Pollination Biology of Heracleum Sphondylium L. (Apiaceae). the Advantages of Being White and Compact

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pollination Biology of Heracleum Sphondylium L. (Apiaceae). the Advantages of Being White and Compact Vol.7l. No.2: 163-170.2002 ACTA SOCIETATISBOTANICORUM POLONIAE 163 POLLINATION BIOLOGY OF HERACLEUMSPHONDYLIUM L. (APIACEAE). THE ADVANTAGES OF BEING WHITE AND COMPACT MeRcnI ZYCH WarsawUniversity Botanic Garden Aleje Ujazdowskie4,00-478 Warszawa, Poland e-mail:[email protected]. pl (Received:August l,zmL. Accepted:February Il,2OO2) ABSTRACT Two questions were addressedin the present study: ( I ) What are the main pollinators of the two subspeciesof H. sphondylium?, and (2) Do the studied plants sharethe pollinators' set or are they attractive for different groups of insects?The survey showed that among 40 insect taxa visiting both subspeciesof H. sphondylium approx. only 53Vo caried significant pollen loads. However, the Pollinator Importance Coefficient (IC) calculated for each insect group, and based on observation of insects' abundance,within-umbel activity and pollen load revealed that only two taxa in case of H. s. ssp.sibiicum (Thicops nigifrons, Eiozona syrphoides) and four in case of H. s. ssp.sphondylium (T. nigifrons, E. syrphoides,Meliscaeva cinctella and Arge ustulata) were truly important polli- nators. Although both subspecieswere visited by similar insects, H. s. ssp. sphondylium, with its characteristic compact and white umbels, was visited more frequently by Diptera and Hymenoptera, while yellow-greenish loose umbels of H. s. ssp,sibiricum were preferred by Coleoptera.This paper indicates that the concept of faithful pollinators may also apply to a broader spectrum of Apiaceae,usually consideredprimitive in terms of pollination strategies,and suggestspossible ways of differentiation in two closely related taxa. KEY WORDS: Heracleum sphondylium L., Diptera, colour morphs, pollination, pollinator importance. INTRODUCTION tegazzianum(Grace and Nelson 1981) showed a considera- ble difference in pollinators' importance. Analysis of in- For the last decade the traditional view of plant pollina- sect visitors of two American umbelliferean genera Tha- tion systemshas been questionedwith arising evidencefor spium and Zizia showed that for most pollinations (up to widespread generalisation of plant pollination strategies 75Vo) orly few insect species were responsible (Lindsey and opinion that the previously accepted idea of a direct 1984). It is also noteworthy that in case of closely related link between the observed floral traits and pollinators mi- H. sphondylium and H. mantegazzianum,growing sympa- ght not be so simple (Waser et al. 1996; Johnson and Stei- trically in a mixed population and characterisedby similar ner 2000). As shown by different authors, plants conside- pollination systems,different pollinators' assemblageswe- red specialised may be pollinated by a considerablenum- re observed (Grace and Nelson 1981). It may have been ber of taxa (Beattie 1971), and primitive species,as those caused by the difference in heights of the inflorescence. 'faithful of Apiaceae, could have pollinators' (Bell 1971). A similar situation may probably be found in other closely The descriptions of flower visitors of Apiaceae list nu- related taxa. merous insectsbelonging from severalto a few hundred ta- Apart of inflorescenceheight, flower colour and symme- xa (Drabble and Drabble 1917, 1927; Corbet 1970; Bell try may be responsible for attracting different groups of 1971; Grace and Nelson 1981; Lindsey 1984; Sheppard pollinators (Faegri and van der Pijl 1979; Proctor, Yeo and 1991; Proctor, Yeo and Lack 1996; Dlussky 1998; Lam- Lack 1996). Usually this kind of studies are conducted on bom and Ollerton 2000), only for the dipteran family Ta- the level of genera, species or for artificial flowers (e.g. chinidae Karczewski (196'7) describes33 speciesobserved Lunau 1993; Johnson and Dafni 1998). There are very few on flowers of H. sphondylium. works that focus on the consequencesof intraspecific dif- More recent studies however reveal that flower visitors ferences on the successof individuals (Herrera 1996). are not synonymous with pollinators. For example pollen Such relationship was found for two colour morphs of loads and number of visits to different speciesof Angelica Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae).In a mixed white- (Bell and Lindsey 1978) and H. sphondylium and H. man' and yellow-flowered population, individuals with yellow POLLINATION OF HERACLEU M SPHONDYLIUM ZychM. flowers were found more attractive for butterfly and hover- Study site fly pollinators (Kay 1976). Also evidence for selection of The observations were conducted in two sites in the flower colour was presented in Delphinium nelsonii same forest complex in Wigry National Park (NE Poland), (Waser and Price 1983). Further analysis of closely related the distance between the two populations was approx. 