report There are a number of risks upon the liability data for the valuation. contained in this document provides involved in the investment of the further details on our approach. This triennial exercise is backed up by Fund. The approach is to monitor desk-top exercises in non valuation years. In addition, the Financial and control these risks as far as Performance Report contains possible, consistent with earning a The strategy and structure is designed information on the timely collection satisfactory return on investments. to ensure that the Fund’s investments of contributions and our approach are adequately diversified. Further details are contained in to the recovery of overpayments. the Risk section of the Investment The performance of the Total Fund Strategy Statement, which may be and each manager and programme viewed on the Fund’s website. is assessed and reported quarterly to the Committee. The Notes to the Accounts set out the nature and extent of the risks arising Action is taken where performance from the investments, alongside a is unsatisfactory. sensitivity analysis on returns. Investment risk is also addressed within the Risk Register, principally within the Assets section.
21 Annual Report 2019/20
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
INTRODUCTION The financial control of the Fund is carried out by the Investments Office of the Pensions Service.
This includes: CONTRIBUTIONS AND PENSIONS • the day to day pensions and In 2019/20, the Fund received £269.5 million (£254.8 million in 2018/19) in pension investment accounting functions contributions from employers and employees. • reconciling the valuation of the During the year £321.6 million (£303.5 million in 2018/19) of pension benefits were investments and monitoring the paid to 51,401 pensioner and beneficiary members. collection of dividends and interest and the associated cash flows in all The chart below shows a breakdown of the contribution income: currencies Contribution income 2019/20 £m • reconciling the cash flows associated with pension benefits, including the collection of contributions and the payment of pensions • the preparation and monitoring of the Pensions Service’s budget 58.3 Employers • the preparation of the final accounts. Employees 211.2
Contributions in 2019/20 were derived from total employer payrolls of £895.7 million (£849.7 million 2018/19) which saw employers pay on average a contribution rate of 23.58% (23.47% in 2018/19) and employees at 6.86% (6.51% in 2018/19). The table below shows the contributions paid by each type of organisation: Contribution income 2019/20 £millions
South Tyneside 19 1
Gateshead
Ne castle City
North Tyneside 2
Sunderland City 1
Other 121 0 0 0 90 120 1 0
22 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE THE DUE DATE The Fund requires employers to pay contributions over by the 14th of each month. This assists with the cash flow for the pension payments, which are made on the 16th of the month. The table below shows the amounts payable each month throughout 2019/20 and the amount collected by the due date:
AMOUNT DUE RECEIVED ON OR MONTH £’000 BEFORE DUE DATE Apr-19 43,734 99.98% May-19 19,791 98.98% Jun-19 19,341 99.00% Jul-19 19,467 99.91% Aug-19 19,726 99.96% Sep-19 19,519 99.04% Oct-19 19,551 99.03% Nov-19 19,644 99.03% Dec-19 19,562 98.92% Jan-20 20,194 99.73% Feb-20 19,710 99.83% Mar-20 19,915 99.98%
Late payments are monitored and pursued.
The following table shows the late payment history for 2019/20:
NUMBER OF DAYS NUMBER OF LATE PERCENTAGE OF LATE PAYMENT WAS LATE PAYMENTS PAYMENTS Less than 10 45 77.7% Between 10 and 19 6 10.3% Between 20 and 29 3 5.2% Between 30 and 39 2 3.4% More than 40 2 3.4% 58 100%
The number of late payments is higher than in the previous year, up to 58 (40 in 2018/19) with the majority being less than 10 days late in payment.
Amounts that were outstanding as at 31 March 2020 were paid by the 31 May 2020.
Interest is calculated in all cases but is only charged when the amount exceeds £20. Interest, for late payments during the year, totalling £867 was charged to and paid by employers on seven occasions.
