DOCSLIB.ORG

Conceptualizations of God by Lutheran Laypeople Ashley Burgess Leininger Iowa State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conceptualizations of God by Lutheran Laypeople Ashley Burgess Leininger Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2009 Conceptualizations of God by Lutheran laypeople Ashley Burgess Leininger Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Leininger, Ashley Burgess, "Conceptualizations of God by Lutheran laypeople" (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 10805. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/10805 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conceptualizations of God by Lutheran laypeople by Ashley Burgess Leininger A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Sociology Program of Study Committee: David Schweingruber, Major Professor Gloria Jones-Johnson Carl Roberts Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2009 Copyright © Ashley Burgess Leininger, 2009. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. iv ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Thesis Structure ............................................................................................................ 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................... 3 Historical Conceptualizations of God ........................................................................... 3 Instruments Employed .................................................................................................. 3 Previous Study Findings ............................................................................................... 6 Beginning of the Research on God Concepts ......................................................... 6 Class ........................................................................................................................ 8 Gender Differences ................................................................................................. 9 Societal Differences .............................................................................................. 10 Images of God ............................................................................................................. 11 Need for Qualitative Methodology ............................................................................. 13 METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 19 Research Design .......................................................................................................... 19 Research Participants .................................................................................................. 21 Interview Process ........................................................................................................ 24 Sample Characteristics ................................................................................................ 26 Data Analysis .............................................................................................................. 28 RESEARCH FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 30 What is God Like? ...................................................................................................... 30 God is Loving and Nurturing ................................................................................ 30 God is Distant ....................................................................................................... 32 God is a Friend and Companion ........................................................................... 32 God is Controlling and Judging ............................................................................ 35 God has Physical Human Attributes ..................................................................... 36 Knowing God is Unknowable ............................................................................... 39 Life Events and Conceptualizations ...................................................................... 41 How People Know God .............................................................................................. 44 Knowing God Theologically: The Bible as a Source ........................................... 44 Knowing God: Through Personal Experiences ..................................................... 46 Knowing God: Others as a Source ........................................................................ 52 The Trinity .................................................................................................................. 54 The Trinity through Stories and Parables ............................................................. 55 Understanding different Persons of the Trinity .................................................... 57 The Situational Nature of the Trinity .................................................................... 64 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................. 69 iii DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................ 70 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................. 74 APPENDIX 1: RECRUITMENT FLYER........................................................................ 79 APPENDIX 2: INFORMED CONSENT ......................................................................... 80 APPENDIX 3: INTERVIEW QUESTIONS .................................................................... 83 APPENDIX 4: RESPONDENT LIFE EVENTS AND CONCEPTUALIZATIONS ...... 85 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. 91 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Lutheran Religious Places of Worship in Davenport, IA ................................... 21 Table 2: Sampled Church Schematics .............................................................................. 22 Table 3: Sample Characteristics by Sex and Age ............................................................. 27 Table 4: Respondent Characteristics ................................................................................. 28 Table 5: Respondent Life Events and Conceptualizations ............................................... 