3 taxa with different flower morphology could be useful for km. The population of 11.s. ssp. sphondylium was situated tracing the possible ways of evolution of features connect- near the village Krzywe in the forest clearance approx. 50 ed with sexual reproduction and subsequentlyto show the m from the road Suwalki-Sejny (road no. 660), and the existing trends of speciesdifferentiation (Herrera 1996). So population of H. s. ssp,sibiicum on the border of the for- far no evidence on this matter has been presented for est sections 133 and 134. Both grew in similar habitat con- Apiaceae. ditions, along the forest road in mixed spruce-pine forest, Among European species Heracleum sphondylium L. and consistedof similar number of individuals. (hogweed) may serve as possible object for similar studies. Two of its subspecies(f1. s. ssp. sphondylium and ly'. s. ssp. Field observations sibiicum), formerly considered separatespecies, differ in Field observationswere conductedon23-21 July of 1998. flower and inflorescence morphology. The former has a These four days representedthe peak of flowering for the white corolla with flowers with elongated petals arranged primary umbels, also the weather was good enough to make on the edge of an umbel, while the later has greenishpetals the observationspossible. Only primary umbels with at le- 'edge with no such effect' (Gawlowska 1961, Sheppard ast50Vo of flowers in the male phasewere chosenfor obse- 1991).It seemspossible that thesefloral characteristicsmay rvations. This restriction was implied by the fact that main- serye as attractants for different groups of pollinators which ly these umbels are responsiblefor seedproduction (Shep- would create a mechanism of differentiation between the pard 1991). The observation started at 8.30 a.m. (the first two related taxa. recording) and ended at 7.00 p.m. (the last capturing). The In the present study I was especially interested in time was chosen on the basis of earlier observationsrevea- answering the following questions: ling that before 8.00 a.m. and after 7.00 p.m. flowers of ho- (1) What are the main pollinators of the two subspecies gweed are visited by insectsonly occasionally. of H. sphondylium? Every day eleven rounds of observationswere conducted (2) Do the plants studied share the pollinators' set or are (except 24rh July - nine rounds, observations stopped by they rather attractive for different groups of insects? rain; and 25th- two rounds). Each round lasted t hour and comprised of three phases: random choice of an umbel, video recording, and insect capturing. MATERIAL AND METHODS Once selectedumbels were not excluded from the next round and therefore it was possible that the same umbel H eracl eum sphondylium L. was observedtwice or more times. H. sphondylium is a perennial (hemicryptophyte) (Rabot- After an umbel had been selected it was stick bound to nov 1956, Sheppard 1991), not a biennial as often stated prevent it from wind-causedmovements. Then for 10 min- (e.g. Brummitt 1968), with cauline leaves arrangedin a ro- utes insect activities were recorded using an 8 mm video sette producing erect flower stems up to 3 m tall. It is wi- camera (Sony TR-3200). The camera was set on a tripod at despread in forests and woodland clearings, riverbanks, a distance of about 0.5 m from the umbel. The recording and tall montane-herb grasslands(Sheppard 1991). In Po- field covered the total umbel surface. 20 minutes after land it is usually described as a common meadow species recording, for l0 minutes, all the insects visiting an umbel (Gawlowska i956), growing also in thickets, on roadsides were collcted either with enthomological net (Diptera, and forest fringes (Rutkowski 1998). Its geographicalran- Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera) or directly to plastic vials ge includes most of the European countries, except the (Coleoptera,Hemiptera). Insects were killed with ethyl extreme north, parts of the Mediteranean region and some acelate and stored dry for further investigations of their Atlantic and Mediterranean islands (Brummitt 1968; Shep- pollen loads. Aphids and other small, sap sucking insects pard 1991). (e.g. Thysanoptera)were excluded from the analysis. H. sphondylium rcproduces mainly by seeds;vegetative division of root stock, although occasionally occurring, is Pollen loads analysis not important (Sheppard 1991). The open, protoandrous For investigation of pollen loads carried by insects visit- flowers, arrangedin compound umbels, are antomophilous ing flowers of H. sphondylium amodified method of Grace with insects visiting flowers for pollen and nectar excluded and Nelson (1981) and Lidsey (1984) was used.An insect by exposed swollen base of the style called stylopodium. was put on the microscopic slide and pollen from its body Most of the flowers are actinomorphic,
