High Line Plant List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

High Line Plant List HIGH LINE PLANT LIST www.thehighline.org Trees & Shrubs Acer triflorum three-flowered maple Lindera glauca var. salicifolia willowleaf spice bush Aesculus parviflora bottlebrush buckeye Magnolia macrophylla bigleaf magnolia Amelanchier arborea shadbush Magnolia macrophylla var. ashei Ashe’s magnolia Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry Magnolia tripetala umbrella magnolia Amorpha fruticosa desert false indigo Magnolia virginiana var. australis ‘Green Shadow’ Green Shadow sweetbay magnolia Aronia melanocarpa ‘Viking’ Viking black chokeberry Mahonia x media ‘Winter Sun’ Winter Sun mahonia Betula populifolia grey birch Malus floribunda crabapple Betula populifolia ‘Whitespire’ Whitespire grey birch Nyssa sylvatica black gum Calycanthus floridus ‘Michael Lindsey’ Michael Lindsey sweetshrub Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’ Wildfire black gum Carpinus betulus European hornbeam Philadelphus ‘Natchez’ Natchez sweet mock orange Carpinus betulus ‘Fastigiata’ Fastigiata European hornbeam Pinus sylvestris Scots pine Cercis canadensis Eastern redbud Pinus virginiana Virginia pine Cercis canadensis ‘Ace of Hearts’ Ace of Hearts redbud Prunus virginiana chokecherry Cercis canadensis ‘Appalachian Red’ Appalachian Red redbud Ptelea trifoliata hoptree Cercis canadensis ‘Forest Pansy’ Forest Pansy redbud Quercus macrocarpa bur oak Cercis canadensis ‘Pauline Lily’ Pauline Lily Eastern redbud Rhododendron atlanticum dwarf azalea Chaenomeles ‘Toyo-nishiki’ Toyo-nishiki flowering quince Rhododendron viscosum swamp azalea Chaenomeles x superba ‘Jet Trail’ Jet Trail flowering quince Rhus aromatica ‘Gro-low’ Gro-low aromatic sumac Chimonanthus praecox fragrant wintersweet Rhus copallinum flameleaf sumac Chionanthus retusus Chinese fringetree Rhus glabra smooth sumac Chionanthus virginicus fringetree Rhus typhina staghorn sumac Clerodendrum trichotomum harlequin glorybower Rhus typhina ‘Laciniata’ Laciniata cutleaf staghorn sumac Clethra alnifolia summersweet Rosa ‘Ausorts’ Mortimer Sackler® rose Clethra barbinervis Japanese clethra Rosa ‘F.J. Grootendorst’ F.J. Grootendorst rose Cornus florida ‘Jean’s Appalachian Snow’ Jean’s Appalachian Snow dogwood Rosa glauca redleaf rose Cornus x ‘Rutban’ Aurora© dogwood Rosa moyesii ‘Geranium’ Geranium Moyes’ rose Cornus sanguinea ‘Midwinter Fire’ Midwinter Fire bloodtwig dogwood Rosa x odorata ‘Mutabilis’ Mutabilis China rose Corylopsis spicata spike winter hazel Rosa ‘Sally Holmes’ Sally Holmes rose Cotinus coggygria ‘Young Lady’ Young Lady smoketree Rosa virginiana Virginia rose Cotinus obovatus American smoketree Rubus calycinoides creeping raspberry Cotinus ‘Grace’ Grace smokebush Salix chaenomeloides giant pussy willow Fothergilla gardenii dwarf fothergilla Salix eleagnos rosemary willow Fothergilla major ‘Mount Airy’ Mount Airy fothergilla Salix gracilistyla ‘Melanostachys’ Melanostachys black pussy willow Gaylussacia baccata black huckleberry Sambucus nigra ‘Eva’ Black Lace™ elderberry Hamamelis x intermedia ‘Jelena’ Jelena witchhazel Sarcococca hookeriana var. digyna Himalayan sweet box Hamamelis x intermedia ‘Pallida’ Pallida witchhazel Sarcococca hookeriana var. humilis Himalayan sweet box Hamamelis x intermedia ‘Sunburst’ Sunburst witchhazel Sassafras albidum sassafras Hydrangea paniculata ‘Limelight’ Limelight panicled hydrangea Styrax japonicus ‘Emerald Pagoda’ Emerald Pagoda Japanese snowbell Ilex opaca ‘Dan Fenton’ Dan Fenton American holly Syringa x laciniata cutleaf lilac Ilex opaca ‘Jersey Night’ Jersey Knight American holly Syringa oblata ‘Cheyenne’ Cheyenne early lilac Ilex verticillata ‘Jim Dandy’ Jim Dandy winterberry Viburnum x bodnantense ‘Dawn’ Dawn viburnum Ilex verticillata ‘Red Sprite’ Red Sprite winterberry Viburnum x burkwoodii Burkwood viburnum Ilex verticillata ‘Southern Gentleman’ Southern Gentleman winterberry Viburnum lentago nannyberry Indigofera amblyantha pink-flower indigo Viburnum nudum ‘Brandywine’ Brandywine smooth witherod Indigofera heterantha Himalayan indigo Viburnum nudum ‘Winterthur’ Winterthur smooth witherod Juniperus virginiana Eastern red cedar Viburnum prunifolium blackhaw viburnum Juniperus virginiana ‘Corcorcor’ Emerald Sentinel™ Eastern red cedar Vitex agnus-castus ‘Abbeville Blue’ Abbeville Blue chaste tree Lespedeza thunbergii ‘Gibraltar’ Gibraltar bushclover Perennials Achillea filipendulina ‘Parker’s Variety’ Parker’s Variety fernleaf yarrow Actaea rubra red baneberry Achillea millefolium ‘Walther Funcke’ Walther Funcke yarrow Adiantum pedatum northern