42 v ABSTRACT God concept researchers have used quantitative methodology exclusively. The Likert Scale combined with the Adjective Rating of God Scale is the most common measurement used in God concept research. The Adjective Rating of God Scale (Gorsuch, 1968) measures conceptualizations of God through a list of adjectives describing God. Combined with the Likert scale, researchers have measured relationships between adjectives, sex, and religious denomination. Although research that has employed these methods has yielded intriguing information, it has not been able to fully explore the area of God concept research. It is argued this scheme ignores three important topics in God concept research. First, the fact that Christians believe in the Trinity. Second, how the God concepts are formed, and finally, how people know God. After providing a brief summary of the primary survey instruments used followed by a brief account of the historical and contemporary studies associated with God concept research, this paper will discuss four familiar God concepts: (1) God is Loving and Nurturing, (2) God is Distant, (3) God is a Friend and Companion, and (4) God is Controlling and Judging. These are followed by two unfamiliar concepts: (1) God has physical human attributes (2) and God is ultimately unknowable. Three sources of how people know God are discussed: (1) the Bible as a source, (2) personal experience, and (3) through others. Finally, findings are presented indicating the Trinity allows for a situational God. 1 INTRODUCTION Religion continues to be an important influence in the lives of individuals. Throughout the world, different religions have emerged as people search for meaning and fulfillment. Religion has changed constantly throughout time. This change has not only mirrored society, as Durkheim would say, but has also shaped society. In order to understand a religion, one needs to understand how its adherents comprehend the deity associated with it. This study investigates how Lutheran laypeople (members of the Evangelical Church in America) conceptualize God. Specifically, this study assesses church members’ God images through their own narratives I conducted 17 in-depth face-to-face interviews with parishioners at an ELCA church. My primary goal was to allow individuals to tell their stories about what they thought God was like. My questions also focused on the formation of their image of God and how this image relates to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. Thesis Structure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Invention Of
    How Did God Get Started? COLIN WELLS the usual suspects One day in the Middle East about four thousand years ago, an elderly but still rather astonishingly spry gentleman took his son for a walk up a hill. The young man carried on his back some wood that his father had told him they would use at the top to make an altar, upon which they would then perform the ritual sacrifice of a burnt offering. Unbeknownst to the son, however, the father had another sort of sacrifice in mind altogether. Abraham, the father, had been commanded, by the God he worshipped as supreme above all others, to sacrifice the young man himself, his beloved and only legitimate son, Isaac. We all know how things turned out, of course. An angel appeared, together with a ram, letting Abraham know that God didn’t really want him to kill his son, that he should sacrifice the ram instead, and that the whole thing had merely been a test. And to modern observers, at least, it’s abundantly clear what exactly was being tested. Should we pose the question to most people familiar with one of the three “Abrahamic” religious traditions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), all of which trace their origins to this misty figure, and which together claim half the world’s population, the answer would come without hesitation. God was testing Abraham’s faith. If we could ask someone from a much earlier time, however, a time closer to that of Abraham himself, the answer might be different. The usual story we tell ourselves about faith and reason says that faith was invented by the ancient Jews, whose monotheistic tradition goes back to Abraham.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant's Theoretical Conception Of
    KANT’S THEORETICAL CONCEPTION OF GOD Yaron Noam Hoffer Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy, September 2017 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee _________________________________________ Allen W. Wood, Ph.D. (Chair) _________________________________________ Sandra L. Shapshay, Ph.D. _________________________________________ Timothy O'Connor, Ph.D. _________________________________________ Michel Chaouli, Ph.D 15 September, 2017 ii Copyright © 2017 Yaron Noam Hoffer iii To Mor, who let me make her ends mine and made my ends hers iv Acknowledgments God has never been an important part of my life, growing up in a secular environment. Ironically, only through Kant, the ‘all-destroyer’ of rational theology and champion of enlightenment, I developed an interest in God. I was drawn to Kant’s philosophy since the beginning of my undergraduate studies, thinking that he got something right in many topics, or at least introduced fruitful ways of dealing with them. Early in my Graduate studies I was struck by Kant’s moral argument justifying belief in God’s existence. While I can’t say I was convinced, it somehow resonated with my cautious but inextricable optimism. My appreciation for this argument led me to have a closer look at Kant’s discussion of rational theology and especially his pre-critical writings. From there it was a short step to rediscover early modern metaphysics in general and embark upon the current project. This journey could not have been completed without the intellectual, emotional, and material support I was very fortunate to receive from my teachers, colleagues, friends, and family.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Theology 1 Process Theology
