History of Hydrocarbon Exploration in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Home , Ain Sifni, Baba Gurgur, Drill stem test, Kirkuk Field, Petroleum geology

GeoArabia, 2015, v. 20, no. 2, p. 181-220 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain

History of hydrocarbon exploration in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

David S. Mackertich and Adnan I. Samarrai

ABSTRACT

The Kurdistan Region of Iraq has witnessed extraordinary levels of exploration activity since the ﬁ rst exploration well to be drilled in over two decades was spudded in 2005. Since then almost 200 wells have been drilled encountering recoverable reserves estimated to be in excess of 15 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Whilst the region is in close proximity to many of the giant and supergiant ﬁ elds of Iran and Iraq, the reservoirs in which discoveries have been made are largely different. In Iraq a large percentage of discovered reserves reside in Cenozoic and Cretaceous sediments capped by Cenozoic evaporite sequences. Over much of Kurdistan, particularly the north and northeastern parts of the region, Cenozoic strata are absent.

A decade ago many were doubtful that signiﬁ cant quantities of hydrocarbons could be trapped in the absence of the Cenozoic evaporite sequences. Furthermore, whilst the presence of large surface structures and signiﬁ cant oil seeps were encouraging to some, to others it fueled concerns about trap leakage. Today the majority of the surface anticlinal features in Kurdistan have been drilled, but remain to be fully evaluated. Almost all of the exploration activity in Kurdistan has taken place on 2-D seismic with vertical exploration wells. In the last few years, a number of 3-D seismic surveys have been acquired and these will undoubtedly lead to production and reserve enhancements in parallel with increased subsurface complexity.

Following a decade of exploration, three fi elds have been fully appraised and have a reasonable early production history: Tawke, Taq Taq and Khurmala. Reserve additions in the Tawke Field have been signifi cant as a result of increased production performance due to better than originally anticipated reservoir properties, better pressure communication and additional reserves found in older reservoirs. It is probable that similar trends will occur in other fi elds and discoveries.

Whilst a small number of horizontal wells have been drilled, advanced techniques used for producing from tight fractured carbonates such as multilateral wells, hydraulic fracturing, selective completions, proping and water injection have not as yet been used in the region. Almost all wells in Kurdistan have been drilled on surface or near subsurface structures within the foreland or the fold belt. Some wells have drilled through thrusts, more often by accident as opposed to on purpose. There have been virtually no dedicated wells for pure sub-thrust plays or stratigraphic traps although hydrocarbons have been found below signiﬁ cant thrusts and also beyond apparent structural closure in some structures.

Challenges remain in what is a structurally complex and recently deformed region. High levels of exploration and appraisal activity persist and new pipeline infrastructure is under construction. It is likely that the Kurdistan Region of Iraq will develop to become an important contributor to world oil and gas production. This paper aims to summarise the ﬁ rst decade of exploration and appraisal activity in Kurdistan Region of northern Iraq. Due to the paucity of technical papers on this subject, this document draws upon the authors’ own knowledge and material published by companies operating in the region.

181 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

INTRODUCTION

This paper is considered to be the ﬁ rst to provide a comprehensive review of exploration, appraisal and production activities in Kurdistan Region of Iraq (Kurdistan) since the region ‘opened’ in 2003. Kurdistan has become one of the most active onshore hydrocarbon provinces in the world with production rising to over 400,000 bopd (barrels of oil per day) and newly discovered reserves in excess of 15 billion barrels.

The paper reviews the licensing and exploration activity since 2003. It details some of the challenges of drilling in this emerging fold-and-thrust belt. A suite of maps document all the key discoveries and producing ﬁ elds and also detail wells that have been unsuccessful with possible reasons for their failure. The paper concludes with a summary of current activity and future trends, which are likely to shape Kurdistan over the next decade.

There are few technical publications speciﬁ c to Kurdistan and much of the material in this paper is drawn from published competent persons reports and corporate presentations, some of which are no longer available. It is hoped that this paper will provide a useful summary of the ﬁ rst full decade of exploration activities in the Kurdish region.

LICENSING AND EXPLORATION ACTIVITY IN KURDISTAN

Activity Prior to 2003

The ﬁ rst exploration well in the Middle East was drilled in 1901 on the Chia Surkh structure close to the present-day border with Iran in the southeastern part of Kurdistan (Figure 1). The well was located on a hill close to an active oil seep and it was abandoned with oil shows after drilling to 710 m in depth. Between 1905 and 1922 four more wells were drilled on the structure, some ﬁ nding oil shows with none of them drilling below 800 m (Aqrawi et al., 2010). During the next 83 years (1922–2005) less than 30 wells were drilled in Kurdistan and these only targeted seven structures; Chia Surkh, Pulkhana, Kor Mor, Khurmala Dome, Chemchemal, Taq Taq, Demir Dagh and Jabal Kand (Figure 2).

During this same period a number of signifi cant discoveries were made both in the central part of Iraq and in the Zagros of Iran. The fi rst signifi cant discovery in the Middle East was made in 1908 at Masjid-i-Suleiman in the Zagros of Iran (Sorkhabi, 2008; Figure 1). The Kirkuk Field was discovered in 1927 by the Turkish Petroleum Company (later to become the Iraq Petroleum Company, IPC). The discovery well (Baba Gurgur-1) encountered oil in the Cenozoic and blew out, taking a number of days to control. The discovery well was located on a surface anticline and close to a natural gas seep: “The Eternal Fire of Baba Gurgur” (father of fi re), which is believed to have been active for more than 4,000 years. Some of the other discoveries in Iraq include: Qaiyarah (1928), Rumaila (1953), West Qurna (1973), Majnoon (1975), East Baghdad (1976) (Figure 1). The Khurmala Dome, at the northwestern end of Kirkuk, was fi rst drilled pre-second World War but it was plugged and abandoned, along with other wells, as European troops approached Egypt in the early 1940s. During the Iran-Iraq war (1980–1988) exploration and appraisal drilling continued in Iraq, albeit at a much reduced pace. A comprehensive summary of the history of oil exploration in Iraq is given in Aqrawi et al. (2010).

The Taq Taq structure in the central part of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (Figure 2) was ﬁ rst drilled in 1960 and drilling was suspended in April 1961 after setting 95/8 inch casing in the top of the Upper Cretaceous Shiranish Formation. This followed the issuance of Public Law 80, which took away 99.5% of the IPC’s ownership (Falola and Genova, 2005). In 1964, the government established the state- owned Iraq National Oil Company (INOC) to develop the concession areas taken over from IPC. Sixteen years later in 1978, INOC decided to re-enter the Taq Taq-1 Well and it was deepened to the Lower Jurassic, testing oil from a number of formations within the Cretaceous. In 1979–1980, INOC contracted a rig to drill more wells on the discovery (Taq Taq-2 discovered oil in the Eocene Pila Spi Formation), but tensions between the Kurds and the Baath regime, coupled with the outbreak of the Iran-Iraq war, led to a cessation of drilling. In 1994, the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) tested and completed Taq Taq-1 and Taq Taq-2 signalling the ﬁ rst production from Kurdistan. Prior

182 182 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Mushorah 40°E 45° TURKEY Mosul Dam Lake Ain Zalah Butmah Greater Zab Gusair Alan River Kurdistan Sasan Atshan Adaiyah Mosul Demir Dagh Qasab Erbil Taq Taq Qalian Jawan Najmah IRAN Ismail Hibbarah Qaiyarah Kirkuk Chemchemal SYRIA Qara Chauq Sulaymaniyah Khanuqah Khabbaz Makhul Kirkuk Hamrin Jambur Anfal 35°N Tigris River Judaida 35° Pulkhana Gilabat Qamar Tikrit Saddam Chia Surkh Tharthar Injana Nau Doman Lake Tikrit Khashm Al Ahmar Jaria Pika Akkas Mansuriyah Naft Khaneh Euphrates Balad River Tel Hit West Diyala Ghazal Baghdad East Baghdad Nafatah Baghdad Abu Jir Nahrawan Badrah Tigri N s River 0 100 Dhafriyah Chashmeh IRAQ Marjan Risha Ahdab Abu Ghirab Khush km Al Kifl Payda East Paydar West Ramin Kumait Buzurgan Rafidain Noor (Mulla Sani) Dujaila Gharraf Jabal Fauqi Masjid-i- Amara Suleiman 34°E 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° Rifai Huwaiza 38°N TURKEY Caspian 38° Halfayah Sea Nasiryah Muhainya Jufeyr Ab-E- Majnoon SYRIA Teimur CYPRUS Study Area Samawa 34° LEBANON IRAN 34° West Qurna Kushk Med IRAQ N 0 300 Diwan Sea Rumaila N&S JORDAN Nahr Umr 30° km 30° Ratawi Gulf KUWAIT Subba Basra Sindbad of Suez Siba BAHRAIN Luhais West Luhais Tuba 26° 26° SAUDI ARABIA QATAR Boliyah Zubair EGYPT Gulf of Rachi Arabian Oman Safwan UAE Jabal Sanam 30° Shield Jerishan 30° 22° 22° Ratqa OMAN SUDAN Red Sea SAUDI ARABIA KUWAIT 18° 18° Arabian Sea ERITREA YEMEN 14° 14° SOCOTRA ETHIOPIA 40°Gulf of Aden 45° 34° 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° Figure 1: Map of Iraq showing the location of major oil and gas ﬁelds.

to the Iraq War of 2003, the Turkish company Genel Enerji AS signed the ﬁ rst production sharing agreement in Kurdistan (KRG, 2002). This contract was for the Taq Taq Field. Soon after another Turkish company, Petoil Petroleum, together with US-based Prime Natural Resources were allocated areas to explore (KRG, 2003). These contracts signalled the start of a new phase of exploration activity in Kurdistan.

Following the Iraq War in 2003, more international oil companies started to approach the KRG and undertake technical work in the Kurdish autonomous region. At this time, neither the Constitution of Iraq nor the Oil Law had been passed and there were ongoing disputes regarding revenue sharing between the KRG and the Iraqi Central Government (ICG). The Kurdish Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), which at this stage comprised only a handful of people, drew up a ‘block map’ of the region nominally assigning one surface structure per block. The 48 blocks were ranked into low, mid and high risk and ﬁ scal terms varied to reﬂ ect perceived technical risk. In addition, 8 lettered blocks were delineated along the border with Turkey and Iran (Figure 2).

In addition to the political risk, there was a paucity of subsurface technical data specifi c to Kurdistan and no service sector. Prior to the Iraq War in 2003, very few exploration wells had been drilled in Kurdistan (Figure 2). There was virtually no seismic data, and what wells and seismic data were available, avoided the more mountainous areas and were generally close to the existing Iraqi oil fi elds. Moreover, even if one knew of the possible existence of subsurface data, getting access to it was often extremely diffi cult.

183 183 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

43°E44° 45° 46° TURKEY Structures drilled prior to 2003 Zakho K1 Chia Surkh (1901) Pulkhana (1927) 37°N Kor Mor (1928) 37° K2 K3 Chemchemal (1929) Dohuk A Khurmala (1938) K4 K9 Taq Taq (1958) K5 Demir Dagh (1960) K7 K6 K10 Jabal Kand (1981) K11 Date of first well on the structure Jabal Kand K8 City B K12 K18 Well K13 C K14 K19 Mosul K15 K22 IRAN K16 K20 K24 K21 Erbil K25 36° Demir Dagh K21 36° K17 K27 D K28 Khurmala K26 Taq Taq K29 K30 N E 0 50 K31 K33 IRAQ K35 K32 K34 km F Sulaymaniyah Chemchemal G 34°E 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° 38°N TURKEY Caspian 38° Kirkuk Sea K39 K36 CYPRUS35° SYRIA Study Area K38 35° 34° LEBANON IRAN 34° Med IRAQ N K41 H Sea 0 300 JORDAN Kor Mor K37 30° km 30° Gulf KUWAIT of K40 Suez K42 BAHRAIN 26° 26° SAUDI ARABIA QATAR EGYPT Gulf of Arabian Oman UAE K43 K44 Shield 22° 22° OMAN Pulkhana K46 SUDAN Red K47 Sea 18° 18° Chia Surkh Arabian K45 Sea ERITREA YEMEN K48 14° 14° SOCOTRA ETHIOPIA Gulf of Aden 34° 38° 42°43° 46° 50° 54° 58° 44° 45° 46° Figure 2: Kurdistan Region of Iraq showing the wells drilled prior to 2003 (red dots). Block map based on map published by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in 2007.

The Iraq Lexicon (van Bellen et al., 1959-2005) has proven to be an invaluable source of data on the lithostratigraphy of Iraq, incorporating four decades of ﬁ eld surveys and investigations. Local geologists and students have produced theses on the surface structure, stratigraphy and hydrogeology. Whilst providing a rich source of information, in the absence of an oil industry, there had been little focus on petroleum systems and what little data was available needed extrapolation into the subsurface.

Early Award Process and Work Programs (2002–2006)

There were no data packages and there was no formal bidding process in the early development of the oil industry (2002–2006). The negotiation between the Ministry of Natural Resources and oil companies largely revolved around the location of the block(s) in question and the cash bonus payable on entry. Work programmes generally consisted of geological fi eldwork, 2-D seismic acquisition and one exploration well to be completed within the fi rst 3 years, plus a second exploration well within the second two-year term of the Production Sharing Agreement (PSA, sometimes referred to as a Production Sharing Contract, PSC). This was a tight time frame given the paucity of infrastructure and service sector support in the early years. By 2007 the Ministry of Natural Resources had produced a ‘formal’ block map (Figure 2) and indicative fi scal terms. Competition for blocks was great, particularly in the period from mid-2007 to mid-2008 when almost half of the available blocks were signed. Block awards favoured those companies that were willing to invest resources in early fi eldwork, data collection and its analysis, and make early commitments to the KRG, not to

184 184 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

mention taking some political and technical risk. Despite the discontinuity of almost three decades of exploration inactivity and the proximity of Kurdistan to the world-class oil ﬁ elds discovered in Iraq, Iran and northeast Syria; there were still technical concerns. Kurdistan was classed by many as frontier, wildcat territory.

Signifi cant oil seeps are known in Iraq (e.g. above Kirkuk) and are present across Kurdistan. In some cases fl ows of oil can be seen on the surface. Signifi cant oil seeps are evident above the Tawke Field (Carstens, 2006); at Gelli Keer above the Shaikan Field (Figure 3a); at Gelli Zonta (Figure 3b) and in the Bekhme Gorge (Csontos et al., 2011). Oil seeps have also been recorded above, or in close proximity to, many of the prominent surface structures such as Bina Bawi, Sangaw, Chia Surkh, Kurdamir and Qara Dagh (Figure 4).

a b

Figure 3: (a) Oil seeping from Pila Spi Limestone: Gelli Keer, northern Kurdistan. Photograph taken at Gelli Keer in the middle of the Shaikan structure. Oil can be seen seeping out of fractures, bedding planes, vugs and pores. (b) Photograph of major oil seep in northern Kurdistan. Ciaran Nolan, David Mackertich and Joe English (Petroceltic) sitting on a spectacular ‘ﬂow of oil’ at Gelli Zonta, close to the Dinarta Block in northern Kurdistan. The active 'ﬂow' is considered to have originated from a nearby fault. The seep is also known as the Gelli Zonta Seep.

In some areas, particularly during the summer months, oil can be seen seeping from outcrop-scale ﬁ ssures, vugs, bedding planes and pores. Some of these natural seeps are thought to be a result of leakage via faults (e.g. above the Tawke Field and at Gelli Zonta), whilst some of the oil-saturated carbonates seen at the surface are almost certainly exhumed oil accumulations (e.g. the Eocene Pila Spi Limestone above the Shaikan Field).

Whilst a number of workers were encouraged that the seeps demonstrated the presence of an underlying mature source rock, others were concerned about traps having been breached and hydrocarbons having leaked away. Signiﬁ cant leakage has undoubtedly occurred and is still occurring today. However, large hydrocarbon accumulations have since been discovered below many of these seeps suggesting that the rate and volume of seepage, in some structures, is largely insigniﬁ cant compared to the volumes that have been generated, trapped, and are probably still being generated today.

Exposure of pre-Cenozoic sediments and in particular the absence of the Miocene Fars Group evaporites was for a number of workers, a ‘play killer’. It was thought that a Fars Group ‘super seal’ was required to preserve subsurface accumulations and as such, some companies were discouraged by the presence of Cretaceous and Jurassic sediments at surface with the belief that no older accumulations were possible. This was a concern in fact, ﬁ rst raised in the early 1950s (Baker and Henson, 1952). Consequently, many companies avoided the fold belt in Kurdistan altogether and focused on the Cenozoic-covered plains (Figure 4). With the beneﬁ t of almost a decade of exploration activity it

185 185 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

43°E44° 45° 46° TURKEY Zakho

37°N 37° N Dohuk Igneous and 0 50 Metamorphic km

IRAN

Mosul

Erbil 36° 36° Ophiolite

TURKEY Zakho IRAQ

Karatchok Sufaiyah Dohuk Ain Zalah Sulaymaniyah

Gusair Butmah IRAN Alan Kirkuk Sarjoon Mosul 35° Atshan Demir Dagh 35° Qalian Erbil Adaiyah Taq Taq Qasab Khurmala Dome Jawan Najmah Qaiyarah Bai Hassan Avanah Dome Chemchemal IRAQ Qara Chauq Baba Dome Sulaymaniyah Khabbaz Khanuqah Kirkuk

Makhul Jambur Kor Mor

Hamrin N Pulkhana 0 50 Saddam Chia Surkh km Gilabat Qumar 43°Injana 44° 45° 46°

Neogene/Pleistocene/ Cretaceous Triassic Main Zagros Thrust Significant hydrocarbon Holocene seeps Permian/Devonian Palaeogene Jurassic Mountain Front Ordovician City Figure 4: Simpliﬁed surface geological map of Kurdistan also showing the approximate outline of the Main Zagros Thrust and the Mountain Front (based on Geological Map of Iraq, modiﬁed after Sissakian, 1997).

is clear that a number of very competent seals (shales and anhydrites) exist in the pre-Cenozoic stratigraphy and these have facilitated the presence of signiﬁ cant hydrocarbon accumulations in the Cretaceous, Jurassic and Triassic. Although probably beneﬁ cial, there is no essential requirement for a Cenozoic ‘super seal’ (Figure 5).

