Additive Manufacturing of Maraging 250 Steels for the Rejuvenation and Repurposing of Die Casting Tooling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Additive Manufacturing of Maraging 250 Steels for the Rejuvenation and Repurposing of Die Casting Tooling ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING OF MARAGING 250 STEELS FOR THE REJUVENATION AND REPURPOSING OF DIE CASTING TOOLING by MICHAEL ANDREW KOTTMAN Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Thesis Advisor: Prof. David Schwam Department of Materials Science and Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2015 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis of Michael Andrew Kottman Candidate for the degree of Master of Science*. Dr. David Schwam Committee Chair, Advisor Dr. John J. Lewandowski Committee Member Dr. Gerhard Welsch Committee Member Date of Defense November 7, 2014 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Dedicated to my wife and parents for their steadfast love and support. 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................4 List of Figures .........................................................................................................................7 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ 12 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................. 13 Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................ 15 1.1. Die casting and die casting dies ..................................................................................... 15 1.2. Modes of failure of die cast tooling ............................................................................... 16 1.3. Tool steels ...................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 2: Processes ............................................................................................................ 20 2.1. Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) ................................................................................... 20 2.1.1. GMAW Equipment ..................................................................................................... 21 2.1.2. GMAW Parameters .................................................................................................... 23 2.1.2.1. Current and Voltage ............................................................................................... 23 2.1.2.2. Shielding Gas .......................................................................................................... 24 2.1.2.3. Travel speed ........................................................................................................... 25 2.2. Laser Hot Wire (LHW) .................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1. LHW Equipment ......................................................................................................... 28 2.2.2. LHW Process Control .................................................................................................. 29 2.2.2.1. Laser Power ............................................................................................................ 29 2.2.2.2. Wire Feed Speed and Travel Speed ....................................................................... 30 2.2.2.3. Shielding Gas .......................................................................................................... 30 2.3. Direct Metal Deposition (DMD) and Laser Engineered Net Shaping (LENS®) ................ 31 2.3.1. Equipment .................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.2. LENS® and DMD Parameters ...................................................................................... 33 2.3.2.1. Laser Input Power .................................................................................................. 33 4 2.3.2.2. Travel Speed ........................................................................................................... 35 2.3.2.3. Powder Feed Rate .................................................................................................. 36 2.4. Electron Beam Freeform Fabrication (EBF3) ................................................................. 36 2.4.1. EBF3 Equipment ......................................................................................................... 37 2.4.2. EBF3 Parameters ........................................................................................................ 38 2.4.2.1. Accelerating Voltage and Beam Current ................................................................ 38 2.4.2.2. Travel Speed ........................................................................................................... 39 2.4.2.3. Focus Current ......................................................................................................... 39 Chapter 3: Experimental Methods ........................................................................................ 40 3.1. Testing Methods and specimens ................................................................................... 41 3.1.1. Tension Testing .......................................................................................................... 42 3.1.2. Charpy V-notch and sub-sized unnotched Testing .................................................... 42 3.1.3. Hardness Testing ........................................................................................................ 42 3.1.4. X-ray radiography ....................................................................................................... 42 3.1.5. Metallography ............................................................................................................ 