    Process theology 1 Process theology Process theology is a school of thought influenced by the metaphysical process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947) and further developed by Charles Hartshorne (1897–2000). While there are process theologies that are similar, but unrelated to the work of Whitehead (such as Pierre Teilhard de Chardin) the term is generally applied to the Whiteheadian/Hartshornean school. Process theology is unrelated to the Process Church. History The original ideas of process thought are found in the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. Various theological and philosophical aspects have been expanded and developed by Charles Hartshorne (1897–2000), John B. Cobb, Jr., and David Ray Griffin. A characteristic of process theology each of these thinkers shared was a rejection of metaphysics that privilege "being" over "becoming," particularly those of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Hartshorne was deeply influenced by French philosopher Jules Lequier and by Swiss philosopher Charles Secrétan who were probably the first ones to claim that in God liberty of becoming is above his substantiality. Process theology soon influenced a number of Jewish theologians including Rabbis Max Kadushin, Milton Steinberg and Levi A. Olan, Harry Slominsky and, to a lesser degree, Abraham Joshua Heschel. Today some rabbis who advocate some form of process theology include Bradley Shavit Artson, Lawrence A. Englander, William E. Kaufman, Harold Kushner, Anton Laytner, Michael Lerner, Gilbert S. Rosenthal, Lawrence Troster, Donald B. Rossoff, Burton Mindick, and Nahum Ward. Alan Anderson and Deb Whitehouse have attempted to integrate process theology with the New Thought variant of Christianity. The work of Richard Stadelmann has been to preserve the uniqueness of Jesus in process theology.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Word of God Is Everything We Need II. God Has Given Us
    What people need to understand today is that the truth is important. What you beLieve to be true is important, because it wiLL determine how you see Life and how you Live your Life. It wiLL determine your abiLity to understand Life and obey God. Truth exists because God is trustworthy. The biblical understanding of truth is that all truth comes from God. God has breathed life into all of Scripture. It is useful for teaching us The entirety of Your word is truth, and every one of Your what is true. It is useful for correcting our mistakes. It is useful for righteous judgments endures forever. PsaLm 119:160 making our lives whole again. It is useful for training us to do what is right. By using Scripture, a man of God can be completely prepared Truth is a gift that God gives to mankind. As we honor that to do every good thing. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 NIRV truth by believing in it and living by it we are blessed and preserved because of it. I. The Word of God is Everything We Need 4. God’s Word is to be obeyed as God directLy telling us what to do. It has been written, Man shall not live and be upheld and sustained by bread alone, but by every word that comes forth from the mouth of When God commands, we are to obey. When he asserts, we are God. Matthew 4:4 (AMP) to believe Him. When he promises, we are to embrace and trust those promises; thus, we respond to the sheer authority of For the Christian, the Bible is the measuring rod, and final word God’s word.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing God: God Speaks by the Holy Spirit Through Bible and Prayer
    • OCTOBER 5 • EXPERIENCING GOD: GOD SPEAKS BY THE HOLY SPIRIT THROUGH BIBLE AND PRAYER Reality #4: God speaks by the Holy Spirit through the Bible, prayer, circumstances, and the church to reveal Himself, His purposes, and His ways. Hebrews 1:1, “Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets…” When God spoke: 1. It was usually unique to that individual 2. He gave enough specific directions to do something now (Exodus 3:16-22) God speaks by the Holy Spirit 1 Corinthians 3:16, “Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?” John 14:26, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” John 16:13-14, “When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you.” 1. God reveals Himself - because He wants you to have faith to believe He can do what He says. Leviticus 19:1-2, “And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, ‘Speak to all the congregation of the people of Israel and say to them, You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy.’” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Brahman, Atman and Maya
    Sanatana Dharma The Eternal Way of Life (Hinduism) Brahman, Atman and Maya The Hindu Way of Comprehending Reality and Life Brahman, Atman and Maya u These three terms are essential in understanding the Hindu view of reality. v Brahman—that which gives rise to maya v Atman—what each maya truly is v Maya—appearances of Brahman (all the phenomena in the cosmos) Early Vedic Deities u The Aryan people worship many deities through sacrificial rituals: v Agni—the god of fire v Indra—the god of thunder, a warrior god v Varuna—the god of cosmic order (rita) v Surya—the sun god v Ushas—the goddess of dawn v Rudra—the storm god v Yama—the first mortal to die and become the ruler of the afterworld The Meaning of Sacrificial Rituals u Why worship deities? u During the period of Upanishads, Hindus began to search for the deeper meaning of sacrificial rituals. u Hindus came to realize that presenting offerings to deities and asking favors in return are self-serving. u The focus gradually shifted to the offerings (the sacrificed). u The sacrificed symbolizes forgoing one’s well-being for the sake of the well- being of others. This understanding became the foundation of Hindu spirituality. In the old rites, the patron had passed the burden of death on to others. By accepting his invitation to the sacrificial banquet, the guests had to take responsibility for the death of the animal victim. In the new rite, the sacrificer made himself accountable for the death of the beast.