maidenhair fern Actaea pachypoda doll’s eyes Agastache foeniculum blue giant hyssop 1 HIGH LINE PLANT LIST Perennials (continued) Amorpha canescens leadplant Geranium maculatum wild geranium Amsonia hubrichtii threadleaf bluestar Geranium x oxonianum ‘Claridge Druce’ Claridge Druce cranesbill Amsonia tabernaemontanta ‘Blue Ice’ Blue Ice bluestar Geranium psilostemon cranesbill geranium Amsonia tabernaemontana var. salicifolia willowleaf bluestar Geranium sanguineum ‘Max Frei’ Max Frei bloody cranesbill Anaphalis margaritacea pearly everlasting Geranium soboliferum cranesbill Anemone cylindrica thimbleweed Geum triflorum prairie smoke Aralia racemosa American spikenard Helenium x ‘Rubinzwerg’ Rubinzwerg sneezeweed Aruncus ‘Horatio’ Horatio goatsbeard Helianthus angustifolius swamp sunflower Asarum canadense wild ginger Helianthus salicifolius willowleaf sunflower Asclepias purpurascens purple milkweed Helleborus argutifolius Corsican hellebore Asclepias tuberosa butterfly milkweed Heuchera americana ‘Dale’s Strain’ Dale’s Strain American alumroot Aster amellus European Michaelmas daisy Heuchera ‘Amethyst Mist’ Amethyst Mist coralbells Aster azureus skyblue aster Heuchera villosa ‘Autumn Bride’ Autumn Bride hairy alumroot Aster laevis ‘Bluebird’ Bluebird smooth aster Heuchera villosa ‘Brownies’ Brownies hairy alumroot Aster ‘Lady in Black’ Lady in Black calico aster Iris fulva copper iris Aster macrophyllus ‘Twilight’ Twilight aster Knautia macedonica pincushion plant Aster oblongifolia ‘Raydon’s Favorite’ Raydon’s Favorite aromatic aster Knautia macedonica ‘Mars Midget’ Mars Midget pincushion plant Aster patens spreading aster Lathyrus vernus spring vetch Aster ptarmicoides upland white aster Liatris aspera blazing star Aster shortii Short’s aster Liatris pycnostachya prairie blazing star Aster tataricus ‘Jindai’ Jindai tatarian aster Liatris scariosa var. scariosa northern blazing star Aster umbellatus flat-topped aster Liatris spicata spiked gayfeather Astilbe chinensis ‘Visions in Pink’ Visions in Pink Chinese astilbe Limonium platyphyllum sea lavender Astrantia major ‘Roma’ Roma masterwort Liriope muscari ‘Densiflora’ Densiflora lilyturf Athyrium filix-femina ‘Minutissima’ Minutissima dwarf lady fern Lythrum alatum winged loosestrife Baptisia alba wild white indigo Monarda bradburiana eastern beebalm Baptisia x ‘Purple Smoke’ Purple Smoke false indigo Monarda fistulosa ‘Claire Grace’ Claire Grace bergamot Brunnera macrophylla ‘Jack Frost’ Jack Frost Siberian bugloss Nepeta racemosa ‘Walker’s Low’ Walker’s Low Persian catmint Calamintha nepeta ssp. nepeta lesser calamint Nepeta sibirica Siberian catmint Campanula glomerata ‘Caroline’ Caroline clustered bellflower Oenothera pilosella prairie sundrops Ceratostigma plumbaginoides plumbago Oenothera speciosa pink evening primrose Coreopsis ‘Full Moon’ Full Moon tickseed Ophiopogon japonicus ‘Nana’ Nana mondo grass Coreopsis tripteris tall tickseed Oxalis debilis var. corymbosa pink wood sorrel Corydalis cava hollow root Pachysandra procumbens Allegheny spurge Corydalis solida fumewort Papaver orientale ‘Mandarin’ Mandarin oriental poppy Corydalis solida ‘George Baker’ George Baker fumewort Parthenium integrifolium wild quinine Dalea purpurea purple prairie clover Penstemon cobaea dewflower Desmodium canadense showy tick-trefoil Penstemon digitalis ‘Husker Red’ Husker Red beardtongue Dianthus carthusianorum clusterhead Persicaria amplexicaulis ‘Firetail’ Firetail mountain fleece Dodecatheon meadia shooting star Phlomis russelliana Jerusalem sage Echinacea pallida pale purple coneflower Phlox divaricata ‘Blue Moon’ Blue Moon wild phlox Echinacea pallida ‘Hula Dancer’ Hula Dancer pale purple coneflower Phlox maculata ‘Miss Lingard’ Miss Lingard meadow phlox Echinacea purpurea ‘Fatal Attraction’ Fatal Attraction coneflower Phlox pilosa ‘Lavender Cloud’ Lavendar Cloud downy phlox Echinacea purpurea ‘Jade’ Jade coneflower Phlox stolonifera ‘Blue Ridge’ Blue Ridge creeping phlox Echinacea purpurea ‘Magnus’ Magnus coneflower Phlox stolonifera ‘Sherwood Purple’ Sherwood Purple creeping phlox Echinacea purpurea ‘Sundown’ Sundown coneflower Polygonatum biflorum giant solomon’s seal Echinacea purpurea ‘Vintage Wine’ Vintage Wine coneflower Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas fern Echinacea purpurea ‘Virgin’ Virgin coneflower Polystichum polyblepharum Korean tassel fern Epimedium grandiflorum ‘Lilafee’ Lilafee barrenwort Porteranthus stipulatus Indian physic Epimedium x perralchicum ‘Fröhnleiten’ Fröhnleiten yellow barrenwort Porteranthus trifoliatus bowman’s root Eryngium yuccifolium rattlesnake master Pycnanthemum incanum hoary mountain mint Eupatorium dubium ‘Baby Joe’ Baby Joe joe pye weed Pycnanthemum muticum bigleaf mountain mint Eupatorium dubium ‘Little Joe’ Little Joe joe pye weed Rudbeckia missouriensis Missouri black-eyed susan Eupatorium hyssopifolium hyssopleaf thoroughwort Rudbeckia subtomentosa sweet black-eyed susan Eupatorium maculatum ‘Gateway’ Gateway joe pye weed Ruellia humilis wild petunia Eupatorium maculatum ‘Purple Bush’ Purple Bush joe