42 Chapter 4: Results ................................................................................................................ 44 3.1. Laser Hot Wire – Company A ......................................................................................... 44 3.1.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 44 3.1.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 44 3.1.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 53 3.2. Laser Hot Wire – Company B ......................................................................................... 56 3.2.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 56 3.2.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 56 3.2.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 62 3.3. GMAW - Company C ..................................................................................................... 63 3.3.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 63 3.3.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 64 3.3.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 69 3.4. Electron Beam with Wire – Company D ......................................................................... 70 5 3.4.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 70 3.4.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 71 3.4.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 78 3.5. DMD with Powder – Company E .................................................................................... 80 3.5.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 80 3.5.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 81 3.5.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 86 3.6. DMD with Powder – Company F .................................................................................... 88 3.6.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 88 3.6.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................. 88 3.6.3. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 94 3.7. Laser Engineered Net Shape – Company G Laboratory ................................................. 95 3.7.1. Description of the method and parameters .............................................................. 95 3.7.2. Experimental Results ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Horizontal Directional Drilling
    Secoroc Rock Drilling Tools Horizontal Directional Drilling Pilot Bits and Hole Openers H orizontal Something oriented horizontally; parallel to or in the plane of the horizon or a base line. D irectional Relating to or indicating a direction; a goal; showing the way by conducting or leading. D rilling Drilling is the cutting of a hole into a solid. Directional boring, commonly called horizontal directional drilling or HDD, is a steerable trenchless method of installing underground pipes, conduits and cables in a shallow arc along a prescribed bore path, by using a surface launched drilling rig, with minimal impact on the surrounding area. Atlas Copco Secoroc can take your HDD business in a new direction! Secoroc Horizontal Directional Drilling Products Atlas Copco has been in the mining and construction market for many years and is committed to innovative, productive, market leading solutions. Atlas Copco Secoroc has over Texas, USA. The production the years set the standard on plant is ISO 9001 and API certi- many Horizontal Directional fied ensuring world class quality Drilling projects involving Hard is delivered to the HDD market. Rock and difficult conditions. You can rely on our technical ex- pertise – any time – anywhere. Our HDD equipment range includes: Our products are the result of – Pilot Bits in all sizes and types decades of drilling research and development and are manufactu- – "Split Bit" Hole Openers in- red in our world class manufac- corporating a common, random turing facility in Grand Prairie, bit third HDD product range Atlas Copco Secoroc Direct ShotTM pilot bits, Sealed Bearing random bit third cutters and Random bit third hole openers are specifically designed for the rigors of HDD applications.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy
    materials Article A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy Jialong Tian 1,2, Wei Wang 2,*, M. Babar Shahzad 2, Wei Yan 2, Yiyin Shan 2, Zhouhua Jiang 3 and Ke Yang 2 1 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China; [email protected] 2 Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China; [email protected] (M.B.S.); [email protected] (W.Y.); [email protected] (Y.S.); [email protected] (K.Y.) 3 School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-24-8397-8745 Received: 17 October 2017; Accepted: 8 November 2017; Published: 10 November 2017 Abstract: A new maraging stainless steel with superior strength–toughness–corrosion synergy has been developed based on an innovative concept of alloy design. The high strength–toughness combination is achieved by forming dispersive nano-sized intermetallic compounds in the soft lath martensitic matrix with a slight amount of residual austenite. The good corrosion resistance is guaranteed by exactly controlling the Co content based on understanding the synergistic effect between Co and Cr. The fine structure characteristics of two dominant strengthening precipitations including Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases were finely characterized associated with transmission electron microscope (TEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) analyses. The relationship among microstructure, strength and toughness is discussed. The precipitation mechanism of different precipitates in the new maraging stainless steel is revealed based on the APT analysis. Keywords: maraging stainless steel; alloy design; strength and toughness; corrosion resistance; atomic probe tomography; precipitation mechanism 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Turning Tools and Their Application Identification and Application of Cutting Tools for Turning
