DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Trails Planning Program Washington Metropolitan  Know Your Route and Any Potatoes, and Hay Were Also Cultivated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Trails Planning Program Washington Metropolitan  Know Your Route and Any Potatoes, and Hay Were Also Cultivated Native Americans National Landmark in few places in Maryland where Common 1973. To learn more visit Mergansers have recently begun to breed. a i a oati g a t i s Native Americans inhabited the Monocacy River valley from the earliest occupation www.nps.gov/mono. Canada geese are present year round. For More Information of North America. Prehistoric sites have been located along the forested river, dating Transient visitors include the spotted and The Monocacy River has a variety of conditions that provide opportunities for Th Riv r With Ma y B s as early as the Paleo-Indian period (12,000-8,000 B.C.). Early natives were most The Heart of the Civil War solitary sandpipers, American widgeon, paddlers of all levels. Those new to the water can take part in group paddle trips Frederick County Division of likely nomadic, foraging and hunting the rich diversity of wildlife found in the area. Heritage Area (HCWHA) ring-necked duck and ruddy duck. offered by the County and more experienced boaters can create their own adventures is comprised of Washing- that can range from a few hours to all day. Be prepared before you get on the water Parks and Recreation Located in Frederick County, Maryland, the Monocacy River is the largest ton, Frederick, and Carroll Prominent predatory birds include the and review these guidelines. 355 Montevue Lane, Suite 100 Maryland tributary to the Potomac River. The Monocacy River is the boundary European Settlement-Agriculture Counties. It is a certified red-shouldered, red-tailed, and Cooper’s Frederick, MD 21702-8213 between Frederick County and Carroll County in its northern reaches. It is European explorers and traders arrived in the region in the early 1700s. In 1702, a Maryland Heritage Area, hawks and the osprey. The American Wear a properly-fitted, U.S. Coast Guard approved, lifejacket while on the water. phone: 301-600-1646 also designated as a Maryland Scenic River and has long been popular with Swiss explorer, Franz Louis Michel visited the Monocacy River valley while searching Area Heritage Heart of the Civil War (See Maryland Boating Regulations below) email: [email protected] and a partner in the Jour- kestrel, a member of the falcon fam- Service U.S. Fish & Wildlife Gentry, George paddlers, fishermen, for silver, and drew a map that clearly depicted the river and Sugarloaf Mountain, Civil War Re-enactors or visit www.Recreater.com ney Through Hallowed ily, is found hunting nearby fields, and American Bald Eagle birdwatchers and others. which is located in Southern Frederick County. Boating safety increases with Ground National Heritage Area. The HCWHA promotes the stewardship of historic, three species of owls have been seen in the watershed – the eastern screech-owl, great Easily accessible from numbers. Boat with others and Maryland Department of Natural Resources cultural, and natural Civil War resources, and shares information about the people, horned, and barred owls. In recent years, the American bald eagle has made a come- the Baltimore and By 1790, Frederick County was a bustling agricultural community, and the largest carry a spare paddle. Chesapeake and Coastal Service wheat producer in the United States. Crops such as flax, corn, orchard fruit, rye, oats, places and stories that led to Civil War. Learn more at www.heartofthecivilwar.org. back, and is sometimes observed along the Monocacy. With its white head, black Public Access and Water Trails Planning Program Washington metropolitan Know your route and any potatoes, and hay were also cultivated. In addition to agricultural productivity, mill- body, white tail, and large size (its wingspan can reach 8 feet), this bird is easy to 580 Taylor Avenue, Suite E-2, Annapolis, MD 21401 areas, the Monocacy potential hazards along it. ing and other industries flourished. By 1791, there were a total of 870 mills of vari- identify. DNR coordinates the creation of a statewide system River provides many Review maps, river levels, and ous types operating on the Monocacy River and its tributaries, including various saw, Nat a e s of public water access sites and water trails and opportunities for visitors Numerous song birds can be found along the Monocacy, including flycatchers, vireos, weather conditions before provides technical, planning and design assistance grist, paper, and flour mills. Michael’s The Monocacy River supports diverse wildlife, recreational pursuits and scenic en- to enjoy the natural beauty, warblers, tree and northern rough-winged swallows, eastern bluebird, wood thrush, launching. Be aware of obstacles to local governments and other partners. For more Mill was built in 1739 and operated tranquility, and cultural joyment. The river corridor provides food, shelter and migration pathways that are indigo bunting, scarlet tanager, and our State bird, the Baltimore oriole. From mid- such as fallen trees, debris, information visit http://dnr.maryland.gov/ccs/Pages/ until the 1950s. and historical resources important to fish, birds, and other wildlife. Several areas along