23 Annual Report 2019/20
PENSION OVERPAYMENTS The Fund seeks to identify and recover all cases of pension overpayments. Such overpayments are identified through a number of mechanisms including notification from family members and friends, from the Tell Us Once service, notices in the press and participation in the National Fraud Initiative. All appropriate action is taken to recover such overpayments, including court action. Amounts are only written off when there is no realistic prospect of recovery.
The table below shows the overpayment position for the last nine years:
Amount Outstanding Percentage Pension Amount written at 31st outstanding overpaid recovered off March 2020 at 31st Year £ £ £ £ March 2020 2011/12 75,241 71,368 1,432 2,441 3.2
2012/13 130,371 120,006 3,897 6,468 5.0
2013/14 92,974 82,886 10,011 77 0.1
2014/15 105,196 95,597 6,036 3,563 3.4
2015/16 178,328 170,779 1,560 5,989 3.4
2016/17 139,754 134,242 122 5,390 3.9
2017/18 285,093 244,744 4,076 36,273 12.7
2018/19 160,921 132,951 582 27,388 17.0
2019/20 218,330 146,559 402 71,369 32.7
Included within the above figures are amounts that were identified through the National Fraud Initiative (NFI). A summary of the amounts identified from the three most recent initiative exercises is shown below:
2014 2016 2018 NFI exercise year: £ £ £ Total value of overpayments identified 105,460 105,558 102,027
Amount recovered to date 100,185 69,173 50,345
Amount written off as unrecoverable 552 1,968 0
Amount Outstanding as at 31st March 2020 4,723 34,417 51,682
No of cases identified 32 37 33
24 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund FORECAST v OUTTURN REPORT FOR THE YEAR
Forecast Actual 2019/20 2019/20 Difference Forecasts £m £m £m Contributions (245.006) (269.516) (24.510) Transfers in from Other Pension Funds (7.022) (43.457) (36.435) Total Contributions (252.028) (312.973) (60.945)
Benefits Payable 298.838 321.632 22.794 Payment in respect of Leavers 11.643 25.296 13.653 Total Costs 310.482 346.928 36.447
Net Reduction/(increase) from dealing with members 58.454 33.955 (24.499)
Management expenses 66.982 55.186 (11.796)
Investment Income (105.694) (80.722) 24.972 Non-recoverable Tax 1.096 0.487 (0.609) Change in Market Value of Investments (441.847) 268.499 710.346 Net Return on Investment (546.445) 188.264 734.709
(Increase)/Decrease in Net Assets (421.009) 277.405 698.414 Available for Benefits during the year
Net Assets of The Fund at the 8,707.649 8,788.062 80.413 Beginning of the Year
Net Assets of the Fund at the 9,128.658 8,510.657 (618.001) End of the Year
25 Annual Report 2019/20
LONGER TERM CASH FLOW FORECASTS The following table has been prepared in line with the triennial valuation cycle and shows the forecasts for the Fund Account and Net Assets Statement to 2021/22. The forecasts do not include Northumberland County Council Pension Fund cash flows.
Forecast Forecast Forecast Longer Term Cash Flow Forecasts 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 Forecasts £m £m £m Contributions (220.463) (224.904) (229.436) Transfers in from Other Pension Funds (8.387) (8.387) (8.387) Total Contributions (228.850) (233.291) (237.823)
Benefits Payable 321.173 332.740 344.792 Payment in respect of Leavers 12.775 12.775 12.775 Total Costs 333.948 345.515 357.567
Net Reduction/(Increase) 105.098 112.223 119.744 from Dealing with Members
Management Expenses 71.442 72.247 75.298
Investment Income (97.236) (102.098) (102.098) Non-Recoverable Tax 0.375 0.394 0.394 Change in Market Value of Investments (141.328) (132.347) (124.827) Net Return on Investments (238.189) (234.051) (226.530)
Decrease/(Increase) in Net Assets (61.649) (49.581) (31.488) Available for Benefits during the Year
The Fund’s actual cash flow is monitored on a daily basis and forward projections are prepared to ensure that short term liquidity problems do not arise. Longer term projections are included in the asset liability modelling work.