Early entrants came armed with commercially available (and sometimes free) satellite imagery such as Landsat and Google Earth. Published geological maps gave an excellent overview of the surface geology of Iraq and Kurdistan. However, they were at times inaccurate, particularly in the more remote and structurally complex areas. A typical workﬂ ow for this data is given in Figure 6. Important aspects of this early work were to calibrate satellite image data, to identify the main structural elements and their possible impact on the structure and stratigraphy, and to establish the age of the oldest exposed sediments in the core of the anticline in question. Given the intensity of weathering, recrystallisation and lithologic variation, biostratigraphic age dating was often indeterminate. Even where good fossil recovery was obtained there were often differences of opinion as to precise age dates and lithostratigraphic assignation.

186 186 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

ERA/PERIOD EPOCH/AGE FORMATION LITHOLOGY PETROLEUM SYSTEM

Holocene Flood Plain Deposits Quaternary Pleistocene Alluvial & Fluvial Deposits

Pliocene Bakhtiari Upper Fars L Middle Fars Mil Qasim

M Lower Fars Chia Surkh Miocene Jeribe Chia Surkh, Sarqala, Tawke, Taza Kor Mor E Dhiban Serikagni Euphrates Chia Surkh, Pulkhana, Taza Kor Mor Baram, Kurdamir, Taza CENOZOIC Oligocene Kirkuk Group Kor Mor, Topkhana

L Pila Spi/ Rocks Source Chemchemal, Demir Dagh, Jaddala Avanah Khurmala, Kurdamir, Pulkhana, Eocene Shakal, Taq Taq M Gercus

Khurmala/ Palaeogene Neogene E Aaliji Bastora, Khurmala, Shakal Sinjar

Kolosh Banan, Bastora, Benenan, Demir Palaeocene Dagh, Khurmala, Miran West, Pulkhana, Qara Dagh, Shewashan, Taq Taq, Tawke, Zey Gawra Maastrichtian Shiranish Tanjero Aqra Bekhme Chemchemal, Summail L Campanian Banan, Demir Dagh, Khurmala, Shewashan, Taq Up. Tur.-Con.-San. Kometan Taq, Zey Gawra Cen.-Lr. Tur. Dokan Chemchemal, Summail

Aptian-Albian Balambo Demir Dagh, Khurmala, Qamchuqa Shewashan, Taq Taq, Tawke, Cretaceous E Barremian Zey Gawra Haut.-Valanginian Garagu Berriasian Sarmord Tithonian Chia Gara Atrush, Benenan, Ber Bahr, Bijell, L Kimmeridgian Gotnia Barsarin Demir Dagh, Mirawa, Peshkabir, Najmah Naokelekan Sarta, Shaikan, Sheikh Adi, Oxford.-Callovian Summail, Tawke, Jisik M Sargelu Jurassic Bajocian-Bath. Ain Al Safra, Atrush, Barda Rash, Toarcian Alan Benenan, Bijell, Bina Bawi, Demir

MESOZOIC Mus Sehkaniyan Dagh, Mirawa, Shaikan, Sheikh Adi, Pliensbachian E Adaiyah Simrit, Summail, Jisik Sinemurian- Miran West, Sangaw North Hettangian Butmah Sarki Banan Rhaetian Miran West Norian L Baluti A Bakrman, Barda Rash, Shaikan, Carnian B Simrit, Swara Tika Triassic Kurra Chine C Bina Bawi, Mirawa, Shakrok, Jisik Ladinian M Beduh Geli Khana Bina Bawi Anisian ? E Olenekian-Induan Satina Mbr Mirga Mir Oil-bearing reservoir Permian Chia Zairi Gas-bearing reservoir Ga’ara Potential source rock Carbon- Visean - Serpukhovian Raha Dominant lithology iferous Tournaisian Harur Ora ? Limestone Upper Famennian? Kaista Anhydritic Limestone Devonian Chalki Pirispiki Marly Limestone Silurian Akkas Dolomite

PALAEOZOIC Ordovician Khabour Anhydrite Halite Cambrian Sandstone/Quartzite Burj Conglomerate Figure 5: Stratigraphic column and hydrocarbon occurrences in the Kurdistan Siltstone Region of Iraq (modiﬁed from English et al., 2015). Claystone/Shale/Marl Volcanics

187 187 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

Geochemical evaluation of potential source rocks and Data surface oil occurrences provided an indication of thermal • Well and seismic data maturity and source potential. It was considered that the • Satellite image data (SPOT) Middle Jurassic Sargelu Formation and the Upper Jurassic • Local geologists / Universities (PhD’s / Naokelekan Formation had yielded the bulk of the oil MSc’s) • Publications that had charged reservoirs in the Mesopotamian Basin – Lexique / scientific papers and Zagros fold belt (Pitman et al., 2004). It was also clear • Offset fields / wells that compositionally distinct oils, considered to have been – NE Syrian Zagros sourced from the Triassic, have also been generated in – SE Turkey – Iranian Zagros northern Iraq and Kurdistan (Al-Ameri and Zumberge, • Geological maps of Iraq 2012).

Once awarded acreage, operators generally undertook Field Visits additional fi eld mapping, sampling and structural • Identify areas of interest from reconstructions (Figure 7). The aim of these studies was geological maps, satellite imagery, to develop a robust geological and structural model of KRG block maps, local knowledge the acreage and thus enable an initial assessment of the • Pre-plan field visit / access • Field transects hydrocarbon prospectivity. Most of this early work had – Roads / tracks / key lineaments to be undertaken within the fi rst 12 months so that 2-D – Ground truth satellite image data seismic acquisition could be undertaken during the and geological maps summer months of the second year and drilling in the fi nal • Data collection / analysis – Geochemical samples year of the fi rst three-year term. 2-D seismic data has now – Rock samples for age dating been acquired over all blocks except for those in the far – Dip / strike measurements for east/northeast beyond the main Zagros thrust. All initial structural reconstruction new fi eld wildcat exploration wells in Kurdistan have been drilled on 2-D seismic data. These lines show considerable Results variation in data quality, which is often seen to degrade where hard carbonates are exposed at the surface and in • Mapping of large-scale geometry • Regional framework regions of structural complexity. Beyond the mountain • High-grade areas / blocks of interest front this has frequently meant that the crests of anticlines • Discuss / negotiate PSA with Oil are often poorly imaged but the fl anks, with Cenozoic Minister (Ministry of Natural Resources, cover, have good imaging. With nearly all exploration Kurdistan Regional Government) wells being crestally located this has often meant some Figure 6: Typical early exploration uncertain and diffi cult drilling (Figure 8). work flow.

In the absence of seismic data, the ‘Busk method’ (also known as the concentric arc Work Scope Product method) was used in an attempt to extrapolate Phase 1 Block / structure wide surface dip and strike measurements into the Field mapping subsurface (Busk, 1929). Whilst this proved geological map to be a useful geometric exercise, it assumed Geochemical evaluation stratigraphic uniformity and was unable to Sampling (source: oil correlation) take into account any signifi cant tectonism Basin modelling Structural model ideally or crestal accommodation in box fold type Transects structures. in 3 dimensions Phase 2 New Drilling in Kurdistan Prospect volumetrics and Inventory and drillable risking. Layout, acquire 2-D prospect Although a limited number of production seismic grid sharing agreements (PSA) on existing Phase 3 discoveries were signed in 2002 and 2003, the Exploration well planning fi rst new exploratory drilling was undertaken Civils (access, water, First exploration well by Norwegian company DNO (Det Norske drill site, mine avoidance) Oljeselskap AS) who signed a PSA with the Figure 7: Typical early exploration work flow KRG in mid-2004 (DNO, 2004; KRG, 2004). post-signature of production sharing agreement Following fi eldwork, the company acquired (PSA).

188 188 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Southwest Northeast QARA DAGH ANTICLINE

5 km

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0 Two-way Time (seconds)

5.0

Figure 8: Example of 2-D seismic section demonstrating structural complexity and regions of poor seismic imaging in the crestal parts and cores of the anticlines (source: Vast Exploration, 2011).

450 km of 2-D seismic data and spudded the ﬁ rst well in Kurdistan for over a quarter of a century on November 28, 2005 (DNO, 2005a). The well was located within an elliptical anticlinal surface feature in the northwestern part of Kurdistan (Figure 9). By late 2005 it was announced that Tawke-1 had encountered 24° API oil at a depth of 350 m (DNO, 2005b). By mid-2006 the well had drilled to a total depth of just over 3,100 m in the Jurassic and ﬂ owed at a restricted rate of 5,000 bopd from Cenozoic limestones (Harstad et al., 2010).

Later that same year, the fi rst new exploration activity took place on the Taq Taq Field under the operatorship of the newly formed Taq Taq Operating Company (TTOPCO) a joint venture between Genel Enerji AS and Addax Petroleum Corporation. 2-D seismic data acquisition commenced in early 2006 and the fi rst new well (Taq Taq-4) spudded in May 2006 reaching total depth in December 2006. The well fl owed an aggregate of 29,600 bopd from three different Cretaceous reservoirs (Addax Petroleum, 2009).

The success of Tawke and Taq Taq accelerated competition in what was already a competitive environment. By early 2006 seven PSAs had been signed and six companies had commenced exploration activities (Figure 9). Within a year almost half the blocks south and west of the mountain front had been signed, each one to a new operator; there were now some 13 operators on 15 blocks. In an eleven-month period between September 2007 and June 2008 some 18 new PSAs were signed (Figure 9). Whilst some of the entrants were ‘small’ in terms of their market capitalisation, some larger oil and gas companies had by this time negotiated contracts (e.g. MOL, Reliance, Hunt and Talisman). Blocks were signed across the region with little apparent preference, by industry as a whole, for either the northern or the southern part of Kurdistan. Whilst most companies came in search of oil, some focused on gas and associated liquids. In early 2007, Dana Gas entered into agreements with the KRG to develop, process and transport natural gas and condensate from the Kor Mor gas ﬁ eld (Dana Gas, 2014). This was the ﬁ rst gas development in Kurdistan.

By late 2009 around 20 new exploration and appraisal wells had been drilled in Kurdistan. New discoveries included; Tawke, Bina Bawi, Sarqala, Miran, Barda Rash, Shaikan, Kurdamir, Jabal Simrit and Bijell. Continued expansion of the service sector (drilling and logging contractors) and

189 189 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

43°E44° 45° 46° TURKEY Zakho 1 16

37°N 37° 20 N Dohuk 0 50 4 18 10 km 13 8 12 IRAN

Mosul 7 Open Blocks

Erbil 15 3 36° 14 36° 2

Oil Field Gas/Condensate Field 21 19 9 Sulaymaniyah

34°E 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° 38°N TURKEY Caspian 38° IRAQ Kirkuk Sea 11 CYPRUS35° SYRIA 35° 34° LEBANON IRAN 34° Med IRAQ N 22 Sea 0 300 17 JORDAN 30° km 30° Gulf KUWAIT of Suez BAHRAIN 26° 26° SAUDI ARABIA QATAR EGYPT Gulf of Arabian Oman UAE 6 Shield 22° 22° OMAN SUDAN Red Sea 18° 18° Arabian 5 Sea ERITREA YEMEN 14° 14° SOCOTRA ETHIOPIA Gulf of Aden 34° 38° 42°43° 46° 50° 54° 58° 44° 45° 46°

Phase I Early 2006 Phase II Late 2007 Phase III Mid-2008 1. Tawke (DNO) 8. Ain Sifni (Hunt Oil) 16. Sindi Amedi (Perenco) 2. Taq Taq (Genel Enerji / Addax) 9. Miran (Heritage) 17. Kor Mor (Dana Gas / Crescent Pet.) 3. Bina Bawi (Petoil / Prime) 10. Shaikan (Gulf Keystone) 18. Atrush (Aspect Energy) 4. Dohuk (DNO) 11. Sangaw North (Sterling Energy) 19. Bazian (KNOC) 5. Shakal (Petoil / Prime) 12. Rovi and Sarta (Reliance) 20. Sarsang (Hillwood) 6. Barwanoor (Western Zagros) 13. Akri-Bijeel (MOL) 21. Chemchemal (Dana Gas / Crescent Pet.) 7. Erbil (DNO) 14. Hawler (Norbest) 22. Block 39 (Talisman) 15. Mala Omar and Shorish (OMV) Figure 9: Licensing positions in Kurdistan Region between early 2004 and mid-2008 (modiﬁed after “The Oil and Gas Year, Kurdistan Region of Iraq”, 2009).

improvement in infrastructure (roads, communications, local work force) has helped maintain signiﬁ cant drilling activity from 2010 onwards with an average of over 20 exploration and appraisal wells drilled per year (Figure 10). This also coincided with the third year of the ﬁ rst term for many of the PSAs that had been signed in 2007 by the end of which almost all companies were required to have drilled at least one exploration well.

The current block map shows that of 64 blocks, 49 are licensed with 25 different operators (Figure 11). Relinquishment, of whole blocks and part blocks, is now resulting in a steady turnover of acreage. Companies that signed PSAs in the early years (2003–2006) were largely dominated by smaller players. Over time and with continued success, larger independents, majors and super majors have entered the region and have begun exploring. In parallel, some of the smaller players have either exited without success or have been ‘taken over’. Although there are a few ‘open’ blocks, the region has seen active deal ﬂ ow with some new entrants willing to buy into existing discoveries or exploration

190 190 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

30 Five Year Intervals One Year Intervals 28

25 25 23

20 20 19

10 10

7 6 6

Number of Exploration and Appraisal Wells Drilled Wells Appraisal and Number of Exploration 5 5 4

2222 2 111 1 1 1 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Spudded Figure 10: Around 25 exploration and appraisal (E&A) wells were drilled in Kurdistan in the 100 years between 1900 and 2000. In the last ﬁve years between 19 and 28 E&A wells per year have been drilled.

blocks. Of the 64 licensed blocks, over half have signifi cant discoveries and technical success rates for new fi eld wildcats, as defi ned by the authors as fl owing in excess of 500 bopd on test, are estimated to be around 63%.

EXPLORATION CHALLENGES

In total over 20,000 line-km of new 2-D seismic data have been acquired since 2005. Given that the majority of surface features are elongate anticlines, the typical 2-D grid for most operators has been to acquire dip lines spaced 2–5 km apart and a more limited number of strike lines; one along the axis/ crest of the structure and one either side. Where possible these lines have generally followed existing roads and tracks, with bulldozers used to navigate more difﬁ cult terrain. Where the terrain is more benign and Cenozoic shales crop out at the surface, vibroseis acquisition has been performed with good effect. In such areas seismic data quality is generally good as a result of better coupling and signal penetration. In the more mountainous areas, acquisition with a dynamite source is often required. In some extreme cases, seismic cables have needed to be positioned by mountaineers (Addax Petroleum, 2008; Vast Exploration, 2009). In such areas, where surface sediments comprise hard, fractured and karstiﬁ ed carbonates, the seismic data are usually much poorer due to near-surface dispersion of the signal (Figure 8).

To date around 20 3-D seismic surveys have been acquired in Kurdistan totalling over 6,350 sq km of 3-D data (Figure 11). Most of these surveys have been acquired post initial discovery and the majority in the last 3 years. The Tawke and Taq Taq 3-D surveys have undergone pre-stack depth migration (PSDM) reprocessing and the Shaikan 3-D has also been reprocessed pre-stack. In each case image quality in the core of the anticline has been much improved. 3-D seismic data is also helping to image local variations in reservoir thickness and in some cases there are indications that areas of better quality reservoir can be mapped on the 3-D seismic (DNO, 2011). In the Kurdamir Field a horizontal well has been planned and positioned in an area predicted to have best quality porous reservoir and high fracture density (Western Zagros Resources, 2015b).