the Monocacy River April through May, the woods along the River are alive with these beautiful songsters islands and rocks which you pawt.aspx are habitat to rare, threatened, or endangered species, and the riparian areas contain that are hallmarks of Maryland DNR Lisa Gutierrez, on their migration northward. Many will breed here and their young can be found may encounter along the route. numerous Wetlands of Special State Concern. These wetlands are of exceptional eco- central Maryland. Rock outcroppings along the Monocacy River Transportation and Bridges throughout the summer. Check Maryland streamflow In Case of Emergency logical value, sometimes containing the last remaining populations of native plants conditions at the USGS website Maryland DNR Lisa Gutierrez, In case of emergency, contact the Sheriff's Department For thousands of years prior to European settlement, Native Americans inhabited Colonial roads were generally poorly marked and maintained, and traveling and animals. waterdata.usgs.gov/md/nwis/rt. Paddle with others Dispatch at 911 and specify that you are in Frederick this valley, living in riverside villages, fishing, hunting, and farming. The Algonquian- L av No a County, Maryland or call the Maryland Natural on them was often hazardous and speaking Shawnee called the river the "Monnockkesy," the “river with many bends.” Forests, Plants and Animals Dress appropriately for the weather and water conditions in addition to air and Resources Police at 410-260-8888. difficult. Natural barriers such as The stewardship principles of Leave No Trace: water temperatures. Always wear protective footwear. In the 17th century, British Explorer, Henry Fleet visited the Monocacy River valley, rivers presented a particular challenge, County Division of Parks and Recreation Frederick Currently, there are approximately 151,085 acres of for- Project coordination, design and mapping for this publication were provided by the Maryland Department and remarked “The place is without question, the most healthful and pleasant …” The especially in inclement weather. By Legore Arch Bridge – Built around 1900 by estland in Frederick County, which represents 35% of the 1) Plan Ahead and Prepare Carry a supply of food and water adequate for the length of your trip. Stay of Natural Resources, Chesapeake and Coastal Service in James William Legore, is the only five-arch, Know your route and the limitations of yourself hydrated and protected from the sun year-round to minimize the danger of Monocacy River Water Trail guide has been compiled to help visitors explore this 1748, traffic had increased on the County’s total land area. Silver maple, cottonwood, syca- partnership with the Frederick County Division of Parks stone bridge in Frederick County. and your group. dehydraton and heat exhaustion. place that Mr. Fleet found so pleasant. Visitors to the river will be greeted by views Georgetown Road sufficiently to more, ash, elm, and box elder can be found in floodplain and Recreation, the Tourism Council of Frederick Carry the proper equipment and clothing. of distant ridges, rich forests and farmland, rock outcroppings, a diversity of wildlife, warrant the establishment of a rope ferry located slightly downstream of current MD forests. Another interesting aspect of the watershed is its Keep your weight centered and as low For more information on paddling County, the National Park Service Monocacy National Notify someone of the time you intend to return. and historic landscapes dotted with mills and bridges, and there are many other 355. Archeological excavations have confirmed a nearby tavern, most likely a log abundant springs and seepages. With the exception of as possible at all times, especially when and boating safety visit Battlefield, and the Monocacy Scenic River Citizens Advisory Board. attractions and points of interest nearby. building, that provided food and lodging for travelers. Fountain Rock spring which flows at over 1,000 gallons per 2) Stay in Designated Areas entering and exiting a boat. Never http://cgaux.org or minute, most springs are small, but still have an important Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Hagerty, Ryan Keep to designated trails and public areas. paddle farther from shore than you are http://dnr.maryland.gov/nrp/Pages/ The facilities and services of the Department of Natural With its temperate climate, fertile soil, and ample rainfall, the Monocacy watershed Further advances in the transportation of goods to market came in the late 1820s cooling effect on the streams they enter. Goldenseal Keep groups small and avoid trampling plants. prepared to swim. BoatingSafety/home.aspx Resources are available to all without regard to race, has a long and rich history, marked by a prosperous agricultural economy and when the Baltimore and Ohio (B&O) Railroad and Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O) Protect wildlife and your food - store rations securely. color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national Canal Company were both chartered to connect the east coast markets with the If your boat flips over, remain calm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Compared