Recommended publications
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough
    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 11 North West Leicestershire Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2006 - 2009
    Leicestershire & Rutland Environmental Records Centre Map 11 North West Leicestershire Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2006 - 2009 Section: SK4624, SK4724, SK4824, SK4623, SK4723, SK4823 Leicestershire County Council. Licence number LA 076724 Scale 1:10000 AA WW III AA AA AA AA SWSW SWSW SIGSIG SWSW SWSW SWSW AA AA AA 44 AA AA AA AA AA AA AA SWSW AA SWSW AA DSDS SWSW SWSW AA WW AA WW AA AA WW AA AA AA 88 III AA WW AA WW III AA 1010 44 III 99 AA III AA III AA AA III AA AA AA AA WW 33 AA AA AA WW AA AA AA AA AA WpWp 1111 22 1111 SWSW III III III III AA 1212 III WW SK4624SK4624 WpWp SK4724SK4724 III SK4824SK4824 SK4924SK4924 22 AA SK4624SK4624 III SK4724SK4724 SK4824SK4824 SK4924SK4924 AA WW III WW III 22 AA WW III AA III III III SWW III 77 AA 44 77 55 AA 44 AA WW 66 PP WpWp AA 1515 AA WpWp AA III WW AA 5P5P AA 33 5P5P WW 33 WW 22 55 III 1414 SWSW AA SWSW III AA AA SWSW AA AA AA AA SWSW AA SWSW AA III SWSW PP III WW 11 1313 GG PP AA WW44 11 WW 11 WW WmWm GG WW 11 SWSW WmWm SWSW PP 22 11 44 WW 55 66 22 22 AA WW 22 SWSW AA WW AMAM 1010 III 44 III AA III III AA AA AA AA AA 33 AA 33 AA 1717 AA 1919 WW 55 33 AA AA WW 55 GG AA WW AA 55 1818 SWSW PP AA SNGSNG GG III 22 III 1414 GG 1818 AMAM WW III 66 III 1616 III 11 22 III 1111 WW AA SWSW III AA 1111 GG 1313 III AA GG GG GG III AA GG AA12121010 99 1212 GG SIGSIG GG 99 88 99 88 SIGSIG AA 1111 77 1111 SIGSIG TRTR III 99 SIGSIG 77 TRTR1515 1313 99 1717 77 1414 1313 III III SNGSNG 1515 66 III WW III III 55 WW AA III 55 SK4623SK4623 III III SK4723SK4723
    [Show full text]
  • SECTION 2 PLANT LIST for Churchyards Only Include One
    SECTION 2 PLANT LIST for Churchyards Only include one record per species See handout 9 for information on DAFOR Dates of surveys: 15th May, 20th June, 15th July, 30th July, 12th August Name of Churchyard and location: St Lawrence, Ingworth 2016 Name of surveyor/s: Cornell Howells, Daniel Lavery, Matthew Mcdade, David Taylor and Emily Nobbs (NWT) Scientific name DAFOR Comments / Common name Please tick relevant box GPS or Grid Reference location D A F O R Oxeye daisy leucanthemum vulgare x pignut conopodium majus x Lady’s bedstraw galium verum x Germander speedwell veronica chamaedrys x Bulbous buttercup ranunculus bulbosus x Meadow buttercup ranunculus acris x Mouse ear hawkweed pillosella officinarum x hybrid bluebell hyacinthoides x massartiana x Knapweed (common) centaurea nigra x common cat’s-ear hypochaeris radicata x common sorrel rumex acetosa x sheep’s sorrel rumex acetosella x bramble rubus fruticosus agg. x broad-leaved dock rumex obtusifolius x broad-leaved willowherb Epilobium montanum x cleavers galium aparine x cocksfoot dactylis glomerata x common bent Agrostis capillaris x daisy bellis perennis x common mallow malva sylvestris x common mouse ear cerastium fontanum x common nettle urtica dioica x common vetch vicia sativa x copper beech Fagus sylvatica f. purpurea x cow parsley anthriscus sylvestris x creeping buttercup ranunculus repens x creeping thistle cirsium arvense x cuckoo flower cardamine pratensis x Curled dock Ruxex crispus X cut-leafed cranesbill geranium dissectum x cylcamen cyclamen sp. x daffodil narcissus sp. x dandelion taraxacum agg. x elder sambucus nigra elm ulmus sp. x European gorse Ulex europaeus x false oat grass Arrhenatherum elatius x fescue sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Weelsby Woods Park Management Plan 2015