191 191 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

43°E44° 45° 46° 59 TURKEY Zakho City Peshkabir Mateen-1 Open Blocks 1 4 60 Tawke Contracted Blocks Gara-1 2 Mangesh-1 37°N 5 Shireen-1 Blocks with 3-D 37° Linnava-1 Ber Swara Tika Seismic Surveys 3 Bahr Dohuk 5 61 Oil Field/Discovery Summail Shk Adi East Swara Tika Extension-1 6 8 10 Atrush Bakrman Bijell-3 Condensate Field 7 (Aqra-1) Summail 11 14 13 Gas Field Khanke-1 9 Shaikan Al Kush-1 Bijell Bekhme-1 Dry Hole Ain Sifni Rovi Gulak-1 57 Oil Show Jabal Kand-1 12 15 Harir-1 Maqlub-1 16 Jisik 24 Gas Show Mirawa Masief-1 Sarta Exploration Wells Barda Rash 17 21 25 23 in Progress 18 Benenan 22 Shakrok-1 Mountain Front Mosul Ain Al Safra 19 Safen-1 20 Main Zagros Thrust Banan Bastora 29 Bina Bawi Mala Omar-1 62 27 26 32 Demir Dagh Erbil 30 28 36° Khalakan-1 IRAN 36° Zey Gawra Shorish-1

Quwair-1 31 34 Bina 55 Taq Servan-1 Qush Tappa-1 Taq Shewashan Khurmala Kewa 33 58 N Dome Chirmila-2 63 35 53 Zewe-1 0 50 Bazian 36 Kewa Chirmila-1 42 Miran km 54 37 Chemchemal Sulaymaniyah 64 44 43 34°E 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° Caspian Kirkuk 38°N TURKEY 38° 46 Sea 38 45 Baranan-1 Sangaw North-1 CYPRUS SYRIA 47 35° Sangaw South-1 35° 34° LEBANON IRAN 34° 52 Med IRAQ N Kor Mor 0 300 Qara Dagh-1 Sea 39 Massayi-1 JORDAN 56 30° km 30° Gulf KUWAIT Taza Topkhana of IRAQ Suez 48 BAHRAIN Kurdamir 26° 26° 41 SAUDI ARABIA QATAR 40 EGYPT Gulf of Arabian Oman Pulkhana UAE Shield 22° 22° 49 Sarqala OMAN 51 SUDAN Red Sea Shakal Chia Surkh 18° 18° Mil Arabian 50 Sea Qasim ERITREA YEMEN 14° 14° SOCOTRA ETHIOPIA Gulf of Aden 34° 38° 42°43° 46° 50° 54° 58° 44° 45° 46°

Block #. NameOperator Block #. Name Operator Block #. Name Operator 1. Tawke DNO 31. Qush Tappa OPEN 61. Sidakan OPEN 2. Central Dohuk OPEN 32. Qala Dze Repsol 62. Gwer/Hamdanya Komet 3. Sulevani OPEN 33. Khalakan Gas Plus 63. Kewa Chirmila OPEN 4. Sindi Amedi East OPEN 34. Taq Taq TTOPCO 64. SE Miran OPEN 5. Sarsang HKN 35. Piramagrun Repsol 6. Ber Bahr Genel 36. Miran Genel 3–D Seismic (Km2) 7. Sheikh Adi Gulf Keystone 37. Bazian KNOC 8. Dohuk DNO 38. Sangaw North OPEN Field Date Area 9. Al Qush ExxonMobil 39. Topkhana Talisman Tawke 2006 200 10. Atrush Taqa 40. Taza Oil Search Taq Taq 2007 292 11. Shaikan Gulf Keystone 41. Pulkhana Turkish Co. Shaikan 2010 599 12. Ain Sifni Hunt Oil 42. Penjwin OPEN Sheikh Adi 2010 / 2011 215 13. Dinarta Hess 43. Arbat East ExxonMobil Miran 2011 730 14. Akri-Bijeel MOL 44. Arbat Turkish Co. Bastora/Erbil 2011? 200* 15. Rovi Chevron 45. Baranan Total Atrush 2011 / 2012 307 16. Sarta Chevron 46. Qara Dagh Chevron Summail 2012 160 17. Barda Rash Afren 47. Sangaw South KNOC Khurmala 2012 350* 18. Baeshiqa ExxonMobil 48. Kurdamir Western Zagros Kurdamir 2013 184 19. Erbil DNO 49. Garmain Western Zagros Topkhana 2012 / 2013 200* 20. Hawler Oryx 50. Shakal Gazprom Peshkabir 2012 200 21. Harir Marathon 51. Chia Surkh Genel Akri-Bijeel 2012 / 2013 490 22. Pirmam ExxonMobil 52. Kor Mor Crescent Sarqala 2012 / 2013 325 23. Betwata ExxonMobil 53. Chemchemal Crescent Ain Sifi/Barda Rash 2012 / 2013 326 24. Choman Turkish Co. 54. Qara Hanjeer ExxonMobil Shakal 2013 / 2014 277 25. Hindreen Turkish Co. 55. Khurmala Dome KAR / KRG North Garmain 2013 / 2014 258 26. Shakrok OPEN 56. Halabja Gazprom Ber Bahr 2014 / 2015 170 27. Safeen Total 57. Jabal Kand Turkish Co. Chia Surkh 2014 300 28. Bina Bawi Genel 58. Mawat OPEN Demir Dagh/Banan 2014 223 29. Malar Omar OPEN 59. Sindi OPEN Taza 2014 500 30. Shorish OPEN 60. Shewran Mazin OPEN *Actual amount unknown Total 6,371 Figure 11: Block map as of early 2015. Relinquishments and delimited ﬁeld areas have meant that approximately 64 blocks now exist in Kurdistan. Of these around 49 are presently licensed and 15 are open. Whilst these numbers are considered to be correct at the time of writing, licensing is actively changing as some companies depart and new entrants arrive. Acreage is also being ‘recycled’ as operators have to relinquish acreage following the 1st and 2nd phases of their PSAs. 192 192 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

It is very likely that these data will reveal additional complexities that have thus far not been imaged on sparse 2-D seismic. One of the key factors in obtaining good quality seismic data, in addition to surface geology, are the acquisition parameters, not least of which the shot array and depth/volume of dynamite used during acquisition. Careful testing prior to acquisition has proven to be extremely helpful in the region.

The eastern and northeastern parts of Kurdistan are mountainous and become increasingly so approaching the main thrust towards the northeast bordering Iran and Turkey (Figure 12). In this region wells have been drilled at high elevations, which often suffer extremes of weather during the year. The highest elevation structures drilled to date are all located in the northern part of Kurdistan and include wells drilled on Sindi Amedi, Sarsang, Shakrok, Harir and Safeen, all of which are mountainous areas with drilling having taken place in excess of 1,400 m above sea level. The highest elevation well to be drilled in Kurdistan to date is the Shireen-1 Well in the Dinarta Block (Hess/ Petroceltic), which spudded in June 2014 at an elevation of 2,094 m above sea level.

Not only can access to these remote hilltop locations be challenging but conditions in winter can be severe with temperatures going well below zero for protracted periods with snow falls and drifts further complicating operations (Preining and Nazhat, 2013). In some cases winter lightning strikes

a 40°N

Caspian Sea

Erbil

Tehran

Shiraz

N Arabian Gulf 0 100

Figure 12: (a) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the Zagros fold belt. (b) Digital Elevation Model with Kurdistan block outlines. Low elevations are red/brown with high elevations in green/white (Images provided courtesy of Airbus Defence and Space).

193 193 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

on rigs, despite conductors, have temporarily halted operations (Gulf Keystone, 2012). Winter weather and associated problems, are considered to be one of the biggest contributors to lost time in wells that have been drilled in the more mountainous parts of the region.

Given recent structuration of brittle carbonates and seasonal extremes of temperature it is no surprise that where carbonates are exposed, near-surface sediments can be highly fractured, weathered and karstiﬁ ed. Top-hole sections of wells in these areas, mainly in the more mountainous northern and eastern parts of Kurdistan, have suffered severe mud losses with signiﬁ cant intervals often drilled ‘blind’ with no returns whatsoever. Losses in excess of 450,000 barrels of mud were recorded in the Shaikan-1 Well (Gulf Keystone, 2014a) and over 380,000 barrels of mud were lost during the drilling of the Swara Tika-2 Well (Preining and Nazhat, 2013).

In some extreme cases, near-surface conditions have led to rig tilting and partial collapse/jamming of the top-hole drill strings necessitating re-spudding of wells. Over the last few years, companies operating where these conditions are likely to occur are successfully using air and foam drilling to good effect. This technique, widely used in the Rocky Mountains of the US, reduces the hydrostatic pressure in the wellbore and reduces lost circulation in low-pressured formations, which are encountered above the water table. Below the water table, in potential hydrocarbon-bearing zones, operators in Kurdistan have largely used water-based mud systems, which are at times nitrifi ed to further reduce mud weight. Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) technology has also been used to good effect to optimise and improve the effi ciency of the drilling process. The MPD technique aims to control the annular pressure in the wellbore, and in doing so minimise continuous infl ux of formation fl uids to the surface, and maintain wellbore integrity (Preining and Nazhat, 2013; Driedger, et al., 2013).

Clearly, signifi cant losses in potential reservoir zones can compromise subsequent formation evaluation and testing. Moreover, signifi cant losses also necessitate large volumes of water. This has at times placed a strain on available water resources with almost all operators needing to drill dedicated water wells for their drilling activities. Often, water is piped uphill from dedicated water wells through a number of pumping stations. In some cases operators have needed to truck additional water to the wellsite, which can delay operations. If in the future, water injection is required in any large measure then this could place a strain on the region’s water resources. This is not a problem unique to the Kurdistan Region of Iraq; in the Rumaila, West Qurna and Zubair fi elds in the southeastern part of the country, it is planned that 5.2 million barrels a day of sea water will be piped from the Gulf and used for water injection to sustain production (CH2M Hill, 2013).

The majority of wells in Kurdistan have been drilled to measured depths of between 3,000 and 4,500 m. Fewer than 10 wells have drilled deeper than 5,000 m and very few have yet penetrated the entire Triassic succession to reach the Permian. Moveable hydrocarbons have been encountered at depths from as shallow as 350 m in the Tawke Field (DNO, 2005b) to over 4,000 m in the Sarqala Field (Western Zagros Resources, 2014a, b). It has not been uncommon for exploration wells in Kurdistan to take in excess of 6 months and in a few cases over a year to drill and test. Difﬁ culties have included: (1) delays due to winter weather; (2) severe losses in fractured and karstiﬁ ed formations; (3) lack

of available water for drilling activities, (4) H2S concentrations that can be in excess of 25% in the gas phase (Table 1); (5) slow drilling through hard carbonates; (6) difﬁ culties in drilling through the Lower Fars (more usually in the southern part of the region) which is often overpressured; and (7) the logistics of drilling in an emerging fold-and-thrust belt province. Given the number of potential reservoirs, and frequent ambiguity of petrophysical results, operators often undertake multiple drill- stem tests (usually at least 3 and in some cases up to 10) adding signiﬁ cantly to the duration of operations.

In the north of the region where Cenozoic strata are largely absent over many of the drilled structures, typical casing programs have been designed so as to isolate units of differing pressure with casing points often separating the Cretaceous and Jurassic. In the southern part of the region, where thick Cenozoic sediments are present (and are often the target), pressure regimes are often more complex and at times

194 194 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Table 1: Published H2S and CO2 Levels in Kurdistan

Field / Block Well Formation Age H2S level CO2 Level Akri-Bijeel Gulak-1 Adaiyah Jurassic Minor Minor Akri-Bijeel Gulak-1 Sargelu / Naokelekan Jurassic 5% 20% Akri-Bijeel Bakrman-1 Kurra Chine B Triassic 40% - Ber Bahr Ber Bahr-1 Jurassic 4.5% Bina Bawi Bina Bawi-1 Triassic 18−20% - Hawler Zey Gawra-1 Shiranish, Kometan, Quamchuga Cretaceous 0.1−0.4% - Hawler Ain Al Safra-1 Alan / Mus Jurassic 20% - Kurdamir Kurdamir-1 Pilaspi / Jaddala Tertiary 0.6% - Miran Miran-1 Butmah Jurassic 7% 4% Sangaw Sangaw North-1Kometan Cretaceous 10% 7% Sangaw North Sangaw North-1 Kurra Chine Triassic 24% 2% Sangaw North Sangaw North-1 Mus, Butmah and Kurra Chine Jurassic / Triassic 46% 1% Shaikan Shaikan -1Sargelu Jurassic 8.9% 10.5% Shaikan Shaikan-1 Mus Jurassic 14.6% 9.4% Shaikan Shaikan-1 Upper Kurra Chine Triassic 8% 4.4% Shaikan Shaikan-1 Upper Kurra Chine B Triassic 13.6% 8.4% Sheikh Adi Sheikh Adi-2 Sargelu Jurassic 5.2% 10.7% Sheikh Adi Sheikh Adi-2 Mus Jurassic 5.9% 12.2% Sheikh Adi Sheikh Adi-2 Adaiyah Jurassic 6.6% 16.2% Sheikh Adi Sheikh Adi-2 Upper Butmah Jurassic 5.2% 30.3% Taq Taq Taq Taq Cretaceous 2.5% - Demir Dagh Demir Dagh-3 Butmah Jurassic 1.8% - Demir Dagh Demir Dagh-3 Adaiyah Jurassic 9% - Demir Dagh Demir Dagh-3 Kometan Cretaceous 1.6% - Demir Dagh Demir Dagh-7 Shiranish, Kometan Cretaceous 0.4% -

have required up to 6 strings of casing to reach total depth (Western Zagros Resources, 2010a). A further complexity, thus far more prevalent in the southern part of the region, is that of abnormal pressured formations (both under-pressured and over-pressured). The Sarqala-1 wildcat well encountered pore pressures over 17.5 pounds per gallon (ppg) (2,100 kg/m3) mud weight equivalent pressures below the Lower Fars top seal (Western Zagros Resources, 2011). The Qara Dagh-1 Well encountered pressures of 9,000 psi in the Shiranish Formation at a depth of 3,500 m (Vast Exploration, 2011) (Figure 11).

Ideally, new exploration wells, in relatively unknown stratigraphy, should be designed to have contingency for additional casing strings should they be required.

Although all drilling in Kurdistan has been onshore and has been undertaken in the last decade, well costs have varied dramatically. A few wells have cost in excess of US $120 million (Kurdamir-1, Western Zagros Resources, 2010b) and some as little as US $7 million (Tawke-16, DNO, 2012a, b). Rig rates (for 1,500 HP units) have typically remained in the region of $30,000–35,000 per day (Gulf Keystone, 2014a). Where operators have in-country drilling experience and pressure/stress regimes are known, well costs have tended to fall over time. Moreover, companies with larger, established operations have also been able to tender more competitively further reducing costs. Well costs in the Taq Taq Field have varied from US $18.5 million to as little as US $3.7 million with average well costs falling from US $12.3 million for the ﬁ rst 7 wells to US $6.9 million for the next 6 wells (Genel Energy, 2012). Wells in the more mountainous areas often take longer and are generally more expensive than those on the plains.

195 195 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

The early discoveries in Kurdistan were made in sediments of Cenozoic and Cretaceous age (Tawke, Taq Taq, Chemchemal, Kor Mor, Pulkhana). Later drilling has tested progressively deeper targets and resulted in discoveries in the Jurassic and Triassic (Shaikan, Bijell, Swara Tika, Bina Bawi, Barda Rash). Only a limited number of wells have thus far drilled through the Triassic and reached the Permian, which is of course a signiﬁ cant reservoir target in the Middle East. The Upper Permian carbonates of the Chia Zairi Formation were penetrated in the Ber Bahr-1 Well and have the potential to form a viable exploration target in Kurdistan (Aqrawi et al., 2010). Albeit high risk, it is possible that if present, lower Silurian hot shales of the Akkas Formation might have sourced gas, as they have done in the western part of Iraq and eastern Jordan (Figure 5, Al-Hadidy, 2007).

Some of the early wells were drilled, but stopped short of now proven reservoirs; these are seeing a resurgence of activity. The Demir Dagh-1 Well, drilled in 1960, reached total depth (TD) at a depth of ca. 2,300 m true vertical depth sub-sea (TVDSS) in the Upper Jurassic having encountered hydrocarbons in the Cretaceous (Figure 2). In 2013–2014 the Demir Dagh-2 Well was drilled less than 2 km away to a depth of ca. 3,600 m TVDSS and encountered oil in additional Middle and Lower Jurassic targets (Oryx Petroleum, 2014a). Eleven wells have now been drilled on the ﬁ eld which measures approximately 9 km in length by 4 km in width and is estimated to have proven and probable oil reserves of 258 million barrels (Oryx Petroleum, 2015).

‘Deep’ wells are planned or in progress on the Bina Bawi, Tawke and the Miran discoveries. Drilling to such targets is likely to be challenging necessitating oversized shallow-hole sections and the contingency for mechanical sidetracks. In the Shaikan Field overpressure is common in the deeper Triassic section and mud weights up to 19 ppg were required whilst drilling (Gulf Keystone, 2014a). A recent well on the Shaikan Field (Shaikan-7) failed to reach its intended Permian target due to a number of mechanical failures in the course of the drilling operations (Gulf Keystone, 2014b).

DISCOVERIES AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY

Some 40 new fi eld wildcat hydrocarbon discoveries have been made in Kurdistan with two-thirds of these being located in the northern half of the Kurdistan Region (Figure 11). Of these discoveries, 12 have approved development plans and four of these (Tawke, Taq Taq, Kor Mor and the Khurmala Dome) have signifi cant production histories. The bulk of the discovered resources are considered to reside in Cenozoic, Cretaceous and Jurassic strata with the Triassic strata thus far are considered to make a small, but important, proportion of overall discovered resources (Figure 13). Almost all of the hydrocarbons discovered in Cenozoic strata in Kurdistan are in the southern part of the region. Other than the Kor Mor and Chemchemal fi elds there have not been as yet any approved development plans for recently discovered fi elds in the southern part of Kurdistan.

The bulk of discovered oil reserves have been made in the northern part of the region between the Taq Taq and Tawke ﬁ elds. This is thought to be due to the maturity of the Jurassic source rocks, which are optimally mature in the northern part of Kurdistan but considered to be more deeply buried and in the light oil to gas window in the southern part of the region due to the signiﬁ cant thicknesses of Cenozoic strata in this area (English et al., 2015). The northern area is also a palaeohigh (the Mosul High) so reservoirs are shallower and carbonates are perhaps more likely to be in shelfal facies (Aqrawi et al., 2010).