    Introduction to Turning Tools and their Application Identification and application of cutting tools for turning The variety of cutting tools available for modern CNC turning centers makes it imperative for machine operators to be familiar with different tool geometries and how they are applied to common turning processes. This course curriculum contains 16-hours of material for instructors to get their students ready to identify different types of turning tools and their uses. ©2016 MachiningCloud, Inc. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 Audience ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Lesson Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 2 Anatomy of a turning tool............................................................................................................... 3 Standard Inserts .............................................................................................................................. 3 ANSI Insert Designations ............................................................................................................. 3 Insert Materials
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement in Mechanical Properties of C300 Maraging Steel by Application of VAR Process
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Vacuum 82 (2008) 521–528 www.elsevier.com/locate/vacuum Improvement in mechanical properties of C300 maraging steel by application of VAR process Seyed Reza Elmi HoseiniÃ, Hosein Arabi, Hekmat Razavizadeh Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, Tehran, Iran Received 22 November 2006; received in revised form 1 August 2007; accepted 11 August 2007 Abstract The prime objective of this research was to improve the mechanical properties of C300 maraging steels originally cast in the vaccum induction melting (VIM) and AIM furnaces by application of vaccum arc remelting (VAR) process. For this purpose two sets of C300 maraging steel with different amounts of Ti were cast in two different types of furnaces. Three bars with 1, 1.5 and 2 wt% of Ti were produced in the argon induction melting (AIM) furnace and two bars with 0.65 and 1 wt% Ti in the VIM furnace. Then all of the bars were subjected to VAR process in order to study the effects of this process on the reduction of N and O gases and inclusions, hence improvement in the mechanical properties. The results show that the total reduction of N and O gases in the bars cast in the AIM furnace was up to 40%, the amounts of inclusions irrespective of their kind reduced up to 30% while ductility and impact energy increased up to 40%. However, these parameters in the bars cast in the VIM furnace changed as follows: total gas reduction decreased by 12%, ductility and impact energy increased by 30% and 47%, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure/Property Relationships in Irons and Steels Bruce L
    Copyright © 1998 ASM International® Metals Handbook Desk Edition, Second Edition All rights reserved. J.R. Davis, Editor, p 153-173 www.asminternational.org Structure/Property Relationships in Irons and Steels Bruce L. Bramfitt, Homer Research Laboratories, Bethlehem Steel Corporation Basis of Material Selection ............................................... 153 Role of Microstructure .................................................. 155 Ferrite ............................................................. 156 Pearlite ............................................................ 158 Ferrite-Pearl ite ....................................................... 160 Bainite ............................................................ 162 Martensite .................................... ...................... 164 Austenite ........................................................... 169 Ferrite-Cementite ..................................................... 170 Ferrite-Martensite .................................................... 171 Ferrite-Austenite ..................................................... 171 Graphite ........................................................... 172 Cementite .......................................................... 172 This Section was adapted from Materials 5election and Design, Volume 20, ASM Handbook, 1997, pages 357-382. Additional information can also be found in the Sections on cast irons and steels which immediately follow in this Handbook and by consulting the index. THE PROPERTIES of irons and steels
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Glossary
    MANUFACTURING GLOSSARY Aging – A change in the properties of certain metals and alloys that occurs at ambient or moderately elevated temperatures after a hot-working operation or a heat-treatment (quench aging in ferrous alloys, natural or artificial aging in ferrous and nonferrous alloys) or after a cold-working operation (strain aging). The change in properties is often, but not always, due to a phase change (precipitation), but never involves a change in chemical composition of the metal or alloy. Abrasive – Garnet, emery, carborundum, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, or other material in various grit sizes used for grinding, lapping, polishing, honing, pressure blasting, and other operations. Each abrasive particle acts like a tiny, single-point tool that cuts a small chip; with hundreds of thousands of points doing so, high metal-removal rates are possible while providing a good finish. Abrasive Band – Diamond- or other abrasive-coated endless band fitted to a special band machine for machining hard-to-cut