26 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund PERFORMANCE AGAINST BUDGET IN 2019/20 A comparison of performance against budget for the net operational expenses of the Fund for 2019/20 is shown below:
2019/20 2019/20 2019/20 Total Budget Actual Variance £000 £000 £000 Employee Costs 2,703 2,583 (120) Premises Costs 73 73 0 IT Costs 425 240 (185) Supplies and Services 3,054 1,814 (1,240) Cost of Democracy 133 101 (32) Other Costs 213 77 (136) Investment Management Expenses 96,353 91,560 (4,793) Total Expenditure 102,954 96,448 (6,506)
Miscellaneous Income (584) (524) 60 Net Expenditure 102,370 95,924 (6,446)
Note: Investment management expenses included within the budget include both Tier 1 (direct costs) and Tier 2 (underlying manager costs) while the figure included within Management fees in the table above only include tier 1 costs. The main variances against the budget are discussed below. As usual the main area of budget variance was in relation to investment management expenses. Given that it is the largest single budget head, which covers the fees and expenses paid to the external investment managers it was expected that the largest variance would occur in the area. The most significant differences all come from alternatives such as Private Equity, Global Property, Infrastructure, and Private Debt. It is extremely difficult to budget for these costs, especially the element that relates to performance fees. IT costs were under budget primarily as a result of the deferment of work replacing personal computers and savings achieved on the purchase of new IT servers. The supplies and services budget is under budget because some of the costs in the budget for Border to Coast operating costs were ultimately charged as an investment management fee rather than an operating cost. In addition there was an underspend on the communications strategy and on other professional fees. This was partly offset by a number of small overspends including performance management fees and travel and subsistence. Other costs shown in the table are shown as being below budget and this relates to the reclaim of taxes paid by the Fund. The recovery work is continuing to take longer than expected and expenditure and budget has slipped into later years. The cost of democracy has come in under budget due to a number of areas of savings, including the commissioning of external reviews. Employee costs were under budget due to vacant posts during the year, the overtime budget not being fully used. Miscellaneous income was lower than forecast because the actual cost of the shared service arrangement with Northumberland County Council Pension Fund was under budget, which meant that the actual amount recharged was lower than expected.
27 Annual Report 2019/20
FUNDING STRATEGY
INTRODUCTION The Scheme benefits are paid from investment income, employees’ contributions and employers’ contributions. Employees’ contributions have been set by the Regulations, with employers’ contributions being adjusted in triennial valuations to ensure that the Fund will have sufficient assets to meet its liabilities.
HISTORY OF THE FUNDING LEVEL A measure of the financial health of The 2001 valuation resulted in the long term gilt yields that were a pension fund is its “funding level”, in a funding level of 82%. This used to set the discount rates for the which is the ratio between its assets reduction was attributable to valuation. These factors impacted and liabilities. A pension fund that improvements in longevity and to negatively on the funding position, holds sufficient assets to meet all employer specific factors such as which had been extremely volatile its projected liabilities would have a pay awards, restructurings and and had deteriorated significantly. A funding level of 100%. A fund with a early retirements. Also, investment straight application of the strategy funding level below 100% is described market returns were below the levels used at the 2007 valuation would as being in deficit. assumed in the 1998 valuation. have led to significant increases in the contributions for most employers. The In 1992 the Fund moved into a The worldwide bear market in equities Pensions Committee recognised this deficit position. To understand between 2000 and 2003 led to a further position and reviewed the assumptions the current funding position it and significant fall in the funding level. and strategy. In order to prevent some is considered important to also The 2004 valuation showed that employers’ contribution rates rising understand the background and the funding level had fallen to 64%. to unaffordable levels, the Committee the decisions taken in the past. This fall was largely attributable to adopted a less prudent strategy for The 1989 valuation revealed a funding investment market returns being employers with a strong covenant by level of 118%, with this surplus arising below the levels assumed in the 2001 increasing the discount rate used to from actual investment returns having valuation, although a reduction in calculate the liabilities. It was stated greatly exceeded expected returns. the discount rates used to calculate that a more prudent strategy would be This led to the scheduled employers liabilities also contributed to the fall. restored at future valuations. Prudent agreeing to take a contribution holiday. use was made of guarantees provided The 2007 valuation revealed an This contribution holiday, alongside a by statutory bodies made to assist improvement in the funding level to government policy change that led to employers with a poorer covenant. 