A number of companies are continuing to explore and appraise their ﬁ elds whilst development is ongoing. DNO recently discovered additional resources in Jurassic strata below the existing Cenozoic and Cretaceous ﬁ eld (DNO, 2013a). Exploration drilling is ongoing in the Taq Taq Field (a Cenozoic and Cretaceous accumulation) for deeper prospective zones in the Jurassic and Triassic. It was recently announced that the Taq Taq deep well had encountered 300 m of gas condensate shows in the Jurassic (Genel Energy, 2014b). Given the recent entry of some players a number of exploration campaigns have only just commenced (e.g. ExxonMobil). It is probable therefore that similar levels of exploration and appraisal activity will continue for the foreseeable future with additional resources potentially discovered in deeper stratigraphy.

196 196 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

43°E44° 45° 46° TURKEY Zakho Peshkabir Discovery by Horizon: Tawke Triassic Jurassic Cenozoic 37°N Swara 37° BerBer Bahr Shk TikaSwara Tika Bahr Cretaceous Dohuk Adi East Swara Tika City AtrushAtrush Mountain Front Summail Shaikan Bakrman Bejil Oil Field/Discovery Rovi JabalShaikan Bijell Gas Field SimritAin Sifni Barda Rash Jisik Mirawa Sarta Mirawa IRAN Bardarash Sarta Benenan Mosul AinAin Al Al Safra Safra

Bastora BinaBina Bawi Bawi Banan DemirDemir Dagh 36° 36° Zey Gawra Erbil

TaqTaqTaq Taq ShewashanShewashan

Khurmala Dome N Bazian 0 50 MiranMiran Chemchemal km Sulaymaniyah

34°E 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58° 38°N TURKEY Caspian 38° Kirkuk Sangaw North Sea Qara CYPRUS35° SYRIA IRAQ Dagh 35° 34° LEBANON IRAN 34° Topkhana Med IRAQ N KorKor MorMor Sea 0 300 JORDAN KurdamirKurdamir 30° km 30° Gulf KUWAIT Taza of Suez BAHRAIN 26° 26° SAUDI ARABIA QATAR EGYPT Gulf of Arabian Oman PulkhanaPulkhana UAE Shield 22° 22° Sarqala OMAN SUDAN Red Sea Shakal Chia Surkh 18° 18° Mil Chia Surkh Arabian Mil Sea QasimQasim ERITREA YEMEN 14° 14° SOCOTRA ETHIOPIA 43°Gulf of Aden 44° 45° 46° 34° 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58°

Discovery Reservoir Age Discovery Reservoir Age Discovery Reservoir Age Discovery Reservoir Age Ain Al Safra Jurassic Bina Bawi Jurassic/Triassic Miran Cret./Jurassic Shakal Cenozoic Atrush Jurassic Chemchemal Cenozoic/Cret. Mirawa Jurassic/Triassic Sheikh Adi Cret./Jurassic Bakrman Triassic Chia Surkh Cenozoic Peshkabir Jurassic Shewashan Cretaceous Banan Cen./Cret./Jur. Demir Dagh Cen./Cret./Jur. Pulkhana Cenozoic/Cret. Summail Cret./Jurassic Barda Rash Cret./Jur./Tri. Jabal Simrit Jurassic/Triassic Qara Dagh Cretaceous Swara Tika Triassic Bastora Cenozoic/Cret. Jisik Jurassic/Triassic Rovi Jurassic Taq Taq Cenozoic/Cret. Bazian Cretaceous Kirkuk/Khurmala Cenozoic/Cret. Sangaw North Jurassic Tawke Cen./Cret./Jur. Bijell Jurassic Kor Mor Cenozoic Sarqala Cenozoic Taza Cenozoic Benenan Cretaceous/Jur. Kurdamir Cenozoic/Cret. Sarta Jurassic Topkhana Cenozoic Ber Bahr Cretaceous/Jur. Mil Qasim Cenozoic Shaikan Cret./Jur./Tri. Zey Gawra Cretaceous Figure 13: Principal discoveries by stratigraphic horizon.

Structures

The Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt forms the northern and northeastern margins of the Arabian Plate (Alavi, 2004; Lawa et al., 2013). Over 50 years ago the northern part of Iraq was subdivided into different zones on the basis of structural complexity: the unfolded zone, the folded zone (low and high) and the nappe zone (Dunnington, 1958-2005). Within Kurdistan it is clear that the structuration is more complex beyond the mountain front and that approaching the main thrust the degree of thrusting and overturning of folds becomes more intense (Figure 4). However, the variation of structural style, even over quite short distances, within the region can be quite marked. The digital elevation images (Figure 12) display quite clearly the NW-trending anticlinal features in the southern and central part of Kurdistan. This “Zagros” trend continues for ca. 150 km within Kurdistan before dying out to the northeast of Erbil. Beyond this area, the structures have a marked WNW-ESE trend

197 197 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

(“Taurus” trend). Some workers postulated the presence of SW-trending lineaments, which facilitate the change of principal stress of the Arabian Plate and inﬂ uence regional subsidence through the Mesozoic (Jassim and Goff, 2006). As yet these possible deep-seated lineaments have not been seen on seismic data (Csontos et al., 2012). It is notable that there are also some structures that do not appear to follow the local structural ‘grain’ such as Tawke in the northwest of the region.

Structures generally range from 15–40 km in length and 2–5 km in width. Most are anticlines, which plunge both to the NW and SE (or W-E). However, very often structures converge and interfere with one another complicating the identifi cation of structural closure. It is quite usual for structures to be asymmetric with one limb dipping more steeply than the other, although it seems equally common for structures to be faulted box folds with signifi cant crestal faulting accommodating movement. Parasitic folds are frequently visible at outcrop refl ecting possible deformation during fold growth.

How much of the accommodation has been taken up by thrust faults is uncertain. In particular, where postulated thrusts might decollé and how much strike-slip movement might have taken place along such lineaments is also uncertain. Beyond the mountain front, Palaeogene and older sediments outcrop (Figure 4). It is in this region, approaching the main Zagros thrust, that the degree of uplift and erosion is generally considered to become more severe (Figure 14). Shallow thrusts may well sole- out on anhydrites and shales, which are developed within the Jurassic and Triassic. Further north, and close to the main thrust, there is evidence that structures have been overturned and both nappes and thrusted nappes have been identiﬁ ed. A number of wells have encountered repeat sections as they have passed through large reverse faults (e.g. Sheikh Adi-1A Well, Law et al., 2014, their ﬁ gure 6.1, p. 54).

The majority of wells in Kurdistan, particularly in the northern part of the region, have been drilled on clearly visible surface structures. More often than not these are signiﬁ cant mountains and folds with marked elevation versus the surrounding terrain. Examples include Ber Bahr, Shaikan, Jabal Simrit, Harir, Bina Bawi, Miran and Qara Dagh. To the west of the mountain front, Neogene, Pleistocene and Holocene deposits have largely obscured deeper structures with the only evidence to their existence sometimes being where thrusts come to surface. This is particularly characteristic of the southern part of Kurdistan in the vicinity of the Kor Mor, Pulkhana, Shakal and Taza discoveries.

Almost all exploration wells have targeted either four-way dip closures or three-way closures against a signiﬁ cant fault (Figures 11 and 15). Whilst hydrocarbons have been discovered beyond apparent structural closure, no pure stratigraphic targets have thus far been drilled. One well, Gulak-1 in the Akri-Bijeel Block operated by the Hungarian company MOL, has been drilled to target sub-thrust potential. Small volumes of oil were produced on test from below the thrust (MOL, 2013).

Southwest Northeast

No scale implied Folds Over Main Thrust Blind Thrusts ‘Buried’ Box Eroded Nappes Mountain Front Anticlines Folds Anticlines Shallow Thrusting Simple within Tertiary Folds Evaporites

Quaternary Upper CenozoicUpper Cretaceous Upper Jurassic Upper Triassic Permian

Metamorphics Lower Cenozoic Lower Cretaceous Lower Jurassic Lower Triassic Carboniferous/ and Volcanics Devonian Figure 14: Diagrammatic cross section through Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Simpliﬁed and generalised cross section based on the Geological Map of Iraq (Sissakian, 1997). There is an overall tendency for anticlines to increase in amplitude and tightness as the main Zagros thrust is approached (Dunnington, 1958-2005).

198 198 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

South North SHAIKAN FIELD

Shaikan 2 Shaikan 10

Ground level 0.5 Pila Spi

1 km 1.0 Sarmord

Barsarin 1.5

Kurra Chine 2.0 Two-Way Time (second)

2.5

Southwest Northeast TAQ TAQ FIELD

1 km

0.5 Bakhtiari Clastics 1.0

Upper Fars

1.5

Pila Spi Lst.

2.0 Shiranish Two-Way Time (second)

2.5 Garagu Chia Gara

KURDAMIR FIELD A K-1 Well A’

1 km Lower Fars Red Beds

Top Oligocene Oligocene 0.5 Porosity Top Eocene

Kurdamir 1.0 Thrust Shiranish

Two-Way Time (second) (Cretaceous)

1.5 Figure 15: Seismic sections of selected hydrocarbon accumulations in Kurdistan showing he variety of structural style displayed in three of the signiﬁcant discoveries in the region: Shaikan Field (courtesy of Gulf Keystone); Taq Taq Field (courtesy of Genel Energy); and Kurdamir Field (courtesy of Western Zagros, see Figure 18). For location see Figure 11.

199 199 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

It is clear that complexities exist both in terms of in-fi eld reservoir facies variations and fl uid distributions across structures. In the absence of 3-D seismic data and sustained production history such complexities might take time to be revealed. In the Taq Taq Field, different oil-water contacts have been observed, with the western fl ank of the structure having an oil-water contact some 60 m deeper than that seen in the east. This is corroborated by wireline pressure data, log and fl ow test data (Addax Petroleum, 2009). It is postulated that there has been strike-slip movement along faults at reservoir level (Garland et al., 2010). Tilted oil-water contacts are interpreted to be present in fi elds in Iran (A. Horbury, personal communication) and these are thought to be present as a result of the pressure gradient in the aquifer as a result of meteoric water infl ux from the higher parts of the Zagros. Although different fl uid contacts are postulated to exist in matrix and fractures, no tilted contacts have been interpreted in Kurdistan to date.

Reservoirs

Almost all hydrocarbon discoveries in Kurdistan have been made in carbonate reservoirs ranging from the Upper Triassic to the Upper Miocene (Figure 5). Comprehensive descriptions of reservoirs units in Iraq and Kurdistan are presented in Aqrawi et al. (2010) and van Bellen et al. (1995-2005).

To date there have been no hydrocarbon discoveries in Palaeozoic strata within Kurdistan. The Jabal Kand-1 Well was spudded in late 1981 (completed in mid-1983), the last well to be drilled in Kurdistan prior to the Tawke-1 Well in 2005 (Figure 2). The well reached total depth in the Lower Carboniferous Harur Formation (Figure 5). Although some Lower Permian reservoirs (Ga’ara Formation) were penetrated they were deemed to have ﬂ owed water (Gulf Keystone, 2009, their ﬁ gure 3). The only Palaeozoic discovery in Iraq to date is in the Akkas Field, which has gas-bearing Ordovician sandstones (Khabour Formation), a play that extends into Jordan (Figure 1).

Late Triassic strata are represented by the Kurra Chine Formation, which consists of interbedded anhydrites with limestones, dolomites and shales. The section crops out in the northwestern part of Kurdistan (in the Gara Anticline) but recrystallisation and dissolution of evaporites has resulted in generally poor quality outcrops (Figure 16c). In the subsurface, the major anhydrite sequences are clearly visible on logging-whilst-drilling (LWD) and wireline logs.

The Upper Triassic, Kurra Chine is a reservoir in the Shaikan Field where ﬂ ow rates of 11.2–20.4 million standard cubic feet gas per day (mmscfg/d) and 5,474 barrels oil per day (bopd) were achieved. The principal reservoirs are dolomites with porosities estimated to range from 7–15% whilst permeabilities are clearly enhanced by fracturing (Ryder Scott, 2011). Triassic strata are also hydrocarbon-bearing in the Swara Tika, Jabal Simrit, and Bakrman discoveries. In the Bina Bawi Field the Triassic is gas-bearing with an estimated hydrocarbon column in excess of 1,000 m (Genel Energy, 2013). Hydrocarbons that have been discovered in Triassic reservoirs are compositionally distinct, and believed to have been sourced from organic-rich layers within the Upper Triassic Kurra Chine Formation (Al-Ameri and Zumberge, 2012). It should be noted that there are difﬁ culties with lithostratigraphic assignation between the Lower Jurassic Butmah Formation and the Upper Triassic Kurra Chine Formation. This complicates correlations, palaeogeographic understanding and petroleum systems analysis.

The principal source rock intervals that are presently considered to have sourced much of the oil in Kurdistan are the Middle to Upper Jurassic Naokelekan and underlying Sargelu formations (Pitman et al., 2004; English et al., 2015). These crop out in the northeastern part of Kurdistan where they are represented by a condensed sequence of argillaceous and bituminous limestones (Figure 16b). In the subsurface they provide readily identiﬁ able marker horizons and they are also proven reservoirs in the Atrush Field in northern Kurdistan (Figure 11). In the Atrush Field, it is estimated that there is an 800 m hydrocarbon column in stacked Jurassic reservoirs including the Barsarin, Sargelu, Alan, Mus, Adaiyah and Butmah formations. These reservoirs have a mix of matrix and fracture porosity. On test, some of these reservoirs have produced at rates up to 15,000 bopd (Shamaran Petroleum Corporation, 2013). In the Shaikan Field, over 65% of the best-estimate total oil-in-place is interpreted to reside in Jurassic strata (Sargelu, Mus and Butmah formations; Law et al., 2014).

200 200 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

a b

Figure 16: Photographs of key reservoirs and source rocks in Kurdistan. (a) Cretaceous, Bekhme Gorge; (b) Jurassic, Naokelekan near Naokelekan Village; (c) Triassic Kurra Chine close to Shiranish Islam Village (courtesy of Geospatial Research Ltd).

Cretaceous reservoirs have proven to be highly productive and signiﬁ cant volumes have been produced from the Cretaceous in both the Tawke and Taq Taq ﬁ elds where they provide the primary reservoirs. In all cases these reservoirs comprise low-porosity limestones and dolomites, which are heavily fractured. In Taq Taq, the Shiranish and Kometan formations have matrix porosities in the region of 3% but the units are fractured with permeabilities in the range of 200–10,000 milliDarcies (mD). These reservoirs form single-porosity, single-permeability systems. Aggregate well test rates from these intervals range from 16,570–19,180 bopd in the Taq Taq-8 Well. The underlying Qamchuqa Formation has higher matrix porosity (in the region of 8%) and similarly high fracture permeabilities.

201 201 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

This reservoir unit forms a dual-porosity, single-permeability system. In the Taq Taq-4 Well aggregate ﬂ ow rates of 12,920 bopd were achieved on test (Addax Petroleum, 2009). In the Shaikan Field the Lower Cretaceous Sarmord Formation comprises dolomites and limestones, which have porosities in the range 10–15% (Ryder Scott, 2011). The Shaikan-4 Well also ﬂ owed oil from the Chia Gara Formation at rates of 130 bopd (Law et al., 2014, their page 22).

The Eocene Pila Spi Formation (and its lateral equivalents the Avanah and Jaddala formations) are important reservoirs in the Taq Taq, Kurdamir and Kirkuk ﬁ elds. In the northern part of Kurdistan it is largely absent or frequently exposed forming prominent ridges around structures; a useful surface feature for satellite mapping. In Gelli Keer (Oil Gully in Kurdish) above the Shaikan Field, the Pila Spi Formation limestones are oil-saturated and actively seeping hydrocarbons. It is possible that this represents an exhumed oil accumulation at this location (Figure 3a). In outcrop, the Pila Spi Formation is a white, chalky, crystalline limestone, which is at times dolomitised. It is considered to represent deposition in a lagoonal setting. In the Taq Taq Field the Pila Spi Formation is a minor reservoir, some 110–130 m in thickness, and it ﬂ owed 2,150 bopd on test (Garland et al., 2010).

Two of the most signiﬁ cant discoveries in the southern part of Kurdistan are the Kurdamir and the nearby Topkhana accumulation (Figure 11). The Kurdamir-1 Well tested hydrocarbons from the Oligocene, Eocene and Cretaceous, the former considered to be the most signiﬁ cant volumetrically (Western Zagros Resources, 2015a). The Oligocene Kirkuk Group forms the main productive interval in the Baba and Avanah domes of the Kirkuk Field. Oligocene reservoirs in the Kirkuk Field are interpreted to have been deposited in basinal, back-reef and fore-reef environments with the latter having porosities above 20% and permeabilities up to 1,000 mD. A comprehensive description of these reservoirs is given in Chapter 8 of Aqrawi et al. (2010).

Whilst it is difﬁ cult to determine the split of hydrocarbon resources by stratigraphic interval due to paucity of published information, we estimate that the Cenozoic, Cretaceous and Jurassic reservoirs each hold around 30% of discovered resources with the Triassic perhaps 10% (Figure 13).

As more companies start to appraise and develop their discoveries, better estimates will undoubtedly be made. Moreover, with continued deeper drilling it is probable that the volumes of discovered Triassic hydrocarbons will increase over time. Thus far most of the produced oil in Kurdistan has come from the Cretaceous reservoirs in the Taq Taq and Tawke ﬁ elds.

Reservoir Evaluation

Recognising and adequately assessing potential hydrocarbon reservoirs in Kurdistan has proven to be challenging. In the northern part of the region, most of the Cretaceous and Jurassic reservoirs are normally or near normally pressured. The combination of low pressure and intense fracturing of the brittle carbonates frequently leads to severe losses whilst drilling. This is particularly true for sections drilled above and close to the water table, the location of which can be difﬁ cult to ascertain whilst drilling.

