The future of direct detection of Dark Matter
Julien Billard Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon / CNRS / Université Lyon 1
UCLA Dark Matter February 17-19, 2016
1 Introduction to direct detection
The hunt for Dark Matter:
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
2 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC Introduction to direct detection
From some basic assumptions: • MB distribution with mean velocity: 300 km/s • Local dark matter density: 0.3 GeV/cm3 • Mass of Dark Matter particle: 100 GeV • Dark Matter flux ~ 100,000 particles/cm2/s ~ 20 million particles/hand/s
Expected WIMP-nucleus scattering rate in a Ge detector: • « Weak scale » cross-section of 10-38 cm2 • Spin-independent coupling • Rate: ~ 20 recoils/kg/day • Mean recoil energy: ~ 10 keV • Direct detection is a very promising dark matter search strategy ! 3 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC Suggested by Goodman and Witten (PRD 1985) Introduction to direct detection: state of the art
-37 -1 10 C 10 D D A M -38 M S -2 I l 10 C i 10 t e (2012)
( -39 2 -3 0 CoGeNT D 10 1 10
(2012) D 2 3
)
S CDMS Si
-40 -4 pb u @ cm 10 (2013) 10 p @ e r -41 C SIMPLE (2012) -5 10 D DAMA 10 M COUPP (2012) S CRESST -42 L -6 10 T ZEPLIN-III (2012) 10 section section (2 01 10-43 4) CDMS II Ge (2009) 10-7 EDELWEISS (2011) Xenon100 (2012) cross cross 10-44 LUX (2013) 10-8 zeptobarn 10-45 10-9 nucleon
nucleon -46 -10 -
- 10 Present status of direct detection: 10 10-47 • Event rate is not as high as originally anticipated 10-11 WIMP
WIMP -48 -12 10 • About 30 experiments are aiming at directly detect dark matter 10 -49 -13 10 • There is a conflicting region in the low mass region 10 10-50 10-14 1 10 100 1000 104 4 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC WIMP Mass GeV c2
@ ê D Introduction to direct detection
Differential event rate: • Astrophysics • Nuclear physics • Particle physics
Standard assumptions: 10 Zb WIMP on Ge
- Maxwell Boltzmann « OK » (N. Bozorgnia et al. arXiv:1601.04707 ) mass = 10 GeV - Elastic WIMP-nucleus scattering - Spin independent interaction: prop. to A2 Featureless exponential
- Spin dependent interaction: prop. to
The « wish list » for a standard direct detection experiment: • Large exposure (few events per ton-year) • Low and controlled backgrounds • Low energy threshold • Discrimination between signal and background
6 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC Thinking outside of the triangle
Detection technique wise:
• Time profile of the scintillation light: DEAP/CLEAN, Darkside
• Nuclear-recoil-only mechanism (bubble chamber): PICO, COUPP, PICASSO
Candidate nuclear recoil or alpha? …use acoustic information
7 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC PICO collaboration, PRD 93 Thinking outside of the triangle
Astrophysics wise:
• Annual modulation: DAMA/LIBRA, XMASS, CoGeNT
• Directional detection: DRIFT, MIMAC, DM-TPC, Newage
Recoil map in galactic coordinates
F. Mayet et al., Phys. Rep. 2016 8 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC The low mass situation
EDELWEISS collaboration, arXiv:1603.05120 10−38 DAMIC ] 2 CoGeNT 2012 10−39
DAMA/LIBRA −40 10 CRESST 2015
10−41 CDMSLITE CRESST 2014 CDMSII-Si CRESST 2012 SuperCDMS-LT −42 10 EDELWEISS-II
−43 WIMP-nucleon cross section [cm 10 LUX EDELWEISS-III
10−44 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 WIMP Mass [GeV/c2] 9 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC The low mass situation: DAMA
K. Freese et al., Rev. of Modern Phys. (2012) DM-Ice collaboration, arXiv:1602.05939 100 kg 250 kg
• 1.3 ton-year exposure of NaI crystals with no discrimination • Claim for a 9.3 sigma Dark Matter induced annual modulation over 14 annual cycles • In strong tension with existing limit but… We can’t explain this modulation… • Dedicated NaI experiments to either confirm or definitely rule out this result as Dark Matter: • DM-ICE: Looking for modulation from the Southern Hemisphere (not enough stats yet) • SABRE: High purity NaI crystals and active vetoing of the 3 keV X-ray/Auger from 40K • COSINUS: NaI crystals with active particle identification from heat and scintillation • and others such as ANAIS and KIMS 10 Where to look for Dark Matter?