Recommended publications
  • Department of Planning and Zoning
    Department of Planning and Zoning Subject: Howard County Landscape Manual Updates: Recommended Street Tree List (Appendix B) and Recommended Plant List (Appendix C) - Effective July 1, 2010 To: DLD Review Staff Homebuilders Committee From: Kent Sheubrooks, Acting Chief Division of Land Development Date: July 1, 2010 Purpose: The purpose of this policy memorandum is to update the Recommended Plant Lists presently contained in the Landscape Manual. The plant lists were created for the first edition of the Manual in 1993 before information was available about invasive qualities of certain recommended plants contained in those lists (Norway Maple, Bradford Pear, etc.). Additionally, diseases and pests have made some other plants undesirable (Ash, Austrian Pine, etc.). The Howard County General Plan 2000 and subsequent environmental and community planning publications such as the Route 1 and Route 40 Manuals and the Green Neighborhood Design Guidelines have promoted the desirability of using native plants in landscape plantings. Therefore, this policy seeks to update the Recommended Plant Lists by identifying invasive plant species and disease or pest ridden plants for their removal and prohibition from further planting in Howard County and to add other available native plants which have desirable characteristics for street tree or general landscape use for inclusion on the Recommended Plant Lists. Please note that a comprehensive review of the street tree and landscape tree lists were conducted for the purpose of this update, however, only
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants of East Central Illinois and Their Preferred Locations”
    OCTOBER 2007 Native Plants at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Campus: A Sourcebook for Landscape Architects and Contractors James Wescoat and Florrie Wescoat with Yung-Ching Lin Champaign, IL October 2007 Based on “Native Plants of East Central Illinois and their Preferred Locations” An Inventory Prepared by Dr. John Taft, Illinois Natural History Survey, for the UIUC Sustainable Campus Landscape Subcommittee - 1- 1. Native Plants and Plantings on the UIUC Campus This sourcebook was compiled for landscape architects working on projects at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign campus and the greater headwaters area of east central Illinois.1 It is written as a document that can be distributed to persons who may be unfamiliar with the local flora and vegetation, but its detailed species lists and hotlinks should be useful for seasoned Illinois campus designers as well. Landscape architects increasingly seek to incorporate native plants and plantings in campus designs, along with plantings that include adapted and acclimatized species from other regions. The term “native plants” raises a host of fascinating scientific, aesthetic, and practical questions. What plants are native to East Central Illinois? What habitats do they occupy? What communities do they form? What are their ecological relationships, aesthetic characteristics, and practical limitations? As university campuses begin to incorporate increasing numbers of native species and areas of native planting, these questions will become increasingly important. We offer preliminary answers to these questions, and a suite of electronic linkages to databases that provide a wealth of information for addressing more detailed issues. We begin with a brief introduction to the importance of native plants in the campus environment, and the challenges of using them effectively, followed by a description of the database, online resources, and references included below.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Rhizobia Associated with Amorpha Fruticosa Isolated from Chinese Soils and Description of Mesorhizobium Amorphae Sp