Given the complexity of the subsurface stratigraphy in Kurdistan, logging programs are often extensive by world standards. Logging-whilst-drilling (LWD, mainly gamma-ray and resistivity logs) are very helpful for correlation, especially in the absence of cuttings. In addition to the ‘basic’ wireline log suite, which might include gamma-ray, caliper, resistivity, density, neutron and sonic, specialist logs aimed at better understanding the varying carbonate mineralogy are frequently used. These often include a spectral gamma-ray, neutron-based spectroscopy tools for better determining lithology and clay content and magnetic resonance tools, which can be used to help better evaluate fl uid fi ll and porosity type. Despite extensive log suites it can still be diffi cult to estimate net pay and moveable hydrocarbons in what are generally low matrix permeability and low-porosity reservoirs.

Conventional coring has proven to be quite variable in terms of recovery and highly dependent on degree of fracturing. Wireline sidewall core tools (mechanical as opposed to explosive) are often used to collect rock samples and are especially useful where cuttings returns to surface have been lacking.

202 202 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Fracture presence, orientation, whether they are open or closed together with the nature of ﬂ uid ﬁ ll, are critical aspects of most logging programs. Specialist imaging logs are frequently run to aid in the location and characterisation of fracture networks. Hydrocarbon shows, together with losses, will frequently determine the location of zones to be drill-stem tested.

More often than not it is the fractured intervals which give the highest deliverability during drill- stem testing and production. Clearly signifi cant losses (and often no or limited cuttings/gas returns) and lost circulation material (LCM) pumped in these zones displacing formation fl uids does not aid subsequent formation evaluation. With the majority of logging tools designed to measure matrix rock properties it can be diffi cult to properly assess the fl uid fi ll in fractures, especially if the near wellbore environment has been fl ushed. Wireline tools for obtaining pressures and fl uid samples have been used across Kurdistan but with mixed results. In many cases it is not possible to obtain good pressure or sample data due to the diffi culty of obtaining a good seal with the probe in hard and fractured carbonates (Garland et al., 2010). Some success has been achieved with the use of advanced probes, in particular large surface area probes in (8½ inch) hole without extensive hole washouts.

Whilst the majority of sandstone reservoirs are water-wet, carbonate rocks over time become mixed- wet or oil-wet. This means that oil can adhere to the surface of carbonate rock and it is therefore harder to produce. Most carbonate reservoirs are believed to have mixed wettability or to be oil-wet (Morrow, 1990). It is probable that the water-wet carbonates are generally those with higher porosity with hard, tight, fractured carbonates being more oil-wet (A. Horbury, personal communication).

Knowledge of rock texture and wettability are vital for the static and dynamic description of carbonate reservoirs and might inﬂ uence the success of short-term well tests. Very often such parameters require special core analysis (SCAL), the results of which could only be forthcoming after a number of months by which time exploration and appraisal wells might have been tested and abandoned.

Given the petrophysical uncertainty that often remains, even after an exploration well has been drilled and logged, almost all exploration wells in Kurdistan have had quite extensive drill-stem test (DST) programmes. Typically operators have undertaken anything between 4 and 10 DSTs across different reservoir intervals. There have been a mixture of open-hole and cased-hole tests; the latter often using external casing packers (ECPs) to locate the test intervals. In the Shaikan Field the operator has undertaken almost 50 DSTs at different intervals. Some of the tests showed extremely high potential ﬂ ow rates, which is attributed to the well having penetrated natural fracture networks. Other tests were unsuccessful, with low or no ﬂ ow, due to the bituminous nature of the oil in places, and possibly the failure to connect with a fracture network. In the Sheikh Adi discovery, two wells have been drilled and a total of 17 DSTs undertaken. Of these 5 are deemed to have suffered mechanical failure (Law et al., 2014).

In heavily fractured reservoirs obtaining seals around ECPs can be problematic. Moreover, a combination of the unfavourable mobility ratio between oil and formation water, and the possibility that there might be different ﬂ uid contacts between the matrix and the fractures, can lead to some uncertain test results and complex interpretations.

Hydrocarbon Quality and Type

There is a wide variation in hydrocarbon type and quality across Kurdistan. Published oil gravities range from 12° API to over 57° API (English et al., 2015; Table 2) and signiﬁ cant volumes of gas have also been discovered.

A number of signifi cant discoveries contain heavy oil (i.e. that which has a gravity below 22.3° API as defi ned by the American Petroleum Institute). In the Shaikan Field it is estimated by the operator that around 80% of the fi elds estimated hydrocarbon resources reside in Jurassic reservoirs which contain heavy oil with the gravity ranging from 12° to 22° API (Gulf Keystone, 2013). The Barda Rash Field is estimated to have total stock tank oil initially in place (STOIIP) (mid case) in excess of 10 billion barrels of which just over 50% is deemed to reside in Cretaceous reservoirs, which are considered to contain heavy oil (Afren, 2011). The primary reason for oils in the recent Kurdish discoveries

203 203 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

Table 2: Published Reservoir Age and Oil Gravity for Principal Hydrocarbon Discoveries in Kurdistan (modiﬁ ed from English et al., 2015)

Discovery (bold = approved ﬁ eld Year Reservoir Age Formation Oil Gravity (ºAPI) development plan) Ain Al Safra 2013 Jurassic Alan - Mus 20−29 Atrush 2011 Jurassic Barsarin-Naokelekan-Sargelu-Alan-Mus 22−27 Bakrman 2013 Triassic Kurra Chine 31−38 Cenozoic Pila Spi Heavy oil Banan 2014 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan 21 Jurassic Butmah 29 Baram 2014 Cenozoic Kirkuk 42 Cretaceous Shiranish-Qamchuqa Heavy oil Barda Rash 2009 Jurassic Mus-Adaiyah 28−30 Triassic Kurra Chine 38−40 Cenozoic Sinjar 10 Bastora 2011 Cretaceous Bekhme 17 Barsarin-Naokelekan-Sargelu- Bijell 2010 Jurassic 14−23 Sehkaniyan Cretaceous Bekhme 10 Benenan 2008 Jurassic Najmah / Mus 8−12 / 30 Ber Bahr 2013 Jurassic Sargelu 12−15 Jurassic Mus-Adaiyah 44−47 Bina Bawi 2007 Triassic Kurra Chine-Geli Khana Gas (10−14 bbl/MMcf) Cenozoic Pila Spi 43 & Gas Chemchemal 1929 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan Gas Chia Surkh 1901 Cenozoic Lower Fars / Jeribe-Dhiban-Euphrates 38 & Gas / 38−50 Cenozoic Pila Spi 15 Demir Dagh 1960 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan-Qamchuqa 23 Jurassic Najmah / Sargelu / Mus-Adaiyah 10 / 29−32 / 37−42 Jurassic Sargelu-Mus-Adaiyah ? 39−45 ? Jisik 2014 Triassic Kurra Chine Gas Cenozoic Avanah-Khurmala 34 Khurmala Dome 1935 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan-Qamchuqa 28−41 Kor Mor 1928 Cenozoic Jeribe-Euphrates-Kirkuk 57 & Gas Kurdamir 2010 Cenozoic Kirkuk-Jaddala 38−47 & Gas (30−40 bbl/MMcf) Mil Qasim 2011 Cenozoic Upper Fars 43−44 Cretaceous Shiranish 15 Miran West 2009 Jurassic Adaiyah-Butmah Gas (2−20 bbl/MMcf) Jurassic Sargelu-Mus-Adaiyah 39−45 Mirawa 2013 Triassic Kurra Chine Gas Peshkabir 2012 Jurassic Sargelu 32 Cenozoic Euphrates-Serikagni-Jaddala 31−34 Pulkhana 1927 Cretaceous Shiranish-Balambo 28−32 Qara Dagh 2011 Cretaceous Tanjero-Shiranish 43−46 Sarqala 2011 Cenozoic Jeribe-Dhiban 40 Sarta 2010 Jurassic Sargelu 20 Sangaw North 2011 Jurassic Mus Dry Gas Cretaceous Sarmord-Garagu-Chia Gara Heavy / bituminous oil Shaikan 2009 Jurassic Naokelekan-Sargelu-Mus 14−20 Triassic Kurra Chine 37−43 & Gas (120 bbl/MMcf) See Table 2 facing page for continuation.

204 204 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Table 2: continued. Shakal 2009 Cenozoic Jaddala-Aaliji 35 Cretaceous Sarmord-Garagu-Chia Gara Heavy oil Sheikh Adi 2012 Jurassic Naokelekan-Sargelu-Mus 16−19 Shewashan 2014 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan-Qamchuqa 45 Jurassic Mus-Adaiyah 14−21 Simrit 2012 Triassic Kurra Chine 36−39 Cretaceous Shiranish-Aqra-Kometan Gas Summail 2011 Jurassic Sargelu-Mus 14 Swara Tika 2011 Triassic Kurra Chine 36−38 Cenozoic Pila Spi 24 Taq Taq 1958 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan-Qamchuqa 48 Cenozoic Jeribe 24 Tawke 2006 Cretaceous Bekhme-Qamchuqa 26−27 Jurassic Sargelu 32 Taza 2013 Cenozoic Jeribe-Dhiban-Euphrates-Kirkuk 36 Topkhana 2011 Cenozoic Kirkuk Gas (30−40 bbl/MMcf) Zey Gawra 2013 Cretaceous Shiranish-Kometan-Qamchuqa 35

being heavy is interpreted to be due to maturity of the source rock; in particular lower maturity oils occurring over the Mosul High and higher maturity oils having been encountered away from this palaeohigh (English et al., 2015). In some cases the heavy oil is considered to be a result of near- surface meteoric water infl ux (water washing) and associated biodegradation. It is possible that there is gravity segregation in some of the accumulations which possess signifi cant hydrocarbon columns and one might think that this would result in heavier oils with depth within a particular reservoir but this does not appear to be the case in some fi elds.

In the Atrush Field (Figure 11), the discovered oil appears to get heavier with depth ranging from 27° API down to 14° API. DST ﬂ ow rates of up to 16,000 bopd have been achieved but ﬂ ow rate is critically dependent on reservoir quality, API gravity and viscosity and the lifting mechanism used during the test (Shamaran Petroleum Corporation, 2015a).

In the Shaikan Field, the model that has been applied to the Jurassic in the most recent Competent Person Report (CPR), is that there is moveable oil in the fractures down to a depth of between 1,350 and 1,400 m TVDSS. This is almost 1,000 m below the crest of the Jurassic structure. Below this level is an interval with semi-mobile oil (termed the ‘high viscosity zone’), which extends a further 50–100 m beyond which the fractures are interpreted to be water-bearing. However, the matrix is interpreted to have oil down to 1,950 m TVDSS. There is an interval (1,450 to 1,950 m TVDSS) where water is deemed to be present in fractures surrounding oil-saturated blocks of matrix. The reason for this situation is thought to be due to possible updip leakage of the oil from the structure in recent geological time, causing drainage of the fractures accompanied by inﬂ ux of water from the aquifer. It is possible that the inﬂ ux of fresh water caused degradation of the oil to form an interval in the fractures of high viscosity, semi-mobile oil or tar (Law et al., 2014).

Often the heavy oils are associated with hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and carbon dioxide (CO2), which have been known to reach concentrations in excess of 250,000 ppm (25%) and 10%, respectively (Table

1). Whilst drilling the Sangaw North-1 exploration well in 2010–2011, high H2S concentrations were encountered resulting in severe damage to the drill pipe, the well had to be re-drilled.

Where heavy oils have been encountered there have often been diffi culties producing them on test. High density, high viscosity and low pressure result in unfavourable mobility and limited fl ow, unless aided by electronic submersible pumps (ESPs) or nitrogen lift. It is possible that some DSTs have been compromised by water infl ux from nearby aquifer even though what appear to be ‘good’ oil

205 205 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

zones on wireline logs have been perforated. In the Atrush Field, a recent DST in one of the appraisal wells, Atrush-3, ﬂ owed 4,900 bopd of 27° API oil using an electrical submersible pump (Shamaran Petroleum Corporation, 2015b).

It has been assumed that thermal recovery techniques would be required to produce heavy oils with recovery from fractures being more signiﬁ cant than from the matrix. Given the volumes of heavy oil in Kurdistan it is very probable that the region will require specialist techniques to recover signiﬁ cant volumes of heavy oil in the future. It is also possible that given the wide range of crude properties in Kurdistan, blending of produced hydrocarbons might facilitate exports.

Leaked and exhumed hydrocarbon accumulations are present at the surface and in near-surface sediments. Here the hydrocarbons appear as either tar, solid bitumen (gilsonite) or in some cases particularly in summer where seeps are active, liquid hydrocarbons (Figure 3). Generally, oil gravities are lower in the near-surface and become higher with depth and stratigraphy, a fact that has been known for many years in Iraqi ﬁ elds (Dunnington, 1967). Most of the hydrocarbons discovered in Triassic strata have gravities in excess of 36° API and often have a large gas component.

Fracture Systems

Given that the majority of reservoirs in Kurdistan have low matrix porosity and permeability, fractures are critically important in aiding deliverability, both during testing and production.

There are a number of aspects which must be considered, some of the most important of which are deemed to be fracture porosity, fracture connectivity and ﬂ uid contacts (both within the fractures and the matrix). Interference testing has been undertaken on the Atrush Field, between the Atrush-1 and Atrush-2 wells some 2 km apart, and a pressure response was seen “instantaneously” implying a high level of connectivity as a result of the fracture system in this location (Shamaran Petroleum Corporation, 2014). Interference testing between two of the appraisal wells, Chiya Khere-6 and Atrush-2, which are 6.5 km apart, demonstrated pressure communication across the ﬁ eld (Shamaran Petroleum Corporation, 2015b).

In the Shaikan Field, a long-term interference test has been undertaken between Shaikan-1B and Shaikan-3; the wells are around 1 km apart. These data, in combination with conventional well test data, are interpreted to indicate variable fl ow capacity with the permeability-thickness product over different zones ranging from 12 to nearly 10,000 Darcy-ft. The latter value is extremely high and corresponds to a well productivity index greater than 100 stock tank barrels per day per psi (stb/d/ psi). This suggests signifi cant fl ow contribution of the fracture network.

Estimating recovery efﬁ ciency from fractures is not straightforward and will depend, amongst other things on hydrocarbon type, pressure, connectivity, interaction with matrix and aquifer, as well as the recovery mechanism employed during development. In the Taq Taq Field, it has been interpreted that the Shiranish and Kometan formations could be considered to be type 1 fractured reservoirs, in which both storage and deliverability are provided only by the fractures. The underlying Qamchuqa Formation, however, has been treated as a type 2 fractured reservoir, in which storage is provided by the matrix and deliverability is provided by the fractures (Garland et al., 2010).

An important recovery mechanism in fractured reservoirs in which water moves through the fracture network involves natural imbibition of water into matrix blocks resulting in the expulsion of oil from the matrix blocks into the fractures where the oil is transported to the producing wells.

Within giant Taq Taq Field, the failure of the Taq Taq-5 Well to fl ow hydrocarbons on test has been interpreted to have been due to the well penetrating an interval with an absence of fracture porosity. The well was located crestally and close to the middle of the fi eld (Vallares, 2011). The Ain Al Safra-1 Well had DSTs in the Butmah and Adaiyah formations which were inconclusive as the tests were unable to connect to a permeable fracture network and fl ow fl uids to surface (Oryx Petroleum, 2013).

206 206 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

EXPLORATION SUCCESS RATES AND FAILURES

Given the quality, distribution and maturity of source rocks in Kurdistan, almost all wells drilled to date have encountered oil and/or gas in some quantities. The measure of exploration success adopted for the purpose of this study is to count the total number of new fi eld wildcat wells and classify them as having been successful or having failed based on them fl owing hydrocarbons (500 bopd or over) to surface. Where initial new fi eld wildcat wells have failed to fl ow, but sidetracks have proven successful then these are counted as successful exploration wells. Using this approach some 63 new fi eld wildcat (NFW) wells have been drilled and tested in Kurdistan between 1901 and late 2014. Of these 23 are regarded as unsuccessful wells and 40 as successful giving a NFW success rate of 63%. Clearly different workers could well view the same data in a different light. The vast majority of these data are in the public domain and where data has not been published, scout information (maps, industry articles and public reports) have been used.

Of the 63 new ﬁ eld wildcat wells, 25 are deemed to have been drilled beyond the mountain front and 38 to the west and southwest of the mountain front on the ‘plains’. Of the 25 wells drilled in the more mountainous terrain, 12 of these are deemed to have been successful and 13 have failed giving a success rate of 48%. There are 38 wells that are considered to have been drilled to the west of the mountain front and on the plains. Of these 28 are considered to have been successful giving a success rate of 70% in this region. Success rates appear to be lower in the more mountainous areas, presumably as a result of trap destruction and seal breaching.

It is diffi cult to accurately estimate commercial success rates as a large number of the discoveries are still under appraisal or fi eld development plans and economics are unknown. However, almost a third of the discoveries have had fi eld development planning approval and in all probability more commercial discoveries will follow post-appraisal (Figure 11).

Of the 40 successful new fi eld wildcat wells, 12 have matured into commercial fi elds with approved fi eld development plans (Figure 11, Table 2). Eight of these are on the plain and 4 in more mountainous terrain. Of the remaining NFW discoveries it is very likely that the majority of them will be commercially viable; some are presently producing at low rates to the local market. This is likely to change as additional export pipeline infrastructure becomes available. Moreover, as such infrastructure develops, the economic viability of tie-backs and accumulations with smaller reserve sizes should become more favourable.