    WEELSBY WOODS PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 – 2020 North East Lincolnshire Council 1 FOREWORD WEELSBY WOODS PARK FIVE YEAR MANAGEMENT & MAINTENANCE PLAN 2015-2020 Parks and open spaces can be havens for wildlife, places for quiet relaxation and reflection, venues for healthy exercise, areas for play and focal points for the community. For these reasons, parks and open spaces have an important role in providing communities with a balanced and agreeable quality of life. North East Lincolnshire is therefore fortunate to have a number of high quality and accessible parks and open spaces scattered across the area. Each with its own charm; each serving its own community. Above all, parks make a key contribution to the image and identity of our local area. Our vision for parks is that by 2022, there will be a diverse network of safe, accessible and attractive green spaces that are well managed and maintained, through community participation, to enhance the quality of life, sense of well-being, health and learning opportunities for all sections of the community. The council is committed to creating spaces that are safe, clean and well maintained. In partnership with funding bodies, the Friends Group and many other partners, North East Lincolnshire Council is pleased to be able to preserve and enhance this special place for future generations to enjoy. 1 Weelsby Woods Park Management Plan 2015 - 2020 CONTENTS Contents WEELSBY WOODS PARK ........................................................................................ 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Symphyta: Argidae) from South Korea with Key to Species of the Subfamily Arginae
    Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 9 (2016) 183e193 HOSTED BY Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/japb Original article Three new species of the genus Arge (Hymenoptera: Symphyta: Argidae) from South Korea with key to species of the subfamily Arginae Jin-Kyung Choi a, Su-Bin Lee a, Meicai Wei b, Jong-Wook Lee a,* a Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea b Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees (Central South University of Forestry and Technology), Ministry of Education, Changsha, China article info abstract Article history: Three new species, Arge koreana Wei & Lee sp. nov. from South Korea, Arge pseudorejecta Wei & Lee sp. Received 20 January 2016 nov., and Arge shengi Wei & Lee sp. nov. from South Korea and China are described. Keys to known genera Received in revised form of Argidae and known species of Arginae from South Korea are provided. 11 February 2016 Copyright Ó 2016, National Science Museum of Korea (NSMK) and Korea National Arboretum (KNA). Accepted 15 February 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// Available online 24 February 2016 creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Keywords: Arginae China key Korea Introduction Takeuchi 1927, 1939; Doi 1938; Kim 1957, 1963, 1970; Togashi 1973, 1990, 1997; Zombori 1974, 1978; Paek et al 2010; Shinohara Taeger et al (2010) listed 58 genera and 913 valid species and et al 2009; Shinohara et al 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • ACERACEAE Acer Pseudoplatanus Sycamore ALISMATACEAE Alisma Plantago-Aquatica Common Water-Plantain APIACEAE Aegopodium Podagrari
    FLORA OF RSPB CONWY NATURE RESERVE ACERACEAE Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore ALISMATACEAE Alisma plantago-aquatica Common Water-plantain APIACEAE Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder Chaerophyllum temulentum Rough Chervil Conium maculatum Hemlock Daucus carota Wild Carrot Foeniculum vulgare Fennel Heracleum sphondylium Hogweed Oenanthe crocata Hemlock Water-dropwort Torilis japonica Upright Hedge Parsley ARALIACEAE Hedera helix Ivy ASTERACEAE (= COMPOSITAE) Achillea millefolium Yarrow (or Milfoil) Artemisia absinthium Wormwood Artemisia vulgaris Mugwort Aster tripolium Sea Aster Bellis perennis Daisy Centaurea nigra subsp. nigra Common Knapweed Centaurea scabiosa Greater Knapweed Cirsium arvense Creeping Thistle Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle Crepis capillaris Smooth Hawksbeard Crepis vesicaria Beaked Hawksbeard Hypochaeris radicata Cat's-ear Inula conyza Autumn Hawkbit Lapsana communis Ploughman's Spikenard Leontodon autumnalis Nipplewort Leontodon saxatilis Lesser Hawkbit Leontodon taraxacoides Common Hawkbit Leucanthemum vulgare Oxeye Daisy Picris echioides Bristly Oxtongue Pilosella officianum Mouse-ear Hawkweed Pulicaria dysenterica Common Fleabane Senecio erucifolius Hoary Ragwort Senecio jacobaea Ragwort Senecio squalidus * Oxford Ragwort Senecio vulgaris Groundsel Sonchus arvensis Perennial Sow-thistle Sonchus asper Prickly Sow-thistle Sonchus oleraceus Smooth Sow-thistle Taraxacum officinale Dandelion Tragopogon pratensis Goatsbeard Tripleurospermum maritimum Sea Mayweed Tussilago farfara Colt's-foot BETULACEAE Alnus cordata Italian