79%, which was due to investment the index-linked element of pensions market returns exceeding the levels These measures led to a reported being charged to pension funds rather assumed at the 2004 valuation and to funding level at the 2010 valuation than directly to employers, eroded the a small increase in the discount rate. of 79%, the same as at the 2007 surplus and led to a funding level of 98% valuation. However, the 2010 low risk at the 1992 valuation. The contribution However, there was upward pressure funding level, based on gilt yields, holiday was ended and an employers’ on contribution rates from inflation was 53%. The comparable figure contribution for the scheduled and from improvements in longevity. at the 2007 valuation was 63%. employers was phased back in. This led to increased employers’ contributions from April 2008. The average future service rate in The 1995 and 1998 valuations both payment from April 2011 was 15.3% of identified funding levels of 87%. With regard to the 2010 valuation, the pay and the contribution to address the The 1998 result was adversely experience had been very poor since deficit was 5.9% of pay, leading to a total affected by the removal of the the 2007 valuation due to investment average contribution of 21.2% of pay. tax credit on UK equity dividends markets falling as a result of the global at the July 1997 budget. economic climate and a reduction The outcome of the 2013 valuation
28 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund reported a funding level of 81%, a slight improvement from the figure of 79% at the 2010 valuation. This valuation took into account the introduction of the new Scheme, which commenced on 1st of April 2014. Over the longer term, the new scheme is expected The outcome of the 2016 valuation The maximum recovery period is only to reduce employers’ contributions resulted in the average future available to those employers with the by approximately 2% of pay. service rate being set at 18.3% of strongest covenant. Where appropriate pensionable pay, against 16.1% at the recovery period for an employer is At the 2013 valuation Aon Hewitt, the the 2013 valuation. The contribution linked to the Average Future Working Fund Actuary, proposed an alternative to address the deficit over a 20 year Life (AFWL) of active members. This approach to deriving the discount rates. period was 6.9% leading to a total is a tightening to the funding strategy. This involved setting the discount average contribution rate of 25.2%, For most transferee admission rates by reference to the forecast against 23.6% at the 2013 valuation. bodies, the recovery period did not return on the assets actually held by exceed the remainder of the contract the Fund, rather than by reference period. A number of employers were to the return on gilts. Aon Hewitt’s THE 2019 VALUATION in surplus. To ensure prudence any Capital Market Assumptions provide The Scheme Regulations required a surplus they had, was amortised over the return assumptions for this valuation to be carried out as at 31 March a period of up to 20 years, resulting in approach, which also sets a “Probability 2019, and new employer contribution a reduction to their contribution rate. of Funding Success”, which is the rates being set from 1 April 2020. likelihood that the strategy would Employers were formally consulted return the Fund to full funding over The approach to setting the discount on the Funding Strategy. the recovery period. The Probability rate at the 2016 valuation was retained The outcome of the 2019 valuation was of Funding Success used for the for the 2019 valuation. The Probability a reported funding level of 106%, which 2013 valuation was 79% and this of Funding Success adopted at the is a 21% increase from the previous led to a discount rate for employers 2019 valuation was 80%, which valuation. The low risk funding level with a stronger covenant of 5.15%. represents a slight increase in the prudence in the funding strategy. based on gilt yields was 68% against The approach to setting the discount This led to a discount rate, for those a figure of 54% at the 2016 valuation. rate at the 2013 valuation was retained employers with a stronger covenant, The main factors which improved for the 2016 valuation. The Probability of 4.3%. The rate for employers the funding position are: of Funding Success adopted at the with orphan liabilities was set at 2016 valuation was 78%, which 4.3% for in service liabilities and • The actual experience of salary represents a slight relaxation in the 1.6% for left service liabilities. and pension increases in the three prudence in the funding strategy. year period to March 2019 was This led to a discount rate, for those The approach to setting deficit below those assumed in the 2016 employers with a stronger covenant, recovery periods was changed, valuation. of 4.5%. The rate for employers with the maximum recovery period with orphan liabilities was set at allowed being reduced from 20 • The average investment return 4.5% for in service liabilities and years at the 2016 valuation to achieved in the three year period 2.4% for left service liabilities. 17 years at this valuation. since the last valuation was above the return assumed in the 2016 valuation. • The contributions paid by employers towards paying off the deficit disclosed at the 2016 valuation.
