Elizabethan Acting Companies, 1588-1594: Received Narratives and Historiographic Problems
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ELIZABETHAN ACTING COMPANIES, 1588-1594: RECEIVED NARRATIVES AND HISTORIOGRAPHIC PROBLEMS A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Terence G. Schoone-Jongen, B. A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Thomas Postlewait, Adviser Dr. Alan Woods d~~~G Adviser Department of Theatre Copyright by Terence Guy Schoone-Jongen 2003 ABSTRACT Over the last century, the major studies of Elizabethan acting companies have all tended to operate under a variety of problematic assumptions. These assumptions are particularly evident in E. K. Chambers and W. W. Greg’s “amalgamation” hypothesis (which states that from 1590 to 1594 the Lord Strange’s and Admiral’s Men were joined as one company) and the various accounts of Pembroke’s Men. In this work, I have sought to mobilize all available evidence in an attempt to reconsider the received narratives about these companies, as well as the assumptions present in those received narratives. In the case of the “amalgamation,” a close study of the evidence reveals that there is little or no support for such a hypothesis, save that the hypothesis, if true, would support a number of traditional assumptions about provincial touring and acting company size. In fact, the surviving evidence actually appears to directly contradict the possibility of an “amalgamated” company. To date, the most thorough critique of the “amalgamation” hypothesis is Andrew Gurr’s “The Chimera of Amalgamation,” but here too several questionable assumptions are at work. I have identified some of these assumptions; I have also brought to bear other evidence and several considerations which Gurr’s argument does not deal with. The histories that have been written about Pembroke’s Men present a slightly different problem. Here, there is concrete evidence that such a company existed, but that evidence has been interpreted in many different ways. I have examined the various histories of Pembroke’s Men and pointed out the many assumptions that operate in each of these accounts. In identifying these assumptions, it becomes clear that, while scholars have become more and more sophisticated in their use of evidence, they have not become any more careful about their employment of assumptions. As a final component of this study, I have, based on the available evidence, compiled detailed itineraries for the acting companies active between 1584 and 1599. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I with to thank my adviser, Thomas Postlewait, for his encouragement, guidance, and enthusiasm, all of which made this project possible, as well as his editting and proofreading, which made the end result bearable. Thanks is due to several people for offering feedback and encouragement on early versions of this thesis. Andrew Gurr offered several comments on an early draft of the paper which became my first chapter; Sally-Beth MacLean gave me a number of helpful hints while I was compiling what has become Appendix A; and Alan Woods suggested a number of useful emendations and clarifications. I owe particular thanks to Sally-Beth MacLean and all of the people at Records of Early English Drama (REED) at the University of Toronto who were willing to make time in their busy schedules to allow me to ask questions and rummage through the unpublished REED transcriptions. I would like to especially thank Elizabeth Baldwin, David Mills, John Coldewey, Peter Greenfield, Sally-Beth MacLean, Alexandra Johnston, Barbara Palmer, John Wasson, Diana Wyatt, and Jane Cowling, all of whom graciously gave me permission to cite their unpublished REED transcriptions. lV This project was made possible in part by a PEGS grant from the Ohio State University Department of Theatre. v VITA August 24, 1978 ............................................. Bom--Pipestone, Minnesota 2001 ................................................................ B. A., Communications Arts and Sciences, Calvin College 2001-present. .................................................. Graduate Teaching Associate, The Ohio State University FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Theatre VI TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................... .ii Acknowledgements .................................................................................. .iv Vita .....................................................................................................vi Chapters: 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 2. An Imagined Company: The Problem of the "Amalgamation" .............................. 6 2.1 Introduction ..........................................................................6 2.2 The "Amalgamation" Hypothesis ................................................ 9 2.3 Against the "Amalgamation" Hypothesis ...................................... 16 2.4 The Evidence: Playing Notices ..................................................21 2.5 The Evidence: Suggestions of an "Amalgamation" ...........................27 2.6 The Evidence: In Opposition to the "Amalgamation" ....................... .33 2.7 A Further "Amalgamation" Difficulty: The Itineraries ...................... .40 2.8 Possible Precendents for an "Amalgamation" ................................ .45 2.9 The Feasibility of the "Amalgamation" ........................................ 54 2.10 Conclusion: Strange's and the Admiral's Men, 1589-1594 .................. 55 3. Pembroke's Men, 1592-93 ...................................................................... 59 3.1 Pembroke's Men: The Surviving Evidence .................................... 59 3.2 An Early Conjecture: Frederick Fleay .......................................... 72 3.3 Ghosts of the "Amalgamation" .................................................. 78 3.4 An Alternative Account: G. M. Pinciss and the Queen's Men .............. 94 3.5 A Turning Point: Simon Jewell's Will ......................................... 98 3.6 Syntheses I: Karl Wentersdorf and the Queen's ............................. 103 3.7 Syntheses II: David George and Strange's .................................... 113 3.8 Conclusion ........................................................................ 122 Vll Appendices: A. Company Itineraries, 1584-1599 ............................................................ 128 B. Potential "Amalgamations" ................................................................... 177 C. Ten Arguments for the Pembroke's company of 1592-93 ................................ 179 Bibliography ........................................................................................ 181 vm CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Beginning with Edmond Malone and continuing up to the present, scholarship on theatre in Renaissance England has focused almost exclusively on London, with only occasional mention of provincial playing. In many ways, Frederick G. Fleay's A Chronicle History ofthe London Stage 1559-1642 (1890) set the terms for the study of Renaissance English theatre. Although Fleay's contemporaries and successors, particularly W.W. Greg and E. K. Chambers, devoted a great deal of their work to correcting his errors and assumptions, Fleay's focus on London playing remained virtually unquestioned. In particular, E. K. Chambers's The Elizabethan Stage offered a much more meticulous and accurate history of Renaissance English theatre, but, like Fleay, Chambers focused almost exclusively on London playing. Displacing Fleay, The Elizabethan Stage became the work which set the tone and terms for the study of Renaissance English theatre and remained so for years. In recent decades, primarily due to the Records of Early English Drama (REED) project, theatre activities outside London have received increasing attention. REED was launched in the mid-1970s; its goal has been to gather, compile, and publish all records of theatre activity throughout England from roughly the late medieval period to 1642. By extending the focus beyond London, REED provides a growing documentary record of provincial playing. Consequently, the historical significance and purpose of provincial 1 touring and playing is being reconceived by scholars. This trend is discernible not only in scholarship of each of the editors for the REED volumes, which are listed in my bibliography, but also in the work of several other scholars, including Peter H. Greenfield's "Touring" (1997), Andrew Gurr's The Shakespearian Playing Companies (1996), and Siobhan Keenan's Travelling Players in Shakespeare's England (2002). Increasingly, recent scholarship on Elizabethan theatre, even when focused on London, has investigated the activities of playing companies, including their touring records. Attending to the playing companies is of course not a new development. In the twentieth century, various scholars carried out major scholarship on the acting companies: J. T. Murray's The English Dramatic Companies, 1558-1642 (1910), Chambers's The Elizabethan Stage (1923), G. E. Bentley's The Jacobean and Caroline Stage (1941-68) and The Profession ofPlayer in Shakespeare's Time, 1590-1642 (1984), Muriel C. Bradbrook's The Rise ofthe Common Player (1962), and Andrew Gurr's The Shakespearian Playing Companies (1996) are especially notable. Gurr's The Shakespearian Playing Companies is particularly important, as it makes major headway in writing the history of the English Renaissance theatre from a perspective