materials. Abrasive Belt – Abrasive-coated belt used for production finishing, deburring, and similar functions.See coated abrasive. Abrasive Cutoff Disc – Blade-like disc with abrasive particles that parts stock in a slicing motion. Abrasive Cutoff Machine, Saw – Machine that uses blade-like discs impregnated with abrasive particles to cut/part stock. See saw, sawing machine. Abrasive Flow Machining – Finishing operation for holes, inaccessible areas, or restricted passages. Done by clamping the part in a fixture, then extruding semisolid abrasive media through the passage. Often, multiple parts are loaded into a single fixture and finished simultaneously. Abrasive Machining – Various grinding, honing, lapping, and polishing operations that utilize abrasive particles to impart new shapes, improve finishes, and part stock by removing metal or other material.See grinding.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Hand Tools 3. Related Tools 4. Chisels 5. Hammer 6. Saw Terminology 7. Pliers Introduction
    1 1. Hand Tools 2. Types 2.1 Hand tools 2.2 Hammer Drill 2.3 Rotary hammer drill 2.4 Cordless drills 2.5 Drill press 2.6 Geared head drill 2.7 Radial arm drill 2.8 Mill drill 3. Related tools 4. Chisels 4.1. Types 4.1.1 Woodworking chisels 4.1.1.1 Lathe tools 4.2 Metalworking chisels 4.2.1 Cold chisel 4.2.2 Hardy chisel 4.3 Stone chisels 4.4 Masonry chisels 4.4.1 Joint chisel 5. Hammer 5.1 Basic design and variations 5.2 The physics of hammering 5.2.1 Hammer as a force amplifier 5.2.2 Effect of the head's mass 5.2.3 Effect of the handle 5.3 War hammers 5.4 Symbolic hammers 6. Saw terminology 6.1 Types of saws 6.1.1 Hand saws 6.1.2. Back saws 6.1.3 Mechanically powered saws 6.1.4. Circular blade saws 6.1.5. Reciprocating blade saws 6.1.6..Continuous band 6.2. Types of saw blades and the cuts they make 6.3. Materials used for saws 7. Pliers Introduction 7.1. Design 7.2.Common types 7.2.1 Gripping pliers (used to improve grip) 7.2 2.Cutting pliers (used to sever or pinch off) 2 7.2.3 Crimping pliers 7.2.4 Rotational pliers 8. Common wrenches / spanners 8.1 Other general wrenches / spanners 8.2. Spe cialized wrenches / spanners 8.3. Spanners in popular culture 9. Hacksaw, surface plate, surface gauge, , vee-block, files 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials Technology – Placement
    MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY 01. An eutectoid steel consists of A. Wholly pearlite B. Pearlite and ferrite C. Wholly austenite D. Pearlite and cementite ANSWER: A 02. Iron-carbon alloys containing 1.7 to 4.3% carbon are known as A. Eutectic cast irons B. Hypo-eutectic cast irons C. Hyper-eutectic cast irons D. Eutectoid cast irons ANSWER: B 03. The hardness of steel increases if it contains A. Pearlite B. Ferrite C. Cementite D. Martensite ANSWER: C 04. Pearlite is a combination of A. Ferrite and cementite B. Ferrite and austenite C. Ferrite and iron graphite D. Pearlite and ferrite ANSWER: A 05. Austenite is a combination of A. Ferrite and cementite B. Cementite and gamma iron C. Ferrite and austenite D. Pearlite and ferrite ANSWER: B 06. Maximum percentage of carbon in ferrite is A. 0.025% B. 0.06% C. 0.1% D. 0.25% ANSWER: A 07. Maximum percentage of carbon in austenite is A. 0.025% B. 0.8% 1 C. 1.25% D. 1.7% ANSWER: D 08. Pure iron is the structure of A. Ferrite B. Pearlite C. Austenite D. Ferrite and pearlite ANSWER: A 09. Austenite phase in Iron-Carbon equilibrium diagram _______ A. Is face centered cubic structure B. Has magnetic phase C. Exists below 727o C D. Has body centered cubic structure ANSWER: A 10. What is the crystal structure of Alpha-ferrite? A. Body centered cubic structure B. Face centered cubic structure C. Orthorhombic crystal structure D. Tetragonal crystal structure ANSWER: A 11. In Iron-Carbon equilibrium diagram, at which temperature cementite changes fromferromagnetic to paramagnetic character? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Machining Magnesium – Datasheet
    DATASHEET DATASHEET • Machining Magnesium 254 † Magnesium is the lightest structural metal and Table 1. Relative power and comparative machinability of metals. exhibits excellent machinability. Some of the AISI - B1112 Relative advantages of machining magnesium compared to Metal machinability power other commonly used metals include: index (%) Magnesium alloys 1.0 500 • Low power required – approximately 55% of that Aluminium alloys 1.8 300 required for Al Mild steel 6.3 50 • Fast machining – employing the use of high cutting speeds, large feed rates and greater depths of cut Titanium alloys 7.6 20 • Excellent surface finish – extremely fine and smooth surface achieved Speeds, feeds and depths of cut • Well broken chips – due to the free-cutting qualities of magnesium The potential for high speed machining of • Reduced tool wear – leading to increased tool life magnesium alloys is usually only limited by the stability of the component in the clamping device, To fully exploit and enjoy the advantages of chip extraction or the rotation speed or accuracy machining magnesium, it is important that the unique limits of the tool or machine. Some relative cutting characteristics of the metal are understood. speeds using HSS tools are given in Table 2. Cutting speeds are also dependant on the tool material. Cutting power and machinabilty Higher speeds can be enjoyed with the use of carbide or poly-crystalline diamond (PCD) tooling. The mean specific cutting force (ks1.1) of magnesium is 280 N/mm2, this is much lower than that of In general, cutting speeds are between aluminium (approx 640 N/mm2). The result of this 200 – 1800 m/min with feed rates greater than means that there is a reduced load on the cutter and 0.25 mm/rev for turning and boring operations.