29 Annual Report 2019/20
The outcome resulted in the average Accounts, as well as in the Funding THE 2022 VALUATION future service rate being set at 19.1% Strategy Statement and the Actuary’s of pensionable pay, against 18.3% at Valuation Report available on the The next valuation is due as at the 2016 valuation. Amortisation of Fund’s website at www.twpf.info. 31 March 2022, which will lead to surpluses over 20 years decreased the new contribution rates from 1 April Previous versions of the contribution rate by 0.6%. An allowance 2023. In the interim period from the Funding Strategy Statement has been made for the outcome of the last valuation to the end of March are available on request by McCloud judgement of 1.2% leading to a 2022, the Fund has been monitoring emailing [email protected] total average contribution rate of 19.7%, the estimated funding level, using against 25.2% at the 2016 valuation. Towards the end of the 2019/20 year a model provided by the Fund’s investment markets fell significantly on Actuary. The analysis provided to When carrying out a valuation, an the back of concerns over the economic the end of March 2020, showed that actuary must have regard to the impact of Covid-19 and the lockdown the funding level had fallen to below desirability of maintaining as nearly measures being put in place. Whilst 100%, however projected funding at constant a common rate, i.e. the this did not result in any changes to the end of June 2020 was 106%. total rate, as possible. The Fund the Funding Strategy or the approach Actuary believes that this was It should also be noted that the 2022 adopted by the Actuary, this was achieved at the Total Fund level. valuation will be the first on the recognised as a risk in the valuation newly merged and enlarged Fund. Further information on the valuation and it has been agreed that the position is contained in the Statement of the will be monitored on a regular basis. Actuary section of these Report and
30 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund TYNE AND WEAR PENSION FUND STATEMENT OF THE ACTUARY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2020
INTRODUCTION The Scheme Regulations require that a full actuarial valuation is carried out every third year. The purpose of this is to establish that the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund (the Fund) is able to meet its liabilities to past and present contributors and to review employer contribution rates.
The last full actuarial investigation into the financial position of the Fund was completed as at 31 March 2019 by Aon, in accordance with Regulation 62 of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 2013.