    International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology (1999), 49, 5 1-65 Printed in Great Britain Diversity of rhizobia associated with Amorpha fruticosa isolated from Chinese soils and description of Mesorhizobium amorphae sp. nov. E. T. Wang,lt3 P. van Berkum,2 X. H. SU~,~D. Beyene,2 W. X. Chen3 and E. Martinez-Romerol Author for correspondence : E. T. Wang. Tel : + 52 73 131697. Fax: + 52 73 175581. e-mail: [email protected] 1 Centro de lnvestigacidn Fifty-five Chinese isolates from nodules of Amorpha fruticosa were sobre Fijaci6n de characterized and compared with the type strains of the species and genera of Nitrdgeno, UNAM, Apdo Postal 565-A, Cuernavaca, bacteria which form nitrogen-f ixing symbioses with leguminous host plants. A Morelos, Mexico polyphasic approach, which included RFLP of PCR-amplified 165 rRNA genes, * Alfalfa and Soybean multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), DNA-DNA hybridization, 165 rRNA Research Laboratory, gene sequencing, electrophoretic plasmid profiles, cross-nodulation and a Ag ricuI tu ra I Research phenotypic study, was used in the comparative analysis. The isolates Service, US Department of Agriculture, BeltsviI le, M D originated from several different sites in China and they varied in their 20705, USA phenotypic and genetic characteristics. The majority of the isolates had 3 Department of moderate to slow growth rates, produced acid on YMA and harboured a 930 kb Microbiology, College of symbiotic plasmid (pSym). Five different RFLP patterns were identified among Biology, China Agricultural the 16s rRNA genes of all the isolates. Isolates grouped by PCR-RFLP of the 165 University, Beijing 100094, People’s Republic of China rRNA genes were also separated into groups by variation in MLEE profiles and by DNA-DNA hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • First Insights Into the Mode of Action of a "Lachrymatory Factor Synthase"
    Phytochemistry 72 (2011) 1939–1946 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Phytochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phytochem First insights into the mode of action of a ‘‘lachrymatory factor synthase’’ – Implications for the mechanism of lachrymator formation in Petiveria alliacea, Allium cepa and Nectaroscordum species ⇑ Quan He a, Roman Kubec b, Abhijit P. Jadhav a, Rabi A. Musah a, a Department of Chemistry, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA b Department of Applied Chemistry, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 370 05 Cˇeské Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic article info abstract Article history: A study of an enzyme that reacts with the sulfenic acid produced by the alliinase in Petiveria alliacea L. Received 16 December 2010 (Phytolaccaceae) to yield the P. alliacea lachrymator (phenylmethanethial S-oxide) showed the protein Received in revised form 11 July 2011 to be a dehydrogenase. It functions by abstracting hydride from sulfenic acids of appropriate structure Available online 15 August 2011 to form their corresponding sulfines. Successful hydride abstraction is dependent upon the presence of a benzyl group on the sulfur to stabilize the intermediate formed on abstraction of hydride. This dehy- Keywords: drogenase activity contrasts with that of the lachrymatory factor synthase (LFS) found in onion, which Petiveria alliacea catalyzes the rearrangement of 1-propenesulfenic acid to (Z)-propanethial S-oxide, the onion lachryma- Phytolaccaceae tor. Based on the type of reaction it catalyzes, the onion LFS should be classified as an isomerase and Lachrymatory factor synthase Sulfenic acid would be called a ‘‘sulfenic acid isomerase’’, whereas the P. alliacea LFS would be termed a ‘‘sulfenic acid Sulfenic acid dehydrogenase dehydrogenase’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts
    Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts Botanical Survey of Bussey Brook Meadow Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts New England Wildflower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508-877-7630 www.newfs.org Report by Joy VanDervort-Sneed, Atkinson Conservation Fellow and Ailene Kane, Plant Conservation Volunteer Coordinator Prepared for the Arboretum Park Conservancy Funded by the Arnold Arboretum Committee 2 Conducted 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................4 METHODS....................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................8 Plant Species ........................................................................................................................8 Natural Communities...........................................................................................................9 DISCUSSION .............................................................................................................................15 Recommendations for Management ..................................................................................15 Recommendations for Education and Interpretation .........................................................17 Acknowledgments..............................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Studies of the South African Campanulaceae Sensu Stricto with an Emphasis on Generic Delimitations