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Hogweed Heracleum Mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier
    giant hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier Synonyms: None Other common names: giant cow parsnip Family: Apiaceae Invasiveness Rank: 81 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description cow parsnip rarely exceeds 183 cm in height, has Giant hogweed is a biennial or perennial plant that umbels that are 20 to 30 ½ cm in diameter, and has grows 3 to 4 ½ meters tall. Stems are hollow and 5 to 10 palmately lobed leaves (Hultén 1968). cm in diameter. They have dark reddish-purple spots and are covered in bristles. Leaves are large, compound, and 91 to 152 ½ cm in width. Inflorescences are many- flowered, broad, flat-topped umbels. They can grow as large as 76 ½ cm in diameter. Flowers are small and white to light pink. Fruits are flat, 9 ½ mm long, oval- shaped, and dry. Most plants die after flowering. Some flower for several years (Noxious Weed Control Program 2003). Infestation of Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier around Kake, Alaska. Photo by Organized Village of Kake. Ecological Impact Impact on community composition, structure, and interactions: Giant hogweed forms dense canopies that Umbel and foliage of Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier. Photo by Organized Village of Kake. enable it to outcompete and displace native riparian species. The plant produces watery sap, which contains toxins that cause severe dermatitis.
    [Show full text]
  • Heracleum Mantegazzianum) This Page Intentionally Left Blank ECOLOGY and MANAGEMENT of GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum Mantegazzianum
    ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum mantegazzianum) This page intentionally left blank ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF GIANT HOGWEED (Heracleum mantegazzianum) Edited by P. Pys˘ek Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Institute of Botany, Pru˚honice, Czech Republic M.J.W. Cock CABI Switzerland Centre Delémont, Switzerland W. Nentwig Community Ecology, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland H.P. Ravn Forest and Landscape, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Hørsholm, Denmark CABI is a trading name of CAB International CAB International Head Office CABI North American Office Nosworthy Way 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 617 395 4056 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org © CABI 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress, Washington, DC. ISBN-13: 978 1 84593 206 0 Typeset by MRM Graphics Ltd, Winslow, Bucks. Printed and bound in the UK by Athenaeum Press, Gateshead. Contents Contributors ix Acknowledgement xiii Preface: All You Ever Wanted to Know About Hogweed, but xv Were Afraid to Ask! David M. Richardson 1 Taxonomy, Identification, Genetic Relationships and 1 Distribution of Large Heracleum Species in Europe S˘árka Jahodová, Lars Fröberg, Petr Pys˘ek, Dmitry Geltman, Sviatlana Trybush and Angela Karp 2 Heracleum mantegazzianum in its Primary Distribution 20 Range of the Western Greater Caucasus Annette Otte, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Management of Heracleum Species in Reykjavík, Iceland
    Distribution and Management of Heracleum species in Reykjavík, Iceland Danielle Elizabeth Beauchemin Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Iceland 2018 Distribution and Management of Heracleum species in Reykjavík, Iceland Danielle Elizabeth Beauchemin 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources MS Committee Mariana Tamayo Snorri Sigurðsson Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavík, May 2018 Distribution and Management of Heracleum species in Reykjavík, Iceland 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Environment and Natural Resources Copyright © 2018 Danielle Elizabeth Beauchemin All rights reserved Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Sæmundargata 2 101, Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4000 Bibliographic information: Danielle Elizabeth Beauchemin, 2018, Distribution and Management of Heracleum species in Reykjavík, Iceland, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, pp. 45. Printing: Háskólaprent Reykjavík, Iceland, May 29, 2018 Abstract Invasive alien species can negatively impact ecosystems in a number of ways that include declines in biodiversity, economic losses, human health issues, and risks to native species. Given these impacts, the City of Reykjavík, Iceland, is concerned about three alien hogweed species: Heracleum mantegazzianum, H. persicum, and H. sphondylium. To assess this concern, these species were mapped in 11 districts in Reykjavík between May and August 2017 on both managed and unmanaged sites, using ArcGIS. The study also focused on the area of Laugarnes, where vegetation cover was measured and efforts to eradicate H.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Weitere Blattwespen (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) Des Zoologischen Institutes Der Universität Rostock, Insbesondere Aus Den Sammlungen Jahn Und Haupt