ACTUARIAL POSITION 1 The valuation as at 31 March 2019 3 In practice, each individual employers’ position is assessed separately and showed that the funding level of the contributions are set out in Aon’s report dated 27 March 2020 (the “actuarial Fund had increased since the previous valuation report”). In addition to the contributions certified, payments to cover valuation with the market value of the additional liabilities arising from early retirements (other than ill-health retirements) Fund’s assets as at 31 March 2019 will be made to the Fund by the employers. (of £8,788.1M) covering 106% of the Total contributions payable by all employers over the three years to 31 March liabilities allowing, in the case of pre- 2023 are estimated to be: 1 April 2014 membership for current contributors to the Fund, for future increases in pensionable pay. Additional contribution Year from 1 April % of pensionable pay amount (£M) 2 The valuation also showed that the aggregate level of contributions 2020 18.6% £1.4M required to be paid by participating 2021 18.6% £1.4M employers with effect from 1 April 2020 was: 2022 18.6% £1.4M 19.1% of pensionable pay. This is the rate calculated as being sufficient, The percentage of pensionable pay 4 The funding plan adopted in together with contributions paid figure shown in the table above assessing the contributions for by members, to meet the liabilities is lower than the future service each employer is in accordance with arising in respect of service after the (primary) contribution rate as at the Funding Strategy Statement. valuation date (the primary rate), 31 March 2019 of 19.1% due to Different approaches were adopted the impact of certain employers in relation to the calculation of the Plus whose sub-funds are in surplus primary contribution rate, stepping an allowance of 1.2% of pay for in excess of 105% of the liabilities of contribution increases and McCloud and cost management – paying contributions below the individual employers’ recovery / see paragraph 9 below, future service rate. Additional amortisation periods as agreed Less monetary contributions are payable with the Administering Authority 0.6% of pensionable pay to remove for individual employers assessed and reflected in the Funding surplus in excess of a funding level to have a shortfall despite the Strategy Statement, reflecting of 105% over an amortisation period overall Fund having a surplus. the employers’ circumstances. of 20 years from 1 April 2020 (which together with the allowance above comprises the secondary rate).
31 Annual Report 2019/20
5 The valuation was carried out using the projected unit actuarial method for most employers and the main financial actuarial assumptions used for assessing the funding target and the contribution rates were as follows.
Discount rate for periods in service Secure scheduled body employers * 4.30% p.a. Intermediate funding target (Strong Covenant) 4.30% p.a. Intermediate funding target (Standard Approach) 4.30% p.a. Ongoing Orphan employers 4.30% p.a.
Discount rate for periods after leaving service Secure scheduled body employers * 4.30% p.a. Intermediate funding target (Strong Covenant) 4.03% p.a. Intermediate funding target (Standard Approach) 3.76% p.a. Ongoing Orphan employers 1.60% p.a.
Rate of pay increases 3.60% p.a.
Rate of increase to pension accounts 2.10% p.a.
Rate of increases in pensions in payment (in excess of Guaranteed Minimum Pension) 2.10% p.a.
*The secure scheduled body discount rate was also used for employers whose liabilities will be subsumed after exit by a scheduled body. In addition, the discount rate for already orphaned liabilities (i.e. where there is no scheme employer responsible for funding those liabilities and employer has exited the Fund) was 1.3% p.a.
The assets were valued at market value. The resulting average future life expectancies at age 65 (for normal health retirements) were: Further details of the assumptions adopted for the valuation, including Men Women the demographic assumptions, are set Current pensioners aged 65 at the valuation date 21.8 24.9 out in the actuarial valuation report. 6 The key demographic assumption Current active members aged 45 at the valuation date 23.4 26.7 was the allowance made for longevity. The post retirement 7 The valuation results summarised Other than as agreed or otherwise mortality assumption adopted for in paragraphs 1 and 2 above are permitted or required by the the actuarial valuation was in line based on the financial position and Regulations, employer contribution with standard self-administered market levels at the valuation date, rates will be reviewed at the next pension scheme (SAPS) S2N 31 March 2019. As such the results actuarial valuation of the Fund as mortality tables with appropriate do not make allowance for changes at 31 March 2022 in accordance scaling factors applied based which have occurred subsequent with Regulation 62 of the Local on an analysis of the Fund’s to the valuation date, although we Government Pension Scheme pensioner mortality experience, comment on changes in market Regulations 2013. and included an allowance for conditions to 31 March 2020 in 9 There are a number of uncertainties improvements based on the 2018 paragraph 10 below. regarding the Scheme benefits and Continuous Mortality Investigation 8 The formal actuarial valuation report hence liabilities: (CMI) Core Projections Model and the Rates and Adjustments (CMI2018), assuming a long term Increases to GMPs: Certificate setting out the employer annual rate of improvement in contribution rates for the period The 2019 valuation allows for the mortality rates of 1.5% p.a. from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2023 extension of the ‘interim solution’ were signed on 27 March 2020. for public service schemes to pay full inflationary increases on GMPs for those reaching State Pension Age (SPA) between 6 April 2016 and 5 April 2021. However, the Government is still exploring various options, including conversion of GMPs to Scheme benefits, in order to achieve equalisation for GMPs as required by the High Court judgement in the Lloyds Bank case.