    [Show full text]
  • Gods and Myths: Creation of the World
    01/12/2016 Gods and Myths: Creation of the World 1 01/12/2016 Ancient Cosmology ‐ What was the shape of the Universe imaged by those ancient peoples to whom all modern knowledge of geography and astronomy was inacessible ? ‐ How did they conceive the form of the cosmos which accommodated not only the known face of the earth and the visible heavenly bodies, but also those other worlds ie. the realms of the dead, both blessed and damned, and the countries inhabited by gods and demons ? • In some cosmologies space inseparable from time : ‐ no account of the shape of the universe would make sense unless we know how it came to be so in the first place ‐ in other words, the cosmologies go along with creation myths ie. the creation of the universe is an essential feature of cosmology ‐ uniquely, this lead the Jewish (biblical and rabbinical) sources to the solution of a notion of linear time ‐ by contrast: • China: notion of creation not of prime importance • Greeks: not so interested in beginnings • Jains: uninterested in beginnings • India: time scales as vast as space, leading to the notion of cyclical time • Norse/Greeks/Chines: also cyclical time notion • 2 01/12/2016 Religious Cosmology ‐ A Way of explaining the Origin, History and Evolution of the Cosmos or Universe on the Religious Mythology of a specific tradition. ‐ Religious cosmologies usually include an act or process of creation by a creator deity or pantheon Creation Myth ‐ A symbolic narrative of how the world began and how people first became to inhabit it.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Fundamentalism in Eight Muslim‐
    JOURNAL for the SCIENTIFIC STUDY of RELIGION Religious Fundamentalism in Eight Muslim-Majority Countries: Reconceptualization and Assessment MANSOOR MOADDEL STUART A. KARABENICK Department of Sociology Combined Program in Education and Psychology University of Maryland University of Michigan To capture the common features of diverse fundamentalist movements, overcome etymological variability, and assess predictors, religious fundamentalism is conceptualized as a set of beliefs about and attitudes toward religion, expressed in a disciplinarian deity, literalism, exclusivity, and intolerance. Evidence from representative samples of over 23,000 adults in Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, and Turkey supports the conclusion that fundamentalism is stronger in countries where religious liberty is lower, religion less fractionalized, state structure less fragmented, regulation of religion greater, and the national context less globalized. Among individuals within countries, fundamentalism is linked to religiosity, confidence in religious institutions, belief in religious modernity, belief in conspiracies, xenophobia, fatalism, weaker liberal values, trust in family and friends, reliance on less diverse information sources, lower socioeconomic status, and membership in an ethnic majority or dominant religion/sect. We discuss implications of these findings for understanding fundamentalism and the need for further research. Keywords: fundamentalism, Islam, Christianity, Sunni, Shia, Muslim-majority countries. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Hinduism Summary Key Words
    Hinduism Summary Key Words Hindu Someone who follows Hinduism. Hinduism is the oldest of the world’s religions. It is now practised all over the world but originated in South East Asia. It is a mix of different Brahman Hindus recognise one God, Brahman. The other Gods of Hinduism are different aspects of Brahman (The universal supreme God) beliefs, cultures and traditions dating back over 4000 years. Hindus Vishnu Hindu god who protects the universe. recognise one God, Brahman. The gods of Hinduism are different aspects Brahma Hindu god of creation. of Brahman. The main three aspects (Trimurti) are Vishnu, Brahma and Shiva. The three great goddesses (Tridevi) are Saraswati, Lakshmi and Shiva Hindu god of destruction and regeneration Shakti. Hindus can pray to different gods and goddesses for help with Trimurti The three aspects of the universal supreme God. (Vishnu, Brahma and Shiva) All of which can be represented in male or female forms. different needs. There are over 1.1 billion Hindus in the world today. mandir A special place for Hindus to worship. Avatars of the three main aspects of Brahman puja Act of worship for Hindus. murtis Special statues or images of Hindu gods and goddesses. Brahma Shiva Vishnu shrine A holy place to pray. (the creator) (the protector) (the destroyer of evil) Shruti Hindu holy scriptures which contain the four Vedas. Smriti Hindu holy scriptures which contain legends, myths and history. Vedas Ancient Hindu text. Avatar In Hinduism, this usually refers to an incarnation of God or His aspects, either as a man or even an animal or some mythical creature.