In some cases the initial new fi eld wildcat wells have encountered hydrocarbons but have failed to fl ow on test. One such example is the Qara Dagh-1 Well, which was drilled by Vast Exploration in 2010 (Figures 8 and 11). The well encountered approximately 1,000 m gross oil column of 41° API oil in the Tanjero and Shiranish formations but was deemed, post-drilling, to have been drilled sub-optimally on a steep fl ank of the structure. A second well was planned but not drilled (Vast Exploration, 2011) and the company relinquished the acreage back to the KRG in late 2012. Within 6 months Chevron Corporation had signed the block (Chevron, 2013) and are believed to be planning a second well on the block along trend from the historic well (Western Zagros Resources, 2014a).

Whilst Kurdistan has seen high success rates, and almost every well has encountered some traces of hydrocarbons, there have been a number of ‘dry’ holes drilled in the last 10 years; wells where the operator has deemed that the structure drilled is devoid of commercial hydrocarbons (Figure 11).

The exploration wells, which are considered to have “failed”, are spread across the region and present both in the fold belt and on the plains to the southwest. There is no apparent structural trend to their distribution. These “failures”, in our opinion, can broadly be grouped into 5 categories:

(1) well drilled in wrong location on a structure, off the crest or out of closure, through a thrust or in an isolated compartment; (2) missed pay, or inadequate testing and/or formation damage, or failure to connect with a permeable fracture network;

207 207 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

(3) not drilled deep enough to adequately test all the reservoir units that might be in closure; e.g. heavy oil encountered in the Cretaceous but deeper targets in the Jurassic and Triassic untested; (4) lack of hydrocarbon charge into the structure as a result of either: (i) compromised migration route (e.g. sealing by major thrust or shear fault, or that the structure is in a migration shadow); or (ii) timing of structuration with respect to hydrocarbon migration (i.e. very young or exhumed structure too recent to receive hydrocarbon charge); (5) structure and top seals breached resulting in seal and thus trap failure and leakage.

The fi rst three points are arguably failures in adequately drilling in the optimal location or adequately evaluating the well, and might not necessarily condemn the particular structure in question. Whilst such wells have been classed as failures it is possible, and indeed has been proven in some instances, that additional drilling and testing has resulted in successful wells on structures that others have drilled and abandoned. It is worth noting that a number of structures in the main part of Iraq, such as Ain Zalah and Butmah (Figure 1), have only very limited production over much of these structures. Single well penetrations can be unrepresentative of these big structural anticlines. Almost all new fi eld wildcat wells have been drilled on relatively sparsely spaced 2-D seismic data and the assumption has generally been that the structures are large anticlines that can be tested with a single, generally crestal, exploration well. In a fold-and-thrust belt setting this is almost certainly an over simplifi cation.

In our opinion there are very few exploration well failures due to inadequate or absence of suitable reservoir facies. However, almost all carbonate reservoirs in Kurdistan have low matrix porosity and permeability and are usually dependent on fracturing to yield commercial fl ow rates. In some cases reservoirs have been encountered, with hydrocarbons, but lack of open fractures have resulted in “failure” of the well to fl ow hydrocarbons at adequate fl ow rates. This is interpreted to have occurred in Ain Al Safra-1 and also in the recent Demir Dagh-5 appraisal well where two DSTs in the Cretaceous fl owed small quantities of oil to surface but were unable to re-connect with the permeable fracture network (Oryx Petroleum, 2013; 2014b). Moreover, almost all exploration wells have been vertical and it is probable that this is not the optimum orientation to intersect fractures within the reservoir. Two recent appraisal wells on the Bijell Field (Bijell-4 and Bijell-6) failed to encounter movable hydrocarbons. Assuming these wells were drilled within the fi eld closure then presumably these results were either due to the low mobility of the reservoir fl uids or a lack of fracturing of the reservoir at these locations, or a combination of the two factors (MOL, 2015).

Excellent source rocks are also present in the subsurface in most of Kurdistan; however adequate maturation and migration are of greater risk and uncertainty. With almost all exploration wells being crestal, the extent, thickness, quality and depth of potential source rocks in the synclinal areas is uncertain. It is probable that most migration is relatively recent (post-structuration) and as such is probably quite local given the diffi culty of migrating hydrocarbons over large distances. Fill-and-spill between accumulations may exist but is yet to be proven. The extent and depth of source kitchens is a more regional issue related to basin evolution and petroleum systems. Thus far operators in Kurdistan have operated on their own acreage with limited working interest in other blocks. With no formal release period for well and seismic data in Kurdistan, there are no comprehensive regional basin modelling studies, which utilise the abundance of well and seismic data, which has been acquired over the last 10 years. This is perhaps one of the most important aspects of petroleum systems evaluation in Kurdistan that remains to be understood. A regional basin model showing the lateral variations in source rock quality, thickness, heat fl ow, and detailed timing of structuration from the foreland through the fold belt would undoubtedly permit a better understanding of the timing of maturation and migration from both local and more regional source kitchens. Such a study would benefi t from a comprehensive standardisation of stratigraphic nomenclature, to ensure consistency across the entire region.

If tectonic uplift were the sole cause of trap destruction then there would not have been signiﬁ cant hydrocarbon discoveries such as Shaikan, Atrush, Swara Tika, Bina Bawi and Miran beyond the mountain front. However, of the successful exploration wells drilled in Kurdistan, it is estimated that around 70% of them reside on the Cenozoic-covered plains with only 30% in the mountainous areas. In the more mountainous areas where Cenozoic strata are absent, traps are reliant on the sealing capabilities of shales and anhydrites, in particular within the Jurassic and Triassic sequences.

208 208 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

It is possible that the sealing capacity of such strata could be compromised by uplift and tectonic fracturing coupled with cooling and depressuring. Two examples are presented which highlight some of the complexities encountered to date.

Example 1: Harir Anticline and Mirawa Structure

In the northern part of Kurdistan the prominent Harir Anticline rises about 700 m from the surrounding plains. In 2013 an exploration well (Harir-1) was drilled close to the crest of this structure penetrating Cretaceous, Jurassic and Triassic strata (Figures 11 and 17). The well was tested and deemed to be dry (Marathon Oil Corporation, 2013a, b, c). Soon after another exploration well was drilled less than 12 km to the southwest on a low-relief structure on the plain below. The Mirawa-1 Well also penetrated Cretaceous to Triassic strata and ﬂ owed high-quality oil from the Jurassic, and gas with condensate from Triassic strata (Marathon Oil Corporation, 2013a, b, c). Both structures are likely to contain very similar reservoir facies and both appear to be prominent anticlines, albeit that the Mirawa structure is more deeply buried compared to the Harir Anticline. Assuming that both wells were valid tests of the structures, the possible reasons for failure of the Harir-1 Well are considered (by the authors) to be as follows:

(1) it is cut off from the source kitchen to the south by the reverse fault interpreted along its southwestern limb; (2) the structure has been breached, seals are ineffective and migrated hydrocarbons have leaked away;

Northeast Southwest Mirawa Harir Mountain M-1 H-1 A B msl km a 1

Cenozoic 0 -1 Cretaceous -2 Jurassic -3 2 km Triassic Basement

b c

Harir Jisik

N Mirawa A

0 10

km Figure 17 : (a) Schematic cross section from Mirawa to Harir, northern Kurdistan. In 2013, Harir-1 was tested and deemed to be dry. In the same year, Mirawa-1 ﬂowed 39−45° API oil from multiple Jurassic zones (totaling in excess of 11,000 bopd), and 72 million cubic feet of gas and 1,700 barrels of condensate per day from one Triassic zone. In Jisik-1 (2014), an equipment-constrained, drill-stem testing program of Jurassic and Triassic zones yielded 6,100 bopd, and 10−15 million cubic feet of gas and condensate (source: Marathon, operator of Harir PSA, 2012, 2013 a, b, c). (b) Digital elevation model (DEM) image of Mirawa and Harir anticlines (courtesy of Airbus Defence and Space); and (c) Harir Mountain, looking NE (height on anticline ca. 700 m; photograph courtesy of Petroceltic International).

209 209 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

(3) the structure is too young to receive hydrocarbons; (4) the well was drilled in a faulted compartment within the large structure which is somehow isolated from charge; (5) the well might have been drilled outside of structural closure at the depth where reservoir targets were encountered.

There are no known seeps on the Harir Mountain, which might preclude signifi cant leakage from the Harir structure. If however, the escaped hydrocarbons were light oil and/or gas then it is possible that all traces have disappeared. In many areas hydrocarbon maturation and migration appear to be very recent and occurring present-day. Although the structure is undoubtedly young, is it too young to receive hydrocarbons that may well be migrating present-day? Seismic over the Taq Taq Field clearly shows folding of the Bakhtiari and Upper Fars Pliocene sediments implying very recent hydrocarbon migration into this structure. The authors favour either the fi rst or second hypotheses as to why the large Harir structure is dry, although it is theoretically possible on such a large structure (25 km in length and up to 5 km in width) that the well might have been drilled into an isolated compartment or in a region lacking signifi cant faults.

Example 2: Sangaw Anticline

The second example is from the southern part of Kurdistan where the Sangaw North-1 exploration well was drilled on the northern part of the large Sangaw Anticline (Figures 11 and 18). The well penetrated Cenozoic to Triassic sediments but ﬂ owed non-commercial gas and water at rates of 4.6 million standard cubic feet of gas and 7,280 barrels of water per day (Sterling Energy, 2011b, 2012). The Sangaw North block has since been relinquished by the operator. Less than 15 km to the south are the Topkhana and Kurdamir discoveries with oil, gas and condensate having been tested from Cenozoic and Cretaceous reservoirs. Southwest Northeast Topkhana Kurdamir Sangaw North T-1 K-1 K-2 SN-1 A B a Pliocene

Pliocene Middle Lower Eocene Miocene Gas Middle Miocene ? Oligocene Oil ? Upper/Middle Lower ? Eocene Miocene Palaeocene

Oligocene Cretaceous Cretaceous Pre-Jurassic Palaeocene Jurassic 5 Km Jurassic Pre-Jurassic

b Gas Oil/Water Contact Oil Gas/Oil Contact

B N Well Thrust Faults 0 10 Sangaw North km Figure 18: (a) Schematic cross section and (b) map of Topkhana, Kurdamir and Sangaw structures, northern SN-1 Kurdistan. In Sangaw North-1 Well (SN-1) ﬁve tests from Mesozoic and Triassic intervals ﬂowed water and gas in non-commercial volumes. Topkhana T-1 Well T-1 Topkhana K-2 discovered oil and gas/condensate in the Oligocene. A The Kurdamir K-1 and K-2 wells discovered oil and K-1 gas/condensate in Oligocene, Eocene and Cretaceous reservoirs (sources: Sterling Energy, 2011; Talisman Kurdamir Energy, 2014; Western Zagros, 2013).

210 210 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Unlike the northern part of Kurdistan, thick Cenozoic strata occur in this region and the presence of evaporite and shale facies are considered to have facilitated shallow, low-angle thrusting. Whilst the cross section interprets lateral facies pinchout of Cenozoic reservoirs, there are a number of signiﬁ cant thrusts and thrust sheets, which potentially separate the downdip discoveries from the updip ‘dry hole’. It would appear that the Sangaw North-1 Well drilled a valid structure with adequate fractured reservoirs; however, hydrocarbons have either been unable to migrate into the structure in any signiﬁ cant quantities, or they have migrated and leaked away due to seal failure as a result of more recent tectonism. Some hydrocarbons seeps have been seen over the Sangaw Anticline and it is thought most likely that this large structure was dry as a result of seal failure and breaching of the trap.

PRODUCTION AND RESOURCES

Whilst presently there are 12 discoveries with approved fi eld development plans (Figure 11), four fi elds have dominated production history in Kurdistan to date: Taq Taq, Tawke, Khurmala and Kor Mor. Since 2008, these fi elds have together produced over 400 million barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE, Table 3). In 2012, the Taq Taq Field produced 27.5 million barrels of oil (MMBO) averaging 75,500 barrels of oil per day (bopd; Genel Energy, 2013). In 2013 production averaged 77,000 bopd (28.1 MMBO) and in 2014 production had increased to an average of 103,000 bopd (37.5 MMBO) (Genel Energy, 2015). In total the Taq Taq Field is estimated to have produced in excess of 138 MMBO.

The Tawke Field produced a gross average of 45,477 bopd in 2012 (16.5 MMBO) whilst in 2014 average production was 91,000 bopd (33 MMBO) (Genel Energy, 2015). The fi eld has produced over of 100 MMBO to date (DNO, 2015). The Kor Mor Field has produced almost 90 MMBOE, comprising 415 billion cubic feet (bcf) of gas and 18 MMBO of condensate since 2008 (Dana Gas, 2013). The Shaikan, Barada Rash and Sarqala fi elds have together produced around 9 MMBO, but these fi elds are not yet connected to pipeline infrastructure, limiting production to export via truck at the present time.

Some of this production has been consumed by the local market, whilst some has been exported. As of early 2015 additional pipeline capacity has now been constructed, production from the region has been increasing over the last 24 months and is likely to increase in the future.

Table 3: Cumulative Production from Kurdish Fields

Gross Cumulative Field Production Date of Published Figures (mmboe) 140 Taq Taq Khurmala Tawke Kor Mor* Shaikan Sarqala Barda Rash Taq Taq 138 End 2014 120 Khurmala 120 End 2013 estimated to end 2014 100 Tawke 100 February 2015 80 Kor Mor* 89 End 2013 (Oil) + 402 bcf gas (67 mmboe) 60 Shaikan 7 August 2014 estimated to end 2014 40 Sarqala 1 End 2013 20 Barda Rash 0.44 End 2013

Commulative Production (MMBO) 0

Oil-in-Place, Reserves and Recovery Efﬁ ciency

Published numbers for oil-in-place, reserves and recovery factors for fi elds and discoveries in Kurdistan are diffi cult to come by. Whilst the publically listed operators of the producing Tawke and Taq Taq fi elds regularly publish reserve estimates, accurate numbers for many of the other discoveries are somewhat harder to come by and often restricted to infrequently updated CPRs. In part this is due to the diffi culty in estimating recovery factors and thus moving from in-place fi gures to recoverable hydrocarbons for discoveries, which have not been fully appraised.

211 211 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

Estimating oil-in-place relies on an understanding of matrix parameters such as gross rock volume, porosity, net-to-gross and hydrocarbon saturation. In carbonate reservoirs in Kurdistan these parameters can be difﬁ cult to measure and extrapolate across large structural features. Measuring similar parameters for fractures can be even more difﬁ cult.

Within carbonate reservoirs in Kurdistan a number of fracture types have been recognised. These range from seismically visible tectonic fractures to microfractures associated with stylolites. In the more mountainous areas a large number of the fractures are associated with strongly folded and at times thrusted anticlines. Published data on fractured carbonate reservoirs in strongly folded anticlines in Iran suggested a range of fracture porosity from 0.1–0.3%. These estimates were derived from material balance calculations (Weber and Bakker, 1981). Within Kurdistan published estimates of fracture porosity for various ﬁ elds and discoveries are presented in Table 4.

In theory, if the matrix porosity, ﬂ uid compressibility and the tidal attenuation ratio (reservoir tidal and surface tidal amplitudes) are known, there is a chance that fracture porosity can be estimated. This is only possible if the matrix porosity is low, ﬂ uid compressibility is low and the fracture system is not parallel to the overburden stress (L. Kaye, personal communication).

Table 4: Fracture Porosities Kurdish Fields and Discoveries

Fracture Porosity Field / discovery System Low Middle High Data Source Ber Bahr Cretaceous 0.1% 0.25% 0.5% Ber Bahr Jurassic 0.1% 0.35% 0.6% Ber Bahr Triassic 0.1% 0.25% 0.5% Bijell Jurassic 0.05% 0.25% 0.6% Shaikan Cretaceous 0.05% 0.3% 0.7% Law et al., 2014 Shaikan Jurassic 0.1% 0.4% 0.7% Shaikan Triassic 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% Sheikh Adi Cretaceous 0.05% 0.3% 0.7% Sheikh Adi Jurassic 0.1% 0.4% 0.7% P99 P50 P1 Tawke Jurassic 0.1% 0.5% 0.9% Miran Cretaceous 0.1% 0.49% 0.9% Vallares, 2011 Taq Taq Cretaceous 0.3% 0.5% 0.7%

In the Cretaceous of the Taq Taq Field, the operator estimates fracture porosity to be 0.3% and the permeability of the fracture network to be several Darcies to inﬁ nite. These estimates are made on the basis of wireline log, core, well test inﬂ ow, pressure data and mud losses. Productivities show a considerable range from a 4 bbl/day/psi up to 500 bbl/day/psi. In the Shaikan Field, interpretation of DST data indicates highly variable productivities from 4 to 148 bbl/day/psi with test permeabilities ranging from 180 to 14,700 mD (Law et al., 2014, their table 5.8).

Clearly, if a pervasive connected fracture network is present (and proven with infl ow/production test data), then recovery effi ciency from this fracture network could be signifi cant; perhaps 60–80%.

Recovery effi ciency from matrix systems with more limited fracture networks are much lower. It is diffi cult to generalise as there are many factors which infl uence recovery factor such as formation pressure, fl uid type, viscosity, wettability of the matrix system, capillary pressure, wellbore contact (horizontal versus vertical production wells), skin damage, aquifer support, development well spacing and number, and depletion strategy. In the Taq Taq Field the operator has suggested a recovery factor of between 30% and 50% for the Cretaceous reservoirs (Addax Petroleum, 2009).