    Archiv Natur- und Landeskunde Mecklenburg-Vorpommern GEOZON SCIENCE MEDIA Band 54 / 2016 / Seiten 3–11 / DOI 10.3285/nlk.54.01 ISSN 0518-3189 www.natur-und-landeskunde-mv.de Weitere Blattwespen (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) des Zoologischen Institutes der Universität Rostock, insbesondere aus den Sammlungen Jahn und Haupt Hans-Joachim Jacobs Zusammenfassung Blattwespen des Zoologischen Institutes der Universität Rostock, insbesondere die Sammlungen Jahn und Haupt, wurden revidiert. Das Material aus den Familien Argidae, Cephidae, Cimbici- dae, Diprionidae, Orussidae, Pamphiliidae, Siricidae, Tenthredinidae und Xiphydriidae stammt aus zehn deutschen Bundesländern, hauptsächlich aus Brandenburg und Hessen. Für folgende Taxa fehlen Hinweise in den Checklisten für die jeweiligen Bundesländer in der Entomofauna Germanica (Blank et al. 2001): Für Brandenburg Tenthredo arcuata Forster, 1771 und Cimbex connatus (Schrank, 1776), für Hessen Sterictiphora angelicae (Panzer, 1799) und Tenthredopsis tarsata (Fabricius, 1804), für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Orussus abietinus (Scopoli, 1763), für Sachsen Macrodiprion nemoralis (Enslin, 1917), für Nordrhein-Westfalen Pamphilius betulae Lin- naeus, 1758, für Rheinland-Pfalz Urocerus gigas Linnaeus, 1758. Daneben finden sich Einzelfunde aus Frankreich, Liechtenstein, Polen, Slowakei, Spanien und der Schweiz. Abstract More sawflies (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) in the Zoological Institute of Rostock University especially in the collections of Jahn and Haupt Symphyta stored in the Zoological Institute of the Rostock University has been revised. This ma- terial contains specimens of Argidae, Cephidae, Cimbicidae, Diprionidae, Orussidae, Pamphilii- dae, Siricidae, Tenthredinidae and Xiphydriidae. The specimens have been collected in 10 federal states of Germany, especially in Brandenburg and Hessen. The following taxa are not includ- ed in the checklists of German provinces published in Entomofauna Germanica (Blank et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Umbellifers As Potential Keystone Species in Restoration Projects
    ACTA AGROBOTANICA Vol. 60 (2): 45–49 2007 UMBELLIFERS AS POTENTIAL KEYSTONE SPECIES IN RESTORATION PROJECTS Marcin Zych*, Paweł Niemczyk, Radosław Niemirski University of Warsaw Botanic Garden, Aleje Ujazdowskie 4, 00-478 Warsaw, Poland *[email protected] Received: 17.09.2007 Summary “fl owers with fully exposed nectar and little or no in- We studied visitation rates to four common European um- trafl oral temperature elevation”) that attract allotropous bellifers: Angelica sylvestris, Anthriscus sylvestris, Daucus caro- and hemitropous insects. ta, and Heracleum sphondylium. Our observations and literature Many plants from this family are widely distri- data confi rm that a single plant species from the family Apiaceae buted throughout Europe and occur naturally in vario- may be visited by over a hundred insect taxa from taxonomically us plant communities. The above attributes make them diverse groups. Here we suggest that in the light of pollination good candidates for consideration in restoration projects shortage faced by many endangered plant species, co-planting of as ‘magnet species’ attracting pollinators to plants of relevant native Apiaceae plants, especially in Europe, should be special care. Our aim was to examine the fl ower visitors taken into consideration in many restoration projects to provide, to four common umbellifers growing in various habi- via umbelliferean magnet species, appropriate pollination service tats, in order to evaluate their use as such magnet plants for focus plant taxa. in European conditions. Key words: pollination, Apiaceae=Umbelliferae, magnet spe- cies, endangered plants, biodiversity, allophilous MATERIALS AND METHODS plants We observed and captured fl ower visitors of two native European taxa of the family Apiaceae – Herac- leum sphondylium and Angelica sylvestris.
    [Show full text]