32 Tyne and Wear Pension Fund The results of the 2019 valuation arrangements were in the form 11 This Statement has been prepared do not allow for the impact of of a final salary underpin) and by the Actuary to the Fund, Aon, potentially extending this interim a consultation on changes to for inclusion in the accounts of solution indefinitely, providing full the LGPS is expected in 2020. the Fund. It provides a summary pension increases on GMPs for of the results of the actuarial The employer contributions members reaching State Pension valuation which was carried out as certified from 1 April 2020 as part Age after 5 April 2021 nor for at 31 March 2019. The valuation of the 2019 valuation include an conversion of GMPs to Scheme provides a snapshot of the funding allowance of 1.2% of pay in relation benefits. Based on approximate position at the valuation date to the potential additional costs calculations, at a whole of fund and is used to assess the future following the McCloud judgement level, the impact of providing full level of contributions required. / cost management process. This pension increases on GMPs for was a simplified approach which This Statement must not be those members reaching State didn’t take account of different considered without reference to Pension Age after 5 April 2021 employer membership profiles the formal actuarial valuation report is an increase in past service or funding targets and may be which details fully the context and liabilities of between 0.1% to 0.2% more or less than the assessed limitations of the actuarial valuation. across the Fund as a whole. cost once the LGPS changes have Aon does not accept any Cost Management Process and been agreed depending upon the responsibility or liability to any party McCloud judgement: precise nature of the new final other than our client, South Tyneside salary underpin, the members in Initial results from the Scheme Council, the Administering Authority scope, and how this affects the Advisory Board cost management of the Fund, in respect of this cost management process. process indicated that benefit Statement. improvements / member 10 Since the valuation date, Fund 12 The report on the actuarial valuation contribution reductions equivalent asset returns have fallen short of as at 31 March 2019 is available on to 0.9% of pay would be required. the assumed return of 4.30% over the Fund’s website at the following However, the cost management the year to 31 March 2020, on its address: process was paused following own leading to a reduction in the the Court of Appeal ruling that funding level. In addition, reduced http://www.twpf.info/ the transitional arrangements expectations of future asset returns CHttpHandler.ashx?id=43497&p=0 in both the Judges’ Pension and falls in gilt yields have led to July 2020 Scheme (McCloud) and a decrease in the discount rates, Firefighters’ Pension Scheme further reducing funding levels and (Sargeant) constituted illegal increasing the primary rate. The age discrimination. Government Actuary, in conjunction with the confirmed that the judgement Administering Authority, will monitor would be treated as applying to all the position on a regular basis and public service schemes including the Administering Authority will take the LGPS (where the transitional action if it believes necessary.
33 Annual Report 2019/20
MEMBERSHIP OF THE FUND
As at 31st March 2020, there were 266 employers participating in the Fund. This includes the five district councils and a wide range of other organisations that provide a public service within the Tyne and Wear County area.
The increase in the number of participating employers The chart shows the movement in membership over the past over the past ten years is shown in the chart below: ten years. The increase was initially caused by the five councils 1 0000 outsourcing work to contractors that take up admitted body status in the Fund. More recently, the increase has been driven by schools converting to academy status and taking up scheduled body status in the Fund. 120000 00 2 2 2 0 2 0 90000 2 2 0 22 210 200 191 000 0000 1
1 0 1 0000