212 212 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Given the wide variations in hydrocarbon type and reservoir properties most operators have taken the approach of calculating separate recovery factors for the matrix and the fractures in each reservoir unit. In the Shaikan Field this has resulted in there being a wide variation in recovery efﬁ ciency between the low viscosity oil in the matrix in the Cretaceous (0% recovery assigned) and the higher pressure, light oil in fractures within the Triassic (up to 80% recovery efﬁ ciency) (Table 5; Law et al., 2014). This range is perhaps typical for other accumulations in the region.

Table 5: Recovery Factors for Shaikan Field (Law et al., 2014)

System Formation Porosity Low Best High Notes Sarmord Matrix 0% 0% 0% 1 Garagu Matrix 0% 0% 0% Chia Gara Matrix 0% 0% 0% Cretaceous Sarmord Fractures 20% 30% 40% 2 Garagu Fractures 20%30% 40% Chia Gara Fractures 20% 30% 40% Sargelu Matrix 0% / 3% 2% / 7% 5% / 11% 3 Alan Matrix 0% / 3% 2% / 7% 5% / 11% Mus Matrix 0% / 3% 2% / 7% 5% / 11% Adaiyah Matrix 0% / 3% 2% / 7% 5% / 11% Butmah Matrix 0% / 3% 2% / 7% 5% / 11% Jurassic Sargelu Fractures 5% / 50% 10% / 65% 15% / 80% 4 Alan Fractures 5% / 50% 10% / 65% 15% / 80% Mus Fractures 5% / 50% 10% / 65% 15% / 80% Adaiyah Fractures 5% / 50% 10% / 65% 15% / 80% Butmah Fractures 5% / 50% 10% / 65% 15% / 80% Kurre Chine A Matrix 5% 10% 20% 5 Kurre Chine B Oil Matrix 4% 12% 20% Kurre Chine B Gas Matrix 5% 20% 40% Kurre Chine C Matrix 5% 10% 20% Triassic Kurre Chine A Fractures 60% 70% 80% Kurre Chine B Oil Fractures 60% 70% 80% Kurre Chine B Gas Fractures 60% 70% 80% Kurre Chine C Fractures 60% 70% 80%

Notes: All ﬁ gures have been taken from Competent Persons Report, writen by ERCE Ltd for Gulf Keystone Shaikan Field (Law et al., 2014)

1) 0% Recovery Factor (RF) assigned to highly viscous oil in the matrix or fractures under conventional recovery techniques.

2) 20%-30%-40% RF for lower viscosity oil in the fractures at greater depth. These recovery factors are based on the assumption of an effective water drive through the fractures either in the form of inﬂ ux from a natural aquifer or from water injection. Achieving these recovery factors also relies on an adequate number of wells and appropriate well design.

3) 0%-2%-5% RF from the top of the high viscosity zone in the fractures down to the OWC in the matrix. 3%-7%-11% RF for oil in the matrix in the shallower interval of lower viscosity oil above the high viscosity zone in the fractures.

4) 5%-10%-15% RF for high viscosity oil in fractures, 50%-65%-80% RF for medium viscosity oil in fractures.

5) In the Triassic, the pressure is higher, the ﬂ uid is light oil with high GOR and rich gas condensate. The light nature of the oil, low viscosity and high pressure favour higher recovery factors than the Jurassic.

The development of the Triassic has not been fi nalised. The fracture network in the Jurassic is the primary source of oil that the current fi eld development plan aims to recover. These recovery factors are based on the assumption that the fi eld will be extensively developed, with an adequate number of wells and appropriate well design and with the implementation of water injection if necessary.

213 213 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

Reserve Estimates

Published reserve estimates suggest that there have been 8 discoveries in Kurdistan with 2P (proven and probable reserves) and 2C (best estimate of contingent resources) in excess of 500 million barrels (Figure 19a). The total 2P reserves and 2C resources discovered to date are estimated to be in excess of 15 billion barrels of oil (based on published numbers).

With limited fi elds in Kurdistan having been fully appraised or in production for any length of time, it is only possible to draw upon publically released data from the Tawke and Taq Taq fi elds as a guide to fi eld performance and how reserve estimates have changed over time. Between them, these fi elds have had 43 wells drilled, of which 40 are presently in production and these two fi elds have produced in excess of 230 MMBO to date.

When the Tawke-1 Well was drilled and successfully tested in 2006 the operator (DNO) estimated that the fi eld had 100 MMBO recoverable reserves in Cenozoic carbonates. Hydrocarbons were encountered in deeper Cretaceous reservoirs but as these were untested no reserves were ascribed to them at that time. Between 2006 and 2014, a total of 28 wells have been drilled on the Tawke Field (DNO, 2014). These wells not only appraised different parts of the fi eld, but also explored deeper targets adding new reserves. Moreover, extended well testing permitted the use of down-hole gauges which were used for evaluating pressure communication across the fi eld and between production and injection wells.

Figure 19b shows the published reserve fi gures for the Tawke Field from its initial discovery in 2006 to present-day. In 2013, following the drilling of a second horizontal well and the discovery of additional reserves in the Jurassic Sargelu Formation, DNO suggested that the recoverable reserves could be “bumped up to the 1 billion barrel mark, compared with the present level of 771 million barrels” (DNO, 2013b). Moreover, fi eld enhancements are being considered to increase the daily output from 100,000 bopd to over 200,000 bopd (Figure 19b), from an initial facility that was scoped for just 50,000 bopd. Over the last 7 years these reserve additions have largely come through recognising reserves in additional reservoir units and by greater recovery from the fi eld’s existing reservoirs based on production data and signifi cant encouragement from recent horizontal wells. In October 2013, the Tawke-23 Well fl owed at a rate of 32,000 bopd from a 900 m horizontal section in the Cretaceous and was drilled at a cost of just US $12 million. The most recent horizontal well, Tawke-27, was drilled in record time and at a cost of under USD 10 million (DNO, 2014). Clearly the commercial viability of such wells are helped by what appear to be very effi cient and cost-effective appraisal and development drilling. In 2014, the operator drilled 5 horizontal production wells bringing the total number of horizontal producers to 9 out of a total of 26 production wells (DNO, 2014; Genel Energy, 2015).

In 2007, 2P gross reserves in the Taq Taq Field were estimated to be ca. 210 MMBO. By 2008 this estimate had increased to 304 MMBO and current ﬁ eld remaining reserves (2P) are estimated to be 579 MMBO (Genel Energy, 2015). The ﬁ rst horizontal well was planned for late 2014 (Genel Energy, 2014c).

Not all discoveries in Kurdistan have grown over time. In 2012 a CPR was published on the Barda Rash Field, which estimated that the accumulation had 2P reserves of 190 MMBO and 2C resources of 1,243 MMBO making it one of the largest new fi nds in Kurdistan (Afren, 2012a). In January 2015, the operator announced that the results of an updated CPR had reduced the 2P reserves to zero and the 2C resources to around 250 MMBO (Afren, 2015). The signifi cant reduction in 2P and 2C reserves and resources has been due to the 2014 reprocessing of 3-D seismic acquired in 2012 and initially processed in 2013, alongside the companies drilling campaign. Overall the reservoirs have not performed according to previous expectations and what was assumed in the approved Field Development Plan (FDP). The wells have produced higher water cuts than expected and the operator encountered operational challenges associated with the drilling of diffi cult complex fractured reservoirs. Whilst recent results at the fi eld have indicated the presence of light oil accumulations

in the Triassic Kurra Chine reservoirs, these have high levels of associated H2S, which might require signiﬁ cant capital to develop (Afren, 2015).

214 214 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

(a) Ain Sifni Ain Al Safra Atrush Akri-Bijeel Banan Ber Bahr Bakrman Taq Taq Taq Shaikan Demir Dagh Zey Gawra Summail Benenan Peshkabir Bastora Garmain Bina Bawi Miran Kurdamir Chemchemal* Topkhana Chia Surkh Barda Rash Swara Tika* Taza Sheikh Adi Khurmala Dome* Kor Mor* Tawke 4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500 2P reserves 2,000

1,500

1,000 Contingent 2C 500 Estimate of Recoverable Reserves (MMBOE) Reserves of Recoverable Estimate 0 Data from operator Competent Persons Reports and published reserve / resource estimates and Wood Mackenzie (*) July 2013 Figure 19: (a) Fields, discoveries and estimated reserves. Figures are taken from operator Competent Person Reports (CPR) or published statements of reserves. If no ﬁgures are available then they are from Wood Mackenzie (July 2013 report, as indicated on the chart). The ﬁgures represent either 2P (proven and probable) and where available 2C recoverable reserves. The graph indicates that 9 discoveries are deemed to have recoverable reserves in excess of 0.5 billion barrels of oil, whilst there are 17 discoveries with in excess of 100 MMBOE.

(b) 1,200 200,000 1 = DNO 2006 Annual Report 1,050 2 = DNO 2007 Annual Report 3 = DNO 2008 Annual Report 8 4 = DNO 2010 Annual Report 900 5 = DNO 2011 Annual Report 150,000 6 = DNO 2012 Annual Report 750 7 = DNO Statement of Reserves 2013 6 8 = DNO PR 11 June 2013 5 7 600 100,000 Reserves Production 450

300 50,000 4 2P Recoverable Reserves (MMBO) Reserves Recoverable 2P

150 23 (bopd) Capacity / Production Production 1 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Figure 19: (b) Published reserves and production profile for the Tawke Field since discovery. Tawke was the first new discovery to be made in Kurdistan. Reserves have increased from an initial estimate of 100 MMBO in 2006 to a current estimate of 713 MMBO in 2013 (gross remaining reserves). The cumulative production at end 2013 was 63.4 MMBO. All numbers are taken from the operator’s annual reports or official press releases (www.dno.no).

Horizontal Wells and 3-D Seismic

Many carbonate reservoirs in Kurdistan have low matrix porosity and low matrix permeability. At times these reservoirs are highly fractured resulting in improved productivity. In such settings, horizontal wells are often effective at intersecting high-angle fracture systems and in maximising ﬂ ow rates whilst minimising pressure draw-down. Horizontal wells have been used extensively in carbonate reservoirs around the world, especially so since the advent of reliable 3-D seismic data in the 1990s.

215 215 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

To date there have been just 10 horizontal wells in Kurdistan, nine in the Tawke Field and one in the Bastora Field. These wells have all been planned and drilled on 3-D seismic data. Two of the horizontal wells completed in the Tawke Field, Tawke-20 and Tawke-23, were brought on-stream during 2013 at rates of 25,000 bopd and 32,500 bopd respectively, some of the highest fl ow rates in Kurdistan to-date (Genel Energy, 2014c). Two additional wells, Tawke-21 and Tawke-22 were brought on stream in 2014 and production was initiated at a combined rate of 37,000 bopd. In one of the new wells, Tawke-21, eight productive fracture corridors penetrated by a 980-metre horizontal section in the main Cretaceous reservoir interval fl owed an average rate of 9,700 bopd each. In the other well, Tawke-22, located six km away, seven productive fracture corridors penetrated by an 800-metre horizontal section fl owed an average rate of 8,800 bopd each. Both wells are subject to wellbore and surface facilities limitations (Genel Energy, 2015). A further fi ve horizontal wells were drilled in 2014 (DNO, 2014).

The Bastora-1 Well is signifi cant due to the fl ow rates achieved from the horizontal well. Although less than 2,000 bopd, the rates were four times higher than those achieved from the vertical well in the same reservoir interval (DNO, 2012b). The fi rst horizontal well was planned for the Taq Taq Field in 2014 (Genel Energy, 2014c) and high-angle wells have been drilled on the Miran and Benenan fi elds.

Horizontal drilling is relatively new to Kurdistan, largely due to the fact that there are few appraised ﬁ elds with 3-D seismic data over them. However, the results of these early wells are very encouraging. As more 3-D seismic surveys are acquired, and more advanced processing (such as pre-stack depth migration and seismic inversion) are undertaken, it is likely that many more horizontal and high- angle wells will be drilled potentially commercialising low-porosity/permeability reservoirs that might otherwise remain unexploited.

FUTURE TRENDS IN KURDISTAN

The transformation of Kurdistan into a new and signiﬁ cant oil region over the last decade has been remarkable. The time line of events shows some of the key milestones that have been achieved in the last decade (Table 6). It is highly probable that technical and commercial success rates will remain high whilst four-way dip closures are still available for new ﬁ eld wildcat drilling. More 3-D seismic surveys will be acquired and these will no doubt reveal additional complexities which 2-D seismic is unable to illuminate. It is possible that 3-D seismic, in certain conditions, could identify areas of possible better reservoir development and perhaps even hydrocarbons.

Horizontal and multilateral wells are likely to be essential in the development of many fi elds and multilateral drilling and fracture proping may prove cost effective in some instances. As fi elds are developed, water injection may well be required to sustain and enhance production levels and recovery effi ciency as has happened in other carbonate provinces. This may place a strain on water resources. A number of accumulations have discovered large volumes of heavy oil (API < 20°) and these are likely to require the use of enhanced oil recovery methods such as thermal or solvent techniques to facilitate commercial recovery. High levels of hydrogen sulphide gas will necessitate the use of specialist

processing facilities, such as amine gas treatment, to remove or signiﬁ cantly reduce H2S and in some

cases CO2 concentrations.

As more ﬁ elds come into full production, the understanding of the dynamic behaviour of the reservoirs will improve dramatically. Given the number and variety of carbonate reservoirs in the region it is very probable that stratigraphically trapped hydrocarbons will continue to be discovered. Pure stratigraphic traps are unlikely to be signiﬁ cant targets until dip and fault closed structures are all drilled out.

The industry has been surprised by the discovery of the hydrocarbon reservoirs in ever yet deeper stratigraphy. The Triassic is proving to be an important contributor to the reserve base in Kurdistan, not least because the hydrocarbons that have been discovered are generally lighter (higher API, higher GOR and more mobile) and of higher pressure than shallower discoveries. It is very probable that hydrocarbons will continue to be discovered in older Triassic strata and probably within the Permian and perhaps even within Carboniferous strata although very few wells have thus far targeted levels

216 216 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Table 6: Time Line of Signiﬁ cant Events from 2002 to 2014

Year Milestone New Operator 2002 First PSA awarded to Genel. Taq Taq Genel Enerji 2003 Iraq War Petoil, Prime Natural Resources 2004 DNO, Western Zagros 2005 Iraq Constitution adopted. Tawke 1: ﬁ rst well in Kurdistan Region for 25 years. First Cenozoic and Cretaceous discoveries. 2006 Taq Taq-4 discovery in Cretaceous reservoirs KNOC, Reliance, Heritage, A&T, Addax 2007 First PSAs signed following passing of the oil and gas law Sterling Energy, Aspect, Hunt, OMV, Dana Gas, Perenco, MOL, Hillwood, Gulf Keystone, Norbest (TNK BP)

2008 Discoveries at Miran, Shaikan, Kurdamir. First Jurassic and Triassic Niko Resources, Hawler, Oil Search, discoveries. Taq Taq-10 appraisal well fl ows > 44,000 bopd. Komet, Talisman, Vast 2009 Tawke Field connected to export pipeline. First oil exports. Shamaran, Longford Kurdistan oil exports 100,000 bopd. 2010 Kurdamir and Akri-Bijeel discoveries Murphy, Petroquest, Marathon, GasPlus 2011 Genel Energy listed on UK stock market ExxonMobil, Hess, Repsol, Afren, Genel Energy, Oryx 2012 Bastora-1 First horizontal well in Kurdistan. Chia Surkh-10 (First Taqa, Gazprom, Chevron, Total well on the structure since 1954) fl ows > 11,000 bopd. 2013 1st Tawke horizontal well fl ows 8,000 bopd. Exxon spud fi rst well in Turkish Entity Kurdistan. Construction of pipeline infrastructure. 2014 Oil exports reach 300,000 bopd 2015 Oil export reach 450,000 bopd

below the Upper Triassic. Given the wide variety of hydrocarbon qualities discovered in the region, it is probable that there would be beneﬁ t in blending crudes, which might facilitate higher overall exports from the region.

There is an increasing need for a regional and industry-wide understanding of petroleum systems and seal effi ciency in Kurdistan. Signifi cant unknowns include the timing of generation versus trap formation, the importance of vertical migration and especially seal effi ciency, the role of thrusts and strike-slip faults in migration effi ciency. Kurdistan does not have a public release mechanism for data although in-country operators are increasingly able to trade data, with the approval and facilitation of the MNR. This should lead to improvements in exploration effi ciency and a better understanding of drilling practices, stratigraphy, facies variations and petroleum systems in the region.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

For almost a decade, our colleagues Tarik Chalabi, George Yaku and Azad Tahir Saeed have provided invaluable guidance on Iraqi geology, ﬁ eld locations and thoughts on hydrocarbon prospectivity in northern Iraq. Our ideas have also been shaped by our many colleagues at Petroceltic International and the Ministry of Natural Resources. The authors would speciﬁ cally like to thank Joseph English, Dermot Corcoran, Ciaran Nolan, Paul Ryan and Sean McDade (Petroceltic), Andrew Horbury (Cambridge Carbonates) and John Bounds (Blueasterisk cartography) for valuable input to the manuscript. We also acknowledge valuable input from the team at GeoArabia including Moujahed Al-Husseini, Nestor “Nino” Buhay IV and Kathy Breining. Cara Burberry’s input is also gratefully appreciated. Thanks also to Petroceltic International and the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Kurdistan Regional Government for their continued support and permission to publish this manuscript.

All reserve ﬁ gures and well results detailed in this paper are taken from public domain sources and the authors have made best efforts to ensure that these are correct at the time of going to press. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their respective organisations.