-37 -1 10 C 10 D D A M -38 M S -2 I l 10 C i 10 t e (2012)
( -39 2 -3 0 CoGeNT D 10 1 10
(2012) D 2 3
)
S CDMS Si
-40 -4 pb u @ cm 10 (2013) 10 p @ e r -41 C SIMPLE (2012) -5 10 D DAMA 10 M COUPP (2012) S CRESST -42 L -6 10 T ZEPLIN-III (2012) 10 section section (2 01 10-43 4) CDMS II Ge (2009) 10-7 EDELWEISS (2011) Xenon100 (2012) cross cross 10-44 LUX (2013) 10-8 10-45 10-9 nucleon
nucleon -46 -10 -
- 10 10 -47 -11 10 Everywhere !! 10 WIMP WIMP 10-48 10-12 10-49 10-13 10-50 10-14 1 10 100 1000 104 11 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC WIMP Mass GeV c2
@ ê D The neutrino background
Neutrino interactions with Dark Matter experiment target material
8 J. Billard et al., PRD 89 (2014) ] 10 -45 -1 WIMP signal: m = 6 GeV/c2, = 4.4x10 cm2 χ σχ-n pp Total CNS background 7Be Weak neutrino-electron 105 pep
8B 102 pp
1
Event rate [(ton.year.keV) − 10 hep
1 keV threshold: atmospheric 10−4 100 evt/ton/year on Ge detector
10−3 10−2 10−1 1 10 102 Recoil energy [keV]
12 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC The neutrino background
Neutrino interactions with Dark Matter experiment target material
8 J. Billard et al., PRD 89 (2014) ] 10 -45 -1 WIMP signal: m = 6 GeV/c2, σ = 4.4x10 cm2 χ χ-n Neutrino-electron pp Total CNS background 7Be background Weak neutrino-electron 105 pep negligible for Ge cryogenic detectors BUT 8B problematic for Xe based detectors 102 pp
1
Event rate [(ton.year.keV) − 10 hep
1 keV threshold: atmospheric 10−4 100 evt/ton/year on Ge detector
10−3 10−2 10−1 1 10 102 Recoil energy [keV]
12 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC The neutrino background
Neutrino interactions with Dark Matter experiment target material
8 J. Billard et al., PRD 89 (2014) ] 10 -45 -1 WIMP signal: m = 6 GeV/c2, σ = 4.4x10 cm2 χ χ-n Neutrino-electron pp Total CNS background 7Be background Weak neutrino-electron 105 pep negligible for Ge cryogenic detectors BUT 8B problematic for Xe based detectors 102 pp
1
Event rate [(ton.year.keV) − 10 hep WIMP or neutrino (8B)?? 1 keV threshold: atmospheric 10−4 100 evt/ton/year on Ge detector
10−3 10−2 10−1 1 10 102 Recoil energy [keV]
12 Julien Billard (IPNL) - DM@LHC The neutrino background
- J. Billard et al., PRD 89 (2014) - C D D A M - M S - IC l i t e (2012)
( - 2 - 0 CoGeNT ] 1 (2012) ] 3
)
- S CDMS Si - u (2013) [ p [ e r - C SIMPLE (2012) - D DAMA (2014) M COUPP (2012) S CRESST CRESST - L - T ZEPLIN-III (2012) (2 01 - 4) CDMS II Ge (2009) - OH EDELWEISS (2011) C ER Xenon100 (2012) EN - 7Be T - N LUX (2013) EU Neutrinos TR TTERIN IN O SCA G - 8B -