    Town The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derivedCape from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of theof source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University Systematic studies of the South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto with an emphasis on generic delimitations Christopher Nelson Cupido Thesis presented for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Botany Town UNIVERSITY OF CAPECape TOWN of September 2009 University Roella incurva Merciera eckloniana Microcodon glomeratus Prismatocarpus diffusus Town Wahlenbergia rubioides Cape of Wahlenbergia paniculata (blue), W. annularis (white) Siphocodon spartioides University Rhigiophyllum squarrosum Wahlenbergia procumbens Representatives of Campanulaceae diversity in South Africa ii Town Dedicated to Ursula, Denroy, Danielle and my parents Cape of University iii Town DECLARATION Cape I confirm that this is my ownof work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. University Christopher N Cupido Cape Town, September 2009 iv Systematic studies of the South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto with an emphasis on generic delimitations Christopher Nelson Cupido September 2009 ABSTRACT The South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto, comprising 10 genera, represent the most diverse lineage of the family in the southern hemisphere. In this study two phylogenies are reconstructed using parsimony and Bayesian methods. A family-level phylogeny was estimated to test the monophyly and time of divergence of the South African lineage. This analysis, based on a published ITS phylogeny and an additional ten South African taxa, showed a strongly supported South African clade sister to the campanuloids.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List
    Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List This PDF document provides additional information to supplement the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Coastal Landscaping website. The plants listed below are good choices for the rugged coastal conditions of Massachusetts. The Coastal Beach Plant List, Coastal Dune Plant List, and Coastal Bank Plant List give recommended species for each specified location (some species overlap because they thrive in various conditions). Photos and descriptions of selected species can be found on the following pages: • Grasses and Perennials • Shrubs and Groundcovers • Trees CZM recommends using native plants wherever possible. The vast majority of the plants listed below are native (which, for purposes of this fact sheet, means they occur naturally in eastern Massachusetts). Certain non-native species with specific coastal landscaping advantages that are not known to be invasive have also been listed. These plants are labeled “not native,” and their state or country of origin is provided. (See definitions for native plant species and non-native plant species at the end of this fact sheet.) Coastal Beach Plant List Plant List for Sheltered Intertidal Areas Sheltered intertidal areas (between the low-tide and high-tide line) of beach, marsh, and even rocky environments are home to particular plant species that can tolerate extreme fluctuations in water, salinity, and temperature. The following plants are appropriate for these conditions along the Massachusetts coast. Black Grass (Juncus gerardii) native Marsh Elder (Iva frutescens) native Saltmarsh Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) native Saltmeadow Cordgrass (Spartina patens) native Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum or nashii) native Spike Grass (Distichlis spicata) native Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) native Plant List for a Dry Beach Dry beach areas are home to plants that can tolerate wind, wind-blown sand, salt spray, and regular interaction with waves and flood waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Gypsy Moth CP