217 217 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

REFERENCES

Addax Petroleum 2008. Welcome to the Kurdistan Region of Iraq! Corporate presentation, October 2008, 49 p. Addax Petroleum 2009. Capital Markets Day presentation, 23-24th March 2009, 100 p. Afren 2011. Letter of opinion of the Barda Rash Field, Kurdistan Resources, April 2011. Letter from RPS Energy to Afren directors dated 19th April 2011. (www.afren.com). Afren 2012a. Afren plc competent persons report on Barda Rash. RPS Energy to Afren directors dated 26th March 2012. (www. afren.com). Afren 2015. Update on Barda Rash, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, 12th January 2015. (www.afren.com). Al-Ameri, T.K. and J. Zumberge 2012. Middle and Upper Jurassic hydrocarbon potential of the Zagros Fold Belt, North Iraq. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 36, p. 13-34, doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.04.004. Al-Hadidy, A. 2007. Paleozoic stratigraphic lexicon and hydrocarbon habitat of Iraq. GeoArabia, v. 12, no. 1, p. 63-130. Alavi, M. 2004. Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution. American Journal of Science, v. 304, p. 1-20. Aqrawi, A.A.M., J.C. Goff, A.D. Horbury and F.N. Sadooni 2010. The petroleum geology of Iraq. Scientifi c Press Ltd, Beaconsfi eld, UK, 424 p. Baker, N.E. and F.R.S. Henson 1952. Geological conditions of oil occurrence in Middle East fi elds. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 36, no. 10, p. 1885-1901. Busk, H.G. 1929. Earth Flexures: Their Geometry and their Representation and Analysis in Geological Section with Special Reference to the Problem of Oil Finding. Cambridge University Press, London, 106 p. Carstens, H. 2006. Targeting giants in Kurdistan. GeoExpro, v. 3, no. 1, p. 14-20. Chevron Corporation 2013. Chevron second quarter report. News release, 2nd August, 2013. (www.chevron.com). CH2M Hill 2013. CH2M Hill Selected to provide project management consultancy services for the Iraq Common Seawater Supply Project. Press release, 19th March, 2013. (www.ch2m.com). Csontos, L., T. Pocsai, Á. Sasvari and I. Knocz 2011. Geology and petroleum systems of Akri-Bijeel Block, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Focus, p. 16-23. (www.mol.hu). Csontos, L., Á. Sasvári, T. Pocsai, L. Kósa, A.T. Salae and A. Ali 2012. Structural evolution of the northwestern Zagros, Kurdistan Region, Iraq: Implications on oil migration. GeoArabia, v. 17, no. 2, p. 81-116. Dana Gas 2013. Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum restore full LPG capacity in Kurdistan. Press release, 22nd July 2013. (http:// www.danagas.com/en/pressrelease/media-center/press-releases/dana-gas-and-crescent-petroleum-restore-full-lpg- capacity-in-kurdistan.html). Dana Gas 2014. Project operations, Iraq, Kurdistan Region. Dana Gas web site. (http://www.danagas.com/en/project/ operations/iraq/kurdistan-region.html). DNO 2004. DNO signs agreement for Kurdistan. Press release, 29th June 2004. (www.dno.no). DNO 2005a. Status northern Iraq. Press release, 29th November 2005. (www.dno.no). DNO 2005b. Drilling status, northern Iraq. Press release, 22nd December 2005. (www.dno.no). DNO 2011. First horizontal well in Kurdistan. Corporate presentation presented at Iraq Future Energy Conference, Istanbul, 26-29th September 2011, p. 29. (www.dno.no). DNO 2012a. DNO international announces successful completion and testing of Tawke 16 Well in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Press release, 21st March 2012. (www.dno.no). DNO 2012b. DNO presentation at Macquarie Explorers Conference. (http://hugin.info/36/R/1575892/490952.pdf, www.dno.no). DNO 2013a. Interim presentation 2013, 2nd quarter, 21st August 2013. (www.dno.no). DNO 2013b. DNO International announces Jurassic discovery, successful horizontal drilling in Tawke license. Press release, 11th June 2013. (www.dno.no). DNO 2014. Interim report 2014, fi rst quarter, 20 p. (http://hugin.info/36/R/1783669/610930.pdf). DNO 2015. DNO reaffi rms commitment to Kurdistan. Press release, 4th March 2015 (www.dno.no). Driedger, D.J., S.P. Kelly, C. Leggett, J. Thain and M. Silva 2013. Managed pressure drilling technique applied in a Kurdistan exploration well. Proceedings of the 18th Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference 2013 (MEOS 2013), Manama, Bahrain, 10-13th March 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 164403. Dunnington, H.V. 1958-2005. Generation, migration, accumulation, and dissipation of oil in northern Iraq. Habitat of Oil (Ed. L.G. Weeks). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 1194-1251. Reprinted by GeoArabia, 2005, v. 10, no. 2, p. 39-84. Dunnington, H.V. 1967. Stratigraphical distribution of oil fi elds in the Iraq-Iran-Arabia basin. Journal Institute of Petroleum, v. 53, p. 129-161. English, J.M., G.A. Lunn, L. Ferreira and G. Yaku 2015. Geologic evolution of the Iraqi Zagros, and its infl uence on the distribution of hydrocarbons in the Kurdistan Region. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 99, no. 2, p. 231-272, doi: 10.1306/06271413205. Falola, T. and A. Genova 2005. The Politics of the Global Oil Industry: An Introduction. Praeger, Westport, CT, 280 p., ISBN: 0-275-98400-1. Garland, C.R., I. Abalioglu, L. Akca, A. Cassidy, Y. Chiffoleau, L. Godail, M.A.S. Grace, H.J. Kader, F. Khalek, H. Legarre, H.B. Nazhat and B. Sallier 2010. Appraisal and development of the Taq Taq Field, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Petroleum Geology Conference series 2010, v. 7; p. 801-810, doi: 10.1144/0070801. Genel Energy Plc 2012. A new force in E&P. Capital Markets Day presentation. Genel Energy, corporate presentation, 23rd February 2012. (www.genelenergy.com). Genel Energy Plc 2013. Bank of America Merrill Lynch Annual Oil and Gas Investor Forum. Genel Energy, corporate presentation, April 2013. (www.genelenergy.com). Genel Energy Plc 2014a. Trading and operations update, 15th January 2014. (www.genelenergy.com). Genel Energy Plc 2014b. Preliminary audited results for the year ended 31st December 2013. Published 6th March 2014. (www. genelenergy.com). Genel Energy Plc 2014c. Investor presentation. May 2014. (www.genelenergy.com). (http://www.genelenergy.com/ media/43556/Genel%20company%20presentation%20May%202014.pdf). Genel Energy Plc 2015. Trading and operations update, 21st January 2015. (www.genelenergy.com).

218 218 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Exploration history, Kurdistan, Iraq

Gulf Keystone 2009. Shaikan resource review. Corporate presentation, 22nd October 2009. Detailing the range of potential resources from the Jurassic of the Shaikan-1 Well, Kurdistan. Gulf Keystone 2012. Kurdistan operational update. RNS number 1140Z, 12th March 2012. (www.gulfkeystone.com). Gulf Keystone 2013. Listing particulars dated 29th November 2013. Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited. (www.gulfkeystone.com). Gulf Keystone 2014a. Macquarie Oil and Gas Explorers. Corporate presentation, January 2014. (www.gulfkeystone.com). Gulf Keystone 2014b. Interim management statement, 14th May 2014. (http://ir1.euroinvestor.com/asp/ir/GulfKeystone/ NewsRead.aspx?storyid=12813814&ishtml=1). Harstad, A.O., N.A. Bang and T.A. Chalabi 2010. Exploration and development of the Tawke oilfi eld in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. First Break, v. 28, no. 2, p. 71-75. Jassim, S.Z. and J.C. Goff 2006. Geology of Iraq. Dolin, Prague and Moravian Museure, Brno, Czech Republic, 341 p. Kurdistan Regional Government 2002. Taq Taq PSA between Genel Enerji and the Interim Joint Regional Administration of Northern Iraq (Regional Government, Sulaimaniyah), dated 17th July 2002, 49 p. (http://www.krg.org/p/p. aspx?l=12&r=296&h=1&s=030000&p=166). Kurdistan Regional Government 2003. PSA between PetOil Petroleum and Petroleum Products International Exploration and Production Inc and Interim Joint Regional Administration of Northern Iraq (Regional Government, Sulaimaniyah), dated 10th January, 2003, 59 p. (http://www.krg.org/p/p.aspx?l=12&r=296&h=1&s=030000&p=179). Kurdistan Regional Government 2004. PSA between DNO ASA and The Kurdistan Regional Government (Dihok Area Governorate), dated 25th June 2004, 67 p. (http://www.krg.org/p/p.aspx?l=12&r=296&h=1&s=030000&p=33). Kurdistan Regional Government 2007. Kurdistan Blocks. (http://cabinet.gov.krd/pdf/4_Kurdistan_Blocks.pdf). Law, A., D. Munn, A. Symms, D. Wilson, S. Hattingh, R. Boblecki, K. Al Marei, P. Chernik, D. Parry and J. Ho 2014. Competent person’s report on certain petroleum interests of Gulf Keystone Petroleum and its subsidiaries in Kurdistan, Iraq. ERC Equipoise Ltd, 114 p. (http://www.gulfkeystone.com/media/79962/gkp_cpr-report-2014.pdf). Lawa, F.A., H. Koyi and A. Ibrahim 2013. Tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the NW segment of the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt, Kurdistan, NE Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 36, no. 1, p. 75-96. Marathon Oil Corporation 2012. Howard Weil 2012 Energy Conference, 26th March 2012. Marathon Oil Corporation 2013a. Business update, 11th November 2013. Marathon Oil Corporation 2013b. Marathon Oil Corporation reports fourth quarter and full-year 2012 results. Press release, 6th February 2013. Marathon Oil Corporation 2013c. Marathon Oil announces Mirawa discovery in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Press release, 30th October 2013. MOL 2013. MOL fi nancial and operating performance. MOL Group annual report 2012. (http://www.mol.hu/ annualreport2012/uploads/fi le/pdf/2012/fi nancial-and-operating-performance.pdf). MOL 2015. 2014 Fourth quarter and annual results of MOL Group. (http://molgroup.info/images/qt/2014_Q4_Flash_ Report_Final_ENG.pdf). Morrow, N.R. 1990. Wettability and its effect on oil recovery: SPE Distinguished Author series, Journal of Petroleum Technology, v. 42, p. 1476-1484. Oryx Petroleum 2013. Oryx Petroleum announces oil discovery at Ain Al Safra. Press Release, 24th October 2013. (http:// www.oryxpetroleum.com/data/news/Oryx_Petroleum_Press_Release_AAS-1_Discovery_FINAL.pdf). Oryx Petroleum 2014a. Annual information form. Year ended 31st December 2013. (http://www.oryxpetroleum.com/data/ fi nancial/2014_AIF.pdf). Oryx Petroleum 2014b. Oryx Petroleum announces appraisal drilling update for Demir Dagh in Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Press release, 19th May 2014. (http://www.oryxpetroleum.com/data/news/Oryx_Petroleum_Press_Release_DD3&5.pdf). Oryx Petroleum 2015. Oryx Petroleum corporate presentation, January 2015. (http://www.oryxpetroleum.com/data/ presentations/Oryx_Petroleum_Corporate_Presentation_09-01-2015.pdf). Pitman, J.K., D. Steinshouer and M.D. Lewan 2004. Petroleum generation and migration in the Mesopotamian Basin and Zagros Fold Belt of Iraq: Results from a basin-modeling study. GeoArabia, v. 9, no. 4, p. 41-72. Preining, P. and D. Nazhat 2013. Advantages and achievements of multiphase managed pressure drilling on exploratory well in Sarsang block in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition (MEDT 2013), Delivering Future Energy Through People, Technology, and Standards, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 7-9th October 2013. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 166725. Ryder Scott Company 2011. Estimated unrisked discovered and undiscovered total petroleum initially in place attributable to certain interests in the Shaikan License Block, Kurdistan, Iraq. Report prepared for Gulf Keystone Petroleum Ltd, January 2011. Shamaran Petroleum Corporation 2013. Corporate presentation, Stockholm, September 2013. (www.shamaranpetroleum.com). Shamaran Petroleum Corporation 2014. Corporate presentation, Pareto Securities Annual Natural Resources Day. Stockholm, 21st May 2014. (www.shamaranpetroleum.com). Shamaran Petroleum Corporation 2015a. Corporate presentation, January 2015. (http://www.shamaranpetroleum.com/i/ pdf/2015-01_SNMCP.pdf). Shamaran Petroleum Corporation 2015b. Shamaran announces successful testing of the Atrush-3 Well. Press release, 16th February 2015. (www.shamaranpetroleum.com). Sissakian, V.K. 1997. Geological map of Arbeel and Mahabad quadrangles. Sheets: NJ-38- 14 and NJ-38–15, Scale 1:250,000. State Establishment of Geological Survey and Mining (GEOSURV), Baghdad, Iraq. Sorkhabi, R. 2008. The centenary of the fi rst oil well in the Middle East. GeoExpro, v. 5, no. 5, p. 76-80. Sterling Energy Plc 2011a. Investor presentation, April 2011. (www.sterlingenergyuk.com). Sterling Energy Plc 2011b. Results for the 6 months ending 30 June 2011 (http://www.sterlingenergyuk.com/pdf/fi nancial- reports/SterlingEnergyplc6monthsending30062011.pdf). Sterling Energy Plc, 2012. Corporate presentation. Repositioning for future growth in Africa. Africa Oil Week, 30th October 2012, 24 p. (www.sterlingenergyuk.com). Talisman Energy 2014. Investor open house, North Sea and Kurdistan, May 2014. (http://www.talisman-energy.com/upload/ media_element/20140521120408/North%20Sea%20and%20Kurdistan.pdf). The Oil and Gas Year, Kurdistan Region of Iraq 2009. Wildcat Publishing, 232 p. ISBN 978-1-906975-04-3. Vallares 2011. Vallares PLC prospectus, 433 p. (www.genelenergy.com/media/12216/prospectus.pdf).

219 219 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 Mackertich and Samarrai

van Bellen, R.C., H.V. Dunnington, R. Wetzel and D.M. Morton 1959-2005. Lexique Stratigraphique International. 03 10 Asie, (Iraq), 333 pages. Reprinted by permission of CNRS by Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain. Vast Exploration Inc 2009. The Kurdistan Opportunity, Qara Dagh Block. Corporate presentation, November 2009. Vast Exploration Inc 2011. The Kurdistan Opportunity, Qara Dagh Block. Corporate presentation, November 2011. Weber, K.J. and M. Bakker 1981. Fracture and vuggy porosity. Proceedings of the 56th Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Fall Technical Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1981, SPE paper 10332, 11 p. Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2010a. Corporate presentation, March 2010. (http://www.westernzagros.com/investors/ presentations-conferences). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2010b. News release, 13th October 2010. (http://www.westernzagros.com/2010/10/ westernzagros-concludes-kurdamir-1-well-control-operations-and-prepares-to-test-the-lower-oligocene). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2011. Managing oil and gas exploration risk in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Presentation given at the World Independent & Junior Oil and Gas Congress, London, UK, 26-28th September, 2011. (http://www. westernzagros.com/documents/ManagingOilandGasExplorationRiskintheKurdistanRegionofIraqPresentation- Sept26_11.pdf). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2013. Iraq Petroleum 2013, Kurdistan Region’s notable oil and gas discoveries, Awakening a Kurdish oil giant. Corporate presentation, 19th June 2013. (http://www.westernzagros.com/wp-content/ uploads/2013/06/CWC-Iraq-Petroleum-June-19-2013.pdf). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2014a. Kurdistan and northern Iraq operator activity map, 12th May 2014. (http://www. westernzagros.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/140512_operator_activity_EXTERNAL.pdf). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2014b. Converting discoveries into light oil production. Corporate presentation, June 2014, 38 p. (http://www.westernzagros.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/2014-June-WZR-Corporate-Presentation.pdf). Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2015a. Reserve and resource tables. (http://www.westernzagros.com/ouroperations/reserves- and-resources/reserve-and-resource-tables/) Western Zagros Resources Ltd 2015b. Fueling our futures. Corporate presentation, February 2015. (http://www.westernzagros. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015-February-WZR-Corporate-Presentation.pdf). Wood Mackenzie 2013. Iraq country overview. Middle East – NW Arabia Upstream Service, July 2013, 47 p. (www.woodmac.com).

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

David Mackertich is an Exploration Geologist who has been working with Petroceltic International since their entry into Kurdistan in 2009. Prior to this he was employed by Gulf Keystone where he led the technical team that helped acquire the company’s interests in the Shaikan and Akri-Bijeel blocks in late 2007. Between 1991 and 2003 he worked for Hess Corporation in the UK, Denmark and Malaysia. David holds an MBA from London Business School, and MSc in Petroleum Geology from University College Dublin, Ireland and is a Fellow of the Geological Society of London. [email protected]

Adnan Samarrai is a geologist, explorer and a key technical advisor in the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), Iraq. Adnan received his BSc degree in Geology in 1962 from the University of Baghdad, Iraq. He commenced work in 1962 with Binnie & Partners later moving to the Iraq Petroleum Company (IPC) and then to the North Oil Company (NOC). Prior to joining the Ministry of Natural Resources, Adnan was Country Manager for Gulf Keystone in Kurdistan where he played a signiﬁ cant role in the capture of the company’s acreage in the country and the discovery of the Shaikan Field. Adnan is an Emeritus Member of the AAPG and Fellow of the Geological Society of London. [email protected]

Manuscript submitted December 20, 2014

Revised January 20, 2015

Accepted February 9, 2015

220 220 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/geoarabia/article-pdf/20/2/181/4568154/mackertich.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021