    Water Resources Overview The goals of the Water Resources Chapter are listed below: - Protect the water supply from pollution and encroachment of developments. - Provide an adequate and safe drinking water supply to serve the existing and future residents of the City of Frederick. - Provide an adequate capacity of wastewater treatment with effluent meeting all necessary regulatory requirements for existing and future residents of the City. - Restore and protect water quality and contribute toward meeting the water qualityby striving to meet or exceed regulatory requirements. for water quality. This will require addressinginclude current water quality impacts as well as future impacts from land development and population growth. - Develop adequate stormwater management. - Protect the habitat value of the local and regional rivers and streams. - Efficiently use public dollars for infrastructure that ensures sustainable, safe, and adequate supply of water for all residents. The City is committed to ensuring water and wastewater (sewer) capacity for both existing and new developments andwhile minimizing the negative impacts of stormwater runoff. In 2002, the City established the Water and Sewer Allocation System to make certain that adequate treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater is in place for new growth prior to approval. In 2012, Ordinance G-12-13 was adopted which updated the allocation process and combined it with it the Impact Fees payable for water and sewer service. The City adopted an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) in 2007 that allows development to proceed only after it has been demonstrated that sufficient infrastructure exists or will be created in the water and wastewater systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources
    Gaithersburg A Character Counts! City City of Gaithersburg WATER RESOURCES A Master Plan Element February 17, 2010 2009 MASTER PLAN CITY OF GAITHERSBURG 2009 MASTER PLAN WATER RESOURCES ELEMENT Planning Commission Approval: January 20, 2010, Resolution PCR-2-10 Mayor and City Council Adoption: February 16, 2010, Resolution R-10-10 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Mayor Sidney A. Katz Council Vice President Cathy C. Drzyzgula Jud Ashman Henry F. Marraffa, Jr. Michael A. Sesma Ryan Spiegel PLANNING COMMISSION Chair John Bauer Vice-Chair Matthew Hopkins Commissioner Lloyd S. Kaufman Commissioner Leonard J. Levy Commissioner Danielle L. Winborne Alternate Commissioner Geraldine Lanier CITY MANAGER Angel L. Jones ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Erica Shingara, former Environmental Services Director Gary Dyson, Environmental Specialist Christine Gallagher, former Environmental Assistant Meredith Strider, Environmental Assistant PLANNING AND CODE ADMINISTRATION Greg Ossont, Director, Planning & Code Administration Lauren Pruss, Planning Director Kirk Eby, GIS Planner Raymond Robinson III, Planner CIT Y CITY OF GAITHERSBURG OF GAITHERSBURG 2009 MASTER PLAN CHAPTER 2 WATER RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose and Intent................................................................................................................ 1 2. Background.......................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River
    Health and History of the North Branch of the Potomac River North Fork Watershed Project/Friends of Blackwater MAY 2009 This report was made possible by a generous donation from the MARPAT Foundation. DRAFT 2 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE OF Figures ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 THE UPPER NORTH BRANCH POTOMAC RIVER WATERSHED ................................................................................... 7 PART I ‐ General Information about the North Branch Potomac Watershed ........................................................... 8 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Geography and Geology of the Watershed Area ................................................................................................. 9 Demographics .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montgomery County Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewerage Systems Plan Chapter 2: General Background 2017 – 2026 Plan (County Executive Draft - March 2017)
    Montgomery County Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewerage Systems Plan Chapter 2: General Background 2017 – 2026 Plan (County Executive Draft - March 2017) Table of Contents Table of Figures: ........................................................................................................................ 2-2 Table of Tables: ......................................................................................................................... 2-2 I. INTRODUCTION: ........................................................................................................... 2-3 II. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: .......................................................................................... 2-3 II.A. Topography:................................................................................................................. 2-4 II.B. Climate: ....................................................................................................................... 2-4 II.C. Geology: ...................................................................................................................... 2-4 II.D. Soils: ............................................................................................................................ 2-5 II.E. Water Resources: ....................................................................................................... 2-6 II.E.1. Groundwater: ........................................................................................................ 2-6 II.E.1.a. Poolesville Sole Source Aquifer:
    [Show full text]
  • F-7-141 Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area
    F-7-141 Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 10-11-2011 CAPSULE SUMMARY Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area MIHJP# F-7-141 Dickerson vicinity Frederick and Montgomery counties, Maryland NRMA=1974 Public The Monocacy Natural Resources Management Area (NRMA) occupies 2,011 acres that includes property along both banks of the lower Monocacy River and most of the Furnace Branch watershed in southeastern Frederick and western Montgomery counties. The area is predominantly rural, comprising farmland and rolling and rocky wooded hills. Monocacy NRMA's main attraction is the Monocacy River, which was designated a Maryland Scenic River in 1974. The NRMA began in 1974 with the acquisition of the 729-acre Rock Hall estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Anacostia River Sediment Project
    Frequently Asked Questions – Anacostia River Sediment Project Q: What is the Anacostia River Sediment Project? A: The “ARSP” is the plan to clean up the bottom of the river. It is following a process similar to the “Superfund” process, but the ARSP is not a Superfund project. The project began in 2014 and the interim cleanup plan for the river is expected to be completed and shared with the public in 2019. Q: What area does the Anacostia River Sediment Project cover? A: The study area includes the tidal Anacostia River from the Potomac River to past Bladensburg, Maryland. It also includes Kingman Lake, which is next to Kingman Island, and the Washington Channel. Q: How big is the Anacostia River watershed? A: The Anacostia Watershed covers 176 square miles in Montgomery County, Prince George's County and Washington, DC. It is home to 43 species of fish, some 200 species of birds and more than 800,000 people. Q: What are contaminants? A: Contaminants are chemicals that are harmful to humans or wildlife. The contaminants of concern include “polychlorinated biphenyls” (PCBs) which were used in electrical equipment until the 1970’s; “dioxins” which are a highly toxic compound often produced by waste-burning incinerators; and “pesticides,” which are chemicals used to repel pests in agriculture and residential use. Q: How did the Anacostia River become contaminated? A: Like most rivers in urban environments, the Anacostia River has a long history of industrial and agricultural activity. Historical and ongoing sources of contamination may include industrial land use, sewer overflows, contaminated groundwater, landfills and runoff from rainstorms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Conococheague Creek
    CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, HAER No. MD-123 CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Aqueduct No. 5) Milepost 99.80 Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Park Williamsport flttfe MD Washington County Maryland Po, 2r PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 mb HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD 3- CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Aqueduct No. 5) HAER NO. MD-123 Location: Milepost 99.80, in Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Park, Williamsport, Washington County, Maryland. Date of Construction: 1833-34 Builder: Michael Byrne and Company Frederick, Maryland Present Owner Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Present Use: Bike and foot path / Significance The Conococheague Creek Aqueduct was the fifth of eleven masonry aqueduct constructed along the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal. It was the last and most ornate of the system1s five multiple span aqueducts Historian: Lee R. Maddex Institute for the History of Technology and Industrial Archaeology West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 Project Information: This recording project is part of the Historic American Engineering Record(HAER), a long-range program to document historically significant engineering and industrial works in the United States. The HAER program is administered by the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record division(HABS/HAER) of the National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. The Conococheague Creek Aqueduct CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT HAER No. MD-123 (Page 2) Recording project was cosponsored during the summer of 1996 by HABS/HAER under the general direction of Blaine Cliver, Chief, and by the Institute for the History of Technology and Industrial Archaeology (IHTIA), Emory L.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersheds.Pdf