    INDUSTRY BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE NURSERY & GARDEN INDUSTRY Threat Specific Contingency Plan Gypsy moth (Asian and European strains) Lymantria dispar dispar Plant Health Australia December 2009 Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts were made to obtain relevant and published information on the pest. New information will be included as it becomes available, or when the document is reviewed. The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. Further information For further information regarding this contingency plan, contact Plant Health Australia through the details below. Address: Suite 5, FECCA House 4 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 Email: [email protected] Website: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au PHA & NGIA | Contingency Plan – Asian and European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar dispar) 1 Purpose and background of this contingency plan .............................................................. 5 2 Australian nursery industry .................................................................................................... 5 3 Eradication or containment determination ............................................................................ 6 4 Pest information/status ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hill View Rare Plants, Summer Catalogue 2011, Australia
    Summer 2011/12 Hill View Rare Plants Calochortus luteus Calochortus superbus Susan Jarick Calochortus albidus var. rubellus 400 Huon Road South Hobart Tas 7004 Ph 03 6224 0770 Summer 2011/12 400 Huon Road South Hobart Tasmania, 7004 400 Huon Road South Hobart Tasmania, 7004 Summer 2011/12 Hill View Rare Plants Ph 03 6224 0770 Ph 03 6224 0770 Hill View Rare Plants Marcus Harvey’s Hill View Rare Plants 400 Huon Road South Hobart Tasmania, 7004 Welcome to our 2011/2012 summer catalogue. We have never had so many problems in fitting the range of plants we have “on our books” into the available space! We always try and keep our lists “democratic” and balanced although at times our prejudices show and one or two groups rise to the top. This year we are offering an unprecedented range of calochortus in a multiplicity of sizes, colours and flower shapes from the charming fairy lanterns of C. albidus through to the spectacular, later-flowering mariposas with upward-facing bowl-shaped flowers in a rich tapestry of shades from canary-yellow through to lilac, lavender and purple. Counterpoised to these flashy dandies we are offering an assortment of choice muscari whose quiet charm, softer colours and Tulipa vvedenskyi Tecophilaea cyanocrocus Violacea persistent flowering make them no less effective in the winter and spring garden. Standouts among this group are the deliciously scented duo, M. muscarimi and M. macrocarpum and the striking and little known tassel-hyacith, M. weissii. While it has its devotees, many gardeners are unaware of the qualities of the large and diverse tribe of “onions”, known as alliums.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Evolutionary History in Visual and Olfactory Floral Cues of the Bee-Pollinated Genus Campanula (Campanulaceae)
    plants Article Differential Evolutionary History in Visual and Olfactory Floral Cues of the Bee-Pollinated Genus Campanula (Campanulaceae) Paulo Milet-Pinheiro 1,*,† , Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos 1, Samuel Prieto-Benítez 2,3, Manfred Ayasse 1 and Stefan Dötterl 4 1 Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein Allee, 89081 Ulm, Germany; [email protected] (P.S.C.S.); [email protected] (M.A.) 2 Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos-ESCET, C/Tulipán, s/n, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Ecotoxicology of Air Pollution Group, Environmental Department, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain 4 Department of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † Present address: Universidade de Pernambuco, Campus Petrolina, Rodovia BR 203, KM 2, s/n, Petrolina 56328-900, Brazil. Abstract: Visual and olfactory floral signals play key roles in plant-pollinator interactions. In recent decades, studies investigating the evolution of either of these signals have increased considerably. However, there are large gaps in our understanding of whether or not these two cue modalities evolve in a concerted manner. Here, we characterized the visual (i.e., color) and olfactory (scent) floral cues in bee-pollinated Campanula species by spectrophotometric and chemical methods, respectively, with Citation: Milet-Pinheiro, P.; Santos, the aim of tracing their evolutionary paths. We found a species-specific pattern in color reflectance P.S.C.; Prieto-Benítez, S.; Ayasse, M.; and scent chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]