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Steel for Percussive Drilling
    TVE-K 17001 Examensarbete 15 hp 2 Juni 2017 High Performance Steel for Percussive Drilling Elin Åkerlund Jakob Jonsson Åberg Patrik Österberg Rebecka Havo Mikael Fredriksson Abstract High Performance Steel for Percussive Drilling Elin Åkerlund, Jakob Jonsson Åberg, Patrik Österberg, Rebecka Havo and Mikael Fredriksson Teknisk- naturvetenskaplig fakultet UTH-enheten Atlas Copco Secoroc AB are searching after new bulk materials for drill heads that are used in percussive drilling in order to improve their strength and durability. The Besöksadress: aim of this project is to assist Atlas Copco in this search and provide them with Ångströmlaboratoriet Lägerhyddsvägen 1 further information regarding material properties, alloying elements, suppliers, etc. Hus 4, Plan 0 A literary study was carried out in order to identify materials that had UTS and KIC Postadress: more than or equal to 1700 MPa and 70 MPa*m^1/2, respectively. Materials that Box 536 751 21 Uppsala fulfilled these criteria were T250 grade maraging steel, Cobalt free maraging steel, High cobalt maraging steel, 300 grade maraging steel, AerMet 100, AF1410, S53, Telefon: M54, 300M, 4340M and PremoMet. These were categorized into maraging steels, 018 – 471 30 03 high alloy secondary hardened steels, and low alloy steels, and were then further Telefax: researched. 018 – 471 30 00 The material with the highest combination of UTS and KIC was M54 followed by Hemsida: AerMet 100; while AF1410 had the highest KIC but a low UTS, and PremoMet had http://www.teknat.uu.se/student the highest UTS but a low KIC. Maraging steels and HASH steels have a similar price range, while low alloy steels are much cheaper.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Machining Carpenter Specialty Alloys Guide to Machining Carpenter Special Ty All O Ys
    GUIDE TO MACHINING CARPENTER SPECIAL GUIDE TO MACHINING CARPENTER SPECIALTY ALLOYS Carpenter Technology Corporation TY ALL Wyomissing, PA 19610 U.S.A. 1-800-654-6543 Visit us at www.cartech.com O YS For on-line purchasing in the U.S., visit www.carpenterdirect.com GUIDE TO MACHINING CARPENTER SPECIALTY ALLOYS Carpenter Technology Corporation Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610 U.S.A. Copyright 2002 CRS Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Printed in U.S.A. 9-02/7.5M The information and data presented herein are suggested starting point values and are not a guarantee of maximum or minimum values. Applications specifically suggested for material described herein are made solely for the purpose of illustration to enable the reader to make his/her own evaluation and are not intended as warranties, either express or implied, of fitness for these or other purposes. There is no representation that the recipient of this literature will receive updated editions as they become available. Unless otherwise noted, all registered trademarks are property of CRS Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Carpenter Technology Corporation. ISO 9000 and QS-9000 Registered Headquarters - Reading, PA Guide to Machining CARPENTER SPECIALTY ALLOYS Contents Introduction ............................................................................. 1 General Stainless Material and Machining Characteristics .... 3 Classification of Stainless Steels .............................................. 5 Basic Families and Designations ........................................ 5 Austenitic
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Factors Affecting the Mechanical Properties of Maraging
    metals Review AReview Review of Factors Affecting the Mechanical PropertiesA Review ofof MaragingFactors Affecting Steel 300 the Fabricated Mechanical via Laser PowderProperties Bed of Fusion Maraging Steel 300 Fabricated via Laser Powder Bed Fusion Barry Mooney and Kyriakos I. Kourousis * Barry Mooney and Kyriakos I. Kourousis * School of Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland * SchoolCorrespondence: of Engineering, [email protected]; University of Limerick, Tel.: V94+353-61202217 T9PX Limerick, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +353-61202217 Received: 29 August 2020; Accepted: 20 September 2020; Published: 22 September 2020 Received: 29 August 2020; Accepted: 20 September 2020; Published: 22 September 2020 Abstract: Maraging steel is an engineering alloy which has been widely employed in metal additive Abstract: Maraging steel is an engineering alloy which has been widely employed in metal additive manufacturing. This paper examines manufacturing and post-processing factors affecting the manufacturing. This paper examines manufacturing and post-processing factors affecting the properties of maraging steel fabricated via laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). It covers the review of properties of maraging steel fabricated via laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). It covers the review of published research findings on how powder quality feedstock, processing parameters, laser scan published research findings on how powder quality feedstock, processing parameters, laser scan strategy, build orientation and heat treatment can influence the microstructure, density and porosity, strategy, build orientation and heat treatment can influence the microstructure, density and defects and residual stresses developed on L-PBF maraging steel, with a focus on the maraging steel porosity, defects and residual stresses developed on L-PBF maraging steel, with a focus on the 300 alloy.
    [Show full text]