    Watershed Code Watershed Name 02130705 Aberdeen Proving Ground 02140205 Anacostia River 02140502 Antietam Creek 02130102 Assawoman Bay 02130703 Atkisson Reservoir 02130101 Atlantic Ocean 02130604 Back Creek 02130901 Back River 02130903 Baltimore Harbor 02130207 Big Annemessex River 02130606 Big Elk Creek 02130803 Bird River 02130902 Bodkin Creek 02130602 Bohemia River 02140104 Breton Bay 02131108 Brighton Dam 02120205 Broad Creek 02130701 Bush River 02130704 Bynum Run 02140207 Cabin John Creek 05020204 Casselman River 02140305 Catoctin Creek 02130106 Chincoteague Bay 02130607 Christina River 02050301 Conewago Creek 02140504 Conococheague Creek 02120204 Conowingo Dam Susq R 02130507 Corsica River 05020203 Deep Creek Lake 02120202 Deer Creek 02130204 Dividing Creek 02140304 Double Pipe Creek 02130501 Eastern Bay 02141002 Evitts Creek 02140511 Fifteen Mile Creek 02130307 Fishing Bay 02130609 Furnace Bay 02141004 Georges Creek 02140107 Gilbert Swamp 02130801 Gunpowder River 02130905 Gwynns Falls 02130401 Honga River 02130103 Isle of Wight Bay 02130904 Jones Falls 02130511 Kent Island Bay 02130504 Kent Narrows 02120201 L Susquehanna River 02130506 Langford Creek 02130907 Liberty Reservoir 02140506 Licking Creek 02130402 Little Choptank 02140505 Little Conococheague 02130605 Little Elk Creek 02130804 Little Gunpowder Falls 02131105 Little Patuxent River 02140509 Little Tonoloway Creek 05020202 Little Youghiogheny R 02130805 Loch Raven Reservoir 02139998 Lower Chesapeake Bay 02130505 Lower Chester River 02130403 Lower Choptank 02130601 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Antietam Map Side
    ★ ANTIETAM CAMPAIGN SITES★ ★ Leesburg (Loudoun Museum) – Antietam Campaign To ur begins here, where Lee rested the Army of Northern MASON/DIXON LINE Virginia before invading Maryland. ★ Mile Hill – A surprise attack led by Confederate Col. Thomas Munford on Sept. 2, 1862, routed Federal forces. ★ White’s Ferry (C&O Canal NHP) – A major part of Lee’s army forded the Potomac River two miles north of this mod- ern ferry crossing, at White’s Ford. To Cumberland, Md. ★ White’s Ford (C&O Canal NHP) – Here the major part of the Army of Northern Virginia forded the Potomac River into Maryland on September 5-6, 1862, while a Confederate band played “Maryland! My Maryland!” ★ Poolesville – Site of cavalry skirmishes on September 5 & 8, 1862. 81 11 ★ Beallsville – A running cavalry fight passed through town Campaign Driving Route on September 9, 1862. 40 ★ Barnesville – On September 9, 1862, opposing cavalry Alternate Campaign Driving Route units chased each other through town several times. Rose Hill HAGERSTOWN Campaign Site ★ Comus (Mt. Ephraim Crossroads) – Confederate cavalry Cemetery fought a successful rearguard action here, September 9-11, Other Civil War Site 1862, to protect the infantry at Frederick. The German Reformed Church in Keedysville W ASHINGTON ★ Sugarloaf Mountain – At different times, Union and was used as a hospital after the battle. National, State or County Park Confederate signalmen atop the mountain watched the 40 I L InformationInformation or Welcome Center opposing army. Williamsport R A T ★ Monocacy Aqueduct (C&O Canal NHP) – Confederate (C&O Canal NHP) troops tried and failed to destroy or damage the aqueduct South Mountain N on September 4 & 9, 1862.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Watershed Partnership the Potomac Watershed Partnership Thethe Monocacymonocacy Catoctincatoctin Watershedwatershed Alliancealliance
    DevelopingDeveloping LocalLocal WorkgroupsWorkgroups andand AcquiringAcquiring FundingFunding: A Case Study From the Potomac River Watershed Bryan Seipp, Director of Restoration/Forester MissionMission StatementsStatements The Potomac The Monocacy & Watershed Partnership (PWP) Catoctin Watershed Alliance is a collaborative effort among coordinates the efforts of a federal, state, and local diverse group of stakeholders partners to restore the health of dedicated to the protection the land and waters of the the land and waters of the and restoration of the natural Potomac River Basin, thereby enhancing the quality of life resources in the MonocacyMonocacy && and overall health of the Catoctin watersheds. Chesapeake Bay. TheThe PotomacPotomac WatershedWatershed PartnershipPartnership Watershed Size: 14,670 sq. miles Population: Nearly 5 million Population: Nearly 5 million nd 2 Largest Contributor of Freshwater to the Chesapeake Bay Largest Contributor of Sediment to the Chesapeake Bay TheThe MonocacyMonocacy CatoctinCatoctin WatershedWatershed AllianceAlliance Watershed Size: 320,807 acres Third Fastest growing area in Maryland 78% of the Land Zoned Agricultural Lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands Most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire Highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution Greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin DevelopmentDevelopment andand WorkWork PlansPlans PWPPWP Formed in 2000 through a USDA Forest Service Initiative. In its first year, the partnership completed a strategic forest assessment for the Potomac watershed to determine where the highest priority forestlands were in most need of restoration, in both rural and urban areas. At the time of the assessment, the Shenandoah River and the Monocacy River and Antietam Creek sub-watersheds had the lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands; the highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution; the most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire; and some of the greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin.
    [Show full text]