    [Show full text]
  • God Is the Gospel the Glory of God in the Face of Jesus 1 God God
    God God God, God God God God Is the Gospel The Glory of God in the Face of Jesus 1 God God. God God God God This book is a plea that God himself, as revealed most clearly t and fully in Jesus’s death and resurrection, be seen and en- God God God God God God. joyed as the final and greatest gift of the gospel. 2 The gospel of Jesus and his many precious blessings are not God God God God God God ultimately what makes the good news good, but means of seeing and savoring the Savior himself. Forgiveness is good because it opens the way to enjoying God himself. Justification God God God God God is good because it wins access to the presence and pleasure of God himself. Eternal life is good because it becomes the ever- u lasting enjoyment of Jesus. God Is the Gospel God God, All God’s good gifts are loving to the degree that they lead us to God himself. This is the love of God: doing everything neces- God God God God God God God sary, most painfully in the death of his Son, to enthrall us with what is most deeply and durably satisfying—namely, himself. God God God God. God God JOHN PIPER is pastor for preaching and vision at Bethlehem Piper Baptist Church in Minneapolis. He has authored numerous books, God God God God?” God God including Desiring God, Don’t Waste Your Life, This Momentary Marriage, and Think. 4God God God, God God God u Meditations on God’s Love as the Gift of Himself CHRISTIAN LIVING John Piper God Is the Gospel Copyright © 2005 by Desiring God Foundation Published by Crossway 1300 Crescent Street Wheaton, Illinois 60187 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Theism in Christianity, Islam and Sikhism: a Comparative Analysis
    THEISM IN CHRISTIANITY, ISLAM AND SIKHISM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Ekpenyong Obo Ekpenyong and Emmanuel Williams Udoh Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT God is usually taken to be a necessarily existing being who is unsurpassably powerful, knowledgeable and good. Theism is conceptualized in a single being that is monotheism in some religions and polytheism that is more than one being in some others. Yet some others see theism in everything of human concern that is pantheism. The doctrine of God is strong-minded by means of the religious experiences of men and evident in the conduct of such religious persons. This work intends to show here, the points of similarities and dissimilarities between the concept of theism in Christianity, Islam and Sikhism. This work exposed among others that their major point of way out is that in Christianity, there is a distinctive and central teaching concerning Jesus Christ as unique incarnations, the word of God, pre-eminently manifested in a historic person, on the ground that his moral character perfectly represents the character and purpose of the invisible holy God. While Islam, and Sikhism, have no such doctrine, or theory of incarnation. INTRODUCTION Theism stems from the Greek word Theos meaning God or from the Latin word dues meaning Deity or God. But we are concerned here with the idea of God that is sacred power or different conceptions of God or deity in different world religions. Theism in some religions is conceptualized in a single being that is monotheism.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. Transcendent Integration 10.1 God As the Object And
    SEC 4 Page 1 of 6 10. TRANSCENDENT INTEGRATION 10.1 GOD AS THE OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF SEARCH: The meaning of life is a philosophical question concerning the significance of life or existence in general. It can also be expressed in different forms, such as "Why are we here?", "What is life all about?", and "What is the purpose of existence?" It has been the subject of much philosophical, scientific, and theological speculation throughout history. There have been a large number of proposed answers to these questions from many different cultural and ideological backgrounds. The meaning of life is in the philosophical and religious conceptions of existence, social ties, consciousness, and happiness, and borders on many other issues, such as symbolic meaning, ontology, value, purpose, ethics, good and evil, free will, the existence of one or multiple gods, conceptions of God, the soul, and the afterlife. Scientific contributions focus primarily on describing related empirical facts about the universe, exploring the context and parameters concerning the 'how' of life. Science also studies and can provide recommendations for the pursuit of well-being and a related conception of morality. An alternative, humanistic approach poses the question "What is the meaning of my life?" The value of the question pertaining to the purpose of life may coincide with the achievement of ultimate reality, or a feeling of oneness, or even a feeling of sacredness Historically and still today many people feel that humankind was created by a supernatural entity called God, that God had an intelligent purpose in creating humankind, and that this intelligent purpose is the ‘meaning of life’.
    [Show full text]